Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, Trikaripur, Kasargod, India, 671310
Sunscreens are topical preparations intended to shield the skin from the damaging effects of ultraviolet (UV) rays, especially UV-A and UV-B radiation, which lead to sunburn, premature aging, and even skin cancer. While traditional sunscreens usually contain synthetic chemicals that might result in skin irritation or ecological damage, herbal sunscreens provide a natural and safer option. Herbal sunscreens are prepared from plant-derived ingredients that have natural UV-blocking, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and skin-soothing properties. This study involves the development and assessment of a herbal sun lotion. The initial objective was to develop a natural, skin-friendly sunscreen product with the help of herbal extracts that have photoprotective and antioxidant effects. The major ingredients employed were Litchi, Tulsi, Green Tea, Aloe Vera, Neem, Sandalwood, Cucumber, and Liquorice. Formulation was carried out by preparing the lotion as an emulsion type and ensuring proper consistency and stability. Preliminary phytochemical screening confirmed the presence of useful compounds such as flavonoids, saponins, glycosides, tannins, and phenols, in higher content in aqueous extracts. Physicochemical parameters such as ash value, extractive value, and moisture content were determined and found within acceptable ranges. Three formulations (F1, F2, F3) were analyzed for organoleptic properties, pH, homogeneity, spreadability, and washability. Sun Protection Factor (SPF) was established using spectrophotometric analysis and showed that the highest UV protection was given by formulation F3. The study generally concludes that the herbal sunscreen lotion provides sun protection, thereby identifying the cosmetic potential of herbal ingredients.
Sunscreens are topical agents used to protect the skin from the harmful effects of ultraviolet (UV) radiation. These formulations work by either reflecting, scattering, or absorbing UV-A and UV-B rays, which are known to cause photoaging, sunburn, and an increased risk of skin cancer. Regular use of sunscreen helps prevent premature skin aging and reduces the incidence of various UV-induced dermatological disorders. UV radiation is typically divided into three types: UV-A (320–400 nm), UV-B (290–320 nm), and UV-C (100–290 nm). While UV-C is mostly absorbed by the Earth’s atmosphere, UV-A and UV-B reach the skin and contribute to different forms of damage. UV-A penetrates deeper, causing long-term effects like aging and DNA damage, whereas UV-B is responsible for more acute issues such as sunburn and blistering.To address this, sunscreens are formulated using active ingredients that function as either physical blockers or chemical absorbers. Physical blockers, like zinc oxide and titanium dioxide, remain on the surface of the skin and reflect UV rays. Chemical absorbers, on the other hand, penetrate the skin and absorb UV radiation, converting it into less harmful energy. Many modern sunscreen products combine both types to achieve broad-spectrum protection. The effectiveness of a sunscreen is typically measured by its Sun Protection Factor (SPF), which indicates the level of protection it offers against UV-B rays. A higher SPF value corresponds to greater protection. However, SPF does not directly correlate with the time a person can spend in the sun without burning; rather, it measures the comparative increase in exposure time required to cause sunburn when using the sunscreen versus without it. In recent years, there has been growing concern over the safety and environmental impact of synthetic sunscreen agents. Compounds like oxybenzone and avobenzone, although effective, have been associated with skin irritation and potential hormonal effects. Furthermore, their accumulation in water bodies has raised environmental alarms, particularly concerning coral reef damage. As a result, the focus has shifted towards naturally derived, plant-based alternatives. Herbal and botanical ingredients offer a safer and more sustainable approach to photoprotection. Many medicinal plants are rich in flavonoids, phenolic acids, and antioxidants that absorb UV radiation and neutralize free radicals. These phytoconstituents are not only effective