Osteonecrosis: A Comprehensive Review of Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management

Abstract

Osteonecrosis, also known as avascular necrosis or aseptic necrosis, represents a debilitating condition characterized by cellular death of bone components due to interruption of blood supply. This condition affects approximately 10,000 to 20,000 individuals annually in the United States and poses significant challenges in orthopedic practice. This review synthesizes current understanding of osteonecrosis pathophysiology, risk factors, diagnostic approaches, and treatment modalities to provide clinicians with evidence-based management strategies. We conducted a comprehensive literature review of peer-reviewed articles, clinical trials, and systematic reviews published over the past two decades, focusing on epidemiology, pathogenesis, imaging techniques, and therapeutic interventions. Osteonecrosis results from multifactorial mechanisms including vascular insufficiency, increased intraosseous pressure, and cellular injury. The femoral head remains the most commonly affected site, though multiple joints may be involved. Early diagnosis through MRI enables timely intervention, while treatment strategies range from conservative management and core decompression in early stages to joint arthroplasty in advanced disease. Osteonecrosis represents a complex orthopedic condition requiring multidisciplinary management. Early detection and risk factor modification remain crucial for optimal outcomes. Emerging regenerative therapies show promise but require further validation through rigorous clinical trials.

Keywords

Osteonecrosis, avascular necrosis, femoral head necrosis, core decompression, arthroplasty, bone regeneration

Introduction

 

 

 

5. Clinical Presentation

 5.1 Symptoms:-

The clinical presentation of osteonecrosis varies with disease stage, anatomical location, and extent of involvement:

Pain:- The cardinal symptom is pain in the affected joint, typically developing insidiously in non-traumatic cases or acutely following trauma. Initially, pain may be intermittent and activity-related, progressing to constant discomfort as disease advances. In femoral head osteonecrosis, pain typically localizes to the groin, though radiation to the buttock, thigh, or knee occurs commonly (41). Pain severity does not always correlate with radiographic stage, with some patients experiencing significant symptoms in early disease while others remain relatively asymptomatic despite advanced structural changes.

Functional Limitation:- Progressive joint dysfunction manifests as decreased range of motion, limping, and difficulty with weight-bearing activities (42). Patients may report difficulty with stairs, prolonged standing, or athletic activities.

Sudden Symptom Onset:- Subchondral collapse may cause acute symptom exacerbation, with sudden intensification of pain and functional impairment marking transition from early to advanced disease.

5.2 Physical Examination:-

Physical examination findings evolve with disease progression:

Early Disease:-  Examination may be normal or show only subtle findings. Reduced internal rotation and abduction of the hip may be detected. Pain with extremes of motion, particularly internal rotation and flexion, suggests early involvement (43).

Advanced Disease:- Examination demonstrates restricted range of motion in all planes, pain throughout range of motion, positive impingement signs, antalgic gait, leg length discrepancy (with femoral head collapse), and muscle atrophy from disuse (44)

Hip-Spine Syndrome:- Patients with hip pathology may develop compensatory lumbar spine changes causing overlapping symptoms, complicating diagnosis (45).

5.3 Asymptomatic Disease:-

A significant proportion of early-stage osteonecrosis remains asymptomatic, discovered incidentally on imaging performed for other indications or during screening of high-risk patients (46). The natural history of asymptomatic osteonecrosis remains incompletely understood, with some lesions remaining stable while others progress to symptomatic disease requiring intervention (47).

6. Diagnosis and Imaging

 6.1 Plain Radiography:-

Standard anteroposterior and frog-leg lateral radiographs represent the initial imaging modality for suspected osteonecrosis. However, radiographic changes lag behind pathological changes by weeks to months, limiting sensitivity in early disease.

Radiographic Signs:-

Increased density/sclerosis:- Reflects attempted repair with new bone formation around necrotic tissue

Lucent lesions/cysts:- Represent areas of bone resorption

Crescent sign:- Radiolucent subchondral fracture line indicating structural collapse (pathognomonic for Stage III disease)

Flattening/collapse:- Deformity of articular surface

Joint space narrowing:- Secondary osteoarthritic changes in advanced disease

Limitations:-  Normal radiographs do not exclude early-stage osteonecrosis. Sensitivity ranges from 40-60% in early disease, increasing to >90% in advanced stages (48).

