View Article

Abstract

A quick, exceedingly sensitive reverse phase high performance liquid chromatographic method has been developed and validated for the estimation of Safinamide in bulk drug and tablets. Chromatography was carried out on a (Fortis) C18 column (4.6mm x 100mm, 2.5µm) using a mixture of Acetonitrile: 0.1% OPA in the ratio of 95:05 % v/v as the mobile phase by the side of 1.0 ml/min flow rate, the detection wavelength was tired at 225 nm. The retention time of the Safinamide was 4.444 min correspondingly. The detection concentration was linear over 10-50 ?g/ml for Safinamide. Regression equations of Safinamide were found to be y = 46.16 x + 4.91 with correlation co-efficient (R2) 0.999. The % RSD for Intra and Inter day precision was < 2%. The accuracy of method was validated disbursing recovery studies and found to be substantial in suitable range 98-102%. The LOD (detection limits) and LOQ (quantification limits) being 0.03046 ug/mL and 0.09230 ug/mL respectively. The developed method was positively validated in accordance with ICH guidelines and found to be accurate, precise, linear, and robust and was efficacious applied to a pharmaceutical tablet formulation for qualitative determination of Safinamide in bulk form and marketed pharmaceutical dosage forms. Hence, this proposed technique can be suitably adopted for routine analysis in quality control laboratories.

Keywords

Safinamide, RP-HPLC, Parkinson’s disease, Method Development, Validation

Introduction

Safinamide (SAF) is used for the usage of Parkinson's disease. After Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease (PD) is the one further common chronic progressive neurological condition in the ageing [5]. SAF works by increasing the amount of dopamine, a chemical messenger specifically needed to control movement in the brain. It is an orally available derivative from chemical class of α-amino amides, with multiple mechanisms of action involving inhibition of MAO-B and Dopamine reuptake used in the treatment of epilepsy and Parkinson's disease [2]. Besides MAO-B inhibition, SAF exhibits novel anticonvulsant activities, including sodium channel blockade, calcium channel blockade and glutamate release inhibition [3]. SAF is a unique molecule with several mechanisms of action and an excessive therapeutic index [4] used with additional medication (levodopa/carbidopa) to treat symptoms of Parkinson's disease. It can help improve symptoms such as shakiness, stiffness, and difficulty moving [6]. It was approved in Europe on February 2015, in the United States on March 2017, and in Canada on January 2019[5]. Safinamide has been associated with a low rate of serum enzyme increases all over treatment, but has not been similar to cases of clinically apparent acute liver injury [6].

Literature survey reveals an authorized chiral liquid chromatographic method for the enantiomeric separation of safinamide mesylate[1] Except this, several analytical methods, encompassing HPTLC[7], UPLC-MS/MS[8-10], RP-HPLC[2-6], and spectrophotometric methods[11-13], have been employed for the analysis of different formulations of safinamide as indicated by detail literature survey. The present study designates the development and validation of a simple, specific, sensitive, accurate and precise RP – HPLC ecofriendly technique for the estimation of SAF in tablet dosage form. The anticipated method is elevated and validated according to ICH guidelines [6]. The IUPAC name of Safinamide is ((2S)-2-[[4-[(3-fluorophenyl) methoxy] phenyl] methylamino] propanamide. The Chemical Structure of SAF is exposed in Fig. No. 01.

Fig. No. 01: Chemical Structure of Safinamide

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemicals Used:

In method development and validation of stabilizers succeeding chemicals and reagents were used.

Table No. 1: List of chemicals

Ingredients

Grade

Suppliers

Safinamide

API

R.S.I.T.C Jalgaon.

Citric acid

HPLC

Avantor Performance material India Ltd. Thane, Maharashtra.

Orthophosphoric acid (OPA)

HPLC

Avantor Performance material India Ltd. Thane, Maharashtra

CAN

HPLC

Merck Specialties Pvt. Ltd. Shiv Sager Estate ‘A’ Worli, Mumbai

Water

HPLC

Merck Specialties Pvt. Ltd. Shiv Sager Estate ‘A’ Worli, Mumbai

Table No. 2: List of instruments

Sr. No.

Name of Instrument

Company Name

1

HPLC Instrument

Agilent 1100with auto sampler (Chemstation software)

2

UV-Spectrophotometer

Analytical Technologies Limited

3

Column(C18)

Fortis C18 (100mmX 4.6mm,2.5µm)

4

pH meter

VSI pH meter(VSI 1-B)

5

Balance

WENSAR™ High Resolution Balance.

6

Sonication

Ultrasonic electronic instrument

HPLC Method Development

Selection of mobile phase:

Each mobile phase was vacuum degassed and filtered over 0.45µ membrane filter. The mobile phase was allowed to equilibrate while waiting for mobile phase over baseline was found. The standard solution having solution of SAF was run using different individual solvents were tried to become a good and stable peak. From the various mobile phases tried, mobile phase containing ACN and Water (0.1% OPA) was selected since it gave sharp, well resolved peaks with symmetry within the limits and significant reproducible retention time for Safinamide.

Selection of Column:

Selection of column is the essential part in the method development. By applying column chemistry, the most suitable column C18 (100mmX 4.6mm, 2.5µm particle size) was selected.

Selection of detection Wavelength:

Standard solutions were scanned in the range of 200-400nm, against 10 ml ACN and volume make with water solvent system as reference Safinamide were showed absorbance maxima (lambda max) at 225 nm respectively.

