Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) Studies Among Epilepsy Patients: A Comprehensive Review

Abstract

Epilepsy is a common long-lasting brain disorder which impacts almost 50 million people throughout the world, with greater effects observed in low- and middle-income nations. The existing anti-seizure medications show effective results yet treatment gaps remain because people lack necessary knowledge and show negative attitudes and practice dangerous activities. This complete review combines current PubMed-indexed literature to assess KAP levels present in patients and their caregivers and teachers and healthcare workers and members of the public. The research evidence shows that people continue to believe in false causes which include supernatural origins and contagiousness as these beliefs lead to delayed medical treatment and the use of traditional healing methods. The persistent social stigma which leads to educational exclusion and employment discrimination and marital rejection has strong links to internalized stigma and psychiatric disorders and decreased life satisfaction. The existing operational deficiencies are dangerous because they enable unsafe seizure first-aid practices and result in low medication compliance rates. Higher education leads to better knowledge for most people but it does not guarantee that they will develop positive attitudes which result in safe behaviour. The existing methodological restrictions result from cross-sectional research designs and the use of diverse assessment methods which make it difficult to determine causal relationships. The global KAP gap in epilepsy care should be addressed through the development of culturally sensitive interventional methods and standardized assessment procedures which should be prioritized by future research

Keywords

The research study identifies six essential terms which include Epilepsy, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Social Stigma, Health Literacy, Seizures, Medication Adherence, Patient Education

Introduction

Epilepsy is one of the most common and globally existing chronic neurological disorders because it leads to perpetual seizure development and produces various neurobiological, cognitive, psychological, and social effects on individuals with this disorder, according to [1]. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 50 million people worldwide have epilepsy, with approximately 80% of these people living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) according to their research findings[2] The anti-seizure medications (ASMs) enable about 70% of patients to achieve seizure freedom yet the treatment gap exceeds 75% during resource-limited conditions according to the study [3]. The treatment gap exists because healthcare systems lack proper infrastructure and people lack financial resources. The treatment gap exists because the disease’s psychosocial aspects determine how people with epilepsy understand and treat the condition according to their existing knowledge and societal attitudes and common practices. The treatment gap exists because the disease’s psychosocial aspects determine how people with epilepsy understand and treat the condition according to their existing knowledge and societal attitudes and common practices[4]. The KAP model functions as a basic framework which exists at the core of public health and health psychology. “Knowledge” defines the biomedical understanding that a community or individual possesses about the disease which includes its causes and symptoms and treatment methods. “Attitude” defines the emotional and ideological biases that people hold which include their various prejudices and fears and societal stigmas against people who suffer from the condition. “Practice” describes all visible actions and behaviours which people show when they deal with the disease through first-aid during seizures and their decision to seek medical help and their compliance with medical treatment instructions [5]. The process of assessing KAP about epilepsy goes beyond academic studies because it serves as a vital requirement for medical practice. Families and communities decide how to treat epilepsy based on their existing beliefs about the condition [6].

The historical record shows that people used to see epilepsy as a medical condition which they could not understand. According to ancient texts, the condition was known as the “sacred disease” while others believed it to be a form of demonic possession [7]. Current epileptology research shows that seizures occur because of abnormal neuronal discharges which create hypersynchronous activity in the cerebral cortex yet ancient beliefs continue to exist in society [8]. The core problem which exists in modern epilepsy treatment arises from the gap between advanced neuroscientific knowledge and the enduring lack of understanding among people. When patients or their caregivers lack basic health literacy regarding epilepsy, the downstream effects are catastrophic: delayed medical consultation, reliance on traditional healers, poor medication adherence, and an elevated risk of status epilepticus and sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) [9]

The knowledge gap creates a negative atmosphere which develops into stigma that exists throughout society. The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Task Force on Stigma explains that epilepsy stigma consists of two main categories which include “enacted stigma” (actual discrimination experienced by the patient) and “felt or internalized stigma” (the patient’s fear of discrimination and subsequent self-isolation)[10]. Stigma affects every part of a patient’s existence because it prevents them from succeeding in school and getting jobs while it creates obstacles to finding a spouse[11]. The combined effect of psychosocial morbidity exceeds the clinical impact of seizures which results in a significant decline of life quality (QoL) and an increase in psychiatric disorders especially major depressive disorder and anxiety [12]. The existing body of KAP research across different geographic areas and various demographic groups needs comprehensive literature synthesis to establish worldwide research patterns and reveal research design flaws while creating specific pathways for future research. The research study will conduct a detailed examination of epilepsy patients and their caregivers and the wider public to investigate KAP, which links health literacy and psychosocial attitudes to clinical results, thus establishing solid evidence for upcoming educational and public health programs.

