View Article

Abstract

Herbal microsphere was prepared by solvent evaporation method using ethyl-cellulose, methylcellulose and dichloromethane. Microspheres were evaluated for SEM, FTIR, entrapment efficiency, swelling index, in vitro drug release. The microspheres of F1 formulation exhibited particle size was 45.35 ?m, entrapment efficiency 86%, and in vitro drug release was 86.30%. A three-factor, three-level Box-Behnken design was applied to the formulation for designing and selecting the optimum formulation. The F1 formulation was found to be the best formulation as it possesses high entrapment efficiency, prolonged drug release for 2 hours in an acidic buffer & 5 hours in an alkaline buffer and this formulation exhibits the sustained release of drug and also improves the bioavailability of drug.

Keywords

Raspberry ketone, sustained release, bioavailability, anti-hyperlipidemic, Ethyl- cellulose.

Introduction

Hyperlipidemia is considered one of the major risk factors causing cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). The world's biggest cause of mortality, cardiovascular disease, could be avoided by addressing behavioral risk factors like smoking, eating poorly, being overweight, and not exercising. Heart and blood vessel illnesses include coronary disease, peripheral arterial disease, and congenital heart disease are included in this group. Cardiac arrest and strokes are typically sudden, severe events that are generally brought on by blockages that stop the blood flow to the heart and brain. Drug therapy is required to lower excessive blood lipid levels, which lowers the risk of heart disease, in order to prevent these diseases. A range of genetic and acquired diseases known collectively as "hyperlipidemia" are defined by elevated lipid levels in the body. It contributes to a number of metabolic risk factors, including hypertension, type II diabetes, gastrointestinal disorders, and coronary artery disease [1]. Elevated cholesterol and triglyceride issues have an effect on the heart and can cause cardiovascular disease, cardiac arrest, and stroke. Changes in lifestyle choices, particularly a malnourished when saturated and cholesterol-rich fat intake surpasses 40% of entire calorie intake, are the primary causes of hyperlipidemia [2]. The risk factors for cardiovascular disease can also be divided into modifiable and non- modifiable. Statins, antihypertensives, and antiplatelet medicines are typical examples of crucial cardiovascular medications [3]. The Frederickson (World Health) classification of dyslipidemias comprised five categories when it was first introduced in the 1960s.

According to a report released in 2020, 4.5 million deaths worldwide were caused by low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [4]. In 2019, there were 4.40 million fatalities and 98.62% million disability-adjusted life years related to elevated plasma LDL cholesterol levels (DALYs). As stated by the survey, ischemic heart disease caused 8.54 million fatalities in 2019, of which 3.78 million were attributable to elevated plasma cholesterol levels, and the ischemic stroke caused 2.73 million deaths, of which 0.61 million were attributable to  increased plasma cholesterol levels [5]. In order to overcome these obstacles, a fresh technique has been designed and developed, which can improve the treatment's efficacy. To overcome these difficulties with traditional medicinal molecules, nanotechnology has offered a number of novel techniques, including nanosuspension,  nano emulsions, nanoparticles, polymeric nanoparticles, dendrimers, polymeric micelles, etc [6]. Nanosuspension, however, has caught the attention of formulation scientists due to a number of advantages, including improved aqueous solubility, enhanced bioavailability, fast onset of action, reduced  dosing  regimen,  increased dosing  frequency,  improved  drug loading, and ease of preparation to help improve patient compliance overall.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials

Raspberry ketones purchased from Kshipra Biotech pvt. Ltd. (Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India), ethyl cellulose, methyl cellulose, Hydrochloric acid, Disodium hydrogen phosphate, methanol purchased from central drug house pvt. ltd. Dichloromethane purchased from Qualikems lifescience pvt. ltd. Potassium dihydrogen phosphate purchased from Avarice laboratories pvt. ltd. Sodium chloride purchased from Nice chemicals pvt. ltd.

Method

Preformulation studies

Solubility

Accurately weighed 25 mg drug, was dissolving in distilled water for 10 min on vortex shaker. in a volumetric flask of 10ml then filter this solution with filter paper. After that, pipetted out 1ml and dilute it with distilled water up to 10ml. The absorbance of the resultant sample was measured at 223nm [7]

Melting point

Melting point of Model drug was determined by capillary method. Fine powder of the raspberry ketones was filled in a clean and dry capillary of uniform diameter across the length by tapping. The packed column of 4 to 6 mm high capillary was tied in close proximity to tip of laboratory thermometer and the thermometer was kept in the tube of the apparatus then slowly increased temperature of the apparatus and recorded the temperature at which drug completely melted. The melting point was recorded [8].

