View Article

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) defines self-medication (SM) as the use of drugs to treat self-diagnosed conditions or the continued use of prescribed drugs without consultation. Aim & Objectives: This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of self-medication in the rural population of Kalaburagi district before and after an educational intervention. It also aimed to identify commonly self-treated conditions and preferred medications. Materials And Methods: A six-month, community-based, prospective educational study was conducted using a structured questionnaire. Data was collected before and after the distribution of educational leaflets. A post-test was conducted 14 days after the intervention. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS 25.0 with paired t-test applied for significance. Results: Of the 247 participants, 145 (58.7%) were male, and 113 (45.8%) were aged 21–40 years. Labourers formed the majority occupation (25.9%). The mean knowledge score (65.1%) showed significant improvement post-intervention. Conclusion: The study found that the rural population had inadequate knowledge of self-medication. Many participants believed SM is unsafe during pregnancy and for all age groups. Post-intervention, there was a significant improvement in KAP scores. The habit of checking expiry dates before use was noted. Educational efforts effectively enhanced awareness and safe practices.

Keywords

Self-Medication, World Health Organization, Rural population, Over the Counter, Adverse Drug Reactions

Introduction

The World Health Organization (WHO) has defined self-medication as the practice whereby individuals treat their ailments and conditions with medicines that are approved and available without prescription, and which are safe and effective when used as directed.1 Individuals around the globe will, in general, treat the ailment, practically half either wait for the problem to run its course or utilize a home cure.2

Medicines for self-medication are often called Non - Prescription or Over the Counter (OTC) drugs and are available without a doctor’s prescription through pharmacies. Self - medication can readily relieve acute medical problems. It can save time spent in waiting to see a doctor and maybe economical also3. Self-medication is an important aspect in health-care delivery system.1 The prevalence of self-treatment ranges from 0.1% to 27% in Europe and in the USA, which is much lower than developing countries. In India, the reported prevalence of self-medication is very high4, leading to 2.9 – 3.7% causes of death due to drug-drug interaction5 young generation have more positive attitude toward self-treatment, which is serious matter of concern 4. In 60-80% of economically poor countries, the health-related problems are treated through self-medication as lower cost method.6 In developing countries like India not only OTC drugs, even prescription only medicines (POM) are also easily accessible without prescriptions in pharmacy outlets7. More than 50% people are taking drugs without a doctor’s advice. In order to tackle this problem, the governments of all the developing countries have promulgated guidelines to prevent self-medication. Each and every drug that is registered to the concerned drug authorities must be strictly monitored for sale and prescription. Health department and drug regulatory authority should follow the WHO guidelines for drug prescription and dispensing.8 College going undergraduate student practice self-medication due to influencing advertisement media or social media.9 This is a threatening trend in young generation leading to improper diagnosis, drug interactions, adverse effects, poly pharmacy etc. and tends to endanger their lives because of these practices.9 Commonly self-medicated drugs worldwide, with over 50% purchased and used without a prescription.10 In line with Rather antibiotic SM constitutes internationally the most common and obvious contributing factor of antibiotic-resistant pathogens.10 Now self-medication has led to increased bacterial resistance, failure in optimal treatment, unintentional and intentional poisonings, drug market disruption, financial loss, and \ increasing per capita of drugs consumption in the community (Hughes et al., 2001).11 Medicines are responsible for 26% of intoxication recorded in the country in 2005, where only 590 cases were a result of self-medication. In a self-care context when there is need for medicines to the patient, the clinical pharmacist has a key role in assisting to identify the best involvement. This may include transfer to another health professional (general physician), suggesting a different non- pharmacological therapy, helping to choose an OTC medicine that is safe and effective, and ensuring that it is used correctly by patient. Therefore, responsible self-medication encourages the rational use of medicines.12 Most of the self-medication drugs are from allopathic system but drugs from other systems are also used. Strict legislation with regard to accessibility to these drugs and educating the community on self-medication is essential for effective use of medicines required.13 Due to restricted health facilities, high cost, and long waiting hours, people tend to prefer self-treatment4 for self- recognized disorder or symptoms or the intermittent or continued use of medication prescribed by the physician for chronic or recurring disease or symptoms14. The condition is worst in rural or distant corners, where the people are deprived socially, economically, and educationally and illiterate with inadequate health facilities.12 About 25% visit a specialist or utilize physician recommended medication recently got for a similar condition. The staying 25% go to the OTC prescriptions.2 Although, OTC drugs are intended to be used as self-medication and are of established efficacy and safety but their inappropriate use due to lack of knowledge of their side effects and drug interactions could have a serious consequence, especially in special population groups such as children, elderly, pregnant, and lactating mothers.12 Self-medication involves the potential to do good as well as cause harm15. Although the practice of self-medication is inevitable, as the first line of contact in   purchasing the OTC drugs.14 A Pharmacist can play a multidisciplinary approach to the promotion of the rational use of medicines by providing proper information, and instruction regarding the adverse drug reactions, dosage schedule of drugs to the patients, warning them about the unwanted effects and preventing abuse in patients.16 However, people should be properly educated about the practice of self-medication in order to prevent the harmful effects caused by the practice. The increasing self-medication will require more and better education of both the public and health professionals to avoid the complications arising from this practice.17

Conditions Treated By SM:

Headache, body ache, cough, cold, constipation, loose motion, acidity, generalized weakness, insomnia, fever, skin infections, joint pain, burns, menstrual pain, insect bite.

