View Article

  • Epigenetics and Cancer: Understanding How Genetic Regulation Beyond DNA Sequencing Influences Tumor Growth, Metastasis, Drug Resistance, and Therapy Response in Precision Medicine

  • 1Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacy, Shri Venkateshwara University, Gajraula, Uttar Pradesh, India.
    2M Pharm Scholar, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Aryakul College of Pharmacy and Research, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
    3Associate Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Chikkaballapur, Karnataka, India.
    4Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacy, BM College of Pharmacy, Farukhnagar, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
    5Head & Assistant Professor, Department of Chemistry (PG), Sahibganj College Sahibganj, Jharkhand, India.
    6,7B Pharm Scholar, Department of Pharmacognosy, Vikas Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh, India.
    8Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Maharana Pratap School of Pharmacy, Uttar Pradesh, India. 
    9Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Dayanand Institute of Pharmacy Latur, Maharashtra, India.

Abstract

Cancer is driven by genetic and epigenetic alterations that regulate tumor progression, metastasis, and therapy resistance. Epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation, histone alterations, and non-coding RNA regulation, influence gene expression without altering DNA sequences. Aberrant DNA methylation, histone remodeling, and dysregulated non-coding RNAs contribute to tumor heterogeneity, immune evasion, and drug resistance. Epigenetic mechanisms also drive epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), angiogenesis, and stromal remodeling, facilitating metastasis. Epigenetic biomarkers are being explored for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment selection, while therapies targeting DNA methylation, histone,modifications, and RNA-based mechanisms show promise. However, challenges remain in specificity, resistance, and multi-omics integration. Future directions include CRISPR-based epigenome editing, AI-driven biomarker discovery, and personalized epigenetic therapies, advancing precision oncology and improving patient outcomes.

Keywords

Epigenetics, DNA methylation, histone modifications, non-coding RNAs, tumor progression, metastasis.

Introduction

Cancer is a multifaceted disease characterized by uncontrolled cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis. Unlike other diseases that may be caused by a single genetic mutation, cancer arises from a combination of genetic, environmental, and epigenetic factors that collectively drive tumorigenesis (Hanahan & Weinberg, 2011). These molecular alterations enable cancer cells to evade apoptosis, sustain proliferative signaling, induce angiogenesis, and develop resistance to therapy (Vogelstein et al., 2013). Traditionally, cancer research has focused on genetic mutations; however, accumulating evidence suggests that epigenetic mechanisms play an equally crucial role in cancer initiation and progression (Baylin & Jones, 2016). Epigenetics refers to heritable changes in gene expression that do not involve alterations in the DNA sequence. These modifications include DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs, all of which regulate gene activity and chromatin structure (Jones & Baylin, 2007). Unlike genetic mutations, epigenetic modifications are reversible, making them promising targets for therapeutic intervention in cancer (Wainwright & Scaffidi, 2017). Dysregulation of the epigenome can activate oncogenes, silence tumor suppressor genes, and alter cellular responses to treatment, thereby influencing tumor growth, metastasis, and drug resistance (Sharma et al., 2010). Understanding the role of epigenetic mechanisms in cancer is essential for developing novel therapeutic strategies, particularly in the context of precision medicine. Epigenetic alterations contribute to intratumoral heterogeneity, influencing how cancer cells respond to targeted therapies and immunotherapies (Holliday, 2006). Furthermore, tumor cells can reprogram their epigenome in response to environmental stressors, facilitating therapy resistance and disease relapse (Dawson & Kouzarides, 2012). Identifying key epigenetic regulators and their impact on tumor behavior can lead to the development of more effective epigenetic drugs and biomarker-driven treatment approaches (You & Jones, 2012). This review aims to explore the influence of epigenetic regulation on cancer progression, metastasis, drug resistance, and therapy response. By examining the latest advancements in epigenetic research, this paper will highlight potential therapeutic strategies and discuss the challenges in translating epigenetic findings into clinical applications. The discussion will provide insights into the growing role of epigenetics in precision oncology and the future directions for epigenetic-based cancer therapies.

2. Fundamentals of Epigenetic Regulation

Epigenetic regulation plays a critical role in maintaining cellular homeostasis and gene expression fidelity. Unlike genetic mutations, epigenetic modifications do not alter the DNA sequence but instead influence gene activity through reversible mechanisms, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs (Jones & Baylin, 2007). These mechanisms collectively shape the chromatin landscape, affecting tumor suppression, oncogene activation, and cancer progression.

2.1 DNA Methylation: Role in Gene Silencing and Tumor Suppression

DNA methylation is a key epigenetic modification involving the addition of a methyl group to cytosine residues within CpG islands, predominantly by DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) (Baylin & Jones, 2016). In normal cells, DNA methylation ensures genomic stability and silences transposable elements. However, in cancer, global DNA hypomethylation leads to genomic instability, while promoter hypermethylation silences tumor suppressor genes (Sharma et al., 2010).

Table 1: Role of DNA Methylation in Tumorigenesis

 

Type of DNA Methylation

Effects on Gene Expression

Implications in Cancer

Hypermethylation of Tumor Suppressor Genes

Silencing of critical genes

Inactivation of TP53, CDKN2A, and BRCA1, leading to uncontrolled proliferation

Global DNA Hypomethylation

Genomic instability

Activation of oncogenes, increased mutation rates

Aberrant Imprinting

Loss of gene dosage control

Unregulated cell division, altered cell fate (e.g., IGF2 overexpression in colorectal cancer)

DNA methylation inhibitors, such as azacitidine and decitabine, have shown promise in reversing epigenetic silencing and restoring tumor suppressor gene function in hematologic malignancies (Dawson & Kouzarides, 2012).

2.2 Histone Modifications: Chromatin Dynamics and Gene Expression

Histone proteins undergo post-translational modifications (PTMs), including acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, and ubiquitination, which dictate chromatin accessibility and transcriptional activity (Kouzarides, 2007). Acetylation by histone acetyltransferases (HATs) is generally associated with active gene expression, whereas histone deacetylation by histone deacetylases (HDACs) leads to transcriptional repression (Shen & Laird, 2013).

