Department of Quality Assurance, Shri D. D. Vispute College of Pharmacy and Research Center, Panvel, Navi Mumbai
Anti-diabetic medications dapagliflozin and sitagliptin phosphate are used to treat Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) by reconsumption of glucose in the kidney (SGLT-2 inhibitor) and prohibiting the activity of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4), respectively. The linearity, accuracy, and precision criteria were developed and validated using the liquid spectrophotometric (HPLC) technique. To provide a straightforward, precise, correct (accurate) and specific High Performance Liquid Chromatographic approach for the Estimation of dapagliflozin and sitagliptin phosphate. Methanol and water (50:50) were used as a diluent in the development of the HPLC technique, which had wavelengths of 224 nm for dapagliflozin and 265 nm for sitagliptin phosphate. For both drugs, the linearity range was found to be between 0 and 25 ug/ml and between 0 and 125 ug/ml, with correlation coefficients of 0.9998 and 0.9997, respectively. For both drugs, the developed method's %RSD value was less than 2, indicating its precision. In accordance with the ICH Q2 (R1) recommendations, precision and results were statistically examined intra-day (0.40%) (1.87%) and inter-day (1.35%) (1.44%). According to the results in this paper, a straightforward, quick, and economically feasible spectroscopic approach for estimating dapagliflozin and sitagliptin phosphate has been developed and validated. The Developed technique may be used for routine analysis and quality control of the listed medications, either alone or in combination for Both Drugs.
Dapagliflozin
Dapagliflozin, a drug in the gliflozin family, is used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes [1]. Dapagliflozin restricts the sodium-glucose transport proteins (SGLT2) class 2, which are responsible for around 90% of the kidney's glucose reconsumption [2]. In the renal proximal tubule, sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) reabsorbs both glucose and sodium chloride. Dapagliflozin is an SGLT2 restrictor that increases renal glucose elimination in order to treat hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes. When this transporter activity is blocked, blood glucose is eliminated through urine [3]. The Molecular formula of dapagliflozin is C21H25ClO6. A white to off-white crystalline powder, dapagliflozin dissolves in Methanol, Acetonitrile (ACN), ethanol and other organic solvents [4,5].
Dapagliflozin chemical Name: (2S,3R,4R,5S,6R)-2-{4-chloro-3-[(4- ethoxy phenyl) methyl] phenyl}-6-(hydroxymethyl) oxane-3,4,5-triol. [6]
Figure.1: Structure of Dapagliflozin
Sitagliptin phosphate is an oral blocker of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4). This enzyme-inhibiting drug is used individually or in combination with other oral antihyperglycemic drugs to treat type 2 diabetes. Sitagliptin restricts the DPP-4 by a competitive mechanism. This enzyme breaks down incretins, which are digestive hormones released after a meal and are also known as GLP-1 and GIP [7]. The pancreas is able to limit the release of glucagon and boost the production of insulin by blocking Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide (GIP) and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) inactivation [8]. Blood glucose levels proceed near to normal as a result. The Molecular formula of Sitagliptin Phosphate is Molecular C16H15F6N5O. It is slightly soluble in acetone and soluble in water, methanol, ethanol, and other solvents. [9,10]
Sitagliptin chemical Name: 7 - [(3R) – 3 – amino – 1 – oxo – 4 - (2, 4, 5-trifluorophenyl) butyl] -5, 6, 7, 8 tetrahydro – 3 (trifluoromethyl)-1, 2, 4 – triazolo [4, 3-a] pyrazine phosphate [11]
Figure.2: Structure of Sitagliptin
The review of the literature demonstrated that UV spectroscopy and RP-HPLC were used to quantify the drug from bulk [12]. The recommended study demonstrates a simple to operate, quick, and affordable RP-HPLC technique for Quantify Dapagliflozin and Sitagliptin in Formulation and API [13,14,15]. In accordance with ICH Standards, the Established technique was verified for Linearity, Accuracy, Precision, Limit of Detection (LOD), Limit of Quantification (LOQ), Robustness, Ruggedness, and sensitivity. Additionally, stress testing was done in a variety of Environments, including temperature, light, oxidation, humidity, and pH (acid/base). [16]
MATERIAL AND METHOD:
Chemical and Reagents:
Table.1: Chemical and Reagents
SR. No |
Chemicals and Drug |
Grade |
Manufacturer |
1. |
Methanol |
HPLC Grade |
Actylis Chemicals |
2. |
Acetonitrile (ACN) |
HPLC Grade |
Actylis Chemicals |
3. |
Dapagliflozin |
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) |
Micro Lab. India |
4. |
Sitagliptin |
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) |
Micro Lab. India |
Instruments:
Table.2: Instruments used for Experiment
SR. No |
Instrument Name |
Model Name |
1. |
UV Spectrophotometer |
Shimadzu UV 1800 |
2. |
UV Software |
UV Probe |
3. |
HPLC |
JASCO Extrema LC- 4000 |
4. |
HPLC Software |
ChromNAV |
5. |
Ultra Sonicator |
Life care Equipment |
6 |
Electronic Weighing Balance |
Shimadzu (sensitivity 0.001gm) |
ANALYTICAL METHOD DEVELOPMENT BY HPLC METHOD
Determination of solubility for HPLC analysis
A specific quantity of the standard medication was dissolved in a variety of solvents, including acetonitrile, methanol, and water. The UV technique was used to estimate solubility quantitatively.
