Srinivas College of Pharmacy, valachil, post Farangipete, Mangalore-574143, Karnataka, India
Background: Imposter Syndrome (IS) is a psychological pattern characterized by persistent self-doubt, fear of failure, and the belief that one’s success is undeserved despite clear evidence of competence [1–3]. Students in health-professional programs, particularly Pharm D students, face rigorous academic expectations, continuous evaluation, and early clinical exposure, making them especially vulnerable to IS. Its impact on academic performance, clinical confidence, mental well-being, and professional identity formation highlights the need for focused research in this population. Objectives: To determine the prevalence and severity of IS among Pharm D students and examine the influence of age, gender, and academic progression. Methods: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted among 101 Pharm D students across different academic years. Data were collected using a validated demographic questionnaire and the Clance Imposter Phenomenon Scale (CIPS). Descriptive statistics and subgroup analyses were performed to assess IS differences across age groups, gender, academic years, and recent academic stress. Results: A majority of participants (79.2%) experienced Frequent or Intense Imposter Syndrome. The highest IS mean scores were observed among students aged 24–26 years, suggesting increased self-doubt during advanced stages of training. Female students reported higher IS levels than males. IS severity peaked during Years 2–4, where academic complexity and initial clinical exposure coincide. Students who reported significant academic stress in the past six months demonstrated notably higher IS severity. Conclusion: Imposter Syndrome is highly prevalent among Pharm D students and is strongly shaped by demographic and academic factors. The findings identify critical vulnerability periods—particularly the 24–26 age group and the middle academic years—where targeted support, mentorship, and mental-health interventions are essential. Early identification and structured guidance can help reduce impostor feelings, strengthen professional identity, and improve students’ readiness for real-world pharmacy practice.
Imposter Syndrome (IS) is a psychological experience characterized by persistent feelings of inadequacy and fear of being exposed as intellectually incapable despite clear evidence of one’s competence [1,2]. Individuals with IS often attribute their achievements to luck or external factors rather than their own abilities, leading to chronic self-doubt and emotional distress [3]. IS has been associated with perfectionism, anxiety, burnout, and diminished academic performance, making it a significant concern within higher education, particularly in demanding professional programs [4–7].
Health-professional education provides an environment where IS commonly emerges due to rigorous academic demands, continuous evaluation, and early exposure to real clinical responsibilities [8–11]. Pharm D students, in particular, experience a unique blend of theoretical learning and clinical application. They are required to master complex pharmacotherapeutic concepts, communicate effectively with healthcare professionals, and make informed decisions in clinical settings, often before feeling fully confident in their abilities [12–14]. This transition from classroom learning to patient-centered care may intensify feelings of incompetence and heighten impostor experiences.
Demographic and academic factors play a significant role in shaping the severity of IS. Research indicates that female students tend to report higher levels of IS due to increased self-criticism, societal expectations, and fear of negative evaluation [15–18]. Age-related differences have also been observed, with older students nearing graduation experiencing greater pressure as they prepare to transition into professional roles [19]. Furthermore, IS often peaks during the middle academic years, when academic workload increases, clinical exposure begins, and professional identity formation is still developing [20–23]. These factors create an emotional climate where students may underestimate their competence despite making steady academic progress.
Given the growing recognition of Imposter Syndrome in pharmacy education, it is essential to understand its prevalence and contributing factors within Pharm D programs. Limited research exists in the Indian context, where academic expectations, training structures, and cultural influences may differ from those in Western countries. Understanding how IS varies across age, gender, and academic progression can help institutions design targeted support strategies such as mentorship, counseling, and confidence-building interventions. Therefore, this study aims to assess the prevalence and severity of Imposter Syndrome among Pharm D students and to examine its relationship with demographic and academic variables to better support their academic and professional development.
2. OBJECTIVES
2.1 Primary Objective
2.2 Secondary Objectives
3. MATERIALS AND METHODS
3.1 STUDY DESIGN
A cross-sectional survey study was conducted among Pharm D students.
3.2 STUDY POPULATION
A total of 101 Pharm D students from Years 1–6 participated.
Inclusion criteria included :
3.3 STUDY TOOLS
The survey consisted of two components
Collected data on: Age, Gender, Year of study, Academic stress in the past 6 months.
A 20-item validated psychological assessment tool scored on a 5-point Likert scale. Severity ranges were categorized as:
3.4 DATA COLLECTION
Data were collected through a structured Google Forms questionnaire circulated to Pharm D students across all academic years. Before beginning the survey, participants viewed an informed consent statement explaining the purpose of the study, voluntary participation, and confidentiality. Only those who agreed proceeded to the questionnaire, which included demographic details and the Clance Imposter Phenomenon Scale (CIPS). Responses were submitted electronically, ensuring anonymity and allowing students to complete the survey at their convenience without time pressure.
Collected data were exported to Microsoft Excel and analyzed using descriptive statistical methods. Frequencies and percentages were calculated for categorical variables such as age, gender, and academic year. Mean scores and standard deviations were computed for CIPS total scores across different groups. Imposter Syndrome levels were categorized based on standard CIPS scoring ranges (Low, Moderate, Frequent, Intense). Findings were summarized in tables and graphs to illustrate variations among demographic and academic subgroups.
