View Article

  • Formulation, Optimization And Characterization Of Anhydrous Polyherbal Face Wash Tablets: A Sustainable Unit-Dose Approach

  • Department of Pharmacy,Shri Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj Shikshan Sanstha's, Institute of Pharmacy, Maregaon - 445303, Dist. Yavatmal, Maharashtra, India Affiliated to Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University (DBATU), Lonere - 402103, Dist. Raigad, Maharashtra, India

Abstract

The present study was undertaken to formulate, optimize and characterize polyherbal face wash tablets as a novel, eco-friendly, portable and sustainable alternative to conventional liquid face wash formulations. The growing demand for herbal cosmetics and environmentally friendly personal care products has encouraged the development of innovative formulations that provide effective cleansing while minimizing environmental impact. The tablets were prepared by the direct compression method using herbal ingredients such as Neem leaves powder, Tulsi leaves powder, Palash flowers powder and orange peels powder, along with suitable herbal based excipients. Pre-formulation studies were carried out to evaluate the flow and compressibility characteristics of the powder blend. Parameters such as angle of repose, bulk density, tapped density, carr’s/compressibility index, hausner’s ratio and loss on drying (LOD) confirmed satisfactory flow behavior and suitability of powder blend for direct compression. The formulated tablets were evaluated for various physicochemical parameters including physical appearance, pH determination, weight variation, hardness, thickness, friability, in-vitro disintegration time, invitro dispersion time, foamability, spreadability, washability, skin irritation test and stability studies. The optimized formulation (F3) exhibited excellent flow properties, acceptable mechanical strength, low friability, rapid disintegration and dispersion, satisfactory foaming ability and a skin-compatible pH. Furthermore, the tablets were found to be non-irritant, easily washable and stable under the prescribed storage conditions. The developed formulation demonstrated effective cleansing action and desirable cosmetic characteristics suitable routine skin care applications. The findings of the study suggest that polyherbal face wash tablets can serve as an effective, convenient and environmentally sustainable alternative to traditional liquid face wash products. The formulation offers several advantages, including improved portability, ease of handling, reduced dependence on synthetic preservatives, minimized packaging waste and enhanced consumer acceptability. Therefore, polyherbal face wash tablets represent a promising advancement in herbal cosmeceutical formulations with potential applications in the personal care and cosmetic industries.

Keywords

Anhydrous cosmetic formulation, Direct compression technique, Herbal cosmetics, Natural sustainable skincare , Polyherbal face wash tablets, Unit-dose formulation

Introduction

× Popup Image

The word “cosmeceutical” describes products with bioactive substances meant to improve skin health, bridging the gap between medications and cosmetics1. Due to growing consumer knowledge of the possible long-term dermatological problems connected with synthetic chemicals, the worldwide cosmetics industry has seen a substantial transition towards “Green Cosmetics” in recent years2. The main purpose of face wash formulations is to remove makeup, dead skin cells, excess sebum and environmental contaminants from the stratum corneum of the face without totally removing the skin’s natural moisture barrier3. Conventional synthetic surfactants, especially sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS), are known to disturb the skin’s natural acid layer and result in transepidermal water loss (TEWL), which causes persistent dryness, irritation and redness4. Because of their wide pharmacological spectrum and excellent safety profile, polyherbal compositions that make usage of the synergistic effects of numerous plant extracts are being given priority5, 6.

Conventional face wash formulas are mostly liquid or semi-solid solutions that include up to 90% water7. To stop microbiological growth, strong artificial preservatives such parabens must be added due to the high-water content8. An important development in sustainable pharmacy is anhydrous (waterless) technology. These formulations naturally inhibit microbial development and lessen the need for preservatives by eliminating aqueous phase7, 9. Additionally, eliminating water weight greatly lowers the carbon footprint related to international logistics and transportation10. Because they are water-activated and travel-friendly, dry powder face washes provide a first step toward waterless cosmetics, but they are still prone to spills, moisture absorption during storage and incorrect consumer dispensing7.

The unit-dose compressed tablet technique is a crucial technological advancement to get around these restrictions11. By ensuring that the customer uses a precise, preset amount of the formulation for a single application, unit dosage administration via tablets prevents product waste12. Tablets enable extremely sustainable, eco-friendly, biodegradable packaging options, in contrast to liquid washes packaged in plastic collapsable tubes13. Tablets are also highly portable and ideal for travel, as they are spill-proof and exempt from international airport liquid volume restrictions14.

In the end, these anhydrous polyherbal tablets reduce the possibility of redness and skin irritation brought on by harsh synthetic cleansers15. In order to provide a stable, environmentally responsible and skin-friendly cleaning option, the current work focuses on the formulation, optimisation, and characterisation of an anhydrous polyherbal face wash tablet.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: 

Materials:

Gathering of plant materials

Neem (Azadirachta indica) leaves, Tulsi (Ocimum tenuiflorum) leaves, Palash (Butea monosperma) flowers and Orange (Citrus sinensis) peels were among the necessary herbal ingredients that were gathered from nearby plants, marketplaces and botanical gardens.

