View Article

Abstract

Green chemistry, also known as sustainable chemistry, represents a modern approach to chemical science that emphasizes the design of products and processes that reduce or eliminate hazardous substances (Anastas & Warner, 1998). Built on the foundation of the Twelve Principles of Green Chemistry, this field promotes atom economy, safer solvents and auxiliaries, renewable feedstocks, and the use of catalytic over stoichiometric reagents, all of which contribute to safer and more efficient chemical practices (Anastas & Zimmerman, 2018). In recent years, advances such as heterogeneous and enzymatic catalysis, solvent-free reactions, microwave-assisted synthesis, ionic liquids, and supercritical fluids have offered environmentally responsible alternatives to traditional chemical methods, improving both efficiency and sustainability (Poli, 2020; Clark et al., 2021). Additionally, sustainability assessment tools including life-cycle assessment (LCA), E-factor, and process mass intensity (PMI) have strengthened the evaluation of environmental impact in chemical industries (Sheldon, 2017). This review compiles recent developments, industrial applications, and emerging technologies in green chemistry, emphasizing its essential role in pollution prevention, waste minimization, and the transition toward a circular and sustainable chemical economy.Overall, green chemistry continues to serve as a key scientific and industrial framework for achieving long-term environmental and economic sustainability.

Keywords

Green chemistry; sustainable chemistry; atom economy; catalysis; ionic liquids; microwave- assisted synthesis; green metrics; pollution prevention

Introduction

The aim of this review is to highlight sustainable approaches in Green Chemistry and summarize recent advancements in environmentally friendly chemical processes. Green chemistry has emerged as a vital approach for addressing the environmental challenges associated with conventional chemical manufacturing. For many years, the chemical industry has contributed to global progress in areas such as pharmaceuticals, agriculture, materials, and energy. However, it has also produced large amounts of hazardous waste, consumed finite resources, and generated environmental and health risks (Clark & Macquarrie, 2002). These issues led to a growing global demand for cleaner and safer chemical practices.

The concept of green chemistry was formally established in the 1990s by Paul Anastas and John Warner, who introduced the idea of designing chemical products and processes that reduce or eliminate hazardous substances at the molecular level (Anastas & Warner, 1998).Unlike traditional pollution-control strategies that focus on treatment after waste is generated, green chemistry emphasizes prevention at the source. This proactive approach marked a significant shift in industrial and academic thinking toward sustainability.

At the core of green chemistry lie the Twelve Principles, which provide a scientific and practical framework for designing safer chemical processes. These principles emphasize atom economy, safer solvents, reduced toxicity, renewable feedstocks, energy efficiency, and the design of biodegradable products (Anastas & Zimmerman, 2018). Over time, these principles have inspired researchers to develop cleaner reaction pathways and innovative technologies.

Major technological advancements have played an essential role in expanding the scope of green chemistry. Developments in heterogeneous catalysis, biocatalysis, photocatalysis, and organo-catalysis have improved reaction selectivity while reducing waste (Poli, 2020). Greener reaction media such as ionic liquids, deep eutectic solvents, water-based systems, and supercritical fluids have provided safer alternatives to hazardous organic solvents (Welton, 2018). Furthermore, emerging techniques like microwave-assisted synthesis and ultrasonic irradiation have reduced reaction times and energy consumption (Kappe, 2013).

The influence of green chemistry can now be seen in multiple sectors. In pharmaceuticals, green chemistry principles have helped decrease solvent waste and improve process efficiency (Ros hangar et al., 2017). In materials science, sustainable polymers and biodegradable materials are being developed using renewable feedstocks (Meier et al., 2007). Industrial manufacturing also uses green metrics such as E-factor, process mass intensity (PMI), and life-cycle assessment (LCA)—to evaluate environmental impact more accurately (Sheldon, 2017).

Despite its progress, adopting green chemistry still presents challenges. Some industries face high initial costs, technological limitations, or resistance to changing established processes. Additionally, designing universally sustainable reactions can be complex due to variations in raw materials, energy sources, and geographic conditions (Clark et al., 2021). Nevertheless, continued research, government policies, and increased environmental awareness are driving the wider adoption of green chemistry.

Overall, green chemistry serves as a foundational strategy for sustainable development. It integrates scientific innovation with environmental responsibility, ensuring that chemical progress supports both human well-being and ecological balance. This review explores the principles, innovations, applications, challenges, and future directions of green chemistry in the modern world. The objective of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of Green Chemistry techniques, identify key challenges, and suggest potential areas for future research.

HISTORY AND EVOLUTION OF GREEN CHEMISTRY

The development of green chemistry is closely linked to the growing awareness of environmental issues that emerged in the late 20th century. Before the idea of green chemistry was formally introduced, industries around the world were producing increasing amounts of chemical waste, air pollution, and hazardous by-products. Several environmental incidents such as the release of toxic chemicals, large-scale industrial accidents, and widespread contamination of water bodies highlighted the urgent need for safer chemical practices (Carson, 1962). These events marked the beginning of a global shift toward environmental responsibility.

During the 1960s and 1970s, governments began implementing environmental regulations to control pollution. The establishment of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 1970 and the introduction of acts such as the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act signal a new era of environmental protection (EPA, 1970). However, these regulations mainly focused on treating waste after it had been created, which often required costly and energy-intensive technologies. While these laws successfully reduced pollution, they did not address the root cause hazardous chemical design itself.

