View Article

Abstract

Drug safety surveillance, or pharmacovigilance, plays a critical role in protecting public health by detecting, assessing, and preventing adverse drug reactions (ADRs) throughout a medicine’s lifecycle. Traditional approaches such as spontaneous reporting systems, clinical trials, and post-marketing surveillance have contributed significantly to drug safety but are limited by underreporting, delayed signal detection, and fragmented data sources. With the increasing complexity of healthcare systems and the expansion of real-world drug use, these conventional methods are no longer sufficient to ensure timely and comprehensive safety monitoring. The emergence of digital health technologies offers a transformative opportunity to modernize pharmacovigilance. Electronic health records, wearable devices, mobile health applications, social media platforms, and large real-world data (RWD) networks generate vast amounts of continuous, patient-Centered data. When integrated with advanced tools such as artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and big data analytics, these technologies enable proactive, real-time, and predictive drug safety surveillance. This shift facilitates earlier detection of safety signals, improved monitoring across diverse populations, and enhanced personalized risk assessment. This study examines the evolving role of digital health in transforming drug safety surveillance, highlighting its potential to improve detection, monitoring, and prevention of adverse drug events in real-world settings. The transition toward integrated, data-driven, and learning health systems is essential for enhancing patient safety, supporting regulatory decision-making, and fostering trust in modern therapeutics.

Keywords

Pharmacovigilance; Drug Safety Surveillance; Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs); Digital Health; Real-World Data (RWD); Artificial Intelligence (AI); Machine Learning (ML).

Introduction

Ensuring the safety of medicines has long been a cornerstone of public health, traditionally relying on spontaneous reporting systems, clinical trials, and post-marketing surveillance to detect adverse drug reactions. While these methods have contributed significantly to patient safety, they are often limited by underreporting, delayed signal detection, and fragmented data sources (1). As healthcare systems grow increasingly complex and data-rich, these conventional pharmacovigilance approaches struggle to keep pace with the dynamic nature of real-world drug use (2). The rapid expansion of digital health technologies presents a transformative opportunity to reinvent drug safety surveillance. Electronic health records, wearable devices, mobile health applications, social media platforms, and real-world evidence databases are generating unprecedented volumes of longitudinal, patient-centric data. When combined with advances in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and big-data analytics, these digital tools enable earlier detection of safety signals, continuous monitoring across diverse populations, and more personalized risk assessment (3). Reinventing drug safety surveillance in the digital age requires a paradigm shift-from reactive, siloed systems to proactive, integrated, and learning health ecosystems. By harnessing digital health innovations while addressing challenges related to data quality, privacy, interoperability, and regulatory oversight, pharmacovigilance can evolve into a more responsive and predictive discipline. This evolution is essential not only for improving patient safety but also for strengthening public trust and supporting innovation in modern therapeutics (4). The purpose of this study is to examine how digital health technologies can transform drug safety surveillance by improving the detection, monitoring, and prevention of adverse drug events in real-world (5).

1.1 Concept of Drug Safety Surveillance

Drug safety surveillance, also known as pharmacovigilance, refers to the systematic process of detecting, assessing, understanding, and preventing adverse effects or any other drug-related problems throughout a medicine’s life cycle. While clinical trials establish a drug’s initial safety and efficacy, they are conducted in controlled environments with limited populations and durations. As a result, rare, long-term, or population-specific adverse drug reactions (ADRs) often emerge only after widespread use (7,8). Traditionally, drug safety surveillance has relied on spontaneous reporting systems, post-marketing studies, and regulatory monitoring. However, these methods are frequently limited by underreporting, delayed signal detection, and fragmented data sources. In the age of digital health, drug safety surveillance is evolving into a more continuous, data-driven, and real-time process, integrating electronic health records, mobile health technologies, wearable devices, social media data, and artificial intelligence to capture real-world drug safety information more effectively (9).

