View Article

Abstract

A simple, accurate, precise, and robust reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) method was developed and validated for the simultaneous estimation of Decitabine and Cedazuridine in pharmaceutical dosage form. Chromatographic separation was achieved on a C18 column using a mobile phase consisting of methanol and potassium dihydrogen phosphate buffer (70:30 v/v) with pH adjusted to 4.0. The flow rate was maintained at 1.0 mL/min and detection was carried out at 240 nm using a UV detector. Decitabine and Cedazuridine were well resolved with retention times of approximately 3.83 and 6.20 minutes, respectively. The developed method was validated in accordance with ICH Q2(R1) guidelines for parameters including specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, robustness, limit of detection (LOD), and limit of quantification (LOQ). The method showed good linearity over the concentration range of 5–30 µg/mL for both drugs, with correlation coefficients greater than 0.998. Accuracy studies demonstrated satisfactory recovery values, indicating the reliability of the method. Precision studies revealed low %RSD values, confirming good repeatability and intermediate precision. The LOD and LOQ values indicated adequate sensitivity of the method. Robustness studies showed that small deliberate variations in chromatographic conditions did not significantly affect the results. The validated RP-HPLC method was successfully applied for the assay of Decitabine and Cedazuridine in marketed pharmaceutical formulations. The proposed method is simple, rapid, cost-effective, and suitable for routine quality control analysis.

Keywords

Decitabine; Cedazuridine; RP-HPLC; Method Development; Method Validation; Pharmaceutical Dosage Form

Introduction

Decitabine is a hypomethylating agent widely used in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia due to its ability to inhibit DNA methyltransferase, resulting in reactivation of tumor suppressor genes. However, its clinical application is limited by rapid degradation caused by cytidine deaminase. Cedazuridine, a cytidine deaminase inhibitor, is co-administered with decitabine to enhance its oral bioavailability and therapeutic effectiveness. The fixed-dose combination of Decitabine and Cedazuridine has gained significant importance in modern anticancer therapy, necessitating reliable analytical methods for quality control and regulatory compliance.1

Figure 1: Components of HPLC 3

Accurate quantification of active pharmaceutical ingredients in combined dosage forms is a critical requirement during drug development, manufacturing, and routine quality assurance. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is one of the most preferred analytical techniques for such purposes due to its high sensitivity, precision, and reproducibility.2 Although several analytical methods have been reported for the individual estimation of Decitabine and Cedazuridine, limited validated methods are available for their simultaneous estimation in combined pharmaceutical dosage forms.3

Figure 2: Components in a UV-Vis spectroscopy 4

Therefore, there is a need to develop a simple, rapid, and cost-effective RP-HPLC method capable of simultaneously estimating Decitabine and Cedazuridine with adequate resolution and accuracy. The present study aims to develop and validate a robust RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of Decitabine and Cedazuridine in pharmaceutical dosage form in accordance with ICH Q2(R1) guidelines. The developed method is intended to be suitable for routine quality control analysis and formulation assessment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemicals and Reagents:

  • Decitabine (working standard) – obtained from a certified pharmaceutical supplier.
  • Cedazuridine (working standard) – obtained from a certified pharmaceutical supplier.
  • Marketed formulation (tablet or capsule containing fixed-dose combination of Decitabine and Cedazuridine), if available.
  • Methanol (HPLC Grade) – purchased from Merck.
  • Acetonitrile (HPLC Grade) – purchased from Merck.
  • Water (Milli-Q or HPLC Grade) – prepared using a Millipore system.
  • Buffer: Potassium dihydrogen phosphate or suitable buffer for pH adjustment.
  • Orthophosphoric acid (AR Grade) – for pH adjustment.
  • Whatman filter paper (0.45 µm) – for filtration before injection.

Instrumentation :

Chromatographic analysis was performed using a Shimadzu LC-2030 HPLC system equipped with a quaternary pump, autosampler, UV–Visible detector, and LabSolutions software. A Kromasil C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm particle size) was used for separation. A calibrated pH meter (Mettler Toledo), analytical balance, and ultrasonic bath were used for sample preparation.  

Table No. 1 List of instruments

Sr. No.

