View Article

Abstract

The present study focuses on the formulation and evaluation of a transdermal patch containing doxycycline hyclate to provide sustained drug release and improve patient compliance. Patches were prepared using the solvent casting method with various polymers and permeation enhancers. The prepared formulations were evaluated for physicochemical properties, drug content, in-vitro drug release, and ex-vivo skin permeation using Franz diffusion cells. The optimized patch showed good mechanical strength, uniform drug content, controlled drug release, and effective skin permeation. Antibacterial activity was retained, and skin irritation studies confirmed safety. The study concludes that doxycycline transdermal patches offer a promising alternative to oral delivery with enhanced therapeutic benefits.

Keywords

Transdermal, Doxycycline, acne, patch, skin

Introduction

Transdermal Drug Delivery System (TDDS) is a modern and innovative method of delivering therapeutic agents through the skin directly into the systemic circulation. Unlike oral or injectable routes, TDDS offers numerous advantages such as avoiding gastrointestinal disturbances, bypassing hepatic first-pass metabolism, and enabling sustained and controlled drug release over extended period(1). This method enhances bioavailability, reduces dosing frequency, and improves patient compliance, especially in chronic treatments. The skin, particularly the stratum corneum, acts as a barrier to drug entry(2). However, advances in formulation science—such as the use of penetration enhancers, liposomes, pro-drugs, and polymeric matrices—have made it possible to overcome this barrier efficiently. The system generally consists of components like a drug reservoir, adhesive layer, backing membrane, and release liner, each contributing to the effectiveness and safety of drug delivery(3). Historically, topical creams and ointments were the main approaches for dermatological conditions. With technological advancements, transdermal patches emerged in the 1980s and 1990s and have since become a reliable means of drug delivery(4). including treatments for cardiovascular diseases, hormone therapy, and dermatological conditions like acne. For instance, in the case of acne vulgaris, antibiotics like doxycycline can be incorporated into a transdermal patch(5). This localized delivery reduces systemic side effects and increases therapeutic efficiency by targeting the affected skin directly, making it a promising option in the field of dermatology.Thus, TDDS represents a significant advancement in pharmaceutical technology, offering a patient-friendly, effective, and targeted method of drug delivery(6).

MATERIAL AND METHOD:

Materials required:

Doxycycline, HPMC, propylene glyacol, glycerin, Ethanol

Methodology:

1.Polymer Dissolution: Accurately weigh the required amount of HPMC polymer. Dissolve it in a mixture of ethanol and acetone (usually 1:1 ratio) under continuous stirring using a magnetic stirrer(7). Stir the solution gently to avoid bubble formation. Continue stirring until a clear, homogeneous polymer solution is formed(8).

b. Drug Incorporation: Weigh the accurate amount of doxycycline. Dissolve the doxycycline separately in a small amount of ethanol to ensure complete solubilization(9). Add the drug solution slowly into the polymer solution under continuous stirring(10).

c. Addition of Plasticizer: Add an appropriate amount of propylene glycol (usually 10-30% w/w of the polymer weight) as a plasticizer into the solution.Stir continuously to achieve a uniform mixture(11).

2. Casting of the Film

a. Preparation of Casting Surface: Clean and dry Petri dishes (or glass molds). If needed, lightly lubricate the surface with a few drops of glycerin to facilitate easy removal of the film (optional)(12).

b. Pouring the Solution :Carefully pour the prepared solution into the Petri dish. Spread uniformly to ensure even thickness across the dish. (You can gently rotate the dish for uniform spreading.)(13).

c. Drying : Allow the solvent to evaporate at room temperature for 24–48 hours in a dust-free environment. Alternatively, drying can be accelerated by placing the dish in a hot air oven at a low temperature (not exceeding 40–45°C) to prevent degradation of doxycycline(14).

3.Removal of the Patch

Once dried completely, carefully peel off the film from the Petri dish using a spatula or tweezers(15).

4.Cutting and Storage

Cut the dried film into patches of desired size (e.g., 2 cm × 2 cm or as required). Wrap the patches in butter paper or aluminum foil and store them in a desiccator or an airtight container until further evaluation(16).

Formulation table : (17)

Table No :1 formulation table

Sr. No.