Herbal powders preparation

The gathered plant materials were thoroughly cleansed to get rid of contaminants and dirt16. Following that, the materials were shade-dried for a few days so as to preserve the active ingredients17. Following full drying, the materials were ground into a coarse powder using a mechanical grinder18. To create a fine powder, each powder was separately sieved through sieve number 80 and kept in airtight containers for later use19.

Gathering of excipients

Reetha (Sapindus mukorossi) powder, Acacia (Acacia senegal) gum, Corn (Zea mays) starch, Potato (Solanum tuberosum) starch, Rice (Oryza sativa) powder, Sandalwood (Santalum album) powder and Menthol (Mentha arvensis) powder were all obtained from reliable sources. After being individually sieved via sieve number 80, each powder was kept in airtight containers19.

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

   

 

 

 

 

            

 

 

Figure 1. Process flow of preparing herbal powders from fresh ingredients via shade drying

 

Methods:

Formulation of anhydrous polyherbal face wash tablets (direct compression method)

  1. Firstly, the required quantity of neem leaves, tulsi leaves, palash flowers and orange peels powders were taken and triturated in a mortar in order to get a homogeneous mixture18, 20.
  2. To this mixture, reetha powder and rice powder were added and mixed thoroughly to enhance cleansing and exfoliating properties21, 22.
  3. Further, corn starch was added as a diluent and disintegrant to the above mixture23.
  4. Acacia gum was incorporated as a natural binder and mixed uniformly24.
  5. Sandalwood powder was added to provide fragrance and skin toning effect25.
  6. Potato starch was added as a lubricant to improve flow properties26.
  7. Menthol powder was added at the final stage to impart a cooling sensation27.
  8. The entire mixture was blended thoroughly to get a homogeneous powder blend20.
  9. The prepared mixture was run through a sieve no. 60 to ensure uniform mixing and flow19.
  10. The final powder blend was compressed into tablets using a tablet compression machine (direct compression method was employed)28.
  11. The compressed tablets were dedusted to remove excess powder28.
  12. The prepared tablets were collected and stored in an air-tight container for further use29.

 

 

 

 

Table 1. Composition of anhydrous polyherbal face wash tablet formulation

Sr.no.

Herbal ingredients

Role

Batch F1

Batch F2

Batch F3

1.

Neem leaves powder

Antibacterial activity

25 mg

25 mg

25 mg

2.

Tulsi leaves powder

Antimicrobial/Anti-inflammatory activity

20 mg

20 mg

20 mg

3.

Palash flowers powder

Antioxidant activity

15 mg

15 mg

15 mg

4.

Orange peels powder

Cleansing/Skin brightening activity

15 mg

15 mg

15 mg

5.

Reetha powder

Natural Surfactant/Foaming agent

30 mg

35 mg

40 mg

6.

Acacia gum

Natural Binder

25 mg

22 mg

20 mg

7.

Corn starch

Diluent/Disintegrant

40 mg

50 mg

55 mg

8.

Potato starch

Lubricant

35 mg

30 mg

20 mg

9.

Rice powder

Exfoliating agent

25 mg

22 mg

25 mg

10.

Sandalwood powder

Fragrance/Skin toning agent

10 mg

10 mg

10 mg

11.

Menthol powder

Cooling agent

10 mg

6 mg

5 mg

 

Total

 

250 mg

250 mg

250 mg

 

Characterization of polyherbal formulations:

Pre-compression characterization of powder blend

a) Angle of repose

The maximum angle formed between the surface of a pile of powder and the horizontal plane is known as the angle of repose. It is employed to assess the powder blend’s flow characteristics. By allowing the powder to pass through a funnel that is fixed at a specific height to create a conical heap, the Funnel technique determines the angle of repose. The angle of repose can be calculated using the formula below after measuring the heap’s height (h) and radius (r): 

θ = tan?¹ (h/r)

where, θ = Angle of repose; h = Height of powder cone; r = Radius of powder cone. Better flow characteristics are indicated by a lower angle of repose9, 20.

 

Table 2. Powder flow characteristics according to angle of repose

Angle of repose (°)

Flow property

< 25

Excellent

25-30

Good

30-40

Passable

> 40

Very poor

 

b) Bulk density

The ratio of the weight of powder to its bulk volume prior to tapping is known as bulk density. It is crucial for figuring out tablet compression characteristics and gives information about the packing qualities of powder particles.

After precisely weighing the powder mixture, it is poured into a graduated cylinder. The powder’s initial volume is recorded. To calculate the bulk density, use the following formula:

Bulk density = Weight of powder / Bulk volume

Depending on the type of powder, bulk density values can vary, although they typically fall between 0.3– 0.8 g/cm³ or g/ml9, 20.

c) Tapped density 

The proportion of weight of powder to the volume occupied upon tapping is referred to as tapped density. It offers details on compressibility and powder packing. 

