View Article

Abstract

To achieve controlled release and optimize therapeutic outcomes, drug delivery systems (DDS) are engineered platforms designed to transport active pharmaceutical ingredients to specific sites within the body. Modern DDS technologies aim to enhance patient adherence, minimize systemic adverse effects, and significantly improve the pharmacokinetic and bioavailability profiles of therapeutic agents. This review explores various DDS approaches including hydrogels, liposomes, polymeric micelles, and nanoparticles. Additionally, it discusses emerging innovations such as stimuli-responsive carriers and personalized delivery strategies that address current clinical challenges. The evolution of pharmacology and pharmacokinetics underscored the critical relationship between release mechanisms and therapeutic effectiveness, laying the foundation for the development of controlled-release systems. With the integration of advanced materials and nanotechnology, a new generation of drug delivery systems (NDDS) has emerged, offering improved targeting, sustained release, and user convenience. Each DDS platform possesses unique physicochemical characteristics that influence its performance and release dynamics. Ongoing research continues to refine these systems for specialized applications, including pulmonary and nasal routes of administration. Representative examples include liposomes, proliposomes, microspheres, gels, prodrugs, and cyclodextrin complexes, all of which exhibit distinct advantages in achieving efficient and safe drug delivery.

Keywords

Drug delivery system, in situ gel, Microemulsifying formulation, Targeted administration, polymers

Introduction

Technological devices known as drug delivery systems create and store drug molecules in forms that are appropriate for administration, such as tablets or liquids. By speeding up the delivery of medications to the precise location in the body, they maximize therapeutic effectiveness and reduce off-target accumulation [1,2]. One of the many ways that drugs can enter the body is through the mouth, albeit this is not the only way [3, 4]. Routes of delivery, including anal and transvaginal, nasal and ocular, buccal and sublingual, transdermal and subcutaneous, and intravesical [5,6]. The drug's constituents are in charge of its physiochemical characteristics and the modifications it affects in bodily systems when ingested. Due to improved systemic circulation and control over the drug's pharmacological action, DDS has been used successfully in the past few decades to treat illnesses and enhance health [7]

For more easy, regulated, and focused distribution, a number of drug delivery systems (NDDS) have recently been created utilizing cutting-edge technologies. Every medication delivery system has unique characteristics that affect its mechanism and rate of release. This is mostly because of the variations in their morphological, chemical, and physical properties, which will ultimately influence how well they bind to different pharmacological molecules [8].  Despite being a contentious idea, numerous researchers have seen this impact in a variety of human tumor types, and it serves as the foundation for the application of nanomedicine in the treatment of cancer. However, its lack of selectivity and higher toxicity are its drawbacks [9].

Early Period of Drug Delivery Systems

People relied on medicinal herbs back in the day. Despite their advantages, their drug delivery was inconsistent, homogeneous, and particular [10]. All medications were manufactured and kept in pill or capsule form prior to the use of controlled drug administration. When it comes into touch with gastrointestinal fluids, it dissolves, passes through the gut wall, and is subsequently taken up by blood capillaries and absorbed into the bloodstream. Advanced coating techniques including keratin, shellac, sugar, enteric coating, and pearl coating were also introduced in the 20th century; however, keratin and shellac were ineffectual because of their high pH and instability during storage, which prevented them from dissolving adequately in the small intestine.[11]

When Jatzkewitz created the first polymer-drug conjugate in 1955, he reported the first medicinal use of nanoparticles. The earliest nanotechnology, called liposomes (lipid vesicles), was found in the 1960s [12,13]. Constant drug release rates, self-regulating, long-term depot formulations, and formulations based on nanotechnology specifically, nanoparticle formulations were among the drug delivery systems that the researchers were interested in creating. Long-term depot-sustained drug-release formulations of peptide/protein medications were created during this time [14].

The current era of controlled release technology is the third generation of medication delivery devices. It must get past the biological and physicochemical obstacles that plagued the previous drug delivery methods in order to be advantageous and effective. While the biological barrier challenges are linked to systemic drug distribution problems, the physiochemical challenges are brought on by therapeutic proteins and peptides' high molecular weight, poor water solubility, and difficulty achieving targeted and controlled drug release [15,16].

Recent Drug Delivery Systems and Applications

The effective development of drug delivery systems based on organic, inorganic, and hybrid nanoparticles as drug carriers for active targeting particularly in chemotherapy has advanced significantly in recent years. Smaller particle size, higher permeability, increased solubility, efficacy, stability, toxicity, and prolonged delivery are some of the enhanced characteristics of recent drug delivery systems (DDS). Compared to traditional dose forms, they can greatly enhance the performance of medicinal agents [17,18].

