View Article

Abstract

The ideal medication delivery system is as practical and user-friendly for the patient as oral solid dose forms, but it has a bioavailability similar to parenteral dosage forms. Transdermal drug delivery (TDD), a non-invasive delivery method, has drawn more attention in recent years. technique that is often seen to be simple to administer to more vulnerable age groups, such as elderly and pediatric patients, while avoiding some bioavailability issues that come with oral drug delivery because of poor metabolism and absorbability. Nevertheless, TDD is still limited to a small number of medications despite its many advantages. The evolution of the TDDS from first-generation to fourth-generation systems is summarized in this work, along with the features of each carrier with regard to mechanism composition, penetration technique, mechanism of action, and current preclinical research. We also examined the major obstacles faced during the TDDS's development and the vital importance of clinical trials. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications (NSAIDs) have revolutionized the treatment of pain, inflammation, and skin disorders through the use of topical and transdermal drug delivery systems. The topical and transdermal uses of ibuprofen, ketoprofen, and flurbiprofen are highlighted in this analysis, emphasizing their superior skin permeability and localized pain management, as well as an assessment of their security in such uses. They are excellent candidates for skin research and targeted therapy due to their broad use in commercial goods, compatibility with a variety of formulations, and low systemic adverse effects.

Keywords

Transdermal Drug Delivery System (TDDS), Inflammatory Skin Diseases, Microneedle Drug Delivery, Nanocarriers, Skin Barrier (Stratum Corneum), Penetration Enhancement Techniques, Topical Anti-inflammatory Therapy

Introduction

The skin, the body’s largest organ, acts as a protective barrier and maintains homeostasis [1,2]. It consists of the epidermis, dermis, and hypodermis, with the stratum corneum (10–20 µm thick) following a “brick and mortar” structure of corneocytes within lipid matrices [3,4]. Transdermal drug delivery (TDD) offers advantages like controlled dosing and improved compliance, while oral delivery is limited by poor solubility, degradation, and first-pass metabolism, and parenteral delivery is used for drugs with low bioavailability[5–9].

Wounds are classified by depth and duration, and healing occurs in inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling phases [10–14]. Microneedles are a recent advancement that create microchannels for delivering large molecules with minimal invasiveness and better targeting, though challenges like scalability and safety remain [15–17].Lipid-based nanocarriers (SLNs, NLCs, nanoemulsions, transfersomes, ethosomes, invasomes) enhance solubility, retention, and controlled release while reducing irritation [18–20]. Ultra-deformable vesicles improve penetration, and invasomes enable deeper delivery[20,21]. Physical methods like sonophoresis and iontophoresis enhance drug permeation but need more clinical validation. Targeting appendageal pathways, especially hair follicles, supports localized and sustained drug delivery, particularly when combined with nanocarriers or microneedles [22].

BARRIERS TO DRUG DELIVERY TO LOCAL SKIN

Drugs vary in molecular size, with micromolecules generally penetrating the skin more easily, while macromolecules require specialized delivery methods[23,24]. Drug permeation occurs through three main pathways: appendageal, transcellular, and intercellular routes [25–27]. The appendageal pathway allows uptake via sweat glands and hair follicles, the transcellular route involves direct passage through cells, and the intercellular pathway facilitates diffusion between cells, especially for lipophilic drugs. Effective therapy requires delivering drugs to the target subcutaneous site at appropriate concentration and dosage [28].

  • Stratum corneum

The stratum corneum (SC) is the main mechanical barrier of the skin and is essential for drug absorption via passive diffusion. It consists of corneocytes embedded in lipid matrices, connected by corneodesmosomes and tight junction remnants. Corneocytes are terminally differentiated cells with a rigid envelope and keratin filaments cross-linked by proteins such as involucrin, loricrin, and filaggrin[29–31].Corneodesmosomes regulate epidermal turnover through protease-mediated degradation, controlled by factors like LEKTI, pH, and cholesterol sulfate, while tight junction remnants limit protease access[29–31]. The extracellular space contains lipid lamellae (ceramides, cholesterol, fatty acids) arranged in structured phases that determine permeability, with ceramides playing a key role in barrier integrity[31–35].Disruption of the SC increases transepidermal water loss and enhances drug absorption [36,37]. Techniques such as laser ablation, electroporation, sonophoresis, iontophoresis, microneedles, and jet injectors improve delivery by altering this barrier[38–40]. Chemical enhancers (e.g., sodium lauryl sulphate, oleic acid, linoleic acid) further increase permeability by disrupting or modifying SC lipids [41–44].

  • Tight Junctions

Tight junctions (TJs) in the stratum granulosum act as a second barrier, restricting molecular penetration and regulating charge-selective paracellular transport of ions like calcium, sodium, and chloride[45,46]. They are composed of claudins, TJ-associated proteins (occludin, tricellulin), and junctional adhesion molecules, with claudin-1 and claudin-4 being critical for barrier integrity (47). Scaffold proteins such as ZO-1, ZO-2, and cingulin support TJ structure and signaling [48].Claudin-1 deficiency increases permeability, causes water loss, and disrupts skin barrier function, as seen in animal models and human NISCH syndrome[49–55]. Modulating TJs can enhance drug delivery; agents like cCPE, peptides (m19, AT1002), antibodies (7A5, 3B11), and sodium caprate increase permeability by disrupting TJ integrity and reducing TEER[56–59]. Thus, targeting TJs is a promising strategy for improving transdermal delivery, though unintended alterations by drugs and carriers must be considered.

  • Basement Membrane (Basal Lamina)

The basement membrane (BM) is located at the dermo-epidermal junction beneath the stratum basale and is composed of carbohydrates and matrix proteins such as laminins, collagens, proteoglycans (e.g., perlecan), and hyaluronic acid. These components form a cross-linked, mat-like structure essential for epidermal development and barrier formation [60]. Autoantibodies against laminin cause blistering pemphigoid disorders[61,62], and BM thickness is reduced in atopic dermatitis[63]. The BM’s role as a barrier remains debated. Its mesh structure suggests limited material exchange, yet proteins up to 40 kDa (HRP) are not restricted in transport [64]. In contrast, absorption of 8 nm particles is significantly reduced(65,66), and it blocks viral spread such as herpes simplex virus [67]. Additionally, due to its negative charge, the BM may act as a charge-selective barrier for larger molecules (~450 kDa) [68].

  • Blood Vessels

The skin’s vasculature acts as the “last barrier,” where a one-cell-thick endothelial layer connects skin tissue to circulation at the papillary loops near the dermo-epidermal junction. This endothelium responds to stimuli such as pressure, heat, osmolarity, chemokines, and cytokines by adjusting permeability and regulating vasodilation or constriction[69]. Beyond inflammatory responses, skin vessels can open normally closed vascular loops, playing a key role in thermoregulation. Skin perfusion ranges from 0.05 L/min in cold stress to about 0.25 L/min at rest and exceeds 5.00 L/min during hyperthermia [70]. These changes influence both thermoregulation and the movement of substances across the skin barrier[71,72]. Clinical trials show that increased temperature enhances systemic absorption of transdermal drugs such as nicotine, fentanyl [73], clonidine [74], and testosterone[75]. Overall, the skin’s vascular system is a crucial component of its barrier function alongside the epidermis.    

DEVELOPMENT AND EVOLUTION OF TDDS

Transdermal penetration in TDDS is influenced by factors such as the stratum corneum, drug properties, carrier systems, temperature, and pH, which can reduce its effectiveness. To address this, researchers have focused on improving carrier systems to enhance permeation efficiency. Since their introduction in 1981, TDDS has evolved through four generations [76]. First-generation systems use patch-based delivery with basic permeation strategies. Second-generation systems incorporate techniques like iontophoresis, sonophoresis, prodrugs, and chemical enhancers, though they may cause physiological damage. Third-generation TDDS emphasizes methods such as electroporation and microneedles. The latest generation focuses on nanocarriers, the most extensively studied systems, which enhance the delivery of hydrophilic biomolecules across the skin and improve drug penetration into deeper layers[77].

  • Iontophoresis

Iontophoresis, a second-generation TDDS, uses low-voltage current (≤10 V) to enhance drug delivery across the stratum corneum into systemic circulation[78]. Its mechanisms include electro-repulsion (movement of similarly charged molecules) and electro-osmosis (transport of charged and uncharged molecules via current-driven flow) [79–82]. Drug transport mainly occurs through skin appendages and intercellular pathways, enabling targeted delivery.It serves as a noninvasive alternative to injections, improving patient compliance and enabling delivery of large molecules[83,84]. Studies show enhanced efficacy, including better outcomes than intradermal injections and improved drug penetration, especially in damaged skin [85,86]. Controlled drug release is achieved by adjusting current intensity and application area [86].Despite advancements, only a few FDA-approved products exist, with limited availability [87]. Safety concerns remain, as high current intensity or prolonged use may cause skin irritation, erythema, itching, and tingling.

  • Sonophoresis

Sonophoresis, a second-generation TDDS, uses ultrasound to enhance drug penetration into the skin, particularly for hydrophilic and macromolecular drugs. It increases skin permeability through micro-vibrations, especially at low frequencies (20 kHz–16 MHz), which allow deeper penetration with minimal energy loss[88–90]. It has clinical use in applications like lidocaine delivery, reducing anesthesia onset time [91,92]. It is classified into preprocessed (enhancing permeability before drug application) and simultaneous (enhancing transport during ultrasound exposure). The main mechanism is cavitation, along with thermal, mechanical, and convective effects[93]. Despite its benefits, sonophoresis alone is less effective for large molecules, may cause irritation, and is time-consuming. Challenges include limited penetration efficiency, equipment cost, and safety concerns. However, it remains useful for delivering low-bioavailability drugs, vaccines, and genes, especially when combined with other methods, with advanced techniques like dual-frequency ultrasound offering improved outcomes[94].

  • Chemical penetration enhancer

Chemical penetration enhancers (CPEs) are widely used in second-generation TDDSs due to their easy application, noninvasive nature, compatibility, and low cost [95–99]. Their concentration significantly influences drug penetration, viscosity, and adhesion of formulations[100]. CPEs improve permeation by increasing diffusion, fluidizing the stratum corneum, enhancing drug thermodynamic activity, and altering partition coefficients. However, disruption of the skin barrier may lead to irritation, allergies, and inflammation, especially at higher concentrations, requiring careful balance between safety and efficacy [101]. Optimizing compatibility and combining CPEs can enhance penetration and reduce risks. Although newer CPEs improve performance, including macromolecule delivery, concerns like toxicity, hypersensitivity, and sensitization limit their wider use, highlighting the need for further research[102].

  • Electroportation

The stratum corneum limits TDDS, and electroporation, a third-generation method, enhances drug permeation by creating temporary pores using high-voltage pulses (50–500 V), especially for macromolecules like DNA and insulin. It disrupts the lipid bilayer to form transient pathways, with effectiveness influenced by pulse parameters and drug properties.Electroporation produces reversible pores with permeability lasting over 12 hours, allowing controlled delivery with minimal lasting damage and improved transport of hydrophilic and high-molecular-weight drugs[103,104] . The mechanism involves structural disruption of the stratum corneum. It is used clinically in electrochemotherapy for skin cancers such as malignant melanoma, but limitations like lower efficiency than iontophoresis and insufficient long-term safety data restrict its wider application, though it remains a promising approach[105].

  • Microneedling

Third-generation TDDSs include microneedling and microneedle patches [106]. Microneedling creates controlled microinjuries using devices like dermarollers to enhance skin texture and collagen production, with drugs applied afterward through microchannels [107–109].In contrast, microneedle patches consist of micron-sized needles that directly deliver drugs into the skin and are classified as solid, coated, dissolving, hollow, and hydrogel-forming types [110,111]. They enable precise dosing and targeted delivery to specific skin layers[112].Microneedle patches offer advantages such as reduced pain, improved patient compliance, and self-administration, with applications in insulin, vaccines, and other macromolecules [112,113]. Thus, microneedling enhances topical drug absorption, while microneedle patches act as direct delivery systems.

  • Solid Microneedles

Solid microneedles enhance skin permeability by creating microchannels for passive drug diffusion, which must close quickly to prevent microbial entry[114]. Advanced designs improve delivery efficiency, reduce leakage, and enable multi-drug delivery [115]. However, they require a two-step process, increasing complexity. They can be made from polymers, with successful drug delivery demonstrated using tilapia-derived microneedles [116]. Studies show enhanced delivery of drugs like verapamil, amlodipine, captopril, and metoprolol using microneedle systems[117,118].They also show superior vaccine delivery compared to intramuscular injections, producing stronger and longer-lasting immune responses.

