View Article

Abstract

Background: Anaemia in pregnancy remains a major public health challenge in low- and middle-income countries and is associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Despite routine antenatal interventions such as iron–folic acid supplementation and nutritional counselling, the burden of anaemia among pregnant women continues to be high. Prospective evidence capturing prevalence, incidence, determinants, and pregnancy outcomes under routine clinical care remains limited. Objectives: The study aimed to determine the prevalence and incidence of anaemia among antenatal women, analyse socio-demographic, nutritional, and clinical determinants, evaluate the association between maternal anaemia and pregnancy outcomes, and assess the utilisation and effectiveness of existing antenatal anaemia prevention and management interventions .Methods:A hospital-based prospective cohort study was conducted over six months among 300 pregnant women attending antenatal care services at a tertiary care hospital. Haemoglobin levels were measured at enrolment and during follow-up using an automated haematology analyser. Anaemia was classified according to standard criteria. Data on sociodemographic characteristics, dietary intake, supplement use, and antenatal care practices were collected using a structured case record form. Pregnancy outcomes were recorded, and utilisation of preventive interventions was assessed. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Results: The overall prevalence of anaemia was 66.7%, with mild, moderate, and severe anaemia accounting for 30.0%, 26.7%, and 10.0%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of new-onset anaemia during pregnancy was 12.78%, with a higher incidence observed during the second trimester. Younger maternal age, short inter-pregnancy interval, vegetarian diet, irregular iron–folic acid intake, and infection history were significant determinants of anaemia (p < 0.05). Iron deficiency anaemia was the most common subtype. Increasing anaemia severity was significantly associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, including postpartum haemorrhage, blood transfusion requirement, low birth weight, and NICU admission (p < 0.001). Regular utilisation of antenatal interventions was associated with improved haemoglobin levels and reduced anaemia severity Conclusion: Anaemia remains highly prevalent among antenatal women and is associated with significant adverse pregnancy outcomes. Strengthening early screening, improving adherence to antenatal interventions, and enhancing clinical pharmacy involvement may substantially reduce anaemia-related morbidity.

Keywords

Anaemia in pregnancy; Antenatal women; Iron–folic acid supplementation; Maternal outcomes; Neonatal outcomes; Pharmacy practice; Prospective cohort study

Introduction

× Popup Image

Anaemia in pregnancy remains a major public health concern globally and continues to affect maternal and neonatal health, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. It is characterized by a reduced haemoglobin concentration, leading to impaired oxygen transport and adverse physiological consequences for both the mother and the developing foetus. The World Health Organization defines anaemia in pregnancy as a haemoglobin concentration below 11 g/dL and classifies it into mild, moderate, and severe categories based on severity. Despite sustained public health efforts, anaemia continues to affect a large proportion of antenatal women worldwide [1].Pregnancy is associated with increased nutritional and metabolic demands due to expansion of plasma volume, increased red blood cell mass, and foetal growth requirements. These physiological changes, coupled with inadequate dietary intake and poor micronutrient bioavailability, predispose pregnant women to anaemia, particularly during the second and third trimesters. Iron deficiency remains the most common cause; however, deficiencies of folate and vitamin B12, chronic inflammation, parasitic infections, repeated pregnancies, and underlying medical conditions also contribute to the development of anaemia during pregnancy [2].