Fig. 1: Application of Drug Delivery System

Self-Micro Emulsifying Drug-Delivery System

Lipid-based pharmacological preparations have drawn a lot of attention lately, with self-micro emulsifying drug-delivery systems (SMEDDS) garnering particular attention [19]. Because medications cannot be absorbed through the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) unless they are in solution forms, low hydrophilicity is therefore a crucial component of bioavailability in this context [20]. In recent years, there has been an increase in the use of lipid-based carrier systems to increase the bioavailability of drugs that are less soluble in water [21].  Suspensions, dry emulsions, microemulsions, and self-emulsifying drug-delivery systems (SEDDS) are some of the different types of lipid-based carriers [22]. The two kinds of emulsifying agents utilized in microemulsions are surfactants (S) and co-surfactants (CoSs). [23,24]

In-Situ Gel Drug Delivery System

One of the most cutting-edge drug delivery methods is in-situ gel medicine administration. The in-situ gel drug delivery system's special ability to switch from Sol to Gel helps to improve patient comfort and compliance while facilitating a controlled and extended release of drugs [25]. Before entering the body, formulations in solution form often undergo a transformation into gel form under specific physiological conditions [26]. A solution can become a gel by combining a number of stimuli, including solvent exchange, temperature changes, and pH changes [27]. Numerous studies have employed parenteral, intraperitoneal, vaginal, nasal, injectable, oral, and rectal ocular methods. Numerous polymeric delivery systems for medications have been developed [28].

Applications of In-Situ Gel Delivery System

  • Opthalmic In-Situ Gelling Systems.

Additionally, traditional delivery techniques lead to limited therapeutic response and availability, which facilitates the removal of the medication from the eye. Viscosity enhancers, such as carbomers, hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose, and polyvinyl alcohol, are used in ocular preparations to increase the viscosity of the drug formulations, which improves bioavailability and precorneal residence length. To encourage the entry of corneal compounds like surfactants and preservers, chelating chemicals are used as penetration enhancers [29,30].

  • Nasal In-Situ Gelling Systems.

Polymers like gum gelan and gum xanthan are used in nasal in-situ production. Research has been done on the effectiveness of momethasone furoate as an in situ gel for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. The impact of in-situ gel on antigen-induced nasal symptoms was shown in vivo using sensitized rats as a model of allergic rhinitis [31,32].

  • Rectal In-Situ Gelling Systems.

 A wide range of medications that come in liquid, semi-solid (such as emulsions, froths, and lotions), or suppositories in solid administration formulations can be prescribed using this technique. Traditional sup positories can be uncomfortable during penetration. Furthermore, the drug's first-pass action can be felt since suppositories can migrate upward into the gut due to their inability to be adequately maintained at a single rectum site [33].

  • Vaginal In-Situ Gelling Systems.         

A delivery system based on a thermoplastic graft copolymer undergoing in situ gelation has been developed for the continuous release of active substances: estrogens, peptides, progestins, and proteins. A recent study found that a combination of poloxamers and polycarbophils mucoadhesive thermosensitive gels increased and maintained the antifungal efficacy of clotrimazole medication compared to conformist formulations based on polyethylene glycol [34].

Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) for Drug Delivery

Actuators, medicine delivery, motion sensing, accelerometers, and inkjet printing are just a few of the many industries that have found use for MEMS technology [35]. Together, these unique elements give MEMS devices their widely recognized multifunctionality and accuracy in comparison to other traditional drug delivery methods. Each of these characteristics’ functions in a strategic manner. For example, actuators are primarily essential to the drug release process because they pressurize the drug reservoir to promote drug release [36].

Combined Drug Delivery Approach

Combination drug administration has been shown to maintain efficacy and diminish drug resistance while lowering therapeutic dosage and adverse effects [37].

The use of combination approaches in pharmacological research and therapeutic investigations has increased, according to a study by Silva et al. [38].

Targeted Drug Delivery System

This method uses a variety of additional drug carriers, including artificial cells, liposomes, neutrophils, soluble polymers, biodegradable microsphere polymers, and micelles [39]. The RGD-peptides, an amino acid composed of Arg-Gly-Asp sequences, were grafted onto the surface of the nanoparticles. In order to efficiently target vβ3 integrin, this was done. Both cellular uptakes by the cancer cells and an efficient release of encapsulated medications were caused by the RGD peptide [40].

