View Article

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major global health concern, ranking as the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Despite current therapeutic options, the prognosis remains poor, necessitating the discovery of novel, effective, and targeted treatments. The AXL tyrosine kinase receptor, overexpressed in several cancers including CRC, plays a pivotal role in tumor progression, metastasis, and resistance to apoptosis, making it a promising therapeutic target.This study aims to design and evaluate novel pyrimidine derivatives as potential AXL tyrosine kinase inhibitors using a comprehensive computational and experimental approach. A virtual library of 100 pyrimidine-based ligands was constructed using ChemSketch and subjected to molecular docking against the AXL tyrosine kinase receptor (PDB ID: 5U6C) using AutoDock Vina. Ramachandran plot analysis confirmed the stability of the target protein, and binding site prediction ensured accuracy in docking. ADMET profiling using Swiss ADME and Osiris Property Explorer indicated that selected ligands possessed favorable pharmacokinetic properties and were non-toxic. Top-performing ligands demonstrated superior binding affinity compared to the standard drug 5-fluorouracil. Hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions were visualized to understand ligand-receptor binding mechanisms. Selected lead compounds are currently being synthesized for further in-vitro evaluation using the HCT-116 colorectal cancer cell line. This integrative study highlights the potential of pyrimidine derivatives as AXL tyrosine kinase inhibitors and paves the way for the development of effective, targeted therapies against colorectal cancer.

Keywords

Pyrimidine derivatives, AXL tyrosine kinase, colorectal cancer, molecular docking, ADMET prediction, in-silico drug design

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks as the third most common cancer globally and is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths (1). Despite advancements in diagnostics and treatment, the high mortality rate underscores the need for novel therapeutic agents. CRC progression is influenced by genetic mutations, chromosomal instability, and epigenetic alterations, leading to uncontrolled cell proliferation and metastasis (2). One promising therapeutic target in CRC is the AXL tyrosine kinase receptor, part of the TAM family (Tyro3, AXL, Mer). AXL is overexpressed in various cancers and promotes tumor progression, metastasis, immune evasion, and resistance to apoptosis. Its inhibition has shown potential in reducing tumor burden and enhancing anti-tumor immune responses. Studies by Xu et al. (2021) and Inoue et al. (2021) have reported promising small-molecule AXL inhibitors with significant anticancer activity (3). Pyrimidine, a versatile heterocyclic scaffold, has shown broad pharmacological activity, including anticancer effects. Min Jung Choi et al. (2018) designed aminopyrimidine derivatives targeting AXL kinase, demonstrating potent activity in sub micromolar ranges (4). Similarly, Siddharth et al. (2018) used 3D-QSAR analysis to correlate pyrimidine structural features with AXL kinase inhibition, supporting their application in drug design (5). Advancements in computer-aided drug design (CADD) enable efficient screening of compounds using docking, ADME prediction, and toxicity profiling. Elizabeth et al. (2022) highlighted the value of structure-based and ligand-based design in accelerating drug discovery (6). This study focuses on designing and synthesizing novel pyrimidine derivatives targeting AXL kinase in CRC. It integrates in silico modeling, ADMET prediction, molecular docking, synthesis, and in-vitro evaluation to develop potent, selective, and non-toxic anticancer agent.

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ligand preparation

ChemSketch (freeware version) (7) was used to draw and optimize 100 novel chemical structures to design a total of 100 novel ligands. The ligands were stored in mol format and further energy minimized by Chem3D (8). We converted the minimized structures into. pdbqt format for molecular docking studies using Auto Dock Tools (ADT).

Ramachandran Plot Analysis

The Ramachandran plot analysis confirmed the structural reliability of 5U6C, with most residues positioned in the favored regions, ensuring accurate docking results (9).

Receptor preparation

The crystal structures of AXL tyrosine kinase (PDB ID: 5U6C) were downloaded from the Protein Data Bank (10). These structures were selected due to their high resolution (approximately 2 Å) and determination by the reliable X-ray diffraction method. Receptors were prepared by removing water molecules, adding polar hydrogens, and assigning Kollman charges using Auto Dock Tools.

ADMET Prediction

The absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) properties of the ligands were evaluated using Swiss ADME (11) and OSIRIS Property Explorer (12). These tools predicted drug-likeness, bioavailability, and toxicity, ensuring the ligands adhered to Lipinski's rule of five and exhibited favorable pharmacokinetic profiles.