A graduated cylinder is filled with a specified amount of powder, then it is manually tapped 50 times. The following formula is used to determine the tapped density:

Tapped density = Weight of powder / Tapped volume

Because tapping causes powder particles to settle closer together, tapped density is always higher than bulk density9, 20.

d) Carr’s index (Compressibility index)

Powder blends compressibility and flowability are assessed using carr’s index. The bulk density and tapped density numbers are employed to compute it. The formula that follows is utilised to determine the carr’s index: 

Carr’s Index = (Tapped density − Bulk density) / Tapped density ×100

Lower values indicate better compressibility and flow characteristics20.

 

Table 3. Carr’s index and associated powder blend flow characteristics

Carr’s index (%)

Flow property

Compressibility

5-15

Good

Good compressibility

16-20

Fair

Fair compressibility

21-25

Passable

Poor compressibility

> 25

Poor

Very poor compressibility

 

e) Hausner’s ratio

Powder flow characteristics are determined using hausner’s ratio. The ratio of tapped density to bulk density is used to calculate it20.

Hausner Ratio = Tapped density / Bulk density

 

Table 4. Hausner’s ratio and associated powder blend flow characteristics

Hausner’s ratio

Flow property

Flowability

1.00 – 1.11

Excellent

Excellent flowability

1.12 – 1.18

Good

Good flowability

1.19 – 1.25

Fair

Moderate flowability

> 1.25

Poor

Poor flowability

 

f) Loss on drying (LOD)

An essential evaluation metric for figuring out how much moisture and volatile matter present in the powder blend is LOD. Because too much moisture can impact the stability, flow characteristics, compressibility, and hardness of tablets, it is especially crucial for anhydrous formulations. Additionally, a high moisture level may shorten the formulation’s shelf life by encouraging microbial development.

This process involves precisely weighing a predetermined amount of powder blend and drying it at 105 °C in a Hot air oven until the weight remains constant. The amount of moisture in the sample is indicated by the weight loss during drying. The formula that follows is utilised to determine the percentage LOD:

%LOD = (Initial weight − Final weight) / Initial weight ×100

The LOD value should typically be kept below 5% for stable anhydrous tablet formulations so as to ensure the formulation’s quality and stability9.

           

 

                

                         (a)                                     (b)                                        (c)                                   (d)                        

Figure 2. Pre-compression characterization of powder blend: (a) Angle of repose determination (b) Bulk density measurement (c) Tapped density measurement (d) Sample preparation for loss on drying (LOD)

 

Post-compression characterization of polyherbal face wash tablets

a) Physical appearance

The physical attributes of the created tablets, including colour, shape, surface texture and odour are assessed visually. To guarantee high quality and user acceptability, tablets should be devoid of chips, fractures and surface irregularities30.

b) pH Determination

To make sure the formulation is suitable for the skin, pH level of the tablet solution is measured. Using a digital pH meter, one may determine the pH after the tablet is dissolved in distilled water in order to make a 1% aqueous solution. The pH value of skin care products should be between 5.5-6.5 to be able to prevent skin irritation31.

c) Weight variation test

Tablet weight homogeneity is guaranteed using the weight variation test. An analytical balance is used to weigh each of the twenty randomly chosen tablets. After calculating the average weight, the weights of each tablet are compared to the average weight. The formula that follows is utilised to determine the percentage deviation:

%Deviation = (Individual weight − Average weight) / Average weight ×100

Tablets must adhere to weight variation limits based on their average weight in accordance with pharmacopeial standards (USP/IP). The permissible variance is ±5% for tablets weighing 250 mg or more9.

 

Table 5. USP/IP weight variation limits for tablets

Average tablet weight

Permissible % deviation

≤ 80 mg

±10%

80–250 mg

±7.5%

≥ 250 mg

±5%

 

d) Hardness 

The mechanical strength of tablets and their capacity to tolerate handling during packing and transit are indicated by tablet hardness. A Monsanto, Pfizer hardness tester or other such device utilized for measure hardness. Hardness ranges from 3-6 kg/cm² for the majority of tablets to guarantee sufficient strength without compromising disintegration9.    

e) Thickness

Tablet thickness is assessed to guarantee consistency in tablet size. It is measured in millimetres (mm) using a Micrometre screw gauge or Vernier calliper. A consistent thickness guarantees that tablets are packaged and look good9.

f) Friability test 

The resistance of tablets to abrasion during handling and transit is assessed using friability. Roche friabilator are utilised for conduct the test. Weighing and rotating a sample of tablets at 25 rpm for 4 min. (100 revolutions). The following formula is applied in order to determine the percentage friability:

%Friability = (Initial weight − Final weight) / Initial weight ×100

Less than 1% weight loss is the permissible limit for friability9.

g) In-vitro disintegration time

The disintegration test measures how long it takes for tablets to disintegrate into smaller particles in an aqueous medium. A USP disintegration apparatus with distilled water kept at 37°C is used to conduct the test. The quick disintegration of cleansing tablets, like face wash tablets, within 20 to 60 seconds is deemed beneficial20, 30.

