View Article

Abstract

CRISPR- Cas systems are a new game-changer in genetic engineering conceptually, as a technique that has much improved speed, specificity, and ease of use for editing genes. The impact of CRISPR has moved quickly from genotyping at your bench and research trials to now in clinical trials as a tool for moving forward with precision medicine. Precision medicine enables targeted therapies based on one's own genetics, environment, and lifestyle in the hopes of maximizing benefit, while limiting the side effects of therapy. CRISPR enables these types of therapies with various approaches including the ability to directly modify the targeted gene that is causing disease, to the use of personalized cellular therapies, and the ability to create patient-specific models of the disease allowing for drug testing. This review highlights CRISPR for the core mechanisms involved and its potential for use in treating monogenic disorders, cancer, and infectious diseases, and its use for drug discovery. The review presents important challenges, including off target effects and limitations to effective delivery and ethical considerations. Continuing innovations are mentioned as prime editing is described and CRISPR-based diagnostics are first discussed. Over time CRISPR is apparently not only redefining therapeutic horizons but is also setting a new expectation for personalized medicine.

Keywords

CRISPR- Cas, Gene Editing, Precision Medicine, Personalized Therapy

Introduction

Precision medicine reflects a radical paradigm change in health care by providing targeted treatment based on a person's genetic background, environment, and lifestyle. This differs from standard health care approaches that convey a standard, or "one-size-fits-all" approach, also known as the "trial and error" approach. Precision medicine's aim is to provide the right patient, the right treatment, at the right time. The emergence of high-throughput gene-editing technologies has enabled the push towards precision medicine, and the CRISPR-Cas system has gained unprecedented attention due to its efficiency, precision, and versatility. CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) was originally discovered in bacterial genomes as part of their adaptive immune systems, and has since been harnessed as a powerful genome-editing tool. The CRISPR-Cas9 system is the most utilized genome editing system among the different types of CRISPR systems. The Cas9 nuclease is directed to a specific genomic location by a guide RNA (gRNA) and generates a double-stranded break in the DNA. The precise editing provided by CRISPR has proffered additions to the treatment of genetic disorders, cancer treatment, and other rare diseases as part of individualized therapy. Recent developments illustrate the potential of CRISPR not only as a gene -correcting device but also as a platform for cell-based therapies, identifying drug targets, and functional genomics. CRISPR -based platforms have even emerged as acceptable avenues for use in clinical trials aimed at ailments like sickle cell disease, β-thalassemia, and even various cancers. Newly evolving classes of CRISPR, such as prime editing, base editing, and RNA - targeting systems (e.g., Cas13), allow for even greater possibilities not only for gene correction, but also for a more general account of personalization of medicine through safer and more versatile therapy. This review provides a broad overview of underlying mechanisms of CRISPR, investigates CRISPR as a fundamental re-describing of precision medicine, discusses relevant therapeutic applications in disease, pharmacological approaches, delivery, and ethics considerations. Recent developments and ongoing clinical trials with CRISPR underscore how CRISPR is leading a new era for personalized medicine. [1-2]

  1. CRISPR Technology: An Overview

CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) is a natural defense system that bacteria and archaea use to identify and eliminate invading viral DNA. Recently, scientists have turned this system into a revolutionary gene-editing mechanism that allows researchers to target and alter genomic DNA with precision across organisms, including humans.

The most commonly used CRISPR system is CRISPR-Cas9, which consists of two components:

  • Cas9 endonuclease: The endonuclease that makes a double-stranded break (DSB) at the target DNA sequence.
  • Guide RNA (gRNA): A synthetic RNA that directs Cas9 to specific site in the genome by complementary base pairing.[3]

Fig 1: - Mechanism of CRISPR-Cas Systems

Ater Cas9 makes a cut, the cell's normal DNA repair mechanisms are invoked. This results in one of two outcomes:

  • Non-Homologous End Joining (NHEJ): An imprecise, error-prone DNA repair method because it may introduce small persistence or deletions (indels) which can leads to gene knockout
  • Homology-Directed Repair (HDR): A more accurate DNA repair method, using donor DNA templates, which could be used to insert specific sequence allowing gene correction or insertion.[4]
    1. Evolution of CRISPR Systems

An overview of the CRISPR-associated enzymes that allow different types of editing:

  • Cas12a (Cpf1): Creates blunt cuts in DNA and requires a different PAM sequence (TTTV instead of NGG).
  • Cas13: Can target and degrade RNA which opens up features and applications for post-transcriptional regulation, and sequencing applications for targeting viral RNA.
  • dCas9 (dead Cas9): A catalytically inactive form of Cas9 which can be fused to other proteins. This allows you to regulate gene expression and not cut DNA.[5]

2.2 Advantages Over Previous Gene-Editing Tools

Compared to prior technologies such as Zinc Finger Nucleases (ZFNs) and TALENs, CRISPR has which   includes More straightforward design and programming ,Greater efficiency and value ,Potential for multiplexing (the ability to edit multiple genes at the same time. These advantages make CRISPR an attractive platform for major advancements in both basic research and clinical translation in the field of precision medicine.