1.1.1 Importance of Drug Safety Surveillance

1. Protection of Patient Safety

The primary importance of drug safety surveillance lies in its role in protecting patients from preventable harm. By identifying adverse drug reactions early, surveillance systems help reduce morbidity, mortality, and avoidable healthcare costs associated with unsafe medication use.

2. Detection of Rare and Long-Term Adverse Effects

Many serious adverse effects are too rare or delayed to be detected during pre-marketing clinical trials. Drug safety surveillance enables the early identification of rare, chronic, or cumulative toxicities once drugs are used across diverse populations in real-world settings.

3. Support for Regulatory Decision-Making

Effective drug safety surveillance provides evidence for regulatory actions, including label updates, safety warnings, usage restrictions, or drug withdrawals. In the digital health era, enhanced data analytics support faster and more evidence-based regulatory responses.

4. Promotion of Rational and Safe Use of Medicines

Surveillance findings guide healthcare professionals in making informed prescribing decisions, improving benefit–risk assessment, and encouraging safer medication practices across healthcare systems.

5. Strengthening Public Trust in Healthcare Systems

Transparent and responsive drug safety surveillance systems help build public confidence in medicines, regulatory authorities, and healthcare providers. When safety issues are promptly identified and addressed, trust in medical innovation is reinforced.

6. Enabling Patient-Cantered Pharmacovigilance

Digital health tools empower patients to actively participate in drug safety surveillance through mobile reporting platforms and real-time symptom tracking, leading to more comprehensive and inclusive safety data.

7. Supporting Innovation in the Digital Health Era

As personalized medicine, biologics, and digital therapeutics expand, robust drug safety surveillance becomes essential for ensuring that innovation does not compromise safety. Advanced analytics and real-world evidence allow surveillance systems to keep pace with rapidly evolving therapies (10,11,12).

1.2 Limitations of conventional pharmacovigilance systems

1. Shift from Passive to Active Surveillance

  • Use large real-world data networks.
  • Continuous monitoring rather than waiting for reports.

2. Leverage Real-World Data (RWD)

  • Electronic Health Records (EHRs)
  • Pharmacy dispensing records
  •  Use Artificial Intelligence & Advanced Analytics
  • Natural Language Processing (NLP) for clinical notes
  • Machine learning for signal detection
  • Predictive modelling for risk stratification

4. Integrate Digital Health Technologies

  • Wearables and remote monitoring devices
  • Mobile health applications
  • Social media signal mining

5. Improve Data Interoperability

  • Standardized data models
  • Cloud-based platforms
  • Secure data-sharing frameworks

6. Patient-Centered Surveillance

  • Direct patient reporting via digital apps
  • Inclusion of patient-generated health data
  • Transparency and feedback loops

7. Global Collaboration & Data Sharing

  • Cross-border data networks
  • Harmonized safety standards
  • Public-private partnerships (13,14,15).

1.3 Emergence of digital health in drug safety surveillance

The emergence of digital health has significantly reshaped drug safety surveillance, offering faster, more dynamic ways to monitor adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Traditional pharmacovigilance systems relied heavily on spontaneous reporting, which often suffered from underreporting and delays. With the integration of digital technologies, real-time data collection and analysis have become increasingly feasible. Electronic health records (EHRs) provide a rich source of patient-level data, enabling continuous monitoring of drug safety across diverse populations. Mobile health applications and wearable devices further contribute by capturing real-world data on medication use, physiological parameters, and patient behaviour. These tools enhance early detection of potential safety signals (16). Social media platforms and online health forums are also being explored as unconventional data sources. They offer insights into patient experiences and can help identify emerging adverse effects that may not yet be formally reported. However, challenges such as data quality, noise, and privacy concerns must be addressed. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) algorithms play a crucial role in processing large datasets, identifying patterns, and predicting potential risks. These technologies improve signal detection efficiency and reduce the burden on manual review processes. Natural language processing (NLP) further aids in extracting meaningful information from unstructured data. Digital health also supports patient-centric pharmacovigilance by encouraging direct patient reporting through user-friendly interfaces. This approach increases engagement and provides a more comprehensive understanding of drug safety in real-world settings. Despite these advancements, issues related to data standardization, interoperability, and regulatory acceptance remain significant barriers. Ensuring data security and maintaining patient confidentiality are critical considerations in digital surveillance systems. Overall, the integration of digital health into drug safety surveillance represents a transformative shift toward proactive, data-driven pharmacovigilance. It holds the potential to improve public health outcomes by enabling timely identification and mitigation of drug-related risks (17).

