View Article

  • Formulation and Evaluation of Liquid Self Micro Emulsifying Drug Delivery System of Trimipramine Maleate to Enhance Aqueous Solubility

  • Centre for Pharmaceutical Sciences, JNTUH University College of Engineering, Science and Technology, Hyderabad, Kukatpally, Telangana 500085

Abstract

Present research work was aimed to enhance aqueous solubility and dissolution rate of Trimipramine maleate by self micro emulsifying drug delivery system(SMEDDS), 40% of drugs in market are lipophilic having poor aqueous solubility and oral bioavailability with reduced dissolution rate, SMEDDS is a novel approach for enhancement of aqueous solubility, bioavailability and dissolution rate. Trimipramine maleate is a BCS class II drug having 65% oral bioavailability; it is used in the treatment of depression. Oils, Surfactants, Co surfactants were selected depending upon the saturated solubility of Trimipramine maleate in those components; excipients were screened depending on Trimipramine maleate solubility in various oils, surfactants and co surfactants. Surfactant: co surfactant {Smix} ratios i.e., 1:4 and 4:1 were prepared to determine micro emulsion regions and also to formulate liquid self micro emulsifying drug delivery system (L-SMEDDS). Pseudo ternary phase diagram were plotted by using Triplot version 4.1.2 software, micro emulsion region was determined and evaluated. Formulations were designed based on saturated solubility of Trimipramine maleate and Pseudo ternary phase diagram using various ratios of oils [Capryol 90], surfactants [Labrasol], co surfactants [Transcutol] depending on its solubility and micro emulsion formation two formulations were developed which are further selected for characterisation of L-SMEDDS like thermodynamic stability studies , self emulsification, determination of droplet size, PDI, zeta potential and also Invitro drug release. Among those two formulations, F1 (CL1T4 2:8) was optimum because compared to F2 (CL4T1 1:9) formulation F1 gave best results in terms of droplet size (250.3 d.nm) with PDI (0.390). The results of present study demonstrates that Trimipramine maleate SMEDDS has an ability and potential to enhance solubility and dissolution rate.

Keywords

Trimipramine maleate, L-SMEDDS, oils, surfactants, co surfactants, pseudo ternary phase diagram.

Introduction

Oral route is most convenient route for non- invasive administration; mostly 40% of drugs are lipophilic in nature having poor aqueous solubility, oral bioavailability and dissolution rate. There are various methods to enhance solubility and dissolution rate they are co solvency, reduction of particle size, salt formation, hydrotrophy etc.., a novel approach has been introduced to enhance solubility and dissolution rate i.e., self emulsifying drug delivery system, which can be classified as nano emulsifying drug delivery system and micro emulsifying drug delivery system.

Solubility plays a key role in the therapeutic efficacy and bioavailability, solubility is defined as amount of solute dissolved or solubilised in a given solvent is termed as solubility.13, 20

    1. SELF MICRO EMULSIFYING DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM:

Self-emulsifying drug delivery system [SEDDS] is a novel approach to enhance aqueous solubility and dissolution rate. It is defined as isotropic mixtures of oils, surfactants and co surfactants some time includes co solvents upon administration which will spontaneously emulsified under mild agitation in GIT.5

SMEDDS can form oil in water emulsion spontaneously in GIT; SMEDDS are more stable and effective when compared to normal emulsions. SEDDS ranges about 300nm to 5µm, depending upon droplet size SEDDS are divided into SMEDDS (self micro emulsifying drug delivery system) with a droplet size of 250nm to 300nm and SNEDDS (self nano emulsifying drug delivery system) with a droplet of < 100nm or 100 to 150nm.14, 27

Oral route is convenient route of administration and widely used route, it is cost effective but 40% of drugs in market are lipophilic and these dosage forms will depends upon various factors like solubility, permeability, dissolution rate and oral bioavailability.2

1.2 LIPID CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM:

Lipids are employed in SNEDDS formulation to enhance solubility, dissolution rate of drugs. Lipid classification system was developed by Pouton based on their composition as given below.

TYPE I: Lipids without any surfactants, oil based systems.

TYPE II: System with water insoluble surfactants these will forms SEDDS formulation systems.

TYPE III: System with water soluble surfactants these will forms SMEDDS or SNEDDS formulation systems.

TYPE IV: System with water soluble surfactants and co solvents, systems are oil free.14

1.3 MECHANISM OF SELF EMULSIFICATION:

Mechanism of self-emulsification was explained by REISS and WAKERLY.

According to REISS self-emulsification can be achieved by entropy change which causes dispersion which is greater than energy required to increase surface area of dispersion.

Free energy of emulsion is a direct function of energy which creates interface between oil and water phases which can be expressed by an equation as given below:

?g =∑n ∏r2s

Where: ?g = Free energy associated with process

            ∑n = Number of droplets

               r = Radius of droplets

               s = Interfacial energy       

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1 Materials:

Trimipramine maleate was obtained as gift sample from R.L.Fine chem., (Banglore, India). Capryol 90 ,Peceol , Capmul PG-8NF , Labrasol , Transcutol were donated by Gattefosse (Mumbai, India), were Almond oil donated by Hamdard Laboratories, Capmul MCM NF, Capmul PG8 , Capmul MCM C8 Ep,Captex 200 ,Labrafac PG ,Maisine CC were donated by Abitec corporation, Span 80 was donated by Research Lab Fine chem Industries , Tween 80 was donated by Oxford laboratory , PEG-400 was donated by SD Fine chem Limited, Hydrochloric acid was donated by Virat labs,mumbai and Methanol was donated by Qualigens.

