View Article

  • Top-Rated Contemporary Migraine Therapies: A Detailed Overview
  • 1Pharm D intern, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Srinivas College of Pharmacy, Valachil, Post Farangipete, Mangalore-574143, Karnataka, India.
    2Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Srinivas College of Pharmacy, Valachil, Post Farangipete, Mangalore-574143, Karnataka, India.
    3Principal, Srinivas College of Pharmacy, Valachil, Post Farangipete, Mangalore-574143, Karnataka, India
     

Abstract

Migraine is a debilitating neurological disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of moderate to severe headache accompanied by symptoms such as nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia. Over the years, considerable progress has been made in understanding the pathophysiology of migraine, leading to the development of various treatment modalities. This review provides an overview of the current landscape of migraine therapy, focusing on both established and emerging treatment options. Traditional pharmacological agents, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), triptans, and preventive medications, are discussed, along with their mechanisms of action, efficacy, and side effect profiles. Additionally, recent advancements in migraine management, particularly the introduction of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies, are explored. The efficacy, safety, and implications of these novel biologics in clinical practice are reviewed, alongside considerations for personalized treatment approaches and the role of non-pharmacological interventions. Furthermore, challenges such as treatment access, affordability, and long-term safety are addressed, underscoring the need for continued research and interdisciplinary collaboration to optimize outcomes and alleviate the global burden of migraine.

Keywords

Headache, Triptans, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies

Introduction

Migraine is a chronic neurologic disease that has different frequency, intensity, and influence on patient’s quality of life. In addition to the patient's diagnosis, symptoms, and comorbid conditions, a treatment plan should also take into account the patient's expectations, requirements, and objectives. An ideal migraine management should start with an accurate diagnosis, excluding other potential causes, conducting appropriate tests, and considering the headache's effect on the patient. This process involves educating the patient about available treatment options, potential side effects, the expected duration of therapy, and anticipated outcomes. Furthermore, a comprehensive treatment plan should be developed that addresses any coexisting and comorbid conditions. Comorbidity is the occurrence of two or more conditions, the association of which is more frequent than would occur by chance. Stroke, comorbid pain disorders, angina, patent foramen ovale (aura), epilepsy, and certain psychiatric disorders, such as depression, psychosis, anxiety, and panic disorder, are conditions that occur in patients with migraine with a higher prevalence than coincidence. Patients who experience recurrent headaches which are severe require both acute (abortive) and preventive (prophylactic) pharmacologic treatments for migraine. Preventive therapy is implemented to mitigate the severity, duration or frequency of attacks. Additional advantages may encompass the enhancement of acute treatment responses, the enhancement of a patient's functional capacity, and the reduction of disability. Preventive treatment may also lead to a decrease in health care expenses.[1] Currently, migraine is the sixth most prevalent disease worldwide and is a significant cause of disability, resulting in a significant personal and socio-economic burden.[2] The economic burden of migraine is the second highest of all neurological diseases, with an estimated annual cost of €111 billion in the European Union alone.[3]

CLASSIFICATION OF MIGRAINE:

Migraines can be classified into several subtypes according to the Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society.

1. Migraine without aura

  • Recurrent headache attacks lasting 4 to 72 hours
  • Typically unilateral, pulsating, moderate to severe in intensity
  • Aggravated by physical activity
  • Associated with nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia

2. Migraine with aura

  • Recurrent, completely reversible episodes lasting minutes
  • Usually includes unilateral symptoms such as speech, visual, language, sensory, motor, retinal and brainstem; headache and other migraine symptoms follow.

3. Chronic migraine

  • Headache occurring on 15 or more days per month for more than three months
  • Migraine symptoms present on at least 8 days per month.

Complications of migraine

Status Migrainosus:

A severe migraine episode lasting more than 72 hours.

Persistent Aura without Infarction:

Aura lasting longer than a week without neuroimaging evidence of infarction.

Migraineous Infarction:

Brain ischemia associated aura symptoms visible on neuroimaging.

Migraine Aura-Triggered Seizure:

Seizure occurring during a migraine attack with aura.

Probable Migraine:

A symptomatic headache episode that does not fully meet the criteria for the above categories and does not fit another headache classification. [4]

ETIOLOGY

Genetics and Inheritance

The hereditary component of migraine is really high. Though no hereditary pattern was found, unwell relatives are at 3 times higher risk of developing migraine than in relatives of non-ill patients. The genetic foundation of migraine is complicated and it is unknown which genes and loci are involved in the pathogenesis. Knowing which genes a migraine sufferer carries could help determine the specific preventive medication.