1.4 Traditional Approaches to Pharmacovigilance

1. Spontaneous Reporting Systems (SRS)

Also known as voluntary reporting systems, these are the cornerstone of traditional pharmacovigilance.

Examples:

  • Uppsala Monitoring Centre (manages global ADR database)
  • World Health Organization Programme for International Drug Monitoring
  • Food and Drug Administration (FDA’s MedWatch program).

2. Case Reports and Case Series

  • Individual case reports published in medical literature.
  • Often the first signal of new or rare adverse reactions.
  • Case series analyse patterns across multiple similar reports.

Example: Early detection of thalidomide-induced birth defects in the 1960s.

3. Cohort Studies

  • Observational studies following a group exposed to a drug over time.
  • Compare incidence of adverse events between exposed and non-exposed groups.

4. Case-Control Studies

  • Compare patients with a specific adverse event (cases) to those without it (controls).
  • Assess prior exposure to the suspected drug.

5. Clinical Trials (Pre-marketing Surveillance)

  • Conducted before drug approval (Phase I–III).
  • Assess safety and efficacy under controlled conditions.

6. Post-Marketing Surveillance (Phase IV Studies)

  • Conducted after drug approval.
  • Monitors real-world safety.
  • May include observational studies or registries.

7. Prescription Event Monitoring (PEM)

  • Active surveillance method.
  • Tracks patients prescribed a specific medicine.
  • Follow-up questionnaires sent to prescribers.

8. Drug Registries

  • Organized systems collecting data on patients using specific medications.
  • Often disease-based or drug-specific (18,19).

1.5 Digital Health Application in Drug Safety

1. Electronic Health Records (EHRs)

Electronic Health Records (EHRs) are digital, longitudinal records of a patient’s medical history, maintained by healthcare providers and accessible across authorized systems. They integrate clinical data such as diagnoses, medications, lab results, and treatment plans to support coordinated, efficient, and evidence-based care.

2. Mobile Health (mHealth) Apps

Mobile Health (mHealth) apps are software applications designed for smartphones and portable devices that support health monitoring, disease management, and wellness promotion. They enable users and healthcare providers to track, collect, and exchange health data in real time, facilitating more personalized and accessible care (20).

3. Wearable Devices & Remote Monitoring

Wearable devices and remote monitoring systems are sensor-based technologies that continuously capture physiological and behavioural data outside traditional clinical settings. They transmit real-time health information to users and healthcare providers, enabling proactive monitoring, early detection of abnormalities, and data-driven, personalized care.

4. Big Data & Data Mining

Big Data refers to extremely large, diverse, and rapidly generated datasets that exceed the capacity of traditional data-processing methods. Data mining involves applying computational and statistical techniques to these datasets to uncover hidden patterns, correlations, and actionable insights that support informed decision-making in healthcare and beyond.

5. Artificial Intelligence (AI) & Machine Learning

Artificial Intelligence (AI) refers to computer systems designed to perform tasks that typically require human intelligence, such as reasoning, perception, and decision-making. Machine Learning (ML), a subset of AI, enables these systems to learn from data patterns and improve their performance over time without explicit programming, supporting predictive and adaptive solutions in healthcare and other domains (21).

6. Social Media & Digital Surveillance

Social media refers to online platforms that facilitate the creation, sharing, and exchange of user-generated content, enabling real-time communication and information dissemination. Digital surveillance involves the systematic collection and analysis of digital interactions and behavioural data to monitor trends, support public health insights, and enhance decision-making in various sectors.

7. Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS)

Integrated into hospital systems, CDSS alerts healthcare providers about:

  • Drug–drug interactions
  • Contraindications
  • Dose adjustments
  • Allergy warnings

These systems reduce medication errors and prevent adverse events before they occur.

8. Telemedicine

Remote consultations allow monitoring of patients on high-risk medications.

Example:

Monitoring adverse reactions in oncology, psychiatry, and chronic disease therapy (22).

Fig.1 Traditional Approaches to Pharmacovigilance

1.6 Gaps Identified in Existing Studies

A major limitation in digital drug safety surveillance lies in inconsistencies in data quality and the absence of uniform standards. Reports of adverse drug reactions are often incomplete or lack sufficient clinical detail, reducing their reliability for signal detection. Additionally, variations in terminology and coding practices across digital platforms hinder effective data integration. Although centralized systems coordinated by the Uppsala Monitoring Centre apply standardized methodologies, many emerging digital tools function outside these harmonized frameworks. Consequently, there is a clear need for rigorous validation of real-world digital data against established clinical benchmarks, as well as improved interoperability among platforms.  Another critical concern is the underrepresentation of vulnerable and marginalized populations in digital pharmacovigilance systems. Older adults, individuals from low- and middle-income regions, and those with limited digital literacy are less likely to contribute data through app-based or online reporting systems.  Despite global efforts led by organizations such as the World Health Organization to strengthen pharmacovigilance, disparities in digital access continue to restrict inclusivity. Future research should prioritize the development of equitable models that ensure broader participation and assess the impact of digital tools on health equity. Furthermore, the existing body of research is dominated by short-term pilot studies that primarily assess feasibility rather than long-term effectiveness. There is a lack of comprehensive evidence evaluating sustained performance of digital surveillance systems, particularly in terms of long-term safety outcomes, reduction in morbidity and mortality, and economic value. Addressing these gaps requires longitudinal studies and robust health economic analyses.  The growing application of artificial intelligence and machine learning introduces additional challenges related to model transparency and validation. Many algorithms operate as “black boxes,” limiting interpretability and trust. Moreover, there is insufficient external validation across diverse healthcare settings, raising concerns about generalizability and reproducibility. Regulatory authorities such as the Food and Drug Administration emphasize the importance of strong validation frameworks before integrating such technologies into routine practice. Comparative studies between AI-driven and conventional pharmacovigilance methods are also limited (23).

CONCLUSION

Reinventing drug safety surveillance in the age of digital health represents a critical transformation from traditional, reactive pharmacovigilance systems to proactive, data-driven, and patient-centred approaches. Conventional methods while foundational-are increasingly insufficient in addressing the complexities of modern healthcare due to limitations such as underreporting, delayed signal detection, and fragmented data systems. The integration of digital health technologies, including electronic health records, mobile health applications, wearable devices, artificial intelligence, and big data analytics, offers unprecedented opportunities to enhance the detection, monitoring, and prevention of adverse drug reactions. These tools enable continuous, real-time surveillance across diverse populations, improving both the speed and accuracy of safety signal identification while supporting personalized risk assessment. Furthermore, the shift toward patient-centred pharmacovigilance empowers individuals to actively participate in reporting and monitoring their health outcomes, thereby enriching the quality and inclusiveness of safety data. Global collaboration, standardized data frameworks, and distributed data networks further strengthen the scalability and effectiveness of modern surveillance systems. However, this transformation is not without challenges. Issues related to data quality, interoperability, privacy, algorithm transparency, and equitable access to digital technologies must be carefully addressed. Ensuring robust validation of AI models, improving signal-to-noise ratios in digital data sources, and including underrepresented populations are essential for building trustworthy and effective systems. In conclusion, the evolution of drug safety surveillance through digital health innovation is both necessary and inevitable. By embracing advanced technologies while maintaining strong regulatory oversight and ethical standards, pharmacovigilance can become more predictive, responsive, and resilient. This transformation will ultimately enhance patient safety, strengthen public trust, and support the sustainable advancement of modern therapeutics.

