View Article

  • High-Throughput UPLC Method for Accurate Quantification of Betahistine in Pharmaceutical Tablets

  • 1,2,3 Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
    4Kamalakshi Pandurangan College of Pharmacy, Tiruvannamalai, Tamil Nadu, India.
    5 Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Selaiyur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Abstract

A simple, novel, sensitive and rapid ultra-performance liquid chromatographic (RP-UPLC) method has been developed and validated for quantitative determination of Betahistine in bulk and tablet formulations. The chromatographic development was carried out on Water C18 (4.6mm X 250 mm; 5 microns) column, with mobile phase consisting of Buffer : ACN 600ml:400 ml v\v with pH adjust to 3.5.. The flow rate was 1 ml/min and the effluents were monitored at 254 nm. The retention time was found to be 1.951 min. The method was validated as per International Conference on Harmonization Guideline with respect to linearity, accuracy, precision, and robustness. The calibration curve was found to be linear over a range of 31–95 ?g/mL with a regression coefficient of 0.9999. The method has proved to be of high sensitivity and specificity. The results of the study showed that the proposed RP-UPLC method was simple, rapid, precise and accurate which is useful for the routine determination of Betahistine in bulk drug and in its pharmaceutical dosage form.

Keywords

Betahistine, UHPLC, Method Validation, ICH guideline.

Introduction

The Betahistine is an Orally active, some H1 selective histamine analogue, which is used to control vertigo in patients of  Meniere’s disease. It possibly acts by causing vasodilatation in the internal ear. It is contraindicated in asthamatics and ulcer patients. Chemically it is N-Methyl-2-pyridine-2-ylethanamine[1,2]. Its Molecular formula is C8H12N2 and Molecular weight is 139.19 g/mol. The present work reports simple, rapid, sensitive and economical rapid UHPLC method with UV detection, useful for the routine analysis of Betahistine in bulk and pharmaceutical formulations. The method parameters such as linearity, accuracy, precision, robustness, stability and system suitability were validated as per International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guidelines.

Figure1: Chemical structure of Betahistine

UPLC

Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC) [6,7] is specially designed to withstand higher system pressures during chromatographic analysis so that it enables significant decreases in separation time and solvent consumption. The UPLC columns packed with 1.7 µm sized particles provides not only increased efficiency but also the ability to work at increased linear velocity without loss of efficiency but also the ability to work at increased linear velocity without loss of efficiency, providing both resolution and speed. Using advantages of UPLC, a number of applications in different fields including pharmacy, clinical analysis, pesticide analysis and tetracycline inhuman urine have been reported. The UPLC is based on the principle of use of stationary phase consisting of particles less than 2µm, while UPLC columns are typically filled with particles of 3 to 5µm. The underlying principles of this evolution are governed by the Van Deemter equation, which is an empirical formula that describes the relationship between linear velocity (flow rate and plate height (HETP or column efficiency). The Van Deemter curve, governed by an equation with three components shows that the usable flow range for a good efficiency with a small diameter particle in much greater than for larger diameters.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS:

INSTRUMENTATION: UHPLC– SOFTWEAR: Open Lab - CHEM STATION (Make - Agilent)

Chromatographic conditions

  • Mobile phase : Dissolve 2.76g of Sodium dihydrogen phosphate monohydrate and 1.6g of Sodium dodecyl-sulphate in 600ml of water add 0.4g of Hexylamine and 400ml of Acetonitrile adjusted to pH 3.5 with Orthophosphoric acid.
  • Flow rate : 1 ml/min
  • Column: C18; 4.6mm X 250 mm; 5 microns
  • Detector wave length : 254 nm
  • Injection volume : 5 µl
  • Run time : 5 min
  • Results : Retention time and peak shape is good.

All analysis was carried out at a temperature of 30°C under isocratic conditions.