Table 2: Key Histone Modifications in Cancer

 

Histone Modification

Enzyme Involved

Effect on Chromatin

Cancer Relevance

H3K9 Acetylation (H3K9ac)

HATs (e.g., CBP, p300)

Open chromatin, active transcription

Loss in solid tumors leads to tumor suppressor gene silencing

H3K27 Methylation (H3K27me3)

Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2)

Repressive chromatin, gene silencing

Aberrant methylation of CDKN2A in breast cancer

H3K4 Methylation (H3K4me3)

MLL1, MLL2

Activation of oncogenes

Promotes MYC overexpression in leukemia

H3K36 Methylation (H3K36me3)

SETD2

Transcriptional activation, DNA repair

SETD2 loss in renal cell carcinoma disrupts genome integrity

HDAC inhibitors (HDACis) such as vorinostat and romidepsin have been approved for treating certain cancers by reactivating silenced tumor suppressor genes (You & Jones, 2012).

2.3 Non-Coding RNAs: miRNAs, lncRNAs, and circRNAs in Gene Expression Regulation

Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) have emerged as key regulators of gene expression in cancer. These include microRNAs (miRNAs), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), and circular RNAs (circRNAs), which influence tumorigenesis through transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation (Huarte, 2015).

Table 3: Non-Coding RNAs and Their Roles in Cancer

 

Type of ncRNA

Mechanism of Action

Cancer-Related Functions

Examples

miRNAs

Bind to 3' UTR of mRNA, preventing translation

Tumor suppression (miR-34a in p53 regulation); Oncogenic activation (miR-21 in PTEN inhibition)

miR-34a, miR-21

lncRNAs

Act as molecular sponges, scaffolds, or guides for chromatin remodeling

Regulate metastasis, EMT, and therapy resistance

HOTAIR (PRC2 recruitment), MALAT1 (metastasis promotion)

circRNAs

Compete for miRNA binding, regulate protein translation

Control cell cycle, proliferation, and apoptosis

circFOXO3 (cell cycle arrest), circHIPK3 (oncogenic in bladder cancer)

Several ncRNAs have been proposed as biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and prognosis, highlighting their potential in precision medicine (Huarte, 2015).

2.4 Chromatin Remodeling Complexes in Cancer Progression

Chromatin remodeling complexes regulate nucleosome positioning and accessibility to transcription factors. These complexes, including the SWI/SNF, ISWI, CHD, and INO80 families, are frequently mutated in cancers, affecting gene expression and genomic stability (Clapier et al., 2017).

Table 4: Chromatin Remodeling Complexes in Cancer

 

Chromatin Remodeling Complex

Function

Cancer Implications

SWI/SNF (BAF complex)

Regulates nucleosome eviction for transcriptional activation

Mutations in ARID1A and SMARCB1 in ovarian and rhabdoid tumors

ISWI Complex

Maintains chromatin compaction and DNA replication fidelity

Dysregulation linked to hematologic malignancies

CHD Family

Controls chromatin accessibility at enhancers and promoters

CHD1 loss promotes prostate cancer progression

INO80 Complex

Regulates DNA repair and genome stability

Defects in INO80 components contribute to DNA damage accumulation in cancers

The frequent loss of function of chromatin remodeling factors in cancer suggests potential therapeutic targets for epigenetic therapies (Clapier et al., 2017).

3. Epigenetic Alterations in Tumor Growth and Progression

Epigenetic dysregulation plays a pivotal role in tumor initiation, progression, and metastasis. Aberrant DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNA (ncRNA) expression contribute to the silencing of tumor suppressor genes, activation of oncogenes, and maintenance of cancer stem cells (Baylin & Jones, 2016). These alterations provide a selective advantage to cancer cells by promoting proliferation, evading apoptosis, and enabling metastasis.

3.1 Hypermethylation of Tumor Suppressor Genes and Hypomethylation of Oncogenes

Aberrant DNA methylation patterns are frequently observed in cancer. Promoter hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes leads to their silencing, while global hypomethylation results in genomic instability and oncogene activation (Sharma et al., 2010).

Table 5: DNA Methylation Alterations in Cancer

 

Methylation Type

Target Genes

Effect

Associated Cancers

Hypermethylation

TP53, CDKN2A, BRCA1

Silencing of tumor suppressor genes

Breast, lung, colorectal

Hypomethylation

MYC, MDM2, IGF2

Activation of oncogenes

Liver, prostate, colorectal

Global DNA Hypomethylation

Repetitive elements (LINE-1, Alu)

Chromosomal instability

Various cancers

Hypomethylation of oncogenes leads to their overexpression, promoting uncontrolled cell proliferation, whereas hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes allows cancer cells to bypass growth arrest and apoptosis (Esteller, 2008).

3.2 Dysregulation of Histone Modifications Promoting Uncontrolled Proliferation

Histone modifications regulate gene expression by altering chromatin accessibility. In cancer, histone-modifying enzymes, such as histone deacetylases (HDACs) and histone methyltransferases (HMTs), are frequently dysregulated, leading to aberrant gene expression (Kouzarides, 2007).

Table 6: Histone Modifications in Tumor Progression

 

Histone Modification

Effect on Gene Expression

Impact on Cancer Progression

H3K9ac (Acetylation)

Activates transcription

Loss leads to tumor suppressor silencing

H3K27me3 (Trimethylation)

Represses transcription

Silencing of tumor suppressors (e.g., CDKN2A)

H3K4me3 (Trimethylation)

Activates transcription

Activation of oncogenes (e.g., MYC)

H3K36me3 (Trimethylation)

Maintains genome integrity

Loss leads to DNA repair defects

Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis), such as vorinostat and romidepsin, have been explored as potential therapeutics to reverse epigenetic silencing in cancer (Dawson & Kouzarides, 2012).

