Central Ayurveda Research Institute, CCRAS, Ministry of Ayush, 4-CN Block, Bidhannagar, Sector- V, Kolkata- 700091.
Background: In Ayurveda, medicated oils are primarily employed to address ailments related to Vata Dosha imbalance. Dasmula Taila, a classical formulation mentioned in Bhaisajya Ratnavali, is used for managing Shiro-roga (head diseases) and nasya (administration of medicament through nostrils). Objectives: Methods: The key ingredients include roots of Bilva (Aegle marmelos (L.) Corrêa), Shyonaka (Oroxylum indicum (L.) Kurz), Gambhari (Gmelina arborea Roxb), Patala (Stereospermum suaveolens (Roxb.) DC), Agnimantha (Clerodendrum phlomidis Linn), Shalaparni (Desmodium gangeticum (L.) DC), Prishniparni (Uraria picta (Jacq.) Desv), Kantakari (Solanum xanthocarpum Schrad. & H. Wend), Brihati (Solanum indicum Linn), Goksura (Tribulus terrestris L.) and murchit Tila Taila. Rich in Tridosha-calming substances, it is prepared by using the traditional Taila-paka method, a form of oil preparation detailed in ancient Ayurvedic texts, and adheres to the prescribed procedures outlined in the Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India (API). The organoleptic study and physicochemical analysis have provided valuable information towards the development of quality control data of the formulation. Also the chemical standards of the formulation were developed using sophisticated analytical techniques like high performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) study. Results: As no detail study on the quality control parameters of Dasmula Taila is available in existing literature, this study is essential to establish quality control benchmarks for the prepared Dasmula Taila formulation. In this regard Quality control data of three batches of Dasmula Taila was prepared along with HPTLC profiling. Accelerated shelf life study was also carried out to access its stability and the data suggests that the formulation is stable for at least for 6 months. Conclusion: The current research findings establish the quality control benchmarks for the raw materials used, which will contribute to developing the quality criteria for the Dasmula Taila formulation. This also includes creating an HPTLC fingerprint profile for the Dasmula Taila formulation. Besides this, stability studies of Taila have also been performed.
Ayurveda is a science of life and it is the ancient and comprehensive medical system, focuses on holistic healing using natural remedies, including herbal formulations and purification procedures [1]. In Ayurveda, Dash stands for ten (10) and Moola stands for Root. Dasmula, a combination of Brihat Panchamoola and Laghu Panchamoola, contains ten roots of ten different plants in equal ratio. Out of the ten roots five roots are of trees, known as Brihat Panchmoola and five roots are of shrubs, known as Laghu panchmoola. Brihat Panchmoola contains Bilva (Aegle marmelos (L.) Corrêa), Shyonaka (Oroxylum indicum (L.) Kurz), Gambhari (Gmelina arborea Roxb), Patala (Stereospermum suaveolens (Roxb.) DC) and Agnimantha (Clerodendrum phlomidis Linn) whereas Laghu Panchmoola contains Shalaparni (Desmodium gangeticum (L.) DC), Prishniparni (Uraria picta (Jacq.) Desv), Kantakari (Solanum xanthocarpum Schrad. & H. Wend), Brihati (Solanum indicum Linn) and Goksura (Tribulus terrestris L.) [2]. Ayurveda makes extensive use of a mixture of these ten (10) roots, which work on Vata and Dosha to lessen their aggravation. There are a plethora of health benefits associated with Dasmula, gout, Parkinson's disease, arthritis, asthma, headaches, puerperal disorders, muscle spasms, lower back aches are the some of those. It has strong analgesic, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory effects [3-4]. In the Ayurvedic system, health is defined by the equilibrium of Dosha, Dhatu, and Malas, which are the body's regulatory, structural, and waste-removal components [4]. The polyherbal combination is one of the most often used ingredients in Ayurveda medicine, where it is utilized to make various kinds of medicine that are used to treat different disorders. Dasmula Taila is a herbal oil blend prescribed for Nasya treatment in cases of Shiro-roga, a category of head-related ailments [2-3]. Sharma et al. recently conducted a clinical study on the Dasmula Taila Nasya and Shirodhara in Vatika Shiroroga (Tension Headache) [5] which showed that both therapies were approximately equally beneficial, but patients who were administered Shirodhara with Dashmoola Taila showed better results in comaparison to those administered Nasya Karma with Dasmula Taila. This preparation is also linked to treating Ardhavbhedaka, which is comparable to migraines. The Taila formulation is crafted to harmonize the body’s elements, specifically to soothe Vatadosha without worsening Kapha [6]. During its preparation, known as Snehpaka, Taila uniquely integrates the qualities of the herbs infused into it while retaining its inherent characteristics [7]. This study chooses Dasmula Taila for managing Ardhavbhedaka due to its predominantly Tridoshamaka contents.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plant Materials
In the present study, roots of the ten (10) selected plants roots viz. Bilva (Aegle marmelos (L.) Corrêa), Shyonaka (Oroxylum indicum (L.) Kurz), Gambhari (Gmelina arborea Roxb), Patala (Stereospermum suaveolens (Roxb.) DC), Agnimantha (Clerodendrum phlomidis Linn), Shalaparni (Desmodium gangeticum (L.) DC), Prishniparni (Uraria picta (Jacq.) Desv), Kantakari (Solanum xanthocarpum Schrad. & H. Wend), Brihati (Solanum indicum Linn), Goksura (Tribulus terrestris L.) was collected [2]. The selected plant roots were authenticated by the Pharmacognosy department of CARI, Kolkata, along with macroscopical and powder microscopical characterization as per API. [8-9]