Name of Equipment’s/ Instruments

Model /Specification

Manufacturer

1

 

HPLC

LC2030

Shimadzu

(I Prominence Plus)

Pump

PU2030

Sample Injection Port

Autosampler

UV/Vis Detector

UV 2030 plus

Software

LabSoltuion

2

pH Meter

F20

Mettler Toledo

3

Balance

AY-120

Mettler Toledo

4

Sonicator

UCB-40

Rolex

5

Deep Freezer

-

Blue Star

6

Refrigerator

-

Godrej

Chromatographic Conditions

Separation was achieved on a C18 column using a mobile phase consisting of methanol and potassium dihydrogen phosphate buffer in the ratio of 70:30 (v/v), with the pH adjusted to 4.0 using orthophosphoric acid. The mobile phase was filtered and degassed prior to use. The flow rate was maintained at 1.0 mL/min and detection was carried out at 240 nm. The injection volume was 20 µL and the analysis was performed at ambient temperature. 7

Preparation of Standard Solutions

Accurately weighed quantities of Decitabine and Cedazuridine working standards were transferred to a volumetric flask and dissolved in the mobile phase. The volume was adjusted with the same solvent to obtain stock solutions. Appropriate dilutions were made from the stock solutions using the mobile phase to obtain working standard solutions within the linearity range. 8

Figure 3: Typical chromatogram of Standard

Preparation of Sample Solution

An accurately weighed quantity of the marketed formulation equivalent to the labeled amount of Decitabine and Cedazuridine was transferred into a volumetric flask containing mobile phase. The solution was sonicated for complete extraction of the drugs and diluted to volume with mobile phase. The resulting solution was filtered through a 0.45 µm membrane filter and further diluted to obtain the required concentration for analysis.

Figure 4: Typical chromatogram of Sample

Method Validation

The developed RP-HPLC method was validated in accordance with ICH Q2(R1) guidelines. Validation parameters included specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), robustness, and system suitability. Linearity was evaluated by analyzing standard solutions at different concentration levels and constructing calibration curves. Accuracy was assessed by recovery studies at different concentration levels. Precision was evaluated in terms of repeatability and intermediate precision, and robustness was studied by making small deliberate changes in chromatographic conditions.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Method Development and Optimization

The RP-HPLC method was systematically optimized to achieve efficient separation of Decitabine and Cedazuridine with good peak shape, resolution, and acceptable retention times. Several mobile phase compositions were evaluated using different ratios of organic solvents and aqueous phases. Initial trials using acetonitrile–water and methanol–water combinations resulted in poor resolution and peak splitting for one or both drugs. Optimization of the mobile phase composition and pH led to the selection of methanol and potassium dihydrogen phosphate buffer (70:30 v/v) adjusted to pH 4.0, which provided symmetrical peaks, adequate theoretical plates, and satisfactory resolution between the analytes.

Figure 5: Typical Chromatogram Trial 6

Table No.2: Chromatographic Condition for Trial-6

Mobile phase

Sodium phosphate buffer: Methanol : Acetonitrile (20:40:40 v/v/v) pH adjusted to 3.5

Selection of column

Kromasil C18 (4.6mm x 250mm, 5µ particle size) column

Flow rate

1.0 ml/min

Column temperature

Room Temperature

Detection wavelength

240nm

Conclusion

Good Peak Properties, Less retention time and great resolution in both peak,

Optimized Chromatographic condition.

Chromatographic separation on a Kromasil C18 column under optimized conditions resulted in well-resolved peaks with retention times of approximately 3.83 minutes for Decitabine and 6.20 minutes for Cedazuridine. The total run time was short, making the method suitable for routine quality control analysis.

Specificity

Specificity of the method was confirmed by analyzing blank, standard, and sample solutions. No interfering peaks were observed at the retention times of Decitabine and Cedazuridine, indicating that common excipients present in the pharmaceutical formulation did not interfere with the analysis. The method demonstrated its ability to unequivocally assess both analytes in the presence of formulation components.

Table 3: Specificity of Decitabine

Specificity

Sample

Label Claim (mg)

Amount Found

Recovery

Retention Time

Infusion

44

43.91

99.79545

3.831

Infusion

100

99.91

99.91

6.201

Linearity

Linearity was evaluated over a concentration range of 5–30 µg/mL for both Decitabine and Cedazuridine. Calibration curves were constructed by plotting peak area versus concentration. A linear relationship was observed across the studied range with correlation coefficients (R²) of 0.999 for Decitabine and 0.998 for Cedazuridine, demonstrating excellent linearity of the method.

Table 4: Linearity of Decitabine and Cedazuridine

Sr. No.