REFERENCES

  1. Lazarou, J., Pomeranz, B. H., & Corey, P. N. (1998). Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: A meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA, 279(15), 1200–1205. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.279.15.1200
  2. Edwards, I. R., & Aronson, J. K. (2000). Adverse drug reactions: Definitions, diagnosis, and management. The Lancet, 356(9237), 1255–1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02799-9
  3. Hazell, L., & Shakir, S. A. (2006). Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions: A systematic review. Drug Safety, 29(5), 385–396. https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200629050-00003
  4. Waller, P., & Evans, S. J. (2003). A model for the future conduct of pharmacovigilance. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 12(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.770
  5. World Health Organization. (2002). The importance of pharmacovigilance: Safety monitoring of medicinal products. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42493
  6. World Health Organization. (2000). Safety monitoring of medicinal products: Guidelines for setting up and running a pharmacovigilance centre. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42296
  7. Harpaz, R., DuMouchel, W., Shah, N. H., Madigan, D., Ryan, P., & Friedman, C. (2012). Novel data-mining methodologies for adverse drug event discovery and analysis. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 91(6), 1010–1021. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2012.50
  8. Golder, S., Norman, G., & Loke, Y. K. (2015). Systematic review on the prevalence, frequency and comparative value of adverse events data in social media. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 80(4), 878–888. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.12746
  9. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). FDA’s Sentinel Initiative: Active surveillance of medical product safety. https://www.fda.gov/safety/fdas-sentinel-initiative
  10. Ventola, C. L. (2014). Mobile devices and apps for health care professionals: Uses and benefits. Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 39(5), 356–364. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4029126/
  11. Hripcsak, G., & Albers, D. J. (2013). Next-generation phenotyping of electronic health records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 20(1), 117–121. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001145
  12. Schneeweiss, S., & Avorn, J. (2005). A review of uses of health care utilization databases for epidemiologic research on therapeutics. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58(4), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.10.012
  13. Sarker, A., Ginn, R., Nikfarjam, A., O’Connor, K., Smith, K., Jayaraman, S., Upadhaya, T., & Gonzalez, G. (2015). Utilizing social media data for pharmacovigilance: A review. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 54, 202–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2015.02.004
  14. World Health Organization. (2019). WHO global surveillance and monitoring system for substandard and falsified medical products. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241513425
  15. Uppsala Monitoring Centre. (2020). VigiBase: The WHO global database of individual case safety reports (ICSRs). https://www.who-umc.org/vigibase/vigibase/
  16. Hripcsak, G., & Albers, D. J. (2013). Next-generation phenotyping of electronic health records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 20(1), 117–121. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001145
  17. Shakir, S. A. W. (2007). Prescription-event monitoring and other forms of pharmacovigilance. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 16(7), 731–737. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.1430
  18. Gliklich, R. E., Dreyer, N. A., & Leavy, M. B. (Eds.). (2020). Registries for evaluating patient outcomes: A user’s guide (4th ed.). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK562575/
  19. Ventola, C. L. (2014). Mobile devices and apps for health care professionals: Uses and benefits. Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 39(5), 356–364. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4029126/
  20. Shaban-Nejad, A., Michalowski, M., Buckeridge, D. L. (2018). Health intelligence: How artificial intelligence transforms population and personalized health. NPJ Digital Medicine, 1(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-018-0058-9
  21. Sutton, R. T., Pincock, D., Baumgart, D. C., Sadowski, D. C., Fedorak, R. N., & Kroeker, K. I. (2020). An overview of clinical decision support systems: Benefits, risks, and strategies for success. NPJ Digital Medicine, 3, 17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-0221-y
  22. World Health Organization. (2010). Telemedicine: Opportunities and developments in Member States. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44497
  23. World Health Organization. (2019). WHO global surveillance and monitoring system for substandard and falsified medical products. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241513425