6.2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI):-

MRI represents the gold standard for osteonecrosis diagnosis, demonstrating 99% sensitivity and 98% specificity for detecting early disease before radiographic changes appear.

MRI Characteristics:-

Double-line sign:- Pathognomonic finding on T2-weighted images consisting of inner bright line (granulation tissue) and outer dark line (sclerotic bone) (49)

Band-like pattern:-  Low signal intensity band on T1-weighted images at interface between necrotic and viable bone.

Bone marrow edema:- High signal on T2-weighted or STIR sequences indicating reactive (50)

Geographic lesion location:- Typically anterosuperior femoral head.

Advantages:-

MRI enables detection 6-12 months before radiographic changes, assessment of lesion size and location for prognostication, bilateral evaluation to detect contralateral involvement, and differentiation from other conditions causing hip pain (51).

Disadvantages:-

Cost, limited availability in some settings, contraindications (metallic implants, pacemakers, claustrophobia), and longer acquisition time compared to other modalities (52).

6.3 Computed Tomography (CT):-

CT demonstrates intermediate sensitivity between radiography and MRI, useful when MRI is contraindicated or unavailable. CT excels at detecting subchondral fracture and quantifying collapse, aiding surgical planning (53).

6.4 Bone Scintigraphy:-

Technetium-99m bone scanning shows increased uptake in osteonecrosis due to reactive bone formation surrounding necrotic tissue. However, sensitivity and specificity are limited compared to MRI, and "cold" lesions may appear in early disease before revascularization begins, potentially leading to false-negative results.

 

6.5 Laboratory Evaluation:-

No specific laboratory tests diagnose osteonecrosis, but evaluation should identify underlying conditions:

- Complete blood count (hemoglobinopathies)

- Lipid panel (hyperlipidemia)

- Coagulation studies including thrombophilia screening in young patients without obvious risk factors (54).

- Autoimmune markers (ANA, anti-dsDNA) if lupus suspected.

- Hemoglobin electrophoresis in appropriate populations

- HIV testing in at-risk individuals.

7. Classification Systems:- Several classification systems grade osteonecrosis severity, guiding treatment decisions and facilitating research standardization:

7.1 Ficat and Arlet Classification:-

One of the earliest systems, based primarily on radiographic findings:

1. Stage 0:- No imaging abnormalities (histologic diagnosis only)
2. Stage I:- Normal radiographs, abnormal bone scan or MRI.
3. Stage II: Radiographic sclerosis, cysts, or osteopenia without collapse.
4. Stage III: Subchondral fracture (crescent sign) without flattening.
5. Stage IV: Flattening/collapse with secondary osteoarthritis

7.2 Steinberg/University of Pennsylvania Classification:-

Refines Ficat-Arlet system by incorporating lesion size and location:

Stage O-IV: Similar to Ficat-Arlet

Subclassifications (A, B, C): Based on lesion extent (<15%, 15-30%, >30% of femoral head involvement) (55)

7.3 Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) Classification:-

International consensus classification combining multiple imaging modalities:

Incorporates radiographs, MRI, CT findings

Quantifies lesion size and location (56)

Includes both femoral and non-femoral sites

Widely used in contemporary literature and clinical trials.

7.4 Japanese Investigation Committee (JIC) Classification:-

Emphasizes lesion location, recognizing that anterosuperior lesions (weight-bearing surface) carry worse prognosis than medial lesions regardless of size (57)

Prognostic Value: Classification systems help predict disease progression, guide treatment selection, and standardize research reporting. Generally, larger lesions, anterosuperior location, and more advanced stages correlate with higher progression risk and worse outcomes with conservative treatment.

8. Treatment Approaches:-

Treatment selection depends on disease stage, lesion characteristics, patient factors, and symptom severity. Goals include pain relief, preservation of native joint when possible, and maintenance of function.

8.1 Conservative Management:-

Indications:- Early-stage disease (pre-collapse), small lesions in non-weight-bearing regions, or patients with significant comorbidities precluding surgery.

Protected Weight-bearing:- Crutch or walker use reduces mechanical stress on affected joint, theoretically allowing healing.  However, effectiveness remains controversial with limited high-quality evidence supporting long-term benefits.