h) In-vitro dispersion time

The time needed for the tablet to fully disperse in water was assessed using the dispersion time. The trial was carried out in a petri plate using 6ml of distilled water. The time it took for the tablet to fully disperse into tiny particles were recorded in seconds after it was carefully positioned in the center of the petri dish31.

i) Foamability

Foam ability is a crucial factor in face wash compositions, Because foam aids in the cleansing process. The cylinder shake method determines the foaming ability. 10ml of water are utilised for dissolve one tablet and the blend is then agitated in a measuring cylinder. Foaming ability is ascertained by calculating the height of foam generated. Better cleaning results are indicated by higher foam heights30, 32.

j) Spreadability

The ease whereby the formulation spreads across the skin’s surface is often known as spreadability. A specific weight is applied while a tiny quantity of the formulation is placed between two glass plates. The time needed for the formulation to spread is noted and spreadability is determined using the following formula:

S = m × l / t

Where: S = Spreadability; m = Weight applied on the upper slide; l = Length of glass slide; t = Time taken for spreading

Good spreadability guarantees that the product is applied uniformly to the skin32.

k) Washability

The ease with which a product can be washed from the skin with water is determined by its washability. After applying the mixture to the skin, water is used to rinse it off. A decent face wash tablet should be easy to remove and leave no residue30.

l) Skin irritation test

The formulation’s safety is assessed by a skin irritation test. After applying a tiny bit of the tablet solution to the skin, it is checked for redness, irritation, swelling or itching after 1-2 hours. There should be no indications of irritation in a safe formulation30, 32.

m) Stability studies 

Studies of stability are carried out to determine the physical and chemical stability and shelf-life of the prepared tablets under different storage conditions. For a predetermined amount of time (often one to three months), the tablets are kept in sealed containers at room temperature and accelerated conditions (40°C ±2°C and 75% ±5% RH). Physical appearance, pH, hardness and disintegration time are among the criteria that are regularly assessed during the study period. If a formulation’s performance and physical characteristics do not significantly change, it is deemed stable33.

 

Figure 3. Post-compression characterization of polyherbal face wash tablets: (a) Physical appearance of formulated tablets (b) pH determination of formulation using calibrated digital pH meter (c) Determination of mechanical breaking force using Monsanto tablet hardness tester (d) Dimensional thickness measurement using Vernier caliper (e) Evaluation of mechanical  integrity and percentage friability using Roche friabilator (f) In-vitro disintegration time test progress monitoring the structural breakdown of the tablets (g) In-vitro dispersion time and visual behaviour characterization of  the tablet in an aqueous medium (h) Evaluation of foam volume via graduated cylinder method (i) Visual assessment of lather consistency and foam texture on hands (j) Determination of  spreadability characteristics using glass slide apparatus (k) Washability and residue clearance assessment under running water (l) Stability evaluation of formulated tablets post 1-3 months storage interval

 

 

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: 

 

Table 6. Pre-compression characterization of powder blend

Sr.no.

Evaluation parameters

Batch F1

Batch F2

Batch F3

a)

Angle of repose (θ)

35.2 °

31.4 °

24.8 °

b)

Bulk density

0.41 g/ml

0.44 g/ml

0.48 g/ml

c)

Tapped density

0.53 g/ml

0.54 g/ml

0.55 g/ml

d)

Carr’s index (Compressibility index)

22.6 %

18.5 %

12.7 %

e)

Hausner’s ratio

1.29

1.22

1.14

f)

Loss on drying (LOD)

4.6 %

4.1 %

3.5 %

Table 7. Post-compression characterization of polyherbal face wash tablets

Sr.no.

Evaluation parameters

Batch F1

Batch F2

Batch F3

a)

Physical appearance

 

 

 

Colour

Light brown

Greenish-brown

Light beige to pale brown

Shape

Irregular with edge chipping

Circular with uneven edges

Circular, flat faces and slightly rounded edges

Surface

Rough and non-uniform

Smooth, slightly pitted

Slightly rough and porous

Appearance

Matte, uncoated

Matte, uncoated

Matte, uncoated

Odour

Mild characteristic

Mild characteristic

Mild characteristic

b)

pH Determination (1% Solution)

5.2

5.5

5.9

c)

Weight variation test

250 ± 8 mg

250 ± 5 mg

250 ± 2 mg

d)

Hardness

2.8 kg/cm²

5.2 kg/cm²

4.1 kg/cm²

e)

Thickness

4.2 mm

4.1 mm

4.0 mm

f)

Friability test

1.25%

0.45%

0.72%

g)

In-vitro disintegration time

110 sec

55 sec

24 sec

h)

In-vitro dispersion time

145 sec

82 sec

48 sec

i)

Foamability

4 cm

6 cm

9 cm

j)

Spreadability

5.2 g·cm/s

6.1 g·cm/s

7.8 g·cm/s

k)

Washability

Good

Good

Excellent

l)

Skin irritation test

No irritation

No irritation

No irritation

m)

Stability studies (1-3 months)

Not evaluated

Not evaluated

Stable

 

The present study effectively demonstrated that the direct compression method can be successfully employed to formulate an anhydrous polyherbal face wash tablet. In order to achieve the intended physicochemical properties and functional performance of the proposed formulation, the choice of herbal ingredients and appropriate excipients was crucial. The results presented in table 6 and table 7 indicate that the formulation strategy was successful in creating tablets with acceptable quality characteristics appropriate for use in face washing.

