Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Liquid crystals (LCs) have gained recognition as a potential drug delivery platform owing to their self-assembling nature and capacity to improve both drug stability and bioavailability. Among these, lyotropic liquid crystal systems—particularly reversed bicontinuous cubic and hexagonal mesophases—are drawing growing attention because of their remarkable microstructures and distinct physicochemical properties. This review aims to provide an in-depth analysis of the role of lyotropic liquid crystals in pharmaceutical formulations, particularly in intranasal drug delivery. Recent studies have demonstrated the ability of lyotropic liquid crystal-based systems to improve drug permeation and controlled release, with promising applications for brain-targeted therapies. However, challenges such as formulation stability, scalability, and regulatory considerations remain. Future research should focus on optimizing formulation parameters, understanding in vivo behavior, and translating laboratory findings into clinical applications.
Liquid crystals (LCs) are mesophases—intermediate states of matter that exhibit characteristics of both isotropic liquids and crystalline solids. In these phases, molecules typically align in a preferred orientation while still maintaining the ability to move freely in space. The compounds capable of forming such mesophases are known as mesogens. Liquid crystals (LCs) are primarily categorized based on the physicochemical factors that drive their phase transitions, namely thermotropic liquid crystals (TLCs) and lyotropic liquid crystals (LLCs). In TLCs, the transition to a mesophase occurs with an increase in temperature, while in LLCs, it is induced by the addition of a solvent. Lyotropic liquid crystal systems—particularly reversed bicontinuous cubic and hexagonal mesophases are drawing growing attention because of their remarkable microstructures and distinct physicochemical properties [1].
Table 1. Overview of Lyotropic Liquid Crystal Phases
Phase Type |
Structure |
Key Features |
Formation Conditions |
Lamellar (La) |
Linear arrangement of lipid bilayers with hydrophilic heads facing water and hydrophobic tails inward. |
Sheet-like, resembles stacked bilayers; highly ordered. |
Formed by amphiphilic molecules in water at moderate concentrations |
Hexagonal (H1) |
Cylindrical micelles with hydrophilic cores arranged in a hexagonal lattice. |
Also known as the normal hexagonal phase; allows for water channels in lipid matrix. |
Formed by amphiphilic molecules with high hydrophilic content |
Hexagonal (H2) |
Cylindrical lipid structures arranged in a hexagonal lattice, embedded in a continuous water phase. |
Also known as the inverse hexagonal phase; often used for hydrophobic drug delivery. |
Formed at higher lipid concentrations or with molecules favouring hydrophobic interactions |
Cubic (Q2) |
3D interconnected lipid bilayers forming a dense, isotropic cubic lattice. |
Can encapsulate hydrophilic, hydrophobic, and amphiphilic drugs; thermodynamically stable. |
Typically forms between H2 and La phases under specific lipid-water ratios [2] |
Nasal Drug Delivery Pathway & Strategy
Nasal therapy has garnered significant attention as a rapid, effective, and reliable route for systemic drug delivery, especially for treatments with poor oral efficacy and limited bioavailability. It also enables drugs to bypass the blood-brain barrier via the olfactory bulb, enhancing their effectiveness on the central nervous system [3]. Various nanocarriers, including liposomes, solid lipid nanoparticles, microspheres, and nano emulsions, have been explored as potential strategies for targeting the central nervous system via the intranasal route. However, these systems often face challenges related to drug encapsulation efficiency and stability [4]. In contrast, colloidal carrier systems protect active ingredients from degradation within the nasal cavity and facilitate their distribution beyond the nasal mucosa. Among these, cubosomes have attracted attention as effective delivery vehicles for brain targeting. Composed of crystalline nanostructured liquid particles with bi-continuous lipid membranes, cubosomes can encapsulate therapeutic agents regardless of their hydrophilic, hydrophobic, or amphiphilic nature. Cubosomes are biocompatible, bio adhesive, and thermodynamically stable, making them a promising option for intranasal drug delivery due to their unique properties [5]. The human nose plays vital roles in respiration and the sense of smell. Anatomically, it consists of the external nose and the nasal cavity (internal nose). The external nose, shaped like a triangular pyramid, is centrally positioned on the face and made up of bone and cartilage. It is connected to facial muscles governed by the facial nerve, contributing to expressions. Extending approximately 12 cm from the nostrils to the nasopharynx, the nasal cavity is divided into left and right halves by the nasal septum. From both structural and functional perspectives, the nasal cavity is subdivided into three main regions: vestibular, respiratory, and olfactory [6].
1.1. Vestibular Region
This is the outermost and smallest segment of the nasal cavity, covering an area of around 0.6 cm² [7]. It contains nasal hairs that trap airborne particles and is lined with squamous epithelium. Due to its limited surface area and barrier characteristics, this region contributes minimally to drug absorption.
1.2. Respiratory Region
Representing the largest portion of the nasal cavity, this region lines the lateral walls and plays a central role in air filtration, humidification, and drug absorption. The epithelium here comprises goblet cells, ciliated and non-ciliated columnar cells, and basal cells [8]. Goblet cells secrete mucus via nasal glands, while basal cells act as progenitors capable of differentiating into other epithelial cells. The presence of cilia and microvilli substantially increases the surface area, enhancing absorption. The respiratory region is highly vascularized, making it ideal for systemic drug delivery. Additionally, this area is innervated by branches of the trigeminal nerve (V1 and V2), offering a secondary route for drugs to reach the central nervous system (CNS) [9].
1.3. Olfactory Region
Located at the roof of the nasal cavity, the olfactory region offers a direct connection to the CNS via the olfactory nerve. This pathway plays a crucial role in nose-to-brain transport, bypassing the blood-brain barrier [10,11].
