View Article

Abstract

Oxadiazole derivatives have emerged as a vital class of heterocyclic compounds in medicinal chemistry due to their diverse pharmacological activities and favorable drug-like properties. The present study focuses on the design, synthesis, in-silico analysis, and pharmacological evaluation of a series of novel substituted oxadiazole derivatives with the objective of identifying promising candidates for future therapeutic development. The structures of the synthesized derivatives were confirmed using spectral techniques such as FT-IR, ¹H-NMR, and mass spectrometry, ensuring purity and structural integrity. In-silico studies were performed to predict the biological behavior of the synthesized compounds, focusing on their molecular docking interactions with selected protein targets known to play key roles in microbial infection and inflammation. The docking results indicated strong binding affinities and stable interactions between several oxadiazole derivatives and the active sites of the target enzymes, suggesting potential for antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activities.

Keywords

Oxadiazole derivatives, synthesis, in-silico, FT-IR, ¹H-NMR, and mass spectrometry, docking, antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activities

Introduction

In the present study, a series of substituted 1,3,4-oxadiazoles were synthesized using microwave-assisted methods and evaluated for their antibacterial and antifungal activities. Microwave synthesis proved to be highly efficient, offering significantly higher yields in a shorter time compared to conventional methods. The synthesized compounds were recrystallized using various solvents, including ethanol, petroleum ether, n-hexane, methanol, butanol, and acetone, through a slow evaporation technique. Among these solvents, ethanol and acetone produced the most well-defined crystal structures, typically forming needle-like, cross-shaped, and clustered crystals. This is particularly important, as polymorphism can greatly influence the bioavailability of drugs—especially those with poor water solubility. The structural integrity of the synthesized compounds was confirmed by satisfactory results from IR, ¹H NMR, and mass spectroscopic analyses.

1,3,4-oxadiazole- An important Heterocycle16-19: -

The five-membered oxadiazole nucleus is present in heterocyclic compounds with a wide range of health benefits. Oxadiazoles are cyclic compounds that include one oxygen and two nitrogen atoms in a five-membered ring. Oxadiazole is considered to be created by replacing two of the methane (-CH=) groups with two of the nitrogen (-N=) groups of the pyridine type in furan. Compounds with the 1,3,4-oxadiazole nucleus exhibit unique anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antibacterial, anticancer, anticonvulsant, anthelmintic, herbicidal, anti-mycobacterial, antioxidant, and anti-hepatitis B virus properties. Oxadiazole is a heterocyclic aromatic compound with five components, including one oxygen and two nitrogen atoms. In medicinal chemistry, they have also been studied as bioisosteres for carboxylic acids, esters, and carboxamides. It comes in a variety of isomeric forms, including 1,2,3, 1,2,4, 1,2,5, and 1,3,4-oxadiazole.

 Reaction scheme:

Where,

R=

  1. 4-Nitrobenzoic acid
  2. 3 Chlorobenzoic acid

R1=

(a)- Benzaldehyde

(b)Formaldehyde

(c) 4 Choro benzaldehyde

(d) 4 Dimethyl amine benzaldehyde

(e) 3 Nitrobenzaldehyde

Synthesis:

Synthesis by conventional method:

Table No. 5.1.1 Physicochemical data of 5 substituted 1,3,4 oxadiazolidin -2 yl formamide by Conventional and microwave methods

Sr.

No.

Com-pound code

Molecular formula

Molecular weight

g/mol

Melting Point

°C

Percentage yield %

Rf Value

Mobile phase

Conven-tional

Micro-wave

1

3a

C16H11N5O9

417.29

120-124

88

90

0.74

Ethyl acetate :Ethanol (8:2)

2

3b

C16H11ClN4O7

406.74

130-134

84

80

0.80

Ethyl acetate :Ethanol (8:2)

3

3c

C16H12N4O7

372.29

122-128

74

88

0.66

Ethyl acetate :Ethanol (8:2)

4

3d

C18H17N5O7

415.36

120-126

86

92

0.82

Ethyl acetate :Ethanol (8:2)

5

3e

C11H8N4O7

324.21

165.5 –167.5

79

88

0.76

Ethyl acetate :Ethanol (8:2)

6

4a

C16H11Cl2N3O5

396.18

240–245

86

94

0.77

Ethyl acetate :Ethanol (8:2)

7

4b

C16H11ClN4O7

406.74

122-126

78

85

0.81

Ethyl acetate :Ethanol (8:2)

8

4c

C18H17ClN4O5

420.81

130-138

69

78

0.84

Ethyl acetate :Ethanol (8:2)

9

4d

C11H8ClN3O5

297.65

128-134

74

88

0.76

Ethyl acetate :Ethanol (8:2)

10

4e

C16H12ClN3O5

361.74

331–333

70

80

0.63

Ethyl acetate :Ethanol (8:2)

Antibacterial Activity Docking Result

When compared to other compounds, compounds 3a through 4e and compound 4a had the lowest dock scores (-62.60). When we compared the results of the molecule to the literature, this docking score indicated that the suggested compounds had a good binding affinity for hinding to receptors (PDB Code-4AA7). In the binding pocket, the suggested compounds all take on a very similar conformation, displaying van der Waals interactions with the ASP5SA, ARG56A, and TYR67A amino acids as well as hydrogen bond interactions with the ARG56A amino acid. A 2D image is used to depict it (figno.6.2.4.2). 4a chemical and receptor overlay in the figure. It was discovered that the popular drug ciprofloxacin had a dock score of -65.60.

