View Article

  • An Overview of Cervical Cancer and Its Prevention

  • 1Department of pharmaceutics, Punjab college of Pharmacy.
    2Department of pharmaceutics, Maharaja Agrasen school of Pharmacy.
     

Abstract

Cervical cancer remains a leading gynecological malignancy and an important global health challenge, particularly in low- and middle-income regions. The disease originates in the cervix when epithelial cells undergo genetic and molecular changes, most often triggered by persistent infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) strains, mainly HPV-16 and HPV-18. While HPV infection is widespread, additional cofactors—including smoking, high parity, long-term oral contraceptive use, immunosuppression, and lack of screening—contribute to malignant progression. Histologically, squamous cell carcinoma represents the majority of cases, followed by adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, and rarer aggressive variants. Clinical presentation ranges from asymptomatic disease detected through screening to symptoms such as abnormal bleeding, unusual discharge, pelvic pain, and advanced complications involving the urinary or gastrointestinal tract. Diagnostic evaluation integrates screening tools (Pap smear and HPV DNA testing), colposcopy with targeted biopsy, and imaging for staging. Treatment strategies depend on disease stage, ranging from fertility-sparing surgery in early cases to chemoradiotherapy and systemic therapy for advanced or recurrent disease. In recent years, therapeutic advances have significantly expanded options for patients with persistent or metastatic disease. These include immune checkpoint inhibitors, antibody–drug conjugates, precision-targeted therapies guided by molecular profiling, and experimental immunotherapies such as therapeutic HPV vaccines. Integration of these modalities into multidisciplinary care has improved survival and quality-of-life outcomes. This review highlights the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical features, diagnostic pathways, and evolving therapeutic landscape of cervical cancer, with emphasis on recent innovations that may contribute to the World Health Organization’s goal of eliminating cervical cancer as a public health problem.

Keywords

Cervical cancer, HPV, Screening, Treatment, Immunotherapy, Antibody-drug conjugates, Prevention

Introduction

Cervical cancer remains a significant gynecological malignancy and a major public health concern, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. It arises in the cervix, the lower part of the uterus that connects to the vagina. The disease develops when cervical epithelial cells undergo genetic alterations, leading to uncontrolled proliferation and invasion of surrounding tissues1. The most important causative factor is persistent infection with oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) strains, particularly HPV 16 and HPV 18, which are collectively responsible for the majority of cases worldwide2. Although HPV infection is common, only a subset of women progress to cancer due to the influence of cofactors such as early sexual activity, multiple pregnancies, long-term use of oral contraceptives, smoking, immunosuppression, and lack of routine screening3,4. Cervical cancer is largely preventable through the implementation of HPV vaccination and regular screening. The vaccines currently available are highly effective in reducing the incidence of precancerous lesions and invasive disease5. Screening methods, including Pap smears and HPV DNA testing, allow for early identification and treatment of precancerous changes before malignant transformation occurs4. Despite these preventive strategies, cervical cancer continues to cause considerable morbidity and mortality worldwide. More than 600,000 new cases and over 340,000 deaths are reported annually, with the highest burden in resource-limited regions2. To address this, the World Health Organization (WHO) has developed a global strategy aiming to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health problem through universal vaccination, screening, and timely treatment2.

Figure1: Cervical Cancer

Types of Cervical Cancer

Cervical cancer is classified based on the type of epithelial cell from which it originates. The two main histological types are squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, while several rare variants also exist.

1. Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC)

  • Accounts for approximately 70–80% of all cervical cancers 6.
  • Originates from the squamous epithelial cells lining the ectocervix.
  • Strongly associated with persistent infection by high-risk HPV, especially HPV-16.
  • Typically arises in the transformation zone, where squamous and glandular cells meet.

 2. Adenocarcinoma

  • Represents around 10–20% of cervical cancers7.
  • Originates from the glandular (columnar) epithelial cells of the endocervical canal.
  • More difficult to detect by Pap smear compared to SCC, because lesions often develop higher in the cervical canal.
  • Strongly associated with HPV-18 infection.

3. Adenosquamous Carcinoma

  • A rare form showing features of both squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma within the same tumor.
  • Accounts for about 3–5% of cases8.

4. Rare Types

Although uncommon, other histological subtypes include:

  • Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma – aggressive, fast-spreading form associated with HPV infection9.
  • Glass cell carcinoma – a rare variant of adenosquamous carcinoma with poor prognosis.
  • Sarcomas, lymphomas, and melanomas of the cervix – extremely rare but possible9.