Familial Hemiplegic Migraine

Hemiplegic migraine can manifest either within families or sporadically, with one person being the first member of a family to experience this type of migraine. These migraines are primarily attributed to channelopathies, which are abnormalities affecting ion channels in the brain. These channelopathies give rise to 3 primary types of hemiplegic migraine caused by:

  1. Chromosomal 19p13 CACNA1A gene mutation (calcium voltage-gated channel alpha 1A subunit).
  2. Chromosomal 1q23 ATP1A2 gene mutations (ATPase, Na+/K+ transporting alpha two subunit).
  3. SCN1A gene mutations (sodium voltage-gated channel Type 1 alpha subunit).
  • PRRT2 (Proline-Rich transmembrane 2) gene mutations can also be considered as one of the possible causes. A protein encoded by the PRRT2 gene interacts with the synaptosomal nerve-associated protein 25, or SNAP25, which may be involved in the control of voltage-gated calcium channels.
  • SLC4A4 (solute carrier family four member 4) gene mutations can also be a part of this forms of migraine

Triggers

Migraine headaches can result from withdrawals or from exposure to a number of circumstances. A retrospective research study revealed that around 76% patients mentioned triggers. While some are only hypothetical or untested, others are most likely contributing elements.

  • Probable factors include stress (80%), Hormonal changes (65%), Skipped meals (57%), Weather changes (53%), Exposure to lights (38%)
  • Possible factors include Hypersomnia or insomnia (50%), Odors like perfumes, colognes, petroleum distillates (40%), Neck pain (38%), Alcohol ingestion (38%)
  • Unproven factors include smoking (36%), tyramine and chocolate (27%). [4]

EPIDEMIOLOGY

  • Migraine and headache are worldwide debilitating illnesses causing great individual suffering and reduced QOL in adults, children and adolescents. Therefore, epidemiological studies are needed to estimate the breadth of the issue. This review contains epidemiological research on migraine and headache in children and adolescents published in the previous 25 years. A total of 64 cross-sectional studies have been discovered, published in 32 different countries and containing a total of 227,249 people. Mean prevalence of headache was 54.4 % (95 % CI 43.1–65.8) and mean prevalence of migraine was 9.1 % (95 % CI 7.1–11.1). There is a scarcity of population-based research from poor and low-middle income nations. Furthermore, there is a notable lack of data concerning the prevalence of chronic migraine and probable migraine, with a particular gap in understanding menstrual migraine among young individuals.
  • Migraine represents a widespread health concern, impacting approximately 12% population annually, with a higher prevalence observed in women, affecting up to 17% of females and 6% of males. Notably, among children, migraine also appears to occur more frequently in females. The adjusted prevalence of migraine demonstrates regional variations, with North America exhibiting the highest prevalence, followed by Central America, South America, Asia, Europe, and Africa.
  • Migraine typically ranks as the fourth most common reason for emergency department visits (approximately 3% visits annually). Its prevalence tends to increase during puberty and continues to rise until individuals reach the age range of 35 to 39 years, after which it tends to decrease, particularly following menopause.[5]

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

  • Pathogenesis entails several peripheral and central nervous system components, yet being poorly understood. This part outlines some of the most well-known concepts.
  • The previous vascular theory of migraine states that aura is caused by vasoconstriction and headache by vasodilation; but, this idea is no longer valid. These days, theories contend that a number of fundamental neuronal abnormalities result in a cascade of intracranial and extracranial modifications that trigger headaches.
  • Trigeminal afferents are activated when neuronal pannexin-1 mega channel opens, caspase-1 is then activated, proinflammatory mediators are released, NF-kB (nuclear factor kappa-B) is activated, and this inflammatory signal spreads to trigeminal nerve fibers surrounding vessels of the pia mater. By a sequence of meningeal, cortical and brainstem events, this inflames the pain-sensitive meninges and, via both central and peripheral pathways, results in headaches. This circuit can thus account for the aura-establishing cerebral depression and the headache-causing extended stimulation of trigeminal nociception.
  • The aura phenomenon in migraine is theorized to stem from of Leão’s cortical spreading depression, characterized by a wave-like propagation of glial and neuronal depolarization across the cortex. This cascade of events triggers the activation of trigeminal afferents and alters the permeability of the blood-brain barrier by inducing the activation of brain matrix metalloproteinases.
  • The trigeminal nerve ophthalmic division primarily innervates the anterior structures, providing a possible explanation for the frontal head pain often experienced during migraines.
  • Neurogenic inflammation occurs as a consequence of the activation of nociceptors, particularly within the trigeminal system. This activation leads to edema, vasodilation and plasma protein extravasation. The conjunction of fibers from upper cervical roots, originating from neurons within the trigeminal nerve and ganglion, along with the trigeminal nucleus caudalis, explains the anterior-to-posterior distribution of pain. These fibers rise up to the sensory cortex and thalamus, contributing to the perception of pain. This may lead to release of vasoactive neuropeptides such as calcitonin gene-related peptide, substance P and neurokinin from the trigeminal ganglion. These neuropeptides are elevated in spinal fluid of individuals with migraines. Sensitization, whereby neurons become more responsive to stimuli, may result from neurogenic inflammation. This phenomenon helps explain certain clinical manifestations of pain and the progression from episodic to chronic migraines. [4]

Several neuropeptides may have significant roles in the pathogenesis of migraines:

Serotonin:

It is hypothesized that low serotonin levels between migraine attacks might lead to a weakened serotonin pain inhibition system, possibly enabling the activation of the trigeminal system. Serotonin may influence migraines through cortical projections of brainstem serotonergic nuclei, central pain control pathways, or direct effects on cranial arteries.

Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP):

 Neurons within the trigeminal ganglion express high levels of CGRP. It increases the synthesis of nitric oxide and sensitizes trigeminal nerves upon release from peripheral terminals. CGRP acts as a potent vasodilator of the dura mater and cerebral vessels, contributing to neurogenic inflammation and facilitating the transmission of trigeminal pain from vessels to CNS.

Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide (PACAP):

PACAP levels are elevated during migraine episodes, suggesting its potential role in mediating migraine attacks. Its infusion has been observed to induce migraine in susceptible individuals, further implicating its involvement in migraine pathophysiology.[3]

TREATMENT / MANAGEMENT


       
            Picture1.png
       

    Fig 1: Abbreviation: ICHD-3, International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition.[6]


A. DRUGS APPROVED AND TESTED FOR TREATMENT OF ACUTE MIGRAINE— COMPARISON OF EARLIER AND CURRENT DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES

Seventeen medications received FDA approval for acute migraine treatment between 1970 and 2020. These drugs predominantly fall into two categories: those specifically designed to target acute migraine, such as drugs acting on anti-CGRP pathways and 5-HT (serotonin) receptor agonists. Additionally, among the latter are general analgesics like COX inhibitors, commonly used for various pain-related conditions. Notably, the period between 2018 and 2020 saw the approval of four drugs that target CGRP and 5-HT1F receptors, marking a shift in drug development strategies towards novel targets. This shift reflects advancements in understanding the roles of CGRP and 5-HT1F receptors in migraine pathogenesis. The emergence of novel 5-HT1F receptor agonists (ditans) and CGRP receptor antagonists (gepants) represents promising alternatives due to their improved efficacy and milder side effect profiles compared to older migraine treatments. However, the full spectrum of pharmacological effects induced by these agents is not yet fully elucidated. Since 2018, there has been a notable expansion in the range of drug targets compared to those approved between 1970 and 2018, particularly focusing on the 5-HT system and its 5-HT1D/1B receptors. This diversification in drug targets underscores ongoing efforts to develop more effective and better-tolerated treatments for acute migraine episodes.[8] [9]

a. Drugs used in clinical trials between 2018 and 2020 for acute migraine—Spectrum of molecular targets

A total of 12 drugs underwent clinical trials between 2018 and 2020 for acute migraine. Among them, six drugs had already received FDA approval for other indications and were being repurposed for migraine treatment. These repurposed drugs, primarily acting as anaesthetics or analgesics, are currently being evaluated for their effectiveness in managing migraine symptoms. Notably, studies on five of these drugs are being conducted through medical centers (lidocaine, dexamethasone and bupivacaine) or driven by universities (ketorolac and indomethacin), while ketamine is being tested through an industry-driven study. These repurposed drugs employ new mechanisms of action (MOAs) for migraine treatment, such as targeting the greater occipital nerve (GON) and the NDMA receptor, while others act on established targets including COX enzymes, 5-HT receptors, and the CGRP receptor. Additionally, six drugs already approved by the FDA for acute migraine treatment are undergoing further company-initiated clinical trials to explore novel drug combinations, new formulations and long-term safety, or to expand their indications within the migraine field. These drugs primarily operate via the 5-HT or CGRP systems.[3]

b. Characterisation of drug classes approved and in clinical trials for the treatment of acute migraine

i. Drugs targeting the 5-HT system (triptans, ergot alkaloids  and ditans)

  • Ergot alkaloids, like ergotamine, have been utilized since the 1970s to manage acute migraine symptoms. However, the advent of triptans, starting with sumatriptan's approval in 1992, marked a significant advancement in symptomatic treatment. Recently developed agents targeting the 5-HT system, known as ditans, demonstrate potent pharmacological effects with fewer adverse effects compared to triptans and ergot alkaloids.
  • Dihydroergotamine (DHE), another ergot alkaloid, is indicated for treating acute migraine with or without aura and cluster headache episodes. It binds strongly to 5-HT1D? and 5-HT1D? receptors.
  • Triptans, such as zolmitriptan and rizatriptan, target 5-HT1B/1D receptors and were first approved in 1997 and 1998, respectively. Zolmitriptan inhibits vasoactive neuropeptide release and inhibits pain signal transmission in the trigeminal dorsal horn. Rizatriptan is undergoing clinical studies for vestibular migraine and combination therapy with meloxicam or naproxen for acute migraine. Triptans can cause peripheral vasoconstriction, thereby restricting their use in patients with cardiovascular diseases or hemiplegic migraine. Novel acute migraine treatments, like ditans, targeting trigeminal pathways without affecting vasoactive 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors, are being developed.[3]
  • Ditans, exemplified by lasmiditan, selectively target the 5-HT1F receptor for acute migraine treatment. Lasmiditan was approved in 2019. Structurally distinct from triptans, ditans contains a pyridine-piperidine scaffold instead of an indole group. Triptans bind non-selectively to 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors, causing vascular vasoconstriction, while ditans offer a promising alternative with fewer vasoactive effects. [7]

