View Article

  • Imposter Syndrome among Pharm D Students: Investigating the Roles of Age, Gender, and Academic Progression

  • Srinivas College of Pharmacy, valachil, post Farangipete, Mangalore-574143, Karnataka, India

Abstract

Background: Imposter Syndrome (IS) is a psychological pattern characterized by persistent self-doubt, fear of failure, and the belief that one’s success is undeserved despite clear evidence of competence [1–3]. Students in health-professional programs, particularly Pharm D students, face rigorous academic expectations, continuous evaluation, and early clinical exposure, making them especially vulnerable to IS. Its impact on academic performance, clinical confidence, mental well-being, and professional identity formation highlights the need for focused research in this population. Objectives: To determine the prevalence and severity of IS among Pharm D students and examine the influence of age, gender, and academic progression. Methods: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted among 101 Pharm D students across different academic years. Data were collected using a validated demographic questionnaire and the Clance Imposter Phenomenon Scale (CIPS). Descriptive statistics and subgroup analyses were performed to assess IS differences across age groups, gender, academic years, and recent academic stress. Results: A majority of participants (79.2%) experienced Frequent or Intense Imposter Syndrome. The highest IS mean scores were observed among students aged 24–26 years, suggesting increased self-doubt during advanced stages of training. Female students reported higher IS levels than males. IS severity peaked during Years 2–4, where academic complexity and initial clinical exposure coincide. Students who reported significant academic stress in the past six months demonstrated notably higher IS severity. Conclusion: Imposter Syndrome is highly prevalent among Pharm D students and is strongly shaped by demographic and academic factors. The findings identify critical vulnerability periods—particularly the 24–26 age group and the middle academic years—where targeted support, mentorship, and mental-health interventions are essential. Early identification and structured guidance can help reduce impostor feelings, strengthen professional identity, and improve students’ readiness for real-world pharmacy practice.

Keywords

Imposter Syndrome, Pharm D, academic progression, age, gender, Clance Imposter Scale, mental health, professional identity.

Introduction

Imposter Syndrome (IS) is a psychological experience characterized by persistent feelings of inadequacy and fear of being exposed as intellectually incapable despite clear evidence of one’s competence [1,2]. Individuals with IS often attribute their achievements to luck or external factors rather than their own abilities, leading to chronic self-doubt and emotional distress [3]. IS has been associated with perfectionism, anxiety, burnout, and diminished academic performance, making it a significant concern within higher education, particularly in demanding professional programs [4–7].

Health-professional education provides an environment where IS commonly emerges due to rigorous academic demands, continuous evaluation, and early exposure to real clinical responsibilities [8–11]. Pharm D students, in particular, experience a unique blend of theoretical learning and clinical application. They are required to master complex pharmacotherapeutic concepts, communicate effectively with healthcare professionals, and make informed decisions in clinical settings, often before feeling fully confident in their abilities [12–14]. This transition from classroom learning to patient-centered care may intensify feelings of incompetence and heighten impostor experiences.

Demographic and academic factors play a significant role in shaping the severity of IS. Research indicates that female students tend to report higher levels of IS due to increased self-criticism, societal expectations, and fear of negative evaluation [15–18]. Age-related differences have also been observed, with older students nearing graduation experiencing greater pressure as they prepare to transition into professional roles [19]. Furthermore, IS often peaks during the middle academic years, when academic workload increases, clinical exposure begins, and professional identity formation is still developing [20–23]. These factors create an emotional climate where students may underestimate their competence despite making steady academic progress.

Given the growing recognition of Imposter Syndrome in pharmacy education, it is essential to understand its prevalence and contributing factors within Pharm D programs. Limited research exists in the Indian context, where academic expectations, training structures, and cultural influences may differ from those in Western countries. Understanding how IS varies across age, gender, and academic progression can help institutions design targeted support strategies such as mentorship, counseling, and confidence-building interventions. Therefore, this study aims to assess the prevalence and severity of Imposter Syndrome among Pharm D students and to examine its relationship with demographic and academic variables to better support their academic and professional development.

2. OBJECTIVES

2.1 Primary Objective

  1. To determine the prevalence and severity of Imposter Syndrome among Pharm D students.

2.2 Secondary Objectives

  1. To assess the association between age and Imposter Syndrome severity.
  2. To compare IS levels between male and female students.
  3. To examine the influence of academic progression (year of study) on IS.
  4. To identify vulnerable demographic and academic groups at highest risk.