Fig 2- Types of cervical cancer

Causes of Cervical Cancer

Cervical cancer primarily arises from persistent infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) types, particularly HPV-16 and HPV-18. These oncogenic viruses produce proteins (E6/E7) that disrupt the function of tumor suppressor genes, triggering abnormal cell growth and potentially cancerous progression10. However, the presence of HPV alone does not always lead to cancer. A number of cofactors influence the progression from HPV infection to cervical cancer:

  • Smoking is strongly implicated in elevating risk. Tobacco carcinogens impair local immune defenses and have been detected in cervical mucus, increasing the likelihood of malignant transformation among HPV-infected women 11,12.
  • Co-infection with other sexually transmitted infections (STIs), such as Chlamydia trachomatis, may facilitate persistent HPV infection and promote cervical carcinogenesis9.
  • High parity (multiple full-term pregnancies) has been linked with elevated risk, possibly due to hormonal fluctuations and increased susceptibility during pregnancy13.
  • Low socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with diminished access to screening and healthcare, delaying detection and treatment and thereby increasing disease risk14.

Figure 3- Causes Of Cervical Cancer

Signs and Symptoms of Cervical Cancer

Cervical cancer often develops slowly and may remain asymptomatic in its early stages, which is why regular screening plays a crucial role in detection. When symptoms appear, they may indicate disease progression.

1.Abnormal Vaginal Bleeding-The most common presenting symptoms may occur between menstrual periods, after sexual intercourse, or post-menopause 15.

2.Unusual Vaginal Discharge-Discharge may be watery, pink, or foul-smelling.Often associated with advanced disease due to necrosis or infection in cervical tissue16.

3.PelvicPain-Persistent pain in the pelvic region or lower back may develop. Pain can radiate to the legs or hips in advanced stages17.

4. Pain During Sexual Intercourse (Dyspareunia)-Caused by tumor growth in the cervix or invasion into surrounding structures18.

5. Urinary and Bowel Symptoms-In later stages, cervical cancer may invade the bladder or rectum, leading to painful urination, hematuria, constipation, or rectal bleeding19. The diagnosis of cervical cancer is a stepwise process that begins with screening, followed by confirmatory tests and staging investigations. Early detection is essential for effective treatment and improved survival outcomes.

  1. Screening Methods
    • Pap smear (cytology): Identifies abnormal cervical cells that may indicate precancerous lesions or cancer. It remains a cornerstone of early detection strategies20.
    • HPV DNA testing: Detects high-risk HPV strains responsible for most cervical cancers, offering higher sensitivity than cytology alone21.
  2. Colposcopy
    Women with abnormal screening results undergo colposcopy, where the cervix is examined under magnification. Application of acetic acid or Lugol’s iodine enhances visualization of abnormal epithelial changes. Suspicious lesions can be targeted for biopsy 22.
  3. Histopathological Examination

Biopsies—such as punch biopsy, endocervical curettage, or cone biopsy—provide definitive confirmation of invasive cervical cancer. Histology also determines the cancer type (squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma) and grade22,23.

  1. Imaging investigations

Once cancer is confirmed, imaging helps determine local and distant spread. MRI(magnetic resonance imaging) is considered the most accurate for local tumor assessment, while CT (computed tomography)and PET (positron emission tomography scan),CT are used to detect nodal and distant metastases 23,24.

Cure and Treatment of Cervical Cancer

The management of cervical cancer depends on the stage of disease, patient’s age, comorbidities, fertility desires, and overall health status. Treatment typically involves a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or targeted therapies.

1. Early-Stage Disease

  • Surgery: For very early stages (IA1 and IA2), procedures such as conization or simple hysterectomy may be sufficient, especially for women wishing to preserve fertility. In stage IB and selected IIA cases, radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy is the standard surgical option25.
  • Fertility-preserving surgery:
    • Radical trachelectomy combined with lymph node assessment is an alternative for women with early-stage disease who wish to retain fertility26.

2. Locally Advanced Disease

Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy (CCRT):

The gold-standard treatment for stages IIB–IVA involves external beam radiotherapy (EBRT)combined with intracavitary brachytherapy, given concurrently with cisplatin-based chemotherapy27.

    • This approach improves both local control and overall survival compared to radiotherapy alone.

