Autism Spectrum Disorders Related Mouse Behavioral Approaches

Abstract

Neurological problems known as autism have an impact on communication and social interaction. recurring actions, social interactions, and spoken and nonverbal communication. Further to increased anxiety and cognitive deficits is the type of hereditary intellectual disability that is most prevalent. No medicine exist that are effective in treating the main symptoms of autism spectrum disorder. Basically, the factors causing their being are currently unsolved. There are limited animal models of autism diseases that replicate one or a few of the main symptoms of the problem (Social behavior infractions and relative communication conditions). elevated plus maze, open-field, self-grooming, and new item identification behavioral testing. It was established that neurotrophin-related methods and a number of autism-like symptoms are connected. New genetic animal models of the behavioral phenotype of autism may result from research on mediators of social behavior, which may also assist discover the neural networks necessary for typical social interaction. The core approach techniques for modelling ASD in animals are explained and examined in this article, along with the behavioral strategies used in the research among these models.

Keywords

Introduction

Figure 1. Test of three section social communication

Figure 2. EPM- test apparatus

                                         Figure 3. MWM- test                                Figure 4. Y- maze test

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

The nerve cells was ready for microscopic examination^23,24. After inducing severe unconsciousness, Mice received an ice-cold perfusion. 0.9 percent biological salinity, 4 percent paraformaldehyde and 2 percent glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.4). After that, the hippocampal tissue was isolated and applied with paraformaldehyde at 4 percent for an entire night at 4°C. The specimens were processed fixation, 1 percent of osmium tetroxide after fixing for 1.5 hours, dehydration in ethanol (There was 1 percent uranyl acetate in the 70 percent ethanol), and implantation in epoxy resin. For the extremely thin segments, The portions that are semithin were given at 500 nm Depths, 1 percent toluidine blue stain, and seen in the light microscope. An ultra-cut Leica ultra small microscope (EM UC7, Leica, Germany) was used to cut ultrathin sections (90 nm) of the appropriate area. Following staining with lead citrate and uranyl acetate, these sections were inspected applying an electron microscopy (Tecnai G2 20 TWIN, FEI, USA). Postsynaptic density and synaptic vesicles were used to identify synapses. We examined 60–80 electron microscopic pictures on average for each group. As previously mentioned²⁵ we quantified the following parameters: synaptic active zone length, strength of synaptic thickness, breadth of the synapse cleft, and synapse density per 100 μm 2.

Analysis of statistics

For statistical evaluation, The GraphPad Prism 26.0 (GraphPad Software) was utilized. The mean ± SEM is used to display the information. The Tukey's multi compare technique post hoc comes after the Unpaired One-way ANOVA or Student's t-test, were employed to assess the data. for the behavioural assessment outcomes. Repeated actions The findings because the electrical reactions to higher current administrations were significantly examined using ANOVA. When p < 0.05, a difference was deemed Significant statistically.

Investigations into Cognitive Rigidity and Interest Limitations

Cognitive rigidity is autism's second key symptom¹⁸. suggested utilizing the T-maze to assess this factor. After teaching the animal to locate a meals incentive in a subdivision, the prize was moved to the opposing arm. The speed at which the animal alters its behaviour and starts searching for food in a new location is noted by the experimenters. Other possible approaches include calculating how long it takes to find the intended level in the MW-maze after it is removed and estimating the rate at which the conditioned reflex attenuates when reinforcement is removed.

an overabundance of common behavioral behaviour, such grooming, maintaining oneself upright, shaking, whirling, flying, etc., are examples of rodents' repetitive and stereotypical pattern of behaviour^26,27,28. Usually, during open field tests or during regular behaviour, these behavioral aspects are seen and documented right in the animal cages where the animals are housed. Usually, during open field tests or during regular behavior, these behavioral aspects are seen and documented right in the animal cages where the animals are housed.

An intriguing method for examining the stereotypical pattern behaviours in models of ASD-specifically, in BTBR--altered mice-is the "burying-stones" test, also known as the "marble burying test"²⁹.

