View Article

Abstract

Nanotechnology has been widely researched and used in cancer treatment because nanoparticles can serve as an effective drug delivery system. Compared to traditional drugs, using nanoparticles for drug delivery offers several benefits, such as better stability and compatibility with the body, improve ability to pass through cell membranes, and better retention in the body. This helps in delivering drugs more precisely to the target area. The development of hybrid nanoparticles, which combine the features of different types of nanoparticles, has taken this drug delivery system to a new level. Also, nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems have been shown to help overcome drug resistance in cancer. Cancer drug resistance happens because of several reasons, such as cells pumping out drugs too much, not responding to signals that cause cell death, and having areas with low oxygen. Nanoparticles that target these issues can help reduce resistance and make chemotherapy more effective. As researchers learn more about how resistance works, they are creating more nanoparticles designed to tackle these problems. Recently, scientists have also begun to look into how nanoparticles can be used in immunotherapy, which is becoming a crucial part of cancer treatment. In this review, we explore how nanoparticles and hybrid nanoparticles are used for drug delivery in chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. We also explain how these nanoparticles work to deliver drugs and how they can help reverse drug resistance.

Keywords

Nanoparticle, Drug Delivery, Hybrid Nanoparticles, Targeted Cancer Therapy, Drug Resistance

Introduction

Drug delivery systems (DDS) have been used in both clinical and pre-clinical settings to deliver therapeutic substances for treating diseases [1]. Traditional DDS methods involve either oral intake or injection. While conventional DDS methods are easy to administer and generally accepted by patients, they have several significant limitations:

  • Limited effectiveness: Many drugs have unpredictable absorption rates when taken by mouth, and the acidic environment in the stomach along with digestive enzymes can break down some drugs before they reach the bloodstream.
  • Lack of selectivity: Many drugs have unpredictable absorption rates when taken by mouth, and the acidic environment in the stomach along with digestive enzymes can break down some drugs before they reach the bloodstream.

Controlled drug delivery systems can address several issues that traditional methods struggle with. For example, chemotherapy drugs used to treat cancer are usually spread throughout the body in a non-targeted way, which can damage both healthy and cancer cells. This leads to lower treatment effectiveness and more side effects [2]. Controlled DDSs could be great for delivering chemotherapy drugs, as they can direct the medication specifically to the tumor. This increases the amount of drug reaching cancer cells while reducing harm to normal cells [3, 4]. In addition, controlled DDSs help protect drugs from breaking down or being removed by the body. This is especially useful for delivering proteins and new treatments like gene therapy and RNA interference. They can also help DNA and siRNA avoid being taken up by the reticuloendothelial system or other tissues, as well as prevent them from being broken down by enzymes [5].

Nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems offer a promising way to treat cancer by making treatments more effective and less harmful. These systems use nanoparticles, which are very small particles, usually between 1 and 1000 nanometers in size, to carry drugs directly to cancer cells. This helps reduce damage to healthy tissues and makes the treatment more targeted, which can lead to fewer side effects and better results.

Cancer is a general term that refers to a group of diseases where cells grow out of control and spread uncontrollably.

For many years, scientists have been trying to find out what causes cancer. Some cancers are linked to environmental factors like radiation and pollution. However, lifestyle choices such as eating an unhealthy diet, using tobacco, smoking, experiencing high levels of stress, and not exercising enough also play a big role in increasing cancer risk. While these external factors are well known, it's more difficult to measure how much genetic changes, like mutations in proto-oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, and genes involved in DNA repair, contribute to cancer development. In fact, only 5 to 10% of cancer cases are connected to inherited genetic factors.

Different types of nanoparticles are utilized in the treatment of cancer (Fig. 1). Nanoparticles have the capability to transport chemotherapy drugs directly to cancer cells, thereby increasing therapeutic effectiveness and reducing side effects. They can also generate heat to destroy cancer cells through a process called hyperthermia. Additionally, nanoparticles can enhance medical imaging techniques, allowing for improved tumor monitoring and precise localization. Overall, nanoparticles present significant potential for improving patient outcomes and advancing the field of oncology [6]. Therefore, it is essential to conduct thorough research on these factors and understand their impact on nanoparticle behavior before progressing to human trials. Furthermore, developing strategies to improve nanoparticle stability and minimize their accumulation in healthy organs will be crucial for their successful application in clinical settings [7]. In this review, we describe the non-drug delivery aspects of cancer therapy.