3. Advanced and Recurrent Disease

  • Systemic Chemotherapy:
    • Cisplatin, carboplatin, and paclitaxel-based regimens remain widely used. Combination chemotherapy provides better outcomes than single-agent regimens28.
  • Targeted and Immunotherapy:
    • Bevacizumab (anti-VEGF antibody), when added to chemotherapy, has shown improved overall survival in advanced disease.
    • Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1 antibody), are increasingly used in recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer with PD-L1 expression29.

Recent advances in treatment of cervical cancer

Despite progress in prevention and screening, treatment options for recurrent, persistent or metastatic cervical cancer have historically been limited. During the past few years several important advances have changed practice and expanded options for patients.

1. Immune checkpoint inhibition in advanced disease- Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become an established option for PD-L1–positive advanced cervical cancer. Randomized data showed that adding pembrolizumab (an anti-PD-1 antibody) to platinum-based chemotherapy (with or without bevacizumab) improved progression-free and overall survival in patients with persistent, recurrent or metastatic disease, establishing chemo-immunotherapy as a new standard in selected patients. ICIs are also being evaluated in earlier lines and in combination with radiation or targeted agents. 30,31

2. Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) — a new drug class with proven survival benefit Tisotumab vedotin (an ADC targeting tissue factor and carrying a cytotoxic payload) has demonstrated clinically meaningful activity in previously treated recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer and gained regulatory approval. Recent randomized data and regulatory decisions have supported its role as an option after progression on prior chemotherapy, representing the first ADC to show an overall-survival benefit in this setting. Ongoing trials are exploring combinations (e.g., ADC + ICI or ADC + chemotherapy) to increase response rates and durability.32,33

Figure 4

3. Precision/targeted approaches and biomarker-driven therapy- Molecular profiling of cervical tumors is uncovering actionable alterations in small subsets of patients (e.g., DNA damage repair gene alterations). Case reports and early studies suggest that PARP inhibitors and other targeted agents may benefit molecularly selected patients, prompting prospective trials of PARP inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and other small molecules in genomically defined cohorts. Wider use of next-generation sequencing is enabling personalized therapy for a minority of patients.34

4. Therapeutic vaccines and novel immunotherapies- Therapeutic (non-prophylactic) vaccines directed against HPV oncoproteins (E6/E7) and combination vaccine + ICI strategies are an active area of clinical research. Early-phase trials have shown immune activation and clinical responses in premalignant lesions and some invasive cancers; larger combination studies are underway to assess whether vaccines can improve outcomes when added to standard therapies. Adoptive T-cell therapies (including engineered T-cell approaches) are also in early clinical testing for HPV-driven cancers.35

5. Improvements in multimodality care and guideline updates- Clinical practice guidelines have adapted to incorporate these new systemic options and emphasize multidisciplinary care. Better integration of systemic therapy advances (immunotherapy, ADCs, targeted agents) with contemporary radiation techniques (image-guided brachytherapy) and surgical decision algorithms has refined treatment sequencing and palliation — leading to improved disease control and quality-of-life outcomes for many patients.31,36

6. Future directions- Research priorities include rational combinations (e.g., ADC + ICI, vaccine + ICI), identification of predictive biomarkers to select patients most likely to benefit, and expanding access to clinical trials globally. The goal is to convert more durable responses into long-term control while maintaining tolerability.

CONCLUSION

Cervical cancer continues to be a significant global health concern despite being largely preventable through HPV vaccination and effective screening programs. Persistent infection with high-risk HPV types remains the central etiological factor, with additional cofactors contributing to progression from precancerous lesions to invasive disease. Early detection through cytology, HPV testing, and timely diagnostic evaluation is critical for improving survival outcomes. Treatment strategies are stage-specific, ranging from fertility-preserving surgical techniques for early-stage disease to concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cases and systemic therapy for metastatic disease. The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors, antibody–drug conjugates, targeted therapies, and therapeutic vaccines has revolutionized management, offering hope for improved survival and quality of life even in advanced or recurrent settings. A multidisciplinary approach integrating prevention, early detection, and personalized treatment strategies remains the cornerstone for reducing cervical cancer incidence and mortality worldwide. Continued research and equitable access to vaccination and novel therapies will be key to achieving global cervical cancer elimination goals.

