View Article

Abstract

Endophytes are microorganisms primarily bacteria and fungi that reside within the internal tissues of plants without causing apparent harm. These symbiotic organisms play a crucial role in plant growth promotion, stress tolerance, and defence against pathogens through the production of bioactive metabolites. The present study focuses on the isolation and characterization of endophytic microbes from selected plant species. Surface sterilization techniques were employed to eliminate epiphytic organisms, followed by culturing the internal tissues on selective media. Morphological, biochemical, and molecular methods, including 16S rRNA and ITS sequencing, were used to identify and characterize the isolated endophytes. Preliminary screening for antimicrobial activity and plant growth-promoting traits such as IAA production, phosphate solubilization, and siderophore production was also conducted. The findings underscore the potential of endophytes as a valuable source of novel bioactive compounds and their possible application in sustainable agriculture and biotechnology.

Keywords

Endophytes, Isolation, Characterization, Plant-microbe interaction, Bioactive compounds,16S rRNA sequencing, ITS sequencing

Introduction

Endophytic fungi are a diverse group of microorganisms that dwell asymptomatically within plant tissues, playing critical ecological roles in plant health and ecosystem functioning. They contribute to nutrient cycling, plant growth promotion, and enhanced tolerance against biotic and abiotic stresses by modulating plant metabolic pathways and producing bioactive compounds. Historically, the discovery of endophytic fungi dates back over a century, initially observed as latent fungal inhabitants, but advances in molecular biology and cultivation techniques have significantly deepened our understanding of their taxonomy, diversity, and functional potential. Over recent decades, research on endophytic fungi has expanded across various disciplines, including agriculture, pharmaceuticals, and environmental sciences, due to their capacity to synthesize novel secondary metabolites with antimicrobial, anticancer, and antioxidant properties. The growing interest underscores the importance of studying endophytic fungi not only to harness their biotechnological applications but also to understand their role in maintaining plant resilience and ecological balance in diverse habitats1.

History:

The history of endophytic fungi research dates back to the early 19th century when German botanist Johann Heinrich Friedrich Link first described these fungi in 1809, initially considering them as plant parasitic organisms. Subsequently, the French scientist Béchamp coined the term "microzymas" to describe similar microbial entities inside plants. For much of the 19th and early 20th centuries, plants were thought to thrive best under sterile conditions, and the idea of internal microbial symbionts was overlooked until Victor Galippe's discovery in 1887 of bacteria naturally inhabiting plant tissues challenged this belief. A major milestone in the study of endophytic fungi was the seminal discovery in the 1990s of the anticancer drug paclitaxel (taxol) produced by the endophytic fungus Taxomyces andreanae isolated from the Pacific yew (Taxus brevifolia). This discovery revolutionized natural product research and pharmacology by revealing the immense secondary metabolite potential harboured by endophytes, stimulating a surge of interest in exploring endophytic fungi as prolific sources of novel bioactive compounds. The increasing recognition of secondary metabolites' pharmaceutical and agricultural significance has propelled endophyte research into a multidisciplinary frontier integrating molecular biology, biochemistry, and ecology2.

Endophytes:

The term "endophyte" (endo = within, phyto = plant) was originally coined by Anton de Bary, the father of modern plant pathology, in 1866 to describe any organism growing inside plant tissues. Over time, the definition has been refined to include only those microorganisms, primarily fungi and bacteria, that inhabit plant tissues without causing disease symptoms, and often even provide benefits to their hosts. Endophytes establish symbiotic relationships inside plants, living asymptomatically while promoting host growth, enhancing tolerance to various stresses such as pathogens, drought, or salinity, and protecting against herbivores. These microorganisms reside inter- or intracellularly and interact with their host through complex biochemical signaling pathways, leading to mutualistic outcomes. The recognition that endophytes can significantly influence plant health and productivity has driven extensive research into their biology and applications in agriculture, biotechnology, and pharmaceuticals. This refined understanding underscores the importance of endophytes as key players in plant ecosystems and promising sources of bioactive compounds3.