Pain Management:- NSAIDs, acetaminophen, and judicious use of opioids for severe pain (58).

Physical Therapy:- Maintains range of motion and muscle strength while minimizing stress on affected joint (59)

Risk Factor Modification: Cessation of alcohol and tobacco use, corticosteroid minimization when possible, optimization of underlying conditions

Monitoring: Serial imaging to detect progression requiring intervention

Outcomes: Natural history studies demonstrate progression to collapse in 60-85% of conservatively managed symptomatic lesions over 2-5 years, particularly larger lesions in weight-bearing regions (60).  Success rates improve with very early detection and small lesions (61).

8.2 Pharmacological Interventions:-

Bisphosphonates: Antiresorptive agents that inhibit osteoclast activity, theoretically preventing collapse during remodeling phase. Multiple small trials and meta-analyses suggest potential benefit in early-stage disease, with some studies showing reduced progression and improved pain (62).  Alendronate represents the most studied agent. However, evidence remains limited by small sample sizes and heterogeneous populations. Optimal dosing, duration, and patient selection criteria require further investigation.

Anticoagulants: Enoxaparin and warfarin have been studied based on the hypothesis that some osteonecrosis involves thrombotic mechanisms (63). Limited evidence suggests possible benefit in select early-stage patients, particularly those with underlying coagulopathy (64). Further research needed to define appropriate candidates.

Lipid-Lowering Agents: Statins may theoretically benefit patients with hyperlipidemia-associated osteonecrosis, though clinical evidence is sparse.

Prostacyclin Analogs: Iloprost, a vasodilator and antiplatelet agent, showed promise in small European studies for early-stage disease but has not gained widespread adoption, particularly in North America.

Other Agents: Vitamin D supplementation, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and pulsed electromagnetic field therapy have been investigated with inconsistent results (65).

8.3 Core Decompression:-

Core decompression represents the most established surgical intervention for early-stage (pre-collapse) osteonecrosis (66).

Technique: The procedure involves drilling one or more channels from the lateral femoral cortex into the necrotic lesion under fluoroscopic guidance. This reduces intraosseous pressure, stimulates vascular ingrowth through the created channels, and initiates a healing response (67).

Variations: Multiple small-diameter channels versus single large-diameter core. Arthroscopic versus open approaches Combined with biological augmentation.

Outcomes: Success rates range from 60-85% in appropriately selected patients (Stage I-II, small-to-medium lesions) (68). Factors predicting success include earlier stage, smaller lesion size, non-weight-bearing location, and pre-collapse status. Benefits include pain relief in 70-80% of patients and reduced progression to collapse compared to natural history (69).

Complications: Include fracture (1-2%), infection (<1%), transient increased pain, and treatment failure requiring additional procedures.

8.4 Advanced Core Decompression with Biological Augmentation:-

 

Enhancement of core decompression with biological materials aims to improve outcomes:

Bone Grafting:

Autologous cancellous bone:- Harvested from iliac crest, provides osteoconductive scaffold and viable osteoprogenitor cells

Vascularized fibular graft:- Microsurgical transfer of fibular segment with intact blood supply provides both structural support and revascularization. Technically demanding with longer operative time and donor site morbidity, but demonstrates superior outcomes in larger lesions and early collapse (60-80% success preventing progression) (70).

Vascularized iliac crest graft:- Alternative to fibular graft with similar principles

Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate(BMAC): Concentrated autologous bone marrow containing mesenchymal stem cells, growth factors, and cytokines. Injected into decompression channels to enhance healing. Early studies suggest improved outcomes compared to decompression alone, though optimal concentration, volume, and technique remain under investigation (71).

Stem Cell Therapy: Direct injection of culture-expanded autologous mesenchymal stem cells (from bone marrow or adipose tissue) aims to regenerate necrotic bone. Multiple small trials demonstrate safety and potential efficacy, but larger randomized controlled trials are needed (72)

Growth Factors and Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP): Biological adjuncts providing concentrated growth factors to stimulate bone healing. PRP represents an accessible option though evidence for benefit remains mixed.

Tantalum Rod Implantation: Porous tantalum rod inserted into decompression tract provides structural support while allowing bone ingrowth. Some studies suggest improved outcomes versus decompression alone in preventing collapse.

