Vighnaharata Trust Shivajirao S. Jondhle College of Pharmacy, Asangaon, Shahapur, Thane, Maharashtra 421601
Nine fast-dissolving film formulations of Losartan Potassium were successfully developed using the solvent casting method, incorporating various grades of Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose (HPMC E5, E15, and E50) along with film modifiers to improve mechanical and physicochemical properties. The films were uniformly thin, flexible, elastic, smooth, and transparent, with consistent weights ranging from 16.14 ± 0.192 mg to 17.31 ± 0.313 mg, indicating reproducible formulation. Mechanical evaluation showed folding endurance values exceeding 150 folds across all formulations, confirming excellent flexibility and durability. Drug content analysis demonstrated uniform distribution of Losartan Potassium in the polymer matrix. In vitro dissolution studies revealed rapid drug release, with over 90% released within 5 minutes for all formulations. Notably, formulation F2 exhibited the highest release at 98.73% within the same timeframe. Based on drug release, uniformity, and disintegration performance, F2 was identified as the most promising formulation. Stability testing under accelerated conditions (40°C and 75% RH) showed no significant changes, confirming the films' physical and chemical stability. A comparative study with the marketed tablet LOSAR-25 highlighted the superior performance of F2, which released 98.73% of the drug in 4 minutes, while LOSAR-25 achieved only 90.76% release in 30 minutes. These findings suggest the developed films, particularly F2, offer rapid onset of action and improved drug delivery over conventional tablets. However, further in vivo studies are needed to confirm clinical efficacy and therapeutic advantage.
Oral administration is the most commonly accepted method for delivering therapeutic agents due to its low cost and ease of use, leading to high patient compliance. Approximately 60% of all dosage forms are oral solids, with tablets and capsules being the most prevalent. However, certain patient groups—such as geriatric, paediatric, and dysphagic individuals—often face challenges when swallowing these solid dosage forms.? Studies have highlighted that swallowing difficulties, known as dysphagia, are particularly prevalent among older adults. A meta-analysis found that 33.2% of nursing home residents experience swallowing disorders, with variations across regions and assessment methods. Similarly, research indicates that 26% of patients encounter difficulties swallowing tablets, with issues related to tablet size, shape, and taste being the most common complaints.?
These challenges are not limited to the elderly; paediatric patients also often struggle with swallowing pills, leading to reduced medication adherence. Factors such as tablet dimensions, palatability, and appearance significantly influence the acceptance of oral solid dosage forms among older adults. Innovative dosage forms, such as sprinkle formulations, orally disintegrating tablets (ODTs), and transformative dosage forms, have been developed to enhance patient compliance. Sprinkle formulations consist of granules that can be mixed with soft food, making them easier to swallow. ODTs dissolve quickly in the mouth without the need for water, benefiting patients with swallowing difficulties. Transformative dosage forms change from solid to semi-solid or liquid upon contact with water, further aiding those with dysphagia.1 ?
In summary, while oral solid dosage forms are widely used, it's essential to consider the unique needs of patients who experience swallowing difficulties. Developing and prescribing patient-centric formulations can significantly improve medication adherence and overall health outcomes?Fast-dissolving film systems present a promising alternative to traditional tablets, capsules, and syrups, especially for paediatric and geriatric patients who often experience difficulties swallowing conventional oral solid dosage forms. These films are designed to dissolve rapidly in the saliva, facilitating swift drug absorption and potentially enhancing bioavailability. This approach aims to address swallowing challenges, thereby improving patient compliance with prescribed therapies.?
Several studies have investigated the development of fast-dissolving oral films containing Losartan Potassium, an antihypertensive medication. For instance, research has demonstrated that such films can achieve rapid dissolution, leading to a quick onset of action in hypertension treatment. These formulations have been prepared using various polymers, including Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose (HPMC), Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA), and Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), employing the solvent casting method. The films have shown favourable characteristics such as smooth surfaces, appropriate folding endurance, and satisfactory drug release profiles, with up to 96% of the drug released within 5 minutes. Moreover, the inclusion of super disintegrants like Carboxymethyl Starch Sodium (CSS) and Crospovidone (CP) has been found to enhance the disintegration and dissolution rates of these films. For example, formulations containing 6% CSS have demonstrated disintegration times around 32 to 36 seconds and released 50% of the drug within approximately 8 to 10 minutes. ?
In summary, the development of fast mouth dissolving films containing Losartan Potassium holds significant potential for improving therapeutic outcomes in patients with swallowing difficulties. These formulations can offer rapid drug release, ease of administration, and enhanced patient compliance, particularly among paediatric and geriatric populations. However, further research and clinical evaluations are essential to fully establish their efficacy and safety profiles. Mouth dissolving films (MDFs), also known as oral thin films, are an innovative drug delivery system designed to rapidly disintegrate and dissolve in the oral cavity without the need for water. These films are thin, flexible strips that contain an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) along with film-forming polymers, plasticizers, sweeteners, and flavouring agents to enhance patient acceptability and compliance. MDFs are especially beneficial for paediatric, geriatric, and dysphagia patients who experience difficulty in swallowing conventional dosage forms like tablets or capsules.