Injection

Peak Area

Concentration

(µg/ml)

Decitabine

Concentration

(µg/ml)

Cedazuridine

1

1

12

1425368

5

986476

2

2

24

2850736

10

1972952

3

3

36

4226104

15

2909428

4

4

48

5701472

20

3945904

5

5

60

7126840

25

4932380

6

6

72

8552208

30

5918856

Figure 6: Calibration Curve of Decitabine

Figure 7: Calibration Curve of Cedazuridine

Accuracy

Accuracy of the method was assessed by recovery studies using the standard addition technique at different concentration levels. The percentage recovery values for both drugs were found to be within acceptable limits, indicating that the method is accurate and free from matrix interference. The low variability in recovery results further confirms the reliability of the proposed method.

Table 5: Recovery study for Decitabine

Accuracy

Sr. No

Concentration (μg/mL)

Peak area

Found Concentration (μg/mL)

% Recovery

1

38.4

4549059.2

38.39

99.97

2

48

5686324

47.99

99.98

3

57.6

2843162

57.69

100.15

Table 6: Recovery study for Cedazuridine

Accuracy

Sr. No

Concentration (μg/mL)

Peak area

Found Concentration (μg/mL)

% Recovery

1

16

3144604.8

15.99

99.92

2

20

3930756

19.99

99.95

3

24

4716907.2

24.09

100.36

Precision

Precision of the method was evaluated in terms of repeatability (intra-day precision) and intermediate precision (inter-day precision). The %RSD values obtained for both drugs were less than 2%, demonstrating good precision and reproducibility of the method under normal operating conditions.

Table 7: Intra Day & Inter Day Precision of Decitabine

Precision

Sr. No

Concentration (μg/mL)

Intraday

Interday

1

48

5706977

5756977

2

48

5699828

5767178

3

48

5704507

5828392

4

48

5685800

5843862

5

48

5756719

5853760

6

48

5704460

5863641

Average

5709715.2

5818968

Standard Deviation

22140.80

41712.85

RSD%

0.3878

0.717

Table 8: Intra Day & Inter Day Precision of Cedazuridine

Precision

Sr. No

Concentration (μg/mL)

Intraday

Interday

1

20

3951409

4001409

2

20

3944260

4011610

3

20

3948939

4072824

4

20

3930232

4088294

5

20

4001151

4098192

6

20

3948892

4108073

Average

5709715.2

3954147.2

Standard Deviation

22140.80

22140.80

RSD%

0.3878

0.5599

Limit of Detection and Limit of Quantification

The sensitivity of the method was determined by calculating the limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ). The LOD values were found to be 0.6280 µg/mL for Decitabine and 0.3779 µg/mL for Cedazuridine, while the LOQ values were 1.9029 µg/mL and 1.1451 µg/mL, respectively. These results indicate that the method is sufficiently sensitive for the estimation of both drugs in pharmaceutical dosage forms.

LOD=3.3σS…………….. equation 1

Where, σ – standard deviation

            S – Slope of calibration curve

LOQ=10 σS …………….. equation 2

Where, σ – standard deviation

            S – Slope of calibration curve

Table 9: LOD & LOQ of Decitabine and Cedazuridine

LOD & LOQ

1

LOD (μg/mL)

0.6280

0.3779

2

LOQ (μg/mL)

1.9029

1.1451

Robustness

Robustness was evaluated by making small deliberate variations in chromatographic conditions such as flow rate, mobile phase composition, and detection wavelength. These changes did not produce significant variations in retention time or peak area, confirming the robustness and reliability of the developed method.

Table 10: Robustness of Decitabine

Robustness

Sr. No

Parameter

Response

Parameter

Response

Methanol: Potassium Di. Phosphate buffer

Retention Time (min)

Detection Wavelength

Peak Area

(V/V)

(nm)

1

69

31

3.734

238

5643345

2

70

30

3.831

240

5701660

3

71

29

3.93

242

5734924

Average

3.832

Average

5693310

Standard Deviation

0.080

Standard Deviation

37850.36

RSD%

2.088

RSD%

0.665

Flow Rate

Retention Time (min)

pH of Buffer

Peak Area

(mL/min)

(mmol/L)

1

0.9

3.962

3.8

5729732

2

1

3.831

4

5701833

3

1.1

3.8269

4.2

5626212

Average

3.873

Average

5685926

Standard Deviation

0.0627

Standard Deviation

43733.13

RSD%

1.620

RSD%

0.7691

Table 11: Robustness of Cedazuridine

Robustness

Sr. No

Parameter

Response

Parameter

Response

Methanol: Potassium Di. Phosphate buffer

Retention Time (min)

Detection Wavelength

Peak Area

(V/V)

(nm)

1

69

31

6.104

238

3887777

2

70

30

6.201

240

3946092

3

71

29

6.3

242

3979356

Average

6.202

Average

3937742

Standard Deviation

0.080

Standard Deviation

37850.36

RSD%

1.290

RSD%

0.961

Flow Rate

Retention Time (min)

pH of Buffer

Peak Area

(mL/min)