  • Dissolved Microneedles

Dissolving microneedles enable “one-step” drug delivery by puncturing the skin and dissolving to release encapsulated drugs. They are typically fabricated by micromolding under mild conditions, suitable for heat-sensitive drugs and vaccines [112,119,120]. Applications include PVA microneedles enhancing boron neutron capture therapy with strong anti-melanoma effects[121], and hyaluronic acid-based microneedles improving melanin inhibition and localized drug delivery[122]. Nanocarriers, a fourth-generation TDDS, enhance drug penetration with minimal skin damage, particularly for hydrophilic biomolecules that are otherwise difficult to deliver transdermally.

  • Liposomes

Liposomes, with particle sizes of 50–1000 nm, are among the most widely used nanocarriers and one of the few nanoformulations applied clinically. Their lipid bilayer structure allows encapsulation of water-soluble drugs in the core and lipid-soluble drugs within the bilayer [123–125]. Due to their amphiphilic, biocompatible, and biodegradable nature, they are especially useful for delivering traditional Chinese medicines. Liposomes enhance therapeutic efficacy by improving bioavailability, enabling sustained release, and supporting targeted drug delivery, thereby increasing safety [112].

  • Lipid Nanoparticles

Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) and polymer nanoparticles (PNPs) are key nanocarriers in TDDSs. SLNs, typically 50–1000 nm in size, are composed of solid natural or synthetic lipids and are valued for high drug-loading capacity, controlled release, stability, and good biosafety[126,127]. PNPs, with sizes ranging from 10–1000 nm, are made from biocompatible and biodegradable polymers. They offer simple fabrication, targeted delivery, enhanced therapeutic efficacy, improved safety, and reduced side effects[128]. An example includes tacrolimus-loaded liquid crystal nanoparticles, which enhance skin barrier penetration and improve therapeutic outcomes in psoriasis[129].

CLINICAL APPLICATION OF TDDS

Inflammatory skin diseases affect 20–25% of the population and arise from infections or immune dysfunction involving skin barrier, innate, and adaptive immunity, with cytokines regulating T cell activity and inflammation[130–132].Prevalence varies across populations and increases with age, affecting about one-eighth of individuals over 50, with regional and disease-specific differences such as higher adult incidence of seborrheic dermatitis and early onset of atopic dermatitis[130,133–135]. Psoriasis is often linked to comorbidities like diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and depression [136].Treatment includes vitamin D analogs, corticosteroids, calmodulin inhibitors, emollients, antihistamines, and biologics[137–139]. However, limited skin penetration (10–20%) and long-term use may cause side effects like skin thinning, immunosuppression, and metabolic complications[140,141]. Common conditions include acne, psoriasis, and atopic dermatitis.

  1. Application of TDDS in inflammatory skin diseases
  • Psoriasis

Psoriasis thickens the stratum corneum, reducing drug penetration. Transdermal patches using polymers like CMC-Na and HPMC enhance mechanical strength, controlled release, and drug absorption, with methotrexate-loaded patches effectively reducing inflammation [142,143]. Advanced approaches include HA-based microneedle patches delivering methotrexate nanoparticles, which decrease inflammation, skin thickness, and cytokines with fewer side effects [144]. Thermoresponsive hydrogels with ionic liquid microemulsions improve solubility, permeability, adhesion, and sustained release while maintaining biocompatibility[145].Nanocarrier systems further enhance therapy, including TQ-Arg-PA nanocapsules and aloe vera-based patches improving drug delivery[146] . Combined nano-systems (TCeO? with 9-ol) reduce ROS and inflammation, while transdermal parthenolide shows superior anti-inflammatory effects via IL-36 targeting[147,148]. ROS-responsive nanomicelles delivering calcipotriol improve solubility and reduce keratinocyte proliferation [149]. Additional innovations include AP-PTPP conjugates, dissolving microneedles, and ROS-regulating systems that enhance delivery and improve the psoriatic microenvironment[150–152].

  • Atopic Dermatitis

A P407/CMCS thermosensitive hydrogel enhances drug release and skin hydration for atopic dermatitis by improving porosity and modulating sol–gel transition without altering its properties, making it an effective dual-function TDDS [153]. A conductive TDDS (cTDS) enables electrically controlled, on-demand drug release, improving delivery and reducing inflammation while supporting smart and biosensor-integrated systems[154]. Low-temperature atmospheric pressure plasma (LTAPP) improves delivery of Jaun ointment, reducing cytokines, eosinophils, and inflammation without tissue damage via NF-κB modulation[155]. Triptolide nano-lotion gel enhances skin absorption and reduces systemic side effects, offering effective and low-toxicity treatment for dermatitis [156].

  • Acne

Acne affects about 85% of individuals aged 11–30 and is associated with androgens, keratinocyte proliferation, sebum production, and oxidative stress caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS)[157,158]. A TDDS using a transfer gel of mulberry leaf extract demonstrated strong antioxidant activity and enhanced skin permeability for acne treatment [159]. Additionally, a high molecular weight hyaluronic acid-based microneedle system loaded with eugenol and combined with photothermal therapy showed effective drug delivery, antibacterial activity, reduced inflammation, sebaceous gland shrinkage, and improved skin healing[160].

RECENT ADVANCES IN TDDS FOR INFLAMMATORY SKIN DISORDERS

 

Study

Technique

Type of ISD

Drug

Key Outcome

Rana Obaidat et al., 2022

Nanofiber microcarrier system

Various inflammatory skin conditions

Pioglitazone

Improved drug retention in skin layers and enhanced local delivery with minimal systemic exposure.

Ji Heun Jeong et al., 2019

Pullulan hydrogel with plant extract

Atopic dermatitis

Rhus verniciflua extract

Provided both physical skin protection and therapeutic anti?inflammatory action.

Wenyi Wang et al., 2016

Thermosensitive composite hydrogel

Atopic dermatitis

P407/CMCS hydrogel

Enhanced drug diffusion due to porous structure and improved storage stability.

Yuan Yang et al., 2022

Conductive transdermal system

Inflammation?related dermatitis

Multiple drugs

Enabled electrically controlled drug release and personalized therapy.

Jeong Hae Choi et al., 2017

Plasma?treated herbal ointment

Atopic dermatitis

Jaun ointment

Improved penetration and regulated inflammatory signaling.

Muhammad Shahid Latif et al., 2022

CMC?based patch

Psoriasis inflammation

Methotrexate

Improved drug retention and reduced toxicity.

Huaji Wang et al., 2021

Microneedle patch

Psoriasis

Methotrexate nanoparticles

Lowered inflammatory markers and improved therapeutic effectiveness.

 

LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE PROSPECTS

The stratum corneum is the primary barrier limiting penetration of hydrophilic drugs and macromolecules, leading to restricted drug selection, low bioavailability, and delayed onset in TDDS(161). Skin irritation and toxicity may occur with chemical enhancers and physical methods like iontophoresis and electroporation [162].

Advanced systems such as microneedles and nanocarriers face challenges including safety concerns, stability issues, potential skin damage, and long-term toxicity[163]. High manufacturing costs, formulation complexity, and limited clinical translation due to regulatory and safety constraints further restrict their use[161,164]. Patient variability also affects drug absorption and efficacy.

Nanocarriers (liposomes, SLNs, PNPs) improve solubility, stability, and targeted delivery with fewer side effects[165], while microneedles enable painless and controlled delivery of macromolecules[163]. Hybrid approaches enhance permeation efficiency[161], and smart systems like stimuli-responsive hydrogels and biosensor-based patches support personalized therapy. Emerging technologies such as 4D bioprinting may improve formulation design, with future research focusing on safety, cost reduction, and clinical translation for effective non-invasive treatment[165].

CONCLUSION

The skin as the major protective tissue of the body represents a challenging target tissue with regards to drug delivery because of the unique structure of the skin, notably the stratum corneum. Traditional routes of drug delivery such as oral and parenteral routes exhibit limitations such as poor bioavailability, adverse systemic effects, and low patient compliance.

Drug delivery through transdermal drug delivery systems (TDDS) presents promising alternative options for drug delivery with regard to providing local, minimal-invasive, and regulated drug delivery. Recent advances in drug delivery approaches include the use of microneedles, electroporation, iontophoresis, and liposomes. These strategies have greatly enhanced permeation rates, leading to successful delivery of complex drug molecules, even biologicals.

In addition, liposomal nanocarriers coupled with microneedle technology have helped enhance the delivery of drugs to target skin inflammatory diseases, such as psoriasis, acne, and atopic dermatitis. Nonetheless, these developments face some limitations, including lack of clinical applications, limited safety profiles, and insufficient evidence.

In conclusion, there is an ever-growing advancement in TDDS, which holds great potential to revolutionize dermal drug delivery.