Classification of Endophytes:

Ecological classification divides endophytic fungi into clavicipitaceous (Class 1) and non-clavicipitaceous groups (Classes 2, 3, and 4). Clavicipitaceous endophytes (mainly in grasses) tend to have narrow host ranges and colonize shoots and rhizomes, often forming mutualistic relationships that enhance host fitness. Non-clavicipitaceous endophytes show broad host ranges and diverse colonization patterns, including root, stem, leaf, and seed tissues. Class 2 endophytes colonize multiple tissues and confer stress tolerance; Class 3 are mainly above-ground endophytes with diverse lifestyles ranging from mutualists to latent pathogens; Class 4 particularly include fungi that are horizontally transmitted and often opportunistic.

Host specificity varies, with some fungi exhibiting high specificity (e.g., Epichloë species in grasses), while others are generalists colonizing many plant species. Morphological identification relies on colony and spore morphology, but advances in DNA sequencing especially ITS rDNA regions have greatly enhanced accurate classification and phylogenetic placement. This classification framework reflects the complex evolutionary relationships and ecological versatility of endophytic fungi4.

Classification of Endophytic fungi based on life history and host interaction

Endophytic Life Cycle and Interactions:

Endophytic fungi are integral members of the plant microbiome, living within plant tissues without causing visible disease symptoms. Their interactions with host plants span a continuum from mutualistic to parasitic relationships. Typically, endophytes avoid triggering strong plant immune defences, allowing a balanced coexistence with the host. This delicate interaction involves complex molecular signalling and modulation of the plant’s immune system to facilitate colonization without harm. Intriguingly, some fungi recognized as pathogens in one plant species may exist harmlessly as endophytes in others. For example, Ramularia collo-cygni is a known pathogen in barley but lives symptomless as an endophyte in other cereal hosts, illustrating the fluid boundary between pathogenic and endophytic lifestyles.

Pathogens with an Endophytic Phase:

Some pathogens may also have an endophytic phase, living quietly within a plant before causing disease when conditions favor. This dual lifestyle highlights the fluid boundary between pathogenic and endophytic roles. Thus, true endophytes are distinguished by their inability to cause disease in their host, while pathogens may transiently adopt an endophytic lifestyle5.

Endophytic Life Cycle and Interactions.

Endophytic fungi can be effectively visualized within plant tissues using a range of microscopic techniques that reveal their colonization patterns and interactions with the host. Light microscopy, often combined with staining methods like aniline blue, lactophenol trypan blue, or rose Bengal, highlights fungal hyphae and structures within the intercellular spaces of leaves, stems, and roots. Fluorescence microscopy, particularly confocal laser scanning microscopy with fluorescence-tagged fungi or dyes, allows three-dimensional visualization of fungal mycelia inside tissues, providing detailed insights into spatial distribution. Electron microscopy techniques, including transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), offer ultrastructural views, elucidating the fungal penetration mechanisms and intimate contact with host cells.

Microscopic evidence confirms that endophytes form true symbiotic relationships by inhabiting internal plant tissues and contributing to plant health through various roles such as stress tolerance, nutrient acquisition, and pathogen defence. Visualization of fungal structures inside plant tissues supports these functional associations and highlights the complexity of plant-endophyte interactions. Continuing research using advanced microscopic and molecular tools is essential to further understand endophyte diversity, ecological roles, and their potential in improving plant productivity and resilience under environmental stresses.

Regarding roles, endophytes contribute to mitigating abiotic stresses like drought and temperature extremes, alleviate biotic stresses caused by pathogens and pests, and enhance nutrient uptake, collectively promoting better plant growth and adaptation. These multifaceted functions vary depending on the host plant, environmental conditions, and developmental stages, underscoring the dynamic nature of endophytic symbiosis6.

Endophytes promoting plant adaptation to abiotic stress:

  • Enhancing drought tolerance:

Endophytes improve water uptake and retention by promoting root growth and facilitating efficient water use, helping plants survive under water deficit conditions.