Anaemia in pregnancy has been consistently linked to adverse maternal outcomes such as fatigue, reduced physical capacity, increased susceptibility to infections, preeclampsia, postpartum haemorrhage, and higher need for blood transfusion. Severe anaemia has also been associated with increased maternal mortality. From a foetal and neonatal perspective, maternal anaemia is associated with low birth weight, preterm delivery, intrauterine growth restriction, low Apgar scores, increased neonatal intensive care unit admissions, and perinatal mortality, thereby contributing to long-term health and developmental consequences [3].India continues to bear a disproportionately high burden of anaemia among pregnant women despite long-standing national initiatives such as iron–folic acid supplementation and the Anaemia Mukt Bharat programme. Recent national survey data indicate that more than half of pregnant women remain anaemic, with higher prevalence observed in rural and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. Poor compliance with supplementation, inadequate nutritional counselling, and gaps in antenatal monitoring have been identified as major barriers to effective anaemia control [4].Although several studies have reported the prevalence of anaemia during pregnancy, many are cross-sectional and fail to capture the dynamic changes in haemoglobin status across different trimesters. In addition, limited data are available on the incidence of newly developed anaemia during pregnancy and its association with pregnancy outcomes under routine clinical care. Prospective hospital-based cohort studies are therefore essential to generate real-world evidence on the determinants and outcomes of anaemia in pregnancy and to support evidence-based antenatal care practices [5].In view of the persistent burden of anaemia, its multifactorial determinants, and its significant impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes, the present study was undertaken to evaluate anaemia among antenatal women attending a tertiary care hospital using a prospective hospital-based cohort design. The findings are expected to provide clinically relevant evidence to strengthen antenatal screening, improve therapeutic compliance, and inform integrated clinical and public health strategies aimed at reducing anaemia-related morbidity during pregnancy [6].

OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

Primary Objective

  • To determine the prevalence and incidence of anaemia among antenatal women attending a tertiary care hospital over a six-month period.

Secondary Objectives

  • To analyse the socio-demographic, nutritional, and clinical determinants associated with anaemia during pregnancy.
  • To evaluate the impact of maternal anaemia on pregnancy outcomes, including selected maternal complications and foetal/neonatal outcomes.
  • To assess the utilisation and effectiveness of existing antenatal anaemia prevention and management interventions, such as iron–folic acid supplementation and nutritional counselling, and to identify areas for improvement.

Materials and Methods

Study Design

A hospital-based prospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the prevalence, incidence, and determinants of anaemia among pregnant women and to examine its association with pregnancy outcomes. The prospective design enabled longitudinal assessment of haemoglobin status and related clinical variables across different stages of pregnancy, allowing identification of both existing and newly developed anaemia under routine antenatal care conditions.

Study Period

The study was carried out over a six-month period, allowing enrolment of participants across all three trimesters of pregnancy and follow-up until later stages of gestation.

Study Setting

The study was conducted in the antenatal outpatient clinics and labour wards of a tertiary care teaching hospital affiliated with a pharmacy practice department. The hospital caters to a mixed urban and rural population and provides comprehensive antenatal services, including routine haemoglobin estimation, nutritional counselling, and iron–folic acid supplementation as part of standard maternal healthcare.

Study Population

The study population comprised pregnant women attending antenatal care services during the study period, irrespective of gestational age. Inclusion of women from the first, second, and third trimesters enabled trimester-wise estimation of anaemia prevalence, incidence, and progression.

Sample Size Determination

The sample size was calculated using Cochran’s formula for prevalence studies. Based on an expected anaemia prevalence of approximately 40%, a 95% confidence level (Z = 1.96), and a margin of error of 5%, the minimum required sample size was estimated. To ensure adequate statistical precision and account for potential loss to follow-up, a final sample size of approximately 400 participants was targeted.

Sampling Technique

A purposive consecutive sampling technique was employed. All eligible pregnant women attending antenatal clinics during the study period were approached consecutively and enrolled until the required sample size was achieved.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Pregnant women aged 18–45 years
  • Women in any trimester of pregnancy
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Willingness to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • Known chronic medical conditions affecting haemoglobin levels, including chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, or cardiovascular disorders
  • Active infections known to influence haemoglobin concentration, such as malaria, tuberculosis, or HIV/AIDS
  • Use of medications affecting haematopoiesis, including chemotherapy or immunosuppressive agents
  • History of recurrent pregnancy loss or known congenital anomalies likely to influence pregnancy outcomes

Data Collection Procedures

Data were collected using a structured and pre-validated case record form through participant interviews, clinical examination, and review of medical records. Information collected included sociodemographic characteristics, obstetric history, inter-pregnancy interval, dietary habits, supplement use, and relevant clinical details.

Haematological Assessment

Venous blood samples were collected under aseptic conditions by trained personnel. Haemoglobin concentration was measured using an automated haematology analyser as part of routine laboratory investigations. Anaemia was classified according to World Health Organization criteria as:

  • Mild anaemia: 10.0–10.9 g/dL
  • Moderate anaemia: 7.0–9.9 g/dL
  • Severe anaemia: <7.0 g/dL

Haemoglobin estimation was performed at enrolment and reassessed during the second and third trimesters to evaluate changes in anaemia status over time.