REFERENCES

        1. González-Mariscal L, Miranda J, Gallego-Gutiérrez H, Cano-Cortina M, Amaya E. Relationship between apical junction proteins, gene expression and cancer. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes. 2020 Sep;1862(9):183278. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2020.183278
  1. Jayakumar R, Prabaharan M, Sudheesh Kumar PT, Nair SV, Tamura H. Biomaterials based on chitin and chitosan in wound dressing applications. Biotechnol Adv. 2011 May;29(3):322–37. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.01.005
  2. Marks R. The Stratum Corneum Barrier: The Final Frontier. J Nutr. 2004 Aug;134(8):2017S-2021S. doi:10.1093/jn/134.8.2017S
  3. Elias PM. Epidermal Lipids, Barrier Function, and Desquamation. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 1983 Jun;80(1):S44–9. doi:10.1038/jid.1983.12
  4. Huttunen J, Adla SK, Markowicz-Piasecka M, Huttunen KM. Increased/Targeted Brain (Pro)Drug Delivery via Utilization of Solute Carriers (SLCs). Pharmaceutics. 2022 Jun 10;14(6):1234. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics14061234
  5. He M, Zhu L, Yang N, Li H, Yang Q. Recent advances of oral film as platform for drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 2021 Jul;604:120759. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120759
  6. Albarqi HA, Demessie AA, Sabei FY, Moses AS, Hansen MN, Dhagat P, et al. Systemically Delivered Magnetic Hyperthermia for Prostate Cancer Treatment. Pharmaceutics. 2020 Oct 25;12(11):1020. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics12111020
  7. Raza A, Hayat U, Bilal M, Iqbal HMN, Wang JY. Zein-based micro- and nano-constructs and biologically therapeutic cues with multi-functionalities for oral drug delivery systems. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2020 Aug;58:101818. doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2020.101818
  8. Anselmo AC, Mitragotri S. Nanoparticles in the clinic: An update. Bioeng Transl Med. 2019 Sep 5;4(3). doi:10.1002/btm2.10143
  9. Caló E, Khutoryanskiy V V. Biomedical applications of hydrogels: A review of patents and commercial products. Eur Polym J. 2015 Apr;65:252–67. doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.11.024
  10. Robertson CG, Hardman NJ. Nature of Carbon Black Reinforcement of Rubber: Perspective on the Original Polymer Nanocomposite. Polymers (Basel). 2021 Feb 12;13(4):538. doi:10.3390/polym13040538
  11. Barrientos S, Stojadinovic O, Golinko MS, Brem H, Tomic?Canic M. PERSPECTIVE ARTICLE: Growth factors and cytokines in wound healing. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 2008 Sep 3;16(5):585–601. doi:10.1111/j.1524-475X.2008.00410.x
  12. Nathan C. Points of control in inflammation. Nature. 2002 Dec;420(6917):846–52. doi:10.1038/nature01320
  13. Gurtner GC, Werner S, Barrandon Y, Longaker MT. Wound repair and regeneration. Nature. 2008 May 15;453(7193):314–21. doi:10.1038/nature07039
  14. Zimecki M, Artym J, Ka?as W, Strz?da?a L, Kaleta-Kuratewicz K, Kuryszko J, et al. Anti-Inflammatory Activity of a Cyclic Tetrapeptide in Mouse and Human Experimental Models. Pharmaceutics. 2020 Oct 28;12(11):1030. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics12111030
  15. Ghandehari H, Chan HK, Harashima H, MacKay JA, Minko T, Schenke-Layland K, et al. Advanced drug delivery 2020 - Parts 1, 2 and 3. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2020;156:1–2. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.11.003
  16. Sylvestre M, Lv S, Yang LF, Luera N, Peeler DJ, Chen BM, et al. Replacement of L-amino acid peptides with D-amino acid peptides mitigates anti-PEG antibody generation against polymer-peptide conjugates in mice. Journal of Controlled Release. 2021 Mar;331:142–53. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.01.015
  17. Souto EB, Baldim I, Oliveira WP, Rao R, Yadav N, Gama FM, et al. SLN and NLC for topical, dermal, and transdermal drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2020 Mar 3;17(3):357–77. doi:10.1080/17425247.2020.1727883
  18. Machhi J, Shahjin F, Das S, Patel M, Abdelmoaty MM, Cohen JD, et al. Nanocarrier vaccines for SARS-CoV-2. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021 Apr;171:215–39. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2021.01.002
  19. Babaie S, Bakhshayesh AR Del, Ha JW, Hamishehkar H, Kim KH. Invasome: A Novel Nanocarrier for Transdermal Drug Delivery. Nanomaterials. 2020 Feb 17;10(2):341. doi:10.3390/nano10020341
  20. Opatha SAT, Titapiwatanakun V, Chutoprapat R. Transfersomes: A Promising Nanoencapsulation Technique for Transdermal Drug Delivery. Pharmaceutics. 2020 Sep 9;12(9):855. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics12090855
  21. Matsumura Y. Cancer stromal targeting therapy to overcome the pitfall of EPR effect. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2020;154–155:142–50. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.07.003
  22. Herman A, Herman AP. Essential oils and their constituents as skin penetration enhancer for transdermal drug delivery: a review. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2015 Apr 1;67(4):473–85. doi:10.1111/jphp.12334
  23. Bajza Á, Kocsis D, Berezvai O, Laki AJ, Lukács B, Imre T, et al. Verification of P-Glycoprotein Function at the Dermal Barrier in Diffusion Cells and Dynamic “Skin-On-A-Chip” Microfluidic Device. Pharmaceutics. 2020 Aug 25;12(9):804. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics12090804
  24. Prausnitz MR, Langer R. Transdermal drug delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Nov 7;26(11):1261–8. doi:10.1038/nbt.1504
  25. Bernkop-Schnürch A. Mucoadhesive systems in oral drug delivery. Drug Discov Today Technol. 2005 Mar;2(1):83–7. doi:10.1016/j.ddtec.2005.05.001
  26. Prow TW, Grice JE, Lin LL, Faye R, Butler M, Becker W, et al. Nanoparticles and microparticles for skin drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2011 May;63(6):470–91. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2011.01.012
  27. Gorzelanny C, Mess C, Schneider SW, Huck V, Brandner JM. Skin Barriers in Dermal Drug Delivery: Which Barriers Have to Be Overcome and How Can We Measure Them? Pharmaceutics. 2020 Jul 20;12(7):684. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics12070684
  28. Lee AY. Molecular Mechanism of Epidermal Barrier Dysfunction as Primary Abnormalities. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Feb 11;21(4):1194. doi:10.3390/ijms21041194
  29. Cai L, Kaneko S, Morita E. Changes in salivary chromogranin A levels in adults with atopic dermatitis are correlated with changes in their condition. J Dermatol. 2018 May 3;45(5):554–9. doi:10.1111/1346-8138.14277
  30. Matsui T, Amagai M. Dissecting the formation, structure and barrier function of the stratum corneum. Int Immunol. 2015 Jun 1;27(6):269–80. doi:10.1093/intimm/dxv013
  31. AUGEY F, GUNERA-SAAD N, BENSAID B, NOSBAUM A, BERARD F, NICOLAS JF. Chronic spontaneous urticaria is not an allergic disease. European Journal of Dermatology. 2011 May;21(3):349–53. doi:10.1684/ejd.2011.1285
  32. Nousbeck J, Sarig O, Magal L, Warshauer E, Burger B, Itin P, et al. Mutations in SMARCAD1 cause autosomal dominant adermatoglyphia and perturb the expression of epidermal differentiation-associated genes. British Journal of Dermatology. 2014 Dec;171(6):1521–4. doi:10.1111/bjd.13176
  33. Bouwstra JA, Ponec M. The skin barrier in healthy and diseased state. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes. 2006 Dec;1758(12):2080–95. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.06.021
  34. Nakamura M, Sundberg JP, Paus R. Mutant laboratory mice with abnormalities in hair follicle morphogenesis, cycling, and/or structure: annotated tables. Exp Dermatol. 2001 Dec 7;10(6):369–90. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0625.2001.100601.x
  35. Horváth I, Multhoff G, Sonnleitner A, Vígh L. Membrane-associated stress proteins: More than simply chaperones. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes. 2008 Jul;1778(7–8):1653–64. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2008.02.012
  36. Belosludtsev KN, Belosludtseva N V., Agafonov A V., Astashev ME, Kazakov AS, Saris NEL, et al. Ca2+-dependent permeabilization of mitochondria and liposomes by palmitic and oleic acids: A comparative study. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes. 2014 Oct;1838(10):2600–6. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2014.06.017
  37. METTRICK DF. Helminth parasites of Hertfordshire birds. II. Cestoda. J Helminthol. 1958;32(3):159–94. doi:10.1017/s0022149x00019568 PubMed PMID: 13587969.
  38. Kaminska E, Madejczyk O, Tarnacka M, Jurkiewicz K, Kaminski K, Paluch M. Studying of crystal growth and overall crystallization of naproxen from binary mixtures. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 2017 Apr;113:75–87. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2016.12.014
  39. Prausnitz MR, Langer R. Transdermal drug delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Nov 7;26(11):1261–8. doi:10.1038/nbt.1504
  40. Thompson SM, Callstrom MR, Butters KA, Knudsen B, Grande JP, Roberts LR, et al. Heat stress induced cell death mechanisms in hepatocytes and hepatocellular carcinoma: In vitro and in vivo study. Lasers Surg Med. 2014 Apr 18;46(4):290–301. doi:10.1002/lsm.22231
  41. Bariya SH, Gohel MC, Mehta TA, Sharma OP. Microneedles: an emerging transdermal drug delivery system. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2012 Jan 1;64(1):11–29. doi:10.1111/j.2042-7158.2011.01369.x
  42. del Río-Sancho S, Lapteva M, Sonaje K, Böhler C, Ling V, Boehncke WH, et al. Targeted cutaneous delivery of etanercept using Er:YAG fractional laser ablation. Int J Pharm. 2020 Apr;580:119234. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119234
  43. Arbiser JL. Implications of Epstein–Barr Virus (EBV)-Induced Carcinogenesis on Cutaneous Inflammation and Carcinogenesis: Evidence of Recurring Patterns of Angiogenesis and Signal Transduction. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2005 May;124(5):xi–xii. doi:10.1111/j.0022-202X.2005.23695.x
  44. Elias PM, Wakefield JS. Mechanisms of abnormal lamellar body secretion and the dysfunctional skin barrier in patients with atopic dermatitis. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2014 Oct;134(4):781-791.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2014.05.048
  45. Zorn K, Oroz-Guinea I, Brundiek H, Bornscheuer UT. Engineering and application of enzymes for lipid modification, an update. Prog Lipid Res. 2016 Jul;63:153–64. doi:10.1016/j.plipres.2016.06.001
  46. Bouwstra J. Structure of the skin barrier and its modulation by vesicular formulations. Prog Lipid Res. 2003 Jan;42(1):1–36. doi:10.1016/S0163-7827(02)00028-0
  47. Williams AC, Barry BW. Penetration enhancers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004 Mar;56(5):603–18. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2003.10.025
  48. Dragicevic N, Atkinson JP, Maibach HI. Chemical Penetration Enhancers: Classification and Mode of Action. In: Percutaneous Penetration Enhancers Chemical Methods in Penetration Enhancement. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2015. p. 11–27. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-47039-8_2
  49. Benson H. Transdermal Drug Delivery: Penetration Enhancement Techniques. Curr Drug Deliv. 2005 Jan 1;2(1):23–33. doi:10.2174/1567201052772915
  50. Kirschner N, Rosenthal R, Furuse M, Moll I, Fromm M, Brandner JM. Contribution of Tight Junction Proteins to Ion, Macromolecule, and Water Barrier in Keratinocytes. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2013 May;133(5):1161–9. doi:10.1038/jid.2012.507
  51. Adams MP, Mallet DG, Pettet GJ. Towards a Quantitative Theory of Epidermal Calcium Profile Formation in Unwounded Skin. PLoS One. 2015 Jan 27;10(1):e0116751. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0116751
  52. Günzel D, Yu ASL. Claudins and the Modulation of Tight Junction Permeability. Physiol Rev. 2013 Apr;93(2):525–69. doi:10.1152/physrev.00019.2012
  53. Brandner J, Zorn-Kruppa M, Yoshida T, Moll I, Beck L, De Benedetto A. Epidermal tight junctions in health and disease. Tissue Barriers. 2015 Apr 3;3(1–2):e974451. doi:10.4161/21688370.2014.974451
  54. Furuse M, Hata M, Furuse K, Yoshida Y, Haratake A, Sugitani Y, et al. Claudin-based tight junctions are crucial for the mammalian epidermal barrier. J Cell Biol. 2002 Mar 18;156(6):1099–111. doi:10.1083/jcb.200110122
  55. Wang Y, Kringen P, Kristensen GB, Holm R, Baekelandt MMO, Olivier M, et al. Effect of the codon 72 polymorphism (c.215G>C, p.Arg72Pro) in combination with somatic sequence variants in theTP53 gene on survival in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma. Hum Mutat. 2006 Feb;27(2):209–10. doi:10.1002/humu.20298
  56. Jouary T, Legros C, Lalanne N, Versapuech J, Ezzedine K, Vergier B, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a new criterion for selection of candidate patients for surgery of low tumour burden metastases from malignant melanoma? British Journal of Dermatology. 2010 Jul;163(1):183–7. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09736.x
  57. Furuse M, Hata M, Furuse K, Yoshida Y, Haratake A, Sugitani Y, et al. Claudin-based tight junctions are crucial for the mammalian epidermal barrier. J Cell Biol. 2002 Mar 18;156(6):1099–111. doi:10.1083/jcb.200110122