Preparation of Dasmula Taila
The oil 'Dasmula Taila' was prepared by the roots of ten (10) plants along with Tila taila (sesame oil), which was chemically standardized by testing of the parameters, i.e. Acid value, Saponification value, Unsaponifiable matter, Iodine value, Peroxide value etc. The physicochemical parameters (Loss on drying, Total ash, Acid insoluble ash, water soluble extractive, alcohol soluble extractive, pH, HPTLC) and safety parameters (Heavy metals, microbial load, specific pathogens, pesticide residue testing) analysis were carried out for all the mentioned raw drugs as per API (Table 1). The murchit tila taila was obtained by following the murchana process of Tila taila using the raw drugs viz. Manjistha (Root), Musta (Rz.), Tvak/Nalika (St. Bk.), Haritaki (Fr.), Haridra (Rz), Ketaki (Root), Bibhitaka (Fr.), Amalaki (Fr.), Hrivera (Root), Vatankura (St. Bk.) and Lodhra (St. Bk.) which were macroscopically studied and chemically standardized as per API [10, 11]. At first, all the plant roots were cleaned, washed, dried and powdered separately. After that, all powdered raw drugs were passed individually through a sieve size 80. After that, all these raw drugs, 320 gm each, were taken, and 16 litres of water was added to make a homogeneous mixture. The process began by adding 1 litre Murchit Tila Taila to the mixture and heating it at a temperature range of 50-60 °C for three hours. The heat was turned off once the three hours had elapsed, and the boiler was left to rest overnight. The next day, heating resumed, and froth development was monitored while regularly checking the kalka for varti formation until the froth eventually settled. Subsequently, the varti was strained while still hot (around 80 °C) through a muslin cloth. After cooling, the clear liquid collected was the final Dasmula Taila product.
Physicochemical ananlysis
The powder form of each plant part were used for the physicochemical analysis as per the WHO/API guidelines. For determining the water and alcohol extractive values, the crude powder (4 g) was soaked in the respective solvents (100 mL) with occasional shaking for up to 6 h, followed by keeping the mixture overnight (18 h) at room temperature. The extracts were subsequently concentrated in a hot water bath to obtain constant weights, and the extractive values were calculated. In order to determine Loss on drying, the crude powder (4 g) was kept in hot air oven at 105 °C for 6 h, followed by cooling weight is noted and LOD at 105 °C was calculated. For total ash determination, 2 g of each raw drugs (powder form) were taken in a silica crucibe and incinerated at 450 °C for 6 h. On the next day the weight of the crucible is noted and result is calculated. Now the ash is ready for determination of acid insoluble ash. The ash obtained on the previous day was treated with 25 mL 2(N) HCl and warmed in a water bath, filtered through a ashless filter paper. Once all the liquid were drained, the ashless filter paper was transferred in the same silica crucible and incinerated at 450 °C for 6 h. On the next day the weight of the crucible is noted and result is calculated. In order to check the pH, 10 % aqueous suspension was prepared, kept for 24 h and pH was noted. The formulation Damula Taila is liquid and three (03) batches of formulations have been prepared. Physicochemical investigations viz. determination of Refractive index at 40 °C, Viscosity, Specific optical rotation, Acid value, Iodine value, Saponification value, Unsaponifiable matter, Peroxide value, Specific gravity and Wt per ml (at 25 °C) of the three batches of Dasmula Taila were carried out following API methods. [12-13]
High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography (HPTLC) study [14-15]
Equipment
A CAMAG HPTLC system (Switzerland), comprising of a CAMAG ATS 4, CAMAG TLC scanner 3, CAMAG Wincats Software, Version 1.44, a CAMAG TLC plate heater, and a CAMAG Visualizer, was used for the study.
Preparation of samples
For each sample, 1 gram was refluxed with 20 ml of Methanol for one hour. The resulting extracts were then passed through filter paper. The filtrates obtained were concentrated for Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) analysis.
The High-Performance Thin Layer Chromatography (HPTLC) analysis of the Dasmula Taila formulation and the raw materials and reference markers was conducted across three separate batches. Each sample, weighing 1 gram (or 2 mL for Taila), underwent reflux with 20 mL of Methanol for one hour; post-reflux, the solution was filtered through filter paper. The resulting filtrate was then reduced in volume and prepared for TLC analysis. Reference standards were created by dissolving 1 mg each of marmelosin, beta-sitosterol, and lupeol acetate in 10 mL of Methanol.
Stationary phase
Pre-activated 20 × 10 cm aluminum-supported precoated silica gel 60 F254 plates (Merck, India, Batch No. 1.05554.0007) were used.
Application of samples
A 5 µL sample was applied to the plate as an 8 mm band, positioned 15 mm above the plate's base using CAMAG ATS4 applicator.
Mobile phase
The solvent system used was a mixture of Toluene, Ethyl acetate, and Formic acid in the ratio of 7:3:0.1(v/v).
The solvent system comprised a blend of toluene, ethyl acetate, and formic acid in a 7.5:2.5:0.4 (v/v) ratio.
Plate development and detection of spots
The plates were developed to a distance of 90 mm in a CAMAG Twin trough chamber, with a pre-conditioning period of 20 minutes at 25°C and 42% average relative humidity. 20% aqueous sulphuric acid solution was used as the derivatising agent. The TLC plate was developed up to 90 mm in a pre-saturated CAMAG twin trough chamber after preconditioning the plate at 25 °C and relative average humidity of 42%. Images of the developed plate were captured at 254, 366 nm and in white light.
