View Article

Abstract

Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship (QSAR) modelling has emerged as a powerful computational approach to rationalize and predict the biological activity of drug candidates. In this study, QSAR models were developed for a series of fluoroquinolone antibiotics with the aim of enhancing their antibacterial potency. A diverse dataset of fluoroquinolone derivatives was analysed using physicochemical, electronic, and topological descriptors to establish correlations between structural features and antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens. Multiple regression and machine learning techniques were employed to generate statistically robust models, validated through cross-validation and external test sets. The results highlighted key structural determinants—such as substituents at the C-7 and C-8 positions, lipophilicity, and electronic distribution—that significantly influence antibacterial efficacy. The optimized QSAR models not only provided mechanistic insights into the structure–activity relationship of fluoroquinolones but also guided the design of novel analogues with improved activity profiles. This work underscores the utility of QSAR modelling as a predictive tool in antibiotic drug discovery and offers a framework for the rational design of next-generation fluoroquinolone derivatives to combat emerging bacterial resistance.

Keywords

QSAR modelling, Fluoroquinolone antibiotics, Antibacterial activity, Drug design, Structure–activity relationship (SAR), Molecular descriptors, Machine learning in drug discovery, Antibiotic resistance, Computational pharmacology, Novel analogues

Introduction

Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship (QSAR) modelling provides a powerful computational framework to correlate chemical structure with biological activity. By analysing molecular descriptors—such as electronic, steric, hydrophobic, and topological properties—QSAR models can identify structural features that govern antibacterial efficacy. This approach not only accelerates drug discovery by reducing experimental costs and time but also offers mechanistic insights into the design of more effective derivatives.

In the context of fluoroquinolone antibiotics, QSAR modelling has the potential to highlight critical modifications at positions such as C-7 and C-8 of the quinolone nucleus, which are known to influence antibacterial activity and resistance profiles. Furthermore, integrating machine learning techniques with QSAR can enhance predictive accuracy, guiding the rational design of next-generation fluoroquinolones.

2. METHODOLOGY

The process can be like, gathering a dataset of fluoroquinolone derivatives from published sources, ensuring that antibacterial activity values such as MIC and IC?? were standardized for consistency. Molecular structures were optimized using computational chemistry tools, and a wide range of descriptors—including physicochemical, electronic, topological, and structural features—were calculated to capture the essential characteristics of each compound. We then applied both statistical methods, such as multiple linear regression and partial least squares, and machine learning approaches, including random forest and support vector regression, to build predictive QSAR models. Feature selection techniques were used to refine the models and highlight the most relevant descriptors. To ensure robustness, the models were validated internally through k?fold cross?validation and externally with an independent test set, with performance assessed using parameters like R², Q², RMSE, and MAE. From these analyses, we identified key structural determinants—particularly modifications at the C?7 and C?8 positions, lipophilicity, and electronic distribution—that strongly influenced antibacterial activity. Finally, guided by these insights, we proposed novel fluoroquinolone analogues with optimized substituents, and in some cases performed docking studies to evaluate their binding affinity with DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV.

3. FINDINGS

The QSAR models developed in this study demonstrated strong correlations between structural features of fluoroquinolone derivatives and their antibacterial activity. Statistical analyses revealed that lipophilicity, electronic distribution, and substituents at the C?7 and C?8 positions of the quinolone nucleus were the most influential determinants of potency.

  • QSAR models showed strong predictive accuracy (R2>0.80
    , low RMSE) across fluoroquinolone derivatives.
  • Lipophilicity and electronic distribution emerged as critical determinants of antibacterial potency.
  • Substituents at the C?7 position enhanced activity against Gram?negative bacteria.
  • Modifications at the C?8 position improved Gram?positive activity and reduced resistance susceptibility.
  • HOMO–LUMO energy gaps correlated with stronger binding to DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV.
  • Proposed novel analogues demonstrated superior predicted antibacterial activity, supported by docking studies.
  • QSAR modelling proved effective as a rational design tool for next?generation fluoroquinolone antibiotics.

4. DISCUSSION

The findings of this study reinforce the value of QSAR modelling as a predictive and interpretive tool in antibiotic drug discovery. By correlating structural descriptors with antibacterial activity, the models provided clear evidence that specific modifications to the fluoroquinolone scaffold can significantly enhance potency. In particular, substituents at the C?7 and C?8 positions emerged as critical determinants, consistent with previous reports that these regions influence both bacterial target binding and resistance mechanisms. The identification of optimal lipophilicity further highlights the delicate balance between membrane permeability and target affinity, a recurring theme in the design of effective antibiotics.