  58. Uchida T, Kanazawa T, Takashima Y, Okada H. Development of an Efficient Transdermal Delivery System of Small Interfering RNA Using Functional Peptides, Tat and AT-1002. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo). 2011;59(2):196–201. doi:10.1248/cpb.59.196
  59. Goodacre N, Devkota P, Bae E, Wuchty S, Uetz P. Protein-protein interactions of human viruses. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2020 Mar;99:31–9. doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.07.018
  60. Witte M, Zillikens D, Schmidt E. Diagnosis of Autoimmune Blistering Diseases. Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Nov 2;5. doi:10.3389/fmed.2018.00296
  61. Stemmler S, Parwez Q, Petrasch-Parwez E, Epplen JT, Hoffjan S. Association of variation in the LAMA3 gene, encoding the alpha-chain of laminin 5, with atopic dermatitis in a German case–control cohort. BMC Dermatol. 2014 Dec 3;14(1):17. doi:10.1186/1471-5945-14-17
  62. De Benedetto A, Kubo A, Beck LA. Skin Barrier Disruption: A Requirement for Allergen Sensitization? Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2012 Mar;132(3):949–63. doi:10.1038/jid.2011.435
  63. Proksch E, Brandner JM, Jensen J. The skin: an indispensable barrier. Exp Dermatol. 2008 Dec 11;17(12):1063–72. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0625.2008.00786.x
  64. Menon GK, Cleary GW, Lane ME. The structure and function of the stratum corneum. Int J Pharm. 2012 Oct;435(1):3–9. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.06.005
  65. Berman B, France DS, Martinelli GP, Hass A. Modulation of Expression of Epidermal Langerhans Cell Properties Following in Situ Exposure to Glucocorticosteroids. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 1983 Mar;80(3):168–71. doi:10.1111/1523-1747.ep12533397
  66. Takada K, Masaki H, Konishi E, Takahashi M, Kurane I. Definition of an epitope on Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) envelope protein recognized by JEV-specific murine CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Arch Virol. 2000 Mar;145(3):523–34. doi:10.1007/s007050050043
  67. Tabi Z, Man S. Challenges for cancer vaccine development. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2006 Oct;58(8):902–15. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2006.05.004
  68. Dawes NC. Marketing and Product Design of Antiaging Skin Care Products. In: Textbook of Aging Skin. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2017. p. 2177–87. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-47398-6_107
  69. Morrison SF. Central neural pathways for thermoregulation. Frontiers in Bioscience. 2011;16(1):74. doi:10.2741/3677
  70. ?íhová B, Strohalm J, Hovorka O, Šubr V, Etrych T, Chytil P, et al. Doxorubicin release is not a prerequisite for the in vitro cytotoxicity of HPMA-based pharmaceuticals: In vitro effect of extra drug-free GlyPheLeuGly sequences. Journal of Controlled Release. 2008 Apr;127(2):110–20. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.01.003
  71. Allen TM, Cullis PR. Drug Delivery Systems: Entering the Mainstream. Science (1979). 2004 Mar 19;303(5665):1818–22. doi:10.1126/science.1095833
  72. Raphael KG, Marbach JJ, Gallagher RM. Somatosensory Amplification and Affective Inhibition Are Elevated in Myofascial Face Pain. Pain Medicine. 2000 Sep 1;1(3):247–53. doi:10.1046/j.1526-4637.2000.00034.x
  73. De Castro S, Pelliccia F, Cartoni D, Funaro S, Melillo G, Beni S, et al. Effects of Angiotensin?Converting Enzyme Inhibition on Left Ventricular Geometric Patterns in Patients with Essential Hypertension. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 1996 Dec 8;36(12):1141–8. doi:10.1002/j.1552-4604.1996.tb04168.x
  74. Paudel KS, Milewski M, Swadley CL, Brogden NK, Ghosh P, Stinchcomb AL. Challenges and Opportunities in dermal/transdermal Delivery. Ther Deliv. 2010 Jul 25;1(1):109–31. doi:10.4155/tde.10.16
  75. Stefanov SR, Andonova VY. Lipid Nanoparticulate Drug Delivery Systems: Recent Advances in the Treatment of Skin Disorders. Pharmaceuticals. 2021 Oct 26;14(11):1083. doi:10.3390/ph14111083
  76. Uchida N, Yanagi M, Hamada H. Physical Enhancement? Nanocarrier? Current Progress in Transdermal Drug Delivery. Nanomaterials. 2021 Jan 28;11(2):335. doi:10.3390/nano11020335
  77. Rimpelä AK, Reinisalo M, Hellinen L, Grazhdankin E, Kidron H, Urtti A, et al. Implications of melanin binding in ocular drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018 Feb;126:23–43. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2017.12.008
  78. Tang-Liu DDS, Liu S, Neff J, Sandri R. Disposition of Levobunolol after an Ophthalmic Dose to Rabbits. J Pharm Sci. 1987 Oct;76(10):780–3. doi:10.1002/jps.2600761005
  79. Brown MB, Martin GP, Jones SA, Akomeah FK. Dermal and Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems: Current and Future Prospects. Drug Deliv. 2006 Jan 10;13(3):175–87. doi:10.1080/10717540500455975
  80. Bakshi P, Vora D, Hemmady K, Banga AK. Iontophoretic skin delivery systems: Success and failures. Int J Pharm. 2020 Aug;586:119584. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119584
  81. Lehtinen OP, Nugroho RWN, Lehtimaa T, Vierros S, Hiekkataipale P, Ruokolainen J, et al. Effect of temperature, water content and free fatty acid on reverse micelle formation of phospholipids in vegetable oil. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2017 Dec;160:355–63. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.09.050
  82. Donnelly RF, Singh TRR, Garland MJ, Migalska K, Majithiya R, McCrudden CM, et al. Hydrogel?Forming Microneedle Arrays for Enhanced Transdermal Drug Delivery. Adv Funct Mater. 2012 Dec 5;22(23):4879–90. doi:10.1002/adfm.201200864
  83. Prausnitz MR, Mitragotri S, Langer R. Current status and future potential of transdermal drug delivery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004 Feb;3(2):115–24. doi:10.1038/nrd1304
  84. Zhang M, Guo X, Wang M, Liu K. Tumor microenvironment-induced structure changing drug/gene delivery system for overcoming delivery-associated challenges. Journal of Controlled Release. 2020 Jul;323:203–24. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.04.026
  85. Chirico S, Dalmoro A, Lamberti G, Russo G, Titomanlio G. Analysis and modeling of swelling and erosion behavior for pure HPMC tablet. Journal of Controlled Release. 2007 Sep;122(2):181–8. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.07.001
  86. Kalia YN, Naik A, Garrison J, Guy RH. Iontophoretic drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004 Mar;56(5):619–58. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2003.10.026
  87. Mitragotri S. Healing sound: the use of ultrasound in drug delivery and other therapeutic applications. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005 Mar;4(3):255–60. doi:10.1038/nrd1662
  88. Ibrulj S, Haveri? S, Haveri? A. Complementarity of Standard Cytogenetic Assays. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2008 Feb 20;8(1):34–7. doi:10.17305/bjbms.2008.2992
  89. Park D, Park H, Seo J, Lee S. Sonophoresis in transdermal drug deliverys. Ultrasonics. 2014 Jan;54(1):56–65. doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2013.07.007
  90. de Oliveira RP, Baptista RP, Martins CB de C, Faletti A, Soletti RC, Borges HL, et al. 3-D Endoluminal Ultrasound Biomicroscopic Imaging and Volumetry of Mouse Colon Tumors. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2021 Oct;47(10):2990–3001. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.06.004
  91. Park D, Park H, Seo J, Lee S. Sonophoresis in transdermal drug deliverys. Ultrasonics. 2014 Jan;54(1):56–65. doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2013.07.007
  92. Gong H, Peng R, Liu Z. Carbon nanotubes for biomedical imaging: The recent advances. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013 Dec;65(15):1951–63. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2013.10.002
  93. Marathe D, Bhuvanashree VS, Mehta CH, T. A, Nayak UY. Low?Frequency Sonophoresis: A Promising Strategy for Enhanced Transdermal Delivery. Adv Pharmacol Pharm Sci. 2024 Jan 5;2024(1). doi:10.1155/2024/1247450
  94. Li W, Yalcin M, Lin Q, Ardawi MSM, Mousa SA. Self-assembly of green tea catechin derivatives in nanoparticles for oral lycopene delivery. Journal of Controlled Release. 2017 Feb;248:117–24. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.01.009
  95. Chen X, Zhu L, Li R, Pang L, Zhu S, Ma J, et al. Electroporation-enhanced transdermal drug delivery: Effects of logP, pKa, solubility and penetration time. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2020 Aug;151:105410. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2020.105410
  96. Zhao X, Coulman SA, Hanna SJ, Wong FS, Dayan CM, Birchall JC. Formulation of hydrophobic peptides for skin delivery via coated microneedles. Journal of Controlled Release. 2017 Nov;265:2–13. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.03.015
  97. Huang Q, Li D, Kang A, An W, Fan B, Ma X, et al. PEG as a spacer arm markedly increases the immunogenicity of meningococcal group Y polysaccharide conjugate vaccine. Journal of Controlled Release. 2013 Nov;172(1):382–9. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.03.008
  98. Jepps OG, Dancik Y, Anissimov YG, Roberts MS. Modeling the human skin barrier — Towards a better understanding of dermal absorption. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013 Feb;65(2):152–68. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.04.003
  99. Ahmed K. An investigation on chloroprene-compatibilized acrylonitrile butadiene rubber/high density polyethylene blends. J Adv Res. 2015 Nov;6(6):811–7. doi:10.1016/j.jare.2014.06.003
  100. Li W, Yalcin M, Lin Q, Ardawi MSM, Mousa SA. Self-assembly of green tea catechin derivatives in nanoparticles for oral lycopene delivery. Journal of Controlled Release. 2017 Feb;248:117–24. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.01.009
  101. Chen X, Zhu L, Li R, Pang L, Zhu S, Ma J, et al. Electroporation-enhanced transdermal drug delivery: Effects of logP, pKa, solubility and penetration time. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2020 Aug;151:105410. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2020.105410
  102. Tsoneva I, Semkova S, Bakalova R, Zhelev Z, Nuss P, Staneva G, et al. Electroporation, electrochemotherapy and electro-assisted drug delivery in cancer. A state-of-the-art review. Biophys Chem. 2022 Jul;286:106819. doi:10.1016/j.bpc.2022.106819
  103. Cruz LJ, Rosalia RA, Kleinovink JW, Rueda F, Löwik CWGM, Ossendorp F. Targeting nanoparticles to CD40, DEC-205 or CD11c molecules on dendritic cells for efficient CD8+ T cell response: A comparative study. Journal of Controlled Release. 2014 Oct;192:209–18. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.07.040
  104. Codrons V, Vanderbist F, Ucakar B, Préat V, Vanbever R. Impact of formulation and methods of pulmonary delivery on absorption of parathyroid hormone (1–34) from rat lungs. J Pharm Sci. 2004 May;93(5):1241–52. doi:10.1002/jps.20053
  105. Cruz LJ, Rosalia RA, Kleinovink JW, Rueda F, Löwik CWGM, Ossendorp F. Targeting nanoparticles to CD40, DEC-205 or CD11c molecules on dendritic cells for efficient CD8+ T cell response: A comparative study. Journal of Controlled Release. 2014 Oct;192:209–18. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.07.040
  106. Donnelly RF, Singh TRR, Woolfson AD. Microneedle-based drug delivery systems: Microfabrication, drug delivery, and safety. Drug Deliv. 2010 May 18;17(4):187–207. doi:10.3109/10717541003667798
  107. Li X, He C, Chen Z, Zhou C, Gan Y, Jia Y. A review of the role of sebum in the mechanism of acne pathogenesis. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2017 Jun 29;16(2):168–73. doi:10.1111/jocd.12345
  108. Rossi AM, Fitzgerald R, Humphrey S. Facial Soft Tissue Augmentation in Males: An Anatomical and Practical Approach. Dermatologic Surgery. 2017 Nov;43(2):S131–9. doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000001315
  109. Yap F, Kiung S, Yap J. Quality of life in patients with erythema nodosum leprosum in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2016;7(4):255. doi:10.4103/2229-5178.185495
  110. Prausnitz MR, Langer R. Transdermal drug delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Nov 7;26(11):1261–8. doi:10.1038/nbt.1504
  111. Kim YC, Park JH, Prausnitz MR. Microneedles for drug and vaccine delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012 Nov;64(14):1547–68. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.04.005
  112. Donnelly RF, Singh TRR, Garland MJ, Migalska K, Majithiya R, McCrudden CM, et al. Hydrogel?Forming Microneedle Arrays for Enhanced Transdermal Drug Delivery. Adv Funct Mater. 2012 Dec 5;22(23):4879–90. doi:10.1002/adfm.201200864
  113. Rodbard D. Interpretation of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data: Glycemic Variability and Quality of Glycemic Control. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Jun 2;11(S1):S-55-S-67. doi:10.1089/dia.2008.0132
  114. Gupta J, Gill HS, Andrews SN, Prausnitz MR. Kinetics of skin resealing after insertion of microneedles in human subjects. Journal of Controlled Release. 2011 Sep;154(2):148–55. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.05.021