ii. Drugs targeting the CGRP system—Gepants

CGRP, or calcitonin gene-related peptide, is known to be a trigger for migraine attacks in patients. Hence by Blocking the canonical CGRP receptor, these agents may be effective in the acute management of migraine. Low molecular weight CGRP receptor antagonists, also known as gepants, have been investigated for their potential in both acute migraine therapy and migraine prevention. Two gepants, ubrogepant and rimegepant, have received approval from the FDA for acute migraine treatment. Ubrogepant (brand name: Ubrelvy™) is an orally administered compound developed by Allergan in collaboration with Merck & Co. It is highly selective and acts as a competitive CGRP receptor antagonist. Ubrogepant offers a potent option for the acute management of migraine, providing patients with an effective and convenient oral medication to manage their symptoms.[8]

iii. Anaesthetics

The notion of ketamine's potential as a treatment for migraine is not a recent one; it has been under investigation for over two decades. However, there has been a resurgence of interest in ketamine's role in migraine treatment in recent times. Ketamine has previously been explored as a means to reduce opioid usage in pain management and as a therapeutic option for mood disorders, with compelling evidence supporting its efficacy in these areas. In contrast, there is currently a lack of robust data demonstrating a significant effect of ketamine in migraine treatment. NMDA receptors, which ketamine targets, are widely distributed throughout the central nervous system. Under normal conditions, the channel pores of these receptors are blocked by magnesium ions (Mg2+), preventing the flow of ions through the receptor channel. However, during neuronal depolarization, Mg2+ is expelled from the pores, allowing calcium ions (Ca2+) to enter. [3]

iv. Non-steroidal antiinflammatory drug


Table 1. —Acetaminophen and Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: Pharmacokinetic, NNTs, and Dosage


       
            Screenshot 2024-08-31 231255.png
       

    


†For acute migraine treatment, only 1 or 2 doses are usually recommended; doses are for adults. ‡Absorbed more quickly than naproxen.

Tmax = time to maximum plasma concentration; NNT = number needed to treat: the number of patients that must be treated to obtain a response on a given end point over and above the response rate obtained from placebo.[9]

 

B. DRUGS APPROVED AND TESTED FOR CHRONIC MIGRAINE —COMPARISON OF DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES

a. The evolution of drug approvals for the treatment of chronic migraine treatment over time — A quantitative and drug class analysis

Between 1970 and 2020, the FDA approved a total of 10 drugs for the treatment of chronic migraine. Initially approved for other indications, these drugs were later found to provide beneficial effects in migraine management. Among them are topiramate (an anticonvulsant), propranolol (a ?-adrenoceptor antagonist), VPA and divalproex sodium (both anticonvulsants), timolol (another beta-adrenoceptor antagonist), and onabotulinum A (commonly known as Botox). The molecular entities targeted by these FDA-approved drugs for chronic migraine exhibit a relatively broad spectrum of mechanisms of action (MOA). These include sodium channels, GABA transaminase, ?-adrenoceptors, synaptosomal-associated protein 25 (SNAP-25), the CGRP receptor, and the CGRP ligand (Figure 2). Notably, anti-CGRP agents focus on a biological pathway that has been demonstrated to play a crucial role in migraine pathogenesis, thereby presenting novel therapeutic possibilities for both episodic and chronic migraine.[10]

b. Characterisation of drug classes approved and those undergoing clinical trials for the treatment of chronic migraine

Anticonvulsants

Three antiepileptic medications, including topiramate, valproate, and gabapentin, have been recommended as first or third-line treatments for preventing migraine attacks. The rationale behind using antiepileptics for migraine prophylaxis stems from their diverse modes of action, which can influence pain systems or specific pathways involved in migraine pathophysiology. However, the precise mechanisms through which antiepileptics exert their effects in migraine prevention are not fully understood.

  • Topiramate, a sulfamate-substituted monosaccharide derived from D-fructose, demonstrates efficacy in migraine prevention by interacting with multiple sites of action. It reduces the frequency of action potentials caused by depolarizing electric currents, leading to the blockade of voltage-dependent Na+ channels.