METHOD DEVELOPMENT

The RP-UPLC method was developed by conducting number of trails in which the values of chromatographic parameters like wavelength, mobile phase composition and ratio, flow rate, stationary phase etc. were altered to determine the effect  of them on separation and identification of selected drug, finally the chromatographic parameters were optimized as follows.

Preparation of mobile phase:

Dissolve 2.76g of Sodium dihydrogen phosphate monohydrate and 1.6g of Sodium dodecyl-sulphate in 600ml of water add 0.4g of Hexylamine and 400ml of Acetonitrile adjusted to pH 3.5 with Orthophosphoric acid, degassed in the mixture by ultrasonication, and was filtered through the 0.45μm Membrane filter using vacuum filtration assembly

Preparation of standard stock solution:

Weigh accurately and transfer about 32 mg of Betahistine standard into 100 ml volumetric standard flask. Dissolve with Mobile phase and makeup to the volume with Mobile phase.

Preparation of Standard solution:

Transfer, 5ml from standard stock solution into 25ml volumetric flask makeup to the volume with Mobile phase.

Preparation of Sample solution:

Weigh and transfer 136.52 of Betahistine sample into 25 ml volumetric flask. Dissolve with Mobile phase and makeup to the volume with Mobile phase and filter through 0.45 µm membrane filter. Further dilute 5ml into 25ml volumetric Flask dilute and makeup with Mobile phase.

Method Validation:

Validation of the optimized method parameters includes linearity, system suitability, accuracy, precision, ruggedness, robustness, limit of detection and limit of quantification according to ICH guidelines.

System suitability parameters:

The system suitability parameters were determined by preparing standard solution of Betahistine injected Five times and the parameters like peak tailing and USP plate count were determined.

The % RSD for the area of five standard injections results should not be more than 2%.

Specificity:

Checking of the interference in the optimized method.

Precision:

Precision of an analytical procedure expresses the closeness of agreement between series of measurements obtained from multiple sampling of the same homogenous sample under the prescribed conditions. The precision of ananalytical procedure is usually expressed as the variance, standard deviation or coefficient of variation of a series of measurements. ICH has defined precision to contain three components: repeatability, intermediate precision, and reproducibility.

Linearity:

The linearity of the developed method was determined by preparing the standard drug solutions with concentrations of 32-95 µg/ml of Betahistine from the standard stock solution, the linearity parameters like regression value (r2), slope, y-intercept, were evaluated by plotting the calibration curve taking concentration in µg/ml on x-axis, and peak area on y-axis for linearity concentrations. The correlation coefficient (r2) should be not less than 0.9999, % RSD of peak areas for replicated individual linearity concentrations should be not more than 2.0% to accept the linearity of the method.

Accuracy:

The accuracy of an analytical procedure expresses the closeness of agreement between the value which is accepted either as a conventional true value or an accepted reference value and the value found. This is also termed as trueness. It was done by recovery study. Sample solutions were prepared with 100% in triplicate. To the formulation, the working standards of the drug were added at the level of 80%, 100%, 120%. Prepare each level in triplicate injection and the average is take to calculate the percentage relative standard deviation.

Acceptance Criteria: The % Recovery for each level should be between 98.0% - 102.0%

Robustness:

The robustness of the proposed method was determined by triplicate injection of working stock solution from homogenous lots by differing physical parameter like flow rate and mobile phase composition, temperature variation which may differ but the response was still within the specified limits of the assay.

Acceptance criteria: % Relative standard deviation of peak areas and Rt should not be more than 2.0%.

Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantification (LOQ)

The limit of detection and limit of quantification was calculated by the average value of standard deviation and slope. The LOD and LOQ were determined by the linearity studies.

LOD = 3.3 x (SD / SLOPE)

LOQ = 10 x (SD / SLOPE)

Where,

SD = standard deviation of y- intercepts

S = slope

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

Method development and optimization:

The current research work enumerates the validated UHPLC method development  for  Betahistine in tablet formulation. The effective separation and good peak symmetry was achieved by using mobile phase Buffer : ACN having pH3.5 [600:400, v/v] as mobile phase, on water C18 (4.6 x 250mm, 5 microns), analytical column under isocratic conditions.