Once placed on the tongue, the film dissolves within seconds, releasing the drug which is then absorbed either through the oral mucosa or swallowed for gastrointestinal absorption. This delivery system offers several advantages including a rapid onset of action, improved bioavailability in some cases, and ease of administration without water. Common methods of preparation include solvent casting and hot-melt extrusion. MDFs are evaluated for parameters such as film thickness, drug content uniformity, disintegration time, mechanical strength, and in vitro drug release. Due to their versatility and convenience, mouth dissolving films are gaining popularity in the pharmaceutical industry for delivering a wide range of therapeutic agents including analgesics, antihistamines, antiemetic’s, and cardiovascular drugs.2
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Applications:
Side effects:
Uses:
Drug profile:
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Materials:
Losartan Potassium and Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose (HPMC) grades E5, E15, and E50 were procured from Vishal Chem Products, located in Thane, India. Other reagents used in the study, including polyethylene glycol, Tween 80, xanthan gum, citric acid, and sodium saccharin, sodium starch Glycolate, were sourced from Shivajirao S. Jondhle College of Pharmacy, India.3
Methods:
Formulation of Mouth dissolving film of losartan potassium
Preparation of mouth-Dissolving Films Containing Losartan Potassium:
4. Film Harvesting and Storage7:
5. Incorporation of Excipients8:
Table 1. Formulation of mouth dissolving films of losartan potassium
Ingredients |
F1 |
F2 |
F3 |
F4 |
F5 |
F6 |
F7 |
F8 |
F9 |
Losartan Potassium (mg) |
400 |
400 |
400 |
400 |
400 |
400 |
400 |
400 |
400 |
HPMC E5 (mg) |
300 |
450 |
600 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
HPMC E15 (mg) |
- |
- |
- |
300 |
450 |
600 |
- |
- |
- |
HPMC E50 (mg) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
300 |
450 |
600 |
PEG 400 (mL) |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
Tween 80 (mL) |
0.75 |
0.75 |
0.75 |
0.75 |
0.75 |
0.75 |
0.75 |
0.75 |
0.75 |
Citric acid (mg) |
45 |
45 |
45 |
45 |
45 |
45 |
45 |
45 |
45 |
Xanthan Gum (mg) |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
Saccharin Sodium (mg) |
7.5 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
Sodium Starch Glycolate (mg) |
3.2 |
3.4 |
3.8 |
3.2 |
3.4 |
3.8 |
3.2 |
3.4 |
3.8 |
Distilled water (mL) |
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
Evaluation:
The prepared films were examined visually to assess their color, clarity, flexibility, and surface smoothness. Their morphology was analysed using a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)9.
The weight of fast-dissolving films (2×2 cm² in size) was measured to ensure consistency. Three different pieces from each batch were weighed using an electronic balance. The average weight was calculated to determine the typical weight of the films, and the standard deviation was computed to assess how much the weights varied from the average. A low standard deviation would indicate that the film weights are consistently close to the average, while a high standard deviation would suggest more variability10. ?
The thickness of a 2×2 cm² film was measured using a screw gauge, a precise instrument for measuring small dimensions. The measurement was taken at three different spots on the film to ensure accuracy. The screw gauge consists of a U-shaped frame with a spindle and a thimble; rotating the thimble moves the spindle, allowing for precise measurements. The average of these three measurements was then calculated to determine the film's typical thickness11.
A method for measuring the surface pH of fast-dissolving films to assess potential irritation risks when the films are used in the mouth. To perform this test, a 2×2 cm² film is placed in a Petri dish and moistened with 5 ml of distilled water. After allowing the film to swell at room temperature for 30 minutes, the surface pH is measured using a digital pH meter by bringing the electrode into contact with the film's surface and waiting for the reading to stabilize. This procedure helps determine if the film's pH is within a range that would be safe and non-irritating to the oral mucosa upon administration12.
Folding endurance measures the flexibility and durability of a film by determining how many times it can be folded at the same spot before breaking or cracking. To assess this, a 2×2 cm² film is repeatedly folded at the same location until it breaks. The number of folds the film withstands before breaking indicates its folding endurance value. Higher folding endurance values suggest greater mechanical strength and flexibility, which are important for the film's performance during handling and use13. ?