Herbal Drug Delivery

Many of the ingredients in plant extracts are likely to be damaged due to the stomach's rather acidic pH. Before entering the bloodstream, various compounds may undergo hepatic metabolism. As a result, the drug may not enter the bloodstream in the required dosage. If the medication does not reach the blood at the minimum effective level, as it is also known, there will be no therapeutic effect. Natural substances are easier and faster for the body to metabolize. They thereby offer better bloodstream absorption and have fewer, if any, side effects, resulting in more comprehensive and effective treatments. Bioactive and plant extracts have been used to create novel herbal formulations, including liposomes, phytosomes, nanoemulsions, microspheres, transferosomes, and ethosomes. [41]

Challenges Associated with Current Drug Delivery Systems

The quest to deliver drugs from different plant sources to their target sites for treatment in the body has advanced significantly in recent years, but there are still many limitations and challenges to what these systems can accomplish in treatment, some of which are discussed below. One of the main obstacles to the advancement of drug delivery systems is the paucity of literature and the variation in the literature that is available. Literature is crucial for the advancement of any research, and in this case, nanomedicine approaches to treatment [42].

Some of these delivery systems use large particles as carriers, which are not very good for treatment because they can cause problems like poor absorption and solubility, in vivo instability, poor bioavailability, target-specific delivery complications, and a number of negative side effects after administration [43]. This problem can be solved by using much smaller particles to deliver to the human biological system [44].  The toxicity of particles employed in distribution is another big difficulty that faces drug delivery systems in general, some of the nanomaterials utilized might be hazardous to human health and also the environment [45].

