View Article

Abstract

Targeted drug delivery systems represent a revolutionary approach in modern pharmacology, designed to enhance therapeutic efficacy while minimizing adverse effects. The causes for adopting such systems stem from the limitations of conventional drug administration, including poor bioavailability, systemic toxicity, and non-specific distribution. By directing drugs specifically to diseased cells or tissues, targeted delivery offers significant advantages such as reduced side effects, improved patient compliance, and enhanced treatment outcomes, though challenges like high cost, complexity, and potential immune reactions remain. An ideal targeted drug delivery system should exhibit biocompatibility, stability, controlled release, and the ability to bypass biological barriers. Carriers play a pivotal role in drug targeting, with diverse nanostructures such as niosomes, nanotubes, nanoparticles, liposomes, and dendrimers serving as vehicles to encapsulate and transport drugs effectively. Each carrier type offers unique properties in terms of stability, drug-loading capacity, and release mechanisms. In conclusion, targeted drug delivery systems hold immense promise in transforming therapeutic practices by achieving site-specific action, reducing systemic toxicity, and improving overall treatment efficiency. Continued advancements in nanotechnology, biomaterials, and molecular biology are expected to overcome current limitations and expand the clinical applications of these systems, such as enhancing the precision of drug delivery to specific tissues and improving patient outcomes in various diseases. As researchers explore innovative strategies and materials, the integration of real-time monitoring and feedback mechanisms may further optimize these systems, potentially allowing for adjustments in drug delivery based on patient responses and improving the effectiveness of treatments.

Keywords

drug targeting, advanced drug delivery, site-specific action, enhanced pharmaceutical effectiveness, reduced side effects, lower dosage requirements.

Introduction

1.1 Targeted Drug Delivery System:

Targeted drug delivery is considered an effective and innovative system for administering medication to patients. In conventional drug delivery, the process occurs through absorption across biological membranes. In contrast, targeted release systems are designed to discharge the drug in a controlled and specific manner, ensuring precise dosage at the intended site [1, 2].

The effectiveness of this drug-receptor binding is compromised unless the drug reaches the target location at an optimal concentration and rate, ensuring minimal side effects while maximizing therapeutic benefits [3].

These challenges fall under pharmacokinetics-the way drugs move through and interact with the body [4]. This not only enhances effectiveness but also minimizes harm to healthy tissues. For these reasons, targeted drug delivery systems are considered a more efficient, safer, and smarter approach compared to conventional drug delivery methods [4, 5].

The following design factors must be considered when establishing a targeted release system: the disease, the targeted site, the drug's adverse effects, the drug's delivery channel, and the drug's qualities [6, 7, 4].

First, the drug must be properly loaded into a suitable carrier. Next, this carrier should be able to avoid the body’s natural defenses and degrading secretions, allowing it to circulate longer and reach the intended destination. Since different areas of the body have unique needs, the choice of delivery system depends on the route being used [8,9].

 

 

Figure 1 : Drug Targeting

 

1.2 Scheme and Rationale for Drug Targeting:

Core principle: deliver a high drug concentration to the target organ/tissue/cells while keeping levels low in healthy sites, to maximize therapeutic effect and minimize side effects, dose, and off-target interactions [10]. 

 

 

 

Figure 2 : Scheme and Rationale For Drug Targeting

 

1.3 Reasons For Site-Specific Delivery Of Drugs:[11]

  • Drug instability in traditional dosage forms
  • Low solubility and absorption
  • Elevated membrane binding
  • Instability in biological systems
  • Short half-life
  • Large volume of distribution
  • Insufficient specificity

1.4 Causes of using the targeted drug delivery systems:[12]

There are several reasons for the application of a targeted drug delivery system, as conventional drugs may:

  • Break down easily, making them less stable.
  • Not be absorbed well by the body.
  • Have short-lived effects due to a short half-life.
  • Spread widely once in the body, leading to a large volume of distribution.
  • Lack selectivity, allowing them to act on unintended targets.
  • Have a narrow margin of safety, meaning the difference between an effective dose and a harmful one is small.

2. CHARACTERISTICS OF TARGETED DRUG DELIVERY

Targeted drug delivery aims to concentrate a drug at a specific site (organ, tissue, cell, or organelle) while minimizing exposure to healthy tissue, thereby improving efficacy and reducing side effects [13,14 ].

  • Ideal carriers should meet the following criteria:
  • They should be biochemically inert.
  • They should be non-immunogenic.
  • They must be chemically and physically stable both in vitro and in vivo.
  • The amount of drug released should be therapeutic.
  • There should be minimal drug leakage during transit.
  • Carriers should be easily removed from the body or biodegradable.
  • The delivery system should be affordable, reproducible, and easy to set up.
  • The drug should have a wide margin of safety, or the system must minimize risks if the margin is narrow.
  • During transportation, there should be as little drug loss as possible [15-17].

3. ADVANTAGE AND DISADVANTAGE OF TARGETED DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM

 

Table 1 : Advantage and Disadvantage of Targeted Drug Delivery System

Advantages of drug targeting:-[18]

Disadvantages of drug targeting:-[19]

 
  1. Simplified Drug Administration Protocol
  2. Reduced Drug Toxicity
  3. Effective Response with a Smaller Dose
  4. Avoidance of First-Pass Metabolism
  5. Improved Absorption at the Target Site
  6. Stable Plasma Concentration
  7. Enhanced Patient Compliance
  8. Prolonged Drug Action
  9. Reduced Frequency of Administration
  10. Minimized Systemic Distribution
  11. Better Therapeutic Index
  12. Improved Treatment of Chronic Diseases
  13. Lower Risk of Drug Resistance
  1. Rapid Drug Elimination
  2. Immune Response to Carriers
  3. Insufficient Localization at Tumor Tissue
  4. Diffusion and Redistribution of Released Drugs
  5. High Expertise Required
  6. Toxicity at Target Site
  7. Difficulty in Product Stability
  8. High Cost of Development
  9. Limited Availability of Suitable Carriers
  10. Complex Regulatory Approval
  11. Risk of Premature Drug Release
  12. Patient-Specific Variability
  13. Potential for Accumulation in Non-Target Organs

 

4. STRATEGIES FOR DRUG TARGETING

There are several strategies for drug targeting as shown by Figure 3 which include:

              

 

 

 

Figure 3: Strategies for Drug Targeting

 

Table 2 : Strategies of Drug Targeting with Examples:-[34-39]

Strategy

Principle

Mechanism

Examples

Passive targeting

Drug accumulates at diseased site due to physiological factors (EPR effect)

Leaky tumor vasculature, poor lymphatic drainage, nanoparticle size (10–200 nm)

Doxorubicin loaded in Doxil;

PLGA nanoparticles carrying paclitaxel

Active targeting

Surface-modified carrier binds to specific receptors overexpressed on target cells

Ligand–receptor interaction (antibody, peptide, folate, transferrin)

Trastuzumab conjugated nanoparticles for HER2+ breast cancer

Inverse targeting

RES (reticuloendothelial system) uptake is avoided to increase circulation time

Surface modification (e.g., PEGylation) to evade macrophage uptake

PEGylated liposomes like Doxil

Physical targeting

Drug delivery controlled by external physical stimuli

 

Magnetic field, ultrasound, hyperthermia, light

Local tumor therapy

Magnetic nanoparticles guided by external magnet; gold nanoparticles activated by NIR light

Ligand-Mediated Targeting

Specific ligand attached to carrier to recognize target cell receptors

Folate receptor, transferrin receptor, integrins

Folic acid-coated liposomes; transferrin-conjugated nanoparticles for brain targeting

Dual Targeting

Combines two targeting mechanisms (e.g., passive + active)

EPR effect + ligand-mediated binding

Folate-targeted PEGylated liposomes delivering paclitaxel

Double Targeting

Targets two different receptors or tissues simultaneously

Two ligands attached to same carrier

Nanoparticles conjugated with folate + transferrin

 

4.1 Passive targeting

Pharmaceutical methods of administration that target the medicine to the systemic circulation are commonly referred to as passive targeting [20]. The enhanced permeation and retention (EPR) effect is the name given to this phenomenon [21]. Opsonins immediately coat the nanoparticle's surface and deliver it to the liver, spleen, and RES organs [22, 23 ].

4.2 Active targeting

This method involves identifying a targeting ligand and attaching it to the receptors in the target cells on the drug delivery system's surface [24]. The targeting ligands consist of albumin proteins, antibodies, and bioadhesive nonionic surfactants [25].

This active targeting approach has different levels [24,  25 ]:

  • First-order targeting
  • Second-order targeting
  • Third-order targeting

4.3 Inverse targeting

The goal of inverse targeting is to prevent the reticuloendothelial system (RES) from passively absorbing the drug delivery mechanism [26,27] . This technique can be accomplished by injecting large amounts of a blank drug delivery system or large molecules of dextran sulfate to saturate the RES and suppress the defense mechanism, thereby suppressing the normal absorption function of the RES [28].

4.4 Dual targeting

Dual targeting increases the therapeutic impact of medication delivery by using a mixture of encapsulated medicines in the carrier [29].

4.5 Double targeting

Double targeting is a type of dual-location targeting (spatial) and action-phase targeting (temporal) [30]. When temporal and spatial methodologies are combined to target a carrier system, it may be called double targeting [31].

4.6 Physical targeting

Physical targeting uses environmental changes such as pH, system temperature, light intensity, magnetic fields, electric fields, or ionic strength, along with other specific stimuli like glucose or gas concentrations, to deliver the drug carrier to a predefined location [32].

4.7 Ligand-mediated targeting

This drug targeting method requires specific receptors to take up both natural low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles and synthetic microemulsions containing LDL particles with attached Apo proteins [33].

5. CARRIERS OF DRUG TARGETING

5.1 Vesicular system

5.1.1 NIOSOMES:

Niosomes are vesicular systems formed from non-ionic surfactants, capable of encapsulating both hydrophilic and lipophilic drugs. Unlike liposomes, they exhibit greater stability due to the intrinsic properties of their surfactant components. Their versatility has made them valuable carriers for the targeted delivery of antiviral, antibacterial, antifungal, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer agents [40,41].

Their amphiphilic nature enables them to encapsulate both types of drugs: hydrophilic compounds within the aqueous core and hydrophobic molecules within the non-polar bilayer region. This dual entrapment capacity makes niosomes effective carriers for a wide range of therapeutic agents [42].