  • Improving nutrient acquisition:

They solubilize and mobilize essential nutrients like phosphorus and nitrogen, enhancing nutrient availability and uptake, which strengthens plant growth and resilience.

  • Increasing temperature stress tolerance:

Through the production of antioxidants, heat shock proteins (HSPs), and osmolytes, endophytes help plants mitigate oxidative damage and maintain cellular stability during heat or cold stress.

  • Modulating plant hormones:

Endophytic microbes influence hormonal signaling to mediate stress tolerance in medicinal plants. The study highlighted that endophytes produce a range of phytohormones, including gibberellins (GAs), cytokinins, abscisic acid (ABA), jasmonic acid (JA), and salicylic acid (SA), which play crucial roles in plant growth, development, and stress responses. These hormones help plants adapt to abiotic stresses by modulating various physiological processes such as stomatal regulation, antioxidant production, and osmotic adjustment.

  • Detoxifying heavy metals and alkalinity:

Some endophytes can enhance tolerance to heavy metals and alkaline soils by altering soil chemistry and supporting plant detoxification mechanisms and additionally, the endophytes enhanced the expression of metal stress-related genes in the host plants, leading to improved growth and reduced metal toxicity7.

Biocontrol potential of endophytes in plants:

  • Inducing plant defence enzymes:

Endophytes such as Penicillium citrinum stimulate plants to produce higher levels of defense-related enzymes like peroxidase (PO) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO), which help resist pathogenic fungi such as Fusarium oxysporum.

  • Enhancing Systemic Immunity:

Endophytic fungi like Trichoderma hamatum activate systemic immunity by promoting the production of defense enzymes, salicylic acid, and pathogenesis-related proteins (PRPs), providing protection against diseases like downy mildew.

  • Producing Antimicrobial Compounds:

Endophytes synthesize secondary metabolites, enzymes, and volatile organic compounds that directly inhibit or antagonize pathogens, reducing infection and damage.

  • Inducing Plant Pathogenic Gene Expression:

Endophytes can trigger plants to express genes involved in pathogen resistance, strengthening the plant's own defense mechanisms.

  • Specific Pathogen Antagonism:

Certain endophytic fungi such as Daldinia eschscholtzii exhibit strong antagonistic activity against pathogens like Colletotrichum acutatum, effectively reducing disease severity8.

Schematic model of endophyte-plant symbiosis

Endophyte isolation techniques and identification methods:

  • Surface Sterilization: A critical initial step to remove epiphytic microbes on plant surfaces using sequential washes with running water, surfactants (Tween 20 or Triton X-100), followed by disinfectants such as 70% ethanol and sodium hypochlorite at optimized concentrations and exposure times. Post sterilization, samples are rinsed with sterile water, sometimes using sodium thiosulfate to neutralize residual bleach, ensuring only internal endophytes remain viable.
  • Tissue Isolation Method: Sterilized plant tissues (leaves, stems, roots) are aseptically cut into small pieces (typically 0.3-0.5 cm) and placed on suitable culture media like potato dextrose agar (PDA) or malt extract agar (MEA) supplemented with antibiotics to inhibit bacteria. Plates are incubated typically around 25 °C, monitored daily for fungal growth, and emerging hyphal tips are sub cultured to obtain pure isolates.
  • Plant Tissue Maceration Method: Used especially for isolating slow-growing or root endophytes. Sterilized tissue is ground in sterile buffer, often with additives like polyvinylpyrrolidone or EDTA to neutralize released toxins, then suspensions are plated on culture media.
  • Plant intercellular fluid culture method: The plant intercellular fluid culture method involves using centrifugation to collect microorganisms from the intercellular (apoplastic) spaces of plant tissues, and it is especially useful for isolating endophytes from roots. After surface sterilization and grinding of the plant fragments, the sample is centrifuged at around 3000G for 1 to 20 minutes to extract the apoplastic fluid. This fluid, which contains endophytes that flow out under centrifugal force, is then streaked onto suitable culture media for isolation of both endophytic bacteria and fungi9.

Culture-dependent isolation methods. A) plant tissue surface sterilization. B) Plant tissue culture method. C) Plant tissue maceration method. D) Plant intercellular fluid culture method.