2.2 Determination of Analytical methods:

Analytical methods employed in this study are UV Visible spectroscopy. UV spectroscopy used for determination of calibration curve, solubility analysis of excipients with drug (Trimipramine maleate), Determination of percentage transmittance, assay and also dissolution studies of formulation.

Trimipramine maleate is analyzed by Shimadzu UV 1800 double beam spectrophotometer shown in figure no 01.

Figure no: 01 Shimadzu UV 1800 spectrophotometer.

2.2.1 Spectrophotometric analysis of Trimipramine maleate in methanol:

2.2.1.1 Standard stock solution preparation of Trimipramine maleate in methanol:

Accurately weighed 10mg of Trimipramine maleate transferred into 10ml of volumetric flask, dissolved in methanol and volume will be made up to 10ml.

2.2.1.2 Determination of λmax of Trimipramine maleate in methanol:

After preparation of standard stock solution, from standard stock solutions 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 ppm was prepared using methanol as analytical solvent. Absorbance was noted by analyzing concentrations in UV visible spectrophotometer, absorbance was scanned from 400-200nm wavelength. Spectrum shows absorbance maxima (λmax) at 250nm, this wavelength was utilised for further analysis present in the study.

2.2.1.3 Calibration curve of Trimipramine maleate in methanol:

Standard stock solutions were prepared with concentration 2, 4, 6, 8,10 ppm using methanol as a solvent. Absorbance was measured at 250nm wavelength and standard plot was drawn by obtained data (i.e., absorbance and concentration), Slope, Regression and correlation was determined. The equation is given along with plot in figure no 02.2,9

3. Solubility studies:

Solubility studies of Trimipramine maleate was determined in various oils, surfactants and co surfactants, Excess amount of drug added to 500mg of excipients contained in a glass vial. Mixture was then cyclomixed for 2 minutes using cyclomixer to enhance drug solubility. Mixtures were sonicated for 5-10 min to dissolve drug completely. Resultant mixtures were kept for equilibrium at room temperature in a mechanical rotary shaker at a speed of 100rpm for 72 hours.2

After 72 hours mixtures were centrifuged at 3000rpm for 15-20 minutes, these will separate dissolved drug as supernatant phase and undissolved drug as sediment phase take 0.1 ml of supernatant by utilising micropipette, supernatant were diluted with methanol which is used as a co solvent the concentrations of Trimipramine maleate in each excipient was determined spectrophotometrically at 250nm. Solubility data of Trimipramine maleate in excipients were shown in table no 04, 05, 06 and graph no 01, 02, 03.2,3,19

3.1 Construction of pseudo ternary phase diagram:

Pseudo ternary phase diagram was constructed to determine micro emulsifying regions and also to select suitable concentrations of oils, surfactants, co surfactants Pseudo ternary phase diagram was constructed by water titration method. Surfactants and co surfactants (smix) ratios were prepared (1:4 , 4:1) by mixing accurately weighed amount of surfactant with co surfactant. Oil were mixed in different weight ratios of 9:1 to 1:9 (9:1, 8:2, 7:3, 6:4, 5:5, 4:6, 3:7, 2:8, 1:9) into the glass vials. Each mixture was titrated by water until mixture turned into blue colour emulsion or milky white or coarse emulsion or gel phases. Different phases were plotted on a phase diagram using Triplot version 4.1.2 software results are shown in figure no 16, components used for construction of phase diagram are oil (Capryol 90), surfactant (Labrasol) and co surfactant (Transcutol ) and Millipore water.20,15,2

4. Formulation of liquid self-micro emulsifying drug delivery system:

Micro emulsion regions were determined by phase diagrams, once micro emulsion region identified. SMEDDS formulations were prepared with addition of varying ratios of selected Smix (surfactant: co surfactant) and Oil. In all the formulations Trimipramine maleate was kept constant (2.5 mg). Weighed amount of drug is dissolved or solubilised in oil phase then cyclomixed for 2 minutes using cyclomixer, Surfactant and co surfactant ratios were prepared and mixed into drug oil mixture and vortexed.2

The prepared formulations were kept at room temperature for further investigation and evaluation; Composition liquid self-micro emulsifying drug delivery system was shown in Table no 18 and formulation of L-SMEDDS were shown in figure no 07.

5. Evaluation liquid self-micro emulsifying drug delivery system:

5.1 Dispersibility test:

Self-emulsification efficacy was determined by addition of 0.1ml of formulated Trimipramine maleate L- SMEDDS into 200ml of distilled water with gentle agitation using a magnetic stirrer, Formation of micro emulsion was visually observed and performance of micro emulsion was evaluated using following grading system shown in below table no 01 and results were shown in table no 11.6,8,21

Table no: 01 Trimipramine maleate L-SMEDDS was evaluated by following grading system.

Grade A

Rapidly forming clear blue emulsion with less than 1min

Grade B

Rapidly forming slight blue emulsion within 1 to 2 mins

Grade C

Fine milky white emulsion formed within 2 mins

Grade D

Dull greyish white emulsion formed more than 2 mins

Grade E

Large oil globules formed which indicates minimum emulsion formation.