REFERENCES

  1. American Cancer Society. Atlanta (GA): American Cancer Society; 2024.
  2. World Health Organization. Cervical cancer Geneva: WHO; 2023 .
  3. Mayo Clinic. Cervical cancer: Symptoms and causes [Internet]. Rochester (MN): Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research; 2024 .
  4. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta (GA): U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; 2024 .
  5. National Cancer Institute. Cervical cancer prevention and screening. Bethesda (MD): National Institutes of Health; 2024.
  6. Crosbie EJ, Einstein MH, Franceschi S, Kitchener HC. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. 2013 Sep;382(9895):889-99.
  7. Smith HO, Tiffany MF, Qualls CR, Key CR. The rising incidence of adenocarcinoma relative to squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix in the United States—a 24-year population-based study. Gynecol Oncol . 2000 Nov ;78(2):97-105.
  8. Pirog EC. Cervical adenocarcinoma: diagnosis, classification, and HPV association. Semin Diagn Pathol . 2020 Sep;37(5):215-21.
  9. Cohen JG, Kapp DS, Shin JY, Urban R, Sherman AE, Chen LM, et al. Small cell carcinoma of the cervix: treatment and survival outcomes of 188 patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol . 2010 Dec;203(4):1-6.
  10. Cancer Research UK. Risk factors for cervical cancer. London: Cancer Research UK; 2024 .
  11. Scoutt LM, Ayesh BM, et al. Smoking as a cofactor in HPV-associated carcinogenesis: pooled analysis shows increased risk (OR 2.17) among smokers. Int J Cancer Epidemiol. 2004
  12. Solares J et al. Relationship between smoking, HPV infection, and risk of cervical lesions—prospective Spanish study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol . 2016 .
  13. American Cancer Society. Risk factors for cervical cancer . Atlanta (GA): American Cancer Society; 2025 .
  14. Ranjith MP, Kumar HP, et al. Socioeconomic status and high parity as risk factors in HPV-infected women: South Indian study. World Acad Sci J  2019
  15. Waggoner SE. Cervical cancer. Lancet . 2003 Jun ;361(9376):2217–25.
  16. Petignat P, Roy M. Diagnosis and management of cervical cancer. BMJ . 2007 Oct ;335(7623):765–8.
  17. Denny L. Cervical cancer: prevention and treatment. Discov Med . 2012 Jul ;14(75):125–31.
  18. Bhatla N, Berek JS, Cuello Fredes M, Denny L, Grenman S, Karunaratne K, et al. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet . 2019 Apr ;145(1):129–35.
  19. Landoni F, Maneo A, Cormio G, Mangioni C. Symptoms of cervical cancer: clinical features and impact on prognosis. Gynecol Oncol . 2001 Dec ;83(3):479–84.
  20. Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni L, de Sanjosé S, Saraiya M, Ferlay J, et al. Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis. Lancet Glob Health . 2020 Feb;8(2):e191-203.
  21. Schiffman M, Wentzensen N. A suggested approach to simplify and improve cervical screening in the United States. J Low Genit Tract 20(2):1-7.
  22.  Massad LS, Einstein MH, Huh WK, Katki HA, Kinney WK, Schiffman M, et al. 2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. J Low Genit Tract Dis . 2013 Apr 17(5 Suppl 1):S1-27.
  23. Balleyguier C, Sala E, Da Cunha T, Bergman A, Brkljacic B, Danza F, et al. Staging of uterine cervical cancer with MRI: guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology. Eur Radiol . 2011 May 21(5):1102-10.
  24. Bhatla N, Berek JS, Cuello Fredes M, Denny LA, Grenman S, Karunaratne K, et al. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 Apr 145(1):129-35
  25.  Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A, Placa F, Milani R, Perego P, et al. Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib–IIa cervical cancer. Lancet . 1997 Aug 350(9077):535-40.
  26. Plante M. Evolution in surgical management of early-stage cervical cancer: radical trachelectomy and fertility preservation. Int J Gynecol Cancer [Internet]. 2013 Apr ;23(6):982-9.
  27. Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-Analysis Collaboration. Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Cochrane Database Syst Rev . 2010 Jan.
  28. Monk BJ, Sill MW, McMeekin DS, Cohn DE, Ramondetta LM, Boardman CH, et al. Phase III trial of four cisplatin-containing doublet combinations in stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent cervical carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jan ;27(28):4649-55.
  29. Chung HC, Ros W, Delord JP, Perets R, Italiano A, Shapira-Frommer R, et al. Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in previously treated advanced cervical cancer: results from the phase II KEYNOTE-158 study. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2019 Jun;37(17):1470-8.
  30. Colombo N, Ferrara R, Zamagni C, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer (KEYNOTE-826). N Engl J Med. 2021;385(16):1505–1516.
  31. Abu-Rustum NR, Yashar CM, Bean S, et al. NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Cervical Cancer, Version 1.2023. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023;21(12):1224–123.
  32. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves tisotumab vedotin-tftv (TIVDAK) for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. Silver Spring (MD): FDA; 2024 Apr 29 .
  33. Camarda F, et al. Antibody–drug conjugates in recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer: focus on tisotumab vedotin — state of the art. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024; (review).
  34. Gross M, Saad A, et al. Case report: olaparib response in BRCA-mutated recurrent cervical cancer and review of PARP inhibitor rationale. Case Rep Oncol. 2022; (example of PARP utility).
  35.  Zheng Q, et al. Advancing the fight against cervical cancer: therapeutic HPV vaccines and combination strategies. Vaccines (Basel). 2025;13(1):92.
  36. Lorusso D, et al. Contemporary management and multidisciplinary care in cervical cancer: implications of new systemic therapies. Ann Oncol. 2025.

