View Article

Abstract

The development of patient-friendly dosage forms, such as oral thin films (OTFs), represents a viable alternative to improving drug compliance and delivering quick therapeutic benefits (1,3). Flunarizine, a calcium channel blocker used in migraine prevention, has low water solubility and limited bioavailability, necessitating formulation improvements (3,10). Flunarizine OTFs were studied in three studies employing the solvent casting process with HPMC (E15 or K15) and PVA or PEG 400 plasticisers (1,2,3). Optimised films exhibited uniform drug distribution, a smooth texture, high mechanical strength, and quick disintegration (25-45 seconds) (1,17). In-vitro dissolution experiments showed that over 95% of the medication was released within 5 minutes, significantly surpassing traditional tablets (1,25). Stability experiments validated the formulation's robustness, with no significant modifications occurring over 30 days (24,26). Overall, the Flunarizine OTFs improved dissolution, absorption, and patient convenience, making them a viable fast-acting method for migraine therapy (1,2,9).

Keywords

Flunarizine, Oral Thin Film, Fast Dissolving Film, Drug Delivery, Migraine, Patient Compliance, Solvent Casting, In-vitro Drug Release, Stability Study.

Introduction

Migraine is a recurring neurological illness characterised by severe headaches, nausea, and sensitivity to light and sound. It generally requires long-term treatment (9,10). Traditional oral dosage forms including tablets and capsules, while commonly used, exhibit delayed onset, inconsistent absorption, and poor compliance-particularly during nausea or vomiting episodes (9,11). Flunarizine dihydrochloride, which is a calcium channel blocker utilised in migraine prevention, has poor solubility and first-pass metabolism, resulting in a poor bioavailability (40-50%) (1,2,3).

Fig no: - 01

The tongue without a need for water, allowing for immediate absorption through the oral mucosa while bypassing hepatic metabolism (4,5,6). This enables a speedier onset, higher bioavailability, and increased patient convenience (11,15). OTFs are made with hydrophilic polymers such as HPMC, PVA, or PVP, as well as plasticisers such as PEG 400 or glycerol, and are commonly made using the solvent casting process to produce homogeneous and flexible films (3,14,19).

The review experiments sought to create instant release Flunarizine OTFs with faster disintegration, improved solubility, and uniform drug content (13,15). These findings highlight OTFs as an effective, patient-friendly strategy to overcoming the solubility and compliance difficulties of traditional Flunarizine formulations, resulting in quicker and more consistent migraine relief (28,30).

Fig: Flow chart for the development of oral solid dosage forms

Rationale for Developing Oral Thin Films of Flunarizine:

The oral thin films (OTFs) were developed to address the drug's poor solubility, low bioavailability, and delayed beginning of action (1,3). OTFs allow for faster drug absorption through the buccal mucosa, avoiding first-pass metabolism and delivering speedier migraine relief (5,6). They are simple to use, require no water, and are perfect for people who have difficulty swallowing (4,7,11). These films, made from hydrophilic polymers such as HPMC, PVA, and PVP, provide flexibility, consistent medication distribution, and immediate release when in contact with saliva (3,14,15).

OTF technology enables easy optimisation of film qualities such as thickness, flexibility, and disintegration by altering polymer and plasticiser concentrations. The solvent casting process produces consistent, stable films ideal for large-scale manufacturing. (28,29) Overall, Flunarizine OTFs improve absorption, bioavailability, and patient convenience, making them a more efficient and patient-friendly drug delivery option (12,25).

Fig no: - 02

Key Advantages:

  • Provide a portable, water-free, and patient-friendly dose form (5,7).
  • Provide immediate migraine relief (1,2,9).
  • Address low solubility and first-pass metabolism (3,16).
  • Improve patient compliance and dosing convenience (10,11).

