Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Abuja, P.M.B117, Abuja, Nigeria.
Studies have revealed obesity to be a common metabolic disorder worldwide. The treatment and management of obesity include conventional anti-obesity medications which are effective but not without various adverse effects. Hence, the need for discovery of ethnomedicinal agents with anti-obesity properties but with little or no adverse effects. This study was aimed at evaluating the effect of aqueous-methanol extract of Zingiber officinale rhizome on obesity using Wistar rats. Adult Wistar rats were grouped into five (of 5 rats each). Rats in group A were administered normal saline (10 ml/kg p.o) to serve as negative control. Rats in groups. B, C and D were treated with graded doses of the extract (100, 200, and 400 mg/kg p.o). Rats in group E were treated with Xenical (Orlistat; 12 mg/kg p.o) to serve as the positive control. Obesity was induced by administering Cyproheptadine (24 mg/kg i.p) and then feeding the rats ad libitum. The experiment lasted for 28 days and the parameters that were measured during the experiment were water intake, feed intake and body weight. Water was measured using calibrated drinkers on a daily interval, feed consumed daily was also measured daily and the weight was measured every week using weighing balance. Results obtained from the study revealed a dose-dependent reduction in weight of rats treated with the extract and the reduction was comparable to the reduction in the positive control group. Thus, Zingiber officinale has potential in the treatment and management of obesity.
Obesity is a chronic complex disease defined as an abnormal or excessive fat accumulation that presents a risk to health. The main cause of weight gain and obesity is the imbalance between the number of calories an individual takes in and the calories the individual burns 1, 2. Over the last century, obesity has emerged as a leading global health concern through recent environmental and societal changes favouring a positive energy balance and weight gain. The main factors are the consumption of high-calorie or high-fat foods, insufficient physical activity, and a shift towards a well-developed sedentary lifestyle. Consequently, the prevalence of obesity nearly doubled worldwide since 1980. In 2014, more than 39% of the adults, who were 18 years or older, were overweight with 13?ing obese. In addition, at least 41 million children under the age of 5 were overweight or obese 2. In 2022, 1 in 8 people in the world were living with obesity. Worldwide, adult obesity has more than doubled since 1990, and adolescent obesity has quadrupled. In 2022, 43% of adults (18 years and older) were overweight. Of these, 16% were living with obesity. In 2022, 37 million children under the age of 5 were overweight. Over 390 million children and adolescents aged 5 – 19 years were overweight, including 160 million who were living with obesity 2. Severe obesity i.e., Body Mass Index (BMI) > 35 kg/m2 is nowadays a rapidly growing segment of the global epidemic, which is especially marked by its negative effect on health as an increase in BMI implies an elevated mortality risk, like low BMI does. Nonetheless, overweight and obesity are killing more people today than underweight 3. Obesity is known to be the main risk factor for several non-communicable diseases like cardiovascular disease, hypertension, coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, polycystic ovary disease, obstructive sleep apnoea, gallbladder disease, osteoarthritis, pain, gastroesophageal reflux disease, incontinence, lymphoedema, plantar fasciitis or certain types of cancers (colon, kidney, oesophageal, postmenopausal breast and endometrial). Obesity also causes diverse psychological problems or various physical disabilities. It also influences the quality of living, such as sleeping or moving. Other potential complications include mood, anxiety and eating disorders. Obesity can reduce healthy life years and can reduce life expectancy by 6 – 14 years 2, 4,5. Treatment for obesity aims at helping obese individuals reach and stay at a healthy weight, limit their risks of developing other serious health issues, and improve their overall quality of life. Management of obesity includes non-surgical methods such as dieting, exercise or physical therapy and pharmacological therapy. The safety and long-term success of several anti-obesity surgeries have been demonstrated 6. Several researchers have demonstrated the potential of natural products and their bioactive compounds for treating obesity. This may be a good alternative for developing future and safe anti-obesity drugs. A vast number of natural products, including crude extracts and isolated bioactive compounds from plants can induce body weight reduction and prevent diet-induced obesity. They have, therefore, been widely used in the treatment of obesity 7. Zingiber officinale (commonly