3.3 Non-Coding RNA-Mediated Regulation of Oncogenic and Tumor-Suppressive Pathways

Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), including microRNAs (miRNAs), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), and circular RNAs (circRNAs), play crucial roles in post-transcriptional gene regulation, influencing cancer progression by modulating oncogenic and tumor-suppressive pathways (Huarte, 2015). Oncogenic miRNAs, such as miR-21 and miR-155, suppress tumor suppressor genes like PTEN, promoting proliferation and inflammation, while tumor-suppressive miRNAs like miR-34a and let-7 inhibit oncogenes such as MYC and RAS, restraining tumor growth. Similarly, oncogenic lncRNAs like HOTAIR and MALAT1 enhance metastasis and inhibit apoptosis, whereas tumor-suppressive lncRNAs like MEG3 and GAS5 regulate chromatin modifications to activate tumor-suppressor pathways. Given their pivotal roles in tumorigenesis, targeting ncRNAs with miRNA mimics and antisense oligonucleotides has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy in cancer treatment, with preclinical studies demonstrating encouraging outcomes (Huarte, 2015).

3.4 Role of Epigenetic Modifications in Cancer Stem Cell Maintenance

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) represent a subpopulation of tumor cells with the ability to self-renew and differentiate, playing a critical role in tumor progression, metastasis, and therapy resistance. Epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation, histone alterations, and non-coding RNAs, regulate CSC plasticity and maintain their stem-like properties (Widschwendter et al., 2007). For instance, DNA hypermethylation of differentiation-associated genes like SOX2 and OCT4 sustains CSCs in an undifferentiated state. Similarly, histone modifications such as H3K27me3 (mediated by EZH2) repress differentiation pathways, further reinforcing stemness. Non-coding RNAs also contribute to CSC regulation; for example, miR-200 influences epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), while lncRNA HOTAIR enhances stemness and drug resistance. Understanding CSC epigenetics is essential for developing targeted therapies that disrupt CSC maintenance, thereby preventing tumor relapse and overcoming resistance to conventional treatments (Dawson & Kouzarides, 2012).

4. Epigenetic Regulation of Metastasis and Tumor Microenvironment

Epigenetic modifications play a crucial role in tumor progression by regulating metastasis, immune evasion, angiogenesis, and stromal interactions. These modifications enable cancer cells to undergo epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), evade immune surveillance, remodel the tumor microenvironment (TME), and develop resistance to therapy (Esteller, 2008).

4.1 Epigenetic Control of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) and Metastasis

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a critical process in cancer metastasis, allowing epithelial tumor cells to acquire mesenchymal properties, enhancing motility and invasiveness. DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs regulate key EMT-associated genes, such as E-cadherin (CDH1), N-cadherin (CDH2), and vimentin (VIM) (Lamouille et al., 2014).

Table 7: Epigenetic Regulation of EMT in Cancer

 

Epigenetic Mechanism

Target Genes

Effect

Cancer Types

Promoter Hypermethylation

CDH1 (E-cadherin)

Silencing promotes EMT

Breast, lung, colorectal

Histone Modifications

H3K27me3 at CDH1

Repressive mark, leading to EMT induction

Prostate, pancreatic

miRNA Dysregulation

miR-200 family

Downregulation promotes EMT

Ovarian, bladder

lncRNA Activation

MALAT1

Enhances invasion and metastasis

Lung, liver

DNA methylation of CDH1 silences E-cadherin expression, weakening cell-cell adhesion and promoting cancer cell migration. Additionally, histone modifications, such as H3K27 trimethylation, further repress EMT-suppressive genes, while miRNAs like the miR-200 family inhibit EMT by targeting ZEB1 and ZEB2 transcription factors (Lamouille et al., 2014).

4.2 Tumor Microenvironment Interactions: Immune Evasion, Angiogenesis, and Stromal Remodeling

Epigenetic mechanisms play a crucial role in shaping interactions between cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment (TME), facilitating processes such as immune evasion, angiogenesis, and stromal remodeling. Tumor cells exploit epigenetic modifications to suppress immune responses and create a pro-tumorigenic niche, thereby promoting disease progression (Sharma et al., 2010). For instance, the epigenetic regulation of immune checkpoint molecules, such as PD-L1, is a key mechanism of immune evasion in various cancers. PD-L1 promoter demethylation leads to increased immune checkpoint expression, allowing tumor cells to escape immune surveillance, a phenomenon observed in melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Similarly, hypomethylation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) genes enhances angiogenesis, fueling tumor growth in cancers such as glioblastoma and renal cancer. In addition to immune evasion and angiogenesis, epigenetic alterations contribute to stromal remodeling within the TME. Epigenetic activation of transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-β1) promotes fibrosis and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling, creating a supportive environment for tumor progression, as seen in pancreatic and colorectal cancers. Furthermore, epigenetic modifications influence macrophage polarization, shifting them from an M1 (anti-tumor) phenotype to an M2 (pro-tumor) phenotype. This shift is mediated by histone modification, specifically H3K27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) at M1 marker genes, which represses their expression and enhances tumor-promoting macrophage activity in breast and ovarian cancers. These findings underscore the role of epigenetic regulation in modulating the TME and highlight the potential of epigenetic therapies to reverse these alterations and improve cancer treatment outcomes (Sharma et al., 2010).

4.3 Epigenetic Mechanisms Shaping Tumor Heterogeneity and Adaptation

Tumor heterogeneity arises from a combination of genetic and epigenetic variations that enable cancer cells to adapt to environmental pressures such as hypoxia, nutrient deprivation, and therapeutic interventions. Unlike genetic mutations, epigenetic plasticity allows for dynamic and reversible changes in gene expression without altering the underlying DNA sequence, thereby facilitating tumor evolution and therapeutic resistance (Meacham & Morrison, 2013). One of the key contributors to tumor heterogeneity is intratumoral variability in DNA methylation patterns, where differential methylation across tumor subclones generates phenotypic diversity, ultimately leading to resistance against targeted therapies. For example, epigenetic heterogeneity allows distinct cancer cell subpopulations to resist chemotherapy by dynamically modifying chromatin states to evade drug-induced cytotoxicity. This inherent adaptability highlights the necessity of integrating combinatorial therapeutic strategies that target both genetic and epigenetic drivers of cancer progression to improve treatment efficacy and overcome resistance (Meacham & Morrison, 2013).