Dietary Assessment

Dietary intake was assessed using a 24-hour dietary recall method supplemented by a food frequency questionnaire. Particular emphasis was placed on intake of iron-rich foods, folic acid sources, dietary inhibitors of iron absorption (such as phytates and tannins), and enhancers of iron absorption, including vitamin C-rich foods.

Anthropometric Measurements

Anthropometric parameters including body weight, height, body mass index (BMI), and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) were measured using standardized procedures and calibrated instruments to assess maternal nutritional status.

Socio-Demographic and Clinical Assessment

Information on age, educational status, socioeconomic status, obstetric history, parity, antenatal supplement intake, and lifestyle factors was collected through structured interviews. Socioeconomic status was assessed using standard classification criteria appropriate to the local population.

Biochemical Investigations

Where clinically indicated, biochemical investigations including serum ferritin, vitamin B12, folate, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were performed to aid in identifying the type of anaemia and to differentiate nutritional anaemia from anaemia associated with inflammation or chronic disease.

Follow-Up Assessments

Participants were followed during routine antenatal visits. Clinical status and haemoglobin levels were reassessed during subsequent trimesters to identify incident cases of anaemia and to monitor progression or improvement.

Statistical Analysis

Data were entered into Microsoft Excel and analysed using appropriate statistical software. Continuous variables were summarised as mean ± standard deviation, while categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. Prevalence and incidence rates of anaemia were calculated. Associations between anaemia and potential risk factors were assessed using logistic regression analysis. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was employed to evaluate time-dependent development of anaemia. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethical Considerations

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee prior to study initiation. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Confidentiality and anonymity of participant information were strictly maintained throughout the study.

Ethical Considerations

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) prior to initiation. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Confidentiality and anonymity of participant information were strictly maintained throughout the study.

RESULTS

Baseline Characteristics of the Study Population

A total of 300 pregnant women were enrolled and prospectively followed during the study period. The mean maternal age was 24.61 ± 4.07 years, with the majority (84.3%) belonging to the 20–30-year reproductive age group. Multigravida women constituted 65.3% of the cohort, while 33.7% were primigravida. More than half of the participants (53.3%) had one or two previous live births, reflecting cumulative nutritional demands due to repeated pregnancies (Table 1)

Socioeconomic assessment revealed that 55.3% of women belonged to lower or upper-lower socioeconomic classes. Rural residents accounted for 57.7% of the study population. Although most women reported non-vegetarian dietary habits (97.3%), access to healthcare services was limited, with 77% reporting poor access.

 

Table 1. Baseline Sociodemographic and Obstetric Profile (n = 300)

 

Variable

Category

n (%)

Age (years)

18–22

96 (32.0)

23–27

146 (48.7)

≥28

58 (19.3)

Gravida

Primigravida

101 (33.7)

Multigravida

196 (65.3)

Parity

P0

104 (34.7)

≥P1

196 (65.3)

Residence

Rural

173 (57.7)

Urban

127 (42.3)

 

 

 

Figure 1. Age-wise distribution of pregnant women.

 

Prevalence and Severity of Anaemia

Anaemia, defined as haemoglobin <11 g/dL as per World Health Organization criteria, was identified in 66.7% of the study population. Among the study population, 66.7% of pregnant women were anaemic, with mild anaemia accounting for 30.0%, followed by moderate anaemia (26.7%) and severe anaemia (10.0%). One-third of the women were non-anaemic (Figure 2).

 

Table 2. Severity of Anaemia among Pregnant Women

Category

Hb (g/dL)

n (%)

Non-anaemic

≥11.0

100 (33.3)

Mild

10.0–10.9

90 (30.0)

Moderate

7.0–9.9

80 (26.7)

Severe

<7.0

30 (10.0)

 

 

 

 

Figure 2. Pie chart depicting the severity of anaemia.

This pie chart depicts the distribution of anaemia severity among pregnant women. Approximately one-third of the participants were non-anaemic, while the remaining two-thirds had varying degrees of anaemia, with mild anaemia being the most common, followed by moderate and severe anaemia.

