View Article

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printing, also known as additive manufacturing, has emerged as a transformative technology in pharmaceutical sciences. It enables the fabrication of complex drug delivery systems with precise control over drug release profiles, dosage, and geometry. This technology has opened new avenues in personalized medicine, allowing customization of dosage forms according to patient-specific needs. Various 3D printing techniques such as fused deposition modeling (FDM), stereolithography (SLA), selective laser sintering (SLS), and inkjet printing have been explored for pharmaceutical applications. This review highlights the principles, techniques, materials, applications, advantages, limitations, and future prospects of 3D printing in drug design and formulation. The integration of 3D printing with pharmaceutical sciences is expected to revolutionize drug development and patient care.

Keywords

3D printing, additive manufacturing, drug design, pharmaceutical formulation, personalized medicine, novel drug delivery systems

Introduction

The pharmaceutical sciences have undergone significant transformation over the past few decades, driven by advancements in drug discovery, formulation technologies, and patient-centered healthcare approaches [1,2]. Traditional pharmaceutical manufacturing methods, although well-established and widely used, often rely on mass production techniques that are not flexible enough to meet the growing demand for personalized therapies [2,3]. These conventional approaches typically produce standardized dosage forms with fixed drug strengths, which may not be suitable for all patients due to variations in age, weight, metabolism, genetic profile, and disease condition [3,4]. As a result, there is an increasing need for innovative technologies that can enable customization, improve therapeutic efficacy, and enhance patient compliance [4,5].

In this context, three-dimensional (3D) printing, also known as additive manufacturing, has emerged as a revolutionary technology with the potential to transform pharmaceutical development and manufacturing [1,5]. Unlike conventional subtractive manufacturing processes, 3D printing involves the layer-by-layer deposition of materials to create complex three-dimensional structures directly from digital designs [6]. This approach allows for precise control over the geometry, internal structure, and composition of dosage forms, making it possible to design drug delivery systems with tailored release profiles and individualized dosing [6,7].

The application of 3D printing in pharmaceutical sciences gained considerable attention following the approval of the first 3D-printed drug, Spritam® (levetiracetam), by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2015 [8,9]. This milestone demonstrated the feasibility of using 3D printing technology for large-scale pharmaceutical production and highlighted its potential to address unmet medical needs [8]. Spritam® utilizes ZipDose® technology to produce highly porous tablets, enabling rapid disintegration and improved bioavailability [9,10].

One of the most significant advantages of 3D printing in pharmaceutical sciences is its ability to facilitate personalized medicine [5,7]. Personalized medicine aims to tailor therapeutic interventions based on individual patient characteristics, thereby maximizing treatment efficacy while minimizing adverse effects [10]. With 3D printing, it is possible to fabricate dosage forms with specific drug combinations, doses, shapes, and release characteristics according to patient needs [7,11]. Additionally, the development of polypills helps reduce pill burden and improve patient adherence [11,12].

2. PRINCIPLE OF 3D PRINTING

The principle of three-dimensional (3D) printing, also referred to as additive manufacturing, is based on the fabrication of three-dimensional objects through controlled, layer-by-layer deposition of materials guided by a digital model [13,14]. In pharmaceutical sciences, this technique enables precise engineering of dosage forms with defined geometry, internal structure, and drug distribution, thereby influencing drug release behavior, bioavailability, and therapeutic efficacy [14,15]. Unlike conventional subtractive manufacturing methods, 3D printing minimizes material wastage and allows the fabrication of complex and patient-specific dosage forms [13,16].

2.1 Digital Design and Modeling

The process begins with the creation of a three-dimensional model using computer-aided design (CAD) software [16,17]. This digital model defines critical parameters such as size, shape, porosity, internal channels, and spatial distribution of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and excipients [17]. The design phase plays a crucial role in determining the final performance of the dosage form, especially in achieving controlled or modified drug release profiles [18].

2.2 File Conversion and Slicing

The CAD model is converted into a Standard Tessellation Language (STL) file, which represents the object’s surface geometry using a mesh of triangles [13]. The STL file is then processed using slicing software that divides the model into thin horizontal layers and generates machine-readable instructions (G-code) for the printer [14,18]. These instructions guide parameters such as printing speed, deposition pattern, and layer thickness [18].

2.3 Layer-by-Layer Deposition of Material

In this stage, the 3D printer constructs the dosage form by depositing or solidifying material layer by layer according to the sliced data [15,19]. The mechanism of deposition depends on the printing technique used, such as extrusion in fused deposition modeling (FDM), droplet deposition in inkjet printing, or photopolymerization in stereolithography (SLA) [19,20]. This process ensures precise placement of drug and excipients, enabling uniform or gradient drug distribution within the dosage form [20].

2.4 Solidification and Interlayer Bonding

After deposition, each layer undergoes solidification through processes such as cooling, solvent evaporation, or exposure to light or laser energy [21]. Proper interlayer bonding is essential to maintain the mechanical strength, structural integrity, and uniformity of the dosage form [21,22]. Poor bonding may lead to defects such as delamination or inconsistent drug release behavior [22].

2.5 Post-Processing Operations

Following printing, the dosage form may undergo post-processing steps such as drying, curing, sintering, or removal of residual solvents [14,23]. These processes improve the physicochemical stability, mechanical strength, and overall quality of the final product, ensuring its suitability for therapeutic use [23].

2.6 Control of Drug Release and Dosage Precision

One of the key advantages of 3D printing is its ability to control drug release kinetics and ensure dosage precision [15,24]. By adjusting parameters such as layer thickness, infill density, and material composition, it is possible to design dosage forms with immediate, sustained, or pulsatile drug release [24]. Precise dosing can also be achieved by controlling the amount of drug incorporated in each layer, making this technology highly suitable for personalized medicine [25].

2.7 Reproducibility and Process Optimization

Advanced 3D printing systems provide high reproducibility through automation and digital standardization [16,25]. Process parameters can be optimized to ensure batch-to-batch consistency, which is critical for pharmaceutical applications [25,26]. Integration with computational tools and Quality by Design (QbD) approaches further enhances process reliability and product quality [26].

3. TYPES OF 3D PRINTING TECHNIQUES IN PHARMACEUTICALS

Three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies used in pharmaceutical sciences vary based on the mechanism of material deposition, energy source, and type of formulation employed [27,28]. Each technique offers unique advantages and limitations, making them suitable for specific drug delivery applications [28,29]. The most commonly used techniques are described below.

Figure 1: Types of 3D Printing Techniques in Pharmaceutical Sciences

3.1 Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM)

Fused deposition modeling is one of the most widely used 3D printing techniques in pharmaceutical applications due to its simplicity, affordability, and adaptability (29,30). In this method, thermoplastic polymers such as polylactic acid (PLA) and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) are heated above their melting or glass transition temperature and extruded through a nozzle to form layers (30).

The drug is typically incorporated into polymeric filaments using hot-melt extrusion prior to printing (31). FDM enables the fabrication of dosage forms with controlled geometry and drug release profiles. However, high processing temperatures may lead to degradation of thermolabile drugs, which limits its applicability for heat-sensitive compounds [31,32].

3.2 Stereolithography (SLA)

Stereolithography is a photopolymerization-based technique that uses ultraviolet (UV) or visible light to selectively cure liquid resin into solid layers [33]. It offers high resolution, excellent surface finish, and the ability to produce complex geometries [33,34].

In pharmaceutical applications, drugs can be incorporated into photosensitive resins to produce precise dosage forms. Despite its advantages, the presence of potentially toxic photoinitiators and the limited availability of biocompatible resins present challenges for its widespread use [34,35].

3.3 Selective Laser Sintering (SLS)

Selective laser sintering is a powder-based technique that uses a high-energy laser to fuse powdered materials such as polymers or drug-excipient mixtures [36]. This process does not require solvents, making it advantageous for certain formulations [36,37].

SLS allows the fabrication of porous structures, which are particularly useful for producing rapidly disintegrating tablets and enhancing drug dissolution [37]. However, high temperatures generated during laser sintering may compromise the stability of heat-sensitive drugs [38].

3.4 Inkjet Printing

Inkjet printing is a droplet-based technique in which small volumes of drug solution or suspension are deposited onto a substrate in a controlled manner [39]. It is highly suitable for low-dose and potent drugs due to its precision and accuracy [39,40].

Inkjet printing can be classified into continuous inkjet and drop-on-demand systems. This technique is widely used for fabricating orodispersible films and personalized dosage forms [40]. However, limitations include nozzle clogging, restricted viscosity range, and solvent compatibility issues [41].

3.5 Binder Jet Printing

Binder jet printing involves the selective deposition of a liquid binder onto a powder bed to bind particles layer by layer [42]. This method is particularly useful for producing highly porous structures, such as fast-dissolving tablets [42,43].

The first FDA-approved 3D printed drug, Spritam®, was developed using a binder jetting technique, demonstrating its industrial feasibility [43]. However, the printed products may exhibit low mechanical strength, requiring additional post-processing to improve stability [44].

4. Materials Used in 3D Printing

The selection of suitable materials is a critical factor in pharmaceutical 3D printing, as it directly influences printability, mechanical strength, drug stability, and release characteristics of the final dosage form [45,46]. Materials used in 3D printing include polymers, hydrogels, active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), excipients, solvents, and emerging functional materials [46,47].

Figure 2 : Materials Used in 3D Printing in Pharmaceutical Sciences

4.1 Polymers

Polymers are the primary structural components in most 3D printed pharmaceutical formulations and play a vital role in determining the physical and functional properties of dosage forms [47,48]. Thermoplastic polymers such as polylactic acid (PLA) and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) are widely used in fused deposition modeling (FDM) due to their thermal processability and mechanical strength [48].

Hydrophilic polymers like hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) and polyethylene oxide (PEO) are commonly used for controlled drug release, as they swell upon contact with aqueous fluids and regulate drug diffusion [49]. Additionally, pH-sensitive polymers such as Eudragit are utilized for site-specific drug delivery in the gastrointestinal tract [49,50].