Fig.1.Different types of nanoparticles are used in cancer treatment

Nanoparticles: -

Nanoparticles (NPs) are particles that are smaller than 100 nm in at least one dimension and have special properties that are not found in larger forms of the same material [8]. They can be grouped into different types based on their shape, such as 0D, 1D, 2D, or 3D [19]. The structure of nanoparticles includes several parts: the surface layer, the shell, and the core, which is the central part and is often considered the main body of the nanoparticle [9]. Because of their unique characteristics, such as a high surface-to-volume ratio, distinct properties, small size, and improved targeting ability, these materials are widely used in many different fields.

Nanoparticles are able to penetrate deep into tissues, which helps improve the enhanced permeability and retention effect. Also, the features on their surface influence how well they are absorbed by the body and how long they stay active by helping them pass through small openings in cell layers. For instance, nanoparticles covered with polyethylene glycol, a water-loving material, are less likely to be detected and removed by the immune system.[10] Moreover, by changing the properties of the material used in nanoparticles, it's possible to control how quickly drugs or active substances are released [11]. Overall, the unique qualities of nanoparticles play a key role in how effectively they work for treating cancer.

Types of Nanoparticles used in Drug Delivery:

1. Inorganic nanoparticles

Inorganic nanoparticles, such as gold and silver nanoparticles, have demonstrated significant potential in cancer treatment due to their distinctive properties. These nanoparticles can be engineered to specifically target cancer cells, thereby increasing the effectiveness of conventional treatments like chemotherapy or radiation therapy. However, there is a need for extensive research to optimize their safety and efficacy. Understanding the long-term effects of nanoparticles on the human body is vital to prevent any unintended harm to patients [12]. Researchers must also tackle the challenge of scaling up nanoparticle production to meet clinical demands. Standardized and cost-effective manufacturing processes are essential for the widespread availability and affordability of these promising cancer treatment options. Moreover, researchers should consider the ethical implications of using nanoparticles in cancer treatment. It is crucial to ensure that the benefits outweigh any potential risks and that patients are fully informed about the use of these innovative therapies [13]. A clinical trial found that nanoparticles combined with chemotherapy drugs enhanced treatment effectiveness by targeting cancer cells while minimizing damage to healthy cells. This breakthrough underscored the importance of understanding how nanoparticles interact with other medications and paved the way for personalized cancer treatment plans tailored to individual patients. Innovative manufacturing techniques, such as continuous flow reactors, have been developed to reduce costs and ensure widespread access to this cutting-edge technology [14]. However, the limited effectiveness of nanoparticle-based cancer treatments for certain types of tumors remains a significant challenge. For example, in pancreatic cancer, dense stromal tissue surrounding the tumor hinders drug penetration, limiting the effectiveness of nanoparticles in certain tumor microenvironments. This challenge has prompted researchers to explore alternative strategies, such as combining nanoparticle-based treatments with other therapeutic approaches like immunotherapy or targeted drug delivery systems [15]. By synergistically leveraging multiple treatment modalities, scientists aim to overcome the limitations posed by dense stromal tissue and enhance the efficacy of cancer treatments in challenging tumor microenvironments.

2. Organic nanoparticles

Organic nanoparticles are a good alternative to metal nanoparticles in medical uses because they are safe for the body and can be made to have special features, like delivering medicine to certain areas or acting as a tool to see inside the body [16]. These nanoparticles have shown promise in treating cancer, as they can target drugs directly to cancer cells, providing a steady and effective treatment [17]. However, organic nanoparticles can also give off light signals when they come into contact with certain body parts, which helps in seeing those areas better. But this method can also cause unwanted side effects and harm, and it's sometimes hard to clearly see the exact areas being treated. More research is needed to fully understand the long-term impacts and risks of using organic nanoparticles in medical treatments [18]. Also, there are worries about these nanoparticles building up in the body over time, which could lead to harmful effects. Therefore, it is very important to do thorough studies to check the safety and effectiveness of organic nanoparticles before they are used widely in medical treatments [19].

