View Article

  • Bioanalytical Method Development and Validation of Brexpiprazole in Human Plasma By RP-HPLC Method

  • Department of pharmaceutical Analysis, Centre for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Science and Technology, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Hyderabad, Kukatpally, Hyderabad, 500085, Telangana, India.

Abstract

A simple, accurate, and precise method for the quantification of brexpiprazole in human plasma was developed by using the RP-HPLC (Reverse phase-High performance Liquid Chromatographic) technology to construct an internal standard of oriconazole. The chromatographic parameters that were used were: With a buffered flow rate of 1.0 ml/min, a detection wavelength of 215 nm, and a column temperature of 30oC, the following parameters are used: stationary phase Phenomenex c18 (150 x 4.6 mm, 5?), mobile phase 0.01N potassium dihydrogen phosphate (pH: 4.8), and acetonitrile in a 60:40(v/v) ratio. The retention time of brexpiprazole was 2.964 minutes. The coefficient of variation (CV) for brexpiprazole is 3.57 percent. The proposed method was determined to be linear (r = 0.999) and to provide a recovery percentage of 98.12% over a concentration range of 10-400 ng/mL. The lowest concentration that could be detected was 10 ng/mL, which is within the range of what could be found in human plasma as a medicine. Further, validation in accordance with ICH standards confirmed that the claimed procedure was within the permissible range.

Keywords

Use of RP-HPLC, oriconazole, and brexpiprazole; adherence to ICH Guidelines for Method Development and Validation

Introduction

Brexpiprazole is a BCS class II type called (7-{4-[4- (1-benzothiophen-4-yl) piperazin-1-yl] butoxy} quinoline2(1H)-one is a new medication in psychiatric 1,2 and also in the treatment of depression which has a high affinity for monoamine neurotransmitters like serotonin, dopamine, and noradrenaline receptors, For other major depressive disorder like Alzheimer’s disease, schizophrenia 3,4 , neurobehavioral disorders 5 , combat disorder, bipolar disorder treatment, adjunctive treatment it is mostly used. It has more potency than other antipsychotic drugs with little aqueous solubility and substantial intestinal permeability. 6,7 Brexpiprazole was originally approved in the United States in July 2015 for use as an adjunctive action for major depressive disorder (MDD) and schizophrenia. 9 Antipsychotics are first and second-generation drugs that are mainly active as D2 receptor antagonists. 10,11 Brexpiprazole acts as a partial agonist of the serotonin 5-HT1A receptor and the dopamine D2 and D3 receptors. Partial agonists have both blocking properties and stimulating properties at the receptor they bind to. The ratio of blocking activity to stimulating activity determines a portion of its clinical effects. . 12 brexpiprazole is a substrate of CYP2D6 and CYP3A4, like its predecessor aripiprazole. A simple, accurate, and precise method for the quantification of brexpiprazole in human plasma was developed by using the RP-HPLC (Reverse phase-High performance Liquid Chromatographic) technology to construct an internal standard of oriconazole.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MATERIALS:

  1. API:
  2. Jai Ram Biosciences generously provided a sample of brexpiprazole API.
  3. Human plasma:

Table No. 1: Human plasma

K2 EDTA control plasma

Deccan Pathological labs, Hyderabad

4. Chemicals:

Table No. 2: Chemicals and Solvents

S. No.

Chemical name

Grade

Manufacturing company

1

Distilled water HPLC water

HPLC

Rankem, Avantor performance material India limited

2

HPLC water

Analytical Reagent

Rankem, Avantor performance material India limited

3

Acetonitrile

Analytical Reagent

Rankem, Avantor performance material India limited

4

Phosphate buffer

Analytical Reagent

Rankem, Avantor performance material India limited

5

Methanol

Analytical Reagent

Rankem, Avantor performance material India limited

6

Sodium dihydrogen phosphate

Analytical Reagent

Rankem, Avantor performance material India limited

3.  Instruments:

Table No. 3: Instruments and Equipment’s

S. No.

Instrument

Company name

Brand name

1

Electronic balance

Sartorious

Denver

2

pH meter

Metsar

BVK enterprises

3

Sonicator

Lab man

BVK enterprises

4

Centrifuge

Thermo Fisher

-

5

Vertex

Remi CM101

-

6

HPLC water

Alliance

Water HPLC 2695 SYSTEM

Method Development:

Diluent: In order to ensure that the medications would dissolve properly, we used a diluent consisting of 0.1% orthophosphoric acid and 50% acetonitrile.

