View Article

Abstract

Mutual prodrug is a form of prodrugs in which two pharmacologically active compounds are in such a manner that one drug acts as carrier for each other. Inflammation is usually defined as the series of changes that occur in living tissues following by injury and is associated with redness, itching and swelling. Non-Steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used for treatment of the inflammation. These drugs are used alone or in combination with other drugs. These drugs are associated major side effects like gastro intestinal irritation due to presence of carboxylic acid group in the structure. The local generation of various reactive oxygen species" play a significant role in the formation of gastric ulceration associated with NSAIDs therapy. This indicates antioxidants may prevent gastric ulceration due to NSAIDs. Mutual prodrugs of Ibuprofen were planned for treatment of inflammation along with antioxidants property. Ibuprofen as mutual prodrugs and their physiological characterization of synthesized products were carried out Analgesic, anti-inflammatory and ulcerogenic activities were evaluated for synthesized compounds. The synergistic property of mutual prodrugs leads to potent biological actions i.e. treatment of inflammation.

Keywords

Analgesic, anti-inflammatory and ulcerogenic activities, redness, itching and swelling

Introduction

The concept of “mutual prodrug” is relatively in medicinal chemistry, pharmaceutics and drug delivery. Mutual prodrug is from if prodrug in which two pharmacologically active agents are attached to each other in a way that each drug acts as a carrier for each other. [1,2].

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs):

These are the mostly used drugs. According the public survey their side effects such as nephrotoxicity, haemorrhages and the most serious GIT ulceration.[3] These side effects produced due to carboxylic acid group (-COOH) in the presence of the structure which are significantly ionized at physiological pH of stomach. The local generation of various ‘reactive oxygen species’ (ROS) play a significant role in the formation of gastric ulceration associated with NSAIDs therapy. These observations indicate that antioxidants may be used to prevent NSAIDs induced gastric ulcers.[3]

All NSAIDs are believed to inhibit the biosynthesis of prostaglandins by inhibiting the group of enzymes called cyclooxygenases that is COX-I and COX-II. The COX-I enzyme is located in normal tissues and is cytoprotective, physiologically important for GI and renal functions. On the other hand, COX-II is pathological, found primarily in inflamed tissues. The NSAIDs cause inhibition of both the isoforms, producing GI and renal side effects due to inhibition of COX-I. while selective inhibition of COX-II could block the prostaglandins production at the side of inflammation without affecting the beneficial prostaglandins tissues in normal tissues such as stomach and kidneys.[4]

Prodrugs: Drug design involves the development of analogues and prodrugs by some chemical modifications from the lead molecule or from a parent compound by modifying the carbon skeletal transformation or by the synthesis of compounds of the same nucleus with various substitutions. Analogues can also be synthesized by changing the position of substitution group.[5]

For example: synthesis of trans-diethylstilbesterol by the modification of oestradiol produced better oestrogenic activity than the latter one.[6]

Mutual Prodrug

Mutual prodrug, where the carrier used is another biologically active drug instead of some inert molecule. A mutual prodrug consists of two pharmacologically active agents coupled together so that each act as a promoiety for the other agent and vice versa. The carrier selected may have the same biological action as that of the parent drug and thus might give synergistic action, or the carrier may have some additional biological action that is lacking in the parent drug, thus ensuring some additional benefit. The carrier may also be a drug that might help to target the parent drug to a specific site or organ or cells or may improve site specificity of a drug. The carrier drug may be used to overcome some side effects of the parent drugs as well.[7] ex. Release of chlorzoxazone and acetaminophen from its prodrug.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

All the melting points were determined in open capillary tube and may be uncorrected.[8] The λmax spectra recorded on SHIMADZU UV-1601 UV-visible spectrophotometer using methanol as solvent.[9] The purity of compound was checked by TLC on silica gel coated glass plate using toluene: ethyl acetate: glacial acetic acid (8.5:6.5:0.5) solvent system for ibuprofen.[10] Infra-red spectra were monitored in KBr palates on SHIAMADZU-8400 infra- red spectrophotometer.[11,12] 1HNMR spectra were obtained on a Bruker ACF 300 spectrometer with tetra methyl silane as an internal standard. 1HNMR spectra were recorded with CDCl3 as a solvent and the chemical shift data were expressed as δ values to relative to TMS. Mass spectra were recorded on SHIMADZU GCMS-2010 mass spectrometer using the EI technique at 70ev.[13]