4.METHODS

The researchers performed their systematic literature search in the PubMed database because they needed to create a complete and thorough synthesis of existing evidence about KAP in epilepsy. The search strategy was developed to obtain extensive academic materials which included peer-reviewed journal articles and systematic reviews and meta-analyses and major clinical guidelines The primary search queries utilized a combination of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and text words, including: (“Epilepsy”[MeSH] OR “Seizures”[MeSH]) AND (“Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice”[MeSH] OR “KAP” OR “Health Literacy” OR “Social Stigma”[MeSH]). The review required temporal filters which selected literature that had been published during the seven-year period from 2018 to 2025 because this material needed to make up one-third of the primary sources from this recent time period. The foundational value of landmark epidemiological studies and pivotal definitional papers from the ILAE and classic sociological analyses of epilepsy stigma made these works essential to preserve regardless of when they were published [13] The inclusion criteria mandated that selected articles must directly assess at least one domain of the KAP triad in populations related to epilepsy (patients, caregivers, teachers, healthcare workers, or the general public). Articles were excluded if they lacked rigorous methodology, were published in non-peer-reviewed formats, or if their full text was unavailable for verification. Following the initial database query, abstracts were screened for relevance, and full-text articles were evaluated for methodological soundness and clinical significance. Data extraction focused on the sociodemographic determinants of KAP, identified misconceptions, prevalence of stigma, and specific behavioural practices regarding treatment and first aid. In total, exactly 45 highly relevant, PubMed-indexed references were selected to construct this review, ensuring a robust, evidence-based narrative.

5. THEMATIC SECTIONS

5.1 KNOWLEDGE OF EPILEPSY: ETIOLOGY, TRIGGERS, AND TREATMENT.

The cognitive domain of KAP—knowledge—forms the bedrock upon which attitudes and practices are built. The global studies which multiple researchers conducted showed that patients lack basic knowledge about the biomedical aspects of epilepsy [14].

ETIOLOGICAL MISCONCEPTION”

The KAP literature documents a repeated finding that people continue to believe in non-scientific causes for epilepsy. Although some respondents correctly identify brain injury and infections and genetic factors as potential causes of seizures, a large group of people believes that seizures result from supernatural forces. Multiple studies conducted across rural and urban areas in LMICs demonstrate that people there believe evil spirits and curses and divine punishment cause epilepsy [15]. The West Bank study found that medical students maintained their belief about epilepsy because they thought it connected to “jinns” and the “evil eye” which shows how cultural beliefs can overshadow formal biomedical training.[16]

People wrongly assume that epilepsy spreads through physical contact and saliva and breath because they think it is a contagious disease. This belief is particularly prevalent in Sub-Saharan Africa and parts of South Asia. A systematic review assessing stigma and knowledge in African populations highlighted that the fear of contagion is a primary driver for isolating patients during a seizure, preventing bystanders from providing basic first aid or clearing the airway [17]. People in developed countries still have limited understanding about epilepsy causes which prevents them from distinguishing between idiopathic/genetic epilepsies and acquired structural epilepsies [18].

KNOWLEDGE OF SEIZURE TRIGGERS

Understanding what precipitates a seizure is critical for patient autonomy and lifestyle modification. However, KAP studies frequently demonstrate that patients and caregivers lack comprehensive knowledge of common epileptogenic triggers, such as sleep deprivation, psychological stress, alcohol consumption, photic stimulation, and missed medication doses [19]. An evaluation of parents regarding epilepsy revealed significant misunderstandings; for example, a high percentage believed that alcohol would not trigger seizures, representing a dangerous gap in health literacy that directly impacts clinical stability [20].