Drug polymer compatibility studies

Infrared  spectrophotometry  is  an  effective analytical method for evaluating the chemical interactions between drugs and excipients in formulations. The sample was powdered and intimately mixed with 10mg of potassium bromide (KBr). The powdered mixture was gathered in a diffuse reflectance sampler and examined using a FTIR spectrophotometer in the 4000- 400/cm wavelength range. The Infrared spectra of the drug was compared to those of the physical combination to find potential drug-excipient interactions [9].

Calibration Curve of Raspberry Ketones

Determination of λ max in 0.1N HCl (pH 1.2)

Raspberry ketones crystal (10mg) was precisely weighed and transferred in a 10ml volumetric flask then dissolved in 1ml of methanol and diluted to 10ml with 0.1N HCl (pH 1.2) to obtain the final concentration of 1000µg/ml. From the 1000µg/ml solution 1ml was pipetted out and was diluted 100ml with 0.1N HCl to obtain the final concentration of 10µg/ml. The maximum wavelength was then found by scanning the λ max in the range of 200–400 nm.

Preparation of calibration curve in 0.1N HCl

Raspberry ketones 10mg precisely weighed and transferred in a volumetric flask of 10ml. It was dissolved in 1ml of methanol and made up the volume with 0.1N HCl (pH 1.2) to get 1000µg/ml solution and then 1ml was pipetted out from 1000µg/ml solution and poured to the volumetric flask of 100ml and diluted with 0.1N HCl to get 10µg/ml solution. To prepare the concentrations of 2, 4, 6, 8, 10ml was pipetted out from the 10µg/ml solution and made up 10ml with 0.1N HCl. The absorbance values of the prepared concentrations  were  measured  at  200-400nm using UV spectrophotometer. The calibration curves were prepared to find out the concentration of Raspberry ketones in samples.

Determination of λ max in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4)

Raspberry ketones crystal (10mg) was correctly weighed and poured in a 10ml volumetric flask then dissolved in 1ml of methanol and diluted to 10ml with phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) to obtain the final concentration of 1000µg/ml. From the 1000µg/ml solution 1ml was pipetted out and was diluted 100ml with Phosphate buffer to obtain the final concentration of 10µg/ml. The maximum wavelength was then found by scanning the λ max in the range of 200–400 nm.

Preparation of calibration curve in phosphate buffer

Raspberry ketones 10mg accurately weighed and transferred in a volumetric flask of 10ml. It was dissolved in 1ml of methanol and made up the volume with Phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) to get 1000µg/ml solution and then 1ml was pipetted out from 1000µg/ml solution and transferred to the volumetric flask of 100ml and diluted with Phosphate buffer to get 10µg/ml solution. To prepare the concentrations of 2, 4, 6, 8, 10ml was pipetted out from the 10µg/ml solution and made up 10ml with phosphate buffer. The absorbance values of the prepared concentrations were measured at 200-400nm using UV spectrophotometer. The calibration curves were prepared to determine the concentration of Raspberry ketones in samples [10].

Preparation of Microspheres:

Solvent evaporation method is one of the most widely used technique for the formulation of microspheres. The film forming polymer Ethyl cellulose (2-6 gm) was taken with 20ml of dichloromethane (organic solvent) and Raspberry ketone added to this solution. The polymer phase was then added to (0.25- 1% w/v) methylcellulose aqueous solution (which was held overnight to make a transparent dispersion). Rotation speed of magnetic stirrer was maintained at rpm (200-400) which helps in complete elimination of dichloromethane. Microspheres were then collected, Filtered, rinsed with distilled water for three times to eliminate the traces of methylene chloride and dried at room temperature for 3-4 hours and then microspheres were placed overnight in a desiccator.

Evaluation Parameters

Percentage Yield

The prepared all formulations of microspheres were dried in a desiccator. The dried microspheres were weighed and their percentage yield was calculating by using the following equation. The actual weight of obtained microspheres was divided by the total quantity of drug and all the polymers that are used for the making of microspheres [11].

