View Article

Abstract

Limited aqueous solubility remains a significant challenge in the field of oral drug delivery, especially when dealing with drugs that fall under Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) Class II. These compounds generally possess good permeability across the gastrointestinal membrane, meaning they can be readily absorbed once dissolved. However, their poor solubility in aqueous environments, such as gastrointestinal fluids, restricts their ability to dissolve effectively. As a result, the rate and extent of drug dissolution become the limiting factors for absorption, ultimately reducing bioavailability. This creates a major obstacle in achieving the desired therapeutic effect, making it essential to develop formulation strategies that enhance the solubility and dissolution rate of such drugs. [1–3]. Traditional approaches developed to address the issue of limited aqueous solubility often yield inconsistent and unpredictable results. While these methods may improve solubility for certain drugs, their effectiveness can vary widely depending on the physicochemical properties of the specific drug candidate. Factors such as molecular structure, stability, and interaction with excipients can influence the success of these techniques. As a result, many conventional strategies fail to provide a universally applicable solution, making them unsuitable for all drug molecules and highlighting the need for more reliable and adaptable formulation approaches. [4–6]. In recent years, pharmaceutical cocrystals have emerged as a promising and increasingly important solid-state modification strategy for enhancing drug performance. This approach involves the formation of a crystalline complex between an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) and a suitable coformer, typically through non-covalent interactions such as hydrogen bonding. Unlike chemical modification techniques, cocrystallization does not alter the intrinsic chemical structure or pharmacological activity of the drug. Instead, it modifies the physical properties of the compound, such as solubility, dissolution rate, stability, and bioavailability. By preserving the drug’s chemical identity while improving its physicochemical characteristics, pharmaceutical cocrystals offer a versatile and effective solution to overcome formulation challenges, particularly for poorly soluble drugs. [7–10]. By forming a crystalline complex with a suitable coformer, the physicochemical properties of a drug can be effectively modified and optimized to enhance its overall performance. This approach allows for improvements in key parameters such as solubility, dissolution rate, stability, and bioavailability, without altering the drug’s inherent chemical structure. As a result, cocrystallization serves as a flexible and efficient strategy in modern pharmaceutical development.This review provides a comprehensive overview of pharmaceutical cocrystals, covering various formulation strategies employed in their preparation, along with the analytical and characterization techniques used to evaluate them. It also discusses their diverse applications in drug delivery, highlights their advantages over conventional methods, addresses potential limitations, and examines the regulatory considerations associated with their development and approval.

Keywords

Cocrystals; Poor solubility; BCS Class II; Crystal engineering; Drug dissolution; Coformer

Introduction

One of the persistent challenges in pharmaceutical development is the poor ability of many drug molecules to dissolve effectively in aqueous environments, such as biological fluids. Since oral drug absorption largely depends on the drug being in a dissolved state, insufficient solubility can significantly hinder the dissolution process. This, in turn, limits the amount of drug available for absorption across biological membranes. As a consequence, inadequate dissolution directly impacts bioavailability, leading to reduced therapeutic effectiveness and potentially inconsistent clinical outcomes. [1,2].

According to the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS), Class II drugs are characterized by high membrane permeability but low aqueous solubility. Although these drugs can readily cross biological membranes once dissolved, their limited solubility restricts the rate at which they dissolve in gastrointestinal fluids. As a result, the dissolution process becomes the rate-limiting step in drug absorption. Consequently, the overall bioavailability of Class II drugs is primarily governed by their dissolution behavior rather than their permeability, making enhancement of solubility and dissolution rate a critical focus in their formulation development. [3].Although a variety of techniques—such as particle size reduction, salt formation, and solid dispersion—have been widely explored to address poor solubility, their effectiveness is often variable and formulation-dependent. While these approaches can enhance dissolution to some extent, the results are not always consistent across different drug candidates. In certain cases, they may introduce additional challenges, such as physical or chemical instability, recrystallization, or difficulties in maintaining improved performance over time. Consequently, these limitations can prevent such methods from delivering reliable and long-term enhancement in drug solubility and overall therapeutic performance. [4–6].

These limitations have driven the need to explore alternative solid-state strategies that can offer more reliable and consistent improvements in drug properties. Among these, cocrystallization has emerged as a promising approach that specifically targets the modification of the internal molecular arrangement within a crystal lattice. In cocrystallization, the drug molecule interacts with a suitable coformer to form a well-defined crystalline structure. This association is governed by non-covalent intermolecular interactions, such as hydrogen bonding or π–π stacking, which help stabilize the new crystal lattice. By altering the molecular packing without changing the chemical identity of the drug, this technique enables the fine-tuning of physicochemical properties, ultimately enhancing drug performance [7–9].

This rearrangement of molecules within the crystal lattice can significantly influence important physicochemical properties, especially solubility and dissolution rate. By altering how the molecules are packed and interact with each other, the drug can exhibit improved interaction with the surrounding aqueous environment, leading to enhanced dissolution behavior. Importantly, these modifications occur without changing the drug’s chemical structure, ensuring that its pharmacological activity and therapeutic effect remain unaffected while its performance is improved [10].

From a formulation perspective, this makes cocrystals a highly adaptable and versatile option compared to conventional techniques. Unlike traditional methods, which may be limited by drug-specific constraints or stability issues, cocrystallization offers greater flexibility in selecting suitable coformers to tailor desired properties. This adaptability allows formulators to optimize key characteristics such as solubility, dissolution rate, and stability in a more controlled and predictable manner, making cocrystals an attractive alternative in modern drug development.

2. Methods of Cocrystal Formulation

2.1 Solvent Evaporation Approach

In this method, the drug and coformer are first dissolved together in a suitable solvent to create a homogeneous solution. As the solvent is gradually removed under controlled conditions, the solute molecules begin to organize and form a crystalline structure. This slow and controlled evaporation promotes the orderly arrangement of the drug and coformer within the crystal lattice, leading to the formation of cocrystals.

Although the technique is relatively simple and widely used, it requires careful optimization of critical parameters such as the choice of solvent, concentration, temperature, and rate of evaporation. Improper control of these factors may result in non-uniform crystal formation, incomplete cocrystallization, or the formation of unwanted phases, making process optimization essential for achieving consistent and high-quality crystals. [11–16].