 

Figure 4 : Structure of Niosomes

 

  • Method of preparatiion of Niosomes:-

 

 

 

Figure 5 : Method of preparation of Niosomes

 

i. Ether Injection Method

  • Niosomes are produced by gradually adding a surfactant solution (dissolved in diethyl ether) into warm water maintained at 60 °C.
  • The ether mixture is injected into the aqueous drug solution using a 14-gauge needle.
  • As the ether vaporizes, single-layer vesicles are formed.The resulting vesicles typically range in size from 50 to 1000 nm, depending on the preparation conditions [43,44,45].

 

Figure 6: Niosome preparation by ether injection method

 

ii. The Bubble Method

  • A bubbling unit is used for temperature control, employing a round-bottom flask with three necks placed in a water bath.
  • The first neck is connected to a water-cooled reflux system.
  • The second neck holds a thermometer for monitoring.
  • The third neck is attached to a nitrogen supply.
  • At 70 °C, cholesterol and surfactant are dispersed in a buffer solution with a pH of 7.4.
  • The dispersion is mixed for 15 seconds using a high-shear homogenizer.
  • Nitrogen gas is then introduced to generate bubbles at 70 °C, facilitating niosome formation [46].

 

Figure 7:- The Bubble Method

 

iii. Sonication

  • A mixture containing the drug solution, surfactant, and cholesterol in buffer is prepared.
  • Niosomes are generated by sonicating this mixture at 60 °C for 3 minutes using a titanium probe sonicator [47].

5.1.2 Liposomes:

Liposomes are tiny vesicles with a bilayer structure made from natural phospholipids [48,49]. Both hydrophilic and lipophilic medications can be trapped within the phospholipid bilayers or the aqueous space [50,51]. The drug's chemical and physical characteristics, as well as the lipid composition, determine the percentage of entrapped drug. Huwyler et al. investigated tumor-targeting using liposomal anti-tumor drugs [52,53].

 

Figure 10 : Structure of Liposomes

 

  • Preparation of Liposomes:-

 

 

 

 

Figure 11 : Preparation of Liposome

 

1. Mechanical method

  • Thin Film method:

Although the original Bangham et al. approach is currently the most straightforward way to make liposomes, it has certain drawbacks due to its poor encapsulation efficiency. This method creates liposomes by hydrating a thin lipid film in an organic solvent, which is subsequently removed by vacuum-induced film deposition. An aqueous buffer is used to hydrate the solid lipid mixture after all of the solvent has been removed. Lipids hydrate and swell on their own to produce liposomes. A population of MLVs with a diameter of more than one micrometer is produced by this procedure [54].

2. Metod based on replacement of organic solvent

  • Ether vaporization method:

This technique, known as the ether vaporization method, is used in pharmaceutics for the preparation of emulsions. It depends on the swift evaporation of a volatile solvent to create small droplets of the dispersed phase. Based on the solvent chosen, it falls into two categories [55,56,57]:

i. Infusion of Ethanol

In this approach, ethanol is initially mixed with the oil phase (drug or lipid material). The ethanolic mixture is then gradually introduced into the aqueous phase containing an emulsifying agent while stirring continuously. As ethanol diffuses out and partially evaporates, fine droplets form, leading to the creation of an emulsion [58].

ii. Injection of Ether

In this method, ether (a highly volatile solvent) containing the oil phase is injected into the aqueous phase. Because of ether’s low boiling point, it quickly evaporates, causing the creation of very fine droplets and thus forming an emulsion. The rapid solvent evaporation contributes to reducing globule size [59].

5.2 Polymeric system

5.2.1 Dendrimers:

Synthetic particles with a specific diameter are called dendrimers [60]. They are made up of polymer layers encircling a central core [61]. The medication may bind to the dendrimers at a number of different locations on their surface [62]. They are employed in medical imaging and gene transfection [63].

Mechanism of Action Dendrimers: [64-67]

Dendrimers like PAMAM encapsulate or conjugate drugs, circulate systemically, and target cells via passive (EPR effect) or active (ligand-based) mechanisms.

Once internalized, they escape endosomes, release drugs intracellularly, achieve site-specific therapy with reduced toxicity, and are eliminated through renal excretion or biodegradation.

5.2.2 Hydrogels:

Hydrogels are hydrophilic polymeric networks that can absorb large amounts of water and undergo appropriate swelling and shrinking to provide controlled medication delivery. They are exceptionally appealing biocompatible drug delivery vehicles because of their porosity and compatibility with aqueous environments [68].

Table : 3 Common targeted applications

Targeted Area

Mechanism / Benefit

Commerical example

Cancer

Provides high local drug concentration at tumor site; may respond to tumor microenvironment (pH, enzymes, etc.).

Eligard (Prostate Cancer)[69]

Ophthalmic

Extends drug residence time on ocular surface or within vitreous cavity; sustained anti-inflammatory effect.

Dextenza (Post –operative pain/inflammation)[70]

5.3 Biological carriers:-

5.3.1 Monoclonal Antibodies

Monoclonal antibodies are highly specific proteins that bind to unique antigens, making them powerful tools for detecting and neutralizing pathogens or toxins. They are widely used in assays to measure targets, kill microbes, and clump or precipitate antigens [71].Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are a single type of identical immunoglobulin directed against a particular epitope (antigenic determinant) and are produced by clones of a single parent B-cell or a single hybridoma cell line. A hybridoma cell line is formed by the fusion of one B-lymphocyte and one myeloma cell. Some myeloma cells naturally produce single mAb antibodies [72].

 

 

 

Figure 12 :Production of Monoclonal Antibodies

 

5.3.2 Erthyrocytes:-

Human erythrocytes, also known as red blood cells (RBCs), are enucleated, biconcave disk-shaped cells. RBCs have a plasma membrane surface area of about 160 µm[73], a diameter of about 7 µm, and a thickness of about 2 µm. The most prevalent component of blood are erythrocytes; approximately 4–5 million RBCs are present in 1 µL of human blood.

Human erythrocytes have a half-life of 100–120 days. The erythrocyte membrane contains a variety of receptors, proteins, and functional groups that serve as binding sites for drugs, particular ligands, and antibodies[74,75].

5.4 Inorganic Nanoparticles

5.4.1 Gold Nanoparticles

Alzheimer's disease has been targeted with β-amyloid peptides and gold nanoparticles [76]. Additionally, these nanoparticles have demonstrated promise in treating Parkinson's disease when combined with L-Dopa [77]. Metal-based nanoparticles are excellent candidates for use as nanomaterials in medicine due to their physical, chemical, optical, thermal, and biological properties [78].

Examples:-

I. Doxorubicin-Loaded Gold Nanoparticles (Cancer Targeting)[79]

Drug: Doxorubicin

Targeting Ligand: Folic acid

Target Site: Folate receptor–overexpressing cancer cells (e.g., breast, ovarian cancer)

Mechanism: AuNPs conjugated with folic acid bind specifically to folate receptors.

                           ?

      Drug released inside tumor cells.

Outcome: Enhanced cytotoxicity, reduced systemic toxicity

5.5 Particulate system:-

5.5.1 Polymeric Nanoparticles:

Nanoparticles can significantly enhance the effectiveness of drugs by offering better protection and enabling targeted delivery to specific sites in the body[80,81]. Several types of nanoparticles have demonstrated potential in drug delivery, including polymer-based, inorganic, and lipid-derived particles[82,83].

Biodegradable polymeric nanoparticle:-

When considering biomolecules such as proteins and peptides for oral vaccination, biodegradable polymers play a crucial role by either protecting these compounds from the harsh acidic environment of the stomach or providing sustained release. This protection can help reduce the frequency of doses, whether maintenance or booster doses[84].

Example:- Examples of synthetic biodegradable polymers include:-

  • poly(d,l-lactide) (PLA),
  • co-polymer poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA),
  • poly(d,l-glycolide) (PLG),[85]

Mechanisms of polymeric nanoparticles:-

Mechanisms of drug release of polymeric nanoparticles the polymeric drug carriers deliver the drug at the tissue site by any one of the three general physicochemical mechanisms.

(1) By the swelling of the polymer nanoparticles by hydration followed by release through diffusion.

(2) By an enzymatic reaction resulting in rupture or cleavage or degradation of the polymer at site of delivery, there by releasing the drug from the entrapped inner core.

(3) Dissociation of the drug from the polymer and its deadsorption/release from the swelled nanoparticles[86].

Example:-

  • Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)
  • Chitosan nanoparticle

5.6 Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) :-

Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) are lipid nanoparticles which use a solid matrix as their fundamental structure. The production of these particles uses solid lipids to form oil-in-water nanoemulsions [86].Recent research developed SLNs which contained ciprofloxacin (CIP) as an antibacterial agent through the process of ultrasonic melt emulsification[87].

Targeting principle:- Solidified Core Lipid carriers enhance poor solubility drugs, thus enabling sustained release[88].

Example:- SLN-based doxorubicin and curcumin carriers[89].

5.7 Micelles:-

Micelles form when amphiphilic molecules create self-assembled nanoparticles through their spontaneous organization in water. The hydrophobic core of micelles can hold poorly water-soluble medications which results in enhanced stability and improved solubility[90].

Targeting principle:- Hydrophobic drugs can be dissolved using self-assembling amphiphilic block copolymers[91].

Example:- Genexol-PM® (paclitaxel loaded micelles)[92].

5.8 Carbon nanotubes:-

Nanostructures with a cylindrical shape composed of carbon atoms, capable of loading drugs and crossing cell membranes. Enhanced drug capacity, stability, targeted drug delivery[93].

The research examines two main points: the effect of biocompatibility and toxicity which includes pulmonary and hepatic toxicity, and the potential danger of organ accumulation[94].

Targeting principle:- Functionalized CNTs therefore have a very large surface area that can be used to convey genes or drugs to the inside of cells [95,112].

Drug-loading strategies:- Adsorption(combining with some chemical bonds-funtional groups), covalent functionalization, encapsulation[96,97]

Release triggers:- pH, NIR light, enzymatic[98,99]

Example:- CNT–doxorubicin conjugates[100]

5.9 Quantum dots:-

Quantum dots (QDs) are semiconductor nanoparticles that range in size from 1 to 10 nm [101,102].

Their compact size is responsible for their long photostability, great brightness, and restricted emission spectrum[103,104,105] . QDs are employed in biomedicine, optoelectronics, electronics, and catalysis [106-107].

QDs are divided into two categories based on their composition: compound semiconductors like CdSe, CdTe, lead sulfide (PbS), lead selenide (PbSe), and carbon compounds, or single-element materials like silicon and germanium[108,109].

Example:-     

  • Doxorubicin-loaded ZnO quantum dots coupled with chitosan and folate

       Efficient drug entrapment (~99%).

  • used for imaging and targeted cancer treatment[110,111].