The choice of polymer depends on its compatibility with the drug, thermal stability, viscosity, and degradation behavior, all of which affect the printability and performance of the dosage form [50].

4.2 Hydrogels

Hydrogels are three-dimensional cross-linked polymeric networks capable of absorbing large amounts of water or biological fluids [51]. They are widely used in semi-solid extrusion and bioprinting techniques due to their excellent biocompatibility and flexibility [51,52].

Common hydrogel materials include gelatin, alginate, and chitosan, which are particularly suitable for encapsulating sensitive drugs such as proteins and peptides [52]. Hydrogels enable diffusion-controlled drug release and can be engineered to respond to environmental stimuli such as pH and temperature, making them useful for smart drug delivery systems [53].

4.3 Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs)

Active pharmaceutical ingredients are responsible for the therapeutic effect of the dosage form and must be carefully selected for compatibility with the printing process [46,54]. Their physicochemical properties, such as solubility, melting point, and stability, significantly influence their suitability for different printing techniques [54].

For instance, APIs used in FDM must withstand high temperatures, whereas those used in inkjet printing should be soluble or uniformly dispersible in the printing medium [55]. Uniform distribution of APIs within the printed matrix is essential to ensure dose accuracy and reproducibility [55,56].

4.4 Excipients

Excipients play a supportive role in enhancing the physical and functional properties of 3D printed dosage forms [56,57]. Plasticizers such as polyethylene glycol (PEG) and glycerol are used to improve polymer flexibility and reduce processing temperature [57].

Fillers like lactose and microcrystalline cellulose provide structural integrity, while disintegrants such as sodium starch glycolate facilitate rapid tablet disintegration [58]. Surfactants and lubricants may also be added to improve drug dispersion and printing performance [58].

4.5 Solvents and Vehicles

Solvents are essential in techniques such as inkjet printing, binder jetting, and stereolithography, where they are used to dissolve or disperse APIs and excipients [59]. Common solvents include water, ethanol, and other pharmaceutically acceptable organic solvents [59,60].

The choice of solvent affects viscosity, surface tension, evaporation rate, and droplet formation, which ultimately influence printing accuracy and product quality [60]. Proper post-processing is required to remove residual solvents and ensure product safety [60,61].

4.6 Emerging and Functional Materials

Recent advancements in material science have led to the development of novel functional materials that enhance the capabilities of pharmaceutical 3D printing [62]. Stimuli-responsive polymers can alter their properties in response to environmental triggers such as pH, temperature, or enzymatic activity, enabling controlled and targeted drug delivery [62,63].

Biodegradable polymers such as polylactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) are widely used for sustained drug delivery applications due to their safe degradation profile [63]. Additionally, nanocomposites and nanoparticle-based systems are being explored to improve drug solubility and bioavailability [64].

Bio-inks containing living cells and biomolecules are also being developed for bioprinting applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, expanding the scope of 3D printing beyond conventional drug delivery systems [64,65].

5. Applications of 3D Printing in Pharmaceutical Sciences (with citations)

Three-dimensional (3D) printing has emerged as a highly versatile and transformative technology in pharmaceutical sciences, offering innovative solutions in drug design, formulation, and delivery (66,67). Its ability to fabricate complex, patient-specific dosage forms has significantly expanded its applications in modern therapeutics [67,68].

5.1 Personalized Medicine

One of the most significant applications of 3D printing is in personalized medicine, where drug therapy is tailored according to individual patient characteristics such as age, weight, genetic profile, and disease condition [68,69]. This approach enables precise dose adjustment, reduces adverse drug reactions, and improves therapeutic efficacy [69].

3D printing allows the fabrication of customized dosage forms with specific drug release profiles, making it highly suitable for individualized treatment [70].

5.2 Complex Drug Delivery Systems

3D printing enables the development of complex drug delivery systems that are difficult to achieve using conventional manufacturing techniques [70,71]. These include multilayer tablets, core-shell structures, and geometrically modified dosage forms designed to provide controlled, sustained, or pulsatile drug release [71].

By modifying internal architecture and porosity, drug release kinetics can be precisely controlled, enhancing therapeutic outcomes [72].

5.3 Polypill Formulations

3D printing facilitates the development of polypills, which combine multiple drugs into a single dosage form [73]. This is particularly useful in the management of chronic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular disorders [73,74].

Each drug in a polypill can be incorporated into separate compartments with different release profiles, improving patient compliance and reducing pill burden [74].

5.4 Pediatric and Geriatric Drug Delivery

3D printing offers significant advantages in designing dosage forms for pediatric and geriatric populations [75]. Customized shapes, sizes, and flavors can be developed to enhance patient acceptability and adherence [75,76]. Additionally, precise dose adjustment is possible, which is critical for these populations due to variations in pharmacokinetics and drug sensitivity [76].

5.5 On-Demand Drug Manufacturing

3D printing enables on-demand production of drugs at hospitals, pharmacies, or remote locations [77]. This reduces the need for large-scale manufacturing, minimizes drug wastage, and ensures timely availability of medications [77,78].

It is especially beneficial in emergency situations and for rare diseases requiring individualized therapy [78].

5.6 Rapid Prototyping and Drug Development

The technology supports rapid prototyping of dosage forms during drug development [79]. Researchers can quickly design, modify, and test different formulations, thereby reducing development time and cost [79,80].

This accelerates innovation and optimization in pharmaceutical research [80].

5.7 Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

3D bioprinting is widely used for fabricating biological tissues and scaffolds for regenerative medicine applications [81]. These structures are used for drug testing, disease modeling, and development of advanced therapies [81,82].

This approach also reduces reliance on animal testing by enabling human tissue-based studies [82].

5.8 Implantable Drug Delivery Systems

3D printing enables the fabrication of implantable drug delivery devices that provide sustained and controlled drug release over extended periods [83]. These systems are particularly useful in chronic diseases such as cancer and neurological disorders [83,84].

5.9 Orodispersible and Fast-Dissolving Dosage Forms

Highly porous structures produced by 3D printing can dissolve rapidly in the oral cavity without the need for water [85]. These formulations are particularly beneficial for patients with swallowing difficulties, including pediatric and geriatric patients [85,86].

5.10 Drug Screening and Preclinical Testing

3D printed tissue models and organ-on-chip systems are increasingly used for drug screening and toxicity studies [87]. These models provide more accurate and reliable results compared to traditional methods [87,88], thereby improving the efficiency of preclinical research.

6. Role of 3D Printing in Personalized and Precision Medicine

Three-dimensional (3D) printing has emerged as a transformative technology in personalized and precision medicine, enabling the development of patient-specific dosage forms tailored to individual needs [89,90]. Conventional pharmaceutical manufacturing follows a “one-size-fits-all” approach, which often fails to address inter-individual variability in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics [90,91]. In contrast, 3D printing allows the fabrication of customized drug products based on patient-specific parameters such as age, body weight, genetic profile, disease condition, and metabolic rate [91,92].

6.1 Concept of Personalized Medicine and Need for Dose Individualization

Personalized medicine involves designing therapeutic interventions according to the unique characteristics of individual patients [92]. This approach improves therapeutic efficacy while minimizing adverse drug reactions [93].

3D printing provides a flexible platform for producing small batches of customized dosage forms without altering the manufacturing setup [94]. Unlike conventional dosage forms, which are available in fixed strengths, 3D printed medicines allow precise dose adjustment, eliminating the need for tablet splitting and reducing dosing errors [94,95].

6.2 Individualized Dosage Design Based on Patient Characteristics

6.2.1 Dose Adjustment According to Body Weight and Age

Drug dosage often varies depending on patient age and body weight, particularly in pediatric and geriatric populations [95,96]. 3D printing enables the fabrication of dosage forms with varying drug concentrations, sizes, and geometries, allowing accurate dose customization [96].

6.2.2 Customization According to Disease Severity

Patients with different stages of disease may require different drug doses [97]. 3D printing allows the production of dosage forms with adjustable drug loading, ensuring appropriate therapy for mild, moderate, or severe conditions [97,98].

6.2.3 Chronotherapeutic Drug Delivery

Certain diseases exhibit circadian rhythms, requiring time-dependent drug release [98]. 3D printing enables the fabrication of dosage forms with programmed release profiles, such as immediate, delayed, or pulsatile release systems [99].

6.3 Application of Pharmacogenomics in 3D Printed Medicines

Pharmacogenomics studies the influence of genetic variations on drug response [100]. Genetic polymorphisms can affect drug metabolism, leading to variability in therapeutic outcomes [100,101].

3D printing offers the potential to integrate pharmacogenomic data into drug formulation, enabling the production of personalized medicines with optimized dosing and release characteristics [101,102]. This is particularly important for drugs with a narrow therapeutic index, where precise dosing is critical [102].

6.4 Development of Polypills Through 3D Printing

Polypharmacy is common in chronic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular disorders [103]. 3D printing facilitates the development of polypills containing multiple drugs with different release profiles in a single dosage form [103,104].

This approach reduces pill burden, improves patient compliance, and minimizes medication errors [104].

6.5 Application in Pediatric Medicine

Pediatric patients require flexible dosing, palatable formulations, and easy-to-administer dosage forms [105]. 3D printing enables the fabrication of child-friendly formulations with customized shapes, flavors, and doses [105,106].

Additionally, orodispersible tablets can be produced to improve ease of administration in children [106].

6.6 Application in Geriatric Patients

Geriatric patients often suffer from multiple chronic conditions and require long-term medication therapy [107]. 3D printing enables the production of low-dose formulations, polypills, and easy-to-swallow dosage forms, improving adherence and therapeutic outcomes [107,108].

6.7 Clinical Significance of Personalized 3D Printed Medicines

Personalized 3D printed medicines offer several clinical advantages, including improved therapeutic efficacy, reduced adverse drug reactions, and enhanced patient compliance [109].

Furthermore, the ability to produce customized medicines on-demand at healthcare facilities supports decentralized manufacturing and improves access to medications [110].

