Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis and Quality Assurance,Prathap Narender Reddy College of Pharmacy, Peddashapur, Shamshabad
A simple, sensitive and precise reverse phase high performance liquid chromatographic method has been developed for the simultaneous estimation of olanzapine and fluoxetine hydrochloride in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage forms. The mobile phase consisted of potassium dihydrogen phosphate buffer adjusted to pH 3.0 with orthophosphoric acid:Acetonitrile in the ratio of 40:60v/v delivered at a flow rate of 1ml/min and wavelength of UV detection at 235nm.The retention times of fluoxetine hyrochloride and olanzapine were found to be 1.967 min and 5.740 min respectively. The linearity was observed and they were in the range of 10-50µg/ml and 5-25µg/ml for fluoxetine hydrochloride and olanzapine respectively. The developed method was validated according to ICH guidelines
Olanzapine1 is chemically, 2-methyl-4-(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)-10H-thieno[2,3-b] [1,5] benzodiazepine (Fig. 1a). It is an antipsychotic agent used in the treatment of schizophrenia. Fluoxetine hydrochloride2 is chemically, methyl({3-phenyl-3-[4-(trifluoromethyl) phenoxy] propyl}) amine hydrochloride (Fig. 1b). It is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor used as an antidepressant agent with non-sedating properties. Literature survey indicated very few methods like HPLC3, Spectroscopy4, HPTLC5 and Electron spray ionization tandem mass spectrometry6 , for the simultaneous estimation of these drugs. Hence the combination of these drugs was selected for the simultaneous estimation by RP-HPLC method. The method presently developed has the advantage of being more sensitive to determine both the drugs concurrently by simple and rapid RP-HPLC method for routine analysis.
FIGURE (1a). Structure of olanzapine
FIGURE (1b). Structure of fluoxetine hydrochloride
Instrumentation : UV-3000+ LABINDIA Double beam with UV win 5 software UV-Visible spectrophotometer with 1cm matched quartz cells was used to determine detection wavelength. WATERSHPLC Aliance 2695, UV- Visible Dual absorbance Detector 2487, with an automated sample injector. The output signal was monitored and integrated using Empower 2 software.
Chemicals and drugs: Acetonitrile, methanol and water are of HPLC grade and ortho phosphoric acid (OPA), pure potassium dihydrogen phosphate is of AR grade were obtained from Merck, Mumbai India. Fluoxetine Hydrochloride and Olanzapine reference standards were obtained as gift samples from Aurobindo Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad, India. Capsule dosage form containing 25mg of fluoxetine hydrochloride and 12mg of olanzapine (SYMBYAX) was procured from the local market.
Chromatographic method: A Symmetry XTerra C18 (4.6 x 150mm, 5 mm) column was used for separations. The mobile phase considered was potassium dihydrogen phosphate:acetonitrile in the ratio of 40:60v/v buffer pH adjusted to 3.0 with orthophosphoric acid. It was pumped at the flow rate of 1ml/min. The mobile phase was passed through 0.45µm membrane filters and degassed before use. The eluent was monitored at 235nm and the injection volume was 20µl.
Preparation of Buffer Solution: 1.36 gm of potassium dihydrogen phosphate was dissolved in 1000mL MilliQ water and pH of this solution was adjusted to 3.0 with ortho phosphoric acid. The solution was mixed well and then filtered through 0.45µ filter paper.
Preparation of Mobile phase: Mobile phase was prepared by mixing pH 3.0 buffer solution and acetonitrile in the ratio 40:60 v/v. Prior to use the mobile phase was filtered through 0.45µ membrane filter after sonication for 8 mins.
Preparation of Standard Stock Solution of Olanzapine: Accurately weighed 100 mg of Olanzapine standard drug was transferred to 100 ml of volumetric flask. Then it was dissolved by adding a little amount of diluent. Mix it well, sonicate the solution and volume was made up to 100 ml. This is 1000µg/ml. From this solution 10 ml was transferred to another 100 ml volumetric flask and volume was made up to 100 ml with diluent(100µg/ml).