Diluent Preparation:

The Mobile phase was utilized as the diluent.  

Preparation of standard stock solution:

Accurately weight and transfer 10 mg of Safinamide  working standard into 10 ml volumetric flask as about diluent  Acetonitrile completely and make volume up to the mark with the same solvent to get 1000 µg/ml standard  (stock solution) and 15 min sonicate to dissolve it and remove the unwanted gas, further an aliquots portion of SAF stock solution were assorted in volumetric flask in 10 ml and volume was make up to the mark with mobile phase from the subsequent solution 0.1-0.5 ml was transferred to 10 ml volumetric flask and the volume was make up to the mark with 95% ACN :05 % 0.1% OPA), prepared in (95% ACN : 05%  buffer pH 3.0 with OPA) solvent. 

Method Validation

The developed method was validated as stated by ICH guidelines.

Specificity:

For specificity study solutions of Safinamide were prepared and injected into HPLC system and chromatogram recorded.

Linearity:

Preparation of standard stock solution for Linearity:

10 mg of Safinamide were weighed and transferred to 10 mL volumetric flask and make up the volume up to the mark with diluent. Sonicate for 10 min with occasional swirling. 0.1 ml of this solution diluted up to 10 ml volumetric flask with diluents was added to make up the volume.

Preparation of linearity solution:

Sample-I (10 µg/ml of Safinamide): Take 0.1 ml from stock solution and make up the volume with diluent upto 10 ml.

Sample-II (20 µg/ml of Safinamide): Take 0.2 ml from stock solution and make up the volume with diluent upto 10 ml.

Sample-III (30 µg/ml of Safinamide): Take 0.3 ml from stock solution and make up the volume with diluent upto 10 ml.

Sample-IV (40 µg/ml of Safinamide): Take 0.4 ml from stock solution and make up the volume with diluent upto 10 ml.

Sample-V (50 µg/ml of Safinamide): Take 0.5 ml from stock solution and make up the volume with diluent upto 10 ml.

Procedure

Inject each sample into the chromatographic system [21] and measure the peak area.

Plot a graph of peak area V/S concentration (Concentration on X-axis and Peak area on Y-axis) and calculate the correlation coefficient.

Accuracy (Recovery):

Preparation of standard stock solution:

10 mg of Safinamide working standards were weighed and transferred to 10 mL volumetric flask & diluents was added to make up the volume 0.1 ml of this solution diluted up to 10 ml with diluents.

Procedure:

The accuracy was determined by Safinamide (equivalent to 10 mg of SAF (80 %, 100 % and 120 % of the label claimed, correspondingly) to quantity equivalent to average weight of marketed preparation. This sample mixture containing 10 mg of SAF were diluted or triturated and then subjected to chromatographic analysis using the described method. The resultant mixtures were analyzed in triplicates done three days. The % recovery of added drug was taken as a measure of accuracy [15].

Table No. 3: Table of Accuracy for RP-HPLC Method

Sample

Tablet Stock solution

API Stock solution

Tablet concentration (µg/ml)

Amount added (ml)

API concentration (µg/ml)

Amount added (ml)

Accuracy 80%

10 µg/ml

0.1 ml

8 µg/ml

0.08 ml

Accuracy 100%

10 µg/ml

0.1 ml

10 µg/ml

0.1 ml

Accuracy 120%

10 µg/ml

0.1 ml

12 µg/ml

0.12 ml

Repeatability: 

Repeatability of system was determined with the sample solution containing 30 μg/ml of Safinamide. Sample was injected, peak areas measured and %RSD was calculated. It was repeated for two times [14].

Procedure:

10 mg weight of sample (1000 μg/ml of Safinamide) were weighed and transferred to 10 mL volumetric flask & diluent was added to make up the volume. Sonicated for 10 min with occasional swirling. Above solution was filtered over and done with 0.45 μ membrane filter. Transfer 0.3 ml from this solution in volumetric flask and diluted up to 10 ml with diluent.  

Precision:

Precision of an analytical technique is the degree of agreement between distinct test results when the procedure is useful repetitively to several test group of a homogenous sample. To calculate the midway precision of the method, Precision was accomplished on altered days by upholding same conditions.

Intra-day precision (Day I):

Sample solutions containing Safinamide in three different concentration (10 µg/ml, 30 µg/ml, 50 µg/ml) concentration and were analyzed three times on the same day and %R.S.D was calculated.

Inter-day precision (Day II):

Sample solutions containing Safinamide in three different concentration (10 µg/ml, 30 µg/ml, 50 µg/ml) concentration and were analyzed three times on the different day and %R.S.D was calculated [24].

Analysis of marketed formulation:

For the determine of content of Safinamide  in marketed tablet pharmaceutical formulation (label claim 10 mg of Safinamide), 10 mg weighed and average weight of tablet was calculated 74.32 mg and sample equivalent to 14.86 gm of the drug was extracted from the tablet powder with 10 ml ACN. To ensure complete extraction it was sonicate for 15 min. 0.2 ml of supernatant was then diluted up to 10 ml with mobile phase. The resultant solution was injected in HPLC and peak area of drug was noted.

(Take 14.864 mg crushed powder of tablet in 10 ml volumetric flaks and make up to 10 ml with Acetonitrile  Means 14.864 mg in 10 ml Acetonitrile= 1000 µg/ml Safinamide  stock2)

Regression equation was generated by peak areas of standard solutions. Using the regression equation and peak area of the sample the amount of Safinamide in the sample was calculated.