Animals are placed with a thick coating in the exam field of matting for this test. It is Animals initially acclimated to the place in order to reduce the tension response to the unfamiliar surroundings. Tiny gravel, pieces of glass, or plastic pellets are placed on the bed by the experimenters, who then count how many of these objects the test animal excavates. One common example of Guarding actions in mice, specifically mice and rats, is the reaction of burying unknown objects³⁰.The animal tries to hide anything it believes to be disagreeable and hazardous from the ground or material that expands with its muzzle and forelimbs. In the natural world, these could be snakes, insects, or scorpions; in the lab, they could be stimulating shock electrodes. Bits of food, they stone, and glass beads—items that aren't meant to be harmful—are also easily buried. One of the main characteristics of ASD in humans is recurrence of behavior, which can be well-indicated by the repeated, obsessive nature of such a behavioral pattern in models of the disorder. Because anxiolytics (like diazepam) significantly reduced the severity of these responses, burying the stones was once thought to be an anxiety correlate³¹. However, such conduct is currently thought to reflect obsessive/compulsive characteristics and be primarily tied to the novelty of objects. For this reason, this test is currently accepted in models of obsessive-compulsive disorders and autism ³².

The test settings, which involve placing the animal in a chamber with numerous burrow-like entrances in the walls and bottom, can cause the hypothesized restriction of interest in rodents to appear. Rats in good health closely inspect various holes, sniffing them and inserting their muzzles into these "burrows." The same "hole" (or several "burrows") is greatly preferred by the animals exhibiting autism symptoms, who repeatedly explore them¹⁹.

Animals are frequently asked to choose between two branches in a Y-shaped maze when their behavior is being examined, and neither branch receives food incentive.

After visiting, say, the left arm, healthy rodents typically go on to the right. One could assume that a propensity to repeatedly visit the same arm would be seen in autism models. However, this test does not identify cognitive rigidity and most likely describes the specialization of research activity³³.

Modelling and investigation of animal communication deficiencies

Since only humans use voice for communication, it might be challenging to replicate the third element of the "autistic triad" in animals. As a result, we can only identify the associated communication problems in humans. A However, it is known that animals can use a variety of signalling systems to build communication relationships. It was discovered that rodents (hamsters, rats, gerbils, mice etc.) consistently communicate using ultrasonic auditory signals³⁴. These indicates were seen in almost every aspect of the rats' social lives, including socialization, violent sexual activity, and more. It has been demonstrated that children who attempt to find the nest produce ultrasonic waves that enable their mothers to locate them and bring them back to a safe area³⁵. The female left the nest and started looking after hearing the signal. Nevertheless, this mother did not respond to lifeless or drugged newborns that did not show these signs. The baby mice's ultrasonic pulses were utilized³⁶. When the equivalent observe was activated in an vacant chamber of the study setup using the nest in place, most of the moms relocated to the previously described chamber, that was totally absent of newborn mice, plush animals of a suitable size, and the matching fragrance tracks. Rats were used in similar investigations later on. Therefore, compared to visual and olfactory inputs, ultrasonic vocalization (USV) likely has a far greater influence on mother behavior in rodents.

Models of autism diseases show significant disruptions of USV when compared to the vocalization of healthy animals. Specifically, when separated from their moms and other young animals, Shank1–/–mutant mice's progeny generated lower signals³⁷. Vocalization problems were also evident in mature model animals. When given the opportunity to sniff female urine, mature male strains of mice BTBRT T+tf/J (BTBR) generated fewer ultrasonic indications and departed from fragrant tags than animals of the unconventional style³⁸.

Vocalization Problems in songbirds were also studied³⁹. It is thought that these birds learn unique songs that are exclusive to particular species throughout their lives in addition to using vocalization for communication. That can be mentioned that just men are capable of "sing" corresponding tunes, and their rivalry in a female partner of breeding heavily relies on his performance. That's believed it human speech learning impairments are caused by mutations in the same gene, FOXP2⁴⁰. rodents' vocalization^41,42 and songbirds' songs⁴³. It was demonstrated that learning songs was hampered by "switching off" this gene due to lentivirus effect⁴⁴. It is well known that songbirds pick up a species-specific tune by imitating an older bird, or "teacher." Birds that had problems with the FOXP2 gene either reproduced the song incompletely or with considerable distortion.