 

 

 

Fig. 1: Solvent Evaporation Method

 

2.2 Grinding-Based Methods

Grinding is widely employed as an initial screening technique for the formation of pharmaceutical cocrystals due to its simplicity, speed, and minimal requirement for specialized equipment. It enables rapid evaluation of potential drug–coformer combinations and is particularly useful during early-stage development.

Dry grinding: The drug and coformer are mechanically mixed using methods such as mortar–pestle or ball milling without the addition of any solvent. The applied mechanical energy facilitates close contact between the molecules, promoting intermolecular interactions that may lead to cocrystal formation.

Liquid-assisted grinding (LAG): It involves the addition of a small amount of solvent during the grinding process. This minimal solvent acts as a facilitator, enhancing molecular mobility and interaction between the drug and coformer. As a result, LAG often leads to improved efficiency, faster cocrystal formation, and better reproducibility compared to dry grinding, making it a preferred approach in many cases. [17].

 

 

 

Fig. 2: Neat Grinding and Liquid Assisted Grinding

 

      

 

 

 

Fig. 3: Grinding Based Methods

 

2.3 Slurry Technique

In this method, the drug and coformer are dispersed in a solvent in which both components exhibit limited solubility, rather than being completely dissolved. As the system is maintained over time, a state of equilibrium is gradually established between the dissolved and undissolved phases. This controlled environment allows the molecules to interact and reorganize, ultimately leading to the formation of cocrystals.

Because the process occurs under near-equilibrium conditions, it often promotes the development of well-ordered and thermodynamically stable crystalline forms. As a result, this method is commonly preferred when the goal is to obtain stable and reproducible cocrystals with desirable physicochemical properties. [18].

 

 

 

Fig. 4: Slurry Method

 

2.4 Hot Melt Extrusion

Hot melt extrusion involves the simultaneous heating and mixing of the drug and coformer under carefully controlled conditions, typically using an extruder. The applied heat softens or melts the components, allowing them to mix at a molecular level and form a homogeneous system. Upon cooling, this mixture solidifies, leading to the formation of cocrystals or solid dispersions depending on the system.

As a solvent-free technique, hot melt extrusion is considered environmentally friendly and well-suited for continuous, large-scale manufacturing. However, the process requires exposure to elevated temperatures, which can pose a limitation for thermolabile compounds that are prone to degradation under heat. Therefore, its applicability depends on the thermal stability of the drug and coformer involved [19].

 

 

 

 

 

Fig. 5: Hot Melt Extrusion Method

 

2.5 Supercritical Fluid Processing

In this method, supercritical carbon dioxide (CO?) is employed as a processing medium to promote cocrystal formation. When CO? is brought above its critical temperature and pressure, it exhibits unique properties—combining gas-like diffusivity with liquid-like solvating ability—which enhances mass transfer and facilitates intimate interaction between the drug and coformer. Depending on the specific approach used (such as supercritical anti-solvent or gas antisolvent techniques), cocrystallization occurs as the components precipitate out in a controlled manner.

One of the key advantages of this technique is the precise control it offers over particle size, morphology, and crystal habit, leading to uniform and high-quality cocrystals. However, the requirement for specialized high-pressure equipment, along with strict control of operating conditions such as temperature and pressure, makes the process more complex and costly compared to conventional methods [20].

 

 

 

 

 

Fig. 6: Supercritical Fluid Processing Method

 

2.6 Recent and Emerging Approaches

Recent advancements in cocrystal research have introduced innovative approaches such as nano-cocrystal systems, microfluidic technologies, and green synthesis methods. Nano-cocrystals focus on reducing particle size to the nanometer range, which significantly enhances surface area and, consequently, improves dissolution rate and bioavailability. This makes them particularly useful for poorly soluble drugs.

Microfluidic technologies, on the other hand, enable precise control over mixing, temperature, and reaction conditions at a microscale level. This results in uniform crystal formation, improved reproducibility, and better control over particle characteristics. Such systems are also advantageous for continuous processing and scale-up with consistent quality.

In addition, environmentally friendly or “green” synthesis methods aim to reduce or eliminate the use of harmful organic solvents. Techniques such as solvent-free grinding or the use of safer solvents contribute to more sustainable manufacturing practices. Collectively, these modern approaches not only enhance the efficiency and quality of cocrystal production but also address scalability challenges while minimizing environmental impact [28–30].

3. Characterization of Cocrystals

3.1 FTIR Spectroscopy

Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) analysis is widely used to detect changes in functional group interactions during cocrystal formation. By comparing the infrared spectra of the pure drug, coformer, and the resulting cocrystal, it becomes possible to identify modifications in vibrational frequencies associated with specific functional groups.

Shifts in characteristic absorption peaks—such as those corresponding to hydroxyl, amine, or carbonyl groups—often indicate the formation of new intermolecular interactions, particularly hydrogen bonding between the drug and coformer. These spectral changes provide strong evidence of cocrystal formation, as they reflect alterations in the molecular environment without any change in the chemical structure of the components [21].

3.2 Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) is commonly used to study the thermal behavior of materials by monitoring heat flow associated with temperature changes. In the context of cocrystals, DSC helps identify phase transitions such as melting, crystallization, or glass transitions.

When a cocrystal is formed, it typically exhibits a distinct melting endotherm that differs from the melting points of the pure drug and the coformer. The appearance of this new, single melting peak indicates the formation of a new crystalline phase rather than a simple physical mixture. This provides strong thermal evidence that a unique and well-defined cocrystal structure has been successfully created [22].

3.3 Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) is used to monitor changes in the weight of a sample as a function of temperature or time under controlled conditions. In the study of cocrystals, TGA is particularly useful for assessing thermal stability by identifying temperatures at which decomposition or mass loss occurs.

Additionally, TGA can detect the presence of residual solvents or moisture within the crystal structure. Any observed weight loss at lower temperatures is often attributed to the evaporation of trapped solvent or water molecules, while weight loss at higher temperatures may indicate decomposition of the material. This information is essential for evaluating the purity, stability, and overall quality of the cocrystal system [22].