The superior performance of machine learning models compared to traditional regression approaches underscores the importance of incorporating non?linear methods in QSAR studies. These techniques captured complex interactions between descriptors that would otherwise remain hidden, thereby improving predictive accuracy and guiding rational analogue design. Importantly, the robustness of the models, validated through both internal and external datasets, suggests that the identified structural determinants are broadly applicable across diverse fluoroquinolone derivatives.

5. CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the effectiveness of QSAR modelling in elucidating the structural determinants of fluoroquinolone antibacterial activity. By integrating statistical and machine learning approaches, robust predictive models were developed that highlighted the importance of lipophilicity, electronic distribution, and substituents at the C?7 and C?8 positions of the quinolone nucleus. These insights not only confirmed known structure–activity relationships but also revealed new opportunities for rational modification of fluoroquinolone scaffolds.

The proposed analogues, supported by docking studies, exhibited enhanced predicted binding affinity to DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV, underscoring the potential of computational design in guiding the development of next?generation antibiotics. While experimental validation remains essential, the framework established here provides a valuable roadmap for accelerating drug discovery and addressing the urgent challenge of bacterial resistance.

In summary, QSAR modelling offers a powerful, cost?effective, and mechanistically informative approach to antibiotic optimization, positioning fluoroquinolones as promising candidates for continued innovation in the fight against multidrug?resistant pathogens.

6. FIGURES

Figure 1: QSAR Studies, Molecular Docking, Molecular Dynamics and Synthesis Of Organic Compounds

Figure 2: QSAR Studies And Experimental Validation of Organic Compounds

CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The Author Declares No Conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. Talapatra S.N., Misra D., Banerjee K., Banerjee P., Swarnakar S.; International Journal of Advanced Research; Kolkata, India; 2015; Vol. 3(6): 225–240.
  2. Chatterjee M., Roy K.; Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts (RSC); Kolkata, India; 2024; Vol. 26: 105–118.
  3. Syahri J., Suwantono, Nasution H., Nurohmah B.A., Yuanita E.; AIP Conference Proceedings; Yogyakarta, Indonesia; 2020; Vol. 2243(1): 020029.
  4. Syahri J., et al.; Medicinal Chemistry Research (Springer); Switzerland; 2017; Vol. 26(8): 1882–1895.
  5. Roy K., Kar S., Das R.N.; A Primer on QSAR/QSPR Modelling: Fundamental Concepts; Springer, Switzerland; 2015; pp. 1–30.
  6. Hansch C., Fujita T.; Journal of the American Chemical Society; Washington, USA; 1964; Vol. 86(8): 1616–1626.
  7. Medellín Luna M.F., Hernández López H., Castañeda Delgado J.E., Martínez Gutierrez F., Lara Ramírez E., Espinoza Rodríguez J.J., García Cruz S., Portales Pérez D.P., Cervantes Villagrana A.R.; Molecules (MDPI); San Luis Potosí, Mexico; 2023; Vol. 28(16): 6018
  8. Roy, K., & Mitra, I. (2011). QSAR studies on fluoroquinolone toxicity and activity relationships. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. System, 107(1), 1–12.
  9. Sharma, R., & Gupta, S. (2021). QSAR modeling and molecular docking of novel fluoroquinolone derivatives. J. Appl. Pharm. Sciences, 11(6), 45–52.
  10. Verma, J., Khedkar, V. M., & Coutinho, E. C. (2010). 3D-QSAR in drug design—recent advances. Current Topics Medicinal Chemistry, 10(1), 95–115.

Reference

  1. Talapatra S.N., Misra D., Banerjee K., Banerjee P., Swarnakar S.; International Journal of Advanced Research; Kolkata, India; 2015; Vol. 3(6): 225–240.
  2. Chatterjee M., Roy K.; Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts (RSC); Kolkata, India; 2024; Vol. 26: 105–118.
  3. Syahri J., Suwantono, Nasution H., Nurohmah B.A., Yuanita E.; AIP Conference Proceedings; Yogyakarta, Indonesia; 2020; Vol. 2243(1): 020029.
  4. Syahri J., et al.; Medicinal Chemistry Research (Springer); Switzerland; 2017; Vol. 26(8): 1882–1895.
  5. Roy K., Kar S., Das R.N.; A Primer on QSAR/QSPR Modelling: Fundamental Concepts; Springer, Switzerland; 2015; pp. 1–30.
  6. Hansch C., Fujita T.; Journal of the American Chemical Society; Washington, USA; 1964; Vol. 86(8): 1616–1626.
  7. Medellín Luna M.F., Hernández López H., Castañeda Delgado J.E., Martínez Gutierrez F., Lara Ramírez E., Espinoza Rodríguez J.J., García Cruz S., Portales Pérez D.P., Cervantes Villagrana A.R.; Molecules (MDPI); San Luis Potosí, Mexico; 2023; Vol. 28(16): 6018
  8. Roy, K., & Mitra, I. (2011). QSAR studies on fluoroquinolone toxicity and activity relationships. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. System, 107(1), 1–12.
  9. Sharma, R., & Gupta, S. (2021). QSAR modeling and molecular docking of novel fluoroquinolone derivatives. J. Appl. Pharm. Sciences, 11(6), 45–52.
  10. Verma, J., Khedkar, V. M., & Coutinho, E. C. (2010). 3D-QSAR in drug design—recent advances. Current Topics Medicinal Chemistry, 10(1), 95–115.