(mmol/L)

1

0.9

6.332

3.8

3974164

2

1

6.201

4

3946265

3

1.1

6.1969

4.2

3870644

Average

6.243

Average

3930358

Standard Deviation

0.0627

Standard Deviation

43733.13

RSD%

1.005

RSD%

1.1127

Application to Pharmaceutical Formulation

The validated RP-HPLC method was successfully applied to the assay of Decitabine and Cedazuridine in marketed pharmaceutical formulations. The assay results were found to be within acceptable limits, confirming the suitability of the method for routine quality control analysis.

CONCLUSION

A simple, accurate, precise, and robust RP-HPLC method was successfully developed and validated for the simultaneous estimation of Decitabine and Cedazuridine in pharmaceutical dosage form. The optimized chromatographic conditions provided good separation, acceptable retention times, and satisfactory peak symmetry for both drugs. The method was validated in accordance with ICH Q2(R1) guidelines and demonstrated excellent linearity, accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and robustness. The validated method was effectively applied to the analysis of marketed formulations, confirming its suitability for routine quality control and formulation analysis. Owing to its simplicity, rapid analysis time, and cost-effectiveness, the proposed RP-HPLC method can be reliably employed in pharmaceutical quality assurance laboratories.

REFERENCES

  1. Kar A. Pharmaceutical Drug Analysis. 2nd ed. New Delhi: New Age International Publishers; 2005. p. 452–474.
  2. Sethi PD. Quantitative Analysis of Drugs in Pharmaceutical Formulations. 3rd ed. New Delhi: CBS Publishers and Distributors; 1997. p. 17–19.
  3. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Dolan JW. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2010.
  4. ICH Q2(R1). Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology. Geneva: International Council for Harmonisation; 2005.
  5. Bakshi M, Singh S. Development of validated stability-indicating assay methods—critical review. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2002;28(6):1011–1040.
  6. Blessy M, Patel RD, Prajapati PN, Agrawal YK. Development of forced degradation and stability-indicating studies of drugs. J Pharm Anal. 2014;4(3):159–165.
  7. Rao RN, Nagaraju V. An overview of the recent trends in stability-indicating HPLC methods for pharmaceutical analysis. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2003;33(3):335–377.
  8. Trivedi RK, Patel MC. Development and validation of RP-HPLC methods for pharmaceutical analysis. J AOAC Int. 2011;94(3):908–914.
  9. Issa JP, Kantarjian HM. Targeting DNA methylation. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(12):3938–3946.
  10. Momparler RL. Pharmacology of decitabine. Clin Epigenetics. 2015;7:1–9.
  11. Kantarjian H, Issa JP, Rosenfeld CS, et al. Decitabine improves patient outcomes in myelodysplastic syndromes. Cancer. 2006;106(8):1794–1803.
  12. Savona MR, Odenike O, Amrein PC, et al. An oral fixed-dose combination of decitabine and cedazuridine in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2020;136(6):674–683.
  13. Laille E, Nie J, Ward P, et al. Pharmacokinetics of oral decitabine with cedazuridine. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2020;9(6):737–746.
  14. United States Pharmacopeial Convention. United States Pharmacopeia–National Formulary (USP–NF). Rockville (MD): USP Convention; 2022.
  15. European Medicines Agency. Assessment Report: Decitabine/Cedazuridine. EMA; 2021.

Reference

  1. Kar A. Pharmaceutical Drug Analysis. 2nd ed. New Delhi: New Age International Publishers; 2005. p. 452–474.
  2. Sethi PD. Quantitative Analysis of Drugs in Pharmaceutical Formulations. 3rd ed. New Delhi: CBS Publishers and Distributors; 1997. p. 17–19.
  3. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Dolan JW. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2010.
  4. ICH Q2(R1). Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology. Geneva: International Council for Harmonisation; 2005.
  5. Bakshi M, Singh S. Development of validated stability-indicating assay methods—critical review. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2002;28(6):1011–1040.
  6. Blessy M, Patel RD, Prajapati PN, Agrawal YK. Development of forced degradation and stability-indicating studies of drugs. J Pharm Anal. 2014;4(3):159–165.
  7. Rao RN, Nagaraju V. An overview of the recent trends in stability-indicating HPLC methods for pharmaceutical analysis. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2003;33(3):335–377.
  8. Trivedi RK, Patel MC. Development and validation of RP-HPLC methods for pharmaceutical analysis. J AOAC Int. 2011;94(3):908–914.
  9. Issa JP, Kantarjian HM. Targeting DNA methylation. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(12):3938–3946.
  10. Momparler RL. Pharmacology of decitabine. Clin Epigenetics. 2015;7:1–9.
  11. Kantarjian H, Issa JP, Rosenfeld CS, et al. Decitabine improves patient outcomes in myelodysplastic syndromes. Cancer. 2006;106(8):1794–1803.
  12. Savona MR, Odenike O, Amrein PC, et al. An oral fixed-dose combination of decitabine and cedazuridine in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2020;136(6):674–683.
  13. Laille E, Nie J, Ward P, et al. Pharmacokinetics of oral decitabine with cedazuridine. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2020;9(6):737–746.
  14. United States Pharmacopeial Convention. United States Pharmacopeia–National Formulary (USP–NF). Rockville (MD): USP Convention; 2022.
  15. European Medicines Agency. Assessment Report: Decitabine/Cedazuridine. EMA; 2021.