called Ginger) belongs to the family Zingiberaceae 8. It is a tropical plant which grows well in hot and humid climates. The plant is cultivated in China, Nepal, the US, India, Bangladesh, Taiwan, Jamaica, Nigeria and Indonesia 9. Zingiber officinale is an erect perennial plant growing from one to three feet in height. The stem sticks up about 12 inches above the ground and is surrounded by the sheathing bases of the two-ranked leaves. It produces clusters of white and pink flower buds that bloom into yellow flowers. Zingiber officinale grows horizontally, laterally flattened with branching pieces, a configuration known as rhizome. The whole rhizome has a firm, striated texture. It is 5 to 15cm long, 1.5 to 6 cm wide, 2 cm thick and depending on the variety can be yellow, white, or red. Zingiber officinale are used as part of Traditional Medicine Systems and there is a large body of anecdotal evidence supporting their use and efficacy. It is used to treat headaches, nausea, colds, arthritis, rheumatism, muscular discomfort, and inflammation. It is used for reducing pain, rheumatoid arthritis, and it has antioxidant effects 10, 11,12. It is used as therapy against several cardiovascular diseases (such as hypertension, atherosclerosis, cholesterol), gastrointestinal disorders, respiratory disorders, migraine, depression, gastric ulcers and is anti-emetic 13, 14, 15, 16, 17. In Nigeria, Z. officinale is believed to have an anti-obesity effect. This study was aimed at evaluating the aqueous-methanol extract of Zingiber officinale rhizome for anti-obesity effect in Wistar rats with the view of authenticating the claim and possibly developing it as an anti-obesity drug that is standardized and readily made available for obese individuals.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plant Collection and Identification
Zingiber officinale (Ginger) rhizomes were collected from Central Market, kubwa, Bwari Area Council of Abuja, Nigeria. Kubwa has a latitude of 9.159634, longitude of 7.338608, Longitude DMS of 20’18.99” E Latitude DMS: 9’34.68” N. The samples were collected in the month of March. Identification and authentication were done by Mr Lateef Adamu, a Plant Taxonomist with the Department of Medicinal Plants Research and Traditional Medicine (MPR & TM), National Institute for Pharmaceutical Research and Development (NIPRD), Idu, Abuja, Nigeria. The specimen was identified to be of the family Zingiberaceae with the Scientific name: Zingiber officinale. Voucher specimen no: NIPRD/H/7300 was assigned to the specimen.
Preparation of Crude Extract
Zingiber officinale rhizome was dried under a shade in a well-ventilated environment for 21 days. It was then pulverized using mortar and pestle, it was further ground into powder using a milling machine. 200 g of the pulverized rhizome was macerated in 80% methanol for 72 h. The mixture was filtered using filter paper and the filtrate was concentrated using a water bath at 40 ?. The extract was then kept in a refrigerator at 4?C until when needed for the study.
Determination of the Yield of the Extract
The resultant yield was determined after the extracted concentrate was weighed. The percentage yield was calculated using the given formula;
Percentage yield of extract (%) = weight of extract / weight of pulverized Z.O X 100
Where Z.O Zingiber officinale.
Chemicals and Drugs
The drugs and chemicals used include Xenicals (120 g, each capsule contains 2s, 3s-3-hexyl-oxo-2=oxetomyl (methyl dodecyl esters) manufactured by R.S No. 63/3, and 4. Thirvander Koil, Pondicherry-605, 102102 India), Normal Saline, Methanol (Sigma- Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) and Cyproheptadine (Asset Pharmacy, Lagos, Nigeria).
Experimental Animals
Wistar rats of both sexes were obtained from the Animal Facility Centre of the National Institute for Pharmaceutical Research and Development (NIPRD), Idu, Abuja, Nigeria. The rats were acclimatized for one week at the Animal Holding Section of the University of Abuja Veterinary Teaching Hospital. They were fed ad libitum daily with growers’ mash and allowed access to clean drinking water. They were maintained under 12 h day and night illumination cycle.
Acute Toxicity Study (LD50)
The Acute toxicity study was done according to the modified method of Lorke 18. The method estimates the dose of the extract that will result in the death of 50 % of the treated animal population. The study was done in a biphasic manner. In the first phase, the following graded dosages of the plant extract were administered to three groups of rats (n = 3): 10, 100, and 1000 mg/kg orally respectively. In the second phase: graded doses of 2000, 3000 and 5000 mg/kg of the extract were administered orally to another three groups of rats (n=3) following observations of rats in the first phase. After administration, the rats were observed for 72 h for signs of toxicity such as nervousness, ataxia, excitement, writhing or death.