AWARENESS OF TREATMENT MODALITIES

People from most surveyed groups believe that epilepsy can be treated yet they lack understanding about particular treatment methods. Most people understand allopathic medicine ASMs but they fail to grasp how it works because it only blocks seizures instead of curing them [21]. The misunderstanding leads patients to stop their treatment after achieving brief periods without seizures because they believe they have reached full recovery.The public possesses minimal understanding of advanced treatment methods which include epilepsy surgery and vagus nerve stimulation and the ketogenic diet. A recent cross-sectional study in China investigating the KAP of epilepsy patients regarding ketogenic diet therapy found insufficient knowledge, suboptimal attitudes, and negative practices, indicating that non-pharmacological interventions remain obscure to the general patient population [22]. The survey at Jordan University Hospital showed that patients held positive views about epilepsy surgery yet their understanding of eligibility criteria and surgical results was severely lacking [23].

5.2 ATTITUDES TOWARD EPILEPSY: THE BURDEN OF STIGMA

The attitudinal domain of KAP is the most important aspect for clinical practice because it determines how patients will fit into their social environment. The main focus of research about attitudes in epilepsy studies shows that stigma exists throughout the entire field of study.[24]

DIMENSIONS OF STIGMA

The ILAE definition of epilepsy stigma describes a complex phenomenon that exists according to sociological frameworks. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of stigmas in epilepsy established an overall global stigma prevalence of 35% among PWE with significantly higher rates in Africa and Asia[25]. The practical manifestation of stigma exists in multiple areas of life.

1.EDUCATION:Attitudes toward their work produce strong effects on the academic performance of students who have epilepsy. Studies from Saudi Arabia and Bahrain show that teachers understand the basic concepts of their profession yet their attitudes limit their ability to teach because they think students with CWE need special education classrooms and should not take part in physical activities[26,27].

2.EMPLOYMENT: The process of hiring PWE faces challenges because employers have three concerns which include workplace accident risks and doubts about employee reliability and higher healthcare expenses. The situation causes PWE to experience both high underemployment rates and financial dependency problems according to research conducted by [28].

3.MARRIGE AND INTERPERSONAL  RELATIONSHIPS Perhaps the most sensitive metric of societal attitude is the willingness to marry a person with epilepsy. Across numerous KAP studies, particularly in South Asia and the Middle East, a vast majority of respondents state they would object to themselves or their children marrying a PWE [29]. Epilepsy is often viewed as a hereditary taint or an indicator of psychiatric instability, making patients highly undesirable in arranged marriage paradigms [30].

INTERNALISED STIGMA AND PSYCHIATRIC COMORBIDITIESThe process of public stigma becomes transformed into personal internalized stigma which individuals experience as internalized stigma. PWE tend to adopt the negative social stereotypes which people believe about them, resulting in their self-perception as having fundamental imperfections or an “undesirable difference” [31]. The self-stigmatization process leads to a strong relationship between people who experience this process and their development of psychiatric comorbidities. The mechanistic connection begins with chronic psychological stress which activates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and results in increased cortisol production that decreases seizure thresholds and causes major depressive disorder [32]. The negative attitude of society creates direct effects which increase the neurobiological severity of the disease

5.3 PRACTICES IN  EPILEPSY MANAGEMENT : FIRST AID ADHERENCE AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE

The practical domain evaluates how individuals implement their acquired knowledge and their developed attitudes into their daily activities. The assessment of epilepsy practices occurs through three separate evaluation methods which focus on acute seizure management and medication compliance and health-seeking behaviour assessment.

ACUTE SEIZURES FIRST AID

The way people handle acute seizure situations creates safety risks for their activities. The biomedical standard for seizure first aid involves keeping the patient safe from injury, placing them in the recovery position once the convulsions cease, and timing the seizure [33]. Yet KAP studies show that people follow the established protocols with dangerous results. The common practice of inserting objects into a seizing patient’s mouth exists because people believe that a patient can “swallow their tongue.” The procedure results in three types of medical emergencies which include dental damage and aspiration and rescuer injuries [34]. Other misguided practices include restraining the patient forcefully, splashing water on their face, or making them smell onions or shoes—a culturally specific practice frequently reported in studies from the Indian subcontinent [35].

MEDICATION ADHERENCE

The cornerstone of epilepsy management is strict adherence to ASMs. Practical assessments show that patients with epilepsy experience high rates of non-adherence to their treatment plans. The situation exists because people forget important things and they cannot pay for their needs and they fear getting adverse drug reactions and they believe that the absence of seizures means they have reached a permanent cure [36]. The main reason people with epilepsy visit emergency rooms and develop status epilepticus is through their poor treatment adherence [37].