Particle Size Analysis

Particle size of 400 dried microspheres from each batch was calculated by microscopic technique to identify the average particle size using an optical microscope [12]. The ocular micro meter was before calibrated by a stage micro meter.

FT-IR Spectroscopy Study of Optimized Formulation

The powdered form of Raspberry ketones was combined to potassium bromide (KBr), mixed homogenously, poured in the sample holder and examined by FTIR spectrophotometer for distinctive peaks in the range of 400-4000cm-1 [13].

Surface Morphological Studies

SEM was used to visualized the surface morphology of microspheres. In SEM, Gold coating was applied to sample using double-sided adhesive tape on brass stub in an ion sputter under vacuum conditions. To prepare the microspheres electrically conductive, a thin coating of gold (3 - 5 nm) was coated for 75 s at 20 KV. A scanning electron microscope was used to examine the morphology of gold-coated microspheres [14].

Entrapment Efficiency

The microspheres containing 50mg of Raspberry ketone were precisely weighed and smashed with the help of using mortar and pestle. The crushed powder was put in a 10ml volumetric flask, and the volume was made up to 10ml by 0.1 N HCl. The drug amount in the filtrate was determined using a UV- spectrophotometer at 200-400nm against a blank [15].

Swelling Index

The swelling index was measured through observing the swelling of microspheres in 100ml phosphate buffer. To achieve equilibrium, 100mg of microspheres were precisely weighed and soaked in phosphate buffer at pH 7.4 for 24 hours. The swollen microspheres were weighed. The following equation below was used to calculate the degree of swelling [16].

In vitro drug release studies of microspheres

Accurately weighed microspheres containing Raspberry ketones equivalent to 200 mg were added in the hard gelatin capsule to avoid the escape of the microspheres from the basket. The formulations were taken for the in vitro drug release studies which was carried out with the help of dissolution apparatus (USP, Type 1 rotating basket type) using simulated conditions by using 900ml of 0.1 N HCl buffer for 2 hrs (gastric emptying time) followed by dissolution in alkaline phosphate buffer for next 5 hrs. The dissolution rates were measured at 37±10 C under 50 rpm speed. 200 mesh size muslin cloth was wrapped over the rotating basket to avoid the escape of raspberry ketone microspheres from the rotating basket. A volume of 5ml sample were collected at regular time intervals replacing with an equal amount of fresh dissolution medium such as acidic buffer and alkaline buffer. After removal of test samples in order to maintain the sink condition throughout the experiment. All samples were taken in a volumetric flask of 10 ml which was filtered. And theses samples were analysed by using a UV- spectrophotometer at 200-400nm against appropriate blank. The concentration of raspberry ketone in sample were calculated from the calibration curve obtained from pure sample of calibration curve obtained from pure sample of calibration curve obtained from pure sample of Raspberry ketone [17].

Stability studies

20 mg drug loaded microspheres (20mg) was transferred in clear glass vials, tightly sealed and stored at controlled temperature, refrigerated conditions. Different temperature conditions were taken, at room temperature (25±20C), Refrigerated conditions maintained up to (5-80C) for a period of 3 months. Following parameters were analysed such as drug release, entrapment efficiency and swelling index of optimized formulations [18].

RESULT AND DISCUSSION

Pre-formulation studies

The following studies were performed for model drug.

Solubility

It is soluble in water

Melting point

The melting point of obtained drug sample was found to be 83ºC.

FT-IR Spectroscopy

The FT-IR spectrum of the pure drug was found to be similar to the standard spectrum of raspberry ketone. The spectrum of Raspberry ketone showed the following functional groups at their frequencies.