3.4 Powder X-ray Diffraction (PXRD)

Powder X-ray Diffraction (PXRD) is regarded as one of the most definitive techniques for the identification of cocrystals. It works by analyzing how X-rays are diffracted by the crystal lattice, producing a characteristic pattern based on the arrangement of atoms within the structure.

Each crystalline material generates a unique diffraction pattern, often referred to as its “fingerprint.” When a cocrystal is formed, its PXRD pattern will be distinctly different from those of the pure drug and the coformer. The appearance of new peaks, along with the disappearance or shifting of existing ones, confirms the formation of a new crystalline phase. This makes PXRD a highly reliable method for verifying the presence and purity of cocrystals [23].

3.5 Single Crystal X-ray Diffraction

This technique offers detailed insight into the molecular arrangement within the crystal lattice, revealing how the drug and coformer are spatially organized. It enables precise determination of atomic positions, orientation of molecules, and the nature of packing within the structure.

Additionally, it helps identify and characterize intermolecular interactions—such as hydrogen bonding, van der Waals forces, and π–π stacking—that play a crucial role in stabilizing the cocrystal. Such in-depth structural information is essential for understanding the properties and behavior of the crystalline system [23].

3.6 Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) is used to examine the surface morphology and particle shape of cocrystals at high resolution. It provides detailed visual information about the size, texture, and structural features of the particles.

In many cases, the morphology of cocrystals differs significantly from that of the pure drug and coformer. Changes in shape—such as from irregular to more defined crystalline forms—or variations in surface texture can indicate successful cocrystal formation. These morphological differences help support other characterization techniques in confirming the development of a new solid-state form [24].

3.7 Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) allows analysis at the nanoscale by transmitting electrons through an ultra-thin sample, providing highly detailed images of internal structure and particle size. This makes it especially valuable for studying nano-cocrystal systems, where precise characterization at the nanometer level is essential.

TEM helps in determining particle size distribution, crystal structure, and degree of crystallinity, while also revealing fine structural details that are not visible through other microscopy techniques. As a result, it plays a crucial role in confirming the successful formation and uniformity of nano-cocrystals, as well as in understanding their potential impact on drug performance [24].

3.8 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) techniques are valuable for confirming both the molecular composition and the nature of interactions within a cocrystal system. By analyzing the chemical environment of atomic nuclei—commonly hydrogen (^1H) and carbon (^13C)—NMR provides detailed information about how the drug and coformer are associated.

In cocrystals, shifts in chemical signals (chemical shift changes) compared to the pure components often indicate the presence of intermolecular interactions such as hydrogen bonding or other non-covalent forces. Additionally, NMR can help verify the stoichiometric ratio of the components, ensuring the correct composition of the cocrystal. This makes it a powerful complementary technique for confirming successful cocrystal formation and understanding molecular-level interactions [25].

3.9 Raman Spectroscopy

Raman spectroscopy serves as a complementary technique to FTIR by offering additional insight into molecular vibrations and structural modifications within a cocrystal system. While FTIR is sensitive to changes in dipole moment, Raman spectroscopy is based on changes in molecular polarizability, allowing it to detect vibrational modes that may be weak or inactive in FTIR.

In the context of cocrystals, shifts in Raman peaks, changes in intensity, or the appearance of new bands can indicate alterations in molecular environment and the formation of intermolecular interactions between the drug and coformer. This complementary nature makes Raman spectroscopy particularly useful for confirming structural changes and providing a more comprehensive understanding of cocrystal formation [26].

3.10 UV–Visible Spectroscopy

This method is primarily employed for quantitative analysis in dissolution and solubility studies, where accurate measurement of drug concentration is essential. It enables the determination of how much drug is dissolved in a given medium over time, allowing for the evaluation of dissolution rate and extent.

By providing precise and reproducible data, this technique helps in comparing the performance of cocrystals with that of the pure drug. It is particularly useful for assessing improvements in solubility and bioavailability, making it an important tool in the characterization and evaluation of pharmaceutical formulations [27].

3.11 Dynamic Vapor Sorption (DVS)

Dynamic Vapor Sorption (DVS) is used to study how cocrystals interact with moisture under controlled humidity conditions. In this technique, the sample is exposed to systematically varying relative humidity levels, and changes in its weight are continuously monitored.

This analysis helps determine the hygroscopic nature of the cocrystal, including its tendency to absorb or release moisture. Such behavior is critical for assessing physical and chemical stability, as exposure to humidity can lead to phase transformations, degradation, or loss of crystallinity. Therefore, DVS plays an important role in predicting storage conditions, packaging requirements, and overall stability of cocrystal formulations [31–33].

3.12 Particle Size and Zeta Potential Analysis

These parameters are particularly important for nano-cocrystals because they directly affect how well the particles remain dispersed and how efficiently they dissolve. At the nanoscale, properties such as particle size, size distribution, surface charge (zeta potential), and surface characteristics play a crucial role in determining stability in suspension.

Well-dispersed nano-cocrystals with optimal surface properties are less likely to aggregate, which helps maintain a high surface area and ensures consistent dissolution. Conversely, poor dispersion stability can lead to particle agglomeration, reducing effective surface area and negatively impacting dissolution behavior. Therefore, careful control and evaluation of these parameters are essential to achieve improved solubility, enhanced bioavailability, and reliable performance of nano-cocrystal formulations [34–36].

4. Applications in BCS Class II Drugs

Cocrystals have demonstrated considerable success in improving the performance of poorly soluble drugs such as fenofibrate, carbamazepine, and indomethacin [37–40]. The enhancement in dissolution is often attributed to improved wettability and lower lattice energy.

Beyond conventional formulations, recent research indicates potential applications in antimicrobial systems and advanced delivery platforms such as transdermal and inhalation-based systems [41–45].