Common Medicines Used For SM:

Analgesics, antipyretics, antacids, antidiarrheal, antiallergic, antiemetics, antibiotics, vitamins, eye drops, ear drops, nasal drops, skin ointment, protein preparations.

Advantages Of SM:

???? It helps to prevent and treat symptoms and ailments that don’t require a doctor.

???? Patient gets immediate relief; this reduces the pressure of medical services where health care

services are not available and insufficient.

???? Reduces economic burden and time regarding health care of the people.

???? SM is first option for minor illness. In treatment of minor illness problems are self-limited, so SM           is used.

Disadvantages Of SM:

Once medicines are entering human body, get absorbed rapidly. At the same time medicines gets sold rapidly through a powerful marketing and have no or less control over medicine. They are used and miss used and over used for different type of illness.

E.g:-1) Taking pain killers for long time without consultation of doctor and without knowing      the cause of headache.

  1. Paracetamol is antipyretic and analgesic which is used in large doses can cause liver problems (toxicity).

The major problem or disadvantages of SM is emergence of human pathogen resistance micro-organisms worldwide particularly in developing countries, where antibiotics are often

used and available without prescription. Its irrational use increases the risk of ADR's and person may develop resistance to particular antibiotics, hypersensitivity of drug withdrawal symptoms and temporary masking of disease can delay correct diagnosis.17

Need For Study

    • Generally rural population have inadequate knowledge regarding the proper usage of medication.
    • This study was planned because self-medication not only cause delay in actual treatment but also further lead to misdiagnosis and drug interactions which could be fatal. It is now felt that the overall drug use situation needs to be assessed and educational should be given to have significant impact on knowledge in concern with proper usage of medications.
    • By considering the above factors we have carried out the study on “Knowledge, Attitude & Practice about Self-Medication among rural population of Kalaburagi District”.

Aim & Objectives

Aim:

    • To assess the Knowledge, Attitude and Practice about Self-Medication in rural population of Kalaburagi District.

Objectives:

    • To assess the Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Self-Medication in rural population by means of questionnaire (before intervention).
    • To assess the Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Self-Medication in rural population by means of questionnaire (after intervention).
    • To assess impact of Self-Medication.
    • To identify the most common conditions preferred for Self-Medication among rural population.
    • To identify the most common medications preferred for Self-Medication among rural population.

METHODOLOGY

Plan Of the Study

Study Design: - Community based prospective educational study.

Source Of Data: -

  1. Informed consent form.
  2. Self-structured questionnaire.

Inclusion Criteria: - The data was collected among rural population of age >18yrs of Kalaburagi District.

Exclusion Criteria: - Health care professionals, psychiatric patients and who are not present for posttest were excluded from the study.

Sample Size: - 247 subjects.

Duration Of Study: - The study was conducted for a period of 06 months. (March to August 2024).

Study Site: -Study was carried out in rural population of Kalaburagi District.

Study Procedure

A community based prospective educational study was conducted among the rural population in Kalaburagi District to assess the Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Self-Medication. The study was initiated after the approval from Institutional Review Board (IRB) and was conducted for a period of six months. During this study, 247 people were interviewed and those fulfilling the inclusion criteria were enrolled into the study. The subjects who were willing to participate in the study were provided with informed consent form which was duly signed by them. After obtaining the consent, face to face interviews were conducted using questionnaire. Questionnaire is a predesigned proforma which includes patient demographic details (Name, age, sex, occupation etc.). In our study, we have included total 30 questions. Out of which, Knowledge based questions were 10, Attitude were 10 questions and Practice were 10 questions. The participants were then given brief information about Self-Medication, its advantages & disadvantages. Then Knowledge, Attitude and Practice towards the medications were assessed. Drug and disease details were also collected. Two weeks after pre-test, all the participants were educated regarding Self-Medication by providing information leaflets. Post-test has been conducted after 14 days of education by means of same questionnaire. Statistical data was analyzed by IBM SPSS 25.0 version software. Collected data were spread on excel sheet and master chart was prepared. Through the master chart, tables and graphs were constructed. For quantitative data analysis, paired t- test was applied for statistical significance. If P-value was less than 0.05 it was considered as significant.

RESULTS

In the present study, 247 subjects were participated, all the participants were further subjected to statistical analysis with nil dropouts.

  1. Demographic data

The selected subjects were categorized as per their gender i.e. male and female with following data.

Table No.1: Gender wise distribution of participants

Gender

Number of participants

Percentage

Males

145

58.7

Females

102

41.3

Total

247

100.0

Bar diagram represents gender wise distribution of participants

Figure no 1: Bar diagram represents gender wise distribution of participants

Furthermore, the consents were grouped into 4 major groups of 20 years gap interval     and        18-20 as well as > 60 years.

Table No.2: Age wise distribution of rural population (participants)

Age in years

Number of participants

Percentage

18—20

26

10.5

21—40

113

45.8

41—60

83

33.6

61—80

25

10.1

Total

247

100.0

Mean ± SD

39.52 ± 15.37

Bar diagram represents age wise distribution of rural population (participants)

Figure no 2: Bar diagram represents age wise distribution of rural population (participants)

The participants were also categorized based on their occupation i.e. Job holders, Housewife, Farmers, Labours, Students, Unemployed

Table No. 3 Occupation wise distribution of participants

Occupation

Number of participants

Percentage

Job holders

45

18.2

House wife

40

16.2

Farmers

49

19.8

Labours

64

25.9

Students

31

12.6

Unemployed

18

7.3

Total

247

100.0

Bar diagram represents occupation wise distribution of participants

Figure no 3: Bar diagram represents occupation wise distribution of participants

Details of distribution of participants according to marital status.