When competing for a female, the male bird did not benefit from such aberrant vocalization. It cannot be ruled out that studying the characteristics of bird vocalization can provide some knowledge about modelling illnesses similar to autism.

Strategies for Repetitive Activity and Special Interests

Repetitive activity in mice can involve persistent sniffing, circling, burrowing, or constant running and jumping in the cage^45,46,47. Repetitive grooming and scratching can result in skin lesions and ear injuries⁴⁸. Both open-field testing and home-cage monitoring can reveal aberrant stereotypies.

Excessive devotion to routine is another manifestation of autism's propensity for repeated behavior. Reverse studying in the MW-Maze challenge may be applied to Calculate resistivity to changing a knowledgeable behavioral arrangement. Mice are educated to find a hidden climb framework that is partially submerged in a circular pool of milky liquid in this exercise. Mice develop swimming abilities straight to the hiding ledge from any access spot on the pool's edge during a few days. Prior to an end test, the platform for escaping is removed to evaluate the task's spatial learning. Animals typically swim in circles. over the platform's placement. The escape platform is moved to a distinct area of the pool in the subsequent testing phase, and the mice's the newly established location's learning capacity is reassessed. Inadequate or delayed formation in the context of reversal studying may act as an example of mental stiffness similar to autism. According to this theory, Fmr1-null mice demonstrated adequate visual education acquisition in the MW-maze test but inadequate Acquiring knowledge while reversing stage^49,50. The water maze test may not be possible for Mice with impaired vision or motor skills. In these situations, learning acquisition and retrieval can be assessed using a straightforward T-maze experiment. In order to receive a food reward, Mice are taught to go in either the left or right arm of the labyrinth. When a significant number of right decisions are noted, the reinforcement arm is switched, requiring the mouse to choose the other arm in order to receive rewards. One drawback of this duty is that I have to go without eating before acquisition, which may result in problems with motivation levels among strains. The spontaneous alternation test is another method that makes use of the T-maze. It is predicated on mice's innate propensity to switch between arms in a maze⁵¹. Exploration metrics on a hole board, such as the number of nose pokes into a certain collection of holes relative to the entire board^52,53, and the inspection of unfamiliar things in an open field are other methods to evaluate repeated behavior^54,55.

CONCLUSION

ASD is a complex neurological condition that impacts communication, social interaction, and repetitive behaviours. Environmental and genetic variables both have an impact. Its pathophysiology is impacted by genetic abnormalities like fragile X and Rett's as well as prenatal exposure to substances like valproic acid. Developing successful therapy approaches and interventions requires an understanding of ASD through behavioral and animal models. It is not possible to identify ADHD alongside an ASD diagnosis. animal models of autism, specific behavioral testing procedures (Morrison, open field, and three chamber, radial maze, MW-maze test, T-maze) and ways for identifying specific A Social contact within 3 compartments tool measurement. The T-maze, MW-maze test, and marble burying exams are examples of a tasks that can be used to simulate and assess cognitive rigidity and repetitive behaviours, two fundamental characteristics of autism. These paradigms evaluate the animal's capacity for exploration, adaptation, and recurrent or compulsive activity. These assessments provide important insights into behavioral phenotypes similar to ASD by differentiating anxiety-related from obsessive behaviours. All things considered, these models are crucial resources for researching the neurological processes and treatment approaches in autism. Modeling the communication deficits of autism in animals is challenging, yet studies of ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) in rodents and song learning in birds offer valuable insights. Rodents use USVs for social communication. Similarly, mutations in the FOXP2 gene in songbirds cause abnormal song learning, paralleling human speech difficulties. These findings suggest that vocalization studies can illuminate the neural and genetic bases of autistic communication deficits. Repetitive behaviors and cognitive rigidity, another hallmark of ASD, can be modeled through behavioral tests like the Morris water maze, T-maze, and hole-board assays. These paradigms reveal persistence, reduced flexibility, and stereotypic patterns in ASD models. Together, such animal models provide crucial platforms for understanding autism’s core features and testing potential therapeutic interventions.

This paper is a review and has nothing to do with any experimental research.

