View Article

  • Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery: Current Advances, Challenges, and Future Perspectives

  • Associate Professor,Department of Chemistry, Sardar Vallabhabhai Patel Arts and Science College, Ainpur, Dist. Jalgaon, Maharashtra. 425507

Abstract

The drug discovery process is notoriously time-consuming, costly, and failure-prone. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) techniques—including machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), graph neural networks (GNNs), and generative modelling—have emerged as transformative tools to accelerate and de?risk key stages of discovery and development. Recent studies indicate that AI can reduce drug discovery timelines by up to 30–50% and significantly improve hit identification rates. This review examines the current state of AI applications across the pharmaceutical pipeline: target identification and validation, virtual screening and lead discovery, lead optimisation and de novo design, drug repurposing, ADME/Tox prediction, and clinical trial design. We highlight major challenges and outline future prospects including generative chemistry, multi-modal data integration, federated learning and ethically trustworthy AI. The review concludes that while AI is not a panacea, it is rapidly becoming a critical component of modern drug discovery and offers genuine promise for more efficient, rational therapeutic development..

Keywords

artificial intelligence, drug discovery, machine learning, deep learning, virtual screening, lead optimization, drug repurposing, generative chemistry.

Introduction

Developing a novel therapeutic agent remains one of the most challenging endeavours in biomedical science. Traditional drug discovery and development typically spans over a decade, costs on the order of billions of U.S. dollars, and still yields low success rates: only a small percentage of drug candidates that enter clinical trials ever reach the market (1). The complexity arises from multiple bottlenecks: identification of a valid biological target, screening or designing chemical or biologic compounds, optimization of potency, selectivity, pharmacokinetics (PK) and toxicity, preclinical in vivo testing, and clinical trials.

In this context, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a compelling paradigm to help overcome these bottlenecks. AI encompasses a broad set of computational techniques—machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), natural language processing (NLP), graph?based learning, and generative modelling—that enable pattern recognition, prediction, and generation from large and heterogeneous data. AI has the potential to revolutionize the drug discovery process by enhancing efficiency, accuracy, and speed (2). In recent years, multiple comprehensive review articles have systematically summarized the state of the art in the application of artificial intelligence to drug discovery, highlighting major methodological advances, emerging computational frameworks, and real-world pharmaceutical applications (3-5). ADME/Tox prediction, and clinical trial design. In addition, the manuscript summarizes the major challenges and enabling factors associated with the adoption of AI, as well as future perspectives and emerging trends in this rapidly evolving field. Ultimately, this article aims to build on those contributions by providing a detailed, structured examination of how AI technologies are being applied at each stage of the drug discovery pipeline, highlighting both opportunities and limitations, and suggesting future directions.

2. OVERVIEW OF AI METHODOLOGIES IN DRUG DISCOVERY

AI has become an integral component of modern pharmaceutical and biomedical research, offering powerful computational tools to address the complexity of drug discovery and development. By leveraging machine learning and deep learning algorithms, AI enables efficient analysis of large-scale omics, chemical, and clinical datasets, thereby enhancing target identification, hit discovery, and lead optimization (6). AI-based models also improve the prediction of pharmacokinetic properties, toxicity, and clinical outcomes (7).

2.1 Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL)


Machine learning broadly refers to algorithms that ‘learn’ from data to make predictions or decisions without being explicitly programmed for each task. Conventional ML algorithms in drug discovery have included support vector machines (SVMs), random forests (RFs), k?nearest neighbours, logistic regression, gradient boosting, etc. (5). Deep learning represents a subset of ML where artificial neural networks with multiple hidden layers (deep architectures) can automatically learn hierarchical representations of data. DL has proven particularly helpful when handling large, complex datasets such as images, sequences or high-dimensional data.

2.2 Graph Neural Networks (GNNs)

In molecular modeling, molecules are naturally represented as graphs (atoms as nodes, bonds as edges). GNNs have emerged as powerful tools for learning directly from such graph?structured data. Recent reviews (8) emphasize how GNNs are used for molecular property prediction, virtual screening, molecular generation, knowledge?graph construction and synthesis planning. GNNs thus bridge structural chemistry and AI in an elegant way.

2.3 Generative Models and De novo Design

Generative modelling is a class of techniques that learn to generate new data instances similar to the training distribution. In drug discovery, generative approaches (e.g., variational autoencoders, generative adversarial networks (GANs), reinforcement-learning scaffolding, and diffusion models) are used to propose novel chemical structures with desired properties (9). The promise of de novo design is the ability to explore chemical space beyond existing compounds and potentially identify “first?in­class” molecules.

2.4 Knowledge Graphs, Multi-Modal learning and NLP

AI also supports integration of heterogeneous biomedical data: genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, phenotypic assays, chemical libraries, literature. Knowledge graphs link entities (genes, proteins, compounds, diseases, pathways) and AI can traverse such graphs for hypothesis generation (10-12). NLP and large?language-model (LLM) methods now enable processing of unstructured textual sources (scientific literature, patents) to extract relationships relevant to drug discovery.