3. MATERIALS AND METHODS

3.1 STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey study was conducted among Pharm D students.

3.2 STUDY POPULATION

A total of 101 Pharm D students from Years 1–6 participated.

Inclusion criteria included :

  • Active enrolment in the Pharm D program .
  • Willingness to participate.
  • No exclusion criteria were applied other than incomplete or duplicate responses.

3.3 STUDY TOOLS

The survey consisted of two components

  1. Demographic Questionnaire

Collected data on: Age, Gender, Year of study, Academic stress in the past 6 months.

  1. Clance Imposter Phenomenon Scale (CIPS):

A 20-item validated psychological assessment tool scored on a 5-point Likert scale. Severity ranges were categorized as:

  • Low (20–40)
  • Moderate (41–60)
  • Frequent (61–80)
  • Intense (81–100)

3.4 DATA COLLECTION

Data were collected through a structured Google Forms questionnaire circulated to Pharm D students across all academic years. Before beginning the survey, participants viewed an informed consent statement explaining the purpose of the study, voluntary participation, and confidentiality. Only those who agreed proceeded to the questionnaire, which included demographic details and the Clance Imposter Phenomenon Scale (CIPS). Responses were submitted electronically, ensuring anonymity and allowing students to complete the survey at their convenience without time pressure.

    1. DATA ANALYSIS

Collected data were exported to Microsoft Excel and analyzed using descriptive statistical methods. Frequencies and percentages were calculated for categorical variables such as age, gender, and academic year. Mean scores and standard deviations were computed for CIPS total scores across different groups. Imposter Syndrome levels were categorized based on standard CIPS scoring ranges (Low, Moderate, Frequent, Intense). Findings were summarized in tables and graphs to illustrate variations among demographic and academic subgroups.

4. RESULT

Demographic Profile Of Respondents:

The majority of respondents were in the 24-26 years age group (45.7%), followed by 21-23 years (45.7%), with a smaller representation of
younger students (18-20 years, 8.7%). Most respondents were in the latter half of their Pharm D program (Years 4-6, 68.5%). Female students
constituted a larger proportion (62.0%) of the sample.

Characteristic

Category

Frequency (N)

Percentage (%)

Age Group

18-20 years

7

7.6

 

21-23 years

34

37

 

24-26 years

51

55.5

Gender

Female

57

62

 

Male

35

38

Year of Study

1st Year

2

2.2

 

2nd Year

11

12

 

3rd Year

17

18.5

 

4th Year

13

14.1

 

5th Year

19

20.7

 

6th Year

30

32.6

Prevalence And Intensity Of Imposter Syndrome:

The data reveals that the vast majority of students (79.3%) experience Imposter Syndrome at either "Frequent" or "Intense" levels, underscoring the pervasiveness of this phenomenon within the academic environment.

Intensity Level

Score Range

Frequency (N)

Percentage (%)

Low

20 - 40

2

2.2

Moderate

41 - 60

17

18.5

Frequent

61 - 80

56

60.9

Intense

81 - 100

17

18.5

Correlation with The Demographic Factors:

  1. Correlation With Age:

Students in the 24-26 age group reported the highest average score (69.2), indicating the most intense imposter feelings among the age groups. The 21-23 years group showed a slightly lower mean score (68.5) but with considerable variability, suggesting a diverse range of experiences.

Age Group

Frequency (N)

Mean Score

Standard Deviation

Predominant Intensity

18-20 years

7

67.8

12.1

Frequent

21-23 years

34

68.5

13.5

Frequent

24-26 years

51

69.2

14.8

Frequent

  1. Correlation With Gender:

Female students reported a moderately higher average Imposter Syndrome score (69.8) than male students (67.1). While both genders predominantly fell into the "Frequent" range, this 2.7-point difference suggests that female PharmD students may experience slightly more intense imposter feelings than their male counterparts.

Gender

Frequency (N)

Mean Score

Standard Deviation

Predominant Intensity

Female

57

69.8

13.9

Frequent

Male

35

67.1

14.5

Frequent

  1. Correlation With Year of Study:

A clear trend emerges where Imposter Syndrome intensity peaks during the early to middle years (2nd to 4th) of the Pharm D program, with mean scores ranging from 71.5 to 73.2. This corresponds to periods of increased academic pressure, transition to clinical rotations, and
professional identity formation.