Preparation of Standard Stock Solution of Fluoxetine Hydrochloride: Accurately weighed 100 mg of Fluoxetine hydrochloride standard drug was transferred to 100 ml of volumetric flask. Then it was dissolved by adding a little amount of diluent. Mix it well, sonicate the solution and volume was made up to 100 ml. This is 1000µg/ml. From this solution 10 ml was transferred to another 100 ml volumetric flask and volume was made up to 100 ml with diluent(100µg/ml).
Preparation of Working Standard Solution: From the above stock solution 1.5ml of OLZ solution and 3ml of FLX solution was transferred to 10 ml of volumetric flask and was made up to with mobile phase. The working standard solution produced contains 15µg/ml of OLZ and 30µg/ml of FLX.
Preparation of Sample Solution: Contents of twenty capsules were weighed accurately and average weight was recorded. 64mg of powder equivalent to 12.5mg of OLX and 25mg of FLX was weighed accurately and transferred to 25ml volumetric flask and dissolved with mobile phase and sonicated for 10mins and filtered through 0.35µ filter paper and volume made up to with mobile phase. The produced sample stock solution is (500µg/ml of OLX and 1000µg/ml of FLX). From this stock solution 0.3ml of solution was transferred to 10ml volumetric flask and made up to volume with mobile phase. The concentration of working solution consists of 15µg/ml of OLX and 30µg/ml of FLX.
Both the solutions of olanzapine and fluoxetine hydrochloride were scanned over the range of 190-400nm. Both the drugs showed good response at 235 nm, hence this wavelength was selected for further study. The overlaid uv spectra is shown in the figure 2.
Figure (2). Overlaid UV Spectra of olanzapine and fluoxetine hydrochloride
|
|
Mobile phase: potassium dihydrogen phosphate (pH 3.0): Acetonitrile (40:60) v/v
Flow rate: 1ml/min
Run time (min): 8 min
Detection: 235 nm
Injection volume: 20µl
|
Fluoxetine |
|
olanzapine |
|
fluoxetine |
Table (1). System suitability parameters
|
S.NO |
PARAMETER |
DRUG |
OBSERVED VALUE |
|
1. |
Theoretical plates |
Olanzapine |
2350 |
|
Fluoxetine Hcl |
5160 |
||
|
2. |
Tailing factor |
Olanzapine |
1.7 |
|
Fluoxetine Hcl |
1.3 |
||
|
3. |
Retention time (min) |
Olanzapine |
5.734 |
|
Fluoxetine Hcl |
1.974 |
||
|
4. |
Resolution |
------- |
5.6 |
Table (2). Linearity data for Fluoxetine Hcl
|
SNO |
Concentration(µg/ml) |
Area |
|
1 |
10 |
754573 |
|
2 |
20 |
1523860 |
|
3 |
30 |
2258968 |
|
4 |
40 |
2949416 |
|
5 |
50 |
3622377 |
|
|
Correlation coefficient |
0.999 |
Figure (4). Calibration curve of Fluoxetine Hcl
Table (3). Linearity data for olanzapine
|
S.No |
Concentration(µg/ml) |
Area |
|
1 |
5 |
567120 |
|
2 |
10 |
1090378 |
|
3 |
15 |
1570684 |
|
4 |
20 |
2047728 |
|
5 |
25 |
2484788 |
|
|
Correlation coefficient |
0.999 |
Figure (5). Calibration curve of Olanzapine
Table (4). Precision data for fluoxetine hydrochloride and olanzapine
|
Injection |
(Fluoxetine) Area |
(Olanzapine) Area |
|
Injection-1 |
2154484 |
1490945 |
|
Injection-2 |
2161125 |
1496948 |
|
Injection-3 |
2166753 |
1502679 |
|
Injection-4 |
2176050 |
1512282 |
|
Injection-5 |
2179032 |
1519006 |
|
Average |
2167489 |
1504372 |
|
Standard Deviation |
10206.66 |
11346.4 |
|
%RSD |
0.47 |
0.75 |
Table (5). Results of Recovery Studies:
|
Sample |
accuracy
|
standard addition |
formulation |
% of recovery |
statistical analysis |
|
Fluoxetine Hcl |
50% |
15µg/ml |
30 µg/ml |
99.8% |
SD=0.038 %RSD=1.26 |
|
100% |
30 µg/ml |
30 µg/ml |
101.3% |
||
|
150% |
45 µg/ml |
30 µg/ml |
101.5% |
||
|
Olanzapine |
50% |
7.5 µg/ml |
15 µg/ml |
100.6% |
SD=0.047 %RSD=1.56 |
|
100% |
15 µg/ml |
15 µg/ml |
101.3% |
||
|
150% |
22.5 µg/ml |
15 |
101.3% |
Table (6). Results of LOD and LOQ:
|
Parameter |
FluoxetineHcl (µg/ml) |
Olanzapine (µg/ml) |
|
LOD |
0.35 |
0.52 |
|
LOQ |
1.064 |
1.586 |
Table (7). Results of Robustness Studies:
|
Condition |
variation |
Average area (n=3) |
%RSD |
||
|
FLX |
OLZ |
FLX |
OLZ |
||
|
MOBILE PHASE phosphate buffer (pH 3.0): acetonitrile (40:60)v/v |
phosphate buffer (pH 3.0): acetonitrile (42:58) |
2325609 |
1575908 |
0.49 |
0.33 |
|
phosphate buffer (pH 3.0): acetonitrile (40:60) |
2235732 |
1535732 |
1.24 |
1.80 |
|
|
phosphate buffer (pH 3.0): acetonitrile (38:62) |
2124504 |
1452138 |
0.28 |
0.70 |
|
|
FLOW RATE: 1ml/min |
Less flow 0.9 ml/min |
2332056 |
1631988 |
0.25 |
0.44 |
|
Actual Flow 1.0 ml/min |
2233850 |
1535732 |
0.18 |
1.80 |
|
|
More Flow 1.1 ml/min |
2136596 |
1448129 |
0.13 |
0.67 |
|
Assay: The proposed validated method was applied to determine fluoxetine hydrochloride and olanzapine in commercial formulation and the results of assay were given in the table 8.
Table (8). Results of Analysis of Commercial formulation and recovery of proposed method
|
Formulation |
Labeled claim (mg) |
% of Assay |
|
SYMBYAX |
OLZ-12 µg/ml FLX- 25µg/ml |
100.90 101.05 |
To develop a new RP-HPLC method, several mobile phase compositions were tried. A satisfactory separation with good peak symmetry was obtained with C18 (4.6 x 150 mm, 5 mm, Make: XTerra) column using mobile phase containing potassium dihyrogen phosphate (pH 3.0): acetonitrile 40:60v/v at a flow rate of 1ml/min. Quantification was achieved with UV detection at 235 nm based on peak area. The retention time for fluoxetine hydrochloride and olanzapine were found to be 1.974 min and 5.740 min, respectively. The optimized method was validated as per ICH guidelines. The System suitability parameters observed by using this optimized conditions were reported. A linearity range of 10-50μg/ml with correlation coefficient 0.999 was established for fluoxetine hydrochloride and 5-25 µg/ml with correlation coefficient 0.999 was established for olanzapine. The precision of the proposed method was carried in terms of the repeatability and the %RSD values of fluoxetine hydrochloride was found to be 0.47% and of olanzapine was found to be 0.75% and reveal that the proposed method is precise. The LOD and LOQ values for fluoxetine hydrochloride were 0.35μg/ml, 1.0648μg/ml respectively and for olanzapine were found to be 0.52μg/ml, 1.586μg/ml. The study of robustness in the present method shows no significant changes either in the peak area or Rt. The results of analysis of commercial formulation indicated that there is no interference due to common formulation excipients with the developed method. Therefore, the proposed method can be used for routine analysis of these two drugs in their combined pharmaceutical dosage form.
CONCLUSION
The proposed method was found to be simple, precise, accurate and rapid for determination of Fluoxetine hydrochloride and Olanzapine from pure and its dosage forms. The mobile phase is simple to prepare and economical. The sample recoveries in the formulation were in good agreement with their respective label claims and they suggested non-interference of formulation excipients in the estimation. Hence, this method can be easily and conveniently adopted for routine analysis of Fluoxetine hydrochloride and Olanzapine in pure form and its dosage form and also can be used for dissolution or similar studies.
REFERENCES
N. Pravalika, Dr. Mohammed Ibrahim, Rehmath Unnisa, Development And Validation of RP-HPLC Method for The Simultaneous Determination of Olanzapine and Fluoxetine Hydrochloride in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 3, 2239-2246. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19131096
10.5281/zenodo.19131096