REFERENCES

  1. B.M. Rayaprolu, J.J. Strawser, G. Anyarambhatla, Excipients in parenteral formulations: selection considerations and effective utilization with small moleculesand biologics, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 44 (2018) 1565–1571, https://doi.org/10.1080/03639045.2018.1483392.
  2. A.M. Vargason, A.C. Anselmo, S. Mitragotri, The evolution of commercial drug delivery technologies, Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5 (2021) 951–967, https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41551-021-00698-w.
  3. M.S. Alqahtani, M. Kazi, M.A. Alsenaidy, M.Z. Ahmad, Advances in oral drug delivery, Front. Pharmacol. 12 (2021), 618411, https://doi.org/10.3389/ fphar.2021.618411.
  4. D. Sahoo, R. Bandaru, S.K. Samal, R. Naik, P. Kumar, P. Kesharwani, R. Dandela, in: P. Kesharwani, S. Taurin, K.B. T.-T., A. of N.N. GreishGreish (Eds.), Chapter 9 - Oral Drug Delivery of Nanomedicine, Academic Press, 2021, pp. 181–207, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820466-5.00009-0.
  5. M. Cho, M. Joo, K. Kim, Y. Wook, S. Lee, Y. Mi, I. Ho, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications the immunotherapeutic effects of recombinant Bacillus rin resistant to antimicrobial peptides on Calmette-Gu e bladder cancer cells, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.12.097.
  6. L. Palugan, M. Cerea, M. Cirilli, S. Moutaharrik, A. Maroni, L. Zema, A. Melocchi, M. Uboldi, I. Filippin, A. Foppoli, A. Gazzaniga, International Journal of Pharmaceutics: X Intravesical drug delivery approaches for improved therapy of urinary bladder diseases, Int. J. Pharm. X. 3 (2021), 100100, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijpx.2021.100100.
  7. R. Verma, S. Garg, Current Status of Drug Delivery Technologies and Future Directions, 2001.
  8. B.D. Mattos, O.J. Rojas, W.L.E. Magalh, Biogenic silica nanoparticles loaded with neem bark extract as green, slow-release biocide 142 (2017) 4206–4213, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.183.
  9. C. Pathak, F.U. Vaidya, S.M. Pandey, Chapter 3 - Mechanism for Development of Nanobased Drug Delivery System, Elsevier Inc., 2019, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/B978-0-12-814029-1.00003-X.
  10. E.O. Akala, Oral controlled release solid dosage forms, in: Theory Pract. Contemp. Pharm., CRC Press, Florida, 2004, pp. 333–366.
  11. C.J. Malm, J. Emerson, G.D. Hiait, Cellulose acetate phthalate as an enteric coating material, J. Am. Pharm. Assoc. (Scientific Ed.). 40 (1951) 520–525, https:// doi.org/10.1002/jps.3030401014.
  12. A.D. Bangham, R.W. Horne, Negative staining of phospholipids and their structural modification by surface-active agents as observed in the electron microscope, J. Mol. Biol. 8 (1964), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(64)80115-7, 660-IN10.
  13. A.D. Bangham, M.M. Standish, J.C. Watkins, Diffusion of univalent ions across the lamellae of swollen phospholipids, J. Mol. Biol. 13 (1965), https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0022-2836(65)80093-6, 238-IN27.
  14. M. Ye, S. Kim, K. Park, Issues in long-term protein delivery using biodegradable microparticles, J. Control. Release Off. J. Control. Release Soc. 146 (2010) 241–260, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.05.011.
  15. W. Zhang, Q. Zhao, J. Deng, Y. Hu, Y. Wang, D. Ouyang, Big data analysis of global advances in pharmaceutics and drug delivery 1980-2014, Drug Discov. Today 22 (2017) 1201–1208, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2017.05.012
  16. Y.H. Yun, B.K. Lee, K. Park, Controlled drug delivery: historical perspective for the next generation, J. Contr. Release 219 (2015) 2–7, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.10.005.
  17. A.M. Faheem, D.H. Abdelkader, Novel Drug Delivery Systems, 1, Elsevier LTD., 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102548-2.00001-9.
  18. H.S. Rahman, H.H. Othman, N.I. Hammadi, S.K. Yeap, K.M. Amin, N.A. Samad, N.B. Alitheen, Novel drug delivery systems for loading of natural plant extracts and their biomedical applications, Int. J. Nanomed. 15 (2020) 2439–2483, https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S227805.  
  19. C.W. Pouton, Formulation of poorly water-soluble drugs for oral administration: physicochemical and physiological issues and the lipid formulation classification system, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. Off. J. Eur. Fed. Pharm. Sci. 29 (2006) 278–287, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2006.04.016. 
  20. Z. Vinarov, M. Abdallah, J.A.G. Agundez, K. Allegaert, A.W. Basit, M. Braeckmans, J. Ceulemans, M. Corsetti, B.T. Griffin, M. Grimm, D. Keszthelyi, M. Koziolek, C.M. Madla, C. Matthys, L.E. McCoubrey, A. Mitra, C. Reppas, J. Stappaerts, N. Steenackers, N.L. Trevaskis, T. Vanuytsel, M. Vertzoni, W. Weitschies, C. Wilson, P. Augustijns, Impact of gastrointestinal tract variability on oral drug absorption and pharmacokinetics: an UNGAP review, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. Off. J. Eur. Fed. Pharm. Sci. 162 (2021), 105812, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2021.105812. 
  21. R.N. Gursoy, S. Benita, Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS) for improved oral delivery of lipophilic drugs, Biomed. Pharmacother. 58 (2004) 173–182, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2004.02.001.
  22. M.M. Mehanna, A.T. Mneimneh, Formulation and applications of lipid-based nanovehicles: spotlight on self-emulsifying systems, Adv. Pharmaceut. Bull. 11 (2021) 56–67, https://doi.org/10.34172/apb.2021.006.