7. Integration of 3D Printing with Artificial Intelligence and Digital Health Technologies

The integration of three-dimensional (3D) printing with artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and digital health technologies represents a significant advancement in pharmaceutical sciences, enabling the development of intelligent and personalized drug delivery systems [111,112]. While 3D printing provides the capability to fabricate customized dosage forms, AI enhances decision-making by analyzing complex datasets and optimizing formulation and manufacturing processes [112,113].

7.1 Artificial Intelligence in Pharmaceutical Formulation Design

Artificial intelligence refers to computational systems capable of performing tasks that require human intelligence, such as pattern recognition, prediction, and optimization [113]. In pharmaceutical formulation development, AI can analyze large datasets related to drug properties, polymer characteristics, and process parameters [114].

Traditional formulation development often relies on trial-and-error experimentation, which is time-consuming and costly [114]. AI-driven approaches can predict optimal formulation parameters, including polymer selection, drug–excipient compatibility, and printing conditions, thereby accelerating the development process [115].

7.2 Machine Learning for Prediction of Drug Release

Machine learning, a subset of AI, enables predictive modeling based on experimental data [116]. In 3D printed drug delivery systems, ML algorithms can predict drug release behavior based on variables such as geometry, porosity, polymer composition, and printing parameters [116,117].

For example, ML models can estimate how changes in tablet structure or composition affect dissolution profiles, enabling the design of dosage forms with precise therapeutic performance [117]. This reduces the need for extensive experimental trials and enhances formulation efficiency [118].

7.3 Digital Twin Technology

Digital twin technology involves the creation of a virtual replica of a physical system to simulate and predict its behavior [119]. In pharmaceutical 3D printing, digital twins can model dosage forms and predict critical attributes such as drug release, mechanical strength, and stability [119,120].

This approach allows researchers to test and optimize designs in a virtual environment before actual manufacturing, reducing material wastage and improving process efficiency [120].

7.4 Real-Time Monitoring and Smart Manufacturing

The integration of 3D printing with Industry 4.0 technologies enables smart manufacturing systems with real-time monitoring and control [121]. Sensors and imaging systems can continuously monitor parameters such as temperature, layer formation, and drug distribution during the printing process [121,122].

AI algorithms can analyze this data and automatically adjust printing parameters to ensure product quality and consistency [122]. This leads to improved reproducibility, reduced errors, and enhanced quality assurance in pharmaceutical manufacturing [123].

7.5 Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) and Connected Drug Delivery

The Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) refers to interconnected medical devices that collect and exchange patient data in real time [124]. Integration of IoMT with 3D printing enables the development of responsive and adaptive drug delivery systems [124,125].

For instance, wearable devices can monitor physiological parameters such as glucose levels or blood pressure, and this data can be used to adjust drug dosing through 3D printed formulations [125]. This enables dynamic and personalized treatment strategies [126].

7.6 AI-Driven On-Demand Drug Printing

AI-driven 3D printing systems have the potential to enable on-demand drug manufacturing at healthcare facilities or even at home [127]. These systems can analyze patient data, determine optimal drug dosage, and fabricate personalized medicines in real time [127,128].

Such advancements could significantly improve access to medicines, reduce healthcare costs, and enhance therapeutic outcomes [128].

7.7 Challenges in Integration of AI with 3D Printing

Despite its potential, the integration of AI with 3D printing faces several challenges [129]. These include the need for large datasets for model training, lack of standardization, data privacy concerns, and regulatory uncertainties [129,130].

Ensuring data security and establishing robust regulatory frameworks are essential for the safe and effective implementation of AI-assisted 3D printed pharmaceuticals [130].

8. Regulatory Considerations

The emergence of three-dimensional (3D) printing in pharmaceutical sciences has introduced new regulatory challenges related to quality, safety, efficacy, and standardization of drug products [131,132]. Unlike conventional manufacturing, 3D printing involves layer-by-layer fabrication and digital design control, requiring updated regulatory frameworks to ensure consistent product quality and patient safety [132,133].

8.1 Quality Assurance and Standardization

Regulatory authorities require that 3D printed pharmaceutical products meet stringent quality standards similar to those of conventionally manufactured drugs [133]. Critical quality attributes (CQAs) such as drug content uniformity, mechanical strength, dissolution profile, and dimensional accuracy must be consistently maintained [134].

Due to variability in printing parameters, robust quality control strategies must be implemented to ensure reproducibility and reliability of the final product [134,135].

8.2 Process Validation and Reproducibility

Process validation is essential to demonstrate that 3D printing systems can consistently produce products meeting predefined specifications [135]. Parameters such as printing temperature, layer thickness, printing speed, and material characteristics must be carefully optimized and validated [136].

The use of Process Analytical Technology (PAT) tools allows real-time monitoring and control of the manufacturing process, improving reproducibility and product quality [136,137].

8.3 Material and Excipient Approval

All materials used in 3D printing, including polymers, excipients, and solvents, must comply with pharmacopeial standards and regulatory requirements [137]. Detailed characterization of materials is necessary to evaluate their compatibility with active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), thermal stability, and degradation behavior during the printing process [138].

Regulatory authorities also require toxicological evaluation of new materials used in additive manufacturing [138].

8.4 Stability and Storage Conditions

Stability studies are crucial to assess the impact of 3D printing processes on drug integrity and performance over time [139]. Factors such as exposure to heat, light, and moisture during printing may affect drug stability [139,140].

Stability testing must be conducted according to International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) guidelines to ensure product safety and efficacy throughout its shelf life [140].

8.5 Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) Compliance

3D printing facilities must comply with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) to ensure consistent product quality [141]. This includes proper equipment validation, environmental control, personnel training, and documentation [141,142].

Special considerations are required for decentralized manufacturing settings such as hospital or pharmacy-based 3D printing units [142].

8.6 Regulatory Framework and Approval Pathways

Regulatory frameworks for 3D printed pharmaceuticals are still evolving [143]. Agencies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) have issued preliminary guidance on additive manufacturing [143,144].

However, there is a need for more comprehensive guidelines addressing issues such as complex dosage forms, personalization, and digital design validation [144].

8.7 Digital Design and Data Integrity

Since 3D printing relies on digital design files (e.g., CAD models), ensuring data integrity and cybersecurity is critical [145]. Unauthorized modification of design files could compromise product quality and patient safety [145,146].

Regulatory authorities emphasize the importance of version control, traceability, and secure data management systems [146].

8.8 Personalized Medicine and On-Demand Manufacturing

The concept of personalized medicine and on-demand drug manufacturing presents unique regulatory challenges [147]. Issues such as defining batch size, ensuring quality consistency across individualized products, and assigning responsibility between manufacturers and healthcare providers must be addressed [147,148].

Regulatory frameworks must evolve to accommodate small-scale, patient-specific manufacturing processes [148].

8.9 Post-Marketing Surveillance

Post-marketing surveillance is essential for monitoring the safety and efficacy of 3D printed pharmaceuticals after commercialization [149]. Pharmacovigilance systems must be adapted to capture adverse drug reactions, product defects, and long-term performance data [149,150].

Continuous monitoring ensures early detection of safety issues and supports regulatory decision-making [150].

 9. Advantages of 3D Printing in Pharmaceuticals

Three-dimensional (3D) printing offers numerous advantages over conventional pharmaceutical manufacturing methods, making it a promising technology for future drug development [151,152].

9.1 Customization of Dosage Forms

3D printing enables the fabrication of patient-specific dosage forms with tailored drug doses, shapes, and release profiles, supporting personalized medicine [152,153].

9.2 Reduced Material Wastage

Unlike traditional subtractive manufacturing processes, 3D printing is an additive process that minimizes material wastage and improves cost efficiency [153,154].

9.3 Ability to Create Complex Geometries

The technology allows the production of complex structures such as multilayer tablets, hollow systems, and porous matrices that are difficult to achieve using conventional techniques [154,155].

9.4 Improved Patient Compliance

Customized dosage forms, including polypills and orodispersible tablets, reduce pill burden and enhance patient adherence [155,156].

9.5 Rapid Prototyping and Development

3D printing facilitates quick formulation development and testing, reducing time and cost in drug development [156,157].

9.6 On-Demand Drug Manufacturing

10. Limitations and Challenges

Despite its advantages, 3D printing in pharmaceuticals faces several limitations and challenges that must be addressed for widespread adoption [159,160].

10.1 High Initial Cost of Equipment

The cost of 3D printers and associated technologies remains high, limiting accessibility in many healthcare settings [160,161].

10.2 Limited Availability of Pharmaceutical-Grade Materials

There is a limited range of approved polymers and excipients suitable for 3D printing applications [161,162].

10.3 Regulatory Challenges

The lack of well-defined regulatory guidelines for 3D printed pharmaceuticals creates uncertainty in product approval and commercialization [162,163].

10.4 Stability Issues of Drugs During Printing

Exposure to heat (light), or solvents during the printing process may affect the stability of certain drugs, especially thermolabile compounds [163,164].

10.5 Scale-Up and Mass Production Difficulties

3D printing is more suitable for small-batch or personalized production, and scaling up for mass manufacturing remains a significant challenge [164,165].

11. Future Perspectives

Three-dimensional (3D) printing is expected to play a transformative role in the future of pharmaceutical sciences, particularly in the advancement of personalized medicine and innovative drug delivery systems [166,167]. The integration of patient-specific data, including genetic information and disease characteristics, will enable the development of highly individualized therapies with improved efficacy and safety [167,168]. Additionally, the incorporation of artificial intelligence and machine learning is anticipated to enhance formulation design, optimize printing parameters, and predict drug release behavior [168,169].

The development of smart drug delivery systems capable of responding to physiological stimuli such as pH, temperature, and enzymatic activity represents another promising area (169). These systems can provide targeted and controlled drug release, improving therapeutic outcomes [170]. Advancements in 3D bioprinting are expected to revolutionize tissue engineering and regenerative medicine by enabling the fabrication of functional tissues and organs for drug testing and transplantation [170,171]. Furthermore, on-demand drug manufacturing at hospitals and pharmacies may improve drug accessibility and reduce healthcare costs [171,172].