Synthetic Procedures

Step-1: Synthesis of Antioxidants Chloroacetyl Derivative (15a-b)

A mixture of an appropriate antioxidant (0.01mol), trimethyl (0.01mol) in dichloromethane (25ml) was cooled in an ice salt mixture to -100. To this reaction mixture Chloroacetyl chloride (0.01mol) in chloroform (25) was added drop wise with constant starring over a period of 1hr, maintaining the temperature constant. The reaction mixture was stirred further for 5hr at room temperature on the magnetic stirrer, washed with 5% HCL (3 x 50ml), 5% sodium hydroxide (3x50 ml), and finally with brine solution (2 x 25 ml). The organic layer was dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate, filtered and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure to obtain the corresponding antioxidant Chloroacetyl derivative. These derivatives were recrystalised from petroleum ether and ethyl acetate.

Step-2: Synthesis Of NSAIDs (Ibuprofen) with Antioxidant of Mutual Prodrugs (17a- b)

A mixture of an appropriate antioxidant Chloroacetyl derivative (0.01 mol), NSAIDs (Ibuprofen): (0.01mol) triethylamine (0.01 mol), sodium iodide (0.01 mol) in DMF (25ml) was stirred overnight at room temperature. The reaction mixture was poured into finely crushed ice with stirred and extracted with chloroform (4 x 25 ml). The combined organic layer was washed with 2% sodium thiosulphate (3 x 50 ml), 5%HCL (3 x 50 ml), 5% sodium hydroxide (3 x 50 ml) and finally with brine solution (2 x 25 ml). The organic layer was dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate, filtered and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure to obtain the semisolid residue. All the mutual prodrugs were synthesized by the above procedure. The final products were synthesized form petroleum ether and ethyl acetate.[2]

Anti-Inflammatory Activity [14,15]

Carrageenan induced rat paw edema method of winter et al. was used for evaluation of Anti-inflammatory activity

Principle

 The Anti-inflammatory reaction readily produced in rats in the form of paw edema with thr help of irritants or inflammaging. Carrageenan induced paw edema is the most commonly used experimental method. Carrageenan is a sulphated polysaccharide obtained from seaweed (Rhodophyceae) causing the release of histamine, 5HT, bradykinin and prostaglandins. It produced inflammation and edema.

Anti-Inflammatory Screening Methods

Anti-inflammatory drugs have been evaluated by inflammatory responses produced in the animals by infecting foreign of noxious agents. These responses mostly comprise of the development of edema and the formation of exudates glaucoma. Drugs which suppress any of these components are designed as anti-inflammatory agents.

MATERIALS

1. Wister albino rats.

 2. Saline or tween 80 and distilled water.

 3. Std. drug: a suspension of Ibuprofen was prepared in 1% v/v solution of tween 80 and dose equivalent to 10mg/kg, 20mg/kg, 20mg/kg respectively.

4. Suspension of mutual prodrugs were prepared in 1% v/v solution of tween 80 and dose equivalent to 10mg/kg, 20mg/kg, 20mg/kg were taken for mutual prodrug respectively.

5. Feeding needles (oral dosing), syringes (1ml, 2ml), tuberculin syringe, 24 G needles, sampling tubes (to prepare suspensions of test compounds).

Selection of Animal Species and Storage Condition

The healthy Wistar albino rats of either sex of weight 100-200g were selected. Animals were housed in standard condition of temperature 220 C (±30) and relative humidity (30%-70%) with 12:12 light: dark cycle. The animals were fed with standard diet (pellets) and water ad libitum.

Grouping of Animals

Six animals were randomly selected in each group and marked to permit individual identification. They were kept in the one animal/cage for five days prior to dosing.