  1. Role Of Crispr in Precision Medicine

Precision medicine is intended to adjust the healthcare model to each patient based on their own genetic makeup, susceptibility to diseases, and the response to treatment. The CRISPR-Cas system provides an important new tool that addresses this method of personalized medicine directly by allowing for modification of genetic material with precision to edit, regulate, or disrupt, functional human genes and it provides greater accuracy for researcher and scientist to design therapies specific to the patients.[6-7]

    1. CRISPR and Genetic Profiling

One of the mainstays of precision medicine is the understanding of the genetic basis of disease. CRISPR allows for this understanding by the Distinguish gene-disease relationships through knockout or knock-in experiments in cell lines and animal models & To create models that are patient-derived to study the mutations and drug response in diseases like Cystic Fibrosis and Duchenne muscular dystrophy & to find biomarkers through high-throughput CRISPR screens to identify response to treatment or drug resistance.[8-9]

3.2 Tailored Therapeutic Interventions

CRISPR enables personalized treatments including as the Correction of pathogenic mutations at the DNA level, in many cases for monogenic diseases such as sickle-cell Anemia and β-thalassemia. Enhancement of immune cells (e.g. CRISPR-edited CAR-T cells) and increase in specificity to target cancer cells. Gene regulation therapy using a dCas9-fusion protein to either switch on or off the expression of genes without changing the DNA sequence itself.[10]

    1. Advantages of CRISPR in Precision Medicine

Table 1:- Advantages of CRISPR in precision medicine

Feature

Contribution to Precision Medicine

High specificity

Reduces off-target effects, ensuring safe gene correction

Versatile targeting

Customizable for DNA, RNA, or epigenetic modulation

Scalability

Allows for personalized, yet broadly applicable therapies

Speed and cost-efficiency

Accelerates development of gene-based treatments

    1. Real-World Clinical Applications

CRISPR-based precision medicine is already moving into clinical trials:

  • CTX001: An ex vivo CRISPR-based therapy for sickle cell disease and β-thalassemia, co-developed by Vertex Pharmaceuticals and CRISPR Therapeutics.
  • Edit-101: In vivo CRISPR therapy targeting the CEP290 gene for Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA10), a rare genetic eye disorder.
  • CAR-T cell modifications: Using CRISPR to improve immune cell specificity in cancer immunotherapy.[11-12]
  1. CRISPR Applications in Disease Treatment

CRISPR-Cas systems are currently under investigation as therapeutic agents for many different diseases, particularly in therapeutic approaches where standard remedies are ineffective or less specific. Because CRISPR-Cas can correct, silence, or regulating disease-causing genes it is a game-changing tool in the movement towards precision medicine. In this section we will highlight CRISPR's most salient applications in monogenic genetic disorders, cancer, and infectious diseases.[13]

4.1 Monogenic Genetic Disorders

Monogenic diseases, caused by mutations in a single gene, are ideal candidates for CRISPR-based correction due to their well-defined genetic basis.

Table 2: - Monogenic Genetic Disorders

Disease

Target Gene

CRISPR Strategy

Status

Sickle Cell Disease

HBB

Reactivation of fetal hemoglobin or correction of point mutation

Clinical trials (CTX001)

β-Thalassemia

HBB

Disruption of BCL11A to increase HbF

Phase I/II trials

Leber Congenital Amaurosis

CEP290

In vivo CRISPR editing in retinal cells

EDIT-101, clinical trial

Cystic Fibrosis

CFTR

Gene correction in airway epithelial cells

Preclinical

Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

DMD

Exon skipping to restore functional dystrophin

Preclinical

Notable Example:

  • CTX001 by CRISPR Therapeutics and Vertex: A one-time ex vivo CRISPR therapy for β-thalassemia and sickle cell anaemia has shown durable therapeutic response in early-phase clinical trials.[14]

 4.2 Cancer

CRISPR has numerous possibilities for use in the treatment of cancer through the gene editing of tumoral cells, immune cells and resistance mechanisms.

a. Engineering CAR-T Cells

CRISPR technology is used to knock out immune checkpoints, like PD-1 or TCR genes, in T cells. Enhances the specificity and efficacy of CAR-T cell treatment.[15]

b. Tumour Suppressor Gene Editing

Correction or deletion of mutations in tumour suppressor genes, like TP53, BRCA1, or KRAS. Takes place mainly in preclinical or animal model studies.

c. Chemotherapy Resistance Reversal

Knock out of MDR1 or other genes related to resistance restores drug sensitivity to chemotherapy.

Current Status: Several trials are testing CRISPR modified immune cells in leukaemia, lymphoma and solid tumours.

