Abstract

The prone positioning impact on mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a critical aspect of managing severe respiratory failure in these individuals. This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy and safety of prone positioning specifically in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients with ARDS. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify relevant studies published within the past five years. A total of 17 studies, including randomized controlled trials and observational studies, were included in the review. Findings suggest that prone positioning is associated with significant improvements in oxygenation and increased ventilator-free days in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients with ARDS. Despite variations in prone positioning protocols and potential biases in observational studies, the evidence supports the use of prone positioning as a therapeutic strategy in the management of COVID-19 ARDS. Further research is needed to standardize prone positioning protocols and investigate long-term outcomes associated with its use in this patient population. Implementation of prone positioning protocols may lead to improved outcomes for COVID-19 patients with ARDS in clinical practice, highlighting its importance in the management of severe respiratory failure in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Keywords

Introduction

       
           
       
    Figure 2 PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses

DISCUSSION

Efficacy of Prone Positioning in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with COVID-19-Associated ARDS

Prone positioning has emerged as a promising intervention in the management of COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This discussion aims to evaluate the efficacy of prone positioning in improving clinical outcomes, its safety profile, optimal timing of implementation, comparative analysis with supine positioning, ethical considerations, implementation challenges, and future research directions (Astasio-Picado & Sánchez-Sánchez, 2021). Previous studies have demonstrated that prone positioning leads to significant improvements in oxygenation and lung mechanics, thereby potentially reducing the need for invasive mechanical ventilation and improving patient outcomes (Guérin et al., 2020; Telias et al., 2020). Additionally, prone positioning may mitigate ventilator-induced lung injury and decrease mortality rates in patients with severe ARDS (Guérin et al., 2020). However, challenges such as patient discomfort, musculoskeletal complications, and logistical barriers to implementation need to be addressed to optimize the use of prone positioning in clinical practice (Munshi et al., 2017; Telias et al., 2020).

Effectiveness in Improving Oxygenation and Lung Mechanics

The findings from the systematic review underscore the significant improvement in oxygenation and lung mechanics observed following the application of prone positioning in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS (Vollenberg et al., 2021). The enhancement in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio and static lung compliance suggests that prone positioning promotes better ventilation-perfusion matching and reduces alveolar collapse, thereby improving gas exchange and lung function. These physiological benefits are crucial in mitigating hypoxemia, a hallmark feature of ARDS, and may contribute to improved patient outcomes (Phoophiboon et al., 2023).

Safety Considerations and Patient Comfort

While prone positioning demonstrates efficacy in enhancing oxygenation, it is essential to consider its safety profile and potential adverse effects. The systematic review reveals that prone positioning is generally safe for COVID-19 patients, with minimal complications reported. However, discomfort and musculoskeletal pain were commonly reported by patients undergoing prone positioning, highlighting the importance of patient comfort and monitoring during this intervention. Healthcare providers should ensure proper positioning techniques, adequate sedation, and frequent assessment to minimize patient discomfort and prevent complications (Lee et al., 2022; Lucchini et al., 2022).

Comparison with Supine Positioning

A comparative analysis between prone and supine positioning provides valuable insights into their respective efficacy and safety profiles. While prone positioning demonstrates significant improvements in oxygenation and lung mechanics, the systematic review did not find substantial differences in mortality rates or the length of hospital stays compared to supine positioning. These findings suggest that while prone positioning offers physiological benefits, it may not translate into improved clinical outcomes such as reduced mortality or shorter hospital stays. Further research is warranted to elucidate the optimal positioning strategy for mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS (Vakaet et al., 2023).

Optimal Timing of Implementation

The optimal timing of prone positioning initiation remains a subject of debate. The systematic review indicates that early initiation of prone positioning within the first 24 to 48 hours of mechanical ventilation may confer greater benefits in terms of improving oxygenation and lung mechanics. However, the evidence regarding the optimal timing of prone positioning initiation in COVID-19-associated ARDS is limited. Future studies should explore the optimal timing of prone positioning initiation to maximize its therapeutic efficacy and clinical outcomes (Vollenberg et al., 2021).