3. Hybrid nanoparticles

Hybrid nanoparticles offer a promising solution to issues related to the buildup of organic nanoparticles by combining the benefits of both organic and inorganic materials. By adding inorganic elements such as metals or metal oxides, these nanoparticles can improve their ability to work safely inside the body and lower the chance of being stored in the body over time [20]. Despite this, more research is needed to fully understand how these hybrid nanoparticles interact with the body and what long-term effects they might have. The way the immune system responds to hybrid nanoparticles can depend on their size, shape, and how their surface looks [12]. Although organic nanoparticles are usually considered safe, adding inorganic parts might cause the immune system to react, which could lead to inflammation or other problems. Therefore, it's important to study how the immune system reacts to hybrid nanoparticles and check their safety before using them in medical treatments [21]. A study on hybrid nanoparticles found that smaller ones with a round shape and smooth surface were more likely to pass through the immune system and be seen as safe [16]. However, larger nanoparticles with odd shapes and rough surfaces caused a stronger immune reaction, leading to inflammation and possible health issues. This shows the need to carefully examine the physical features of nanoparticles to ensure they are safe for medical use. For example, gold nanoparticles have been found to trigger immune responses and cause inflammation, indicating that size and shape alone do not always determine safety [22]. Also, some inorganic nanoparticles with irregular shapes and rough surfaces have shown low immunogenicity, which goes against the idea that these features always lead to a strong immune reaction. Thus, having a full understanding of how nanoparticles behave is essential for accurately assessing their safety in medical applications [23].

Targeted nanoparticle drug delivery

Nanoparticle systems covered with pH-sensitive polymers can help solve problems in cancer treatment by delivering medicine straight to the tumor, making the treatment more effective and less harmful to healthy tissues [24]. Better nanoparticle systems that are more sensitive to pH changes can release drugs more accurately and in a controlled way, which overcomes the limits of today's pH-sensitive polymers. A promising method is using nanogels, which are three-dimensional networks made of linked polymers that can hold drugs and react to pH changes. These nanogels can be made to release medicine based on pH levels, allowing the drug to target the tumor site specifically [25].

Fig.2.Nanoparticle-mediated targeted drug delivery to cancer cells

Fig.3.Passive Targeting of Nanoparticles to cancer cells.

Researchers are also investigating stimulus-responsive nanoparticles that can react to various factors, such as temperature or enzymatic activity, to enhance the precision of drug release. These developments have significant potential to transform cancer treatment and improve patient results. pH-responsive nanogels, for example, can be loaded with chemotherapy drugs and injected into the bloodstream, delivering the treatment directly to cancer cells while reducing harm to healthy tissues. This targeted drug delivery method boosts treatment effectiveness and lowers the side effects commonly associated with chemotherapy [26]. However, cancer cells can develop resistance to the effects of nanogels. To address this, combination therapy where multiple drugs are used together to counteract resistance has demonstrated promising outcomes in enhancing chemotherapy efficacy. Researchers are also exploring alternative approaches, such as immunotherapy and gene therapy, to tackle drug resistance and improve treatment outcomes [27]. Additionally, nanotechnology continues to evolve, with ongoing studies aimed at creating more efficient and targeted drug delivery systems capable of overcoming resistance mechanisms and further improving patient care [28].