  115. Pappinen S, Pryazhnikov E, Khiroug L, Ericson MB, Yliperttula M, Urtti A. Organotypic cell cultures and two-photon imaging: Tools for in vitro and in vivo assessment of percutaneous drug delivery and skin toxicity. Journal of Controlled Release. 2012 Jul;161(2):656–67. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.03.005
  116. Olatunji O, Igwe CC, Ahmed AS, Alhassan DOA, Asieba GgO, Diganta B Das. Microneedles from fish scale biopolymer. J Appl Polym Sci. 2014 Jun 15;131(12). doi:10.1002/app.40377
  117. Joseph S, Bunjes H. Evaluation of Shirasu Porous Glass (SPG) membrane emulsification for the preparation of colloidal lipid drug carrier dispersions. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 2014 May;87(1):178–86. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2013.11.010
  118. Sullivan SP, Koutsonanos DG, del Pilar Martin M, Lee JW, Zarnitsyn V, Choi SO, et al. Dissolving polymer microneedle patches for influenza vaccination. Nat Med. 2010 Aug 18;16(8):915–20. doi:10.1038/nm.2182
  119. Gabrielsson J, Hjorth S, Vogg B, Harlfinger S, Gutierrez PM, Peletier L, et al. Modeling and design of challenge tests: Inflammatory and metabolic biomarker study examples. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2015 Jan;67:144–59. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2014.11.006
  120. Kim YC, Park JH, Prausnitz MR. Microneedles for drug and vaccine delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012 Nov;64(14):1547–68. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.04.005
  121. Drevelle O, Bergeron E, Senta H, Lauzon MA, Roux S, Grenier G, et al. Effect of functionalized polycaprolactone on the behaviour of murine preosteoblasts. Biomaterials. 2010 Sep;31(25):6468–76. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.010
  122. Wang Y shuai, Yang W han, Gao W, Zhang L, Wei F, Liu H, et al. Combination and efficiency: preparation of dissolving microneedles array loaded with two active ingredients and its anti-pigmentation effects on guinea pigs. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2021 May;160:105749. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2021.105749
  123. Torchilin V. Antibody-modified liposomes for cancer chemotherapy. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2008 Sep 29;5(9):1003–25. doi:10.1517/17425247.5.9.1003
  124. El-Samaligy MS, Afifi NN, Mahmoud EA. Increasing bioavailability of silymarin using a buccal liposomal delivery system: Preparation and experimental design investigation. Int J Pharm. 2006 Feb;308(1–2):140–8. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.11.006
  125. Bazban-Shotorbani S, Hasani-Sadrabadi MM, Karkhaneh A, Serpooshan V, Jacob KI, Moshaverinia A, et al. Revisiting structure-property relationship of pH-responsive polymers for drug delivery applications. Journal of Controlled Release. 2017 May;253:46–63. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.02.021
  126. TRIMAILLE T, MONDON K, GURNY R, MOLLER M. Novel polymeric micelles for hydrophobic drug delivery based on biodegradable poly(hexyl-substituted lactides). Int J Pharm. 2006 Aug 17;319(1–2):147–54. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.03.036
  127. Mehnert W. Solid lipid nanoparticles Production, characterization and applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2001 Apr 25;47(2–3):165–96. doi:10.1016/S0169-409X(01)00105-3
  128. Hachim D, Whittaker TE, Kim H, Stevens MM. Glycosaminoglycan-based biomaterials for growth factor and cytokine delivery: Making the right choices. Journal of Controlled Release. 2019 Nov;313:131–47. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.10.018
  129. Feng L, Zhu C, Yuan H, Liu L, Lv F, Wang S. Conjugated polymer nanoparticles: preparation, properties, functionalization and biological applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42(16):6620. doi:10.1039/c3cs60036j
  130. Rao JP, Geckeler KE. Polymer nanoparticles: Preparation techniques and size-control parameters. Prog Polym Sci. 2011 Jul;36(7):887–913. doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.01.001
  131. Zheng Z, Zhang T, Liu H, Chen Y, Kwok RTK, Ma C, et al. Bright Near-Infrared Aggregation-Induced Emission Luminogens with Strong Two-Photon Absorption, Excellent Organelle Specificity, and Efficient Photodynamic Therapy Potential. ACS Nano. 2018 Aug 28;12(8):8145–59. doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b03138
  132. Bartneck M. Lipid nanoparticle formulations for targeting leukocytes with therapeutic RNA in liver fibrosis. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021 Jun;173:70–88. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2021.03.009
  133. López E, Cabrera R, Lecaros C. Targeted therapy for immune mediated skin diseases. What should a dermatologist know? An Bras Dermatol. 2024 Jul;99(4):546–67. doi:10.1016/j.abd.2023.10.002
  134. Ertugrul A, Bostanci I, Ozturk Kaymak A, Gurkan A, Ozmen S. Pediatric cutaneous mastocytosis and c-KIT mutation screening. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2019 Mar 1;40(2):123–8. doi:10.2500/aap.2019.40.4201
  135. Polesie S, Gillstedt M, Paoli J, Osmancevic A. Methotrexate Exposure and Risk of Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma: No Evidence of a Dose-response Relationship. Acta Dermato Venereologica. 2018;98(9):888–95. doi:10.2340/00015555-2987
  136. Toh EQ, Liau MYQ, Suendermann O, Bewley A, Choi ECE. Updating theoretical frameworks in body dysmorphic disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAAD Int. 2025 Jun;20:41–50. doi:10.1016/j.jdin.2024.12.005
  137. Starace M, Loi C, Bruni F, Alessandrini A, Misciali C, Patrizi A, et al. Erosive pustular dermatosis of the scalp: Clinical, trichoscopic, and histopathologic features of 20 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Jun;76(6):1109-1114.e2. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2016.12.016
  138. Hsiao K, Smart J. Anaphylaxis caused by in?season switchover of sublingual immunotherapy formulation. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology. 2014 Nov 29;25(7):714–5. doi:10.1111/pai.12268
  139. Gao J, Shen X, Ko R, Huang C, Shen C. Cognitive Process of Psoriasis and Its Comorbidities: From Epidemiology to Genetics. Front Genet. 2021 Nov 26;12. doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.735124
  140. Iversen L, Lange MM, Bissonette R, Carvalho AVE, van de Kerkhof PC, Kirby B, et al. Topical treatment of psoriasis: questionnaire results on topical therapy accessibility and influence of body surface area on usage. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 2017 Jul 19;31(7):1188–95. doi:10.1111/jdv.14250
  141. Zafari Z, Lynd LD, FitzGerald JM, Sadatsafavi M. Economic and health effect of full adherence to controller therapy in adults with uncontrolled asthma: A simulation study. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2014 Oct;134(4):908-915.e3. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2014.04.009
  142. Chalmers JR, Haines RH, Bradshaw LE, Montgomery AA, Thomas KS, Brown SJ, et al. Daily emollient during infancy for prevention of eczema: the BEEP randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2020 Mar;395(10228):962–72. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32984-8
  143. Sidbury R, Davis DM, Cohen DE, Cordoro KM, Berger TG, Bergman JN, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Aug;71(2):327–49. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2014.03.030
  144. Zhang R, Liu R, Liu C, Pan L, Qi Y, Cheng J, et al. A pH/ROS dual-responsive and targeting nanotherapy for vascular inflammatory diseases. Biomaterials. 2020 Feb;230:119605. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119605
  145. Latif MS, Al-Harbi FF, Nawaz A, Rashid SA, Farid A, Mohaini M Al, et al. Formulation and Evaluation of Hydrophilic Polymer Based Methotrexate Patches: In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization. Polymers (Basel). 2022 Mar 24;14(7):1310. doi:10.3390/polym14071310
  146. Ren J, Murray R, Wong CS, Qin J, Chen M, Totsika M, et al. Development of 3D Printed Biodegradable Mesh with Antimicrobial Properties for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Polymers (Basel). 2022 Feb 16;14(4):763. doi:10.3390/polym14040763
  147. Polat BE, Hart D, Langer R, Blankschtein D. Ultrasound-mediated transdermal drug delivery: Mechanisms, scope, and emerging trends. Journal of Controlled Release. 2011 Jun;152(3):330–48. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.01.006
  148. Tun TY, Gokhale R, Heng PWS. Melt spheronization – Direct rotary shaping process for hot melt extrudates. Int J Pharm. 2018 Feb;536(2):499–500. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.08.023
  149. Adin SN, Gupta I, Aqil Mohd, Mujeeb Mohd. Baicalin loaded transethosomes for rheumatoid arthritis: Development, characterization, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2023 Mar;81:104209. doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2023.104209
  150. Wang W, Xu X, Song Y, Lan L, Wang J, Xu X, et al. Nano transdermal system combining mitochondria-targeting cerium oxide nanoparticles with all-trans retinoic acid for psoriasis. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2023 Sep;18(5):100846. doi:10.1016/j.ajps.2023.100846
  151. Zhan ZY, Zhang ZH, Sun RH, Wu YL, Nan JX, Lian LH. A therapeutic strategy of parthenolide in improving imiquimod-induced psoriasis-like skin inflammation targeting IL-36/NETs through skin transdermal therapeutic system. Int Immunopharmacol. 2024 Apr;131:111824. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2024.111824
  152. Polat BE, Hart D, Langer R, Blankschtein D. Ultrasound-mediated transdermal drug delivery: Mechanisms, scope, and emerging trends. Journal of Controlled Release. 2011 Jun;152(3):330–48. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.01.006
  153. Ogasawara N, Poposki JA, Klingler AI, Tan BK, Weibman AR, Hulse KE, et al. IL-10, TGF-β, and glucocorticoid prevent the production of type 2 cytokines in human group 2 innate lymphoid cells. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2018 Mar;141(3):1147-1151.e8. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2017.09.025
  154. Collins DS, Sánchez-Félix M, Badkar A V., Mrsny R. Accelerating the development of novel technologies and tools for the subcutaneous delivery of biotherapeutics. Journal of Controlled Release. 2020 May;321:475–82. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.02.036
  155. Liu C, Liu K, Zhang D, Liu Y, Yu Y, Kang H, et al. Dual-layer microneedles with NO/O2 releasing for diabetic wound healing via neurogenesis, angiogenesis, and immune modulation. Bioact Mater. 2025 Apr;46:213–28. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.12.012
  156. Dandeniyage LS, Knower W, Adhikari R, Bown M, Shanks R, Adhikari B, et al. In vitro oxidative stability of high strength siloxane poly(urethane?urea) elastomers based on linked?macrodiol. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2019 Nov 5;107(8):2557–65. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.34346
  157. Wang W, Wat E, Hui PCL, Chan B, Ng FSF, Kan CW, et al. Dual-functional transdermal drug delivery system with controllable drug loading based on thermosensitive poloxamer hydrogel for atopic dermatitis treatment. Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 19;6(1):24112. doi:10.1038/srep24112
  158. Liang C, Sun D, Lv H, Chu W, Duan Y, Bu Y, et al. Sintering Behaviors of Supported Nanoparticles Related to Spatial Location by a Quasi-Four-Dimensional TEM. Nano Lett. 2022 Aug 24;22(16):6523–9. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c01538
  159. Zhu Y, Wang X, Chen J, Zhang J, Meng F, Deng C, et al. Bioresponsive and fluorescent hyaluronic acid-iodixanol nanogels for targeted X-ray computed tomography imaging and chemotherapy of breast tumors. Journal of Controlled Release. 2016 Dec;244:229–39. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.08.027
  160. Gupta A, Eral HB, Hatton TA, Doyle PS. Nanoemulsions: formation, properties and applications. Soft Matter. 2016;12(11):2826–41. doi:10.1039/C5SM02958A
  161. Liu J, Zhang A, Hayden JC, Bhagavathula AS, Alshehhi F, Rinaldi G, et al. Roxadustat (FG-4592) treatment for anemia in dialysis-dependent (DD) and not dialysis-dependent (NDD) chronic kidney disease patients: A systematic review and meta?analysis. Pharmacol Res. 2020 May;155:104747. doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104747
  162. Jubayer F, Kayshar S, Rahaman M. Effects of Ajwa date seed powder on serum lipids in humans: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. J Herb Med. 2020 Dec;24:100409. doi:10.1016/j.hermed.2020.100409
  163. Huttunen J, Adla SK, Markowicz-Piasecka M, Huttunen KM. Increased/Targeted Brain (Pro)Drug Delivery via Utilization of Solute Carriers (SLCs). Pharmaceutics. 2022 Jun 10;14(6):1234. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics14061234
  164. Kumar VB, Tiwari OS, Finkelstein-Zuta G, Rencus-Lazar S, Gazit E. Design of Functional RGD Peptide-Based Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering. Pharmaceutics. 2023 Jan 19;15(2):345. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15020345