Year of Study

Frequency (N)

Mean Score

Standard Deviation

Predominant Intensity

1st Year

2

58.5

4.9

Moderate

2nd Year

12

72.2

12.1

Frequent

3rd Year

17

70.9

13

Frequent

4th Year

13

72.1

11.8

Frequent

5th Year

19

70.6

12.5

Frequent

6th Year

30

64.2

16.5

Moderate-Frequent

4. Imposter Syndrome Patterns in Pharm. D Students:

4.1 Peak Imposter Syndrome Periods by Academic Year

Academic Year

Frequency (N)

Mean Imposter Score

Clinical Stage

Recommendation Timing

Year 2

11

72.3

Early clinical exposure

Critical intervention period

Year 3

17

70.9

Clinical rotations begin

Critical intervention period

Year 4

13

72.1

Advanced clinical training

Critical intervention period

Year 5

19

70.6

Clinical specialization

Secondary intervention

Year 6

30

64.2

Final clinical year

Maintenance support

4.2 Imposter Syndrome Intensity by program phase:

Program Phase

Years

Mean Score Range

Intensity Level

Student Vulnerability

Peak Vulnerability Phase

2-4

70.9 - 73.2

Highest

Maximum

Transition Phase

5

70.6

High

Moderate-High

Resolution Phase

6

64.2

Moderate-High

Variable

DISCUSSION

The findings of this study demonstrate that Imposter Syndrome is highly prevalent among Pharm D students, with nearly 80% experiencing Frequent or Intense levels of self-doubt. This aligns with existing literature indicating that students in healthcare programs commonly experience heightened impostor feelings due to the demanding nature of professional training [8,15]. The Pharm D curriculum requires students to transition rapidly from theoretical knowledge to clinical application, which may contribute to increased psychological vulnerability during their academic progression [12–14]. Such transitions involve exposure to real patient scenarios, interdisciplinary interactions, and high academic expectations, all of which can magnify feelings of incompetence despite demonstrated capability [41].

The present study found that students aged 24–26 years exhibited the highest IS scores. This age group corresponds with advanced academic years, during which students face substantial academic and clinical responsibilities, including research work, case presentations, professional examinations, and internship preparation. Similar findings have been reported in medical and pharmacy students internationally, where older learners approaching graduation experience increased pressure to perform independently, leading to intensified impostor feelings [22,28,42]. This period is also characterized by the consolidation of professional identity, a stage that naturally evokes uncertainty and heightened performance anxiety [37,43].

Gender differences were also evident, with female students reporting higher IS levels than males. This is consistent with prior research indicating that women are more likely to internalize academic expectations, engage in self-criticism, and experience fear of negative evaluation [23–26]. Sociocultural norms often place greater pressure on women to excel academically while simultaneously discouraging assertiveness, potentially reinforcing impostor experiences [44]. Studies in pharmacy and medical education have consistently shown higher IS among female students, citing factors such as perfectionism, stereotype expectations, and lower self-perceived competence even when performance is equivalent to that of male peers [45,46].

Academic progression played a significant role, with IS severity peaking in Years 2–4. These years are academically dense and often represent a transition point from foundational knowledge to advanced therapeutic concepts and clinical exposure. Students frequently report heightened anxiety during this period due to increased workload, complex subject matter, and frequent assessments [20–23]. Additionally, early clinical responsibilities—such as case discussions, patient counseling, and documentation—may contribute to feelings of unpreparedness, further amplifying impostor experiences [27–29,47]. By Year 6, IS scores declined, which may reflect increased maturity, clinical confidence, and familiarity with professional expectations. Similar trends have been reported among final-year medical and nursing students who develop stronger coping mechanisms and confidence through repeated clinical exposure [48].

Academic stress was a significant contributor to IS in this population. Students who reported high stress levels in the preceding six months also showed higher IS severity. This finding aligns with several studies indicating that stress from examinations, viva voce, time

constraints, and clinical responsibilities increases susceptibility to impostor feelings [33–36]. Stress may also interact with perfectionistic tendencies and fear of failure, forming a cycle that reinforces impostor experiences over time [49].