Table No.4: Marital status wise distribution of participants

Marital status

Number of participants

Percentage

Married

175

70.9

Unmarried

72

29.1

Total

247

100.0

Pie chart presents marital status wise distribution of participants

Figure no 4: Pie chart presents marital status wise distribution of participants

Details of distribution of participants according to their income.

Table No.5: Monthly income wise distribution of participants

Monthly Income in Rs

Number of participants

Percentage

No income

47

19.0

6000—10000

61

24.7

>10000

34

13.8

1000—5000

105

42.5

Total

247

100.0

Bar diagram represents monthly income wise distribution of participants

Figure no 5: Bar diagram represents monthly income wise distribution of participants

  1. Data related to Knowledge

The following table and figure illustrate regarding scoring patterns for Knowledge, Attitude and Practice.

Table No.6: Pre-test knowledge score of participants

Pre-test knowledge scores

Categories

No. of participants

Percentage

<50%

Poor

114

46.2

50%--75%

Moderately Good

110

44.5

75%--100%

Good

23

9.3

Total

---

247

100.0

Mean ± SD

4.78 ± 1.92 (47.8%)

Bar diagram represents pre-test knowledge score of participants

Figure no 6: Bar diagram represents pre-test knowledge score of participants

Table No.7: Post-test knowledge score of participants

Pre-test knowledge scores

Categories

No. of participants

Percentage

<50%

Poor

46

18.6

50%--75%

Moderately Good

105

42.5

75%--100%

Good

96

38.9

Total

---

247

100.0

Mean ± SD

6.51 ± 2.07 (65.1%)

Bar diagram represents post-test knowledge score of participants

Figure no 7: Bar diagram represents post-test knowledge score of participants

Table No.8: Comparison of knowledge scores of self-medication between Pre and Post-test

knowledge scores

Categories

Pre-test

Post-test

No.

%

No

%

<50%

Poor

114

46.2

46

18.6

50%--75%

Moderately Good

110

44.5

105

42.5

75%--100%

Good

23

9.3

96

38.9

Total

---

247

100.0

247

100.0

Mean ± SD

----

4.78 ± 1.92

6.51 ± 2.07

Diff. of mean

---

1.73 (36.19%)

Paired t-test and    p-value

t = 10.508,    P = 0.0001,     HS

NS= not significant, S=significant, HS=highly significant

Multiple bar diagram shows the comparison of knowledge score of self-medication between Pre and Post-test

Figure no 8: Multiple bar diagram shows the comparison of knowledge score of self-medication between Pre and Post-test

Data related to Attitude

The response of the participants related to attitude were recorded and tabulated

Table No.9: Pre-test attitude of self-medication among rural population

Statements

Options

Number of participants

Percentage

1. Self-medications can be advised to others?

  1. Agree

85

34.3

  1. Disagree

162

65.7

2. Do you think you will get desired relief from self-medications?

  1. Agree

132

53.4

  1. Disagree

115

46.6

3. Self-medications under professional advice will give better out come?

  1. Agree

112

45.3

  1. Disagree

135

54.7

4. Some of the drugs which are preferred as self-medications are not safe in pregnancy?

  1. Agree

137

55.5

  1. Disagree

110

44.5

5. Self-medications are not safe all age groups?

  1. Agree

86

34.8

  1. Disagree

161

65.2

6. Advice for self-medications can be taken from others?

  1. Agree

84

34.0

  1. Disagree

163

66.0

7. Would you recommend self-medications to others for similar conditions you have treated         yourself?

  1. Agree

108

43.7

  1. Disagree

139

56.3

8. Do you think public awareness about the risk self-medications is sufficient?

  1. Agree

96

38.9

  1. Disagree

151

61.1

9. Do you believe self-medications often with necessary due to lack of immediate access

  1. Agree

125

50.6

  1. Disagree

122

49.4

10. Do you think that self-medication is a practical solution in today’s busy life style?

  1. Agree

112

45.3

  1. Disagree

135

54.7

Table No.10: Post-test attitude of self-medication among rural population

Statements

Options

Number of participants

Percentage

1. Self-medications can be advised to others?

  1. Agree

61

24.7

  1. Disagree

186

75.3

2. Do you think you will get desired relief from self-medications?

  1. Agree

114

46.2

  1. Disagree

133

53.8

3. Self-medications under professional advice will give better out come?

  1. Agree

184

74.5

  1. Disagree

63

25.5

4. Some of the drugs which are preferred as self-medications are not safe in pregnancy?

  1. Agree

182

73.7

  1. Disagree

65

26.3

5. Self-medications are not safe all age groups?

  1. Agree

149

60.3

  1. Disagree

98

39.7

6. Advice for self-medications can be taken from others?

  1. Agree

70

28.4

  1. Disagree

177

71.6

7. Would you recommend self-medications to others for similar conditions you have treated         yourself?

  1. Agree

85

34.4

  1. Disagree

162

65.6

8. Do you think public awareness about the risk self-medications is sufficient?

  1. Agree

75

30.4

  1. Disagree

172

69.6

9. Do you believe self-medications often with necessary due to lack of immediate access

  1. Agree

161

65.2

  1. Disagree

86

34.8

10. Do you think that self-medication is a practical solution in today’s busy life style?

  1. Agree

174

70.4

  1. Disagree

73

29.6

Table No.11: Comparison of attitude of self-medication among rural population (participants) between pre and post-test