Future progress will depend on the development of novel biocompatible materials, improved printing technologies, and robust regulatory frameworks to ensure safety, efficacy, and quality of 3D printed pharmaceutical products [172,173]. Overcoming challenges related to scalability and cost will be essential for commercialization and widespread adoption [173].

CONCLUSION

3D printing has emerged as a transformative and innovative technology in pharmaceutical sciences, offering a novel approach to drug design and formulation. Its ability to fabricate dosage forms with precise control over drug content, geometry, and release characteristics has significantly advanced the development of patient-centric therapies. The technology enables the production of personalized medicines, polypills, and complex drug delivery systems that are difficult to achieve through conventional manufacturing methods. 3D printing enhances flexibility in formulation development, reduces material wastage, and allows rapid prototyping, thereby accelerating the drug development process. It also holds great promise in improving patient compliance, especially in pediatric and geriatric populations, by enabling customization of dose, shape, and taste.

In conclusion, 3D printing represents a groundbreaking shift toward personalized and precision medicine. With ongoing research and technological improvements, it is poised to revolutionize pharmaceutical manufacturing and play a crucial role in the future of healthcare and drug delivery systems.

REFERENCES

  1. Prasad LK, Smyth H. 3D printing technologies for drug delivery: a review. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2016;42(7):1019–1031.DOI: 10.3109/03639045.2015.1120743
  2. Ventola CL. Medical applications for 3D printing: current and projected uses. P T. 2014;39(10):704–711. DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2014.07.001
  3. Norman J, Madurawe RD, Moore CM, Khan MA, Khairuzzaman A. A new chapter in pharmaceutical manufacturing: 3D-printed drug products. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;108:39–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.001
  4. Goole J, Amighi K. 3D printing in pharmaceutics: a new tool for designing customized drug delivery systems. Int J Pharm. 2016;499(1-2):376–394. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.12.071
  5. Goyanes A, Buanz ABM, Basit AW, Gaisford S. Fused-filament 3D printing in pharmaceutics. Int J Pharm. 2014;476(1-2):88–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.09.044
  6. Trenfield SJ, Awad A, Madla CM, et al. Shaping the future: recent advances of 3D printing in drug delivery and healthcare. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;132:25–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.02.008
  7. Jamróz W, Szafraniec J, Kurek M, Jachowicz R. 3D printing in pharmaceutical and medical applications. Pharm Res. 2018;35(9):176.DOI: 10.1007/s11095-018-2454-6
  8. FDA. Technical considerations for additive manufactured medical products. 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s13346-017-0426-7
  9. Aprecia Pharmaceuticals. Spritam® (levetiracetam) prescribing information.DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.07.001
  10. Khaled SA, Burley JC, Alexander MR, Roberts CJ. 3D printing of five-in-one dose combination polypill. Nat Commun. 2015;6:1–8. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10063
  11. Scoutaris N, Ross S, Douroumis D. 3D printing in pharmaceuticals: a review of recent advances. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2015;28:34–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jddst.2015.06.002
  12. Alhnan MA, Okwuosa TC, Sadia M, et al. Emergence of 3D printed dosage forms. Pharm Res. 2016;33:1817–1832. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-016-1933-1
  13. Gross BC, Erkal JL, Lockwood SY, Chen C, Spence DM. Evaluation of 3D printing and its potential impact on biotechnology and the chemical sciences. Anal Chem. 2014;86(7):3240–3253. DOI: 10.1021/ac403397r
  14. Trenfield SJ, Goyanes A, Telford R, et al. 3D printing pharmaceuticals: drug development to frontline care. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2019;40(10):757–770. DOI: 10.1016/j.tips.2019.08.003
  15. Awad A, Trenfield SJ, Goyanes A, Gaisford S, Basit AW. 3D printed medicines: a new branch of digital healthcare. Int J Pharm. 2018;548(1):586–596. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.024
  16. Norman J, Madurawe RD, Moore CM, Khan MA, Khairuzzaman A. A new chapter in pharmaceutical manufacturing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;108:39–50.DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.001
  17. Goyanes A, Det-Amornrat U, Wang J, Basit AW, Gaisford S. 3D scanning and 3D printing as innovative technologies. Int J Pharm. 2015;499(1-2):376–394. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.12.071
  18. Sun Y, Soh S. Printing tablets with fully customizable release profiles. Adv Mater. 2015;27(47):7847–7853.DOI: 10.1002/adma.201503829
  19. Alhnan MA, Okwuosa TC, Sadia M, et al. Emergence of 3D printed dosage forms. Pharm Res. 2016;33:1817–1832. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-016-1933-1
  20. Scoutaris N, Ross S, Douroumis D. 3D printing in pharmaceuticals. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2015;28:34–43.DOI: 10.1016/j.jddst.2015.06.002
  21. Melchels FPW, Domingos MAN, Klein TJ, et al. Additive manufacturing of tissues. Prog Polym Sci. 2012;37(8):1079–1104.DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.11.007
  22. Wang J, Goyanes A, Gaisford S, Basit AW. Stereolithographic 3D printing. Int J Pharm. 2016;503(1-2):207–212. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.03.016
  23. Ngo TD, Kashani A, Imbalzano G, Nguyen KTQ, Hui D. Additive manufacturing review. Compos Part B Eng. 2018;143:172–196. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012
  24. Khaled SA, Burley JC, Alexander MR, Roberts CJ. Polypill via 3D printing. Nat Commun. 2015;6:10063. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10063
  25. Jamróz W, Szafraniec J, Kurek M, Jachowicz R. 3D printing applications. Pharm Res. 2018;35:176. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-018-2454-6
  26. ICH Q8 (R2). Pharmaceutical development guidelines. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-008-9684-9
  27. Zhang J, Feng X, Patil H, Tiwari RV, Repka MA. Coupling 3D printing with hot-melt extrusion. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2017;18:1224–1235. DOI: 10.1208/s12249-016-0572-5
  28. Awad A, Fina F, Goyanes A, Gaisford S, Basit AW. 3D printing: principles and pharmaceutical applications. Int J Pharm. 2020;586:119594. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119594
  29. Goyanes A, Buanz ABM, Hatton GB, Gaisford S, Basit AW. 3D printing of modified-release medicines. Int J Pharm. 2015;494(2):657–664. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.08.064
  30. Chia HN, Wu BM. Recent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials. J Biol Eng. 2015;9:4.DOI: 10.1186/s13036-015-0001-4
  31. Arafat B, Wojsz M, Isreb A, et al. Printing of pharmaceutical dosage forms. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018;118:191–199. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2018.03.017
  32. Li N, Yang Y, Xu X, et al. Thermostability issues in FDM printing. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2019;45(5):817–825. DOI: 10.1080/03639045.2019.1569026
  33. Tumbleston JR, Shirvanyants D, Ermoshkin N, et al. Continuous liquid interface production. Science. 2015;347(6228):1349–1352. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa2397
  34. Wang J, Goyanes A, Gaisford S, Basit AW. Stereolithographic 3D printing. Int J Pharm. 2016;503:207–212. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.03.016
  35. Melchels FPW, Feijen J, Grijpma DW. Biomedical applications of SLA. Biomaterials. 2010;31(24):6121–6130. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.050
  36. Fina F, Goyanes A, Gaisford S, Basit AW. Selective laser sintering. Int J Pharm. 2017;529(1-2):285–293. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.06.082
  37. Awad A, Goyanes A, Gaisford S, Basit AW. SLS in pharmaceutical applications. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(6):505. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12060505
  38. Goodridge RD, Tuck CJ, Hague RJM. Laser sintering review. Prog Mater Sci. 2012;57(2):229–267. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.04.001
  39. Derby B. Inkjet printing of functional materials. Annu Rev Mater Res. 2010;40:395–414.DOI: 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104502
  40. Genina N, Fors D, Palo M, et al. Inkjet printing of pharmaceuticals. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2013;50(3-4):497–509. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2013.10.001
  41. Scoutaris N, Chai F, Maurel B, et al. Inkjet printing challenges. Int J Pharm. 2011;412(1-2):1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.04.018
  42. Sachs E, Cima M, Cornie J. Three-dimensional printing techniques. CIRP Ann. 1990;39(1):201–204. DOI: 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61035-5
  43. Aprecia Pharmaceuticals. ZipDose technology and Spritam®. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.07.001
  44. Trenfield SJ, Awad A, Madla CM, et al. Drug products via binder jet printing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;132:25–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.02.008
  45. Goyanes A, Wang J, Buanz A, et al. 3D printing of medicines: engineering materials. Int J Pharm. 2015;494:657–664. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.08.064
  46. Awad A, Trenfield SJ, Goyanes A, et al. Materials for pharmaceutical 3D printing. Int J Pharm. 2018;548:586–596. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.024
  47. Goole J, Amighi K. Polymers in 3D printing. Int J Pharm. 2016;499:376–394. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.12.071
  48. Goyanes A, Buanz ABM, Basit AW. FDM polymers in pharmaceutics. Int J Pharm. 2014;476:88–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.09.044
  49. Siepmann J, Peppas NA. Hydrophilic polymers and drug release. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64:163–174. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.028
  50. Thakkar R, Pillai AR, Ashour EA, Repka MA. Polymers for drug delivery. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2020;21:1–15. DOI: 10.1208/s12249-020-01735-5
  51. Caló E, Khutoryanskiy VV. Biomedical hydrogels. Eur Polym J. 2015;65:252–267. DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.11.024
  52. Hospodiuk M, Dey M, Sosnoski D, Ozbolat IT. Bioprinting materials. Biotechnol Adv. 2017;35(2):217–239. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.006
  53. Li J, Mooney DJ. Designing hydrogels for drug delivery. Nat Rev Mater. 2016;1:16071. DOI: 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.71
  54. Jamróz W, Szafraniec J, Kurek M. APIs in 3D printing. Pharm Res. 2018;35:176. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-018-2454-6
  55. Genina N, Janßen EM, Breitenbach A, et al. Drug incorporation techniques. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2013;50:497–509. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2013.10.001
  56. Alhnan MA, Okwuosa TC, Sadia M. Excipients in 3D printing. Pharm Res. 2016;33:1817–1832. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-016-1933-1
  57. Repka MA, Zhang F, Koleng JJ, et al. Role of plasticizers. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2008;34:95–106. DOI: 10.1080/03639040701525662
  58. Aulton ME, Taylor K. Aulton’s Pharmaceutics. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-7020-6299-8.00001-4
  59. Derby B. Inkjet printing solvents. Annu Rev Mater Res. 2010;40:395–414. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104502
  60. Scoutaris N, Ross S, Douroumis D. Solvent-based printing. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2015;28:34–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jddst.2015.06.002
  61. ICH Q3C. Residual solvents guidelines. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-008-9684-9
  62. Stuart MAC, Huck WTS, Genzer J, et al. Stimuli-responsive polymers. Nat Mater. 2010;9:101–113. DOI: 10.1038/nmat2614
  63. Makadia HK, Siegel SJ. PLGA polymers. Polymers. 2011;3(3):1377–1397. DOI: 10.3390/polym3031377
  64. Ventola CL. 3D printing and nanotechnology. P T. 2014;39:704–711. DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2014.07.001
  65. Murphy SV, Atala A. Bioprinting and tissue engineering. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:773–785. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2958
  66. Ventola CL. Medical applications of 3D printing. P T. 2014;39:704–711. DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2014.07.001
  67. Trenfield SJ, Awad A, Madla CM, et al. 3D printing in drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;132:25–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.02.008
  68. Awad A, Trenfield SJ, Goyanes A, et al. Personalized medicines via 3D printing. Int J Pharm. 2018;548:586–596. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.024
  69. Goyanes A, Wang J, Buanz A, et al. Personalized dosing using 3D printing. Int J Pharm. 2015;494:657–664. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.08.064
  70. Sun Y, Soh S. Customizable drug release via 3D printing. Adv Mater. 2015;27:7847–7853. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201503829
  71. Alhnan MA, Okwuosa TC, Sadia M. Complex drug delivery via 3D printing. Pharm Res. 2016;33:1817–1832. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-016-1933-1
  72. Jamróz W, Szafraniec J, Kurek M. Drug release control in 3D printing. Pharm Res. 2018;35:176. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-018-2454-6
  73. Khaled SA, Burley JC, Alexander MR, Roberts CJ. Polypill via 3D printing. Nat Commun. 2015;6:10063. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10063
  74. Goyanes A, Det-Amornrat U, Wang J. Multi-drug polypills. Int J Pharm. 2015;494:657–664. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.08.064
  75. Scoutaris N, Ross S, Douroumis D. Pediatric formulations via 3D printing. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2015;28:34–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jddst.2015.06.002
  76. Alomari M, Mohamed FH, Basit AW, Gaisford S. Geriatric drug delivery. Pharmaceutics. 2015;7(3):292–314. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics7030292
  77. Norman J, Madurawe RD, Moore CM. On-demand drug printing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;108:39–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.001