Figure 1: FT-IR spectrum of Raspberry ketone

Figure 2: FTIR spectrum of drug physical mixture

Formulation of Microspheres

Table 1: Composition of different formulations

Formulation code

Factor 1

Factor 2

Factor 3

Response 1

Response 2

Response 3

A: Ethyl cellulose gm

B: Methylcellulose %w/v

C: Stirring speed rpm

Particle size μm

Entrapment efficiency %

Drug release %

F1

6

0.625

400

45.35

86.54

86.30

F2

4

1

200

33.21

75.71

68.00

F3

6

0.625

200

43.16

80.21

80.31

F4

4

0.625

300

37.24

71.11

67.50

F5

4

1

400

34.12

68.23

57.36

F6

4

0.625

300

33.82

76.31

72.99

F7

4

0.625

300

36.19

70.21

70.83

F8

2

0.25

300

30.19

59.45

52.86

F9

4

0.625

300

38.32

77.65

73.33

F10

4

0.25

400

33.67

69.57

70.17

F11

2

0.625

200

35.69

61.78

57.36

F12

4

0.625

300

42.38

72.78

60.18

F13

6

1

300

44.19

82.67

81.81

F14

2

1

300

31.42

65.21

65.34

F15

6

0.25

300

40.23

84.34

80.65

F16

2

0.625

400

34.24

62.11

54.03

F17

4

0.25

200

38.47

78.89

77.32

Spectroscopic Studies

The size of microspheres was determined using microscope fitted with an ocular micrometer and stage micrometer. The SEM was used to visualised the surface morphology of the optimised raspberry ketone  microspheres.  The  SEM  images indicate the free flowing, identical and circular microsphere [19]. The surface of the microspheres smooth, it existed on the microsphere surface. It is attributed that with increase the polymer concentration that increase the particle size with smooth surface of microspheres was noticed.

Figure 3: SEM images of microspheres of F1 formulation

Percentage yield (%)

The microspheres were weighed and evaluating their percentage yield and it was discovered that the percentage yield rises with increase in concentration of polymers. The % yield was found (16.12- 31.34%). It was shown that as the concentration of polymers rises, the percentage yield of microspheres automatically increased. The percentage yield of F1 formulation increases due to greater concentration of polymers whereas the % yield of F8 formulation decreases due to lesser concentration of polymers.

Table 2: Percentage yield of different formulations

Formulation Code

Percentage Yield

F1

31.34

F2

28.41

F3

30.06

F4

22.36

F5

25.21

F6

22.57

F7

20.87

F8

18.45

F9

19.67

F10

26.43

F11

16.12

F12

22.05

F13

25.32

F14

17.44

F15

29.69

F16

18.38

F17

27.21

Entrapment efficiency

The quantity of drug entrapped in formulations was determined at 217nm. The entrapment study indicates that, with increase in polymer concentration the drug loading capacity of microspheres was raised. The microspheres formulation F1 are with higher concentration of polymer Ethyl cellulose produced the greater concentration of drug entrapment efficiency and was found to be 86.54 whereas the entrapment efficiency of formulation F8 with low concentration of polymers was found to be 59.45. The amount drug loaded into polymeric network depends upon following parameters such as drug solubility in initial solution and cross linking between polymers and solution [20].

Swelling Index

microspheres were introduced to alkaline buffer up to 7 hrs. Many other causes that can influence the drug release from the microspheres  involve  the  size  of  the Swelling studies indicates that the quantity of polymers plays a major role in solvent transfer. It was also noticed that increase in polymer concentration, the swelling index was also increased. The swelling index of optimized microspheres was found to be 2255 ± 1.6% in swelling media, 0.1N HCl (pH- 1.2).

In-vitro drug release studies

Using a Type II dissolving apparatus, the in vitro drug release tests were conducted for two hours in an acidic buffer and 5 hours in an alkaline buffer. Observed information from the study indicates both phases drug release of microspheres. At initial stage drug release was noticed in the first 2 hours in acidic buffer, after this a period of sustained release was detect when microsphere, type of polymer, physical state of drug in the polymer and its morphology [21].

Table 3: In vitro drug release studies of optimized formulation

Cumulative drug release (%) ± SD (n=3)

Time (min)

Optimized formulation (F1)

Pure drug (RK)

0

0

0

15

19.27±1.57

12.82±0.38

30

21.79±1.65

15.91±0.47

60

23.76±1.71

19.83±0.59

90

26.84±1.79

27.96±0.83

120

36.37±1.81

32.73±0.98

180

55.69±1.67

 

240

63.01±1.89

 

300

71.50±2.14

 

360

76.65±2.29

 

420

86.30±2.58

 

Figure 4: In vitro Drug Release studies of optimized formulation

Stability studies

20 mg drug loaded microspheres (20mg) was transferred in clear glass vials, tightly sealed and stored at controlled temperature, refrigerated conditions. Different temperature conditions were taken, at room temperature (25±20C),    Refrigerated conditions maintained up to (5±80C) for a period of 3 months. Following parameters were analysed such as drug release, entrapment efficiency and swelling index of optimized formulations.

