View Article

  • Development And Validation of RP-HPLC Method for The Simultaneous Determination of Olanzapine and Fluoxetine Hydrochloride in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms

  • Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis and Quality Assurance,Prathap Narender Reddy College of Pharmacy, Peddashapur, Shamshabad   

Abstract

A simple, sensitive and precise reverse phase high performance liquid chromatographic method has been developed for the simultaneous estimation of olanzapine and fluoxetine hydrochloride in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage forms. The mobile phase consisted of potassium dihydrogen phosphate buffer adjusted to pH 3.0 with orthophosphoric acid:Acetonitrile in the ratio of 40:60v/v delivered at a flow rate of 1ml/min and wavelength of UV detection at 235nm.The retention times of fluoxetine hyrochloride and olanzapine were found to be 1.967 min and 5.740 min respectively. The linearity was observed and they were in the range of 10-50µg/ml and 5-25µg/ml for fluoxetine hydrochloride and olanzapine respectively. The developed method was validated according to ICH guidelines

Keywords

Olanzapine, fluoxetine hydrochloride, validation

Introduction

Olanzapine1 is chemically, 2-methyl-4-(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)-10H-thieno[2,3-b] [1,5] benzodiazepine (Fig. 1a). It is an antipsychotic agent used in the treatment of schizophrenia. Fluoxetine hydrochloride2 is chemically, methyl({3-phenyl-3-[4-(trifluoromethyl) phenoxy] propyl}) amine hydrochloride (Fig. 1b). It is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor used as an antidepressant agent with non-sedating properties. Literature survey indicated very few methods like HPLC3, Spectroscopy4, HPTLC5 and Electron spray ionization tandem mass spectrometry6 ,  for the simultaneous estimation of these drugs. Hence the combination of these drugs was selected for the simultaneous estimation by RP-HPLC method. The method presently developed has the advantage of being more sensitive to determine both the drugs concurrently by simple and rapid RP-HPLC method for routine analysis.                                                                        

 

 

FIGURE (1a).  Structure of olanzapine

 

 

 

FIGURE (1b).  Structure of fluoxetine hydrochloride

  1. METHODOLOGY

 

    1.  MATERIALS AND METHODS:

 

Instrumentation : UV-3000+ LABINDIA Double beam with UV win 5 software UV-Visible spectrophotometer with 1cm matched quartz cells was used to determine detection wavelength. WATERSHPLC Aliance 2695, UV- Visible Dual absorbance Detector 2487, with an automated sample injector. The output signal was monitored and integrated using Empower 2 software.

Chemicals and drugs: Acetonitrile, methanol and water are of HPLC grade and ortho phosphoric acid (OPA), pure potassium dihydrogen phosphate is of AR grade were obtained from Merck, Mumbai India. Fluoxetine Hydrochloride and Olanzapine reference standards were obtained as gift samples from Aurobindo Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad, India. Capsule dosage form containing 25mg of fluoxetine hydrochloride and 12mg of olanzapine (SYMBYAX) was procured from the local market.

Chromatographic method:  A Symmetry XTerra C18 (4.6 x 150mm, 5 mm) column was used for separations. The mobile phase considered was potassium dihydrogen phosphate:acetonitrile in the ratio of 40:60v/v  buffer pH adjusted to 3.0 with orthophosphoric acid. It was pumped at the flow rate of 1ml/min. The mobile phase was passed through 0.45µm membrane filters and degassed before use. The eluent was monitored at 235nm and the injection volume was 20µl.

    1. Preparation of solutions:

Preparation of Buffer Solution: 1.36 gm of potassium dihydrogen phosphate was dissolved in 1000mL MilliQ water and pH of this solution was adjusted to 3.0 with ortho phosphoric acid. The solution was mixed well and then filtered through 0.45µ filter paper.

