Department of pharmaceutical Analysis, Centre for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Science and Technology, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Hyderabad, Kukatpally, Hyderabad, 500085, Telangana, India.
A simple, accurate, and precise method for the quantification of brexpiprazole in human plasma was developed by using the RP-HPLC (Reverse phase-High performance Liquid Chromatographic) technology to construct an internal standard of oriconazole. The chromatographic parameters that were used were: With a buffered flow rate of 1.0 ml/min, a detection wavelength of 215 nm, and a column temperature of 30oC, the following parameters are used: stationary phase Phenomenex c18 (150 x 4.6 mm, 5?), mobile phase 0.01N potassium dihydrogen phosphate (pH: 4.8), and acetonitrile in a 60:40(v/v) ratio. The retention time of brexpiprazole was 2.964 minutes. The coefficient of variation (CV) for brexpiprazole is 3.57 percent. The proposed method was determined to be linear (r = 0.999) and to provide a recovery percentage of 98.12% over a concentration range of 10-400 ng/mL. The lowest concentration that could be detected was 10 ng/mL, which is within the range of what could be found in human plasma as a medicine. Further, validation in accordance with ICH standards confirmed that the claimed procedure was within the permissible range.
Brexpiprazole is a BCS class II type called (7-{4-[4- (1-benzothiophen-4-yl) piperazin-1-yl] butoxy} quinoline2(1H)-one is a new medication in psychiatric 1,2 and also in the treatment of depression which has a high affinity for monoamine neurotransmitters like serotonin, dopamine, and noradrenaline receptors, For other major depressive disorder like Alzheimer’s disease, schizophrenia 3,4 , neurobehavioral disorders 5 , combat disorder, bipolar disorder treatment, adjunctive treatment it is mostly used. It has more potency than other antipsychotic drugs with little aqueous solubility and substantial intestinal permeability. 6,7 Brexpiprazole was originally approved in the United States in July 2015 for use as an adjunctive action for major depressive disorder (MDD) and schizophrenia. 9 Antipsychotics are first and second-generation drugs that are mainly active as D2 receptor antagonists. 10,11 Brexpiprazole acts as a partial agonist of the serotonin 5-HT1A receptor and the dopamine D2 and D3 receptors. Partial agonists have both blocking properties and stimulating properties at the receptor they bind to. The ratio of blocking activity to stimulating activity determines a portion of its clinical effects. . 12 brexpiprazole is a substrate of CYP2D6 and CYP3A4, like its predecessor aripiprazole. A simple, accurate, and precise method for the quantification of brexpiprazole in human plasma was developed by using the RP-HPLC (Reverse phase-High performance Liquid Chromatographic) technology to construct an internal standard of oriconazole.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
MATERIALS:
Table No. 1: Human plasma
|
K2 EDTA control plasma |
Deccan Pathological labs, Hyderabad |
4. Chemicals:
Table No. 2: Chemicals and Solvents
|
S. No. |
Chemical name |
Grade |
Manufacturing company |
|
1 |
Distilled water HPLC water |
HPLC |
Rankem, Avantor performance material India limited |
|
2 |
HPLC water |
Analytical Reagent |
Rankem, Avantor performance material India limited |
|
3 |
Acetonitrile |
Analytical Reagent |
Rankem, Avantor performance material India limited |
|
4 |
Phosphate buffer |
Analytical Reagent |
Rankem, Avantor performance material India limited |
|
5 |
Methanol |
Analytical Reagent |
Rankem, Avantor performance material India limited |
|
6 |
Sodium dihydrogen phosphate |
Analytical Reagent |
Rankem, Avantor performance material India limited |
3. Instruments:
Table No. 3: Instruments and Equipment’s
|
S. No. |
Instrument |
Company name |
Brand name |
|
1 |
Electronic balance |
Sartorious |
Denver |
|
2 |
pH meter |
Metsar |
BVK enterprises |
|
3 |
Sonicator |
Lab man |
BVK enterprises |
|
4 |
Centrifuge |
Thermo Fisher |
- |
|
5 |
Vertex |
Remi CM101 |
- |
|
6 |
HPLC water |
Alliance |
Water HPLC 2695 SYSTEM |
Method Development:
Diluent: In order to ensure that the medications would dissolve properly, we used a diluent consisting of 0.1% orthophosphoric acid and 50% acetonitrile.