Shelf life study [16-17]
The stability of the formulation was evaluated in a stability chamber (Model: REMI 12C) under regulated conditions (temperature at 38 °C and relative humidity at 75%) over a period of six months, with assessments at intervals of one month (01), three months (03), and six months (06). The stability profile, composed of specific parameters, is essential for determining appropriate storage conditions and the expiration period for pharmaceuticals. The construction of the stability study should rely on an understanding of the drug's characteristics and the physical form in which it is administered. The purpose of the present study was to establish stability data by taking three batches of drug formulation at specified intervals of 0 days, 1st month, 3rd month, and 6th month. Various physical parameters, like the refractive index, viscosity, and specific gravity, as well as chemical parameters, like saponification, acid, and iodine values, were studied.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Organoleptic and quality control studies carried out on the ingredients of Dasmula Taila
In Dasmula Taila the ingredients present are the roots of the following ten (10) plants viz. Bilva (Aegle marmelos (L.) Corrêa), Shyonaka (Oroxylum indicum (L.) Kurz), Gambhari (Gmelina arborea Roxb), Patala (Stereospermum suaveolens (Roxb.) DC), Agnimantha (Clerodendrum phlomidis Linn), Shalaparni (Desmodium gangeticum (L.) DC), Prishniparni (Uraria picta (Jacq.) Desv), Kantakari (Solanum xanthocarpum Schrad. & H. Wend), Brihati (Solanum indicum Linn), Goksura (Tribulus terrestris L.) and Murchit Tila Taila. In The following table (Table 1) photographs, organoleptic findings, physicochemical parametrs and safety parameters of the ingredients of Dasmula Taila are documented.
Table 1: List of ingredients of Dasmula Taila along with their photographs and quality control data
Sl. No. |
Plant Name |
Plant part used |
Photograph |
Organoleptic study |
Physicochemical Parameters (% w/w) |
Safety Parameters |
Sl. No. |
Plant Name |
Plant part used |
|
|
|
|
Colour |
Texture |
Odour |
|
|
|
1 |
Bilva [Aegle marmelos (L.) Corrêa] [18] (API, Part-I, Vol- III, Pg. 29-31) |
Root |
|
Greyish brown |
Rough |
Faintly aromatic |
1 |
Bilva [Aegle marmelos (L.) Corrêa] [18] (API, Part-I, Vol- III, Pg. 29-31) |
Root |
2 |
Shyonaka [Oroxylum indicum (L.) Kurz] [19] (API, Part-I, Vol- III, Pg. 209-210) |
Root |
|
Light brown |
Rough |
Characteristic |
2 |
Shyonaka [Oroxylum indicum (L.) Kurz] [19] (API, Part-I, Vol- III, Pg. 209-210) |
Root |
3 |
Gambhari [Gmelina arborea Roxb] [20] (API, Part-I, Vol- I, Pg. 36-37) |
Root |
|
Orangish brown |
Rough |
Not characteristic |
3 |
Gambhari [Gmelina arborea Roxb] [20] (API, Part-I, Vol- I, Pg. 36-37) |
Root |
4 |
Patala [Stereospermum suaveolens (Roxb.) DC] [21] (API, Part-I, Vol- III, Pg. 147-148) |
Root |
|
Orangish brown |
Rough |
No odour |
4 |
Patala [Stereospermum suaveolens (Roxb.) DC] [21] (API, Part-I, Vol- III, Pg. 147-148) |
Root |
5 |
Agnimantha [Clerodendrum phlomidis Linn] [22] (API, Part-I, Vol- III, Pg. 3-4) |
Root |
|
Buff |
Rough |
Faintly aromatic |
5 |
Agnimantha [Clerodendrum phlomidis Linn] [22] (API, Part-I, Vol- III, Pg. 3-4) |
Root |
6 |
Shalaparni [Desmodium gangeticum (L.) DC] [23] (API, Part-I, Vol- III, Pg. 178-180) |
Root |
|
Brown |
Rough |
Not characteristic |
6 |
Shalaparni [Desmodium gangeticum (L.) DC] [23] (API, Part-I, Vol- III, Pg. 178-180) |
Root |
7 |
Prishniparni [Uraria picta (Jacq.) Desv] (Not in API) |
Root |
|
Orangish brown |
Rough |
Not characteristic |
7 |
Prishniparni [Uraria picta (Jacq.) Desv] (Not in API) |
Root |
8 |
Kantakari [Solanum xanthocarpum Schrad. & H. Wendl] (Not in API) |
Root |
|
Yellowish brown |
Rough |
Nil |
8 |
Kantakari [Solanum xanthocarpum Schrad. & H. Wendl] (Not in API) |
Root |
9 |
Brihati [Solanum indicum Linn] [24] (API, Part-I, Vol- II, Pg. 27-28) |
Root |
|
Greenish brown |
Rough |
Faint |
9 |
Brihati [Solanum indicum Linn] [24] (API, Part-I, Vol- II, Pg. 27-28) |
Root |
10 |
Goksura [Tribulus terrestris L.] [25] (API, Part-I, Vol- I, Pg. 40) |