Table 4: Stability studies

Parameters

At room temperature (25±20C)

At refrigerated conditions (5±80C)

1 month

2 months

3 months

1 month

2 months

3 months

Drug release (%)

73.80±1.6

73.76± 2.1

73.74±1.2

79.68±1.6

81.58±1.64

83.09±1.66

Entrapment efficiency (EE %)

71.71±1.2

71.68±1.4

71.65±1.6

62.53±1.22

59.86±1.20

57.41±1.17

Swelling index

2255±119.4

2248±117.5

2241±115.6

1657±87.6

1645±85.8

1545±81.4

CONCLUSION

Microspheres prepared by solvent evaporation technique using anti- hyperlipidemic agent i.e. raspberry ketone shows controlled release behaviour. The percentage yields were observed to be 16.12-31.34%. It was discovered that the percentage yield of the microspheres increased because the higher concentration of polymers. The particle size of F1 formulation was observed to be 45.35 μm and the microspheres were spherical in shape. It is also observed that the particle size of microspheres increased with increased in concentration of polymers. Surface morphological studies also optimized microspheres F1 was visualized by Scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Scanning electron microscopy reveals that microspheres are spherical in shape. Ethyl cellulose acts as a matrix material it is utilized because of its film forming abilities. The entrapment efficiency also done of microspheres which is discovered to be 86.54% (F1). The swelling index of optimized microspheres was observed to be 2255±1.6% in swelling media, 0.1N HCl. The in vitro studies indicates that there was a slow and extended release of drug in formulations was depend upon lower and higher concentration of polymers. Stability studies of optimized formulation (F1) were done for 3 months, at room temperature (25±20C) and refrigerated conditions maintained up to (5±80C). It was observed that there is no effect on formulation at room temp. for 3 months. Whereas at refrigerated conditions entrapment efficiency decreases, drug was too slow and swelling index also decreases. It was determined that formulation was stable at room temperature. It was discovered that formulation F1 is the best formulation.