REFERENCES

1. Klein ME. Bangerter A. Halter RJ. Cooper K. Aguilar Z. Canuso CM. Drevets WC. Schmidt ME. Pandina G. Efficacy and safety of JNJ-42165279,a fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitor,in adolescents and adults with autism spectrum disorder; a randomized. phase 2. placebo-controlled study. Neuropsycho pharmacology. 2024;50(2):480-487:doi.org/10.1038/s41386-024-02001-2.
2. Kurahashi H. Kunisawa K. Tanaka KF. Kubota H. Hasegawa M. Miyachi M. Moriya Y. Hasegawa Y. Nagai T. Saito K. et al. Autism spectrum disorder like behaviors induced by hyper-glutamatergic NMDA receptor signaling through hypo-serotonergic 5-HT1A receptor signaling in the prefrontal cortex in mice exposed to prenatal valproic acid. Neuropsychopharmacol ogy. 2024;50(5):739-750. doi.org/ 10.1038/s41386-024-02004-z.
3. Huguet G. Ey E. Bourgeron T. The genetic landscapes of autism spectrum disorders. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2013; 14:191–213. doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev-genom-091212-153431.
4. Christianson AL. Chesler N. Kromberg JG. Fetal valproate syndrome: clinical and neuro-developmental features in two sibling pairs. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1994; 36(4): 361–369. doi.org/  10.1111/j.1469-8749.1994.tb11858.x.
5. Crippa A. Del Vecchio G. Busti Ceccarelli S. Nobile M. Arrigoni F. & Brambilla P. Cortico-Cerebellar connectivity in autism spec trum disorder: What do we know so far? Frontiers in Psychiatry.2016; 7:1–7. doi.org/ 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00020.
6. Lecavalier L. Behavioral and emotional problems in young people with pervasive developmental disorders: relative prevalence, effects of subject characteristics, and empirical classification. J Autism Dev Disord.2006 ;36(8):1101-1114. doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0147-5.
7. Folstein S E. Sheidley B Rosen. Genetics of autism: complex aetiology for a heterogeneous disorder.Nat Rev Genet.2001 ;2(12):943-955. doi: 10.1038/35103559 .
8. Gadow KD. Sverd J. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, chronic tic disorder, and methylphenidate. Adv Neurol. 2006; 99:197-207.
9. Goldstein S. Schwebach AJ. The comorbidity of pervasive develop mental disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: results of a ret rospective chart review. J Autism Dev Disord. 2004; 34: 329-339.
10. Harris.  C James . Developmental Neuropsychiatry. Assessment, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Developmental Disorders. 1995; vol-2. New York : Oxford University Press Publisher.
11. Evans B. How autism became autism: The radical transformation of a central concept of child devel opment in Britain. Hist Human Sci. 2013;26(3):1-3. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695113484320.
12. Wing JK. Hailey AM. Evaluating a community psychiatric service: The Camberwell register. 1964-1971;London .New York : Oxford University Press of the Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust Publisher.
13. Baron-Cohen SI. Leslie AM.Frith U. Do children with autism have a “theory of mind”?. Cognition. 1985;21: 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)8-90022.
14. King BH. Navot N. Bernier R. Webb SJ. Update on diagnostic classification in autism. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2014;27(2):105. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000040.
15. Hernández Díaz S. Straub L. Bateman BT. Zhu Y. Mogun H. Wisner KL. Gray KJ. Lester B. McDougle CJ. DiCesare E. et al. Risk of autism after prenatal topiramate, valproate, or lamotrigine exposure. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(12):1069-1079.
16. Meng J. Pan P. Guo G. Chen A. Meng X. Liu H. Transient CSF1R Inhibition ame liorates behavioral deficits in Cntnap2 knockout and valproic acid-exposed mouse models of autism. J Neuroinflamm. 2024;21(1):262.