Robustness:

The analysis was executed in different conditions to find the inconsistency of test results. The subsequent conditions are tested for discrepancy of results.

Preparation of standard stock solution:

1000 µg/ml of Safinamide working standards were transferred to 0.3 mL in volumetric flask & this solution diluted up to 10 ml with diluent. The mobile phase composition was changed in (±1 %) proportion of ACN:0.1% OPA  in the mobile phase composition 94:06, 96:04 instead of 95:05 and the flow rate was changed in (±0.1 ml/min) 0.9 ml/min, 1.1 ml/min instead of 1.0 ml/min also the change in detection wavelength (±1 nm) 224 nm, 226 nm instead of 225 nm and the effect of the results were examined it was performed using 30 µg/ml solution of Safinamide  in duplicate.

Ruggedness:

The degree of reproducibility of test outcome acquires by the analysis of equivalent sample under variability of Condition. For example, different analyst, laboratory as well as different instrument.

Detection Limit and Quantitation Limit:  

Based on the S.D. of the response and the slope of calibration curve, the detection limit (DL) and quantitation limit (QL) was calculated as,   

Detection Limit   = 

Quantitation Limit =

Where, σ = the S.D. of regression lines, S = slope. 

The slope (S) may be predictable from the calibration curve and S.D. was used should be intended from the y-intercepts of regression line in calibration curve.  

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

Spectroscopy

UV absorption of 20 mcg solution of Safinamide in Acetonitrile was generated and absorbance was taken in the range of 200-400 nm. λ max of SAF was found to be 225 nm respectively.

Fig. No. 02: UV Spectrum of Safinamide

Analytical Method Development

Optimization of the HPLC method

To estimate SAF six trials were performed from that 6th trial which provides the optimized result. Therefore, all parameters are anticipated for the development of the RP-HPLC technique. Table No. 4

Principle: Reverse phase liquid chromatography with DAD Detector Fortis (S.K) Gradient System.

Table No. 4: Optimized chromatographic conditions

Parameter

Description

Mode

Gradient System

Analytical column

(Fortis) C18 column (4.6mm x 100mm, 2.5µm)

Injection volume

20µl

Flow rate

1.0 ml/min

Mobile phase

Acetonitrile :0.1% OPA (95:05 % v/v)

Detection Wavelength

225 nm

Column Oven Temperature

25° C (Ambient)

Run Time

15 min

Optimized chromatogram of Safinamide:

Fig. No. 03: Optimized chromatogram of Safinamide

Table No. 5: Details of chromatogram of Safinamide

Sr. No.

RT[min]

Area[mAU*s]

TP

TF

Resolution

1

4.444

2116.50024

6918

1.01

-

The basic objective of the chromatographic technique [20] was to develop a precise, specific RP-HPLC technique for the determination of SAF. In order to develop a suitable gradient RP-HPLC method, different buffer pH, organic solvent concentration and column chemistry were applied to achieve the gradient system of Safinamide. The mobile phase Acetonitrile: 0.1% OPA (95:05 % v/v) with the flow rate at 1.0 mL/min and wavelength at 225 nm was found to be satisfactory. The retention time of SAF was found to be 4.444 min. From the observation of experiments this proposed method has good symmetrical peak shape, theoretical plates and tailing factor, therefore the chromatographic conditions were subjected to method validation.

Method Validation

All the method validation parameters such as accuracy, linearity, precision, detection limit, quantification limit and robustness were validated as per the ICH guidelines [22-23].

Specificity and Selectivity:

The studies should have no interfering from the inessential components and be well determined from them. Specificity is the procedure to identify quantitatively to evaluate in presence of component that may be assessed to be present in the sample medium, while selectivity is the procedure to distinguish qualitatively the analyst in existence of components that may be assessed to be existing in the sample medium.

Fig. No. 04: Chromatogram of Specificity & Selectivity (20 mcg)

Table No. 6: Details for Chromatogram of Specificity & Selectivity

DRUG NAME

R.T

AREA

T.P

SYMM.

Safinamide

4.117

925.9976

5571

1.20

Linearity:

From Safinamide  standard stock solution, different working standard solution (10-50 μg/ml) were prepared in mobile phase 20 μl of sample solution [16] was injected into the chromatographic system using fixed volume loop injector. Chromatograms were recorded. The area of each concentration was recorded shown in Table No. 7

Fig. No. 05: Overlay of Linearity

Table No. 7: Linearity data for Safinamide

Method

Conc. (µg/ml)

Peak area(µV.sec)

Average peak area

(µV.sec)

S.D

% RSD

1

2

HPLC

Method

10

475.35

474.79

475.07

0.39

0.08

20

918.32

917.70

918.01

0.44

0.05

30

1412.16

1412.21

1412.19

0.03

0.00

40

1873.17

1874.07

1873.62

0.64

0.03

50

2307.54

2308.46

2308.00

0.65

0.03

Equation

 

y = 46.16 x + 4.91

 

R2

 

0.999

 

The data obtained in the calibration experiments when subjected to linear regression analysis showed a linear relationship between peak areas and concentrations in the range 10-50 µg/mL for Safinamide Table No. 7 depict the calibration data of SAF. The respective linear equation for SAF was y = 46.16 x + 4.91, where x is the concentration and y is area of peak. The correlation coefficient [17] was 0.999. The calibration curve of SAF is shown in Fig. No. 06.  