8.5 Osteotomy:-

Rotational or varus/valgus osteotomy repositions the necrotic segment away from the weight-bearing surface while moving healthy bone into functional position (73)

Transtrochanteric Rotational

Osteotomy:- Surgically rotates femoral head to position viable bone under the acetabular weight-bearing surface. Requires precise preoperative planning and technical expertise. Success rates of 60-80% reported in appropriately selected patients (adequate viable bone remaining, pre-collapse or early collapse) (74)

Disadvantages:- Technically demanding, long rehabilitation, altered anatomy complicating future arthroplasty if needed, and limited applicability (requires sufficient healthy bone for rotation).

Current Use: Less commonly performed with improved outcomes from core decompression augmentation and earlier arthroplasty techniques, though remains an option in young patients wishing to preserve native anatomy (75)

8.6 Joint Arthroplasty:-

Arthroplasty represents definitive treatment for advanced osteonecrosis with collapse and secondary osteoarthritis.

Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA): Gold standard for end-stage femoral head osteonecrosis, providing reliable pain relief and functional restoration. Modern implants and techniques demonstrate excellent long-term outcomes with 90-95% 10-year survival rates (76)

Considerations in Osteonecrosis:

Young patient age: Osteonecrosis patients undergo arthroplasty 10-20 years younger than osteoarthritis patients, raising concerns about implant longevity and need for revision (77)

Bilateral disease: Approximately 50-60% require bilateral arthroplasty

Alternative bearing surfaces:- Ceramic-on-ceramic or ceramic-on-polyethylene bearings may improve longevity in young, active patients (78)

Femoral head preservation: Large-diameter metal-on-metal bearings (now largely abandoned due to complications) and modern hard-on-hard bearings aimed to maximize longevity

Hip Resurfacing: Alternative to conventional THA preserving femoral bone stock. Initially popular for young osteonecrosis patients, use has declined due to complications including femoral neck fracture, metal ion release, and pseudotumor formation.  Select patients may still benefit, though conventional THA remains preferred.

Outcomes: THA for osteonecrosis demonstrates slightly higher revision rates compared to osteoarthritis (related to younger age and higher activity levels) (79) but provides excellent pain relief and function in >90% of patients (80)

Other Joint Arthroplasty:-

Osteonecrosis affecting other joints follows similar treatment principles:-

Shoulder: Humeral head osteonecrosis may require hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty (81)

Knee: Unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty for femoral condyle or tibial plateau involvement

Ankle: Talus osteonecrosis may require ankle fusion or total ankle arthroplasty (82)

9. Special Populations:-

9.1 Pediatric Osteonecrosis:-

Osteonecrosis in children presents unique challenges. Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease represents idiopathic femoral head osteonecrosis in children aged 4-8 years, managed differently from adult disease with emphasis on containment and guided growth (83). Secondary osteonecrosis occurs in children receiving corticosteroids for leukemia, organ transplantation, or inflammatory conditions (84). Treatment focuses on risk factor modification, protected weight-bearing, and joint-preserving procedures when possible to delay arthroplasty until skeletal maturity.

9.2 Pregnancy:-

Osteonecrosis rarely occurs during pregnancy or postpartum period, possibly related to hypercoagulability, mechanical factors, or hormonal changes (85). Management emphasizes conservative treatment with protected weight-bearing and pain control using pregnancy-safe medications. Surgical intervention is typically delayed until after delivery when possible.

9.3 Sickle Cell Disease:-

Patients with sickle cell disease demonstrate particularly high osteonecrosis prevalence and unique management considerations including attention to disease-specific complications, optimization of hematological status preoperatively, and awareness of higher perioperative complication rates including infection and thrombosis.

10. Prognosis and Natural History:-

The natural history of untreated osteonecrosis varies with stage, lesion characteristics, and anatomical location:

Early-Stage Disease:- Small, non-weight-bearing lesions may remain stable or heal spontaneously in 10-30% of cases (86).  However, most symptomatic lesions (60-85%) progress to collapse without intervention, typically within 2-5 years.