Molecular docking

Docking studies were performed using AutoDock Vina 1.5.6 (13). The active sites of AXL tyrosine kinase and 5U6C were defined based on their co crystallized ligands. The grid box dimensions and coordinates (x, y, z) for the docking simulations were determined using the CB-Dock server (14), which predicts the binding pockets and centers the grid box around the identified active site residues. This automated approach ensured optimal coverage of the ligand-binding site and included all key residues critical for each ligand was docked against both receptors, and binding affinities were recorded as binding energies (kcal/mol).

Visualization and Interaction Analysis

Binding interactions of the docked ligands with the receptors were analyzed using Molegro Molecular Viewer (MMV) (15). Hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic interactions, and π-π stacking interactions were identified. The top-scoring ligands were visualized and compared with standard drugs, correlating to the interaction pattern with the active site residues.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Ramachandran Plot

The Ramachandran plot analysis results indicate that the selected protein, AXL tyrosine kinase  with (PDB ID:5U6C), predominantly (more than 90%) have their amino-acid residues situated within the most favored region as represented in the fig no 1.

Figure No 1: Ramchandran Plot For 5U6C

Novelty Assessment

The novelty of the designed ligands was checked by using the ZINC 15 and PUBCHEM database. The outcomes were shown below.

Table No 1: Ligands Showing Novelty

Novel Ligands

Already existing compounds

A1,A2,A3,A4,A5,A6,A7,A8,A9,A10,A11,A12,A13,A14,A15,A16,A17,A18,A19,A20,A21,A22,A23,A25,A26,A28,A29,A30,A33,A34,A35,A36,A38,A39,A40,A41,A43,A44,A46,A47,A48,A49,A51,A52,A54,A55,A56,A57,A59,A60,A62,A63,A64,A65,A66,A67,A70,A71,A72,A73,A74,A75,A76,A78,A79,A80,A81,A82,A83,A84,A86,A87,A88,A89,A91,A92,A95,A96,A97,A99,A100,A101,A103,A104,A105,A107.

A24,A27,A31,A32,A37,A42,A45,A50,A53,A58,A61,A68,A69,A77,A85,A90,A93,A94,A98,A102,A106,A108.

In Silico ADMET

Based on the novelty results, the developed ligands are evaluated for the drug-likeness and toxicity property by using the Swiss ADME Online Software tool and the Osiris Property Explorer. Mutagenicity, tumorigenicity, irritant, reproductive are presented by M, T, I and R respectively.

Table No 2: ADMET Properties of Novel Ligands

Lig No

M

T

I

R

Log P

Mol Wt.