Selecting an appropriate solvent: A 50:50 v/v composition of water to methanol was used as the solvent. Based on studies on solubility choice solvents and solubility experiments conducted on a number of solvents, the solvent was chosen.
Formation of stock solution for standard
10 mg of dapagliflozin were carefully measured and pour into a 10-milliliter volumetric flask, diluted with 50:50 water and methanol, and then sonicated to the appropriate concentration of 1000 µg/mL to create the standard stock solution. A 1 mL aliquot of the previously mentioned standard stock solution was put into a 10 mL volumetric flask. It was then diluted with 50:50 water and methanol to achieve the required concentration, which resulted in a sub-stock solution of 100 µg/mL.
Formation of stock solution for sample
To make the sample stock solution, five pills were accurately weighed and crushed into powder. A volume equal to 10 mg were weighted and pour into a 10-milliliter volumetric flask, diluted with 50:50 water and methanol, and sonicated for 15 minutes. 1 mL of the previously stated sample stock solution, diluted with water: methanol (50:50), was added to a 10-milliliter volumetric flask to create the solution with a concentration of 100 µg/mL.
Detection of Wavelength for Dapagliflozin
The standard solution of 10 µg/mL of Dapagliflozin was prepared and scanned over the 400-200nm range. After the scan was completed, it showed maximum absorbance at 224 nm, so the detection wavelength was selected as 224 nm.
Figure.3: Spectrum of Dapagliflozin.
Sitagliptin phosphate
Determination of solubility for HPLC analysis
A specific quantity of the standard medication was dissolved in a variety of solvents, including acetonitrile, methanol, and water. The UV technique was used to estimate solubility quantitatively.
Selecting an appropriate solvent: A 50:50 v/v composition of water to methanol was used as the solvent. Based on studies on solubility choice solvents and solubility experiments conducted on a number of solvents, the solvent was chosen.
Formation of stock solution for standard
10 mg of Sitagliptin Phosphate were carefully measured and pour into a 10-milliliter volumetric flask, diluted with 50:50 water and methanol, and then sonicated to the appropriate concentration of 1000 µg/mL to create the standard stock solution.
Formation of stock solution for sample
To make the sample stock solution, five pills were accurately weighed and crushed into powder. A volume equal to 100 mg were weighted and pour into a 100-milliliter volumetric flask, diluted with 50:50 water and methanol, and sonicated for 15 minutes.
Detection of wavelength for Sitagliptin Phosphate
The standard solution of 100 µg/mL of Sitagliptin Phosphate was prepared and scanned over the 400-200nm range. After the scan was completed, it showed maximum absorbance at 265 nm, so the detection wavelength was selected as 265 nm.