4. RESULT
Demographic Profile Of Respondents:
The majority of respondents were in the 24-26 years age group (45.7%), followed by 21-23 years (45.7%), with a smaller representation of
younger students (18-20 years, 8.7%). Most respondents were in the latter half of their Pharm D program (Years 4-6, 68.5%). Female students
constituted a larger proportion (62.0%) of the sample.
|
Characteristic |
Category |
Frequency (N) |
Percentage (%) |
|
Age Group |
18-20 years |
7 |
7.6 |
|
21-23 years |
34 |
37 |
|
|
24-26 years |
51 |
55.5 |
|
|
Gender |
Female |
57 |
62 |
|
Male |
35 |
38 |
|
|
Year of Study |
1st Year |
2 |
2.2 |
|
2nd Year |
11 |
12 |
|
|
3rd Year |
17 |
18.5 |
|
|
4th Year |
13 |
14.1 |
|
|
5th Year |
19 |
20.7 |
|
|
|
6th Year |
30 |
32.6 |
Prevalence And Intensity Of Imposter Syndrome:
The data reveals that the vast majority of students (79.3%) experience Imposter Syndrome at either "Frequent" or "Intense" levels, underscoring the pervasiveness of this phenomenon within the academic environment.
|
Intensity Level |
Score Range |
Frequency (N) |
Percentage (%) |
|
Low |
20 - 40 |
2 |
2.2 |
|
Moderate |
41 - 60 |
17 |
18.5 |
|
Frequent |
61 - 80 |
56 |
60.9 |
|
Intense |
81 - 100 |
17 |
18.5 |
Correlation with The Demographic Factors:
Students in the 24-26 age group reported the highest average score (69.2), indicating the most intense imposter feelings among the age groups. The 21-23 years group showed a slightly lower mean score (68.5) but with considerable variability, suggesting a diverse range of experiences.
|
Age Group |
Frequency (N) |
Mean Score |
Standard Deviation |
Predominant Intensity |
|
18-20 years |
7 |
67.8 |
12.1 |
Frequent |
|
21-23 years |
34 |
68.5 |
13.5 |
Frequent |
|
24-26 years |
51 |
69.2 |
14.8 |
Frequent |
Female students reported a moderately higher average Imposter Syndrome score (69.8) than male students (67.1). While both genders predominantly fell into the "Frequent" range, this 2.7-point difference suggests that female PharmD students may experience slightly more intense imposter feelings than their male counterparts.
|
Gender |
Frequency (N) |
Mean Score |
Standard Deviation |
Predominant Intensity |
|
Female |
57 |
69.8 |
13.9 |
Frequent |
|
Male |
35 |
67.1 |
14.5 |
Frequent |
A clear trend emerges where Imposter Syndrome intensity peaks during the early to middle years (2nd to 4th) of the Pharm D program, with mean scores ranging from 71.5 to 73.2. This corresponds to periods of increased academic pressure, transition to clinical rotations, and
professional identity formation.
|
Year of Study |
Frequency (N) |
Mean Score |
Standard Deviation |
Predominant Intensity |
|
1st Year |
2 |
58.5 |
4.9 |
Moderate |
|
2nd Year |
12 |
72.2 |
12.1 |
Frequent |
|
3rd Year |
17 |
70.9 |
13 |
Frequent |
|
4th Year |
13 |
72.1 |
11.8 |
Frequent |
|
5th Year |
19 |
70.6 |
12.5 |
Frequent |
|
6th Year |
30 |
64.2 |
16.5 |
Moderate-Frequent |
4. Imposter Syndrome Patterns in Pharm. D Students:
4.1 Peak Imposter Syndrome Periods by Academic Year
|
Academic Year |
Frequency (N) |
Mean Imposter Score |
Clinical Stage |
Recommendation Timing |
|
Year 2 |
11 |
72.3 |
Early clinical exposure |
Critical intervention period |
|
Year 3 |
17 |
70.9 |
Clinical rotations begin |
Critical intervention period |
|
Year 4 |
13 |
72.1 |
Advanced clinical training |
Critical intervention period |
|
Year 5 |
19 |
70.6 |
Clinical specialization |
Secondary intervention |
|
Year 6 |
30 |
64.2 |
Final clinical year |
Maintenance support |
4.2 Imposter Syndrome Intensity by program phase:
|
Program Phase |
Years |
Mean Score Range |
Intensity Level |
Student Vulnerability |
|
Peak Vulnerability Phase |
2-4 |
70.9 - 73.2 |
Highest |
Maximum |
|
Transition Phase |
5 |
70.6 |
High |
Moderate-High |
|
Resolution Phase |
6 |
64.2 |
Moderate-High |
Variable |
DISCUSSION
The findings of this study demonstrate that Imposter Syndrome is highly prevalent among Pharm D students, with nearly 80% experiencing Frequent or Intense levels of self-doubt. This aligns with existing literature indicating that students in healthcare programs commonly experience heightened impostor feelings due to the demanding nature of professional training [8,15]. The Pharm D curriculum requires students to transition rapidly from theoretical knowledge to clinical application, which may contribute to increased psychological vulnerability during their academic progression [12–14]. Such transitions involve exposure to real patient scenarios, interdisciplinary interactions, and high academic expectations, all of which can magnify feelings of incompetence despite demonstrated capability [41].