4.3 Infectious Diseases

CRISPR represents a new path for targeting viral DNA or RNA, perhaps allowing us to erase a couple of chronic infections from a genomic perspective. CRISPR - based diagnostic systems SHERLOCK and DETECTR enable rapid, sensitive and specific identification of and infectious agent, with proven success identifying SARS-CoV-2, Zika and Dengue viruses. CRISPR-Cas systems (most notably Cas9, Cas12 and Cas13) permitted targeting and cleavage of a viral genome while inside a host cell, which is a possibility to treat chronic infections such as HIV, hepatitis B and herpes simplex virus. Importantly, when it comes to combating antimicrobial resistance, CRISPR has been shown to specifically eliminate drug resistant bacteria by targeting resistance genes, thereby providing a precision pathway to eliminate a superbug. CRISPR also is speeding up vaccine development via precise editing of viral vectors or live-attenuated organisms offering improvements in the development of mRNA and adenoviral vaccines such as those developed during the COVID-19 pandemic. CRISPR also supports functional genomic studies of bacteria or pathogens, allowing researchers to identify essential gene(s) responsible for virulence, replication or even immune evasion that can be exploited for drug discovery. Genome-wide CRISPR in host cells also allows researchers to identify host factors that are essential for pathogen entrance and pathogen replication, which may reveal new possibilities for therapies. While CRISPR technologies are very promising, the use of CRISPR in infectious disease medicine is a concern for several reasons: a possible off-target effect, delivery strategies, immune response issues, ethics issues related to 1. molecular engineered viruses (or other pathogens) and 2. gene editing/gene editing of germline cells. CRISPR-based technologies also permit real-time assessment of emerging infectious diseases. CRISPR has the ability to rapidly identify pathogen mutations allowing for epidemiological surveillance of outbreaks. CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) allows scientists to silence specific genes of bacteria or viruses without cutting the DNA. It can also be used as a method for reversible gene regulation to analyze how pathogens cause infections. CRISPR-Cas engineered bacteriophages are showing promise as next-generation antibacterial agents to selectively kill pathogenic strains, while preserving non-pathogenic microorganisms in beneficial microbiota. In parasitic infection research, such as that studying malaria, CRISPR is being applied to alter the Plasmodium species genomes which will further our understanding of the life cycle, as well as the pathways that promote drug resistance. CRISPR is now enabling gene drive systems which can provide the capability to change mosquito populations under the right environmental conditions by propagating genes that inhibit the capacity of mosquitoes to transduce malaria. Using messenger RNA, researchers are working to apply CRISPR to make "universal antivirals" by using conserved regions of the viral genomes found across strains and species. When studying infectious disease, especially viral processes, CRISPR technologies are generating exciting advances toward dissecting the host immune response to such infections by knocking out immune regulatory genes and using the readouts of these manipulations to better understand the role of these genes in pathogen clearance. High-throughput CRISPR screens in infected human cells also facilitate the discovery of new druggable targets for viral, bacterial, and fungal pathogens. CRISPR is being used to develop personalized approaches in infectious disease treatment with respect to identifying unique patient genetic variants that will guide therapeutics, while accounting for toxicity or effectiveness depending on disease severity. CRISPR's programmability should also enhance multiplexed emerging technologies for detecting co-infections from complex samples, which is essential for diagnosis in resource-limited environments. The promising potential of using CRISPR together with biosensors and microfluidic chips for developing portable diagnostic tools may allow for analysis in remote or point-of-care contexts. Finally, CRISPR technology methodologies also fall under the "synthetic biology" umbrella in their capacity for engineering circuits in immune cells and microbes for infection suppression or immunity in infectious disease contexts. [16-17]

Table 3: - Infectious Diseases

Pathogen

Target

CRISPR System

Application/Goal

HIV

Proviral DNA

Cas9

Eradicate latent virus from host genome

HPV

E6/E7 genes

Cas9

Silence oncogenes in cervical cancer

SARS-CoV-2

Viral RNA

Cas13

Diagnostic and antiviral applications

Example:

  • CRISPR-Cas13 is being used in rapid detection kits (Sherlock, Detectr) for viral RNA, useful in point-of-care COVID-19 testing.
  1. CRISPR In Drug Development and Target Validation

The development of effective and safe drugs depends on identifying precise molecular targets and understanding their role in disease. CRISPR technology has emerged as a powerful tool in the drug discovery pipeline, offering unmatched capabilities in target identification, validation, screening, and resistance analysis. It enables researchers to simulate disease models, uncover new druggable genes, and test compound efficacy all with high specificity and efficiency. CRISPR technology allows accurate gene editing to identify genes related to diseases and evaluate previously established targets for therapy. In addition, CRISPR provides new tools for high-throughput genetic screens to systematically knock out the genes and assess phenotypic variations associated with drug discovery. As target validation has a significant cultural challenge, CRISPR provides an additional enhancement for accuracy of confirming a gene's causal relationship in a disease model. Furthermore, CRISPR provides scientists with the ability to generate genetically modified cell lines and animal models that closely represent the human disease for preclinical testing. CRISPRi (interference) and CRISPRa (activation) allow users to study gene function readouts without making permanent changes to DNA, such as  reversible drug-response studies.  By allowing the study of synthetic lethality screening, CRISPR technology is Discovery of relevant gene pairs obligate to cancer cell survival leading to repetitive targeted therapy. In addition, CRISPR technology allows researchers to investigate the mechanisms of drug resistance and the duration of cellular sensitization to drugs by discovering genes that favorably sensitize cells to drugs.  CRISPR will also help therapeutics discover predictive biomarkers useful for stratifying patients for personalized treatment approaches. In addition, CRISPR provides speed and efficiency of linking a genotype to phenotype for the validation of novel drug targets. Pharmaceutical companies are currently developing approaches to use CRISPR technology in drug discovery to help guide and develop improved efficiency so investment can result in new drug development with less risk and consequently improve start-up costs and increase New Drug Application (NDA) success rates. [18]

Fig 2: - CRISPR in Drug Development and Target Validation

5.1 Target Discovery and Validation

CRISPR-based gene editing allows for functional interrogation of genes for therapeutic relevance:

  • Knockout screens with CRISPR libraries identify essential genes in cancer, neurodegeneration, and autoimmunity.
  • CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) and CRISPR activation (CRISPRa) tools allow modulation of gene expression without permanent changes, mimicking drug functionality.
  • Allow for rapid loss-of-function and gain-of-function studies in a high-throughput format.