Figure.4: Spectrum of Sitagliptin Phosphate
Chromatographic Conditions
Table.3: Chromatographic Conditions
Sr no. |
Specification |
Description |
1 |
Equipment |
JASCO Extrema LC- 4000 |
2 |
Software |
ChromNAV |
3 |
Column |
BDS Hypersil C18 (250 x 4.6 mm, 5µm) |
4 |
Wavelength |
|
5 |
Column temperature |
25°C |
6 |
Flowrate |
0.8 mL/min |
7 |
Injection volume |
10 µL |
8 |
Run time |
10 min |
9 |
Mobile phase |
Water: Acetonitrile (60:40) |
10 |
Diluent |
Water: Methanol (50:50) |
ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION BY HPLC METHOD
To illustrate the specificity of the described approach, the following solutions were prepared and injected.
Diluent is used as a blank solution. (Methanol: Water 50:50)
Standard solution: Standard solution was produced, in accord with the ICH Guidelines.
Sample solution: Sample solution was produced, in accord with the ICH Guidelines.
Verify the drug's peak and interference study identification.
10 ml volumetric flask was filled with 10 mg of the drug, which had been carefully weighed. The solvent was then added to dilute the drug to the required concentration of 1000 µg/mL. Using the previously described solution, the drug's linear response was determined for Dapagliflozin (0–25 µg/mL) and Sitagliptin Phosphate (0–125 µg/mL), respectively. The calibration curve indicated peak area as a function of concentration. We calculated the correlation coefficient and Y-intercept of the linearity curve.
According to the analytical method, a known quantity of drug X was spiked into sample solutions in triplicate to produce drug concentrations that were proportional to the working concentration, 80%, 100%, and 120%. This data was then used to evaluate the procedure's accuracy. One estimated the percentage of recovery.
A standard solution comprising 125 ?g/mL of sitagliptin phosphate and 25 ?g/mL of dapagliflozin was used for six injections into the system. The chromatogram was recorded, and the % RSD of the Peak Area was then calculated.
A standard peak's responses were measured on the same day with the same concentration solution in order to determine the Intraday precision.
A standard peak's responses were measured on a different day with the same concentration solution in order to determine the Interday precision.
Six sets of linearity concentrations were assessed based on the response and slope of a regression equation, and LOD and LOQ were calculated using the following calculations in accordance with ICH guidelines.
The following parameters and their effect on the system suitability test have been changed one by one. In accordance with ICH Guidelines, change in flowrate (±0.2 ml/min); Change in temperature (±5°C); Change in wavelength (±2 nm).
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Specificity
Standard Peaks of Dapagliflozin and Sitagliptin Phosphate
Linearity for Dapagliflozin
The linearity of the drug Dapagliflozin was assessed by dilutions produced using the standard stock solution. The concentration range spanned by the dilutions was 0–25 ?g/mL.
Table.4: Linearity for Dapagliflozin
Concentration (ug/mL) |
Area |
0 |
0 |
5 |
150701 |
10 |
313798 |
15 |
471066 |
20 |
620803 |
25 |
771181 |
Figure.7: Calibration curve of Dapagliflozin by HPLC
Linearity for Sitagliptin Phosphate
The linearity of the drug Sitagliptin Phosphate was assessed by dilutions produced using the standard stock solution. The concentration range spanned by the dilutions was 0–125 ?g/mL.
Table.5: Linearity for Sitagliptin Phosphate
Concentration (ug/mL) |
Area |
0 |
0 |
25 |
122992 |
50 |
251855 |
75 |
366288 |
100 |
495142 |
125 |
626220 |
Figure.8: Calibration curve of Sitagliptin Phosphate by HPLC
Accuracy for Dapagliflozin
80%, 100%, and 120% of three distinct concentrations' percentage drug accuracy. Using the information gathered from the recovery experiments, the mean recovery % was then computed.
Table.6: Accuracy for Dapagliflozin
Level |
Peak area |
Actual Concentration |
Calculated Concentration |
Mean Concentration |
% recovery |
Standard deviation |
%RSD |
80% |
553612 |
18 |
17.8809 |
17.9953 |
99.97% |
0.10504 |
0.58373 |
560011 |
18.0873 |
||||||
557852 |
18.0177 |
||||||
100% |
620778 |
20 |
20.0481 |
20.1504 |
100.75% |
0.23133 |
1.14803 |
632155 |
20.4152 |
||||||
618909 |
19.9878 |
||||||
120% |
680022 |
22 |
21.9598 |
22.0794 |
100.36% |
0.08731 |
0.39543 |
679651 |
21.9478 |
||||||
684512 |
22.1047 |
Accuracy for Sitagliptin Phosphate
80%, 100%, and 120% of three distinct concentrations' percentage drug accuracy. Using the information gathered from the recovery experiments, the mean recovery % was then computed.