17. Rutter M. Incidence of autism spectrum disorders: changes over time and their meaning.Acta Paediatr. 2005;94: 2–15.
18. Crawley J N. What’s Wrong with My Mouse? Behavioral Phenotyping of Transgenic and Knockout Mice, John Wiley and Sons.2006; 329.doi.org/10.1002/0470119055.
19. Wöhr M. Scattoni M L. Behavioural methods used in rodent models of autism spectrum disorders: Current standards and new developments. Behav Brain Res.2013; 5-17.
20. Wang D. Zhao D. Wang W. Hu F. Cui M. Liu J. Meng F. Liu C. Qiu C. Liu D. et al. How do lateral septum projections to the ventral CA1 influence sociability? Neural Regeneration Res. 2024;19(8):1789–1801.
21. Zorab JM. Li H. Awasthi R. Schinasi A. Cho Y. Loughlin T. Wu X. Serotonin and neurotensin inputs in the vCA1 dictate opposing social Valence. Nature. 2025;2:1-30.
22. Yin H. Zhang J. Chen Y. Guo J. Li Q. Dinnyes A. Sun Q. Liu X. He G. Zhu B. et al. Placenta-specific CYP11A1 overexpression lead to autism-like symptom in offspring with altered steroid hormone biosynthesis in the placenta brain axis and rescued by vitamin D intervention. Brain Behav Immun. 2024;121: 13–25.
23. Hongpaisan J. Sun M K. Alkon D L. PKC ε activation prevents synaptic loss, Aβ elevation, and cognitive deficits in Alzheimer’s disease transgenic mice. J Neurosci. 2011; 31: 630–643. doi.org/ 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5209-10.2011.
24. Chen C. Wang Z. Zhang Z. Liu X. Kang S S. Zhang Y. Ye K. The prodrug of 7,8-dihydroxyflavone development and therapeutic efficacy for treating Alzheimer’s disease. Proc Natl.2018; 115: 578–583.
25. Csabai D. Wiborg O. Cz´eh B. Reduced synapse and axon numbers in the prefrontal cortex of rats subjected to a chronic stress model for depression. Front Cell Neurosci. 2018;12: 24.
26. McFarlane H G. KusekG K.Yang M. et al. Autism like behavioral phenotypes in BTBR T+tf/J mice. Genes Brain Behav.2008; 7(2): 152-163.
27. Pe?agarikano O. Abrahams B S. Herman E I. et al. Absence of CNTNAP2 leads to epilepsy, neuronal migration abnormalities, and core autism-related deficits. Cell.2011; 147(1): 235-246.
28. Silverman J L. Tolu S S. Barkan C L. Crawley J N. Repetitive self-grooming behavior in the BTBR mouse model of autism is blocked by the mGluR5 antagonist MPEP. Neuropsychopharmacology.2010;35(4):976-989 .
29. Thomas A. Burant A. Bui N. et al. Marble burying reflects a repetitive and perseverative behavior more than novelty-induced anxiety. Psychopharmacology (Berlin).2009;204(2): 361-373.
30. Pinel J P J. Treit D. Burying as a defensive response in rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1978; 92(4): 708–712.
31. Broekkamp C L. Rijk H W. Joly-Gelouin D. Lloyd K L. Major tranquillizers can be distinguished from minor tranquillizers on the basis of effects on marble burying and swim-induced grooming in mice. Eur J Pharmacol.1986; 126(3): 223-229.
32. Njung K.  Handley S L. Evaluation of marble burying behavior as a model of anxiety. Pharmacol Biochem  Behav.1991; 38(1): 63-67.
33. Belzung C. Measuring rodent exploratory behavior in Handbook of Molecular Genetic Techniques for Brain and Behavior Research. Elsevier, Amsterdam. 2001;739–749.
34. Jamain S. Radyushkin K. Hammerschmidt K. et al. Reduced social interaction and ultrasonic communication in a mouse model of monogenic heritable autism.  Proc  Natl  Acad. 2008;105: 1710–1715.
35. Zippelius H M. Schleidt W M. Ultraschall-Laute bei jungen Mäusen. Naturwissenschaften.1956; 43: 502.
36. Sewell G D. Ultrasonic communication in rodents. Nature. 1970; 227: 410.
37. Wöhr M. Roullet F I. Hung A Y. et al. Communication impairments in mice lacking Shank1: Reduced levels of ultrasonic vocalizations and scent marking behavior. PLoS ONE.2011; 6(6).