Reference

        1. González-Mariscal L, Miranda J, Gallego-Gutiérrez H, Cano-Cortina M, Amaya E. Relationship between apical junction proteins, gene expression and cancer. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes. 2020 Sep;1862(9):183278. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2020.183278
  1. Jayakumar R, Prabaharan M, Sudheesh Kumar PT, Nair SV, Tamura H. Biomaterials based on chitin and chitosan in wound dressing applications. Biotechnol Adv. 2011 May;29(3):322–37. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.01.005
  2. Marks R. The Stratum Corneum Barrier: The Final Frontier. J Nutr. 2004 Aug;134(8):2017S-2021S. doi:10.1093/jn/134.8.2017S
  3. Elias PM. Epidermal Lipids, Barrier Function, and Desquamation. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 1983 Jun;80(1):S44–9. doi:10.1038/jid.1983.12
  4. Huttunen J, Adla SK, Markowicz-Piasecka M, Huttunen KM. Increased/Targeted Brain (Pro)Drug Delivery via Utilization of Solute Carriers (SLCs). Pharmaceutics. 2022 Jun 10;14(6):1234. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics14061234
  5. He M, Zhu L, Yang N, Li H, Yang Q. Recent advances of oral film as platform for drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 2021 Jul;604:120759. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120759
  6. Albarqi HA, Demessie AA, Sabei FY, Moses AS, Hansen MN, Dhagat P, et al. Systemically Delivered Magnetic Hyperthermia for Prostate Cancer Treatment. Pharmaceutics. 2020 Oct 25;12(11):1020. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics12111020
  7. Raza A, Hayat U, Bilal M, Iqbal HMN, Wang JY. Zein-based micro- and nano-constructs and biologically therapeutic cues with multi-functionalities for oral drug delivery systems. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2020 Aug;58:101818. doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2020.101818
  8. Anselmo AC, Mitragotri S. Nanoparticles in the clinic: An update. Bioeng Transl Med. 2019 Sep 5;4(3). doi:10.1002/btm2.10143
  9. Caló E, Khutoryanskiy V V. Biomedical applications of hydrogels: A review of patents and commercial products. Eur Polym J. 2015 Apr;65:252–67. doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.11.024
  10. Robertson CG, Hardman NJ. Nature of Carbon Black Reinforcement of Rubber: Perspective on the Original Polymer Nanocomposite. Polymers (Basel). 2021 Feb 12;13(4):538. doi:10.3390/polym13040538
  11. Barrientos S, Stojadinovic O, Golinko MS, Brem H, Tomic?Canic M. PERSPECTIVE ARTICLE: Growth factors and cytokines in wound healing. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 2008 Sep 3;16(5):585–601. doi:10.1111/j.1524-475X.2008.00410.x
  12. Nathan C. Points of control in inflammation. Nature. 2002 Dec;420(6917):846–52. doi:10.1038/nature01320
  13. Gurtner GC, Werner S, Barrandon Y, Longaker MT. Wound repair and regeneration. Nature. 2008 May 15;453(7193):314–21. doi:10.1038/nature07039
  14. Zimecki M, Artym J, Ka?as W, Strz?da?a L, Kaleta-Kuratewicz K, Kuryszko J, et al. Anti-Inflammatory Activity of a Cyclic Tetrapeptide in Mouse and Human Experimental Models. Pharmaceutics. 2020 Oct 28;12(11):1030. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics12111030
  15. Ghandehari H, Chan HK, Harashima H, MacKay JA, Minko T, Schenke-Layland K, et al. Advanced drug delivery 2020 - Parts 1, 2 and 3. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2020;156:1–2. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.11.003
  16. Sylvestre M, Lv S, Yang LF, Luera N, Peeler DJ, Chen BM, et al. Replacement of L-amino acid peptides with D-amino acid peptides mitigates anti-PEG antibody generation against polymer-peptide conjugates in mice. Journal of Controlled Release. 2021 Mar;331:142–53. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.01.015
  17. Souto EB, Baldim I, Oliveira WP, Rao R, Yadav N, Gama FM, et al. SLN and NLC for topical, dermal, and transdermal drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2020 Mar 3;17(3):357–77. doi:10.1080/17425247.2020.1727883
  18. Machhi J, Shahjin F, Das S, Patel M, Abdelmoaty MM, Cohen JD, et al. Nanocarrier vaccines for SARS-CoV-2. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021 Apr;171:215–39. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2021.01.002
  19. Babaie S, Bakhshayesh AR Del, Ha JW, Hamishehkar H, Kim KH. Invasome: A Novel Nanocarrier for Transdermal Drug Delivery. Nanomaterials. 2020 Feb 17;10(2):341. doi:10.3390/nano10020341
  20. Opatha SAT, Titapiwatanakun V, Chutoprapat R. Transfersomes: A Promising Nanoencapsulation Technique for Transdermal Drug Delivery. Pharmaceutics. 2020 Sep 9;12(9):855. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics12090855
  21. Matsumura Y. Cancer stromal targeting therapy to overcome the pitfall of EPR effect. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2020;154–155:142–50. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.07.003
  22. Herman A, Herman AP. Essential oils and their constituents as skin penetration enhancer for transdermal drug delivery: a review. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2015 Apr 1;67(4):473–85. doi:10.1111/jphp.12334
  23. Bajza Á, Kocsis D, Berezvai O, Laki AJ, Lukács B, Imre T, et al. Verification of P-Glycoprotein Function at the Dermal Barrier in Diffusion Cells and Dynamic “Skin-On-A-Chip” Microfluidic Device. Pharmaceutics. 2020 Aug 25;12(9):804. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics12090804
  24. Prausnitz MR, Langer R. Transdermal drug delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Nov 7;26(11):1261–8. doi:10.1038/nbt.1504
  25. Bernkop-Schnürch A. Mucoadhesive systems in oral drug delivery. Drug Discov Today Technol. 2005 Mar;2(1):83–7. doi:10.1016/j.ddtec.2005.05.001
  26. Prow TW, Grice JE, Lin LL, Faye R, Butler M, Becker W, et al. Nanoparticles and microparticles for skin drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2011 May;63(6):470–91. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2011.01.012
  27. Gorzelanny C, Mess C, Schneider SW, Huck V, Brandner JM. Skin Barriers in Dermal Drug Delivery: Which Barriers Have to Be Overcome and How Can We Measure Them? Pharmaceutics. 2020 Jul 20;12(7):684. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics12070684
  28. Lee AY. Molecular Mechanism of Epidermal Barrier Dysfunction as Primary Abnormalities. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Feb 11;21(4):1194. doi:10.3390/ijms21041194
  29. Cai L, Kaneko S, Morita E. Changes in salivary chromogranin A levels in adults with atopic dermatitis are correlated with changes in their condition. J Dermatol. 2018 May 3;45(5):554–9. doi:10.1111/1346-8138.14277
  30. Matsui T, Amagai M. Dissecting the formation, structure and barrier function of the stratum corneum. Int Immunol. 2015 Jun 1;27(6):269–80. doi:10.1093/intimm/dxv013
  31. AUGEY F, GUNERA-SAAD N, BENSAID B, NOSBAUM A, BERARD F, NICOLAS JF. Chronic spontaneous urticaria is not an allergic disease. European Journal of Dermatology. 2011 May;21(3):349–53. doi:10.1684/ejd.2011.1285
  32. Nousbeck J, Sarig O, Magal L, Warshauer E, Burger B, Itin P, et al. Mutations in SMARCAD1 cause autosomal dominant adermatoglyphia and perturb the expression of epidermal differentiation-associated genes. British Journal of Dermatology. 2014 Dec;171(6):1521–4. doi:10.1111/bjd.13176
  33. Bouwstra JA, Ponec M. The skin barrier in healthy and diseased state. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes. 2006 Dec;1758(12):2080–95. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.06.021
  34. Nakamura M, Sundberg JP, Paus R. Mutant laboratory mice with abnormalities in hair follicle morphogenesis, cycling, and/or structure: annotated tables. Exp Dermatol. 2001 Dec 7;10(6):369–90. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0625.2001.100601.x
  35. Horváth I, Multhoff G, Sonnleitner A, Vígh L. Membrane-associated stress proteins: More than simply chaperones. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes. 2008 Jul;1778(7–8):1653–64. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2008.02.012
  36. Belosludtsev KN, Belosludtseva N V., Agafonov A V., Astashev ME, Kazakov AS, Saris NEL, et al. Ca2+-dependent permeabilization of mitochondria and liposomes by palmitic and oleic acids: A comparative study. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes. 2014 Oct;1838(10):2600–6. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2014.06.017
  37. METTRICK DF. Helminth parasites of Hertfordshire birds. II. Cestoda. J Helminthol. 1958;32(3):159–94. doi:10.1017/s0022149x00019568 PubMed PMID: 13587969.
  38. Kaminska E, Madejczyk O, Tarnacka M, Jurkiewicz K, Kaminski K, Paluch M. Studying of crystal growth and overall crystallization of naproxen from binary mixtures. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 2017 Apr;113:75–87. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2016.12.014
  39. Prausnitz MR, Langer R. Transdermal drug delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Nov 7;26(11):1261–8. doi:10.1038/nbt.1504
  40. Thompson SM, Callstrom MR, Butters KA, Knudsen B, Grande JP, Roberts LR, et al. Heat stress induced cell death mechanisms in hepatocytes and hepatocellular carcinoma: In vitro and in vivo study. Lasers Surg Med. 2014 Apr 18;46(4):290–301. doi:10.1002/lsm.22231
  41. Bariya SH, Gohel MC, Mehta TA, Sharma OP. Microneedles: an emerging transdermal drug delivery system. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2012 Jan 1;64(1):11–29. doi:10.1111/j.2042-7158.2011.01369.x
  42. del Río-Sancho S, Lapteva M, Sonaje K, Böhler C, Ling V, Boehncke WH, et al. Targeted cutaneous delivery of etanercept using Er:YAG fractional laser ablation. Int J Pharm. 2020 Apr;580:119234. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119234
  43. Arbiser JL. Implications of Epstein–Barr Virus (EBV)-Induced Carcinogenesis on Cutaneous Inflammation and Carcinogenesis: Evidence of Recurring Patterns of Angiogenesis and Signal Transduction. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2005 May;124(5):xi–xii. doi:10.1111/j.0022-202X.2005.23695.x
  44. Elias PM, Wakefield JS. Mechanisms of abnormal lamellar body secretion and the dysfunctional skin barrier in patients with atopic dermatitis. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2014 Oct;134(4):781-791.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2014.05.048
  45. Zorn K, Oroz-Guinea I, Brundiek H, Bornscheuer UT. Engineering and application of enzymes for lipid modification, an update. Prog Lipid Res. 2016 Jul;63:153–64. doi:10.1016/j.plipres.2016.06.001
  46. Bouwstra J. Structure of the skin barrier and its modulation by vesicular formulations. Prog Lipid Res. 2003 Jan;42(1):1–36. doi:10.1016/S0163-7827(02)00028-0
  47. Williams AC, Barry BW. Penetration enhancers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004 Mar;56(5):603–18. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2003.10.025
  48. Dragicevic N, Atkinson JP, Maibach HI. Chemical Penetration Enhancers: Classification and Mode of Action. In: Percutaneous Penetration Enhancers Chemical Methods in Penetration Enhancement. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2015. p. 11–27. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-47039-8_2
  49. Benson H. Transdermal Drug Delivery: Penetration Enhancement Techniques. Curr Drug Deliv. 2005 Jan 1;2(1):23–33. doi:10.2174/1567201052772915
  50. Kirschner N, Rosenthal R, Furuse M, Moll I, Fromm M, Brandner JM. Contribution of Tight Junction Proteins to Ion, Macromolecule, and Water Barrier in Keratinocytes. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2013 May;133(5):1161–9. doi:10.1038/jid.2012.507
  51. Adams MP, Mallet DG, Pettet GJ. Towards a Quantitative Theory of Epidermal Calcium Profile Formation in Unwounded Skin. PLoS One. 2015 Jan 27;10(1):e0116751. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0116751
  52. Günzel D, Yu ASL. Claudins and the Modulation of Tight Junction Permeability. Physiol Rev. 2013 Apr;93(2):525–69. doi:10.1152/physrev.00019.2012
  53. Brandner J, Zorn-Kruppa M, Yoshida T, Moll I, Beck L, De Benedetto A. Epidermal tight junctions in health and disease. Tissue Barriers. 2015 Apr 3;3(1–2):e974451. doi:10.4161/21688370.2014.974451
  54. Furuse M, Hata M, Furuse K, Yoshida Y, Haratake A, Sugitani Y, et al. Claudin-based tight junctions are crucial for the mammalian epidermal barrier. J Cell Biol. 2002 Mar 18;156(6):1099–111. doi:10.1083/jcb.200110122
  55. Wang Y, Kringen P, Kristensen GB, Holm R, Baekelandt MMO, Olivier M, et al. Effect of the codon 72 polymorphism (c.215G>C, p.Arg72Pro) in combination with somatic sequence variants in theTP53 gene on survival in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma. Hum Mutat. 2006 Feb;27(2):209–10. doi:10.1002/humu.20298
  56. Jouary T, Legros C, Lalanne N, Versapuech J, Ezzedine K, Vergier B, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a new criterion for selection of candidate patients for surgery of low tumour burden metastases from malignant melanoma? British Journal of Dermatology. 2010 Jul;163(1):183–7. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09736.x
  57. Furuse M, Hata M, Furuse K, Yoshida Y, Haratake A, Sugitani Y, et al. Claudin-based tight junctions are crucial for the mammalian epidermal barrier. J Cell Biol. 2002 Mar 18;156(6):1099–111. doi:10.1083/jcb.200110122
  58. Uchida T, Kanazawa T, Takashima Y, Okada H. Development of an Efficient Transdermal Delivery System of Small Interfering RNA Using Functional Peptides, Tat and AT-1002. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo). 2011;59(2):196–201. doi:10.1248/cpb.59.196
  59. Goodacre N, Devkota P, Bae E, Wuchty S, Uetz P. Protein-protein interactions of human viruses. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2020 Mar;99:31–9. doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.07.018
  60. Witte M, Zillikens D, Schmidt E. Diagnosis of Autoimmune Blistering Diseases. Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Nov 2;5. doi:10.3389/fmed.2018.00296
  61. Stemmler S, Parwez Q, Petrasch-Parwez E, Epplen JT, Hoffjan S. Association of variation in the LAMA3 gene, encoding the alpha-chain of laminin 5, with atopic dermatitis in a German case–control cohort. BMC Dermatol. 2014 Dec 3;14(1):17. doi:10.1186/1471-5945-14-17
  62. De Benedetto A, Kubo A, Beck LA. Skin Barrier Disruption: A Requirement for Allergen Sensitization? Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2012 Mar;132(3):949–63. doi:10.1038/jid.2011.435
  63. Proksch E, Brandner JM, Jensen J. The skin: an indispensable barrier. Exp Dermatol. 2008 Dec 11;17(12):1063–72. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0625.2008.00786.x
  64. Menon GK, Cleary GW, Lane ME. The structure and function of the stratum corneum. Int J Pharm. 2012 Oct;435(1):3–9. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.06.005
  65. Berman B, France DS, Martinelli GP, Hass A. Modulation of Expression of Epidermal Langerhans Cell Properties Following in Situ Exposure to Glucocorticosteroids. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 1983 Mar;80(3):168–71. doi:10.1111/1523-1747.ep12533397
  66. Takada K, Masaki H, Konishi E, Takahashi M, Kurane I. Definition of an epitope on Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) envelope protein recognized by JEV-specific murine CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Arch Virol. 2000 Mar;145(3):523–34. doi:10.1007/s007050050043
  67. Tabi Z, Man S. Challenges for cancer vaccine development. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2006 Oct;58(8):902–15. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2006.05.004
  68. Dawes NC. Marketing and Product Design of Antiaging Skin Care Products. In: Textbook of Aging Skin. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2017. p. 2177–87. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-47398-6_107
  69. Morrison SF. Central neural pathways for thermoregulation. Frontiers in Bioscience. 2011;16(1):74. doi:10.2741/3677
  70. ?íhová B, Strohalm J, Hovorka O, Šubr V, Etrych T, Chytil P, et al. Doxorubicin release is not a prerequisite for the in vitro cytotoxicity of HPMA-based pharmaceuticals: In vitro effect of extra drug-free GlyPheLeuGly sequences. Journal of Controlled Release. 2008 Apr;127(2):110–20. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.01.003
  71. Allen TM, Cullis PR. Drug Delivery Systems: Entering the Mainstream. Science (1979). 2004 Mar 19;303(5665):1818–22. doi:10.1126/science.1095833
  72. Raphael KG, Marbach JJ, Gallagher RM. Somatosensory Amplification and Affective Inhibition Are Elevated in Myofascial Face Pain. Pain Medicine. 2000 Sep 1;1(3):247–53. doi:10.1046/j.1526-4637.2000.00034.x
  73. De Castro S, Pelliccia F, Cartoni D, Funaro S, Melillo G, Beni S, et al. Effects of Angiotensin?Converting Enzyme Inhibition on Left Ventricular Geometric Patterns in Patients with Essential Hypertension. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 1996 Dec 8;36(12):1141–8. doi:10.1002/j.1552-4604.1996.tb04168.x
  74. Paudel KS, Milewski M, Swadley CL, Brogden NK, Ghosh P, Stinchcomb AL. Challenges and Opportunities in dermal/transdermal Delivery. Ther Deliv. 2010 Jul 25;1(1):109–31. doi:10.4155/tde.10.16
  75. Stefanov SR, Andonova VY. Lipid Nanoparticulate Drug Delivery Systems: Recent Advances in the Treatment of Skin Disorders. Pharmaceuticals. 2021 Oct 26;14(11):1083. doi:10.3390/ph14111083
  76. Uchida N, Yanagi M, Hamada H. Physical Enhancement? Nanocarrier? Current Progress in Transdermal Drug Delivery. Nanomaterials. 2021 Jan 28;11(2):335. doi:10.3390/nano11020335
  77. Rimpelä AK, Reinisalo M, Hellinen L, Grazhdankin E, Kidron H, Urtti A, et al. Implications of melanin binding in ocular drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018 Feb;126:23–43. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2017.12.008
  78. Tang-Liu DDS, Liu S, Neff J, Sandri R. Disposition of Levobunolol after an Ophthalmic Dose to Rabbits. J Pharm Sci. 1987 Oct;76(10):780–3. doi:10.1002/jps.2600761005
  79. Brown MB, Martin GP, Jones SA, Akomeah FK. Dermal and Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems: Current and Future Prospects. Drug Deliv. 2006 Jan 10;13(3):175–87. doi:10.1080/10717540500455975
  80. Bakshi P, Vora D, Hemmady K, Banga AK. Iontophoretic skin delivery systems: Success and failures. Int J Pharm. 2020 Aug;586:119584. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119584
  81. Lehtinen OP, Nugroho RWN, Lehtimaa T, Vierros S, Hiekkataipale P, Ruokolainen J, et al. Effect of temperature, water content and free fatty acid on reverse micelle formation of phospholipids in vegetable oil. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2017 Dec;160:355–63. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.09.050
  82. Donnelly RF, Singh TRR, Garland MJ, Migalska K, Majithiya R, McCrudden CM, et al. Hydrogel?Forming Microneedle Arrays for Enhanced Transdermal Drug Delivery. Adv Funct Mater. 2012 Dec 5;22(23):4879–90. doi:10.1002/adfm.201200864
  83. Prausnitz MR, Mitragotri S, Langer R. Current status and future potential of transdermal drug delivery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004 Feb;3(2):115–24. doi:10.1038/nrd1304
  84. Zhang M, Guo X, Wang M, Liu K. Tumor microenvironment-induced structure changing drug/gene delivery system for overcoming delivery-associated challenges. Journal of Controlled Release. 2020 Jul;323:203–24. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.04.026
  85. Chirico S, Dalmoro A, Lamberti G, Russo G, Titomanlio G. Analysis and modeling of swelling and erosion behavior for pure HPMC tablet. Journal of Controlled Release. 2007 Sep;122(2):181–8. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.07.001
  86. Kalia YN, Naik A, Garrison J, Guy RH. Iontophoretic drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004 Mar;56(5):619–58. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2003.10.026