System suitability:

The retention time (Rt) for Betahistine were found as 1.951 min respectively with consistent reproducibility represented by % RSD shown in Figure 2. The chromatographic parameter like USP plate count, tailing factor, resolution were found to be within the limits and given in Table1 which indicates the system suitability of the developed method.

Figure 2: Optimized Chromatogram of Betahistine

Table 1: System suitability parameters of Betahistine

Sr. No.

Parameter

piroxicam

Mean ± SD

% RSD

1

Rt (min)

1.96 ± 0.007

0.38

2

Peak area

624.641 ± 0.985

0.16

3

Plate count

5444 ± 14.08

0.0.26

4

Tailing Factor

1.123 ± 0.008

0.73

Specificity:

Retention time of Betahistine was eluted at 1.951min. We did not find and interfering peaks in blank and placebo at retention times of these drugs in this method. So, this method was said to be specific.

Linearity:

The developed method showed the proportional relationship between peak area and concentration at different level of standard drug in the range 32-95μg/ml with regression coefficients (r2) 0.9999 for Betahistine. Respectively the linearity result were given in the Table 2. The linearity plots were shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3: Calibiration curve of Betahistine

Table-2. Linearity result of Betahistine

Linearity level (%)

Betahistine

Con.(µg/ml)

Peak area

50

31.78

320.439

70

47.67

470.536

100

63.55

633.356

125

79.44

792.435

150

95.33

946.954

Correlation coefficient (R2)

0.9999

Precision:

Repeatability:

Six working sample solution of 64 ppm are injected and the percentage amount was calculated and %RSD was found to be 0.37 (Table 3)

Table 3: Repeatability data of Betahistine

Sr. No.

Sample ID

Sample weight (mg)

Area

Content (mg)

% Assay

1

Sample 1

137.15

631.055

7.906

98.83

2

Sample 2

136.35

633.365

7.981

98.76

3

Sample 3

136.54

634.652

7.986

98.83

4

Sample 4

136.85

633.245

7.951

98.39

5

Sample 5

136.18

631.56

7.965

98.56

6

Sample 6

137.15

636.611

7.976

98.70

Mean:

7.961

99.51

SD:

0.03

0.369

%RSD:

0.38

0.37

Six working sample solution of 64 ppm are injected on the next day of the preparation of sample and the % amount found was calculated and %RSD was found to be 0.97. (Table 4)

Table 4: Intermediate precision of Betahistine

Sr. No.

Sample ID

Sample weight (mg)

Area

Content (mg)

% Assay

1

Sample 1

137.22

625.223

7.952

99.40

2

Sample 2

137.59

624.126

7.916

98.95

3

Sample 3

138.06

632.554

7.996

99.95

4

Sample 4

136.69

636.580

8.127

101.59

5

Sample 5

137.86

634.153

8.027

100.34

6

Sample 6

136.50

631.518

8.074

100.93

Mean:

8.015

100.19

SD:

0.078

0.975

%RSD:

0.97

0.97

Accuracy:

Three injections of 80%, 100%, and 120% concentration were made in triplicate, and the recovery percentage was determined to be 98.49% to 100.24%. The accuracy result of Betahistine shown in Table 5.

Table 5. Accuracy of Betahistine

% level

Sample wt. (mg)

Area

Content

(mg)

Content (%)

 

80%

108.23

512.056

7.969

99.61

108.52

513.058

7.964

99.55

109.55

512.458

7.879

98.49

 

100%

136.05

643.901

7.972

99.65

136.57

640.252

7.897

98.71

135.96

647.259

8.019

100.24

 

120%

163.25

771.477

7.960

99.50

164.19

772.037

7.920

99.00

163.25

776.350

8.010

99.43

Robustness:

Robustness of the method was checked by small deliberate changes in the method parameters such as wavelength (±2nm) and flow rate (±0.025ml) which shall not much affect in theoretical plates and peak asymmetry.

