View Article

  • Phytomarker-Based Standardization of Ayurvedic Polyherbal Formulations: A Review on Analytical Approaches and Quality Control

  • 1Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance, Sardar Patel College of Pharmacy, SPEC, Bakrol, Anand, Gujarat, India

    ²Department of Pharmacognosy, Parul Institute of Pharmacy and Research, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.

Abstract

Ayurvedic polyherbal formulations have gained significant global recognition due to their therapeutic potential, natural origin, and comparatively lower adverse effects. However, the complex phytochemical composition of herbal formulations creates challenges related to quality control, authentication, reproducibility, and batch-to-batch consistency. Variations in geographical source, cultivation conditions, harvesting practices, storage, and processing methods may influence the chemical composition and therapeutic efficacy of herbal products. Therefore, scientifically validated standardization approaches are essential for ensuring the quality, safety, and efficacy of Ayurvedic medicines. Phytomarker-based standardization has emerged as an important strategy for quality assessment and authentication of herbal formulations. The present review highlights the role of selected phytomarkers including piperine, marmelosin, limonene, and apigenin in the standardization and quality control of Ayurvedic polyherbal formulations. Modern analytical techniques such as HPLC, HPTLC, GC-MS, UV-visible spectroscopy, and LC-MS/MS play a crucial role in phytomarker analysis and chromatographic fingerprinting of herbal products. The review also discusses major challenges associated with herbal standardization and emphasizes the future potential of advanced analytical technologies, chemometrics, and artificial intelligence in phytomarker-based quality evaluation. Overall, phytomarker-oriented standardization may significantly improve the scientific validation and global acceptance of Ayurvedic formulations.

Keywords

Ayurvedic formulations; Phytomarkers; Herbal standardization; Polyherbal formulations; HPLC; HPTLC; Quality control; Herbal medicines

Introduction

Ayurveda is among the oldest traditional healthcare systems and has been widely practiced in India for centuries. In recent years, herbal medicines and plant-derived therapeutic agents have gained considerable worldwide recognition due to their natural origin, therapeutic effectiveness, and relatively lower adverse effects. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), traditional herbal medicines are extensively used by a large proportion of the population, particularly in developing countries, for primary healthcare purposes. The increasing popularity of complementary and alternative medicine has further enhanced the global demand for safe, effective, and scientifically standardized herbal formulations. Herbal products are commonly utilized in the management of chronic diseases, inflammatory disorders, gastrointestinal complications, immune-related conditions, and general health maintenance. ¹?³

Despite their growing acceptance, Ayurvedic and herbal formulations face several challenges related to quality, safety, and consistency. Variability in phytochemical composition may arise due to differences in geographical location, climatic conditions, cultivation practices, harvesting period, storage conditions, and processing methods. Moreover, adulteration and substitution of raw herbal materials remain major concerns that may compromise the therapeutic efficacy and safety of herbal products. The absence of proper standardization protocols and insufficient quality control measures further affects the reproducibility and reliability of polyherbal formulations. In comparison with synthetic drugs, the complex chemical nature of herbal formulations makes their evaluation and quality assessment more challenging. ???

To address these issues, phytomarker-based standardization has emerged as an important strategy for quality evaluation of herbal formulations. Phytomarkers are chemically characterized constituents present in medicinal plants that are employed for identification, authentication, and quantitative assessment of herbal products. Marker-based standardization plays a crucial role in maintaining batch-to-batch consistency, therapeutic efficacy, and safety of Ayurvedic formulations. In addition, selection of appropriate phytomarkers helps minimize variability and improve the reproducibility of herbal preparations. Therefore, phytochemical profiling and marker-oriented analysis have become essential aspects of modern herbal drug standardization. ???

Modern analytical techniques contribute significantly to the qualitative and quantitative analysis of phytoconstituents present in herbal formulations. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is extensively used for accurate separation and quantification of phytomarkers in complex polyherbal matrices. High-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) is widely employed for chromatographic fingerprinting, authentication, and comparative analysis of herbal drugs. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) is particularly useful for characterization of volatile compounds such as essential oils and terpenoids, whereas UV-visible spectroscopy serves as a simple, rapid, and cost-effective method for routine phytochemical estimation. These analytical approaches greatly support the quality control and standardization of Ayurvedic medicines. ¹??¹³

Among the numerous phytomarkers reported in medicinal plants, piperine, marmelosin, limonene, and apigenin have gained considerable scientific attention because of their pharmacological importance and analytical relevance. Piperine, an alkaloid present in Piper longum, is known for its bioavailability-enhancing and digestive stimulant properties. Marmelosin, a coumarin derivative isolated from Aegle marmelos, exhibits antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities. Limonene, a monoterpene found in Anethum graveolens and other aromatic plants, possesses antimicrobial and gastroprotective properties. Apigenin, a flavonoid present in Apium graveolens, is recognized for its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and cardioprotective effects. These phytomarkers are frequently employed as analytical targets for quality assessment and standardization of herbal formulations. ¹??¹?

The present review highlights the significance of selected phytomarkers in the standardization and quality control of Ayurvedic polyherbal formulations using modern analytical techniques. The review further emphasizes the applications of HPLC, HPTLC, GC-MS, and UV spectroscopy in phytomarker-based evaluation of herbal medicines.

 

 

 

Figure 1. Overview of Phytomarker-based standardization of Ayurvedic polyherbal formulations

 

2. Concept of Phytomarkers:

Phytomarkers are chemically characterized constituents present in medicinal plants or herbal formulations that are utilized for identification, authentication, and quality evaluation of herbal products. These compounds may or may not exhibit direct therapeutic activity; however, they act as important reference standards for ensuring the quality, safety, consistency, and efficacy of herbal medicines. Phytomarkers are extensively employed in the standardization of Ayurvedic formulations because herbal drugs contain complex mixtures of phytoconstituents whose composition may vary due to geographical origin, environmental conditions, cultivation practices, harvesting period, and processing methods. ¹??²?

Selection of appropriate phytomarkers is essential for the development of reliable quality control protocols for herbal formulations. An ideal phytomarker should possess chemical stability, analytical detectability, and consistent presence within the raw material or finished formulation. Marker compounds are generally selected based on their pharmacological importance, abundance, therapeutic relevance, and ease of analysis. The use of phytomarkers also facilitates the development of characteristic chromatographic fingerprints and quantitative standards that help maintain batch-to-batch uniformity in herbal products. In addition, chromatographic fingerprinting based on phytomarkers provides characteristic chemical profiles useful for identification, authentication, and comparative assessment of herbal formulations. ¹??²¹

Phytomarker-based standardization has become increasingly important in modern herbal drug analysis because it provides scientific support for traditional medicinal systems. The presence and concentration of specific phytomarkers can be employed to verify the authenticity of raw materials, identify adulteration or substitution, and evaluate the quality of polyherbal formulations. Furthermore, phytomarkers assist in stability monitoring, optimization of extraction procedures, and assessment of therapeutic reproducibility of herbal products. Advanced analytical techniques such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) have significantly improved the detection, separation, and quantification of marker compounds in complex herbal matrices. ²²?²?