5.2 Self emulsification test:

0.1ml of Trimipramine maleate  L-SMEDDS were added into 200ml of distilled water under mild or gentle agitation using a magnetic stirrer at a speed of 100rpm temperature maintained at 37°c ± 1°c. Self-emulsification was visually assessed by changing the appearance of the formulation and self-emulsification time will be noted, if it forms clear blue emulsion which indicates formulated Ol Trimipramine maleate  L-SMEDDS was good or if it forms less clear or turbid emulsion appearance which indicates bad emulsion. Results were shown in table no 12.1,9

5.3 Thermodynamic stability studies:

Thermodynamic stability studies were performed to determine temperature and centrifugation efficacy. The formulation were added to Millipore water at 1:20 ratio and centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 15 to 30 min and observed for changes like phase separation cracking or creaming and precipitation, Formulations are subjected to freeze thaw cycle by diluting formulations at 1:20 ratio with Millipore water at a temperature -20 to +25°c stored for 48 hrs results were shown in table no 13.16,18

5.4 Determination of droplet size, PDI and Zeta potential:

Trimipramine maleate  L-SMEDDS were 100 times diluted with water in a test tube or volumetric flask, globule size, PDI and zeta potential were determined after 1 hour by dynamic light scattering spectroscopy using Zetasizer nano ZS 90 version 7.1 (Malvern instruments) and results were shown in table no 14.9

5.5 Invitro drug release by Diffusion studies :

In vitro diffusion studies were performed for all the formulations developed, using a dialysis technique. The dialyzing medium was 0.1 N HCL. One end of egg membrane was tied with thread, and then 1 ml of self-micro-emulsifying formulation was placed in it along with 0.5 ml of dialyzing medium. The other end of the tubing was also secured with thread and was allowed to rotate freely in 200 ml of dialyzing medium and stirred continuously at 100 rpm with magnetic bead on magnetic plate at 37°C.

Aliquots of 3 ml withdrawn at 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120 minutes respectively time interval with a volume of 3ml and buffer (0.1N HCL) were replaced to maintain sink conditions. These samples were analyzed quantitatively for drug dialyzed across the membrane at corresponding time by using UV-visible spectrophotometer (250nm). After 1 month diffusion studies performed and compared with diffusion data shown in table no 15.2,14

6. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

6.1 Spectrophotometric analysis of Trimipramine maleate in Methanol:

6.1.1 Determination of λmax and Calibration curve of Trimipramine maleate in Methanol:

λmax of Trimipramine maleate in Methanol was found to be 250nm using methanol as blank peak table with absorbance of Trimipramine maleate in Methanol were shown in table no 02, Standard graph was plotted with concentrations ranges from 2-10 µg/ml. Standard graph values were shown in table no 03.

Standard plot was constructed by taking absorbance on Y-axis and concentration on X-axis the plot is shown in figure no 02. The regression co-efficient (R2) was found to be 0.99603.

Table no: 02 Peak table showing absorbance and wavelength of Trimipramine maleate in Methanol.

No.

P/V

Wavelength

Abs.

1

398.40

0.070

2

250.40

0.324

3

210.60

1.170

4

203.60

1.150

Table no: 03 Standard graph values of Trimipramine maleate in Methanol Concentration (µg/ml).

concentration (ppm)

Absorbance (Mean ±SD)

2ppm

0.132±0.004

4ppm

0.180 ± 0.002

6ppm

0.220± 0.003

8ppm

0.265± 0.003

10ppm

0.317± 0.004

Figure no:02 Calibration curve of Trimipramine maleate in methanol.

6.2 Solubility studies of Trimipramine maleate:

6.2.1 Solubility studies of Trimipramine maleate in various oils :

Solubility of Trimipramine maleate in various oils was determined by UV visible spectroscopy at 250nm using methanol as blank.

Table no: 04 Solubility of Trimipramine maleate in various oils.

Oils

Solubility (mg/ml)

Capryol 90

13.42± 0.283

Capmul-MCM NF

5.571±0.404

Capmul-PG8

0.597± 0.055

Peceol

2.699± 0.132

Almond oil

5.501± 0.306

Capmul PG-8NF

13.098 ± 0.157

Capmul MCM C8 Ep

8.470 ± 0.458

Captex 200

6.626 ± 0.208

Labrafac PG

5.073 ± 0.156

Maisine CC

11.092 ± 0.432

Graph no: 01 Comparison of solubility of Trimipramine maleate in various oils

6.2.2 Solubility of Trimipramine maleate in various surfactants:

Table no:05 Solubility of Trimipramine maleate in various surfactants:

Surfactants

Solubility (mg/ml)

Labrasol

13.198 ± 0.157

Span 80

8.470 ± 0.458

Tween 80

8.153 ± 0.208

Labrafil M1944

11.532 ± 0.156

Graph no: 02 Comparison of solubility of Trimipramine maleate in various surfactants.

6.2.3 Solubility of Trimipramine maleate in various co surfactants:

Table no: 06 Solubility of Trimipramine maleate in various co surfactants:

Co-surfactants

Solubility (mg/ml)

PEG-400

12.532 ± 0.156

Transcutol

1.697 ± 0.432

Lauroglycol 90

8.270 ± 0.458

Graph no: 03 Comparison of solubility of Trimipramine maleate in various co surfactants:

6.3 Pseudo ternary phase diagram:

From pseudo ternary phase diagram, it was found that systems containing Capryol 90 as oil phase, Labrasol as surfactant and Transcutol as co surfactant showed good micro emulsifying property.