6. APPLICATION OF TARGETED DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM

6.1 Cancer Therapy (Oncology)[113,114,115]

This technology is being evaluated for cancer therapy. Nanoshells are tuned to absorb infrared rays when exposed from a source outside the body and get heated and cause destruction of the tissue. This has been studied in both in vitro and in vivo experiments on various cell lines[116].

6.2 Diagnostic Applications:

Monoclonal antibodies have revolutionized the laboratory diagnosis of various diseases. For this purpose, MAbs may be employed as diagnostic reagents for biochemical analysis or as tools for diagnostic imaging of diseases[117].

(A) MAbs in Biochemical Analysis

(B) MAbs in Diagnostic Imaging[118]

6.3 Cardiovascular Diseases :-

Cardiovascular applications, targeted delivery systems frequently make use of particular markers expressed in diseased vessels or combine magnetic guidance for targeted medication administration. The creation of injectable systems that react to particular pathological conditions, like pH shifts or cardiovascular disease-related enzyme levels, have made more accurat e therapeutic measures [119,120].

6.4 Infectious Diseases :-

Targeted delivery systems have profoundly influenced the management of infectious diseases by facilitating more efficient delivery of antimicrobial agents. These systems can improve drug penetration into infected tissues and intracellular pathogens, potentially addressing antimicrobial resistance mechanisms[121,122].

6.5 Inflammatory Diseases:-

Targeted drug delivery systems improve treatment of inflammatory diseases by directing drugs precisely to affected tissues.

In rheumatoid arthritis, they enhance drug accumulation in inflamed joints using passive and active targeting[123].

Inflammation-responsive carriers release drugs selectively at disease sites, boosting efficacy.

Long-acting formulations reduce dosing frequency and improve patient compliance[124].

For inflammatory bowel disease, colon-specific systems protect drugs until reaching inflamed tissue, minimizing side effects[125].

6.6 Neurological Disorders

The management of neurological diseases poses distinct challenges because of the blood-brain barrier. Targeted delivery mechanisms tailored for central nervous system applications have demonstrated advancements in improving drug delivery to the brain. These mechanisms frequently utilize specific targeting ligands that aid in crossing the BBB via receptor-mediated transcytosis [126].

7. CHALLENGES AND LIMITATIONS OF TARGETED DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (TDDS)

Targeted drug delivery systems are designed to deliver drugs specifically to diseased tissues or cells. However, several scientific and technological challenges limit their clinical effectiveness.

I. Biological Barriers:-

A key challenge is the existence of biological obstacles that hinder drug delivery systems from accessing the intended site.

Such barriers consist of the blood–brain barrier (BBB), the thick tumor extracellular matrix, and the immune system's clearance mechanisms. These obstacles decrease the effectiveness of nanoparticle or carrier build-up within the target tissue[127].

II. Rapid Clearance by the Immune System:-

The reticuloendothelial system (RES), particularly in the liver and spleen, commonly identifies nanoparticles and other carriers as foreign particles. This leads to rapid removal from circulation and reduces drug delivery to the target tissue[128].

III. Limited Targeting Efficiency:-

Drug delivery systems often face the challenge of limited targeting efficiency. Even when advanced ligand-mediated strategies are employed- such as using antibodies, peptides, or receptor-specific molecules to guide carriers toward diseased tissues—the majority of the administered therapeutic agents fail to reach the intended destination [129].

IV. Toxicity and Safety Issues:-

Nanocarrier-based drug delivery systems often encounter significant toxicity and safety challenges that hinder their progress toward widespread clinical application. Certain classes of nanomaterials-such as dendrimers, quantum dots, and specific synthetic polymers-have been reported to induce adverse biological effects. These may include direct cytotoxicity, unintended immunogenic responses, or the potential for long-term accumulation within vital organs and tissues[130].

V. Stability and Drug Leakage:-

One of the persistent challenges in nanomedicine is the issue of stability and drug leakage from carrier systems. Drug delivery vehicles such as liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, and other nanoscale formulations are often prone to structural instability, which can manifest in several problematic ways. For instance, premature drug leakage may occur during storage or upon exposure to biological fluids, leading to a significant reduction in the amount of therapeutic agent available at the intended site of action[131].

VI. High Production Cost and Complex Manufacturing:-

High production costs and complex manufacturing processes frequently hinder the development of advanced targeted drug delivery systems. Unlike conventional pharmaceutical formulations, these innovative nanocarriers demand sophisticated preparation methods that involve multiple stages of synthesis, functionalization, and Only through such innovations can the balance between affordability and therapeutic sophistication be achieved , paving the way for broader accessibility and real-world application [132].

VII. Regulatory and Clinical Translation Challenges:-

Only a limited number of targeted nanomedicines have successfully progressed into clinical practice, largely because the pathway to regulatory approval is highly demanding. Before such therapies can be authorized , they must undergo extensive investigations into safety, pharmacokinetics, and potential toxicity. These studies are not only rigorous but also require significant financial investment and long periods of evaluation. As a result, the overall process becomes both costly and time-consuming, slowing down the translation of promising nanocarrier technologies from the laboratory to real-world medical use [133,134].                                                    CONCLUSION

Targeted Drug Delivery Systems (TDDS) represent a major advancement in pharmaceutical science, designed to deliver drugs directly to diseased tissues while minimizing exposure to healthy cells. The central aim is to improve therapeutic efficacy and reduce side effects by using strategies such as passive targeting, which exploits physiological features like the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect, and active targeting, which employs ligands such as antibodies or peptides to bind specifically to target cells. The choice of drug carriers is critical, with liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, dendrimers, and lipid-based nanoparticles widely used for their ability to encapsulate drugs, protect them from degradation, and enable controlled release. These carriers also enhance drug solubility, stability, and bioavailability, making them versatile tools in modern medicine.

The efficiency of TDDS depends on several factors, including the physicochemical properties of the drug, particle size, surface charge, ligand–receptor interactions, and biological barriers such as the immune system or blood–brain barrier. Proper optimization of these parameters ensures precise targeting and sustained therapeutic outcomes. Recent advances in nanotechnology and biotechnology have introduced innovations like stimuli-responsive nanoparticles, surface-modified carriers, and gene delivery systems, which expand the potential of TDDS in treating complex diseases such as cancer, neurological disorders, and genetic conditions.

Looking ahead, TDDS are expected to play a pivotal role in personalized and precision medicine, offering tailored treatments for individual patients. Despite challenges in large-scale production, regulatory approval, and long-term safety, ongoing research in nanomedicine and biomaterials promises safer and more efficient drug delivery platforms. Overall, TDDS hold immense promise for revolutionizing disease management and improving patient outcomes.