The pre-compression characterization results (table 6) confirmed that the powder blends possessed satisfactory compressibility and flowability properties for direct compression. Adequate flow characteristics are essential for reliable tablet manufacture and homogeneous die filling. The balanced excipient composition, which improved particle arrangement and decreased interparticle friction, may be responsible for the improved flow behaviour shown in the optimised batch F3. Studies using herbal tablet formulations made by direct compression have revealed similar findings15, 24.

The produced tablets had adequate mechanical strength and physical features, according to post-compression examination (figure 3 and table 7). Maintaining tablet integrity throughout handling, packing and transportation requires the right amount of hardness and minimal friability. The ideal balance between mechanical strength and quick disintegration was demonstrated by the optimised batch F3, suggesting that it’s suitable for practical application. Similar outcomes have been reported in earlier studies where tablet performance was greatly enhanced by optimising binder and disintegrant concentrations18, 24.

The pH of tablets was found to be within the skin-compatible range (table 7), indicating that they might be utilised in regular face washing. Maintaining the proper pH is crucial for protecting the skin’s natural barrier and reducing inflammation. The dermatological safety of the chosen herbal components is further supported by the lack of irritation during skin compatibility examinations (table 7). The antibacterial, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, cleaning and skin-brightening qualities of herbal ingredients including neem, tulsi, palash and orange peel have been well documented. These qualities may enhance the formulation’s overall efficacy3, 19.

Because they have a direct impact on consumer acceptance and convenience, rapid disintegration and dispersion are crucial features of face wash tablets. Effective water penetration and swelling action inside the tablet matrix may be responsible for the effective tablet breakdown observed in optimised batch F3 (table 7). Rapid tablet disintegration facilitates quick preparation of the cleansing formulation and enhances user convenience. Tablet formulations with effective disintegrating agents have been shown to exhibit similar behaviour3, 24.

Foaming ability, spreadability and washability are important characteristics of cleaning products. The optimized formulation demonstrated superior foamability, spreadability and excellent washability (table 7). Sufficient foam production helps clear the skin’s surface of pollutants, excess oil and debris. Additionally, superior spreadability and washability guarantee efficient cleaning without leaving unwanted residue on the skin and improve user ease15.

The stability study indicated that batch F3 did not considerably alter in appearance or performance characteristics during the storage term (figure 3 and table 7). Because the formulation is anhydrous, there is less chance of microbial contamination and moisture-related deterioration, which may have increased stability. Compared to traditional aqueous formulations, which frequently need greater preservative concentrations to maintain product stability, this is a significant advantage1,2.

Overall, the findings of the present study indicate that polyherbal face wash tablets are a viable substitute for traditional liquid face cleansers. The developed formulation offers a convenient, portable, eco-friendly and skin-friendly washing method by combining the benefits of herbal ingredients, anhydrous technology and tablet dosage form. The study emphasises the potential of polyherbal face wash tablets as a cutting-edge strategy for sustainable skincare products and herbal cosmeceuticals.

CONCLUSION

The current work effectively created an anhydrous polyherbal face wash tablet using the direct compression method. Pre-compression characterisation showed appropriate flow and compressibility characteristics of the powder blends while post-compression investigations verified acceptable physicochemical features of the produced tablets. Excellent flowability, good compressibility, acceptable mechanical strength, rapid disintegration and dispersion, superior foamability, enhanced spreadability, skin-compatible pH, excellent washability and lack of skin irritation were among the most desirable features of batch F3 among the formulations examined. During the storage period, the optimised formulation also held steady.

The study’s outcomes show that polyherbal face wash tablets are a viable substitute for traditional liquid face cleansers. Benefits of the anhydrous unit-dose method include increased stability, decreased need for preservatives, better portability and environmental sustainability. Consequently, the produced composition offers a huge deal of potential for use as an environmentally friendly herbal skincare product. To promote future commercial development, more research involving microbiological characterisation, long-term stability studies and user acceptance evaluations is advised.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors express their sincere gratitude to Ms. Supriya K. Bhagat, Assistance Professor (M. Pharm) for her invaluable guidance and support throughout this research. We are highly thankful Dr. Nilesh O. Chachda, Principal, Shri Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj Shikshann Sansth’s, Institute of Pharmacy, Maregaon, for providing the necessary facilities and research environment. The assistance and cooperation extended by the faculty and staff of the institute, as well as all individuals who contributed directly or indirectly to the completion of this study, are gratefully acknowledged.