Trimester-wise Distribution of Anaemia

Anaemia persisted throughout pregnancy, with increasing severity observed in later trimesters. Moderate anaemia showed a notable rise during the second and third trimesters, indicating progressive iron depletion with advancing gestation (Table 3)

Table 3. Trimester-wise Severity of Anaemia

Trimester

Mild n (%)

Moderate n (%)

Severe n (%)

First

2 (66.7)

1 (33.3)

0

Second

28 (62.2)

13 (28.9)

4 (8.9)

Third

151 (60.2)

95 (37.8)

5 (2.0)

 

 

 

Figure 3. Stacked bar graph of anaemia severity across trimester

 

This bar graph illustrates the trimester-wise distribution of anaemia severity among pregnant women. Mild anaemia was the most prevalent form across all trimesters. The proportion of moderate anaemia increased during the third trimester, while severe anaemia was more frequently observed during the second trimester, indicating a critical period for progression of anaemia.

Incidence of New-Onset Anaemia

Among women who were non-anaemic at baseline, 34 new cases developed during follow-up, giving an overall incidence of 12.78%. The incidence was significantly higher in the second trimester (28.6%) compared to the third trimester (10.3%).

 

Table 4. Incidence of Anaemia during Pregnancy

Trimester

Women at risk

New cases

Incidence (%)

Second

35

10

28.6

Third

232

24

10.3

Overall

266

34

12.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 4. Kaplan–Meier curve showing time to development of anaemia.

 

Figure 4 depicts the cumulative incidence of anaemia during pregnancy. The incidence of new-onset anaemia was highest during the second trimester (28.6%), followed by the third trimester (10.3%), with an overall cumulative incidence of 12.8% during pregnancy.

Determinants of Anaemia

Younger maternal age (≤20 years), short inter-pregnancy interval (<18 months), vegetarian diet, irregular iron–folic acid (IFA) intake, history of infections, and abnormal menstrual patterns were statistically significantly associated with anaemia (p < 0.05). Education level and socioeconomic status did not independently predict anaemia.

 

 

 

Table 5. Determinants of Anaemia

Determinant

p-value

Maternal age ≤20 years

0.032

Inter-pregnancy interval <18 months

0.020

Vegetarian diet

0.014

Irregular IFA intake

0.002

Infection history

0.050

Types of Anaemia

Iron deficiency anaemia was the most prevalent subtype (40%), followed by megaloblastic anaemia (25%) and anaemia of chronic disease (15%).

Table 6. Distribution of Anaemia Types

Type

n (%)

Iron deficiency anaemia

120 (40.0)

Megaloblastic anaemia

75 (25.0)

Anaemia of chronic disease

45 (15.0)

Hemoglobinopathies

20 (6.7)

Thyroid-related

15 (5.0)

 

 

 

 

Figure 5. Etiological distribution of anaemia among pregnant women

 

This figure depicts the etiological distribution of anaemia among the study population. Iron deficiency anaemia was the predominant subtype (40.0%), followed by megaloblastic anaemia (25.0%) and anaemia of chronic disease (15.0%). Hemoglobinopathies (6.7%) and thyroid-related anaemia (5.0%) accounted for smaller proportions, indicating the multifactorial etiology of anaemia in pregnancy.

Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes

Maternal complications increased significantly with anaemia severity, including preeclampsia, postpartum haemorrhage, blood transfusion requirement, and prolonged hospital stay. Neonatal outcomes such as low birth weight, preterm birth, NICU admissions, and perinatal mortality showed a dose-response relationship with maternal anaemia severity.

Table 7. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes by Anaemia Severity

Outcome

Non-anaemic (%)

Severe anaemia (%)

p-value

PPH

3.0

23.3

<0.001

Blood transfusion

2.0

60.0

<0.001

Low birth weight

8.3

50.0

<0.001

NICU admission

6.7

40.0

<0.001

 

 

 

 

Figure 6. Trend of maternal and neonatal complications with anaemia severity.

 

Figure 6 shows the comparative distribution of key maternal and neonatal outcomes among non-anaemic and severely anaemic pregnant women. The frequency of postpartum haemorrhage, blood transfusion requirement, low birth weight, and NICU admission was markedly higher among women with severe anaemia compared with non-anaemic women, demonstrating a clear severity-dependent increase in adverse outcomes (p < 0.001).