Identification techniques:

Traditional methods:

Morphological and Cultural Characterization of Endophytic Fungi:

After initial isolation of fungi from surface-sterilized plant tissues on nutrient media, individual fungal colonies are purified by transferring hyphal tips or spores onto fresh agar plates to obtain pure cultures. This step is essential to separate mixed cultures and ensure that each isolate represents a single fungal species.

Identification of purified endophytic fungi traditionally relies on morphological characteristics observed in culture. This includes colony morphology (color, texture, growth rate), microscopic examination of fungal structures such as hyphae, conidia, and spores, as well as sporulation patterns. Because many isolates may not produce spores under standard conditions, inducing sporulation through modifying culture media or environmental conditions (e.g., adding sterilized host tissue or altering light and temperature) is often necessary to aid identification.

Despite these efforts, morphological identification can be limited by sterile isolates that lack distinctive features. Therefore, traditional identification is sometimes complemented by molecular techniques to accurately classify fungi at species or genus level10.

Modern approaches:

Molecular characterization of endophytic microorganisms:

The development of molecular biology brings a new per spective to endophyte diversity studies. Application of molecular techniques, such as DNA fingerprinting and sequencing methods, has the potential to overcome the obstacles in traditional cultivation-dependent methods.

Molecular characterization of sterile fungal isolates:

In traditional cultivation-dependent methods, fungal isolates are identified based on morphological features, primarily reproductive structures. However, a significant portion of isolates do not sporulate in culture and remain sterile, making morphological identification impossible. These non-sporulating isolates are often grouped into morphotypes based on colony characteristics such as color, texture, and growth rate, but these groupings do not reflect true species relationships.

Molecular techniques, particularly DNA sequence analysis of regions like the ITS (Internal Transcribed Spacer), are essential for accurately identifying these sterile mycelia. By analyzing genetic sequences, researchers can assign non-sporulating isolates to appropriate taxonomic groups at the genus, family, or order level. Molecular identification reveals that morphologically similar sterile isolates can belong to distantly related taxa, highlighting the limitations of morphology-based classification. Overall, molecular methods significantly enhance our understanding of fungal diversity, especially for sterile isolates that traditional techniques fail to identify11.

Molecular Identification of Endophytic Fungal Communities:

Endophytic fungal communities comprise diverse fungal groups from major phyla such as Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, and Zygomycota, making identification based solely on morphology challenging and time-consuming. To overcome these limitations, DNA sequencing, especially of the ITS region, combined with morphological data, has become a standard approach for studying endophyte diversity.

Molecular techniques allow researchers to detect a wide variety of fungal taxa across different plant tissues and ecosystems, often revealing greater species richness than morphological methods alone. Genes like 18S, 28S, and ITS are commonly used for taxonomic resolution at various levels, from broad classification to species identification. Molecular data have also uncovered novel taxa and clarified relationships within complex fungal groups. Overall, these molecular tools accelerate and enhance the understanding of fungal biodiversity in natural ecosystems, independent of the fungi’s sporulation ability in culture12.

Molecular Detection of Endophytic Fungi Within Plant Tissues:

Traditional isolation techniques for endophytic fungi often miss many species because some fungi grow slowly or do not grow on artificial media, being outcompeted by faster-growing fungi. To overcome these limitations, molecular techniques have become widely used to detect and analyze endophytic fungi directly from plant tissues.

The typical molecular detection workflow involves:

  • Extracting total genomic DNA from surface-sterilized plant tissues (including both plant and fungal DNA).
  • Amplifying fungal-specific DNA regions such as ITS, 18S, or 28S rRNA genes using PCR.
  • Separating PCR products using methods like Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE) to distinguish different fungal taxa.
  • Cloning and sequencing representative DNA fragments to identify fungal taxa by comparing sequences with reference databases.
  • Using phylogenetic analyses to assign taxonomic positions to the detected fungi.