  87. Mitragotri S. Healing sound: the use of ultrasound in drug delivery and other therapeutic applications. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005 Mar;4(3):255–60. doi:10.1038/nrd1662
  88. Ibrulj S, Haveri? S, Haveri? A. Complementarity of Standard Cytogenetic Assays. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2008 Feb 20;8(1):34–7. doi:10.17305/bjbms.2008.2992
  89. Park D, Park H, Seo J, Lee S. Sonophoresis in transdermal drug deliverys. Ultrasonics. 2014 Jan;54(1):56–65. doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2013.07.007
  90. de Oliveira RP, Baptista RP, Martins CB de C, Faletti A, Soletti RC, Borges HL, et al. 3-D Endoluminal Ultrasound Biomicroscopic Imaging and Volumetry of Mouse Colon Tumors. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2021 Oct;47(10):2990–3001. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.06.004
  91. Park D, Park H, Seo J, Lee S. Sonophoresis in transdermal drug deliverys. Ultrasonics. 2014 Jan;54(1):56–65. doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2013.07.007
  92. Gong H, Peng R, Liu Z. Carbon nanotubes for biomedical imaging: The recent advances. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013 Dec;65(15):1951–63. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2013.10.002
  93. Marathe D, Bhuvanashree VS, Mehta CH, T. A, Nayak UY. Low?Frequency Sonophoresis: A Promising Strategy for Enhanced Transdermal Delivery. Adv Pharmacol Pharm Sci. 2024 Jan 5;2024(1). doi:10.1155/2024/1247450
  94. Li W, Yalcin M, Lin Q, Ardawi MSM, Mousa SA. Self-assembly of green tea catechin derivatives in nanoparticles for oral lycopene delivery. Journal of Controlled Release. 2017 Feb;248:117–24. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.01.009
  95. Chen X, Zhu L, Li R, Pang L, Zhu S, Ma J, et al. Electroporation-enhanced transdermal drug delivery: Effects of logP, pKa, solubility and penetration time. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2020 Aug;151:105410. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2020.105410
  96. Zhao X, Coulman SA, Hanna SJ, Wong FS, Dayan CM, Birchall JC. Formulation of hydrophobic peptides for skin delivery via coated microneedles. Journal of Controlled Release. 2017 Nov;265:2–13. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.03.015
  97. Huang Q, Li D, Kang A, An W, Fan B, Ma X, et al. PEG as a spacer arm markedly increases the immunogenicity of meningococcal group Y polysaccharide conjugate vaccine. Journal of Controlled Release. 2013 Nov;172(1):382–9. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.03.008
  98. Jepps OG, Dancik Y, Anissimov YG, Roberts MS. Modeling the human skin barrier — Towards a better understanding of dermal absorption. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013 Feb;65(2):152–68. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.04.003
  99. Ahmed K. An investigation on chloroprene-compatibilized acrylonitrile butadiene rubber/high density polyethylene blends. J Adv Res. 2015 Nov;6(6):811–7. doi:10.1016/j.jare.2014.06.003
  100. Li W, Yalcin M, Lin Q, Ardawi MSM, Mousa SA. Self-assembly of green tea catechin derivatives in nanoparticles for oral lycopene delivery. Journal of Controlled Release. 2017 Feb;248:117–24. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.01.009
  101. Chen X, Zhu L, Li R, Pang L, Zhu S, Ma J, et al. Electroporation-enhanced transdermal drug delivery: Effects of logP, pKa, solubility and penetration time. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2020 Aug;151:105410. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2020.105410
  102. Tsoneva I, Semkova S, Bakalova R, Zhelev Z, Nuss P, Staneva G, et al. Electroporation, electrochemotherapy and electro-assisted drug delivery in cancer. A state-of-the-art review. Biophys Chem. 2022 Jul;286:106819. doi:10.1016/j.bpc.2022.106819
  103. Cruz LJ, Rosalia RA, Kleinovink JW, Rueda F, Löwik CWGM, Ossendorp F. Targeting nanoparticles to CD40, DEC-205 or CD11c molecules on dendritic cells for efficient CD8+ T cell response: A comparative study. Journal of Controlled Release. 2014 Oct;192:209–18. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.07.040
  104. Codrons V, Vanderbist F, Ucakar B, Préat V, Vanbever R. Impact of formulation and methods of pulmonary delivery on absorption of parathyroid hormone (1–34) from rat lungs. J Pharm Sci. 2004 May;93(5):1241–52. doi:10.1002/jps.20053
  105. Cruz LJ, Rosalia RA, Kleinovink JW, Rueda F, Löwik CWGM, Ossendorp F. Targeting nanoparticles to CD40, DEC-205 or CD11c molecules on dendritic cells for efficient CD8+ T cell response: A comparative study. Journal of Controlled Release. 2014 Oct;192:209–18. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.07.040
  106. Donnelly RF, Singh TRR, Woolfson AD. Microneedle-based drug delivery systems: Microfabrication, drug delivery, and safety. Drug Deliv. 2010 May 18;17(4):187–207. doi:10.3109/10717541003667798
  107. Li X, He C, Chen Z, Zhou C, Gan Y, Jia Y. A review of the role of sebum in the mechanism of acne pathogenesis. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2017 Jun 29;16(2):168–73. doi:10.1111/jocd.12345
  108. Rossi AM, Fitzgerald R, Humphrey S. Facial Soft Tissue Augmentation in Males: An Anatomical and Practical Approach. Dermatologic Surgery. 2017 Nov;43(2):S131–9. doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000001315
  109. Yap F, Kiung S, Yap J. Quality of life in patients with erythema nodosum leprosum in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2016;7(4):255. doi:10.4103/2229-5178.185495
  110. Prausnitz MR, Langer R. Transdermal drug delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Nov 7;26(11):1261–8. doi:10.1038/nbt.1504
  111. Kim YC, Park JH, Prausnitz MR. Microneedles for drug and vaccine delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012 Nov;64(14):1547–68. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.04.005
  112. Donnelly RF, Singh TRR, Garland MJ, Migalska K, Majithiya R, McCrudden CM, et al. Hydrogel?Forming Microneedle Arrays for Enhanced Transdermal Drug Delivery. Adv Funct Mater. 2012 Dec 5;22(23):4879–90. doi:10.1002/adfm.201200864
  113. Rodbard D. Interpretation of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data: Glycemic Variability and Quality of Glycemic Control. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Jun 2;11(S1):S-55-S-67. doi:10.1089/dia.2008.0132
  114. Gupta J, Gill HS, Andrews SN, Prausnitz MR. Kinetics of skin resealing after insertion of microneedles in human subjects. Journal of Controlled Release. 2011 Sep;154(2):148–55. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.05.021
  115. Pappinen S, Pryazhnikov E, Khiroug L, Ericson MB, Yliperttula M, Urtti A. Organotypic cell cultures and two-photon imaging: Tools for in vitro and in vivo assessment of percutaneous drug delivery and skin toxicity. Journal of Controlled Release. 2012 Jul;161(2):656–67. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.03.005
  116. Olatunji O, Igwe CC, Ahmed AS, Alhassan DOA, Asieba GgO, Diganta B Das. Microneedles from fish scale biopolymer. J Appl Polym Sci. 2014 Jun 15;131(12). doi:10.1002/app.40377
  117. Joseph S, Bunjes H. Evaluation of Shirasu Porous Glass (SPG) membrane emulsification for the preparation of colloidal lipid drug carrier dispersions. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 2014 May;87(1):178–86. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2013.11.010
  118. Sullivan SP, Koutsonanos DG, del Pilar Martin M, Lee JW, Zarnitsyn V, Choi SO, et al. Dissolving polymer microneedle patches for influenza vaccination. Nat Med. 2010 Aug 18;16(8):915–20. doi:10.1038/nm.2182
  119. Gabrielsson J, Hjorth S, Vogg B, Harlfinger S, Gutierrez PM, Peletier L, et al. Modeling and design of challenge tests: Inflammatory and metabolic biomarker study examples. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2015 Jan;67:144–59. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2014.11.006
  120. Kim YC, Park JH, Prausnitz MR. Microneedles for drug and vaccine delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012 Nov;64(14):1547–68. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.04.005
  121. Drevelle O, Bergeron E, Senta H, Lauzon MA, Roux S, Grenier G, et al. Effect of functionalized polycaprolactone on the behaviour of murine preosteoblasts. Biomaterials. 2010 Sep;31(25):6468–76. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.010
  122. Wang Y shuai, Yang W han, Gao W, Zhang L, Wei F, Liu H, et al. Combination and efficiency: preparation of dissolving microneedles array loaded with two active ingredients and its anti-pigmentation effects on guinea pigs. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2021 May;160:105749. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2021.105749
  123. Torchilin V. Antibody-modified liposomes for cancer chemotherapy. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2008 Sep 29;5(9):1003–25. doi:10.1517/17425247.5.9.1003
  124. El-Samaligy MS, Afifi NN, Mahmoud EA. Increasing bioavailability of silymarin using a buccal liposomal delivery system: Preparation and experimental design investigation. Int J Pharm. 2006 Feb;308(1–2):140–8. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.11.006
  125. Bazban-Shotorbani S, Hasani-Sadrabadi MM, Karkhaneh A, Serpooshan V, Jacob KI, Moshaverinia A, et al. Revisiting structure-property relationship of pH-responsive polymers for drug delivery applications. Journal of Controlled Release. 2017 May;253:46–63. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.02.021
  126. TRIMAILLE T, MONDON K, GURNY R, MOLLER M. Novel polymeric micelles for hydrophobic drug delivery based on biodegradable poly(hexyl-substituted lactides). Int J Pharm. 2006 Aug 17;319(1–2):147–54. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.03.036
  127. Mehnert W. Solid lipid nanoparticles Production, characterization and applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2001 Apr 25;47(2–3):165–96. doi:10.1016/S0169-409X(01)00105-3
  128. Hachim D, Whittaker TE, Kim H, Stevens MM. Glycosaminoglycan-based biomaterials for growth factor and cytokine delivery: Making the right choices. Journal of Controlled Release. 2019 Nov;313:131–47. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.10.018
  129. Feng L, Zhu C, Yuan H, Liu L, Lv F, Wang S. Conjugated polymer nanoparticles: preparation, properties, functionalization and biological applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42(16):6620. doi:10.1039/c3cs60036j
  130. Rao JP, Geckeler KE. Polymer nanoparticles: Preparation techniques and size-control parameters. Prog Polym Sci. 2011 Jul;36(7):887–913. doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.01.001
  131. Zheng Z, Zhang T, Liu H, Chen Y, Kwok RTK, Ma C, et al. Bright Near-Infrared Aggregation-Induced Emission Luminogens with Strong Two-Photon Absorption, Excellent Organelle Specificity, and Efficient Photodynamic Therapy Potential. ACS Nano. 2018 Aug 28;12(8):8145–59. doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b03138
  132. Bartneck M. Lipid nanoparticle formulations for targeting leukocytes with therapeutic RNA in liver fibrosis. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021 Jun;173:70–88. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2021.03.009
  133. López E, Cabrera R, Lecaros C. Targeted therapy for immune mediated skin diseases. What should a dermatologist know? An Bras Dermatol. 2024 Jul;99(4):546–67. doi:10.1016/j.abd.2023.10.002
  134. Ertugrul A, Bostanci I, Ozturk Kaymak A, Gurkan A, Ozmen S. Pediatric cutaneous mastocytosis and c-KIT mutation screening. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2019 Mar 1;40(2):123–8. doi:10.2500/aap.2019.40.4201
  135. Polesie S, Gillstedt M, Paoli J, Osmancevic A. Methotrexate Exposure and Risk of Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma: No Evidence of a Dose-response Relationship. Acta Dermato Venereologica. 2018;98(9):888–95. doi:10.2340/00015555-2987
  136. Toh EQ, Liau MYQ, Suendermann O, Bewley A, Choi ECE. Updating theoretical frameworks in body dysmorphic disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAAD Int. 2025 Jun;20:41–50. doi:10.1016/j.jdin.2024.12.005
  137. Starace M, Loi C, Bruni F, Alessandrini A, Misciali C, Patrizi A, et al. Erosive pustular dermatosis of the scalp: Clinical, trichoscopic, and histopathologic features of 20 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Jun;76(6):1109-1114.e2. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2016.12.016
  138. Hsiao K, Smart J. Anaphylaxis caused by in?season switchover of sublingual immunotherapy formulation. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology. 2014 Nov 29;25(7):714–5. doi:10.1111/pai.12268
  139. Gao J, Shen X, Ko R, Huang C, Shen C. Cognitive Process of Psoriasis and Its Comorbidities: From Epidemiology to Genetics. Front Genet. 2021 Nov 26;12. doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.735124
  140. Iversen L, Lange MM, Bissonette R, Carvalho AVE, van de Kerkhof PC, Kirby B, et al. Topical treatment of psoriasis: questionnaire results on topical therapy accessibility and influence of body surface area on usage. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 2017 Jul 19;31(7):1188–95. doi:10.1111/jdv.14250
  141. Zafari Z, Lynd LD, FitzGerald JM, Sadatsafavi M. Economic and health effect of full adherence to controller therapy in adults with uncontrolled asthma: A simulation study. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2014 Oct;134(4):908-915.e3. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2014.04.009
  142. Chalmers JR, Haines RH, Bradshaw LE, Montgomery AA, Thomas KS, Brown SJ, et al. Daily emollient during infancy for prevention of eczema: the BEEP randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2020 Mar;395(10228):962–72. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32984-8
  143. Sidbury R, Davis DM, Cohen DE, Cordoro KM, Berger TG, Bergman JN, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Aug;71(2):327–49. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2014.03.030
  144. Zhang R, Liu R, Liu C, Pan L, Qi Y, Cheng J, et al. A pH/ROS dual-responsive and targeting nanotherapy for vascular inflammatory diseases. Biomaterials. 2020 Feb;230:119605. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119605
  145. Latif MS, Al-Harbi FF, Nawaz A, Rashid SA, Farid A, Mohaini M Al, et al. Formulation and Evaluation of Hydrophilic Polymer Based Methotrexate Patches: In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization. Polymers (Basel). 2022 Mar 24;14(7):1310. doi:10.3390/polym14071310
  146. Ren J, Murray R, Wong CS, Qin J, Chen M, Totsika M, et al. Development of 3D Printed Biodegradable Mesh with Antimicrobial Properties for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Polymers (Basel). 2022 Feb 16;14(4):763. doi:10.3390/polym14040763
  147. Polat BE, Hart D, Langer R, Blankschtein D. Ultrasound-mediated transdermal drug delivery: Mechanisms, scope, and emerging trends. Journal of Controlled Release. 2011 Jun;152(3):330–48. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.01.006
  148. Tun TY, Gokhale R, Heng PWS. Melt spheronization – Direct rotary shaping process for hot melt extrudates. Int J Pharm. 2018 Feb;536(2):499–500. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.08.023
  149. Adin SN, Gupta I, Aqil Mohd, Mujeeb Mohd. Baicalin loaded transethosomes for rheumatoid arthritis: Development, characterization, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2023 Mar;81:104209. doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2023.104209
  150. Wang W, Xu X, Song Y, Lan L, Wang J, Xu X, et al. Nano transdermal system combining mitochondria-targeting cerium oxide nanoparticles with all-trans retinoic acid for psoriasis. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2023 Sep;18(5):100846. doi:10.1016/j.ajps.2023.100846
  151. Zhan ZY, Zhang ZH, Sun RH, Wu YL, Nan JX, Lian LH. A therapeutic strategy of parthenolide in improving imiquimod-induced psoriasis-like skin inflammation targeting IL-36/NETs through skin transdermal therapeutic system. Int Immunopharmacol. 2024 Apr;131:111824. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2024.111824
  152. Polat BE, Hart D, Langer R, Blankschtein D. Ultrasound-mediated transdermal drug delivery: Mechanisms, scope, and emerging trends. Journal of Controlled Release. 2011 Jun;152(3):330–48. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.01.006
  153. Ogasawara N, Poposki JA, Klingler AI, Tan BK, Weibman AR, Hulse KE, et al. IL-10, TGF-β, and glucocorticoid prevent the production of type 2 cytokines in human group 2 innate lymphoid cells. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2018 Mar;141(3):1147-1151.e8. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2017.09.025
  154. Collins DS, Sánchez-Félix M, Badkar A V., Mrsny R. Accelerating the development of novel technologies and tools for the subcutaneous delivery of biotherapeutics. Journal of Controlled Release. 2020 May;321:475–82. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.02.036
  155. Liu C, Liu K, Zhang D, Liu Y, Yu Y, Kang H, et al. Dual-layer microneedles with NO/O2 releasing for diabetic wound healing via neurogenesis, angiogenesis, and immune modulation. Bioact Mater. 2025 Apr;46:213–28. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.12.012
  156. Dandeniyage LS, Knower W, Adhikari R, Bown M, Shanks R, Adhikari B, et al. In vitro oxidative stability of high strength siloxane poly(urethane?urea) elastomers based on linked?macrodiol. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2019 Nov 5;107(8):2557–65. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.34346
  157. Wang W, Wat E, Hui PCL, Chan B, Ng FSF, Kan CW, et al. Dual-functional transdermal drug delivery system with controllable drug loading based on thermosensitive poloxamer hydrogel for atopic dermatitis treatment. Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 19;6(1):24112. doi:10.1038/srep24112
  158. Liang C, Sun D, Lv H, Chu W, Duan Y, Bu Y, et al. Sintering Behaviors of Supported Nanoparticles Related to Spatial Location by a Quasi-Four-Dimensional TEM. Nano Lett. 2022 Aug 24;22(16):6523–9. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c01538
  159. Zhu Y, Wang X, Chen J, Zhang J, Meng F, Deng C, et al. Bioresponsive and fluorescent hyaluronic acid-iodixanol nanogels for targeted X-ray computed tomography imaging and chemotherapy of breast tumors. Journal of Controlled Release. 2016 Dec;244:229–39. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.08.027
  160. Gupta A, Eral HB, Hatton TA, Doyle PS. Nanoemulsions: formation, properties and applications. Soft Matter. 2016;12(11):2826–41. doi:10.1039/C5SM02958A
  161. Liu J, Zhang A, Hayden JC, Bhagavathula AS, Alshehhi F, Rinaldi G, et al. Roxadustat (FG-4592) treatment for anemia in dialysis-dependent (DD) and not dialysis-dependent (NDD) chronic kidney disease patients: A systematic review and meta?analysis. Pharmacol Res. 2020 May;155:104747. doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104747
  162. Jubayer F, Kayshar S, Rahaman M. Effects of Ajwa date seed powder on serum lipids in humans: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. J Herb Med. 2020 Dec;24:100409. doi:10.1016/j.hermed.2020.100409
  163. Huttunen J, Adla SK, Markowicz-Piasecka M, Huttunen KM. Increased/Targeted Brain (Pro)Drug Delivery via Utilization of Solute Carriers (SLCs). Pharmaceutics. 2022 Jun 10;14(6):1234. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics14061234
  164. Kumar VB, Tiwari OS, Finkelstein-Zuta G, Rencus-Lazar S, Gazit E. Design of Functional RGD Peptide-Based Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering. Pharmaceutics. 2023 Jan 19;15(2):345. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15020345