2.5 Federated Learning and Data Privacy

Because many drug discovery datasets are proprietary and confidential, federated learning (where models are trained across multiple institutions without sharing raw data) is becoming increasingly important (13). This approach helps preserve data privacy while enabling the use of broader and more diverse training datasets.

2.6 Explainable AI (XAI) and Uncertainty Quantification

As ML/DL models are increasingly used in decision-making, issues of interpretability, transparency, and reliability become paramount. Explainable AI techniques aim to make model predictions more understandable to human scientists (1, 14) Equally, quantifying uncertainty (i.e., confidence in predictions) is critical when deploying AI-driven decisions in high-stakes domains such as drug development. 

Collectively, these methodologies form the computational backbone of modern AI-driven drug discovery, enabling data-driven decision-making across the pharmaceutical pipeline.  A structured overview of the principal artificial intelligence methodologies employed in drug discovery, including their key characteristics, applications, advantages, and limitations, is presented in Table 1. This overview highlights the diversity of AI approaches used to address complex chemical and biological data, while also emphasizing challenges related to data bias, interpretability, and model generalizability (2, 4, 15).

 

Table 1: Overview of key AI techniques used in drug discovery

AI Method

Description

Typical Applications

Advantages

Limitations

Machine Learning (ML)

Algorithms (e.g., SVM, Random Forest) for learning structure–activity relationships

ADME prediction, toxicity classification, virtual screening.

Fast training, interpretable (for some methods).

Limited scalability for high-dimensional data.

Deep Learning (DL)

Neural networks with multiple layers capable of representation learning.

Molecular property prediction, image-based phenotypic screening.

Handles complex data; automates feature generation.

Requires large labelled datasets, harder to interpret.

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs)

Models that operate on graph-structured inputs (e.g., molecules).

Binding prediction, de novo design, molecular optimisation.

Captures topological molecular features effectively.

Computationally expensive; still maturing.

Generative Models (VAE, GAN, Diffusion)

Learn distributions of chemical space to generate new molecules.

De novo design, scaffold hopping, library expansion.

Enables exploration of novel chemical space.

Synthesizability not always guaranteed; validation needed.

Knowledge-Graph AI

Networks linking biological/chemical entities.

Target identification, drug repurposing.

Integrates heterogeneous data sources.

Strongly dependent on curated datasets.

Natural Language Processing (NLP)

Extraction of information from literature and patents.

Target–disease association mining, hypothesis generation.

Utilizes vast unstructured data.

May propagate errors from weak text sources.

Federated Learning

ML training across distributed datasets without centralised data sharing.

Collaborative pharma research, rare disease datasets.

Protects confidentiality, improves data diversity.

Technical complexity; regulatory considerations.

 

3. APPLICATIONS OF AI ACROSS THE DRUG DISCOVERY PIPELINE

This section outlines the main stages of drug discovery and development and describes how AI is applied at each stage, supported by recent literature. The following pipeline breakdown is adopted.

  1. Target identification & validation
  2. Virtual screening & lead discovery
  3. Lead optimization & de novo design
  4. Drug repurposing
  5. ADME/Toxicity prediction
  6. Clinical trial design and patient stratification.

3.1 Target Identification and Validation

Identifying a valid biological target (gene, protein, pathway) that is druggable and relevant to disease mechanism is a foundational step. Traditional methods involve experimental screens, literature mining, and expert hypothesis generation. AI introduces several enhancements:

  1. Machine learning can integrate genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics and phenotypic data to identify disease-associated targets. For example, AI algorithms can analyse gene expression and protein interaction networks to identify hub proteins or dysregulated modules (1).
  2. Knowledge-graph and NLP approaches can mine scientific literature to link genes, proteins, diseases and drugs in data-rich graphs, generating novel hypotheses for target-disease associations  (2).
  3. Prediction of target druggability: ML models can estimate whether a given protein is likely to be “druggable” (i.e., can bind small molecules or biologics with suitable affinity, selectivity and safety) based on structural, sequence and network features.
  4. Validation: AI can prioritise which targets are most likely to succeed in downstream development, thereby reducing downstream attrition.AI algorithms can identify novel targets more effectively than traditional methods by integrating genomics, proteomics, and other data sources. Thus, AI contributes to earlier, more informed decisions in target selection, potentially reducing costly failures later.