Phytomarkers are broadly classified into different categories according to their therapeutic and analytical significance. Active markers are phytoconstituents that directly contribute to the pharmacological activity of the herbal formulation. Examples include piperine from Piper longum and apigenin from Apium graveolens, which are known for their antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities. Analytical markers are compounds selected mainly for analytical evaluation and quality control purposes irrespective of their therapeutic effects. These markers are widely used for fingerprint profiling, authentication, and standardization of herbal products. Negative markers refer to undesirable or toxic constituents whose presence must be monitored and controlled to ensure safety of herbal formulations. Identification and quantification of these different categories of phytomarkers are essential for comprehensive quality assurance of Ayurvedic medicines. ²??²?

The increasing global utilization of herbal medicines has highlighted the importance of scientifically validated standardization methods based on phytomarker analysis. The World Health Organization (WHO) has also emphasized marker-based standardization as a crucial approach for quality assurance of herbal medicines. Regulatory authorities and researchers increasingly recognize phytomarker-based evaluation as an effective strategy for improving the safety, efficacy, reproducibility, and international acceptance of Ayurvedic formulations. Therefore, phytomarkers serve as indispensable tools in modern herbal drug standardization and quality control systems.

 

Table 1: Classification of Phytomarkers

Type of Phytomarker

Definition

Example

Importance in Standardization

Active Marker

Phytoconstituent responsible for pharmacological activity

Piperine, Apigenin

Evaluation of therapeutic efficacy

Analytical Marker

Compound selected mainly for analytical and quality control purposes

Marmelosin

Fingerprinting and authentication

Negative Marker

Undesirable or toxic constituent monitored for safety evaluation

Toxic alkaloids, contaminants

Safety assessment and contamination control

 

 

Figure 2. Role of Phytomarkers in Herbal Standardization

 

3. Importance of Standardization in Ayurvedic Formulations:

Standardization is a critical aspect of Ayurvedic and herbal formulations to ensure their quality, safety, efficacy, and reproducibility. Unlike synthetic medicines, herbal products contain complex mixtures of phytoconstituents whose chemical composition may vary due to several environmental and processing factors. Variability in crude drugs is one of the major challenges in the preparation of consistent and therapeutically effective herbal formulations. Factors such as plant species, cultivation practices, harvesting period, drying conditions, and extraction procedures can significantly influence the concentration of bioactive constituents present in medicinal plants. ²??²?

Polyherbal formulations are extensively used in Ayurveda because of their synergistic therapeutic effects. However, the presence of multiple herbal ingredients further increases the complexity of standardization. Variations in phytochemical composition may directly affect the therapeutic efficacy, safety, and reproducibility of herbal products. Therefore, scientific standardization is essential for maintaining consistency and reliability of Ayurvedic formulations.

Geographical and climatic conditions also play an important role in determining the phytochemical profile of medicinal plants. Environmental factors such as soil composition, altitude, temperature, rainfall, and environmental stress may alter the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites. Consequently, the same plant species collected from different regions may exhibit variations in chemical composition and therapeutic activity, thereby affecting the quality and consistency of herbal formulations. ²??²?

Improper storage conditions can further influence the stability and quality of herbal raw materials and finished products. Exposure to moisture, heat, oxygen, and light may result in degradation of phytoconstituents, microbial contamination, and reduced therapeutic potency. Similarly, contamination and adulteration with heavy metals, pesticides, microbial toxins, or substitute plant materials remain major concerns associated with Ayurvedic formulations. Such practices may compromise the authenticity, efficacy, and safety of herbal medicines. ³??³?

Another significant challenge is the lack of reproducibility in therapeutic outcomes. Minor variations in raw material quality, extraction methods, and manufacturing processes can produce substantial changes in phytochemical composition and pharmacological response. Therefore, scientifically validated standardization protocols are necessary to ensure batch-to-batch consistency and therapeutic reliability of herbal formulations. ³?

Standardization of Ayurvedic formulations involves physicochemical evaluation, phytochemical profiling, chromatographic fingerprinting, and quantitative estimation of phytomarkers. Modern analytical techniques such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC), and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) are extensively employed for identification and quantification of bioactive constituents in herbal products. Proper standardization not only improves product quality and safety but also enhances scientific credibility and global acceptance of Ayurvedic medicines. Therefore, phytomarker-based standardization has become an indispensable approach in quality control of polyherbal formulations. ²??³?

 

Table 2: Major Factors Affecting Standardization of Ayurvedic Formulations

Factor

Effect on Herbal Formulations

Impact on Quality

Geographical variation

Alters phytochemical composition

Batch inconsistency

Climatic conditions

Affects secondary metabolite production

Variability in efficacy

Storage conditions

Causes degradation of phytoconstituents

Reduced stability and potency

Adulteration/Substitution

Changes formulation authenticity

Safety and efficacy concerns

Extraction variability

Produces inconsistent phytochemical profiles

Poor reproducibility

Contamination

Introduces toxic substances and microbes

Quality and safety issues

 

4. Modern Analytical Techniques Used in Herbal Standardization:

Modern analytical techniques play a vital role in the identification, authentication, standardization, and quality assessment of Ayurvedic and herbal formulations. Since polyherbal formulations contain complex mixtures of phytoconstituents, advanced analytical methods are required for accurate qualitative and quantitative evaluation of herbal products. Techniques such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), UV-visible spectroscopy, and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) are widely used for phytochemical analysis and phytomarker-based standardization of herbal formulations. ³??³?

 

Table 3: Modern Analytical Techniques Used in Herbal Standardization

Analytical Technique

Principle

Major Applications in Herbal Analysis

Advantages

High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)

Separation based on differential interaction between stationary and mobile phases under high pressure

Quantification of phytomarkers, fingerprint profiling, impurity analysis, batch consistency evaluation

High sensitivity, accuracy, reproducibility

High-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC)

Separation of compounds on precoated silica plates followed by densitometric analysis

Fingerprint profiling, authentication, adulteration detection, routine quality control

Rapid, simple, cost-effective

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS)

Separation of volatile compounds followed by mass spectral identification

Analysis of volatile oils, terpenoids, limonene, metabolite profiling

High specificity and structural characterization

UV-visible spectroscopy

Measurement of absorption of ultraviolet or visible radiation by compounds

Routine estimation of flavonoids, alkaloids, phenolics, phytochemical screening

Simple, economical, rapid

Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)

Combination of chromatographic separation with mass spectral analysis

Metabolite profiling, structural elucidation, impurity analysis, trace-level quantification

Highly sensitive and selective

 

The application of these analytical techniques has significantly improved the scientific validation and quality control of herbal medicines. Chromatographic and spectroscopic methods enable accurate identification and quantification of phytomarkers, thereby supporting the development of safe, effective, and standardized Ayurvedic formulations.