5. Epigenetics and Cancer Drug Resistance

Drug resistance remains a major challenge in cancer therapy, often driven by epigenetic modifications that alter gene expression without changing the underlying DNA sequence. These modifications influence drug transport, apoptotic pathways, and tumor cell adaptability, contributing to resistance against chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy (Sharma et al., 2010).

5.1 Epigenetic Silencing of Drug Transporters and Apoptotic Pathways

The reduced efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents is often linked to epigenetic suppression of drug transporters and apoptosis-regulating genes. DNA methylation and histone modifications silence key genes involved in drug efflux and cell death, reducing intracellular drug accumulation and enhancing tumor cell survival. For example, promoter hypermethylation of ABCB1 (P-glycoprotein), a crucial drug efflux transporter, impairs drug removal, leading to chemoresistance in breast and ovarian cancers (Souroullas et al., 2016). Similarly, histone deacetylation represses apoptotic regulators like BAX and BAK, weakening the apoptotic response in leukemia and colon cancer. Additionally, overexpression of miR-221 inhibits pro-apoptotic pathways, further promoting drug resistance in glioblastoma and liver cancer. These epigenetic alterations underscore the need for therapeutic strategies targeting epigenetic regulators to restore drug sensitivity and improve treatment outcomes.

5.2 Role of Histone Modifications in Chemotherapy and Targeted Therapy Resistance

Histone modifications, such as acetylation, methylation, and phosphorylation, contribute to drug resistance by altering chromatin accessibility and gene expression. These modifications regulate key resistance-related genes involved in DNA repair, cell cycle progression, and survival pathways.

Table 8: Histone Modifications and Their Role in Drug Resistance

 

Histone Modification

Target Genes/Pathways

Impact

Resistant Cancer Types

H3K27me3 (Repressive Mark)

p16INK4a, p21

Silencing of cell cycle regulators

Lung, prostate

H3K9ac (Activating Mark)

ABC transporters

Increases drug efflux

Colon, leukemia

H4K20me3 (Repressive Mark)

BRCA1, RAD51

Inhibits DNA repair pathways

Breast, ovarian

For example, trimethylation of H3K27 at the p16INK4a promoter leads to silencing of this tumor suppressor, promoting unchecked proliferation and chemotherapy resistance (Sharma et al., 2010). Conversely, histone acetylation at ABC transporter genes enhances drug efflux, reducing intracellular drug accumulation.

5.3 Non-Coding RNAs in Mediating Multi-Drug Resistance

Non-coding RNAs, including microRNAs (miRNAs) and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), regulate drug resistance by targeting genes involved in apoptosis, drug efflux, and DNA repair.

Table 9: Non-Coding RNAs and Their Role in Drug Resistance

 

Non-Coding RNA

Target Pathway

Mechanism of Resistance

Cancer Types

miR-21

PTEN/PI3K/AKT

Enhances survival and drug resistance

Breast, lung

miR-155

p53/BAX

Inhibits apoptosis

Leukemia, lymphoma

lncRNA HOTAIR

EMT markers

Promotes metastasis and resistance

Breast, gastric

Overexpression of miR-21 leads to activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway, promoting survival and therapy resistance (Souroullas et al., 2016). Likewise, lncRNA HOTAIR induces EMT, enhancing metastatic potential and drug resistance.

5.4 Epigenetic Plasticity and Tumor Cell Reprogramming in Response to Therapy

Cancer cells leverage epigenetic plasticity to adapt to therapeutic pressures, dynamically reprogramming their gene expression to evade treatment. This adaptability enables transdifferentiation, acquisition of stem-like phenotypes, and the emergence of drug-tolerant persister cells (DTPs), all of which contribute to long-term resistance (Dawson & Kouzarides, 2012). Histone demethylases such as KDM6B remove the repressive H3K27me3 mark, reinstating a stem-like state that confers resilience against differentiation-targeted therapies. Similarly, promoter hypomethylation of stemness-associated genes like SOX2 and OCT4 enhances tumor plasticity, facilitating adaptation to therapeutic interventions. Additionally, miRNA dysregulation, including suppression of tumor-suppressive miRNAs like miR-34, promotes survival in drug-tolerant cancer cells. These findings underscore the necessity of targeting epigenetic regulators to counteract therapy-induced tumor reprogramming and resistance (Souroullas et al., 2016).

6. Epigenetics in Precision Medicine and Therapeutic Strategies

Advancements in epigenetics have paved the way for precision oncology, allowing for targeted therapeutic strategies based on an individual’s epigenomic profile. Epigenetic biomarkers serve as crucial tools for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy selection. Additionally, emerging epigenetic therapies, including DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTis), histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis), and RNA-based therapeutics, are being explored for clinical applications (Jones et al., 2016).

6.1 Epigenetic Biomarkers for Cancer Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment Selection

Epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation patterns and histone modifications, serve as valuable biomarkers for cancer detection, prognosis, and treatment response prediction. These biomarkers facilitate tumor subtype classification and inform personalized therapeutic strategies. For example, hypermethylation of the MGMT promoter in glioblastoma predicts enhanced sensitivity to alkylating agents such as temozolomide, making it a crucial determinant of treatment efficacy (Esteller et al., 2000). Similarly, BRCA1 hypermethylation in breast and ovarian cancers compromises DNA repair pathways, influencing susceptibility to DNA-damaging agents and guiding therapy selection. Moreover, global hypomethylation of repetitive elements like LINE-1 is linked to genomic instability and poor prognosis in colorectal cancer. Additionally, repression of CDKN2A through H3K27me3 modifications correlates with aggressive tumor phenotypes in lung and melanoma cases. The integration of epigenetic biomarkers into clinical practice holds promise for advancing precision oncology by enabling early diagnosis, risk stratification, and individualized treatment planning.