Root |
|
Greenish brown |
Rough |
Slightly aromatic |
10 |
Goksura [Tribulus terrestris L.] [25] (API, Part-I, Vol- I, Pg. 40) |
Root |
11 |
Tila Taila (Sesamum oil) |
Oil |
|
Colorless |
Oily |
Odorless |
11 |
Tila Taila (Sesamum oil) |
Oil |
12 |
Murchit Tila Taila |
Oil |
|
Light brown |
Oily |
Mild, characteristic |
12 |
Murchit Tila Taila |
Oil |
Abbreviations: LOD- Loss on drying; TAV: Total ash value; AIA: Acid insoluble ash; WSE- Water soluble extractive; ASE- Alcohol soluble extractive
HPTLC study of Murchit Tila Taila (oil) along with raw drugs used for Murchana
The murchit tila taila was obtained by following the murchana process of Tila taila using the raw drugs viz. Manjistha (Root), Musta (Rz.), Tvak/Nalika (St. Bk.), Haritaki (Fr.), Haridra (Rz), Ketaki (Root), Bibhitaka (Fr.), Amalaki (Fr.), Hrivera (Root), Vatankura (St. Bk.) and Lodhra (St. Bk.). For each sample, 1 gram was refluxed with 20 ml of Methanol for one hour. The resulting extracts were then passed through filter paper. The filtrates obtained were concentrated for Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) analysis. The TLC was performed on pre-coated Silica Gel Plates (60 F254) supported on aluminium sheets from Merck. The solvent system used was a mixture of Toluene, Ethyl acetate, and Formic acid in the ratio of 7:3:0.1(v/v). A 5 µL sample was applied to the plate as an 8 mm band, positioned 15 mm above the plate's base. The plates, measuring 20x10cm, were developed to a length of 90 mm in a CAMAG Twin trough chamber, with preconditioning at 25 °C and 42% relative humidity. Figure 1 documents the TLC plates scanned at 254 nm and 366 nm while Table 2 lists the Rf valus.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Figure 1. Photography of Developed HPTLC Plate in (a) 254 nm and (b) 366 nm
Table 2: Rf values
Track No. |
Sample name |
Rf values (Observed at 254nm) |
Rf values (Observed at 366nm)
|
1. |
Manjistha (Rt.) |
0.04,0.12,0.18,0.61,0.67 |
0.07,0.12,0.19,0.31,0.36, 0.65,0.73,0.78,0.83 |
2. |
Ketaki (Rt.) |
0.04,0.09,0.25,0.32,0.46,0.73 |
0.06,0.11,0.17,0.21,0.27, 0.73 |
3. |
Haridra (Rz.) |
0.05,0.09,0.19,0.24,0.28,0.32,0.40,0.44,00.64,0.75,0.82 |
0.10,0.20,0.25,0.31,0.39, 0.45,0.55,0.65
|
4. |
Lodhra (St. Bk.) |
0.14,0.29,0.43 |
0.18,0.25,0.33,0.39,0.44 |
5. |
Musta (Rz.) |
0.12,0.41,0.46 |
0.32,0.41. |
6. |
Haritaki (Fr.) |
0.04,0.16 |
0.32, 0.40 |
7. |
Bibhitaki (Fr.) |
0.05,0.16,0.32 |
0.27,0.33,0.40 |
8. |
Tvak (St. Bk.) |
0.04,0.51,0.65,0.73 |
0.41,0.45 |
9. |
Hrivera (Rt.) |
0.03,0.33,0.44,0.79 |
0.41,0.45 |
10. |
Vatnkura (St. Bk.) |
0.04,0.44,0.76,0.80 |
0.18,0.28,0.40,0.46,0.53,0.73,0.83 |
11. |
Amlaki (Fr.) |
0.04,0.15 |
0.32 |
12. |
Murchit Tila Taila |
0.04,0.12, 0.61,0.80 |
0.29,0.40,0.45,0.61,0.71,0.82 |
Organoleptic studies of Dasmula Taila (oil)
The Dasmula Taila formulation was prepared by the Pharmacy department of CARI, Kolkata, in three batches (Batch-I, II & III). Organoleptic characteristics, macroscopical analysis and photographs of three batches of Dasmula Taila are listed in Table 3.
Table 3: Organoleptic characteristics and photographs of three batches of Dasmula Taila
Batch |
Organoleptic study |
Photograph |
|||
Colour |
Texture |
Odour |
Taste |
||
I |
Brown |
Oily |
Mild, characteristic |
Tasteless |
|
II |
Brown |
Oily |
Mild, characteristic |
Tasteless |
|
III |
Brown |
Oily |
Mild, characteristic |
Tasteless |
|
Chemical Standardization of Dasmula Taila
The chemical standardization of Dasmula Taila was performed by analysing the following parameters, i.e. determination of Refractive index at 40 °C, Viscosity, Specific optical rotation, Acid value, Iodine value, Saponification value, Unsaponifiable matter, Peroxide value, Specific gravity and Wt per ml (at 25 °C). Safety parameters i.e. testing of heavy metals, aflatoxins, microbial load, test for specific pathogens and pestiside residue were also carried out. Comparative marker-based HPTLC fingerprinting profile of all ten (10) raw drugs & three (03) batches of the formulation were also carried out. All these results are documents in Table 4-9.