Smix (CLT1:4, CLT4:1) ratios were prepared with oil ratios from 9:1 to 1:9 i.e.,  9:1,8:2, 7:3, 6:4, 5:5, 4:6, 3:7, 2:8, 1:9.

  • Smix (1:4) formulations of 1:9 to 2:8 showed bluish white emulsions (BWE) ,as 3:7 to 5:5 showed milky white emulsions (MWE) and 6:4 to 9:1 showed clear phase separation (PS) showed in table no 07 and figure no 03.
  • Smix (4:1) formulation of 2:8 to 5:5 showed milky white emulsion (MWE) and 1:9 showed bluish white emulsion (BWE), and 6:4 to 9:1 showed clear phase separation (PS) showed in table no 08 and figure no 05.

Table no: 07 Percentage composition of Capryol 90, Labrasol and Transcutol upon water Titration method.

Formulation

(oil: Smix)

Oil

(mg)

Smix1:4

(mg)

Water

(mg)

Total

(mg)

% Oil

% Smix

% Water

Remarks

CL1T4 (1:9)

50

450

811

1311

3.81

34.32

61.86

BWE

CL1T4 (2:8)

100

400

720

1220

8.19

32.78

59.01

BWE

CL1T4 (3:7)

150

350

603

1103

13.51

31.73

5.66

MWE

CL1T4 (4:6)

200

300

572

1072

18.65

27.98

53.35

MWE

CL1T4 (5:5)

250

250

557

1057

23.65

23.65

52.69

MWE

CL1T4 (6:4)

300

200

571

1071

28.01

18.67

53.31

PS

CL1T4 (7:3)

350

150

601

1101

31.79

13.62

54.58

PS

CL1T4 (8:2)

400

100

611

1111

36.01

9.01

54.91

PS

CL1T4 (9:1)

450

50

620

1120

40.17

4.47

55.36

PS

Figure no:03 Physical appearance of CL1T4(Smix1:4) with water titration method.

Figure no:04 Pseudo ternary phase diagram of CL1T4(Smix1:4)

Table no: 08 Percentage composition of Capryol 90, Labrasol and Transcutol upon water Titration method.

Formulation

(oil: Smix)

Oil

(mg)

Smix 4:1

(mg)

Water

(mg)

Total

(mg)

% Oil

% Smix

% Water

Remarks

CL4T1 (1:9)

50

450

860

1360

3.67

33.08

63.23

BWE

CL4T1 (2:8)

100

400

831

1331

7.51

30.05

62.43

MWE

CL4T1 (3:7)

150

350

845

1345

11.15

26.02

62.82

MWE

CL4T1 (4:6)

200

300

772

1272

15.72

23.58

60.69

MWE

CL4T1 (5:5)

250

250

690

1190

21.01

21.01

57.98

MWE

CL4T1 (6:4)

300

200

668

1168

25.68

17.12

57.19

PS

CL4T1 (7:3)

350

150

595

1095

31.96

13.69

54.33

PS

CL4T1 (8:2)

400

100

593

1093

36.60

9.14

54.25

PS

CL4T1 (9:1)

450

50

544

1044

43.10

4.78

52.10

PS

Figure no:05 Physical appearance of CL4T1(Smix4:1) with water titration method.

Figure no:6 Pseudo ternary phase diagram of CL4T1(Smix4:1)

6.4 Selection of Formulation:

Table no:09 Selection composition of formulation.

Formulation

Oil: Smix

Sur : co-sur

Oil

Surfactant

Co-surfactant

CL1T4

1:4

2:8

Capryol 90

Labrasol

Transcutol

CL4T1

4:1

1:9

Capryol 90

Labrasol

Transcutol

7. Formulation of Trimipramine maleate L-SMEDDS:

Smix (Labrasol: Transcutol) ratios were prepared, Trimipramine maleate was added into oil (Capryol 90) and the mixtures were cyclomixed for 2min, Trimipramine maleate L-SMEDDS were shown below.

Figure no 7: Formulation of Trimipramine maleate.

7.1 Composition of prepared Trimipramine maleate L-SMEDDS formulations:

Table no:10 Composition of Trimipramine maleate L-SMEDDS formulations.

Sr. No

Formulation

API(Trpm)

w/w%

Capryol 90 w/w%

Labrasol w/w%

Transcutol w/w%

Total

1.

CL1T4 2:8

200mg

500

750

750

2ml

2.

CL4T1 1:9

200mg

250

875

875

2ml

8. Evaluation of Trimipramine maleate L-SMEDDS:

8.1 Dispersibility test: Visual observation of Trimipramine maleate liquid self-micro emulsifying drug delivery system showed that formulations are grade A, Rapidly emulsion forming within less than minute with clear appearance. Formulations were assessed by grading system results were shown in table no 11.

Table no: 11 Dispersibility test values of Trimipramine maleate L-SMEDDS

Formulation

Observations

Grade

CL1T4(2:8)

Rapidly forming clear blue emulsion with < 1min

A

CL4T1(1:9)

Rapidly forming clear blue emulsion with < 1min

A

8.2 Self emulsification time: Trimipramine maleate L-SMEDDS was dispersed completely and quickly when subjected to aqueous dilution under mild agitation results were shown in table no 12.