  23. N. Parmar, N. Singla, S. Amin, K. Kohli, Study of cosurfactant effect on nanoemulsifying area and development of lercanidipine loaded (SNEDDS) self-nano-emulsifying drug delivery system, Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 86 (2011) 327–338, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.04.016.
  24. M.A. Rahman, A. Hussain, M.S. Hussain, M.A. Mirza, Z. Iqbal, Role of excipients in successful development of self-emulsifying/microemulsifying drug delivery system (SEDDS/SMEDDS), Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 39 (2013) 1–19, https://doi.org/10.3109/03639045.2012.660949
  25. B. Vigani, S. Rossi, G. Sandri, M.C. Bonferoni, C.M. Caramella, F. Ferrari, Recent advances in the development of in situ gelling drug delivery systems for non-parenteral administration routes, Pharmaceutics 12 (2020), https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12090859.
  26. S. Hua, Physiological and pharmaceutical considerations for rectal drug formulations, Front. Pharmacol. 10 (2019) 1196, https://doi.org/10.3389/ fphar.2019.01196.
  27. B. Singh, R.K. Khurana, B. Garg, S. Saini, R. Kaur, Stimuli-responsive systems with diverse drug delivery and biomedical applications: recent updates and mechanistic pathways, Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier Syst. 34 (2017) 209–255, https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevTherDrugCarrierSyst.2017017284.
  28. M. Khule, S. Vyavahare, A Review: in-situ Gel Drug Delivery System 9 (2021) 2455–6211.
  29. R. Sheshala, Y.Y. Kok, J.M. Ng, R.R.S. Thakur, K. Dua, In situ gelling ophthalmic drug delivery system: an overview and its applications., recent pat, Drug Deliv. Formul. 9 (2015) 237–248, https://doi.org/10.2174/1872211309666150724101227.
  30. Y. Wu, Y. Liu, X. Li, D. Kebebe, B. Zhang, J. Ren, J. Lu, J. Li, S. Du, Z. Liu, Research progress of in-situ gelling ophthalmic drug delivery system, Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 14 (2019) 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajps.2018.04.008.
  31. A. Paul, K.M. Fathima, S.C. Nair, Intra nasal in situ gelling system of lamotrigine using ion activated mucoadhesive polymer, Open Med. Chem. J. 11 (2017) 222–244, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874104501711010222.
  32. M. Agrawal, S. Saraf, S. Saraf, S.K. Dubey, A. Puri, U. Gupta, P. Kesharwani, V. Ravichandiran, P. Kumar, V.G.M. Naidu, U.S. Murty, Ajazuddin, A. Alexander, Stimuli-responsive in situ gelling system for nose-to-brain drug delivery, J. Contr. Release 327 (2020) 235–265, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.07.044.
  33. M. Bialik, M. Kuras, M. Sobczak, E. Oledzka, Achievements in thermosensitive gelling systems for rectal administration, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (2021), https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115500.
  34. M. Kouchak, In situ gelling systems for drug delivery, Jundishapur J. Nat. Pharm. Prod. 9 (2014), e20126, https://doi.org/10.17795/jjnpp-20126.
  35. T. Khudiyev, J. Clayton, E. Levy, N. Chocat, A. Gumennik, A.M. Stolyarov, J. Joannopoulos, Y. Fink, Electrostrictive microelectromechanical fibres and textiles, Nat. Commun. 8 (2017) 1435, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01558-5
  36. M.E. Zaghloul, Introduction to Microelectromechanical Systems (MEMS): Design and Application, Mech. Eng. Handb., 2015, pp. 1–12, https://doi.org/ 10.1002/9781118985960.meh225.
  37. H. Wang, Y. Huang, Combination therapy based on nano codelivery for overcoming cancer drug resistance, Med. Drug Discov. 6 (2020), 100024, https://doi. org/10.1016/j.medidd.2020.100024.
  38. F. Silva, L. Sitia, R. Allevi, A. Bonizzi, M. Sevieri, C. Morasso, M. Truffi, F. Corsi, S. Mazzucchelli, Combined method to remove endotoxins from protein nanocages for drug delivery applications: the case of human ferritin, Pharmaceutics 13 (2021), https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13020229.
  39. K. Rani, S. Paliwal, A review on targeted drug delivery: its entire focus on advanced therapeutics and diagnostics, Scholars J. Appl. Med. Sci 2 (2014)
  40. pt.al Combinatorial nanocarrier based drug delivery approach for amalgamation of anti-tumor agent in breast cancer cells: an improved nanomedicine strategy, Sci. Rep. 6 (2016)
  41. majedul Hoque, Md. Shohel Hossain, Taharat Akram, Sentu Ranjan, Das, Advancing healthcare: Exploring recent innovation in drug delivery system, International journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 2023
  42. Y.S. Youn, Y.H. Bae, Perspectives on the past, present, and future of cancer nanomedicine, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 130 (2018) 3–11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. addr.2018.05.008.
  43. J.K. Patra, G. Das, L.F. Fraceto, E. Vangelie, R. Campos, P. Rodriguez, L. Susana, A. Torres, LArmando, D. Torres, R. Grillo, Nano based drug delivery systems: recent developments and future prospects, J. Nanobiotechnol. (2018) 1–33, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-018-0392-8
  44. A. Khalid, S. Persano, H. Shen, Y. Zhao, E. Blanco, J. Wolfram, W.C. Medicine-qatar, W.C. Medicine, W.C. Medicine, W.C. Medicine, HHS Public Access 14 (2018) 865–877, https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2017.1243527.Strategies
  45. N. Singh, A. Joshi, A.P. Toor, G. Verma, (Chapter 27) - Drug delivery: Advancements And Challenges, Elsevier Inc., 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0- 323-46143-6/00027-0.