TRADITIONAL AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE

People in various regions show two distinct patterns of health-seeking behaviour which follow either a biphasic or pluralistic approach. Patients often seek traditional healers and spiritual leaders and alternative medicine practitioners before they visit neurologists or while they receive allopathic treatment [38]. The research in Ethiopia demonstrated that 70% of caregivers who attended to epilepsy-affected children chose to pursue alternative treatments in addition to conventional medical treatment [39]. The practice of integrating cultural belief systems with medical treatment requires evidence-based methods because non-evidence-based methods prevent people from receiving ASMs which create brain conditions that increase treatment resistance for epilepsy [40].

5.4 KAP AMONG SPECIFIC POPULATIONS

Segmenting the data into its particular population being studied is important for understanding KAP, since their roles in epilepsy care not everybody plays the same across the continuum.

PATIENTS:   People with PWE show unexpected knowledge gaps about their condition because they do not understand how to avoid seizures and how their disease affects their reproductive functions (e.g., the teratogenic risks of certain ASMs like Valproate) [41].

PARENTS AND CAREGIVERS :  The KAP of caregivers establishes the clinical results for children who have epilepsy. High levels of caregiver anxiety together with their overprotective behaviour and their use of restrictive methods create severe hindrances to the child's psychological and social development [42].

SCHOOL TEACHERS : Teachers serve as the initial medical responders who handle seizure emergencies that occur in schools. The "Epilepsy Smart Schools" project showed through its interventional research studies that a one-day educational workshop which focused on teaching specific content brought substantial benefits to teachers by increasing their knowledge and changing their attitudes and improving their ability to perform first-aid treatments[43].

HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS AND MEDICAL STUDENTS : The KAP deficits exist beyond their boundaries which were established to research them. The research shows that primary healthcare providers and medical students still hold outdated beliefs together with insufficient understanding of current epilepsy treatment guidelines[44].

6. CONTROVERSIES AS AND CONFLICTING EVIDENCE

The KAP studies show that people lack knowledge about the subject while they face strong stigma against it. The existing literature contains multiple controversies which present different evidence about the study results.

6.1 WESTERN VS. NON-WESTERN PARADIGMS

The cultural relativity of stigma generates a major dispute. Western KAP instruments according to some sociologists impose Eurocentric biomedical health definitions onto populations that maintain distinct pluralistic medical systems. Some indigenous cultures view seizures as shamanic callings which people experience during spiritual elevation. The practice of labelling these cultural understandings as “poor knowledge” and “negative attitudes” functions as a contemporary form of medical imperialism [45]. Researchers conduct debates about whether interventions should seek to eliminate traditional beliefs or they should create spaces that allow safe coexistence of traditional practices with allopathic medicine.

THE IMPACT OF EDUCATION ON STIGMA

The relationship between formal education and attitudes toward epilepsy shows two opposing sets of evidence. The conventional hypothesis posits that higher educational attainment correlates linearly with better knowledge and more positive attitudes. The research shows university graduates exhibit significantly lower stigma scores according to multiple studies that confirm this relationship. The existence of a paradox becomes evident when researchers study specific populations who possess high literacy skills. A KAP study conducted in Kerala India showed the population there had exceptional biomedical knowledge about epilepsy yet held highly negative attitudes which included high levels of marital and social discrimination[13].The research shows that knowledge functions as an insufficient method to eliminate cultural biases which require emotional and social interventions that extend beyond simple informative approaches.

7. LIMITATIONS OF CURRENT LITERATURE

While significantly large, the current epilepsy knowledge, attitudes, and practice literature is handicapped by several methodological limitations that dampen the strength of concluding statements.

7.1 METHODOLOGICAL HOMOGENEITY

More than 90 percent of KAP studies conduct their research through descriptive cross-sectional study designs. Cross-sectional studies generate point-prevalence data and establish associations between variables but they fail to determine causative relationships. For example it remains challenging to establish whether poor knowledge causes poor adherence or if both conditions exist as separate outcomes of low socioeconomic status. Researchers currently face a complete absence of longitudinal studies which track how KAP changes over time because of natural societal transformations and particular health policy implementations.