It was clear that the formulations were self-emulsified within 30 ± 1.75 to 35 ± 1.85 seconds and indicates good micro emulsion formation.

Table no:12 Self emulsification time of Trimipramine maleate L-SMEDDS

Formulation

Self-emulsification time (sec)

Remarks

CL1T4(2:8)

30 ± 1.75

Good

CL4T1(1:9)

35 ± 1.85

Good

All values are expressed as Mean±SD(n=3)

8.3 Thermodynamic stability studies:

No phase separation or precipitation is observed for formulations CL1T4(2:8) and CL4T1(1:9) which indicate that the formulations are stable formulations under temperature results were showni in table no13.

Table no:13 Thermodynamic stability studies of Trimipramine maleate L-SMEDDS.

Formulation

Freeze Thaw cycle (2 cycles NLT 48 hrs)

Centrifugation

(3500rpm for 30min)

CL1T4 (2:8)

Passed

Passed

CL4T1 (1:9)

Passed

Passed

All values are expressed as Mean±SD(n=3)

8.4 Determination of Globule size and Zeta potential:

Table no: 14 Globule size, Zeta potential and PDI values of Trimipramine maleate L-SMEDDS.

Formulation

Globule size (d.nm)

PDI

Zeta potential (mv)

CL1T4 (2:8)

250.3

0.390

-19.7

CL4T1 (1:9)

550.2

0.768

-11.7

All values are expressed as Mean±SD(n=3)

Figure no 08 : Globule size of CL1T4(2:8)

Figure no 09 : Zeta potential of CL1T4(2:8)

Figure no 10 : Globule size of CL4T1(1:9)

Figure no 11 : Zeta potential of CL4T1(1:9)

8.5 Invitro drug release:

 

Figure no 12 : In vitro diffusion studies.

Table no:15 In vitro diffusion studies of Trimipramine maleate L-SMEDDS.

Sr. No

Time(min)

Conc(mg/ml)

%CDR

1

5min

23.273

11.364± 0.547

2

10min

31.775

16.613±0.643

3

15min

42.830

21.900±0.500

4

45min

97.528

48.160±0.529

5

60min

124.933

61.993±0.503

6

90min

166.551

83.327±0.603

7

120min

172.069

86.603±0.535

8

180min

172.851

98.173±0.603

Graph no 04: % CDR of Trimipramine maleate im 0.1NHcl.

9. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION:

Trimipramine maleate is poorly soluble drug which has been selected for SMEDDS study to enhance its solubility and dissolution rate. A series of pseudo ternary phase diagram was constructed by using water titration method with the help of Capryol 90 as oil, Labrasol as surfactant and Transcutol as co surfactant at a Smix ratio of 1:4 and 4:1 which gave clear micro emulsion, bluish white emulsion and white emulsion.

Two different formulations were formulated in that F-{1} formulation was selected as optimised formulation because of its micro particle size (250.3nm, zeta potential -19.7 mV and PDI 0.390), drug release ((88.201 plus/minus 0.25)%) self emulsification time (30 ± 1.75 sec), Dispersity grade (A), and it also shown a good micro emulsion formation.

So finally, CL1T4 (2:8) shows better results when compared to CL4T1 (1:9) formulation. Hence, Trimipramine maleate L-SMEDDS has capability for enhancement of solubility .