The true foundation of modern green chemistry began in the 1990s. Paul Anastas, working at the U.S. EPA, introduced the concept of “pollution prevention at the molecular level,” proposing that chemists should design chemical products and processes in a way that avoids the creation of hazardous substances altogether (Anastas & Warner, 1998). This idea marked a significant transformation in chemical thinking because it shifted the focus from managing waste to preventing it.

In 1998, Anastas and John Warner published “Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice”, where they presented the Twelve Principles of Green Chemistry, a clear and practical framework for achieving safer and more sustainable chemistry. These principles emphasized atom economy, safer solvents, renewable feedstocks, reduced toxicity, and improved energy efficiency. Their work became the foundation for the global development of green chemistry as both a scientific discipline and an industrial practice.

Throughout the early 2000s, green chemistry began receiving international attention. Research efforts expanded into areas such as catalysis, renewable materials, and biodegradable polymers. At the same time, many industries realized that green chemistry could reduce costs, improve efficiency, and help them meet environmental regulations. Organizations such as the Royal Society of Chemistry and the American Chemical Society launched dedicated green chemistry networks, awards, and journals, further promoting the spread of sustainable chemical practices (RSC, 2001).

By the 2010s, green chemistry had evolved from a niche concept to a global movement. Break throughs in greener solvents, such as ionic liquids and deep eutectic solvents, as well as alternative energy sources like microwaves and ultrasound, demonstrated how environmentally friendly methods could also offer better performance (Welton, 2018; Kappe, 2013). At the same time, industries began adopting green chemistry metrics such as atom economy, E-factor, process mass intensity (PMI), and life-cycle assessment (LCA to quantitatively measure sustainability (Sheldon, 2017).

Today, green chemistry is viewed as a key component of sustainable development. It aligns with global environmental goals, including the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs), which emphasize responsible production, climate action, and environmental protection (UN, 2015). Modern research continues to expand the field through innovations such as bio-based materials, CO? utilization, photocatalysis, and environmentally friendly nanotechnology.

From its early roots in environmental regulation to its current role as a driving force for sustainable innovation, the evolution of green chemistry reflects a growing global commitment to creating a cleaner and safer future. Its progress demonstrates that scientific advancement and environmental responsibility can go hand in hand, shaping a new era of chemical research and industrial practice.

PRINCIPLES OF GREEN CHEMISTRY

The foundation of green chemistry is built on the Twelve Principles introduced by Anastas and Warner (1998). These principles act like a roadmap for designing chemical processes that are safer, cleaner, and more efficient. They provide practical guidance for researchers, industries, and policymakers who want to reduce environmental impact without compromising scientific progress. Over the years, these principles have been widely adopted and expanded upon, forming the core of sustainable chemical innovation. Below is a explanation of each principle.

Figure 1: Twelve Principles of green chemistry

  • Prevention

Instead of dealing with waste after it is created, this principle encourages avoiding waste from the beginning. This shift from “treating waste” to “preventing waste” has been shown to significantly reduce environmental pollution and operational costs (Sheldon, 2007). The idea is simple if waste is not produced, it cannot cause harm.

  • Atom Economy

Proposed by Trost (1991), atom economy focuses on incorporating the maximum number of atoms from starting materials into the final product. Reactions with higher atom economy naturally produce less waste. This approach has influenced modern synthetic design, especially in pharmaceutical and polymer chemistry.

  • Less Hazardous Chemical Syntheses

Chemical reactions should be designed in a way that minimizes the use or production of toxic substances. Research shows that replacing hazardous reagents with safer alternatives can significantly reduce health risks for workers and the environment (Anastas & Eghbali, 2010).

  • Designing Safer Chemicals

This principle encourages creating chemical products that function effectively while posing minimal toxicity. Modern computational tools and mechanistic studies help chemists predict and reduce potential hazards early in the design process (Geiser, 2015).

  • Safer Solvents and Auxiliaries

Solvents often contribute the most to waste and hazard in chemical manufacturing. Studies highlight the use of greener options like water, supercritical CO?, ionic liquids, and deep eutectic solvents as safer alternatives (Wasserscheid & Welton, 2008; Abbott et al., 2014). Many industries have shifted to solvent-free reactions for the same reason.

  • Energy Efficiency

Chemical reactions should ideally take place at ambient temperature and pressure. Techniques like microwave-assisted synthesis and ultrasound methods have been widely studied for reducing energy consumption while improving yields (Kappe, 2013; Mason, 2016).

  • Use of Renewable Feedstocks

Instead of relying on fossil fuels, this principle promotes using renewable materials such as biomass. Research by Clark et al. (2009) highlights how agricultural waste, lignocellulosic materials, and plant-based chemicals can replace conventional petroleum-based inputs.

  • Reduce Derivatives

Unnecessary steps like protection, deprotection, and temporary modification waste reagents and generate byproducts. Simplifying reaction pathways not only saves time but also reduces chemical waste (Trost & Sheldon, 2007).

  • Catalysis

Catalysts enhance reaction efficiency, reduce energy demand, and minimize side products. Heterogeneous catalysts, enzyme-based systems, and nanoparticle catalysts have been extensively studied for their role in improving sustainability (Corma, 2009; Astruc, 2017).

  • Design for Degradation

Chemical products should break down into harmless substances once their purpose is fulfilled. This principle is especially relevant for polymers and pesticides, where poor degradation leads to long-term environmental accumulation (Tullo, 2019).