Post-Collapse Disease:- After subchondral fracture, progression to end-stage arthritis occurs in >90% of cases, necessitating arthroplasty (87) (88)

Prognostic Factors:-

Lesion size: Larger lesions carry higher progression risk (89)

Location: Anterosuperior (weight-bearing) location predicts progression

Stage: Later stages demonstrate higher failure rates with joint-preserving treatment

Bilateral involvement: Suggests systemic etiology with potentially worse prognosis

Underlying etiology: Corticosteroid-induced disease may have worse natural history than alcohol-related (90)

Post-Treatment Outcomes:-

Core decompression: 60-85% success in early-stage disease

Vascularized grafting: 60-80% prevent progression in select patients (91)

Arthroplasty: >90% achieve excellent pain relief and function with modern techniques.

11. Future Directions and Emerging Therapies:-

11.1 Regenerative Medicine:-

Stem Cell Therapy: Culture-expanded mesenchymal stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cells, and embryonic stem cells represent promising avenues for bone regeneration (92). Challenges include optimal cell source, delivery method, differentiation protocols, and regulatory considerations.

Tissue Engineering: Scaffold-based approaches combining biomaterials with cells and growth factors aim to regenerate functional bone tissue. Three-dimensional printed scaffolds customized to defect geometry show promise in preclinical studies.

Gene Therapy: Viral vector-mediated delivery of osteogenic genes (BMP-2, VEGF) to enhance bone healing represents an experimental approach requiring extensive safety evaluation (93).

11.2 Advanced Imaging:-

Quantitative MRI:- Techniques including T1 and T2 mapping, diffusion-weighted imaging, and perfusion MRI may enable earlier detection and better characterization of early ischemic changes before frank necrosis (94).

Molecular Imaging:- PET imaging with bone metabolism tracers may identify at-risk bone before structural changes occur.

Pharmacological Prevention:- Identifying high-risk patients (particularly those initiating high-dose corticosteroid therapy) and implementing prophylactic strategies represents an important research priority. Studies examining bisphosphonates, anticoagulation, statins, and other agents for prevention in at-risk populations are ongoing (95)

11.4 Precision Medicine:-

Genetic Risk Stratification: Identifying genetic polymorphisms affecting bone metabolism, coagulation, and lipid handling may enable personalized risk assessment and targeted prevention in susceptible individuals.

Biomarkers: Discovery of serum or imaging biomarkers predicting disease development or progression could transform management by enabling earlier intervention and personalized treatment selection (96)

11.5 Artificial Intelligence

Machine learning algorithms analyzing imaging data, clinical parameters, and treatment outcomes may improve prognostication, treatment selection, and outcome prediction, supporting clinical decision-making.

CONCLUSION

Osteonecrosis represents a complex, multifactorial condition with significant impact on patient quality of life and healthcare systems.  Understanding the diverse etiologies, pathophysiological mechanisms, and clinical presentations enables appropriate diagnosis and management. Early detection through judicious use of MRI in symptomatic patients and high-risk populations remains critical, as joint-preserving interventions demonstrate greatest efficacy before irreversible structural collapse occurs.