REFERENCE

  1. G. Shattat, “A Review Article on Hyperlipidemia: Types, Treatments and New Drug Targets,” Biomed. Pharmacol. J., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 399–409, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.13005/bpj/504.
  2. M. Vergeer, A. G. Holleboom, J. J. P. Kastelein, and J. A. Kuivenhoven, “The HDL hypothesis: does high-density lipoprotein protect from atherosclerosis?,” J. Lipid Res., vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 2058–2073, Aug. 2010, doi: 10.1194/jlr.R001610.
  3. M. H. Elnaem, N. F. F. Rosley, A. A. Alhifany, M. E. Elrggal, and E. Cheema, “Impact of Pharmacist-Led Interventions on Medication Adherence and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Hypertension and Hyperlipidemia: A Scoping Review of Published Literature,” J. Multidiscip. Healthc., vol. 13, no. 20, pp. 635–645, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S257273.
  4. L. Su, R. Mittal, D. Ramgobin, R. Jain, and R. Jain, “Current Management Guidelines on Hyperlipidemia: The Silent Killer,” J. Lipids, vol. 2021, no. 2, pp. 9883352, 2021, doi: 10.1155/2021/9883352.
  5. C. W. Tsao et al., “Heart disease and Stroke Statistics-2022 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association,” Circulation, vol. 145, no. 8, pp. 153–639, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001052.
  6. D. K. Wang, M. Rahimi, and C. S. Filgueira, “Nanotechnology applications for cardiovascular disease treatment: Current and future perspectives,” Nanomedicine Nanotechnol. Biol. Med., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 102387-102396, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2021.102387.
  7. M. Lu, F. Guo, B. Fan, Z. Ren, and Q. Li, “Solubility and solution thermodynamics of Raspberry Ketone in pure organic solvents and binary solvent mixtures from T = (293.15 to 333.15) K,” J. Mol. Liq., vol. 246, pp. 332–341, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2017.09.084.
  8. J. O and J. Young, “True Melting Point Determination,” Chem. Edu., vol. 18, no. 13, pp. 203–208, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1333/s00897132500a.
  9. S. Jain and R. P. Shah, “Drug-Excipient Compatibility Study Through a Novel Vial-in- Vial Experimental Setup: A Benchmark Study,” AAPS PharmSciTech, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 117, May 2023, doi: 10.1208/s12249-023-02573-0.
  10. B. Yang, P. Zheng, D. Wu, and P. Chen, “Efficient Biosynthesis of Raspberry Ketone by Engineered Escherichia coli Coexpressing Zingerone Synthase and Glucose Dehydrogenase,” J. Agric. Food Chem., vol. 69, no. 8, pp. 2549-2556, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c07697.
  11. A. Jabar et al., “Statistically optimized pentazocine loaded microsphere for the sustained delivery application: Formulation and characterization,” Plos One, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. e0250876, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250876.
  12. E. Haustein and A. Kury?owicz-Cudowska, “Effect of Particle Size of Fly Ash Microspheres (FAMs) on the Selected Properties of Concrete,” Minerals, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 847, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.3390/min12070847.
  13. D. V. Panpaliya, A. Y. Sahare, P. Lanje, and P. Dhoke, “Formulation Development and Evaluation of Sustained Release Microsphere of Levetiracetam,” Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res., vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 165-173, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.47583/ijpsrr.2021.v71i02.026.
  14. Y. Jagtap, R. Bhujbal, and N. Ranpise, “Floating microspheres: A review,” Braz. J. Pharm. Sci.,  vol.  48,  no.  1,  pp.  17–30,  Mar.  2012,  doi:  10.1590/S1984-82502012000100003.
  15. L. Li, Z. Li, Y. Guo, K. Zhang, W. Mi, and J. Liu, “Preparation of uniform-sized GeXIVA[1,2]-loaded PLGA microspheres as long-effective release system with high encapsulation efficiency,” Drug Deliv., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 2283–2295, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1080/10717544.2022.2089297.
  16. S. H. B. Mundarinti and H. A. Ahad, “Impact of Pistacia lentiscus Plant Gum on Particle Size and Swelling Index in Central Composite Designed Amoxycillin Trihydrate Mucoadhesive Microspheres,” Indian J. Pharm. Educ. Res., vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 763–772, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.5530/ijper.57.3.93.
  17. M. Pooresmaeil and H. Namazi, “Facile preparation of pH-sensitive chitosan microspheres for delivery of curcumin; characterization, drug release kinetics and evaluation of anticancer activity,” Int. J. Biol. Macromol., vol. 162, no. 1, pp. 501–511, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.183.
  18. J. Pandey, R. Shankar, M. Kumar, K. Shukla, and B. Kumari, “Development of Nasal Mucoadhesive Microspheres of Granisetron: A Potential Drug,” Drug Res., vol. 70, no. 08, pp. 367, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1055/a-1193-4781.
  19. T. Song, T. Liu, X. Yang, and F. Bai, “Raspberry-like particles via the heterocoagulated reaction between reactive epoxy and amino groups,” Colloids Surf. Physicochem. Eng. Asp., vol. 469, no. 6, pp. 60–65, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.01.016.
  20. V. Maravajhala, N. Dasari, A. Sepuri, and S. Joginapalli, “Design and Evaluation of Niacin Microspheres,” Indian J. Pharm. Sci., vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 663–669, Dec. 2009, doi: 10.4103/0250-474X.59549.
  21. C. Berkland, M. J. Kipper, B. Narasimhan, K. (Kevin) Kim, and D. W. Pack, “Microsphere size, precipitation kinetics and drug distribution control drug release from biodegradable polyanhydride microspheres,” J. Controlled Release, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 129– 141, Jan. 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2003.09.011