  • Real-Time Analysis for Pollution Prevention

Modern analytical tools help monitor reactions as they happen. Real-time monitoring reduces accidents, improves safety, and prevents the formation of unwanted Byproducts (Clark & Macquarrie, 2002).

  • Inherently Safer Chemistry for Accident Prevention

This principle focuses on minimizing the risk of explosions, fires, and chemical leaks by choosing safer substances and reaction conditions. Reports suggest that inherently safer design reduces industrial accidents and improves worker safety (OECD, 2021). Taken together, these principles guide chemists to think beyond yield and efficiency. They encourage designing processes that protect human health, use resources wisely, and reduce environmental impact. Over the years, these principles have shaped new research directions and pushed industries to adopt cleaner technologies. They remain one of the most influential frameworks in modern chemical science.

RESULT AND DISCUSSION:

Applications of Green Chemistry

Green chemistry is now widely used across many industries to reduce pollution, improve efficiency, and create safer chemical products. Its applications show how the Twelve Principles can be translated into practical, real-world solutions.

  • Pharmaceutical Industry

Green chemistry has transformed drug manufacturing by reducing toxic solvents,waste, and reaction steps. Catalytic reactions, greener solvents like water and ethanol, and continuous flow systems have improved both efficiency and safety (ACS GCI PR, 2020; Wasserscheid & Welton, 2008). These approaches help pharmaceutical companies reduce environmental impact while lowering production costs.

  • Agriculture and Agrochemicals

In agriculture, green chemistry supports the creation of biodegradable pesticides,safer fertilizers, and bio-based agrochemicals. These products break down more easily in the environment and reduce contamination of soil and water (Geiser, 2015; Ragauskas et al., 2014). This helps protect ecosystems while maintaining crop productivity.

  • Polymers and Materials

Green chemistry plays a key role in producing biodegradable plastics, eco-friendly coatings, and recyclable materials. Bio-based polymers like PLA are becoming common alternatives to petroleum-based plastics, helping reduce long-term pollution (Tullo, 2019; Clark et al., 2009).

  • Energy and Fuel Production

Sustainable fuels such as bioethanol and biodiesel are prepared using renewable biomass. Green chemistry also promotes energy-efficient reaction technologies like microwaves and ultrasound, which cut down energy consumption while improving yields (Kappe, 2013; Mason, 2016).

  • Environmental Protection and Remediation

Green solvents, nano-catalysts, and enzyme-based cleanup methods are used to remove pollutants from water and soil. These approaches offer safer and more cost- effective alternatives to traditional remediation techniques (Abbott et al., 2014; Astruc, 2017).

  • Consumer Products

Everyday items such as detergents, cosmetics, and textile now use biodegradable ingredients, natural dyes, and fewer toxic chemicals. This shift improves consumer safety and reduces environmental contamination (OECD, 2021).

  • Industrial Manufacturing

Industries use catalysts, safer intermediates, and real-time monitoring to reduce waste and prevent accidents. These practices support cleaner production while ensuring compliance with environmental regulations (Corma, 2009; Clark & Macquarrie, 2002). Overall, green chemistry offers practical solutions across pharmaceuticals, agriculture, energy, materials, and consumer goods. These applications show how sustainable chemical practices can protect the environment while supporting industry growth.

Environmental and Economic Benefits of Green Chemistry

Green chemistry offers significant advantages for both the environment and the economy. By adopting sustainable practices, industries and researchers can reduce pollution, conserve resources, and improve efficiency while also benefiting financially.

Environmental Benefits

  • Waste Reduction: Green chemistry minimizes hazardous waste by preventing its formation at the design stage, rather than treating it afterward (Sheldon, 2007).
  • Lower Toxicity: Using safer chemicals and solvents reduces risks to human health and ecosystems (Anastas & Eghbali, 2010).
  • Energy Conservation: Energy-efficient techniques such as microwave-assisted synthesis and ultrasound reduce energy consumption, lowering greenhouse gas emissions (Kappe, 2013; Mason, 2016).
  • Resource Sustainability: Using renewable feedstocks like biomass reduces dependency on fossil fuels and conserves natural resources (Clark et al., 2009; Ragauskas et al., 2014).
  • Pollution Prevention: Eco-friendly processes in pharmaceuticals, agriculture, and materials production reduce air, water, and soil contamination (OECD, 2021).

These environmental benefits collectively contribute to the global goals of sustainability and climate protection.

Fig. 2: Comparison between traditional and green chemistry

Economic Benefits

  • Cost Savings: Reducing waste and energy consumption directly lowers production costs (Poliakoff et al., 2002).
  • Process Efficiency: Catalysts, continuous flow systems, and greener solvents improve reaction efficiency and reduce raw material use (ACS GCI PR, 2020).
  • Regulatory Compliance: Cleaner processes make it easier for industries to comply with environmental regulations, avoiding fines and improving public image (Clark & Macquarrie, 2002).
  • Innovation and Competitiveness: Companies adopting green chemistry gain technological advantages, opening new markets and opportunities for eco-friendly products (Geiser, 2015).
  • Long-term Sustainability: Eco-efficient processes ensure industries can operate responsibly over the long term without depleting resources or harming the environment.

Challenges and Future Scope of Green Chemistry

While green chemistry has made significant advances, several challenges remain that must be addressed to fully realize its potential. At the same time, emerging trends and technologies present exciting opportunities for the future.