Statements

Options

Number of participants

X2 test value P-value & sig

Pre

Post

1. Self-medications can be advised to others?

  1. Agree

85

61

X2= 5.600     P= 0.017,  S

  1. Disagree

162

186

2. Do you think you will get desired relief from self-medications?

  1. Agree

132

114

X2= 2.623     P= 0.105, NS

  1. Disagree

115

133

3. Self-medications under professional advice will give better out come?

  1. Agree

112

184

X2= 43.695     P= 0.001,  HS

  1. Disagree

135

63

4. Some of the drugs which are preferred as self-medications are not safe in pregnancy?

  1. Agree

137

182

X2= 17.910    P= 0.001,  HS

  1. Disagree

110

65

5. Self-medications are not safe all age groups?

  1. Agree

86

149

X2= 32.213     P= 0.001,  HS

  1. Disagree

161

98

6. Advice for self-medications can be taken from others?

  1. Agree

84

70

X2= 1.849     P= 0.178, NS

  1. Disagree

163

177

7. Would you recommend self-medications to others for similar conditions you have treated         yourself?

  1. Agree

108

85

X2= 4.498     P= 0.033,  S

  1. Disagree

139

162

8. Do you think public awareness about the risk self-medications is sufficient?

  1. Agree

96

75

X2= 3.994     P= 0.047,   S

  1. Disagree

151

172

9. Do you believe self-medications often with necessary due to lack of immediate access

  1. Agree

125

161

X2= 10.762     P= 0.001,  HS

  1. Disagree

122

86

10. Do you think that self-medication is a practical solution in today’s busy life style?

  1. Agree

112

174

X2= 31.921    P= 0.001,  HS

  1. Disagree

135

73

  1. Data related to Practice

The response of the participants related to practice were recorded and tabulated.

Table No.12: Pre-test practice of self-medication among rural population

Statements

Options

Number of participants

Percentage

1. Where did you obtain medicine for self-medication?

 

  1. Community pharmacy

54

21.9

  1. Medical representative

99

40.1

  1. Left over previous prescription

51

20.6

  1. Others

43

17.4

2. For which of the following complaint did you use medicine?

  1. Running nose

82

33.2

  1. Fever

65

26.3

  1. Aches and pain

43

17.4

  1. All of the above

57

23.1

3. How many time did you treat yourself with medication in past one year?

  1. 1 time

69

27.9

  1. 2—5 times

79

32.0

  1. 6—10 times

57

23.1

  1. More than 10 times

35

14.2

4. What are the reasons for using self-medicating?

  1. Cost saving

33

13.4

  1. Convenience

69

27.9

  1. Lack of trust in prescribing

61

24.7

  1. Others

72

29.1

5. Your selection of medicine for self-treatment was based on?

  1. Opinion of family and friends

50

20.2

  1. By own experience

81

32.8

  1. Previous doctor prescription

48

19.4

  1. Advertisement in mass-Medea

53

21.5

6. Do you check expiring date before taking self-medication?

  1. Yes

53

21.5

  1. No

75

30.4

  1. Don’t ‘know

61

24.7

  1. Not sure

40

16.2

7. Do you store medication?

 

a)  Always

69

27.9

b)  Often

69

27.9

c)  Sometimes

57

23.1

d)  Never

36

14.6

8. Do you keep the stock of medicine rather than the medicine prescribed by the doctors?

a) Always

39

15.8

b) Often

81

32.8

c) Sometimes

60

24.3

d) Never

41

16.6

9. In all type of illness do you prefer self-medication?

a) Always

53

21.5

b) Often

76

30.8

c) Sometimes

57

23.1

d) Never

45

18.2

10. Do you inform your healthcare provider all the medication your taking, including those for self-med

a) Always

96

38.9

b) Often

40

16.2

c) Sometimes

36

14.6

d) Never

59

23.9

Table No.13: Post-test practice of self-medication among rural population

Statements

Options

Number of participants

Percentage

1. Where did you obtain medicine for self-medication?

 

  1. Community pharmacy

54

21.9

  1. Medical representative

99

40.1

  1. Left over previous prescription

51

20.6

  1. Others

34

13.8

2. For which of the following complaint did you use medicine?

  1. Running nose

104

42.1

  1. Fever

45

18.2

  1. Aches and pain

44

17.8

  1. All of the above

50

20.2

3. How many times did you treat yourself with medication in past one year?

  1. 1 time

109

44.1

  1. 2—5 times

52

21.1

  1. 6—10 times

28

11.3

  1. More than 10 times

18

7.3

4. What are the reasons for using self-medicating?

  1. Cost saving

44

17.8

  1. Convenience

92

37.2

  1. Lack of trust in prescribing

44

17.8

  1. Others

52

21.1

5. Your selection of medicine for self-treatment was based on?

  1. Opinion of family and friends

45

18.2

  1. By own experience

62

25.1

  1. Previous doctor prescription

61

24.7

  1. Advertisement in mass-Medea

47

19.0

6. Do you check expiring date before taking self-medication?

  1. Yes

96

38.9

  1. No

52

21.2

  1. Don’t ‘know

45

18.2

  1. Not sure

38

15.4

7. Do you store medication?

 

a)  Always

57

23.1

b)  Often

71

28.7

c)  Sometimes

70

28.3

d)  Never

28

11.3

8. Do you keep the stock of medicine rather than the medicine prescribed by the doctors?

a) Always

39

15.8

b) Often

66

26.7

c) Sometimes

61

24.7

d) Never

53

21.5

9. In all type of illness do you prefer self-medication?

a) Always

45

18.2

b) Often

74

30.0

c) Sometimes

57

23.1

d) Never

48

19.4

10. Do you inform your healthcare provider all the medication your taking, including those for self-med

a) Always

106

42.9

b) Often

43

17.4

c) Sometimes

31

12.6

d) Never

44

17.8

Table No.14: Comparison of practice of self-medication among rural population (participants) between pre and post-test