6.2 Emerging Epigenetic Therapies: DNA Methyltransferase Inhibitors, Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors, and RNA-Based Therapeutics

Epigenetic therapies aim to reverse aberrant modifications that contribute to oncogenesis. Several epigenetic drugs have been approved, while others are in clinical trials for targeted cancer therapy.

Table 10: FDA-Approved and Investigational Epigenetic Therapies

 

Drug Class

Drug Name

Mechanism of Action

Cancer Indications

DNMT Inhibitors

5-Azacytidine, Decitabine

Inhibits DNA methylation, reactivating tumor suppressor genes

Myelodysplastic syndromes, AML

HDAC Inhibitors

Vorinostat, Romidepsin

Enhances histone acetylation, promoting apoptosis

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma

EZH2 Inhibitors

Tazemetostat

Inhibits H3K27 methylation, blocking cancer growth

Epithelioid sarcoma, NHL

RNA-Based Therapies

miRNA mimics, siRNAs

Targets oncogenic or tumor-suppressor pathways

Various solid tumors

DNMT inhibitors such as 5-azacytidine are used to reverse hypermethylation and restore the expression of tumor suppressor genes (Momparler, 2005). Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis), including vorinostat, enhance chromatin accessibility, reactivating suppressed genes involved in apoptosis and differentiation (Marks et al., 2001).

6.3 Challenges and Opportunities in Epigenetic Drug Development

Despite the promise of epigenetic therapies, several challenges exist, including specificity, off-target effects, and resistance mechanisms. However, advancements in drug delivery and biomarker-driven therapy selection present new opportunities.

Table 11: Key Challenges and Potential Solutions in Epigenetic Therapy

 

Challenge

Description

Potential Solution

Lack of specificity

Epigenetic drugs affect both cancerous and normal cells

Targeted drug delivery systems

Tumor heterogeneity

Variability in epigenetic landscapes within tumors

Personalized multi-omic profiling

Development of resistance

Cancer cells adapt to epigenetic drugs

Combination therapies with conventional treatments

Toxicity concerns

HDAC inhibitors can cause severe side effects

Second-generation inhibitors with better safety profiles

To overcome these barriers, research is focusing on refining epigenetic inhibitors with higher specificity and combining them with immunotherapy and targeted molecular treatments.

6.4 Personalized Epigenetic Interventions in Clinical Oncology

Precision oncology integrates epigenomic profiling with personalized medicine, enabling the tailoring of treatment based on individual epigenetic signatures. Advances in single-cell sequencing and liquid biopsy techniques further enhance the applicability of epigenetic interventions.

Table 12: Future Directions in Personalized Epigenetic Medicine

 

Innovation

Description

Clinical Potential

Single-cell epigenomic analysis

Identifies heterogeneity in tumor epigenetics

Precision treatment planning

CRISPR-based epigenome editing

Targets specific epigenetic modifications

Potential for direct epigenetic reprogramming

Liquid biopsy for epigenetic markers

Detects circulating tumor DNA methylation patterns

Non-invasive cancer diagnosis and monitoring

AI-driven epigenetic drug discovery

Uses machine learning to identify novel epigenetic targets

Faster development of precision drugs

The application of AI and big data analytics in epigenetics is accelerating drug discovery and treatment optimization. Emerging strategies like CRISPR-mediated epigenome editing hold promise for precisely reprogramming cancer-associated epigenetic changes (Liu et al., 2016).

7. Challenges and Future Perspectives in Epigenetic Cancer Research

Epigenetic research has significantly advanced our understanding of tumor biology, but several challenges persist in translating these findings into clinical applications. The limitations of current profiling techniques, the need for integrative multi-omics approaches, and the potential of CRISPR-based epigenome editing represent critical areas for future investigation.

7.1 Limitations of Current Epigenetic Profiling Techniques

Despite rapid advancements, existing epigenetic profiling technologies face limitations related to sensitivity, resolution, and clinical applicability.

Table 13: Limitations of Current Epigenetic Profiling Techniques and Potential Solutions

 

Technology

Limitation

Potential Solution

Bisulfite Sequencing (BS-Seq)

Cannot distinguish between 5-methylcytosine (5mC) and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC)

Oxidative BS-Seq and nanopore sequencing

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing (ChIP-Seq)

Antibody specificity issues, high background noise

Improved antibody validation and CUT&RUN technology

ATAC-Seq (Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin)

Limited in detecting histone modifications

Integration with ChIP-Seq and multi-omics

RNA Sequencing for ncRNAs

Difficulty in distinguishing functional vs. non-functional ncRNAs

Functional validation through CRISPR screens

Newer methods, such as single-cell epigenomics and nanopore-based sequencing, are enhancing resolution and accuracy in epigenetic research.

7.2 Need for Integrative Multi-Omics Approaches in Epigenetic Research

A comprehensive understanding of cancer epigenetics requires the integration of multiple omics layers, including genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics.

Table 14: Benefits of Multi-Omics Integration in Epigenetic Cancer Research

 

Omics Layer

Role in Cancer Epigenetics

Analytical Tools

Genomics

Identifies DNA mutations influencing epigenetic regulation

Whole-genome sequencing (WGS), CRISPR screens

Epigenomics

Maps DNA methylation, histone modifications, and chromatin accessibility

ATAC-Seq, ChIP-Seq, BS-Seq

Transcriptomics

Analyzes gene expression and non-coding RNAs

RNA-Seq, microarrays

Proteomics

Examines epigenetic enzyme activity and protein interactions

Mass spectrometry, co-immunoprecipitation

Metabolomics

Studies metabolic intermediates that affect epigenetic marks

LC-MS, NMR spectroscopy

The integration of these omics data provides a systems biology approach to cancer epigenetics, allowing for a more precise understanding of tumor heterogeneity and therapeutic responses.