Regression equation data for Safinamide 

The plot of Concentration (on X axis) V/S Average Peak Area (on Y axis) data of Safinamide is a straight line.

Y = mx + c

Slope (m) = 46.16

Intercept (c) = 4.91

Correlation Coefficient (r) = 0.999

Fig. No. 06: Calibration curve of Safinamide

The plot was linear passing through the origin; Correlation Coefficient was obtained less than 1 that concluded.

Accuracy:-

To validate the accuracy of developed method Recovery studies were accomplished. To pre evaluated tablet solution, a definite concentration of standard drug (80%, 100%, and 120%) was added and then its recovery was estimated Table No 8.  

Table No 8: Recovery Studies of Safinamide for RP-HPLC method

Level

(%)

Amt. taken (ug/ml

Amt.

Added

(ug/ml)

Amount found

Mean*±S.D.

Amt.

recovered

Mean*±S.D.

%Recovery

Mean*± S.D.

% RSD

Mean           %

Recovery

80%

10

8

17.9 ± 0.046

7.99 ± 0.046

99.84 ± 0.58

0.58

100.13%

100%

10

8

20.0 ± 0.028

10.03 ± 0.028

100.25 ± 0.28

0.28

120%

10

8

22.04 ± 0.065

12.04 ± 0.065

100.29 ± 0.54

0.54

*Mean of each 3 reading

RP-HPLC method is established by recovery studies executed at different stages of concentrations (80%, 100% and 120%). The % recovery was found to be contained by 98-102%.

System suitability parameters: (Repeatability)

To determine the resolution and reproducibility of the proposed chromatographic method for determination of Safinamide system suitability parameters were studied. The result shown in below. Table No. 9.

Table No. 9: Repeatability studies on RP-HPLC for Safinamide

Method

Conc. of Safinamide (mg/ml)

Peak area

Mean

Amount found (mg)

% Amount found

SD

%RSD

HPLC Method

50

2298.420

2300.75

49.26

98.51

3.30

0.14

50

2303.084

Repeatability studies on RP-HPLC method for SAF found to be 98.51 %, the % RSD was less than 2%, which appearances high percentage amount found 49.26 and percent amount 98.51 % designates the analytical technique that determined.

Precision:-

The method was established by analyzing various replicates standards of Safinamide. All the solution was analyzed thrice in order to record any intra-day & inter-day disparity in the consequence that determined. The result acquired for intraday and inter day precision is revealed in Table No. 10 respectively.

Table No. 10: Result for Intra-day and Inter day Precision

Conc. (µg/ml)

Intra-day Precision

Inter day Precision

Mean ± SD

% Amount Found

% RSD

Mean ± SD

% Amount Found

% RSD

10

473.47 ± 0.23

100.53

0.05

477.82 ± 2.00

101.46

0.42

30

1399.88 ± 4.84

99.76

0.35

1405.66 ± 2.60

100.18

0.18

50

2300.53 ± 2.85

98.50

0.12

2300.77 ± 3.01

98.51

0.13

Intraday and Inter day Precision studies on RP-HPLC method for Safinamide which shows the high precision % amount in between 98.00 % to 102.50 % indicates to analytical method and % RSD was found to be less than 2 % that concluded.

Analysis of tablet formulation: (Brand name: Safion 50 mg)

Total weight of 20 tablet Powder wt. = 14.86 gm

Avg. Powder Weight 74.32 mg

Eq.wt for 10 mg =   10 x 74.32 / 50 = 14.864 mg

Tablet stock solution: Take 14.864 mg in 10 ml mobile phase i.e. = 1000 µg/ml tab solution.

Weigh 10 mg Safinamide Tablet and calculated the average weight, accurately weigh and transfer the sample equivalent to 14.864 mg SAF into 10 ml volumetric flask. Make volume up to the mark with diluent and sonicate to dissolve it completely. Mix well and filter over 0.45 µm filter. Further pipette out 0.2 ml from the above stock solution transfer to 10 ml volumetric flask and dilute up to the mark with diluents. (20 µg/ml). The simple chromatogram of test SAF Shown in Fig. No. 07 the amounts of SAF per Tablet were calculated by extrapolating the value of area from the calibration curve. Practice of the analysis was recurrent two times with Tablet formulation. Tablet Assay for %Label claim for %RSD Intended, Result was exposed in Table No. 12.

Fig. No. 07: Chromatogram of marketed formulation (20 mcg/ml)

Table No. 11: Details of chromatogram of marketed formulation

DRUG NAME

R.T

AREA

T.P

SYMM.

Safinamide

4.117

925.9976

5571

1.20

Table No. 12: Analysis of marketed formulation

Concentration

Area

Amount found

% Label Claim

20 μg/mL

925.998

19.76

98.81

20 μg/mL

929.504

19.84

99.18

Mean

927.75

19.80

99.00

S.D

0.266

% RSD

0.269

Analysis of marketed formulation were accomplished and % Label Claim was found to be 99.00 % Acceptable are concluded.

Robustness:

The Robustness of a method is its proficiency to continue usual by insignificant measured differences in parameters. To calculate the robustness of the proposed method, insignificant but measured variations in the optimized method parameters were done. The consequence of changes in mobile phase configuration and flow rate, wavelength on retention time and tailing factor of drug peak was deliberate. The results of robustness studies are shown in Table No. 13.