Reference

  1. B.M. Rayaprolu, J.J. Strawser, G. Anyarambhatla, Excipients in parenteral formulations: selection considerations and effective utilization with small moleculesand biologics, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 44 (2018) 1565–1571, https://doi.org/10.1080/03639045.2018.1483392.
  2. A.M. Vargason, A.C. Anselmo, S. Mitragotri, The evolution of commercial drug delivery technologies, Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5 (2021) 951–967, https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41551-021-00698-w.
  3. M.S. Alqahtani, M. Kazi, M.A. Alsenaidy, M.Z. Ahmad, Advances in oral drug delivery, Front. Pharmacol. 12 (2021), 618411, https://doi.org/10.3389/ fphar.2021.618411.
  4. D. Sahoo, R. Bandaru, S.K. Samal, R. Naik, P. Kumar, P. Kesharwani, R. Dandela, in: P. Kesharwani, S. Taurin, K.B. T.-T., A. of N.N. GreishGreish (Eds.), Chapter 9 - Oral Drug Delivery of Nanomedicine, Academic Press, 2021, pp. 181–207, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820466-5.00009-0.
  5. M. Cho, M. Joo, K. Kim, Y. Wook, S. Lee, Y. Mi, I. Ho, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications the immunotherapeutic effects of recombinant Bacillus rin resistant to antimicrobial peptides on Calmette-Gu e bladder cancer cells, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.12.097.
  6. L. Palugan, M. Cerea, M. Cirilli, S. Moutaharrik, A. Maroni, L. Zema, A. Melocchi, M. Uboldi, I. Filippin, A. Foppoli, A. Gazzaniga, International Journal of Pharmaceutics: X Intravesical drug delivery approaches for improved therapy of urinary bladder diseases, Int. J. Pharm. X. 3 (2021), 100100, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijpx.2021.100100.
  7. R. Verma, S. Garg, Current Status of Drug Delivery Technologies and Future Directions, 2001.
  8. B.D. Mattos, O.J. Rojas, W.L.E. Magalh, Biogenic silica nanoparticles loaded with neem bark extract as green, slow-release biocide 142 (2017) 4206–4213, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.183.
  9. C. Pathak, F.U. Vaidya, S.M. Pandey, Chapter 3 - Mechanism for Development of Nanobased Drug Delivery System, Elsevier Inc., 2019, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/B978-0-12-814029-1.00003-X.
  10. E.O. Akala, Oral controlled release solid dosage forms, in: Theory Pract. Contemp. Pharm., CRC Press, Florida, 2004, pp. 333–366.
  11. C.J. Malm, J. Emerson, G.D. Hiait, Cellulose acetate phthalate as an enteric coating material, J. Am. Pharm. Assoc. (Scientific Ed.). 40 (1951) 520–525, https:// doi.org/10.1002/jps.3030401014.
  12. A.D. Bangham, R.W. Horne, Negative staining of phospholipids and their structural modification by surface-active agents as observed in the electron microscope, J. Mol. Biol. 8 (1964), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(64)80115-7, 660-IN10.
  13. A.D. Bangham, M.M. Standish, J.C. Watkins, Diffusion of univalent ions across the lamellae of swollen phospholipids, J. Mol. Biol. 13 (1965), https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0022-2836(65)80093-6, 238-IN27.
  14. M. Ye, S. Kim, K. Park, Issues in long-term protein delivery using biodegradable microparticles, J. Control. Release Off. J. Control. Release Soc. 146 (2010) 241–260, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.05.011.
  15. W. Zhang, Q. Zhao, J. Deng, Y. Hu, Y. Wang, D. Ouyang, Big data analysis of global advances in pharmaceutics and drug delivery 1980-2014, Drug Discov. Today 22 (2017) 1201–1208, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2017.05.012
  16. Y.H. Yun, B.K. Lee, K. Park, Controlled drug delivery: historical perspective for the next generation, J. Contr. Release 219 (2015) 2–7, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.10.005.
  17. A.M. Faheem, D.H. Abdelkader, Novel Drug Delivery Systems, 1, Elsevier LTD., 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102548-2.00001-9.
  18. H.S. Rahman, H.H. Othman, N.I. Hammadi, S.K. Yeap, K.M. Amin, N.A. Samad, N.B. Alitheen, Novel drug delivery systems for loading of natural plant extracts and their biomedical applications, Int. J. Nanomed. 15 (2020) 2439–2483, https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S227805.  
  19. C.W. Pouton, Formulation of poorly water-soluble drugs for oral administration: physicochemical and physiological issues and the lipid formulation classification system, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. Off. J. Eur. Fed. Pharm. Sci. 29 (2006) 278–287, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2006.04.016. 
  20. Z. Vinarov, M. Abdallah, J.A.G. Agundez, K. Allegaert, A.W. Basit, M. Braeckmans, J. Ceulemans, M. Corsetti, B.T. Griffin, M. Grimm, D. Keszthelyi, M. Koziolek, C.M. Madla, C. Matthys, L.E. McCoubrey, A. Mitra, C. Reppas, J. Stappaerts, N. Steenackers, N.L. Trevaskis, T. Vanuytsel, M. Vertzoni, W. Weitschies, C. Wilson, P. Augustijns, Impact of gastrointestinal tract variability on oral drug absorption and pharmacokinetics: an UNGAP review, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. Off. J. Eur. Fed. Pharm. Sci. 162 (2021), 105812, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2021.105812. 
  21. R.N. Gursoy, S. Benita, Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS) for improved oral delivery of lipophilic drugs, Biomed. Pharmacother. 58 (2004) 173–182, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2004.02.001.
  22. M.M. Mehanna, A.T. Mneimneh, Formulation and applications of lipid-based nanovehicles: spotlight on self-emulsifying systems, Adv. Pharmaceut. Bull. 11 (2021) 56–67, https://doi.org/10.34172/apb.2021.006.