 

 

 

Fig. 7: Applications of Co-Crystals Formulation

 

5. Advantages

  • Cocrystals provide several formulation benefits:
  • Increased dissolution rate and solubility
  • Improved bioavailability
  • Applicability to non-ionizable drugs
  • Enhanced mechanical properties
  • Greater stability compared to amorphous forms [46–50]

6. Limitations

  • Despite their potential, certain limitations remain:
  • Difficulty in identifying suitable coformers
  • Sensitivity to environmental conditions
  • Scale-up and manufacturing challenges
  • Risk of phase transformation during storage
  • Limited long-term data on stability and performance [51–55]

7. Regulatory Perspective

Regulatory authorities such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency have developed specific guidelines for the evaluation and approval of pharmaceutical cocrystals. Within these frameworks, cocrystals are generally classified as distinct solid forms of an active pharmaceutical ingredient rather than entirely new chemical entities.

They are often treated as intermediates or specialized forms of the drug substance, meaning they must demonstrate clear advantages over the parent drug, such as improved solubility, dissolution rate, or bioavailability. In addition to performance enhancement, regulatory submissions must include comprehensive data on safety, stability, physicochemical characterization, and manufacturing reproducibility. This ensures that the cocrystal form is not only effective but also safe, stable, and suitable for consistent large-scale production [56–58]. There is also a growing emphasis on adopting environmentally sustainable manufacturing approaches in pharmaceutical development. This includes minimizing the use of hazardous organic solvents, reducing energy consumption, and implementing cleaner, more efficient processes. Techniques such as solvent-free grinding, use of greener solvents, and supercritical fluid methods are increasingly being explored to align with green chemistry principles.

Such sustainable practices not only reduce environmental impact but also improve process safety, regulatory acceptance, and long-term cost efficiency. As a result, the shift toward eco-friendly manufacturing is becoming an important consideration in the development and commercialization of pharmaceutical cocrystals [59,60].

CONCLUSION        

Cocrystals represent a flexible and effective strategy for enhancing the solubility of BCS Class II drugs, where poor dissolution limits drug performance despite adequate permeability. By modifying the crystal structure rather than altering the chemical composition of the drug, cocrystals offer a distinct advantage over conventional approaches, preserving pharmacological activity while improving key physicochemical properties.

This ability to tailor properties such as solubility, dissolution rate, and stability makes cocrystallization a valuable tool in formulation development. Furthermore, with continuous advancements in formulation technologies and increasing support from regulatory authorities, cocrystals are gaining wider acceptance. As a result, they are expected to play a significant role in the future of pharmaceutical development, particularly in addressing challenges associated with poorly soluble drugs.