REFERENCES

  1. Dureja H, Kaushik D, Gupta M, Kumar V, Lather V. Cosmeceuticals: An emerging concept. Indian Journal of Pharmacology. 2005; 37(3): 155-159. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.16211
  2. Corazza M, Lauriola MM, Zappaterra M, Bianchi A, Virgili A. Surfactants, skin cleansing protagonists. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 2010; 24(1): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03349.x
  3. Jadhav A, Jadhav A, Jadhav S, Holgir Y, Jadhav A. Formulation and evaluation of polyherbal facewash for skin cleansing and antimicrobial activity. International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Engineering and Technology. 2025; 12(11): 228-243. doi: 10.17148/IARJSET.2025.121141
  4. Ananthapadmanabhan KP, Moore DJ, Subramanyan K, Misra M, Meyer F. Cleansing without compromise: The impact of cleansers on the skin barrier and the technology of mild cleansing. Dermatologic Therapy. 2004; 17(s1): 16-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1396-0296.2004.04S1002.x
  5. Bhinge SD, Bhutkar MA, Randive DS, Wadkar GH, Todkar SS, Kakade PM, Kadam PM. Formulation development and evaluation of antimicrobial polyherbal gel. In Annales pharmaceutiques francaises. 2017; 75(5): 349-358. Elsevier Masson. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharma.2017.04.006
  6. Chanchal D, Swarnlata S. Novel approaches in herbal cosmetics. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2008; 7(2): 89-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-2165.2008.00369.x
  7. Aguiar JB, Martins AM, Almeida C, Ribeiro HM, Marto JM. Water sustainability: A waterless life cycle for cosmetic products. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 2022; 32: 35-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.04.008
  8. Varvaresou A, Papageorgiou S, Tsirivas E, Protopapa E, Kintziou H, Kefala V, Demetzos C. Self?preserving cosmetics. International Journal of Cosmetic Science. 2009; 31(3): 163-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2494.2009.00492.x
  9. Devaraj S, Radhakrishnan A, Kothandan S, Abhijith KR, Ashish A, Pradeesh M, Pranesh B, Kuppusamy G, Singh SK. Formulation and evaluation of consumer friendly facewash tablet. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021; 14(2): 838-842. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2021.00148.7
  10. Bom S, Jorge J, Ribeiro HM, Marto JO. A step forward on sustainability in the cosmetics industry: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019; 225: 270-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.255
  11. Padarshi A. Formulation and evaluation of herbal facewash tablets: development, characterization, and comparative assessment of three formulations. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2025; 3(10): 765-772. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17295294
  12. Anumukonda P, Bhutada S. A practical manual of cosmetic formulations for B.Pharm and M.Pharm. 1st ed. Nirali Prakashan, Pune. 2020.
  13. Vassallo N, Refalo P. Reducing the environmental impacts of plastic cosmetic packaging: A multi-attribute life cycle assessment. Cosmetics. 2024; 11(2): 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics11020034
  14. Sheri PS, Anjali S, Anjudas P, Shaji L. A review on formulation and evaluation of travel-friendly facewash tablet using polyherbal ingredients. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. 2026; 29(02): 856-866. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2026.29.2.0386
  15. World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on safety monitoring of herbal medicines in pharmacovigilance systems. World Health Organization, Geneva. 2004.
  16. Evans WC. Trease and Evans’ pharmacognosy. 16th ed. Elsevier Health Sciences, London. 2009.
  17. Harborne JB. Phytochemical methods: A guide to modern techniques of plant analysis. 3rd ed. Chapman and Hall, London. 1998.
  18. Aulton ME, Taylor KMG. Aulton’s pharmaceutics: The design and manufacture of medicines.5th ed. Elsevier, London. 2018.
  19. Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission. Indian Pharmacopoeia. 9th ed. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, Ghaziabad. 2022.
  20. Khar RK, Vyas SP, Ahmad FJ, Jain GK. Lachman/Lieberman's: The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy. 4th ed. CBS Publishers and Distributors, New Delhi. 2013.
  21. Sharma PP. Cosmetics: Formulation, manufacturing and quality control. 5th ed. Vandana Publications, Delhi. 2014.
  22. Barel AO, Paye M, Maibach HI. Handbook of Cosmetic Science and Technology. 4th ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1201/b16716
  23. Banker GS, Anderson NR. Tablets. In: Lachman L, Lieberman HA and Kanig JL (eds). The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy. Varghese Publishing House, Bombay. 1987; 3rd ed: pp. 293-345.
  24. Patil SV, Ghatage SL, Navale SS, Mujawar NK. Natural binders in tablet formulation. International Journal of PharmTech Research. 2014; 6(3): 1070-1073.
  25. Kapoor VP. Herbal cosmetics for skin and hair care. Natural Product Radiance. 2005; 4(4): 306-314.
  26. Szabo-Revesz P, Szepes A. Potato starch in pharmaceutical technology - A review. Food. 2009; 3(2): 109-117.
  27. Eccles R. Menthol and related cooling compounds. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 1994; 46(8): 618-630. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7158.1994.tb03871.x
  28. Armstrong NA. Tablet manufacture by direct compression. In: Swarbrick J (ed). Encyclopedia of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology. CRC Press, Boca Raton. 2013; 4th ed: pp. 3591-3604.
  29. United States Pharmacopeia. United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary. United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Rockville. 2022.
  30. Ramya P, Diya A, Reslin A, Muhammed Siraj IV, Shahala KP, Fathima N, Raj U. Formulation and evaluation of herbal facewash tablet. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Applications. 2025; 10(1): 1162-1167. doi: 10.35629/4494-100111621167
  31. Nagamani HB, Ganesh NS, Chandy V. Liquisolid technique: A novel approach to enhance solubility. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2019; 8(13): 751-764. doi: 10.20959/wjpr201913-16344
  32. Gadge AG, Gayatri D, Pratiksha H, Bhalekar SM. Formulation and evaluation of polyherbal facewash tablet. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2025; 7(1): 284-288. https://www.doi.org/10.33545/26647222.2025.v7.i1d.177
  33. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products Q1A(R2). International Conference on Harmonisation, Geneva. 2003.