REFERENCES

  1. Pouton, C. W. (1997). Formulation of self-emulsifying drug delivery systems. Advanced drug delivery reviews, 25(1), 47-58.
  2. Reddy, M. S., & Sravani, B. (2021). Formulation and evaluation of solid self nano emulsifying drug delivery system of olanzapine to enhance aqueous solubility and dissolution rate. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 11(4), 227-238.
  3. Singh, B., Bandopadhyay, S., Kapil, R., Singh, R., & Katare, O. P. (2009). Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS): formulation development, characterization, and applications. Critical Reviews™ in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems, 26(5).
  4. Prajapat, M. D., Patel, N. J., Bariya, A., Patel, S. S., & Butani, S. B. (2017). Formulation and evaluation of self-emulsifying drug delivery system for nimodipine, a BCS class II drug. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, 39, 59-68.
  5. Pouton, C. W. (2000). Lipid formulations for oral administration of drugs: non-emulsifying, self-emulsifying and ‘self-microemulsifying’ drug delivery systems. European journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 11, S93-S98.
  6. Kommuru, T., Gurley, B., Khan, M. A., & Reddy, I. K. (2001). Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS) of coenzyme Q10: formulation development and bioavailability assessment. International journal of pharmaceutics, 212(2), 233-246.
  7. Charman, S. A., Charman, W. N., Rogge, M. C., Wilson, T. D., Dutko, F. J., & Pouton, C. W. (1992). Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems: formulation and biopharmaceutic evaluation of an investigational lipophilic compound. Pharmaceutical research, 9(1), 87-93.
  8. Gursoy, R. N., & Benita, S. (2004). Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS) for improved oral delivery of lipophilic drugs. Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy, 58(3), 173-182.
  9. Reddy, M. S., & Sowjanya, N. (2015). Formulation and in-vitro characterization of solid self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system (S-SNEDDS) of Simvastatin. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences and research, 7(1), 40.
  10. Shah, N. H., Carvajal, M. T., Patel, C. I., Infeld, M. H., & Malick, A. W. (1994). Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS) with polyglycolyzed glycerides for improving in vitro dissolution and oral absorption of lipophilic drugs. International journal of pharmaceutics, 106(1), 15-23.
  11. Singh, A. K., Chaurasiya, A., Awasthi, A., Mishra, G., Asati, D., Khar, R. K., & Mukherjee, R. (2009). Oral bioavailability enhancement of exemestane from self-microemulsifying drug delivery system (SMEDDS). Aaps Pharmscitech, 10(3), 906-916.
  12. Mahajan S, Singh D, Sharma R, Singh G, Bedi N. pH-Independent Dissolution and Enhanced Oral Bioavailability of Aripiprazole-Loaded Solid Self-microemulsifying Drug Delivery System. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2021 Jan 5;22(1):24. doi: 10.1208/s12249-020-01882-y. PMID: 33400035.
  13. Bora, D. (2012). Formulation and Evaluation of Self microemulsifying drug delivery system of low solubility drug for enhanced solubility and dissolution. Asian journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical sciences.
  14. Patel, D., & Sawant, K. K. (2009). Self-micro-emulsifying drug delivery system: formulation development and biopharmaceutical evaluation of lipophilic drugs. Current drug delivery, 6(4), 419-424.
  15. Kyatanwar, A. U., Jadhav, K. R., & Kadam, V. J. (2010). Self-micro-emulsifying drug delivery system (SMEDDS). Journal of Pharmacy Research, 3(2), 75-83.
  16. Krsti?, M., Medarevi?, ?., ?uriš, J., & Ibri?, S. (2018). Self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems (SNEDDS) and self-microemulsifying drug delivery systems (SMEDDS) as lipid nanocarriers for improving dissolution rate and bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs. In Lipid nanocarriers for drug targeting (pp. 473-508). William Andrew Publishing.
  17. Do Thi, T., Van Speybroeck, M., Barillaro, V., Martens, J., Annaert, P., Augustijns, P., ... & Van den Mooter, G. (2009). Formulate-ability of ten compounds with different physicochemical profiles in SMEDDS. European journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 38(5), 479-488.
  18. Yi, T., Wan, J., Xu, H., & Yang, X. (2008). A new solid self-microemulsifying formulation prepared by spray-drying to improve the oral bioavailability of poorly water soluble drugs. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 70(2), 439-444.
  19. Dokania, S., & Joshi, A. K. (2015). Self-microemulsifying drug delivery system (SMEDDS)–challenges and road ahead. Drug delivery, 22(6), 675-690.
  20. Rahman, M. A., Hussain, A., Hussain, M. S., Mirza, M. A., & Iqbal, Z. (2013). Role of excipients in successful development of self-emulsifying/ micro emulsifying drug delivery system (SEDDS/SMEDDS). Drug development and industrial pharmacy, 39(1), 1-19.
  21. Singh, D., Bedi, N., & Tiwary, A. K. (2018). Enhancing solubility of poorly aqueous soluble drugs: Critical appraisal of techniques. Journal of pharmaceutical investigation, 48(5), 509-526.
  22. Reddy, M. R., & Gubbiyappa, K. S. (2021). A comprehensive review on supersaturable self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system. System (BCS), 4, 5.
  23. Dokania S, Joshi AK. Self-micro emulsifying drug delivery system (SMEDDS)--challenges and road ahead. Drug Deliv. 2015;22(6):675-90. doi: 10.3109/10717544.2014.896058. Epub 2014 Mar 27. PMID: 24670091.
  24. Kim DS, Cho JH, Park JH, Kim JS, Song ES, Kwon J, Giri BR, Jin SG, Kim KS, Choi HG, Kim DW. Self-microemulsifying drug delivery system (SMEDDS) for improved oral delivery and photostability of methotrexate. Int J Nanomedicine. 2019 Jul 5;14:4949-4960. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S211014. PMID: 31308665; PMCID: PMC6617838.
  25. Khan, B. A., Bakhsh, S., Khan, H., Mahmood, T., & Rasul, A. (2012). Basics of self micro emulsifying drug delivery system. Journal of pharmacy and alternative medicine, 1(1), 13-19.
  26. Komal, R. (2018). Self micro emulsifying drug delivery system-A. World J. Pharm. Res, 7(11), 249.
  27. Maurya, S. D., Arya, R. K., Rajpal, G., & Dhakar, R. C. (2017). Self-micro emulsifying drug delivery systems (SMEDDS): A review on physico-chemical and biopharmaceutical aspects. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics, 7(3), 55-65.
  28. Sharma, V. K., Koka, A., Yadav, J., Sharma, A. K., & Keservani, R. K. (2016). Self-micro emulsifying drug delivery systems: A strategy to improve oral bioavailability.
  29. Misal, R. S., Potphode, V. R., & Mahajan, V. R. (2017). Review on: New approaches in self micro-emulsifying drug delivery system. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology, 10(4), 1215-1224.
  30. Gurram, A. K., Deshpande, P. B., Kar, S. S., Nayak, U. Y., Udupa, N., & Reddy, M. S. (2015). Role of components in the formation of self-microemulsifying drug delivery systems. Indian journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 77(3), 249.
  31. Kumar, A., Sharma, S., & Kamble, R. (2010). Self-emulsifying drug delivery system (SEDDS): Future aspects. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci, 2(4), 7-13.