in minimizing sun damage but also contribute to overall skin health through anti-inflammatory and moisturizing actions. Polyherbal formulations, which combine multiple herbal extracts, are widely used in traditional medicine systems for their synergistic effects. In the context of sunscreens, combining extracts such as Aloe vera, Green tea, Tulsi, Neem, Sandalwood, Litchi, Cucumber, and Liquorice allows for broader protective coverage while enhancing the formulation’s stability and cosmetic acceptability. This project is aimed at formulating and evaluating a herbal sunscreen lotion using a combination of plant-based extracts known for their UV-absorbing and antioxidant properties. The study includes preparation of the formulation, analysis of physicochemical properties (such as pH, viscosity, spreadability), and SPF evaluation using UV spectrophotometry. The goal is to develop a safe, effective, and eco-friendly alternative to chemical sunscreens that meets current demands for natural skincare solutions
MATERIALS AND METHODS
List of Materials, Chemicals and Equipments
Table no:1 Plant materials used for the development of formulation
Sr. No |
Botanical name |
Vernacular name |
Source |
1 |
Litchi chinensis |
Litchi |
Indoor vendors |
2 |
Ocimum sanctum |
Tulsi |
Indoor vendors |
3 |
Aloe barbadenis |
Aloe vera |
Indoor vendors |
4 |
Camellia sinensis |
Green tea |
Indoor vendors |
5 |
Santalum album |
Sandalwood |
Indoor vendors |
6 |
Cucumis sativus |
Cucumber |
Indoor vendors |
7 |
Glycyrrhiza glabra |
Liquorice |
Indoor vendors |
8 |
Azadirachta indica |
Neem |
Indoor vendors |
9 |
Helianthus annus |
Sunflower oil |
Indoor vendors |
Table no: 2 Chemical ingredients used for the development of formulation
Sr. No. |
Materials/ Solvents |
Suppliers/ Manufacturers |
1 |
Beeswax |
Numex chemical products India Ltd |
2 |
Cetostearyl alcohol |
Burgoyne burbidges |
Table no: 3 Equipments used for the formulation
Sr. No |
Equipments |
Suppliers/ Manufacturers |
1 |
Digital weighing balance |
Universal agencies |
2 |
Digital pH meter |
Universal agencies |
3 |
Compound microscope |
Pentac solutions |
4 |
Muffle furnace |
Universal agencies |
5 |
Hot air oven |
Pentac solutions |
6 |
Spectrophotometer |
Pentac solutions |
METHODS
PHYSICOCHEMICAL STUDY OF THE PLANT MATERIALS
Determination of ash value
The ash value is an important parameter for the evaluation of the crude drugs. The following different methods are adopted.
Determination of moisture content
Weigh accurately 3g of powdered drug and transfer it into a tared Petri dish. Then the crude drugs were heated at 105c in an oven till constant weight was obtained. Percentage moisture content of the sample was calculated with the reference to the air-dried drug.
Moisture content (%) = Initial weight of sample-Final weight of sample/Initial weight of sample ? 100
PREPARATION OF PLANT EXTRACT
Aqueous extraction of collected material is done by Maceration.
Steps Involved
PRELIMINARY PHYTOCHEMICAL STUDY
The extracts were subjected to preliminary phytochemical screening to detect the various phytoconstituents such as Alkaloids, Flavonoids, Tannins, Saponin, Phenol, Glycosides, Proteins and Carbohydrates
FORMULATION OF THE HERBAL SUNSCREEN LOTION
Table no: 4 Formulation of herbal sunscreen
Sr.No |
Ingredients |
F1 |
F2 |
F3 |
1 |
Aloe vera extract |
5g |
7g |
10g |
2 |
Green tea extract |
3g |
5g |
7g |
3 |
Tulsi extract |
2g |
3g |
5g |
4 |
Litchi extract |
2g |
3g |
5g |
5 |
Sandalwood extract |
1g |
2g |
3g |
6 |
Neem extract |
2g |
3g |
4g |
7 |
Cucumber extract |
2g |
3g |
5g |
8 |
Liquorice extract |
1g |
2g |
3g |
9 |
Beeswax |
3g |
3g |
3g |
10 |
Cetostearyl alcohol |
2ml |
2ml |
2ml |
11 |
Sunflower oil |
5ml |
5ml |
5ml |
12 |
Perfume |
Q.S. |
Q.S. |
Q.S. |
13 |
Distilled water |
Upto 100ml |
Upto 100ml |
Upto 100ml |
Procedure
EVALUATION OF HERBAL SUNSCREEN LOTION
Organoleptic Evaluation
Formulation prepared was evaluated for the clarity, colour, odour, and foam producing ability.
Determination of pH
The pH of sunscreens was determined using a digital pH meter. pH was measured after 1 g of the formulation was dissolved in 100 ml of newly prepared distilled water for 2 hours. The purpose of this study was to guarantee that the pH of the produced herbal sunscreens is similar to the pH of the skin after 24 hours of use.