Reference

  1. Dureja H, Kaushik D, Gupta M, Kumar V, Lather V. Cosmeceuticals: An emerging concept. Indian Journal of Pharmacology. 2005; 37(3): 155-159. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.16211
  2. Corazza M, Lauriola MM, Zappaterra M, Bianchi A, Virgili A. Surfactants, skin cleansing protagonists. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 2010; 24(1): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03349.x
  3. Jadhav A, Jadhav A, Jadhav S, Holgir Y, Jadhav A. Formulation and evaluation of polyherbal facewash for skin cleansing and antimicrobial activity. International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Engineering and Technology. 2025; 12(11): 228-243. doi: 10.17148/IARJSET.2025.121141
  4. Ananthapadmanabhan KP, Moore DJ, Subramanyan K, Misra M, Meyer F. Cleansing without compromise: The impact of cleansers on the skin barrier and the technology of mild cleansing. Dermatologic Therapy. 2004; 17(s1): 16-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1396-0296.2004.04S1002.x
  5. Bhinge SD, Bhutkar MA, Randive DS, Wadkar GH, Todkar SS, Kakade PM, Kadam PM. Formulation development and evaluation of antimicrobial polyherbal gel. In Annales pharmaceutiques francaises. 2017; 75(5): 349-358. Elsevier Masson. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharma.2017.04.006
  6. Chanchal D, Swarnlata S. Novel approaches in herbal cosmetics. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2008; 7(2): 89-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-2165.2008.00369.x
  7. Aguiar JB, Martins AM, Almeida C, Ribeiro HM, Marto JM. Water sustainability: A waterless life cycle for cosmetic products. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 2022; 32: 35-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.04.008
  8. Varvaresou A, Papageorgiou S, Tsirivas E, Protopapa E, Kintziou H, Kefala V, Demetzos C. Self?preserving cosmetics. International Journal of Cosmetic Science. 2009; 31(3): 163-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2494.2009.00492.x
  9. Devaraj S, Radhakrishnan A, Kothandan S, Abhijith KR, Ashish A, Pradeesh M, Pranesh B, Kuppusamy G, Singh SK. Formulation and evaluation of consumer friendly facewash tablet. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021; 14(2): 838-842. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2021.00148.7
  10. Bom S, Jorge J, Ribeiro HM, Marto JO. A step forward on sustainability in the cosmetics industry: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019; 225: 270-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.255
  11. Padarshi A. Formulation and evaluation of herbal facewash tablets: development, characterization, and comparative assessment of three formulations. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2025; 3(10): 765-772. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17295294
  12. Anumukonda P, Bhutada S. A practical manual of cosmetic formulations for B.Pharm and M.Pharm. 1st ed. Nirali Prakashan, Pune. 2020.
  13. Vassallo N, Refalo P. Reducing the environmental impacts of plastic cosmetic packaging: A multi-attribute life cycle assessment. Cosmetics. 2024; 11(2): 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics11020034
  14. Sheri PS, Anjali S, Anjudas P, Shaji L. A review on formulation and evaluation of travel-friendly facewash tablet using polyherbal ingredients. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. 2026; 29(02): 856-866. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2026.29.2.0386
  15. World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on safety monitoring of herbal medicines in pharmacovigilance systems. World Health Organization, Geneva. 2004.
  16. Evans WC. Trease and Evans’ pharmacognosy. 16th ed. Elsevier Health Sciences, London. 2009.
  17. Harborne JB. Phytochemical methods: A guide to modern techniques of plant analysis. 3rd ed. Chapman and Hall, London. 1998.
  18. Aulton ME, Taylor KMG. Aulton’s pharmaceutics: The design and manufacture of medicines.5th ed. Elsevier, London. 2018.
  19. Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission. Indian Pharmacopoeia. 9th ed. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, Ghaziabad. 2022.
  20. Khar RK, Vyas SP, Ahmad FJ, Jain GK. Lachman/Lieberman's: The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy. 4th ed. CBS Publishers and Distributors, New Delhi. 2013.
  21. Sharma PP. Cosmetics: Formulation, manufacturing and quality control. 5th ed. Vandana Publications, Delhi. 2014.
  22. Barel AO, Paye M, Maibach HI. Handbook of Cosmetic Science and Technology. 4th ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1201/b16716
  23. Banker GS, Anderson NR. Tablets. In: Lachman L, Lieberman HA and Kanig JL (eds). The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy. Varghese Publishing House, Bombay. 1987; 3rd ed: pp. 293-345.
  24. Patil SV, Ghatage SL, Navale SS, Mujawar NK. Natural binders in tablet formulation. International Journal of PharmTech Research. 2014; 6(3): 1070-1073.
  25. Kapoor VP. Herbal cosmetics for skin and hair care. Natural Product Radiance. 2005; 4(4): 306-314.
  26. Szabo-Revesz P, Szepes A. Potato starch in pharmaceutical technology - A review. Food. 2009; 3(2): 109-117.
  27. Eccles R. Menthol and related cooling compounds. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 1994; 46(8): 618-630. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7158.1994.tb03871.x
  28. Armstrong NA. Tablet manufacture by direct compression. In: Swarbrick J (ed). Encyclopedia of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology. CRC Press, Boca Raton. 2013; 4th ed: pp. 3591-3604.
  29. United States Pharmacopeia. United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary. United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Rockville. 2022.
  30. Ramya P, Diya A, Reslin A, Muhammed Siraj IV, Shahala KP, Fathima N, Raj U. Formulation and evaluation of herbal facewash tablet. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Applications. 2025; 10(1): 1162-1167. doi: 10.35629/4494-100111621167
  31. Nagamani HB, Ganesh NS, Chandy V. Liquisolid technique: A novel approach to enhance solubility. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2019; 8(13): 751-764. doi: 10.20959/wjpr201913-16344
  32. Gadge AG, Gayatri D, Pratiksha H, Bhalekar SM. Formulation and evaluation of polyherbal facewash tablet. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2025; 7(1): 284-288. https://www.doi.org/10.33545/26647222.2025.v7.i1d.177
  33. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products Q1A(R2). International Conference on Harmonisation, Geneva. 2003.