Anti-Obesity Study
Wistar rats of both sexes with mean weights between 173.2 g – 287.2 g were used for the study. Cyproheptadine (16 mg/kg) was administered intraperitoneally to all the rats to stimulate their appetite. The rats were then marked and separated into 5 groups (with 5 rats in each group) as follows:
Group A- Rats in this group were administered normal saline (10 mg/kg P.O) to serve as the
negative control.
Group B- Rats were administered aqueous-methanol extract of Zingiber officinale rhizome
(100 mg/kg P.O).
Group C- Rats were administered an aqueous-methanol extract of Zingiber officinale rhizome
(200 mg/kg P.O).
Group D- Rats were administered an aqueous-methanol extract of Zingiber officinale rhizome
(400 mg/kg P.O).
Group E- Rats in this group were administered Xenicals (Orlistat®; 12 mg/kg P.O) to serve as
the positive control group. The treatments lasted for 28 days during which the water intake, feed intake and body weight of all the rats were measured.
Measurement of Water Intake
A volume of 400 ml of water was measured with a measuring cylinder and poured into the drinkers for each group daily. The volume of water taken by the rats daily was calculated using the difference between the 400 ml of water given the previous day and the volume of water remaining in the current day of observation.
Measurement of Feed Intake
250 g of pelleted feed was weighed using a weighing balance and placed in the feeding troughs of each group of rats daily. The amount of feed consumed daily was calculated by finding the difference between the 250 g of the feed given the previous day and the feed remnant on the current day of observation.
Measurement of Body Weight
The body weights of the rats were taken on Day1 and then taken every week (weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4) using a weighing balance. The difference between the body weight of rats in each group was compared statistically with those of the negative control. The difference in the body weight of each group at the end of every week and its body weight on Day 1 was calculated and statistically analyzed.
The difference between the body weight of each group at the end of a prevailing (current) week and the previous week was also calculated and analyzed statistically. The total weight gain for each group was determined using the difference in the body weight of each group on Day 28 and Day 1.
Statistical Analysis: All data were analyzed statistically by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the IBM SPSS version 23. Data were expressed as mean ± standard error of mean and P values ? 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results were expressed as tables and a chat.
RESULTS
Extract Yield and Description
The weight of the pulverized Zingiber officinale was 680 g, while the extract yield was 56 g.
The percentage yield was then calculated to be 8.2%. The extract obtained was sticky in texture and dark brown in colour.
Acute Toxicity Study
No mortality was recorded 72 h after the treatment of rats with the aqueous-methanol extract of Zingiber officinale rhizome at (10-5000 mg/kg P.O). However, rats treated with a 5000 mg/kg dose showed writhing reflex, which lasted for about 5 minutes. The oral (LD50) of the extract was therefore estimated to be greater than 5000 mg/kg (Table 1).
Table 1: Determination of oral median lethal dose (LD50) of aqueous-methanol extract of
Zingiber officinale rhizome in rats
|
Treatments |
No of dead rats |
No of rats alive |
|
Phase 1 |
|
|
|
Zingiber officinale |
|
|
|
10 mg/kg P. O |
0/3 |
3/3 |
|
100 mg/kg P. O |
0/3 |
3/3 |
|
1000 mg/kg P. O |
0/3 |
3/3 |
|
Phase 2 |
|
|
|
Zingiber officinale |
|
|
|
2000 mg/kg P. O |
0/3 |
3/3 |
|
3000 mg/kg P. O |
0/3 |
3/3 |
|
5000 mg/kg P. O |
0/3 |
3/3 |
n=3
Anti-Obesity Study
Effect of Aqueous-Methanol Extract of Zingiber officinale Rhizome on Water Intake of Rats Treated for 28 Days
The aqueous-methanol extract of Zingiber officinale rhizome (100, 200, and 400 mg/kg P.O) dose-dependently reduced water intake of rats within each week of the treatment period of 28 days (within week 1, week 2, week 3 and week 4). In week 1, the reduction within was significant (p < 0>®, 12 mg/kg P.O) within each of the weeks (Table 2).