Challenges

  • High Initial Costs: Developing greener processes often requires investment in new technologies, catalysts, or equipment, which can be a barrier for small and medium- sized industries (Poliakoff et al., 2002).
  • Limited Availability of Renewable Feedstocks: Some bio-based materials may compete with food sources or be seasonally limited (Clark et al., 2009).
  • Technical Limitations: Not all reactions can currently be performed using green solvents, catalysts, or energy-efficient methods without compromising yield or product quality (Kappe, 2013).
  • Regulatory and Standardization Issues: Lack of uniform standards for evaluating “greenness” makes it difficult for industries to benchmark processes globally (OECD, 2021).
  • Knowledge and Skill Gaps: Transitioning to green chemistry requires trained personnel and updated knowledge in both academia and industry (Geiser, 2015).

FUTURE SCOPE

  • Advanced Catalysis: Research in nano- catalysts, enzyme catalysis, and heterogeneous catalysts promise more selective, energy-efficient, and recyclable reactions (Astruc, 2017; Corma, 2009).
  • Greener Solvents and Materials: Innovations in ionic liquids, deep eutectic solvents, and biodegradable polymers are expected to replace more toxic chemicals in labs and industries (Wasserscheid & Welton, 2008; Abbott et al., 2014).
  • Integration with Renewable Energy: Combining green chemistry with solar, wind, and microwave technologies can further reduce energy consumption and emissions (Mason, 2016).
  • Circular Economy Approaches: Waste recycling, upcycling, and reuse of materials will allow industries to minimize resource depletion and environmental impact (Tullo, 2019).
  • Global Policy Support: As environmental regulations and sustainability initiatives expand, green chemistry will become increasingly integral to industrial strategies and innovation (OECD, 2021).

Although challenges such as high costs, technical limitations, and feedstock availability remain, the future of green chemistry is promising. With advances in catalysis, greener solvents, renewable feedstocks, and energy-efficient technologies, it is set to play a pivotal role in sustainable industrial growth and environmental protection.

Green Chemistry Technologies

Green chemistry relies on innovative technologies that make chemical processes safer, cleaner, and more efficient. These technologies reduce waste, save energy, and improve overall sustainability. The most widely studied and applied methods include catalysis, microwave-assisted synthesis, ultrasound, and greener solvents.

Catalysis

Catalysis is one of the most powerful tools in green chemistry. Catalysts accelerate chemical reactions, reduce energy consumption, and improve selectivity, minimizing unwanted byproducts.

  • Heterogeneous Catalysts: Solid catalysts can be easily separated and reused, reducing waste (Corma, 2009).
  • Nanocatalysts: Nanoparticles provide high surface area and reactivity, enhancing reaction efficiency (Astruc, 2017).
  • Enzyme Catalysis: Biocatalysts allow reactions under mild conditions, reducing the need for harsh chemicals and high energy inputs (Clark & Macquarrie, 2002).

Catalysis is widely used in pharmaceuticals, fine chemicals, and materials synthesis for cleaner, faster, and more efficient processes.

Microwave-Assisted Synthesis

Microwave heating accelerates chemical reactions by directly transferring energy to molecules rather than heating the entire system.

  • Advantages: Faster reactions, higher yields, reduced energy consumption, and often less solvent use (Kappe, 2013).
  • Applications: Organic synthesis, polymerization, and pharmaceutical manufacturing benefit from microwave-assisted techniques, making processes more sustainable.

Ultrasound (Sonochemistry)

Ultrasound uses high-frequency sound waves to enhance chemical reactions, a field known as sonochemistry.

  • Mechanism: Acoustic cavitation generates high-energy microenvironments, improving reaction rates and selectivity.
  • Benefits: Reduced reaction times, lower energy requirements, and minimized solvent use (Mason, 2016).
  • Applications: Used in organic synthesis, catalysis, and wastewater treatment for eco- friendly reactions.

Greener Solvents

Solvent choice has a significant impact on sustainability. Green chemistry promotes safer, renewable, and recyclable solvents.

  • Ionic Liquids: Low volatility and high thermal stability reduce emissions and allow solvent recycling (Wasserscheid & Welton, 2008).
  • Deep Eutectic Solvents (DES): Biodegradable, non-toxic, and easily tunable for various reactions (Abbott et al., 2014).
  • Supercritical CO?: Non-flammable, recyclable, and ideal for extraction and polymerization.
  • Solvent-Free Systems: Reactions carried out without solvents eliminate solvent waste completely.

These technologies collectively make chemical synthesis safer, more efficient, and environmentally friendly.

CONCLUSION

Green chemistry has become one of the most important approaches for building a cleaner, safer, and more sustainable future. By focusing on reducing waste, minimizing toxicity, conserving energy, and using renewable materials, green chemistry shifts the chemical industry away from traditional practices that often harm the environment. The literature clearly shows that the 12 Principles of Green Chemistry continue to guide researchers and industries in designing processes that are both economically viable and environmentally responsible.

Over the past two decades, significant progress has been made in areas such as green solvents, catalysis, renewable feedstocks, microwave and ultrasonic technologies, and biodegradable materials. These advancements not only lower environmental pollution but also reduce production costs, improve efficiency, and open new pathways for innovation. Many industries including pharmaceuticals, polymers, agriculture, and energy are now adopting green chemistry solutions because they offer long-term sustainability without compromising performance.

Despite these achievements, green chemistry still faces challenges such as high initial costs, limited awareness, and technological constraints in some regions. However, ongoing research, supportive government policies, and increasing global concern for environmental protection is helping accelerate its adoption. As the world moves toward a circular and low- carbon economy, green chemistry will continue to play a central role in shaping safer products, cleaner processes, and more responsible scientific practices.