How to make a stock solution of brexpiprazole (100 µg/ml):
Make a solution of 10 mg of Brexpiprazole in 100 ml of volumetric flask to achieve a concentration of 100 µg/ml...
Preparation of Brexpiprazole Spiking Solutions (0.010 µg/ml to 0.4µg/ml):
Brexpiprazole was generated from the stock solution at the following concentrations: 0.1 µg/ml, 0.2 µg/ml, 0.3 µg/ml, 1.6 µg/ml, 2.00 µg/ml, 2.4 µg/ml, 3.2 µg/ml, and 4.0 µg/ml. The eight 10-milliliter volumetric flasks were thereafter filled to the top with diluent. Calibration standards and quality control (QC) samples were prepared by spiking blank plasma with analyte dilutions from working stocks at concentrations of 10, 20, 30, 160, 200, 240, 320, plus 400 ng/ml, respectively.
Preparation of internal standard Solution (oriconazole):
Stock-1: Put 5 mg of Oriconazole into 100 mL of volumetric flask and dilute it until the volume reaches 50 mg per mL.
Stock-2: Dilute the solution to a concentration of 5µg/ml by adding 1 millilitre to a 10-milliliter volumetric flask from the previous solution..
Final concentration: To achieve an ISD concentration of 1µg/ml, 0.5 ml of the solution from the preceding stage should be mixed with blank plasma using working stock dilutions of the analyte.
Extraction procedure
Put 750µl of plasma, 500µl of internal standard, 250µl of Brexpiprazole from both spiking solutions, and 1 ml of acetonitrile into a centrifuging tube. Stir for another 15 seconds. Next, vertex for 2 minutes after spinning for 5 minutes at 3200 rpm. After the centrifugation process, gently add 10 µ L of the filtered sample to the HPLC directly.
There was a 15-second mixing period between 250µl of Brexpiprazole, 500µl of internal standard, and 750µl of plasma. acetonitrile and a chemical blender for two minutes. Node set Drain by spinning the mixture at 3200 rpm for 5 minutes. Collecting a specimen from the liquid above Using a 0.45µ filter constructed of polyvinylidene difluoride or polyvinylidene fluoride, squeeze the sample out. Put 20 µ L into the HPLC.
Trial (optimized method):
Chromatographic conditions
Phase of mobility: 0.01 nanoohms A 60:40 mixture of acetonitrile and potassium dihydrogen phosphate at a pH of 4.8, with a flow rate of one millilitre per minute. Applying a Phenomenex c18 column (150 x 4.6 mm, 5 ?). Detector beam width: 215 nanometres. Column temperature: 300 °C Two thousand three hundred microlitres is the prescribed injection volume.
Six minutes, tops
Resolved: 0.01% This is a 2:5 solution of potassium dihydrogen phosphate in acetonitrile.
Table No: 10 and Figure No: 4 show the trial's outcomes.
Method Validation:
System Suitability:
All indicators for system appropriateness were adequate and within the permitted range, as per ICH requirements. During the system compatibility test, the percentage CVs for retention time (RT) and area ratio (analyte area/IS area) were in the range of 0.06 to 0.08. This is because the auto-sampler was fed a cocktail of extracted and unextracted samples for analysis. The results of this experiment did not show any evidence of carryover..
Matrix factor evaluation:
The matrix impact is a key component in assessing pharmacokinetic studies. The internal standard normalised matrix factor, which was close to 1, varied from 0.90 to 0.99, indicating that plasma samples do not show any ionisation suppression or augmentation.
Quality control samples:
By examining the retention time of Brexpiprazole and the internal standard for interference with the endogenous plasma components, we validated the approach and demonstrated its selectivity. The mass detection of the extracted blank plasma demonstrated good drug and internal standard selectivity in six sets of K2EDTA blank plasma that were evaluated for selectivity. No interferences were detected that would have altered the retention periods of the analytes or the internal standard. Below are chromatograms illustrating the internal standard sample made up of pooled plasma, as well as the standard blank prepared using a representative sample. This result is shown in Figures 10 and 12...
The calibration curve for Brexpiprazole was found to be linear from 10 to 400 ng/mL. The coefficient of correlation (r2) was more than 0.999 in every case. It appears that the results are linear because the peak area ratios are strongly related for all analyte concentrations.
Section 4: Accuracy & Precision:
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Method Development:
The following conditions were considered when developing the method for determining Brexpiprazole: drug solubility; PKA value; and compliance with current ICH standards.