Based Drug Delivery Systems: -

Nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems have shown promise in making cancer treatment more effective by delivering drugs directly to cancer cells, which helps protect healthy tissues from damage [29]. However, drug resistance is still a big problem that needs to be solved to make the most out of these systems. Scientists are working on ways to beat drug resistance and make these systems work better. One approach is using combination therapies, where multiple drugs are delivered at the same time through nanoparticles. This target different ways cancer cells become resistant to drugs [30]. Nanoparticles can also help drugs get past the defenses that cancer cells use to resist treatment, allowing the drugs to reach their target and work properly. These particles can be designed to release drugs slowly, keeping drug levels steady and reducing side effects. Additionally, researchers are trying to make nanoparticles more precise so they can target cancer cells more accurately while leaving healthy tissue untouched. This could lead to better, more personalized cancer treatments in the future [31]. Gene therapy agents that reverse or inhibit cancer cell drug resistance are under investigation. Nanoparticles can encapsulate chemotherapy drugs and specifically target cancer cells while bypassing the resistance mechanisms that typically make them ineffective. This targeted delivery helps reduce confusion and frustration in patients and increases the effectiveness of treatment. However, not all cancer cells respond equally to nanoparticle-based treatments, as certain mutations or genetic variations may reduce their susceptibility. Some cancer cells may actively expel or neutralize nanoparticles, making them less effective in delivering drugs to their intended targets [32]. Additionally, interactions between nanoparticles and cancer cells can lead to unexpected side effects or toxicities, which could harm healthy tissues and organs. It is important to recognize that the effectiveness of nanoparticle-based treatments can vary depending on the specific type of cancer cells being targeted [33]. Certain cancer cells may possess unique characteristics that make them more resistant to nanoparticle therapies. The delivery method of nanoparticles to cancer cells is also a critical factor. The ability of nanoparticles to efficiently reach and penetrate the tumor site significantly influences their effectiveness [34]. Moreover, understanding the potential long-term effects and safety profile of nanoparticle-based treatments is essential to ensure patient well-being and minimize any unforeseen risks [35].

How Nanoparticles Work in Cancer Drug Delivery: -

Fig.4.Polymeric Nanoparticles

Cancer treatment depends on the type, stage, and location of the cancer, as well as the patient's overall health. Common treatments approaches include:

Standard Treatments

  • Surgery: Removing tumors or damaged tissues.
  • Chemotherapy: Using drugs to kill cancer cells.
  • Radiation therapy: Using high energy rays to destroy cancer cells.
  • Immunotherapy: Helping the body’s immune system fight cancer.
  • Targeted therapy: Focusing on specific cancer cells or proteins.

Other Treatments

  • Hormone therapy: Suppressing or decreasing hormone production.
  • Stem cell Transplant: Replacing damaged stem cells.
  • Precision medicine: Customizing treatment based to individual genetic profiles.

Emerging Treatments

  • Gene therapy: Altering genes to prevent or treat cancer.
  • CAR-T cell therapy: Employing genetically modified T cells to target cancer cells.
  • Nanoparticle-based therapy: Utilizing nanoparticles for targeted treatment delivery.

Treatment Goals

  • Curative: Trying to completely remove cancer.
  • Control: Trying to manage cancer and slow its growth [36, 37].

CONCLUSION:

Nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems have emerged as a promising approach to overcome the limitations of conventional cancer therapies by enabling targeted, controlled, and efficient delivery of anticancer agents. These systems enhance therapeutic efficacy while minimizing systemic toxicity through mechanisms such as passive and active targeting. Various nanocarriers including liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, dendrimers, and metallic nanoparticles have demonstrated potential in preclinical and clinical studies. However, despite significant progress, challenges such as large-scale manufacturing, reproducibility, long-term safety, and regulatory approval remain major barriers to clinical translation. Continued research focused on improving biocompatibility, understanding tumor biology, and integrating personalized medicine approaches will be crucial for the successful development of next-generation nanomedicines in cancer therapy. Ultimately, the future of nanoparticle-based drug delivery lies in translating innovative laboratory findings into safe, effective, and patient-centered clinical applications.