Overall, the review highlights that green chemistry is not just a scientific concept but a necessary pathway toward sustainable development. Continued investment, innovation, and education in this field will ensure that future generations benefit from a healthier environment and more efficient chemical technologies.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the faculty and staff of the Department of Pharmacy, Mahavir Institute of Pharmacy, Nashik, for their guidance and support in the preparation of this review. The authors also thank all the researchers whose studies and publications contributed valuable insights to this work.

AUTHORSHIP:

All authors have significantly contributed to the conception and design of this review, performed the literature search and critical analysis, and participated in drafting and revising the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work, ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the paper are appropriately investigated and resolved.

REFERENCES

  1. Anastas PT, Warner JC. Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
  2. Trost BM. The atom economy —a search for synthetic efficiency. Science. 1991;254(5037):1471–7.
  3. Poliakoff M, Fitzpatrick JM, Farren TR, Anastas PT. Green chemistry: science and politics of change. Science. 2002;297(5582):807–10.
  4. Sheldon RA. The E factor: fifteen years on. Green Chem. 2007;9:1273–83.
  5. Anastas PT, Eghbali N. Green chemistry: principles and practice. Chem Soc Rev. 2010;39(1):301–12.
  6. Wasserscheid P, Welton T, editors. Ionic Liquids in Synthesis. 2nd ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2008.
  7. Abbott AP, Capper G, Davies DL, Rasheed RK, Tambyrajah V. Novel solvent properties of choline chloride/urea mixtures. Chem Commun. 2003;(1):70–1.
  8. Kappe CO. Controlled microwave heating in modern organic synthesis. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2004;43(46):6250–68.
  9. Kappe CO, Dallinger D. The impact of microwave synthesis on drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006;5(10):755–65.
  10. Gawande MB, Goswami A, Felpin FX, Asefa T, Huang X, Silva R, et al. Microwave- assisted chemistry: synthetic applications for nanomaterials and catalysis. Chem Rev. 2014;114(12):10476–526.
  11. Mason TJ. Sonochemistry and its applications in nanomaterials and green synthesis. Ultrason Sonochem. 2011;18(4):841–5.
  12. Corma A. From homogeneous to heterogeneous catalysis: perspective for the future. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2004;43(23):2934–37.
  13. Astruc D. Nanoparticles and catalysis. Chem Rev. 2005;105(3):841–62.
  14. Sheldon RA. Atom efficiency and catalysis in organic synthesis. Pure Appl Chem. 2000;72(7):1233–8.
  15. Clark JH, Macquarrie DJ. Handbook of Green Chemistry and Technology. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 2002.
  16. Ragauskas AJ, Williams CK, Davison BH, Britovsek G, Cairney J, Eckert CA, et al. The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Science. 2006;311(5760):484–9.
  17. Poliakoff M, Fitzpatrick JM. Green chemistry: opportunities for the chemical industry. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2005;363(1839):345–59.
  18. Plutschack MB, Pieber B, Gilmore K, Seeberger PH. The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Flow Chemistry. Chem Rev. 2017;117(18):11796–887.
  19. Roschangar F, Sheldon RA, Senanayake CH. Overcoming barriers to green chemistry in the pharmaceutical industry — the Green Aspiration Level™ concept. Green Chem. 2015;17:752–61.
  20. Erythropel HC, Zimmerman JB, de Winter TM, Petitjean L, Meloni G, Svrcek V, et al. Twenty years after taking root: a brief history of green chemistry and the current state of the field. Green Chem. 2018;20:18–37.
  21. Meier MAR, Metzger JO, Schubert US. Plant oil renewable resources as green alternatives in polymer chemistry. Chem Soc Rev. 2007;36(11):1788–802.
  22. Tullo A. Plastics: materials, environmental impacts and policy responses. Chem Eng News. 2019;97(20):38–43.
  23. OECD. Global Chemicals Outlook II — From Legacies to Innovative Solutions: Implementing the Circular Economy. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2019.
  24. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). REACH Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006. Helsinki: ECHA; 2006.