How to make a stock solution of brexpiprazole (100 µg/ml):

Make a solution of 10 mg of Brexpiprazole in 100 ml of volumetric flask to achieve a concentration of 100 µg/ml...

Preparation of Brexpiprazole Spiking Solutions (0.010 µg/ml to 0.4µg/ml):

Brexpiprazole was generated from the stock solution at the following concentrations: 0.1 µg/ml, 0.2 µg/ml, 0.3 µg/ml, 1.6 µg/ml, 2.00 µg/ml, 2.4 µg/ml, 3.2 µg/ml, and 4.0 µg/ml.  The eight 10-milliliter volumetric flasks were thereafter filled to the top with diluent. Calibration standards and quality control (QC) samples were prepared by spiking blank plasma with analyte dilutions from working stocks at concentrations of 10, 20, 30, 160, 200, 240, 320, plus 400 ng/ml, respectively.

Preparation of internal standard Solution (oriconazole):

Stock-1: Put 5 mg of Oriconazole into 100 mL of volumetric flask and dilute it until the volume reaches 50 mg per mL.

Stock-2: Dilute the solution to a concentration of 5µg/ml by adding 1 millilitre to a 10-milliliter volumetric flask from the previous solution..

Final concentration: To achieve an ISD concentration of 1µg/ml, 0.5 ml of the solution from the preceding stage should be mixed with blank plasma using working stock dilutions of the analyte.

Extraction procedure

Put 750µl of plasma, 500µl of internal standard, 250µl of Brexpiprazole from both spiking solutions, and 1 ml of acetonitrile into a centrifuging tube.  Stir for another 15 seconds.   Next, vertex for 2 minutes after spinning for 5 minutes at 3200 rpm.   After the centrifugation process, gently add 10 µ L of the filtered sample to the HPLC directly.

There was a 15-second mixing period between 250µl of Brexpiprazole, 500µl of internal standard, and 750µl of plasma.   acetonitrile and a chemical blender for two minutes. Node set Drain by spinning the mixture at 3200 rpm for 5 minutes.   Collecting a specimen from the liquid above  Using a 0.45µ filter constructed of polyvinylidene difluoride or polyvinylidene fluoride, squeeze the sample out.   Put 20 µ L into the HPLC.

Trial (optimized method):

Chromatographic conditions

Phase of mobility: 0.01 nanoohms A 60:40 mixture of acetonitrile and potassium dihydrogen phosphate at a pH of 4.8, with a flow rate of one millilitre per minute. Applying a Phenomenex c18 column (150 x 4.6 mm, 5 ?).   Detector beam width: 215 nanometres. Column temperature: 300 °C   Two thousand three hundred microlitres is the prescribed injection volume.

Six minutes, tops

Resolved: 0.01%   This is a 2:5 solution of potassium dihydrogen phosphate in acetonitrile.

Table No: 10 and Figure No: 4 show the trial's outcomes.

Method Validation:

System Suitability:

All indicators for system appropriateness were adequate and within the permitted range, as per ICH requirements. During the system compatibility test, the percentage CVs for retention time (RT) and area ratio (analyte area/IS area) were in the range of 0.06 to 0.08. This is because the auto-sampler was fed a cocktail of extracted and unextracted samples for analysis.   The results of this experiment did not show any evidence of carryover..

Matrix factor evaluation:

The matrix impact is a key component in assessing pharmacokinetic studies.   The internal standard normalised matrix factor, which was close to 1, varied from 0.90 to 0.99, indicating that plasma samples do not show any ionisation suppression or augmentation.