Example: CRISPR screens identified PARP1 as a synthetic lethal partner in BRCA1/2-deficient cancers that subsequently led to PARP inhibitor development.[19]

5.2 CRISPR in Phenotypic Drug Screening

CRISPR engineered cell lines and organoids closely resemble human disease, and therefore drug screening will be more relevant to human pathologies. Enables testing of drugs as applied to patient-derived models that incorporate specific mutations. Screens for drug-gene interactions and can yield predictions for drug effectiveness for patient-specific models. Genome-wide knockout or activation screens are now undertaken through CRISPR as a means to screen for genes that modulate cellular responses to drug treatments. CRISPR utilizes genetic editing of candidate genes to facilitate unbiased phenotypic screens by altering the expression of key genes and subsequently determining any changes to qualitative features associated with morphology, viability, or behavior at the time of exposure to the drug. CRISPR-based libraries have been used to identify genetic modifiers of drug sensitivity or drug resistance in cancer and infectious diseases and neurological disorders. Importantly, CRISPR can be used to identify unknown targets of bioactive compounds by linking genetic perturbations to phenotypic readouts. Furthermore, CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) and CRISPR activation (CRISPRa) facilitate fine-tuning of gene expression and study how gene expression changes can produce slight phenotypic changes. Most importantly, CRISPR can be used for multiplexed screening, that is editing several genes simultaneously to study interactions involving multiple drugs and genes. These approaches can uncover pathways that can be targeting using pathway modulator to gene action, and potentially provide investigators with more information regarding genetic networks implicated in the action of any drug. CRISPR enhances phenotypic screening approaches working with patient-derived cells or organoids as this can provide an even greater physiological relevance where drug interactions expect to require sophisticated biological testing. CRISPR can also be used for the additional purpose of improving data collection about off-target effects and toxicities either genetically or pharmacologically by highlighting or abolishing specific genes by retrospectively determine which genes are essential for cell survivability. Therefore, CRISPR adopts rigorous testing methods to provide more intercoupled relationships among cells, drugs, and mechanisms that facilitate new drug discovery whilst also identifying therapeutic targets, biomarkers, and mechanisms of drug action; CRISPR represents a new era in phenotypic drug screening and phenotypic studies.

Fig 3: - CRISPR in Phenotypic Drug Screening

Advantage: Reduces time period to discover new therapies that are guided by biomarkers in cancers, neurological diseases, and infectious diseases.

5.3 Analysis of Mechanisms of Drug Resistance

CRISPR can be used to identify:

  • Genes that confer drug resistance (efflux transporters, DNA repair).
  • Pathways changed by the therapy that allow moving forward with second-generation drugs.

For example--CRISPR-Cas9 was used to knockout the EGFR mutation variants to describe the mechanism of resistance in non-small cell lung cancer treated with TKIs.[20]

5.4 Individualized Pharmacogenomics

CRISPR allows us to identify and clarify individuals diversity within their DNA that relates to drug metabolism. As an example, editing variants within genes relating to drug metabolism, such as CYP450 enzyme variants, TPMT, or UGT1A1 could provide tangibles to predict drug metabolism and decrease the concentration of toxic active drug metabolites. CRISPR for use in developing companion diagnostics and safer drug regimens. CRISPR allows for editing of the genes encodes drugs metabolism lines such as CYP450 enzymes making it easier for researchers to model and predict therapeutics for target therapies including adverse drug reaction. CRISPR could also boost personalized medicine by correcting or editing genetic variants in induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), which could then be used to test therapy effects and/or toxicity in vitro. CRISPR-based pharmacogenomic screening can enable researchers to identify genetic mutations affecting drug export and import from tissues to recognize alteration drug targets, transporters or drug metabolizing enzymes and assist in customizing therapies based upon an individuals genetic response formulate therapeutic ideas. With the integration of CRISPR and next-generation sequencing it will easy to validate biomarkers of pharmacogenomics information and deliver customize therapeutics to patients with their condition (e.g. patients with cancer or epilepsy, patients developing cardiovascular problems). To unlimited possibilities, CRISPR allows researcher explore gene-drug interactions from genome-scale data helping them to individually design and administer therapeutics with the least side effects with dosages that are optimized for individuals.