38. Wöhr M. Roullet F I. Crawley J N. Reduced scent marking and ultrasonic vocalizations in the BTBR T+tf/J mouse model of autism. Genes Brain Behav. 2011; 10(1): 35-43.
39. Panaitof S C.  A songbird animal model for dissecting the genetic bases of autism spectrum disorder.  Dis  Markers.2012;33(5): 241–249.
40. Lai C S. Gerrelli D. Monaco A P. Fisher S E.  Copp AJ. FOXP2 expression during brain development coincides with adult sites of pathology in a severe speech and language disorder Brain. 2003;126(11): 2455-2462.
41. Holy T E. Guo Z. Ultrasonic songs of male mice. PLoS Biol. 2005; 3(12): 386.
42. Arriaga G. Zhou E P. Jarvis E D. Of Mice, Birds and Men: The Mouse Ultrasonic Song System Has Some Features Similar to Humans and Song-Learning Birds. PLoS ONE 2012; 7(10): e46610. Doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0046610.
43. Condro M C. White S A. Distribution of language related Cntnap2 protein in neural circuits critical for vocal learning. J Compar Neurol. 2014; 522: 169.
44. Haesler S. Rochefort C. Georgi B. et al. Incomplete and inaccurate vocal imitation after knockdown of FoxP2 in songbird basal ganglia nucleus Area X. PLoS Biol.2007; 5: e321.
45. Cases O. Seif I. Grimsby J. Gaspar P. Chen K. Pournin S. Muller U. Aguet M. Babinet C. Shih JC. De Maeyer E. Aggressive behavior and altered amounts of brain serotonin and norepinephrine in mice lacking MAOA. Science. 1995; 268:1763–1766.
46. Homanics GE. DeLorey TM. Firestone LL. Quinlan JJ. Handforth A. Harrison NL. Krasowski MD. Rick CEM. Korpi ER. Makela R. Brilliant MH. Hagiwara N. Ferguson C. Synder K. Olsen RW. Mice devoid of a-aminobutyrate type A receptor b3 subunit have epilepsy cleft palate and hypersensitive behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94: 4143–4148.
47. Presti MF. Watson CJ. Kennedy RT. Yang M. Lewis MH. Behavior-related altera tions of striatal neurochemistry in a mouse model of stereotyped movement disorder. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2003; 77(3):501-507.
48. Wu C-L. Melton DW. Production of a model for Lesch-Nyhan syndrome in hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase-de f icient mice. Nat Genet.1993; 3: 235–239.
49. Bakker CE. Verheij C. Willemsen R. Vander Helm R. Oerlemans F. Vermey M. Bygrave A. Hoogeveen AT. Oostra BA. Reyniers E. De Boulle K. D’Hooge R. Cras P. van Velzen D. Nagels G. Martin J-J. De Deyn PP. Darby JK. Willems PJ. Fmr1 knockout mice: A model to study fragile X mental retardation. Cell. 1994; 78: 23–33.
50. Kooy RF. D’Hooge R. Reyniers E. Bakker CE. Nagels G. De Boulle K. Storm K. Clincke G. De Deyn PP. Oostra BA. Willems PJ. Transgenic mouse model for the fragile X syndrome. American J Med Gen.1996; 64: 241–245.
51. Lalonde R. Hayzoun K. Derer M. Mariani J. Strazielle C. Neurobehavioral evalua tion of Relnrl-orl mutant mice and correla tions with cytochrome oxidase activity. Neurosci Res. 2004;49: 297-305.
52. Popova NK. Vishnivetskaya GB. Ivanova EA. Skrinskaya JA. Seif I.  Altered behavior and alcohol tolerance in transgenic mice lacking MAO A: A comparison with effects of MAO A inhibitor clorgyline. Pharmacol Biochem Behav .2000;67: 719–727.
53. Bell K. Shokrian D. Potenzieri C. Whitaker Azmitia PM. Harm avoidance, anxiety and response to novelty in the adolescent S-100B transgenic mouse: Role of serotonin and relevance to Down syndrome. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2003;28: 1810–1816.
54. Salinger WL. Ladrow P. Wheeler C. Behavioral phenotype of the reeler mutant mouse: Effects of Reln gene dosage and social isolation. Behav Neurosci. 2003;117: 1257–1275.
55. Yan QJ. Asafo-Adjei PK. Arnold HM. Brown RE. Bauchwitz RP. Aphenotypicand molecular characterization of the fmr1 tm1Cgr Fragile X mouse. Genes Brain Behav. 2004; 3: 337–359.