3.2 Virtual Screening and Lead Discovery

Once a target is identified, the next step is to discover compounds (“hits”) that modulate the target. Virtual screening (VS) is the computational counterpart of high-throughput screening (HTS). AI enhances screening in multiple ways:

  1. ML/DL models trained on historical binding affinity, assay data and molecular descriptors can prioritise compounds likely to bind the target (16). These methods can filter vast chemical libraries rapidly.
  2. GNNs allow molecular graphs of compounds to serve as inputs, capturing atom–bond topology and enabling improved predictions of binding potential (17)
  3. AI-driven docking and scoring models: While classical docking uses physics-based or empirical scoring, ML models can learn to predict binding energies or ligand pose quality, sometimes offering superior performance in larger libraries (2).
  4. Active learning: Iterative approaches where ML models select most informative compounds to test next, thereby reducing experimental burden.
  5. Crowdsourced or generative screening: Generated compounds (via generative models) can be subjected to virtual screening filters before synthesis.The application of AI to screening addresses two key issues: narrowing the chemical search space (which is astronomically large with estimates exceeding 1060 possible small molecules) and improving hit?rate (reducing false positives/negatives). AI is increasingly being applied in small-molecule design and screening, where it plays a significant role in improving hit identification (5).

3.3 Lead Optimisation and De novo Design

Leads must be optimised for potency, selectivity, PK/PD (pharmacodynamics/ pharmacokinetics), safety, manufacturability and more. AI again plays multiple roles:

  1. Multi-parameter optimisation: Conventional medicinal chemistry is often manual and iterative. AI models can predict multiple endpoints simultaneously (potency, solubility, toxicity, metabolic stability), enabling compound ranking and guiding synthetic efforts (18). Generative chemistry aims to explore novel regions of chemical space and accelerate lead?generation.
  2. Fragment?based and reaction?based design: Some AI models incorporate synthetic feasibility constraints, co-optimise chemical modifications, and propose synthetic routes (19). GNNs again enable representation of difficult structure–activity relationships (SAR) and chemical context.

Despite progress, lead optimisation remains challenging: Chemical synthesizability, patentability, off?target effects, metabolism, regulatory concerns all complicate translation of AI-designed molecules. (1) emphasise that meaningful progress depends on integration of AI proposals with expert chemist input, experimental validation and feasibility filters.

3.4 Drug Repurposing

Drug repurposing (also called repositioning) refers to the identification of new therapeutic indications for existing drugs. The advantages: shorter development timelines, cheaper cost, known safety profiles. AI amplifies repurposing by:

  1. Predicting drug-target interactions (DTIs): ML/DL systems trained on known drug-target pairs can predict new interaction possibilities. These predictions, combined with disease data, enable ranking of repurposing candidates (20).
  2. Integrating multi?omics and clinical data: AI can analyse gene?expression signatures, patient stratification, network perturbation to suggest that a drug approved for disease A may be effective in disease B.
  3. Knowledge?graph and literature mining: AI can identify relationships among drugs, proteins, pathways and diseases to suggest repurposing hypotheses (12).

Repurposing is a relatively low-risk entry point for AI in drug discovery because many compounds already exist; the main challenge becomes matching them to new disease contexts. AI helps to accelerate hypothesis generation and prioritisation, reducing the cost and time of screening.

3.5 ADME / Toxicity (Safety) Prediction

One of the major causes of failure in drug development is inadequate pharmacokinetics (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion; ADME) or unacceptable toxicity. AI contributes by:

  1. Predicting absorption, bioavailability, distribution (e.g., blood-brain barrier penetration), metabolic stability, clearance: ML models trained on prior data can rapidly screen virtual compounds for favourable ADME profiles (21).
  2. Toxicity prediction: ML and DL approaches can predict mutagenicity, cardiotoxicity (e.g., hERG channel inhibition), hepatotoxicity, off-target liabilities. Models may ingest chemical structure, molecular descriptors, cell?based assay data, gene?expression profiles, and provide risk scores (15).
  3. Reducing downstream attrition: By flagging undesirable profiles earlier, AI helps to reduce costly late-stage failures.

Despite the promise, predictions remain probabilistic; real?world translation still demands thorough experimental and in-vivo validation. Model interpretability and the availability of robust training datasets remain key bottlenecks for safety prediction models (1).

3.6 Clinical Trial Design, Patient Stratification and Real-World Evidence

Beyond early discovery, AI is increasingly applied in the later phases of drug development: clinical trials, patient recruitment, biomarker discovery and real-world data (RWD) analysis. Key applications include:

  1. Patient stratification: AI algorithms can analyse genomics, imaging, EHR (electronic health record) and omics data to identify subgroups likely to respond to a therapy or to display adverse events, thereby enabling precision medicine and improved trial success rates (1).
  2. Trial design and optimisation: AI can help optimise inclusion/exclusion criteria, predict recruitment rates, monitor trial progression, detect anomalies, and run adaptive trials (22).
  3. Post-market surveillance and real-world evidence: AI can analyse large real-world datasets (claims, EHRs, registries) to monitor safety signals, identify drug–drug interactions, and support pharmacovigilance (23).