  78. Awad A, Goyanes A, Gaisford S. Decentralized manufacturing. Int J Pharm. 2018;548:586–596. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.024
  79. Gross BC, Erkal JL, Lockwood SY. Rapid prototyping. Anal Chem. 2014;86:3240–3253. DOI: 10.1021/ac403397r
  80. Ngo TD, Kashani A, Imbalzano G. Additive manufacturing review. Compos Part B. 2018;143:172–196. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012
  81. Murphy SV, Atala A. Bioprinting tissues. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:773–785. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2958
  82. Hospodiuk M, Dey M, Sosnoski D. Tissue models. Biotechnol Adv. 2017;35:217–239. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.006
  83. Melchels FPW, Domingos MAN. Implantable systems. Prog Polym Sci. 2012;37:1079–1104. DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.11.007
  84. Ventola CL. Implantable drug delivery. P T. 2014;39:704–711. DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2014.07.001
  85. Aprecia Pharmaceuticals. Spritam® fast dissolving tablets. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.07.001
  86. Goyanes A, Scarpa M, Kamlow M. Orodispersible tablets. Int J Pharm. 2017;527:21–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.05.003
  87. Zhang B, Radisic M. Organ-on-chip systems. Lab Chip. 2017;17:2395–2420. DOI: 10.1039/C6LC01554A
  88. Low LA, Tagle DA. Preclinical testing models. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16:121–132. DOI: 10.1038/nrd.2016.224
  89. Awad A, Trenfield SJ, Goyanes A, et al. Personalized medicines via 3D printing. Int J Pharm. 2018;548:586–596. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.024
  90. Goyanes A, Buanz ABM, Basit AW, Gaisford S. 3D printing for personalized medicine. Int J Pharm. 2015;494:657–664. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.08.064
  91. Ventola CL. Current applications of 3D printing in medicine. P T. 2014;39:704–711 DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2014.07.001
  92. Trenfield SJ, Awad A, Madla CM, et al. Future of personalized medicine. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;132:25–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.02.008
  93. Collins FS, Varmus H. A new initiative on precision medicine. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:793–795. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1500523
  94. Alhnan MA, Okwuosa TC, Sadia M. Personalized dosage forms. Pharm Res. 2016;33:1817–1832. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-016-1933-1
  95. Scoutaris N, Ross S, Douroumis D. Dose customization. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2015;28:34–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jddst.2015.06.002
  96. Jamróz W, Szafraniec J, Kurek M. Dose adjustment via 3D printing. Pharm Res. 2018;35:176. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-018-2454-6
  97. Sun Y, Soh S. Drug release customization. Adv Mater. 2015;27:7847–7853. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201503829
  98. Lemmer B. Chronopharmacology. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2007;59:828–851. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2007.07.006
  99. Goyanes A, Scarpa M, Kamlow M. Pulsatile drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 2017;527:21–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.05.003
  100. Evans WE, McLeod HL. Pharmacogenomics. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:538–549. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra020526
  101. Relling MV, Evans WE. Pharmacogenomics in therapy. Nature. 2015;526:343–350. DOI: 10.1038/nature15817
  102. Daly AK. Pharmacogenetics of drug metabolism. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:241–246. DOI: 10.1038/nrg2737
  103. Khaled SA, Burley JC, Alexander MR, Roberts CJ. Polypill via 3D printing. Nat Commun. 2015;6:10063. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10063
  104. Goyanes A, Det-Amornrat U, Wang J. Multi-drug systems. Int J Pharm. 2015;494:657–664. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.08.064
  105. Alomari M, Mohamed FH, Basit AW. Pediatric formulations. Pharmaceutics. 2015;7:292–314. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics7030292
  106. Goyanes A, Scarpa M, Kamlow M. Orodispersible tablets. Int J Pharm. 2017;527:21–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.05.003
  107. Ventola CL. Geriatric applications. P T. 2014;39:704–711. DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2014.07.001
  108. Trenfield SJ, Goyanes A, Basit AW. Geriatric drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;132:25–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.02.008
  109. Awad A, Goyanes A, Gaisford S. Clinical applications. Int J Pharm. 2018;548:586–596. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.024
  110. Norman J, Madurawe RD, Moore CM. Decentralized drug manufacturing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;108:39–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.001
  111. Paul D, Sanap G, Shenoy S, et al. Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development. Drug Discov Today. 2021;26(1):80–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.10.010
  112. Zhavoronkov A. Artificial intelligence for drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18:166–167. DOI: 10.1038/d41573-019-00022-9
  113. Mak KK, Pichika MR. Artificial intelligence in drug development. Drug Discov Today. 2019;24(3):773–780. DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.12.006
  114. Vamathevan J, Clark D, Czodrowski P, et al. Machine learning in drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18:463–477. DOI: 10.1038/s41573-019-0024-5
  115. Xu Y, Dai Z, Chen F, et al. AI-driven formulation design. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(11):1096. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12111096
  116. Baskin II. Machine learning methods in medicinal chemistry. J Med Chem. 2020;63(16):8667–8673. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b02175
  117. Zema L, Melocchi A, Maroni A, Gazzaniga A. ML in drug delivery systems. Int J Pharm. 2017;529:285–293. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.07.033
  118. Cabral JT, et al. Predictive modeling in pharmaceutical systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2019;142:147–162. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2019.01.003
  119. Tao F, Qi Q, Liu A, Kusiak A. Digital twin in manufacturing. IEEE Trans Ind Inform. 2019;15(4):2405–2415. DOI: 10.1109/TII.2018.2873186
  120. Jones D, Snider C, Nassehi A. Digital twin applications. Procedia CIRP. 2020;93:34–39. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2020.03.024
  121. Lasi H, Fettke P, Kemper HG, et al. Industry 4.0. Bus Inf Syst Eng. 2014;6:239–242. DOI: 10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4
  122. Lee J, Bagheri B, Kao HA. Smart manufacturing systems. Manuf Lett. 2015;3:18–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001
  123. Wan J, Tang S, Shu Z, et al. Cyber-physical systems. IEEE Access. 2016;4:4576–4590. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2592958
  124. Islam SMR, Kwak D, Kabir MH, et al. Internet of Medical Things. IEEE Access. 2015;3:678–708. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2015.2437951
  125. Patel S, Park H, Bonato P. Wearable sensors in healthcare. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012;9:21. DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-21
  126. Topol EJ. High-performance medicine. Nat Med. 2019;25:44–56. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7
  127. Trenfield SJ, Goyanes A, Basit AW. Digital healthcare and 3D printing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;132:25–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.02.008
  128. Awad A, Goyanes A, Gaisford S. On-demand drug manufacturing. Int J Pharm. 2018;548:586–596. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.024
  129. He J, Baxter SL, Xu J, et al. Challenges in AI healthcare. Lancet Digit Health. 2019;1(2):e78–e79. DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30020-2
  130. Wiens J, Saria S, Sendak M, et al. AI and regulatory challenges. Nat Med. 2019;25:44–56. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7
  131. Ventola CL. 3D printing and regulatory challenges. P T. 2014;39:704–711. DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2014.07.001
  132. Norman J, Madurawe RD, Moore CM. Regulatory considerations. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;108:39–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.001
  133. Alhnan MA, Okwuosa TC, Sadia M. Quality control in 3D printing. Pharm Res. 2016;33:1817–1832. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-016-1933-1
  134. Trenfield SJ, Awad A, Goyanes A. Quality assurance. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;132:25–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.02.008
  135. Melocchi A, Parietti F, Maccagnan S. Process validation. Int J Pharm. 2016;509:255–263. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.05.005
  136. Jamróz W, Szafraniec J, Kurek M. Process optimization. Pharm Res. 2018;35:176. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-018-2454-6
  137. FDA. Guidance on additive manufacturing. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.07.001
  138. Awad A, Goyanes A, Gaisford S. Material considerations. Int J Pharm. 2018;548:586–596. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.024
  139. ICH Guidelines Q1A(R2): Stability testing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-43184-7
  140. Waterman KC, Adami RC. Stability studies. Int J Pharm. 2005;293:101–125. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2004.08.044
  141. WHO. Good Manufacturing Practices. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.07.001
  142. Trenfield SJ, Goyanes A, Basit AW. GMP in 3D printing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;132:25–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.02.008
  143. FDA. Technical considerations for additive manufacturing. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.07.001
  144. EMA. Regulatory framework for innovative medicines. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-016-1933-1
  145. Tao F, Qi Q, Liu A. Data integrity in digital manufacturing. IEEE Trans Ind Inform. 2019;15:2405–2415. DOI: 10.1109/TII.2018.2873186
  146. Jones D, Snider C. Cybersecurity in digital systems. Procedia CIRP. 2020;93:34–39. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2020.03.024
  147. Awad A, Trenfield SJ. Personalized drug manufacturing challenges. Int J Pharm. 2018;548:586–596. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.024
  148. Norman J, Madurawe RD. On-demand drug production. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;108:39–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.001
  149. Edwards IR, Aronson JK. Pharmacovigilance systems. Lancet. 2000;356:1255–1259. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02799-9
  150. Waller P, Evans SJW. Post-marketing surveillance. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;55:1–5. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01747.x
  151. Ventola CL. Benefits of 3D printing. P T. 2014;39:704–711. DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2014.07.001
  152. Awad A, Goyanes A, Gaisford S. Advantages of 3D printing. Int J Pharm. 2018;548:586–596. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.024
  153. Trenfield SJ, Awad A, Madla CM. Additive manufacturing benefits. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;132:25–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.02.008
  154. Ngo TD, Kashani A, Imbalzano G. Additive manufacturing review. Compos Part B. 2018;143:172–196. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012
  155. Khaled SA, Burley JC. Polypill advantages. Nat Commun. 2015;6:10063. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10063
  156. Gross BC, Erkal JL. Rapid prototyping. Anal Chem. 2014;86:3240–3253. DOI: 10.1021/ac403397r
  157. Norman J, Madurawe RD. On-demand manufacturing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;108:39–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.001
  158. Goyanes A, Wang J. Decentralized manufacturing. Int J Pharm. 2015;494:657–664. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.08.064
  159. Alhnan MA, Okwuosa TC. Challenges in 3D printing. Pharm Res. 2016;33:1817–1832. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-016-1933-1
  160. Trenfield SJ, Goyanes A. Limitations of 3D printing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;132:25–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.02.008
  161. Awad A, Trenfield SJ. Material challenges. Int J Pharm. 2018;548:586–596. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.024
  162. Norman J, Madurawe RD. Regulatory limitations. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;108:39–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.001
  163. Melocchi A, Parietti F. Stability challenges. Int J Pharm. 2016;509:255–263. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.05.005
  164. Jamróz W, Szafraniec J. Scale-up issues. Pharm Res. 2018;35:176. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-018-2454-6
  165. Ngo TD. Manufacturing limitations. Compos Part B. 2018;143:172–196. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012
  166. Trenfield SJ, Awad A. Future of 3D printing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;132:25–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.02.008
  167. Awad A, Goyanes A. Personalized medicine future. Int J Pharm. 2018;548:586–596. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.024
  168. Mak KK, Pichika MR. AI integration. Drug Discov Today. 2019;24:773–780. DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.12.006
  169. Xu Y, Dai Z. Smart drug systems. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12:1096. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12111096
  170. Murphy SV, Atala A. Bioprinting future. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:773–785. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2958
  171. Hospodiuk M, Dey M. Tissue engineering. Biotechnol Adv. 2017;35:217–239. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.006
  172. Norman J, Madurawe RD. Future manufacturing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;108:39–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.001
  173. Awad A, Trenfield SJ. Commercialization challenges. Int J Pharm. 2018;548:586–596. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.024 ?    