REFERENCES

  1. Acharya S., Shoo S. K. (2011). PLGA nanoparticles containing various anticancer agents and tumor delivery by EPR effect. Adv. Drug Deli. Rev. 63 170–183.
  2. Agarwal R., Kaye S. B. (2003). Ovarian cancer: strategies for overcoming resistance to chemotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3 502–516.
  3. K.K. Jain Drug Delivery System (2014)
  4. K. Cho, X. Wang, S. Nia, Z. Chen, D.M. (2008). Shin Therapeutic nanoparticles for drug delivery in cancer Clan. Canc. Res., 14 (5), pp. 1310-1316
  5. H. Maeda the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect in tumor vasculature: the key role of tumor-selective macromolecular drug targeting Adv. Enzyme. Regal., 41 (2001), pp. 189-207
  6. T.M. Allen, P.R. Collis (2013). Liposomal drug delivery systems: from concept to clinical applications Adv. Drug Deli. Rev., 65 (1), pp. 36-48
  7. J. Shi, A.R. Yoruba, O.C. Farrokhzad, R. Langer (2010). Nanotechnology in drug delivery and tissue engineering: from discovery to applications Nano Let., 10 (9), pp. 3223-32308.
  8. L. Wang, C. Chen (2016). Light-activated mesoporous Nano carriers to overcome drug resistance of cancer cells Nano med. Nanotechnology. Biol. Med., 12, p. 519
  9. G. Pire, C.N. Print (2016). Could the use of nanowire structures overcome some of the current limitations of brain electrode implants Nano medicine (N. Y., NY, U. S.), 11, pp. 745-747
  10. Bissau P, Lou baton B (2011) Nano medicine, nanotechnology in medicine. Science Direct.
  11. Laurent S, Forge D, Port M, Rocha A, Robin C, Vander Lest L, Muller R (2008) Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, stabilization, factorization, physicochemical characterizations, and biological applications.
  12. P. Li, D. Wang, J. Hu, X. Yang (2022). The role of imaging in targeted delivery of nanomedicine for cancer therapy, Adv. Drug Delivery. Rev. 189, 114447.
  13. D. Singh (2017). The significance of nanomedicine in brain-targeted drug delivery: crossing blood-brain barriers, J. Nano Res. 5.
  14. Y. Li, G. Deng, X. Hu, C. Li, X. Wang, Q. Zhu, K. Zheng, W. Xiong, H. Wu, (2022). Recent advances in mesoporous silica nanoparticle-based targeted drug-delivery systems for cancer therapy, Nanomedicine (N. Y., NY, U. S.) 17 1253–1279.
  15. G. Pour Gashtasbi (2015). Nanotoxicology and challenges of translation, Nanomedicine (N. Y., NY, U. S.) 10 3121–3129.
  16. S. Venkatraman, T. Wong, (2014). how can nanoparticles be used to overcome the challenges of glaucoma treatment, Nanomedicine (N. Y., NY, U. S.) 9 1281–1283.
  17. Y. Doleyres (2020). Benefits of branched polymeric nanoparticles for enhanced targeted drug delivery, Nano med. & Nanotech. Open Access 5.
  18. R. Juneja, I. Roy (2018). Iron oxide-doped niosomes as drug carriers for magnetically targeted drug delivery, Int. J. Nano med. 13 7–9
  19. S. Puri, M. Mazza, G. Roy, R.M. England, L. Zhou, S. Nourian, J. Anand Subramony (2023). Evolution of nanomedicine formulations for targeted delivery and controlled release, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 114962.
