1Pharm D intern, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Srinivas College of Pharmacy, Valachil, Post Farangipete, Mangalore-574143, Karnataka, India.
2Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Srinivas College of Pharmacy, Valachil, Post Farangipete, Mangalore-574143, Karnataka, India.
3Principal, Srinivas College of Pharmacy, Valachil, Post Farangipete, Mangalore-574143, Karnataka, India
Migraine is a debilitating neurological disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of moderate to severe headache accompanied by symptoms such as nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia. Over the years, considerable progress has been made in understanding the pathophysiology of migraine, leading to the development of various treatment modalities. This review provides an overview of the current landscape of migraine therapy, focusing on both established and emerging treatment options. Traditional pharmacological agents, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), triptans, and preventive medications, are discussed, along with their mechanisms of action, efficacy, and side effect profiles. Additionally, recent advancements in migraine management, particularly the introduction of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies, are explored. The efficacy, safety, and implications of these novel biologics in clinical practice are reviewed, alongside considerations for personalized treatment approaches and the role of non-pharmacological interventions. Furthermore, challenges such as treatment access, affordability, and long-term safety are addressed, underscoring the need for continued research and interdisciplinary collaboration to optimize outcomes and alleviate the global burden of migraine.
Migraine is a chronic neurologic disease that has different frequency, intensity, and influence on patient’s quality of life. In addition to the patient's diagnosis, symptoms, and comorbid conditions, a treatment plan should also take into account the patient's expectations, requirements, and objectives. An ideal migraine management should start with an accurate diagnosis, excluding other potential causes, conducting appropriate tests, and considering the headache's effect on the patient. This process involves educating the patient about available treatment options, potential side effects, the expected duration of therapy, and anticipated outcomes. Furthermore, a comprehensive treatment plan should be developed that addresses any coexisting and comorbid conditions. Comorbidity is the occurrence of two or more conditions, the association of which is more frequent than would occur by chance. Stroke, comorbid pain disorders, angina, patent foramen ovale (aura), epilepsy, and certain psychiatric disorders, such as depression, psychosis, anxiety, and panic disorder, are conditions that occur in patients with migraine with a higher prevalence than coincidence. Patients who experience recurrent headaches which are severe require both acute (abortive) and preventive (prophylactic) pharmacologic treatments for migraine. Preventive therapy is implemented to mitigate the severity, duration or frequency of attacks. Additional advantages may encompass the enhancement of acute treatment responses, the enhancement of a patient's functional capacity, and the reduction of disability. Preventive treatment may also lead to a decrease in health care expenses.[1] Currently, migraine is the sixth most prevalent disease worldwide and is a significant cause of disability, resulting in a significant personal and socio-economic burden.[2] The economic burden of migraine is the second highest of all neurological diseases, with an estimated annual cost of €111 billion in the European Union alone.[3]
CLASSIFICATION OF MIGRAINE:
Migraines can be classified into several subtypes according to the Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society.
1. Migraine without aura
2. Migraine with aura
3. Chronic migraine
Complications of migraine
Status Migrainosus:
A severe migraine episode lasting more than 72 hours.
Persistent Aura without Infarction:
Aura lasting longer than a week without neuroimaging evidence of infarction.
Migraineous Infarction:
Brain ischemia associated aura symptoms visible on neuroimaging.
Migraine Aura-Triggered Seizure:
Seizure occurring during a migraine attack with aura.
Probable Migraine:
A symptomatic headache episode that does not fully meet the criteria for the above categories and does not fit another headache classification. [4]
ETIOLOGY
Genetics and Inheritance
The hereditary component of migraine is really high. Though no hereditary pattern was found, unwell relatives are at 3 times higher risk of developing migraine than in relatives of non-ill patients. The genetic foundation of migraine is complicated and it is unknown which genes and loci are involved in the pathogenesis. Knowing which genes a migraine sufferer carries could help determine the specific preventive medication.
Familial Hemiplegic Migraine
Hemiplegic migraine can manifest either within families or sporadically, with one person being the first member of a family to experience this type of migraine. These migraines are primarily attributed to channelopathies, which are abnormalities affecting ion channels in the brain. These channelopathies give rise to 3 primary types of hemiplegic migraine caused by:
Triggers
Migraine headaches can result from withdrawals or from exposure to a number of circumstances. A retrospective research study revealed that around 76% patients mentioned triggers. While some are only hypothetical or untested, others are most likely contributing elements.
EPIDEMIOLOGY
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
Several neuropeptides may have significant roles in the pathogenesis of migraines:
Serotonin:
It is hypothesized that low serotonin levels between migraine attacks might lead to a weakened serotonin pain inhibition system, possibly enabling the activation of the trigeminal system. Serotonin may influence migraines through cortical projections of brainstem serotonergic nuclei, central pain control pathways, or direct effects on cranial arteries.
Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP):
Neurons within the trigeminal ganglion express high levels of CGRP. It increases the synthesis of nitric oxide and sensitizes trigeminal nerves upon release from peripheral terminals. CGRP acts as a potent vasodilator of the dura mater and cerebral vessels, contributing to neurogenic inflammation and facilitating the transmission of trigeminal pain from vessels to CNS.
Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide (PACAP):
PACAP levels are elevated during migraine episodes, suggesting its potential role in mediating migraine attacks. Its infusion has been observed to induce migraine in susceptible individuals, further implicating its involvement in migraine pathophysiology.[3]
TREATMENT / MANAGEMENT
Fig 1: Abbreviation: ICHD-3, International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition.[6]
A. DRUGS APPROVED AND TESTED FOR TREATMENT OF ACUTE MIGRAINE— COMPARISON OF EARLIER AND CURRENT DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES
Seventeen medications received FDA approval for acute migraine treatment between 1970 and 2020. These drugs predominantly fall into two categories: those specifically designed to target acute migraine, such as drugs acting on anti-CGRP pathways and 5-HT (serotonin) receptor agonists. Additionally, among the latter are general analgesics like COX inhibitors, commonly used for various pain-related conditions. Notably, the period between 2018 and 2020 saw the approval of four drugs that target CGRP and 5-HT1F receptors, marking a shift in drug development strategies towards novel targets. This shift reflects advancements in understanding the roles of CGRP and 5-HT1F receptors in migraine pathogenesis. The emergence of novel 5-HT1F receptor agonists (ditans) and CGRP receptor antagonists (gepants) represents promising alternatives due to their improved efficacy and milder side effect profiles compared to older migraine treatments. However, the full spectrum of pharmacological effects induced by these agents is not yet fully elucidated. Since 2018, there has been a notable expansion in the range of drug targets compared to those approved between 1970 and 2018, particularly focusing on the 5-HT system and its 5-HT1D/1B receptors. This diversification in drug targets underscores ongoing efforts to develop more effective and better-tolerated treatments for acute migraine episodes.[8] [9]
a. Drugs used in clinical trials between 2018 and 2020 for acute migraine—Spectrum of molecular targets
A total of 12 drugs underwent clinical trials between 2018 and 2020 for acute migraine. Among them, six drugs had already received FDA approval for other indications and were being repurposed for migraine treatment. These repurposed drugs, primarily acting as anaesthetics or analgesics, are currently being evaluated for their effectiveness in managing migraine symptoms. Notably, studies on five of these drugs are being conducted through medical centers (lidocaine, dexamethasone and bupivacaine) or driven by universities (ketorolac and indomethacin), while ketamine is being tested through an industry-driven study. These repurposed drugs employ new mechanisms of action (MOAs) for migraine treatment, such as targeting the greater occipital nerve (GON) and the NDMA receptor, while others act on established targets including COX enzymes, 5-HT receptors, and the CGRP receptor. Additionally, six drugs already approved by the FDA for acute migraine treatment are undergoing further company-initiated clinical trials to explore novel drug combinations, new formulations and long-term safety, or to expand their indications within the migraine field. These drugs primarily operate via the 5-HT or CGRP systems.[3]
b. Characterisation of drug classes approved and in clinical trials for the treatment of acute migraine
i. Drugs targeting the 5-HT system (triptans, ergot alkaloids and ditans)
ii. Drugs targeting the CGRP system—Gepants
CGRP, or calcitonin gene-related peptide, is known to be a trigger for migraine attacks in patients. Hence by Blocking the canonical CGRP receptor, these agents may be effective in the acute management of migraine. Low molecular weight CGRP receptor antagonists, also known as gepants, have been investigated for their potential in both acute migraine therapy and migraine prevention. Two gepants, ubrogepant and rimegepant, have received approval from the FDA for acute migraine treatment. Ubrogepant (brand name: Ubrelvy™) is an orally administered compound developed by Allergan in collaboration with Merck & Co. It is highly selective and acts as a competitive CGRP receptor antagonist. Ubrogepant offers a potent option for the acute management of migraine, providing patients with an effective and convenient oral medication to manage their symptoms.[8]
iii. Anaesthetics
The notion of ketamine's potential as a treatment for migraine is not a recent one; it has been under investigation for over two decades. However, there has been a resurgence of interest in ketamine's role in migraine treatment in recent times. Ketamine has previously been explored as a means to reduce opioid usage in pain management and as a therapeutic option for mood disorders, with compelling evidence supporting its efficacy in these areas. In contrast, there is currently a lack of robust data demonstrating a significant effect of ketamine in migraine treatment. NMDA receptors, which ketamine targets, are widely distributed throughout the central nervous system. Under normal conditions, the channel pores of these receptors are blocked by magnesium ions (Mg2+), preventing the flow of ions through the receptor channel. However, during neuronal depolarization, Mg2+ is expelled from the pores, allowing calcium ions (Ca2+) to enter. [3]
iv. Non-steroidal antiinflammatory drug
Table 1. —Acetaminophen and Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: Pharmacokinetic, NNTs, and Dosage
†For acute migraine treatment, only 1 or 2 doses are usually recommended; doses are for adults. ‡Absorbed more quickly than naproxen.