Table No. 13: Result of Robustness Study of Safinamide

Parameters

Conc. (µg/ml)

Amount of detected (mean ±SD)

%RSD

For Safinamide

flow change 0.9 ml/min

30

1721.30 ± 4.34

0.25

flow change 1.1 ml/min

30

1293.13 ± 8.62

0.67

wavelength change 224 nm

30

1390.20 ± 0.13

0.01

wavelength change 226 nm

30

1224.41 ± 0.16

0.01

mobile phase change 94:06 % v/v

30

1470.50 ± 2.39

0.16

mobile phase change 96:04 % v/v

30

1472.61± 1.48

0.10

The changes were did flow rate (±0.1 ml/min), mobile phase composition (±1 % v/v), and Wavelength (±1 nm). %RSD for peak area was intended which should be less than 2%.the result revealed in analytical method that concluded.

Ruggedness:

From stock solution, sample solution of SAF 30 µg/mL was prepared and analyzed by two different analysts using similar operative and conservational circumstances. Peak area was measured for same concentration solutions, two times. The results are indicated in Table No. 14.

Table No. 14: Analysis of Analyst-1 & 2

Analyst

Concentration

Area

Amount found

% Label Claim

I

30 μg/mL

1405.23

30.04

100.14

II

30 μg/mL

1408.69

30.12

100.39

Mean

1406.96

30.08

100.27

S.D

0.175

% RSD

0.175

Ruggedness studies on RP-HPLC technique for SAF was found to be 100.14 % and 100.39 %, the %RSD was less than 2%. 

Limit of Detection and Limit of Quantitation:

The limit of detection is the lowest limit that be able to detect and limit of quantitation is the lowest concentration that be able to quantitatively measure. Based on the S.D. deviation of the response and the slope the limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) may be expressed as:

Limit of Detection = 3.3 (SD)/S and

Limit of Quantitation = 10 (SD)/ S

Where, SD = Standard deviation, Y intercept (0.43), S = Slope (46.61)

Limit of detection (LOD) = 3.3 (SD)/S = 3.3 X 0.43/46.61 = 0.03046 (ug/mL)

Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) = 10 (SD)/S = 10 X 0.43/46.61= 0.09230 (μg/mL)

The LOD and LOQ of Safinamide was found to be 0.03046 (ug/mL) and 0.09230 (ug/mL), analytical method that concluded.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION:

Attempts were completed to develop RP-HPLC method for synchronized determination of Safinamide from   Tablet.  On behalf of  the  RP - Agilent Tech. Gradient System with Auto injector, UV (DAD) &   Gradient Detector Reverse Phase (Fortis) C18 column (4.6mm x 100mm;2.5µm), a 20µl injection loop and UV730D Absorbance detector and running chemstation 10.1 software.

Acetonitrile: 0.1% OPA, (95:05%) v/v, was utilize as the mobile phase directed at the method. The detection wavelength was 225 nm and flow rate was 1.0 ml/min. In the developed method, the retention time of Safinamide was found to be being 4.444 min. The developed technique was validated in line with ICH guidelines. The linearity, precision, range, robustness was found within the limits as detailed by the ICH guidelines. Henceforth the technique was found to be simple, accurate, precise, economic and reproducible. So the proposed methods can be used for the routine quality control analysis of Safinamide in bulk drug as well as in formulations.