Statements

Options

Pre-test

Post-test

X2 test

P-value

1. Where did you obtain medicine for self-medication?

 

  1. Community pharmacy

54

54

 

X2= 0.885     P= 0.828, NS

  1. Medical representative

99

99

  1. Left previous prescription

51

51

  1. Others

43

34

2. For which of the following complaint did you use medicine?

  1. Running nose

82

104

 

X2= 6.969     P= 0.043, S

  1. Fever

65

45

  1. Aches and pain

43

44

  1. All of the above

57

50

3. How many times did you treat yourself with medication in past one year?

  1. 1 time

69

109

 

X2= 27.615     P= 0.001, HS

  1. 2—5 times

79

52

  1. 6—10 times

57

28

  1. More than 10 times

35

18

4. What are the reasons for using self-medicating?

  1. Cost saving

33

44

 

X2= 10.814     P= 0.012, S

  1. Convenience

69

92

  1. Lack of trust in prescribe

61

44

  1. Others

72

52

5. Your selection of medicine for self-treatment was based on?

  1. Opinion of family & friends.

50

45

 

X2= 4.057     P= 0.255, NS

  1. By own experience

81

62

  1. Previous prescription

48

61

  1. Advertisement & media

53

47

6. Do you check expiring date before taking self-medication?

  1. Yes

53

96

 

X2= 19.037    P= 0.001, HS

  1. No

75

52

  1. Don’t ‘know

61

45

  1. Not sure

40

38

7. Do you store medication?

 

a)  Always

69

57

 

X2= 3.448     P= 0.327, NS

b)  Often

69

71

c)  Sometimes

57

70

d)  Never

36

28

8. Do you keep the stock of medicine rather than the medicine prescribed by the doctors?

a) Always

39

39

 

X2= 3.061     P= 0.382, NS

b) Often

81

66

c) Sometimes

60

61

d) Never

41

53

9. In all type of illness do you prefer self-medication?

a) Always

53

45

 

X2= 0.765     P= 0.874, NS

b) Often

76

74

c) Sometimes

57

57

d) Never

45

48

10. Do you inform your healthcare provider all the medication your taking, including those for self-med

a) Always

96

106

 

X2= 3.054     P= 0.383, NS

b) Often

40

43

c) Sometimes

36

31

d) Never

59

44

Statistical data analysis: Statistical data was analyzed by IBM SPSS 25.0 version software. Collected data were spread on excel sheet and prepared master chart. Through the master chart tables and graphs were constructed. For qualitative data analysis chi-square test and Fisher exact tests were applied. For quantitative data analysis t-test and ANOVA tests were applied for statistical significance. If P-value was less than 0.05 considered as significant.

DISCUSSION

Self-Medication is more likely to be inappropriate if used by poorly informed people. The depth of knowledge regarding self-medication use in rural community is need to be assessed. Many of the individuals often practice self-medication for various medical illnesses. Even though self-medication is useful to treat mild to moderate illness, improper self-medication may lead to ADR’s and drug interactions. In our study we have enrolled 247 participants out of which male 145 (58.7%) were more compared to female 102 (41.3%) which was identical to the study conducted by Ahmad A et al.21 We have categorized the participants age into 4 groups of 20 years interval each comprising of 21-40 years in 113 (45.8%) followed by 41-60 years include 83 (33.6%) < 20 years include 26 (10.5%) and only 25 (10.1%) belonged to the age group of 61-80 years which was in concurrence with the study conducted by Sivaskthi k et al. In rural areas of Erode.24 Most of the subject’s occupation of our study was labours 64 (25.9%), followed by farmers 49 (19.8%), job holders 45 (18.2%), house wife 40 (16.2%) and only 18 (7.3%) were unemployed which was similar to the study conducted by Thuzar Moe et al.30 In our study most of them were married 175 (70.9%) and 72 (29.1%) were unmarried which is similar to the study conducted by Limaye D et al.9 Most of the participants income of our study was 105 (42.5%) were does not showed the income i-e nil income, 61 (25.7%) of participant’s monthly income in the range of 6000—10000, 47 (19.0%) of participant’s monthly income was in the range of 1000—5000 and 34 (13.8%) of participant’s monthly income was >10000, which was identical to the study conducted by Shafie M et al.29 As we analyzed in the present study the mean knowledge scores of participants in pre-test and post-test was 4.78 and 6.51 which was identical to the study conducted by MD Sohail A et al.31 In according to our study, we designed 10 questions of Attitude. During pre-test in Attitude related questionnaire 137 (55.5%) participants felt self-medication are not safe in pregnancy. These findings are similar to the study conducted self-medication among pharmacy students by F Susheela et al.6 In pretest 86 (34.8%) and post 149 (60.3%) majority are not safe in all age group. These findings are identical to the study conducted by the F. Susheela et al. on self-medication among students in pharmacy.6 In according to our study, we designed 10 questions of practice. Most of the participants are said Yes 53 (21.5%) in pre-test, after interval 96 (38.9%), Majority of the participants has changed their practice towards checking of expiring date of self-medication which was concurrent to the study conducted by Uppal D et al.26 Thus, the health education on self-medication given to the rural population was found to be significantly effective. As an outcome, our study revealed that majority of the population were unaware about proper usage of self-medication. It brings various risks when these medicines are not taken accordingly.