Botulinum toxin type A

Onabotulinumtoxin A, commonly known as Botox, is a natural substance produced by the anaerobic bacterium Clostridium botulinum. Its clinical application initially began in the early 1980s for conditions characterized by excessive muscle contractions. Over time, it has emerged as the primary treatment option for various conditions such as dystonia, spasticity, hyperhidrosis, and certain bladder disturbances. Beyond its muscle-relaxing properties, botulinum toxin has demonstrated pain-relieving effects, which have led to its use in migraine treatment. When used to treat migraines, botulinum toxin is injected intramuscularly into multiple sites across the head and neck, with repeated treatments scheduled regularly.[12]

Drugs targeting CGRP signalling

  • Medications targeting CGRP signaling, including gepants and anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies, have emerged as effective treatments for migraine. CGRP has been identified as a crucial factor in migraine pathophysiology, validating it as a therapeutic target. Gepants and monoclonal antibodies are designed to inhibit the CGRP pathway. Monoclonal antibodies work by blocking CGRP transmission within the trigeminovascular system. These antibodies, such as galcanezumab, eptinezumab, and fremanezumab, bind to CGRP released by trigeminal sensory nerve fibers, effectively deactivating it. Similarly, antibodies targeting the CGRP receptor, like erenumab, prevent CGRP from accessing its canonical receptor. CGRP exists in two isoforms, with CGRP? being the predominant form implicated in migraine pathology and targeted by monoclonal antagonizing antibodies.
  • Atogepant, a novel, orally effective, low molecular weight CGRP receptor antagonist, is currently being investigated for migraine prevention. Clinical trials, including a Phase 2/3 trial, have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of atogepant in reducing the monthly number of migraine days over a 12-week period compared to a placebo. However, chronic reduction of CGRP raises concerns about potential cardiovascular complications such as hypertension, ischemic diseases and cardiac dysfunction. Despite these concerns, no cardiovascular adverse effects or hypertension development have been reported during 6 months of Phase 3 clinical testing with anti-CGRP and anti-CGRP receptor antibodies. Additionally, a 2018 study found that erenumab, a CGRP receptor antagonist, had no effect on older men with angina monitored with electrocardiography during treadmill exercise until chest pain was reported. Studies suggest that reducing CGRP signaling may mildly interfere with the CGRP-dependent pathway rather than completely blocking it, potentially lowering the risk of cardiovascular side effects.[13]

Cardiovascular agents and diuretics

  • Propranolol, an antagonist of ?-adrenoceptors, stands as one of the most frequently prescribed drugs for preventing migraine attacks. Its efficacy has been consistently demonstrated in numerous clinical trials dating back to the 1970s. Although the proper mechanisms of propranolol in prophylaxis of migraine are not fully explained, it is theorized that it reduces central hyperexcitability by inhibiting the release of noradrenaline via ?1-adrenoceptor-mediated pathways, thereby diminishing central catecholaminergic hyperactivity.[14]
  • Flunarizine, a well-established migraine preventive agent, has been extensively utilized across pediatric and adult populations in various regions worldwide for over thirty years. Operating as a non-selective calcium ion channel and dopamine receptor antagonist, flunarizine also exhibits activities as a 5-HT receptor antagonist and histamine (H1 receptor antagonist), contributing to its migraine prophylactic effects.[15]
  • Amiloride, categorized as a diuretic, selectively antagonizes acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs), a family of ion channels linked to degenerin and epithelial sodium channels, initially identified in 1997. Comprising four members, ASIC1–ASIC4, along with several splice variants, these channels are not only activated by decreased pH but are also modulated by nerve growth factor (NGF) and serotonin (5-HT). Recent findings indicate that 5-HT potentiates ASIC3 through a non-proton ligand-binding site, implicating amiloride's potential role in migraine management.[16]

Kallikrein blockers

  • Kallikrein blockers such as IONIS-PKKRx utilize the concept of 'antisense' oligonucleotide-based drugs, first introduced in 1978. Leveraging Watson–Crick hybridization, these drugs offer a high degree of specificity compared to conventional low molecular weight drugs. Bradykinin, a key player in pain transmission, has been shown to elicit both excitation and mechanical sensitization of somatic and meningeal nociceptors, underscoring the potential therapeutic value of kallikrein blockers in migraine management.[3] [7]

PROPHYLACTIC / PREVENTIVE TREATMENT

The aim of prophylaxis is to reduce the frequency of migraine attacks, enhance responsiveness to acute attack management, and alleviate the severity and duration of attacks, ultimately reducing disability. It's crucial for individuals to identify and document their migraine triggers to mitigate them effectively in the future.

Indications for preventive treatment include:

  • Frequent or prolonged headaches
  • Attacks causing significant disability and impacting quality of life
  • Contraindications or ineffectiveness of acute therapies
  • Possibility of medication overuse headache
  • Menstrual migraine, often requiring short-term premenstrual prophylaxis
  • Specific migraine subtypes like brainstem aura migraine, hemiplegic migraine, migrainous infarction and persistent aura without infarction

Agents commonly used for preventive treatment are:

  • Beta-blockers such as metoprolol and propranolol, particularly beneficial for hypertensive and non-smoker patients
  • Antidepressants like amitriptyline and venlafaxine, especially effective in patients with comorbid depression, anxiety disorders, and insomnia
  • Anticonvulsants including valproate acid and topiramate, particularly helpful in patients with epilepsy
  • Calcium channel blockers like verapamil and flunarizine, particularly suitable for patients with Raynaud's phenomenon or women of childbearing age.
  • Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists such as erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab, offering targeted therapy for migraine prevention. [4]

ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT

  • Lifestyle changes are vital for migraine management, requiring commitment from the patient, with social support playing a crucial role in enhancing mental health and encouraging patient involvement.
  • Regular exercise can be beneficial in managing migraine symptoms.
  • Yoga offers a holistic approach to stress reduction and relaxation, potentially reducing the severity and frequency of migraines.
  • Relaxation training techniques, such as deep breathing and progressive muscle relaxation, can help alleviate migraine symptoms.
  • Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) aims to modify dysfunctional thoughts, emotions, and behaviors associated with migraines, potentially reducing their impact.
  • Biofeedback involves learning to control physiological responses to stressors, potentially reducing migraine severity and frequency.
  • Identifying and reducing triggers, such as certain foods, stress, or environmental factors, can help prevent migraine attacks.
  • Detoxification practices may help some individuals reduce migraine frequency by eliminating potential triggers or toxins from the body.
  • Butterbur, an herbal supplement, has shown promise in reducing migraine severity and frequency in some studies, although its safety and efficacy should be discussed with a healthcare provider.
  • Melatonin, a hormone involved in regulating sleep-wake cycles, may help improve sleep quality and reduce migraine frequency in some individuals. However, its use should be discussed with a healthcare provider, as it may interact with other medications or conditions. [4]

MEDICATION-OVERUSE HEADACHE

Medication-overuse headache (MOH) is defined as a headache occurring for 15 or more days per month, in a patient with a pre-existing primary headache and develops as a consequence of regular overuse of acute or symptomatic headache medication (on 10 or more or 15 or more days per month, depending on the medication) for more than 3 months (Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society, 2018). A recent epidemiological population based study in Denmark reported a prevalence of 2% in 55,000 respondents. MOH is classified as ergotamine-overuse headache, triptan-overuse headache, analgesic overuse headache, opioid-overuse headache, combination-medication-overuse headache and probable MOH (Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society, 2018).[17] Medication-overuse headache (MOH) is a secondary headache disorder associated with excessive acute use of analgesics or other drugs used to treat migraine.1 The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3) criteria for a diagnosis of MOH is ?15 headache days/month in a patient with a pre-existing headache disorder, with >3 months of regular overuse of ?1 drug that can be taken for acute and/or symptomatic treatment of headache or ?15 days/month for nonopioid (simple) analgesics, or ?10 days/month for ergots, triptans, opioids, and/or combination analgesics, as well as combinations of different classes of headache medications. The resolution of MOH is typically regarded as reduction of acute medication below the levels defined by ICHD-3 thresholds for three consecutive months. Eptinezumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits calcitonin gene related peptide, is approved in the United States for the preventive treatment of migraine. Previous analysis indicated that eptinezumab effectively reduced the number of monthly migraine days and was well tolerated among the subgroup of PROMISE-2 patients diagnosed with both chronic migraine and medication-overuse headache.[11]

CONCLUSION:

The landscape of migraine treatment has evolved significantly, with a growing array of options available for both acute and preventive management. While traditional therapies such as NSAIDs and triptans remain cornerstone treatments, newer agents targeting the CGRP pathway have revolutionized migraine care. Despite these advancements, challenges persist in optimizing treatment outcomes and addressing the diverse needs of migraine patients. Continued research efforts and collaborative initiatives are essential to further refine treatment strategies, improve patient outcomes, and alleviate the substantial burden of migraine on individuals and society.