Reference

  1. G. Shattat, “A Review Article on Hyperlipidemia: Types, Treatments and New Drug Targets,” Biomed. Pharmacol. J., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 399–409, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.13005/bpj/504.
  2. M. Vergeer, A. G. Holleboom, J. J. P. Kastelein, and J. A. Kuivenhoven, “The HDL hypothesis: does high-density lipoprotein protect from atherosclerosis?,” J. Lipid Res., vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 2058–2073, Aug. 2010, doi: 10.1194/jlr.R001610.
  3. M. H. Elnaem, N. F. F. Rosley, A. A. Alhifany, M. E. Elrggal, and E. Cheema, “Impact of Pharmacist-Led Interventions on Medication Adherence and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Hypertension and Hyperlipidemia: A Scoping Review of Published Literature,” J. Multidiscip. Healthc., vol. 13, no. 20, pp. 635–645, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S257273.
  4. L. Su, R. Mittal, D. Ramgobin, R. Jain, and R. Jain, “Current Management Guidelines on Hyperlipidemia: The Silent Killer,” J. Lipids, vol. 2021, no. 2, pp. 9883352, 2021, doi: 10.1155/2021/9883352.
  5. C. W. Tsao et al., “Heart disease and Stroke Statistics-2022 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association,” Circulation, vol. 145, no. 8, pp. 153–639, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001052.
  6. D. K. Wang, M. Rahimi, and C. S. Filgueira, “Nanotechnology applications for cardiovascular disease treatment: Current and future perspectives,” Nanomedicine Nanotechnol. Biol. Med., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 102387-102396, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2021.102387.
  7. M. Lu, F. Guo, B. Fan, Z. Ren, and Q. Li, “Solubility and solution thermodynamics of Raspberry Ketone in pure organic solvents and binary solvent mixtures from T = (293.15 to 333.15) K,” J. Mol. Liq., vol. 246, pp. 332–341, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2017.09.084.
  8. J. O and J. Young, “True Melting Point Determination,” Chem. Edu., vol. 18, no. 13, pp. 203–208, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1333/s00897132500a.
  9. S. Jain and R. P. Shah, “Drug-Excipient Compatibility Study Through a Novel Vial-in- Vial Experimental Setup: A Benchmark Study,” AAPS PharmSciTech, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 117, May 2023, doi: 10.1208/s12249-023-02573-0.
  10. B. Yang, P. Zheng, D. Wu, and P. Chen, “Efficient Biosynthesis of Raspberry Ketone by Engineered Escherichia coli Coexpressing Zingerone Synthase and Glucose Dehydrogenase,” J. Agric. Food Chem., vol. 69, no. 8, pp. 2549-2556, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c07697.
  11. A. Jabar et al., “Statistically optimized pentazocine loaded microsphere for the sustained delivery application: Formulation and characterization,” Plos One, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. e0250876, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250876.
  12. E. Haustein and A. Kury?owicz-Cudowska, “Effect of Particle Size of Fly Ash Microspheres (FAMs) on the Selected Properties of Concrete,” Minerals, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 847, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.3390/min12070847.
  13. D. V. Panpaliya, A. Y. Sahare, P. Lanje, and P. Dhoke, “Formulation Development and Evaluation of Sustained Release Microsphere of Levetiracetam,” Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res., vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 165-173, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.47583/ijpsrr.2021.v71i02.026.
  14. Y. Jagtap, R. Bhujbal, and N. Ranpise, “Floating microspheres: A review,” Braz. J. Pharm. Sci.,  vol.  48,  no.  1,  pp.  17–30,  Mar.  2012,  doi:  10.1590/S1984-82502012000100003.
  15. L. Li, Z. Li, Y. Guo, K. Zhang, W. Mi, and J. Liu, “Preparation of uniform-sized GeXIVA[1,2]-loaded PLGA microspheres as long-effective release system with high encapsulation efficiency,” Drug Deliv., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 2283–2295, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1080/10717544.2022.2089297.
  16. S. H. B. Mundarinti and H. A. Ahad, “Impact of Pistacia lentiscus Plant Gum on Particle Size and Swelling Index in Central Composite Designed Amoxycillin Trihydrate Mucoadhesive Microspheres,” Indian J. Pharm. Educ. Res., vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 763–772, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.5530/ijper.57.3.93.
  17. M. Pooresmaeil and H. Namazi, “Facile preparation of pH-sensitive chitosan microspheres for delivery of curcumin; characterization, drug release kinetics and evaluation of anticancer activity,” Int. J. Biol. Macromol., vol. 162, no. 1, pp. 501–511, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.183.
  18. J. Pandey, R. Shankar, M. Kumar, K. Shukla, and B. Kumari, “Development of Nasal Mucoadhesive Microspheres of Granisetron: A Potential Drug,” Drug Res., vol. 70, no. 08, pp. 367, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1055/a-1193-4781.
  19. T. Song, T. Liu, X. Yang, and F. Bai, “Raspberry-like particles via the heterocoagulated reaction between reactive epoxy and amino groups,” Colloids Surf. Physicochem. Eng. Asp., vol. 469, no. 6, pp. 60–65, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.01.016.
  20. V. Maravajhala, N. Dasari, A. Sepuri, and S. Joginapalli, “Design and Evaluation of Niacin Microspheres,” Indian J. Pharm. Sci., vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 663–669, Dec. 2009, doi: 10.4103/0250-474X.59549.
  21. C. Berkland, M. J. Kipper, B. Narasimhan, K. (Kevin) Kim, and D. W. Pack, “Microsphere size, precipitation kinetics and drug distribution control drug release from biodegradable polyanhydride microspheres,” J. Controlled Release, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 129– 141, Jan. 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2003.09.011