Quality control samples:

  1. The chromatography observed during the period of Brexpiprazole was good, as shown in Figures 5-9, which present example chromatograms of the standard zero, QC-LLOQ, QC-MQC, and QC-HQC samples, respectively.
  2. Selectivity/Specificity:

By examining the retention time of Brexpiprazole and the internal standard for interference with the endogenous plasma components, we validated the approach and demonstrated its selectivity.   The mass detection of the extracted blank plasma demonstrated good drug and internal standard selectivity in six sets of K2EDTA blank plasma that were evaluated for selectivity.   No interferences were detected that would have altered the retention periods of the analytes or the internal standard.   Below are chromatograms illustrating the internal standard sample made up of pooled plasma, as well as the standard blank prepared using a representative sample.   This result is shown in Figures 10 and 12...

  1. Linearity:

The calibration curve for Brexpiprazole was found to be linear from 10 to 400 ng/mL.   The coefficient of correlation (r2) was more than 0.999 in every case.   It appears that the results are linear because the peak area ratios are strongly related for all analyte concentrations.

  1. The third accuracy and precision batch acquired a typical calibration curve, as shown in Figure 25.   In Table 14, Figure 13–21, we can see the combined results of the three calibration curves' concentrations that were back-calculated..

Section 4: Accuracy & Precision:

  1. We were able to evaluate the precision and accuracy both within and between days by analysing six replicates at five different QC levels (LLOQ, LQC, MQC, and HQC).   Using six replicate analyses, the procedure's precision and accuracy were evaluated at four distinct concentrations: 10ng/ml (LLOQ), 30ng/ml (LQC), 200ng/ml (MQC), and 320ng/ml (HQC).   When evaluating the accuracy of plasma samples, we found that intraday accuracy ranged from 99.91% to 103.000% and interday accuracy ranged from 100.07% to 102.23%, both of which are excellent.   Intraday, the precision of the analyte ranged from 0.36 percent to 2.07 percent, and interday, the precision of the plasma sample ranged from 0.4 percent to 2.09 percent.   For a rundown of the findings, see Tables 15 and 16, as well as Figures 22–27..
  2. Recovery: Extracting blank plasma spiked with standards containing the same area with a known dose of Brexpiprazole allowed us to estimate recovery, as did measuring the peak areas of prepared plasma samples.   It was found that the overall mean recovery rate with Brexpiprazole was 98.12%.
  3. The results for Brexpiprazole at three distinct QC concentration levels are summarised in Table No. 17.
  4. A recovery rate of 99.00% was found for Oriconazole overall.   Table 18 provides a synopsis of the Oriconazole recovery results.  12.  Main Ideas:
  5.  How long does the stock solution of Brexpiprazole remain effective?   On a bench top, six distinct LQC and HQC samples were evaluated for stability, with concentrations of 30 and 320 ng/ml, respectively.
  6. The experiment was conducted in a controlled atmosphere for 9 hours on the benchtop.   In terms of mean stability, 100.78% was calculated for LQC and 101.18% for HQC.   Table 19 showed this result.Matrix samples' stability at room temperature for 37 days and at -80 ± 5°C.
  7. A 37-day period of refrigeration at -28°C and -80°C proved that the Brexpiprazole stock solution maintained its long-term stability at a concentration of LQC-HQC.   At 28 ± 5°C, the average stability of Brexpiprazole was found to be 100.28%, 100.05% & 101.88%, 101.86, and at the same temperature, 99.90%, 100.44% & 101.85%, 101.36—respectively.
  8. The long-term stability of Brexpiprazole is shown in Tables 20, 21.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

Method Development:

The following conditions were considered when developing the method for determining Brexpiprazole: drug solubility; PKA value; and compliance with current ICH standards.

Trial 4 (optimized method):

Fig No. 1: Chromatogram of trial 4

Table No. 4: Observation of trial-4 Chromatogram

S. No.

Peak name

RT

Area

USP

plate count

USP

tailing

USP

resolution

1

Brexpiprazole

2.964

21234

4741.4

1.3

 

3.2

2

Oriconazole

3.577

551182

5377.0

1.3

Observation: Both peaks exhibited excellent peak shape, retention time, and tailing-free elution.