Utilisation and effectiveness of antenatal anaemia prevention and management interventions

Utilisation of antenatal anaemia prevention and management strategies varied among the study population. Regular iron–folic acid supplementation, nutritional counselling, deworming therapy, and adequate antenatal follow-up were significantly associated with improved haemoglobin levels and reduced anaemia severity (Table 9).

 

Table 9. Utilisation and effectiveness of antenatal anaemia prevention and management interventions among antenatal women (n = 300)

 

Intervention

Utilisation status

n (%)

Effectiveness indicator

p-value*

Iron–folic acid (IFA) supplementation

Regular intake

210 (70.0)

Mean Hb: 11.2 ± 1.1 g/dL

<0.001

Irregular / not compliant

90 (30.0)

Mean Hb: 9.6 ± 1.4 g/dL

 

Nutritional counselling

Received

195 (65.0)

Anaemia prevalence: 48.2%

0.002

Not received

105 (35.0)

Anaemia prevalence: 72.4%

 

Deworming therapy

Received

180 (60.0)

Moderate–severe anaemia: 22.8%

0.014

Not received

120 (40.0)

Moderate–severe anaemia: 38.3%

 

Dietary iron intake

Adequate

165 (55.0)

Mean Hb: 11.0 ± 1.2 g/dL

0.018

Inadequate

135 (45.0)

Mean Hb: 9.8 ± 1.3 g/dL

 

Antenatal care visits

≥4 ANC visits

188 (62.7)

Severe anaemia: 5.3%

<0.001

<4 ANC visits

112 (37.3)

Severe anaemia: 17.0%

 
 

DISCUSSION

This prospective cohort study demonstrates a substantial burden of anaemia among antenatal women, with clear evidence of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with increasing severity. The predominance of women in early reproductive age reflects regional fertility trends, yet younger maternal age emerged as a significant determinant, consistent with nutritional vulnerability in this group [7,8].The observed prevalence aligns with reports from low- and middle-income countries, where iron deficiency remains the leading cause of maternal anaemia [9]. The higher incidence during the second trimester supports physiological explanations related to plasma volume expansion and rising fetal iron demands [10]. This underscores the second trimester as a critical window for intensified screening and intervention.Dietary patterns and adherence to IFA supplementation were the most influential modifiable risk factors. Vegetarian diets and poor compliance were strongly associated with anaemia, reinforcing evidence that bioavailability of dietary iron and sustained supplementation are essential during pregnancy [11,12]. The lack of association with socioeconomic status suggests that anaemia is widespread across economic strata and may reflect gaps in health system delivery rather than affordability alone [13].Iron deficiency anaemia remained the predominant subtype, followed by megaloblastic anaemia, highlighting the need to address both iron and micronutrient deficiencies. The identification of hemoglobinopathies and thyroid-related anaemia further emphasizes the importance of comprehensive diagnostic evaluation rather than empirical iron therapy [14,15].Maternal outcomes such as postpartum haemorrhage and transfusion requirement increased markedly with anaemia severity, findings that are biologically plausible due to impaired oxygen delivery and uterine contractility [16,17]. Similarly, neonatal outcomes showed a graded worsening pattern, with severe anaemia significantly increasing risks of low birth weight, preterm birth, NICU admission, and perinatal mortality [18,19].

From a pharmacy practice perspective, the study highlights suboptimal adherence to antenatal pharmacotherapy and limited awareness as key contributors to poor outcomes. Women compliant with IFA and counselling demonstrated significantly better haemoglobin levels and neonatal outcomes, reaffirming that anaemia-related morbidity is largely preventable through effective pharmaceutical care and patient education [20].