REFERENCES

  1. Kai Zhang, Na Xue, Xiaowei Shi, Weina Liu, Jing Meng, Yumin Du (2011). A validated chiral liquid chromatographic method for the enantiomeric separation of safinamide mesilate, a new anti-Parkinson drug, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 55 220–224.
  2. Vivekkumar K.Redasani, Bhushan J.Mali, Amod S.Patil, Atul A.Shirkhedkar (2013). Development and validation of RP-HPLC method for determination of safinamide mesylate in bulk and in tablet dosage form ACAIJ, 13(4) ISSN: 0974-7419.
  3. Vaibhav S. Adhao, Raju R. Thenge, J. Sharma, M. Thakare (2020). Development and Validation of Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Method for Determination of Safinamide Mesylate. Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Volume 13, No. 2.
  4. V.SHIRISHA, GURRAM SRIKANTH, SANTHOSH ILLENDULA, Dr.K. RAJESWAR DUTT (2021). RP-HPLC METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION FOR THE ESTIMATION OF SAFINAMIDE IN API FORM AND MARKETED FORMULATION. International Journal of Research Volume X, Issue II, ISSN NO:2236-6124.
  5. Gayatri R. Amrutkar, Smita S Aher and R S Bachhav (2022). Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Method Development and Validation for Estimation of Safinamide in Bulk Drug and Dosage Form. International Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences. Online ISSN: 2230-7605, Print ISSN: 2321-3272.
  6. Dusakanti Akhila, Pasupuleti Sunitha, Vijaya Kuchana (2024). Stability indicating RP-HPLC analytical method development and validation for the estimation of safinamide in bulk and marketed pharmaceutical dosage form. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation ISSN (online):2582-7138 Volume:05.
  7. Redasani, VK, Mali, BJ, & Surana, SJ (2012). Development and validation of HPTLC method for determination of safinamide mesylate in bulk and in tablet dosage form. International Scholarly Research Notices.
  8. Madhu Medabalimi, K. Saravanakumar and S.V. Satyanarayana (2022). “Development and Validation of Stability Indicating RP-UPLC Method for Quantitative Estimation of Safinamide Mesylate in Bulk and its Tablet Dosage Form”. urrent Trends in Biotechnology and Pharmacy 50Vol. 16 (Supplementry Issue 2) 50- 59, ISSN 0973-8916.
  9. Ying Wang, Guan-An Zhao, Xia Li, En Zhang, Wei Tan and Jia-qi Chen (2023). “Establishment of a sensitive UPLC-MS/MS technique to enumerate safinamide in rat plasma”. Frontiers in Pharmacology 10.3389/fphar. 2023.1211383.
  10. Mohan Rao Tammisetty, Balasekhara Reddy Challa and Srinivasa Babu Puttagunta (2020). “Application Of Liquid Chromatography With Tandem Mass Spectrometric Method For Quantification Of Safinamide In Invitro Samples”. International Journal of Lifescience and Pharma Research, ijlpr 2020; doi 10.22376/ijpbs/lpr.2020.10.2.P55-61.
  11. EngyA. Ibrahim, Hoda M. Marzouk, MahaA. Hegazy, Samah S. Saad & Laila E.Abdel Fattah (2024). “Ecofriendly micellar mediated spectrofluorimetric method for ultrasensitive quantifcation of the antiparkinsonian drug safnamide in pharmaceutical formulations and spiked human plasma”. Scientific Reports, Article number: 16460. 
  12. Heba M. El-Sayed, Omar M. El-Abassy, Hassan A. M. Hendawy, Hisham Ezzat Abdellatef, and Hany Ibrahim (2023). “Green Spectrophotometric Platforms for Determining Overlapped Spectral Signals of Recently Approved Antiparkinsonian Drug (Safinamide) in the Presence of Its Synthetic Precursor (4-Hydroxybenzaldehyde): Applying Ecological Appraisal and Comparative Statistical Studies”. Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 106(1), 26–33.
  13. Galal Magdy, Aya Saad Radwan, Heba Elmansi, Fathalla Belal, Mai Abd El-Aziz, Omar M El-Abassy (2024). “Ultrasensitive spectrofluorimetric method for quantitation of the novel antiparkinsonian drug safinamide in different mediums at nanogram levels: Assessment of greenness and whiteness profiles”. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, Volume 38, 101448.
  14. Lavanya G, Sunil MM, Eswarudu MM, Eswaraiah MC, Harisudha K, Spandana BN (2013). Analytical method validation: an updated review. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2013;4(4):1280.
  15. Gil EC, Colarte AI, Bataille B, Pedraz JL, Rodríguez F, Heinämäki J (2006). Development and optimization of a novel sustained-release dextran tablet formulation for propranolol hydrochloride. International journal of pharmaceutics. 2006;317(1):32-39.
  16. Heyman ML, Williams RL (2011). USP council of the convention section on global public health. Ensuring global access to quality medicines: Role of the US pharmacopeia. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2011;100(4):1280-1287.
  17. Barbulovic-Nad I, Lucente M, Sun Y, Zhang M, Wheeler AR, Bussmann M (2006). Bio-microarray fabrication techniques—a review. Critical Reviews In Biotechnology. 2006;26(4):237-59.
  18. Tammisetty, M. R., Challa, B. R., & Puttagunta, S. B. (2020). Application of Liquid Chromatography with Tandem Mass Spectrometric Method for Quantification of Safinamide In Invitro Samples. Int. J. Life Sci. Pharma Res, 10(2), P55-61.
  19. Ellenhorn MJ & Barceloux DG (1988) Medical toxicology, diagnosis and treatment of human poisoning. New York, Elsevier Science Publishing Co, Inc, p 261-265.
  20. ICH Q2B (2003): Validation of Analytical Procedure; Methodology. International Conferences on Harmonization of Technical requirements for the registration of Drugs for Human use, Geneva, Switzerland.
  21. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Glajch JL (2012). Practical HPLC method development. John Wiley & Sons.
  22. Haller Jr JS (1982). The United States Pharmacopoeia: its origin and revision in the 19th century. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine. 1982;58(5):480.
  23. ICH Q2B (1997): Validation of Analytical Procedure; Methodology. International Conferences on Harmonization of Technical requirements for the registration of Drugs for Human use, Geneva, Switzerland.
  24. Santell JP (2005). Medication errors: experience of the United States Pharmacopeia (USP). Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. 2005;31(2):114-119.
  25. Quality Assurance Guide (1997) – OPP Analytical Method Development and Validation, Michael Swartz, Swartz Swartz, Michael Swartz, CRC press.
  26. Modern HPLC for practicing scient ists, Michael W.Dong.  ( google.com) 
  27. Pharmaceutical process validation, NashRA and Watcher AH, CBS  publishers and Distributors, Newdelhi. 
  28. Indian       pharmacopoeia (2010), The    Indian pharmacopoeia Commission, Ghaziabad. 
  29. United State Pharmacopoeia (2007). 30- NF 25. 
  30. British Pharmacopoeia (2009). vol.1 & 2, The British Pharmacopoeia Commission, London.
  31. ICH Q2B (1996), Validation of Analytical Procedures: Methodology, adoptedin 1996, Geneva Q2B, in 2005 incorporated in Q2(R1).
  32. IUPAC Technical Report (2002), Harmonized Guidelines for Single-Laboratory Validation of Methods of Analysis, Pure Appl. Chem., 74 (5) 835/855.