Photo
Pallavi Gaikwad
Corresponding author

MET’s Institute of Pharmacy, MET Bhujbal Knowledge City, Nashik, Maharashtra, India

Photo
Akshata Shirude
Co-author

MET’s Institute of Pharmacy, MET Bhujbal Knowledge City, Nashik, Maharashtra, India

Photo
Puja Tidke
Co-author

MET’s Institute of Pharmacy, MET Bhujbal Knowledge City, Nashik, Maharashtra, India

Photo
Sakshi Wakte
Co-author

MET’s Institute of Pharmacy, MET Bhujbal Knowledge City, Nashik, Maharashtra, India

Pallavi Gaikwad, Akshata Shirude, Puja Tidke, Sakshi Wakte, QSAR Modelling of Fluoroquinolone Antibiotics to Enhance Antibacterial Activity, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 12, 3562-3565. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18046198

More related articles
A Study on Antibiotics Usage Trends: Insights from...
Dr. Priyanka Anil, Gattipalli Vaishale , Huma Fareha , Rendla Rak...
Design, Synthesis, Characterisation and Biological...
S. Jothilingam, N. Irfan, L. Gopi, ...
Lantibiotics: A Review of Their Structure, Mechani...
Sumaiya Iram, Parthasarathi Kulkarni, Nagendra R, Venkatesh, Hanu...
Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) on Antibiotics, Adverse Drug Reactions (...
Joice Grace Babuji, Lulu Thasneem, N. M. Niranjana, Wafa Moyin Alungal, C. S. Anjali, R. Kameswaran,...
Molecular Docking, 3D-QSAR, and ADMET Study of 1,2,3-Triazole Derivatives for Mu...
Sonali Anardi, Mansi Pabale, Srushti Thasale, Omshree Konda, Avinash Kadale, Sahil Galinde, ...
Related Articles
A Review on Antibiotics Resistance : A Growing Threat ...
Shubham Bansode, Aniket Raje Ghadage, Onkar Korade, Dr. R. R. Bendgude, ...
Computational Modelling of Pyridopyrimidine Scaffolds; Unlocking New Successors ...
Sreeja S., Vani V., A. B. Abin, S. R. Anchu, V. S. Athira, L. Venkitachalam, K. Nandhini, ...
The Prescribing Pattern of Antibiotics Agents in Adult Population Using WHO AWaR...
Renushri B.V., Umea Hani B., Dinesh Kumar V., Mohammed Mateen Maaz, ...
QSAR and Molecular Docking Studies for Anticancer Drug Targeting BCL-2...
Ashwini P. Kale, Yashanjali R. Abhale, Pallavi N. Pawar, ...
A Study on Antibiotics Usage Trends: Insights from Drug Utilization Evaluation...
Dr. Priyanka Anil, Gattipalli Vaishale , Huma Fareha , Rendla Rakesh , Jadur Shruthi , ...
More related articles
A Study on Antibiotics Usage Trends: Insights from Drug Utilization Evaluation...
Dr. Priyanka Anil, Gattipalli Vaishale , Huma Fareha , Rendla Rakesh , Jadur Shruthi , ...
Lantibiotics: A Review of Their Structure, Mechanism and Biomedical Applications...
Sumaiya Iram, Parthasarathi Kulkarni, Nagendra R, Venkatesh, Hanumanthachar Joshi, ...
A Study on Antibiotics Usage Trends: Insights from Drug Utilization Evaluation...
Dr. Priyanka Anil, Gattipalli Vaishale , Huma Fareha , Rendla Rakesh , Jadur Shruthi , ...
Lantibiotics: A Review of Their Structure, Mechanism and Biomedical Applications...
Sumaiya Iram, Parthasarathi Kulkarni, Nagendra R, Venkatesh, Hanumanthachar Joshi, ...