CONCLUSION

Anaemia in pregnancy remains a major clinical and public health challenge, particularly in resource-limited settings. This study demonstrates a high prevalence and incidence of anaemia among antenatal women, with clear evidence of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes that worsen with increasing severity. Iron deficiency anaemia remains the dominant subtype, but micronutrient deficiencies and chronic disease-related anaemia also contribute substantially.Early identification, trimester-specific monitoring, and sustained adherence to iron–folic acid supplementation are critical to preventing progression of anaemia. From a clinical pharmacy perspective, structured patient counselling, medication adherence monitoring, and multidisciplinary collaboration are essential to improving maternal haemoglobin status and reducing preventable complications.Strengthening antenatal pharmacotherapeutic interventions and integrating clinical pharmacists into maternal healthcare teams can significantly enhance pregnancy outcomes and reduce the burden of anaemia-related morbidity and mortality.

REFERENCES

  1. World Health Organization, “WHO guideline on haemoglobin concentrations for the diagnosis of anaemia and assessment of severity,” Geneva, Switzerland, 2023.
  2. J. P. Peña-Rosas, L. M. De-Regil, M. N. Garcia-Casal, and T. Dowswell, “Daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 7, Art. no. CD004736, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004736.pub5.
  3. J. Daru, J. Zamora, B. M. Fernández-Félix, et al., “Risk of maternal mortality in women with severe anaemia during pregnancy and postpartum,” Lancet Global Health, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. e548–e554, May 2018, doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30078-0.
  4. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), “National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), 2019–21: India,” Mumbai, India, 2022.
  5. G. A. Stevens, M. M. Finucane, L. M. De-Regil, et al., “Global, regional, and national trends in haemoglobin concentration and prevalence of anaemia in children and pregnant and non-pregnant women,” Lancet Global Health, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. e16–e25, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70001-9.
  6. D. S. Al-Dossari, A. M. Al-Zahrani, and G. K. Al-Shaikh, “Impact of pharmacist-led interventions on anaemia management during pregnancy,” Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 210–216, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1002/jppr.1689.
  7. Y. Balarajan, U. Ramakrishnan, E. Özaltin, A. H. Shankar, and S. V. Subramanian, “Anaemia in low-income and middle-income countries,” The Lancet, vol. 378, no. 9809, pp. 2123–2135, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62304-5.
  8. G. Sedgh, S. S. Ashford, and R. Hussain, “Age at first pregnancy and maternal outcomes,” Reproductive Health, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0192-7.
  9. K. Kalaivani, “Prevalence and consequences of anaemia in pregnancy,” Indian Journal of Medical Research, vol. 130, no. 5, pp. 627–633, Nov. 2009.
  10. N. Milman, “Iron deficiency and pregnancy,” Annals of Hematology, vol. 90, no. 11, pp. N. Milman1247–1253, Nov. 2011, doi: 10.1007/s00277-011-1273-0.
  11. J. L. Beard, “Iron biology in pregnancy,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 999–1005, May 2001, doi: 10.1093/ajcn/73.5.999.
  12. J. P. Peña-Rosas, L. De-Regil, T. Dowswell, and F. Viteri, “Daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 7, Article CD004736, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004736.pub5.
  13. B. C. Seck and R. T. Jackson, “Determinants of anaemia among women of reproductive age,” Public Health Nutrition, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 813–823, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1017/S1368980017002936.
  14. L. H. Allen, “Causes of vitamin B12 and folate deficiency,” Food and Nutrition Bulletin, vol. 30, no. 2_suppl1, pp. S20–S34, Jun. 2009, doi: 10.1177/15648265090302S103.
  15. D. J. Weatherall, “The inherited anaemias,” BMJ, vol. 341, Article c4371, Aug. 2010, doi: 10.1136/bmj.c4371.
  16. P. J. Steer, “Maternal haemoglobin concentration and pregnancy outcome,” The Lancet, vol. 355, no. 9211, pp. 1431–1432, Apr. 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02142-7.
  17. J. Villar, E. Merialdi, A. M. Gulmezoglu, et al., “Anaemia and the risk of postpartum haemorrhage,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 110, no. 10, pp. 927–934, Oct. 2003, doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2003.02416.x.
  18. K. S. Khan, T. Wojdyla, L. Say, A. M. Gülmezoglu, and P. F. A. Van Look, “Maternal anaemia and risk of adverse birth outcomes,” BMJ, vol. 364, Article l691, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1136/bmj.l691.
  19. G. A. Stevens, M. M. Finucane, L. M. De-Regil, et al., “Global, regional, and national trends in haemoglobin concentration and prevalence of anaemia,” The Lancet Global Health, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. e16–e25, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70001-9.
  20. World Health Organization, Guideline: Daily iron and folic acid supplementation in pregnant women, Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press, 2016.