Thus, AI helps bridge the gap between bench and bedside, improving the entire therapeutic development lifecycle. Table 2 summarizes the integration of AI-driven approaches across multiple stages of the drug discovery pipeline, including target identification, virtual screening, lead optimization, and clinical development. It illustrates how AI methodologies enhance predictive accuracy, streamline workflows, and reduce development timelines, thereby improving efficiency and decision-making in pharmaceutical research (1, 24)

 

Table 2. AI Applications across the drug discovery pipeline

Drug Discovery Stage

AI Role

Example Methods

Expected Benefits

Target Identification

Identify disease-relevant genes/proteins using multi-omics integration.

Knowledge graphs, ML clustering, NLP.

Higher confidence in target selection.

Virtual Screening

Predict hit molecules and filter large chemical libraries.

DL models, GNNs, ML-based scoring functions.

Faster, cheaper, more accurate screening.

Lead Optimisation

Predict activity, ADME/Tox, design modifications.

Multi-task DL, reinforcement learning, generative models.

Reduced synthetic cycles, multi-parameter optimisation.

De Novo Design

Generate novel molecules with desired properties.

VAE, GAN, diffusion models.

Innovative scaffolds, IP advantages.

Repurposing

Identify new indications for existing drugs.

DTI prediction models, knowledge graphs, network analysis.

Lower development cost and time.

ADME/Tox Prediction

Predict safety, metabolism, clearance.

DL toxicity models, ML ADMET predictors.

Reduces late-stage failures.

Clinical Trial AI

Patient stratification, adaptive design.

ML on EHR data, survival analysis models.

Increased trial success, precision medicine.

 

4. CHALLENGES, LIMITATIONS AND ENABLERS

While AI offers enormous promise in drug discovery, significant hurdles remain before it becomes a standard, reliable tool. In this section we examine key challenges and enabling factors.

4.1 Data Quality, Quantity and Curation

AI models are only as good as the data on which they are trained. Issues include:

  1. Limited high-quality annotated data: For many targets, compounds or diseases, labelled data (e.g., binding affinities, ADME/Tox endpoints) are sparse or proprietary.
  2. Data heterogeneity: Data may come from different assay formats, labs, or data-sources, leading to inconsistencies, batch effects, missing values.
  3. Biases and domain shift: Models trained on one chemical or biological space may fail when applied to new areas (15).
  4. Data reproducibility (ground truth): Concerns have been raised regarding the reproducibility of published datasets (2).

Effective curation, standardisation, data sharing (while respecting IP/confidentiality) and generation of large, diverse training sets are essential enablers for AI in drug discovery.

4.2 Interpretability and Transparency

Deep learning models often behave as “black boxes”, which undermines trust in high-stakes decisions. In drug discovery, decisions such as “select this compound” or “advance this target” require scientific rationale. Key issues:

  1. Lack of mechanistic explanation: Why did the model rank one compound over another?
  2. Uncertainty quantification: How confident are we in the prediction?
  3. Explainable AI (XAI) frameworks and calibrated uncertainty remain underdeveloped in many drug-discovery applications (25).

Thus, ensuring transparency and interpretability of AI models is critical for scientific adoption, regulatory acceptance and cross-discipline collaboration (chemists, biologists, AI scientists).

4.3 Integration with Experimental and Medicinal Chemistry Workflows

AI cannot replace experimental validation or expert human judgement. Key integration issues include:

  1. Synthesizability: Generative models may propose molecules that are chemically infeasible or synthetically impractical.
  2. Medicinal?chemistry context: AI may not account for IP/patent landscapes, novelty, manufacturability, scale-up issues, formulation, regulatory constraints.
  3. Workflow alignment: The output of AI must fit into existing drug-discovery pipelines (e.g., compound libraries, assay availability, chemical vendors).

Successful deployment of AI in drug discovery requires seamless collaboration among AI specialists, medicinal chemists, pharmacologists, and biologists (4).

4.4 Regulatory, Ethical and IP Considerations

Given the stakes in drug development (patient safety, high cost, regulatory scrutiny), AI introduces additional layers of complexity:

  1. Regulatory acceptance: How do regulators (e.g., FDA, EMA) view AI-derived molecules or AI-guided decisions? What validation, audits or interpretability are required?
  2. IP and data ownership: Proprietary datasets, model IP, licensing issues complicate data sharing and collaboration.
  3. Ethics: AI must be used responsibly—guarding against biases (e.g., in datasets, patient stratification), ensuring transparency, respecting patient privacy, handling data provenance (26).
  4. Liability: If an AI-derived compound later fails or causes harm, where does liability lie?