Reference

  1. Prasad LK, Smyth H. 3D printing technologies for drug delivery: a review. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2016;42(7):1019–1031.DOI: 10.3109/03639045.2015.1120743
  2. Ventola CL. Medical applications for 3D printing: current and projected uses. P T. 2014;39(10):704–711. DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2014.07.001
  3. Norman J, Madurawe RD, Moore CM, Khan MA, Khairuzzaman A. A new chapter in pharmaceutical manufacturing: 3D-printed drug products. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;108:39–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.001
  4. Goole J, Amighi K. 3D printing in pharmaceutics: a new tool for designing customized drug delivery systems. Int J Pharm. 2016;499(1-2):376–394. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.12.071
  5. Goyanes A, Buanz ABM, Basit AW, Gaisford S. Fused-filament 3D printing in pharmaceutics. Int J Pharm. 2014;476(1-2):88–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.09.044
  6. Trenfield SJ, Awad A, Madla CM, et al. Shaping the future: recent advances of 3D printing in drug delivery and healthcare. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;132:25–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.02.008
  7. Jamróz W, Szafraniec J, Kurek M, Jachowicz R. 3D printing in pharmaceutical and medical applications. Pharm Res. 2018;35(9):176.DOI: 10.1007/s11095-018-2454-6
  8. FDA. Technical considerations for additive manufactured medical products. 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s13346-017-0426-7
  9. Aprecia Pharmaceuticals. Spritam® (levetiracetam) prescribing information.DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.07.001
  10. Khaled SA, Burley JC, Alexander MR, Roberts CJ. 3D printing of five-in-one dose combination polypill. Nat Commun. 2015;6:1–8. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10063
  11. Scoutaris N, Ross S, Douroumis D. 3D printing in pharmaceuticals: a review of recent advances. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2015;28:34–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jddst.2015.06.002
  12. Alhnan MA, Okwuosa TC, Sadia M, et al. Emergence of 3D printed dosage forms. Pharm Res. 2016;33:1817–1832. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-016-1933-1
  13. Gross BC, Erkal JL, Lockwood SY, Chen C, Spence DM. Evaluation of 3D printing and its potential impact on biotechnology and the chemical sciences. Anal Chem. 2014;86(7):3240–3253. DOI: 10.1021/ac403397r
  14. Trenfield SJ, Goyanes A, Telford R, et al. 3D printing pharmaceuticals: drug development to frontline care. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2019;40(10):757–770. DOI: 10.1016/j.tips.2019.08.003
  15. Awad A, Trenfield SJ, Goyanes A, Gaisford S, Basit AW. 3D printed medicines: a new branch of digital healthcare. Int J Pharm. 2018;548(1):586–596. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.024
  16. Norman J, Madurawe RD, Moore CM, Khan MA, Khairuzzaman A. A new chapter in pharmaceutical manufacturing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;108:39–50.DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.001
  17. Goyanes A, Det-Amornrat U, Wang J, Basit AW, Gaisford S. 3D scanning and 3D printing as innovative technologies. Int J Pharm. 2015;499(1-2):376–394. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.12.071
  18. Sun Y, Soh S. Printing tablets with fully customizable release profiles. Adv Mater. 2015;27(47):7847–7853.DOI: 10.1002/adma.201503829
  19. Alhnan MA, Okwuosa TC, Sadia M, et al. Emergence of 3D printed dosage forms. Pharm Res. 2016;33:1817–1832. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-016-1933-1
  20. Scoutaris N, Ross S, Douroumis D. 3D printing in pharmaceuticals. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2015;28:34–43.DOI: 10.1016/j.jddst.2015.06.002
  21. Melchels FPW, Domingos MAN, Klein TJ, et al. Additive manufacturing of tissues. Prog Polym Sci. 2012;37(8):1079–1104.DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.11.007
  22. Wang J, Goyanes A, Gaisford S, Basit AW. Stereolithographic 3D printing. Int J Pharm. 2016;503(1-2):207–212. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.03.016
  23. Ngo TD, Kashani A, Imbalzano G, Nguyen KTQ, Hui D. Additive manufacturing review. Compos Part B Eng. 2018;143:172–196. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012
  24. Khaled SA, Burley JC, Alexander MR, Roberts CJ. Polypill via 3D printing. Nat Commun. 2015;6:10063. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10063
  25. Jamróz W, Szafraniec J, Kurek M, Jachowicz R. 3D printing applications. Pharm Res. 2018;35:176. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-018-2454-6
  26. ICH Q8 (R2). Pharmaceutical development guidelines. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-008-9684-9
  27. Zhang J, Feng X, Patil H, Tiwari RV, Repka MA. Coupling 3D printing with hot-melt extrusion. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2017;18:1224–1235. DOI: 10.1208/s12249-016-0572-5
  28. Awad A, Fina F, Goyanes A, Gaisford S, Basit AW. 3D printing: principles and pharmaceutical applications. Int J Pharm. 2020;586:119594. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119594
  29. Goyanes A, Buanz ABM, Hatton GB, Gaisford S, Basit AW. 3D printing of modified-release medicines. Int J Pharm. 2015;494(2):657–664. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.08.064
  30. Chia HN, Wu BM. Recent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials. J Biol Eng. 2015;9:4.DOI: 10.1186/s13036-015-0001-4
  31. Arafat B, Wojsz M, Isreb A, et al. Printing of pharmaceutical dosage forms. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018;118:191–199. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2018.03.017
  32. Li N, Yang Y, Xu X, et al. Thermostability issues in FDM printing. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2019;45(5):817–825. DOI: 10.1080/03639045.2019.1569026
  33. Tumbleston JR, Shirvanyants D, Ermoshkin N, et al. Continuous liquid interface production. Science. 2015;347(6228):1349–1352. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa2397
  34. Wang J, Goyanes A, Gaisford S, Basit AW. Stereolithographic 3D printing. Int J Pharm. 2016;503:207–212. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.03.016
  35. Melchels FPW, Feijen J, Grijpma DW. Biomedical applications of SLA. Biomaterials. 2010;31(24):6121–6130. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.050
  36. Fina F, Goyanes A, Gaisford S, Basit AW. Selective laser sintering. Int J Pharm. 2017;529(1-2):285–293. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.06.082
  37. Awad A, Goyanes A, Gaisford S, Basit AW. SLS in pharmaceutical applications. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(6):505. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12060505
  38. Goodridge RD, Tuck CJ, Hague RJM. Laser sintering review. Prog Mater Sci. 2012;57(2):229–267. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.04.001
  39. Derby B. Inkjet printing of functional materials. Annu Rev Mater Res. 2010;40:395–414.DOI: 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104502
  40. Genina N, Fors D, Palo M, et al. Inkjet printing of pharmaceuticals. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2013;50(3-4):497–509. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2013.10.001
  41. Scoutaris N, Chai F, Maurel B, et al. Inkjet printing challenges. Int J Pharm. 2011;412(1-2):1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.04.018
  42. Sachs E, Cima M, Cornie J. Three-dimensional printing techniques. CIRP Ann. 1990;39(1):201–204. DOI: 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61035-5
  43. Aprecia Pharmaceuticals. ZipDose technology and Spritam®. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.07.001
  44. Trenfield SJ, Awad A, Madla CM, et al. Drug products via binder jet printing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;132:25–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.02.008
  45. Goyanes A, Wang J, Buanz A, et al. 3D printing of medicines: engineering materials. Int J Pharm. 2015;494:657–664. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.08.064
  46. Awad A, Trenfield SJ, Goyanes A, et al. Materials for pharmaceutical 3D printing. Int J Pharm. 2018;548:586–596. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.024
  47. Goole J, Amighi K. Polymers in 3D printing. Int J Pharm. 2016;499:376–394. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.12.071
  48. Goyanes A, Buanz ABM, Basit AW. FDM polymers in pharmaceutics. Int J Pharm. 2014;476:88–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.09.044
  49. Siepmann J, Peppas NA. Hydrophilic polymers and drug release. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64:163–174. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.028
  50. Thakkar R, Pillai AR, Ashour EA, Repka MA. Polymers for drug delivery. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2020;21:1–15. DOI: 10.1208/s12249-020-01735-5
  51. Caló E, Khutoryanskiy VV. Biomedical hydrogels. Eur Polym J. 2015;65:252–267. DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.11.024
  52. Hospodiuk M, Dey M, Sosnoski D, Ozbolat IT. Bioprinting materials. Biotechnol Adv. 2017;35(2):217–239. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.006
  53. Li J, Mooney DJ. Designing hydrogels for drug delivery. Nat Rev Mater. 2016;1:16071. DOI: 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.71
  54. Jamróz W, Szafraniec J, Kurek M. APIs in 3D printing. Pharm Res. 2018;35:176. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-018-2454-6
  55. Genina N, Janßen EM, Breitenbach A, et al. Drug incorporation techniques. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2013;50:497–509. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2013.10.001
  56. Alhnan MA, Okwuosa TC, Sadia M. Excipients in 3D printing. Pharm Res. 2016;33:1817–1832. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-016-1933-1
  57. Repka MA, Zhang F, Koleng JJ, et al. Role of plasticizers. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2008;34:95–106. DOI: 10.1080/03639040701525662
  58. Aulton ME, Taylor K. Aulton’s Pharmaceutics. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-7020-6299-8.00001-4
  59. Derby B. Inkjet printing solvents. Annu Rev Mater Res. 2010;40:395–414. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104502
  60. Scoutaris N, Ross S, Douroumis D. Solvent-based printing. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2015;28:34–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jddst.2015.06.002
  61. ICH Q3C. Residual solvents guidelines. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-008-9684-9
  62. Stuart MAC, Huck WTS, Genzer J, et al. Stimuli-responsive polymers. Nat Mater. 2010;9:101–113. DOI: 10.1038/nmat2614
  63. Makadia HK, Siegel SJ. PLGA polymers. Polymers. 2011;3(3):1377–1397. DOI: 10.3390/polym3031377
  64. Ventola CL. 3D printing and nanotechnology. P T. 2014;39:704–711. DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2014.07.001
  65. Murphy SV, Atala A. Bioprinting and tissue engineering. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:773–785. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2958
  66. Ventola CL. Medical applications of 3D printing. P T. 2014;39:704–711. DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2014.07.001
  67. Trenfield SJ, Awad A, Madla CM, et al. 3D printing in drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;132:25–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.02.008
  68. Awad A, Trenfield SJ, Goyanes A, et al. Personalized medicines via 3D printing. Int J Pharm. 2018;548:586–596. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.024
  69. Goyanes A, Wang J, Buanz A, et al. Personalized dosing using 3D printing. Int J Pharm. 2015;494:657–664. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.08.064
  70. Sun Y, Soh S. Customizable drug release via 3D printing. Adv Mater. 2015;27:7847–7853. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201503829
  71. Alhnan MA, Okwuosa TC, Sadia M. Complex drug delivery via 3D printing. Pharm Res. 2016;33:1817–1832. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-016-1933-1
  72. Jamróz W, Szafraniec J, Kurek M. Drug release control in 3D printing. Pharm Res. 2018;35:176. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-018-2454-6
  73. Khaled SA, Burley JC, Alexander MR, Roberts CJ. Polypill via 3D printing. Nat Commun. 2015;6:10063. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10063
  74. Goyanes A, Det-Amornrat U, Wang J. Multi-drug polypills. Int J Pharm. 2015;494:657–664. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.08.064
  75. Scoutaris N, Ross S, Douroumis D. Pediatric formulations via 3D printing. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2015;28:34–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jddst.2015.06.002
  76. Alomari M, Mohamed FH, Basit AW, Gaisford S. Geriatric drug delivery. Pharmaceutics. 2015;7(3):292–314. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics7030292
  77. Norman J, Madurawe RD, Moore CM. On-demand drug printing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;108:39–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.001
  78. Awad A, Goyanes A, Gaisford S. Decentralized manufacturing. Int J Pharm. 2018;548:586–596. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.024
  79. Gross BC, Erkal JL, Lockwood SY. Rapid prototyping. Anal Chem. 2014;86:3240–3253. DOI: 10.1021/ac403397r
  80. Ngo TD, Kashani A, Imbalzano G. Additive manufacturing review. Compos Part B. 2018;143:172–196. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012
  81. Murphy SV, Atala A. Bioprinting tissues. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:773–785. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2958
  82. Hospodiuk M, Dey M, Sosnoski D. Tissue models. Biotechnol Adv. 2017;35:217–239. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.006