Ethical Considerations and Implementation Challenges

Ethical considerations surrounding the implementation of prone positioning in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS warrant careful deliberation. Healthcare providers must ensure equitable access to prone positioning, minimize disparities in healthcare delivery, and prioritize patient autonomy and informed consent. Additionally, implementation challenges such as resource constraints, staff training, and logistical issues may impact the widespread adoption of prone positioning in clinical practice. Addressing these challenges requires collaborative efforts between healthcare institutions, policymakers, and multidisciplinary teams to optimize the delivery of care for patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS (Karampelias et al., 2020; Ryan et al., 2021).

CONCLUSION

The systematic review of this study provides valuable insights into the efficacy and safety of prone positioning in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS. While prone positioning demonstrates significant improvements in oxygenation and lung mechanics, its impact on clinical outcomes such as mortality rates and hospital length of stay remains uncertain. Despite minimal complications reported, challenges related to patient discomfort and implementation barriers require careful consideration. Future research should focus on elucidating the optimal timing of prone positioning initiation, addressing implementation challenges, and exploring adjunctive therapies to maximize therapeutic efficacy. By addressing these knowledge gaps and challenges, healthcare providers can optimize patient care and improve outcomes for individuals with COVID-19-associated ARDS.

FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS

Despite the promising findings, several knowledge gaps exist that warrant further investigation. Future research should focus on elucidating the long-term effects of prone positioning on clinical outcomes, such as mortality, ventilator-free days, and ICU length of stay. Additionally, comparative studies evaluating different prone positioning protocols, adjunctive therapies, and patient populations are needed to optimize treatment strategies for COVID-19-associated ARDS. Furthermore, prospective randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes and standardized outcome measures are essential to validate the efficacy and safety of prone positioning and inform evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

LIMITATIONS

This study includes small number of randomized controlled trials available for analysis, potentially limiting the generalizability of the findings. Heterogeneity in methodologies and patient populations across the included trials may introduce bias. Limited follow-up duration may restrict the assessment of long-term outcomes, such as mortality. The focus solely on mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS may limit broader applicability. Additionally, publication bias and exclusion of non-English studies may have influenced the results.

STRENGTHS

• • Methodological rigor ensured comprehensive coverage of relevant literature.
  • Inclusion of randomized controlled trials enhanced the study's reliability.
  • Detailed examination of outcomes provided valuable insights into prone positioning efficacy.
  • Clear presentation of results upheld academic standards.
  • Focus on specific patient population increased study relevance to clinical practice.

Novelty of Research

The novelty of this research lies in its focused examination of the impact of prone positioning specifically on mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19-associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). While previous studies have explored the efficacy of prone positioning in ARDS patients, this systematic review hones in on a specific subset of patients affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the unique challenges posed by COVID-19, including its propensity to cause severe respiratory complications and the widespread reliance on mechanical ventilation in affected individuals, investigating the role of prone positioning in this context is crucial. Moreover, the inclusion of recent evidence within the last five years ensures that the findings are reflective of the latest advancements in the field and relevant to current clinical practices. By synthesizing and analyzing the available literature on this topic, this research aims to contribute novel insights into the effectiveness and safety of prone positioning as a therapeutic strategy in the management of COVID-19-associated ARDS. The findings of this study have the potential to inform clinical decision-making, guide treatment protocols, and ultimately improve outcomes for critically ill patients affected by COVID-19.

DECLARATION OF AUTHORS' CONTRIBUTIONS

AUTHORSHIP CONTRIBUTIONS:

All authors have contributed significantly to the research and writing of this paper

DECLARATION OF FUNDING:

Not applicable.

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

DECLARATION OF DATA AVAILABILITY

DATA AVAILABILITY:

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

DECLARATION OF CONSENT

INFORMED CONSENT:

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this research and any accompanying images.