  23. N. Parmar, N. Singla, S. Amin, K. Kohli, Study of cosurfactant effect on nanoemulsifying area and development of lercanidipine loaded (SNEDDS) self-nano-emulsifying drug delivery system, Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 86 (2011) 327–338, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.04.016.
  24. M.A. Rahman, A. Hussain, M.S. Hussain, M.A. Mirza, Z. Iqbal, Role of excipients in successful development of self-emulsifying/microemulsifying drug delivery system (SEDDS/SMEDDS), Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 39 (2013) 1–19, https://doi.org/10.3109/03639045.2012.660949
  25. B. Vigani, S. Rossi, G. Sandri, M.C. Bonferoni, C.M. Caramella, F. Ferrari, Recent advances in the development of in situ gelling drug delivery systems for non-parenteral administration routes, Pharmaceutics 12 (2020), https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12090859.
  26. S. Hua, Physiological and pharmaceutical considerations for rectal drug formulations, Front. Pharmacol. 10 (2019) 1196, https://doi.org/10.3389/ fphar.2019.01196.
  27. B. Singh, R.K. Khurana, B. Garg, S. Saini, R. Kaur, Stimuli-responsive systems with diverse drug delivery and biomedical applications: recent updates and mechanistic pathways, Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier Syst. 34 (2017) 209–255, https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevTherDrugCarrierSyst.2017017284.
  28. M. Khule, S. Vyavahare, A Review: in-situ Gel Drug Delivery System 9 (2021) 2455–6211.
  29. R. Sheshala, Y.Y. Kok, J.M. Ng, R.R.S. Thakur, K. Dua, In situ gelling ophthalmic drug delivery system: an overview and its applications., recent pat, Drug Deliv. Formul. 9 (2015) 237–248, https://doi.org/10.2174/1872211309666150724101227.
  30. Y. Wu, Y. Liu, X. Li, D. Kebebe, B. Zhang, J. Ren, J. Lu, J. Li, S. Du, Z. Liu, Research progress of in-situ gelling ophthalmic drug delivery system, Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 14 (2019) 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajps.2018.04.008.
  31. A. Paul, K.M. Fathima, S.C. Nair, Intra nasal in situ gelling system of lamotrigine using ion activated mucoadhesive polymer, Open Med. Chem. J. 11 (2017) 222–244, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874104501711010222.
  32. M. Agrawal, S. Saraf, S. Saraf, S.K. Dubey, A. Puri, U. Gupta, P. Kesharwani, V. Ravichandiran, P. Kumar, V.G.M. Naidu, U.S. Murty, Ajazuddin, A. Alexander, Stimuli-responsive in situ gelling system for nose-to-brain drug delivery, J. Contr. Release 327 (2020) 235–265, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.07.044.
  33. M. Bialik, M. Kuras, M. Sobczak, E. Oledzka, Achievements in thermosensitive gelling systems for rectal administration, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (2021), https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115500.
  34. M. Kouchak, In situ gelling systems for drug delivery, Jundishapur J. Nat. Pharm. Prod. 9 (2014), e20126, https://doi.org/10.17795/jjnpp-20126.
  35. T. Khudiyev, J. Clayton, E. Levy, N. Chocat, A. Gumennik, A.M. Stolyarov, J. Joannopoulos, Y. Fink, Electrostrictive microelectromechanical fibres and textiles, Nat. Commun. 8 (2017) 1435, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01558-5
  36. M.E. Zaghloul, Introduction to Microelectromechanical Systems (MEMS): Design and Application, Mech. Eng. Handb., 2015, pp. 1–12, https://doi.org/ 10.1002/9781118985960.meh225.
  37. H. Wang, Y. Huang, Combination therapy based on nano codelivery for overcoming cancer drug resistance, Med. Drug Discov. 6 (2020), 100024, https://doi. org/10.1016/j.medidd.2020.100024.
  38. F. Silva, L. Sitia, R. Allevi, A. Bonizzi, M. Sevieri, C. Morasso, M. Truffi, F. Corsi, S. Mazzucchelli, Combined method to remove endotoxins from protein nanocages for drug delivery applications: the case of human ferritin, Pharmaceutics 13 (2021), https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13020229.
  39. K. Rani, S. Paliwal, A review on targeted drug delivery: its entire focus on advanced therapeutics and diagnostics, Scholars J. Appl. Med. Sci 2 (2014)
  40. pt.al Combinatorial nanocarrier based drug delivery approach for amalgamation of anti-tumor agent in breast cancer cells: an improved nanomedicine strategy, Sci. Rep. 6 (2016)
  41. majedul Hoque, Md. Shohel Hossain, Taharat Akram, Sentu Ranjan, Das, Advancing healthcare: Exploring recent innovation in drug delivery system, International journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 2023
  42. Y.S. Youn, Y.H. Bae, Perspectives on the past, present, and future of cancer nanomedicine, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 130 (2018) 3–11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. addr.2018.05.008.
  43. J.K. Patra, G. Das, L.F. Fraceto, E. Vangelie, R. Campos, P. Rodriguez, L. Susana, A. Torres, LArmando, D. Torres, R. Grillo, Nano based drug delivery systems: recent developments and future prospects, J. Nanobiotechnol. (2018) 1–33, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-018-0392-8
  44. A. Khalid, S. Persano, H. Shen, Y. Zhao, E. Blanco, J. Wolfram, W.C. Medicine-qatar, W.C. Medicine, W.C. Medicine, W.C. Medicine, HHS Public Access 14 (2018) 865–877, https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2017.1243527.Strategies
  45. N. Singh, A. Joshi, A.P. Toor, G. Verma, (Chapter 27) - Drug delivery: Advancements And Challenges, Elsevier Inc., 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0- 323-46143-6/00027-0.