4.5 Evaluation Metrics and Benchmarking

Standardised evaluation of AI models in drug discovery remains a challenge. Some issues:

  1. Lack of standard benchmarks across tasks (screening, de-novo design, ADME/Tox).
  2. Over?optimism: Models may perform well on historical datasets but fail prospectively in real discovery settings (27).
  3. Real-world translation: Success in silico does not guarantee success in vitro or in vivo.
  4. Therefore, rigorous benchmarking, prospective validation, and realistic performance metrics are essential.

4.6 Organisational and Cultural Barriers

Adopting AI in pharmaceutical organisations brings its own challenges:

  1. Skill gaps: There is a need for cross-disciplinary teams comprising AI and data scientists, medicinal chemists, and biologists, along with appropriate training.
  2. Legacy systems: Many companies have entrenched workflows, data silos, and risk-averse cultures.
  3. Change management: Encouraging trust and adoption of AI recommendations by human experts.

Nevertheless, many organisations now recognise that AI is essential for future competitiveness (28-29). These challenges highlight the need for hybrid approaches combining AI predictions with experimental validation to ensure reliable and translational outcomes in drug discovery.

5. FUTURE PERSPECTIVES AND EMERGING TRENDS

Looking forward, several emerging trends are likely to shape the future of AI in drug discovery:

5.1 Generative Chemistry and Automated Synthesis

Generative artificial intelligence is rapidly advancing, with methods such as diffusion models, transformer-based architectures, and reinforcement learning increasingly capable of proposing novel molecular structures under multiple constraints, including bioactivity, ADME properties, and synthetic feasibility (8). The integration of generative models with automated synthesis platforms, such as robotic chemistry systems, holds the potential to enable closed-loop design–synthesis–testing workflows. These developments highlight generative chemistry as a rapidly evolving field with significant promise for future drug discovery.

5.2 Multi-Modal and Multi-Scale Data Integration

Future workflows will increasingly integrate diverse data types: sequence, structure, omics, phenotypic imaging, EHR, literature. Multi-modal deep-learning models will enable richer representations and predictions. For example, integrating single-cell transcriptomics, proteomics and chemical structure to predict drug response in patient subgroups.

5.3 Federated Learning, Privacy-Preserving AI and Data Sharing

Because much pharmaceutical data is proprietary, federated learning and other privacy-preserving approaches will be central to collaborative AI development across institutions. This enables model training on distributed datasets without sharing raw data, enabling richer models while preserving confidentiality (30).

5.4 Explainable, Trustworthy and Responsible AI

As AI becomes more embedded in drug discovery, demands for interpretability, robustness, fairness and auditability will intensify. Model certification, uncertainty quantification, and clearly documented decision pathways will build trust across stakeholders (31). In parallel, regulatory frameworks may evolve to include AI-specific guidance in drug development.

5.5 AI-Enabled Clinical Trials and Real-World Evidence (RWE)

Beyond drug discovery, artificial intelligence is increasingly shaping clinical development and post-marketing surveillance through adaptive clinical trial designs, patient stratification and enrichment strategies, digital biomarker discovery, real-world evidence (RWE) analytics, and predictive monitoring of drug safety and efficacy, thereby accelerating translational pipelines and improving clinical outcomes (24, 32).

5.6 Small Molecule, Biologics, Cell & Gene Therapies

While much early AI work focused on small-molecule drug discovery, future applications will extend to biologics (antibodies, peptides), cell & gene therapies, and RNA-based modalities. These modalities present additional complexities (structure, delivery, immunogenicity) where AI can arguably add value.

5.7 Digital Twins and In Silico Clinical Trials

An ambitious horizon involves digital-twin models of human physiology and virtual clinical populations, enabling in silico trials guided by AI predictions. While still nascent, such frameworks could drastically reduce cost and time of development. The convergence of artificial intelligence, automation, and systems biology is expected to redefine the paradigm of drug discovery in the coming decade.

CONCLUSION

The application of artificial intelligence to drug discovery is no longer speculative—it is already reshaping how the pharmaceutical industry identifies targets, screens and designs compounds, predicts safety and efficacy, and designs clinical trials. From target identification leveraging knowledge-graphs and omics data to de novo generative chemistry, AI brings enhanced speed, improved prediction accuracy, and cost-efficiencies. Nevertheless, AI is not a magic bullet. Significant challenges remain: data quality and curation, model interpretability, integration with experimental workflows, regulatory and ethical considerations, and organizational adoption.We are moving toward a frontier where AI and robotics synergize with shared data and human experience to drive the next wave of innovation. Integrative frameworks that link generative design, automated synthesis, multi?modal data and iterative learning will pave the way for next-generation therapeutics. For academic researchers and industry alike, the imperative is clear: invest in data infrastructure, cultivate cross-disciplinary expertise, adopt transparent AI workflows, and rigorously validate models prospectively. If these prerequisites are met, AI holds the promise to deliver safer, more effective, and more affordable medicines to patients in less time. AI-driven drug discovery is poised to transition from a supportive tool to a central pillar of pharmaceutical innovation.