Procedure

Male of female Wistar rats with a body weight between 100-200g were used. The animals were stared overnight. These animals were treated with control, standard and synthetic mutual prodrug (17a-b) orally. Thirty minutes later, the rats were challenged by a subcutaneous injection of 0.05ml of 1% solution of carrageenan into planner side of the left hind paw. The paw volume was measured by venire calliper scale immediately after injection i.e. 0 hrs and 5 hrs.

% inhibition=1-[a-x/b-y] x 100

Where- 

a. Paw volume of test group after 5hrs of injecting carrageenan

b. Paw volume of test group before injecting carrageenan

c. Paw volume of control group after 5hrs of injecting carrageenan

d. Paw volume of control group before injecting carrageenan

Ulcerogenicity Activity [15]

The ulcer index o synthesized prodrugs were recorded to observe the extent of gastrointestinal side effects. The ulcer index of prodrugs was found much lesser in comparison with the std. drug. The minimized side effects obtained in the prodrug might be due to the inhibition of direct contact of carboxylic acid group of the drug to the gastric mucosa which is mainly responsible for the damage.

Material

1. Anaesthesia i.e. ether

2. Wister albino rats.

3. Saline or tween 80 and distilled water.

4. Std. drug: a suspension of Ibuprofen was prepared in 1% v/v solution off tween 80 and dose equivalent to 10mg/kg, 20mg/kg, 20mg/kg respectively.

5. Suspension of mutual prodrugs were prepared in 1% v/v solution of tween 80 and dose equivalent to 10mg/kg, 20mg/kg, 20mg/kg were taken for Ibuprofen mutual prodrug respectively.

6. Feeding needles (oral dosing), syringes (1ml, 2ml), tuberculin syringe, 24 G needles, sampling tubes (to prepare suspensions of test compounds).

Selection of Animal Species and Storage Condition

The healthy Wistar albino rats of either sex of weight 100-200g were selected. Animals were housed in standard condition of temperature 220C (±30) and relative humidity (30%-70%) with 12:12 light: dark cycle. The animals were fed with standard diet (pellets) and water ad libitum.

Grouping of Animals

In these method albino rats were divided into10groups. Each group considered were administered. The animals were randomly selected in each group and marked to permit individual identification. They were kept in the one animal/cage for five days prior to dosing.

Procedure

The animals were dosed orally. The control, test and standard drug were administered orally for four days in 1% tween 80 solution and they were having free access to water and food during this period. On fifth day (24 hrs after dose the last dose) the rats were scarified after anaesthesia and stomach was removed. The stomach was filled with 1.5ml-2% buffer formalin for 10 min. and it was opened along the greater curvature, wash with warm water and examine under a 3- fold magnifier. The lengths of the longest diameter of the lesions were measured by scoring method.

The number of ulcers is noted and the severity recorded with the following:

· 0= no ulcer

· 1= superficial ulcer

· 2= deep ulcer

· 3= perforation

Evaluation

An ulcer index UI was calculated by the following formula:

UI= UN + US + UP x 10 – 1

Were,

UN= average of number of ulcers per animal

US= average of severity score

UP= percentage of animals with ulcers.

Drug profile: Ibuprofen (IBU)

It is propionic acid derivative:

IUPAC: (RS)-2-(4-Isobutylphenyl) propionic acid.

Description: A white or almost white, crystalline powder or colourless crystals, odour slight Molecular formula: C13H18O2

Mol wt:206.28

Category: Anti-inflammatory, analgesic

Solubility: soluble in water, freely soluble in acetone, chloroform, ethanol, ether and in ethylene chloride

Pharmacokinetics: Bioavailability is 49 to 73%, 90 to 99% plasma protein binding, t1/2 is 2hr,

Extensively metabolites, excreted by urine.

Pharmacology: MOA of action of IBU, inhibiting the enzyme cyclooxygenase (COX), which converts arachidonic acid to prostaglandins H2 (PGH2).