REFERENCES

1. Adawy, Z., Iskandarani, A., Alharbi, A., Iskandarani, Y. A., Salem, G., Iskandarani, D. A., Ali, A. R. H., Salem, M. A., & Sobh, E. (2024). Response to prone positioning in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective observational study. The Egyptian Journal of Bronchology, 18(1), 10.
2. Astasio-Picado, Á., & Sánchez-Sánchez, M. d. R. (2021). Effectiveness of Prone positioning in patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation. Applied Sciences, 11(21), 10263.
3. Binda, F., Galazzi, A., Marelli, F., Gambazza, S., Villa, L., Vinci, E., Adamini, I., & Laquintana, D. (2021). Complications of prone positioning in patients with COVID-19: a cross-sectional study. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 67, 103088.
4. Camporota, L., Sanderson, B., Chiumello, D., Terzi, N., Argaud, L., Rimmelé, T., Metuor, R., Verstraete, A., Cour, M., & Bohé, J. (2022). Prone position in COVID-19 and-COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome: an international multicenter observational comparative study. Critical care medicine, 50(4), 633-643.
5. Chen, X., Zhou, Y., Zhou, X., Su, P., & Yi, J. (2023). Knowledge, attitudes, and practice related to the prone positioning of patients among intensive care unit nurses working in COVID?19 units: A cross?sectional study in China. Nursing in Critical Care, 28(6), 967-975.
6. Cunha, M. C., Schardong, J., Righi, N. C., Lunardi, A. C., Sant’Anna, G. N. d., Isensee, L. P., Xavier, R. F., Brambatti, K. R., Pompeu, J. E., & Frâncio, F. (2022). Impact of prone positioning on patients with COVID-19 and ARDS on invasive mechanical ventilation: a multicenter cohort study. Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia, 48, e20210374.
7. Doolittle, L. M. (2020). The Impact of Alveolar Type II Cell Mitochondrial Damage and Altered Energy Production on Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Development During Influenza A Virus Infection. The Ohio State University.
8. Goh, K. J., Choong, M. C., Cheong, E. H., Kalimuddin, S., Wen, S. D., Phua, G. C., Chan, K. S., & Mohideen, S. H. (2020). Rapid progression to acute respiratory distress syndrome: review of current understanding of critical illness from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 49(3), 108-118.
9. Guérin, C., Albert, R. K., Beitler, J., Gattinoni, L., Jaber, S., Marini, J. J., Munshi, L., Papazian, L., Pesenti, A., & Vieillard-Baron, A. (2020). Prone position in ARDS patients: why, when, how and for whom. Intensive care medicine, 46, 2385-2396.
10. Guérin, C., Cour, M., & Argaud, L. (2022). Prone Positioning and Neuromuscular Blocking Agents as Adjunctive Therapies in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine,
11. Hochberg, C. H., Card, M. E., Seth, B., Kerlin, M. P., Hager, D. N., & Eakin, M. N. (2023). Factors Influencing the Implementation of Prone Positioning during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study. Ann Am Thorac Soc, 20(1), 83-93. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202204-349OC
12. Junejo, Y., Ozaslan, M., Safdar, M., Khailany, R. A., Rehman, S., Yousaf, W., & Khan, M. A. (2020). Novel SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19: Origin, pathogenesis, genes and genetic variations, immune responses and phylogenetic analysis. Gene reports, 20, 100752.
13. Karampelias, V., Spanidis, Y., & Roussakou, E. (2020). Ethical Issues in Intensive Care Units during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Indian J Crit Care Med, 24(9), 855-856. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23543
14. Karlis, G., Markantonaki, D., Kakavas, S., Bakali, D., Katsagani, G., Katsarou, T., Kyritsis, C., Karaouli, V., Athanasiou, P., & Daganou, M. (2023). Prone position ventilation in severe ARDS due to COVID-19: comparison between prolonged and intermittent strategies. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(10), 3526.
15. Lee, H.-J., Kim, J., Choi, M., Choi, W.-I., Joh, J., Park, J., & Kim, J. (2022). Efficacy and safety of prone position in COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Medical Research, 27(1), 310.
16. Long, M. E., Mallampalli, R. K., & Horowitz, J. C. (2022). Pathogenesis of pneumonia and acute lung injury. Clinical Science, 136(10), 747-769.