Photo
Dr. Vishakha Jaiswal
Corresponding author

Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow Campus, Uttar Pradesh, India- 226028

Photo
Sailesh Kumar
Co-author

Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow Campus, Uttar Pradesh, India- 226028

Photo
Dr. Swati Prakash
Co-author

Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow Campus, Uttar Pradesh, India- 226028

Sailesh Kumar, Vishakha Jaiswal, Emerging Transdermal Drug Delivery Technologies & Their Clinical Use in Inflammatory Skin Disorder, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 4, 2512-2531, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19606260

More related articles
Review On In-Situ Gel Drug Delivery System for Per...
Nithyasri J., Dr. Eswar Gupta Maddi, ...
Introduction To Lepidium Sativum Linn Seeds, And E...
Sumangal narayan wahule, Sushant Marchande, Girija Bhanushali, Ha...
Review On Phytochemical and Pharmacological Invest...
Khandare Sakshi, Khandale Priti, Khadare Shivraj, Sumit S. Bodhke...
Curcumin Phytosomes: A Promising Nanocarrier System for Enhancing Bioavailabilit...
Nikhil Khopade, Kakasaheb kore, Sucheta bhise, Adinath bhusari, Dr. Rajkumar Shete , ...
Related Articles
Natural Product Derived Compounds in Cancer Therapy: Pharmacological Mechanisms ...
Vinayak Dasharath Gaikwad, Samruddhi S Patil, Navin C Pant, Subhash Chand, Chandresh Maurya, Harpree...
Drug Repurposing of Pantoprazole for Its Anticancer Activity Focusing on Its Ant...
Vismaya Babu K. K., Sukrutha K. P., Farija R. S., Abitha P. B., Arya P., Amra Raffy K., ...
More related articles
Introduction To Lepidium Sativum Linn Seeds, And Extraction Of Mucilage...
Sumangal narayan wahule, Sushant Marchande, Girija Bhanushali, Harshal Ashok Vishe, ...
Review On Phytochemical and Pharmacological Investigation of Lantana Camara Extr...
Khandare Sakshi, Khandale Priti, Khadare Shivraj, Sumit S. Bodhke, ...
Introduction To Lepidium Sativum Linn Seeds, And Extraction Of Mucilage...
Sumangal narayan wahule, Sushant Marchande, Girija Bhanushali, Harshal Ashok Vishe, ...
Review On Phytochemical and Pharmacological Investigation of Lantana Camara Extr...
Khandare Sakshi, Khandale Priti, Khadare Shivraj, Sumit S. Bodhke, ...