REFERENCES

1. Shah, K. N., Racine, J., Jones, L. C. & Aaron, R. K. (2015). Pathophysiology and risk factors for osteonecrosis. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 8(3).
2. (2000). Osteonecrosis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 82(5), pp. 732-746.
3. "Osteonecrosis of femoral head in young patients with femoral neck fracture: a retrospective study of 250 patients followed for average of 7.5 years." Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, vol. 15, 2025.
4. Lavernia, et al. "Osteonecrosis of the femoral head.." The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, vol. 7, 1999.
5. Petek, et al. "Osteonecrosis of the femoral head: pathophysiology and current concepts of treatment." EFORT Open Reviews, vol. 4, 2019.
6. "Comparison between osteonecrosis of the humeral and femoral heads - epidemiological analysis of the surgical trend using the nationwide claims database of the Republic of Korea."
7. "Magnitude and determinants of alcohol use disorder among adult population in East Asian countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis." Frontiers in Public Health, vol. 11, 2023.
8. "Sickle cell and autoimmune disease: a double whammy."
9. Thanakit, et al. "Incidence of Osteonecrosis from Histopathological Study Following Fracture Neck of Femur." Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, vol. 91, 2008.
10. Gundestrup, A.K., Lynggaard, C.D., Forner, L. et al. Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Osteoradionecrosis of the Mandible: a Systematic Review of Preclinical and Human Studies. Stem Cell Rev and Rep 16, 1208–1221 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-020-10034-5Liu, J., Su, Y. & Nan, G. Clinical treatment of traumatic hip dislocation in children: a single-centre retrospective study. Sci Rep 14, 17860 (2024).
11. "Posttraumatic Avascular Necrosis After Proximal Femur, Proximal Humerus, Talar Neck, and Scaphoid Fractures." Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, vol. 27, 2019
12. Mont, et al. "High-Dose Corticosteroid Use and Risk of Hip Osteonecrosis: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Literature Review." Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 97, 2015.
13. Jones, and J.P. Jr.. "Fat embolism and osteonecrosis." Orthopedic Clinics of North America, vol. 16, 1985
14. "Alcohol and the mechanisms of liver disease." Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol. 38, 2023.
15. (2018). A rare case of avascular necrosis in sickle cell trait: a case report. BMC Hematology 18.
16. (1991). Sickle cell disease as a cause of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Blood 78.
17. Glacet-Bernard, et al. "Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Retinal Vascular Occlusions: A Prospective Study of 75 Patients." JAMA Ophthalmology, vol. 125, 2007.
18. "Osteonecrosis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Clinical Features, Risk Factor Analysis, and Outcomes." Journal of Clinical Rheumatology, vol. 29, 2023.
19. "Gaucher Disease in Bone: From Pathophysiology to Practice." Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 34, 2025.
20. "Heterozygosity for the Leiden mutation of the factor V gene, a common pathoetiology for osteonecrosis of the jaw, with thrombophilia augmented by exogenous estrogens." Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 55, 1997.
21. Scribner, et al. "Osteonecrosis in HIV-Infected Patients: A Case-Control Study." JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, vol. 25, 2000.
22. "Epidemiology of osteonecrosis among older adults in Sweden." Osteoporosis International, vol. 29, 2018.
23. "Significant association of SREBP-2 genetic polymorphisms with avascular necrosis in the Korean population." BMC Medical Genetics, vol. 9, 2008.
24. "Hyperacute pathophysiology of traumatic and vascular brain injury captured by ultrasound, photoacoustic, and magnetic resonance imaging."
25. Nguyen, and T. al. et. "Fat Embolism Syndrome With Cerebral Involvement: An Underrecognized Complication of Long Bone Fractures." Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 101, 2022, pp. 1-4.
26. "Perfusion abnormalities in subchondral bone associated with marrow edema, osteoarthritis, and avascular necrosis." Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 89, 2007
27. "Hormonal Regulation of Osteocyte Perilacunar and Canalicular Remodeling in the Hyp Mouse Model of X-Linked Hypophosphatemia." Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 33, 2020.
28. "Toughening and mechanosensing in bone: a perfectly balanced mechanism based on competing stresses."
29. "Hypoxic-Preconditioned Bone Marrow Stem Cell Medium Significantly Improves Outcome After Retinal Ischemia in Rats." Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 57, 2016.
30. "Alcohol-induced adipogenesis in bone and marrow: a possible mechanism for osteonecrosis." Alcohol-induced adipogenesis in bone and marrow: a possible mechanism for osteonecrosis. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, vol. 27, 2003.
31. "IL-6, RANKL, TNF-alpha/IL-1: interrelations in bone resorption pathophysiology." Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 113, 2004.
32. "Ischemia leads to delayed union during fracture healing: a mouse model." Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 24, 2006.