These molecular approaches can detect a broader diversity of fungi, including those that do not sporulate or grow well in culture. Studies have found significant differences between fungal communities detected by molecular methods and those isolated by traditional culturing, highlighting the complementary nature of molecular detection.

However, molecular methods also have limitations such as:

  • Difficulty in identifying fungi to species level if only short DNA fragments are amplified.
  • Lower sensitivity in detecting rare species.
  • The need for more universal primers that provide better phylogenetic resolution.

Additional techniques like Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) markers offer robust and reproducible detection, helping to further characterize fungal diversity13.

High-Throughput Sequencing in Endophyte Studies:

High-throughput sequencing (HTS), especially next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies like pyrosequencing and Illumina sequencing, have revolutionized the study of fungal endophyte diversity. Compared to traditional Sanger sequencing, HTS offers:

  • Greater depth and resolution: Detects more fungal taxa, including rare and unculturable species.
  • Speed and cost-effectiveness: Processes many samples simultaneously at a lower cost per sequence.
  • Less bias: Provides a more comprehensive and less biased view of fungal community composition.

HTS has been successfully applied to diverse environments to explore fungal communities, revealing hidden diversity missed by culture-based methods. However, challenges include:

  • PCR bias caused by primer selection and amplification cycles.
  • DNA extraction bias affecting recovery of certain fungal taxa.
  • Short read lengths limiting taxonomic resolution in some platforms (though newer long-read technologies like PacBio improve this).
  • The need for standardized protocols for data processing, taxonomic assignment, and reporting to ensure reproducibility and comparability.

Ongoing advances in sequencing technology and bioinformatics are rapidly enhancing our ability to characterize endophytic fungi in ecological and functional contexts.

DNA Barcoding Systems in Fungal Endophyte Studies:

DNA barcoding uses short, standardized gene regions to identify species, relying on high inter-specific variation and low intra-specific variation. While the animal kingdom widely uses the CO1 mitochondrial gene, this marker is unsuitable for fungi due to the presence of introns.

For fungi, the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) region of rDNA is the primary DNA barcode marker due to:

  • High amplification success across fungal lineages using universal primers.
  • Suitable length (~500-700 bp) for sequencing.
  • Extensive representation in public databases.

ITS has been broadly used in fungal species identification, including endophytic fungi, though it faces challenges:

  • Variable divergence thresholds among different fungal groups make universal species delimitation difficult.
  • Limited reference sequences exist compared to the estimated fungal diversity.
  • Misidentified sequences in databases complicate accurate identification.
  • ITS alone may be insufficient to distinguish closely related or rapidly evolving species, requiring supplementary loci in some cases.

In 2011, a fungal barcoding workshop and subsequent international consensus formally recommended ITS as the official DNA barcode for fungi, making it the standard marker in fungal ecology, diversity, and endophyte studies14-15.

CURRENT CHALLENGES

In endophytic fungi research include incomplete understanding of the complex interactions between endophytes and their host plants at molecular and ecological levels. The regulation of secondary metabolite biosynthesis remains poorly elucidated, hindering the optimization and consistent production of bioactive compounds. Culturing many endophytes in laboratory conditions is difficult due to their specialized nutritional and environmental requirements, leaving a significant portion of biodiversity unexplored. Scaling up metabolite production for commercial applications faces obstacles such as low yields, variability in metabolite profiles due to environmental factors, and high costs associated with fermentation and purification processes. Additionally, regulatory hurdles require extensive safety and efficacy data before endophyte-derived products can enter the market, adding to the time and complexity of commercialization. Environmental concerns also arise regarding sustainability and potential ecological impacts of manipulating endophytic populations.

FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

The future research emphasizes integrating multi-omics technologies including genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics to comprehensively profile endophyte-host interactions and biosynthetic pathways. Advances in synthetic biology and metabolic engineering hold promise to enhance metabolite yields and create novel compounds. Ecological and systems biology approaches can provide holistic insights into endophyte roles in plant health and stress resilience, facilitating the development of robust bioinoculants and sustainable agricultural practices. Moreover, leveraging nanotechnology and innovative formulation strategies may improve delivery and stability of endophyte products. Expanded bioprospecting efforts targeting diverse and extreme environments are likely to uncover new endophytic taxa and metabolites beneficial for pharmaceuticals, agriculture, and environmental remediation.