Test for homogeneity
A small amount of the sunscreen lotion is placed on a glass slide. The lotion is carefully spread into a thin, even layer on the slide. A cover glass is placed on top. The slide is then observed under a microscope. The lotion is visually examined for any visible particles, clumps, or uneven distribution. If the lotion appears uniform with no visible coarse particles, it's considered homogeneous.
Washability test
Apply a small amount of the sunscreen lotion to the fingertip. Gently rub the lotion-covered fingertip with water. Note how easily the lotion washes off and if any residue remains.
Spreadabilty test
A known weight of the sunscreen lotion is placed on a glass surface. Another glass surface is placed on top, and a weight is added. After a specific time, the diameter of the spread is measured.
Determination of SPF
SPF value is determined in vitro using a spectrophotometer. 0.0125 grams of each preparation sample was taken and then diluted with 70% ethanol to 50 ml. The 70% ethanol solution was used as a blank. The absorbance results of the sample at a wavelength of 290 - 320 and an interval of 5 nm were recorded, and then the SPF value was calculated. The SPF value was calculated using the Mansur method;
SPF = CF x ∑EE(λ) x I(λ) x Abs(λ)
Description:
CF: Correction Factor (10)
EE: Spectrum of effects of erythema
I: Solar intensity spectrum
Abs: Sample absorbance
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Table no:5 Results of physicochemical study
Sr. No |
Sample |
Total Ash Value (% w/w) |
Water Soluble Extractive Value (%w/w) |
Percentage Loss on Drying (% w/w) |
1 |
Green Tea |
6% |
7.6% |
3.15% |
2 |
Cucumber |
1.36% |
21% |
8.19% |
3 |
Neem |
10.34% |
4.6% |
10.53% |
4 |
Sandalwood |
23.65% |
2.8% |
5.63% |
5 |
Litchi |
0.64% |
17% |
6.39% |
6 |
Liquorice |
5.67% |
6.2% |
7.64% |
7 |
Tulsi |
13.67% |
6.6% |
6.38% |
8 |
Aloe Vera |
12.46% |
9% |
11.79% |
Figure 9: Determination of ash value
Figure 10 &11: Extraction of plant materials
PRELIMINARY PHYTOCHEMICAL STUDY
Table no:6 Results of Preliminary phytochemical study of aqueous extract
|
Green tea |
Cucumber |
Neem |
Sandalwood |
Litchi |
Liquorice |
Tulsi |
Aloe vera |
Alkaloids |
++ |
- |
++ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
Flavonoids |
++ |
++ |
+ |
++ |
+++ |
+ |
+ |
++ |
Tannins |
+ |
+ |
+++ |
+ |
++ |
++ |
++ |
+ |
Saponin |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
++ |
Phenol |
+++ |
++ |
++ |
++ |
++ |
+ |
+++ |
++ |
Glycosides |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
++ |
+ |
- |
Proteins |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
Carbohydrates |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
[ +: mild, ++: moderate, +++: intense, -: negative]
Table no: 7 Results of preliminary phytochemical study of alcoholic extract
|
Green tea |
Cucumber |
Neem |
Sandalwood |
Litchi |
Liquorice |
Tulsi |
Aloe vera |
Alkaloids |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
Flavonoids |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
++ |
+ |
- |
+ |
Tannins |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
Saponin |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
Phenol |
++ |
+ |
++ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
++ |
Glycosides |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
Proteins |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
Carbohydrates |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
[ +: mild, ++: moderate, +++: intense, -: negative]
Table no: 8 Results of preliminary phytochemical study of chloroform extract
|
Green tea |
Cucumber |
Neem |
Sandalwood |
Litchi |
Liquorice |
Tulsi |
Aloe vera |
Alkaloids |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
++ |
- |
+ |
+ |
Flavonoids |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
Tannins |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
++ |
Saponin |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
Phenol |
++ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
Glycosides |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
Proteins |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