Preparation of Mobile phase: Mobile phase was prepared by mixing pH 3.0 buffer solution and acetonitrile in the ratio 40:60 v/v. Prior to use the mobile phase was filtered through 0.45µ membrane filter after sonication for 8 mins.

Preparation of Standard Stock Solution of Olanzapine: Accurately weighed 100 mg of Olanzapine standard drug was transferred to 100 ml of volumetric flask. Then it was dissolved by adding a little amount of diluent. Mix it well, sonicate  the solution and volume was made up   to 100 ml. This is 1000µg/ml. From this solution 10 ml was transferred to another 100 ml volumetric flask and volume was made up to 100 ml with diluent(100µg/ml).

Preparation of Standard Stock Solution of Fluoxetine Hydrochloride: Accurately weighed 100 mg of Fluoxetine hydrochloride standard drug was transferred to 100 ml of volumetric flask. Then it was dissolved by adding a little amount of diluent. Mix it well, sonicate the solution and volume was made up to 100 ml. This is 1000µg/ml. From this solution 10 ml was transferred to another 100 ml volumetric flask and volume was made up to 100 ml with diluent(100µg/ml).

Preparation of Working Standard Solution: From the above stock solution 1.5ml of OLZ solution and 3ml of FLX solution was transferred to 10 ml of volumetric flask and was made up to with mobile phase. The working standard solution produced contains 15µg/ml of OLZ and 30µg/ml of FLX.

Preparation of Sample Solution: Contents of twenty capsules were weighed accurately and average weight was recorded. 64mg of powder equivalent to 12.5mg of OLX and 25mg of FLX was weighed accurately and transferred to 25ml volumetric flask and dissolved with mobile phase and sonicated for 10mins and filtered through 0.35µ filter paper and volume made up to with mobile phase. The produced sample stock solution is (500µg/ml of OLX and 1000µg/ml of FLX). From this stock solution 0.3ml of solution was transferred to 10ml volumetric flask and made up to volume with mobile phase. The concentration of working solution consists of 15µg/ml of OLX and 30µg/ml of FLX.

    1.  Determination of Absorption maxima by uv/visible spectrophotometer:

Both the solutions of olanzapine and fluoxetine hydrochloride were scanned over the range of 190-400nm. Both the drugs showed good response at 235 nm, hence this wavelength was selected for further study. The overlaid uv spectra is shown in the figure 2.

 

 

 

 

 

Figure (2). Overlaid UV Spectra of olanzapine and fluoxetine hydrochloride

 

 

    1.  Optimized Chromatographic conditions:

 

 

 Azilsartan

 

Stationary phase: Symmetry C18 column (XTerra with 150 × 4.6 mm, 5µm)

 

Mobile phase: potassium dihydrogen phosphate (pH 3.0): Acetonitrile (40:60) v/v

Flow rate: 1ml/min

Run time (min): 8 min

Detection: 235 nm

Injection volume: 20µl

    1.  Procedure: Mixed standard solutions containing fluoxetine hydrochloride and olanzapine in the range of 10µg/ml to 50µg/ml and 5µg/ml to 25µg/ml were prepared and each solution was injected in to the optimized chromatographic system. The chromatograms were recorded and the peak areas were determined for each concentration of the drug solution. Calibration curve of fluoxetine hydrochloride and olanzapine was obtained by plotting the peak areas versus the respective concentrations. The linear correlation coefficient for fluoxetine hydrochloride and olanzapine was found to be 0.999 and 0.999 respectively. A typical chromatogram of fluoxetine hydrochloride and olanzapine was shown in Fig 3.

 

Fluoxetine

 
   

 


 

 

olanzapine

fluoxetine

 

 

  1.  VALIDATION STUDIES7,8:
    1.  System suitability studies: The system suitability studies were done for parameters like theoretical plates, tailing factor, repeatability, resolution and the results were given in the table 1.

 

Table (1).  System suitability parameters

S.NO

PARAMETER

DRUG

OBSERVED VALUE

 

1.