Ingredients

F1

F2

F3

1.

Doxycycline

200 mg

200 mg

200 mg

2.

HPMC

300mg

350 mg

400 mg

3.

Propylene glyacol

5 ml

4 ml

3 ml

4.

Glycerine

2 ml

1ml

2 ml

5.

Ethanol

2 ml

1 ml

2 ml

 

Evaluation test :

  1. Identification and characterization of drug

1.Organoleptic Properties:

Appearance: Yellow crystalline powder

Odor:  Odorless

Taste: Bitter(18)

b. Melting Point:170 -190°C

c. Solubility:

Soluble in water and methanol

Slightly soluble in ethanol

Practically insoluble in ether and chloroform(19)

2. Characterization:

a.Particle Size Analysis:

Important for drug release rate from the patch.

b. pKa and LogP:

pKa ~ 3.3 and 9.4 (two ionizable groups)

LogP ~ -0.2 to 0.5 (indicating moderate hydrophilicity)(20)

  1. UV spectroscopy :

UV-Visible spectroscopy, with a λmax around 270–280 nm, is commonly used to measure drug content and permeation in transdermal patches due to its accuracy and cost-effectiveness(21). A standard drug solution is prepared, diluted to 2–20 µg/mL, and absorbance is measured at λmax. A calibration curve is then plotted with absorbance versus concentration(22).

  1. IR spectroscopy:

FTIR spectroscopy is used to analyze chemical interactions and compatibility between drugs and excipients in transdermal formulations. Pellets of pure drug, polymer, and drug-loaded patch (each mixed with KBr) are scanned over 4000–400 cm?¹ using an FTIR spectrophotometer(23). The resulting spectra are compared to identify characteristic functional groups and confirm component compatibility(24)

  1. Weight uniformity :

Randomly select about 20 to 30 patches from a batch. Individually weigh each patch carefully ,Using an analytical balance (precision at least 0.1 mg).Record the weight of each patch(25).

  1. Thickness:

Randomly select a few patches (typically3-5 samples) from the batch to ensure the Measurement is representative. Micrometer or Digital Caliper: Micrometer: This is ideal for precise measurements especially for thin patches like pimple Patches(26).

Digital Caliper: If a micrometer is not available a digital caliper with a high precision (0.01 Mm or better) can be used. Ensure the caliper is calibrated for accuracy(27).

  1. Surface pH :

pH Meter: Place the pH probe gently on the surface of the patch (without pressing too hard). If needed, you can lightly moisten the patch surface with a small amount of distilled water(especially ifit’sa dry patch) before measurement(28). This is done to improve contact with the probe and avoid affecting the patch’s structure.Record the pH from the meter’s display(29).

  1. Percent moisture content :

Drying Oven or Desiccator: A drying oven is commonly used for accurate moisture content Measurement, but a desiccator can also work if lower temperatures are used(30).

  1. Drug content :

Drug content evaluation involves sampling from a batch and analyzing the active ingredient using techniques like HPLC or UV-Visible Spectrophotometry. Content uniformity checks ensure consistent API distribution in individual units(31). Dissolution tests assess drug release over time using USP apparatus, while stability testing monitors content under various conditions. Impurity and degradation analysis is also done using HPLC or GC, all following validated pharmacopeial standards(32).

  1. Drug  solubility :

To evaluate drug solubility, a known excess amount of the drug is added to a fixed volume of Solvent (usually water or a buffer) in a sealed container(33). The mixture is then stirred or shaken Continuously at a controlled temperature (typically 25°C or 37°C) for 24–48 hours to reach Equilibrium.(33)

  1. Dissolution Time :

Dissolution testing of a transdermal patch assesses drug release over time. A patch section is placed in USP Apparatus II with phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) at 32°C.(34) The paddle stirs at 50–100 rpm, and samples are collected at set intervals, then analyzed by UV spectrophotometry or HPLC. The resulting drug release profile helps evaluate release rate and patch performance(35).

Results :

  1. Weight uniformity :

Table No : 2 Weight Uniformity

Sr. No.

Batches

Weight uniformity

1.

F1

50-80 mg per

2.

F2

80-100 mg per

3.