Method Validation:

System suitability of Brexpiprazole

Table No. 5: System Suitability of Brexpiprazol

Sample Name

File Name

Analyte Area

Analyte RT (min)

ISTD

Area

ISTD

RT (min)

Area Ratio

1

 

21779

2.96

555317

3.57

0.0392

2

 

21973

2.96

545537

3.58

0.0403

3

 

21581

2.96

564914

3.58

0.0382

4

 

21551

2.96

557846

3.58

0.0386

5

 

21614

2.96

545219

3.57

0.0396

6

 

21397

2.97

550566

3.58

0.0389

Mean

 

2.963

 

3.575

0.03914

SD

0.0017

0.0029

0.000744

%CV

0.06

0.08

1.90

Auto sampler carryover of Brexpiprazole:

Table 6: Auto sampler carryover of brexpiprazole

Unextracted samples

RS

0

0

N/A

N/A

AQ ULOQ

45075

588364

0.00

0.00

RS

0

0

AQ LLOQ

1164

582577

N/A

N/A

Extracted samples

STD Blk

0

0

N/A

N/A

ULOQ

41245

552786

0.00

0.00

STD Blk

0

0

LLOQ

1064

554319

N/A

N/A

Matrix factor evaluation:

Table No. 7: Reviewing matrix factors in the absence of a matrix

Acquisition Batch ID

 

Date

 

S. No.

Plasma Lot No.

HQC

LQC

Nominal Concentration (ng/mL)

320.000

30.000

Nominal Concentration Range (ng/mL)

(272.000-368.000)

(25.500-34.500)

Calculated Concentration (ng/mL)

1

LOT1

319.10

29.71

313.15

29.85

315.20

29.95

2

LOT2

317.25

30.30

320.30

29.85

312.35

29.54

3

LOT3

319.40

29.95

317.45

30.45

319.50

30.85

4

LOT4

319.55

30.60

319.60

30.65

317.65

30.70

5

LOT5

320.70

30.75

323.75

30.10

321.80

30.85

6

LOT6

320.85

30.90

324.90

30.95

328.90

30.10

N

18

18

Mean

319.5222

30.3361

SD

3.96730

0.46128

% CV

1.24

1.52

% Mean Accuracy

99.85

101.12

Quality control samples

Standard zero sample:

Fig. No. 2: Chromatogram of a calibration standard

QC-LLOQ

Fig. No. 3: The QC-LLOQ sample chromatogram

Brexpiprazole QC-LQC

Fig. No. 4: Brexpiprazole chromatogram from a QC-LQC sample

QC-MQC

Fig. No. 5: Sample chromatogram for QC-MQC

Brexpiprazole QC-HQC

Fig. No. 6: The Brexpiprazole QC-HQC sample chromatogram

1. Selectivity/Sensitivity:

Fig. No. 7: Obtaining a blank, standard sample

Fig. No. 8: Oriconazole Chromatogram (Internal standard)

Fig. No. 9: Brexpiprazole pure medication chromatogram)

2. Linearity:

Linearity of brexpiprazole

Table No. 8: Linearity of Brexpiprazole

Acquisition Batch ID

STD1

STD2

STD3

STD4

STD5

STD6

STD7

STD8

Nominal Concentration (ng/mL)

10.000

20.000

30.000

160.000

200.000

240.000

320.000

400.000

Nominal Concentration Range (ng/mL)

(8.000-

12.000)

(17.000-

23.000)

(25.500-

34.500)

(136.000-

184.000)

(170.000-

230.000)

(204.000-

276.000)

(272.000-

368.000)

(340.000-

460.000)

Back Calculated Concentration (ng/mL)

P&A1

9.990

20.590

30.810

159.410

201.800

241.200

320.600

402.200

P&A2

9.861

20.600

30.910

159.350

202.500

240.600

319.500

401.800

P&A3

9.920

19.620

29.930

159.500

201.600

238.400

318.400

400.300

N

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

Mean

9.9237

20.2700

30.5500

159.4200

201.9667

240.0667

319.5000

401.4333

SD

0.06458

0.56294

0.53926

0.07550

0.47258

1.47422

1.10000

1.00167

%CV

0.65

2.78

1.77

0.05

0.23

0.61

0.34

0.25

% Mean Accuracy

99.24

101.35

101.83

99.64

100.98

100.03

99.84

100.36

                                    

Final conc in µg/ml

ISD(area)

Drug(area)