7.3 Potential of CRISPR-Based Epigenome Editing in Cancer Therapy

CRISPR-based technologies have revolutionized gene editing, and recent advancements enable direct epigenetic modifications without altering the DNA sequence.

Table 15: Applications of CRISPR-Based Epigenome Editing in Cancer Therapy

 

CRISPR-Based Tool

Function

Potential Application

dCas9-DNMT3A

Induces targeted DNA methylation

Silencing oncogenes

dCas9-TET1

Removes methylation marks

Reactivating tumor suppressor genes

dCas9-HDAC

Alters histone deacetylation

Epigenetic reprogramming of resistant tumors

CRISPRa (CRISPR activation)

Enhances expression of genes

Activating immune response pathways

CRISPRi (CRISPR interference)

Represses specific gene expression

Targeting oncogenic drivers

The ability to precisely modulate epigenetic states using CRISPR tools holds promise for next-generation cancer therapeutics, particularly in overcoming drug resistance and reversing tumor-promoting epigenetic alterations.

7.4 Future Directions in Precision Epigenetic Medicine

The future of epigenetic cancer research is geared toward personalized therapies, leveraging patient-specific epigenomic landscapes for tailored interventions.

Table 16: Future Innovations in Precision Epigenetic Medicine

 

Innovation

Description

Potential Impact

Single-cell epigenomics

High-resolution mapping of epigenetic heterogeneity

Identifying drug-resistant tumor subpopulations

AI-driven epigenetic analysis

Machine learning models for epigenetic biomarker discovery

Accelerating drug development and personalized treatments

Epigenetic immunotherapy

Modifying immune cell epigenomes to enhance anti-tumor immunity

Improving efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors

Organoid models for epigenetic studies

Patient-derived tumor organoids for epigenetic drug screening

Enhancing preclinical testing accuracy

Epigenetic reprogramming

Direct reprogramming of cancer cells to a less aggressive state

Potential alternative to cytotoxic chemotherapy

The convergence of epigenetics, artificial intelligence, and precision medicine is expected to transform cancer treatment paradigms, offering novel, highly specific, and less toxic therapeutic strategies.

8. CONCLUSION

8.1 Summary of Key Findings and Insights

Epigenetic regulation plays a pivotal role in cancer biology, influencing tumor initiation, progression, metastasis, drug resistance, and therapy response. Key mechanisms include:

  1. DNA methylation: Hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes and hypomethylation of oncogenes contribute to tumor progression (Esteller et al., 2000).
  2. Histone modifications: Acetylation, methylation, and phosphorylation dynamically regulate chromatin states, affecting gene expression in cancer cells (Marks et al., 2001).
  3. Non-coding RNAs: MicroRNAs (miRNAs), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), and circular RNAs (circRNAs) modulate oncogenic and tumor-suppressive pathways (Jones et al., 2016).
  4. Plasticity: Tumor cells utilize epigenetic reprogramming to evade therapy, underscoring the need for targeted epigenetic interventions (Momparler, 2005).

The integration of epigenetic biomarkers and therapeutics into clinical practice holds promise for improving patient outcomes.

8.2 Implications for Cancer Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Therapy

The clinical applications of epigenetics in oncology are expanding rapidly:

  1. Diagnosis & Prognosis: Epigenetic biomarkers enable early cancer detection and stratification of patients based on their epigenomic profiles.
  2. Therapy Selection: Epigenetic modifications influence drug response, guiding the use of precision medicine strategies.
  3. Epigenetic Therapies: FDA-approved DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTis) and histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) have demonstrated efficacy in treating hematologic malignancies and are being explored for solid tumors (Liu et al., 2016).

8.3 Final Thoughts on the Evolving Role of Epigenetics in Oncology

The field of cancer epigenetics is evolving, with advancements in multi-omics, CRISPR-based epigenome editing, and AI-driven biomarker discovery offering transformative potential. Future research should focus on:

  1. Refining epigenetic-based diagnostics for earlier detection and risk assessment.
  2. Developing next-generation epigenetic therapeutics with improved specificity and reduced toxicity.
  3. Integrating epigenomics into precision oncology to enhance treatment personalization.

As technology advances, epigenetics will continue to shape the future of oncology, providing novel insights and therapeutic avenues for combating cancer.