Reference

  1. Pouton, C. W. (1997). Formulation of self-emulsifying drug delivery systems. Advanced drug delivery reviews, 25(1), 47-58.
  2. Reddy, M. S., & Sravani, B. (2021). Formulation and evaluation of solid self nano emulsifying drug delivery system of olanzapine to enhance aqueous solubility and dissolution rate. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 11(4), 227-238.
  3. Singh, B., Bandopadhyay, S., Kapil, R., Singh, R., & Katare, O. P. (2009). Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS): formulation development, characterization, and applications. Critical Reviews™ in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems, 26(5).
  4. Prajapat, M. D., Patel, N. J., Bariya, A., Patel, S. S., & Butani, S. B. (2017). Formulation and evaluation of self-emulsifying drug delivery system for nimodipine, a BCS class II drug. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, 39, 59-68.
  5. Pouton, C. W. (2000). Lipid formulations for oral administration of drugs: non-emulsifying, self-emulsifying and ‘self-microemulsifying’ drug delivery systems. European journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 11, S93-S98.
  6. Kommuru, T., Gurley, B., Khan, M. A., & Reddy, I. K. (2001). Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS) of coenzyme Q10: formulation development and bioavailability assessment. International journal of pharmaceutics, 212(2), 233-246.
  7. Charman, S. A., Charman, W. N., Rogge, M. C., Wilson, T. D., Dutko, F. J., & Pouton, C. W. (1992). Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems: formulation and biopharmaceutic evaluation of an investigational lipophilic compound. Pharmaceutical research, 9(1), 87-93.
  8. Gursoy, R. N., & Benita, S. (2004). Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS) for improved oral delivery of lipophilic drugs. Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy, 58(3), 173-182.
  9. Reddy, M. S., & Sowjanya, N. (2015). Formulation and in-vitro characterization of solid self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system (S-SNEDDS) of Simvastatin. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences and research, 7(1), 40.
  10. Shah, N. H., Carvajal, M. T., Patel, C. I., Infeld, M. H., & Malick, A. W. (1994). Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS) with polyglycolyzed glycerides for improving in vitro dissolution and oral absorption of lipophilic drugs. International journal of pharmaceutics, 106(1), 15-23.
  11. Singh, A. K., Chaurasiya, A., Awasthi, A., Mishra, G., Asati, D., Khar, R. K., & Mukherjee, R. (2009). Oral bioavailability enhancement of exemestane from self-microemulsifying drug delivery system (SMEDDS). Aaps Pharmscitech, 10(3), 906-916.
  12. Mahajan S, Singh D, Sharma R, Singh G, Bedi N. pH-Independent Dissolution and Enhanced Oral Bioavailability of Aripiprazole-Loaded Solid Self-microemulsifying Drug Delivery System. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2021 Jan 5;22(1):24. doi: 10.1208/s12249-020-01882-y. PMID: 33400035.
  13. Bora, D. (2012). Formulation and Evaluation of Self microemulsifying drug delivery system of low solubility drug for enhanced solubility and dissolution. Asian journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical sciences.
  14. Patel, D., & Sawant, K. K. (2009). Self-micro-emulsifying drug delivery system: formulation development and biopharmaceutical evaluation of lipophilic drugs. Current drug delivery, 6(4), 419-424.
  15. Kyatanwar, A. U., Jadhav, K. R., & Kadam, V. J. (2010). Self-micro-emulsifying drug delivery system (SMEDDS). Journal of Pharmacy Research, 3(2), 75-83.
  16. Krsti?, M., Medarevi?, ?., ?uriš, J., & Ibri?, S. (2018). Self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems (SNEDDS) and self-microemulsifying drug delivery systems (SMEDDS) as lipid nanocarriers for improving dissolution rate and bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs. In Lipid nanocarriers for drug targeting (pp. 473-508). William Andrew Publishing.
  17. Do Thi, T., Van Speybroeck, M., Barillaro, V., Martens, J., Annaert, P., Augustijns, P., ... & Van den Mooter, G. (2009). Formulate-ability of ten compounds with different physicochemical profiles in SMEDDS. European journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 38(5), 479-488.
  18. Yi, T., Wan, J., Xu, H., & Yang, X. (2008). A new solid self-microemulsifying formulation prepared by spray-drying to improve the oral bioavailability of poorly water soluble drugs. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 70(2), 439-444.
  19. Dokania, S., & Joshi, A. K. (2015). Self-microemulsifying drug delivery system (SMEDDS)–challenges and road ahead. Drug delivery, 22(6), 675-690.
  20. Rahman, M. A., Hussain, A., Hussain, M. S., Mirza, M. A., & Iqbal, Z. (2013). Role of excipients in successful development of self-emulsifying/ micro emulsifying drug delivery system (SEDDS/SMEDDS). Drug development and industrial pharmacy, 39(1), 1-19.
  21. Singh, D., Bedi, N., & Tiwary, A. K. (2018). Enhancing solubility of poorly aqueous soluble drugs: Critical appraisal of techniques. Journal of pharmaceutical investigation, 48(5), 509-526.
  22. Reddy, M. R., & Gubbiyappa, K. S. (2021). A comprehensive review on supersaturable self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system. System (BCS), 4, 5.
  23. Dokania S, Joshi AK. Self-micro emulsifying drug delivery system (SMEDDS)--challenges and road ahead. Drug Deliv. 2015;22(6):675-90. doi: 10.3109/10717544.2014.896058. Epub 2014 Mar 27. PMID: 24670091.
  24. Kim DS, Cho JH, Park JH, Kim JS, Song ES, Kwon J, Giri BR, Jin SG, Kim KS, Choi HG, Kim DW. Self-microemulsifying drug delivery system (SMEDDS) for improved oral delivery and photostability of methotrexate. Int J Nanomedicine. 2019 Jul 5;14:4949-4960. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S211014. PMID: 31308665; PMCID: PMC6617838.
  25. Khan, B. A., Bakhsh, S., Khan, H., Mahmood, T., & Rasul, A. (2012). Basics of self micro emulsifying drug delivery system. Journal of pharmacy and alternative medicine, 1(1), 13-19.
  26. Komal, R. (2018). Self micro emulsifying drug delivery system-A. World J. Pharm. Res, 7(11), 249.
  27. Maurya, S. D., Arya, R. K., Rajpal, G., & Dhakar, R. C. (2017). Self-micro emulsifying drug delivery systems (SMEDDS): A review on physico-chemical and biopharmaceutical aspects. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics, 7(3), 55-65.
  28. Sharma, V. K., Koka, A., Yadav, J., Sharma, A. K., & Keservani, R. K. (2016). Self-micro emulsifying drug delivery systems: A strategy to improve oral bioavailability.
  29. Misal, R. S., Potphode, V. R., & Mahajan, V. R. (2017). Review on: New approaches in self micro-emulsifying drug delivery system. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology, 10(4), 1215-1224.
  30. Gurram, A. K., Deshpande, P. B., Kar, S. S., Nayak, U. Y., Udupa, N., & Reddy, M. S. (2015). Role of components in the formation of self-microemulsifying drug delivery systems. Indian journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 77(3), 249.
  31. Kumar, A., Sharma, S., & Kamble, R. (2010). Self-emulsifying drug delivery system (SEDDS): Future aspects. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci, 2(4), 7-13.