Overall, the findings highlight the multifactorial nature of Imposter Syndrome, influenced by personal, academic, and contextual variables. Pharm D students operate in environments where mistakes feel costly, expectations are high, and comparison with peers is common—all factors known to fuel impostor thinking [50]. Understanding these influences is essential for designing targeted interventions that can reduce psychological distress and promote confidence in future clinical pharmacists.

LIMITATIONS

  1. The study was conducted in a single institution, which may limit generalizability.
  2. Self-reported responses may be affected by personal bias.
  3. The cross-sectional design captures only one timeframe and cannot establish causation.
  4. Online data collection may have influenced participation rates.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrates a significant burden of Imposter Syndrome among Pharm D students, with a large majority experiencing frequent or intense levels of self-doubt despite their academic abilities. The findings clearly indicate that Imposter Syndrome is not uniformly distributed across the student population but is strongly influenced by age, gender, and academic progression. Students aged 24–26 years, female students, and those in the middle academic years (Years 2–4) were identified as the most vulnerable groups. These stages correspond with increased academic demands, early exposure to clinical responsibilities, and the formative stages of professional identity development, all of which may heighten perceptions of inadequacy.

The strong association between recent academic stress and Imposter Syndrome severity further underscores the emotional pressures faced by Pharm D students. High expectations, examinations, case presentations, and clinical evaluations contribute to a stressful academic environment that may intensify impostor feelings and reduce confidence in clinical performance. Without timely intervention, these psychological experiences may hinder academic success, limit engagement in clinical activities, and negatively affect preparedness for professional practice.

Addressing Imposter Syndrome within pharmacy education is therefore essential. Institutions should implement structured support strategies, including mentorship programs, mental-health counseling, stress-management training, and peer-support groups. Faculty awareness and supportive teaching approaches can also help reduce self-doubt and create an environment where students feel safe to learn, ask questions, and make mistakes. Encouraging reflective practice and promoting recognition of personal achievements can further strengthen students’ confidence and professional growth.

In conclusion, Imposter Syndrome represents a significant psychological challenge within Pharm D education. Proactive institutional efforts aimed at early identification, targeted support, and ongoing guidance are crucial for developing competent, confident, and resilient future pharmacists. Future research involving multiple institutions and longitudinal follow-up may provide deeper insights into the progression of impostor feelings and the effectiveness of intervention strategies.