Adverse effects: Nausea, dyspepsia, GI ulceration/bleeding, raised liver enzymes, diarrhoea, constipation, epistaxis, dizziness, priapism, rash, salt, and fluid retention, and hypertension.

Dose: 600mg to 1.2g daily, in divided dose, after food.

Use: it is use in the management of mild to moderate pain, fever, and headache including migraine and tension type headache, pain.[16]

Antioxidants

Menthol

It’s a cyclohexanol compound

IUPAC: 5-methyl-2-(propan-2-yl) cyclohexanol

Description: it is waxy, crystalline substance, clear or white colour which is solid at room temp. and melts slightly above.

Molecular formula: C10H20O

Molecular wt.: 156.27

Solubility: it is slightly soluble in water and extremely soluble in alcohols.

Use: local anaesthetic and counterirritant, short term relief of minor sore throat minor mouth and throat irritation [17]

Vanillin

It’s a phenolic compound.

IUPAC: 4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde

Description: it is white crystalline substance with floral and pleasant odor Molecular formula:

C8H8O3 Molecular wt.:152.15

Solubility: extremely soluble in ethanol

Use: Largest use is as a flavouring agent, usually in foods, The ice-cream and chocolate industries together comprise 75% of the market for vanillin as a flavouring agent. Also used in fragrance industry, perfumes, to mask unpleasant odours or tastes in medicines, and cleaning products. [18]

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

General scheme and mechanism [2]

Step 1: Synthesis of antioxidants Chloroacetyl derivative

Step 2: Synthesis of mutual prodrug of NSAIDs with antioxidant

Following table given the physicochemical properties of synthesized mutual prodrug

Comp. code

IUPAC names

Mol. formula

Mol. Wt.

m.p. ( 0C)

B.p.

(0C)

% yeild

Rf value

λ max n

17a

2-Isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl-2- [2- (4-isobutylphenyl) propanoyloxy] ethanoate

C25H38O4

402.56

45- 47

230-232

54.82

0.692

260

17b

4-formyl-2-methylphenyl-2- [2-(4- isobutylphenyl) propanoyloxy] ethanoate

C24H26O6

398.44

-

200-203

43.65

0.649

249

Physicochemical studies Infrared spectroscopy

2-Isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl-2-[2-(4-isobutylphenyl) propanoyloxy] ethanoate (17a) In FTIR spectra of Compound 17a the stretching at about 2960 cm-1 indicates the presence of C-H bond in the aromatic ring. The stretching at about 2850 cm-1 shows the presence of CH bond. Due to presence of ester O=C-O group in 17a stretching vibration is shown at 1746.42 cm-1. The bending vibration at about 11453 cm-1 indicates the presence of O-H bond. The C-O stretching vibrations is present at about 1150.46 cm-1. A stretching vibration at 1044 cm-1 indicates the presence of C-C group.  4-formyl-2-methylphenyl-2-[2-(4-isobutylphenyl) propanoyloxy] ethanoate (17b) In FTIR spectra of Compound 17b the stretching at about 3000 cm indicates the presence of C-H bond in the aromatic ring. The stretching at about 2150 cm shows the presence of C-H bond. Due to presence of ester O=C-O group in 17b stretching vibration is shown at 1846.42 cm. The bending vibration at about 1500 cm-1 indicates the presence of O-H bond. The C-O stretching vibrations is present at about 1600.12 cm-. A stretching vibration at 1446 cm-1 indicates the presence of C-C group.

1HNMR spectroscopy

Compound shows broad doublet peak at 7.1-7.2ppm presence of 4protons of aromatic ring. A cluster of triplet peak at 4.7 – 4.8ppm shows the presence of –CH2 protons of cyclohexane ring. A cluster of quartet peak at 3.8ppm indicates the –CH2 protons of ester linkage. A doublet peak at 2.4-2.5ppm shows the presence of –CH2 protons attached to the ring. a broad multiplate at 2.2-2.3ppm indicates the presence of –CH2 protons attached to the cyclohexane ring. A broad triplet peak at 1.6-1.7ppm shows the presence of –CH protons adjacent to aromatic ring. a sharps doublet peak at 1.5ppm indicates –CH2 protons adjacent to benzylic protons. A cluster of broad at 1.3-1.4ppm indicates –CH3 protons attached to cyclohexane ring. a broad triplet peak at 1.1-1.2ppm shows the –CH3 protons adjacent to cyclohexane ring. a broad multiplate peak at 0.9-1ppm shows the –CH3 protons. A sharp multiplate at 0.8ppm again shows the –CH3 protons. A broad multiplate peak at 0.7ppm shows the –CH3 protons.