CONCLUSION

The endophytic fungi represent an invaluable resource for novel bioactive compounds and plant growth-promoting agents. Realizing their full potential requires coordinated interdisciplinary research focusing on overcoming current limitations in isolation, cultivation, metabolite production, and regulatory approval. Continued innovation promises to unlock sustainable solutions addressing food security, environmental challenges, and human health.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I would like to express my sincere gratitude to SET’s College of Pharmacy, Dharwad for providing the necessary infrastructure and academic support throughout the course. I am deeply thankful to my guide her expertise and mentorship have been instrumental in shaping the direction and quality of this work. I also extend my appreciation to the faculty and staff for offering excellent facilities and fostering a stimulating academic environment. Finally, I am immensely grateful to my family, friends and my mother for their constant encouragement and patience, which kept me motivated during the most challenging phases of this journey.

REFERENCE

    1. Wang X, Zhang Y, Li J, Ding Y, Ma X, Zhang P, Liu H, Wei J, Bao Y. Diversity and functional insights into endophytic fungi in halophytes from West Ordos Desert ecosystems. Journal of Fungi. 2025 Jan 4;11(1):30.
    2. Tiwari P, Bae H. Endophytic fungi: key insights, emerging prospects, and challenges in natural product drug discovery. Microorganisms. 2022 Feb 4;10(2):360.
    3. Gakuubi MM, Munusamy M, Liang ZX, Ng SB. Fungal endophytes: A promising frontier for discovery of novel bioactive compounds. Journal of fungi. 2021 Sep 22;7(10):786.
    4. Hajji-Hedfi L, Wannassi T, El-Maradny YA. Fungal endophytes: Insight into evolution, classification, and ecological functions in plants. Microbial Biosystems. 2025 Mar 1;10(1):51-67.
    5. Khare E, Mishra J, Arora NK. Multifaceted interactions between endophytes and plant: developments and prospects. Frontiers in microbiology. 2018 Nov 15;9:2732.
    6. Rani S, Kumar P, Dahiya P, Maheshwari R, Dang AS, Suneja P. Endophytism: a multidimensional approach to plant–prokaryotic microbe interaction. Frontiers in microbiology. 2022 May 12;13:861235.
    7. Morales-Vargas AT, López-Ramírez V, Álvarez-Mejía C, Vázquez-Martínez J. Endophytic fungi for crops adaptation to abiotic stresses. Microorganisms. 2024 Jul 2;12(7):1357.
    8. Fontana DC, de Paula S, Torres AG, de Souza VH, Pascholati SF, Schmidt D, Dourado Neto D. Endophytic fungi: Biological control and induced resistance to phytopathogens and abiotic stresses. Pathogens. 2021 May 8;10(5):570.
    9. Wang H, Liu Z, Duan F, Chen Y, Qiu K, Xiong Q, Lin H, Zhang J, Tan H. Isolation, identification, and antibacterial evaluation of endophytic fungi from Gannan navel orange. Frontiers in microbiology. 2023 Jun 15;14:1172629.
    10. Figueiredo A, Guerra-Guimarães L. Isolation of apoplastic fluid from woody plant leaves: Grapevine and coffee as a case study. Shotgun Proteomics: Methods and Protocols. 2021:49-57.
    11. Namdev, R., Dass, P., & Khare, K. (2024). Isolation and identification of endophytic fungi from Ocimum sanctum. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biological Sciences, 12(1), 38–42.
    12. Sarsaiya S, Jain A, Jia Q, Fan X, Shu F, Chen Z, Zhou Q, Shi J, Chen J. Molecular identification of endophytic fungi and their pathogenicity evaluation against Dendrobium nobile and Dendrobium officinale. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020 Jan 2;21(1):316.
    13. Nurunnabi TR, Sarwar S, Sabrin F, Alam F, Nahar L, Sohrab H, Sarker SD, Rahman SM, Billah M. Molecular identification and antimicrobial activity of endophytic fungi isolated from Heritiera fomes (Buch.-Ham), a mangrove plant of the Sundarbans. Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 2020 Dec;9:1-0.
    14. Zhang T, Wang Z, Lv X, Li Y, Zhuang L. High-throughput sequencing reveals the diversity and community structure of rhizosphere fungi of Ferula Sinkiangensis at different soil depths. Scientific reports. 2019 Apr 25;9(1):6558.
    15. Cazabonne J, Bartrop L, Dierickx G, Gafforov Y, Hofmann TA, Martin TE, Piepenbring M, Rivas-Ferreiro M, Haelewaters D. Molecular-based diversity studies and field surveys are not mutually exclusive: On the importance of integrated methodologies in mycological research. Frontiers in Fungal Biology. 2022 Mar 25;3:860777.