F3

95-110 mg per

  1. Thickness :

Table No : 3 Thickness

Sr. No.

Batches

Surface PH

1.

F1

5.1-5.6

2.

F2

5.7-6.1

3.

F3

6.2-6.8

  1. Surface pH:

Table No : 4 Surface pH

Sr. No.

Batches

Surface PH

1.

F1

5.1-5.6

2.

F2

5.7-6.1

3.

F3

6.2-6.8

  1. Percent moisture content :

Table No : 5 percent moisture content

Sr. No.

Batches

Percent moisture content

1.

F1

1.1-1.4%

2.

F2

1.5-2.4%

3.

F3

2.5-3.5 %

  1. Dissolution Time:

Table No : 6 Dissolution Time

Time

(hour)

Cumulative drug release ( mg)

%Drug release

1 hour

2.1

10.5 %

2 hour

3.9

19.5%

4 hour

6.3

31.5%

6 hour

8.9

44.5%

8 hour

11.2

56.0%

12 hour

14.7

73.5%

16 hour

17.2

86.0%

20 hour

18.6

93.0%

  1. Drug content :

Table No : 7 Drug content

Hour(Time)

% of Drug content

1 hour

80.00%

2 hour

80.55%

3 hour

80.55%

4 hour

87.63%

5 hour

89.91%

6 hour

91.00%

7 hour

94.00%

8 hour

94.00%

  1. Drug solubility :

Table No : 8 Drug solubility

Solvent/matrix

Temperature

Solubility

Water

25°C

3.5 mg / ml

Ethanol

25°C

8.2 mg / ml

Propylene glyacol

25°C

12.6 mg / ml

CONCLUSION:

Formulation F3 demonstrates excellent physical and chemical characteristics suitable for transdermal application. The uniformity in weight and thickness ensures consistent drug delivery while the near-physiological surface pH and low moisture content support skin compatibility and formulation stability(36). These attributes indicate that F3 is a promising and well-optimized transdermal patch formulation, ready for further pharmacokinetic and efficacy evaluations. The combination of uniform weight and thickness, a skin-compatible pH, and stable moisture content confirms that Formulation F3 is pharmaceutically acceptable and safe for transdermal delivery(37). These features contribute to the controlled release profile, enhanced patient compliance, and improved therapeutic efficacy. Moreover the formulation appears robust enough for scale-up and commercialization, pending further in vitro permeation and in vivo bioavailability studies(38).This data supports the conclusion that F3 is a promising transdermal patch formulation with potential for clinical application and further development in drug delivery systems(39). Collectively the parameters of Formulation F3 reflect strong formulation control and suggest excellent product performance from manufacturing through patient use(40).