REFERENCES

  1. Muller RH, Keck CM. Challenges and solutions for the delivery of biotech drugs–a review of drug nanocrystal technology and lipid nanoparticles. Journal of biotechnology. 2004 Sep 30;113(1-3):151-70.
  2. Allen TM, Cullis PR. Drug delivery systems: entering the mainstream. Science. 2004 Mar 19;303(5665):1818-22.
  3. Rani K. A review on targeted drug delivery: Its entire focus on advanced therapeutics and diagnostics.
  4. Vyas SP, Khar RK. Basis of targeted drug delivery. Targeted and controlled Drug Delivery, CBS Publishers and Distributors Reprint. 2008;74:42-6.
  5. Bhattacharyya P, Sastry HG, Marriboyina V, Sharma R, editors. Smart and Innovative Trends in Next Generation Computing Technologies: Third International Conference, NGCT 2017, Dehradun, India, October 30-31, 2017, Revised Selected Papers, Part I. Springer; 2018 Jun 8.
  6. Muller RH, Keck CM. Challenges and solutions for the delivery of biotech drugs–a review of drug nanocrystal technology and lipid nanoparticles. Journal of biotechnology. 2004 Sep 30;113(1-3):151-70.
  7. Sameera A, Erugula SR, Nellore VK, Sudhir MV, Kumar AS, Chandrababu VR. A review of literature on Targeted Drug Delivery Systems for the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer and strategies of targeting cancer.
  8. Nahak CK, Nahak A, Padhy DP, NarayanaPadhy A, Kumar KS. An Overview on Targeted Drug Delivery Systems. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Life Sciences: Volume. 2024 Jan;5(1):29-37.
  9. Choudhary P, Singh S. Targeted Drug Delivery. InBiotechnology in the Modern Medicinal System 2021 Dec 22 (pp. 55-74). Apple Academic Press.
  10. Tewabe A, Abate A, Tamrie M, Seyfu A, Abdela Siraj E. Targeted drug delivery—from magic bullet to nanomedicine: principles, challenges, and future perspectives. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2021 Jul 5:1711-24.
  11. Gujral S, Khatri S. A review on basic concept of drug targeting and drug carrier system. Int. J. Adv. Pharm. Biol. Chem. 2013 Jan;2(1).
  12. Misra A, Shahiwala A. Novel drug delivery technologies. Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany; 2019.
  13. Adepu S, Ramakrishna S. Controlled drug delivery systems: current status and future directions. Molecules. 2021 Sep 29;26(19):5905.
  14. Zhao Z, Ukidve A, Kim J, Mitragotri S. Targeting strategies for tissue-specific drug delivery. Cell. 2020 Apr 2;181(1):151-67.
  15. Molema G, Meijer DK. Drug targeting: organ-specific strategies. (No Title). 2001.
  16. Köhler G, Milstein C. Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. nature. 1975 Aug 7;256(5517):495-7.
  17. Gujral S, Khatri S. A review on basic concept of drug targeting and drug carrier system. Int. J. Adv. Pharm. Biol. Chem. 2013 Jan;2(1).
  18. Vyas SP, Khar RK. Basis of targeted drug delivery. Targeted and controlled Drug Delivery, CBS Publishers and Distributors Reprint. 2008;74:42-6.
  19. Torchilin VP. Drug targeting. European journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2000 Oct 1;11:S81-91.
  20. Yokoyama M. Drug targeting with nano-sized carrier systems. Journal of Artificial Organs. 2005 Aug;8(2):77-84.
  21. M Rabanel J, Aoun V, Elkin I, Mokhtar M, Hildgen P. Drug-loaded nanocarriers: passive targeting and crossing of biological barriers. Current medicinal chemistry. 2012 Jul 1;19(19):3070-102.
  22. Yadav KS, Mishra DK, Deshpande A, Pethe AM. Levels of drug targeting. InBasic fundamentals of drug delivery 2019 Jan 1 (pp. 269-305). Academic Press.
  23. Agnihotri J, Saraf S, Khale A. Targeting: new potential carriers for targeted drug delivery system. International Journal of pharmaceutical sciences Review and Research. 2011;8(2):117-23.
  24. Bhargav E, Madhuri N, Ramesh K, Manne A, Ravi V. Targeted drug delivery-a review. World J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2013;3(1):150-69.
  25. Schneider CM, Mihaljev T, Herrmann HJ. Inverse targeting—An effective immunization strategy. EPL (Europhysics Letters). 2012 May 1;98(4):46002.
  26. Balthasar JP, Fung HL. Inverse targeting of peritoneal tumors: Selective alteration of the disposition of methotrexate through the use of anti?methotrexate antibodies and antibody fragments. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 1996 Oct;85(10):1035-43.
  27. Bhargav E, Madhuri N, Ramesh K, Manne A, Ravi V. Targeted drug delivery-a review. World J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2013;3(1):150-69.
  28. Prabahar K, Alanazi Z, Qushawy M. Targeted drug delivery system: Advantages, carriers and strategies. Indian J. Pharm. Educ. Res. 2021 Apr 1;55(2):346-53.
  29. Wanunu M. Nanopores: A journey towards DNA sequencing. Physics of life reviews. 2012 Jun 1;9(2):125-58.
  30. Bhargav E, Madhuri N, Ramesh K, Manne A, Ravi V. Targeted drug delivery-a review. World J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2013;3(1):150-69.
  31. Dunuweera SP, Rajapakse RM, Rajapakshe RB, Wijekoon SH, Nirodha Thilakarathna MG, Rajapakse RM. Review on targeted drug delivery carriers used in nanobiomedical applications. Current Nanoscience. 2019 Aug 1;15(4):382-97.
  32. Vyas SP, Sihorkar V. Endogenous carriers and ligands in non-immunogenic site-specific drug delivery. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2000 Sep 30;43(2-3):101-64.
  33. Danhier F, Feron O, Préat V. To exploit the tumor microenvironment: Passive and active tumor targeting of nanocarriers for anti-cancer drug delivery. Journal of controlled release. 2010 Dec 1;148(2):135-46.
  34. Khandker SS, Shakil MS, Hossen MS. Gold nanoparticles; potential nanotheranostic agent in breast cancer: a comprehensive review with systematic search strategy. Current Drug Metabolism. 2020 Jul 1;21(8):579-98.
  35. Laura Immordino M, Dosio F, Cattel L. Stealth liposomes: review of the basic science, rationale, and clinical applications, existing and potential. International journal of nanomedicine. 2006 Sep 15;1(3):297-315.
  36. Gupta V, Sengupta M, Prakash J, Tripathy BC. Drug targeting and delivery. InBasic and Applied Aspects of Biotechnology 2016 Oct 23 (pp. 279-303). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
  37. Wang AZ, Langer R, Farokhzad OC. Nanoparticle delivery of cancer drugs. Annual review of medicine. 2012 Feb 18;63(1):185-98.
  38. Mura S, Nicolas J, Couvreur P. Stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for drug delivery. Nature materials. 2013 Nov;12(11):991-1003.
  39. Moghassemi S, Hadjizadeh A. Nano-niosomes as nanoscale drug delivery systems: an illustrated review. Journal of controlled release. 2014 Jul 10;185:22-36.
  40. Gurjar P, Naik N, Chouksey S. Niosome: a promising pharmaceutical drug delivery. Int. J. Pharm Anal. 2014;2(5):425-31.
  41. Danhier F, Feron O, Préat V. To exploit the tumor microenvironment: Passive and active tumor targeting of nanocarriers for anti-cancer drug delivery. Journal of controlled release. 2010 Dec 1;148(2):135-46.
  42. Rogerson AC, Cummings J, Willmott N, Florence AT. The distribution of doxorubicin in mice following administration in niosomes. Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology. 1988 May;40(5):337-42.
  43. Moser P, Marchand-Arvier M, Labrude P, Vigneron C. Hemoglobin niosomes. II. In vitro interactions of plasma proteins and phagocytes. Pharmaceutica acta Helvetiae. 1990;65(3):82-92.
  44. Lohumi A, Rawat S, Sarkar S. A novel drug delivery system: niosomes review. J. Drug Deliv. Ther. 2012;2(5):129-35.
  45. Sankhyan A, Pawar P. Recent trends in niosome as vesicular drugdelivery system. Journal of applied pharmaceutical science. 2012 Jun 30(Issue):20-32.
  46. Agnihotri J, Saraf S, Khale A. Targeting: new potential carriers for targeted drug delivery system. International Journal of pharmaceutical sciences Review and Research. 2011;8(2):117-23.
  47. Weiner N, Martin F, Riaz M. Liposomes as a drug delivery system. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy. 1989 Jan 1;15(10):1523-54.
  48. Anwekar H, Patel S, Singhai AK. Liposome-as drug carriers. International journal of pharmacy & life sciences. 2011 Jul 1;2(7).
  49. Heurtault B, Saulnier P, Pech B, Proust JE, Benoit JP. Physico-chemical stability of colloidal lipid particles. Biomaterials. 2003 Oct 1;24(23):4283-300.
  50. Huwyler J, Drewe J, Krähenbühl S. Tumor targeting using liposomal antineoplastic drugs. International journal of nanomedicine. 2008 Dec 1;3(1):21-9.
  51. Allen TM, Cullis PR. Liposomal drug delivery systems: from concept to clinical applications. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2013 Jan 1;65(1):36-48.
  52. Bangham AD, Standish MM, Watkins JC. Diffusion of univalent ions across the lamellae of swollen phospholipids. Journal of molecular biology. 1965 Aug 1;13(1):238-IN27.
  53. Aulton ME, Taylor K, editors. Aulton's pharmaceutics: the design and manufacture of medicines. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013.
  54. Roostaee M, Derakhshani A, Mirhosseini H, Mofakham EB, Fathi-Karkan S, Mirinejad S, Sargazi S, Barani M. Composition, preparation methods, and applications of nanoniosomes as codelivery systems: a review of emerging therapies with emphasis on cancer. Nanoscale. 2024;16(6):2713-46.
  55. Allen TM, Cullis PR. Liposomal drug delivery systems: from concept to clinical applications. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2013 Jan 1;65(1):36-48.
  56. Remington JP. Remington: the science and practice of pharmacy. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.
  57. Florence AT, Whitehill D. The formulation and stability of multiple emulsions. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 1982 Aug 1;11(4):277-308.
  58. Myers VS, Weir MG, Carino EV, Yancey DF, Pande S, Crooks RM. Dendrimer-encapsulated nanoparticles: new synthetic and characterization methods and catalytic applications. Chemical science. 2011;2(9):1632-46.
  59. Nanjwade BK, Bechra HM, Derkar GK, Manvi FV, Nanjwade VK. Dendrimers: emerging polymers for drug-delivery systems. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2009 Oct 8;38(3):185-96.
  60. Garg T, Singh O, Arora S, Murthy R. Dendrimer-a novel scaffold for drug delivery. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2011;7(2):211-20.
  61. Svenson S, Tomalia DA. Dendrimers in biomedical applications—reflections on the field. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2012 Dec 1;64:102-15.
  62. Svenson S, Tomalia DA. Dendrimers in biomedical applications—reflections on the field. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2012 Dec 1;64:102-15.
  63. Tomalia DA, Baker H, Dewald J. A new class of polymers: Starburst-dendritic macromolecules. Polymer journal/Society of Polymer Science, Japan. 2002;34(5-2):132-47.
  64. Kukowska-Latallo JF, Bielinska AU, Johnson J, Spindler R, Tomalia DA, Baker Jr JR. Efficient transfer of genetic material into mammalian cells using Starburst polyamidoamine dendrimers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1996 May 14;93(10):4897-902.
  65. Duncan R, Izzo L. Dendrimer biocompatibility and toxicity. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2005 Dec 14;57(15):2215-37.
  66. Kesharwani P, Jain K, Jain NK. Dendrimer as nanocarrier for drug delivery. Progress in Polymer Science. 2014 Feb 1;39(2):268-307.
  67. Hoare TR, Kohane DS. Hydrogels in drug delivery: Progress and challenges. polymer. 2008 Apr 15;49(8):1993-2007.
  68. Crawford ED, Eisenberger MA, McLeod DG, Spaulding JT, Benson R, Dorr FA, Blumenstein BA, Davis MA, Goodman PJ. A controlled trial of leuprolide with and without flutamide in prostatic carcinoma. New England Journal of Medicine. 1989 Aug 17;321(7):419-24.
  69. Lai JY. Biodegradable in situ gelling delivery systems containing pilocarpine as new antiglaucoma formulations: effect of a mercaptoacetic acid/N-isopropylacrylamide molar ratio. Drug design, development and therapy. 2013 Oct 24:1273-85.
  70. Swami A, Shi J, Gadde S, Votruba AR, Kolishetti N, Farokhzad OC. Nanoparticles for targeted and temporally controlled drug delivery. InMultifunctional nanoparticles for drug delivery applications: imaging, targeting, and delivery 2012 Feb 1 (pp. 9-29). Boston, MA: Springer US.