6. Challenges And Limitations of CRISPR in Precision Medicine

Despite the revolutionary potential of CRISPR technology, several scientific, technical, and ethical barriers still limit its widespread use in clinical precision medicine. These challenges must be carefully addressed before CRISPR can be adopted as a mainstream therapeutic modality. [21-22]

6.1 Unintentional Effects

One of the great worries is of off-target cleavage, or unintended cuts made by CRISPR-Cas9 at genomic locations, that could potentially lead to:

  • Unintentional mutations
  • Oncogene activation
  • Disruption of essential genes
  • Solutions in development:
  • Better design of guide RNA (gRNA)
  • High-fidelity Cas9 variants (e.g. eSpCas9, SpCas9-HF1)
  • Using base editing and prime editing to completely avoid double-stranded breaks

  6.2 Delivery Mechanisms

 Efficiently and specifically delivering CRISPR components to tissues and cells still pose a major challenge. Efficient delivery of CRISPR components is a key barrier to its clinical adoption, and viral delivery systems, including adeno-associated viruses (AAVs), are commonly used because of their ability to transduce cells efficiently, but non-viral delivery systems, including lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), are gaining popularity and providing safer methods of briefly exposing cells to CRISPR machinery while avoiding insertional mutagenesis. Physical systems, including electroporation and microinjection, are useful for ex vivo editing, particularly editing stem cells or immune cells including CAR-T, because they provide more uniform and precise spatial control of gene editing prior to being reinfused back into patients. Recent advances in engineered extracellular vesicles and cell-penetrating peptides are providing exciting new delivery systems for the targeted, non-toxic delivery of CRISPR-Cas systems to tissues or cells. Additionally, more advanced delivery systems using stimuli-responsive and programmable delivery systems, are improving not only the spatiotemporal control of CRISPR activity, but also enhancing the overall infidelity and consequently limiting off-target effects for therapeutic applications. The delivery of CRISPR components in a viable manner is crucial for therapeutic applications involving genome editing. Viral approaches like adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) are ideal because of their high transduction efficiencies and their ability to target specific tissues. Non-viral methods of delivery, such as lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), provide safer, transient expression and are a safer approach for in vivo delivery of Cas9 mRNA and the guide RNA. There is also the possibility of physical methods of delivery: for example, electroporation and microinjection can be used to physically deliver CRISPR reagents inside of the cells of interest, and is often used in ex vivo editing and in vivo animal models. Gold nanoparticles and polymeric carriers have been developed with the hope of increased biocompatibility and biostability, while decreasing immune responses in the case of systemic delivery. New emerging delivery strategies such as cell-penetrating peptides, and exosomes, are proposed innovative delivery platforms that have the ability to deliver reagents in a low-toxicity method, and allow for targeting of uptake in specific tissues. Meanwhile, delivery efficiency is also strongly reliant on the format of the cargo considering that Cas9 can be delivered as DNA, mRNA, or protein (ribonucleoprotein complex), each method having differing stability and expression kinetics. Targeted delivery strategies will employ tissue-specific ligands or antibodies and reduce the risk of off-target effects, maximizing therapeutic precision. Ensuring successful delivery of CRISPR reagents includes challenges such as avoiding immune recognition, nuclear access, and the ability to control the expression of CRISPR components. Overall, improved delivery methods will be a critical aspect for translating CRISPR-based therapies from bench-top to the clinic in a highly safe and efficacious method.

Table 4:- Delivery Mechanisms

Delivery Method

Limitation

Viral vectors (AAV)

Immunogenicity, limited cargo size

Lipid nanoparticles

Low efficiency in some tissues

Electroporation

Applicable mostly ex vivo

As given below the figure as concerned to explain in detail that which types accordingly work to as in it.

Fig 4: - Types of Delivery Mechanisms in CRISPR

Emerging approaches:

  • Cell-penetrating peptides
  • Exosomes
  • mRNA-based CRISPR delivery

6.3 Immune Response

  • Host immune systems may recognize Cas proteins as foreign, especially Cas9 derived from Streptococcus pyogenes.
  • Immune responses can result in degradation of CRISPR components or inflammation, reducing efficacy and safety.[23]

Workarounds:

  • Using Cas proteins from less immunogenic species (e.g., Cas12a)
  • Immunosuppressive protocols in clinical trials

6.4 Ethical and Regulatory Concerns

  • Germline editing poses serious ethical questions due to heritable changes.
  • Cases like the CRISPR-edited babies in China (2018) have triggered global debates.
  • Regulatory frameworks vary by country and are still evolving.

Need for:

  • Transparent clinical guidelines
  • Ethical oversight committees
  • International consensus on boundaries of CRISPR use

6.5 Long-term Safety and Stability

  • Long-term consequences of genome editing are still unknown.
  • Risk of mosaicism or delayed mutagenesis must be studied in longitudinal human trials.

7. Future Perspectives and Innovations in CRISPR-Based Medicine

CRISPR technology continues to evolve rapidly, with novel tools and strategies being developed to overcome current limitations and expand its clinical potential. The future of CRISPR in precision medicine lies in refining its safety, specificity, and delivery, while also broadening its applications across diverse therapeutic areas.

7.1 Next-Generation Editing Tools

Advancements beyond traditional CRISPR-Cas9 systems are offering more precise and safer genome editing:

  • Base Editing

Allows conversion of single DNA bases (e.g., A→G or C→T) without causing double-strand breaks.
? Example: Correction of point mutations in sickle cell disease and progeria.

  • Prime Editing

A "search-and-replace" tool that enables insertion, deletion, or replacement of DNA segments.
? More versatile and lower off-target risk than Cas9.

  • CRISPR-Cas12 and Cas13 Systems
    • Cas12: DNA editing with distinct PAM requirements.
    • Cas13: RNA-targeting CRISPR tool, enabling transcriptomic control and viral RNA targeting.