REFERENCES

        1. Baylin, S. B., & Jones, P. A. (2016). Epigenetic determinants of cancer. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 8(9), a019505. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a019505
        2. Clapier, C. R., Iwasa, J., Cairns, B. R., & Peterson, C. L. (2017). Mechanisms of action and regulation of ATP-dependent chromatin-remodelling complexes. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 18(7), 407-422. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2017.26
        3. Dawson, M. A., & Kouzarides, T. (2012). Cancer epigenetics: From mechanism to therapy. Cell, 150(1), 12-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.013
        4. Esteller, M. (2008). Epigenetics in cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 358(11), 1148-1159. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra072067
        5. Esteller, M., Hamilton, S. R., Burger, P. C., Baylin, S. B., & Herman, J. G. (2000). Inactivation of the DNA repair gene O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase by promoter hypermethylation is a common event in primary human neoplasia. Cancer Research, 60(4), 793-800.
        6. Hanahan, D., & Weinberg, R. A. (2011). Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell, 144(5), 646-674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013
        7. Holliday, R. (2006). Epigenetics: A historical overview. Epigenetics, 1(2), 76-80. https://doi.org/10.4161/epi.1.2.2762
        8. Huarte, M. (2015). The emerging role of lncRNAs in cancer. Nature Medicine, 21(11), 1253-1261. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3981
        9. Jones, P. A., & Baylin, S. B. (2007). The epigenomics of cancer. Cell, 128(4), 683-692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.029
        10. Jones, P. A., Issa, J. P., & Baylin, S. (2016). Targeting the cancer epigenome for therapy. Nature Reviews Genetics, 17(10), 630-641. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2016.93
        11. Kouzarides, T. (2007). Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell, 128(4), 693-705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.005
        12. Lamouille, S., Xu, J., & Derynck, R. (2014). Molecular mechanisms of epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 15(3), 178-196. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3758
        13. Liu, X. S., Wu, H., Krzisch, M., Wu, X., Graef, J., Muffat, J., ... & Jaenisch, R. (2016). Rescue of fragile X syndrome neurons by DNA methylation editing of the FMR1 gene. Cell, 172(5), 979-992.e6.
        14. Marks, P. A., Richon, V. M., Miller, T., & Kelly, W. K. (2001). Histone deacetylase inhibitors. Advances in Cancer Research, 91, 137-168.
        15. Meacham, C. E., & Morrison, S. J. (2013). Tumor heterogeneity and cancer cell plasticity. Nature, 501(7467), 328-337. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12624
        16. Momparler, R. L. (2005). Pharmacology of 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine (decitabine). Seminars in Hematology, 42(3 Suppl 2), S9-S16.
        17. Sharma, P., Hu-Lieskovan, S., Wargo, J. A., & Ribas, A. (2017). Primary, adaptive, and acquired resistance to cancer immunotherapy. Cell, 168(4), 707-723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.017
        18. Sharma, S., Kelly, T. K., & Jones, P. A. (2010). Epigenetics in cancer. Carcinogenesis, 31(1), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgp220
        19. Souroullas, G. P., Jeck, W. R., Parker, J. S., Simon, J. M., Liu, J. Y., Paulk, J., ... & Sharpless, N. E. (2016). Cellular senescence and epigenetic reprogramming in drug resistance. Nature Reviews Cancer, 16(10), 601-617. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc.2016.82
        20. Vogelstein, B., Papadopoulos, N., Velculescu, V. E., Zhou, S., Diaz, L. A., & Kinzler, K. W. (2013). Cancer genome landscapes. Science, 339(6127), 1546-1558. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1235122
        21. Wainwright, E. N., & Scaffidi, P. (2017). Epigenetics and cancer stem cells: Unleashing, hijacking, and restricting cellular plasticity. Trends in Cancer, 3(5), 372-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trecan.2017.04.002
        22. Widschwendter, M., et al. (2007). Epigenetic stem cell signature in cancer. Nature Genetics, 39(2), 157-158. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1941
        23. You, J. S., & Jones, P. A. (2012). Cancer genetics and epigenetics: Two sides of the same coin? Cancer Cell, 22(1), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2012.06.008.

Reference

  1. Baylin, S. B., & Jones, P. A. (2016). Epigenetic determinants of cancer. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 8(9), a019505. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a019505
  2. Clapier, C. R., Iwasa, J., Cairns, B. R., & Peterson, C. L. (2017). Mechanisms of action and regulation of ATP-dependent chromatin-remodelling complexes. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 18(7), 407-422. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2017.26
  3. Dawson, M. A., & Kouzarides, T. (2012). Cancer epigenetics: From mechanism to therapy. Cell, 150(1), 12-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.013
  4. Esteller, M. (2008). Epigenetics in cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 358(11), 1148-1159. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra072067
  5. Esteller, M., Hamilton, S. R., Burger, P. C., Baylin, S. B., & Herman, J. G. (2000). Inactivation of the DNA repair gene O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase by promoter hypermethylation is a common event in primary human neoplasia. Cancer Research, 60(4), 793-800.
  6. Hanahan, D., & Weinberg, R. A. (2011). Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell, 144(5), 646-674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013
  7. Holliday, R. (2006). Epigenetics: A historical overview. Epigenetics, 1(2), 76-80. https://doi.org/10.4161/epi.1.2.2762
  8. Huarte, M. (2015). The emerging role of lncRNAs in cancer. Nature Medicine, 21(11), 1253-1261. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3981
  9. Jones, P. A., & Baylin, S. B. (2007). The epigenomics of cancer. Cell, 128(4), 683-692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.029
  10. Jones, P. A., Issa, J. P., & Baylin, S. (2016). Targeting the cancer epigenome for therapy. Nature Reviews Genetics, 17(10), 630-641. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2016.93
  11. Kouzarides, T. (2007). Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell, 128(4), 693-705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.005
  12. Lamouille, S., Xu, J., & Derynck, R. (2014). Molecular mechanisms of epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 15(3), 178-196. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3758
  13. Liu, X. S., Wu, H., Krzisch, M., Wu, X., Graef, J., Muffat, J., ... & Jaenisch, R. (2016). Rescue of fragile X syndrome neurons by DNA methylation editing of the FMR1 gene. Cell, 172(5), 979-992.e6.
  14. Marks, P. A., Richon, V. M., Miller, T., & Kelly, W. K. (2001). Histone deacetylase inhibitors. Advances in Cancer Research, 91, 137-168.
  15. Meacham, C. E., & Morrison, S. J. (2013). Tumor heterogeneity and cancer cell plasticity. Nature, 501(7467), 328-337. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12624
  16. Momparler, R. L. (2005). Pharmacology of 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine (decitabine). Seminars in Hematology, 42(3 Suppl 2), S9-S16.
  17. Sharma, P., Hu-Lieskovan, S., Wargo, J. A., & Ribas, A. (2017). Primary, adaptive, and acquired resistance to cancer immunotherapy. Cell, 168(4), 707-723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.017
  18. Sharma, S., Kelly, T. K., & Jones, P. A. (2010). Epigenetics in cancer. Carcinogenesis, 31(1), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgp220
  19. Souroullas, G. P., Jeck, W. R., Parker, J. S., Simon, J. M., Liu, J. Y., Paulk, J., ... & Sharpless, N. E. (2016). Cellular senescence and epigenetic reprogramming in drug resistance. Nature Reviews Cancer, 16(10), 601-617. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc.2016.82
  20. Vogelstein, B., Papadopoulos, N., Velculescu, V. E., Zhou, S., Diaz, L. A., & Kinzler, K. W. (2013). Cancer genome landscapes. Science, 339(6127), 1546-1558. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1235122
  21. Wainwright, E. N., & Scaffidi, P. (2017). Epigenetics and cancer stem cells: Unleashing, hijacking, and restricting cellular plasticity. Trends in Cancer, 3(5), 372-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trecan.2017.04.002
  22. Widschwendter, M., et al. (2007). Epigenetic stem cell signature in cancer. Nature Genetics, 39(2), 157-158. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1941
  23. You, J. S., & Jones, P. A. (2012). Cancer genetics and epigenetics: Two sides of the same coin? Cancer Cell, 22(1), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2012.06.008.

