View Article

  • Integrating Quality Management Systems (QMS) and Quality by Design (QBD) in the Design and Development of Dexlansoprazole Pellets: Enhancing Product Quality, Consistency, and Regulatory Compliance

  • Roorkee College of Pharmacy Roorkee

Abstract

The design and development of Dexlansoprazole (DEX) Lansoprazole pellets require a meticulous approach to ensure the final product meets the stringent standards of quality, efficacy, and safety. In this context, Quality Management System (QMS) and Quality by Design (QbD) play pivotal roles. QMS provides a structured framework that ensures compliance with regulatory requirements, facilitates traceability, and promotes continuous improvement throughout the product lifecycle. It emphasizes risk management, ensuring that potential issues are identified early, and corrective actions are implemented proactively. In parallel, QbD focuses on building quality into the product from the outset. It involves identifying critical quality attributes (CQAs), understanding the relationship between formulation variables and product performance, and applying Design of Experiments (DoE) to optimize the formulation and manufacturing processes. By integrating QMS and QbD, the development of DEX Lansoprazole pellets benefits from enhanced product consistency, minimized variability, and a robust control strategy. This integrated approach not only ensures the desired release profile, stability, and patient compliance but also streamlines the development process, reduces risks, and improves the overall quality of the final product. Together, QMS and QbD contribute to the creation of a reliable and effective therapeutic product that meets the highest pharmaceutical standards.

Keywords

Dexlansoprazole (DEX), Quality Management System (QMS), Quality by Design (QbD), Design of Experiments (DoE), Lansoprazole

Introduction

The design and development of Dexlansoprazole (DEX) Lansoprazole pellets require a comprehensive and structured approach to ensure the formulation is effective, consistent, and meets regulatory standards. Dexlansoprazole, a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), has a complex pharmacokinetic profile, and the development of a pellet dosage form offers significant advantages in terms of controlled and sustained drug release, improved patient compliance, and enhanced bioavailability. However, the challenges associated with formulating DEX in a pellet form—such as stability, drug release characteristics, and manufacturing scalability—necessitate a careful and systematic development process. Quality Management Systems (QMS) and Quality by Design (QbD) are critical frameworks that guide the development of pharmaceutical products, including DEX Lansoprazole pellets. QMS focuses on ensuring consistent quality through structured processes, documentation, and regulatory compliance, while QbD emphasizes designing quality into the product from the outset, focusing on identifying critical quality attributes (CQAs), understanding the relationship between process parameters and product performance, and ensuring the product meets its desired therapeutic outcomes. The integration of QMS and QbD throughout the DEX Lansoprazole pellets' lifecycle enhances product development by ensuring the final product is robust, reproducible, and meets predefined quality standards. QMS helps mitigate risks through documentation, process controls, and continuous monitoring, while QbD facilitates optimized formulation development through risk-based design, real-time monitoring, and efficient process control strategies. This paper aims to explore the roles of QMS and QbD in the design and development of DEX Lansoprazole pellets, highlighting how their integration ensures high-quality, patient-centric, and regulatory-compliant pharmaceutical products.

Overview of Dexlansoprazole Pellets [6-12]

Dexlansoprazole is the R-enantiomer of lansoprazole, a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) that provides effective management of acid-related disorders such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and erosive esophagitis. It is uniquely formulated using a dual delayed-release (DDR) delivery system, which enables two distinct drug release phases in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, resulting in extended plasma drug levels and prolonged therapeutic action.

Advantages of Pellet-Based Formulation

The pellet-based multiparticulate delivery system used in Dexlansoprazole capsules offers several critical advantages over conventional dosage forms:

  • Improved stability: The acid-labile nature of Dexlansoprazole necessitates protection from gastric acid. This is achieved through the application of an enteric coating, which prevents degradation in the stomach and allows the drug to reach the intestine for optimal absorption.
  •  Enhanced bioavailability: The dual-pulse release approach provides controlled and sustained drug delivery, improving systemic exposure and clinical efficacy compared to single-release PPIs.
  • Increased patient compliance: Once-daily dosing made possible by extended drug exposure improves patient adherence and symptom control, especially for nighttime acid reflux.