Trial 4 (optimized method):
Fig No. 1: Chromatogram of trial 4
Table No. 4: Observation of trial-4 Chromatogram
|
S. No. |
Peak name |
RT |
Area |
USP plate count |
USP tailing |
USP resolution |
|
1 |
Brexpiprazole |
2.964 |
21234 |
4741.4 |
1.3 |
3.2 |
|
2 |
Oriconazole |
3.577 |
551182 |
5377.0 |
1.3 |
Observation: Both peaks exhibited excellent peak shape, retention time, and tailing-free elution.
Method Validation:
System suitability of Brexpiprazole
Table No. 5: System Suitability of Brexpiprazol
|
Sample Name |
File Name |
Analyte Area |
Analyte RT (min) |
ISTD Area |
ISTD RT (min) |
Area Ratio |
|
1 |
|
21779 |
2.96 |
555317 |
3.57 |
0.0392 |
|
2 |
|
21973 |
2.96 |
545537 |
3.58 |
0.0403 |
|
3 |
|
21581 |
2.96 |
564914 |
3.58 |
0.0382 |
|
4 |
|
21551 |
2.96 |
557846 |
3.58 |
0.0386 |
|
5 |
|
21614 |
2.96 |
545219 |
3.57 |
0.0396 |
|
6 |
|
21397 |
2.97 |
550566 |
3.58 |
0.0389 |
|
Mean |
|
2.963 |
|
3.575 |
0.03914 |
|
|
SD |
0.0017 |
0.0029 |
0.000744 |
|||
|
%CV |
0.06 |
0.08 |
1.90 |
|||
Auto sampler carryover of Brexpiprazole:
Table 6: Auto sampler carryover of brexpiprazole
|
Unextracted samples |
||||
|
RS |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
N/A |
|
AQ ULOQ |
45075 |
588364 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
RS |
0 |
0 |
||
|
AQ LLOQ |
1164 |
582577 |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Extracted samples |
||||
|
STD Blk |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
N/A |
|
ULOQ |
41245 |
552786 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
STD Blk |
0 |
0 |
||
|
LLOQ |
1064 |
554319 |
N/A |
N/A |
Matrix factor evaluation:
Table No. 7: Reviewing matrix factors in the absence of a matrix
|
Acquisition Batch ID |
|
Date |
|
|
S. No. |
Plasma Lot No. |
HQC |
LQC |
|
Nominal Concentration (ng/mL) |
|||
|
320.000 |
30.000 |
||
|
Nominal Concentration Range (ng/mL) |
|||
|
(272.000-368.000) |
(25.500-34.500) |
||
|
Calculated Concentration (ng/mL) |
|||
|
1 |
LOT1 |
319.10 |
29.71 |
|
313.15 |
29.85 |
||
|
315.20 |
29.95 |
||
|
2 |
LOT2 |
317.25 |
30.30 |
|
320.30 |
29.85 |
||
|
312.35 |
29.54 |
||
|
3 |
LOT3 |
319.40 |
29.95 |
|
317.45 |
30.45 |
||
|
319.50 |
30.85 |
||
|
4 |
LOT4 |
319.55 |
30.60 |
|
319.60 |
30.65 |
||
|
317.65 |
30.70 |
||
|
5 |
LOT5 |
320.70 |
30.75 |
|
323.75 |
30.10 |
||
|
321.80 |
30.85 |
||
|
6 |
LOT6 |
320.85 |
30.90 |
|
324.90 |
30.95 |
||
|
328.90 |
30.10 |
||
|
N |
18 |
18 |
|
|
Mean |
319.5222 |
30.3361 |
|
|
SD |
3.96730 |
0.46128 |
|
|
% CV |
1.24 |
1.52 |
|
|
% Mean Accuracy |
99.85 |
101.12 |
|
Quality control samples
Standard zero sample:
Fig. No. 2: Chromatogram of a calibration standard
QC-LLOQ
Fig. No. 3: The QC-LLOQ sample chromatogram
Brexpiprazole QC-LQC
Fig. No. 4: Brexpiprazole chromatogram from a QC-LQC sample
QC-MQC
Fig. No. 5: Sample chromatogram for QC-MQC
Brexpiprazole QC-HQC
Fig. No. 6: The Brexpiprazole QC-HQC sample chromatogram
1. Selectivity/Sensitivity:
Fig. No. 7: Obtaining a blank, standard sample