CONCLUSION

  • Our study findings revealed that the rural population have insufficient knowledge regarding self-medication.
  • In our study the rural respondents were in the opinion that self-medication is not safe in all age groups and few of them felt self-medication is not safe in pregnancy.
  • Another important aspect of our study appreciates that rural population had the habit of asking the chemist to check the expiry date before using the medications.
  • The outcomes have shown that educational intervention has significant impact on knowledge, attitude and practice of self-medication among rural population. Community pharmacists have pivotal role in providing information about the medications to patients.
  • After educational intervention the knowledge, attitude and practice regarding self- medication were significantly improved.

REFERENCES

  1. Marak A, Borah M, Bhattacharyya H, Talukdar K, A cross-sectional study on self-medication practices among the rural population of Meghalaya, Int J of Med Sci and Public Health, 2016; 5(6): 1134 – 1138
  2. Cecyli C, Pragati T. Assessment of knowledge and practice of self-medication among urban and rural population. DIT,2020;13(6):1059-64.
  3. Kumari R, Kumar D, Bahl R, Gupta R, Study of Knowledge and Practices of Self - medication among Medical Students at Jammu, J of Med Sci, 2012; 15(2): 141-14
  4. Kalyani V, Bisht M, Thapliyal S, Rohilla KK. Comparison of practice and attitude of self-treatment in rural and urban population in Uttarakhand, India: A comparative study. NJPPP. 2020;10(12):1052-9.
  5. Gayathri S, Selvaraj K, Satyajith P, Mithunkumar G.H, Estimation of self - medication practices among rural Kanchipuram, India, Research Article IAIM, 2017; 4(10): 87-92
  6. Susheela F, Goruntla N, Bhupalam PK, Veerabhadrappa KV, Sahithi B, Ishrar SM. Assessment of knowledge, attitude, and practice toward responsible self-medication among students of pharmacy colleges located in Anantapur district, Andhra Pradesh, India. JEHP. 2018; 7:96;1-8.
  7. Thoufiq AAA, Vijayan A. Prevalence of self-medication practices in Urban area of Kanchipuram district, Tamil Nadu. IJCMPH,2020;7(3):1089-94.
  8. Jalihalkar S.S, Birari P.B, Gaykhe A, Mishal RH, Mishal HB. Self-medication among pharmacy students – A threatening trend. IJMPR,2020;4(3):126-130.
  9. Limaye D, Limaye V, Fortwengel G, Krause G. Self-medication practices in urban and rural areas of western India: a cross-sectional study. IJCMPH. 2018;(5 (7)):2672-85.
  10. Latifi A, Ramezankhani A, Rezaei Z, Ashtarian H, Salmani B, Yousefi MR, Khezeli M. Prevalence and associated factors of self-medication among the college students in Tehran. JAPS. 2017 Jul;7(7):128-32.
  11. Prasad BS, Chouhan K. Self-medication and their consequences: A challenge to health professional. AJPCR,2016;9(2):314-317.
  12. Patil BS, Nagaiah HB, Raikar RS, Rao V. Self-medication practices among 2nd year medical students in a rural medical college of Telangana state. NJPPP,2018;8(4):501-506.
  13. Mehta R K, Sharma S, Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Self-Medication among Medical Students, IOSR J Of Nursing and Health Science, 2015; 4(1): 89-96
  14. James H, H.A.J Khalid, Al Khaja Sameer Otoom Reginald P. Sequeira, Evaluation of the Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Self-Medication among First-Year Medical Students, Med Princ Pract, 2006; 15: 270-275
  15. Chordiya S V. Role of pharmacist in rational drug therapy. IP J of Surgery and Allied Sci, 2019 Mar;1(1):5-7.
  16. Singh NP, Singh N, Jain PK, Singh V, Chaurasiya S, Verma R, Ranjan M. Comparative study to determine self-medication practice and pattern in urban and rural areas of Etawah district. IJCMPH, 2019; 7[1]; 216-223.
  17. Vidyavati SD, Sneha A, Kamarudin J, Katti SM. Self-medication-reasons, risks and benefits. IJHBR. 2016 Jul;4(04):4.21-24.
  18. Karmacharya A, Uprety BN, Pathiyil RS, Gyawali S. Knowledge and practice of self- medication among undergraduate medical students. JLMC. 2018 May 13;6(1):21-6.
  19. Sinha U, Namdev G. Knowledge attitude and practices among self-medication users in a rural area of Bhopal NJCM, 2016; 7(10); 825-828.
  20. Makeen HA, Albarraq AA, Banji OJ, Taymour S, Meraya A, Alqhatani S, Banji D. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward self-medication in a rural population in South- Western Saudi Arabia. SJHS. 2019 Jan 1;8(1):54.
  21. Ahmad A, Khan MU, Srikanth AB, Kumar B, Singh NK, Trivedi N, Elnour AA, Patel I. Evaluation of knowledge, attitude and practice about self-medication among rural and urban north Indian population. IJPCR. 2015 Oct 25;7(05):326-32.
  22. Swetha R, Rani U. Study of self-medication pattern among adults in Tumkur city. JPMHH. 2021 Feb 15;2(1):13-6.
  23. Athira R, Govind G, Irene MJ, Sachin C, Ritty SC, Vishwanath BA. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice towards Self-Medications in a Rural Community. JDDT. 2020 Jun 15;10(3- s):128-32.
  24. Sivasakthi K, Koshila KS, Viswa S. Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude and Practice about Self Medication among Rural Areas in Erode District. IJOPP. 2020;13(3).
  25. Singh A, Dhami DB, Singh K, Shah GJ. Self-medication practice among undergraduate medical students in Nepalgunj medical college, Chisapani. JNGMC,2018;16(1);67-70.
  26. Agarwal M, Uppal D, Roy V. Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of self- medication among college students. IJBCP,2014;3(6):988-994
  27. Bhandari A, Upadhyay R, Joshi A, Bajeta D, Maher D, Joshi J, Singh K, Bisht N, Misha N, Bisht R, Haldar P, Peter R, Bisht M. Self-medication practices in nursing students. IJSHR,2018;3(2):35-39.
  28. Syed N, Naseer M, Memon MQ, Rani K. Prevalence of self-medication and its practice among the medical and non-medical students. JLUMHS. 2014 May;13(02):79.
  29. Shafie M, Eyasu M, Muzeyin K, Worku. Prevalence and determinants of self-medication practice among selected        households      in Addis Ababa community.2016; doi: 10.1371/journal.phone. 0194122.t003
  30. Thuzar M, Aung P. Prevalence of self-medication and its influence in the labour force in Rural Hlaing Tharyar, Yangon, Myanmar. The Open Public Health J, 2019: DOI 10.2174/1874944501912010038.
  31. MD Sohail A, Ghanti N, Regi M, Thombre N, Waggi M. A study on knowlwge, attitude and practice about self medication among rural population of Kalaburagi city. World J of pharmaceutical Res.2022 jul ; 11(12):2037-2045.