Area response ratio

0

0

0

0

0.01

5559605

1088

0.0002

0.02

5515193

2023

0.0004

0.03

5524868

3251

0.0006

0.16

5506295

16812

0.0031

0.2

5590101

21292

0.0038

0.24

5501973

25103

0.0046

0.32

5581958

32351

0.0058

0.4

5596601

41038

0.0073

Accuracy (Brexpiprazole intra-day runs):

Table No. 9: Accurate information for Brexpiprazole runs performed within a day

Acquisition Batch ID

Date

HQC

MQC1

LQC

LLOQ QC

Nominal Concentration (ng/mL)

320.000

200.000

30.000

10.000

Nominal Concentration Range (ng/mL)

(272.000-

368.000)

(170.000-

230.000)

(25.500-

34.500)

(8.000-

12.000)

Back Calculated Concentration (ng/mL)

 

 

320.800

200.900

30.920

9.890

320.900

208.300

29.926

9.968

319.600

198.500

28.900

9.830

323.100

201.100

30.850

9.924

319.200

201.800

30.880

9.880

319.500

200.900

30.840

9.913

N

6

6

6

6

Mean

320.5167

201.9167

30.3860

9.9008

SD

1.44971

3.32170

0.82102

0.04640

%CV

0.45

1.65

2.70

0.47

% Mean Accuracy

100.16

100.96

101.29

99.01

 

 

318.800

201.800

30.900

9.930

319.700

199.100

29.910

9.980

320.600

201.200

30.920

9.922

321.500

206.300

30.860

9.995

323.100

209.700

30.880

9.810

318.800

201.600

30.830

9.968

N

6

6

6

6

Mean

320.4167

203.2833

30.7167

9.9342

SD

1.68216

3.92806

0.39642

0.06713

%CV

0.52

1.93

1.29

0.68

% Mean Accuracy

100.13

101.64

102.39

99.34

Fig No. 10: Intraday precision 1

Fig No. 12: Intraday precision 3

Precision (inter-day runs of Brexpiprazole):

Table No. 10: Precision data for inter-day runs of Brexpiprazole

 

 

319.600

205.100

30.880

10.308

319.800

201.500

30.940

10.320

320.720

206.300

29.860

10.400

320.200

202.800

31.880

10.290

320.400

204.600

30.910

10.310

317.500

201.900

30.930

9.850

N

6

6

6

6

Mean

319.7033

203.7000

30.9000

10.2463

SD

1.15242

1.91937

0.63953

0.19793

%CV

0.36

0.94

2.07

1.93

% Mean Accuracy

99.91

101.85

103.00

102.46

Between Batch Precision and Accuracy

N

18

18

18

18

Mean

320.2122

202.9667

30.6676

10.0271

SD

1.40708

3.07915

0.64240

0.19779

%CV

0.44

1.52

2.09

1.97

% Mean Accuracy

100.07

101.48

102.23

100.27

5. Recovery:

Recovery of brexpiprazole

Table No. 11: Recovery of Brexpiprazole

 

Replicate No.

HQC

MQC1

LQC

Un extracted Response

Extracted Response

Un extracted Response

Extracted Response

Un extracted Response

Extracted Response

1

33161

32553

21831

21705

3301

3268

2

33444

32510

22258

21332

3327

3285

3

32916

32568

21928

21290

3301

3293

4

33575

32533

21996

21662

3306

3266

5

32994

32625

22120

21642

3324

3277

6

33081

32462

22306

21208

3318

3299

N

6

6

6

6

6

6

Mean

33195

32542

22073

21473

3313

3281

SD

260.31

55.12

187.74

219.86

11.65

13.37

% CV

0.78

0.17

0.85

1.02

0.35

0.41

% Mean

Recovery

98.03

97.28

99.05

Overall %

Mean Recovery

98.121

Overall SD

0.8871

Overall % CV

0.90

Recovery - Internal standard

Table No. 12: Recovery of Oriconazole (IS)

S. No.

Un extracted Area Ratio

Extracted Area Ratio

1

552924

555317

2

557866

545537

3

568364

564914

4

552577

557846

5

564590

545219

6

556620

550566

N

6

6

Mean

558823.5

553233.2

SD

6385.43

7650.28

% CV

1.14

1.38

% Mean Recovery

99.00

6. Stabilities:

Long term stock solution stability

Table No. 13: Stability of Brexpiprazole (zero day)

S. No.

Un extracted Area Ratio

Extracted Area Ratio

1

552924

555317

2

557866

545537

3

568364

564914

4

552577

557846

5

564590

545219

6

556620

550566

N

6

6

Mean

558823.5

553233.2

SD

6385.43

7650.28

% CV

1.14

1.38

% Mean Recovery

99.00

Matrix samples stability at -28 ± 5?C for 37 days

Table No. 14: Matrix samples stability at -28 ± 5?C

Replicate No.