Tmax = time to maximum plasma concentration; NNT = number needed to treat: the number of patients that must be treated to obtain a response on a given end point over and above the response rate obtained from placebo.[9]
B. DRUGS APPROVED AND TESTED FOR CHRONIC MIGRAINE —COMPARISON OF DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES
a. The evolution of drug approvals for the treatment of chronic migraine treatment over time — A quantitative and drug class analysis
Between 1970 and 2020, the FDA approved a total of 10 drugs for the treatment of chronic migraine. Initially approved for other indications, these drugs were later found to provide beneficial effects in migraine management. Among them are topiramate (an anticonvulsant), propranolol (a ?-adrenoceptor antagonist), VPA and divalproex sodium (both anticonvulsants), timolol (another beta-adrenoceptor antagonist), and onabotulinum A (commonly known as Botox). The molecular entities targeted by these FDA-approved drugs for chronic migraine exhibit a relatively broad spectrum of mechanisms of action (MOA). These include sodium channels, GABA transaminase, ?-adrenoceptors, synaptosomal-associated protein 25 (SNAP-25), the CGRP receptor, and the CGRP ligand (Figure 2). Notably, anti-CGRP agents focus on a biological pathway that has been demonstrated to play a crucial role in migraine pathogenesis, thereby presenting novel therapeutic possibilities for both episodic and chronic migraine.[10]
b. Characterisation of drug classes approved and those undergoing clinical trials for the treatment of chronic migraine
Anticonvulsants
Three antiepileptic medications, including topiramate, valproate, and gabapentin, have been recommended as first or third-line treatments for preventing migraine attacks. The rationale behind using antiepileptics for migraine prophylaxis stems from their diverse modes of action, which can influence pain systems or specific pathways involved in migraine pathophysiology. However, the precise mechanisms through which antiepileptics exert their effects in migraine prevention are not fully understood.
Botulinum toxin type A
Onabotulinumtoxin A, commonly known as Botox, is a natural substance produced by the anaerobic bacterium Clostridium botulinum. Its clinical application initially began in the early 1980s for conditions characterized by excessive muscle contractions. Over time, it has emerged as the primary treatment option for various conditions such as dystonia, spasticity, hyperhidrosis, and certain bladder disturbances. Beyond its muscle-relaxing properties, botulinum toxin has demonstrated pain-relieving effects, which have led to its use in migraine treatment. When used to treat migraines, botulinum toxin is injected intramuscularly into multiple sites across the head and neck, with repeated treatments scheduled regularly.[12]
Drugs targeting CGRP signalling
Cardiovascular agents and diuretics
Kallikrein blockers
PROPHYLACTIC / PREVENTIVE TREATMENT
The aim of prophylaxis is to reduce the frequency of migraine attacks, enhance responsiveness to acute attack management, and alleviate the severity and duration of attacks, ultimately reducing disability. It's crucial for individuals to identify and document their migraine triggers to mitigate them effectively in the future.
Indications for preventive treatment include:
Agents commonly used for preventive treatment are:
ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT
MEDICATION-OVERUSE HEADACHE
Medication-overuse headache (MOH) is defined as a headache occurring for 15 or more days per month, in a patient with a pre-existing primary headache and develops as a consequence of regular overuse of acute or symptomatic headache medication (on 10 or more or 15 or more days per month, depending on the medication) for more than 3 months (Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society, 2018). A recent epidemiological population based study in Denmark reported a prevalence of 2% in 55,000 respondents. MOH is classified as ergotamine-overuse headache, triptan-overuse headache, analgesic overuse headache, opioid-overuse headache, combination-medication-overuse headache and probable MOH (Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society, 2018).[17] Medication-overuse headache (MOH) is a secondary headache disorder associated with excessive acute use of analgesics or other drugs used to treat migraine.1 The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3) criteria for a diagnosis of MOH is ?15 headache days/month in a patient with a pre-existing headache disorder, with >3 months of regular overuse of ?1 drug that can be taken for acute and/or symptomatic treatment of headache or ?15 days/month for nonopioid (simple) analgesics, or ?10 days/month for ergots, triptans, opioids, and/or combination analgesics, as well as combinations of different classes of headache medications. The resolution of MOH is typically regarded as reduction of acute medication below the levels defined by ICHD-3 thresholds for three consecutive months. Eptinezumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits calcitonin gene related peptide, is approved in the United States for the preventive treatment of migraine. Previous analysis indicated that eptinezumab effectively reduced the number of monthly migraine days and was well tolerated among the subgroup of PROMISE-2 patients diagnosed with both chronic migraine and medication-overuse headache.[11]
CONCLUSION:
The landscape of migraine treatment has evolved significantly, with a growing array of options available for both acute and preventive management. While traditional therapies such as NSAIDs and triptans remain cornerstone treatments, newer agents targeting the CGRP pathway have revolutionized migraine care. Despite these advancements, challenges persist in optimizing treatment outcomes and addressing the diverse needs of migraine patients. Continued research efforts and collaborative initiatives are essential to further refine treatment strategies, improve patient outcomes, and alleviate the substantial burden of migraine on individuals and society.
REFERENCES
Aysha Sahana Shireena Y. Z. , Christy T Chacko , A.R. Shabaraya , Top-Rated Contemporary Migraine Therapies: A Detailed Overview , Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2024, Vol 2, Issue 8, 4113-4125. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13623576