Table 4: Physicochemical parameters
Parameters |
Result (in w/w%) |
Limit (As per API) |
||
Batch-I |
Batch-II |
Batch-III |
||
Refractive index at 40 °C |
1.4670 |
1.4665 |
1.4670 |
Not mentioned in API |
Viscosity |
86.91 |
82.73 |
83.51 |
|
Specific optical rotation |
+0.50 |
+0.50 |
+0.50 |
|
Acid value |
1.37 |
1.46 |
1.32 |
|
Iodine value |
98.67 |
104.53 |
100.05 |
|
Saponification value |
186.76 |
196.60 |
191.83 |
|
Unsaponifiable matter |
1.20 |
1.22 |
1.25 |
|
Peroxide value |
NIL |
NIL |
NIL |
|
Specific gravity |
0.9196 |
0.9192 |
0.9198 |
|
Wt per ml (at 25 °C) |
0.910 g |
0.910 g |
0.910 g |
Table 5: Heavy metals testing:
Tests |
Protocol |
Results (mg/kg)
|
Acceptance Limit (in ppm) |
||
|
|
Batch-I |
Batch-II |
Batch-III |
|
Lead |
API |
0.39 |
0.47 |
0.50 |
10 |
Arsenic |
API |
B.L.Q (0.1) |
B.L.Q(0.1) |
B.L.Q(0.1) |
3.0 |
Cadmium |
API |
B.L.Q (0.1) |
B.L.Q(0.1) |
B.L.Q(0.1) |
0.3 |
Mercury |
API |
B.L.Q (0.1) |
B.L.Q(0.1) |
B.L.Q(0.1) |
1.0 |
*1,2,3 Limit of Detection = < 0>
Table 6: Aflatoxins:
Parameter |
Result
|
Permissible Limit as in API (in ppb) |
||
|
Batch-I |
Batch-II |
Batch-III |
|
B1 |
N.D. |
N.D. |
N.D. |
0.5 |
B2 |
N.D. |
N.D. |
N.D. |
0.1 |
G1 |
N.D. |
N.D. |
N.D. |
0.5 |
G2 |
N.D. |
N.D. |
N.D. |
0.1 |
Table 7: Microbial Load:
Tests |
Results (in cfu/gm) |
Permissible Limit as in API (in cfu/gm) |
||
Batch-I |
Batch-II |
Batch-III |
||
Total Microbial plate Count |
<10> |
<10> |
<10> |
<10> |
Yeast and mould count |
<10> |
<10> |
<10> |
<10> |
Table 8: Pathogens testing:
Tests |
Protocol |
Results |
Acceptance Limit |
||
Batch-I |
Batch-II |
Batch-III |
|||
Escherichia coli |
As per A.P.I |
Abs/gm |
Abs/gm |
Abs/gm |
Abs/gm |
Salmonella spp. |
As per A.P.I |
Abs/gm |
Abs/gm |
Abs/gm |
Abs/gm |
Staphylococcus aureus |
As per A.P.I |
Abs/gm |
Abs/gm |
Abs/gm |
Abs/gm |
Pseudomonas |
As per A.P.I |
Abs/gm |
Abs/gm |
Abs/gm |
Abs/gm |
*Abs- Absent
Table 9: Pesticide Residue:
Substance (s) |
Result $(in ppm)
|
Permissible Limit prescribed in API (in ppm) |
||
|
Batch-I |
Batch-II |
Batch-III |
Batch-I |
Alachlor |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
0.02 |
Aldrin and Dieldrin (sum of) |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
0.05 |
Azinphos-methyl |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
1.0 |
Bromopropylate |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
0.3 |
Chlordane(sum of cis-,Trans- and Oxythlordane) |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
0.05 |
Chlorfenvinphos |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
0.5 |
Chlorpyrifos |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
0.2 |
Chlorpyrifos-methyl |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
0.1 |
Cypermenthrin (and Isomers) |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
1.0 |
DDT (sum of p,p-DDT, o,p-DDT, p,p-DDE and p,p-TDE) |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
1.0 |
Deltamenthrin |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
0.5 |
Diazinon |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
0.5 |
Dichlorvos |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
1.0 |
Dithiocarbamates (as CS2) |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
2.0 |
Endosulfan (sum of isomers and endosulfan sulphate) |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
3.0 |
Endrin |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
0.05 |
Ethion |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
2.0 |
Fenitrothion |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
0.5 |
Fenvalerate |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
1.5 |
Fonofos |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
0.05 |
Heptachlor (sum of Heptachlor and Heptachlorepoxide) |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
0.05 |
Hexachlorbenzene |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
1.0 |
Hexachlorocyclohexane isomers (other than ?) |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
0.3 |
Lindane (?- Hexachlorocyclohexane) |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
0.6 |
Malathion |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
1.0 |
Methidathion |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
0.2 |
Parathion |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
0.5 |
Parathion-methyl |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
0.2 |
Permethrin |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
1.0 |
Phosalone |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
0.1 |
Piperonyl Butoxide |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
3.0 |
Pirimiphos-methyl |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
4.0 |
Pyrethrins (sum of) |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
3.0 |
Quintozene (sum of quintozene, pentachloroaniline and methyl pentachlorophnyl sulphide) |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
B.L.Q |
1.0 |
Dasmula Taila along with its ten (10) raw ingredients and markers
The High-Performance Thin Layer Chromatography (HPTLC) analysis of three batches of Dasmula Taila formulation and the raw materials and reference markers was conducted across three separate batches. Each sample, weighing 1 gram (or 2 mL for Taila), underwent reflux with 20 mL of Methanol for one hour; post-reflux, the solution was filtered through filter paper. The resulting filtrate was then reduced in volume and prepared for TLC analysis. Reference standards were created by dissolving 1 mg each of marmelosin, beta-sitosterol, and lupeol acetate in 10 mL of Methanol. For the chromatography, precoated Silica Gel Plates (60 F254) on aluminium sheets supplied by Merck were utilized. The solvent system comprised a blend of toluene, ethyl acetate, and formic acid in a 7.5:2.5:0.4 ratio. The plant extracts, 5 µL each, were applied to the plate as 8 mm bands, placed 15 mm from the bottom edge. The plates, sized 5x10 cm, were developed to a distance of 90 mm in a CAMAG Twin trough chamber, with a preconditioning period of 20 minutes at 25°C and 42% average relative humidity. The chemical development was completed using a 20% aqueous sulphuric acid solution as the derivatising agent.