Photo
Chinchole Pratik
Corresponding author

Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Dayanand Institute of Pharmacy Latur, Maharashtra, India.

Photo
Rihan Ahmad
Co-author

M Pharm Scholar, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Aryakul College of Pharmacy and Research, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Photo
Pradeep Kumar Lakshminaryana Murthy
Co-author

Associate Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Chikkaballapur, Karnataka, India.

Photo
Manisha
Co-author

Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacy, BM College of Pharmacy, Farukhnagar, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.

Photo
Anil Kumar
Co-author

Head & Assistant Professor, Department of Chemistry (PG), Sahibganj College Sahibganj, Jharkhand, India.

Photo
Nadipudi Sundar Praveen
Co-author

B Pharm Scholar, Department of Pharmacognosy, Vikas Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Photo
Sree Rama Chandra Murthy Goud
Co-author

B Pharm Scholar, Department of Pharmacognosy, Vikas Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Photo
Manorama
Co-author

Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Maharana Pratap School of Pharmacy, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Photo
Yash Srivastav
Co-author

Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacy, Shri Venkateshwara University, Gajraula, Uttar Pradesh, India

Yash Srivastav, Rihan Ahmad, Pradeep Kumar Lakshminaryana Murthy, Manisha, Anil Kumar, Nadipudi Sundar Praveen, Sree Rama Chandra Murthy Goud, Manorama, Chinchole Pratik, Epigenetics and Cancer: Understanding How Genetic Regulation Beyond DNA Sequencing Influences Tumor Growth, Metastasis, Drug Resistance, and Therapy Response in Precision Medicine, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 4, 770-785 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15167218

More related articles
Decoding Breast Cancer Complexity: Insights Into P...
Arnab Roy, K. Rajeswar Dutt, Ankita Singh, Mahesh Kumar Yadav, An...
Car-T Cell Therapy: A Review ...
Patil Bhavesh, Sayyed A. Kirmani , Kawade R. M. , ...
Hepatoprotective Abilities of Flavonoids and the D...
Abdul Hameed, Dr. Divya Sing, Hina Afaq, Yash Srivastav, ...
Decoding Breast Cancer Complexity: Insights Into Pathogenesis And Emerging Treat...
Arnab Roy, K. Rajeswar Dutt, Ankita Singh, Mahesh Kumar Yadav, Anupama Kumari, Anjali Raj, Umaira Sa...
Anti-Cholinesterase Drugs and Its Effects in Alzheimer Disease, And Its Impacts ...
A. R. Shreya, Dr. A.V. Kishore Babu, Dr. A. Srinivasa Roa, Dr. J. V. Manisha Vajra, ...
Formulation And Evaluation Of Herbal Anti-Bacterial Crack Heel Ointment Using Th...
Ms.Priyanka Raut, Mrs.Manisha Mishra, Gayatri Bawane, Ayushi Ambade, Alshapha Anjum Khan, Abhilasha ...
Related Articles
Comparative Anthelmintic Potential Study of Aqueous and Ethanolic Extracts of Le...
Khomendra Sarwa, Manisha Chandrakar, Gaurav Kashyap, Rahul Singh, Vijendra Kumar Suryawanshi, Varsha...
The pharmacognostic study, phytochemical screening, and TLC of Allamanda Cathart...
Namrata M. Waghmare , Manisha G. Pate, Jayshree S. Dalal, Prasad P. Jumde , ...
A Review On Colon Targeted Drug Delivery System...
Ruchiket Jagtap, Manisha Savle, Gajanan Sanap, ...
In Depth Review on Taxonomy, Phytochemistry and Pharmacological Significance of ...
Sachin Kumar, Anil Kumar, Vedavahini Parankusham, Rachakatla Madhulika, Sudhahar Dharmalingam, Mubas...
Decoding Breast Cancer Complexity: Insights Into Pathogenesis And Emerging Treat...
Arnab Roy, K. Rajeswar Dutt, Ankita Singh, Mahesh Kumar Yadav, Anupama Kumari, Anjali Raj, Umaira Sa...
More related articles
Decoding Breast Cancer Complexity: Insights Into Pathogenesis And Emerging Treat...
Arnab Roy, K. Rajeswar Dutt, Ankita Singh, Mahesh Kumar Yadav, Anupama Kumari, Anjali Raj, Umaira Sa...
Car-T Cell Therapy: A Review ...
Patil Bhavesh, Sayyed A. Kirmani , Kawade R. M. , ...
Hepatoprotective Abilities of Flavonoids and the Development and Detection of He...
Abdul Hameed, Dr. Divya Sing, Hina Afaq, Yash Srivastav, ...
Decoding Breast Cancer Complexity: Insights Into Pathogenesis And Emerging Treat...
Arnab Roy, K. Rajeswar Dutt, Ankita Singh, Mahesh Kumar Yadav, Anupama Kumari, Anjali Raj, Umaira Sa...
Car-T Cell Therapy: A Review ...
Patil Bhavesh, Sayyed A. Kirmani , Kawade R. M. , ...
Hepatoprotective Abilities of Flavonoids and the Development and Detection of He...
Abdul Hameed, Dr. Divya Sing, Hina Afaq, Yash Srivastav, ...