  20. R. Huang (2016). Peptide-mediated drug delivery systems for targeted glioma therapy, Nanomed. Nanotechnology. Biol. Med. 12 535.
  21. G. Piret, C.N. Prinz (2016). Could the use of nanowire structures overcome some of the current limitations of brain electrode implants, Nanomedicine (N. Y., NY, U. S.) 11 745–747.
  22. M. Talelli, W.E. Hennink (2011). Thermosensitive polymeric micelles for targeted drug delivery, Nanomedicine (N. Y., NY, U. S.) 6 1245–1255.
  23. R. Müller, Junghanns (2008). Nanocrystal Technology, Drug Delivery and Clinical Applications, Inter J of Nanomed, p. 295.
  24. H.A. Salama, M. Ghorab, A.A. Mahmoud, M. Abdel Hady (2017). PLGA nanoparticles as subconjunctival injection for management of glaucoma, AAPS Pharm SciTech 18 2517–2528
  25. J. Liu, X. Zhang, G. Li, F. Xu, S. Li, L. Teng, Y. Li, F. Sun (2019). Anti-angiogenic activity of bevacizumab-bearing dexamethasone-loaded PLGA nanoparticles for potential intravitreal applications, Int. J. Nanomed. 14 8819–8834.
  26. F. Qiu, T. Meng, Q. Chen, K. Zhou, Y. Shao, G. Matlock, X. Ma, W. Wu, Y. Du, X. Wang, G. Deng, J. Ma, Q. Xu (2019). Fenofibrate-loaded biodegradable nanoparticles for the treatment of experimental diabetic retinopathy and neovascular age related macular degeneration, Mol. Pharm. 16 1958
  27. L. Wang, E. Jia, (2015). Ovarian cancer targeted hyaluronic acid-based nanoparticle system for paclitaxel delivery to overcome drug resistance, Drug Delivery. 23, 1810–1817.
  28. G. Wang, H. Uludag, (2008). Recent developments in nanoparticle-based drug delivery and targeting systems with emphasis on protein-based nanoparticles, expert Opinion Drug Delivery. 5 499–515.
  29. Tiwari JN (2011) Zero-dimensional, one-dimensional, two-dimensional and three-dimensional nanostructured materials for advanced electrochemical energy devices.
  30. Shin WK, Cho J, Kennan A, et al. (2016). Cross-linked composite gel polymer electrolyte using mesoporous methacrylate-functionalized SiO2 nanoparticles for lithium-ion polymer batteries. Sic Rep.
  31. Procom A, Davidson JM. (2008). Nano vehicular intracellular delivery systems. J Pharm Sci.
  32. M.K. Viswanath, M.S. Moth (2018). Targeted bio adhesive Nano medicine: an effective approach for synergistic drug delivery to cancers Nano medicine (N. Y., NY, U. S.), 13, pp. 1401-1403
  33. K. Vyas, M. Rather, M.M. Patel (2023). Insight on Nano drug delivery systems with targeted therapy in treatment of oral cancer Nano med. Nanotechnology. Biol. Med., 49.
  34. D.S. Benoit, H. Koo (2016). Targeted, triggered drug delivery to tumor and biofilm microenvironments Nano medicine (N. Y., NY, U. S.), 11, pp. 873-879
  35. P. Li, D. Wang, J. Hu, X. Yang (2022). The role of imaging in targeted delivery of Nano medicine for cancer therapy Adv. Drug Deli. Rev., 189
  36. M. Mishra, V. Chandavarkar, R. Sharma and D. Bhargava, (2019). Structure, function and role of CD44 in neoplastic, J. Oral Maxillofacial. Pathos.,23, 267–272
  37. M. Hassan Maserati, S. E. Syafruddin, M. A. Mother and A. Yahir, (2021). CD44: A Multifunctional Mediator of Cancer Progression, Biomolecules, ,11, 1850