Photo
Geeta Mahlawat
Corresponding author

School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, MVN University, Palwal, Haryana, 121105

Photo
Manju Vashisth
Co-author

Research Scholar, MVN University, Palwal, Haryana, 121105

Photo
Ashutosh Upadhayay
Co-author

Professor and Dean, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, MVN University, Palwal, Haryana, 121105

Photo
Yogendra Singh
Co-author

School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, MVN University, Palwal, Haryana, 121105

Manju Vashisth, Geeta Mahlawat, Ashutosh Upadhayay, Yogendra Singh, Formulation and Evaluation of Herbal Microspheres for Antihyperlipidemic Activity, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 11, 4298-3308. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17731301

More related articles
Nutritional Management and Emerging Therapies in N...
Abeera Khan, Mohammad Raza, Mohamid Ashraf, Naveera Firdos, Pooja...
Design and Development of Clinical Trials...
Sakshi Kengar, Dr. Sanjay Bias, Dr. Savita Sonawane, ...
A Review Article on: Pathophysiology, Treatment St...
Vishakha Kholape, Dr. Sanjay Bias, Nida Mulla, ...
Quantum Pathways to Innovation: Redefining the Landscape of Drug Discovery...
Pocham Ravikiran, Mamidala Tejasree, Kethavath Mangulal, Donthula Srilatha, ...
Standardization of Chyavanaprasam K Tab: A Diabetic-Friendly Tablet Based on Cla...
Sibi Narayanan, Reeshma C. R., Smitha Francis, Anju Antony, Veena K., ...
Related Articles
Understanding the Knowledge, Attitude and Awareness of the Public Towards Liver ...
Dr. R S Meghasri, Akshitha K P, Umme Salma, Hima P M, Sanjay Pattar, Tejas Kumar V, ...
Formulation And In Vitro Evaluation Of Bilayer Tablets Of Sustained Release Glic...
Nusiba Albasheer , Sumia Farid, Dhia Eldin Ehag, Neha Jaiswal, Swarnima Pandey, Abubaker Elamin, ...
An Extensive Analysis of Achyranthes Aspera's (Amaranthaceae) Traditional Applic...
Pratiksha Kardile, Amruta Varpe, Rohan Salve, Dipali Devkate, Sanika Palange, Gayatri Khodade, Dr. R...
Nutritional Management and Emerging Therapies in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disea...
Abeera Khan, Mohammad Raza, Mohamid Ashraf, Naveera Firdos, Pooja Gonde, Rubeena Sheikh, Prerona Das...
More related articles
Nutritional Management and Emerging Therapies in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disea...
Abeera Khan, Mohammad Raza, Mohamid Ashraf, Naveera Firdos, Pooja Gonde, Rubeena Sheikh, Prerona Das...
Design and Development of Clinical Trials...
Sakshi Kengar, Dr. Sanjay Bias, Dr. Savita Sonawane, ...
Nutritional Management and Emerging Therapies in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disea...
Abeera Khan, Mohammad Raza, Mohamid Ashraf, Naveera Firdos, Pooja Gonde, Rubeena Sheikh, Prerona Das...
Design and Development of Clinical Trials...
Sakshi Kengar, Dr. Sanjay Bias, Dr. Savita Sonawane, ...