REFERENCES

  1. Lipinski CA. Drug-like properties and the causes of poor solubility and poor permeability. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2000 Jul-Aug;44(1):235-49. 
  2. Savjani KT, Gajjar AK, Savjani JK. Drug solubility: importance and enhancement techniques. ISRN Pharm. 2012;2012:195727.
  3. Amidon GL, Lennernäs H, Shah VP, Crison JR. A theoretical basis for a biopharmaceutic drug classification: the correlation of in vitro drug product dissolution and in vivo bioavailability. Pharm Res. 1995 Mar;12(3):413-20. 
  4. Leuner C, Dressman J. Improving drug solubility for oral delivery using solid dispersions. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2000 Jul;50(1):47-60. 
  5. Chiou WL, Riegelman S. Pharmaceutical applications of solid dispersion systems. J Pharm Sci. 1971 Sep;60(9):1281-302.
  6. Vasconcelos T, Sarmento B, Costa P. Solid dispersions as strategy to improve oral bioavailability of poor water soluble drugs. Drug Discov Today. 2007 Dec;12(23-24):1068-75.
  7. Aakeröy CB, Salmon DJ. Building co-crystals with molecular sense and supramolecular sensibility. CrystEngComm. 2005;7(72):439-48.
  8. Schultheiss N, Newman A. Pharmaceutical Cocrystals and Their Physicochemical Properties. Cryst Growth Des. 2009 Jun 3;9(6):2950-2967. 
  9. Duggirala NK, Perry ML, Almarsson Ö, Zaworotko MJ. Pharmaceutical cocrystals: along the path to improved medicines. Chemical communications. 2016;52(4):640-55.
  10. Qiao N, Li M, Schlindwein W, Malek N, Davies A, Trappitt G. Pharmaceutical cocrystals: an overview. Int J Pharm. 2011 Oct 31;419(1-2):1-11.
  11. Cerreia Vioglio P, Chierotti MR, Gobetto R. Pharmaceutical aspects of salt and cocrystal forms of APIs and characterization challenges. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017 Aug 1;117:86-110.
  12. Healy AM, Worku ZA, Kumar D, Madi AM. Pharmaceutical solvates, hydrates and amorphous forms: A special emphasis on cocrystals. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017 Aug 1;117:25-46. 
  13. Karimijafari M, Padrela L, Walker G, Croker D. Cocrystal preparation methods. Cryst Growth Des. 2018;18:6370–6387.
  14. Yousef, M.A.E. and Vangala, V.R. (2019) Pharmaceutical Cocrystals: Molecules, Crystals, Formulations, Medicines. Crystal Growth & Design, 19, 7420-7438.
  15. Shan N, Zaworotko MJ. The role of cocrystals in pharmaceutical science. Drug Discov Today. 2008 May;13(9-10):440-6.
  16. Guo M, Sun X, Chen J, Cai T. Pharmaceutical cocrystals: A review of preparations, physicochemical properties and applications. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2021 Aug;11(8):2537-2564.
  17. Friš?i? T, Jones W. Cocrystal formation by grinding. Cryst Growth Des. 2009;9:1621–1637.
  18. Good DJ, Rodríguez-Hornedo N. Solubility advantage. Cryst Growth Des. 2009;9:2252–2264.
  19. Patil H, Tiwari RV, Repka MA. Hot-Melt Extrusion: from Theory to Application in Pharmaceutical Formulation. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2016 Feb;17(1):20-42.
  20. Padrela L, Rodrigues MA, Velaga SP, Fernandes AC, Matos HA, de Azevedo EG. Screening for pharmaceutical cocrystals using the supercritical fluid enhanced atomization process. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2010 Jun 1;53(1-3):156-64.
  21. Wong KC. Review of spectrometric identification of organic compounds.
  22. Craig DQ, Reading M. Thermal analysis of pharmaceuticals. CRC press; 2006 Dec 21.
  23. Wolter SD. Materials science of X-ray diffraction. InX-Ray Diffraction Imaging 2018 Nov 2 (pp. 141-164). CRC Press.
  24. Goldstein JI, Newbury DE, Echlin P, Joy DC, Lyman CE, Lifshin E, Sawyer L, Michael JR. The SEM and its modes of operation. InScanning Electron Microscopy and X-ray Microanalysis: Third Edition 2003 (pp. 21-60). Boston, MA: Springer US.
  25. Claridge TD. High-resolution NMR techniques in organic chemistry. Elsevier; 2016 Apr 22.
  26. Smith E, Dent G. Modern Raman spectroscopy: a practical approach. John Wiley & Sons; 2019 Apr 29..
  27. Sakhiya DC, Borkhataria CH. A review on advancement of cocrystallization approach and a brief on screening, formulation and characterization of the same. Heliyon. 2024 Apr 15;10(7).
  28. Blagden N, de Matas M, Gavan PT, York P. Crystal engineering of active pharmaceutical ingredients to improve solubility and dissolution rates. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2007 Jul 30;59(7):617-30.
  29. Childs SL, Chyall LJ, Dunlap JT, Smolenskaya VN, Stahly BC, Stahly GP. Crystal engineering approach to forming cocrystals of amine hydrochlorides with organic acids. Molecular complexes of fluoxetine hydrochloride with benzoic, succinic, and fumaric acids. J Am Chem Soc. 2004 Oct 20;126(41):13335-42.
  30. Chavan DD, Thorat VM, Shete AS, Bhosale RR, Patil SJ, Tiwari DD. Current Perspectives on Development and Applications of Cocrystals in the Pharmaceutical and Medical Domain. Cureus. 2024 Sep 27;16(9):e70328.
  31. Wong SN, Chen YC, Xuan B, Sun CC, Chow SF. Cocrystal engineering of pharmaceutical solids: Therapeutic potential and challenges. CrystEngComm. 2021;23(40):7005-38
  32. .Panzade P, Wagh A, Harale P, Bhilwade S. Pharmaceutical cocrystals: a rising star in drug delivery applications. Journal of drug targeting. 2024 Feb 7;32(2):115-27.
  33. Nangia A. Conformational polymorphism in organic crystals. Accounts of chemical research. 2008 May 20;41(5):595-604.