  71. Lai JY. Biodegradable in situ gelling delivery systems containing pilocarpine as new antiglaucoma formulations: effect of a mercaptoacetic acid/N-isopropylacrylamide molar ratio. Drug design, development and therapy. 2013 Oct 24:1273-85.
  72. Allen TM. Ligand-targeted therapeutics in anticancer therapy. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2002 Oct;2(10):750-63.
  73. Bhateria M, Rachumallu R, Singh R, Bhatta RS. Erythrocytes-based synthetic delivery systems: transition from conventional to novel engineering strategies. Expert opinion on drug delivery. 2014 Aug 1;11(8):1219-36.
  74. Ruff J, Hüwel S, Kogan MJ, Simon U, Galla HJ. The effects of gold nanoparticles functionalized with ß-amyloid specific peptides on an in vitro model of blood–brain barrier. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine. 2017 Jul 1;13(5):1645-52.
  75. Gonzalez-Carter DA, Ong ZY, McGilvery CM, Dunlop IE, Dexter DT, Porter AE. L-DOPA functionalized, multi-branched gold nanoparticles as brain-targeted nano-vehicles. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine. 2019 Jan 1;15(1):1-1.
  76. Hamblin MR, Avci P, editors. Applications of Nanoscience in Photomedicine. Elsevier; 2015 Feb 17.
  77. Samadian H, Hosseini-Nami S, Kamrava SK, Ghaznavi H, Shakeri-Zadeh A. Folate-conjugated gold nanoparticle as a new nanoplatform for targeted cancer therapy. Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology. 2016 Nov;142(11):2217-29.
  78. Huang HC, Barua S, Sharma G, Dey SK, Rege K. Inorganic nanoparticles for cancer imaging and therapy. Journal of controlled Release. 2011 Nov 7;155(3):344-57.
  79. Ulbrich K, Hola K, Subr V, Bakandritsos A, Tucek J, Zboril R. Targeted drug delivery with polymers and magnetic nanoparticles: covalent and noncovalent approaches, release control, and clinical studies. Chemical reviews. 2016 May 11;116(9):5338-431.
  80. Zhang Y, Sun C, Wang C, Jankovic KE, Dong Y. Lipids and lipid derivatives for RNA delivery. Chemical reviews. 2021 Jul 19;121(20):12181-277.
  81. Pattni BS, Chupin VV, Torchilin VP. New developments in liposomal drug delivery. Chemical reviews. 2015 Oct 14;115(19):10938-66.
  82. Haque K, Rana M, Khan MS. Biodegradable nanoparticles for sustainable drug delivery. Biosensors and Nanotheranostics. 2023 May 30;2(1):1-9.
  83. Anju S, Prajitha N, Sukanya VS, Mohanan PV. Materials Today Chemistry. Mater. Today. 2020;16:100236.
  84. Nagavarma BV, Yadav HK, Ayaz AV, Vasudha LS, Shivakumar HG. Different techniques for preparation of polymeric nanoparticles-a review. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2012 Jun;5(3):16-23.
  85. López KL, Ravasio A, González-Aramundiz JV, Zacconi FC. Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) prepared by microwave and ultrasound-assisted synthesis: promising green strategies for the nanoworld. Pharmaceutics. 2023 Apr 25;15(5):1333.
  86. Islam NU, Khan E. Exploring Salts, Co?crystals, Drug Nanoparticles, and Co?Delivery in Formulation Development of Ciprofloxacin: A Review. ChemistrySelect. 2025 Jan;10(2):e202405182.
  87. Queiroz MD, Muehlmann LA. Characteristics and preparation of solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers. Journal of Nanotheranostics. 2024 Nov 25;5(4):188-211.
  88. Sivadasan D, Ramakrishnan K, Mahendran J, Ranganathan H, Karuppaiah A, Rahman H. Solid lipid nanoparticles: applications and prospects in cancer treatment. International journal of molecular sciences. 2023 Mar 24;24(7):6199.
  89. Ghezzi M, Pescina S, Padula C, Santi P, Del Favero E, Cantù L, Nicoli S. Polymeric micelles in drug delivery: An insight of the techniques for their characterization and assessment in biorelevant conditions. Journal of Controlled Release. 2021 Apr 10;332:312-36.
  90. Kontogiannis O, Selianitis D, Lagopati N, Pippa N, Pispas S, Gazouli M. Surfactant and block copolymer nanostructures: from design and development to nanomedicine preclinical studies. Pharmaceutics. 2023 Feb 2;15(2):501.
  91. Binkhathlan Z, Yusuf O, Ali R, Alomrani AH, Alshamsan A, Alshememry AK, Almomen A, Alkholief M, Aljuffali IA, Alqahtani F, Alobid S. Polycaprolactone–Vitamin E TPGS micelles for delivery of paclitaxel: In vitro and in vivo evaluation. International Journal of Pharmaceutics: X. 2024 Jun 1;7:100253.
  92. Sonowal L, Gautam S. Advancements and challenges in carbon nanotube-based drug delivery systems. Nano-Structures & Nano-Objects. 2024 May 1;38:101117.
  93. Brindhadevi K, Garalleh HA, Alalawi A, Al-Sarayreh E, Pugazhendhi A. Carbon nanomaterials: Types, synthesis strategies and their application as drug delivery system for cancer therapy. Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2023 Mar 1;192:108828.
  94. Das S, Roy S, Dinda SC, Bose A, Mahapatra C, Basu B, Prajapati B. Carbon nanotubes in brain targeted drug delivery: A comprehensive review. Results in Chemistry. 2025 May 1;15:102206.
  95. Peng LM. High-performance carbon nanotube thin-film transistor technology. ACS nano. 2023 Nov 13;17(22):22156-66.
  96. Vaidya N, Bhatia AK, Dewangan S. Carbon allotropes in air purification. Carbon Allotropes and Composites: Materials for Environment Protection and Remediation. 2023 Jun 22:191-228.
  97. Nabitabar M, Shaterian M, Danafar H, Enhessari M. Multi-wall carbon Nanotube surface-based functional nanoparticles for stimuli-responsive dual pharmaceutical compound delivery. Scientific Reports. 2024 May 27;14(1):12073.
  98. Alfei S, Reggio C, Zuccari G. Carbon nanotubes as excellent adjuvants for anticancer therapeutics and cancer diagnosis: a plethora of laboratory studies versus few clinical trials. Cells. 2025 Jul 9;14(14):1052.
  99. Singhal S, Gupta M, Alam MS, Javed MN, Ansari JR. Carbon allotropes-based nanodevices: graphene in biomedical applications. InNanotechnology 2022 Mar 2 (pp. 241-269). CRC Press.
  100. Fang M, Peng CW, Pang DW, Li Y. Quantum dots for cancer research: current status, remaining issues, and future perspectives. Cancer Biology & Medicine. 2012 Sep 1;9(3):151-63.
  101. Gao X, Yang L, Petros JA, Marshall FF, Simons JW, Nie S. In vivo molecular and cellular imaging with quantum dots. Current opinion in biotechnology. 2005 Feb 1;16(1):63-72.
  102. Dave S, Das J, Sillanpää M, editors. Nanomaterials and Point of Care Technologies. CRC Press; 2024 Aug 30.
  103. He Z, Zheng X, Liu R, Zhao K, Mao D, Zhang L, Wan R, Zhang H, Wang X. Recent advances in HPV detection: From traditional methods to nanotechnology and the application of quantum dots. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2025 Dec 31:6333-56.
  104. Tripathi D, Hajra K, Maity D. Recent advancement of bio-inspired nanoparticles in cancer theragnostic. Journal of Nanotheranostics. 2023 Jul 24;4(3):299-322.
  105. Navid P, Akbari?Hasanjani HR, Akbari?Hasanjani R. A Comprehensive Study of Quantum Dots: Ranging From Synthesis to Applications in Electrochemical Biosensors in the Detection of Biomolecules, Gastrointestinal Diseases, and Electrophysiology. Nano Select. 2025 Dec;6(12):e70046.
  106. Mansuriya BD, Altintas Z. Carbon Dots: Classification, Properties, Synthesis, Characterization, and Applications in Health Care—An Updated Review (2018–2021). Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2525 [Internet]. 2021.
  107. Rodríguez CF, Guzmán-Sastoque P, Rodriguez-Bazurto C, Rojas-Hernández JC, Reyes LH, Cruz JC. Carbon-Based Nanocarriers: Carbon Nanotubes, Graphene Oxide, Fullerenes, and Carbon Dots. Nanocarriers for Nucleic Acids and Proteins.:141-88.
  108. Sarkar S, Srivastava TP, Sahoo OS, Shankar A, Rai A, Pethusamy K, Dhar R, Karmakar S. Applications of quantum dots in preventive oncology. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention: APJCP. 2024;25(3):747.
  109. Pareek A, Kumar D, Pareek A, Gupta MM. Advancing cancer therapy with quantum dots and other nanostructures: a review of drug delivery innovations, applications, and challenges. Cancers. 2025 Mar 4;17(5):878.
  110. Ramezani Z, Ghalehsardi FK, Noorizadeh S. Classifications of quantum dots and their detection principles in sensing.
  111. Mehra NK, Verma AK, Mishra PR, Jain NK. The cancer targeting potential of D-α-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate tethered multi walled carbon nanotubes. Biomaterials. 2014 May 1;35(15):4573-88.
  112. Allen TM, Cullis PR. Drug delivery systems: entering the mainstream. Science. 2004 Mar 19;303(5665):1818-22.
  113. Peer D, Karp JM, Hong S, Farokhzad OC, Margalit R, Langer R. Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy. Nano-enabled medical applications. 2020 Nov 23:61-91.
  114. Bae YH, Park K. Targeted drug delivery to tumors: myths, reality and possibility. Journal of controlled release. 2011 Aug 10;153(3):198-205.
  115. Panchagnula R, Dey CS. Monoclonal antibodies in drug targeting. Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics. 1997 Jan;22(1):7-19.
  116. Scott AM, Allison JP, Wolchok JD. Monoclonal antibodies in cancer therapy. Cancer immunity. 2012 Jan 1;12(1):14.
  117. Rogerson AC, Cummings J, Willmott N, Florence AT. The distribution of doxorubicin in mice following administration in niosomes. Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology. 1988 May;40(5):337-42.
  118. Coelho JF, Ferreira PC, Alves P, Cordeiro R, Fonseca AC, Góis JR, Gil MH. Drug delivery systems: Advanced technologies potentially applicable in personalized treatments. EPMA journal. 2010 Mar;1(1):164-209.
  119. Lammers T, Kiessling F, Hennink WE, Storm G. Drug targeting to tumors: principles, pitfalls and (pre-) clinical progress. Journal of controlled release. 2012 Jul 20;161(2):175-87.
  120. Zhang L, Pornpattananangkul D, Hu CM, Huang CM. Development of nanoparticles for antimicrobial drug delivery. Current medicinal chemistry. 2010 Feb 1;17(6):585-94.
  121. Huh AJ, Kwon YJ. “Nanoantibiotics”: a new paradigm for treating infectious diseases using nanomaterials in the antibiotics resistant era. Journal of controlled release. 2011 Dec 10;156(2):128-45.
  122. Wang D, Miller SC, Liu XM, Anderson B, Wang XS, Goldring SR. Novel dexamethasone-HPMA copolymer conjugate and its potential application in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis research & therapy. 2007 Jan 18;9(1):R2.
  123. Girdhar V, Patil S, Banerjee S, Singhvi G. Nanocarriers for drug delivery: mini review. Current Nanomedicine (Formerly: Recent Patents on Nanomedicine). 2018 Aug 1;8(2):88-99.
  124. Wilson DS, Dalmasso G, Wang L, Sitaraman SV, Merlin D, Murthy N. Orally delivered thioketal nanoparticles loaded with TNF-α–siRNA target inflammation and inhibit gene expression in the intestines. Nature materials. 2010 Nov;9(11):923-8.
  125. Huang HC, Barua S, Sharma G, Dey SK, Rege K. Inorganic nanoparticles for cancer imaging and therapy. Journal of controlled Release. 2011 Nov 7;155(3):344-57.
  126. Ulbrich K, Hola K, Subr V, Bakandritsos A, Tucek J, Zboril R. Targeted drug delivery with polymers and magnetic nanoparticles: covalent and noncovalent approaches, release control, and clinical studies. Chemical reviews. 2016 May 11;116(9):5338-431.
  127. Zhang Y, Sun C, Wang C, Jankovic KE, Dong Y. Lipids and lipid derivatives for RNA delivery. Chemical reviews. 2021 Jul 19;121(20):12181-277.
  128. Pattni BS, Chupin VV, Torchilin VP. New developments in liposomal drug delivery. Chemical reviews. 2015 Oct 14;115(19):10938-66.
  129. Singh A, Sakure K, Badwaik H. Role of Pullulan and Pullulan-based Polymeric Nanoparticles in Drug Delivery. Drug Delivery Letters. 2026.
  130. Lal N, Rastogi V, Mishra R, Jahan S, Ali H, Bharadwaj S, Goel R, Hashmi RR. Polymeric Nanoparticles: A Promising Pharmaceutical Approach for Advanced Drug Delivery Systems. Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology. 2026.
  131. Gagliardi A, Giuliano E, Venkateswararao E, Fresta M, Bulotta S, Awasthi V, Cosco D. Biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles for drug delivery to solid tumors. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2021 Feb 3;12:601626.
  132. Anju S, Prajitha N, Sukanya VS, Mohanan PV. Materials Today Chemistry. Mater. Today. 2020;16:100236.
  133. Kumari A, Yadav SK, Yadav SC. Biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles based drug delivery systems. Colloids and surfaces B: biointerfaces. 2010 Jan 1;75(1):1-8.