5. Profile of Selected Phytomarkers:

Phytomarkers are important bioactive constituents employed for identification, authentication, and quality evaluation of herbal formulations. Selection of appropriate phytomarkers is essential for maintaining batch consistency, therapeutic efficacy, and reproducibility of Ayurvedic polyherbal formulations. In the present review, piperine, marmelosin, limonene, and apigenin were selected as representative phytomarkers because of their pharmacological relevance and analytical importance in herbal standardization.

5.1 Piperine:

Piperine is a major alkaloidal phytoconstituent mainly present in Piper longum and Piper nigrum. It is well known for its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, hepatoprotective, and bioavailability-enhancing properties. Piperine is extensively used as a marker compound in Ayurvedic formulations due to its pharmacological significance and analytical stability. Various analytical techniques such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC), UV-visible spectroscopy, and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) are commonly employed for its identification and quantitative estimation. ?³???

Chemical name: (E, E)-1-[5-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-1-oxo-2,4-pentadienyl] piperidine
Chemical class: Alkaloid
Molecular formula: C??H??NO?

 

 

Figure 3. Chemical structure of Piperine

5.2 Marmelosin:

Marmelosin is an important coumarin derivative present in Aegle marmelos (Bael). It possesses antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antidiarrheal, and hepatoprotective properties. HPLC and HPTLC methods are widely employed for the analysis and fingerprint profiling of marmelosin-containing herbal formulations. ?????

Chemical name: 7-methoxy-6-(3-methyl-2-butenyloxy) coumarin
Chemical class: Coumarin
Molecular formula: C??H??O?

 

 

Figure 4. Chemical structure of Marmelosin

5.3 Limonene:

Limonene is a cyclic monoterpene commonly found in Anethum graveolens and other aromatic medicinal plants. Due to its volatile nature, limonene is mainly analyzed using GC-MS and GC-FID techniques. Pharmacologically, limonene exhibits antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and gastroprotective activities. ?¹??³

Chemical name: (R)-p-Mentha-1,8-diene
Chemical class: Monoterpene
Molecular formula: C??H??

 

 

 

Figure 5. Chemical structure of Limonene

5.4 Apigenin:

Apigenin is a naturally occurring flavonoid present in Apium graveolens and several medicinal herbs. It exhibits antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, cardioprotective, neuroprotective, and anticancer properties. HPLC, HPTLC, UV spectroscopy, and LC-MS/MS methods are commonly used for quantitative estimation and characterization of apigenin in herbal formulations. ?????

Chemical name: 4′,5,7-Trihydroxyflavone
Chemical class: Flavonoid (Flavone)
Molecular formula: C??H??O?

 

 

Figure 6. Chemical structure of Apigenin

 

Table 4: Analytical Profile of Selected Phytomarkers

Phytomarker

Plant Source

Chemical Class

Major Pharmacological Activities

Analytical Methods Used

Application in Standardization

Piperine

Piper longum

Alkaloid

Bioavailability enhancer, antioxidant, antimicrobial

HPLC, HPTLC, UV, LC-MS/MS

Quantification and quality control

Marmelosin

Aegle marmelos

Coumarin

Antioxidant, antidiarrheal, anti-inflammatory

HPLC, HPTLC, UV

Fingerprinting and authentication

Limonene

Anethum graveolens

Monoterpene

Antimicrobial, gastroprotective, antioxidant

GC-MS, GC-FID

Volatile oil profiling

Apigenin

Apium graveolens

Flavonoid

Antioxidant, cardioprotective, anti-inflammatory

HPLC, HPTLC, UV, LC-MS/MS

Flavonoid quantification

 

6. Role of Phytomarkers in Polyherbal Formulation Standardization:

Polyherbal formulations are extensively used in Ayurveda because of their synergistic therapeutic effects and diverse pharmacological activities. However, the presence of multiple medicinal plants and complex phytoconstituents creates challenges related to quality control, authentication, reproducibility, and batch consistency. In recent years, phytomarker-based standardization has emerged as an effective scientific approach for ensuring the quality, safety, and efficacy of Ayurvedic polyherbal formulations. ?????

Phytomarkers play a significant role in chromatographic fingerprinting, authentication, quantitative estimation, and quality assurance of herbal formulations. Advanced analytical techniques such as HPLC, HPTLC, GC-MS, and LC-MS are widely employed for phytomarker profiling and standardization of herbal products. Marker-based analysis assists in maintaining batch consistency, detecting adulteration, confirming authenticity, and evaluating therapeutic reproducibility of Ayurvedic formulations. ????²

In addition, phytomarker analysis helps in contamination detection, stability monitoring, and development of reliable quality control protocols for herbal medicines. Quantitative estimation of marker compounds such as piperine, marmelosin, limonene, and apigenin ensures uniformity and consistency in herbal formulations. Therefore, phytomarker-based standardization significantly contributes to the scientific validation and global acceptance of Ayurvedic medicines. ?³???

 

Table 5: Role of Phytomarkers in Herbal Standardization

Role of Phytomarkers

Significance in Herbal Formulations

Chromatographic fingerprinting

Generates characteristic chemical profiles

Authentication

Confirms identity and purity of herbal drugs

Detection of adulteration

Identifies substitution and contamination

Batch consistency

Maintains uniform phytochemical composition

Quantitative estimation

Determines concentration of marker compounds

Quality assurance

Ensures safety, efficacy, and reproducibility

Stability monitoring

Evaluates storage-related phytochemical changes

 

Selection of Phytomarkers

Chromatographic Fingerprinting

Authentication of Herbal Drugs

Detection of Adulteration

Quantitative Estimation

Batch Consistency Evaluation

Quality Assurance

Standardized Herbal Formulation

Figure 7. Role of Phytomarkers in Polyherbal Formulation Standardization

 

7. Challenges in Standardization of Ayurvedic Polyherbal Formulations:

Despite remarkable advancements in herbal drug research and analytical technologies, standardization of Ayurvedic polyherbal formulations continues to be a major scientific challenge. Polyherbal formulations contain multiple phytoconstituents belonging to various chemical classes such as alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, glycosides, and coumarins. The complex composition of these formulations makes their qualitative and quantitative evaluation more difficult compared with synthetic drugs containing single active ingredients. ?????