  34. Garg U, Azim Y. Challenges and opportunities of pharmaceutical cocrystals: a focused review on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. RSC medicinal chemistry. 2021;12(5):705-21.
  35. Yu L. Amorphous pharmaceutical solids: preparation, characterization and stabilization. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2001 May 16;48(1):27-42.
  36. Bolla, G. and Nangia, A. (2016) Pharmaceutical Cocrystals: Walking the Talk. Chemical Communications, 52, 8342-8360.
  37. Shaikh R, Singh R, Walker GM, Croker DM. Pharmaceutical cocrystal drug products: an outlook on product development. Trends in pharmacological sciences. 2018 Dec 1;39(12):1033-48.
  38. European Medicines Agency (EMA). Guideline on the investigation of bioequivalence  London: EMA; 2014
  39. Kumar Bandaru R, Rout SR, Kenguva G, Gorain B, Alhakamy NA, Kesharwani P, Dandela R. Recent Advances in Pharmaceutical Cocrystals: From Bench to Market. Front Pharmacol. 2021 Nov 11;12:780582. 
  40. Bolla G, Sarma B, Nangia AK. Crystal engineering of pharmaceutical cocrystals in the discovery and development of improved drugs. Chemical reviews. 2022 Jun 1;122(13):11514-603.
  41. Gomes SN, Biscaia IF, Lopes DS, Mengarda M, Murakami FS, Oliveira PR, Bernardi LS. Cocrystals enhance biopharmaceutical and antimicrobial properties of norfloxacin. Pharmaceutics. 2023 Aug 26;15(9):2211.
  42. Singh M, Barua H, Jyothi VG, Dhondale MR, Nambiar AG, Agrawal AK, Kumar P, Shastri NR, Kumar D. Cocrystals by design: a rational coformer selection approach for tackling the API problems. Pharmaceutics. 2023 Apr 6;15(4):1161.
  43. Guan D, Xuan B, Wang C, Long R, Jiang Y, Mao L, Kang J, Wang Z, Chow SF, Zhou Q. Improving the physicochemical and biopharmaceutical properties of active pharmaceutical ingredients derived from traditional Chinese medicine through cocrystal engineering. Pharmaceutics. 2021 Dec 15;13(12):2160.
  44. Wu D, Zhang B, Yao Q, Hou B, Zhou L, Xie C, Gong J, Hao H, Chen W. Evaluation on cocrystal screening methods and synthesis of multicomponent crystals: a case study. Crystal Growth & Design. 2021 Jul 23;21(8):4531-46.
  45. Braga D, Casali L, Grepioni F. The relevance of crystal forms in the pharmaceutical field: sword of damocles or innovation tools?. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022 Aug 12;23(16):9013.
  46. Kumar S, Nanda A. Approaches to design of pharmaceutical cocrystals: A review. Molecular Crystals and liquid crystals. 2018 May 24;667(1):54-77.
  47. Karki S, Frisci? T, Jones W, Motherwell WD. Screening for pharmaceutical cocrystal hydrates via neat and liquid-assisted grinding. Mol Pharm. 2007 May-Jun;4(3):347-54. 
  48. Remenar JF, Peterson ML, Stephens PW, Zhang Z, Zimenkov Y, Hickey MB. Celecoxib: nicotinamide dissociation: using excipients to capture the cocrystal's potential. Molecular pharmaceutics. 2007 Jun 4;4(3):386-400.
  49. Vishweshwar P, McMahon JA, Peterson ML, Hickey MB, Shattock TR, Zaworotko MJ. Crystal engineering of pharmaceutical co-crystals from polymorphic active pharmaceutical ingredients. Chem Commun (Camb). 2005 Sep 28;(36):4601-3. 
  50. Zaworotko MJ. Molecules to crystals, crystals to molecules... and back again?. Crystal growth & design. 2007 Jan 3;7(1):4-9.
  51. Shattock TR, Arora KK, Vishweshwar P, Zaworotko MJ. Hierarchy of supramolecular synthons: persistent carboxylic acid··· pyridine hydrogen bonds in cocrystals that also contain a hydroxyl moiety. Crystal growth and design. 2008 Dec 3;8(12):4533-45.
  52. Kale DP, Zode SS, Bansal AK. Challenges in Translational Development of Pharmaceutical Cocrystals. J Pharm Sci. 2017 Feb;106(2):457-470.
  53. Maheshwari C, Jayasankar A, Khan NA, Amidon GE, Rodríguez-Hornedo N. Factors that influence the spontaneous formation of pharmaceutical cocrystals by simply mixing solid reactants. CrystEngComm. 2009;11(3):493-500.
  54. Akhtar N, SAMI HESHAM. CO-CRYSTALS IN PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE: AN UPDATED REVIEW. JETIR . 2023;
  55. Ervasti T, Aaltonen J, Ketolainen J. Theophylline–nicotinamide cocrystal formation in physical mixture during storage. International journal of pharmaceutics. 2015 May 30;486(1-2):121-30.
  56. Sun C, Grant DJ. Influence of crystal shape on the tableting performance of L?lysine monohydrochloride dihydrate. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2001 May 1;90(5):569-79.
  57. Sun CC, Hou H. Improving mechanical properties of caffeine and methyl gallate crystals by cocrystallization. Crystal Growth and Design. 2008 May 7;8(5):1575-9.
  58. Mishra MK, Mishra K, Narayan A, Reddy CM, Vangala VR. Structural basis for mechanical anisotropy in polymorphs of a caffeine–glutaric acid cocrystal. Crystal Growth & Design. 2020 Sep 15;20(10):6306-15.
  59. hipparaboina R, Kumar D, Chavan RB, Shastri NR. Multidrug co-crystals: towards the development of effective therapeutic hybrids. Drug Discov Today. 2016 Mar;21(3):481-90.
  60. Chettri A, et al. Green cocrystal synthesis. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2024.  Chettri A, Subba A, Singh GP, Bag PP. Pharmaceutical co-crystals: A green way to enhance drug stability and solubility for improved therapeutic efficacy. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2024 Jan 1;76(1):1-2.