REFERENCES

  1. Kant S, Deepika, Roy S. Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development: transforming challenges into opportunities. Discover Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2025;1(1):7.
  2. Blanco-Gonzalez A, Cabezon A, Seco-Gonzalez A, Conde-Torres D, Antelo-Riveiro P, Pineiro A, et al. The role of AI in drug discovery: challenges, opportunities, and strategies. Pharmaceuticals. 2023;16(6):891.
  3. Fu C, Chen Q. The future of pharmaceuticals: Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development. Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2025:101248.
  4. Rehman AU, Li M, Wu B, Ali Y, Rasheed S, Shaheen S, et al. Role of artificial intelligence in revolutionizing drug discovery. Fundamental Research. 2025;5(3):1273-87.
  5. Dhudum R, Ganeshpurkar A, Pawar A. Revolutionizing drug discovery: a comprehensive review of AI applications. Drugs and Drug Candidates. 2024;3(1):148-71.
  6. Ali H. Artificial intelligence in multi-omics data integration: Advancing precision medicine, biomarker discovery and genomic-driven disease interventions. Int J Sci Res Arch. 2023;8(1):1012-30.
  7. Obrezanova O. Artificial intelligence for compound pharmacokinetics prediction. Current Opinion in Structural Biology. 2023;79:102546.
  8. Zhang K, Yang X, Wang Y, Yu Y, Huang N, Li G, et al. Artificial intelligence in drug development. Nature medicine. 2025;31(1):45-59.
  9. Gangwal A, Ansari A, Ahmad I, Azad AK, Kumarasamy V, Subramaniyan V, et al. Generative artificial intelligence in drug discovery: basic framework, recent advances, challenges, and opportunities. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2024;15:1331062.
  10. Zitnik M, Agrawal M, Leskovec J. Modeling polypharmacy side effects with graph convolutional networks. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(13):i457-i66.
  11. Nicholson DN, Greene CS. Constructing knowledge graphs and their biomedical applications. Computational and structural biotechnology journal. 2020;18:1414-28.
  12. Himmelstein DS, Lizee A, Hessler C, Brueggeman L, Chen SL, Hadley D, et al. Systematic integration of biomedical knowledge prioritizes drugs for repurposing. elife. 2017;6:e26726.
  13. Rieke N, Hancox J, Li W, Milletari F, Roth HR, Albarqouni S, et al. The future of digital health with federated learning. NPJ digital medicine. 2020;3(1):119.
  14. Samek W, Montavon G, Lapuschkin S, Anders CJ, Müller K-R. Explaining deep neural networks and beyond: A review of methods and applications. Proceedings of the IEEE. 2021;109(3):247-78.
  15. Wu Z, Ramsundar B, Feinberg EN, Gomes J, Geniesse C, Pappu AS, et al. MoleculeNet: a benchmark for molecular machine learning. Chemical science. 2018;9(2):513-30.
  16. Wang H. Prediction of protein–ligand binding affinity via deep learning models. Briefings in Bioinformatics. 2024;25(2):bbae081.
  17. Nguyen T, Le H, Quinn TP, Nguyen T, Le TD, Venkatesh S. GraphDTA: predicting drug–target binding affinity with graph neural networks. Bioinformatics. 2021;37(8):1140-7.
  18. Luukkonen S, van den Maagdenberg HW, Emmerich MT, van Westen GJ. Artificial intelligence in multi-objective drug design. Current Opinion in Structural Biology. 2023;79:102537.
  19. Bradshaw J, Paige B, Kusner MJ, Segler M, Hernández-Lobato JM. A model to search for synthesizable molecules. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2019;32.
  20. Luo H, Li M, Yang M, Wu F-X, Li Y, Wang J. Biomedical data and computational models for drug repositioning: a comprehensive review. Briefings in Bioinformatics. 2021;22(2):1604-19.
  21. Yang H, Lou C, Sun L, Li J, Cai Y, Wang Z, et al. admetSAR 2.0: web-service for prediction and optimization of chemical ADMET properties. Bioinformatics. 2019;35(6):1067-9.
  22. Olawade DB, Fidelis SC, Marinze S, Egbon E, Osunmakinde A, Osborne A. Artificial intelligence in clinical trials: A comprehensive review of opportunities, challenges, and future directions. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2025:106141.
  23. Bate A, Hobbiger SF. Artificial intelligence, real-world automation and the safety of medicines. Drug safety. 2021;44(2):125-32.
  24. Harrer S, Shah P, Antony B, Hu J. Artificial intelligence for clinical trial design. Trends in pharmacological sciences. 2019;40(8):577-91.
  25. Vamathevan J, Clark D, Czodrowski P, Dunham I, Ferran E, Lee G, et al. Applications of machine learning in drug discovery and development. Nature reviews Drug discovery. 2019;18(6):463-77.
  26. Rajkomar A, Hardt M, Howell MD, Corrado G, Chin MH. Ensuring fairness in machine learning to advance health equity. Annals of internal medicine. 2018;169(12):866-72.
  27. Sheridan RP. Time-split cross-validation as a method for estimating the goodness of prospective prediction. Journal of chemical information and modeling. 2013;53(4):783-90.
  28. Schneider G. Automating drug discovery. Nature reviews Drug discovery. 2018;17(2):97-113.
  29. Martin O. Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development. Advanced Sciences. 2021;3(2):1-10.
  30. Dayan I, Roth HR, Zhong A, Harouni A, Gentili A, Abidin AZ, et al. Federated learning for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Nature medicine. 2021;27(10):1735-43.
  31. Gawlikowski J, Tassi CRN, Ali M, Lee J, Humt M, Feng J, et al. A survey of uncertainty in deep neural networks. Artificial Intelligence Review. 2023;56(Suppl 1):1513-89.
  32. Coravos A, Khozin S, Mandl KD. Developing and adopting safe and effective digital biomarkers to improve patient outcomes. NPJ digital medicine. 2019;2(1):14.