7.2 Personalized CRISPR Therapeutics

  • Integration of patient genomic data with CRISPR allows the design of customized gene-editing therapies.
  • Supports real-time design of therapies for rare or patient-specific mutations.
  • Advances in AI-driven gRNA design and high-throughput screening accelerate this approach.

7.3 CRISPR-Based Diagnostics

CRISPR is being adapted for rapid, low-cost diagnostics:

  • Sherlock (Specific High-sensitivity Enzymatic Reporter unlocking)
  • Detectr (DNA Endonuclease Targeted CRISPR Trans Reporter)
    Used for detection of pathogens like SARS-Cov-2, Zika Virus, and even cancer biomarkers.

These tools enable point-of-care testing, especially in low-resource settings.

7.4 Epigenome Editing and Gene Regulation

  • dCas9 (dead Cas9) fused with transcriptional activators or repressors can modulate gene expression without changing DNA.
  • Offers a reversible, safer alternative to genome editing.
  • Promising for diseases with dysregulated gene expression (e.g., neurodegenerative or autoimmune diseases).

7.5 CRISPR and Synthetic Biology

  • CRISPR is being used to engineer synthetic gene circuits, enabling smart cells that can sense and respond to disease signals.
  • Applications include smart CAR-T cells, programmable bacteria, and biosensors.

7.6 Global Collaborations and Regulation

  • Increasing collaborations between biotech firms, academic institutions, and regulatory agencies are promoting safe clinical translation.
  • Examples include NIH-funded trials, CRISPR Therapeutics + Vertex, and Intellia Therapeutics partnerships. [24-25]

8. CONCLUSION

CRISPR technology has ushered in a new era in precision medicine, enabling unprecedented control over genetic material with high specificity, efficiency, and scalability. From correcting pathogenic mutations to customizing gene expression and building next-generation diagnostics, CRISPR has rapidly transformed the landscape of molecular medicine. Despite its transformative power, CRISPR still faces hurdles such as off-target effects, delivery challenges, immunogenicity, and ethical considerations that must be carefully addressed before it can become a routine clinical tool. However, ongoing innovations in base editing, prime editing, RNA targeting, and synthetic biology are paving the way for safer, more versatile applications. The convergence of CRISPR with big data, AI, and patient-derived genomic insights is steering the development of truly personalized therapeutics, offering hope for diseases that were once considered untreatable. As the technology matures, robust regulatory frameworks, ethical oversight, and interdisciplinary collaboration will be key to unlocking its full potential. Ultimately, CRISPR represents not just a tool but a platform that is redefining how we approach diagnosis, treatment, and prevention shaping the future of precision medicine.

REFERENCES

  1. Li T, Huang S, Zhao X, Wright DA, Carpenter S, Spalding MH, et al. “Modularly assembled designer TAL effector nucleases for targeted gene knockout and gene replacement in eukaryotes”, Nucl Acids Res. (2011);39(14):6315-25. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr188.
  2.  Eid A, Mahfouz MM. “Genome editing: the road of CRISPR/Cas9 from bench to clinic”, Exp Mol Med. (2016);48(10). https://doi.org/10.1038/emm.2016.111
  3.  Jasin M, Rothstein R. “Repair of strand breaks by homologous recombination” Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. (2013);5(11)https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a012740.
  4.  Chapman JR, Taylor MR, Boulton SJ. Playing the end game “DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice. Mol Cell” ,(2012);47(4):497-510.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.07.029.
  5.  Mardis ER. “A decade’s perspective on DNA sequencing technology. Nature” (2011);470(7333):198-203. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09796.
  6.  Komor AC, Badran AH, Liu DR. “CRISPR-based technologies for the manipulation of eukaryotic genomes” Cell. (2017);168(1):20-36.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.044.
  7.  Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E “A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science” (2012);337(6096):816-21. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1225829.
  8.  Ashley EA. “Towards precision medicine. Nat Rev Genet”(2016);17(9):507-22. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2016.86.
  9.  Ledford H. “CRISPR the disruptor Nature”(2015);522(7554):20-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/522020a.
  10.  Doudna JA, Charpentier E. “The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9” Science.2014;346(6213):1258096.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258096.
  11.  Abudayyeh OO, Gootenberg JS, Essletzbichler P, Han S, Joung J, Belanto JJ, et al “RNA targeting with CRISPR-Cas13. Nature”(2017);550(7675):280-4.https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24049.
  12.  Hsu PD, Lander ES, Zhang F “ Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell” (2014);157(6):1262-78.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.010.
  13.  Lanphier E, Urnov F, Haecker SE, Werner M, Smolenski J “Don’t edit the human germ line. Nature”. (2015);519(7544):410-1.https://doi.org/10.1038/519410a.
  14.  Mojica FJ, Díez-Villaseñor C, Soria E, Juez G “ Biological significance of a family of regularly spaced repeats in the genomes of Archaea, Bacteria and mitochondria. Mol Microbiol.” (2000);36(1):244-6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01838.x
  15. Matano M, Date S, Shimokawa M, Takano A, Fujii M, Ohta Y, et al “ Modeling colorectal cancer using CRISPR-Cas9-mediated engineering of human intestinal organoids. Nat Med”(2015);21(3):256-62. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3802.
  16.  Nishimasu H, Ran FA, Hsu PD, Konermann S, Shehata SI, Dohmae N, et al” Crystal structure of Cas9 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA. Cell”(2014);156(5):935-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.001.
  17. Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Alkhnbashi OS, Costa F, Shah SA, Saunders SJ, et al  “An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas,systems.Nat,Rev,Microbiol.”(2015);13(11):722-36. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3569.
  18. Koonin EV, Makarova KS, Zhang F. Diversity,” classification and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems. Curr Opin Microbiol”(2017);37:67-78.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2017.05.008.
  19. Sternberg SH, Redding S, Jinek M, Greene EC, Doudna JA “DNA interrogation by the CRISPR RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9,Biophys”J(2014);106(2):695a.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2013.11.3848.
  20. Torres RA, Martin MC, Garcia A, Cigudosa JC, Ramirez JC, Rodriguez-Perales S” Engineering human tumour-associated chromosomal translocations with the RNA-guided CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat Commun” (2014);5(1):3964. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4964.
  21. Razzouk S. A cornerstone for “the evolution of precision medicine. Ann Hum Genet” (2018);82(6):331-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/ahg.12271.
  22. Gillyard T, Davis J. DNA double-strand break repair in cancer: a path to achieving precision medicine. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol(2021);364:111-37.https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.ircmb.2021.06.003.
  23. Pawelczak KS, Gavande NS, Vander Vere-Carozza PS, Turchi JJ” Modulating DNA repair pathways to improve precision genome.engineering.ACS,Chem-Biol”(2018);13(2):389-96.https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.7b00777.
  24. Smirni khina SA, Zaynitdi nova MI, Sergeeva VA, Lavrov AV” Improving homology-directed repair in genome editing experiments by influencing the cell cycle. Int J Mol Sci” (2022);23(11):5992. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23115992.
  25. Kleinstiver BP, Pattanayak V, Prew MS, Tsai SQ, Nguyen NT, Zheng Z, et al” High-fidelity CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with no detectable genome-wide off-target effects. Nature” (2016);529(7587):490-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16526.