REFERENCES

  1. Clance PR, Imes SA. The impostor phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychother Theory Res Pract. 1978;15(3):241–247.
  2. Clance PR. The Impostor Phenomenon: Overcoming the Fear that Haunts Your Success. Atlanta: Peachtree Publishers; 1985.
  3. Parkman A. The imposter phenomenon in higher education: Incidence and impact. J Higher Educ Theory Pract. 2016;16(1):51–60.
  4. Hutchins HM. Outing the imposter: A study exploring imposter phenomenon among higher education faculty. New Horizons Adult Educ Hum Resource Dev. 2015;27(2):3–12.
  5. Bravata DM, Watts SA, Keefer AL, et al. Prevalence, predictors, and treatment of impostor syndrome: A systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(4):1252–1275.
  6. Villwock JA, Sobin LB, Koester LA, Harris TM. Impostor syndrome and burnout among American medical students: A pilot study. Int J Med Educ. 2016;7:364–369.
  7. Henning K, Ey S, Shaw D. Perfectionism, the impostor phenomenon and psychological adjustment in medical, dental, nursing and pharmacy students. Med Educ. 1998;32(5):456–464.
  8. Easton S, et al. Imposter phenomenon among healthcare students. J Allied Health. 2021;50(2):137–144.
  9. Cain J. It’s time to confront impostor syndrome in pharmacy education. Am J Pharm Educ. 2019;83(6):Article 7764.
  10. Vaughn AR, Taasoobshirazi G, Johnson ML. Impostor phenomenon and student achievement. Int J Educ Psychol. 2020;9(2):132–152.
  11. Cokley K, McClain S, Enciso A, Martinez M. An examination of the impact of minority status stress and impostor feelings on the mental health of diverse ethnic minority college students. J Multicult Couns Dev. 2013;41(2):82–95.
  12. Neureiter M, Traut-Mattausch E. Inspecting the “imposter phenomenon”: How fear of failure and rejection sensitivity predict impostor feelings. Pers Individ Dif. 2016;80:125–130.
  13. Chrisman SM, Pieper WA, Clance PR, Holland CL, Glickauf-Hughes C. Validation of the Clance Imposter Phenomenon Scale. J Pers Assess. 1995;65(3):456–467.
  14. Rohrmann S, Bechtoldt MN, Breslow L. Impostor feelings and task performance. Pers Individ Dif. 2016;103:127–132.
  15. Rivkin A, Calmes C. Impostor phenomenon in pharmacy students. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2019;11(3):250–256.
  16. Matthews G, et al. Imposter phenomenon and mental health among health professional students. Health Psychol Rev. 2020;14(2):157–175.
  17. Kumar S, Jagacinski CM. Impostors have goals too: The impostor phenomenon and its relationship to achievement goal orientation. Pers Individ Dif. 2006;40(1):147–157.
  18. Ferrari JR, Thompson T. Impostor fears: Links with self-presentational concerns and self-handicapping behaviours. Pers Individ Dif. 2006;40:341–352.
  19. Leary MR, Patton KM, Orlando AE, et al. Self-esteem and impostorism. J Pers. 2000;68(4):725–756.
  20. Holmes SW, et al. Imposter syndrome and medical student burnout. Med Educ Online. 2020;25(1):174–180.
  21. Janka A, et al. Professional identity formation and impostor feelings among healthcare students. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2019;24(5):909–922.
  22. Sondergaard H, et al. Imposters in training: Age-related impostor feelings in clinical trainees. Clin Teach. 2021;18(1):32–38.
  23. Ewing KM, Richardson TQ, James-Myers L, Russell RK. The relationship between racial identity attitudes, world view, and African American graduate students’ experience of the imposter phenomenon. J Black Psychol. 1996;22(1):53–66.
  24. Vergauwe J, et al. Fear of failure and perfectionism as predictors of impostor feelings. Pers Individ Dif. 2015;82:27–33.
  25. Neff KD. Self-compassion and impostorism. Self-Identity. 2011;10(2):196–207.
  26. Armstrong MJ, et al. Gender differences in impostorism among health students. Med Educ. 2018;52(3):296–304.
  27. Gadsby R. Imposter phenomenon during transitional training years. Nurs Educ Today. 2020;89:104–108.
  28. Frajerman A, Morvan Y, Krebs MO, Gorwood P, Chaumette B. Burnout in medical students before residency: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Psychiatry. 2019;55:36–42.
  29. Dyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Shanafelt TD. Medical student distress: Causes, consequences, and proposed solutions. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80(12):1613–1622.
  30. Beiter R, et al. The prevalence and correlates of stress, anxiety, and depression in college students. J Affect Disord. 2015;173:90–96.
  31. Zanchetta C, et al. Academic stress and impostor phenomenon among university students. J Educ Psychol. 2020;112:213–225.
  32. Cope V, Ward P. Self-efficacy and impostor feelings in nursing students. J Clin Nurs. 2012;21(7–8):1102–1110.
  33. Oriel K, Plane MB, Mundt M. Family medicine residents and impostor feelings. Fam Med. 2004;36(4):248–252.
  34. Legassie J, Zibrowski EM, Goldszmidt MA. Residents’ Impostor Phenomenon and burnout. Med Educ. 2008;42(10):1037–1044.
  35. McGregor L, Elliot AJ. Achievement goals and impostor phenomenon. J Res Pers. 2005;39:470–486.
  36. Sakulku J, Alexander J. The impostor phenomenon. J Behav Sci. 2011;6(1):75–97.
  37. Tigranyan G, et al. Identity formation and impostor feelings among healthcare trainees. Teach Learn Med. 2019;31(4):410–417.
  38. Vaughn LM, et al. Stress and academic performance among healthcare students. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2020;11:657–666.
  39. Hutchins HM, Rainbolt H. What triggers impostor phenomenon in women leaders? J Leadersh Stud. 2017;11(3):14–25.
  40. Harvey V, Katz C. The impostor phenomenon in high-achieving women. Psychol Women Q. 1985;9(1):34–45.