One of the major challenges in herbal standardization is variability in phytochemical composition caused by geographical origin, climatic conditions, harvesting season, storage, and processing methods. In addition, phytomarkers may be present in trace concentrations, making their detection and quantification difficult using routine analytical techniques. Therefore, advanced analytical methods such as HPLC, GC-MS, and LC-MS/MS are often required for accurate phytochemical analysis. ?¹??²

Extraction variability also greatly influences the quality and reproducibility of herbal formulations. Differences in extraction solvents, temperature, extraction time, and processing techniques may lead to variations in phytochemical profiles and therapeutic efficacy. Moreover, the lack of universally accepted standardization protocols and harmonized regulatory guidelines contributes to inconsistency in herbal product quality. ?³???

Another important concern is authentication and detection of adulteration in polyherbal formulations. Substitution, contamination, and adulteration with inferior plant materials or synthetic substances may alter the phytochemical composition and safety profile of herbal products. Stability-related issues such as degradation of phytoconstituents during storage may further reduce the shelf life and therapeutic reliability of herbal formulations. ?????

Therefore, the development of robust analytical methods, validated extraction procedures, reliable phytomarker selection strategies, and harmonized quality control guidelines is essential for improving the reproducibility, safety, and global acceptance of Ayurvedic polyherbal formulations.

FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

The growing global acceptance of herbal medicines has increased the demand for scientifically validated and standardized Ayurvedic formulations. Emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), chemometrics, advanced chromatographic fingerprinting, and hyphenated analytical techniques are expected to enhance phytomarker-based standardization approaches. ?????

Artificial intelligence and machine learning can support interpretation of complex chromatographic and spectral data, detection of adulteration, identification of phytomarkers, and optimization of analytical methods. Likewise, chemometric tools such as principal component analysis (PCA) and multivariate data analysis are increasingly applied for evaluation of batch consistency and differentiation of herbal samples. ????¹

Advanced analytical techniques including HPLC, HPTLC, GC-MS, LC-MS/MS, and NMR spectroscopy provide highly sensitive and reproducible phytochemical profiling of herbal formulations. In addition, hyphenated techniques such as LC-MS/MS and UPLC-QTOF-MS are becoming increasingly important for metabolite profiling, impurity analysis, and structural characterization of phytoconstituents. ?²???

Regulatory agencies are also emphasizing scientifically validated quality control protocols and harmonized guidelines for herbal medicines. Therefore, integration of advanced analytical technologies, computational tools, and standardized regulatory frameworks may further strengthen the scientific validation and global acceptance of Ayurvedic polyherbal formulations. ??

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 6: Emerging Approaches in Herbal Standardization

Emerging Approach

Application in Herbal Analysis

Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Data interpretation and adulteration detection

Chemometrics

Batch consistency and fingerprint analysis

Advanced Fingerprinting

Authentication and phytochemical profiling

Hyphenated Techniques

Structural characterization and metabolite analysis

Regulatory Harmonization

Development of global quality standards

 

CONCLUSION

Phytomarker-based standardization has become an important approach for ensuring the quality, safety, efficacy, and reproducibility of Ayurvedic polyherbal formulations. Selected phytomarkers such as piperine, marmelosin, limonene, and apigenin serve as reliable analytical tools for authentication, chromatographic fingerprinting, batch consistency evaluation, and quantitative quality assessment of herbal products. Marker-based analysis significantly strengthens the scientific validation and therapeutic reliability of traditional Ayurvedic medicines.

Modern analytical techniques including HPLC, HPTLC, GC-MS, UV-visible spectroscopy, and LC-MS/MS have considerably improved the identification, detection, and quantification of phytoconstituents present in complex herbal formulations. These analytical methods contribute to effective quality control, detection of adulteration, and development of standardized herbal products with improved safety and reproducibility.

However, challenges such as phytochemical complexity, variability in raw materials, low concentration of phytomarkers, and lack of harmonized regulatory guidelines still remain significant concerns in herbal drug standardization. Therefore, development of robust, validated, and universally accepted analytical methods is essential for strengthening the quality assurance systems of Ayurvedic formulations.

The increasing global demand for herbal medicines highlights the need for scientifically standardized and quality-assured Ayurvedic products. Integration of phytomarker analysis with advanced analytical technologies, chemometric approaches, and modern regulatory frameworks may further enhance the international acceptance and scientific credibility of Ayurvedic polyherbal formulations. Overall, phytomarker-based standardization represents a promising bridge between traditional Ayurvedic knowledge and modern scientific quality control systems.

10. Conflict of Interest:

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

11. Acknowledgement:

The authors are thankful to Sardar Patel College of Pharmacy and Parul Institute of Pharmacy and Research for providing necessary academic support.