REFERENCES

  1. Prausnitz MR, Langer R. Transdermal drug delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(11):1261–8.
  2. Guy RH. Current status and future prospects of transdermal drug delivery. Pharm Res. 1996;13(12):1765–9.
  3. Prausnitz MR, Mitragotri S, Langer R. Current status and future potential of transdermal drug delivery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004;3(2):115–24.
  4. Brown MB, Martin GP, Jones SA, Akomeah FK. Dermal and transdermal drug delivery systems: current and future prospects. Drug Deliv. 2006;13(3):175–87.
  5. Prausnitz MR. Microneedles for transdermal drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004; 56   (5):581–7.
  6. Barry BW. Novel mechanisms and devices to enable successful transdermal drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2001;14(2):101–14.
  7. Cevc G, Blume G. Lipid vesicles penetrate into intact skin owing to the transdermal osmotic gradients and hydration force. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1992;1104(1):226–32.
  8. Ita K. Transdermal delivery of drugs with microneedles—potential and challenges. Pharmacodynamic . 2015;7(3):90–105. 
  9. Prausnitz MR, Langer R. Transdermal drug delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(11):1261–8.
  10. Sweetman SC. Martindale: The complete drug reference. 36th ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2009.
  11. Kulkarni RV, Mutalik S. Effect of plasticizers on the permeability and mechanical properties of eudragit films for transdermal application. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2002;64(1):28–31. 
  12. Rao PR, Diwan PY. Permeability studies of cellulose acetate-free films for transdermal use: influence of plasticizer concentration and polymer molecular weight. Pharm Dev Technol. 1997;2(2):133–41.
  13. Thakur R, Kashyap P, Gupta S, Patidar A. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patches. Int J Pharm Life Sci. 2011;2(7):998–1005.
  14. Dhiman S, Thakur GS, Rehni AK, Bedi N. Transdermal patches: a recent approach to new drug delivery system. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2011;3(5):26–34.
  15. Prausnitz MR, Langer R. Transdermal drug delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(11):1261–8.
  16. Benson HA. Transdermal drug delivery: penetration enhancement techniques. Curr Drug Deliv. 2005;2(1):23–33.
  17. Barry BW. Novel mechanisms and devices to enable successful transdermal drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2001;14(2):101–14.
  18. Patel RP, Baria AH. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patch of aceclofenac. Int J Drug Deliv. 2011;3(3):398–406.
  19. Prajapati ST, Patel CG, Patel CN. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patches of repaglinide. Int J Pharm Investig. 2011;1(4):199–206.
  20. Karki S, Kim H, Na SJ, Shin D, Jo K, Lee JO. Thin films as an emerging platform for drug delivery. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2016;11(5):559–74.
  21. Pichayakorn W, Boonme P. Evaluation of crosslinked chitosan microparticles containing doxycycline hyclate. Pharm Dev Technol. 2013;18(5):1217–23.
  22. Lakshmi PK, Sridharan A. Spectrophotometric methods for the determination of doxycycline in pharmaceutical dosage forms. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2016;7(2):467–72.
  23. Bunnage ME. Getting pharmaceutical R&D back on target. Nat Chem Biol. 2011;7(6):335–9.
  24.  Avdeef A. Solubility of drugs and drug candidates. In: Absorption and Drug Development .2nd ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2012. P. 159–80.
  25. Qiu Y, Chen Y, Zhang GGZ, Liu L, Porter W. Developing Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Pharmaceutical Theory & Practice. 2nd ed. Boston: Academic Press; 2017. P. 725–35.
  26. Prausnitz MR, Langer R. Transdermal drug delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(11):1261–Doi:10.1038/nbt.1504
  27. Barry BW. Breaching the skin’s barrier to drugs. Nat Biotechnol. 2004 Aug;22(8):165–9. Doi:10.1038/nbt0804-165
  28. Sankar V, Mishra B, Rana V, Sadanandam M. Design and evaluation of transdermal drug delivery system of tamoxifen citrate. Int J Pharm. 2003 Jul;254(1):73–82. Doi:10.1016/S0378-5173(03)00047-1
  29. Lambers H, Piessens S, Bloem A, Pronk H, Finkel P. Natural skin surface pH is on average below 5, which is beneficial for its resident flora. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2006 Oct;28(5):359–70. Doi:10.1111/j.1468-2494.2006.00344.x
  30. Shinde AJ, More HN, Desai TR. Design and evaluation of transdermal drug delivery system of a saquinavir. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2007;69(5):622–5. Doi:10.4103/0250-474X.38459
  31. Patel, S. P., & Desai, P. R. (2021). Development and evaluation of transdermal drug delivery systems: A review. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 25(4), 98-115.Doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.12.022
  32. Jain, S., & Rani, V. (2018). Advances in transdermal drug delivery systems: Current research and future prospects. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, 11(5), 1-8.Doi: 10.22159/ajpcr.2018.v11i5.27409
  33. Bajpai, M., & Puri, P. (2019). Transdermal patches: A review on various aspects. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology, 12(7), 3451-3460. Doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2019.00585.3.