Reference

  1. World Health Organization, “WHO guideline on haemoglobin concentrations for the diagnosis of anaemia and assessment of severity,” Geneva, Switzerland, 2023.
  2. J. P. Peña-Rosas, L. M. De-Regil, M. N. Garcia-Casal, and T. Dowswell, “Daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 7, Art. no. CD004736, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004736.pub5.
  3. J. Daru, J. Zamora, B. M. Fernández-Félix, et al., “Risk of maternal mortality in women with severe anaemia during pregnancy and postpartum,” Lancet Global Health, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. e548–e554, May 2018, doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30078-0.
  4. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), “National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), 2019–21: India,” Mumbai, India, 2022.
  5. G. A. Stevens, M. M. Finucane, L. M. De-Regil, et al., “Global, regional, and national trends in haemoglobin concentration and prevalence of anaemia in children and pregnant and non-pregnant women,” Lancet Global Health, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. e16–e25, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70001-9.
  6. D. S. Al-Dossari, A. M. Al-Zahrani, and G. K. Al-Shaikh, “Impact of pharmacist-led interventions on anaemia management during pregnancy,” Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 210–216, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1002/jppr.1689.
  7. Y. Balarajan, U. Ramakrishnan, E. Özaltin, A. H. Shankar, and S. V. Subramanian, “Anaemia in low-income and middle-income countries,” The Lancet, vol. 378, no. 9809, pp. 2123–2135, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62304-5.
  8. G. Sedgh, S. S. Ashford, and R. Hussain, “Age at first pregnancy and maternal outcomes,” Reproductive Health, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0192-7.
  9. K. Kalaivani, “Prevalence and consequences of anaemia in pregnancy,” Indian Journal of Medical Research, vol. 130, no. 5, pp. 627–633, Nov. 2009.
  10. N. Milman, “Iron deficiency and pregnancy,” Annals of Hematology, vol. 90, no. 11, pp. N. Milman1247–1253, Nov. 2011, doi: 10.1007/s00277-011-1273-0.
  11. J. L. Beard, “Iron biology in pregnancy,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 999–1005, May 2001, doi: 10.1093/ajcn/73.5.999.
  12. J. P. Peña-Rosas, L. De-Regil, T. Dowswell, and F. Viteri, “Daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 7, Article CD004736, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004736.pub5.
  13. B. C. Seck and R. T. Jackson, “Determinants of anaemia among women of reproductive age,” Public Health Nutrition, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 813–823, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1017/S1368980017002936.
  14. L. H. Allen, “Causes of vitamin B12 and folate deficiency,” Food and Nutrition Bulletin, vol. 30, no. 2_suppl1, pp. S20–S34, Jun. 2009, doi: 10.1177/15648265090302S103.
  15. D. J. Weatherall, “The inherited anaemias,” BMJ, vol. 341, Article c4371, Aug. 2010, doi: 10.1136/bmj.c4371.
  16. P. J. Steer, “Maternal haemoglobin concentration and pregnancy outcome,” The Lancet, vol. 355, no. 9211, pp. 1431–1432, Apr. 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02142-7.
  17. J. Villar, E. Merialdi, A. M. Gulmezoglu, et al., “Anaemia and the risk of postpartum haemorrhage,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 110, no. 10, pp. 927–934, Oct. 2003, doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2003.02416.x.
  18. K. S. Khan, T. Wojdyla, L. Say, A. M. Gülmezoglu, and P. F. A. Van Look, “Maternal anaemia and risk of adverse birth outcomes,” BMJ, vol. 364, Article l691, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1136/bmj.l691.
  19. G. A. Stevens, M. M. Finucane, L. M. De-Regil, et al., “Global, regional, and national trends in haemoglobin concentration and prevalence of anaemia,” The Lancet Global Health, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. e16–e25, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70001-9.
  20. World Health Organization, Guideline: Daily iron and folic acid supplementation in pregnant women, Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press, 2016.