Typical Pellet Formulation Components

The formulation of Dexlansoprazole pellets consists of a multiparticulate system with multiple coating layers to achieve site-specific release:

  1. Core material:
    The core includes the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), often combined with inert excipients such as microcrystalline cellulose or sugar spheres to form a spherical substrate using processes like extrusion-spheronization or fluid-bed layering.
  2. Sub-coating layer:
    A separation or sub-coating layer (typically using hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, HPMC) is applied to prevent interaction between the API and the enteric polymers and to enhance adhesion of the enteric layer.
  3. Enteric polymer coating:
    This layer ensures delayed release by dissolving only at higher pH levels, typically in the small intestine. Commonly used enteric polymers include Eudragit L100-55, cellulose acetate phthalate (CAP), and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose phthalate (HPMCP).

Quality Management System (QMS): A Framework for Compliance [13-15]

A Quality Management System (QMS) is a structured framework that encompasses the policies, processes, standard operating procedures (SOPs), and resources required to ensure consistent product quality, safety, and regulatory compliance in pharmaceutical manufacturing. The primary objective of a QMS is to ensure that pharmaceutical products are manufactured under controlled conditions that meet predefined quality standards.

Key components of a pharmaceutical QMS include:

  • Document control: Ensures the accurate creation, review, approval, distribution, and archiving of controlled documents.
  • Deviation and CAPA (Corrective and Preventive Action) management: Facilitates the identification, investigation, and remediation of process deviations, helping to prevent recurrence.
  • Change control: Manages any changes to materials, processes, equipment, or documentation in a systematic manner to maintain product integrity.
  • Training and internal audits: Ensure that personnel are competent and that systems are periodically evaluated for compliance and effectiveness.
  • Supplier qualification and management: Verifies that external vendors meet quality expectations and regulatory requirements, reducing supply chain risks.

A robust QMS is designed to be proactive rather than reactive and is aligned with internationally recognized standards and guidelines. Notably:

  • ISO 9001:2015 sets the general principles for quality management systems, emphasizing a risk-based approach and continual improvement across industries, including pharmaceuticals.
  • ICH Q10 provides a model for a pharmaceutical QMS that promotes product lifecycle management and integrates quality risk management and knowledge management across all stages of product development and manufacturing (ICH Q10, 2008).

Together, these frameworks foster a culture of continuous improvement, facilitate regulatory readiness, and support compliance with global Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) regulations.

Quality by Design (QbD): Scientific Approach to Development [16-20]

Quality by Design (QbD) is a modern, science- and risk-based approach to pharmaceutical development, as outlined in the ICH Q8(R2) guideline. It emphasizes building quality into the product from the outset, rather than relying solely on end-product testing. QbD promotes process understanding, identification of critical variables, and control strategies that ensure consistent product quality throughout the lifecycle.

According to ICH Q8(R2), the essential elements of QbD include:

  • Defining the Quality Target Product Profile (QTPP)
  • Identifying Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs)
  • Conducting risk assessments
  • Establishing the design space
  • Implementing a control strategy
  • Lifecycle management and continuous improvement

This structured approach is especially valuable in the development of complex oral dosage forms, such as delayed-release pellets of Dexlansoprazole, where formulation and process variables significantly affect drug performance.

  • Quality Target Product Profile (QTPP) for Dexlansoprazole Pellets

The QTPP serves as the foundation of product design and outlines the desired quality characteristics to ensure safety and efficacy.

Attribute

                       Target

  Dosage form

                Delayed-release pellets

     Strength

                      30 mg, 60 mg

 Release profile

                   Dual pulse release

   Stability

                   Acid resistance, thermal stability

These targets inform the identification of Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs) and guide formulation and process development.