Figure 2. Photography of Developed HPTLC Plate in (a) 254 nm, (b) 366 nm and (c) white light
Table 10. Rf values
Track No. |
Sample name |
Rf values (Observed at 254 nm) |
Rf values (Observed at 366 nm) |
Rf values (Observed at white light) |
1 |
Dasmula Formulation Batch-I |
0.33, 0.47, 0.73 |
0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.15, 0.17, 0.20, 0.24, 0.28, 0.29, 0.32, 0.45, 0.48, 0.58, 0.71 |
0.47, 0.53, 0.61, 0.75 |
2 |
Dasmula Formulation Batch-II |
0.32, 0.47, 0.68 |
0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.15, 0.17, 0.20, 0.24, 0.28, 0.29, 0.32, 0.43, 0.47, 0.54, 0.64 |
0.45, 0.51, 0.57, 0.71 |
3 |
Dasmula Formulation Batch-III |
0.32, 0.47, 0.68 |
0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.15, 0.17, 0.20, 0.24, 0.28, 0.29, 0.32, 0.43, 0.48, 0.55, 0.65 |
0.45, 0.51, 0.58, 0.70 |
4 |
Shalaparni (Rt.) |
0.07 |
0.15, 0.18, 0.61 |
0.05, 0.09, 0.13, 0.18, 0.22, 0.24, 0.34, 0.39, 0.45, 0.49, 0.86 |
5 |
Agnimantha (Rt.) |
0.07, 0.48 |
0.03, 0.09, 0.24, 0.30, 0.37, 0.60 |
0.45, 0.60, 0.87 |
6 |
Goksura (Rt.) |
0.05 |
0.03, 0.08, 0.09, 0.13, 0.17, 0.21, 0.28, 0.33, 0.38, 0.45, 0.59 |
0.04, 0.07, 0.47, 0.58, 0.65, 0.77, 0.86 |
7 |
Brishniparni (Rt.) |
0.02 |
0.16, 0.18, 0.59 |
0.04, 0.47, 0.86 |
8 |
Bilva (Rt.) |
0.08, 0.19, 0.31, 0.44, 0.53, 0.62 |
0.02, 0.04, 0.09, 0.15, 0.21, 0.25, 0.31, 0.36, 0.39, 0.44, 0.50, 0.55, 0.62 |
0.07, 0.10, 0.14, 0.23, 0.32, 0.47, 0.59, 0.86 |
9 |
Gambhari (Rt.) |
0.63 |
0.08, 0.14, 0.21, 0.29, 0.59 |
0.47, 0.58, 0.64, 0.79, 0.86 |
10 |
Brihati (Rt.) |
0.06 |
0.08, 0.21, 0.25, 0.29, 0.59 |
0.47 |
11 |
Patala (Rt.) |
0.08, 0.11, 0.13, 0.15, 0.22, 0.32, 0.36, 0.52, 0.57, 0.64, 0.70 |
0.03, 0.07, 0.08, 0.12, 0.27, 0.30, 0.37, 0.41, 0.49, 0.59, 0.74, 0.81 |
0.35, 0.47, 0.55, 0.60, 0.72 |
12 |
Shyonaka (Rt.) |
0.07, 0.63 |
0.03, 0.09, 0.16, 0.59, 0.63, 0.73 |
0.12, 0.47, 0.59, 0.78, 0.85 |
13 |
Kantakari (Rt.) |
- |
0.08, 0.21, 0.25, 0.60 |
0.47 |
14 |
Marmelosin |
0.55 |
0.55 |
0.55 |
15 |
Beta- sitosterol |
- |
- |
0.48 |
16 |
Lupeol acetate |
- |
- |
0.59 |
Shelf life Study of Dasmula Taila
Three batches of Dasmula taila formulation were prepared at Pharmacy department of CARI Kolkata and were kept in stability chamber at the Department of Chemistry for stability assessment and accelerated stability study. Understanding shelf life ensures that the prepared Dasmula Taila maintain acceptable quality and safety standards. Table 11 documents the comparative test result of Dasmula Taila kept in controlled environmental condition at temperature 38 °C and relative (RH) humidity 75% over a period of six months, with assessments at intervals of one month (01), three months (03), and six months (06).