Reference

  1. Lipinski CA. Drug-like properties and the causes of poor solubility and poor permeability. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2000 Jul-Aug;44(1):235-49. 
  2. Savjani KT, Gajjar AK, Savjani JK. Drug solubility: importance and enhancement techniques. ISRN Pharm. 2012;2012:195727.
  3. Amidon GL, Lennernäs H, Shah VP, Crison JR. A theoretical basis for a biopharmaceutic drug classification: the correlation of in vitro drug product dissolution and in vivo bioavailability. Pharm Res. 1995 Mar;12(3):413-20. 
  4. Leuner C, Dressman J. Improving drug solubility for oral delivery using solid dispersions. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2000 Jul;50(1):47-60. 
  5. Chiou WL, Riegelman S. Pharmaceutical applications of solid dispersion systems. J Pharm Sci. 1971 Sep;60(9):1281-302.
  6. Vasconcelos T, Sarmento B, Costa P. Solid dispersions as strategy to improve oral bioavailability of poor water soluble drugs. Drug Discov Today. 2007 Dec;12(23-24):1068-75.
  7. Aakeröy CB, Salmon DJ. Building co-crystals with molecular sense and supramolecular sensibility. CrystEngComm. 2005;7(72):439-48.
  8. Schultheiss N, Newman A. Pharmaceutical Cocrystals and Their Physicochemical Properties. Cryst Growth Des. 2009 Jun 3;9(6):2950-2967. 
  9. Duggirala NK, Perry ML, Almarsson Ö, Zaworotko MJ. Pharmaceutical cocrystals: along the path to improved medicines. Chemical communications. 2016;52(4):640-55.
  10. Qiao N, Li M, Schlindwein W, Malek N, Davies A, Trappitt G. Pharmaceutical cocrystals: an overview. Int J Pharm. 2011 Oct 31;419(1-2):1-11.
  11. Cerreia Vioglio P, Chierotti MR, Gobetto R. Pharmaceutical aspects of salt and cocrystal forms of APIs and characterization challenges. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017 Aug 1;117:86-110.
  12. Healy AM, Worku ZA, Kumar D, Madi AM. Pharmaceutical solvates, hydrates and amorphous forms: A special emphasis on cocrystals. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017 Aug 1;117:25-46. 
  13. Karimijafari M, Padrela L, Walker G, Croker D. Cocrystal preparation methods. Cryst Growth Des. 2018;18:6370–6387.
  14. Yousef, M.A.E. and Vangala, V.R. (2019) Pharmaceutical Cocrystals: Molecules, Crystals, Formulations, Medicines. Crystal Growth & Design, 19, 7420-7438.
  15. Shan N, Zaworotko MJ. The role of cocrystals in pharmaceutical science. Drug Discov Today. 2008 May;13(9-10):440-6.
  16. Guo M, Sun X, Chen J, Cai T. Pharmaceutical cocrystals: A review of preparations, physicochemical properties and applications. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2021 Aug;11(8):2537-2564.
  17. Friš?i? T, Jones W. Cocrystal formation by grinding. Cryst Growth Des. 2009;9:1621–1637.
  18. Good DJ, Rodríguez-Hornedo N. Solubility advantage. Cryst Growth Des. 2009;9:2252–2264.
  19. Patil H, Tiwari RV, Repka MA. Hot-Melt Extrusion: from Theory to Application in Pharmaceutical Formulation. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2016 Feb;17(1):20-42.
  20. Padrela L, Rodrigues MA, Velaga SP, Fernandes AC, Matos HA, de Azevedo EG. Screening for pharmaceutical cocrystals using the supercritical fluid enhanced atomization process. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2010 Jun 1;53(1-3):156-64.
  21. Wong KC. Review of spectrometric identification of organic compounds.
  22. Craig DQ, Reading M. Thermal analysis of pharmaceuticals. CRC press; 2006 Dec 21.
  23. Wolter SD. Materials science of X-ray diffraction. InX-Ray Diffraction Imaging 2018 Nov 2 (pp. 141-164). CRC Press.
  24. Goldstein JI, Newbury DE, Echlin P, Joy DC, Lyman CE, Lifshin E, Sawyer L, Michael JR. The SEM and its modes of operation. InScanning Electron Microscopy and X-ray Microanalysis: Third Edition 2003 (pp. 21-60). Boston, MA: Springer US.
  25. Claridge TD. High-resolution NMR techniques in organic chemistry. Elsevier; 2016 Apr 22.
  26. Smith E, Dent G. Modern Raman spectroscopy: a practical approach. John Wiley & Sons; 2019 Apr 29..
  27. Sakhiya DC, Borkhataria CH. A review on advancement of cocrystallization approach and a brief on screening, formulation and characterization of the same. Heliyon. 2024 Apr 15;10(7).
  28. Blagden N, de Matas M, Gavan PT, York P. Crystal engineering of active pharmaceutical ingredients to improve solubility and dissolution rates. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2007 Jul 30;59(7):617-30.
  29. Childs SL, Chyall LJ, Dunlap JT, Smolenskaya VN, Stahly BC, Stahly GP. Crystal engineering approach to forming cocrystals of amine hydrochlorides with organic acids. Molecular complexes of fluoxetine hydrochloride with benzoic, succinic, and fumaric acids. J Am Chem Soc. 2004 Oct 20;126(41):13335-42.
  30. Chavan DD, Thorat VM, Shete AS, Bhosale RR, Patil SJ, Tiwari DD. Current Perspectives on Development and Applications of Cocrystals in the Pharmaceutical and Medical Domain. Cureus. 2024 Sep 27;16(9):e70328.
  31. Wong SN, Chen YC, Xuan B, Sun CC, Chow SF. Cocrystal engineering of pharmaceutical solids: Therapeutic potential and challenges. CrystEngComm. 2021;23(40):7005-38
  32. .Panzade P, Wagh A, Harale P, Bhilwade S. Pharmaceutical cocrystals: a rising star in drug delivery applications. Journal of drug targeting. 2024 Feb 7;32(2):115-27.
  33. Nangia A. Conformational polymorphism in organic crystals. Accounts of chemical research. 2008 May 20;41(5):595-604.
  34. Garg U, Azim Y. Challenges and opportunities of pharmaceutical cocrystals: a focused review on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. RSC medicinal chemistry. 2021;12(5):705-21.
  35. Yu L. Amorphous pharmaceutical solids: preparation, characterization and stabilization. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2001 May 16;48(1):27-42.
  36. Bolla, G. and Nangia, A. (2016) Pharmaceutical Cocrystals: Walking the Talk. Chemical Communications, 52, 8342-8360.
  37. Shaikh R, Singh R, Walker GM, Croker DM. Pharmaceutical cocrystal drug products: an outlook on product development. Trends in pharmacological sciences. 2018 Dec 1;39(12):1033-48.
  38. European Medicines Agency (EMA). Guideline on the investigation of bioequivalence  London: EMA; 2014
  39. Kumar Bandaru R, Rout SR, Kenguva G, Gorain B, Alhakamy NA, Kesharwani P, Dandela R. Recent Advances in Pharmaceutical Cocrystals: From Bench to Market. Front Pharmacol. 2021 Nov 11;12:780582. 
  40. Bolla G, Sarma B, Nangia AK. Crystal engineering of pharmaceutical cocrystals in the discovery and development of improved drugs. Chemical reviews. 2022 Jun 1;122(13):11514-603.
  41. Gomes SN, Biscaia IF, Lopes DS, Mengarda M, Murakami FS, Oliveira PR, Bernardi LS. Cocrystals enhance biopharmaceutical and antimicrobial properties of norfloxacin. Pharmaceutics. 2023 Aug 26;15(9):2211.
  42. Singh M, Barua H, Jyothi VG, Dhondale MR, Nambiar AG, Agrawal AK, Kumar P, Shastri NR, Kumar D. Cocrystals by design: a rational coformer selection approach for tackling the API problems. Pharmaceutics. 2023 Apr 6;15(4):1161.
  43. Guan D, Xuan B, Wang C, Long R, Jiang Y, Mao L, Kang J, Wang Z, Chow SF, Zhou Q. Improving the physicochemical and biopharmaceutical properties of active pharmaceutical ingredients derived from traditional Chinese medicine through cocrystal engineering. Pharmaceutics. 2021 Dec 15;13(12):2160.
  44. Wu D, Zhang B, Yao Q, Hou B, Zhou L, Xie C, Gong J, Hao H, Chen W. Evaluation on cocrystal screening methods and synthesis of multicomponent crystals: a case study. Crystal Growth & Design. 2021 Jul 23;21(8):4531-46.
  45. Braga D, Casali L, Grepioni F. The relevance of crystal forms in the pharmaceutical field: sword of damocles or innovation tools?. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022 Aug 12;23(16):9013.
  46. Kumar S, Nanda A. Approaches to design of pharmaceutical cocrystals: A review. Molecular Crystals and liquid crystals. 2018 May 24;667(1):54-77.
  47. Karki S, Frisci? T, Jones W, Motherwell WD. Screening for pharmaceutical cocrystal hydrates via neat and liquid-assisted grinding. Mol Pharm. 2007 May-Jun;4(3):347-54. 
  48. Remenar JF, Peterson ML, Stephens PW, Zhang Z, Zimenkov Y, Hickey MB. Celecoxib: nicotinamide dissociation: using excipients to capture the cocrystal's potential. Molecular pharmaceutics. 2007 Jun 4;4(3):386-400.
  49. Vishweshwar P, McMahon JA, Peterson ML, Hickey MB, Shattock TR, Zaworotko MJ. Crystal engineering of pharmaceutical co-crystals from polymorphic active pharmaceutical ingredients. Chem Commun (Camb). 2005 Sep 28;(36):4601-3. 
  50. Zaworotko MJ. Molecules to crystals, crystals to molecules... and back again?. Crystal growth & design. 2007 Jan 3;7(1):4-9.
  51. Shattock TR, Arora KK, Vishweshwar P, Zaworotko MJ. Hierarchy of supramolecular synthons: persistent carboxylic acid··· pyridine hydrogen bonds in cocrystals that also contain a hydroxyl moiety. Crystal growth and design. 2008 Dec 3;8(12):4533-45.
  52. Kale DP, Zode SS, Bansal AK. Challenges in Translational Development of Pharmaceutical Cocrystals. J Pharm Sci. 2017 Feb;106(2):457-470.
  53. Maheshwari C, Jayasankar A, Khan NA, Amidon GE, Rodríguez-Hornedo N. Factors that influence the spontaneous formation of pharmaceutical cocrystals by simply mixing solid reactants. CrystEngComm. 2009;11(3):493-500.
  54. Akhtar N, SAMI HESHAM. CO-CRYSTALS IN PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE: AN UPDATED REVIEW. JETIR . 2023;
  55. Ervasti T, Aaltonen J, Ketolainen J. Theophylline–nicotinamide cocrystal formation in physical mixture during storage. International journal of pharmaceutics. 2015 May 30;486(1-2):121-30.
  56. Sun C, Grant DJ. Influence of crystal shape on the tableting performance of L?lysine monohydrochloride dihydrate. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2001 May 1;90(5):569-79.
  57. Sun CC, Hou H. Improving mechanical properties of caffeine and methyl gallate crystals by cocrystallization. Crystal Growth and Design. 2008 May 7;8(5):1575-9.
  58. Mishra MK, Mishra K, Narayan A, Reddy CM, Vangala VR. Structural basis for mechanical anisotropy in polymorphs of a caffeine–glutaric acid cocrystal. Crystal Growth & Design. 2020 Sep 15;20(10):6306-15.
  59. hipparaboina R, Kumar D, Chavan RB, Shastri NR. Multidrug co-crystals: towards the development of effective therapeutic hybrids. Drug Discov Today. 2016 Mar;21(3):481-90.
  60. Chettri A, et al. Green cocrystal synthesis. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2024.  Chettri A, Subba A, Singh GP, Bag PP. Pharmaceutical co-crystals: A green way to enhance drug stability and solubility for improved therapeutic efficacy. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2024 Jan 1;76(1):1-2.