Table.7: Accuracy for Sitagliptin Phosphate
Level |
Peak area |
Actual Concentration (ug/mL) |
Calculated Concentration (ug/mL) |
Mean Concentration (ug/mL) |
% recovery |
Standard Deviation |
%RSD |
80% |
458782 |
90 |
91.80 |
90.88 |
100.98% |
0.90396 |
0.99464 |
449772 |
89.99 |
||||||
454087 |
90.86 |
||||||
100% |
492633 |
100 |
98.59 |
98.37 |
98.37% |
0.75599 |
0.76855 |
487321 |
97.52 |
||||||
494608 |
98.99 |
||||||
120% |
551455 |
110 |
110.39 |
109.26 |
99.33% |
1.01089 |
0.92523 |
541744 |
108.44 |
||||||
544263 |
108.95 |
Precision for Dapagliflozin:
Both intraday (repeatability assessed by analysing the standard solution on the same day) and interday methods (repeatability conducted by analysing the standard solution on different day) were used to analyse precision. Injecting the standard solution six times was the method used for this precision investigation. The slope is used to express the results.
Intraday Precision
Table.8: Intraday Precision for Dapagliflozin
Sample Name |
Test 1 |
Test 2 |
Test 3 |
Test 4 |
Test 5 |
Test 6 |
Mean |
SD |
% RSD |
Area |
771097 |
773627 |
774876 |
774491 |
775453 |
767379 |
772820.5 |
3071.69 |
0.40 |
Theoretical Plate |
10979 |
10935 |
10858 |
10844 |
10834 |
10963 |
10902.17 |
64.29 |
0.59 |
Tailing Factor |
1.199 |
1.203 |
1.204 |
1.196 |
1.198 |
1.187 |
1.20 |
0.01 |
0.51 |
Retention Time |
4.18 |
4.17 |
4.17 |
4.16 |
4.16 |
4.17 |
4.17 |
0.01 |
0.21 |
Interday Precision
Table.9: Interday Precision for Dapagliflozin
Sample Name |
Test 1 |
Test 2 |
Test 3 |
Test 4 |
Test 5 |
Test 6 |
Mean |
SD |
% RSD |
Area |
766751 |
781503 |
776824 |
762451 |
764087 |
788194 |
773302 |
10459.53 |
1.35 |
Theoretical Plate |
11100 |
11072 |
10699 |
11098 |
10806 |
10922 |
10949.5 |
169.59 |
1.55 |
Tailing Factor |
1.183 |
1.179 |
1.187 |
1.144 |
1.16 |
1.173 |
1.2 |
0.02 |
1.39 |
Retention Time |
4.17 |
4.16 |
4.13 |
4.13 |
4.13 |
4.14 |
4.14 |
0.02 |
0.43 |
Precision for Sitagliptin Phosphate
In this level of accuracy investigation, the standard solution was injected six times; the results were expressed using the slope. Both intraday (repeatability evaluated by analyzing the standard solution on the same day) and interday methods (repeatability carried out by analyzing the standard solution on Different day) were employed to analyze precision.
Intraday Precision
Table 10 Intraday Precision for Sitagliptin Phosphate
Sample Name |
Test 1 |
Test 2 |
Test 3 |
Test 4 |
Test 5 |
Test 6 |
Mean |
SD |
% RSD |
Area |
636637 |
636692 |
623069 |
610097 |
638115 |
618221 |
627138.5 |
11734.31 |
1.87 |
Theoretical Plate |
5425 |
5423 |
5496 |
5521 |
5463 |
5484 |
5468.67 |
39.36 |
0.72 |
Tailing Factor |
1.433 |
1.445 |
1.384 |
1.415 |
1.448 |
1.404 |
1.42 |
0.03 |
1.76 |
Retention Time |
4.96 |
4.97 |
4.98 |
5 |
5.04 |
5.01 |
4.99 |
0.03 |
0.6 |
Interday Precision
Table.11: Interday Precision for Sitagliptin Phosphate
Sample Name |
Test 1 |
Test 2 |
Test 3 |
Test 4 |
Test 5 |
Test 6 |
Mean |
SD |
% RSD |
Area |
622046 |
615982 |
608947 |
603070 |
604414 |
623561 |
613003 |
8843.17 |
1.44 |
Theoretical Plate |
5672 |
5800 |
5867 |
5800 |
5801 |
5653 |
5765.5 |
84.07 |
1.46 |
Tailing Factor |
1.417 |
1.481 |
1.484 |
1.44 |
1.454 |
1.472 |
1.5 |
0.02 |
1.15 |
Retention Time |
4.82 |
4.83 |
4.84 |
4.84 |
4.87 |
4.85 |
4.8 |
0.02 |
0.38 |
Robustness
The system suitability test has been affected by the gradual changes made to the following parameters.