 

Reference

  1. Muller RH, Keck CM. Challenges and solutions for the delivery of biotech drugs–a review of drug nanocrystal technology and lipid nanoparticles. Journal of biotechnology. 2004 Sep 30;113(1-3):151-70.
  2. Allen TM, Cullis PR. Drug delivery systems: entering the mainstream. Science. 2004 Mar 19;303(5665):1818-22.
  3. Rani K. A review on targeted drug delivery: Its entire focus on advanced therapeutics and diagnostics.
  4. Vyas SP, Khar RK. Basis of targeted drug delivery. Targeted and controlled Drug Delivery, CBS Publishers and Distributors Reprint. 2008;74:42-6.
  5. Bhattacharyya P, Sastry HG, Marriboyina V, Sharma R, editors. Smart and Innovative Trends in Next Generation Computing Technologies: Third International Conference, NGCT 2017, Dehradun, India, October 30-31, 2017, Revised Selected Papers, Part I. Springer; 2018 Jun 8.
  6. Muller RH, Keck CM. Challenges and solutions for the delivery of biotech drugs–a review of drug nanocrystal technology and lipid nanoparticles. Journal of biotechnology. 2004 Sep 30;113(1-3):151-70.
  7. Sameera A, Erugula SR, Nellore VK, Sudhir MV, Kumar AS, Chandrababu VR. A review of literature on Targeted Drug Delivery Systems for the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer and strategies of targeting cancer.
  8. Nahak CK, Nahak A, Padhy DP, NarayanaPadhy A, Kumar KS. An Overview on Targeted Drug Delivery Systems. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Life Sciences: Volume. 2024 Jan;5(1):29-37.
  9. Choudhary P, Singh S. Targeted Drug Delivery. InBiotechnology in the Modern Medicinal System 2021 Dec 22 (pp. 55-74). Apple Academic Press.
  10. Tewabe A, Abate A, Tamrie M, Seyfu A, Abdela Siraj E. Targeted drug delivery—from magic bullet to nanomedicine: principles, challenges, and future perspectives. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2021 Jul 5:1711-24.
  11. Gujral S, Khatri S. A review on basic concept of drug targeting and drug carrier system. Int. J. Adv. Pharm. Biol. Chem. 2013 Jan;2(1).
  12. Misra A, Shahiwala A. Novel drug delivery technologies. Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany; 2019.
  13. Adepu S, Ramakrishna S. Controlled drug delivery systems: current status and future directions. Molecules. 2021 Sep 29;26(19):5905.
  14. Zhao Z, Ukidve A, Kim J, Mitragotri S. Targeting strategies for tissue-specific drug delivery. Cell. 2020 Apr 2;181(1):151-67.
  15. Molema G, Meijer DK. Drug targeting: organ-specific strategies. (No Title). 2001.
  16. Köhler G, Milstein C. Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. nature. 1975 Aug 7;256(5517):495-7.
  17. Gujral S, Khatri S. A review on basic concept of drug targeting and drug carrier system. Int. J. Adv. Pharm. Biol. Chem. 2013 Jan;2(1).
  18. Vyas SP, Khar RK. Basis of targeted drug delivery. Targeted and controlled Drug Delivery, CBS Publishers and Distributors Reprint. 2008;74:42-6.
  19. Torchilin VP. Drug targeting. European journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2000 Oct 1;11:S81-91.
  20. Yokoyama M. Drug targeting with nano-sized carrier systems. Journal of Artificial Organs. 2005 Aug;8(2):77-84.
  21. M Rabanel J, Aoun V, Elkin I, Mokhtar M, Hildgen P. Drug-loaded nanocarriers: passive targeting and crossing of biological barriers. Current medicinal chemistry. 2012 Jul 1;19(19):3070-102.
  22. Yadav KS, Mishra DK, Deshpande A, Pethe AM. Levels of drug targeting. InBasic fundamentals of drug delivery 2019 Jan 1 (pp. 269-305). Academic Press.
  23. Agnihotri J, Saraf S, Khale A. Targeting: new potential carriers for targeted drug delivery system. International Journal of pharmaceutical sciences Review and Research. 2011;8(2):117-23.
  24. Bhargav E, Madhuri N, Ramesh K, Manne A, Ravi V. Targeted drug delivery-a review. World J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2013;3(1):150-69.
  25. Schneider CM, Mihaljev T, Herrmann HJ. Inverse targeting—An effective immunization strategy. EPL (Europhysics Letters). 2012 May 1;98(4):46002.
  26. Balthasar JP, Fung HL. Inverse targeting of peritoneal tumors: Selective alteration of the disposition of methotrexate through the use of anti?methotrexate antibodies and antibody fragments. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 1996 Oct;85(10):1035-43.
  27. Bhargav E, Madhuri N, Ramesh K, Manne A, Ravi V. Targeted drug delivery-a review. World J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2013;3(1):150-69.
  28. Prabahar K, Alanazi Z, Qushawy M. Targeted drug delivery system: Advantages, carriers and strategies. Indian J. Pharm. Educ. Res. 2021 Apr 1;55(2):346-53.
  29. Wanunu M. Nanopores: A journey towards DNA sequencing. Physics of life reviews. 2012 Jun 1;9(2):125-58.
  30. Bhargav E, Madhuri N, Ramesh K, Manne A, Ravi V. Targeted drug delivery-a review. World J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2013;3(1):150-69.
  31. Dunuweera SP, Rajapakse RM, Rajapakshe RB, Wijekoon SH, Nirodha Thilakarathna MG, Rajapakse RM. Review on targeted drug delivery carriers used in nanobiomedical applications. Current Nanoscience. 2019 Aug 1;15(4):382-97.
  32. Vyas SP, Sihorkar V. Endogenous carriers and ligands in non-immunogenic site-specific drug delivery. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2000 Sep 30;43(2-3):101-64.
  33. Danhier F, Feron O, Préat V. To exploit the tumor microenvironment: Passive and active tumor targeting of nanocarriers for anti-cancer drug delivery. Journal of controlled release. 2010 Dec 1;148(2):135-46.
  34. Khandker SS, Shakil MS, Hossen MS. Gold nanoparticles; potential nanotheranostic agent in breast cancer: a comprehensive review with systematic search strategy. Current Drug Metabolism. 2020 Jul 1;21(8):579-98.
  35. Laura Immordino M, Dosio F, Cattel L. Stealth liposomes: review of the basic science, rationale, and clinical applications, existing and potential. International journal of nanomedicine. 2006 Sep 15;1(3):297-315.
  36. Gupta V, Sengupta M, Prakash J, Tripathy BC. Drug targeting and delivery. InBasic and Applied Aspects of Biotechnology 2016 Oct 23 (pp. 279-303). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
  37. Wang AZ, Langer R, Farokhzad OC. Nanoparticle delivery of cancer drugs. Annual review of medicine. 2012 Feb 18;63(1):185-98.
  38. Mura S, Nicolas J, Couvreur P. Stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for drug delivery. Nature materials. 2013 Nov;12(11):991-1003.
  39. Moghassemi S, Hadjizadeh A. Nano-niosomes as nanoscale drug delivery systems: an illustrated review. Journal of controlled release. 2014 Jul 10;185:22-36.
  40. Gurjar P, Naik N, Chouksey S. Niosome: a promising pharmaceutical drug delivery. Int. J. Pharm Anal. 2014;2(5):425-31.
  41. Danhier F, Feron O, Préat V. To exploit the tumor microenvironment: Passive and active tumor targeting of nanocarriers for anti-cancer drug delivery. Journal of controlled release. 2010 Dec 1;148(2):135-46.
  42. Rogerson AC, Cummings J, Willmott N, Florence AT. The distribution of doxorubicin in mice following administration in niosomes. Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology. 1988 May;40(5):337-42.
  43. Moser P, Marchand-Arvier M, Labrude P, Vigneron C. Hemoglobin niosomes. II. In vitro interactions of plasma proteins and phagocytes. Pharmaceutica acta Helvetiae. 1990;65(3):82-92.
  44. Lohumi A, Rawat S, Sarkar S. A novel drug delivery system: niosomes review. J. Drug Deliv. Ther. 2012;2(5):129-35.
  45. Sankhyan A, Pawar P. Recent trends in niosome as vesicular drugdelivery system. Journal of applied pharmaceutical science. 2012 Jun 30(Issue):20-32.
  46. Agnihotri J, Saraf S, Khale A. Targeting: new potential carriers for targeted drug delivery system. International Journal of pharmaceutical sciences Review and Research. 2011;8(2):117-23.
  47. Weiner N, Martin F, Riaz M. Liposomes as a drug delivery system. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy. 1989 Jan 1;15(10):1523-54.
  48. Anwekar H, Patel S, Singhai AK. Liposome-as drug carriers. International journal of pharmacy & life sciences. 2011 Jul 1;2(7).
  49. Heurtault B, Saulnier P, Pech B, Proust JE, Benoit JP. Physico-chemical stability of colloidal lipid particles. Biomaterials. 2003 Oct 1;24(23):4283-300.
  50. Huwyler J, Drewe J, Krähenbühl S. Tumor targeting using liposomal antineoplastic drugs. International journal of nanomedicine. 2008 Dec 1;3(1):21-9.
  51. Allen TM, Cullis PR. Liposomal drug delivery systems: from concept to clinical applications. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2013 Jan 1;65(1):36-48.
  52. Bangham AD, Standish MM, Watkins JC. Diffusion of univalent ions across the lamellae of swollen phospholipids. Journal of molecular biology. 1965 Aug 1;13(1):238-IN27.
  53. Aulton ME, Taylor K, editors. Aulton's pharmaceutics: the design and manufacture of medicines. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013.
  54. Roostaee M, Derakhshani A, Mirhosseini H, Mofakham EB, Fathi-Karkan S, Mirinejad S, Sargazi S, Barani M. Composition, preparation methods, and applications of nanoniosomes as codelivery systems: a review of emerging therapies with emphasis on cancer. Nanoscale. 2024;16(6):2713-46.
  55. Allen TM, Cullis PR. Liposomal drug delivery systems: from concept to clinical applications. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2013 Jan 1;65(1):36-48.
  56. Remington JP. Remington: the science and practice of pharmacy. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.
  57. Florence AT, Whitehill D. The formulation and stability of multiple emulsions. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 1982 Aug 1;11(4):277-308.
  58. Myers VS, Weir MG, Carino EV, Yancey DF, Pande S, Crooks RM. Dendrimer-encapsulated nanoparticles: new synthetic and characterization methods and catalytic applications. Chemical science. 2011;2(9):1632-46.
  59. Nanjwade BK, Bechra HM, Derkar GK, Manvi FV, Nanjwade VK. Dendrimers: emerging polymers for drug-delivery systems. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2009 Oct 8;38(3):185-96.
  60. Garg T, Singh O, Arora S, Murthy R. Dendrimer-a novel scaffold for drug delivery. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2011;7(2):211-20.
  61. Svenson S, Tomalia DA. Dendrimers in biomedical applications—reflections on the field. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2012 Dec 1;64:102-15.
  62. Svenson S, Tomalia DA. Dendrimers in biomedical applications—reflections on the field. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2012 Dec 1;64:102-15.
  63. Tomalia DA, Baker H, Dewald J. A new class of polymers: Starburst-dendritic macromolecules. Polymer journal/Society of Polymer Science, Japan. 2002;34(5-2):132-47.
  64. Kukowska-Latallo JF, Bielinska AU, Johnson J, Spindler R, Tomalia DA, Baker Jr JR. Efficient transfer of genetic material into mammalian cells using Starburst polyamidoamine dendrimers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1996 May 14;93(10):4897-902.
  65. Duncan R, Izzo L. Dendrimer biocompatibility and toxicity. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2005 Dec 14;57(15):2215-37.
  66. Kesharwani P, Jain K, Jain NK. Dendrimer as nanocarrier for drug delivery. Progress in Polymer Science. 2014 Feb 1;39(2):268-307.
  67. Hoare TR, Kohane DS. Hydrogels in drug delivery: Progress and challenges. polymer. 2008 Apr 15;49(8):1993-2007.
  68. Crawford ED, Eisenberger MA, McLeod DG, Spaulding JT, Benson R, Dorr FA, Blumenstein BA, Davis MA, Goodman PJ. A controlled trial of leuprolide with and without flutamide in prostatic carcinoma. New England Journal of Medicine. 1989 Aug 17;321(7):419-24.
  69. Lai JY. Biodegradable in situ gelling delivery systems containing pilocarpine as new antiglaucoma formulations: effect of a mercaptoacetic acid/N-isopropylacrylamide molar ratio. Drug design, development and therapy. 2013 Oct 24:1273-85.
  70. Swami A, Shi J, Gadde S, Votruba AR, Kolishetti N, Farokhzad OC. Nanoparticles for targeted and temporally controlled drug delivery. InMultifunctional nanoparticles for drug delivery applications: imaging, targeting, and delivery 2012 Feb 1 (pp. 9-29). Boston, MA: Springer US.