Reference

  1. Marak A, Borah M, Bhattacharyya H, Talukdar K, A cross-sectional study on self-medication practices among the rural population of Meghalaya, Int J of Med Sci and Public Health, 2016; 5(6): 1134 – 1138
  2. Cecyli C, Pragati T. Assessment of knowledge and practice of self-medication among urban and rural population. DIT,2020;13(6):1059-64.
  3. Kumari R, Kumar D, Bahl R, Gupta R, Study of Knowledge and Practices of Self - medication among Medical Students at Jammu, J of Med Sci, 2012; 15(2): 141-14
  4. Kalyani V, Bisht M, Thapliyal S, Rohilla KK. Comparison of practice and attitude of self-treatment in rural and urban population in Uttarakhand, India: A comparative study. NJPPP. 2020;10(12):1052-9.
  5. Gayathri S, Selvaraj K, Satyajith P, Mithunkumar G.H, Estimation of self - medication practices among rural Kanchipuram, India, Research Article IAIM, 2017; 4(10): 87-92
  6. Susheela F, Goruntla N, Bhupalam PK, Veerabhadrappa KV, Sahithi B, Ishrar SM. Assessment of knowledge, attitude, and practice toward responsible self-medication among students of pharmacy colleges located in Anantapur district, Andhra Pradesh, India. JEHP. 2018; 7:96;1-8.
  7. Thoufiq AAA, Vijayan A. Prevalence of self-medication practices in Urban area of Kanchipuram district, Tamil Nadu. IJCMPH,2020;7(3):1089-94.
  8. Jalihalkar S.S, Birari P.B, Gaykhe A, Mishal RH, Mishal HB. Self-medication among pharmacy students – A threatening trend. IJMPR,2020;4(3):126-130.
  9. Limaye D, Limaye V, Fortwengel G, Krause G. Self-medication practices in urban and rural areas of western India: a cross-sectional study. IJCMPH. 2018;(5 (7)):2672-85.
  10. Latifi A, Ramezankhani A, Rezaei Z, Ashtarian H, Salmani B, Yousefi MR, Khezeli M. Prevalence and associated factors of self-medication among the college students in Tehran. JAPS. 2017 Jul;7(7):128-32.
  11. Prasad BS, Chouhan K. Self-medication and their consequences: A challenge to health professional. AJPCR,2016;9(2):314-317.
  12. Patil BS, Nagaiah HB, Raikar RS, Rao V. Self-medication practices among 2nd year medical students in a rural medical college of Telangana state. NJPPP,2018;8(4):501-506.
  13. Mehta R K, Sharma S, Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Self-Medication among Medical Students, IOSR J Of Nursing and Health Science, 2015; 4(1): 89-96
  14. James H, H.A.J Khalid, Al Khaja Sameer Otoom Reginald P. Sequeira, Evaluation of the Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Self-Medication among First-Year Medical Students, Med Princ Pract, 2006; 15: 270-275
  15. Chordiya S V. Role of pharmacist in rational drug therapy. IP J of Surgery and Allied Sci, 2019 Mar;1(1):5-7.
  16. Singh NP, Singh N, Jain PK, Singh V, Chaurasiya S, Verma R, Ranjan M. Comparative study to determine self-medication practice and pattern in urban and rural areas of Etawah district. IJCMPH, 2019; 7[1]; 216-223.
  17. Vidyavati SD, Sneha A, Kamarudin J, Katti SM. Self-medication-reasons, risks and benefits. IJHBR. 2016 Jul;4(04):4.21-24.
  18. Karmacharya A, Uprety BN, Pathiyil RS, Gyawali S. Knowledge and practice of self- medication among undergraduate medical students. JLMC. 2018 May 13;6(1):21-6.
  19. Sinha U, Namdev G. Knowledge attitude and practices among self-medication users in a rural area of Bhopal NJCM, 2016; 7(10); 825-828.
  20. Makeen HA, Albarraq AA, Banji OJ, Taymour S, Meraya A, Alqhatani S, Banji D. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward self-medication in a rural population in South- Western Saudi Arabia. SJHS. 2019 Jan 1;8(1):54.
  21. Ahmad A, Khan MU, Srikanth AB, Kumar B, Singh NK, Trivedi N, Elnour AA, Patel I. Evaluation of knowledge, attitude and practice about self-medication among rural and urban north Indian population. IJPCR. 2015 Oct 25;7(05):326-32.
  22. Swetha R, Rani U. Study of self-medication pattern among adults in Tumkur city. JPMHH. 2021 Feb 15;2(1):13-6.
  23. Athira R, Govind G, Irene MJ, Sachin C, Ritty SC, Vishwanath BA. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice towards Self-Medications in a Rural Community. JDDT. 2020 Jun 15;10(3- s):128-32.
  24. Sivasakthi K, Koshila KS, Viswa S. Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude and Practice about Self Medication among Rural Areas in Erode District. IJOPP. 2020;13(3).
  25. Singh A, Dhami DB, Singh K, Shah GJ. Self-medication practice among undergraduate medical students in Nepalgunj medical college, Chisapani. JNGMC,2018;16(1);67-70.
  26. Agarwal M, Uppal D, Roy V. Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of self- medication among college students. IJBCP,2014;3(6):988-994
  27. Bhandari A, Upadhyay R, Joshi A, Bajeta D, Maher D, Joshi J, Singh K, Bisht N, Misha N, Bisht R, Haldar P, Peter R, Bisht M. Self-medication practices in nursing students. IJSHR,2018;3(2):35-39.
  28. Syed N, Naseer M, Memon MQ, Rani K. Prevalence of self-medication and its practice among the medical and non-medical students. JLUMHS. 2014 May;13(02):79.
  29. Shafie M, Eyasu M, Muzeyin K, Worku. Prevalence and determinants of self-medication practice among selected        households      in Addis Ababa community.2016; doi: 10.1371/journal.phone. 0194122.t003
  30. Thuzar M, Aung P. Prevalence of self-medication and its influence in the labour force in Rural Hlaing Tharyar, Yangon, Myanmar. The Open Public Health J, 2019: DOI 10.2174/1874944501912010038.
  31. MD Sohail A, Ghanti N, Regi M, Thombre N, Waggi M. A study on knowlwge, attitude and practice about self medication among rural population of Kalaburagi city. World J of pharmaceutical Res.2022 jul ; 11(12):2037-2045.