HBD

HBA

Rule Of 5

1

No

No

No

No

2.17

285.36

1

3

0

2

No

No

No

No

2.26

234.30

1

4

0

3

No

No

No

No

1.54

216.24

1

4

0

4

No

No

No

No

2.06

241.29

1

3

0

5

No

No

No

No

1.84

271.34

1

3

0

6

No

No

No

No

1.64

220.27

1

4

0

7

No

No

No

No

1.08

202.21

1

4

0

8

No

No

No

No

1.71

227.26

1

3

0

9

No

No

No

No

1.72

313.37

1

4

0

10

No

No

No

No

1.55

262.31

1

5

0

11

No

No

No

No

1.02

244.25

1

5

0

12

No

No

No

No

1.68

269.30

1

4

0

13

No

No

No

No

1.06

314.36

2

4

0

14

No

No

No

No

0.94

263.30

2

5

0

15

No

No

No

No

0.32

245.24

2

5

0

16

No

No

No

No

0.88

270.29

2

4

0

17

No

No

No

No

2.16

299.35

1

4

0

18

No

No

No

No

1.61

248.28

1

5

0

19

No

No

No

No

1.19

230.22

1

5

0

20

No

No

No

No

0.98

255.27

1

4

0

21

No

No

No

No

2.35

313.37

1

4

0

22

No

No

No

No

2.43

262.31

1

5

0

23

No

No

No

No

1.83

244.25

1

5

0

25

No

No

No

No

2.62

325.43

1

4

0

26

No

No

No

No

2.58

274.36

0

4

0

28

No

No

No

No

3.02

339.45

0

3

0

29

No

No

No

No

3.02

339.45

0

3

0

30

No

No

No

No

2.61

288.39

0

4

0

33

No

No

No

No

2.52

326.42

2

5

0

34

No

No

No

No

2.47

275.35

2

6

0

35

No

No

No

No

1.75

257.29

1

5

0

36

No

No

No

No

2.24

282.24

2

5

0

38

No

No

No

No

1.48

228.25

1

4

0

39

No

No

No

No

1.56

219.24

2

5

0

40

No

No

No

No

1.36

229.24

1

5

0

41

No

No

No

No

1.46

220.23

1

5

0

43

No

No

No

No

1.55

234.28

1

4

0

44

No

No

No

No

1.98

293.37

1

4

0

46

No

No

No

No

0.98

214.22

1

4

0

47

No

No

No

No

1.03

205.22

2

5

0

48

No

No

No

No

1.00

215.21

1

5

0

49

No

No

No

No

0.89

206.20

1

5

0

51

No

No

No

No

1.12

220.25

1

4

0

52

No

No

No

No

1.44

279.34

1

4

0

54

No

No

No

No

0.94

256.26

1

5

0

55

No

No

No

No

0.88

247.25

2

6

0

56

No

No

No

No

0.86

257.25

1

6

0

57

No

No

No

No

0.96

248.24

1

6

0

59

No

No

No

No

0.82

262.29

1

5

0

60

No

No

No

No

1.34

321.38

1

5

0

62

No

No

No

No

0.33

257.25

2

5

0

63

No

No

No

No

0.38

248.24

3

6

0

64

No

No

No

No

0.45

258.24

2

6

0

65

No

No

No

No

0.32

249.23

2

6

0

66

No

No

No

No

0.74

256.26

2

4

0

67

No

No

No

No

0.02

263.28

2

5

0

70

No

No

No

No

1.52

242.23

1

5

0

71

No

No

No

No

1.10

233.23

2

6

0

72

No

No

No

No

0.97

243.22

1

6

0

73

No

No

No

No

0.81

234.21

1

6

0

74

No

No

No

N o

1.73

241.25

1

4

0

75

No

No

No

No

1.14

248.25

1

5

0

76

No

No

No

No

1.56

307.35

1

5

0

78

No

No

No

No

1.77

256.26

1

5

0

79

No

No

No

No

0.96

247.25

2

6

0

80

No

No

No

No

1.55

257.25

1

6

0

81

No

No

No

No

0.81

248.24

1

6

0

82

No

No

No

No

2.00

255.27

1

4

0

83

No

No

No

No

1.63

262.29

1

5

0

84

No

No

No

No

1.50

321.38

1

5

0

86

No

No

No

No

2.15

268.29

1

5

0

87

No

No

No

No

1.95

259.31

2

6

0

88

No

No

No

No

1.72

269.30

1

6

0

89

No

No

No

No

1.99

260.30

1

6

0

91

No

No

No

No

2.24

274.34

1

5

0

92

No

No

No

No

2.27

333.43

1

5

0

95

No

No

No

No

1.80

273.33

2

6

0

96

No

No

No

No

1.91

283.33

1

6

0

97

No

No

No

No

2.04

274.32

1

6

0

99

No

No

No

No

2.20

288.37

1

5

0

100

No

No

No

No

2.41

347.46

1

5

0

101

No

No

No

No

3.62

341.43

0

3

0

103

No

No

No

No

2.99

375.81

2

5

0

104

No

No

No

No

2.30

358.39

2

4

0

105

No

No

No

No

3.67

356.44

0

4

0

107

No

No

No

No

2.63

368.39

2

5

0

Molecular Docking

The ligands with good drug likeness properties and no toxicity were selected for molecular docking studies against AXL tyrosine kinase receptor (PDB ID: 5U6C).