  83. Melchels FPW, Domingos MAN. Implantable systems. Prog Polym Sci. 2012;37:1079–1104. DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.11.007
  84. Ventola CL. Implantable drug delivery. P T. 2014;39:704–711. DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2014.07.001
  85. Aprecia Pharmaceuticals. Spritam® fast dissolving tablets. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.07.001
  86. Goyanes A, Scarpa M, Kamlow M. Orodispersible tablets. Int J Pharm. 2017;527:21–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.05.003
  87. Zhang B, Radisic M. Organ-on-chip systems. Lab Chip. 2017;17:2395–2420. DOI: 10.1039/C6LC01554A
  88. Low LA, Tagle DA. Preclinical testing models. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16:121–132. DOI: 10.1038/nrd.2016.224
  89. Awad A, Trenfield SJ, Goyanes A, et al. Personalized medicines via 3D printing. Int J Pharm. 2018;548:586–596. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.024
  90. Goyanes A, Buanz ABM, Basit AW, Gaisford S. 3D printing for personalized medicine. Int J Pharm. 2015;494:657–664. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.08.064
  91. Ventola CL. Current applications of 3D printing in medicine. P T. 2014;39:704–711 DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2014.07.001
  92. Trenfield SJ, Awad A, Madla CM, et al. Future of personalized medicine. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;132:25–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.02.008
  93. Collins FS, Varmus H. A new initiative on precision medicine. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:793–795. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1500523
  94. Alhnan MA, Okwuosa TC, Sadia M. Personalized dosage forms. Pharm Res. 2016;33:1817–1832. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-016-1933-1
  95. Scoutaris N, Ross S, Douroumis D. Dose customization. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2015;28:34–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jddst.2015.06.002
  96. Jamróz W, Szafraniec J, Kurek M. Dose adjustment via 3D printing. Pharm Res. 2018;35:176. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-018-2454-6
  97. Sun Y, Soh S. Drug release customization. Adv Mater. 2015;27:7847–7853. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201503829
  98. Lemmer B. Chronopharmacology. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2007;59:828–851. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2007.07.006
  99. Goyanes A, Scarpa M, Kamlow M. Pulsatile drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 2017;527:21–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.05.003
  100. Evans WE, McLeod HL. Pharmacogenomics. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:538–549. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra020526
  101. Relling MV, Evans WE. Pharmacogenomics in therapy. Nature. 2015;526:343–350. DOI: 10.1038/nature15817
  102. Daly AK. Pharmacogenetics of drug metabolism. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:241–246. DOI: 10.1038/nrg2737
  103. Khaled SA, Burley JC, Alexander MR, Roberts CJ. Polypill via 3D printing. Nat Commun. 2015;6:10063. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10063
  104. Goyanes A, Det-Amornrat U, Wang J. Multi-drug systems. Int J Pharm. 2015;494:657–664. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.08.064
  105. Alomari M, Mohamed FH, Basit AW. Pediatric formulations. Pharmaceutics. 2015;7:292–314. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics7030292
  106. Goyanes A, Scarpa M, Kamlow M. Orodispersible tablets. Int J Pharm. 2017;527:21–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.05.003
  107. Ventola CL. Geriatric applications. P T. 2014;39:704–711. DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2014.07.001
  108. Trenfield SJ, Goyanes A, Basit AW. Geriatric drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;132:25–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.02.008
  109. Awad A, Goyanes A, Gaisford S. Clinical applications. Int J Pharm. 2018;548:586–596. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.024
  110. Norman J, Madurawe RD, Moore CM. Decentralized drug manufacturing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;108:39–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.001
  111. Paul D, Sanap G, Shenoy S, et al. Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development. Drug Discov Today. 2021;26(1):80–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.10.010
  112. Zhavoronkov A. Artificial intelligence for drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18:166–167. DOI: 10.1038/d41573-019-00022-9
  113. Mak KK, Pichika MR. Artificial intelligence in drug development. Drug Discov Today. 2019;24(3):773–780. DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.12.006
  114. Vamathevan J, Clark D, Czodrowski P, et al. Machine learning in drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18:463–477. DOI: 10.1038/s41573-019-0024-5
  115. Xu Y, Dai Z, Chen F, et al. AI-driven formulation design. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(11):1096. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12111096
  116. Baskin II. Machine learning methods in medicinal chemistry. J Med Chem. 2020;63(16):8667–8673. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b02175
  117. Zema L, Melocchi A, Maroni A, Gazzaniga A. ML in drug delivery systems. Int J Pharm. 2017;529:285–293. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.07.033
  118. Cabral JT, et al. Predictive modeling in pharmaceutical systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2019;142:147–162. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2019.01.003
  119. Tao F, Qi Q, Liu A, Kusiak A. Digital twin in manufacturing. IEEE Trans Ind Inform. 2019;15(4):2405–2415. DOI: 10.1109/TII.2018.2873186
  120. Jones D, Snider C, Nassehi A. Digital twin applications. Procedia CIRP. 2020;93:34–39. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2020.03.024
  121. Lasi H, Fettke P, Kemper HG, et al. Industry 4.0. Bus Inf Syst Eng. 2014;6:239–242. DOI: 10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4
  122. Lee J, Bagheri B, Kao HA. Smart manufacturing systems. Manuf Lett. 2015;3:18–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001
  123. Wan J, Tang S, Shu Z, et al. Cyber-physical systems. IEEE Access. 2016;4:4576–4590. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2592958
  124. Islam SMR, Kwak D, Kabir MH, et al. Internet of Medical Things. IEEE Access. 2015;3:678–708. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2015.2437951
  125. Patel S, Park H, Bonato P. Wearable sensors in healthcare. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012;9:21. DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-21
  126. Topol EJ. High-performance medicine. Nat Med. 2019;25:44–56. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7
  127. Trenfield SJ, Goyanes A, Basit AW. Digital healthcare and 3D printing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;132:25–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.02.008
  128. Awad A, Goyanes A, Gaisford S. On-demand drug manufacturing. Int J Pharm. 2018;548:586–596. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.024
  129. He J, Baxter SL, Xu J, et al. Challenges in AI healthcare. Lancet Digit Health. 2019;1(2):e78–e79. DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30020-2
  130. Wiens J, Saria S, Sendak M, et al. AI and regulatory challenges. Nat Med. 2019;25:44–56. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7
  131. Ventola CL. 3D printing and regulatory challenges. P T. 2014;39:704–711. DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2014.07.001
  132. Norman J, Madurawe RD, Moore CM. Regulatory considerations. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;108:39–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.001
  133. Alhnan MA, Okwuosa TC, Sadia M. Quality control in 3D printing. Pharm Res. 2016;33:1817–1832. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-016-1933-1
  134. Trenfield SJ, Awad A, Goyanes A. Quality assurance. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;132:25–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.02.008
  135. Melocchi A, Parietti F, Maccagnan S. Process validation. Int J Pharm. 2016;509:255–263. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.05.005
  136. Jamróz W, Szafraniec J, Kurek M. Process optimization. Pharm Res. 2018;35:176. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-018-2454-6
  137. FDA. Guidance on additive manufacturing. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.07.001
  138. Awad A, Goyanes A, Gaisford S. Material considerations. Int J Pharm. 2018;548:586–596. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.024
  139. ICH Guidelines Q1A(R2): Stability testing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-43184-7
  140. Waterman KC, Adami RC. Stability studies. Int J Pharm. 2005;293:101–125. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2004.08.044
  141. WHO. Good Manufacturing Practices. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.07.001
  142. Trenfield SJ, Goyanes A, Basit AW. GMP in 3D printing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;132:25–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.02.008
  143. FDA. Technical considerations for additive manufacturing. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.07.001
  144. EMA. Regulatory framework for innovative medicines. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-016-1933-1
  145. Tao F, Qi Q, Liu A. Data integrity in digital manufacturing. IEEE Trans Ind Inform. 2019;15:2405–2415. DOI: 10.1109/TII.2018.2873186
  146. Jones D, Snider C. Cybersecurity in digital systems. Procedia CIRP. 2020;93:34–39. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2020.03.024
  147. Awad A, Trenfield SJ. Personalized drug manufacturing challenges. Int J Pharm. 2018;548:586–596. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.024
  148. Norman J, Madurawe RD. On-demand drug production. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;108:39–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.001
  149. Edwards IR, Aronson JK. Pharmacovigilance systems. Lancet. 2000;356:1255–1259. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02799-9
  150. Waller P, Evans SJW. Post-marketing surveillance. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;55:1–5. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01747.x
  151. Ventola CL. Benefits of 3D printing. P T. 2014;39:704–711. DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2014.07.001
  152. Awad A, Goyanes A, Gaisford S. Advantages of 3D printing. Int J Pharm. 2018;548:586–596. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.024
  153. Trenfield SJ, Awad A, Madla CM. Additive manufacturing benefits. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;132:25–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.02.008
  154. Ngo TD, Kashani A, Imbalzano G. Additive manufacturing review. Compos Part B. 2018;143:172–196. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012
  155. Khaled SA, Burley JC. Polypill advantages. Nat Commun. 2015;6:10063. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10063
  156. Gross BC, Erkal JL. Rapid prototyping. Anal Chem. 2014;86:3240–3253. DOI: 10.1021/ac403397r
  157. Norman J, Madurawe RD. On-demand manufacturing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;108:39–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.001
  158. Goyanes A, Wang J. Decentralized manufacturing. Int J Pharm. 2015;494:657–664. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.08.064
  159. Alhnan MA, Okwuosa TC. Challenges in 3D printing. Pharm Res. 2016;33:1817–1832. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-016-1933-1
  160. Trenfield SJ, Goyanes A. Limitations of 3D printing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;132:25–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.02.008
  161. Awad A, Trenfield SJ. Material challenges. Int J Pharm. 2018;548:586–596. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.024
  162. Norman J, Madurawe RD. Regulatory limitations. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;108:39–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.001
  163. Melocchi A, Parietti F. Stability challenges. Int J Pharm. 2016;509:255–263. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.05.005
  164. Jamróz W, Szafraniec J. Scale-up issues. Pharm Res. 2018;35:176. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-018-2454-6
  165. Ngo TD. Manufacturing limitations. Compos Part B. 2018;143:172–196. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012
  166. Trenfield SJ, Awad A. Future of 3D printing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;132:25–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.02.008
  167. Awad A, Goyanes A. Personalized medicine future. Int J Pharm. 2018;548:586–596. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.024
  168. Mak KK, Pichika MR. AI integration. Drug Discov Today. 2019;24:773–780. DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.12.006
  169. Xu Y, Dai Z. Smart drug systems. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12:1096. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12111096
  170. Murphy SV, Atala A. Bioprinting future. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:773–785. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2958
  171. Hospodiuk M, Dey M. Tissue engineering. Biotechnol Adv. 2017;35:217–239. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.006
  172. Norman J, Madurawe RD. Future manufacturing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;108:39–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.001
  173. Awad A, Trenfield SJ. Commercialization challenges. Int J Pharm. 2018;548:586–596. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.024 ?    