Reference

  1. American Cancer Society. Atlanta (GA): American Cancer Society; 2024.
  2. World Health Organization. Cervical cancer Geneva: WHO; 2023 .
  3. Mayo Clinic. Cervical cancer: Symptoms and causes [Internet]. Rochester (MN): Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research; 2024 .
  4. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta (GA): U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; 2024 .
  5. National Cancer Institute. Cervical cancer prevention and screening. Bethesda (MD): National Institutes of Health; 2024.
  6. Crosbie EJ, Einstein MH, Franceschi S, Kitchener HC. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. 2013 Sep;382(9895):889-99.
  7. Smith HO, Tiffany MF, Qualls CR, Key CR. The rising incidence of adenocarcinoma relative to squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix in the United States—a 24-year population-based study. Gynecol Oncol . 2000 Nov ;78(2):97-105.
  8. Pirog EC. Cervical adenocarcinoma: diagnosis, classification, and HPV association. Semin Diagn Pathol . 2020 Sep;37(5):215-21.
  9. Cohen JG, Kapp DS, Shin JY, Urban R, Sherman AE, Chen LM, et al. Small cell carcinoma of the cervix: treatment and survival outcomes of 188 patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol . 2010 Dec;203(4):1-6.
  10. Cancer Research UK. Risk factors for cervical cancer. London: Cancer Research UK; 2024 .
  11. Scoutt LM, Ayesh BM, et al. Smoking as a cofactor in HPV-associated carcinogenesis: pooled analysis shows increased risk (OR 2.17) among smokers. Int J Cancer Epidemiol. 2004
  12. Solares J et al. Relationship between smoking, HPV infection, and risk of cervical lesions—prospective Spanish study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol . 2016 .
  13. American Cancer Society. Risk factors for cervical cancer . Atlanta (GA): American Cancer Society; 2025 .
  14. Ranjith MP, Kumar HP, et al. Socioeconomic status and high parity as risk factors in HPV-infected women: South Indian study. World Acad Sci J  2019
  15. Waggoner SE. Cervical cancer. Lancet . 2003 Jun ;361(9376):2217–25.
  16. Petignat P, Roy M. Diagnosis and management of cervical cancer. BMJ . 2007 Oct ;335(7623):765–8.
  17. Denny L. Cervical cancer: prevention and treatment. Discov Med . 2012 Jul ;14(75):125–31.
  18. Bhatla N, Berek JS, Cuello Fredes M, Denny L, Grenman S, Karunaratne K, et al. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet . 2019 Apr ;145(1):129–35.
  19. Landoni F, Maneo A, Cormio G, Mangioni C. Symptoms of cervical cancer: clinical features and impact on prognosis. Gynecol Oncol . 2001 Dec ;83(3):479–84.
  20. Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni L, de Sanjosé S, Saraiya M, Ferlay J, et al. Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis. Lancet Glob Health . 2020 Feb;8(2):e191-203.
  21. Schiffman M, Wentzensen N. A suggested approach to simplify and improve cervical screening in the United States. J Low Genit Tract 20(2):1-7.
  22.  Massad LS, Einstein MH, Huh WK, Katki HA, Kinney WK, Schiffman M, et al. 2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. J Low Genit Tract Dis . 2013 Apr 17(5 Suppl 1):S1-27.
  23. Balleyguier C, Sala E, Da Cunha T, Bergman A, Brkljacic B, Danza F, et al. Staging of uterine cervical cancer with MRI: guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology. Eur Radiol . 2011 May 21(5):1102-10.
  24. Bhatla N, Berek JS, Cuello Fredes M, Denny LA, Grenman S, Karunaratne K, et al. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 Apr 145(1):129-35
  25.  Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A, Placa F, Milani R, Perego P, et al. Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib–IIa cervical cancer. Lancet . 1997 Aug 350(9077):535-40.
  26. Plante M. Evolution in surgical management of early-stage cervical cancer: radical trachelectomy and fertility preservation. Int J Gynecol Cancer [Internet]. 2013 Apr ;23(6):982-9.
  27. Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-Analysis Collaboration. Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Cochrane Database Syst Rev . 2010 Jan.
  28. Monk BJ, Sill MW, McMeekin DS, Cohn DE, Ramondetta LM, Boardman CH, et al. Phase III trial of four cisplatin-containing doublet combinations in stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent cervical carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jan ;27(28):4649-55.
  29. Chung HC, Ros W, Delord JP, Perets R, Italiano A, Shapira-Frommer R, et al. Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in previously treated advanced cervical cancer: results from the phase II KEYNOTE-158 study. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2019 Jun;37(17):1470-8.
  30. Colombo N, Ferrara R, Zamagni C, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer (KEYNOTE-826). N Engl J Med. 2021;385(16):1505–1516.
  31. Abu-Rustum NR, Yashar CM, Bean S, et al. NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Cervical Cancer, Version 1.2023. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023;21(12):1224–123.
  32. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves tisotumab vedotin-tftv (TIVDAK) for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. Silver Spring (MD): FDA; 2024 Apr 29 .
  33. Camarda F, et al. Antibody–drug conjugates in recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer: focus on tisotumab vedotin — state of the art. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024; (review).
  34. Gross M, Saad A, et al. Case report: olaparib response in BRCA-mutated recurrent cervical cancer and review of PARP inhibitor rationale. Case Rep Oncol. 2022; (example of PARP utility).
  35.  Zheng Q, et al. Advancing the fight against cervical cancer: therapeutic HPV vaccines and combination strategies. Vaccines (Basel). 2025;13(1):92.
  36. Lorusso D, et al. Contemporary management and multidisciplinary care in cervical cancer: implications of new systemic therapies. Ann Oncol. 2025.