Reference

  1. Kant S, Deepika, Roy S. Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development: transforming challenges into opportunities. Discover Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2025;1(1):7.
  2. Blanco-Gonzalez A, Cabezon A, Seco-Gonzalez A, Conde-Torres D, Antelo-Riveiro P, Pineiro A, et al. The role of AI in drug discovery: challenges, opportunities, and strategies. Pharmaceuticals. 2023;16(6):891.
  3. Fu C, Chen Q. The future of pharmaceuticals: Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development. Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2025:101248.
  4. Rehman AU, Li M, Wu B, Ali Y, Rasheed S, Shaheen S, et al. Role of artificial intelligence in revolutionizing drug discovery. Fundamental Research. 2025;5(3):1273-87.
  5. Dhudum R, Ganeshpurkar A, Pawar A. Revolutionizing drug discovery: a comprehensive review of AI applications. Drugs and Drug Candidates. 2024;3(1):148-71.
  6. Ali H. Artificial intelligence in multi-omics data integration: Advancing precision medicine, biomarker discovery and genomic-driven disease interventions. Int J Sci Res Arch. 2023;8(1):1012-30.
  7. Obrezanova O. Artificial intelligence for compound pharmacokinetics prediction. Current Opinion in Structural Biology. 2023;79:102546.
  8. Zhang K, Yang X, Wang Y, Yu Y, Huang N, Li G, et al. Artificial intelligence in drug development. Nature medicine. 2025;31(1):45-59.
  9. Gangwal A, Ansari A, Ahmad I, Azad AK, Kumarasamy V, Subramaniyan V, et al. Generative artificial intelligence in drug discovery: basic framework, recent advances, challenges, and opportunities. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2024;15:1331062.
  10. Zitnik M, Agrawal M, Leskovec J. Modeling polypharmacy side effects with graph convolutional networks. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(13):i457-i66.
  11. Nicholson DN, Greene CS. Constructing knowledge graphs and their biomedical applications. Computational and structural biotechnology journal. 2020;18:1414-28.
  12. Himmelstein DS, Lizee A, Hessler C, Brueggeman L, Chen SL, Hadley D, et al. Systematic integration of biomedical knowledge prioritizes drugs for repurposing. elife. 2017;6:e26726.
  13. Rieke N, Hancox J, Li W, Milletari F, Roth HR, Albarqouni S, et al. The future of digital health with federated learning. NPJ digital medicine. 2020;3(1):119.
  14. Samek W, Montavon G, Lapuschkin S, Anders CJ, Müller K-R. Explaining deep neural networks and beyond: A review of methods and applications. Proceedings of the IEEE. 2021;109(3):247-78.
  15. Wu Z, Ramsundar B, Feinberg EN, Gomes J, Geniesse C, Pappu AS, et al. MoleculeNet: a benchmark for molecular machine learning. Chemical science. 2018;9(2):513-30.
  16. Wang H. Prediction of protein–ligand binding affinity via deep learning models. Briefings in Bioinformatics. 2024;25(2):bbae081.
  17. Nguyen T, Le H, Quinn TP, Nguyen T, Le TD, Venkatesh S. GraphDTA: predicting drug–target binding affinity with graph neural networks. Bioinformatics. 2021;37(8):1140-7.
  18. Luukkonen S, van den Maagdenberg HW, Emmerich MT, van Westen GJ. Artificial intelligence in multi-objective drug design. Current Opinion in Structural Biology. 2023;79:102537.
  19. Bradshaw J, Paige B, Kusner MJ, Segler M, Hernández-Lobato JM. A model to search for synthesizable molecules. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2019;32.
  20. Luo H, Li M, Yang M, Wu F-X, Li Y, Wang J. Biomedical data and computational models for drug repositioning: a comprehensive review. Briefings in Bioinformatics. 2021;22(2):1604-19.
  21. Yang H, Lou C, Sun L, Li J, Cai Y, Wang Z, et al. admetSAR 2.0: web-service for prediction and optimization of chemical ADMET properties. Bioinformatics. 2019;35(6):1067-9.
  22. Olawade DB, Fidelis SC, Marinze S, Egbon E, Osunmakinde A, Osborne A. Artificial intelligence in clinical trials: A comprehensive review of opportunities, challenges, and future directions. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2025:106141.
  23. Bate A, Hobbiger SF. Artificial intelligence, real-world automation and the safety of medicines. Drug safety. 2021;44(2):125-32.
  24. Harrer S, Shah P, Antony B, Hu J. Artificial intelligence for clinical trial design. Trends in pharmacological sciences. 2019;40(8):577-91.
  25. Vamathevan J, Clark D, Czodrowski P, Dunham I, Ferran E, Lee G, et al. Applications of machine learning in drug discovery and development. Nature reviews Drug discovery. 2019;18(6):463-77.
  26. Rajkomar A, Hardt M, Howell MD, Corrado G, Chin MH. Ensuring fairness in machine learning to advance health equity. Annals of internal medicine. 2018;169(12):866-72.
  27. Sheridan RP. Time-split cross-validation as a method for estimating the goodness of prospective prediction. Journal of chemical information and modeling. 2013;53(4):783-90.
  28. Schneider G. Automating drug discovery. Nature reviews Drug discovery. 2018;17(2):97-113.
  29. Martin O. Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development. Advanced Sciences. 2021;3(2):1-10.
  30. Dayan I, Roth HR, Zhong A, Harouni A, Gentili A, Abidin AZ, et al. Federated learning for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Nature medicine. 2021;27(10):1735-43.
  31. Gawlikowski J, Tassi CRN, Ali M, Lee J, Humt M, Feng J, et al. A survey of uncertainty in deep neural networks. Artificial Intelligence Review. 2023;56(Suppl 1):1513-89.
  32. Coravos A, Khozin S, Mandl KD. Developing and adopting safe and effective digital biomarkers to improve patient outcomes. NPJ digital medicine. 2019;2(1):14.