REFERENCES

  1. World Health Organization. WHO traditional medicine strategy: 2014–2023. Geneva: WHO; 2013.
  2. Parasuraman S, Thing GS, Dhanaraj SA. Polyherbal formulation: Concept of Ayurveda. Pharmacogn Rev. 2014;8(16):73-80.
  3. Balekundri A, Mannur V. Quality control of the traditional herbs and herbal products: A review. Future J Pharm Sci. 2020; 6:67.
  4. Kunle OF, Egharevba HO, Ahmadu PO. Standardization of herbal medicines - A review. Int J Biodivers Conserv. 2012;4(3):101-12.
  5. Pandey MM, Rastogi S, Rawat AKS. Indian traditional Ayurvedic system of medicine and nutritional supplementation. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:376327.
  6. Newmaster SG, Grguric M, Shanmughanandhan D, Ramalingam S, Ragupathy S. DNA barcoding detects contamination and substitution in North American herbal products. BMC Med. 2013; 11:222.
  7. Liang YZ, Xie P, Chan K. Quality control of herbal medicines. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2004;812(1-2):53-70.
  8. Mukherjee PK. Quality Control of Herbal Drugs. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Business Horizons; 2007.
  9. Chanda S. Importance of pharmacognostic study of medicinal plants: An overview. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2014;2(5):69-73.
  10. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Dolan JW. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Wiley; 2010.
  11. Reich E, Schibli A. High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography for the Analysis of Medicinal Plants. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2007.
  12. Sparkman OD, Penton Z, Kitson FG. Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry: A Practical Guide. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press; 2011.
  13. Skoog DA, Holler FJ, Crouch SR. Principles of Instrumental Analysis. 6th ed. Belmont: Thomson Brooks/Cole; 2007.
  14. Meghwal M, Goswami TK. Piper nigrum and piperine: An update. Phytother Res. 2013;27(8):1121-30.
  15. Brijesh S, Daswani P, Tetali P, Antia N, Birdi T. Studies on the antidiarrhoeal activity of Aegle marmelos unripe fruit. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2009;9:47.
  16. Sun J. D-Limonene: Safety and clinical applications. Altern Med Rev. 2007;12(3):259-64.
  17. Salehi B, Venditti A, Sharifi-Rad M, et al. The therapeutic potential of apigenin. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(6):1305.
  18. Mukherjee PK. Quality Control of Herbal Drugs. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Business Horizons; 2007.
  19. Liang YZ, Xie P, Chan K. Quality control of herbal medicines. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2004;812(1-2):53-70.
  20. Kunle OF, Egharevba HO, Ahmadu PO. Standardization of herbal medicines - A review. Int J Biodivers Conserv. 2012;4(3):101-12.
  21. Chanda S, Nagani K. Importance of pharmacognostic study of medicinal plants: An overview. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2013;2(5):69-73.
  22. Reich E, Schibli A. High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography for the Analysis of Medicinal Plants. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2007.
  23. Waksmundzka-Hajnos M, Sherma J, Kowalska T. Thin Layer Chromatography in Phytochemistry. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2008.
  24. Patel PM, Patel NM, Goyal RK. Quality control of herbal products. Indian Pharm. 2006;5(45):26-30.
  25. World Health Organization. Quality control methods for herbal materials. Geneva: WHO; 2011.
  26. Mukherjee PK. Quality Control of Herbal Drugs. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Business Horizons; 2007.
  27. Kunle OF, Egharevba HO, Ahmadu PO. Standardization of herbal medicines - A review. Int J Biodivers Conserv. 2012;4(3):101-12.
  28. Liang YZ, Xie P, Chan K. Quality control of herbal medicines. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2004;812(1-2):53-70.
  29. Pandey MM, Rastogi S, Rawat AKS. Indian traditional Ayurvedic system of medicine and nutritional supplementation. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:376327.
  30. World Health Organization. Quality control methods for herbal materials. Geneva: WHO; 2011.
  31. Chanda S, Nagani K. Importance of pharmacognostic study of medicinal plants: An overview. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2013;2(5):69-73.
  32. Newmaster SG, Grguric M, Shanmughanandhan D, Ramalingam S, Ragupathy S. DNA barcoding detects contamination and substitution in North American herbal products. BMC Med. 2013;11:222.
  33. Joshi DD. Adulteration and substitution in endangered, as well as other medicinal plants in India. In: Medicinal Plants. Berlin: Springer; 2008. p. 319-29.
  34. Posadzki P, Watson LK, Ernst E. Contamination and adulteration of herbal medicinal products. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2013;34(6):307-12.
  35. Balekundri A, Mannur V. Quality control of the traditional herbs and herbal products: A review. Future J Pharm Sci. 2020;6:67.
  36. Reich E, Schibli A. High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography for the Analysis of Medicinal Plants. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2007.
  37. Mukherjee PK. Quality Control of Herbal Drugs. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Business Horizons; 2007.
  38. Liang YZ, Xie P, Chan K. Quality control of herbal medicines. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2004;812(1-2):53-70.
  39. Reich E, Schibli A. High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography for the Analysis of Medicinal Plants. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2007.
  40. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Dolan JW. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Wiley; 2010.
  41. Dong MW. Modern HPLC for Practicing Scientists. Hoboken: Wiley-Interscience; 2006.
  42. Waksmundzka-Hajnos M, Sherma J, Kowalska T. Thin Layer Chromatography in Phytochemistry. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2008.
  43. Reich E. HPTLC for the analysis of medicinal plants. Thieme Med Publ. 2007.
  44. Sethi PD. High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography: Quantitative Analysis of Pharmaceutical Formulations. 1st ed. New Delhi: CBS Publishers; 1996.
  45. Patel PM, Patel NM, Goyal RK. Quality control of herbal products. Indian Pharm. 2006;5(45):26-30.
  46. Sparkman OD, Penton Z, Kitson FG. Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry: A Practical Guide. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press; 2011.
  47. McLafferty FW, Turecek F. Interpretation of Mass Spectra. 4th ed. California: University Science Books; 1993.