Table No 3: Binding scores of ligands

S no

Compound code

AXL tyrosine kinase receptor 5U6C

1

A1

-8.32

2

A2

-7.42

3

A3

-6.73

4

A4

-7.3

5

A5

-8.3

6

A6

-6.9

7

A7

-6.73

8

A8

-7.55

9

A9

-7.92

10

A10

-8.01

11

A11

-8.54

12

A12

-8.05

13

A13

-8.05

14

A14

-8.52

15

A15

-7.68

16

A16

-8.28

17

A17

-9.79

18

A18

-7.45

19

A19

-6.82

20

A20

-7.41

21

A21

-9.21

22

A22

-7.58

23

A23

-7.29

24

A25

-8.99

25

A26

-8.3

26

A28

-8.27

27

A29

-8.47

28

A30

-8.26

29

A33

-8.74

30

A34

-7.86

31

A35

-7.46

32

A36

-8.74

33

A38

-7.41

34

A39

-6.77

35

A40

-7.38

36

A41

-8.24

37

A43

-7.33

38

A44

-6.76

39

A46

-7.42

40

A47

-8.84

41

A48

-8.3

42

A49

-7.83

43

A51

-7.41

44

A52

-8.77

45

A54

-8.75

46

A55

-8.42

47

A56

-9.03

48

A57

-8.48

49

A59

-7.91

50

A60

-7.07

51

A62

-7.92

52

A63

-6.61

53

A64

-7.02

54

A65

-7.27

55

A66

-7.35

56

A67

-7.68

57

A70

-6.84

58

A71

-9.22

59

A72

-8.27

60

A73

-7.01

61

A74

-7.97

62

A75

-8.24

63

A76

-8.45

64

A77

-8.12

65

A78

-9.0

66

A79

-7.64

67

A80

-8.57

68

A81

-8.65

69

A82

-7.86

70

A83

-8.7

71

A84

-8.56

72

A86

-8.32

73

A87

-8.4

74

A88

-8.08

75

A89

-7.23

76

A91

-6.9

77

A92

-7.09

78

A95

-7.36

79

A96

-7.89

80

A97

-8.36

81

A99

-7.21

82

A100

-8.8

83

A101

-9.38

84

A103

-10.1

85

A104

-11.11

86

A105

-10.66

87

A107

-10.2

88

5 Fluoro uracil

-7.33

Table No 4: Chemical structures of top-performing ligands based on docking scores

Lig No

Structure

A5

 

 

A11

 

 

A13

 

 

 

A16

 

 

A26

 

 

A101

 

A103

 

 

A104

 

 

A105

 

 

A107

 

 

 

5-Fluorouracil

 

 

 

Table No 5: Ligand-Receptor Binding Pose Visualisations

AXL Tyrosine Kinase Receptor

A5

 

 

 

 

A11

 

 

 

 

A13

 

 

 

 

A16

 

 

 

 

 

 

A26

 

 

 

 

A101

 

 

 

 

A103

 

 

 

 

A104

 

 

 

 

A105

 

 

 

 

 

A107

 

 

 

 

5-Fluorouracil

 

 

 

 

 

Table No 6: Ligand-Receptor Interactions

Lig Code

Hydrogen Bonding Axl Tyrosine Kinase Receptor

Lig 5

ASP 741

Lig 11

Met 647, ASP 741

Lig 13

ASP 678, PRO 672

Lig 16

ASP 678, Met 674

Lig 103

ASP 741

Lig 104

Met 650, LYS 619

Lig 107

PRO 672

5-Fluorouracil

LEU 724, ASP 723

CONCLUSION 

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains one of the most prevalent and lethal malignancies worldwide, necessitating the development of novel therapeutic strategies. AXL tyrosine kinase, a member of the TAM receptor family, has emerged as a crucial target due to its role in tumor progression, metastasis, immune evasion, and resistance to conventional therapies. The current study was designed to explore the potential of novel pyrimidine-based derivatives as AXL tyrosine kinase inhibitors using an integrated approach of computational drug design, synthesis, and biological evaluation. Through structure-based design, a virtual library of pyrimidine derivatives was developed and screened using molecular docking to identify candidates with high binding affinity for the AXL receptor. Promising ligands exhibited favorable ADMET properties and non-toxic profiles as predicted by in silico tools. Selected compounds were synthesized and are intended for further in-vitro evaluation against the HCT-116 colorectal cancer cell line.