Reference

  1. Li T, Huang S, Zhao X, Wright DA, Carpenter S, Spalding MH, et al. “Modularly assembled designer TAL effector nucleases for targeted gene knockout and gene replacement in eukaryotes”, Nucl Acids Res. (2011);39(14):6315-25. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr188.
  2.  Eid A, Mahfouz MM. “Genome editing: the road of CRISPR/Cas9 from bench to clinic”, Exp Mol Med. (2016);48(10). https://doi.org/10.1038/emm.2016.111
  3.  Jasin M, Rothstein R. “Repair of strand breaks by homologous recombination” Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. (2013);5(11)https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a012740.
  4.  Chapman JR, Taylor MR, Boulton SJ. Playing the end game “DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice. Mol Cell” ,(2012);47(4):497-510.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.07.029.
  5.  Mardis ER. “A decade’s perspective on DNA sequencing technology. Nature” (2011);470(7333):198-203. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09796.
  6.  Komor AC, Badran AH, Liu DR. “CRISPR-based technologies for the manipulation of eukaryotic genomes” Cell. (2017);168(1):20-36.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.044.
  7.  Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E “A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science” (2012);337(6096):816-21. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1225829.
  8.  Ashley EA. “Towards precision medicine. Nat Rev Genet”(2016);17(9):507-22. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2016.86.
  9.  Ledford H. “CRISPR the disruptor Nature”(2015);522(7554):20-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/522020a.
  10.  Doudna JA, Charpentier E. “The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9” Science.2014;346(6213):1258096.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258096.
  11.  Abudayyeh OO, Gootenberg JS, Essletzbichler P, Han S, Joung J, Belanto JJ, et al “RNA targeting with CRISPR-Cas13. Nature”(2017);550(7675):280-4.https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24049.
  12.  Hsu PD, Lander ES, Zhang F “ Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell” (2014);157(6):1262-78.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.010.
  13.  Lanphier E, Urnov F, Haecker SE, Werner M, Smolenski J “Don’t edit the human germ line. Nature”. (2015);519(7544):410-1.https://doi.org/10.1038/519410a.
  14.  Mojica FJ, Díez-Villaseñor C, Soria E, Juez G “ Biological significance of a family of regularly spaced repeats in the genomes of Archaea, Bacteria and mitochondria. Mol Microbiol.” (2000);36(1):244-6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01838.x
  15. Matano M, Date S, Shimokawa M, Takano A, Fujii M, Ohta Y, et al “ Modeling colorectal cancer using CRISPR-Cas9-mediated engineering of human intestinal organoids. Nat Med”(2015);21(3):256-62. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3802.
  16.  Nishimasu H, Ran FA, Hsu PD, Konermann S, Shehata SI, Dohmae N, et al” Crystal structure of Cas9 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA. Cell”(2014);156(5):935-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.001.
  17. Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Alkhnbashi OS, Costa F, Shah SA, Saunders SJ, et al  “An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas,systems.Nat,Rev,Microbiol.”(2015);13(11):722-36. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3569.
  18. Koonin EV, Makarova KS, Zhang F. Diversity,” classification and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems. Curr Opin Microbiol”(2017);37:67-78.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2017.05.008.
  19. Sternberg SH, Redding S, Jinek M, Greene EC, Doudna JA “DNA interrogation by the CRISPR RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9,Biophys”J(2014);106(2):695a.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2013.11.3848.
  20. Torres RA, Martin MC, Garcia A, Cigudosa JC, Ramirez JC, Rodriguez-Perales S” Engineering human tumour-associated chromosomal translocations with the RNA-guided CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat Commun” (2014);5(1):3964. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4964.
  21. Razzouk S. A cornerstone for “the evolution of precision medicine. Ann Hum Genet” (2018);82(6):331-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/ahg.12271.
  22. Gillyard T, Davis J. DNA double-strand break repair in cancer: a path to achieving precision medicine. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol(2021);364:111-37.https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.ircmb.2021.06.003.
  23. Pawelczak KS, Gavande NS, Vander Vere-Carozza PS, Turchi JJ” Modulating DNA repair pathways to improve precision genome.engineering.ACS,Chem-Biol”(2018);13(2):389-96.https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.7b00777.
  24. Smirni khina SA, Zaynitdi nova MI, Sergeeva VA, Lavrov AV” Improving homology-directed repair in genome editing experiments by influencing the cell cycle. Int J Mol Sci” (2022);23(11):5992. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23115992.
  25. Kleinstiver BP, Pattanayak V, Prew MS, Tsai SQ, Nguyen NT, Zheng Z, et al” High-fidelity CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with no detectable genome-wide off-target effects. Nature” (2016);529(7587):490-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16526.