  48. Niessen WMA. Current practice of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2001.
  49. Skoog DA, Holler FJ, Crouch SR. Principles of Instrumental Analysis. 6th ed. Belmont: Thomson Brooks/Cole; 2007.
  50. Chatwal GR, Anand SK. Instrumental Methods of Chemical Analysis. 5th ed. Mumbai: Himalaya Publishing House; 2007.
  51. Niessen WMA. Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2006.
  52. Willoughby R, Sheehan E, Mitrovich S. A Global View of LC/MS: How to Solve Your Most Challenging Analytical Problems. Pittsburgh: Global View Publishing; 2002.
  53. Meghwal M, Goswami TK. Piper nigrum and piperine: An update. Phytother Res. 2013;27(8):1121-30.
  54. Srinivasan K. Black pepper and its pungent principle-piperine: A review of diverse physiological effects. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2007;47(8):735-48.
  55. Atal CK, Dubey RK, Singh J. Biochemical basis of enhanced drug bioavailability by piperine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1985;232(1):258-62.
  56. Hamrapurkar PD, Jadhav K, Zine S. Quantitative estimation of piperine in herbal formulations by HPTLC method. J Planar Chromatogr. 2009;22(2):117-20.
  57. Patel PN, Patel NM, Goyal RK. HPLC method development and validation for piperine estimation. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2010;1(3):24-30.
  58. Brijesh S, Daswani P, Tetali P, Antia N, Birdi T. Studies on the antidiarrhoeal activity of Aegle marmelos unripe fruit. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2009;9:47.
  59. Maity P, Hansda D, Bandyopadhyay U, Mishra DK. Biological activities of crude extracts and chemical constituents of Bael, Aegle marmelos. Indian J Exp Biol. 2009;47(11):849-61.
  60. Sharma PC, Bhatia V, Bansal N, Sharma A. A review on Bael tree. Nat Prod Radiance. 2007;6(2):171-8.
  61. Sun J. D-Limonene: Safety and clinical applications. Altern Med Rev. 2007;12(3):259-64.
  62. Vieira AJ, Beserra FP, Souza MC, Totti BM, Rozza AL. Limonene: Aroma of innovation in health and disease. Chem Biol Interact. 2018;283:97-106.
  63. Sparkman OD, Penton Z, Kitson FG. Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry: A Practical Guide. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press; 2011.
  64. Salehi B, Venditti A, Sharifi-Rad M, et al. The therapeutic potential of apigenin. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(6):1305.
  65. Shukla S, Gupta S. Apigenin: A promising molecule for cancer prevention. Pharm Res. 2010;27(6):962-78.
  66. Markham KR. Techniques of Flavonoid Identification. London: Academic Press; 1982.
  67. Mukherjee PK. Quality Control of Herbal Drugs. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Business Horizons; 2007.
  68. Liang YZ, Xie P, Chan K. Quality control of herbal medicines. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2004;812(1-2):53-70.
  69. Reich E, Schibli A. High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography for the Analysis of Medicinal Plants. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2007.
  70. Waksmundzka-Hajnos M, Sherma J, Kowalska T. Thin Layer Chromatography in Phytochemistry. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2008.
  71. Kunle OF, Egharevba HO, Ahmadu PO. Standardization of herbal medicines - A review. Int J Biodivers Conserv. 2012;4(3):101-12.
  72. Chanda S, Nagani K. Importance of pharmacognostic study of medicinal plants: An overview. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2013;2(5):69-73.
  73. Newmaster SG, Grguric M, Shanmughanandhan D, Ramalingam S, Ragupathy S. DNA barcoding detects contamination and substitution in North American herbal products. BMC Med. 2013;11:222.
  74. Posadzki P, Watson LK, Ernst E. Contamination and adulteration of herbal medicinal products. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2013;34(6):307-12.
  75. World Health Organization. Quality control methods for herbal materials. Geneva: WHO; 2011. Available from: WHO Quality Control Methods for Herbal Materials
  76. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Dolan JW. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Wiley; 2010.
  77. Sethi PD. High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography: Quantitative Analysis of Pharmaceutical Formulations. 1st ed. New Delhi: CBS Publishers; 1996.
  78. Mukherjee PK. Quality Control of Herbal Drugs. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Business Horizons; 2007.
  79. Liang YZ, Xie P, Chan K. Quality control of herbal medicines. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2004;812(1-2):53-70.
  80. Kunle OF, Egharevba HO, Ahmadu PO. Standardization of herbal medicines - A review. Int J Biodivers Conserv. 2012;4(3):101-12.
  81. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Dolan JW. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Wiley; 2010.
  82. Niessen WMA. Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2006.
  83. Handa SS, Khanuja SPS, Longo G, Rakesh DD. Extraction Technologies for Medicinal and Aromatic Plants. Trieste: ICS-UNIDO; 2008.
  84. World Health Organization. Quality control methods for herbal materials. Geneva: WHO; 2011.
  85. Balekundri A, Mannur V. Quality control of the traditional herbs and herbal products: A review. Future J Pharm Sci. 2020;6:67.
  86. Newmaster SG, Grguric M, Shanmughanandhan D, Ramalingam S, Ragupathy S. DNA barcoding detects contamination and substitution in North American herbal products. BMC Med. 2013;11:222.
  87. Chanda S, Nagani K. Importance of pharmacognostic study of medicinal plants: An overview. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2013;2(5):69-73.
  88. Mukherjee PK. Quality Control of Herbal Drugs. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Business Horizons; 2007.
  89. Liang YZ, Xie P, Chan K. Quality control of herbal medicines. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2004;812(1-2):53-70.
  90. Ahmed S, Rahman A, Alam A. Artificial intelligence in pharmaceutical and herbal drug analysis: Current perspectives and future prospects. J Pharm Anal. 2021;11(6):700-12.
  91. Brereton RG. Chemometrics for Pattern Recognition. Chichester: Wiley; 2009.
  92. Reich E, Schibli A. High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography for the Analysis of Medicinal Plants. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2007.
  93. Wolfender JL, Marti G, Thomas A, Bertrand S. Current approaches and challenges for the metabolite profiling of complex natural extracts. J Chromatogr A. 2015;1382:136-64.
  94. Niessen WMA. Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2006.
  95. World Health Organization. Quality control methods for herbal materials. Geneva: WHO; 2011.