Reference

  1. Lazarou, J., Pomeranz, B. H., & Corey, P. N. (1998). Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: A meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA, 279(15), 1200–1205. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.279.15.1200
  2. Edwards, I. R., & Aronson, J. K. (2000). Adverse drug reactions: Definitions, diagnosis, and management. The Lancet, 356(9237), 1255–1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02799-9
  3. Hazell, L., & Shakir, S. A. (2006). Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions: A systematic review. Drug Safety, 29(5), 385–396. https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200629050-00003
  4. Waller, P., & Evans, S. J. (2003). A model for the future conduct of pharmacovigilance. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 12(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.770
  5. World Health Organization. (2002). The importance of pharmacovigilance: Safety monitoring of medicinal products. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42493
  6. World Health Organization. (2000). Safety monitoring of medicinal products: Guidelines for setting up and running a pharmacovigilance centre. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42296
  7. Harpaz, R., DuMouchel, W., Shah, N. H., Madigan, D., Ryan, P., & Friedman, C. (2012). Novel data-mining methodologies for adverse drug event discovery and analysis. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 91(6), 1010–1021. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2012.50
  8. Golder, S., Norman, G., & Loke, Y. K. (2015). Systematic review on the prevalence, frequency and comparative value of adverse events data in social media. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 80(4), 878–888. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.12746
  9. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). FDA’s Sentinel Initiative: Active surveillance of medical product safety. https://www.fda.gov/safety/fdas-sentinel-initiative
  10. Ventola, C. L. (2014). Mobile devices and apps for health care professionals: Uses and benefits. Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 39(5), 356–364. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4029126/
  11. Hripcsak, G., & Albers, D. J. (2013). Next-generation phenotyping of electronic health records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 20(1), 117–121. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001145
  12. Schneeweiss, S., & Avorn, J. (2005). A review of uses of health care utilization databases for epidemiologic research on therapeutics. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58(4), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.10.012
  13. Sarker, A., Ginn, R., Nikfarjam, A., O’Connor, K., Smith, K., Jayaraman, S., Upadhaya, T., & Gonzalez, G. (2015). Utilizing social media data for pharmacovigilance: A review. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 54, 202–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2015.02.004
  14. World Health Organization. (2019). WHO global surveillance and monitoring system for substandard and falsified medical products. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241513425
  15. Uppsala Monitoring Centre. (2020). VigiBase: The WHO global database of individual case safety reports (ICSRs). https://www.who-umc.org/vigibase/vigibase/
  16. Hripcsak, G., & Albers, D. J. (2013). Next-generation phenotyping of electronic health records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 20(1), 117–121. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001145
  17. Shakir, S. A. W. (2007). Prescription-event monitoring and other forms of pharmacovigilance. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 16(7), 731–737. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.1430
  18. Gliklich, R. E., Dreyer, N. A., & Leavy, M. B. (Eds.). (2020). Registries for evaluating patient outcomes: A user’s guide (4th ed.). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK562575/
  19. Ventola, C. L. (2014). Mobile devices and apps for health care professionals: Uses and benefits. Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 39(5), 356–364. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4029126/
  20. Shaban-Nejad, A., Michalowski, M., Buckeridge, D. L. (2018). Health intelligence: How artificial intelligence transforms population and personalized health. NPJ Digital Medicine, 1(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-018-0058-9
  21. Sutton, R. T., Pincock, D., Baumgart, D. C., Sadowski, D. C., Fedorak, R. N., & Kroeker, K. I. (2020). An overview of clinical decision support systems: Benefits, risks, and strategies for success. NPJ Digital Medicine, 3, 17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-0221-y
  22. World Health Organization. (2010). Telemedicine: Opportunities and developments in Member States. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44497
  23. World Health Organization. (2019). WHO global surveillance and monitoring system for substandard and falsified medical products. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241513425