Reference

  1. Wang X, Zhang Y, Li J, Ding Y, Ma X, Zhang P, Liu H, Wei J, Bao Y. Diversity and functional insights into endophytic fungi in halophytes from West Ordos Desert ecosystems. Journal of Fungi. 2025 Jan 4;11(1):30.
  2. Tiwari P, Bae H. Endophytic fungi: key insights, emerging prospects, and challenges in natural product drug discovery. Microorganisms. 2022 Feb 4;10(2):360.
  3. Gakuubi MM, Munusamy M, Liang ZX, Ng SB. Fungal endophytes: A promising frontier for discovery of novel bioactive compounds. Journal of fungi. 2021 Sep 22;7(10):786.
  4. Hajji-Hedfi L, Wannassi T, El-Maradny YA. Fungal endophytes: Insight into evolution, classification, and ecological functions in plants. Microbial Biosystems. 2025 Mar 1;10(1):51-67.
  5. Khare E, Mishra J, Arora NK. Multifaceted interactions between endophytes and plant: developments and prospects. Frontiers in microbiology. 2018 Nov 15;9:2732.
  6. Rani S, Kumar P, Dahiya P, Maheshwari R, Dang AS, Suneja P. Endophytism: a multidimensional approach to plant–prokaryotic microbe interaction. Frontiers in microbiology. 2022 May 12;13:861235.
  7. Morales-Vargas AT, López-Ramírez V, Álvarez-Mejía C, Vázquez-Martínez J. Endophytic fungi for crops adaptation to abiotic stresses. Microorganisms. 2024 Jul 2;12(7):1357.
  8. Fontana DC, de Paula S, Torres AG, de Souza VH, Pascholati SF, Schmidt D, Dourado Neto D. Endophytic fungi: Biological control and induced resistance to phytopathogens and abiotic stresses. Pathogens. 2021 May 8;10(5):570.
  9. Wang H, Liu Z, Duan F, Chen Y, Qiu K, Xiong Q, Lin H, Zhang J, Tan H. Isolation, identification, and antibacterial evaluation of endophytic fungi from Gannan navel orange. Frontiers in microbiology. 2023 Jun 15;14:1172629.
  10. Figueiredo A, Guerra-Guimarães L. Isolation of apoplastic fluid from woody plant leaves: Grapevine and coffee as a case study. Shotgun Proteomics: Methods and Protocols. 2021:49-57.
  11. Namdev, R., Dass, P., & Khare, K. (2024). Isolation and identification of endophytic fungi from Ocimum sanctum. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biological Sciences, 12(1), 38–42.
  12. Sarsaiya S, Jain A, Jia Q, Fan X, Shu F, Chen Z, Zhou Q, Shi J, Chen J. Molecular identification of endophytic fungi and their pathogenicity evaluation against Dendrobium nobile and Dendrobium officinale. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020 Jan 2;21(1):316.
  13. Nurunnabi TR, Sarwar S, Sabrin F, Alam F, Nahar L, Sohrab H, Sarker SD, Rahman SM, Billah M. Molecular identification and antimicrobial activity of endophytic fungi isolated from Heritiera fomes (Buch.-Ham), a mangrove plant of the Sundarbans. Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 2020 Dec;9:1-0.
  14. Zhang T, Wang Z, Lv X, Li Y, Zhuang L. High-throughput sequencing reveals the diversity and community structure of rhizosphere fungi of Ferula Sinkiangensis at different soil depths. Scientific reports. 2019 Apr 25;9(1):6558.
  15. Cazabonne J, Bartrop L, Dierickx G, Gafforov Y, Hofmann TA, Martin TE, Piepenbring M, Rivas-Ferreiro M, Haelewaters D. Molecular-based diversity studies and field surveys are not mutually exclusive: On the importance of integrated methodologies in mycological research. Frontiers in Fungal Biology. 2022 Mar 25;3:860777.