Reference

  1. medicine strategy: 2014–2023. Geneva: WHO; 2013.
  2. Parasuraman S, Thing GS, Dhanaraj SA. Polyherbal formulation: Concept of Ayurveda. Pharmacogn Rev. 2014;8(16):73-80.
  3. Balekundri A, Mannur V. Quality control of the traditional herbs and herbal products: A review. Future J Pharm Sci. 2020; 6:67.
  4. Kunle OF, Egharevba HO, Ahmadu PO. Standardization of herbal medicines - A review. Int J Biodivers Conserv. 2012;4(3):101-12.
  5. Pandey MM, Rastogi S, Rawat AKS. Indian traditional Ayurvedic system of medicine and nutritional supplementation. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:376327.
  6. Newmaster SG, Grguric M, Shanmughanandhan D, Ramalingam S, Ragupathy S. DNA barcoding detects contamination and substitution in North American herbal products. BMC Med. 2013; 11:222.
  7. Liang YZ, Xie P, Chan K. Quality control of herbal medicines. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2004;812(1-2):53-70.
  8. Mukherjee PK. Quality Control of Herbal Drugs. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Business Horizons; 2007.
  9. Chanda S. Importance of pharmacognostic study of medicinal plants: An overview. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2014;2(5):69-73.
  10. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Dolan JW. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Wiley; 2010.
  11. Reich E, Schibli A. High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography for the Analysis of Medicinal Plants. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2007.
  12. Sparkman OD, Penton Z, Kitson FG. Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry: A Practical Guide. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press; 2011.
  13. Skoog DA, Holler FJ, Crouch SR. Principles of Instrumental Analysis. 6th ed. Belmont: Thomson Brooks/Cole; 2007.
  14. Meghwal M, Goswami TK. Piper nigrum and piperine: An update. Phytother Res. 2013;27(8):1121-30.
  15. Brijesh S, Daswani P, Tetali P, Antia N, Birdi T. Studies on the antidiarrhoeal activity of Aegle marmelos unripe fruit. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2009;9:47.
  16. Sun J. D-Limonene: Safety and clinical applications. Altern Med Rev. 2007;12(3):259-64.
  17. Salehi B, Venditti A, Sharifi-Rad M, et al. The therapeutic potential of apigenin. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(6):1305.
  18. Mukherjee PK. Quality Control of Herbal Drugs. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Business Horizons; 2007.
  19. Liang YZ, Xie P, Chan K. Quality control of herbal medicines. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2004;812(1-2):53-70.
  20. Kunle OF, Egharevba HO, Ahmadu PO. Standardization of herbal medicines - A review. Int J Biodivers Conserv. 2012;4(3):101-12.
  21. Chanda S, Nagani K. Importance of pharmacognostic study of medicinal plants: An overview. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2013;2(5):69-73.
  22. Reich E, Schibli A. High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography for the Analysis of Medicinal Plants. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2007.
  23. Waksmundzka-Hajnos M, Sherma J, Kowalska T. Thin Layer Chromatography in Phytochemistry. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2008.
  24. Patel PM, Patel NM, Goyal RK. Quality control of herbal products. Indian Pharm. 2006;5(45):26-30.
  25. World Health Organization. Quality control methods for herbal materials. Geneva: WHO; 2011.
  26. Mukherjee PK. Quality Control of Herbal Drugs. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Business Horizons; 2007.
  27. Kunle OF, Egharevba HO, Ahmadu PO. Standardization of herbal medicines - A review. Int J Biodivers Conserv. 2012;4(3):101-12.
  28. Liang YZ, Xie P, Chan K. Quality control of herbal medicines. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2004;812(1-2):53-70.
  29. Pandey MM, Rastogi S, Rawat AKS. Indian traditional Ayurvedic system of medicine and nutritional supplementation. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:376327.
  30. World Health Organization. Quality control methods for herbal materials. Geneva: WHO; 2011.
  31. Chanda S, Nagani K. Importance of pharmacognostic study of medicinal plants: An overview. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2013;2(5):69-73.
  32. Newmaster SG, Grguric M, Shanmughanandhan D, Ramalingam S, Ragupathy S. DNA barcoding detects contamination and substitution in North American herbal products. BMC Med. 2013;11:222.
  33. Joshi DD. Adulteration and substitution in endangered, as well as other medicinal plants in India. In: Medicinal Plants. Berlin: Springer; 2008. p. 319-29.
  34. Posadzki P, Watson LK, Ernst E. Contamination and adulteration of herbal medicinal products. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2013;34(6):307-12.
  35. Balekundri A, Mannur V. Quality control of the traditional herbs and herbal products: A review. Future J Pharm Sci. 2020;6:67.
  36. Reich E, Schibli A. High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography for the Analysis of Medicinal Plants. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2007.
  37. Mukherjee PK. Quality Control of Herbal Drugs. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Business Horizons; 2007.
  38. Liang YZ, Xie P, Chan K. Quality control of herbal medicines. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2004;812(1-2):53-70.
  39. Reich E, Schibli A. High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography for the Analysis of Medicinal Plants. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2007.
  40. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Dolan JW. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Wiley; 2010.
  41. Dong MW. Modern HPLC for Practicing Scientists. Hoboken: Wiley-Interscience; 2006.
  42. Waksmundzka-Hajnos M, Sherma J, Kowalska T. Thin Layer Chromatography in Phytochemistry. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2008.
  43. Reich E. HPTLC for the analysis of medicinal plants. Thieme Med Publ. 2007.
  44. Sethi PD. High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography: Quantitative Analysis of Pharmaceutical Formulations. 1st ed. New Delhi: CBS Publishers; 1996.
  45. Patel PM, Patel NM, Goyal RK. Quality control of herbal products. Indian Pharm. 2006;5(45):26-30.
  46. Sparkman OD, Penton Z, Kitson FG. Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry: A Practical Guide. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press; 2011.
  47. McLafferty FW, Turecek F. Interpretation of Mass Spectra. 4th ed. California: University Science Books; 1993.
  48. Niessen WMA. Current practice of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2001.
  49. Skoog DA, Holler FJ, Crouch SR. Principles of Instrumental Analysis. 6th ed. Belmont: Thomson Brooks/Cole; 2007.
  50. Chatwal GR, Anand SK. Instrumental Methods of Chemical Analysis. 5th ed. Mumbai: Himalaya Publishing House; 2007.
  51. Niessen WMA. Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2006.
  52. Willoughby R, Sheehan E, Mitrovich S. A Global View of LC/MS: How to Solve Your Most Challenging Analytical Problems. Pittsburgh: Global View Publishing; 2002.
  53. Meghwal M, Goswami TK. Piper nigrum and piperine: An update. Phytother Res. 2013;27(8):1121-30.
  54. Srinivasan K. Black pepper and its pungent principle-piperine: A review of diverse physiological effects. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2007;47(8):735-48.
  55. Atal CK, Dubey RK, Singh J. Biochemical basis of enhanced drug bioavailability by piperine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1985;232(1):258-62.
  56. Hamrapurkar PD, Jadhav K, Zine S. Quantitative estimation of piperine in herbal formulations by HPTLC method. J Planar Chromatogr. 2009;22(2):117-20.
  57. Patel PN, Patel NM, Goyal RK. HPLC method development and validation for piperine estimation. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2010;1(3):24-30.
  58. Brijesh S, Daswani P, Tetali P, Antia N, Birdi T. Studies on the antidiarrhoeal activity of Aegle marmelos unripe fruit. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2009;9:47.
  59. Maity P, Hansda D, Bandyopadhyay U, Mishra DK. Biological activities of crude extracts and chemical constituents of Bael, Aegle marmelos. Indian J Exp Biol. 2009;47(11):849-61.
  60. Sharma PC, Bhatia V, Bansal N, Sharma A. A review on Bael tree. Nat Prod Radiance. 2007;6(2):171-8.
  61. Sun J. D-Limonene: Safety and clinical applications. Altern Med Rev. 2007;12(3):259-64.
  62. Vieira AJ, Beserra FP, Souza MC, Totti BM, Rozza AL. Limonene: Aroma of innovation in health and disease. Chem Biol Interact. 2018;283:97-106.
  63. Sparkman OD, Penton Z, Kitson FG. Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry: A Practical Guide. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press; 2011.
  64. Salehi B, Venditti A, Sharifi-Rad M, et al. The therapeutic potential of apigenin. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(6):1305.
  65. Shukla S, Gupta S. Apigenin: A promising molecule for cancer prevention. Pharm Res. 2010;27(6):962-78.
  66. Markham KR. Techniques of Flavonoid Identification. London: Academic Press; 1982.
  67. Mukherjee PK. Quality Control of Herbal Drugs. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Business Horizons; 2007.
  68. Liang YZ, Xie P, Chan K. Quality control of herbal medicines. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2004;812(1-2):53-70.
  69. Reich E, Schibli A. High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography for the Analysis of Medicinal Plants. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2007.
  70. Waksmundzka-Hajnos M, Sherma J, Kowalska T. Thin Layer Chromatography in Phytochemistry. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2008.
  71. Kunle OF, Egharevba HO, Ahmadu PO. Standardization of herbal medicines - A review. Int J Biodivers Conserv. 2012;4(3):101-12.
  72. Chanda S, Nagani K. Importance of pharmacognostic study of medicinal plants: An overview. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2013;2(5):69-73.
  73. Newmaster SG, Grguric M, Shanmughanandhan D, Ramalingam S, Ragupathy S. DNA barcoding detects contamination and substitution in North American herbal products. BMC Med. 2013;11:222.
  74. Posadzki P, Watson LK, Ernst E. Contamination and adulteration of herbal medicinal products. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2013;34(6):307-12.
  75. World Health Organization. Quality control methods for herbal materials. Geneva: WHO; 2011. Available from: WHO Quality Control Methods for Herbal Materials
  76. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Dolan JW. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Wiley; 2010.
  77. Sethi PD. High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography: Quantitative Analysis of Pharmaceutical Formulations. 1st ed. New Delhi: CBS Publishers; 1996.
  78. Mukherjee PK. Quality Control of Herbal Drugs. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Business Horizons; 2007.
  79. Liang YZ, Xie P, Chan K. Quality control of herbal medicines. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2004;812(1-2):53-70.
  80. Kunle OF, Egharevba HO, Ahmadu PO. Standardization of herbal medicines - A review. Int J Biodivers Conserv. 2012;4(3):101-12.
  81. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Dolan JW. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Wiley; 2010.
  82. Niessen WMA. Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2006.
  83. Handa SS, Khanuja SPS, Longo G, Rakesh DD. Extraction Technologies for Medicinal and Aromatic Plants. Trieste: ICS-UNIDO; 2008.
  84. World Health Organization. Quality control methods for herbal materials. Geneva: WHO; 2011.
  85. Balekundri A, Mannur V. Quality control of the traditional herbs and herbal products: A review. Future J Pharm Sci. 2020;6:67.
  86. Newmaster SG, Grguric M, Shanmughanandhan D, Ramalingam S, Ragupathy S. DNA barcoding detects contamination and substitution in North American herbal products. BMC Med. 2013;11:222.
  87. Chanda S, Nagani K. Importance of pharmacognostic study of medicinal plants: An overview. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2013;2(5):69-73.
  88. Mukherjee PK. Quality Control of Herbal Drugs. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Business Horizons; 2007.
  89. Liang YZ, Xie P, Chan K. Quality control of herbal medicines. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2004;812(1-2):53-70.
  90. Ahmed S, Rahman A, Alam A. Artificial intelligence in pharmaceutical and herbal drug analysis: Current perspectives and future prospects. J Pharm Anal. 2021;11(6):700-12.
  91. Brereton RG. Chemometrics for Pattern Recognition. Chichester: Wiley; 2009.
  92. Reich E, Schibli A. High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography for the Analysis of Medicinal Plants. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2007.
  93. Wolfender JL, Marti G, Thomas A, Bertrand S. Current approaches and challenges for the metabolite profiling of complex natural extracts. J Chromatogr A. 2015;1382:136-64.
  94. Niessen WMA. Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2006.
  95. World Health Organization. Quality control methods for herbal materials. Geneva: WHO; 2011.