[Sitagliptin Phosphate (263nm and 267nm)]
Table.12: Robustness Data of Dapagliflozin
SR NO. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
MEAN |
SD |
%RSD |
||
FLOW RATE |
0.6 ml/min |
AREA |
418254 |
411648 |
424602 |
418168 |
6477.43 |
1.55 |
RT |
5.437 |
5.543 |
5.533 |
6 |
0.06 |
1.06 |
||
NTP |
10713 |
10828 |
10812 |
10784 |
62.29 |
0.58 |
||
1 ml/min |
AREA |
251209 |
247123 |
251423 |
249918 |
2423.19 |
0.97 |
|
RT |
3.327 |
3.333 |
3.337 |
3 |
0.01 |
0.15 |
||
NTP |
9273 |
9271 |
9253 |
9266 |
11.02 |
0.12 |
||
TEMP |
20°C |
AREA |
331684 |
323588 |
323312 |
326195 |
4755.9 |
1.46 |
RT |
4.183 |
4.183 |
4.163 |
4 |
0.01 |
0.28 |
||
NTP |
10701 |
10561 |
10600 |
10621 |
72.25 |
0.68 |
||
30°C |
AREA |
315056 |
310931 |
315129 |
313705 |
2402.92 |
0.77 |
|
RT |
4.16 |
4.167 |
4.16 |
4 |
0.00 |
0.10 |
||
NTP |
10970 |
11115 |
11070 |
11052 |
74.22 |
0.67 |
||
WAVE LENGTH |
222nm |
AREA |
313612 |
310612 |
309309 |
311178 |
2206.57 |
0.71 |
RT |
4.167 |
4.11 |
4.173 |
4 |
0.03 |
0.84 |
||
NTP |
10933 |
10938 |
11146 |
11006 |
121.56 |
1.10 |
||
226nm |
AREA |
302471 |
297118 |
292973 |
297521 |
4761.79 |
1.60 |
|
RT |
4.177 |
4.167 |
4.107 |
4 |
0.04 |
0.91 |
||
NTP |
10871 |
11038 |
10831 |
10913 |
109.8 |
1.01 |
Table.13: Robustness Data of Sitagliptin Phosphate
SR NO. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
MEAN |
SD |
%RSD |
||
FLOW RATE |
0.6ml/min |
AREA |
664637 |
683319 |
662454 |
670137 |
11468.3 |
1.71 |
RT |
6.87 |
6.763 |
6.77 |
7 |
0.06 |
0.88 |
||
NTP |
5875 |
5715 |
5883 |
5824 |
94.77 |
1.63 |
||
1 ml/min |
AREA |
395616 |
385005 |
390815 |
391479 |
6829.73 |
1.74 |
|
RT |
4 |
4.07 |
4.023 |
4 |
0.04 |
0.89 |
||
NTP |
5728 |
5720 |
5810 |
5753 |
49.81 |
0.87 |
||
TEMP |
20°C |
AREA |
479853 |
490162 |
479140 |
483052 |
6168.04 |
1.28 |
RT |
5.087 |
5.053 |
5.073 |
5 |
0.02 |
0.34 |
||
NTP |
6243 |
6178 |
6060 |
6160 |
92.77 |
1.51 |
||
30°C |
AREA |
483654 |
481269 |
488993 |
484639 |
3955.02 |
0.82 |
|
RT |
5 |
4.923 |
4.913 |
5 |
0.05 |
0.96 |
||
NTP |
6044 |
6158 |
6124 |
6109 |
58.53 |
0.96 |
||
WAVE LENGTH |
263 nm |
AREA |
473349 |
481451 |
471642 |
475481 |
5240.43 |
1.10 |
RT |
4.993 |
4.947 |
5.033 |
5 |
0.04 |
0.86 |
||
NTP |
6027 |
5987 |
5932 |
5981 |
47.57 |
0.8 |
||
267 nm |
AREA |
489076 |
484329 |
496031 |
49812 |
5885.62 |
1.2 |
|
RT |
5.07 |
5.043 |
5.103 |
5 |
0.03 |
0.59 |
||
NTP |
5996 |
5847 |
5894 |
5912 |
76.17 |
1.29 |
Forced Degradation
Research on forced degradation can be used to investigate the quality of drug substance and drug product changes over time and in response to various climatic variables. They may be helpful in identifying the drug molecule's inherent stability, the degradation route, the degradants, and proven stability-indicating analytical procedures. In accordance with ICH Guidelines, which are ICH Q1A, Q1B, and Q2B represent forced degradation. [17,18]