HQC

LQC

Nominal Concentration (ng/mL)

320.000

320.000

30.000

30.000

Nominal Concentration Range (ng/mL)

(272.000-

368.000)

(272.000-

368.000)

(25.500-

34.500)

(25.500-

34.500)

Calculated Concentration (ng/mL)

Comparison Samples

Stability Samples

Comparison Samples

Stability Samples

1

320.65

320.42

30.896

30.956

2

319.66

320.51

30.936

30.925

3

319.62

320.99

27.931

29.912

4

323.55

319.65

28.865

29.861

5

320.52

319.61

33.839

30.842

6

321.47

320.64

30.915

30.850

N

6

6

6

6

Mean

320.9117

320.3033

30.5637

30.5577

SD

1.46489

0.55655

2.04532

0.52195

% CV

0.46

0.17

6.69

1.71

%Mean Accuracy

100.28

100.09

101.88

101.86

% Mean Stability

99.81

99.98

Matrix samples stability at -80 ± 5?C for 37days

Table No. 15: Matrix samples stability at -80 ± 5?C for 37 days

Replicate No.

HQC

LQC

Nominal Concentration (ng/mL)

320.000

320.000

30.000

30.000

Nominal Concentration Range (ng/mL)

(272.000-

368.000)

(272.000-

368.000)

(25.500-

34.500)

(25.500-

34.500)

Calculated Concentration (ng/mL)

Comparison Samples

Stability Samples

Comparison Samples

Stability Samples

1

320.610

321.650

29.929

29.925

2

319.620

322.630

28.942

28.945

3

319.780

318.680

32.901

29.955

4

319.580

320.550

31.870

29.862

5

318.980

324.530

28.866

32.910

6

319.503

320.420

30.818

30.851

N

6

6

6

6

Mean

319.6788

321.4100

30.5543

30.4080

SD

0.53100

2.02252

1.62163

1.36625

% CV

0.17

0.63

5.31

4.49

%Mean Accuracy

99.90

100.44

101.85

101.36

% Mean Stability

100.54

99.52

CONCLUSION

A simple, precise, and accurate method was developed for the determination of Brexpiprazole in human plasma with Oriconazole as the internal standard.   The results demonstrated that Brexpiprazole had a retention length of 2.964 minutes and a CV of 3.57%.   A recovery percentage of 98.12% was calculated.   Linearity is observed between 10 and 400 ng/mL, with a correlation value of 0.999.   Both drugs may be present in plasma at concentrations below the quantifiable limits of 10ng/mL in humans.   The ICH criteria were also used to validate the given approach, and it was found to be within the permitted range.   The proposed method is perfect for therapeutic and pharmacokinetic drug monitoring in clinical laboratories due to its speed, ease, accuracy, and precision.

REFERENCES

  1. Karol Connors.  The third edition of A Textbook of Pharmaceutical Analysis, published by Wiley Interscience Inc. in Delhi in 1994, includes pages 373–421.
  2.  From pages 2.566 to 2.638 of Instrumental Methods of Chemical Analysis, Gurdeep R. Chatwal and Sham K. Anand (2007).
  3.  International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH), Text and Methodology for Validation of Analytical Procedures.  International Forum on Product and Market Harmonisation, IFPMA, Geneva, since 1996.
  4.  The Gold Book, Vol. 2 of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry.
  5.  Section 5. of the PAC69, 1137 (1997).  In computational drug design, there is a glossary of terminology that are recommended by the IUPAC.
  6.  In the 2018 Journal of Chromatographic Science, published in volume 56, issue 8, pages 702–708, Qiaogen Zou, Ran Yan, Wei Liu, and Ping Wei presented a validated method for quantifying brexpiprazole in canine plasma.
  7.   “Quantitative Determination of Brexpiprazole by RP-HPLC Method” (Veera S. Pulusu1, Krishna C.).  "Pharm Anal Acta" (2019, 10:610).
  8.  Using the UV-Visible Spectroscopic and SIAM RP-LC Method, the authors Thakkar, Chhalotiya, Parekh, Desai, and colleagues were able to quantify brexpiprazole in both its bulk and pharmaceutical dosage form.  The article was published in the journal Austin Chromatogr. in 2018 with the DOI (1050).