Theoretical plates

Olanzapine

2350

Fluoxetine Hcl

5160

 

2.

Tailing factor

Olanzapine

1.7

Fluoxetine Hcl

1.3

 

3.

Retention time (min)

Olanzapine

5.734

Fluoxetine Hcl

1.974

4.

Resolution

-------

5.6

 

    1.  Linearity studies: A series of standard solutions of different concentrations containing 10-50µg/ml of fluoxetine hydrochloride and 5-25µg/ml of olanzapine were prepared and 20µl of each standard was injected. The calibration curves were plotted by taking concentration on x-axis and peak areas on y-axis. The linearity data and calibration curve of the two drugs were given the table 2 and 3 respectively and calibration curves in fig 4 and 5.

Table (2).  Linearity data for Fluoxetine Hcl

SNO

Concentration(µg/ml)

Area

1

10

754573

2

20

1523860

3

30

2258968

4

40

2949416

5

50

3622377

 

Correlation coefficient

0.999

 

 

 

Figure (4).  Calibration curve of Fluoxetine Hcl

 

Table (3). Linearity data for olanzapine

S.No

Concentration(µg/ml)

Area

1

5

567120

2

10

1090378

3

15

1570684

4

20

2047728

5

25

2484788

 

Correlation coefficient

0.999

 

 

 

Figure (5). Calibration curve of Olanzapine

 

    1. Precision studies: The system precision and method precision studies were done by using standard and sample solutions respectively. For precision the same injection was repeatedly given and % RSD was calculated. The results were given in the table 4.

 

 

Table (4). Precision data for fluoxetine hydrochloride and olanzapine

 

Injection

(Fluoxetine) Area

(Olanzapine) Area

Injection-1

2154484

1490945

Injection-2

2161125

1496948

Injection-3

2166753

1502679

Injection-4

2176050

1512282

Injection-5

2179032

1519006

Average

2167489

1504372

Standard Deviation

10206.66

11346.4

%RSD

0.47

0.75

 

    1.  Accuracy studies: The accuracy studies were done by spiking the standard solutions to 50%, 100%, 150% and the recovery data was given in the table 5.

                          

 

Table (5). Results of Recovery Studies:

 

     Sample

accuracy

 

standard        

                      addition

formulation

% of recovery

statistical

analysis

Fluoxetine Hcl

50%

15µg/ml

30 µg/ml

99.8%

 

SD=0.038

%RSD=1.26

100%

30 µg/ml

30 µg/ml

101.3%

150%

45 µg/ml

30 µg/ml

101.5%

 

Olanzapine

50%

7.5 µg/ml

15 µg/ml

100.6%

 

SD=0.047

%RSD=1.56

100%

15 µg/ml

15 µg/ml

101.3%

150%

22.5 µg/ml

15

101.3%

 

    1. LOD and LOQ: The LOD and LOQ were separately determined based on the standard deviation of the response and the slope; the results are presented in table 6.        

 

 

 

Table (6). Results of LOD and LOQ:

Parameter

FluoxetineHcl (µg/ml)

Olanzapine             (µg/ml)

LOD

0.35

0.52

LOQ

1.064

1.586

    1.  Robustness studies: Robustness studies were done by changing the flow rate and the composition of mobile phase.

 

Table (7). Results of Robustness Studies:

 

 

Condition

 

variation

Average area (n=3)

%RSD

FLX

OLZ

FLX

OLZ

MOBILE PHASE

phosphate buffer (pH 3.0): acetonitrile (40:60)v/v

phosphate buffer (pH 3.0): acetonitrile (42:58)

2325609

1575908

0.49

0.33

phosphate buffer (pH 3.0): acetonitrile  (40:60)

2235732

1535732

1.24

1.80

phosphate buffer (pH 3.0): acetonitrile  (38:62)

2124504

1452138

0.28

0.70

FLOW RATE: 1ml/min

Less flow 0.9 ml/min

2332056

1631988

0.25

0.44

Actual Flow 1.0 ml/min

2233850

1535732

0.18

1.80

More Flow 1.1 ml/min

2136596

1448129

0.13

0.67

 

Assay: The proposed validated method was applied to determine fluoxetine hydrochloride and olanzapine in commercial formulation and the results of assay were given in the table 8.