  71. Lai JY. Biodegradable in situ gelling delivery systems containing pilocarpine as new antiglaucoma formulations: effect of a mercaptoacetic acid/N-isopropylacrylamide molar ratio. Drug design, development and therapy. 2013 Oct 24:1273-85.
  72. Allen TM. Ligand-targeted therapeutics in anticancer therapy. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2002 Oct;2(10):750-63.
  73. Bhateria M, Rachumallu R, Singh R, Bhatta RS. Erythrocytes-based synthetic delivery systems: transition from conventional to novel engineering strategies. Expert opinion on drug delivery. 2014 Aug 1;11(8):1219-36.
  74. Ruff J, Hüwel S, Kogan MJ, Simon U, Galla HJ. The effects of gold nanoparticles functionalized with ß-amyloid specific peptides on an in vitro model of blood–brain barrier. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine. 2017 Jul 1;13(5):1645-52.
  75. Gonzalez-Carter DA, Ong ZY, McGilvery CM, Dunlop IE, Dexter DT, Porter AE. L-DOPA functionalized, multi-branched gold nanoparticles as brain-targeted nano-vehicles. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine. 2019 Jan 1;15(1):1-1.
  76. Hamblin MR, Avci P, editors. Applications of Nanoscience in Photomedicine. Elsevier; 2015 Feb 17.
  77. Samadian H, Hosseini-Nami S, Kamrava SK, Ghaznavi H, Shakeri-Zadeh A. Folate-conjugated gold nanoparticle as a new nanoplatform for targeted cancer therapy. Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology. 2016 Nov;142(11):2217-29.
  78. Huang HC, Barua S, Sharma G, Dey SK, Rege K. Inorganic nanoparticles for cancer imaging and therapy. Journal of controlled Release. 2011 Nov 7;155(3):344-57.
  79. Ulbrich K, Hola K, Subr V, Bakandritsos A, Tucek J, Zboril R. Targeted drug delivery with polymers and magnetic nanoparticles: covalent and noncovalent approaches, release control, and clinical studies. Chemical reviews. 2016 May 11;116(9):5338-431.
  80. Zhang Y, Sun C, Wang C, Jankovic KE, Dong Y. Lipids and lipid derivatives for RNA delivery. Chemical reviews. 2021 Jul 19;121(20):12181-277.
  81. Pattni BS, Chupin VV, Torchilin VP. New developments in liposomal drug delivery. Chemical reviews. 2015 Oct 14;115(19):10938-66.
  82. Haque K, Rana M, Khan MS. Biodegradable nanoparticles for sustainable drug delivery. Biosensors and Nanotheranostics. 2023 May 30;2(1):1-9.
  83. Anju S, Prajitha N, Sukanya VS, Mohanan PV. Materials Today Chemistry. Mater. Today. 2020;16:100236.
  84. Nagavarma BV, Yadav HK, Ayaz AV, Vasudha LS, Shivakumar HG. Different techniques for preparation of polymeric nanoparticles-a review. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2012 Jun;5(3):16-23.
  85. López KL, Ravasio A, González-Aramundiz JV, Zacconi FC. Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) prepared by microwave and ultrasound-assisted synthesis: promising green strategies for the nanoworld. Pharmaceutics. 2023 Apr 25;15(5):1333.
  86. Islam NU, Khan E. Exploring Salts, Co?crystals, Drug Nanoparticles, and Co?Delivery in Formulation Development of Ciprofloxacin: A Review. ChemistrySelect. 2025 Jan;10(2):e202405182.
  87. Queiroz MD, Muehlmann LA. Characteristics and preparation of solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers. Journal of Nanotheranostics. 2024 Nov 25;5(4):188-211.
  88. Sivadasan D, Ramakrishnan K, Mahendran J, Ranganathan H, Karuppaiah A, Rahman H. Solid lipid nanoparticles: applications and prospects in cancer treatment. International journal of molecular sciences. 2023 Mar 24;24(7):6199.
  89. Ghezzi M, Pescina S, Padula C, Santi P, Del Favero E, Cantù L, Nicoli S. Polymeric micelles in drug delivery: An insight of the techniques for their characterization and assessment in biorelevant conditions. Journal of Controlled Release. 2021 Apr 10;332:312-36.
  90. Kontogiannis O, Selianitis D, Lagopati N, Pippa N, Pispas S, Gazouli M. Surfactant and block copolymer nanostructures: from design and development to nanomedicine preclinical studies. Pharmaceutics. 2023 Feb 2;15(2):501.
  91. Binkhathlan Z, Yusuf O, Ali R, Alomrani AH, Alshamsan A, Alshememry AK, Almomen A, Alkholief M, Aljuffali IA, Alqahtani F, Alobid S. Polycaprolactone–Vitamin E TPGS micelles for delivery of paclitaxel: In vitro and in vivo evaluation. International Journal of Pharmaceutics: X. 2024 Jun 1;7:100253.
  92. Sonowal L, Gautam S. Advancements and challenges in carbon nanotube-based drug delivery systems. Nano-Structures & Nano-Objects. 2024 May 1;38:101117.
  93. Brindhadevi K, Garalleh HA, Alalawi A, Al-Sarayreh E, Pugazhendhi A. Carbon nanomaterials: Types, synthesis strategies and their application as drug delivery system for cancer therapy. Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2023 Mar 1;192:108828.
  94. Das S, Roy S, Dinda SC, Bose A, Mahapatra C, Basu B, Prajapati B. Carbon nanotubes in brain targeted drug delivery: A comprehensive review. Results in Chemistry. 2025 May 1;15:102206.
  95. Peng LM. High-performance carbon nanotube thin-film transistor technology. ACS nano. 2023 Nov 13;17(22):22156-66.
  96. Vaidya N, Bhatia AK, Dewangan S. Carbon allotropes in air purification. Carbon Allotropes and Composites: Materials for Environment Protection and Remediation. 2023 Jun 22:191-228.
  97. Nabitabar M, Shaterian M, Danafar H, Enhessari M. Multi-wall carbon Nanotube surface-based functional nanoparticles for stimuli-responsive dual pharmaceutical compound delivery. Scientific Reports. 2024 May 27;14(1):12073.
  98. Alfei S, Reggio C, Zuccari G. Carbon nanotubes as excellent adjuvants for anticancer therapeutics and cancer diagnosis: a plethora of laboratory studies versus few clinical trials. Cells. 2025 Jul 9;14(14):1052.
  99. Singhal S, Gupta M, Alam MS, Javed MN, Ansari JR. Carbon allotropes-based nanodevices: graphene in biomedical applications. InNanotechnology 2022 Mar 2 (pp. 241-269). CRC Press.
  100. Fang M, Peng CW, Pang DW, Li Y. Quantum dots for cancer research: current status, remaining issues, and future perspectives. Cancer Biology & Medicine. 2012 Sep 1;9(3):151-63.
  101. Gao X, Yang L, Petros JA, Marshall FF, Simons JW, Nie S. In vivo molecular and cellular imaging with quantum dots. Current opinion in biotechnology. 2005 Feb 1;16(1):63-72.
  102. Dave S, Das J, Sillanpää M, editors. Nanomaterials and Point of Care Technologies. CRC Press; 2024 Aug 30.
  103. He Z, Zheng X, Liu R, Zhao K, Mao D, Zhang L, Wan R, Zhang H, Wang X. Recent advances in HPV detection: From traditional methods to nanotechnology and the application of quantum dots. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2025 Dec 31:6333-56.
  104. Tripathi D, Hajra K, Maity D. Recent advancement of bio-inspired nanoparticles in cancer theragnostic. Journal of Nanotheranostics. 2023 Jul 24;4(3):299-322.
  105. Navid P, Akbari?Hasanjani HR, Akbari?Hasanjani R. A Comprehensive Study of Quantum Dots: Ranging From Synthesis to Applications in Electrochemical Biosensors in the Detection of Biomolecules, Gastrointestinal Diseases, and Electrophysiology. Nano Select. 2025 Dec;6(12):e70046.
  106. Mansuriya BD, Altintas Z. Carbon Dots: Classification, Properties, Synthesis, Characterization, and Applications in Health Care—An Updated Review (2018–2021). Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2525 [Internet]. 2021.
  107. Rodríguez CF, Guzmán-Sastoque P, Rodriguez-Bazurto C, Rojas-Hernández JC, Reyes LH, Cruz JC. Carbon-Based Nanocarriers: Carbon Nanotubes, Graphene Oxide, Fullerenes, and Carbon Dots. Nanocarriers for Nucleic Acids and Proteins.:141-88.
  108. Sarkar S, Srivastava TP, Sahoo OS, Shankar A, Rai A, Pethusamy K, Dhar R, Karmakar S. Applications of quantum dots in preventive oncology. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention: APJCP. 2024;25(3):747.
  109. Pareek A, Kumar D, Pareek A, Gupta MM. Advancing cancer therapy with quantum dots and other nanostructures: a review of drug delivery innovations, applications, and challenges. Cancers. 2025 Mar 4;17(5):878.
  110. Ramezani Z, Ghalehsardi FK, Noorizadeh S. Classifications of quantum dots and their detection principles in sensing.
  111. Mehra NK, Verma AK, Mishra PR, Jain NK. The cancer targeting potential of D-α-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate tethered multi walled carbon nanotubes. Biomaterials. 2014 May 1;35(15):4573-88.
  112. Allen TM, Cullis PR. Drug delivery systems: entering the mainstream. Science. 2004 Mar 19;303(5665):1818-22.
  113. Peer D, Karp JM, Hong S, Farokhzad OC, Margalit R, Langer R. Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy. Nano-enabled medical applications. 2020 Nov 23:61-91.
  114. Bae YH, Park K. Targeted drug delivery to tumors: myths, reality and possibility. Journal of controlled release. 2011 Aug 10;153(3):198-205.
  115. Panchagnula R, Dey CS. Monoclonal antibodies in drug targeting. Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics. 1997 Jan;22(1):7-19.
  116. Scott AM, Allison JP, Wolchok JD. Monoclonal antibodies in cancer therapy. Cancer immunity. 2012 Jan 1;12(1):14.
  117. Rogerson AC, Cummings J, Willmott N, Florence AT. The distribution of doxorubicin in mice following administration in niosomes. Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology. 1988 May;40(5):337-42.
  118. Coelho JF, Ferreira PC, Alves P, Cordeiro R, Fonseca AC, Góis JR, Gil MH. Drug delivery systems: Advanced technologies potentially applicable in personalized treatments. EPMA journal. 2010 Mar;1(1):164-209.
  119. Lammers T, Kiessling F, Hennink WE, Storm G. Drug targeting to tumors: principles, pitfalls and (pre-) clinical progress. Journal of controlled release. 2012 Jul 20;161(2):175-87.
  120. Zhang L, Pornpattananangkul D, Hu CM, Huang CM. Development of nanoparticles for antimicrobial drug delivery. Current medicinal chemistry. 2010 Feb 1;17(6):585-94.
  121. Huh AJ, Kwon YJ. “Nanoantibiotics”: a new paradigm for treating infectious diseases using nanomaterials in the antibiotics resistant era. Journal of controlled release. 2011 Dec 10;156(2):128-45.
  122. Wang D, Miller SC, Liu XM, Anderson B, Wang XS, Goldring SR. Novel dexamethasone-HPMA copolymer conjugate and its potential application in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis research & therapy. 2007 Jan 18;9(1):R2.
  123. Girdhar V, Patil S, Banerjee S, Singhvi G. Nanocarriers for drug delivery: mini review. Current Nanomedicine (Formerly: Recent Patents on Nanomedicine). 2018 Aug 1;8(2):88-99.
  124. Wilson DS, Dalmasso G, Wang L, Sitaraman SV, Merlin D, Murthy N. Orally delivered thioketal nanoparticles loaded with TNF-α–siRNA target inflammation and inhibit gene expression in the intestines. Nature materials. 2010 Nov;9(11):923-8.
  125. Huang HC, Barua S, Sharma G, Dey SK, Rege K. Inorganic nanoparticles for cancer imaging and therapy. Journal of controlled Release. 2011 Nov 7;155(3):344-57.
  126. Ulbrich K, Hola K, Subr V, Bakandritsos A, Tucek J, Zboril R. Targeted drug delivery with polymers and magnetic nanoparticles: covalent and noncovalent approaches, release control, and clinical studies. Chemical reviews. 2016 May 11;116(9):5338-431.
  127. Zhang Y, Sun C, Wang C, Jankovic KE, Dong Y. Lipids and lipid derivatives for RNA delivery. Chemical reviews. 2021 Jul 19;121(20):12181-277.
  128. Pattni BS, Chupin VV, Torchilin VP. New developments in liposomal drug delivery. Chemical reviews. 2015 Oct 14;115(19):10938-66.
  129. Singh A, Sakure K, Badwaik H. Role of Pullulan and Pullulan-based Polymeric Nanoparticles in Drug Delivery. Drug Delivery Letters. 2026.
  130. Lal N, Rastogi V, Mishra R, Jahan S, Ali H, Bharadwaj S, Goel R, Hashmi RR. Polymeric Nanoparticles: A Promising Pharmaceutical Approach for Advanced Drug Delivery Systems. Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology. 2026.
  131. Gagliardi A, Giuliano E, Venkateswararao E, Fresta M, Bulotta S, Awasthi V, Cosco D. Biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles for drug delivery to solid tumors. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2021 Feb 3;12:601626.
  132. Anju S, Prajitha N, Sukanya VS, Mohanan PV. Materials Today Chemistry. Mater. Today. 2020;16:100236.
  133. Kumari A, Yadav SK, Yadav SC. Biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles based drug delivery systems. Colloids and surfaces B: biointerfaces. 2010 Jan 1;75(1):1-8.