REFERENCES

  1. Menon G. Cagir B. Colon Cancer. In: Stat Pearls [internet]. Treasure Island (FL) Stat Pearls Publishing, 2025 [cited 2025 Mar 22]. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470380/
  2. Duan B, Zhao Y, Bai J, Wang J, Duan X, Luo X, et al. Colorectal Cancer: An Overview. In: Morgado-Diaz JA, editor. Gastrointestinal Cancers (Internet). Brisbane (AU): Exon Publications: 2022 [cited 2025 Mar 23). Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK586003/
  3. Snyder C, Hampel H. Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Syndromes. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2019 Feb 35(1):58-78.
  4. Allen J. Sears CL. Impact of the gut microbiome on the genome and epigenome of colon epithelial cells contributions to colorectal cancer development. Genome Med. 2019 Feb 25,11(1):11
  5. Xu D, Sun D, Wang W, Peng X, Zhan Z, Ji Y, Shen Y, Geng M, Ai J, Duan W. Discovery of pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine derivatives as potent Axl inhibitors: Design, synthesis and biological evaluation. Eur J Med Chem. 2021 Aug 5;220:113497. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113497. Epub 2021 Apr 25. PMID: 33957388.
  6. Inoue S, Yamane Y, Tsukamoto S, Murai N, Azuma H, Nagao S, Nishibata K, Fukushima S, Ichikawa K, Nakagawa T, Hata Sugi N, Ito D, Kato Y, Goto A, Kakiuchi D, Ueno T, Matsui J, Matsushima T. Discovery of 5,6,7,8-tetrahydropyrido[3,4-d] pyrimidine derivatives as novel selective Axl inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2021 Sep 15;48:128247. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2021.128247. Epub 2021 Jul 13. PMID: 34271070.
  7. Advanced Chemistry Development (ACD/Labs). ACD/ChemSketch Freeware (version 2023.1.2) [software]. Toronto: Advanced Chemistry Development; 2023.
  8. 8.  CambridgeSoft Corporation. (version 19.0) [software]. Chem3D Cambridge: CambridgeSoft Corporation; 2023.
  9. UCLA-DOE Lab. SAVES v6.1: ProCheck [online]. 2023. Available from: https://saves.mbi.ucla.edu.
  10. Protein Data Bank. Protein Data Bank [online]. Available from: https://www.rcsb.org.
  11. Swiss ADME : Daina, A., Michielin, O., & Zoete, V. Swiss ADME : A Free Web Tool to Predict the Physical-Chemical Properties of Small Molecules. Sci. Rep. 2017; 7: 42717. Available from: https://www.Swiss ADME Ch.
  12. Osiris Property Available Explorer https://www.osirissoftware.com. [software]. from: https://www.osirissoftware.com.
  13. Trott, O., & Olson, A. J. Auto Dock Vina: Improving the Speed and Accuracy of Docking with a New Scoring Function, Efficient Optimization, and Multithreading. J. Compute. Chem. 2010; 31(2): 455-461. Auto Dock 1.5.6 [software]. Available from: https://autodock.scripps.edu, September 17, 2017
  14. Chen, J., Li, Z., & Xu, D. CB-Dock: A Web Server for Protein-Ligand Docking. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2020; 60(1): 44-48. Available from: https://cadd.bjmu.edu.cn/cbdock.
  15. Molegro. Molecular Molegro Viewer (MMV 2.5.0) [software]. Available from: https://www.molegro.com, October 10, 2012.