  •  Identified Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs)

CQAs are physical, chemical, biological, or microbiological properties that must be controlled within predefined limits to ensure product quality.

  • API assay – To ensure proper dosing and uniformity.
  • Dissolution profile – Reflects drug release behavior and therapeutic performance.
  • Pellet size distribution – Affects uniformity of coating and dissolution.
  • Coating integrity – Ensures acid resistance and proper drug release timing.
  • Moisture content – Influences stability, especially for acid-labile APIs like Dexlansoprazole.
  • Critical Process Parameters (CPPs)

CPPs are variables in the manufacturing process that have a direct impact on the identified CQAs. These must be carefully controlled and monitored.

  • Binder addition rate during layering – Influences pellet formation and uniformity.
  • Fluid bed temperature – Affects drying and coating uniformity.
  • Spray rate and atomization pressure – Critical for achieving consistent coating thickness.
  • Curing temperature of enteric coating – Impacts the integrity and functionality of the enteric layer.

Risk assessment tools like Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) or Ishikawa diagrams are used to link CPPs with CQAs and determine control strategies accordingly

Risk Assessment and Design Space [21-28]

Risk assessment tools like FMEA and Ishikawa diagrams help identify high-risk parameters. Design space is then developed using DoE (Design of Experiments) techniques.

Example:

  • Optimizing fluid bed coating parameters using a 2³ factorial design.
  • Correlating atomization pressure and inlet temperature with coating uniformity and release lag time.

Control Strategy

A comprehensive control strategy includes:

  • In-process testing: pellet size, moisture
  • Process Analytical Technology (PAT): real-time coating thickness
  • Finished product testing: dissolution, assay
  • Environmental monitoring: controlled humidity and temperature

Regulatory Perspectives

Regulatory agencies support QbD submission through:

  • QbD-based CMC documentation
  • Real-time release testing (RTRT)
  • Reduced post-approval changes

The FDA’s QbD pilot program and EMA’s scientific advice framework have both encouraged QbD adoption for complex formulations like Dexlansoprazole pellets.

Integration of QMS and QbD: Synergies and Benefits

  • Cross-functional collaboration between development, quality, and regulatory teams.
  • Improved knowledge management and traceability.
  • Reduction in batch failures due to proactive control of variability.
  • Faster regulatory approvals with risk-based documentation.

Case Study: Hypothetical Application

A development project for Dexlansoprazole pellets using QbD resulted in:

  • 15% improved batch consistency
  • 25% reduction in coating rework
  • 50% faster response to process deviations

These outcomes were supported by a fully compliant QMS ensuring robust documentation and quality oversight.

Challenges and Future Directions

  • High initial investment in QbD tools and training
  • Cultural shift toward data-driven development
  • Need for real-time analytics and digital QMS platforms

Future directions include:

  • Integration with AI for predictive process control
  • Cloud-based QMS and eBMR (electronic batch manufacturing records)
  • Greater harmonization across global regulatory frameworks

CONCLUSION

The integration of Quality Management Systems (QMS) and Quality by Design (QbD) in the development of Dexlansoprazole delayed-release pellets represents a transformative approach in pharmaceutical manufacturing. By embedding quality into every stage of the product lifecycle—from formulation design to commercial production—this dual framework ensures that the final product consistently meets predefined standards of safety, efficacy, and performance. QMS provides the procedural backbone to maintain compliance, manage risks, and drive continuous improvement, while QbD offers a scientific foundation for understanding critical material attributes (CMAs) and critical process parameters (CPPs) that influence critical quality attributes (CQAs). Together, they facilitate robust process design, reduce variability, enhance manufacturing efficiency, and support regulatory flexibility through comprehensive product knowledge. This paradigm shift—from quality-by-testing to quality-by-design—is essential for modern pharmaceutical development, especially in the context of complex dosage forms like dual delayed-release pellets. It not only ensures regulatory compliance aligned with ICH and ISO guidelines but also promotes innovation, product consistency, and patient-centric outcomes.