Reference

  1. Kai Zhang, Na Xue, Xiaowei Shi, Weina Liu, Jing Meng, Yumin Du (2011). A validated chiral liquid chromatographic method for the enantiomeric separation of safinamide mesilate, a new anti-Parkinson drug, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 55 220–224.
  2. Vivekkumar K.Redasani, Bhushan J.Mali, Amod S.Patil, Atul A.Shirkhedkar (2013). Development and validation of RP-HPLC method for determination of safinamide mesylate in bulk and in tablet dosage form ACAIJ, 13(4) ISSN: 0974-7419.
  3. Vaibhav S. Adhao, Raju R. Thenge, J. Sharma, M. Thakare (2020). Development and Validation of Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Method for Determination of Safinamide Mesylate. Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Volume 13, No. 2.
  4. V.SHIRISHA, GURRAM SRIKANTH, SANTHOSH ILLENDULA, Dr.K. RAJESWAR DUTT (2021). RP-HPLC METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION FOR THE ESTIMATION OF SAFINAMIDE IN API FORM AND MARKETED FORMULATION. International Journal of Research Volume X, Issue II, ISSN NO:2236-6124.
  5. Gayatri R. Amrutkar, Smita S Aher and R S Bachhav (2022). Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Method Development and Validation for Estimation of Safinamide in Bulk Drug and Dosage Form. International Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences. Online ISSN: 2230-7605, Print ISSN: 2321-3272.
  6. Dusakanti Akhila, Pasupuleti Sunitha, Vijaya Kuchana (2024). Stability indicating RP-HPLC analytical method development and validation for the estimation of safinamide in bulk and marketed pharmaceutical dosage form. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation ISSN (online):2582-7138 Volume:05.
  7. Redasani, VK, Mali, BJ, & Surana, SJ (2012). Development and validation of HPTLC method for determination of safinamide mesylate in bulk and in tablet dosage form. International Scholarly Research Notices.
  8. Madhu Medabalimi, K. Saravanakumar and S.V. Satyanarayana (2022). “Development and Validation of Stability Indicating RP-UPLC Method for Quantitative Estimation of Safinamide Mesylate in Bulk and its Tablet Dosage Form”. urrent Trends in Biotechnology and Pharmacy 50Vol. 16 (Supplementry Issue 2) 50- 59, ISSN 0973-8916.
  9. Ying Wang, Guan-An Zhao, Xia Li, En Zhang, Wei Tan and Jia-qi Chen (2023). “Establishment of a sensitive UPLC-MS/MS technique to enumerate safinamide in rat plasma”. Frontiers in Pharmacology 10.3389/fphar. 2023.1211383.
  10. Mohan Rao Tammisetty, Balasekhara Reddy Challa and Srinivasa Babu Puttagunta (2020). “Application Of Liquid Chromatography With Tandem Mass Spectrometric Method For Quantification Of Safinamide In Invitro Samples”. International Journal of Lifescience and Pharma Research, ijlpr 2020; doi 10.22376/ijpbs/lpr.2020.10.2.P55-61.
  11. EngyA. Ibrahim, Hoda M. Marzouk, MahaA. Hegazy, Samah S. Saad & Laila E.Abdel Fattah (2024). “Ecofriendly micellar mediated spectrofluorimetric method for ultrasensitive quantifcation of the antiparkinsonian drug safnamide in pharmaceutical formulations and spiked human plasma”. Scientific Reports, Article number: 16460. 
  12. Heba M. El-Sayed, Omar M. El-Abassy, Hassan A. M. Hendawy, Hisham Ezzat Abdellatef, and Hany Ibrahim (2023). “Green Spectrophotometric Platforms for Determining Overlapped Spectral Signals of Recently Approved Antiparkinsonian Drug (Safinamide) in the Presence of Its Synthetic Precursor (4-Hydroxybenzaldehyde): Applying Ecological Appraisal and Comparative Statistical Studies”. Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 106(1), 26–33.
  13. Galal Magdy, Aya Saad Radwan, Heba Elmansi, Fathalla Belal, Mai Abd El-Aziz, Omar M El-Abassy (2024). “Ultrasensitive spectrofluorimetric method for quantitation of the novel antiparkinsonian drug safinamide in different mediums at nanogram levels: Assessment of greenness and whiteness profiles”. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, Volume 38, 101448.
  14. Lavanya G, Sunil MM, Eswarudu MM, Eswaraiah MC, Harisudha K, Spandana BN (2013). Analytical method validation: an updated review. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2013;4(4):1280.
  15. Gil EC, Colarte AI, Bataille B, Pedraz JL, Rodríguez F, Heinämäki J (2006). Development and optimization of a novel sustained-release dextran tablet formulation for propranolol hydrochloride. International journal of pharmaceutics. 2006;317(1):32-39.
  16. Heyman ML, Williams RL (2011). USP council of the convention section on global public health. Ensuring global access to quality medicines: Role of the US pharmacopeia. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2011;100(4):1280-1287.
  17. Barbulovic-Nad I, Lucente M, Sun Y, Zhang M, Wheeler AR, Bussmann M (2006). Bio-microarray fabrication techniques—a review. Critical Reviews In Biotechnology. 2006;26(4):237-59.
  18. Tammisetty, M. R., Challa, B. R., & Puttagunta, S. B. (2020). Application of Liquid Chromatography with Tandem Mass Spectrometric Method for Quantification of Safinamide In Invitro Samples. Int. J. Life Sci. Pharma Res, 10(2), P55-61.
  19. Ellenhorn MJ & Barceloux DG (1988) Medical toxicology, diagnosis and treatment of human poisoning. New York, Elsevier Science Publishing Co, Inc, p 261-265.
  20. ICH Q2B (2003): Validation of Analytical Procedure; Methodology. International Conferences on Harmonization of Technical requirements for the registration of Drugs for Human use, Geneva, Switzerland.
  21. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Glajch JL (2012). Practical HPLC method development. John Wiley & Sons.
  22. Haller Jr JS (1982). The United States Pharmacopoeia: its origin and revision in the 19th century. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine. 1982;58(5):480.
  23. ICH Q2B (1997): Validation of Analytical Procedure; Methodology. International Conferences on Harmonization of Technical requirements for the registration of Drugs for Human use, Geneva, Switzerland.
  24. Santell JP (2005). Medication errors: experience of the United States Pharmacopeia (USP). Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. 2005;31(2):114-119.
  25. Quality Assurance Guide (1997) – OPP Analytical Method Development and Validation, Michael Swartz, Swartz Swartz, Michael Swartz, CRC press.
  26. Modern HPLC for practicing scient ists, Michael W.Dong.  ( google.com) 
  27. Pharmaceutical process validation, NashRA and Watcher AH, CBS  publishers and Distributors, Newdelhi. 
  28. Indian       pharmacopoeia (2010), The    Indian pharmacopoeia Commission, Ghaziabad. 
  29. United State Pharmacopoeia (2007). 30- NF 25. 
  30. British Pharmacopoeia (2009). vol.1 & 2, The British Pharmacopoeia Commission, London.
  31. ICH Q2B (1996), Validation of Analytical Procedures: Methodology, adoptedin 1996, Geneva Q2B, in 2005 incorporated in Q2(R1).
  32. IUPAC Technical Report (2002), Harmonized Guidelines for Single-Laboratory Validation of Methods of Analysis, Pure Appl. Chem., 74 (5) 835/855.