The robustness was tested by changing the wavelength and flow rate in the chromatographic system. The results are tabulated in Table 6.

Table 6: Study of Robustnesss result for Betahistine.

Sr. No

Condition

% Rsd

1

Flow rate (-) _0.35

0.43%

2

Flow rate (+) _0.55

0.43%

3

Wavelength (-) _228

0.53%

4

Wavelength (+) _232

0.50%

Limit of Detection (LOD):

Detection limit of the Betahistine in this method was found to be 0.59 µg/ml.

Limit of quantification (LOQ):      

Detection limit of the Betahistine in this method was found to be 1.78 µg/ml.

Assay of marketed formulation:

Standard solution and sample solution were injected separately into the system and chromatograms were recorded and drug present in sample was calculated using before mentioned formula. The report of Betahistine assay given in Table7

Table-7: Assay of Formulation:

Standard

Sample

%Assay

625.542

626.210

100.92%

CONCLUTION:

A novel UHPLC method was developed for the estimation of Betahistine in pharmaceutical dosage form. The method was optimized by evaluating various chromatographic condition. Sample recovery was in good agreement with the respective label claim. The proposed method was validated as per ICH guideline across all relevant parameter. This method can be effectively used for quality test of H1 selective histamine drug Betahistine in Pharmaceutical doasage form.

REFERENCES

  1. Gangrade DM, Gangrade DP. RP-HPLC method development and validation for Betahistine Hydrochloride in controlled-release tablets. Int J Chem Pharm Anal. 2014;2(1):18–22.
  2. Anandrao PB, Dayanand CP. RP-HPLC method development and validation of Betahistine Dihydrochloride in tablet dosage forms. Int J Res Pharm Appl Sci. 2023;2(4):19–27.
  3. Ibrahim AE, El Deeb S, Abdellatef HE, Hendawy HAM, El-Abassy OM, Ibrahim H. Eco-friendly and sensitive HPLC and TLC methods validated for determination of Betahistine in the presence of its process-related impurity. Separations. 2022;9(2):49. doi:10.3390/separations9020049
  4. Kumar A, Nanda S. Spectrophotometric estimation of Betahistine Hydrochloride in tablet formulations. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2010;2(2):121–4.
  5. Dasari PK, Jayavarapu KR, Gopi Krishna C, Tanuku S. Development and validation of LC–MS/MS method for estimation of Betahistine in human plasma. Int J Pharm Pharm Res. 2020;18(3):385–98.
  6. Nováková L, Vl?ková H, Solich P. UPLC — advantages in pharmaceutical analysis. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2006;40(4):832–40.
  7. Waters Corporation. Beginner’s guide to UPLC technology. 2008 [cited 2025 Aug 30]. Available from: Waters website (UPLC primer).
  8. Ibrahim MA, El-Hadidy GS, El-Zahaby SA, El-Ahmady SH. Eco-friendly chromatographic methods: review including betahistine assay. Chromatographia. 2022;85(6):395–410.
  9. Waters Corporation; multiple authors. Column chemistries (end-capped C18, BEH, CSH) for basic drug separations. UPLC and UPLC-MS Application Notebook. 2008;
  10. Green-chemistry-oriented chromatography reviews (2023–24) advocating sustainability in QC via micellar and UPLC methods. J Chromatogr A. 2023;1700:462–75 or Green Chem Rev. 2024;