Table 2: Effect of aqueous-methanol extract of Zingiber officinale rhizome (100, 200 and
400 mg/kg P.0) on water intake of rats treated for 28 days
|
|
Mean Water Intake (ml) ± SEM |
|||
|
Treatments |
Week 1 |
Week 2 |
Week 3 |
Week 4 |
|
Normal Saline 10ml/ kg P. O |
241.0 ± 35.9 |
298.6 ± 24.0 |
318.6 ± 12.6 |
272.9 ± 21.8 |
|
Zingiber officinale 100 mg/kg P.0 |
202.9 ± 18.4 |
220.0 ± 15.6 |
194.4 ± 10.2* |
200.0 ± 4.9* |
|
200 mg/kg P.0 |
225.7 ± 22.1 |
193.6 ± 10.4* |
182.0 ± 4.6* |
195.7 ± 10.4* |
|
400 mg/kg P.0 |
129.4 ± 21.6* |
167.1 ± 18.4* |
145.7 ± 10.2* |
167.1 ± 4.2* |
|
Xenical (orlistat®) 12 mg/kg P.0 |
160.0 ± 13.8 |
155.7 ± 18.8* |
164.3 ± 15.7* |
197.1 ± 9.4* |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM; *P ? 0.05 = Significantly different from the control one-way ANOVA; Turkey post hoc.
Effect of Aqueous -Methanol Extract Zingiber officinale Rhizome on Feed Intake of Rats Treated for 28 Days
The aqueous-methanol extract of Zingiber officinale (100, 200, and 400 mg/kg P.O) caused a reduction in feed intake of rats within each of the weeks of the treatment period (i.e. within week 1, week 2, week 3 and week 4). The feed reduction effect was dose-dependent and the reduction was significant (P < 0> at all the tested doses of 100 mg/kg P.O, 200 mg/kg P.O and 400 mg/kg P.O in weeks 2, 3 and 4. The reduction was also comparable to the reduction caused by Xenical (12 mg/kg P.O) which served as the positive control (Table 3).
Table 3: Effect of aqueous-methanol extract of Zingiber officinale rhizome (100, 200, and
400 mg/kg) on Feed Intake of rats Treated for 28 days
|
|
Mean Feed Intake (g) ± SEM |
|||
|
Treatments |
Week 1 |
Week 2 |
Week 3 |
Week 4 |
|
Normal Saline 10 ml/kg P.0 |
121.7 ± 14.5 |
199.3 ± 5.2 |
199.3 ± 4.3 |
202.9 ± 4.7 |
|
Zingiber officinale 100 mg/kg P.0 |
124.0 ± 28.4 |
175.4 ± 3.6* |
160.3 ± 3.2* |
167.3 ± 4.2* |
|
200 mg/kg P.0 |
109.0 ± 7.6 |
124.3 ± 5.3* |
115.0 ± 5.3* |
118.1 ± 3.5* |
|
400 mg/kg P.0 |
80.7 ± 10.5 |
80.1 ± 0.9* |
79.3 ± 0.7* |
78.6 ± 2.1* |
|
Xenical(orlistat®) 12 mg/kg P.0 |
60.6 ± 10.5 |
43.7 ± 1.1* |
42.6 ± 0.6* |
43.1 ± 67.0* |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM; *P ? 0.05 = significantly different from the control one-way ANOVA; Turkey post hoc.
Effect of Aqueous-Methanol Extract of Zingiber officinale Rhizome on the Body Weight of Rats Treated for 28 Days
The aqueous-methanol extract of Zingiber officinale (100, 200 and 400 mg/kg P.O) significantly (P < 0>
Table 4: Effect of aqueous-methanol extract of Zingiber officinale rhizome (100, 200 and
400 mg/kg P.0) on body weight of rats treated for 28 days
|
|
Mean Body Weight (g) ± SEM |
||||
|
Treatments |
Day 1 |
Day 7 |
Day 14 Day 21 |
Day 28 |
|
|
Normal Saline 10 ml/kg P.0 |
287.2 ± 48.5 |
293.3 ± 4.9 |
303.6 ± 44.8 |
313.6 ± 42.0 |
337.0 ± 36.2 |
|
Zingiber officinale 100 mg/kg P.0 |
176.0 ± 14.0 |
171.6 ± 12.5* |
180.0 ± 5.9* |
187.0 ± 6.3* |
194.0 ± 6.4 |
|
200 mg/kg P.0 |
174.4 ± 5.9 |
174.4 ± 4.2* |
184.8 ± 3.8* |
194.8 ± 2.3* |
199.8 ± 4.2* |
|
400 mg/kg P.0 |
188.0 ± 13.5 |
187.4 ± 15.0* |
188.0 ± 14.3* |
195.2 ± 13.6* |
198.2 ± 13.2* |
|
Xenical (orlistat®) 12 mg/kg P.0 |
173.2 ± 3.5 |
174.8 ± 2.0* |
171.2 ± 3.0* |
179.8 ± 1.6* |
188.8± 2.4* |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM; *P ? 0.05 = significantly different from the control one-way ANOVA; Turkey post hoc.