17. Lucchini, A., Russotto, V., Barreca, N., Villa, M., Casartelli, G., Marcolin, Y., Zyberi, B., Cavagnuolo, D., Verzella, G., & Rona, R. (2022). Short and long-term complications due to standard and extended prone position cycles in CoViD-19 patients. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 69, 103158.
18. Mehta, O. P., Bhandari, P., Raut, A., Kacimi, S. E. O., & Huy, N. T. (2021). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): comprehensive review of clinical presentation. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 582932.
19. Mohan, B., & Nambiar, V. (2020). COVID-19: an insight into SARS-CoV-2 pandemic originated at Wuhan City in Hubei Province of China. J Infect Dis Epidemiol, 6(4), 146.
20. Montenegro, F., Unigarro, L., Paredes, G., Moya, T., Romero, A., Torres, L., López, J. C., González, F. E. J., Del Pozo, G., & López-Cortés, A. (2021). Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) caused by the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a practical comprehensive literature review. Expert review of respiratory medicine, 15(2), 183-195.
21. Okin, D., Huang, C.-Y., Alba, G. A., Jesudasen, S. J., Dandawate, N. A., Gavralidis, A., Chang, L. L., Moin, E. E., Ahmad, I., & Witkin, A. S. (2023). Prolonged prone position ventilation is associated with reduced mortality in intubated COVID-19 patients. Chest, 163(3), 533-542.
22. Park, J., Lee, H. Y., Lee, J., & Lee, S.-M. (2021). Effect of prone positioning on oxygenation and static respiratory system compliance in COVID-19 ARDS vs. non-COVID ARDS. Respiratory research, 22, 1-12.
23. Pelosi, P., Ball, L., Barbas, C. S., Bellomo, R., Burns, K. E., Einav, S., Gattinoni, L., Laffey, J. G., Marini, J. J., & Myatra, S. N. (2021). Personalized mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Critical Care, 25, 1-10.
24. Phoophiboon, V., Owattanapanich, N., Owattanapanich, W., & Schellenberg, M. (2023). Effects of prone positioning on ARDS outcomes of trauma and surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pulmonary Medicine, 23(1), 504.
25. Ryan, P., Fine, C., & DeForge, C. (2021). An evidence-based protocol for manual prone positioning of patients with ARDS. Critical Care Nurse, 41(6), 55-60.
26. Scaravilli, V., Grasselli, G., Castagna, L., Zanella, A., Isgrò, S., Lucchini, A., Patroniti, N., Bellani, G., & Pesenti, A. (2015). Prone positioning improves oxygenation in spontaneously breathing nonintubated patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure: A retrospective study. J Crit Care, 30(6), 1390-1394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.07.008
27. Silva, P. L., Ball, L., Rocco, P. R., & Pelosi, P. (2022). Physiological and pathophysiological consequences of mechanical ventilation. Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine,
28. Taboada, M., Gonzalez, M., Alvarez, A., Gonzalez, I., Garcia, J., Eiras, M., Vieito, M. D., Naveira, A., Otero, P., & Campana, O. (2021). Effectiveness of prone positioning in nonintubated intensive care unit patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome by coronavirus disease 2019. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 132(1), 25-30.
29. Tzotzos, S. J., Fischer, B., Fischer, H., & Zeitlinger, M. (2020). Incidence of ARDS and outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a global literature survey. Critical Care, 24, 1-4.
30. Vakaet, V., Deseyne, P., Bultijnck, R., Post, G., West, C., Azria, D., Bourgier, C., Farcy-Jacquet, M.-P., Rosenstein, B., & Green, S. (2023). Comparison of prone and supine positioning for breast cancer radiotherapy using REQUITE data: dosimetry, acute and two years physician and patient-reported outcomes. Acta Oncologica, 62(9), 1036-1044.
31. Vollenberg, R., Matern, P., Nowacki, T., Fuhrmann, V., Padberg, J.-S., Ochs, K., Schütte-Nütgen, K., Strauß, M., Schmidt, H., & Tepasse, P.-R. (2021). Prone position in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients: a multicenter study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(5), 1046.
32. Weiss, T. T., Cerda, F., Scott, J. B., Kaur, R., Sungurlu, S., Mirza, S. H., Alolaiwat, A. A., Augustynovich, A. E., & Li, J. (2021). Prone positioning for patients intubated for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) secondary to COVID-19: a retrospective observational cohort study. British journal of anaesthesia, 126(1), 48-55.

Xu, H., Sheng, S., Luo, W., Xu, X., & Zhang, Z. (2023). Acute respiratory distress syndrome heterogeneity and the septic ARDS subgroup. Frontiers in immunology, 14, 1277161.