Photo
L. Tejasri
Corresponding author

Department of Pharmacy Practice, KLR Pharmacy College, Telangana, India

Photo
M.Vanaja
Co-author

Department of Pharmacy Practice, KLR Pharmacy College, Telangana, India

Photo
M.Gowthami
Co-author

Department of Pharmacy Practice, KLR Pharmacy College, Telangana, India

Photo
B.Prasad Rao
Co-author

Department of Pharmacy Practice, KLR Pharmacy College, Telangana, India

Photo
N. Divya Sri
Co-author

Department of Pharmacy Practice, KLR Pharmacy College, Telangana, India

Photo
Rajani.G.
Co-author

Associate Professor Department of Pharmacy Practice, KLR Pharmacy College, Telangana, India,

Photo
V. Rajasimha Reddy
Co-author

Department of Pharmacy Practice, KLR Pharmacy College, Telangana, India

L. Tejasri*, M. Vanaja, M. Gowthami, B. Prasad Rao, Rajani. G, V. Rajasimha Reddy, N. Divya Sri, Anaemia among Antenatal Women: Determinants and Pregnancy Outcomes from a Prospective Hospital-Based Cohort Study, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 2, 78-90. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18453876

More related articles
Analytical Method Development And Validation of Da...
Dr. Nilesh Patil, Dr. Parag Patil, Dr. Bhuvaneshwari Rane, Meghan...
Ethnopharmacological and Phytochemical Basis of Me...
Aradhana Kangare , Jayashri Shejul, Snehal Rahate, Varsha Jadhav,...
Formulation and Evaluation of Herbal Hair Scrub Ge...
Piyush Vaidya, Nitin Indurwade, Bhagyashri Sontakke, Priyanka Mal...
Evaluation of Neutropenia in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Weekly and 3-Weekl...
Dr. Swathi Boddupally, Mogilicharla Archana, Oddi Sahithi, Nermetla Mahesh, Jarupla Mahika, Dornala ...
Off-Label Medication Use in Paediatric Patients: Prevalence, Safety Concerns and...
Ananda Krishnan , Archa S., Anugraha Biju , Anjum K. , Manasa T. , J.S. Venkatesh ...
A Review on Diabetes Mellitus...
M. Prasadarao, G. Raghu, S. Rajini, Y. Narasimharao...
Related Articles
A Review on the Clinical Presentation of Schizophernia...
M.Prasada Rao, N. Mahesh, S. Rajini, Y. Narasimha Rao...
Formulation and Optimization of Metoprolol Succinate Extended-Release Tablets us...
Chandra Sekhar Naik , Shabana Parveen, Mallampalli Rani...
Artificial Intelligence in Liquid Biopsy: Transforming Breast Milk Analysis for ...
S. Navaneethakrishnan, A. Santhiya, K. Hemavathi, V. Akash...
Analytical Method Development And Validation of Dapagliflozin and Saxagliptin by...
Dr. Nilesh Patil, Dr. Parag Patil, Dr. Bhuvaneshwari Rane, Meghana More...
More related articles
Analytical Method Development And Validation of Dapagliflozin and Saxagliptin by...
Dr. Nilesh Patil, Dr. Parag Patil, Dr. Bhuvaneshwari Rane, Meghana More...
Ethnopharmacological and Phytochemical Basis of Medicinal Plants in Urolithiasis...
Aradhana Kangare , Jayashri Shejul, Snehal Rahate, Varsha Jadhav, Vilas Ghawate...
Formulation and Evaluation of Herbal Hair Scrub Gel...
Piyush Vaidya, Nitin Indurwade, Bhagyashri Sontakke, Priyanka Malekar...
Analytical Method Development And Validation of Dapagliflozin and Saxagliptin by...
Dr. Nilesh Patil, Dr. Parag Patil, Dr. Bhuvaneshwari Rane, Meghana More...
Ethnopharmacological and Phytochemical Basis of Medicinal Plants in Urolithiasis...
Aradhana Kangare , Jayashri Shejul, Snehal Rahate, Varsha Jadhav, Vilas Ghawate...
Formulation and Evaluation of Herbal Hair Scrub Gel...
Piyush Vaidya, Nitin Indurwade, Bhagyashri Sontakke, Priyanka Malekar...