Reference

  1. Menon G. Cagir B. Colon Cancer. In: Stat Pearls [internet]. Treasure Island (FL) Stat Pearls Publishing, 2025 [cited 2025 Mar 22]. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470380/
  2. Duan B, Zhao Y, Bai J, Wang J, Duan X, Luo X, et al. Colorectal Cancer: An Overview. In: Morgado-Diaz JA, editor. Gastrointestinal Cancers (Internet). Brisbane (AU): Exon Publications: 2022 [cited 2025 Mar 23). Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK586003/
  3. Snyder C, Hampel H. Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Syndromes. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2019 Feb 35(1):58-78.
  4. Allen J. Sears CL. Impact of the gut microbiome on the genome and epigenome of colon epithelial cells contributions to colorectal cancer development. Genome Med. 2019 Feb 25,11(1):11
  5. Xu D, Sun D, Wang W, Peng X, Zhan Z, Ji Y, Shen Y, Geng M, Ai J, Duan W. Discovery of pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine derivatives as potent Axl inhibitors: Design, synthesis and biological evaluation. Eur J Med Chem. 2021 Aug 5;220:113497. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113497. Epub 2021 Apr 25. PMID: 33957388.
  6. Inoue S, Yamane Y, Tsukamoto S, Murai N, Azuma H, Nagao S, Nishibata K, Fukushima S, Ichikawa K, Nakagawa T, Hata Sugi N, Ito D, Kato Y, Goto A, Kakiuchi D, Ueno T, Matsui J, Matsushima T. Discovery of 5,6,7,8-tetrahydropyrido[3,4-d] pyrimidine derivatives as novel selective Axl inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2021 Sep 15;48:128247. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2021.128247. Epub 2021 Jul 13. PMID: 34271070.
  7. Advanced Chemistry Development (ACD/Labs). ACD/ChemSketch Freeware (version 2023.1.2) [software]. Toronto: Advanced Chemistry Development; 2023.
  8. 8.  CambridgeSoft Corporation. (version 19.0) [software]. Chem3D Cambridge: CambridgeSoft Corporation; 2023.
  9. UCLA-DOE Lab. SAVES v6.1: ProCheck [online]. 2023. Available from: https://saves.mbi.ucla.edu.
  10. Protein Data Bank. Protein Data Bank [online]. Available from: https://www.rcsb.org.
  11. Swiss ADME : Daina, A., Michielin, O., & Zoete, V. Swiss ADME : A Free Web Tool to Predict the Physical-Chemical Properties of Small Molecules. Sci. Rep. 2017; 7: 42717. Available from: https://www.Swiss ADME Ch.
  12. Osiris Property Available Explorer https://www.osirissoftware.com. [software]. from: https://www.osirissoftware.com.
  13. Trott, O., & Olson, A. J. Auto Dock Vina: Improving the Speed and Accuracy of Docking with a New Scoring Function, Efficient Optimization, and Multithreading. J. Compute. Chem. 2010; 31(2): 455-461. Auto Dock 1.5.6 [software]. Available from: https://autodock.scripps.edu, September 17, 2017
  14. Chen, J., Li, Z., & Xu, D. CB-Dock: A Web Server for Protein-Ligand Docking. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2020; 60(1): 44-48. Available from: https://cadd.bjmu.edu.cn/cbdock.
  15. Molegro. Molecular Molegro Viewer (MMV 2.5.0) [software]. Available from: https://www.molegro.com, October 10, 2012.

Photo
Archana S.
Corresponding author

Department Of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Photo
Guhan G.
Co-author

Department Of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Photo
Priyadharshini R.
Co-author

Department Of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Photo
Hanitha Mathanke J.
Co-author

Department Of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Priyadharshini R., Archana S.*, Guhan G., Hanitha Mathanke J., Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 6, 4443-4459. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15745638

More related articles
Method Development and Validation for Anti Diabeti...
Najiya Mansuri, Pratiksha Awari, Ziyaur Rahman, ...
Elucidation of Anti-Bacterial Potential of Argemon...
Sakshi Kothawade, Kuril Nandini, Mahadik Rohit, Atish Salunkhe, N...
Related Articles
Comprehensive Review on Amoxiclav in Different Clinical Condition...
Ramya G. S., J. S. Venkatesh, Supin P. Sabu, Sumaya S., ...
Formation And Characterization Of Silver Nanostructures From Limonia acidissima ...
Jatin Agarwal , Dr. Ashok Kumar Rajput, Akshanshu Patel, Sudhanshu Sagar, Shubham Rana, ...
Formulation and Evaluation Anal Inflammation (Hemorrhoids) Herbal Cream of Eupho...
Sujata Samant, Jija Lode, Priyanka Boratwar, Aishwary Kalbhut, Samir Pandhare, ...
A Systematic Review on Metformin...
Alwin Thomas, Bhoomika Keshavrao Malete , ...
Method Development and Validation for Anti Diabetic Drugs ...
Najiya Mansuri, Pratiksha Awari, Ziyaur Rahman, ...
More related articles
Method Development and Validation for Anti Diabetic Drugs ...
Najiya Mansuri, Pratiksha Awari, Ziyaur Rahman, ...
Elucidation of Anti-Bacterial Potential of Argemone Mexicana...
Sakshi Kothawade, Kuril Nandini, Mahadik Rohit, Atish Salunkhe, Namita Jadhav, Jitendra More, ...
Method Development and Validation for Anti Diabetic Drugs ...
Najiya Mansuri, Pratiksha Awari, Ziyaur Rahman, ...
Elucidation of Anti-Bacterial Potential of Argemone Mexicana...
Sakshi Kothawade, Kuril Nandini, Mahadik Rohit, Atish Salunkhe, Namita Jadhav, Jitendra More, ...