Reference

  1. Acharya S., Shoo S. K. (2011). PLGA nanoparticles containing various anticancer agents and tumor delivery by EPR effect. Adv. Drug Deli. Rev. 63 170–183.
  2. Agarwal R., Kaye S. B. (2003). Ovarian cancer: strategies for overcoming resistance to chemotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3 502–516.
  3. K.K. Jain Drug Delivery System (2014)
  4. K. Cho, X. Wang, S. Nia, Z. Chen, D.M. (2008). Shin Therapeutic nanoparticles for drug delivery in cancer Clan. Canc. Res., 14 (5), pp. 1310-1316
  5. H. Maeda the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect in tumor vasculature: the key role of tumor-selective macromolecular drug targeting Adv. Enzyme. Regal., 41 (2001), pp. 189-207
  6. T.M. Allen, P.R. Collis (2013). Liposomal drug delivery systems: from concept to clinical applications Adv. Drug Deli. Rev., 65 (1), pp. 36-48
  7. J. Shi, A.R. Yoruba, O.C. Farrokhzad, R. Langer (2010). Nanotechnology in drug delivery and tissue engineering: from discovery to applications Nano Let., 10 (9), pp. 3223-32308.
  8. L. Wang, C. Chen (2016). Light-activated mesoporous Nano carriers to overcome drug resistance of cancer cells Nano med. Nanotechnology. Biol. Med., 12, p. 519
  9. G. Pire, C.N. Print (2016). Could the use of nanowire structures overcome some of the current limitations of brain electrode implants Nano medicine (N. Y., NY, U. S.), 11, pp. 745-747
  10. Bissau P, Lou baton B (2011) Nano medicine, nanotechnology in medicine. Science Direct.
  11. Laurent S, Forge D, Port M, Rocha A, Robin C, Vander Lest L, Muller R (2008) Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, stabilization, factorization, physicochemical characterizations, and biological applications.
  12. P. Li, D. Wang, J. Hu, X. Yang (2022). The role of imaging in targeted delivery of nanomedicine for cancer therapy, Adv. Drug Delivery. Rev. 189, 114447.
  13. D. Singh (2017). The significance of nanomedicine in brain-targeted drug delivery: crossing blood-brain barriers, J. Nano Res. 5.
  14. Y. Li, G. Deng, X. Hu, C. Li, X. Wang, Q. Zhu, K. Zheng, W. Xiong, H. Wu, (2022). Recent advances in mesoporous silica nanoparticle-based targeted drug-delivery systems for cancer therapy, Nanomedicine (N. Y., NY, U. S.) 17 1253–1279.
  15. G. Pour Gashtasbi (2015). Nanotoxicology and challenges of translation, Nanomedicine (N. Y., NY, U. S.) 10 3121–3129.
  16. S. Venkatraman, T. Wong, (2014). how can nanoparticles be used to overcome the challenges of glaucoma treatment, Nanomedicine (N. Y., NY, U. S.) 9 1281–1283.
  17. Y. Doleyres (2020). Benefits of branched polymeric nanoparticles for enhanced targeted drug delivery, Nano med. & Nanotech. Open Access 5.
  18. R. Juneja, I. Roy (2018). Iron oxide-doped niosomes as drug carriers for magnetically targeted drug delivery, Int. J. Nano med. 13 7–9
  19. S. Puri, M. Mazza, G. Roy, R.M. England, L. Zhou, S. Nourian, J. Anand Subramony (2023). Evolution of nanomedicine formulations for targeted delivery and controlled release, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 114962.
  20. R. Huang (2016). Peptide-mediated drug delivery systems for targeted glioma therapy, Nanomed. Nanotechnology. Biol. Med. 12 535.
  21. G. Piret, C.N. Prinz (2016). Could the use of nanowire structures overcome some of the current limitations of brain electrode implants, Nanomedicine (N. Y., NY, U. S.) 11 745–747.
  22. M. Talelli, W.E. Hennink (2011). Thermosensitive polymeric micelles for targeted drug delivery, Nanomedicine (N. Y., NY, U. S.) 6 1245–1255.
  23. R. Müller, Junghanns (2008). Nanocrystal Technology, Drug Delivery and Clinical Applications, Inter J of Nanomed, p. 295.
  24. H.A. Salama, M. Ghorab, A.A. Mahmoud, M. Abdel Hady (2017). PLGA nanoparticles as subconjunctival injection for management of glaucoma, AAPS Pharm SciTech 18 2517–2528
  25. J. Liu, X. Zhang, G. Li, F. Xu, S. Li, L. Teng, Y. Li, F. Sun (2019). Anti-angiogenic activity of bevacizumab-bearing dexamethasone-loaded PLGA nanoparticles for potential intravitreal applications, Int. J. Nanomed. 14 8819–8834.
  26. F. Qiu, T. Meng, Q. Chen, K. Zhou, Y. Shao, G. Matlock, X. Ma, W. Wu, Y. Du, X. Wang, G. Deng, J. Ma, Q. Xu (2019). Fenofibrate-loaded biodegradable nanoparticles for the treatment of experimental diabetic retinopathy and neovascular age related macular degeneration, Mol. Pharm. 16 1958
  27. L. Wang, E. Jia, (2015). Ovarian cancer targeted hyaluronic acid-based nanoparticle system for paclitaxel delivery to overcome drug resistance, Drug Delivery. 23, 1810–1817.
  28. G. Wang, H. Uludag, (2008). Recent developments in nanoparticle-based drug delivery and targeting systems with emphasis on protein-based nanoparticles, expert Opinion Drug Delivery. 5 499–515.
  29. Tiwari JN (2011) Zero-dimensional, one-dimensional, two-dimensional and three-dimensional nanostructured materials for advanced electrochemical energy devices.
  30. Shin WK, Cho J, Kennan A, et al. (2016). Cross-linked composite gel polymer electrolyte using mesoporous methacrylate-functionalized SiO2 nanoparticles for lithium-ion polymer batteries. Sic Rep.
  31. Procom A, Davidson JM. (2008). Nano vehicular intracellular delivery systems. J Pharm Sci.
  32. M.K. Viswanath, M.S. Moth (2018). Targeted bio adhesive Nano medicine: an effective approach for synergistic drug delivery to cancers Nano medicine (N. Y., NY, U. S.), 13, pp. 1401-1403
  33. K. Vyas, M. Rather, M.M. Patel (2023). Insight on Nano drug delivery systems with targeted therapy in treatment of oral cancer Nano med. Nanotechnology. Biol. Med., 49.
  34. D.S. Benoit, H. Koo (2016). Targeted, triggered drug delivery to tumor and biofilm microenvironments Nano medicine (N. Y., NY, U. S.), 11, pp. 873-879
  35. P. Li, D. Wang, J. Hu, X. Yang (2022). The role of imaging in targeted delivery of Nano medicine for cancer therapy Adv. Drug Deli. Rev., 189
  36. M. Mishra, V. Chandavarkar, R. Sharma and D. Bhargava, (2019). Structure, function and role of CD44 in neoplastic, J. Oral Maxillofacial. Pathos.,23, 267–272
  37. M. Hassan Maserati, S. E. Syafruddin, M. A. Mother and A. Yahir, (2021). CD44: A Multifunctional Mediator of Cancer Progression, Biomolecules, ,11, 1850