33. "Systemic alendronate prevents resorption of necrotic bone during revascularization. A bone chamber study in rats." BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, vol. 3, 2002.
34. "Osteoclast activation and sickle bone disease." Blood, vol. 126, 2015.
35. Wang, et al. "The Role of Structural Deterioration and Biomechanical Changes of the Necrotic Lesion in Collapse Mechanism of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head." Orthopaedic Surgery, vol. 14, 2022.
36. "Pericollapse stage of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a review." Chinese Medical Journal, vol. 136, 2023.
37. Yoon BH, Mont MA, Koo KH, Chen CH, Cheng EY, Cui Q, Drescher W, Gangji V, Goodman SB, Ha YC, Hernigou P, Hungerford MW, Iorio R, Jo WL, Jones LC, Khanduja V, Kim HKW, Kim SY, Kim TY, Lee HY, Lee MS, Lee YK, Lee YJ, Nakamura J, Parvizi J, Sakai T, Sugano N, Takao M, Yamamoto T, Zhao DW. The 2019 Revised Version of Association Research Circulation Osseous Staging System of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head. J Arthroplasty. 2020 Apr;35(4):933-940.
38. Chen Y, Miao Y, Liu K, Xue F, Zhu B, Zhang C, Li G. Evolutionary course of the femoral head osteonecrosis: Histopathological - radiologic characteristics and clinical staging systems. J Orthop Translat. 2021 Aug 16;32:28-40.
39. Piuzzi, et al. "Osteonecrosis of the femoral head with subchondral collapse." Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, vol. 86, 2019. 
40. "Distribution of hip pain in patients with idiopathic osteonecrosis of the femoral head." Journal of Orthopaedic Science, vol. 21, 2016.
41. "Avascular Necrosis Treatment | Dr Peter Gifford | Qld." giffordorthopaedics.com.
42. "Hip Impingement: Identifying and Treating a Common Cause of Hip Pain." American Family Physician, vol. 80, 2009.
43. "Clinical Features and Management of Hip-Spine Syndrome: A Case Report." International Journal of Science and Healthcare Research, vol. 9, 2024.
44. "Osteonecrosis of the Hip Misdiagnosed as Lumbar-Disc Herniation: Three Case Studies." Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, vol. 18, 2023.
45. "Asymptomatic multifocal avascular necrosis, a commonly overlooked finding in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus." BMC Rheumatology, vol. 8, 2024.
46. Mont, et al. "The Natural History of Untreated Asymptomatic Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A Systematic Literature Review." The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American), vol. 92, 2010, pp. 2165-2170.
47. "Radiographic features and limitations in diagnosing osteonecrosis." International Journal of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, vol. 4, 2021.
48. "Chemical shift and the double-line sign in MRI of early femoral avascular necrosis." Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 2, 1992.
49. "Histological findings of bone marrow edema pattern on MRI in osteonecrosis of the femoral head." Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 81, 1999.
50. "Early diagnosis and response assessment in chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis: changes in lesion volume and signal intensity assessed by whole-body MRI." British Journal of Radiology, vol. 95, 2025.
51.  "MRI-LINAC: A transformative technology in radiation oncology." Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 13, 2023..
52. "Subchondral fractures in osteonecrosis of the femoral head: comparison of radiography, CT, and MR imaging." Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 27, 2003.
53. "Thrombophilia screening revisited: an issue of personalized medicine."
54. Steinberg, et al. "A quantitative system for staging avascular necrosis." Bone & Joint Journal, vol. 77, 1995.
55. "ISLES 2022: A multi-center magnetic resonance imaging stroke lesion segmentation dataset."
56. "The Role of Structural Deterioration and Biomechanical Changes of the Necrotic Lesion in Collapse Mechanism of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head."
57. "Practice Guidelines: Management of Acute Pain from Non–Low Back Musculoskeletal Injuries." American Family Physician, vol. 102, 2020.
58. "Effects of Physical Therapy on Joint Pain, Joint Range of Motion, Joint Health, Strength, and Mobility in Patients With Hemophilia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis." Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, vol. 53, 2023.
59. "Osteonecrosis: natural course and conservative therapy." Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 82, 2000.
60. "Development and outcomes of a comprehensive multidisciplinary incidental lung nodule and lung cancer screening program."
61. "Adjuvant zoledronic acid therapy for patients with early stage breast cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis." Journal of Hematology & Oncology, vol. 6, 2022.
62. Beckmann, et al. "Enoxaparin Prevents Steroid-Related Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head." ScientificWorldJournal, vol. 2014, 2014.
63. "Anticoagulant therapy for osteonecrosis associated with heritable hypofibrinolysis and thrombophilia." Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 84, 2002.
64. "Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields Stimulation Prevents Steroid-Induced Osteonecrosis in Rats." BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, vol. 12, 2011.
65. "Evaluation of core decompression outcome in systemic lupus erythematosus with hip osteonecrosis: a retrospective cohort study." Advances in Rheumatology, vol. 63, 2025.