Carbohydrates |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
[ +: mild, ++: moderate, +++: intense, -: negative]
EVALUATION OF HERBAL SUNSCREEN LOTION
Table no:9 Evaluation of herbal sunscreen lotion
Sr. No |
Parameters |
Formulation |
||
F1 |
F2 |
F3 |
||
1 |
State |
Liquid |
Liquid |
Liquid |
2 |
Colour |
Pale Green |
Pale Green |
Pale Green |
3 |
Odour |
Characteristic |
Characteristic |
Characteristic |
4 |
Texture |
Smooth |
Smooth |
Smooth |
5 |
pH |
7.05 |
6.97 |
7.18 |
6 |
Homogeneity |
Good |
Good |
Good |
7 |
Washability |
Good |
Good |
Good |
8 |
Spreadability |
6.5 |
5.8 |
7.2 |
Table no: 10 Results of determination of SPF
Wavelength |
EE×I |
F1 |
F2 |
F3 |
|||
Abs |
EE×I×Abs |
Abs |
EE×I×Abs |
Abs |
EE×I×Abs |
||
290 |
0.015 |
1.843 |
0.0276 |
1.396 |
0.0209 |
2.015 |
0.0302 |
295 |
0.0817 |
1.636 |
0.1336 |
1.582 |
0.1292 |
2.594 |
0.2119 |
300 |
0.2874 |
0.893 |
0.2556 |
1.713 |
0.4923 |
2.839 |
0.8159 |
305 |
0.3274 |
1.568 |
0.5139 |
1.863 |
0.6101 |
3.103 |
1.0171 |
310 |
0.1864 |
0.956 |
0.0177 |
1.792 |
0.3340 |
4.739 |
0.1881 |
315 |
0.0834 |
1.198 |
0.1002 |
1.785 |
0.1488 |
2.995 |
0.2497 |
320 |
0.0180 |
1.235 |
0.0222 |
1.613 |
0.0290 |
1.973 |
0.0355 |
|
|
Total:1.0708 |
Total:1.7643 |
Total:2.4484 |
|||
|
|
SPF:10.708 |
SPF:17.643 |
SPF:24.484 |
DISCUSSIONS:
The ultimate aim of the present work was to formulate and evaluate herbal sunscreen lotion. The study was targeted to prepare a natural and dermatologically friendly sunscreen formulation by incorporating herbal components recognized for their photoprotective, antioxidant, and calming attributes. The preparation comprised a synergistic mixture of the following herbal compounds such as Litchi, Tulsi, Green tea, Aloe vera, Neem, Sandalwood, Cucumber, Liquorice. The formulation process involved creating an emulsion-based lotion with these herbal extracts, ensuring optimal consistency, stability, and skin compatibility. Preliminary screening of phytochemicals of the chosen plants was conducted in alcohol, chloroform and water and the result indicated the presence of phytoconstituents including flavonoids, saponins, glycosides, tannins and phenols. The preliminary phytochemical screening of the herbal sunscreen cream indicated a greater content of phytochemicals in aqueous extraction as compared to alcohol and chloroform. The physicochemical parameters like ash value, extractive value, moisture content was estimated and all the results were within the acceptable limit. The herbal sunscreen lotion was formulated based on 3 formulae (F1, F2, F3) and evaluation was carried out. The organoleptic characteristics, pH, homogeneity, spreadability and washability were also performed. The Sun Protection Factor (SPF) was determined using spectrophotometric analysis across the UV-B range (290–320 nm) on all formulations, and the results indicate that Formulation F3 has the highest sun protection efficacy, followed by F2 and F1. In conclusion the SPF values suggest that the formulation F3 offers the most effective UV protection.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We humbly owe the completion of this dissertation work to the almighty GOD who always guided, protected and let us at every moment of our life with our steadfast love. We express our heartfelt gratitude and sincere thanks to our esteemed guide Dr. Arun Kumar K.V, Professor & HOD, Department of Pharmaceutics, Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Pharmaceutical science and research for his constant guidance, valuable suggestions and encouragement. We are deeply indebted to Prof. Dr. M. Paridhavi, M Pharm, PhD, FABAP, Principal, Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Pharmaceutical science and research, for providing all necessary facilities for our study and also for the constant support and encouragement. We also extend our sincere thanks to all teachers, who helped us for the completion of this dissertation.
REFERENCES
Jawhara MTP, Ajul Saji, Fathima K, Nayana K, Rithika Divyan, Arunkumar KV, Formulation and Evaluation of Herbal Sunscreen Lotion, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 7, 88-95. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15782377