The present study found that students aged 24–26 years exhibited the highest IS scores. This age group corresponds with advanced academic years, during which students face substantial academic and clinical responsibilities, including research work, case presentations, professional examinations, and internship preparation. Similar findings have been reported in medical and pharmacy students internationally, where older learners approaching graduation experience increased pressure to perform independently, leading to intensified impostor feelings [22,28,42]. This period is also characterized by the consolidation of professional identity, a stage that naturally evokes uncertainty and heightened performance anxiety [37,43].
Gender differences were also evident, with female students reporting higher IS levels than males. This is consistent with prior research indicating that women are more likely to internalize academic expectations, engage in self-criticism, and experience fear of negative evaluation [23–26]. Sociocultural norms often place greater pressure on women to excel academically while simultaneously discouraging assertiveness, potentially reinforcing impostor experiences [44]. Studies in pharmacy and medical education have consistently shown higher IS among female students, citing factors such as perfectionism, stereotype expectations, and lower self-perceived competence even when performance is equivalent to that of male peers [45,46].
Academic progression played a significant role, with IS severity peaking in Years 2–4. These years are academically dense and often represent a transition point from foundational knowledge to advanced therapeutic concepts and clinical exposure. Students frequently report heightened anxiety during this period due to increased workload, complex subject matter, and frequent assessments [20–23]. Additionally, early clinical responsibilities—such as case discussions, patient counseling, and documentation—may contribute to feelings of unpreparedness, further amplifying impostor experiences [27–29,47]. By Year 6, IS scores declined, which may reflect increased maturity, clinical confidence, and familiarity with professional expectations. Similar trends have been reported among final-year medical and nursing students who develop stronger coping mechanisms and confidence through repeated clinical exposure [48].
Academic stress was a significant contributor to IS in this population. Students who reported high stress levels in the preceding six months also showed higher IS severity. This finding aligns with several studies indicating that stress from examinations, viva voce, time
constraints, and clinical responsibilities increases susceptibility to impostor feelings [33–36]. Stress may also interact with perfectionistic tendencies and fear of failure, forming a cycle that reinforces impostor experiences over time [49].
Overall, the findings highlight the multifactorial nature of Imposter Syndrome, influenced by personal, academic, and contextual variables. Pharm D students operate in environments where mistakes feel costly, expectations are high, and comparison with peers is common—all factors known to fuel impostor thinking [50]. Understanding these influences is essential for designing targeted interventions that can reduce psychological distress and promote confidence in future clinical pharmacists.
LIMITATIONS
CONCLUSION
The present study demonstrates a significant burden of Imposter Syndrome among Pharm D students, with a large majority experiencing frequent or intense levels of self-doubt despite their academic abilities. The findings clearly indicate that Imposter Syndrome is not uniformly distributed across the student population but is strongly influenced by age, gender, and academic progression. Students aged 24–26 years, female students, and those in the middle academic years (Years 2–4) were identified as the most vulnerable groups. These stages correspond with increased academic demands, early exposure to clinical responsibilities, and the formative stages of professional identity development, all of which may heighten perceptions of inadequacy.
The strong association between recent academic stress and Imposter Syndrome severity further underscores the emotional pressures faced by Pharm D students. High expectations, examinations, case presentations, and clinical evaluations contribute to a stressful academic environment that may intensify impostor feelings and reduce confidence in clinical performance. Without timely intervention, these psychological experiences may hinder academic success, limit engagement in clinical activities, and negatively affect preparedness for professional practice.
Addressing Imposter Syndrome within pharmacy education is therefore essential. Institutions should implement structured support strategies, including mentorship programs, mental-health counseling, stress-management training, and peer-support groups. Faculty awareness and supportive teaching approaches can also help reduce self-doubt and create an environment where students feel safe to learn, ask questions, and make mistakes. Encouraging reflective practice and promoting recognition of personal achievements can further strengthen students’ confidence and professional growth.
In conclusion, Imposter Syndrome represents a significant psychological challenge within Pharm D education. Proactive institutional efforts aimed at early identification, targeted support, and ongoing guidance are crucial for developing competent, confident, and resilient future pharmacists. Future research involving multiple institutions and longitudinal follow-up may provide deeper insights into the progression of impostor feelings and the effectiveness of intervention strategies.
REFERENCES
Ashna Sayish, Dhanya Bappanad, A R Shabaraya, Imposter Syndrome among Pharm D Students: Investigating the Roles of Age, Gender, and Academic Progression, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 12, 2771-2779. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17966824
10.5281/zenodo.17966824