Fig. No. 8: Oriconazole Chromatogram (Internal standard)
Fig. No. 9: Brexpiprazole pure medication chromatogram)
2. Linearity:
Linearity of brexpiprazole
Table No. 8: Linearity of Brexpiprazole
|
Acquisition Batch ID |
STD1 |
STD2 |
STD3 |
STD4 |
STD5 |
STD6 |
STD7 |
STD8 |
|
Nominal Concentration (ng/mL) |
||||||||
|
10.000 |
20.000 |
30.000 |
160.000 |
200.000 |
240.000 |
320.000 |
400.000 |
|
|
Nominal Concentration Range (ng/mL) |
||||||||
|
(8.000- 12.000) |
(17.000- 23.000) |
(25.500- 34.500) |
(136.000- 184.000) |
(170.000- 230.000) |
(204.000- 276.000) |
(272.000- 368.000) |
(340.000- 460.000) |
|
|
Back Calculated Concentration (ng/mL) |
||||||||
|
P&A1 |
9.990 |
20.590 |
30.810 |
159.410 |
201.800 |
241.200 |
320.600 |
402.200 |
|
P&A2 |
9.861 |
20.600 |
30.910 |
159.350 |
202.500 |
240.600 |
319.500 |
401.800 |
|
P&A3 |
9.920 |
19.620 |
29.930 |
159.500 |
201.600 |
238.400 |
318.400 |
400.300 |
|
N |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|
Mean |
9.9237 |
20.2700 |
30.5500 |
159.4200 |
201.9667 |
240.0667 |
319.5000 |
401.4333 |
|
SD |
0.06458 |
0.56294 |
0.53926 |
0.07550 |
0.47258 |
1.47422 |
1.10000 |
1.00167 |
|
%CV |
0.65 |
2.78 |
1.77 |
0.05 |
0.23 |
0.61 |
0.34 |
0.25 |
|
% Mean Accuracy |
99.24 |
101.35 |
101.83 |
99.64 |
100.98 |
100.03 |
99.84 |
100.36 |
|
Final conc in µg/ml |
ISD(area) |
Drug(area) |
Area response ratio |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0.01 |
5559605 |
1088 |
0.0002 |
|
0.02 |
5515193 |
2023 |
0.0004 |
|
0.03 |
5524868 |
3251 |
0.0006 |
|
0.16 |
5506295 |
16812 |
0.0031 |
|
0.2 |
5590101 |
21292 |
0.0038 |
|
0.24 |
5501973 |
25103 |
0.0046 |
|
0.32 |
5581958 |
32351 |
0.0058 |
|
0.4 |
5596601 |
41038 |
0.0073 |
Accuracy (Brexpiprazole intra-day runs):
Table No. 9: Accurate information for Brexpiprazole runs performed within a day
|
Acquisition Batch ID |
Date |
HQC |
MQC1 |
LQC |
LLOQ QC |
|
Nominal Concentration (ng/mL) |
|||||
|
320.000 |
200.000 |
30.000 |
10.000 |
||
|
Nominal Concentration Range (ng/mL) |
|||||
|
(272.000- 368.000) |
(170.000- 230.000) |
(25.500- 34.500) |
(8.000- 12.000) |
||
|
Back Calculated Concentration (ng/mL) |
|||||
|
|
|
320.800 |
200.900 |
30.920 |
9.890 |
|
320.900 |
208.300 |
29.926 |
9.968 |
||
|
319.600 |
198.500 |
28.900 |
9.830 |
||
|
323.100 |
201.100 |
30.850 |
9.924 |
||
|
319.200 |
201.800 |
30.880 |
9.880 |
||
|
319.500 |
200.900 |
30.840 |
9.913 |
||
|
N |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
|
|
Mean |
320.5167 |
201.9167 |
30.3860 |
9.9008 |
|
|
SD |
1.44971 |
3.32170 |
0.82102 |
0.04640 |
|
|
%CV |
0.45 |
1.65 |
2.70 |
0.47 |
|
|
% Mean Accuracy |
100.16 |
100.96 |
101.29 |
99.01 |
|
|
|
|
318.800 |
201.800 |
30.900 |
9.930 |
|
319.700 |
199.100 |
29.910 |
9.980 |
||
|
320.600 |
201.200 |
30.920 |
9.922 |
||
|
321.500 |
206.300 |
30.860 |
9.995 |
||
|
323.100 |
209.700 |
30.880 |
9.810 |
||
|
318.800 |
201.600 |
30.830 |
9.968 |
||
|
N |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
|
|
Mean |
320.4167 |
203.2833 |
30.7167 |
9.9342 |