Photo
Anjali Chandel
Corresponding author

Assistant Professor Department of Pharmacology, Dreamz college of Pharmacy Khilra, 175036

Photo
Ritesh Kumar
Co-author

Department of Pharmacy, Dreamz College of Pharmacy, Khilra 175036

Photo
Sahil
Co-author

Department of Pharmacy, Dreamz College of Pharmacy, Khilra 175036

Photo
Vishal Thakur
Co-author

Department of Pharmacy, Dreamz College of Pharmacy, Khilra 175036

Photo
Saurav
Co-author

Department of Pharmacy, Dreamz College of Pharmacy, Khilra 175036

Photo
Kavita Pathania
Co-author

Department of Pharmacy, Dreamz College of Pharmacy, Khilra 175036

Photo
V. k. Gupta
Co-author

Department of Pharmacy, Dreamz College of Pharmacy, Khilra 175036

Ritesh Kumar, Sahil, Vishal Thakur, Saurav, Anjali Chandel*, Kavita Pathania, V. k. Gupta, Review on Reinventing Drug Safety Survillance in the Age of Digital Health, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 5, 4710-4719. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20281240

More related articles
Comparative Evaluation of Different Generic Formul...
Riya Batra, Atif Ahmad , Vaidehi Bhaladhare , Vishakha Bhange , S...
Development and Validation of a Rapid RP-HPLC Meth...
Ankita Dhiware, Dr. V. L. Badgujar, Dr. R. D. Wagh, ...
Development And Validation of a Simple Stability I...
Shivam Jadhav, Sanket Deshmukh , Shailesh Deshmukh, Shivam Gayakw...
Hydrophilic Interaction Liquid Chromatography (Hilic)...
Ajay A, Prasanth S. S, Sanooja P. k, Jisha U, K. T. Akshara, Riya Rajan, Sibina M. K, Mohammed Faroo...
Integrating Herbal Science and Nanostructured Emulgel Technology for Enhanced To...
Janhvi Bora , Samadhan Anarse , Tejal Bhalshankar, Vaisnavi Gadilkar, Shubham Gaikawad, Shubham Gaik...
Development and Validation of Analytical Method for Simultaneous Estimation of R...
V. Sowmya, M D. Rahman Ghori , Dr. A. Ganesh, Dr. M. Venkataramana, Dr. N. Swathi, ...
Related Articles
Formulation And Evaluation of a Itraconazole Nanosponges...
Gaurav Nawale , Yash Pawar, Siddhi Choure, Vaishnavi Gugale, ...
A Review of Transdermal Anti-Aging Patch...
Ashish pal , Vandana Sahani, Dr Shivanand patil, ...
Development And Formulation Of Sustained Release Capsules Bearing Anti-Hypertens...
Akash R. Shahu, Amol S. Warokar, Sagar S. Yadav, Akash M. Bhakare, ...
Comparative Evaluation of Different Generic Formulations of Atorvastatin Calcium...
Riya Batra, Atif Ahmad , Vaidehi Bhaladhare , Vishakha Bhange , Sakshi Bhonde , ...
More related articles
Comparative Evaluation of Different Generic Formulations of Atorvastatin Calcium...
Riya Batra, Atif Ahmad , Vaidehi Bhaladhare , Vishakha Bhange , Sakshi Bhonde , ...
Development And Validation of a Simple Stability Indicating High Performance Liq...
Shivam Jadhav, Sanket Deshmukh , Shailesh Deshmukh, Shivam Gayakwad, Abhishek Nagre, Shahebaz Deshmu...
Comparative Evaluation of Different Generic Formulations of Atorvastatin Calcium...
Riya Batra, Atif Ahmad , Vaidehi Bhaladhare , Vishakha Bhange , Sakshi Bhonde , ...
Development And Validation of a Simple Stability Indicating High Performance Liq...
Shivam Jadhav, Sanket Deshmukh , Shailesh Deshmukh, Shivam Gayakwad, Abhishek Nagre, Shahebaz Deshmu...