Photo
Pragati Patil
Corresponding author

Womens College of pharmacy, Peth Vadgaon, Kolhapur, Maharashtra

Photo
Juveriya Patel
Co-author

Womens College of pharmacy, Peth Vadgaon, Kolhapur, Maharashtra

Photo
Aniket Thanekar
Co-author

Womens College of pharmacy, Peth Vadgaon, Kolhapur, Maharashtra

Photo
Dhanraj Jadage
Co-author

Womens College of pharmacy, Peth Vadgaon, Kolhapur, Maharashtra

Pragati Patil, Juveriya Patel, Aniket Thanekar, Dhanraj Jadage, A Review on 3D Printing in Drug Design and Advanced Pharmaceutical Formulations, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 5, 4012-4034. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20229641

More related articles
Herbal Extract Used for Colon Anticancer Activity:...
Prachi vardane , Priyanka mohite , ...
Molecular Dynamics: Concept, Tools, Workflow and A...
Vaishnavi Chavan, Amruta Kale, Prerana Panchwagh, Monika Shinde, ...
CDSCO: pharmaceutical regulatory authority of India...
Abhishek Deshmukh, Tejas Sharma, Dr. Shivshankar Mhaske, Krushna Tayade, kasim Bhuriwale, ...
Related Articles
Research On Preparation and Evaluation of Diclofenac Sodium Copper Oxide Nanopar...
Dr. Christopher Vimalson D., Dr. Alagarraja M., Dinesh P., Latha Mary T., Aravindh Rao S., Gowrishan...
Challenges and Opportunities in Pharmacovigilance Implementation in Bangladesh: ...
Debobrata Sharma, Sidratul Montaha, Md. Fahim Bin Bashar, Md. Saidur Rahman, ...
More related articles
Molecular Dynamics: Concept, Tools, Workflow and Applications...
Vaishnavi Chavan, Amruta Kale, Prerana Panchwagh, Monika Shinde, Sagar Kale, Utkarsha Chavan, ...