|
|
SD |
1.68216 |
3.92806 |
0.39642 |
0.06713 |
|
|
%CV |
0.52 |
1.93 |
1.29 |
0.68 |
|
|
% Mean Accuracy |
100.13 |
101.64 |
102.39 |
99.34 |
|
Fig No. 10: Intraday precision 1
Fig No. 12: Intraday precision 3
Precision (inter-day runs of Brexpiprazole):
Table No. 10: Precision data for inter-day runs of Brexpiprazole
|
|
|
319.600 |
205.100 |
30.880 |
10.308 |
|
319.800 |
201.500 |
30.940 |
10.320 |
||
|
320.720 |
206.300 |
29.860 |
10.400 |
||
|
320.200 |
202.800 |
31.880 |
10.290 |
||
|
320.400 |
204.600 |
30.910 |
10.310 |
||
|
317.500 |
201.900 |
30.930 |
9.850 |
||
|
N |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
|
|
Mean |
319.7033 |
203.7000 |
30.9000 |
10.2463 |
|
|
SD |
1.15242 |
1.91937 |
0.63953 |
0.19793 |
|
|
%CV |
0.36 |
0.94 |
2.07 |
1.93 |
|
|
% Mean Accuracy |
99.91 |
101.85 |
103.00 |
102.46 |
|
|
Between Batch Precision and Accuracy |
|||||
|
N |
18 |
18 |
18 |
18 |
|
|
Mean |
320.2122 |
202.9667 |
30.6676 |
10.0271 |
|
|
SD |
1.40708 |
3.07915 |
0.64240 |
0.19779 |
|
|
%CV |
0.44 |
1.52 |
2.09 |
1.97 |
|
|
% Mean Accuracy |
100.07 |
101.48 |
102.23 |
100.27 |
|
5. Recovery:
Recovery of brexpiprazole
Table No. 11: Recovery of Brexpiprazole
|
Replicate No. |
HQC |
MQC1 |
LQC |
|||
|
Un extracted Response |
Extracted Response |
Un extracted Response |
Extracted Response |
Un extracted Response |
Extracted Response |
|
|
1 |
33161 |
32553 |
21831 |
21705 |
3301 |
3268 |
|
2 |
33444 |
32510 |
22258 |
21332 |
3327 |
3285 |
|
3 |
32916 |
32568 |
21928 |
21290 |
3301 |
3293 |
|
4 |
33575 |
32533 |
21996 |
21662 |
3306 |
3266 |
|
5 |
32994 |
32625 |
22120 |
21642 |
3324 |
3277 |
|
6 |
33081 |
32462 |
22306 |
21208 |
3318 |
3299 |
|
N |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
|
Mean |
33195 |
32542 |
22073 |
21473 |
3313 |
3281 |
|
SD |
260.31 |
55.12 |
187.74 |
219.86 |
11.65 |
13.37 |
|
% CV |
0.78 |
0.17 |
0.85 |
1.02 |
0.35 |
0.41 |
|
% Mean Recovery |
98.03 |
97.28 |
99.05 |
|||
|
Overall % Mean Recovery |
98.121 |
|||||
|
Overall SD |
0.8871 |
|||||
|
Overall % CV |
0.90 |
|||||
Recovery - Internal standard
Table No. 12: Recovery of Oriconazole (IS)
|
S. No. |
Un extracted Area Ratio |
Extracted Area Ratio |
|
1 |
552924 |
555317 |
|
2 |
557866 |
545537 |
|
3 |
568364 |
564914 |
|
4 |
552577 |
557846 |
|
5 |
564590 |
545219 |
|
6 |
556620 |
550566 |
|
N |
6 |
6 |
|
Mean |
558823.5 |
553233.2 |
|
SD |
6385.43 |
7650.28 |
|
% CV |
1.14 |
1.38 |
|
% Mean Recovery |
99.00 |
|
6. Stabilities:
Long term stock solution stability
Table No. 13: Stability of Brexpiprazole (zero day)
|
S. No. |
Un extracted Area Ratio |
Extracted Area Ratio |
|
1 |
552924 |
555317 |
|
2 |
557866 |
545537 |
|
3 |
568364 |
564914 |
|
4 |
552577 |
557846 |
|
5 |
564590 |
545219 |
|
6 |
556620 |
550566 |
|
N |
6 |
6 |
|
Mean |
558823.5 |
553233.2 |
|
SD |
6385.43 |
7650.28 |
|
% CV |
1.14 |
1.38 |
|
% Mean Recovery |
99.00 |
|
Matrix samples stability at -28 ± 5?C for 37 days
Table No. 14: Matrix samples stability at -28 ± 5?C
|
Replicate No. |