Reference

  1. Karol Connors.  The third edition of A Textbook of Pharmaceutical Analysis, published by Wiley Interscience Inc. in Delhi in 1994, includes pages 373–421.
  2.  From pages 2.566 to 2.638 of Instrumental Methods of Chemical Analysis, Gurdeep R. Chatwal and Sham K. Anand (2007).
  3.  International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH), Text and Methodology for Validation of Analytical Procedures.  International Forum on Product and Market Harmonisation, IFPMA, Geneva, since 1996.
  4.  The Gold Book, Vol. 2 of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry.
  5.  Section 5. of the PAC69, 1137 (1997).  In computational drug design, there is a glossary of terminology that are recommended by the IUPAC.
  6.  In the 2018 Journal of Chromatographic Science, published in volume 56, issue 8, pages 702–708, Qiaogen Zou, Ran Yan, Wei Liu, and Ping Wei presented a validated method for quantifying brexpiprazole in canine plasma.
  7.   “Quantitative Determination of Brexpiprazole by RP-HPLC Method” (Veera S. Pulusu1, Krishna C.).  "Pharm Anal Acta" (2019, 10:610).
  8.  Using the UV-Visible Spectroscopic and SIAM RP-LC Method, the authors Thakkar, Chhalotiya, Parekh, Desai, and colleagues were able to quantify brexpiprazole in both its bulk and pharmaceutical dosage form.  The article was published in the journal Austin Chromatogr. in 2018 with the DOI (1050).

Photo
Etikala Teja
Corresponding author

Department of pharmaceutical Analysis, Centre for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Science and Technology, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Hyderabad, Kukatpally, Hyderabad, 500085, Telangana, India.

Photo
Dr. S. Shobha Rani
Co-author

Department of pharmaceutical Analysis, Centre for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Science and Technology, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Hyderabad, Kukatpally, Hyderabad, 500085, Telangana, India.

Etikala Teja, Dr. S. Shobha Rani, Bioanalytical Method Development and Validation of Brexpiprazole in Human Plasma By RP-HPLC Method, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 11, 892-906 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17542471

More related articles
Simultaneous Quantification of Sofosbuvir & Ledipa...
Amgoth Raj Kumar, Dr. M. Ajitha, ...
Analytical Method Development and Validation of UV...
Hemal Tandel, Vishwa Patel, Yash Bhimani,, ...
Formulation And Evaluation of Mouth Ulcer Gel...
Shinde Aishwary, Sachin Bhalekar, Ganesh Lamkhed, Choudhari Shrawani, Gadekar Sainath, Dr. Sachin Bh...
Phytochemical and Pharmacological Evaluation of Capsicum Annuum ...
Pratibha Verma, Suresh Kumar Nair, Manoj Kumar Mishra, Arvind Kumar Shrivastava, ...
Formulation And Evolution of Anti-Hemorrhoidal Cream by Using Ricinus Communis L...
Abhay Shinde, Anand Shinde, Ganesh Shinde, Mohini Shinde, Priyanka Shinde, Ashwini Gaikwad, ...
Related Articles
Nutritive Values, Preliminary Phytochemical and Physiochemical Screening of Plan...
Ganesh Salunke, Dr. Sachin Bhalekar, Ganesh Lamkhade, Sudarshan Shelke, Aditya Thorat, ...
A Comprehensive Review on the Formulation and Evaluation of Biphasic Herbal Pain...
Pratik Kale, Ganesh Sapkal, Ram Gawanjal, Rushikesh Poke, Rohan Dhanve, Munjaji Dhawale, Prasad Khan...
Recent Trends in Vaccine Development...
Neha Pawar, Rajshree Patil , Manasi Borse , Mayuri Shinde , Yogesh Chaudhari, ...