Mass Spectroscopy

Mass spectra of compound 17a show a small peak at m/z 426.3 which is molecular ion peak indicating the molecular weight of the compound. 426 is an even number which indicates the absence of N, S. a sharp peak at m/z 160.1 is the base peak.  Mass spectra of compound 17b show a small peak at m/z 516.1 which is molecular ion peak indicating the molecular weight of the compound. 516 is an even number which indicates the absence of N, S. a sharp peak at m/z 210.1 is the base peak.

Test compounds

Paw volume (mm)

% Inhibition

Initial

After 5hrs

Control

2.64± 0.43

5.43

±

--

1

 

1.08

 

 

STD

3.07±0.33

4.18

±

37.64±1.08

IBU

 

0.52

 

 

17a

3.00±0.31

4.94±0.70

±

30.46±0.67

17b

3.16±0.33

5.04±0.72

±

32.61±0.06

 

Group No.

Group specification

Ulcer index

(mean ± SEM)

I

Control

--

II

Std-IBU

8±0.47

III

17a

3±0.18

IV

17b

4±0.24

The synthesized mutual prodrug 17a-b showed significant anti-inflammatory activity as compared to standard compounds. The ulcer index of synthesized mutual prodrugs were less compared to standard drugs indicates that all synthesized mutual prodrugs have less gastric irritation as side effects of NSAIDs as compared to parent molecules. Differentiation between the control, standard and mutual prodrugs show the ulceration covered.

CONCLUSION

The ester derivative of mutual prodrug of ibuprofen with oxidants menthol and vanillin were successfully synthesized by using mentioned synthetic procedures.  Compounds determined melting point, good percentage yield, chemical structure were confirmed by IR,1HNMR AND MASS spectroscopy. Compounds screen their pharmacological activity anti-inflammatory and anti-ulcer activity by hot plate method, carrageenan induced rat paw edema and scoring method.  Significant activity shows the anti-inflammatory activity. The absence of gastric damage in all these cases may be attributed to the combined effect of antioxidants of the compounds as well as improved physicochemical properties and bioavailability of the prodrugs.

On the basis of above observations, it is concluded that these mutual prodrugs conjugates can be successfully applied to attain the goal of minimized gastro -intestinal toxicity without loss of the anti-inflammatory and antiulcerogenicity activity of the drug. The pharmacokinetic studies showed greater bioavailability as compared to parent’s compounds.