Reference

  1. Gangrade DM, Gangrade DP. RP-HPLC method development and validation for Betahistine Hydrochloride in controlled-release tablets. Int J Chem Pharm Anal. 2014;2(1):18–22.
  2. Anandrao PB, Dayanand CP. RP-HPLC method development and validation of Betahistine Dihydrochloride in tablet dosage forms. Int J Res Pharm Appl Sci. 2023;2(4):19–27.
  3. Ibrahim AE, El Deeb S, Abdellatef HE, Hendawy HAM, El-Abassy OM, Ibrahim H. Eco-friendly and sensitive HPLC and TLC methods validated for determination of Betahistine in the presence of its process-related impurity. Separations. 2022;9(2):49. doi:10.3390/separations9020049
  4. Kumar A, Nanda S. Spectrophotometric estimation of Betahistine Hydrochloride in tablet formulations. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2010;2(2):121–4.
  5. Dasari PK, Jayavarapu KR, Gopi Krishna C, Tanuku S. Development and validation of LC–MS/MS method for estimation of Betahistine in human plasma. Int J Pharm Pharm Res. 2020;18(3):385–98.
  6. Nováková L, Vl?ková H, Solich P. UPLC — advantages in pharmaceutical analysis. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2006;40(4):832–40.
  7. Waters Corporation. Beginner’s guide to UPLC technology. 2008 [cited 2025 Aug 30]. Available from: Waters website (UPLC primer).
  8. Ibrahim MA, El-Hadidy GS, El-Zahaby SA, El-Ahmady SH. Eco-friendly chromatographic methods: review including betahistine assay. Chromatographia. 2022;85(6):395–410.
  9. Waters Corporation; multiple authors. Column chemistries (end-capped C18, BEH, CSH) for basic drug separations. UPLC and UPLC-MS Application Notebook. 2008;
  10. Green-chemistry-oriented chromatography reviews (2023–24) advocating sustainability in QC via micellar and UPLC methods. J Chromatogr A. 2023;1700:462–75 or Green Chem Rev. 2024;

Photo
Prakash M
Corresponding author

Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Photo
Dr. Saraswathy T
Co-author

Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Photo
Megala M
Co-author

Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Photo
Manikandan R
Co-author

Kamalakshi Pandurangan College of Pharmacy, Tiruvannamalai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Photo
Vijayalakshmi M. K
Co-author

Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Selaiyur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Prakash M, Dr. Saraswathy T, Megala M, Manikandan R, Vijayalakshmi M. K, High-Throughput UPLC Method for Accurate Quantification of Betahistine in Pharmaceutical Tablets, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 9, 2755-2761. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17189344

More related articles
A Research Study On The Formulation And Evaluation...
Utsav pathak *, Chinu kumari , Dev prakash dahiya , ...
A Systematic Review on Management of Type 2 Diabet...
Raj Kumar, Leena Thakur, Pardeep Kumar, ...
Clinical Research Design and Its Types...
Jesima Begum A, Samuel D., Santhiya S., Santhiyarubi N., Saratha ...
Narrative Review: Multifunction Pharmaceutical Excipients in Tablet Formulation...
hussein k. alkufi, Ahmed H. Salman, Ali Saeed Owayez, ...
A Review on Organogel and Its Application in Drug Delivery...
Manikandan K., Dhanesh Kumar M. R., Suganya J., Nisaruthin A., Harish S., Manjunathan C. M., ...
Related Articles
Formulation And Evaluation of HERBALn Eyeshadow from Natural Coloring Matter (MU...
Rugvedi Hiwase, Vaishnavi Bhatkar, Roshani Garkal, Pooja Bekate, Swati Deshmukh, ...
Niosomes Used In Treatment Of Cancer: A Review...
Sudarshan Kale, Shraddha vaishnav , Vinit khairnar , chaitali markand , ...
Formulation And Evaluation of Nanoemulgel for Mouth Ulcer...
Sreethu K., Maziya Anvar, Safa K., Kamal Krishnan C. M., Aswathi V. V., ...
More related articles
Clinical Research Design and Its Types...
Jesima Begum A, Samuel D., Santhiya S., Santhiyarubi N., Saratha K., Senthamarai R., ...
Clinical Research Design and Its Types...
Jesima Begum A, Samuel D., Santhiya S., Santhiyarubi N., Saratha K., Senthamarai R., ...