Table 11: Comparative test result of Dasmula Taila kept in controlled environmental condition Temperature 38 °C and Relative (RH) Humidity 75% (Test reports after sample standing in Stability chamber)
Sl. No. |
Test parameters |
Unit |
0 day |
1st month |
3rd month |
6th month |
||||||||||||||||||
B-I |
B-II |
B-III |
B-I |
B-II |
B-III |
B-I |
B-II |
B-III |
B-I |
B-II |
B-III |
|
||||||||||||
1 |
Refractive index at 40 °C |
- |
1.4670 |
1.4665 |
1.4665 |
1.4691 |
1.4668 |
1.4701 |
1.4720 |
1.4705 |
1.4721 |
1.4735 |
1.4741 |
1.4742 |
|
|||||||||
2 |
Viscosity |
mpa/sec |
86.91 |
82.73 |
83.51 |
89.95 |
87.37 |
85.25 |
96.21 |
91.29 |
92.61 |
101.5 |
95.96 |
97.82 |
|
|||||||||
3 |
Specific optical rotation |
|
+0.50 |
+0.50 |
+0.50 |
+0.50 |
+0.50 |
+0.50 |
+0.50 |
+0.50 |
+0.50 |
+0.50 |
+0.50 |
+0.50 |
|
|||||||||
4 |
Specific gravity |
- |
0.9196 |
0.9192 |
0.9198 |
0.9199 |
0.92 |
0.92 |
0.9199 |
0.92 |
0.9199 |
0.92 |
0.92 |
0.92 |
|
|||||||||
5 |
Saponification value |
- |
186.76 |
196.60 |
191.83 |
196.53 |
210.55 |
205.10 |
203.04 |
217.86 |
210.33 |
207.55 |
221.56 |
216.52 |
|
|||||||||
6 |
Unsaponifiable matter |
- |
1.20 |
1.22 |
1.25 |
1.21 |
1.24 |
1.26 |
1.23 |
1.25 |
1.28 |
1.25 |
1.29 |
1.30 |
|
|||||||||
7 |
Acid value |
- |
1.37 |
1.46 |
1.32 |
1.66 |
1.81 |
1.58 |
1.81 |
2.04 |
1.85 |
2.63 |
2.84 |
2.67 |
|
|||||||||
8 |
Iodine value |
- |
98.67 |
104.53 |
100.05 |
96.74 |
103.82 |
98.31 |
94.93 |
102.89 |
96.84 |
93.82 |
100.63 |
94.98 |
|
|||||||||
9 |
Peroxide value |
- |
NIL |
NIL |
NIL |
NIL |
NIL |
NIL |
NIL |
NIL |
NIL |
NIL |
NIL |
NIL |
|
|||||||||
10 |
Heavy metals |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cd |
ppm |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
|
|||||||||
|
Pb |
ppm |
0.39 |
0.47 |
0.50 |
0.39 |
0.47 |
0.50 |
0.39 |
0.47 |
0.50 |
0.39 |
0.47 |
0.50 |
|
|||||||||
|
As |
ppm |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
|
|||||||||
|
Hg |
ppm |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
|
|||||||||
11 |
Microbial load |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total microbial plate count |
cfu/ gm |
<10> |
<10> |
<10> |
<10> |
<10> |
<10> |
<10> |
<10> |
<10> |
<10> |
<10> |
<10> |
|
|||||||||
|
Yeast and mould count |
cfu/ gm |
<10> |
<10> |
<10> |
<10> |
<10> |
<10> |
<10> |
<10> |
<10> |
<10> |
<10> |
<10> |
|
|||||||||
12 |
Specific pathogens |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
E. coli |
/ml |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
|
|||||||||
|
Salmonella |
/ml |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
|
|||||||||
|
Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
/ml |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
|
|||||||||
|
S. aureus |
/ml |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
|
|||||||||
13 |
Pesticide residue |
- |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
|
|||||||||
14 |
Aflatoxins |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
B1 |
ppb |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
|
|||||||||
|
B2 |
ppb |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
|
|||||||||
|
G1 |
ppb |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
|
|||||||||
|
G2 |
ppb |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
|
|||||||||
The refractive index (RI) serves as an indicator of a sample's purity. It is commonly measured using refractometers in the pharmaceutical industry to ensure the quality of raw, intermediate, and final products. Typically, this measurement is conducted at the sodium D-line (NaD) wavelength of approximately 589 nm589 nm. The recorded values for batches I, II, and III are 1.4670, 1.4665, and 1.4665 respectively, suggesting consistency across the batches with no significant variation. Viscosity is a fluid's resistance to flow or change shape at a specified rate. The values obtained in (Pa-sec) are 86.91, 82.73, 83.51 of batches I, II and III, respectively at 0 day and 101.5, 95.96, 97.82 (Pa-sec) of batches I, II and III at 6 months [Figure 3(a)] thus indicating that a slight increase viscosity of Dasmula Taila upon storage.
Specific rotation can also be used to test the purity of the material. The Specific Optical Rotation (SOR) is denoted by [?]. SOR means examining the same at a specific temperature like - is constant at +0.50 for batches in the initial 0th day and at the 6th month. This formulation is stable. It can also be used to test the purity of the material. The specific gravity was measured at 40 °C. The values of batches did not show any significant changes in values of 0 day and 6th month. Thus, the formulation is stable. The saponification values of batches I, II and III at specific intervals of 0 day, 1st, 3rd, and 6th months showed an increase in Figure 3(b). The values were 186.76, 196.60, and 191.83 for batches I, II, and III on the 0th day to 207.55, 221.56 and 216.52 for batches I, II, and III at the end of six months, respectively. A greater saponification value indicates that the fatty acids present are, on average, shorter in chain length. There is no peroxide value, which suggests that the formulation is stable. Unsaponifiable matter is within the specified limit of 1.5, suggesting fit for topical usage. The highest acid value found at the 6th month suggests that prepared Taila could remain stable for up to 6 months, i.e. 180 days. The Iodine value typically reflects the oxidative resilience of fats, which is closely linked to the degree of unsaturation. This factor significantly influences the processing, longevity, and appropriate use of fat based products. The Iodine values of batches I, II and III at specific intervals of 0 day, 1st, 3rd, and 6th months showed a decrease trajectory. The values were 98.67, 104.53 and 100.05 for batches I, II, and III on the 0th day to 93.82, 100.63 and 94.98 for batches I, II, and III at the end of six months, respectively.