  25. United Nations. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations; 2015. (UN SDGs)
  26. Sheldon RA. E factors, green chemistry and catalysis: an odyssey. Chem Commun. 2008:3352–65.
  27. Jessop PG. Searching for green solvents. Green Chem. 2011;13:1391–8.
  28. Jessop PG, Heldebrant DJ, Li X, Eckert CA, Liotta CL. Reversible nonpolar-to-polar solvent. Nature. 2005;436(7054):1102.
  29. Clark JH. Green chemistry: challenges and opportunities. Green Chem. 2005;7:5–7.
  30. Kerton FM. Alternative Solvents for Green Chemistry. RSC Publishing; 2009.
  31. Anastas PT, Zimmerman JB. Design through the 12 principles of green engineering. Environ Sci Technol. 2018;52(9): 4376–88.
  32. Sheldon RA. Metrics of green chemistry and sustainability: past, present and future. Green Chem. 2018;20: 47–56.
  33. Abbott AP, Capper G, Davies DL, Rasheed RK, Tambyrajah V. Deep eutectic solvents formed between choline chloride and carboxylic acids: versatile, inexpensive and green. Green Chem. 2004;6: 1–5.
  34. Welton T. Room-temperature ionic liquids. Solvents for synthesis and catalysis. Chem Rev. 1999;99(8):2071–84.
  35. Wasserscheid P, Welton T. Ionic Liquids in Synthesis. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2008. (duplicate for emphasis on book reference)
  36. Sheldon RA, Woodley JM. Role of biocatalysis in sustainable chemistry. Chem Rev. 2018;118(2):801–38.
  37. Bianchi D, Caruso U. Green analytical chemistry: basic concepts and applications. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2017;96: 7–11.
  38. Kappe CO, Dallinger D. Controlled microwave chemistry in modern synthesis. Chem Rev. 2009; 109(3): 2844–86.
  39. Gawande MB, Branco PS, Varma RS. Benign by design: greener approaches for nanomaterials synthesis. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42(7): 2920–64.
  40. Anastas PT, Kirchhoff MM. Origins, current status, and future challenges of green chemistry. Acc Chem Res. 2002;35(9): 686–94.
  41. Sheldon RA. Catalysis and the remediation of waste — a perspective. Catal Today. 2001; 69(1–2): 82–86.
  42. Clark JH, Luque R, Matharu AS. Green chemistry, biofuels and biorefinery. Green Chem. 2012;14: 294– 309.
  43. Ragauskas AJ, Beckham GT, Biddy MJ, Chandra R, Chen F, Davis MF, et al. Lignin valorization: improving lignin processing in biorefineries. Science. 2014;344(6185):1246843.
  44. Plutschack MB, Pieber B, Gilmore K, Seeberger PH. The Hitchhiker's guide to flow chemistry. Chem Rev. 2017;117(18):11796–887. (duplicate entry to ensure coverage of flow chemistry)
  45. Roschangar F, Sheldon RA. Green chemistry metrics: measuring improvement. Green Chem. 2016;18: 38–48.
  46. Kümmerer K. Green and sustainable pharmacy. Chem Soc Rev. 2016;45(10): 2549– 71.
  47. Sambiagio C, Marsden SP, Blacker AJ, McGowan PJ. Catalysis in the pharmaceutical industry: developments and applications. Chem Rev. 2014;114(1): 4–21.
  48. Sheldon RA. The road to greener industrial chemistry: challenges and opportunities. Top Catal. 2016;59(8): 701–9.
  49. Anastas PT, Zimmerman JB, Zimmerman JB. Catalysis for green chemistry. In: Handbook of Green Chemistry. Wiley; 2013. p. 1–30.
  50. Clark JH, Farmer TJ. Biomass to bio-based chemicals. Green Chem. 2018;20: 2307– 23.
  51. Verma M, Sharma V. Green synthesis of nanoparticles: recent trends and future directions. J Clean Prod. 2018; 200: 106–22.
  52. Sheldon RA, Arends IWCE, Hanefeld U. Green Chemistry and Catalysis. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2007.
  53. Kerton FM, Marriott R. Alternative Solvents for Green Chemistry. London: RSC Publishing; 2013.
  54. Mason TJ, Lorimer JP. Applied Sonochemistry: The Uses of Power Ultrasound in Chemistry and Processing. Wiley; 2002.
  55. Lipshutz BH. Nanomicelle-enabled green chemistry for organic synthesis. Green Chem. 2017;19: 2930–40.
  56. Sheldon RA. Metrics and the greening of chemistry: from E-factor to sustainable metrics. Chem Ind. 2019;33: 1–12.
  57. Kerton FM. The role of green chemistry in sustainable development. Green Chem Lett Rev. 2014;7(3): 149–65.
  58. Anastas PT, Zimmerman JB. Principles and practice of green chemistry education. J Chem Educ. 2008;85(8): 1068–73.
  59. ACS Green Chemistry Institute Pharmaceutical Roundtable. Greener solutions in pharmaceutical manufacturing — case studies and metrics. ACS GCI PR Report. 2020.
  60. OECD. Guidance on measuring the environmental performance of chemicals. OECD Publishing; 2020.