Photo
Lovepreet Kaur
Corresponding author

Global College of Pharmacy Kahanpur Khui , Anandpur Sahib , Punjab, India, 140117

Photo
Mania
Co-author

Global College of Pharmacy Kahanpur Khui , Anandpur Sahib , Punjab, India, 140117.

Photo
Sanjiv Duggal
Co-author

Global College of Pharmacy Kahanpur Khui , Anandpur Sahib , Punjab, India, 140117.

Mania, Lovepreet Kaur, Sanjiv Duggal Targeted Drug Delivery System: Carriers and Strategies, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 5, 4788-4809, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20283744

More related articles
Preparation And Evaluation Of Herbal Hair Spray...
Nikunj Patadiya, Hetal Dalvi , Priti Patel , Darshana Dalvi , Shi...
Quality by Design and Analytical Quality by Design...
Abhijeet Pawar, Hamja Pathan, Dr. Sushama Vaishnav, Dr. Preeti Sa...
Supersaturated Drug Delivery System: An Approach T...
MANOJ R. V., Parthasarathi K. Kulkarni, Nagendra R., Venkatesh K....
View more
Download PDF
Related Articles
Navigating the Launching of New Pharmaceutical Products: Promotional Challenges ...
Prajwal Bhadke, Ishwar Kale, Vaishnavi Dere, Aakansha Usare , Shubham Kamdi, ...
Development and Validation of Dissolution Test Method for Determination of Bilas...
Pooja Chhanikar, Krishna Gupta, ...
Role of Bisoprolol and Dapagliflozin in the Management of Cardiometabolic Disord...
Vishweshwari Dhore, Prachi Mandave, Dr. Anup Barsagade, Dr. Sachin Dudhe, ...
Comprehensive Impurity Profiling and Degradation Pathway Elucidation Study...
Rasika Tilekar, Smita Waghmare, Neelam Bhagdewani, Bhagyashri Gandhile, Vaibhav Ade, Pramod Ingale, ...
Preparation And Evaluation Of Herbal Hair Spray...
Nikunj Patadiya, Hetal Dalvi , Priti Patel , Darshana Dalvi , Shilpa Patel , ...
More related articles
Preparation And Evaluation Of Herbal Hair Spray...
Nikunj Patadiya, Hetal Dalvi , Priti Patel , Darshana Dalvi , Shilpa Patel , ...
Quality by Design and Analytical Quality by Design in Pharmaceutical Analytical ...
Abhijeet Pawar, Hamja Pathan, Dr. Sushama Vaishnav, Dr. Preeti Sable, Dr. Pravin wakte, ...
Supersaturated Drug Delivery System: An Approach To Enhance The Bioavailability...
MANOJ R. V., Parthasarathi K. Kulkarni, Nagendra R., Venkatesh K., Hanumanthachar Joshi, ...
View more
Preparation And Evaluation Of Herbal Hair Spray...
Nikunj Patadiya, Hetal Dalvi , Priti Patel , Darshana Dalvi , Shilpa Patel , ...
Quality by Design and Analytical Quality by Design in Pharmaceutical Analytical ...
Abhijeet Pawar, Hamja Pathan, Dr. Sushama Vaishnav, Dr. Preeti Sable, Dr. Pravin wakte, ...
Supersaturated Drug Delivery System: An Approach To Enhance The Bioavailability...
MANOJ R. V., Parthasarathi K. Kulkarni, Nagendra R., Venkatesh K., Hanumanthachar Joshi, ...
View more

Copyright © 2025 IJPS. All rights reserved