The percentage of moisture loss was determined by placing the fast-dissolving films in a desiccator containing anhydrous calcium chloride. After 72 hours, the films were removed and re-weighed. The percentage moisture loss was calculated using the formula
Moisture loss (%) = initial weight – final weight
Initial weight ×100
To determine the drug content in fast-dissolving films, a 4 cm² piece of the film is dissolved in 100 ml of phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) using a magnetic stirrer for 30 minutes. The resulting solution is then analysed using a spectrophotometer at 206 nm. Measurements are taken in triplicate, and the average drug content is calculated to ensure accuracy and reliability14.
Tensile strength and percentage elongation are important mechanical properties that assess the film's resistance to breaking under tension and its ability to stretch, respectively. To evaluate these properties, a standardized testing method, such as ASTM D882, is typically used. This involves applying a uniaxial tensile force to the film and measuring the force required to break the film (tensile strength) and the extent to which the film stretches before breaking (percentage elongation). These measurements provide valuable information about the film's suitability for its intended application15.?
Tensile strength =Break force/ab (1+ b ΔL/L)
A, b, L = width, thickness and length of the strip.
ΔL = elongation at break
The percent of elongation was mainly based on tensile strength of films. It was calculated by measuring the increase in length of the film after tensile strength using the formula,
Elongation (%) = Increase in length
Original length × 100
?In vitro disintegration time refers to the duration it takes for a film to break down when exposed to a specific medium, simulating conditions in the human mouth. This parameter is crucial for ensuring that oral films dissolve appropriately, enhancing patient compliance and effectiveness16.?
The drug release study was conducted using a USP dissolution apparatus (Basket Type XXIV). The procedure involved 900 ml of phosphate buffer (pH 6.8), maintained at 37 ±0.5 °C and stirred at 50 rpm. At specific time intervals, 5 ml samples were withdrawn and replaced with an equal volume of fresh buffer solution17. These samples were filtered using Whatman filter paper, diluted with buffer, and analysed using a UV spectrophotometer at 206 nm. The mechanism of drug release was evaluated by fitting the release data to the Higuchi and Korsmeyer-Peppas models18.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION:
A total of nine formulations were developed and evaluated based on various parameters. Among them, formulation F2 exhibited the best results. The appearance of the films was assessed visually to determine whether they were transparent or opaque. The prepared films were found to be thin, flexible, and elastic and smooth (Figure 1). The weight of the films varied from 15.87 ± 0.102 to 17.31 ± 0.313, indicating no significant variation among the different formulations (Table 2). This confirmed the uniformity of the films.
Table 2: Weight uniformity of formulation
Formulation Code |
Weight Uniformity (mg) |
F1 |
15.96 ± 0.116 |
F2 |
15.87 ± 0.102 |
F3 |
15.98 ± 0.128 |
F4 |
16.14 ± 0.192 |
F5 |
16.30 ± 0.208 |
F6 |
16.28 ± 0.214 |
F7 |
16.80 ± 0.298 |
F8 |
17.10 ± 0.301 |
F9 |
17.31 ± 0.313 |
Figure 1:- Appearance of the film
The thickness of all the formulations ranged between 0.19±0.0043 and 0.26±0.0024, indicating consistency in film uniformity. The surface pH of the films was found to be between 6.72 and 7.35, which is close to neutral, suggesting that the films are unlikely to cause any irritation to the oral mucosa (Table 3).
Table 3: Thickness, surface pH of formulations
Formulation Code |
Thickness (mm) |
Surface pH |
Folding Endurance |
F1 |
0.21 ± 0.0016 |
6.83 ± 0.0233 |
>150 |
F2 |
0.19 ± 0.0043 |
6.72 ± 0.0109 |
>150 |
F3 |
0.24 ± 0.0019 |
6.91 ± 0.0031 |
>150 |
F4 |
0.20 ± 0.0094 |
7.21 ± 0.1029 |
>150 |
F5 |
0.22 ± 0.0014 |
6.81 ± 0.0300 |
>150 |
F6 |
0.25 ± 0.0070 |
6.96 ± 0.0200 |
>150 |
F7 |
0.23 ± 0.0018 |
6.74 ± 0.0529 |
>150 |
F8 |
0.25 ± 0.0012 |
7.35 ± 0.1500 |
>150 |
F9 |
0.26 ± 0.0024 |
6.59 ± 0.1029 |
>150 |
The films underwent folding endurance testing to assess their flexibility. All formulations demonstrated a folding endurance greater than 150, indicating that the films possessed good flexibility and could withstand mechanical stress. Moisture loss studies (Table 4) revealed that formulation F9 had the highest moisture loss, while formulation F2 exhibited the lowest. The drug content across the formulations ranged from 92.73 ± 0.19% to 98.78 ± 0.64% (Table 4), which falls within the acceptable range, confirming uniform drug distribution.