Photo
Rushikesh Ugale
Corresponding author

Department of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance, SND College of Pharmacy, Yeola, Nashik, Maharashtra, India 423401

Photo
Sushil Patil
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance, SND College of Pharmacy, Yeola, Nashik, Maharashtra, India 423401

Photo
Vikas Shinde
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance, SND College of Pharmacy, Yeola, Nashik, Maharashtra, India 423401

Photo
Amol Gayke
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance, SND College of Pharmacy, Yeola, Nashik, Maharashtra, India 423401

Photo
Vaishnavi Ugale
Co-author

Matoshri College of Pharmacy, Eklahare, Nashik, Maharashtra, India 422105

Rushikesh Ugale, Sushil Patil, Vikas Shinde, Amol Gayke, Vaishnavi Ugale, RP-HPLC Method Development and Validation for Determination of Safinamide in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Formulation, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 8, 1904-1917. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16895066

More related articles
Microneedle-Based Transdermal Systems for Vaccines...
Mohammad Azmath Hussain, Srinivasarao Mande, ...
Gut-Brain Axis and Neurodegeneration: Mechanisms, ...
Arti Rana, Adtiya Verma, Ansh Rihal, Shivam , Ashish Sharma, ...
Formulation and Evaluation of Hematinic Syrup Cont...
Varad Mahajan, Shailesh Taktode, Sham Doke, Yash Nemade, Shivpras...
Case Report on COVID-19-Induced Neurological Symptoms ...
Dr. Saurabh Saklani, Shrestha Joshi, Mohit Saklani, Poonam Rishishwar, ...
Floating Microspheres in Diabetes Treatment: A Comprehensive Review ...
Janhavi Chaudhari, Dr. Prashant Malpure, Rahul Arote, Dr. Gokul Talale, ...
An Overview on Essential oil Loaded Nanoparticle Approach for Novel Drug Deliver...
Shrutika Bhurse, Kanchan Upadhye, Namrata Hole, Ojaswini Urkudkar, Pratik Mishra, ...
Related Articles
A Review on Herbal Peel–Off Face Mask: Advanced Hydration and Youthful Skin Be...
Mohammad Ali, Kishor C. K, Lokesh K. C, Manoj S, Mokshith B. M, ...
Microencapsulation Of Probiotics- A Review...
PREETHA PUTHEZHATH, C K DHANAPAL, K KRISHNAKUMAR, B DINESH KUMAR, ...
More related articles
Gut-Brain Axis and Neurodegeneration: Mechanisms, Evidence, and Therapeutic Pote...
Arti Rana, Adtiya Verma, Ansh Rihal, Shivam , Ashish Sharma, ...
Formulation and Evaluation of Hematinic Syrup Containing Iron, Vitamin B12 and F...
Varad Mahajan, Shailesh Taktode, Sham Doke, Yash Nemade, Shivprasad Machhale, Prof.Arif Shaikh, Dr. ...
Gut-Brain Axis and Neurodegeneration: Mechanisms, Evidence, and Therapeutic Pote...
Arti Rana, Adtiya Verma, Ansh Rihal, Shivam , Ashish Sharma, ...
Formulation and Evaluation of Hematinic Syrup Containing Iron, Vitamin B12 and F...
Varad Mahajan, Shailesh Taktode, Sham Doke, Yash Nemade, Shivprasad Machhale, Prof.Arif Shaikh, Dr. ...