Photo
Isha Bonde
Corresponding author

Shri Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj Shikshan Sanstha's, Institute of Pharmacy, Maregaon -445303, Dist. Yavatmal, Maharashtra, India Affiliated to Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University (DBATU), Lonere - 402103, Dist. Raigad, Maharashtra, India

Photo
Shruti Peche
Co-author

Shri Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj Shikshan Sanstha's, Institute of Pharmacy, Maregaon -445303, Dist. Yavatmal, Maharashtra, India Affiliated to Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University (DBATU), Lonere - 402103, Dist. Raigad, Maharashtra, India

Photo
Supriya Bhagat
Co-author

Shri Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj Shikshan Sanstha's, Institute of Pharmacy, Maregaon -445303, Dist. Yavatmal, Maharashtra, India Affiliated to Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University (DBATU), Lonere - 402103, Dist. Raigad, Maharashtra, India

Photo
Dr. Nilesh Chachda
Co-author

Shri Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj Shikshan Sanstha's, Institute of Pharmacy, Maregaon -445303, Dist. Yavatmal, Maharashtra, India Affiliated to Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University (DBATU), Lonere - 402103, Dist. Raigad, Maharashtra, India

Isha Bonde, Shruti Peche, Supriya Bhagat, Dr. Nilesh Chachda, Formulation, Optimization and Characterization of Anhydrous Polyherbal Face Wash Tablets:A Sustainable Unit-Dose Approach, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 10, 1037-1049, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23210567

More related articles
Formulation And Evaluation of Herbal Lip Scrub...
Alok Giri, Kale Pramod, Dnyaneshwar Mhetre...
Transforming Pharmaceutical Manufacturing for Plan...
Pooja Kedar, Priyanka Supare, Janhavi Patil, Prem Shinde, Vaibhav...
Organoids as Living Drug Testbeds: Emerging Technologies and Precision Pharmacol...
Balakoti Erothi, Donka Devi, K Eswar Kumar, Routhu Pratyusha, Mahankali Manichandana, Tagore Tanniru...
More related articles
Formulation And Evaluation of Herbal Lip Scrub...
Alok Giri, Kale Pramod, Dnyaneshwar Mhetre...
Transforming Pharmaceutical Manufacturing for Planetary Health: A Review on Gree...
Pooja Kedar, Priyanka Supare, Janhavi Patil, Prem Shinde, Vaibhav Ghongate, Kuldipak Parkhe...
Formulation And Evaluation of Herbal Lip Scrub...
Alok Giri, Kale Pramod, Dnyaneshwar Mhetre...
Transforming Pharmaceutical Manufacturing for Planetary Health: A Review on Gree...
Pooja Kedar, Priyanka Supare, Janhavi Patil, Prem Shinde, Vaibhav Ghongate, Kuldipak Parkhe...