HQC |
LQC |
||
|
Nominal Concentration (ng/mL) |
||||
|
320.000 |
320.000 |
30.000 |
30.000 |
|
|
Nominal Concentration Range (ng/mL) |
||||
|
(272.000- 368.000) |
(272.000- 368.000) |
(25.500- 34.500) |
(25.500- 34.500) |
|
|
Calculated Concentration (ng/mL) |
||||
|
Comparison Samples |
Stability Samples |
Comparison Samples |
Stability Samples |
|
|
1 |
320.65 |
320.42 |
30.896 |
30.956 |
|
2 |
319.66 |
320.51 |
30.936 |
30.925 |
|
3 |
319.62 |
320.99 |
27.931 |
29.912 |
|
4 |
323.55 |
319.65 |
28.865 |
29.861 |
|
5 |
320.52 |
319.61 |
33.839 |
30.842 |
|
6 |
321.47 |
320.64 |
30.915 |
30.850 |
|
N |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
|
Mean |
320.9117 |
320.3033 |
30.5637 |
30.5577 |
|
SD |
1.46489 |
0.55655 |
2.04532 |
0.52195 |
|
% CV |
0.46 |
0.17 |
6.69 |
1.71 |
|
%Mean Accuracy |
100.28 |
100.09 |
101.88 |
101.86 |
|
% Mean Stability |
99.81 |
99.98 |
||
Matrix samples stability at -80 ± 5?C for 37days
Table No. 15: Matrix samples stability at -80 ± 5?C for 37 days
|
Replicate No. |
HQC |
LQC |
||
|
Nominal Concentration (ng/mL) |
||||
|
320.000 |
320.000 |
30.000 |
30.000 |
|
|
Nominal Concentration Range (ng/mL) |
||||
|
(272.000- 368.000) |
(272.000- 368.000) |
(25.500- 34.500) |
(25.500- 34.500) |
|
|
Calculated Concentration (ng/mL) |
||||
|
Comparison Samples |
Stability Samples |
Comparison Samples |
Stability Samples |
|
|
1 |
320.610 |
321.650 |
29.929 |
29.925 |
|
2 |
319.620 |
322.630 |
28.942 |
28.945 |
|
3 |
319.780 |
318.680 |
32.901 |
29.955 |
|
4 |
319.580 |
320.550 |
31.870 |
29.862 |
|
5 |
318.980 |
324.530 |
28.866 |
32.910 |
|
6 |
319.503 |
320.420 |
30.818 |
30.851 |
|
N |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
|
Mean |
319.6788 |
321.4100 |
30.5543 |
30.4080 |
|
SD |
0.53100 |
2.02252 |
1.62163 |
1.36625 |
|
% CV |
0.17 |
0.63 |
5.31 |
4.49 |
|
%Mean Accuracy |
99.90 |
100.44 |
101.85 |
101.36 |
|
% Mean Stability |
100.54 |
99.52 |
||
CONCLUSION
A simple, precise, and accurate method was developed for the determination of Brexpiprazole in human plasma with Oriconazole as the internal standard. The results demonstrated that Brexpiprazole had a retention length of 2.964 minutes and a CV of 3.57%. A recovery percentage of 98.12% was calculated. Linearity is observed between 10 and 400 ng/mL, with a correlation value of 0.999. Both drugs may be present in plasma at concentrations below the quantifiable limits of 10ng/mL in humans. The ICH criteria were also used to validate the given approach, and it was found to be within the permitted range. The proposed method is perfect for therapeutic and pharmacokinetic drug monitoring in clinical laboratories due to its speed, ease, accuracy, and precision.
REFERENCES
Etikala Teja, Dr. S. Shobha Rani, Bioanalytical Method Development and Validation of Brexpiprazole in Human Plasma By RP-HPLC Method, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 11, 892-906 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17542471
10.5281/zenodo.17542471