Photo
Sakshi Bhope
Corresponding author

Smt. Kusumtai Wankhede Institute of Pharmacy, Katol

Photo
Riddhi Shirbhate
Co-author

KDK College of Pharmacy and Research Institute, Nagpur

Photo
Shruti Shende
Co-author

KDK College of Pharmacy and Research Institute, Nagpur

Photo
Sapna Patel
Co-author

KDK College of Pharmacy and Research Institute, Nagpur

Photo
Kamlesh Wadher
Co-author

KDK College of Pharmacy and Research Institute, Nagpur

Shruti Shende, Riddhi Shirbhate, Sakshi Bhope, Sapna Patel, Kamlesh Wadher, A Review of Recent Developments in Drug Delivery, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 10, 2602-2609. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17441246

More related articles
Review on Nose-To-Brain Drug Delivery...
Umesh Jaybhaye, Shraddha Kayande, Ashwini Waybhase, ...
A Comprehensive Review on Poly Herbal Cough Syrup...
N. B. V. D. Lalitha, B. Sravana Sree, P. Sai Lakshmi, N. Phanindr...
Related Articles
A Review of Medicinal Uses and Pharmacological Activities of Ephorbia Hirta...
Varpe Amruta , Devkate Dipali , Kardile Pratiksha , Salve Rohan , Khodade Gayatri , Palange Sanika ,...
Carica Papaya as a Functional Therapeutic Agent: An Integrative Review...
Anuja Malape, Mayuri Lendave, Dr. Sanjay Bias, ...
Review on Nose-To-Brain Drug Delivery...
Umesh Jaybhaye, Shraddha Kayande, Ashwini Waybhase, ...
More related articles
Review on Nose-To-Brain Drug Delivery...
Umesh Jaybhaye, Shraddha Kayande, Ashwini Waybhase, ...
A Comprehensive Review on Poly Herbal Cough Syrup...
N. B. V. D. Lalitha, B. Sravana Sree, P. Sai Lakshmi, N. Phanindra, Dr. T. K. V. Kesava Rao, ...
Review on Nose-To-Brain Drug Delivery...
Umesh Jaybhaye, Shraddha Kayande, Ashwini Waybhase, ...
A Comprehensive Review on Poly Herbal Cough Syrup...
N. B. V. D. Lalitha, B. Sravana Sree, P. Sai Lakshmi, N. Phanindra, Dr. T. K. V. Kesava Rao, ...