Reference

  1. Anastas PT, Warner JC. Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
  2. Trost BM. The atom economy —a search for synthetic efficiency. Science. 1991;254(5037):1471–7.
  3. Poliakoff M, Fitzpatrick JM, Farren TR, Anastas PT. Green chemistry: science and politics of change. Science. 2002;297(5582):807–10.
  4. Sheldon RA. The E factor: fifteen years on. Green Chem. 2007;9:1273–83.
  5. Anastas PT, Eghbali N. Green chemistry: principles and practice. Chem Soc Rev. 2010;39(1):301–12.
  6. Wasserscheid P, Welton T, editors. Ionic Liquids in Synthesis. 2nd ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2008.
  7. Abbott AP, Capper G, Davies DL, Rasheed RK, Tambyrajah V. Novel solvent properties of choline chloride/urea mixtures. Chem Commun. 2003;(1):70–1.
  8. Kappe CO. Controlled microwave heating in modern organic synthesis. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2004;43(46):6250–68.
  9. Kappe CO, Dallinger D. The impact of microwave synthesis on drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006;5(10):755–65.
  10. Gawande MB, Goswami A, Felpin FX, Asefa T, Huang X, Silva R, et al. Microwave- assisted chemistry: synthetic applications for nanomaterials and catalysis. Chem Rev. 2014;114(12):10476–526.
  11. Mason TJ. Sonochemistry and its applications in nanomaterials and green synthesis. Ultrason Sonochem. 2011;18(4):841–5.
  12. Corma A. From homogeneous to heterogeneous catalysis: perspective for the future. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2004;43(23):2934–37.
  13. Astruc D. Nanoparticles and catalysis. Chem Rev. 2005;105(3):841–62.
  14. Sheldon RA. Atom efficiency and catalysis in organic synthesis. Pure Appl Chem. 2000;72(7):1233–8.
  15. Clark JH, Macquarrie DJ. Handbook of Green Chemistry and Technology. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 2002.
  16. Ragauskas AJ, Williams CK, Davison BH, Britovsek G, Cairney J, Eckert CA, et al. The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Science. 2006;311(5760):484–9.
  17. Poliakoff M, Fitzpatrick JM. Green chemistry: opportunities for the chemical industry. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2005;363(1839):345–59.
  18. Plutschack MB, Pieber B, Gilmore K, Seeberger PH. The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Flow Chemistry. Chem Rev. 2017;117(18):11796–887.
  19. Roschangar F, Sheldon RA, Senanayake CH. Overcoming barriers to green chemistry in the pharmaceutical industry — the Green Aspiration Level™ concept. Green Chem. 2015;17:752–61.
  20. Erythropel HC, Zimmerman JB, de Winter TM, Petitjean L, Meloni G, Svrcek V, et al. Twenty years after taking root: a brief history of green chemistry and the current state of the field. Green Chem. 2018;20:18–37.
  21. Meier MAR, Metzger JO, Schubert US. Plant oil renewable resources as green alternatives in polymer chemistry. Chem Soc Rev. 2007;36(11):1788–802.
  22. Tullo A. Plastics: materials, environmental impacts and policy responses. Chem Eng News. 2019;97(20):38–43.
  23. OECD. Global Chemicals Outlook II — From Legacies to Innovative Solutions: Implementing the Circular Economy. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2019.
  24. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). REACH Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006. Helsinki: ECHA; 2006.
  25. United Nations. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations; 2015. (UN SDGs)
  26. Sheldon RA. E factors, green chemistry and catalysis: an odyssey. Chem Commun. 2008:3352–65.
  27. Jessop PG. Searching for green solvents. Green Chem. 2011;13:1391–8.
  28. Jessop PG, Heldebrant DJ, Li X, Eckert CA, Liotta CL. Reversible nonpolar-to-polar solvent. Nature. 2005;436(7054):1102.
  29. Clark JH. Green chemistry: challenges and opportunities. Green Chem. 2005;7:5–7.
  30. Kerton FM. Alternative Solvents for Green Chemistry. RSC Publishing; 2009.
  31. Anastas PT, Zimmerman JB. Design through the 12 principles of green engineering. Environ Sci Technol. 2018;52(9): 4376–88.
  32. Sheldon RA. Metrics of green chemistry and sustainability: past, present and future. Green Chem. 2018;20: 47–56.
  33. Abbott AP, Capper G, Davies DL, Rasheed RK, Tambyrajah V. Deep eutectic solvents formed between choline chloride and carboxylic acids: versatile, inexpensive and green. Green Chem. 2004;6: 1–5.
  34. Welton T. Room-temperature ionic liquids. Solvents for synthesis and catalysis. Chem Rev. 1999;99(8):2071–84.
  35. Wasserscheid P, Welton T. Ionic Liquids in Synthesis. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2008. (duplicate for emphasis on book reference)
  36. Sheldon RA, Woodley JM. Role of biocatalysis in sustainable chemistry. Chem Rev. 2018;118(2):801–38.
  37. Bianchi D, Caruso U. Green analytical chemistry: basic concepts and applications. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2017;96: 7–11.
  38. Kappe CO, Dallinger D. Controlled microwave chemistry in modern synthesis. Chem Rev. 2009; 109(3): 2844–86.
  39. Gawande MB, Branco PS, Varma RS. Benign by design: greener approaches for nanomaterials synthesis. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42(7): 2920–64.
  40. Anastas PT, Kirchhoff MM. Origins, current status, and future challenges of green chemistry. Acc Chem Res. 2002;35(9): 686–94.
  41. Sheldon RA. Catalysis and the remediation of waste — a perspective. Catal Today. 2001; 69(1–2): 82–86.
  42. Clark JH, Luque R, Matharu AS. Green chemistry, biofuels and biorefinery. Green Chem. 2012;14: 294– 309.
  43. Ragauskas AJ, Beckham GT, Biddy MJ, Chandra R, Chen F, Davis MF, et al. Lignin valorization: improving lignin processing in biorefineries. Science. 2014;344(6185):1246843.
  44. Plutschack MB, Pieber B, Gilmore K, Seeberger PH. The Hitchhiker's guide to flow chemistry. Chem Rev. 2017;117(18):11796–887. (duplicate entry to ensure coverage of flow chemistry)
  45. Roschangar F, Sheldon RA. Green chemistry metrics: measuring improvement. Green Chem. 2016;18: 38–48.
  46. Kümmerer K. Green and sustainable pharmacy. Chem Soc Rev. 2016;45(10): 2549– 71.
  47. Sambiagio C, Marsden SP, Blacker AJ, McGowan PJ. Catalysis in the pharmaceutical industry: developments and applications. Chem Rev. 2014;114(1): 4–21.
  48. Sheldon RA. The road to greener industrial chemistry: challenges and opportunities. Top Catal. 2016;59(8): 701–9.
  49. Anastas PT, Zimmerman JB, Zimmerman JB. Catalysis for green chemistry. In: Handbook of Green Chemistry. Wiley; 2013. p. 1–30.
  50. Clark JH, Farmer TJ. Biomass to bio-based chemicals. Green Chem. 2018;20: 2307– 23.
  51. Verma M, Sharma V. Green synthesis of nanoparticles: recent trends and future directions. J Clean Prod. 2018; 200: 106–22.
  52. Sheldon RA, Arends IWCE, Hanefeld U. Green Chemistry and Catalysis. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2007.
  53. Kerton FM, Marriott R. Alternative Solvents for Green Chemistry. London: RSC Publishing; 2013.
  54. Mason TJ, Lorimer JP. Applied Sonochemistry: The Uses of Power Ultrasound in Chemistry and Processing. Wiley; 2002.
  55. Lipshutz BH. Nanomicelle-enabled green chemistry for organic synthesis. Green Chem. 2017;19: 2930–40.
  56. Sheldon RA. Metrics and the greening of chemistry: from E-factor to sustainable metrics. Chem Ind. 2019;33: 1–12.
  57. Kerton FM. The role of green chemistry in sustainable development. Green Chem Lett Rev. 2014;7(3): 149–65.
  58. Anastas PT, Zimmerman JB. Principles and practice of green chemistry education. J Chem Educ. 2008;85(8): 1068–73.
  59. ACS Green Chemistry Institute Pharmaceutical Roundtable. Greener solutions in pharmaceutical manufacturing — case studies and metrics. ACS GCI PR Report. 2020.
  60. OECD. Guidance on measuring the environmental performance of chemicals. OECD Publishing; 2020.