Reference

  1. Prausnitz MR, Langer R. Transdermal drug delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(11):1261–8.
  2. Guy RH. Current status and future prospects of transdermal drug delivery. Pharm Res. 1996;13(12):1765–9.
  3. Prausnitz MR, Mitragotri S, Langer R. Current status and future potential of transdermal drug delivery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004;3(2):115–24.
  4. Brown MB, Martin GP, Jones SA, Akomeah FK. Dermal and transdermal drug delivery systems: current and future prospects. Drug Deliv. 2006;13(3):175–87.
  5. Prausnitz MR. Microneedles for transdermal drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004; 56   (5):581–7.
  6. Barry BW. Novel mechanisms and devices to enable successful transdermal drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2001;14(2):101–14.
  7. Cevc G, Blume G. Lipid vesicles penetrate into intact skin owing to the transdermal osmotic gradients and hydration force. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1992;1104(1):226–32.
  8. Ita K. Transdermal delivery of drugs with microneedles—potential and challenges. Pharmacodynamic . 2015;7(3):90–105. 
  9. Prausnitz MR, Langer R. Transdermal drug delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(11):1261–8.
  10. Sweetman SC. Martindale: The complete drug reference. 36th ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2009.
  11. Kulkarni RV, Mutalik S. Effect of plasticizers on the permeability and mechanical properties of eudragit films for transdermal application. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2002;64(1):28–31. 
  12. Rao PR, Diwan PY. Permeability studies of cellulose acetate-free films for transdermal use: influence of plasticizer concentration and polymer molecular weight. Pharm Dev Technol. 1997;2(2):133–41.
  13. Thakur R, Kashyap P, Gupta S, Patidar A. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patches. Int J Pharm Life Sci. 2011;2(7):998–1005.
  14. Dhiman S, Thakur GS, Rehni AK, Bedi N. Transdermal patches: a recent approach to new drug delivery system. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2011;3(5):26–34.
  15. Prausnitz MR, Langer R. Transdermal drug delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(11):1261–8.
  16. Benson HA. Transdermal drug delivery: penetration enhancement techniques. Curr Drug Deliv. 2005;2(1):23–33.
  17. Barry BW. Novel mechanisms and devices to enable successful transdermal drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2001;14(2):101–14.
  18. Patel RP, Baria AH. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patch of aceclofenac. Int J Drug Deliv. 2011;3(3):398–406.
  19. Prajapati ST, Patel CG, Patel CN. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patches of repaglinide. Int J Pharm Investig. 2011;1(4):199–206.
  20. Karki S, Kim H, Na SJ, Shin D, Jo K, Lee JO. Thin films as an emerging platform for drug delivery. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2016;11(5):559–74.
  21. Pichayakorn W, Boonme P. Evaluation of crosslinked chitosan microparticles containing doxycycline hyclate. Pharm Dev Technol. 2013;18(5):1217–23.
  22. Lakshmi PK, Sridharan A. Spectrophotometric methods for the determination of doxycycline in pharmaceutical dosage forms. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2016;7(2):467–72.
  23. Bunnage ME. Getting pharmaceutical R&D back on target. Nat Chem Biol. 2011;7(6):335–9.
  24.  Avdeef A. Solubility of drugs and drug candidates. In: Absorption and Drug Development .2nd ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2012. P. 159–80.
  25. Qiu Y, Chen Y, Zhang GGZ, Liu L, Porter W. Developing Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Pharmaceutical Theory & Practice. 2nd ed. Boston: Academic Press; 2017. P. 725–35.
  26. Prausnitz MR, Langer R. Transdermal drug delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(11):1261–Doi:10.1038/nbt.1504
  27. Barry BW. Breaching the skin’s barrier to drugs. Nat Biotechnol. 2004 Aug;22(8):165–9. Doi:10.1038/nbt0804-165
  28. Sankar V, Mishra B, Rana V, Sadanandam M. Design and evaluation of transdermal drug delivery system of tamoxifen citrate. Int J Pharm. 2003 Jul;254(1):73–82. Doi:10.1016/S0378-5173(03)00047-1
  29. Lambers H, Piessens S, Bloem A, Pronk H, Finkel P. Natural skin surface pH is on average below 5, which is beneficial for its resident flora. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2006 Oct;28(5):359–70. Doi:10.1111/j.1468-2494.2006.00344.x
  30. Shinde AJ, More HN, Desai TR. Design and evaluation of transdermal drug delivery system of a saquinavir. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2007;69(5):622–5. Doi:10.4103/0250-474X.38459
  31. Patel, S. P., & Desai, P. R. (2021). Development and evaluation of transdermal drug delivery systems: A review. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 25(4), 98-115.Doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.12.022
  32. Jain, S., & Rani, V. (2018). Advances in transdermal drug delivery systems: Current research and future prospects. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, 11(5), 1-8.Doi: 10.22159/ajpcr.2018.v11i5.27409
  33. Bajpai, M., & Puri, P. (2019). Transdermal patches: A review on various aspects. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology, 12(7), 3451-3460. Doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2019.00585.3.