Table (8).  Results of Analysis of Commercial formulation and recovery of proposed method

Formulation

Labeled claim (mg)

% of  Assay

SYMBYAX

OLZ-12 µg/ml

FLX- 25µg/ml

100.90

101.05

  1. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

To develop a new RP-HPLC method, several mobile phase compositions were tried. A satisfactory separation with good peak symmetry was obtained with C18 (4.6 x 150 mm, 5 mm, Make: XTerra) column using mobile phase containing potassium dihyrogen phosphate (pH 3.0): acetonitrile 40:60v/v at a flow rate of 1ml/min. Quantification was achieved with UV detection at 235 nm based on peak area. The retention time for fluoxetine hydrochloride and olanzapine were found to be 1.974 min and 5.740 min, respectively. The optimized method was validated as per ICH guidelines. The System suitability parameters observed by using this optimized conditions were reported. A linearity range of 10-50μg/ml with correlation coefficient 0.999 was established for fluoxetine hydrochloride and 5-25 µg/ml with correlation coefficient 0.999 was established for olanzapine. The precision of the proposed method was carried in terms of the repeatability and the %RSD values of fluoxetine hydrochloride was found to be 0.47% and of olanzapine was found to be 0.75% and reveal that the proposed method is precise. The LOD and LOQ values for fluoxetine hydrochloride were 0.35μg/ml, 1.0648μg/ml respectively and for olanzapine were found to be 0.52μg/ml, 1.586μg/ml. The study of robustness in the present method shows no significant changes either in the peak area or Rt. The results of analysis of commercial formulation indicated that there is no interference due to common formulation excipients with the developed method. Therefore, the proposed method can be used for routine analysis of these two drugs in their combined pharmaceutical dosage form.

CONCLUSION

The proposed method was found to be simple, precise, accurate and rapid for determination of Fluoxetine hydrochloride and Olanzapine from pure and its dosage forms. The mobile phase is simple to prepare and economical. The sample recoveries in the formulation were in good agreement with their respective label claims and they suggested non-interference of formulation excipients in the estimation. Hence, this method can be easily and conveniently adopted for routine analysis of Fluoxetine hydrochloride and Olanzapine in pure form and its dosage form and also can be used for dissolution or similar studies.

REFERENCES

  1. Indian Pharmacopoeia (2007) volume 3, 857.
  2. United States Pharmacopeia 29 NF-24 volume 30(3), 848.
  3. Rani, P.; Sekaran, B., Inter J of Pharmtech Research, (1), 654-57, (2009).
  4. Rubesh, S.; Kiran, CH.; Duganath.N., (3), 52-55, (2011).
  5. Patel, S.; Patel, NJ., Indian J of Pharm Sci, (73), 477, (2007).
  6. Nirogi, RVS.; Kandikere, VN.; Mauryaa, S., J of Pharm and Biomed Anal, (41), 935-42, (2006).
  7. ICH, Q2 (R1), Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology, International Conference on Harmonization, Geneva. 2005.
  8. US FDA, Technical Review Guide: Validation of Chromatographic Methods, 1993.

Reference

  1. Indian Pharmacopoeia (2007) volume 3, 857.
  2. United States Pharmacopeia 29 NF-24 volume 30(3), 848.
  3. Rani, P.; Sekaran, B., Inter J of Pharmtech Research, (1), 654-57, (2009).
  4. Rubesh, S.; Kiran, CH.; Duganath.N., (3), 52-55, (2011).
  5. Patel, S.; Patel, NJ., Indian J of Pharm Sci, (73), 477, (2007).
  6. Nirogi, RVS.; Kandikere, VN.; Mauryaa, S., J of Pharm and Biomed Anal, (41), 935-42, (2006).
  7. ICH, Q2 (R1), Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology, International Conference on Harmonization, Geneva. 2005.
  8. US FDA, Technical Review Guide: Validation of Chromatographic Methods, 1993.