Nasal Administration: A Smart Route for Drug Delivery
Challenge:
Solution: In Situ Gelation Systems
Thus, by overcoming physiological barriers like mucociliary clearance, in situ gelation systems significantly enhance the efficacy of intranasal drug delivery, making them a promising strategy for targeted brain therapies [12]
Table 2. Formulation strategies for intranasal liquid crystal systems.
Formulation Aspect |
Description |
Examples/ Benefits |
References |
Lipids |
Form the structural base of LLCs |
Glyceryl monooleate (GMO), Phytantriol |
(13) |
Surfactants |
Stabilize mesophases and improve mucoadhesion |
Poloxamers, PEGylated phospholipids |
(14,15) |
Drug Loading |
Spatial organization allows loading of diverse drug types |
Hydrophilic (aqueous channels), Lipophilic (lipid bilayers), Amphiphilic (interfaces) |
(16) |
In-Situ Gelling Agents |
Thermoresponsive polymers enhance nasal retention |
Poloxamer 407: gels at body temperature |
(17) |
2.Nanoparticle preparation: technologies and methodologies
For nanoparticle systems to be considered viable for industrial-scale applications, their preparation must be cost-effective, time-efficient, and energy-conscious. The synthesis of liquid crystalline nanoparticles, such as cubosomes and hexosomes, has evolved significantly, resulting in a diverse array of preparation techniques. This section provides a concise overview of the most commonly employed methodologies [18].
2.1. Top-Down Preparation
Figure 1: Top-down preparation of Cubosomes and Hexosomes
The top-down approach, introduced in the mid-1990s, remains a widely used method for producing cubosomes and hexosomes. It relies on high-energy mechanical processes—such as ultrasonication, high-shear mixing, or high-pressure homogenization—to break down bulk amphiphilic lipid phases into stable nanoparticles.
Typically, a formulation of amphiphilic lipids, active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), and a stabilizer like Pluronic® F127 is mechanically agitated. Pluronic F127 ensures steric stabilization, preventing aggregation and enhancing colloidal stability.
Although scalable, this method has drawbacks:
2.2. Bottom-Up Preparation
The bottom-up approach represents a low-energy alternative to the conventional top-down method for cubosome production. This technique involves the formulation of a solution containing amphiphilic lipids, drug cargo, and, critically, hydrotropic agents—molecules that significantly enhance the solubility of amphiphiles and inhibit premature aggregation during dispersion.
Figure 2: Bottom-up preparation of Cubosomes and Hexosomes
The bottom-up approach represents a low-energy alternative to the conventional top-down method for cubosome production. This technique involves the formulation of a solution containing amphiphilic lipids, drug cargo, and, critically, hydrotropic agents—molecules that significantly enhance the solubility of amphiphiles and inhibit premature aggregation during dispersion. Upon gentle agitation, this homogeneous solution undergoes spontaneous self-assembly into nanostructured liquid crystalline particles, forming cubosomes directly from solution rather than by breaking down bulk lipid phases, as seen in top-down methods. The inclusion of hydrotropes is central to this process, as they reduce the need for high energy input and facilitate more efficient nanoparticle formation.
This method offers several advantages:
Table 3: Insights from experimental studies on intranasal liquid crystals
Study |
Drug |
Formulation type |
Key outcomes |
Desai et al [13] |
Almotriptan malate |
Cubosomal in situ gel |
~177 nm size, 72.58% EE, >90% release in 5 h, 2.52× permeation vs. conventional gel, no nasal toxicity |
Eissa et al [15] |
Granisetron |
Cubosomal thermoresponsive gel |
Small particle size, high zeta potential & EE, prolonged nasal residence, enhanced brain uptake & bioavailability |
See et al [19] |
Tranilast |
GMO- & MGE-based LC system |
2–12× higher brain delivery than solution, µCT confirmed olfactory transport, olfactory bulb showed highest drug levels |
Souza et al [20] |
Donepezil |
LLC microemulsion to mesophase |
Mucoadhesive mesophase formation, sustained release, enhanced brain accumulation in rats |
Fonseca-Santos et al [12] |
Resveratrol |
In situ LC gel (hexagonal phase) |
Hexagonal mesophase in nasal mucus, improved memory in AD model, reduced IL-1β & TNF-α, strong brain targeting via mucoadhesion & phase transition |
Future Perspectives
To advance liquid crystal-based intranasal drug delivery toward clinical use, future research should focus on elucidating nose-to-brain transport mechanisms, assessing long-term safety, and optimizing formulation scalability. Clinical trials are essential to validate efficacy and safety in humans. Integrating these systems with stimuli-responsive polymers or personalized medicine approaches could further enhance brain targeting. Additionally, establishing regulatory guidelines and standardizing quality control will be critical for commercialization. Advancements in these areas will accelerate the translation of this promising platform for effective treatment of neurological disorders.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, liquid crystal-based intranasal drug delivery systems represent a transformative and promising approach for non-invasive, efficient, and targeted treatment of neurological disorders. Emerging research supports the use of liquid crystal nanocarriers, especially cubosomes as innovative systems for intranasal drug delivery with improved brain targeting and therapeutic outcomes. These systems demonstrate significant advantages over conventional delivery routes by offering rapid onset of action, prolonged mucosal retention, improved permeation across the nasal epithelium, and enhanced bioavailability in the brain. Optimized formulations showed high entrapment efficiencies, nanoscale particle sizes, desirable surface charges, and stable physicochemical properties, contributing to their superior therapeutic performance and safety profiles.
REFERENCES
Deepa S. Nair*, Reshmi Krishna A., Lyotropic Liquid Crystals for Intranasal Drug Delivery: A Review of a Promising Platform for Enhanced Brain Targeting, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 6, 1500-1506. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15615844