Photo
Sakshi Shrinath
Corresponding author

Shraddha Institute of Pharmacy, kondala zambre, Washim 444505, Maharashtra

Photo
Aditi Tikait
Co-author

Shraddha Institute of Pharmacy, kondala zambre, Washim 444505, Maharashtra

Photo
Dr. Swati Deshmukh
Co-author

Shraddha Institute of Pharmacy, kondala zambre, Washim 444505, Maharashtra

Sakshi Shrinath*, Aditi Tikait, Dr. Swati Deshmukh, Formulation and Evaluation of Transdermal Patches of Doxycycline for Acne, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 5, 2516-2523. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15427505

More related articles
Comparative Analysis of Mucoadhesive Patches and O...
Mehak Gupta, Dr. Daisy Sharma , Gopal Thakur, Arshiya Sharma, Apa...
Recent Study on Herbal Medicine for Skin Diseases ...
Dipali Patil , Shravani Dhanve, Mayuri Bhadlekar, Dr. Nilesh Chou...
Formulation and Evaluation of Herbal Anti-Acne Pat...
Rajani Bhati, Rohan Hade , Rajashree Shinde , Dr. Priyatama Pawar...
Formulation and Evaluation of Herbal Anti-itching Cream ...
Payal Theng, Pratiksha Kale, Pooja Gaikwad, D. R. Bhagwat, Dr. K. R. Biyani, Tahniyat Afsha Mujammil...
Formulation And Evaluation Of Anti-Acne Herbal Gel...
Mufeeda Mohammad Ali, Haneena Swafiya A, Hasanath P, Marjhan rafeeq, Sharafa BK, Dr Arun Kumar KV, ...
Retinol: A Magical Ingredients for Improving the Skin Texture ...
Zalak Prajapati, Sifa Memon, Mona A. Gupta, Dr. Nisha Patel, Sandhya Bodhe, ...
Related Articles
Formulation And Evaluation of Herbal Cream of Crude Drug ...
Megha Awatade, Sarika Waghmode, Vidya Takmoge, Shailesh Pendor , ...
Formulation and Evaluation of Herbal Foot Cream ...
Shashikant Kuthe, Yash Dhadange , Sayali Ganjiwale , Sachin Dighade, ...
Recent Advancements In Pharmaceutical Industry : Emulgel...
Saleha Firoz Tamboli , Suhana Afjal Tamboli , Shital B Gondkar , ...
Comparative Analysis of Mucoadhesive Patches and Oral Disintegrating Films for B...
Mehak Gupta, Dr. Daisy Sharma , Gopal Thakur, Arshiya Sharma, Aparna Thakur, ...
More related articles
Comparative Analysis of Mucoadhesive Patches and Oral Disintegrating Films for B...
Mehak Gupta, Dr. Daisy Sharma , Gopal Thakur, Arshiya Sharma, Aparna Thakur, ...
Recent Study on Herbal Medicine for Skin Diseases ...
Dipali Patil , Shravani Dhanve, Mayuri Bhadlekar, Dr. Nilesh Chougule, Dhanaji Tondale, ...
Formulation and Evaluation of Herbal Anti-Acne Patches Containing ethanolic extr...
Rajani Bhati, Rohan Hade , Rajashree Shinde , Dr. Priyatama Pawar, Rohit Khandare, ...
Comparative Analysis of Mucoadhesive Patches and Oral Disintegrating Films for B...
Mehak Gupta, Dr. Daisy Sharma , Gopal Thakur, Arshiya Sharma, Aparna Thakur, ...
Recent Study on Herbal Medicine for Skin Diseases ...
Dipali Patil , Shravani Dhanve, Mayuri Bhadlekar, Dr. Nilesh Chougule, Dhanaji Tondale, ...
Formulation and Evaluation of Herbal Anti-Acne Patches Containing ethanolic extr...
Rajani Bhati, Rohan Hade , Rajashree Shinde , Dr. Priyatama Pawar, Rohit Khandare, ...