REFERENCES

  1. ICH Q10 - Pharmaceutical Quality System. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH), 2008.
  2. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Guidance for Industry: Quality by Design for ANDAs. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, FDA, 2014.
  3. Singh, S. et al. (2016). "Application of Quality by Design in Pharmaceutical Product Development." International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, 7(5): 1824–1832.
  4. Shargel, L., & Yu, A. B. (2016). Applied Biopharmaceutics & Pharmacokinetics (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  5. FDA, (2011). "Pharmaceutical cGMPs for the 21st Century: A Risk-Based Approach." U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, FDA.
  6. Desai, D., Timmins, P., & Wang, J. (2014). Development and evaluation of dual delayed-release Dexlansoprazole capsules. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 40(3), 382–392. https://doi.org/10.3109/03639045.2013.778813
  7. Yu, L. X. (2008). Pharmaceutical quality by design: Product and process development, understanding, and control. Pharmaceutical Research, 25(4), 781–791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-007-9511-1
  8. Sharma, S., Bajaj, H., & Bhardwaj, S. (2013). Multiparticulate drug delivery systems. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research, 22(1), 220–228.
  9. Gupta, P., Vermani, K., & Garg, S. (2012). Hydrogels: From controlled release to pH-responsive drug delivery. Drug Discovery Today, 7(10), 569–579.
  10. Ganapathy, D., Senthil, N., & Elumalai, M. (2017). Recent trends in gastroretentive drug delivery systems: A review. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics, 7(5), 45–50.
  11. Patel, D., Patel, P., & Patel, N. (2011). Pellets: A general overview. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 3(2), 59–62.
  12. Rowe, R. C., Sheskey, P. J., & Quinn, M. E. (2009). Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients (6th ed.). Pharmaceutical Press.
  13. ICH Q10: Pharmaceutical Quality System. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, 2008. https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/Q10%20Guideline.pdf
  14. International Organization for Standardization. (2015). ISO 9001:2015 - Quality management systems — Requirements. ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/62085.html
  15. Nasr, M. M. (2009). Quality by Design (QbD): A modern system for pharmaceutical development and manufacturing. Pharmaceutical Engineering, 29(6), 1–7.
  16. ICH Q8(R2): Pharmaceutical Development. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, 2009.
  17. ICH Q9: Quality Risk Management. International Conference on Harmonisation, 2005.
  18. Yu, L.X. (2008). Pharmaceutical Quality by Design: Product and Process Development, Understanding, and Control. Pharmaceutical Research, 25(4), 781–791.
  19. Desai, D., Timmins, P., Wang, J. (2014). Development and Evaluation of Dual Delayed-Release Dexlansoprazole Capsules. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 40(3), 382–392.
  20. Nasr, M.M. (2009). Quality by Design (QbD): A Modern System for Pharmaceutical Development and Manufacturing. Pharmaceutical Engineering, 29(6), 1–7.
  21. ICH Q8(R2): Pharmaceutical Development. International Conference on Harmonisation.
  22. ICH Q10: Pharmaceutical Quality System. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline.
  23. FDA Guidance for Industry: QbD Approaches for Drug Products.
  24. Winkle, H. (2010). "Quality by Design (QbD)—FDA Perspectives." Journal of Validation Technology, 16(1), 14–18.
  25. Nasr, M. (2009). "Implementing QbD in Pharmaceutical Development." Pharmaceutical Engineering, 29(6), 1–7.
  26. Chang, R.K., Raw, A., Lionberger, R., Yu, L. (2007). "Generic Development of Topical Dermatologic Products: Formulation Development, Process Development, and Testing of Topical Dermatologic Products." AAPS Journal, 9(1), E30–E40.
  27. Desai, D., et al. (2014). "QbD Approach to the Formulation and Development of Delayed-Release Dexlansoprazole Pellets." Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 40(3), 382–392.
  28. Yu, L.X. (2008). "Pharmaceutical Quality by Design: Product and Process Development, Understanding, and Control." Pharmaceutical Research, 25(4), 781–791.