Photo
Meet Agrawal
Corresponding author

Sigma Institute Of Pharmacy, Bakrol , Vadodara, Gujarat, India.

Photo
Preet Patil
Co-author

Sigma Institute Of Pharmacy, Bakrol, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.

Photo
Isha Sharma
Co-author

Sigma Institute Of Pharmacy, Bakrol, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.

Photo
Upashna Solanki
Co-author

Sigma Institute Of Pharmacy, Bakrol, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.

Photo
Parvez Lakdawala
Co-author

Sigma Institute Of Pharmacy, Bakrol, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.

Meet Agrawal*, Preet Patil, Isha Sharma, Upashna Solanki, Parvez Lakdawala, CRISPR: Redefining Precision Medicine, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 8, 123-137. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16722617

More related articles
Medicinal Chemistry of Anticancer Drugs...
Pavan Sable , Mangesh Randive, Amol Shirode, ...
Natural Dyes: A Comprehensive Review on Medicinal ...
Shankar Bali, Vishal Lande, Rushikesh Navale, Dhananjay Popalghat...
Comparative Efficacy of Nutraceuticals and Convent...
Arnab Roy, Sajid Ansari, Faiz Alam , Chandan Kumar, Ayush Kumar, ...
Advancements in Herbal Medicine: A Review of Current Research and Applications...
Shreya Patwa, Vishal Rasve, Gaffar Sayyad, Sanjay Garje, ...
Phytochemistry And Pharmacological Studies Of Cassia Angustifolia: A Medicinal P...
Pooja Dhangar, Amol Chandekar, Atul Tripathi, Kaushal Patil , Swati Chumbhale, ...
A Review on A Medicinal Tree Acacia Nilotica and Hibiscus Sabdariffa ...
Vijay Jadhav, Jaya Kambale, Dr. Nilesh Chougule, Vaibhav Paymal, ...
Related Articles
Green Solutions for Better Medicine: Natural Bioavailability Enhancers in Drug F...
Kalyani Parihar, Dr. H. A. Sawarkar, Dr. K. R. Biyani, ...
Ketamine in Modern Medicine: Antidepressant Breakthrough, Anaesthetic Staple, or...
Tejas Pagar, Satyajit Waje, Parmeshwar Mane, Zaid-Ameen Gulam Wasi, Prerana Chaudhari, ...
Medicinal Chemistry of Anticancer Drugs...
Pavan Sable , Mangesh Randive, Amol Shirode, ...
More related articles
Medicinal Chemistry of Anticancer Drugs...
Pavan Sable , Mangesh Randive, Amol Shirode, ...
Natural Dyes: A Comprehensive Review on Medicinal Plant-Based Pigments and Culin...
Shankar Bali, Vishal Lande, Rushikesh Navale, Dhananjay Popalghat, Karan Gavhane, Nilesh Gwali , Dr....
Comparative Efficacy of Nutraceuticals and Conventional Medicines in Hypertensio...
Arnab Roy, Sajid Ansari, Faiz Alam , Chandan Kumar, Ayush Kumar, Alijan Mansur, Shahid Afridi, Md. A...
Medicinal Chemistry of Anticancer Drugs...
Pavan Sable , Mangesh Randive, Amol Shirode, ...
Natural Dyes: A Comprehensive Review on Medicinal Plant-Based Pigments and Culin...
Shankar Bali, Vishal Lande, Rushikesh Navale, Dhananjay Popalghat, Karan Gavhane, Nilesh Gwali , Dr....
Comparative Efficacy of Nutraceuticals and Conventional Medicines in Hypertensio...
Arnab Roy, Sajid Ansari, Faiz Alam , Chandan Kumar, Ayush Kumar, Alijan Mansur, Shahid Afridi, Md. A...