Photo
Dattatray Yadav
Corresponding author

Rajgad Dnyanpeeth's College of Pharmacy, Bhor, Pune 412206, India

Photo
Dr. Deepak Kardile
Co-author

Rajgad Dnyanpeeth's College of Pharmacy, Bhor, Pune 412206, India

Photo
Dr. Vishwas Bhagat
Co-author

Rajgad Dnyanpeeth's College of Pharmacy, Bhor, Pune 412206, India

Photo
Tushar Shinde
Co-author

Rajgad Dnyanpeeth's College of Pharmacy, Bhor, Pune 412206, India

Photo
Dr. Rajkumar Shete
Co-author

Rajgad Dnyanpeeth's College of Pharmacy, Bhor, Pune 412206, India

Dattatray Yadav, Dr. Deepak Kardile, Dr. Vishwas Bhagat, Tushar Shinde, Dr. Rajkumar Shete, Development and Validation of RP-HPLC Method for the Simultaneous Estimation of Decitabine and Cedazuridine in Pharmaceutical Dosage Form, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 12, 3377-3386. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18017106

More related articles
Connection between chronic kidney disease and non ...
Majedul Hoque, Shuvo Nath Saha, Taharat Akram, Kazi Emon, ...
A Review On Phytochemical And Pharmacological Aspe...
Prabhu Dayal Rajan, Pradeep Kumar Sharma, ...
From Traditional Medicine to Modern Therapeutics: ...
Jeevan kore, Shruti Gadhave, Shruti Gaikwad, Akshata Pawar, Viras...
Mechanistic Insights into Punicalagin’s Cytotoxic Effects on Lung Cancer Cells...
Keshav Bondre , Princess Wankhade, Ajay Turke, R. Ganjiwale, Bhushan Gandhare, ...
Extensive Study of Formulation and Bryophyllum Pinnatum Plant...
Siddhesh Gaikwad, Sipora Gaikwad, Rushikesh Gagre, Prachi Desai, Pallavi Patil, Vaishnav Khadre, ...
Related Articles
3D Bio Printed Implants: Combining Dosage Form with Bone Tissue Engineering...
Pooja Lohakane, Disha Kandalkar, Bhagyashri Murtadak, Janvi Joshi, Sonali Kote, ...
Evaluation Of Jamun-Based Polyherbal Formulations for Wound Healing By In Vitro ...
Dr. Bela Nabar, Neha Ailani, Dr. Suhas Abhyankar, Dr. Narendra Pendse, Renu Jaisinghani, Dr. Manju L...
Connection between chronic kidney disease and non alcoholic fatty liver disease ...
Majedul Hoque, Shuvo Nath Saha, Taharat Akram, Kazi Emon, ...
More related articles
Connection between chronic kidney disease and non alcoholic fatty liver disease ...
Majedul Hoque, Shuvo Nath Saha, Taharat Akram, Kazi Emon, ...
From Traditional Medicine to Modern Therapeutics: A Review of The Phytochemical ...
Jeevan kore, Shruti Gadhave, Shruti Gaikwad, Akshata Pawar, Virashree Awati, Samyakraj Ghuge, ...
Connection between chronic kidney disease and non alcoholic fatty liver disease ...
Majedul Hoque, Shuvo Nath Saha, Taharat Akram, Kazi Emon, ...
From Traditional Medicine to Modern Therapeutics: A Review of The Phytochemical ...
Jeevan kore, Shruti Gadhave, Shruti Gaikwad, Akshata Pawar, Virashree Awati, Samyakraj Ghuge, ...