Photo
Shah Salvi
Corresponding author

Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance, Sardar Patel College of Pharmacy, SPEC, Bakrol, Anand, Gujarat, India

Photo
Jaya Patel
Co-author

Department of Pharmacognosy, Parul Institute of Pharmacy and Research, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.

Salvi Shah, Jaya Patel, Phytomarker-Based Standardization of Ayurvedic Polyherbal Formulations: A Review on Analytical Approaches and Quality Control, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 5, 3451-3466, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20180400

More related articles
Development Of Nootropic Adaptogenic Herbal Lozeng...
Shweta Ram, Fiza Nazreen, Dr. Gyanesh Kumar Sahu, Suchita Wamanka...
Oral Dispersible Films (ODFs)...
Shubham Patel, Kavita Rana, Dr. Priyanka Patil, ...
An Observational Study on The Epidemiology, Clinic...
Dr. A. Shannumukha Saianth, Dr. M .A. Tabassum, Dr. Sayed Alishar...
A Comprehensive and Systemic Review on the Development and Validation of Differe...
Kajal Vable, Yaksh Gandhi, Khushi Prajapati, Himani Vaghasiya, Dr. Mitali Dalwadi, Dr. Chainesh Shah...
Topical Drug Innovation: Past, Present And Future Prospects ...
Ankita Damahe, Aditi Sharma, Shakuntala Pal, Anusha Sinha , Himanshu Bhuarya, ...
Related Articles
Recent Advancements in Lawsone-Derived Heterocyclic Compounds: Synthesis, Struct...
Manojkumar R., Gowtham A., Nandhakumar S., Balaji A., Devi P., Vijayabaskaran M., ...
Formulation and Evaluation of Mouth Dissolving Tablet of Metoclopramide: A Revie...
Amol Dhayarkar , Pravin Navgire , Dr. V. M satpute, S. R. Ghodake , ...
ACTIVE CONSTITUENTS FROM MEDICINAL PLANTS USED IN INFLAMMATION...
Lattupally Varalakshm, Gandhi Archana, Gali Havissu, Gandikota Tarun, Gogada Abhilash, Chinnawar Vai...
Development And Validation of Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Method For the Simult...
Hetal Pateliya, Dhirendra Kumar Tarai, Khyati Bhupta, Dr. Santosh Kirtane, ...
Development Of Nootropic Adaptogenic Herbal Lozenges for Stress Alleviation...
Shweta Ram, Fiza Nazreen, Dr. Gyanesh Kumar Sahu, Suchita Wamankar, Prof. Dr. Chanchal deep Kaur, ...
More related articles
Development Of Nootropic Adaptogenic Herbal Lozenges for Stress Alleviation...
Shweta Ram, Fiza Nazreen, Dr. Gyanesh Kumar Sahu, Suchita Wamankar, Prof. Dr. Chanchal deep Kaur, ...
Oral Dispersible Films (ODFs)...
Shubham Patel, Kavita Rana, Dr. Priyanka Patil, ...
An Observational Study on The Epidemiology, Clinical Characteristics, And Outcom...
Dr. A. Shannumukha Saianth, Dr. M .A. Tabassum, Dr. Sayed Alishar, ...
Development Of Nootropic Adaptogenic Herbal Lozenges for Stress Alleviation...
Shweta Ram, Fiza Nazreen, Dr. Gyanesh Kumar Sahu, Suchita Wamankar, Prof. Dr. Chanchal deep Kaur, ...
Oral Dispersible Films (ODFs)...
Shubham Patel, Kavita Rana, Dr. Priyanka Patil, ...
An Observational Study on The Epidemiology, Clinical Characteristics, And Outcom...
Dr. A. Shannumukha Saianth, Dr. M .A. Tabassum, Dr. Sayed Alishar, ...