High-Performance Thin Layer Chromatography Profile of Dasmula Taila (B-I, II, III)
For the analysis, 2 mL of each Dasmula Taila batch (B-I, II, III) was refluxed with 20 mL of Methanol for one hour. The mixture was filtered through filter paper, and the filtrate was reduced in volume for Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC). A TLC Silica Gel 60F254 plate, supported on aluminium sheets, served as the stationary phase. The solvent mixture used was Toluene, Ethyl acetate, and Formic acid in a 7.5:2.5:0.4 (v/v) ratio. A 5 µL sample was applied as an 8 mm band, 15 mm from the plate's bottom. The plate, measuring 5x10 cm, was developed to 90 mm in a CAMAG Twin trough chamber under conditions of 25 °C and 42% humidity. Finally, 20% aqueous sulphuric acid was employed as the derivatising agent. Table 12 documents the comparative test result of HPTLC of Dasmula Taila kept in controlled environmental condition at temperature 38 °C and relative (RH) humidity 75% over a period of six months, with assessments at intervals of one month (01), three months (03), and six months (06).
Table 12: Rf values
Time |
Photographs |
|||
254 nm |
366 nm |
White light |
||
1st month Temperature 38 °C and Relative (RH) Humidity 75% |
I II III |
I II III |
I II III |
|
Rf values |
Batch-I |
0.33, 0.47, 0.73 |
0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.15, 0.17, 0.20, 0.24, 0.28, 0.29, 0.32, 0.45, 0.48, 0.58, 0.71 |
0.47, 0.53, 0.61, 0.74 |
Batch-II |
0.32, 0.47, 0.73 |
0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.15, 0.17, 0.20, 0.24, 0.28, 0.29, 0.32, 0.43, 0.47, 0.54, 0.64 |
0.45, 0.51, 0.57, 0.74 |
|
Batch-III |
0.32, 0.47, 0.74 |
0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.15, 0.17, 0.20, 0.24, 0.28, 0.29, 0.32, 0.43, 0.48, 0.55, 0.65 |
0.45, 0.51, 0.58, 0.75 |
|
3rd month Temperature 38 °C and Relative (RH) Humidity 75% |
I II III |
I II III |
I II III |
|
Rf values |
Batch-I |
0.33, 0.47, 0.73 |
0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.15, 0.17, 0.20, 0.24, 0.28, 0.29, 0.32, 0.45, 0.48, 0.58, 0.71 |
0.47, 0.53, 0.61, 0.74 |
Batch-II |
0.32, 0.47, 0.73 |
0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.15, 0.17, 0.20, 0.24, 0.28, 0.29, 0.32, 0.43, 0.47, 0.54, 0.64 |
0.45, 0.51, 0.57, 0.74 |
|
Batch-III |
0.32, 0.47, 0.74 |
0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.15, 0.17, 0.20, 0.24, 0.28, 0.29, 0.32, 0.43, 0.48, 0.55, 0.65 |
0.45, 0.51, 0.58, 0.75 |
|
6th month Temperature 38 °C and Relative (RH) Humidity 75% |
I II III |
I II III |
I II III |
|
Rf values |
Batch-I |
0.33, 0.47, 0.73 |
0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.15, 0.17, 0.20, 0.24, 0.28, 0.29, 0.32, 0.45, 0.48, 0.58, 0.71 |
0.47, 0.53, 0.61, 0.74 |
Batch-II |
0.32, 0.47, 0.73 |
0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.15, 0.17, 0.20, 0.24, 0.28, 0.29, 0.32, 0.43, 0.47, 0.54, 0.64 |
0.45, 0.51, 0.57, 0.74 |
|
Batch-III |
0.32, 0.47, 0.74 |
0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.15, 0.17, 0.20, 0.24, 0.28, 0.29, 0.32, 0.43, 0.48, 0.55, 0.65 |
0.45, 0.51, 0.58, 0.75 |
CONCLUSION
The findings of quality control parameters of Dasmula Taila i.e., refractive index (at 40 °C), specific gravity, acid value, iodine value, saponification value and unsaponifiable matter is incorporated in this study to establish the quality control benchmarks for the raw drug materials used, which will contribute to the development of the quality standards for the Dasmula Taila formulation. High-performance thin Layer Chromatography fingerprint profiling of Dasmula Taila formulation and its ingredients comply with the various reference standards. Accelerated shelf-life study of Dasmula Taila have been performed and reported first time. As no standard reference is available for this formulation, the present quality assessment report may be helpful for the preparation of the monograph and quality control data may be used as references which will setting the pharmacopeial standards for Dasmula Taila formulation. It may also help to assess the quality of this formulation for research and clinical purposes in future.
Financial support and sponsorship
Financial support from CCRAS Hqrs. is gratefully acknowledged.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Data availability statement
This article includes all data generated or analyzed during this study.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We are very much thankful to the Director-General, CCRAS for sanctioning the Project (F. No. 3-31/2020-CCRAS/Admn/IMR/8025 dt. 12.03.2020) entitled “Development of Quality Standards and SOP for the Dasmula Taila Formulation” and for providing the necessary facilities at the Central Ayurveda Research Institute, Kolkata to carry out the research work.
REFERENCES
Manosi Das*, Sudipto Debnath, Rajesh Bolleddu, Susmita Mondal, Parth Gharat, Varanasi Subhose, Ajay Kumar Meena, Ravindra Singh, Gajji Babu, Quality Control and Shelf-Life Study of Dasmula Taila- A Classical Ayurvedic Formulation for Nasya, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 1, 1871-1888. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14718352