Photo
Bhosale Abhilekh
Corresponding author

Rajiv Memorial Education Society’s College of Pharmacy, Kalburagi-585102.

Photo
Patti Sri Harsha Vardhan
Co-author

Rajiv Memorial Education Society’s College of Pharmacy, Kalburagi-585102.

Photo
Siddaling Phoolar
Co-author

Rajiv Memorial Education Society’s College of Pharmacy, Kalburagi-585102.

Photo
Sagar Reddy
Co-author

Rajiv Memorial Education Society’s College of Pharmacy, Kalburagi-585102.

Photo
Vishwanath M. Jeevangi
Co-author

Rajiv Memorial Education Society’s College of Pharmacy, Kalburagi-585102.

Bhosale Abhilekh*, Patti Sri Harsha Vardhan, Siddaling Phoolar, Sagar Reddy, Vishwanath M. Jeevangi, A Study on Knowledge, Attitude and Practice About Self-Medication Among Rural Population of Kalaburagi District, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 10, 2514-2530 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17430492

More related articles
An Analytical Study of Financial Efficiency and Pr...
Dr. Vinod Parghi, Dr. Dhaval Zala, Dr. Dinesh Chavda, ...
Identifying And Validating Target for NAFLD Throug...
Yash Bhoyar, Vrushab Awachat, Disha Kemekar, Anuja Jikar, Sachin ...
Related Articles
A Study of Adverse Drug Reactions due to Anti-Obesity Drugs in Diabetic Patients...
Anand Gupta, Samir Raja, Fujail Ashraf, Khushi Kumari, Satyam Kumar, Sabreen Khatoon, Sakshi Kumari,...
Quercetin-3?-O-glucoside and Delphinidin-3-O-sambubioside from Hibiscus sabdarif...
Nishigandha Ashwinikumar Dixit, Netravati Patil, Dimpal Ashok Chaudhari, Dr. Jitendra Bhalchandra Ka...
An Analytical Study of Financial Efficiency and Profitability in Leading Indian ...
Dr. Vinod Parghi, Dr. Dhaval Zala, Dr. Dinesh Chavda, ...
More related articles
An Analytical Study of Financial Efficiency and Profitability in Leading Indian ...
Dr. Vinod Parghi, Dr. Dhaval Zala, Dr. Dinesh Chavda, ...
Identifying And Validating Target for NAFLD Through in Silico Study...
Yash Bhoyar, Vrushab Awachat, Disha Kemekar, Anuja Jikar, Sachin More, ...