Photo
N.Pravalika
Corresponding author

Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis and Quality Assurance, Prathap Narender Reddy College of Pharmacy

Photo
Dr.Mohammed Ibrahim
Co-author

Principal,Professor, Department of Medicinal chemistry, Prathap Narender Reddy College of Pharmacy

Photo
Rehmath Unnisa
Co-author

Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Prathap Narender Reddy college of Pharmacy

N. Pravalika, Dr. Mohammed Ibrahim, Rehmath Unnisa, Development And Validation of RP-HPLC Method for The Simultaneous Determination of Olanzapine and Fluoxetine Hydrochloride in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 3, 2239-2246. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19131096

More related articles
Green Fabrication of Silver Nanoparticles Using Ca...
Savita Shende, Saloni Satpute, Pooja Ghutake, Chhagan Doijad, ...
Creatine As a Dietary Supplement for The General P...
Saurabh S. Bhandare, Gayatri V. Dusane, Dr. Rajendra kawade, ...
Development and Stability Assessment of Neem Herba...
Nutan sahu , Vinay Panagar, Rohit Baidh, Dr. Gyanesh Kumar Sahu, ...
In-Silico Design, Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Some Noval Benzimidazol...
Akshara Vinayakrishnan, Aneesha Thomas, Malavika K., Aswagosh K., ...
To Formulate And Evaluate Herbal Hair Oil For Healthier Hair ...
Chand Pravin Dnyandeo , V. R. Muley, Prachi P. Udhapurkar , Ghule Govind Arjun, ...
Related Articles
The Inhalable Dry Powder Nano- Formulation Advancing Lung Disease Therapy ...
Muskare Mayuri , Pandhare Jayashri, Majge Shashank , Pandhare Priya, ...
Formulation And Evaluation Of Herbal Hair Dye Stick ...
Rahul G. Chaudhari , Virendra D. Sarkar, Abhay D. Lilhare, Vikram K. Sakure, Yash A. Agarwal , ...
Formulation & Evaluation of Polyherbal Anti-tussive Gummies...
Atharva Bade, Vishal Sapkal, Tambe R. V., ...
Anti –Oxidant Activity of Methanolic Extract of Azadirachta Indica Flowers...
Vijaya Lakshmi Nandikatti, Pravalika Amanik, Sravani G., ...
Green Fabrication of Silver Nanoparticles Using Casytha filiformis Extract a Pro...
Savita Shende, Saloni Satpute, Pooja Ghutake, Chhagan Doijad, ...
More related articles
Green Fabrication of Silver Nanoparticles Using Casytha filiformis Extract a Pro...
Savita Shende, Saloni Satpute, Pooja Ghutake, Chhagan Doijad, ...
Creatine As a Dietary Supplement for The General Public ...
Saurabh S. Bhandare, Gayatri V. Dusane, Dr. Rajendra kawade, ...
Development and Stability Assessment of Neem Herbal Soap ...
Nutan sahu , Vinay Panagar, Rohit Baidh, Dr. Gyanesh Kumar Sahu, ...
Green Fabrication of Silver Nanoparticles Using Casytha filiformis Extract a Pro...
Savita Shende, Saloni Satpute, Pooja Ghutake, Chhagan Doijad, ...
Creatine As a Dietary Supplement for The General Public ...
Saurabh S. Bhandare, Gayatri V. Dusane, Dr. Rajendra kawade, ...
Development and Stability Assessment of Neem Herbal Soap ...
Nutan sahu , Vinay Panagar, Rohit Baidh, Dr. Gyanesh Kumar Sahu, ...