REFERENCES

  1. Ohlan S. et al, Mutual Prodrugs- A Swot Analysis, International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, 2011;
  2. 719-729. 2. Barar F. S. K. Essential of Pharmacokinetic, 1st edition, S. Chand and company LTD; New Delhi, 2000; 12.
  3. Manon B, et al, Design Synthesis and Evalution of Diclofenac-Antioxidant Mutual Prodrugs as Safer NSAIDs, Indian Journal of Chemistry, 2009; 48B: 1279-1287.
  4. Dinesh TM, et al, Improvement of GI tolerance of NSAIDs Using Oral Prodrug Approach, Scholars Research Library, 2010; 2: 300-309.
  5. Tripathi K. D. Essential of Medical Pharmacology, 4th edition, Jaypee Brother Medical Pulishers Ltd; New Delhi, 2005; 169.
  6. V. Algarswamy, “Textbook of Medicinal Chemistry”, „ELSEVIER? A division of Reed Elsevier India Private Limited.,New Delhi, 2010; I: 43-45.
  7. D. Bhosle, S. Bharambe, Neha Gairola And Suneela S. Dhaneshwar “Mutual Prodrug    Concept: Fundamentals And Applications”, Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences., 2006; 68(3): 286-294.
  8. Martindale, The extra pharmacopoeia, 31th edition, Royal Pharmaceutical Society, London, 1996; 36, 50, 81.
  9. Kaur H. Spectroscopy, 5TH edition, Pragati Educational, Meerut, 2010; 8: 285.
  10. Stahk E. Thin Layer chromatoghraohy, 2nd edition, Acadmic Press, New Yorkm, 1969; 904.
  11. Silverstein R.M. Spectrometric Identification of Organic Compound, 6 th edition, John Wiley and Sons Inc. Publication, New York, 2004; 71-78, 79-109.
  12. Sharma Y.R. Elementry Organic Spectroscopy, 1st edition, S.Chand and Company Ltd, New Delhi, 2002; 3: 88-133.
  13. McLafferty F.W. Interpretation of Mass Spectra, 4th edition, Unoversity Science Book, USA, 1993; 283-291.
  14. Vogel H. G. Drug Delivery and Evalution Pharmacological Assay, 2nd Edition, Springer Science, New York, 2002; 696: 759-760.
  15. Goswami R. A. et al, Develpoment of Analytical Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Lornoxicam and Thiocolchicoside in Pharmaceutical Formulation and Biological Fluids, 2010; 61-64.
  16. https://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DBO1050
  17. https://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DBO0425
  18. https://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DBO2130.

Reference

  1. Ohlan S. et al, Mutual Prodrugs- A Swot Analysis, International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, 2011;
  2. 719-729. 2. Barar F. S. K. Essential of Pharmacokinetic, 1st edition, S. Chand and company LTD; New Delhi, 2000; 12.
  3. Manon B, et al, Design Synthesis and Evalution of Diclofenac-Antioxidant Mutual Prodrugs as Safer NSAIDs, Indian Journal of Chemistry, 2009; 48B: 1279-1287.
  4. Dinesh TM, et al, Improvement of GI tolerance of NSAIDs Using Oral Prodrug Approach, Scholars Research Library, 2010; 2: 300-309.
  5. Tripathi K. D. Essential of Medical Pharmacology, 4th edition, Jaypee Brother Medical Pulishers Ltd; New Delhi, 2005; 169.
  6. V. Algarswamy, “Textbook of Medicinal Chemistry”, „ELSEVIER? A division of Reed Elsevier India Private Limited.,New Delhi, 2010; I: 43-45.
  7. D. Bhosle, S. Bharambe, Neha Gairola And Suneela S. Dhaneshwar “Mutual Prodrug    Concept: Fundamentals And Applications”, Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences., 2006; 68(3): 286-294.
  8. Martindale, The extra pharmacopoeia, 31th edition, Royal Pharmaceutical Society, London, 1996; 36, 50, 81.
  9. Kaur H. Spectroscopy, 5TH edition, Pragati Educational, Meerut, 2010; 8: 285.
  10. Stahk E. Thin Layer chromatoghraohy, 2nd edition, Acadmic Press, New Yorkm, 1969; 904.
  11. Silverstein R.M. Spectrometric Identification of Organic Compound, 6 th edition, John Wiley and Sons Inc. Publication, New York, 2004; 71-78, 79-109.
  12. Sharma Y.R. Elementry Organic Spectroscopy, 1st edition, S.Chand and Company Ltd, New Delhi, 2002; 3: 88-133.
  13. McLafferty F.W. Interpretation of Mass Spectra, 4th edition, Unoversity Science Book, USA, 1993; 283-291.
  14. Vogel H. G. Drug Delivery and Evalution Pharmacological Assay, 2nd Edition, Springer Science, New York, 2002; 696: 759-760.
  15. Goswami R. A. et al, Develpoment of Analytical Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Lornoxicam and Thiocolchicoside in Pharmaceutical Formulation and Biological Fluids, 2010; 61-64.
  16. https://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DBO1050
  17. https://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DBO0425
  18. https://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DBO2130.