Table 5: Effect of aqueous-methanol extract of Zingiber officinale rhizome (100, 200 and
400 mg/kg P.0) on body weight difference between current week and Day 1 of the same group of rats
|
Body Weight Difference between Current Week and Day 1 (g) ± SEM |
||||
|
Treatments |
D7-D1 |
D14-D1 |
D21-D1 |
D28-D1 |
|
Normal Saline 10 ml/kg P.0 |
5.8 ± 1.2 |
15.8 ± 4.7 |
26.4 ± 7.8 |
48.8 ± 16.5 |
|
Zingiber officinale 100 mg/kg P.0 |
-4.4 ± 4.3 |
4.0 ± 11.3 |
11.0 ± 10.5 |
18.5 ± 10.1 |
|
200 mg/kg P.0 |
0.0 ± 2.2 |
10.4 ± 2.9 |
20.4 ± 3.7 |
25.4 ± 2.9 |
|
400 mg/kg P.0 |
0.8 ± 4.5 |
-0.2 ± 4.0 |
7.0 ± 4.1 |
10.0 ± 4.6* |
|
Xenical (orlistat®) 12 mg/kg P.0 |
1.6 ± 2.0 |
-2.0 ± 3.0 |
6.6 ± 3.8 |
15.6 ± 3.9 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM; *P ? 0.05 = significantly different from the control one-way ANOVA; Turkey post hoc (D = Day).
Table 6: Effect of aqueous-methanol extract of Zingiber officinale rhizome (100, 200 and
400 mg/kg P.0) on body weight difference between prevailing/current week and previous week in the same groups
|
Body Weight Difference between Current Week and Previous Week (g) ± SEM |
||||
|
Treatments |
D 7 - D 1 |
D 14 – D 7 |
D 21 – D 14 |
D28– D 21 |
|
Normal Saline 10 ml/kg P.0 |
5.8 ± 1.2 |
10.4 ± 3.3 |
10.6 ± 4.4 |
23.4 ± 1.1 |
|
Zingiber officinale 100 mg/kg P.0 |
-4.4 ± 4.3 |
8.4 ± 10.5 |
7.0 ± 0.8 |
7.4 ± 0.9 |
|
200 mg/kg P.0 |
0.0 ± 2.2 |
10.4 ± 1.9 |
10.0 ±1.4 |
5.0 ± 1.7 |
|
400 mg/kg P.0 |
0.8 ± 4.5 |
-1.0 ± 0 .6 |
7.2 ± 1.0 |
3.0 ± 0.5 |
|
Xenicals (orlistat®) 12 mg/kg P.0 |
1.6 ± 2.0 |
-3.6 ± 3.0 |
8.6 ± 2.7 |
9.0 ± 1.0 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM; *P ? 0.05 = significantly different from the control one-way ANOVA; Turkey post hoc (D = Day).

Figure 1: Total weight gain of rats treated with aqueous-methanol extract of Zingiber officinale rhizome (100, 200, and 400 mg/kg P.O) for 28 days (N/S= Normal Saline; Z.O=Zingiber officinale).