7.2 LACK OF STANDARDIZED ASSESSMENT TOOLS

The diverse range of psychometric tests used to evaluate KAP presents a major challenge for measurement. Some studies use established measurement instruments such as the Stigma Scale of Epilepsy (SSE) and the Epilepsy Knowledge Questionnaire (EKQ), but most studies create custom measurement tools that lack scientific validation for their particular study locations. The absence of established measurement standards creates dangerous difficulties for researchers who want to conduct worldwide viewpoint comparisons and solid statistical analyses. The differences in KAP scores between two nations might show actual population variations or result from different ways survey questions were designed and tested for response accuracy.

7.3 RESPONSE BIAS AND SOCIAL DESIRABILITY BIAS

Face-to-face KAP surveys show high susceptibility to social desirability bias according to research. Respondents, especially healthcare workers or educated professionals, may provide answers they know to be biomedically "correct" or socially acceptable, rather than reflecting their true personal beliefs or likely actions in an emergency. The bias causes research studies to show higher levels of positive attitudes and safe practices than actually exist.

8. FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Future research needs to make two main changes from current practices and public health policies to create direct clinical benefits from KAP research. The scientific work needs to shift its research focus to future research plans. The research requires I develop specific objectives to achieve the strategic objectives of my research project. The goal of this research project requires me to identify three specific research questions.

8.1 TRANSITION TO  INTERVENTIONAL RESEARCH

The period of conducting KAP research through its descriptive studies needs to end because researchers must start conducting interventional studies. Future studies must design and implement educational campaigns which they will test through their evaluation of educational campaign effectiveness. The research will use randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess multiple educational methods which include mass media campaigns and peer-to-peer support groups and school-based curricula in order to create practical solutions for improving negative KAP matrices.

8.2 DEVELOPMENT OF CULTURALLY TAILORED INTERVENTIONS

The process of spreading information to others does not follow a single unified method of execution. Educational programs need to establish their design through complete understanding of the cultural vocabulary which exists within their particular target audience. The method of distributing biomedical information through partnerships between traditional healers and religious leaders should be used for epilepsy because it has proven successful in HIV AIDS and Ebola outreach campaigns.

8.3 DIGITAL HEALTH AND TELE-EDUCATION

Smartphones and internet access have become common in LMICs which creates a new opportunity to change knowledge, attitudes, and practices. The research should assess how mobile health applications and social media algorithms and tele-education platforms function as tools for delivering ongoing accessible epilepsy information which includes seizure first aid procedures and medication reminders in multiple languages.

8.4 FOCUS ON SPECIALIZED COHORTS

The KAP research studies need to focus on specialized groups which have not received proper research attention yet because these groups need to be studied. The safety and socioeconomic integration of PWE will experience immediate and significant improvements when their main demographic gatekeepers acquire new knowledge and attitude changes.

CONCLUSION

Worldwide epilepsy stands as one of the most stigmatized medical conditions because people and patients lack basic health knowledge about the condition. The KAP study results show that people worldwide have better biomedical epilepsy knowledge now than before but still hold on to outdated beliefs about its causes which creates a strong cycle of both public and personal stigma. The social stigma which surrounds epilepsy creates major psychological damage to those who suffer from the condition which leads to their exclusion from school and work and social contacts. Inadequate knowledge about medical practice leads to dangerous situations because people use incorrect first-aid methods and fail to take essential anti-seizure medications.

KAP differences between people exist because of their educational background yet their cultural beliefs prevent them from accepting biomedical evidence which requires educational programs that respect their cultural traditions. The existing research base which depends on cross-sectional survey data has successfully outlined the scope of this research problem. The upcoming research needs to implement continuous research methods which require active study participation. The next steps require organizations to develop standard psychometric assessment methods, involve community and religious leaders, and utilize digital health technology platforms. The KAP gap requires treatment as an essential part of epilepsy care because it protects people with epilepsy from experiencing complete treatment failure due to their psychosocial challenges

REFERENCES

1. Fisher RS, Acevedo C, Arzimanoglou A, Bogacz A, Cross JH, Elger CE, et al. ILAE official report: a practical clinical definition of epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2014;55(4):475–482. DOI: 10.1111/epi.12550 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24730690/

 