Photo
B. Anusha Rao
Corresponding author

Centre for Pharmaceutical Sciences, JNTUH University College of Engineering, Science and Technology, Hyderabad, Kukatpally, Telangana 500085

Photo
M. Sunitha Reddy
Co-author

Centre for Pharmaceutical Sciences, JNTUH University College of Engineering, Science and Technology, Hyderabad, Kukatpally, Telangana 500085

Photo
K. Anie Vijetha
Co-author

Centre for Pharmaceutical Sciences, JNTUH University College of Engineering, Science and Technology, Hyderabad, Kukatpally, Telangana 500085

B. Anusha Rao, M. Sunitha Reddy, K. Anie Vijetha, Formulation and Evaluation of Liquid Self Micro Emulsifying Drug Delivery System of Trimipramine Maleate to Enhance Aqueous Solubility, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 9, 3712-3726. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17236675

More related articles
Global Plastic Production, Environmental Impacts, ...
Sateesh Kumar Beepala, V. Luke Paul, Srividhya Maripi, ...
Experimental and Computational Evaluation of Garli...
Pankaj Kore, Pratiksha Parit, Saloni Pawar, Shital Vadar, Tushar ...
Advanced Formulation Strategies for Diabetic Foot ...
Devina Gaike, Rutuja Sahajrao, Ajay Rore, Dr. S. S. Angadi, ...
Integrating Herbal Bioenhancers into Advanced Drug-Delivery Systems: Trends and ...
Dnyaneshwar Shinde , Sayali Patil , Mahesh Said , Gaurav Zalte, Aditya Shinde, Divya Shinde, Varsha ...
Formulation And Evaluation of Spanlastic Gel Containing Econazole Nitrate...
Vaishnavi Krishna, Janavi M., Nirmala P., Lakshmi S. T., ...
Related Articles
A Review On: Coffee Bean-Based Herbal Face Scrub Formation and Evaluation...
Dikshita Valvi, Amol Gayke, Tejas Zond, Sakshi Jadhav, Snehal Mate, ...
Formulation and Evaluation of Aloe Vera Herbal Soap ...
Swapnil Talekar , Sachin Bhalekar , Sainath Gadekar , Pranay Chavan , Tejas Satpute , ...
Global Plastic Production, Environmental Impacts, and Sustainable Remediation St...
Sateesh Kumar Beepala, V. Luke Paul, Srividhya Maripi, ...
More related articles
Global Plastic Production, Environmental Impacts, and Sustainable Remediation St...
Sateesh Kumar Beepala, V. Luke Paul, Srividhya Maripi, ...
Experimental and Computational Evaluation of Garlic (Allium Sativum) for its Pot...
Pankaj Kore, Pratiksha Parit, Saloni Pawar, Shital Vadar, Tushar Kawale, ...
Advanced Formulation Strategies for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Bridging Current Marke...
Devina Gaike, Rutuja Sahajrao, Ajay Rore, Dr. S. S. Angadi, ...
Global Plastic Production, Environmental Impacts, and Sustainable Remediation St...
Sateesh Kumar Beepala, V. Luke Paul, Srividhya Maripi, ...
Experimental and Computational Evaluation of Garlic (Allium Sativum) for its Pot...
Pankaj Kore, Pratiksha Parit, Saloni Pawar, Shital Vadar, Tushar Kawale, ...
Advanced Formulation Strategies for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Bridging Current Marke...
Devina Gaike, Rutuja Sahajrao, Ajay Rore, Dr. S. S. Angadi, ...