Photo
Gunjal Samruddhi
Corresponding author

Vidya Niketan Institute of Pharmacy and Research Centre, Bota

Photo
Deshmukh Rajashree
Co-author

Vidya Niketan Institute of Pharmacy and Research Centre, Bota

Gunjal Samruddhi, Deshmukh Rajashree, Nanoparticle Based Drug Delivery for Cancer Therapy, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 10, 2504-2513. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17433850

More related articles
Emerging Nanocarrier-Based Drug Delivery in Cancer...
Siddharth Auti, Samruddhi Andre , Sakshi Bhosle , Sanjana Jadhav,...
A Systematic Review on Metformin...
Alwin Thomas, Bhoomika Keshavrao Malete , ...
Optimization Of Herbal Extract-Based Ointments: Characterization and Wound Heali...
Dipraj Sonawane , Shrikant Madhekar, Sachidanand Angadi, ...
Design And Development of Ethosomes Containing Extract of Curcuma Caesia Roxb fo...
Prakash S., Parthasarathi K. Kulkarni, Tanuja A. J., Venkatesh, Hanumanthachar Joshi, ...
Related Articles
Formulaton and Evaluation of Curcustrips and Dual Action of Herbal Oral Film...
Dr. M. Kishore Babu, S. Gowthami, A. Venkata Vineesha, Ch. Anusha, J. Madankumar, A. Vyshnavi, M. Sa...
A Review on Herbal Ointment for Anti-inflammatory Activity...
Prajakta Thombare, Shradha Gudaghe, Priti Sanap, Rushikesh Salve, ...
Dual Drug-Loaded Microspheres: Design Strategies, Release Mechanisms, and Therap...
Bhuvaneswari. K, Kumara Guru. V, Sathish Kumar. D, Dhanalakshmi. P, ...
In-Situ Gel: A Smart Drug Delivery System for Mouth Ulcer Pain Relief...
Vikram Choudhary, Sourav Charan, Gururaj Kulkarni, ...
Emerging Nanocarrier-Based Drug Delivery in Cancer Therapy...
Siddharth Auti, Samruddhi Andre , Sakshi Bhosle , Sanjana Jadhav, Priyatama Pawar, ...
More related articles
Emerging Nanocarrier-Based Drug Delivery in Cancer Therapy...
Siddharth Auti, Samruddhi Andre , Sakshi Bhosle , Sanjana Jadhav, Priyatama Pawar, ...
A Systematic Review on Metformin...
Alwin Thomas, Bhoomika Keshavrao Malete , ...
Emerging Nanocarrier-Based Drug Delivery in Cancer Therapy...
Siddharth Auti, Samruddhi Andre , Sakshi Bhosle , Sanjana Jadhav, Priyatama Pawar, ...
A Systematic Review on Metformin...
Alwin Thomas, Bhoomika Keshavrao Malete , ...