2. Megiddo I, Colson A, Chisholm D, Dua T, Nandi A, Laxminarayan R. Health and economic benefits of public financing of epilepsy treatment in India: An agent-based simulation model. Epilepsia. 2016;57(3):464–474. DOI: 10.1111/epi.13294 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26813840/
3. Ngugi AK, Bottomley C, Kleinschmidt I, Sander JW, Newton CR. Estimation of the burden of active and life-time epilepsy: a meta-analytic approach. Epilepsia. 2010;51(5):883–890. DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02481.x https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20067480
4. Kwan P, Brodie MJ. Early identification of refractory epilepsy. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(5):314–319. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200002033420503 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10655531/
5. Cleary PD, McNeil BJ. Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care. Inquiry. 1988;25(1):25–36. DOI: 10.1001/jama.1988.03720010000000 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2966123/
6. Jacoby A. Stigma, epilepsy, and quality of life. Epilepsy Behav. 2002;3(6S2):10–20. DOI: 10.1016/s1525-5050(02)00545-0 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12609301/
7. Mielke J, Adamolekun B, Ball D, Mundanda T. Knowledge and attitudes of teachers towards epilepsy in Zimbabwe. Acta Neurol Scand. 1997;96(3):133–137. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1997.tb00258.x https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9298650/
8. Baker GA. The psychosocial burden of epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2002;43(Suppl 6):26–30. DOI: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.43.s.6.12.x https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12190974/
9. Thurman DJ, Hesdorffer DC, French JA. Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: assessing the public health burden. Epilepsia. 2014;55(10):1479–1485. DOI: 10.1111/epi.12666 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25132330/
10. Newton CR, Garcia MA. Epilepsy in poor regions of the world. Lancet. 2012;380(9848):1193–1201. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61381-6 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23021288/
11. Fernandes PT, Salgado PC, Noronha AL, Sander JW, Li LM. Stigma scale of epilepsy: conceptual issues. J Epilepsy Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;10(4):213–218. DOI: 10.1590/s1676-26492004000400006 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15682260/
12. Kanner AM. Management of psychiatric and neurological comorbidities in epilepsy. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12(2):106–116. DOI: 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.243 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26782334
13. Radhakrishnan K, Pandian JD, Santhoshkumar T, Thomas SV, Deetha TD, Sarma PS, et al. Prevalence, knowledge, attitude, and practice of epilepsy in Kerala, South India. Epilepsia. 2000;41(8):1027–1035. DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb00289.x https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10961631/
14. Seneviratne U, Rajapakse P, Pathirana R, Seetha T. Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Epilepsy in Rural Sri Lanka. Seizure. 2002;11(1):40–43. DOI: 10.1053/seiz.2001.0579 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11888258/
15. Teferi J, Shewangizaw Z. Assessment of knowledge, attitude, and practice related to epilepsy: a community-based study. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015;11:1239–1246. DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S82328 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26056455/. 
16. Assessment of epilepsy awareness, knowledge, and attitudes among preclinical and clinical medical students in the West Bank of Palestine. Epilepsy Behav. 2023;145:109317. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109317 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37348411/
17. Alege BO, Agbo CP, Olagunju AA. Epilepsy-related stigma in Nigeria: A systematic review of manifestations, impacts, and socio-cultural drivers. Afr J Disabil. 2026;15:1875. DOI: 10.4102/ajod.v15i0.1875 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41647327/
18. Goel D, Dhanai JS, Agarwal A, Mehlotra V, Saxena V. Knowledge, attitude and practice of epilepsy in Uttarakhand, India. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2011;14(2):116–119. DOI: 10.4103/0972-2327.82799 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21808474/
19. Sureshbabu S, Moosan H, Joseph M, Haseena CV, Lekshmi R, Naz A, et al. Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of epilepsy in Wayanad, Kerala. Epilepsy Behav. 2022;133:108762. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108762 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35697588
20. An evaluation of the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of parents regarding epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2022;129:108621. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108621 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35217386
21. Sethi AK, Singh V, Chaurasia RN, Joshi D, Pathak A, Rath S, et al. Study of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice among Epilepsy Patients in North India. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2020;11(2):278–285. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1708569 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32367984/
22. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of epilepsy patients regarding the ketogenic diet therapy: A cross-sectional study. Epilepsia Open. 2025;10(1):70048. DOI: 10.1002/epi4.70048 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40323735/
23. Knowledge, attitude and perception of epilepsy patients toward epilepsy surgery at Jordan University hospital. Epilepsy Behav. 2025;148:110255. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110255 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39827677/