Photo
Toshik Lade
Corresponding author

Maharashtra Institute of Pharmacy, (B. Pharm), Betala Bramhapuri, Chandrapur, Maharashtra-441206 (India).

Photo
Nutan Chahare
Co-author

Maharashtra Institute of Pharmacy, (B. Pharm), Betala Bramhapuri, Chandrapur, Maharashtra-441206 (India).

Photo
Snehal Karmankar
Co-author

Maharashtra Institute of Pharmacy, (B. Pharm), Betala Bramhapuri, Chandrapur, Maharashtra-441206 (India).

Photo
Anup Barsagade
Co-author

Maharashtra Institute of Pharmacy, (B. Pharm), Betala Bramhapuri, Chandrapur, Maharashtra-441206 (India).

Toshik Lade*, Anup Barsagade, Snehal Karmankar, Nutan Chahare, Synthesis and Evaluation of Mutual Prodrugs of Ibuprofen as Non- Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs with Antioxidants, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 7, 2861-2871. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16269704

More related articles
3D Bioprinting in Organ Regeneration and Tissue En...
Anushka Patil , Shruti Alasandkar , Sakshi Devkar , Sayali More, ...
Acid Base Indicator Paper Extracted From Rose And ...
Nandkumar Machhindra chaudhari, Suraj D. Bendre, Savil V. Deshmuk...
Phytopharmaceutical Formulations: Advances in Herb...
Shital Shinde, Chaitali Sonawane, Vaishnavi Sutar, Dr. Nitin Wagh...
Formulation and Evaluation of Mucoadhesive Tablet of Tinidazole...
Geeta Mahlawat, Soarav Godara, Yogesh Vashsith, Pushpika Jain, Ashutosh Upadhyay, ...
Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Biomedical Waste Management Among Nursing St...
Dr Sk Md Wasim Ikbal, Dr. Rupali Baruah, Dr. Shashanka Chakraborty, ...
Related Articles
Nanogels Based Drug Delivery System: A Promising Therapeutic Strategy...
Majedul Hoque, Shuvo Nath Saha, Taharat Akram, ...
Exploring The Role of Herbal Gels in Accelerating Wound Healing: Evidence and Ap...
Sonu Gathe, Nishant Thakre, Komal Katre, Chanchal Pathade, Dharmendra Yadav , ...
Extraction, Phytochemical Investigation and Antimicrobial Activity of Hibiscus R...
Ganesh D. Barkade, Akshata B. Sinare, Mayur G. Tandale, Rutuja B. Sonawane, Rutuja R. Sumbe, ...
3D Bioprinting in Organ Regeneration and Tissue Engineering: Current Status, Cha...
Anushka Patil , Shruti Alasandkar , Sakshi Devkar , Sayali More, Shailaja Kamble, ...
More related articles
3D Bioprinting in Organ Regeneration and Tissue Engineering: Current Status, Cha...
Anushka Patil , Shruti Alasandkar , Sakshi Devkar , Sayali More, Shailaja Kamble, ...
Acid Base Indicator Paper Extracted From Rose And Hibiscus Flower ...
Nandkumar Machhindra chaudhari, Suraj D. Bendre, Savil V. Deshmukh , Ashish S. Kumbhakarn , Vaishnav...
Phytopharmaceutical Formulations: Advances in Herbal Drug Delivery and Therapeut...
Shital Shinde, Chaitali Sonawane, Vaishnavi Sutar, Dr. Nitin Waghmode, ...
3D Bioprinting in Organ Regeneration and Tissue Engineering: Current Status, Cha...
Anushka Patil , Shruti Alasandkar , Sakshi Devkar , Sayali More, Shailaja Kamble, ...
Acid Base Indicator Paper Extracted From Rose And Hibiscus Flower ...
Nandkumar Machhindra chaudhari, Suraj D. Bendre, Savil V. Deshmukh , Ashish S. Kumbhakarn , Vaishnav...
Phytopharmaceutical Formulations: Advances in Herbal Drug Delivery and Therapeut...
Shital Shinde, Chaitali Sonawane, Vaishnavi Sutar, Dr. Nitin Waghmode, ...