Photo
Dipak Patil
Corresponding author

Associate Professor, Department of Chemistry, Sardar Vallabhabhai Patel Arts and Science College, Ainpur, Dist. Jalgaon, Maharashtra. 425507

Dipak Patil, Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery: Current Advances, Challenges, and Future Perspectives, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 4, 2711-2722, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19627749

More related articles
A Review on Neuralink – Achieve Ai Symbiosis wit...
Ganesh Patil, Chetan panpatil, Aaditi ahirrao , Pallavi ugale , D...
Prevalence Of Thyroid Disorders in Women Experienc...
Anupama Koneru , Atiya Begum , Heena Kausar , Sumaiya Khan , Habe...
Quality Aspects of Herbal Drugs and Its Formulation...
Vedika Thete, Soham Purohit, Ankush vadnere, Akshada Kale, ...
A Review of Ethno Medicinal Studies on Respiratory Disorders Management Among Tr...
Jayalekshmi M., Karan Solanki , Mahi Solanki, Makwana Divya , Sparsh Shah, Sanjesh Kumar G. Rathi, ...
Related Articles
Antidiabetic Potential of Geodorum Densiflorum: A Comprehensive Review...
Rani Nandre , Aditi Mishra , Dr. Karna Khavane , ...
Molecular Docking: A Technique For Discovering Telomerase Inhibitors For Cancer ...
Vidya Magar , Karna Khavane, Shailesh Patwekar, Santosh Shelke, ...
A Review on Neuralink – Achieve Ai Symbiosis with Medical Field. ...
Ganesh Patil, Chetan panpatil, Aaditi ahirrao , Pallavi ugale , Dr. Vishal Gulecha, ...
More related articles
A Review on Neuralink – Achieve Ai Symbiosis with Medical Field. ...
Ganesh Patil, Chetan panpatil, Aaditi ahirrao , Pallavi ugale , Dr. Vishal Gulecha, ...
Prevalence Of Thyroid Disorders in Women Experiencing Abnormal Uterine Bleeding:...
Anupama Koneru , Atiya Begum , Heena Kausar , Sumaiya Khan , Habeeb Khizar , ...
A Review on Neuralink – Achieve Ai Symbiosis with Medical Field. ...
Ganesh Patil, Chetan panpatil, Aaditi ahirrao , Pallavi ugale , Dr. Vishal Gulecha, ...
Prevalence Of Thyroid Disorders in Women Experiencing Abnormal Uterine Bleeding:...
Anupama Koneru , Atiya Begum , Heena Kausar , Sumaiya Khan , Habeeb Khizar , ...