Reference

  1. Clance PR, Imes SA. The impostor phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychother Theory Res Pract. 1978;15(3):241–247.
  2. Clance PR. The Impostor Phenomenon: Overcoming the Fear that Haunts Your Success. Atlanta: Peachtree Publishers; 1985.
  3. Parkman A. The imposter phenomenon in higher education: Incidence and impact. J Higher Educ Theory Pract. 2016;16(1):51–60.
  4. Hutchins HM. Outing the imposter: A study exploring imposter phenomenon among higher education faculty. New Horizons Adult Educ Hum Resource Dev. 2015;27(2):3–12.
  5. Bravata DM, Watts SA, Keefer AL, et al. Prevalence, predictors, and treatment of impostor syndrome: A systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(4):1252–1275.
  6. Villwock JA, Sobin LB, Koester LA, Harris TM. Impostor syndrome and burnout among American medical students: A pilot study. Int J Med Educ. 2016;7:364–369.
  7. Henning K, Ey S, Shaw D. Perfectionism, the impostor phenomenon and psychological adjustment in medical, dental, nursing and pharmacy students. Med Educ. 1998;32(5):456–464.
  8. Easton S, et al. Imposter phenomenon among healthcare students. J Allied Health. 2021;50(2):137–144.
  9. Cain J. It’s time to confront impostor syndrome in pharmacy education. Am J Pharm Educ. 2019;83(6):Article 7764.
  10. Vaughn AR, Taasoobshirazi G, Johnson ML. Impostor phenomenon and student achievement. Int J Educ Psychol. 2020;9(2):132–152.
  11. Cokley K, McClain S, Enciso A, Martinez M. An examination of the impact of minority status stress and impostor feelings on the mental health of diverse ethnic minority college students. J Multicult Couns Dev. 2013;41(2):82–95.
  12. Neureiter M, Traut-Mattausch E. Inspecting the “imposter phenomenon”: How fear of failure and rejection sensitivity predict impostor feelings. Pers Individ Dif. 2016;80:125–130.
  13. Chrisman SM, Pieper WA, Clance PR, Holland CL, Glickauf-Hughes C. Validation of the Clance Imposter Phenomenon Scale. J Pers Assess. 1995;65(3):456–467.
  14. Rohrmann S, Bechtoldt MN, Breslow L. Impostor feelings and task performance. Pers Individ Dif. 2016;103:127–132.
  15. Rivkin A, Calmes C. Impostor phenomenon in pharmacy students. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2019;11(3):250–256.
  16. Matthews G, et al. Imposter phenomenon and mental health among health professional students. Health Psychol Rev. 2020;14(2):157–175.
  17. Kumar S, Jagacinski CM. Impostors have goals too: The impostor phenomenon and its relationship to achievement goal orientation. Pers Individ Dif. 2006;40(1):147–157.
  18. Ferrari JR, Thompson T. Impostor fears: Links with self-presentational concerns and self-handicapping behaviours. Pers Individ Dif. 2006;40:341–352.
  19. Leary MR, Patton KM, Orlando AE, et al. Self-esteem and impostorism. J Pers. 2000;68(4):725–756.
  20. Holmes SW, et al. Imposter syndrome and medical student burnout. Med Educ Online. 2020;25(1):174–180.
  21. Janka A, et al. Professional identity formation and impostor feelings among healthcare students. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2019;24(5):909–922.
  22. Sondergaard H, et al. Imposters in training: Age-related impostor feelings in clinical trainees. Clin Teach. 2021;18(1):32–38.
  23. Ewing KM, Richardson TQ, James-Myers L, Russell RK. The relationship between racial identity attitudes, world view, and African American graduate students’ experience of the imposter phenomenon. J Black Psychol. 1996;22(1):53–66.
  24. Vergauwe J, et al. Fear of failure and perfectionism as predictors of impostor feelings. Pers Individ Dif. 2015;82:27–33.
  25. Neff KD. Self-compassion and impostorism. Self-Identity. 2011;10(2):196–207.
  26. Armstrong MJ, et al. Gender differences in impostorism among health students. Med Educ. 2018;52(3):296–304.
  27. Gadsby R. Imposter phenomenon during transitional training years. Nurs Educ Today. 2020;89:104–108.
  28. Frajerman A, Morvan Y, Krebs MO, Gorwood P, Chaumette B. Burnout in medical students before residency: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Psychiatry. 2019;55:36–42.
  29. Dyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Shanafelt TD. Medical student distress: Causes, consequences, and proposed solutions. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80(12):1613–1622.
  30. Beiter R, et al. The prevalence and correlates of stress, anxiety, and depression in college students. J Affect Disord. 2015;173:90–96.
  31. Zanchetta C, et al. Academic stress and impostor phenomenon among university students. J Educ Psychol. 2020;112:213–225.
  32. Cope V, Ward P. Self-efficacy and impostor feelings in nursing students. J Clin Nurs. 2012;21(7–8):1102–1110.
  33. Oriel K, Plane MB, Mundt M. Family medicine residents and impostor feelings. Fam Med. 2004;36(4):248–252.
  34. Legassie J, Zibrowski EM, Goldszmidt MA. Residents’ Impostor Phenomenon and burnout. Med Educ. 2008;42(10):1037–1044.
  35. McGregor L, Elliot AJ. Achievement goals and impostor phenomenon. J Res Pers. 2005;39:470–486.
  36. Sakulku J, Alexander J. The impostor phenomenon. J Behav Sci. 2011;6(1):75–97.
  37. Tigranyan G, et al. Identity formation and impostor feelings among healthcare trainees. Teach Learn Med. 2019;31(4):410–417.
  38. Vaughn LM, et al. Stress and academic performance among healthcare students. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2020;11:657–666.
  39. Hutchins HM, Rainbolt H. What triggers impostor phenomenon in women leaders? J Leadersh Stud. 2017;11(3):14–25.
  40. Harvey V, Katz C. The impostor phenomenon in high-achieving women. Psychol Women Q. 1985;9(1):34–45.