Photo
Beeralinga G
Corresponding author

SET’s College of Pharmacy, S R Nagar, Dharwad

Photo
Smita D. Madagundi
Co-author

SET’s College of Pharmacy, S R Nagar, Dharwad

Photo
Prasanna Vasantrao Habbu
Co-author

SET’s College of Pharmacy, S R Nagar, Dharwad

Beeralinga G, Smita D. Madagundi, Prasanna Vasantrao Habbu, Insights into Endophytic Fungi: Historical Perspectives, Isolation Strategies, Technological Advances and Future Directions, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 11, 4445-4456. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17735983

More related articles
Cardiovascular And Metabolic Abnormalities Induced...
Benson P Wilson , Sona sojan, Athul Krishna SA , Assish p Antony ...
Designing, In Silico Screening and Molecular Docki...
Sagar Magar, Amol Dighe, Manisha Sonawane, Nilima Wani, Pradnya B...
Tradition Healing Wisdom: A Study on Tribal Medicine Practices and Medicinal Pla...
V. Kasi Viswanadham, DR. T. K. V. Kesava Rao, A. Venkateswara Rao, S. Lakshmi Kavya, S. Divya Sruthi...
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Applic...
Sathishkumar S, Dr. R. Sivakumar, Dr. Hariharan V, Sunil Kumar R. U., Dharun Dexit T, Vignesh R, Jag...
Structural Hybridization as An Efficient Method for Novel Drug Candidates...
Amar Kumar Mishra, Kartikay Prakash, Nancy Tiwari, ...
Related Articles
Formulation and Evaluation of Topical Emulgel Containing Papaya Seed Oil for Ant...
Ardra Dileep, Arya Ajayan, Faheema Thajudeen, Shiby John, Sona Sajeev, ...
Artificial Intelligence in Preclinical and Clinical Pharmacology...
Jagruti Patil, Priti Kothawade, M. R. N. Shaikh, Sukhada Gite, Tushar Jadhav, Danish Vakil, Kalyani ...
Use of Herbal Medications for Treatment of Osteoarthritis and Rheumatoid Arthrit...
Nikhil Rajguru , Nikhil Rajput , Mayuri Sonawane , Shweta Agrawal , ...
Cardiovascular And Metabolic Abnormalities Induced By Antipsychotic Drug Therapy...
Benson P Wilson , Sona sojan, Athul Krishna SA , Assish p Antony , Happy Thomas , ...
More related articles
Cardiovascular And Metabolic Abnormalities Induced By Antipsychotic Drug Therapy...
Benson P Wilson , Sona sojan, Athul Krishna SA , Assish p Antony , Happy Thomas , ...
Designing, In Silico Screening and Molecular Docking Studies of Some Novel 5-(4-...
Sagar Magar, Amol Dighe, Manisha Sonawane, Nilima Wani, Pradnya Bawake, Shainesh Bhosale, ...
Cardiovascular And Metabolic Abnormalities Induced By Antipsychotic Drug Therapy...
Benson P Wilson , Sona sojan, Athul Krishna SA , Assish p Antony , Happy Thomas , ...
Designing, In Silico Screening and Molecular Docking Studies of Some Novel 5-(4-...
Sagar Magar, Amol Dighe, Manisha Sonawane, Nilima Wani, Pradnya Bawake, Shainesh Bhosale, ...