REFERENCES

  1. Silberstein SD. Preventive migraine treatment. Continuum: Lifelong Learning in Neurology. 2015 Aug 1;21(4):973-89.
  2. Collaborators GB. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.
  3. Zobdeh F, Ben Kraiem A, Attwood MM, Chubarev VN, Tarasov VV, Schiöth HB, Mwinyi J. Pharmacological treatment of migraine: Drug classes, mechanisms of action, clinical trials and new treatments. British journal of pharmacology. 2021 Dec;178(23):4588-607.
  4. Ruschel MA, De Jesus O. Migraine headache. InStatPearls [Internet] 2023 Feb 13. StatPearls Publishing.
  5. Wöber-Bingöl Ç. Epidemiology of migraine and headache in children and adolescents. Current pain and headache reports. 2013 Jun;17:1-1.
  6. Ailani J, Burch RC, Robbins MS, Board of Directors of the American Headache Society. The American Headache Society Consensus Statement: Update on integrating new migraine treatments into clinical practice. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain. 2021 Jul;61(7):1021-39.
  7. Antonaci F, Ghiotto N, Wu S, Pucci E, Costa A. Recent advances in migraine therapy. Springerplus. 2016 May 17;5(1):637.
  8. Ailani J, Lipton RB, Goadsby PJ, Guo H, Miceli R, Severt L, Finnegan M, Trugman JM. Atogepant for the preventive treatment of migraine. New England Journal of Medicine. 2021 Aug 19;385(8):695-706.
  9. Rissardo JP, Caprara AL. Gepants for acute and preventive migraine treatment: a narrative review. Brain sciences. 2022 Nov 24;12(12):1612.
  10. Scheffler A, Messel O, Wurthmann S, Nsaka M, Kleinschnitz C, Glas M, Naegel S, Holle D. Erenumab in highly therapy-refractory migraine patients: first German real-world evidence. The journal of headache and pain. 2020 Dec;21:1-5.
  11. Marmura MJ, Diener HC, Cowan RP, Tepper SJ, Diamond ML, Starling AJ, Hirman J, Mehta L, Brevig T, Cady R. Preventive migraine treatment with eptinezumab reduced acute headache medication and headache frequency to below diagnostic thresholds in patients with chronic migraine and medication?overuse headache. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain. 2021 Oct;61(9):1421-31.
  12. Herd, C. P., Tomlinson, C. L., Rick, C., Scotton, W. J., Edwards, J., Ives, N., Clarke, C. E., & Sinclair, A. (2018). Botulinum toxins for the prevention of migraine in adults. The Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews, 6(6), CD011616.
  13. Hay, D. L. (2019). CGRP receptor biology: Is there more than one receptor? Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, 255, 13–22.
  14. Dakhale, G. N., Sharma, V. S., Thakre, M. N., & Kalikar, M. (2019). Low dose sodium valproate versus low-dose propranolol in prophylaxis of common migraine headache: A randomized, prospective, parallel, open-label study. Indian Journal of Pharmacology, 51(4), 255–262.
  15. Karsan, N., Palethorpe, D., Rattanawong, W., Marin, J. C., Bhola, R., & Goadsby, P. J. (2018). Flunarizine in migraine-related headache prevention: Results from 200 patients treated in the UK. European Journal of Neurology, 25(6), 811–817.
  16. Munkholm, T. K., & Arendt-Nielsen, L. (2017). The interaction between NGF-induced hyperalgesia and acid-provoked pain in the infrapatellar fat pad and tibialis anterior muscle of healthy volunteers. European Journal of Pain (London, England), 21(3), 474–485.
  17. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). (2018). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia, 38(1), 1–211.

Reference

  1. Silberstein SD. Preventive migraine treatment. Continuum: Lifelong Learning in Neurology. 2015 Aug 1;21(4):973-89.
  2. Collaborators GB. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.
  3. Zobdeh F, Ben Kraiem A, Attwood MM, Chubarev VN, Tarasov VV, Schiöth HB, Mwinyi J. Pharmacological treatment of migraine: Drug classes, mechanisms of action, clinical trials and new treatments. British journal of pharmacology. 2021 Dec;178(23):4588-607.
  4. Ruschel MA, De Jesus O. Migraine headache. InStatPearls [Internet] 2023 Feb 13. StatPearls Publishing.
  5. Wöber-Bingöl Ç. Epidemiology of migraine and headache in children and adolescents. Current pain and headache reports. 2013 Jun;17:1-1.
  6. Ailani J, Burch RC, Robbins MS, Board of Directors of the American Headache Society. The American Headache Society Consensus Statement: Update on integrating new migraine treatments into clinical practice. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain. 2021 Jul;61(7):1021-39.
  7. Antonaci F, Ghiotto N, Wu S, Pucci E, Costa A. Recent advances in migraine therapy. Springerplus. 2016 May 17;5(1):637.
  8. Ailani J, Lipton RB, Goadsby PJ, Guo H, Miceli R, Severt L, Finnegan M, Trugman JM. Atogepant for the preventive treatment of migraine. New England Journal of Medicine. 2021 Aug 19;385(8):695-706.
  9. Rissardo JP, Caprara AL. Gepants for acute and preventive migraine treatment: a narrative review. Brain sciences. 2022 Nov 24;12(12):1612.
  10. Scheffler A, Messel O, Wurthmann S, Nsaka M, Kleinschnitz C, Glas M, Naegel S, Holle D. Erenumab in highly therapy-refractory migraine patients: first German real-world evidence. The journal of headache and pain. 2020 Dec;21:1-5.
  11. Marmura MJ, Diener HC, Cowan RP, Tepper SJ, Diamond ML, Starling AJ, Hirman J, Mehta L, Brevig T, Cady R. Preventive migraine treatment with eptinezumab reduced acute headache medication and headache frequency to below diagnostic thresholds in patients with chronic migraine and medication?overuse headache. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain. 2021 Oct;61(9):1421-31.
  12. Herd, C. P., Tomlinson, C. L., Rick, C., Scotton, W. J., Edwards, J., Ives, N., Clarke, C. E., & Sinclair, A. (2018). Botulinum toxins for the prevention of migraine in adults. The Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews, 6(6), CD011616.
  13. Hay, D. L. (2019). CGRP receptor biology: Is there more than one receptor? Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, 255, 13–22.
  14. Dakhale, G. N., Sharma, V. S., Thakre, M. N., & Kalikar, M. (2019). Low dose sodium valproate versus low-dose propranolol in prophylaxis of common migraine headache: A randomized, prospective, parallel, open-label study. Indian Journal of Pharmacology, 51(4), 255–262.
  15. Karsan, N., Palethorpe, D., Rattanawong, W., Marin, J. C., Bhola, R., & Goadsby, P. J. (2018). Flunarizine in migraine-related headache prevention: Results from 200 patients treated in the UK. European Journal of Neurology, 25(6), 811–817.
  16. Munkholm, T. K., & Arendt-Nielsen, L. (2017). The interaction between NGF-induced hyperalgesia and acid-provoked pain in the infrapatellar fat pad and tibialis anterior muscle of healthy volunteers. European Journal of Pain (London, England), 21(3), 474–485.
  17. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). (2018). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia, 38(1), 1–211.