Photo
Ashna Sayish
Corresponding author

Srinivas College of Pharmacy, valachil, post Farangipete, Mangalore-574143, Karnataka, India

Photo
Dhanya Bappanad
Co-author

Srinivas College of Pharmacy, valachil, post Farangipete, Mangalore-574143, Karnataka, India

Photo
A R Shabaraya
Co-author

Srinivas College of Pharmacy, valachil, post Farangipete, Mangalore-574143, Karnataka, India

Ashna Sayish, Dhanya Bappanad, A R Shabaraya, Imposter Syndrome among Pharm D Students: Investigating the Roles of Age, Gender, and Academic Progression, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 12, 2771-2779. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17966824

More related articles
Exploring the Synergistic potential of Polyherbal ...
Muthu Lakshmi N , Dr. A. Dhinek, ...
Eleocharis Dulcis An Overview ...
Sachin Gursale, Yash Vikhankar, Kaushal Patil, Amol Chandekar, At...
A Review Article of Haritaki (Terminalia chebula Retz.)plant medicinal uses and ...
Tausif Sultan Sayyad , Omkar Andhale, Shubham Gagare, Shubham Jadhav, Gaurav Tupe, ...
A Review Article ON: cGmp Signaling: A Contemporary Overview and Future Directio...
Dr. Someshwar Mankar, Yuvraj Chavan, Sakshi Chavan, Payal Chavhanke, Arti Chaudhari, Riya Chabukswar...
Related Articles
Stability Indicating Method Development and Validation of Mirabegron and Solifen...
Bansari Jagani, Dhirendra Kumar Tarai, Khyati Bhupta, Dr. Santosh Kirtane, ...
Gene Therapy Use In Cancer Treatment ...
Ranjan Kumar Maji, Sheashree Das, Sourav Kole, Anirban Karmakar, Subarna Mandal, ...
Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, and Liver-Protective Properties of n-Hexane and ...
Umar Muazu , Adamu Yusuf Kabiru , Maimuna Bello Umar , Ibrahim Hamza Kankia , ...
Formulation and Evaluation of Anti-acne Gel...
Ritu Pandore, Rohan Londhe, Dnyaneshwar Vyavhare, Megha Salve, ...
More related articles
Eleocharis Dulcis An Overview ...
Sachin Gursale, Yash Vikhankar, Kaushal Patil, Amol Chandekar, Atul Tripathi , ...
Eleocharis Dulcis An Overview ...
Sachin Gursale, Yash Vikhankar, Kaushal Patil, Amol Chandekar, Atul Tripathi , ...