Reference

  1. ICH Q10 - Pharmaceutical Quality System. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH), 2008.
  2. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Guidance for Industry: Quality by Design for ANDAs. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, FDA, 2014.
  3. Singh, S. et al. (2016). "Application of Quality by Design in Pharmaceutical Product Development." International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, 7(5): 1824–1832.
  4. Shargel, L., & Yu, A. B. (2016). Applied Biopharmaceutics & Pharmacokinetics (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  5. FDA, (2011). "Pharmaceutical cGMPs for the 21st Century: A Risk-Based Approach." U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, FDA.
  6. Desai, D., Timmins, P., & Wang, J. (2014). Development and evaluation of dual delayed-release Dexlansoprazole capsules. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 40(3), 382–392. https://doi.org/10.3109/03639045.2013.778813
  7. Yu, L. X. (2008). Pharmaceutical quality by design: Product and process development, understanding, and control. Pharmaceutical Research, 25(4), 781–791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-007-9511-1
  8. Sharma, S., Bajaj, H., & Bhardwaj, S. (2013). Multiparticulate drug delivery systems. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research, 22(1), 220–228.
  9. Gupta, P., Vermani, K., & Garg, S. (2012). Hydrogels: From controlled release to pH-responsive drug delivery. Drug Discovery Today, 7(10), 569–579.
  10. Ganapathy, D., Senthil, N., & Elumalai, M. (2017). Recent trends in gastroretentive drug delivery systems: A review. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics, 7(5), 45–50.
  11. Patel, D., Patel, P., & Patel, N. (2011). Pellets: A general overview. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 3(2), 59–62.
  12. Rowe, R. C., Sheskey, P. J., & Quinn, M. E. (2009). Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients (6th ed.). Pharmaceutical Press.
  13. ICH Q10: Pharmaceutical Quality System. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, 2008. https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/Q10%20Guideline.pdf
  14. International Organization for Standardization. (2015). ISO 9001:2015 - Quality management systems — Requirements. ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/62085.html
  15. Nasr, M. M. (2009). Quality by Design (QbD): A modern system for pharmaceutical development and manufacturing. Pharmaceutical Engineering, 29(6), 1–7.
  16. ICH Q8(R2): Pharmaceutical Development. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, 2009.
  17. ICH Q9: Quality Risk Management. International Conference on Harmonisation, 2005.
  18. Yu, L.X. (2008). Pharmaceutical Quality by Design: Product and Process Development, Understanding, and Control. Pharmaceutical Research, 25(4), 781–791.
  19. Desai, D., Timmins, P., Wang, J. (2014). Development and Evaluation of Dual Delayed-Release Dexlansoprazole Capsules. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 40(3), 382–392.
  20. Nasr, M.M. (2009). Quality by Design (QbD): A Modern System for Pharmaceutical Development and Manufacturing. Pharmaceutical Engineering, 29(6), 1–7.
  21. ICH Q8(R2): Pharmaceutical Development. International Conference on Harmonisation.
  22. ICH Q10: Pharmaceutical Quality System. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline.
  23. FDA Guidance for Industry: QbD Approaches for Drug Products.
  24. Winkle, H. (2010). "Quality by Design (QbD)—FDA Perspectives." Journal of Validation Technology, 16(1), 14–18.
  25. Nasr, M. (2009). "Implementing QbD in Pharmaceutical Development." Pharmaceutical Engineering, 29(6), 1–7.
  26. Chang, R.K., Raw, A., Lionberger, R., Yu, L. (2007). "Generic Development of Topical Dermatologic Products: Formulation Development, Process Development, and Testing of Topical Dermatologic Products." AAPS Journal, 9(1), E30–E40.
  27. Desai, D., et al. (2014). "QbD Approach to the Formulation and Development of Delayed-Release Dexlansoprazole Pellets." Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 40(3), 382–392.
  28. Yu, L.X. (2008). "Pharmaceutical Quality by Design: Product and Process Development, Understanding, and Control." Pharmaceutical Research, 25(4), 781–791.