In-vitro disintegration time studies (Table 4) indicated that all films formulated with various grades of HPMC E V disintegrated in under 50 seconds, which is within acceptable limits. An ideal fast mouth dissolving film requires balanced tensile strength and adequate elongation. Dissolution studies showed rapid drug release from all formulations, with more than 90% of Losartan Potassium released within 5 minutes. Among them, formulation F2 demonstrated the highest release (98.73%) within 5 minutes.
Considering drug release, drug content, and disintegration time, formulation F2 was identified as the most suitable and was chosen for stability studies. The results showed no significant changes in evaluation parameters before and after storage, all remaining within acceptable limits. The formulations exhibited good physical stability when stored at 40°C and 75% relative humidity. The data are presented in Table 5.
Table 4: Moisture loss, drug content and in vitro disintegration time, Tensile Strength and elongation of the formulations
Formulation Code |
Moisture Loss |
Drug Content |
In Vitro Disintegration Time (sec) |
Tensile Strength |
Elongation (%) |
F1 |
1.88 ± 0.34 |
96.46 ± 0.50 |
24 |
18.07 ± 0.2421 |
28.43 ± 0.9132 |
F2 |
1.37 ± 0.12 |
98.78 ± 0.64 |
20 |
14.20 ± 1.0201 |
21.10 ± 1.5300 |
F3 |
2.37 ± 0.28 |
95.81 ± 0.91 |
26 |
17.43 ± 0.0266 |
30.50 ± 1.6033 |
F4 |
2.21 ± 0.14 |
97.52 ± 1.20 |
25 |
17.81 ± 0.1532 |
21.84 ± 1.2833 |
F5 |
2.50 ± 0.46 |
94.62 ± 3.84 |
30 |
18.16 ± 0.2700 |
24.40 ± 0.4300 |
F6 |
2.58 ± 0.15 |
93.82 ± 0.88 |
32 |
18.59 ± 0.4132 |
19.58 ± 2.0366 |
F7 |
2.56 ± 0.22 |
96.93 ± 1.49 |
36 |
16.48 ± 0.2900 |
26.98 ± 0.4300 |
F8 |
2.88 ± 0.28 |
95.41 ± 0.54 |
38 |
17.54 ± 0.0632 |
29.43 ± 1.2466 |
F9 |
3.10 ± 0.14 |
92.73 ± 0.19 |
42 |
17.91 ± 0.1865 |
29.01 ± 1.1066 |
The in vitro drug release profiles of all the formulations is shown in (Figure 2).
Figure 2: In vitro drug release profiles of formulations F1 – F9
Table 5: Stability studies of the best formulation
Time (days) |
Physical Appearance |
Folding Endurance |
Surface pH |
Drug Content (%) |
Drug Release (%) |
0 |
No change |
154–157?±?1.2 |
6–7 |
97.02?±?1.3 |
98.73?±?1.6 |
45 |
No change |
151–153?±?1.1 |
6–7 |
96.43?±?1.0 |
96.78?±?1.1 |
The in vitro dissolution profile of the marketed Losartan Potassium product (LOSAR-25) is illustrated in Figure 3. The results indicate that formulation F2 achieved 98.73% drug release within 5 minutes, whereas the marketed product LOSAR-25 released 90.76% of the drug over a period of 30 minutes.
Figure 3: The in vitro drug release profile of marketed product LOSAR 25
The surface morphology of the selected film, F2, was examined using SEM to assess drug distribution. The analysis clearly showed that formulation F2 exhibited a uniform dispersion of the drug, as illustrated in Figure 4.
Figure 4: SEM image of the Formulation F2
CONCLUSION:
Losartan Potassium fast dissolving films were specifically developed as a novel drug delivery system aimed at overcoming the limitations associated with the drug’s extensive first-pass metabolism and inherently low oral bioavailability. By formulating the drug into a fast dissolving film, the intention was to facilitate rapid absorption through the oral mucosa, thereby potentially enhancing therapeutic efficacy and achieving quicker onset of action. Comprehensive in vitro evaluations revealed that the formulation exhibits promising physicochemical stability, satisfactory mechanical properties, and efficient drug release profiles, all of which support its potential utility in clinical applications. Nevertheless, while the in vitro data are encouraging and provide a strong foundation for further development, it remains imperative to conduct extensive in vivo studies. These investigations are necessary to validate the observed in vitro performance, confirm the pharmacokinetic advantages, and ensure the overall safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability of this drug delivery approach.
REFERENCES
Devesh Kolte, Tejashree Kuwlekar, Shravani Lokhande, Aishwarya Manthal, Shivani Mhasal, Akash Nalawade, Swati Wakchoure, Formulation And Evaluation of Mouth Dissolving Film of Losartan Potassium, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 7, 2739-2749. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16153167