Photo
AYSHA SAHANA SHIREENA Y Z
Corresponding author

SRINIVAS COLLEGE OF PHARMACY

Photo
CHRISTY T CHACKO
Co-author

SRINIVAS COLLEGE OF PHARMACY

Photo
A R SHABARAYA
Co-author

SRINIVAS COLLEGE OF PHARMACY

Aysha Sahana Shireena Y. Z. , Christy T Chacko , A.R. Shabaraya , Top-Rated Contemporary Migraine Therapies: A Detailed Overview , Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2024, Vol 2, Issue 8, 4113-4125. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13623576

More related articles
Formulation and Characterization of an Advanced Mo...
Nikita M. Wakchaware, Akshay B. Ghanmode, Vanshika K. Sahu, Mayur...
A Overview Of Pharmacognostical, Phytochemical, Ph...
Surya devi.M, Elakiya. V, Kalaiyarasan. S, Sathish Kumar. R, Hema...
Anti-Cancer Activity Of Cisplatin And Its Toxicity...
Pinki Chandra , Gagan Panda, Sudhir Kathane, Shruti Rathore , ...
A Study On Antimicrobial Activity Of Lantana Camara...
Anshika Rathore , B. N. Birla , Vivek Yadav , Aman Karma , Sonali Patidar , ...
Herbal Nanogel Formulations For Psoriasis: A Review Of Recent Advances And Futur...
Shweta Dnyandev Birajdar , Supriya dayanand Khutwad , Kishor Otari, ...
Related Articles
A Review Of The Pathophysiology, Staging, Therapeutic Options, And Epidemiology ...
Anjali Bhojappa Koli , Kavita Biru Mote, Archana swapnil Murgunde, Sakshi Santosh kurade, Reeyan Bas...
Ayurvedic Herbal Product Induced Liver Injury: A Case Report...
Dhanya Dharman, Sreelekshmy B. S., Ranjana S. R., Shaiju S. Dharan, ...
Formulation Development & Evaluation Of Herbal Cream For Wound Healing Activity...
Abhishek Rajendra Putale , Rane Prashant Mangalsingh , Pinjari Aman Siraj , Sneha Abhishek Vikhe, Ro...
Research On: Chloramphenicol Loaded Nanofibre With Pmma & PVPK90 For Ocular Dis...
Omprakash G. Bhusnure , Shivam A S Vyavahare , Mani Ganesh, D D Vibhute, Vijayendra Swammy , Hyun Ta...
Formulation and Characterization of an Advanced Mouth Dissolving Drug Delivery S...
Nikita M. Wakchaware, Akshay B. Ghanmode, Vanshika K. Sahu, Mayuri S. Pawar, Ashwini V. Aswar, Vaish...
More related articles
Formulation and Characterization of an Advanced Mouth Dissolving Drug Delivery S...
Nikita M. Wakchaware, Akshay B. Ghanmode, Vanshika K. Sahu, Mayuri S. Pawar, Ashwini V. Aswar, Vaish...
A Overview Of Pharmacognostical, Phytochemical, Pharmacological Studies Of Hydra...
Surya devi.M, Elakiya. V, Kalaiyarasan. S, Sathish Kumar. R, Hemamalini. T, ...
Anti-Cancer Activity Of Cisplatin And Its Toxicity...
Pinki Chandra , Gagan Panda, Sudhir Kathane, Shruti Rathore , ...
Formulation and Characterization of an Advanced Mouth Dissolving Drug Delivery S...
Nikita M. Wakchaware, Akshay B. Ghanmode, Vanshika K. Sahu, Mayuri S. Pawar, Ashwini V. Aswar, Vaish...
A Overview Of Pharmacognostical, Phytochemical, Pharmacological Studies Of Hydra...
Surya devi.M, Elakiya. V, Kalaiyarasan. S, Sathish Kumar. R, Hemamalini. T, ...
Anti-Cancer Activity Of Cisplatin And Its Toxicity...
Pinki Chandra , Gagan Panda, Sudhir Kathane, Shruti Rathore , ...