Photo
Prajakta Pawar
Corresponding author

Research Scholar, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Government College of Pharmacy, Karad, Satara – 415124, Maharashtra, India..

Photo
Shital Chavan
Co-author

Assistant Professor Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Government College of Pharmacy, Karad, Satara – 415124, Maharashtra, India..

Photo
Tapas Ghosh
Co-author

Research Scholar Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Government College of Pharmacy, Karad, Satara – 415124, Maharashtra, India..

Photo
Omkar Alase
Co-author

Research Scholar Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Government College of Pharmacy, Karad, Satara – 415124, Maharashtra, India..

Photo
Pratiksha Kamble
Co-author

Research Scholar Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Government College of Pharmacy, Karad, Satara – 415124, Maharashtra, India..

Prajakta Pawar, Shital Chavan, Tapas Ghosh, Omkar Alase, Pratiksha Kamble, Pharmaceutical Cocrystals: An Emerging Strategy for Improving Solubility of BCS Class II Drugs, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 5, 5173-5186, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20308618

More related articles
A Comprehensive Review On: Effect of Green Chemist...
Aachal Bansod, Yasmin Sheikh, Suchita Kapgate, Swati Tembhurne, ...
Phytochemical Characterization, Formulation, and E...
Surabhi Rane, Vidyaswarna Koliyar, Rashmi Kori, Shivani Singh, Su...
Sansevieria Trifasciata: A Low-Maintenance, Air-Pu...
Shaikh Bushra, Thange Shejal, Shaikh Muskan , ...
Comprehensive Review on Rice (Oryza sativa L.): Characteristics, Quality, and Ap...
Pratik Dhokne, Swapnil Tirmanwar, Shivani Wadichar, Ragini Dani, Akash Shembekar, Rutuja Thakre, ...
A Review: Formulation And Evaluation of Glycerosomes of Anti-Fungal Drug...
S. S. Gotpagar, S. V. Potdar, A. H. Hosmani, I. D. Gonjari, B. S. Gaikwad, S. J. Momin, R. A. Tambe ...
Formulation & Evaluation of Polyherbal Anti-Microbial Ointment of Blumea Lacera ...
Harshala Shirose, Harsh Suroshe, Girish Kokate, Rohit Aghane, Dr. Rajanikant Kokate, ...
Related Articles
Beyond Gravity: The Impact of Microgravity and Spaceflight on Human Pharmacokine...
Chandrakanta Das, Nityapriya Maharana , Biswa Bhushan Padhi, Jeeban Pradeep Agnihotri , Tushar Kanti...
Advancements in Nanotechnology-Driven Herbal Drug Delivery Systems: Current Prog...
Sakshi Mane, Avinash Narale, Akshay Thorat, Akshata Patil , ...
A Comprehensive Review On: Effect of Green Chemistry on Industry...
Aachal Bansod, Yasmin Sheikh, Suchita Kapgate, Swati Tembhurne, ...
More related articles
A Comprehensive Review On: Effect of Green Chemistry on Industry...
Aachal Bansod, Yasmin Sheikh, Suchita Kapgate, Swati Tembhurne, ...
Phytochemical Characterization, Formulation, and Evaluation of Antibacterial Act...
Surabhi Rane, Vidyaswarna Koliyar, Rashmi Kori, Shivani Singh, Suresh Sirvi, ...
A Comprehensive Review On: Effect of Green Chemistry on Industry...
Aachal Bansod, Yasmin Sheikh, Suchita Kapgate, Swati Tembhurne, ...
Phytochemical Characterization, Formulation, and Evaluation of Antibacterial Act...
Surabhi Rane, Vidyaswarna Koliyar, Rashmi Kori, Shivani Singh, Suresh Sirvi, ...