Dapagliflozin
Table.14: Degradation Data of Dapagliflozin
SR. No |
Degradation |
Procedure (10PPM) |
?gradation |
1 |
Acid (1% HCL) |
1mL Drug+ 1 mL HCL (for 24 hours) |
5.34% |
2 |
Base (1% NaOH) |
1mL Drug+ 1 mL NaOH (for 24 hours) |
9.09% |
3 |
Oxidation (H2O2) |
1mL Drug+ 1 mL H2O2 (for 24 hours) |
13.1% |
4 |
Photolytic |
2 hours in UV Chamber |
22.28% |
5 |
Thermal |
2 hours in Hot Air Oven (for 2 hours) |
34.14% |
Sitagliptin Phosphate
Table.15: Degradation Data of Sitagliptin Phosphate
SR. No |
Degradation |
Procedure (50PPM) |
?gradation |
1 |
Acid (1% HCL) |
1mL Drug+ 1 mL HCL (for 24 hours) |
10.09% |
2 |
Base (1% NaOH) |
1mL Drug+ 1 mL NaOH (for 24 hours) |
38.7 % |
3 |
Oxidation (H2O2) |
1mL Drug+ 1 mL H2O2 (for 24 hours) |
3.37% |
4 |
Photolytic |
2 hours in UV Chamber |
14.5% |
5 |
Thermal |
2 hours in Hot Air Oven (for 2 hours) |
11.06% |
CONCLUSION
The HPLC technique for measuring dapagliflozin and sitagliptin phosphate was properly designed and verified using a JASCO Extrema LC system-4000 HPLC model. The developed method for drug analysis is novel and makes use of a BDS Hypersil C18 (250 x 4.6 mm, ID 5µm) column and a specific wavelength of the respective drugs detected on a Shimadzu UV 1800 Spectrophotometer. There is a 10 µL injection volume. The ICH-compliant technique for Dapagliflozin and Sitagliptin Phosphate was found to be simple, accurate, sensitive, fast, dependable, and reasonably priced. The analytical conditions were quickly established with a satisfactory resolution. It was found that the maximum percentage RSD for all parameters was less than 2%. The Developed technique is properly Estimated the Dapagliflozin and Sitagliptin Phosphate in labs and in industry for quality control purpose.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
It’s a great pleasure for me to acknowledge all those who helped me and supported me. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to our principal, Dr Ashish Jain, and the management for their constant encouragement and for providing all necessary facilities. My deepest thanks to my guide, Dr. Mukesh S. Patil, for guiding me and making necessary corrections as and when needed. I express my sincere gratitude to PG Incharge Dr. Bhushan Rane for his kind cooperation and guidance.
REFERENCES
Mukesh Patil*, Raj Patil, Ashish Jain, Swati Borase, Rupali Bothara, Development and Validation of a Stability-Indicating RP-HPLC Method for the Quantification of Sitagliptin and Dapagliflozin in Bulk Drug and Commercial Formulation, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2024, Vol 2, Issue 12, 1861-1875. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14448943