Photo
Rashmi Sumbria
Corresponding author

Department of pharmaceutics, Punjab college of Pharmacy.

Photo
Anjana Thakur
Co-author

Department of pharmaceutics, Maharaja Agrasen school of Pharmacy.

Rashmi Sumbria*, Anjana Thakur, An Overview of Cervical Cancer and Its Prevention, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 9, 2265-2273 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17165743

More related articles
In-vitro antioxidant activity of hydroalcoholic ex...
Darshika Acharya, Prof. Meenakshi Vaidya, ...
Development And Assessment of Herbal Facial Cream...
A. S. Sontakke, R. S. Dahiwale, S. S. Sontakke, S. S. Kharate , S...
Statistical Study and Analysis of Plasma Proteins ...
Bhargavi Reddy Metta, Krishna Samalla, ...
A Clinical Study on Iris Thickness in Asians and Africans...
Dr. KVV Satyanarayana, Dr. Vidhya Kuppili, CH. Tejaswi, Dr. K. Ravi Naini, Satya Varaprasad, Dr. VVL...
Efficacy of Unani Formulation (Mentha Longifolia) And Ruta Graveolans in The Man...
Gulafshan Fatima , Syeda Aamena Naaz , Dr Abiha Ahmad Khan , ...
Related Articles
Analytical Detection of Soil Parameters Using PH Measurement, Conductivity Analy...
Dr. Sandip Wagh, Aditi Brahamankar, Ayush Burad, Ishwari Chavan, Nikita Chavan, Siddharth Chhajed, A...
A Comprehensive Review of Insights into Rheumatoid Arthritis: From Pathophysiolo...
Sanika Gurav, Shruti Choudhari, Shweta Patil, Tejasvini Kamble, Shradha Lokare, Dr. Jadge D. R., ...
More related articles
Development And Assessment of Herbal Facial Cream...
A. S. Sontakke, R. S. Dahiwale, S. S. Sontakke, S. S. Kharate , S. A. Borkar, S. C. Dhande, Dr. R. H...
Development And Assessment of Herbal Facial Cream...
A. S. Sontakke, R. S. Dahiwale, S. S. Sontakke, S. S. Kharate , S. A. Borkar, S. C. Dhande, Dr. R. H...