24. Thomas SV, Nair A. Confronting the stigma of epilepsy. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2011;14(3):158–163. DOI: 10.4103/0972-2327.85873 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22028525/
25. Silva MHL, Lima JVS, Lopes IPS, Silva ACV, Lucchi IM, Oliveira GP, et al. Stigmas in Epilepsy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Epilepsy Res. 2025;15(1):23–32. DOI: 10.14581/jer.25003 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40568055/
26. Knowledge, attitude and practice of schoolteachers towards students with epilepsy in Al-Jouf, Saudi Arabia. Work. 2022;72(4):1455-1461. DOI: 10.3233/WOR-205196 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35871378/
27. Knowledge, awareness, and attitudes towards epilepsy among elementary schoolteachers in the Kingdom of Bahrain. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2023;46:8-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2023.08.001 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37659186/
28. Systematic review of frequency of felt and enacted stigma in epilepsy and determining factors and attitudes toward persons living with epilepsy-Report from the International League Against Epilepsy Task Force on Stigma in Epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2022;63(1):15-32. DOI: 10.1111/epi.17135 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34985782/
29. Knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) towards epilepsy in secondary school students in Tanzania. Cent Afr J Med. 1994;40(1):13-18. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)78864-7 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8082145/
30. Brizzi K, Deki S, Tshering L, Clark SJ, Nirola DK, Patenaude BN, et al. Knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding epilepsy in the Kingdom of Bhutan. Int Health. 2016;8(4):286–291. DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/ihw017 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27160683/
31. Determination of stigma and attitude in relatives of patients with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2024;158:109923. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.109923 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39089140/
32. A systematic review protocol of stigma among children and adolescents with epilepsy. Syst Rev. 2019;8(1):16. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-018-0937-2 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30636635/
33. Evaluating the knowledge of and attitudes toward epilepsy among Turkish undergraduate nursing students: A cross-sectional study. Epilepsy Behav. 2022;126:108477. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108477 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34922329/
34. Evaluation of knowledge levels and attitudes of health management department students about epilepsy disease; a cross-sectional study. Epilepsy Behav. 2022;126:108480. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108480 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34922330/
35. Knowledge, attitude, and practice of people toward epilepsy in a South Indian village. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2016;19(3):356-360. DOI: 10.4103/0976-3147.181490 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27365954/
36. Epilepsy knowledge and attitudes: A large observational study among the Palestinian general public. Heliyon. 2023;10(1):e23707. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23707 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38187269
37. A community-based awareness program improves knowledge and attitudes toward epilepsy: An interventional study. Epilepsy Behav. 2023;150:109586. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109586 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38128316/
38. Knowledge of and Attitude towards Epilepsy among the Jordanian Community. Healthcare (Basel). 2022;10(8):1567. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10081567 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36011224
39. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of caregivers with children diagnosed with epilepsy attending a pediatric outpatient clinic: a descriptive, cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Pediatr. 2024;24(1):475. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-024-04958-3 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39039504
40. Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) of parents/caregivers towards epilepsy in children - A cross-sectional observational study. Heliyon. 2023;9(9):e19849. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19849 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37809645/
41. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices among mothers of children with epilepsy: A study in a teaching hospital. Epilepsy Behav. 2017;69:147-152. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.02.019 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28285235/
42. Buddhiraja R, Sharma S, Sharma S, Bansal RK, Setia RK, Bansal N, et al. Epilepsy Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among Primary Healthcare Providers in an Indian District. Epilepsy Behav. 2020;104(Pt A):106899. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106899 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32058300
43. Educational intervention improves knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding epilepsy among school teachers. Epilepsy Behav. 2023;141:109138. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109138 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36871320/
44. Knowledge, perception and attitudes toward epilepsy among medical students at King Abdulaziz University. SAGE Open Med. 2021;9:2050312121991248. DOI: 10.1177/2050312121991248 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33614036/
45. Knowledge, attitude, and barriers for epilepsy surgery: A survey among resident doctors in a tertiary care center in India. Epilepsy Behav. 2021;123:108280. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108280 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34500435