DISCUSSIONS
In the acute toxicity study, the absence of toxicity signs at doses less than 5000 mg/kg P.O and the absence of mortality at the doses of 10, 100, 1000, 2000, 3000 and 5000 mg/kg P.O shows that the oral median lethal dose is greater than 5000 mg/kg. This suggests that the extract of Zingiber officinale rhizome is relatively safe for consumption. According to Lorke 18, any substance that has an oral median lethal dose greater than 1000 mg/kg is relatively non-toxic and is safe for consumption. However, the writhing reflex observed at the dose of 5000 mg/kg could suggest toxicity at that high dose. The present study evaluated the ability of aqueous-methanol extract of Zingiber officinale to reduce obesity. Cyproheptadine is an antihistamine and antiserotonergic agent used to manage allergic reactions and allergies. It works by blocking the action of histamine and serotonin which cause inflammation allergy. However, Cyproheptadine is also an appetite stimulant that is efficacious in promoting weight gain 19. In this study, Cyproheptadine was administered to all the experimental rats to stimulate their appetite for the rats to eat more and subsequently gain more weight. The results revealed that the aqueous-methanol extract of Zingiber officinale (100, 200 and 400 mg/kg P.O) dose-dependently reduced water intake of rats within each week of the treatment period of 28 days (i.e. within week 1, week 2, week 3 and week 4). Similarly, the aqueous-methanol extract of Zingiber officinale (100, 200, and 400 mg/kg P.O) caused dose-dependent reduction of feed intake of rats within each of the treatment weeks (week 1, week 2, week 3 and week 4). These suggest that the extract of Zingiber officinale has the ability of reducing appetite unlike cyproheptadine. It may also suggest that the ability of Zingiber officinale extract to inhibit appetite may translate to loss of body weight. The reduction of feed and water intake produced by the extract of Zingiber officinale was comparable to the reductions caused by Xenical (12 mg/kg P.O) which is an agent used for weight loss. The results also showed that the aqueous-methanol extract of Zingiber officinale (100, 200 and 400 mg/kg P.O) significantly (P < 0>Zingiber officinale (100, 200 and 400 mg/kg) when compared with the negative control group. Further calculation of the difference between the body weight of each group at the end of a prevailing (current) week and the body weight in the previous week also revealed that there were reductions in body weight of treated groups when compared with the negative control. Finally, calculation of the total weight gain for all the groups showed that the normal-saline treated rats (negative control) had the highest weight gain of 49.8 g. The aqueous-methanol extract of Zingiber officinale (100, 200 and 400 mg/kg P.O) had the total weight gain of 18.0 g, 24.8 g and 9.8 g respectively while Xenicals (12 mg/kg P.O) had a total weight gain of 14.8 g. These findings suggest that extract of Zingiber officinale rhizome exhibited the ability to reduce weight gain. Studies have shown that different agents used for weight loss act through different mechanisms. Xenical which is the agent used as the positive control in this study belongs to the class of drugs called lipase inhibitors. It works by preventing the absorption of dietary fat in the body rather than by suppressing appetite. Dietary fats are large molecules that need to be broken down before they can be absorbed into the body 20. Other weight-reducing agents act through other mechanisms. Sibutramine (Reductil,® Meridiar®) is an anorectic or appetite suppressant. It is a dual monoamine form, they are inhibitors of nor-adrenaline and serotonin (5-Hydroxytryptamine) reuptake in the nerve ending of central nervous system (CNS) and this action has anorexigenic and satiety effects, effective in improving metabolic syndrome parameters such as fasting glucose, triglycerides and High-density lipoprotein. Rimonabant’s (Acomplia®) mode of action in appetite regulation poses involvement of cannabinoid-1-receptors (CB1r) which on stimulation decreases demand for food. Rimonabant reduces food intake by blocking CB1r and enhances thermogenesis. Lorcaserin, a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT2c) receptor agonist has serotonergic properties and acts as an anorectic. 5-HT2c receptors are located in various parts of the brain, including the hypothalamus, activation of which leads to pro-opiomelanocortin production and results in the weight loss through hypophagia 21. The ability of the aqueous- methanol extract of Zingiber officinale to reduce water and feed intake within the experimental period of 28 days suggests that Zingiber officinale probably causes reduction in body weight by suppression of appetite. This implies that it may be an anorectic.
CONCLUSION
Based on the results of this experiment, Zingiber officinale rhizome extract showed a significant (P < 0>Zingiber officinale rhizome has a potential in the treatment and management of obesity. Zingiber officinale reduced body weight probably by causing the reduction in feed and water intake suggesting anorectic mechanism for its anti-obesity effect. Further studies will include assessment for chronic anti-obesity effect and safety evaluation of Zingiber officinale rhizome.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors are thankful to Mr. Adamu Mohammed and Mr. David Akumka, the Academic Technologists with the Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Abuja for their technical assistance towards the success of the work. Gratitude also goes to Mr Lateef Adamu, a Plant Taxonomist with the Department of Medicinal Plants Research and Traditional Medicine (MPR & TM), National Institute for Pharmaceutical Research and Development (NIPRD), Idu, Abuja, Nigeria for authentication of the study plant.
REFERENCES
F.C. Nwinyi*, S.E. Yusuf, Evaluation of Rhizome Extract of Zingiber officinale for Anti-Obesity Property in Wistar Rats, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 2, 914-923. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14862585
10.5281/zenodo.14862585