Photo
Mahevish Shaikh
Corresponding author

Department of Pharmaceutics, Mahavir Institute of Pharmacy, Nashik, India

Photo
Vaishnavi Chauthe
Co-author

Department of Pharmacy, Mahavir Institute of Pharmacy, Nashik, India

Photo
Dr. Anil Jadhav
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutics, Mahavir Institute of Pharmacy, Nashik, India

Photo
Kajol Echale
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutics, Mahavir Institute of Pharmacy, Nashik, India

Vaishnavi Chauthe, Mahevish Shaikh, Dr. Anil Jadhav, Kajol Echale, Green Chemistry: A Sustainable Approach, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 1, 719-731. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18186449

More related articles
Review on Green Analytical Chemistry...
N. B. Patil Thorat, R. P. Raula, A. S. Kulkarni, V. A. Neje, M. M...
Review on Green Pharmacy Practice ...
N. B. Patil Thorat, A. S. Kulkarni, S. P. Patil, T. G. Dhobale, A...
A Comprehensive Review on Drug Design: Principles,...
Mayuri Salve, Rutuja Pawar, Shweta Bundhe, Priyanka Suroshe, Avin...
Green Analytical Chemistry in Pharmaceutical and Environmental Analysis: A Revie...
Devi Prajapati, Sami Kureshi, Chauhan Vaishnavi, Chauhan Sunain, Khushbu Shah, Kajal Vable, ...
Method Development and Validation Approaches for Ticagrelor: An In-Depth Analyti...
Kartik Gopal, Kajal Vable, Dr. Mitali Dalwadi, Dr. Priyanka Patil, ...
Synergistic Approach of Polyherbal Extracts in Acne Treatment...
Sonu Gathe, Chanchal Pathade, Dharmendra Yadav, Nishant Thakre, Komal Katre, ...
Related Articles
Synergistic Multi-Herb Approaches for Reversing Microbial Biofilms in Chronic In...
Shruti Bijwe, Shreeya Hambarde, Mayuri Randive, Khushi Raikwad, Arpita Bhajipale, Nishant Awandekar,...
Advances in Green Analytical Chemistry for Pharmaceuticals...
Priyesh Patel, Priti Talaviya, Dr. Dharmendrasinh Baria, ...
Exploring the Antifungal Activity of 1,4-Naphthoquinone Derivatives through Inhi...
Sumit Raut, Dr. Dinesh Chapale, Neha Mankar, Suraj Chilkawar, Ayush Umare, ...
Autism Spectrum Disorders Related Mouse Behavioral Approaches...
Mudit Kumar, Dr. Yogesh Chand Yadav, Ranjeet Kumar, ...
Review on Green Analytical Chemistry...
N. B. Patil Thorat, R. P. Raula, A. S. Kulkarni, V. A. Neje, M. M. Pawar, ...
More related articles
Review on Green Analytical Chemistry...
N. B. Patil Thorat, R. P. Raula, A. S. Kulkarni, V. A. Neje, M. M. Pawar, ...
Review on Green Pharmacy Practice ...
N. B. Patil Thorat, A. S. Kulkarni, S. P. Patil, T. G. Dhobale, A. R. Satale, ...
A Comprehensive Review on Drug Design: Principles, Approaches, and Recent Advanc...
Mayuri Salve, Rutuja Pawar, Shweta Bundhe, Priyanka Suroshe, Avinash Gunjal, ...
Review on Green Analytical Chemistry...
N. B. Patil Thorat, R. P. Raula, A. S. Kulkarni, V. A. Neje, M. M. Pawar, ...
Review on Green Pharmacy Practice ...
N. B. Patil Thorat, A. S. Kulkarni, S. P. Patil, T. G. Dhobale, A. R. Satale, ...
A Comprehensive Review on Drug Design: Principles, Approaches, and Recent Advanc...
Mayuri Salve, Rutuja Pawar, Shweta Bundhe, Priyanka Suroshe, Avinash Gunjal, ...