Compound code 4a             Standard (Ciprofloxacin)

Fig. no. 6.2.4.1 Docking poses of compound code 4a and standard drug

Compound code 4a                                            Standard (Ciprofloxacin)

Fig. no. 6.2.4.2: 2D representation of Docking poses of compound code 4a and standard drug

Table 6.2.4.2: Data for interaction of compound code 4a with amino acid

Amino acid

Atom of ligand

Distance

Interaction type

TYR279B

1C

3.991

AROMATIC_INTERACTION

ARG56A

956H

2.982

VDW_ INTERACTION

OH507C

17C

2.937

VDW_ INTERACTION

ARG56A

957H

2.534

HYDROGENBOND_ INTERACTION

Compound code 4a                                          Standard (Ciprofloxacin)

Fig. no. 6.2.4.3:  Superimpose image representation of Docking poses of compound code 4a and standard drug

Anti-Fungal Activity Docking Result

Compounds 3a through 4e have dock scores ranging from - 48.121, with compound 3a having the minimum dock value compared to the remaining compounds. This docking score showed that the developed compounds have a strong binding affinity for binding to the receptor (PDB Code-1kZN) when we compared the results of compound 3a to the literature. The optimal position derived from the docking findings is shown in figure no.6.2.4.4. At the binding pocket, every proposed molecule takes on a fairly similar shape. This includes hydrogen bonding with the amino acid of TYR80A, vanderwal interaction binding LEU83A, hydrophobic interaction binding LEU83A, and aromatic interaction showing with the amino acid of HIS72A. This is depicted in the 2D representation diagram (fig. 6.2.4.5). Superimpose the 3a compound picture with the receptor depicted in the diagram (fig. 6.2.4.6).

Compound code 3a                                           Standard (Fluconazole)

Fig. no. 6.2.4.4:  Docking poses of compound code 3a and standard drug

Compound code 3a                                           Standard (Fluconazole)

Fig. no. 6.2.4.5: 2D representation of Docking poses of compound code 3a and standard drug

Table 6.2.4.4: Data for interaction of compound code 3a with amino acid

Amino acid

Atom of ligand

Distance

Interaction type

TYR80A

9O

1.690

HYDROGENBOND_ INTERACTION

TYR80A

15N

3.750

VDW_ INTERACTION

HIS72A

8C

4.310

AROMATIC_ INTERACTION

LEU83A

17C

3.408

VDW_ INTERACTION

Compound code 3a                                            Standard (Ciprofloxacin)

Fig. no. 6.2.4.6:  Superimpose image representation of Docking poses of compound code 3a and standard drug

Graph No.5.2.1: IR Spectrum of 3a 5-(2 -formyl-4-nitrobenzamido)-1,3,4-oxadiaazolidin-2-yl-4-nitrobenzoate

Table. No.5.2.1: IR Spectrum of 3a 5-(2 -formyl-4-nitrobenzamido)-1,3,4-oxadiaazolidin-2-yl-4-nitrobenzoate

Sr. No.

Assignment

Functional groups

Wavenumber (cm?¹)

1

C-H Stretching

Aromatic and alkyl C-H

3111-2924

2

C=O Stretching

Ester and amide carbonyls

1729-1702

3

C=C Aromatic stretching

Aromatic rings

1600-1500

4

NO2 Stretching

Nitro group

1350-1300

5

C-O Stretching

Ester or ether

1250-1000

Graph No.5.2.6: IR Spectrum of 4a 5 (5 -chloro-2-formylbenzamido)-1,3,4-oxadiazolidin-2-yl-4- chlorobenzoate

Table. No.5.2.6: IR Spectrum of 4a 5 (5 -chloro-2-formylbenzamido)-1,3,4-oxadiazolidin-2-yl-4- chlorobenzoate.

Sr. No.

Assignment

Functional groups

Wavenumber (cm?¹)

1

N–H or O–H stretch

amide N–H stretch or phenolic O–H

3300–3400

2

C–H stretch

Alkyl or aromatic C–H

2900

3

C=O stretch

Ester or amide carbonyl group

1700–1730

4

C=C or C=N stretch

Aromatic ring or oxadiazole C=N

1600–1620

5

C–O stretch

Ester

1200–1300

6

C–Cl stretch or aromatic C–H bending

Chlorine-substituted aromatic ring

700–800

NMR Spectrum of 3a 5-(2 -formyl-4-nitrobenzamido)-1,3,4-oxadiaazolidin-2-yl-4-nitrobenzoate

Graph no 5.2.11: NMR Spectrum of compound 3a

Table no. 5.2.11: NMR Spectrum value of compound 3a

Sr. No.

Chemical Shift (δ)

Assignment

1

10.39

Aldehyde (-CHO) proton

2

10.17

Amide NH proton

3

9.72

Aromatic H ortho to NO? group

4

8.46

Aromatic protons on substituted benzene rings

5

4.99

CH/CH? attached to oxadiazole or ester group

6

2.18

Minor aliphatic protons

NMR Spectrum of 4a 5 (5 -chloro-2-formylbenzamido)-1,3,4-oxadiazolidin-2-yl-4- chlorobenzoate

Graph no 5.2.12: NMR Spectrum of compound 4a

Table no.5.2.12: NMR Spectrum value of compound 4a

Sr. No.

Chemical Shift (δ)

Assignment

1

10.38

Aldehyde proton (-CHO)

2

10.16

Amide NH

3

8.4

Aromatic protons

4

5.11

amide NH

5

3.90

CH near oxadiazole or solvent

6

2.76

trace impurities

7

1.25

aliphatic solvent

MASS Spectrum of 3a 5-(2 -formyl-4-nitrobenzamido)-1,3,4-oxadiaazolidin-2-yl-4-nitrobenzoate

Graph no. 5.2.13: MASS Spectrum of compound 3a

MASS Spectrum of 4a 5 (5 -chloro-2-formylbenzamido)-1,3,4-oxadiazolidin-2-yl-4- chlorobenzoate