66. "Efficacy of small-diameter core decompression with platelet-rich plasma in early osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a retrospective study."
67. "Nonvascularized Bone Grafting Defers Joint Arthroplasty in Hip Osteonecrosis." Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, vol. 79, 2008.
68. "Autograft bone grafting via surgical hip dislocation for collapsed necrotic femoral head: a mid-term retrospective study." BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, vol. 26, 2025. 
69. "Donor site morbidity following vascularized fibular grafting." Microsurgery, vol. 18, 1998.
70. "Core Decompression and Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Grafting for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head." Medicine, vol. 104, 2025.
71. Cao, and Mumin al. et. "Efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cells in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials." Stem Cell Research & Therapy, vol. 16, 2025.
72. "Small changes of femoral torsion in varus or valgus distal femoral osteotomy using patient-specific instruments." International Orthopaedics, vol. 49, 2025.
73. "Transtrochanteric Rotational Osteotomy for Nontraumatic Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head in Young Adults." n/a.
74. "Efficacy of small-diameter core decompression with platelet-rich plasma in early osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a retrospective study." BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, vol. 26, 2025.
75. "Uncemented total hip arthroplasty in osteonecrosis: A 2- to 10-year evaluation." Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 334, 1997, pp. 116-123.
76. "The risk of revision after total hip arthroplasty in young patients depends on surgical approach, femoral head size and bearing type; an analysis of 19,682 operations in the Dutch arthroplasty register."
77. D'Antonio, et al. "Ceramic Bearings for Total Hip Arthroplasty Have High Survivorship at 10 Years." Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 470, 2011
78. "The outcomes of total hip replacement in osteonecrosis versus osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis." Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, vol. 18, 2023.
79. "Patients with osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis have better functional outcomes and those with avascular necrosis worse pain outcomes compared to rheumatoid arthritis after primary hip arthroplasty: a cohort study." Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 95, 2013.
80. Feeley, et al. "Hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty for avascular necrosis of the humeral head." Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, vol. 17, 2008.
81. "Combined Total Talus Replacement and Total Ankle Arthroplasty." Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances, vol. 29, 2020.
82. Grigoriou, et al. "Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease."
83. "Osteonecrosis as a complication in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia." La Pediatria Medica e Chirurgica, vol. 38 No. 3, 2016, pp. 118-121.
84. "Widespread osteonecrosis of long bones following pregnancy." IAIM, vol. 4, 2017.
85. Hernigou, et al. "Spontaneous resolution of osteonecrosis of the femoral head." Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 86, 2004.
86. Chen M, Wang X, Takahashi E, Kaneuji A, Zhou Y, Kawahara N. Current Research on Subchondral Insufficiency Fracture of the Femoral Head. Clin Orthop Surg. 2022 Dec;14(4):477-485.
87. Moya-Angeler J, Gianakos AL, Villa JC, Ni A, Lane JM. Current concepts on osteonecrosis of the femoral head. World J Orthop. 2015 Sep 18;6(8):590-601.
88. "Increased lesion depth, higher body mass index and older age are risk factors for osteoarthritis during long-term follow-up in patients with osteochondritis dissecans of the knee." Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, vol. 142, 2022.
89. "The Natural Progression of Adult Elbow Osteonecrosis Related to Corticosteroid Treatment.
90. "Treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head by free vascularized fibular grafting: an analysis of surgical outcome and patient health status." Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 370, 2000, pp. 221-229.
91. "Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Differentiate Into Functional Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Repair Bone Defects." Stem Cells Translational Medicine, vol. 5, 2016.
92. "Synergistic enhancement of bone formation and healing by stem cell–expressed VEGF and bone morphogenetic protein-4." Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 110, 2025.
93. Crawford, et al. "Clinical outcome in ischemic stroke predicted by early diffusion-weighted and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: a preliminary analysis." Stroke, vol. 26, 1995.
94. Lee YJ, Cui Q, Koo KH. Is There a Role of Pharmacological Treatments in the Prevention or Treatment of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head?:
95.  A Systematic Review. J Bone Metab. 2019 Feb;26(1):13-18.
96. Serum B-cell maturation antigen levels to predict outcomes for patients with MGUS and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM)." Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 37, 2024.