Photo
Shazuddin Shamsi
Corresponding author

Roorkee College of Pharmacy Roorkee

Photo
Dr. Amit Chaudhary
Co-author

Roorkee College of Pharmacy Roorkee

Shazuddin Shamsi*, Dr. Amit Chaudhary, Integrating Quality Management Systems (QMS) and Quality by Design (QBD) in the Design and Development of Dexlansoprazole Pellets: Enhancing Product Quality, Consistency, and Regulatory Compliance, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 5, 1054-1060. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15353202

More related articles
Brain Tumors: Signs, Detection, and Treatment...
V. A. Chavan, V. K. Gahal, S. S. Deokar, ...
Assessment of Microbial Contamination of Coins Col...
Sujit Nagare, Sneha Limbani, Shrushti Chalke, Raj Ambre, Vipul Sa...
In-Silico Study of Ethambutol and Its Derivatives ...
Dr. Dinesh Kawade, Shriya Bagh, Shikha Shahu, Yashika Bhattad, Se...
Formulation And Evaluation of Oral Floating Microspheres of Norfloxacin Using Ok...
Dr. Pradnya Patil , Somiyaz Begum, H. Doddayya, Sarfraz Md, Adidurga Rao, ...
Study The Efficacy of Polyherbal Formulations (Vetricare Integumentary) Against ...
Dr. Sushma Ghadigaonkar, Purva Joshi, M. G. Ghadigaonkar , ...
Impact of Telemedicine on patient Compliance and Drug Adherence ...
Deepak Sahu , Dr. Praveen Tahilani , Dr. Jitendra Banweer, Dr. Sarika Shrivastava , ...
Related Articles
An Overview of Asthma and Its Management...
LESUKA.K, MUNI NIKESH.B, M.K. SUNDAR SRI, ...
Pathophysiology of Diabetes Mellitus with Disease Economics ...
Akash Narbat, Vaibhav Madane, Namdeo Shinde , ...
Intra Nasal Vaccines: An Overview...
Rama Vaishnavi Vedantam, M.Tulasi Maheswari, ...
Brain Tumors: Signs, Detection, and Treatment...
V. A. Chavan, V. K. Gahal, S. S. Deokar, ...
More related articles
Brain Tumors: Signs, Detection, and Treatment...
V. A. Chavan, V. K. Gahal, S. S. Deokar, ...
Assessment of Microbial Contamination of Coins Collected from Local Market of Kh...
Sujit Nagare, Sneha Limbani, Shrushti Chalke, Raj Ambre, Vipul Sansare, ...
In-Silico Study of Ethambutol and Its Derivatives On 7nt7 Receptor for Anti-Tube...
Dr. Dinesh Kawade, Shriya Bagh, Shikha Shahu, Yashika Bhattad, Sejal Kshirsagar, ...
Brain Tumors: Signs, Detection, and Treatment...
V. A. Chavan, V. K. Gahal, S. S. Deokar, ...
Assessment of Microbial Contamination of Coins Collected from Local Market of Kh...
Sujit Nagare, Sneha Limbani, Shrushti Chalke, Raj Ambre, Vipul Sansare, ...
In-Silico Study of Ethambutol and Its Derivatives On 7nt7 Receptor for Anti-Tube...
Dr. Dinesh Kawade, Shriya Bagh, Shikha Shahu, Yashika Bhattad, Sejal Kshirsagar, ...