DRUG PROFILE:

Table no: - 01

Parameter

Information

Drug Name

Flunarizine

Brand Name

Sibelium, Stugeron Forte (varies by region)

Structure

Weight

404.50 g/mol

Chemical formula

C??H??F?N

IUPAC Name

1-[Bis(4-fluoropheyl) methyl]-4-[(2E)-3-phenylprop-2-en-1-yl] piperazine

BCS Class

Class II (low solubility, high permeability)

Half life

~18–19 days (very long, explains once-daily dosing)

Pka 1

~2.7 (basic piperazine group)

Pka 2

~9.2(second nitrogen of the piperazine ring)

Log P

~5.0 (lipophilic, crosses BBB easily)

Particle size

Not less than 90% below 50 μm (for solid dosage forms, varies by manufacturer)

Hygroscopicity

Slightly hygroscopic in nature.

Polymorphic form

Form I (most stable and widely used), Form I (less stable).

Solid state Stability

Stable, Crystalline, Photosensitive

Melting Point

~115–117 °C (10,11)

T max

2-4 hours

Solubility

Practically insoluble in water; soluble in chloroform, methanol, ethanol, acetone (9,11)

4. Formulation Approaches for Flunarizine Films:

The Flunarizine oral thin films (OTFs) are designed to provide a fast-dissolving, patient-friendly dose form that provides quick antihistaminic effect and increased absorption. The methodologies employed to develop these films build upon the formulation procedures used for Flunarizine oral thin films, as mentioned in earlier pharmaceutical studies (1,3,5).

Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API)

  • Drug: Flunarizine Hydrochloride
  • Dose: Typically, 5–10 mg per film (suitable for thin-film technology) (1,14).
  • Properties: Moderately water-soluble, bitter-tasting, lipophilic, stable.
  • Function in Film: Flunarizine is a calcium channel blocker and antihistamine, used for the treatment of vertigo, migraine prevention, and motion sickness.

Challenges:

  • Taste masking is essential due to the drug's bitter profile.
  • Uniformity medication distribution in the film matrix is critical for uniform release and bioavailability.
  • Solubility enhancement may be necessary due to the moderate water solubility of Flunarizine.

Selection of Film-Forming Polymers

The strength, dissolving, and flexibility of the film are all dependent on the polymer used. Based on the Flunarizine formulations, the most favoured polymer is Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose (HPMC) due to its superior film-forming capabilities and biocompatibility.

  • Commonly used grades: HPMC E-15, HPMC K4M, and HPMC K15M (3,14,18).
  • Polymer concentration: 200-900 mg per batch maintains film consistency.
  • Alternative polymers: Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and Pullulan can be added to improve transparency and strength (19,20).
  • Key role: Provides rapid hydration, flexibility, and uniform drug dispersion

Plasticizers and Humectants

Plasticisers increase the elasticity and folding durability of films, preventing them from breaking or becoming brittle during storage.

  • Plasticizers used: Propylene glycol and Polyethylene glycol (PEG-400) (3,14,25).
  • Recommended range: 5–20% w/w of polymer weight
  • Function: Enhances flexibility, reduces brittleness, and ensures smooth texture
  • Humectants like glycerol Maintain moisture balance to keep films supple and avoid drying.

Sweeteners and Saliva-Stimulating Agents

Taste masking and mouthfeel are vital for patient acceptability Flunarizine has a slightly bitter taste, so the inclusion of sweeteners and saliva stimulants helps improve palatability.

  • Sweeteners used: Mannitol and Aspartame (21,22).
  • Saliva stimulants: Citric acid (3–6% w/w) enhances saliva secretion and accelerates disintegration
  • Additional benefits: Improves mouthfeel and taste, ensuring patient comfort and adherence

Solvent and Casting Medium                                                                                    

The solvent casting process is still the most extensively used and reproducible method for producing oral films, as seen in all three Flunarizine film experiments.

  • Solvent system: Ethanol–water mixture for dissolving both polymer and drug (3,14,19).
  • Procedure:
    • Polymer is soaked in solvent for 30 minutes to swell
    • Drug and excipients are added with continuous stirring
    • The homogenous, bubble-free solution is poured onto a glass plate
    • Films are dried at 40–45°C for 24 hours
  • Result: Clear, smooth, and uniform thin films ready for cutting into accurate dose units

Optimization of Film Composition

The polymer and plasticiser quantities must be optimised to provide a balance of strength, disintegration time, and medication release.

  • Ideal combination: For best results, combine a moderate polymer concentration (HPMC 400-500 mg) with 0.15 mL propylene glycol.
  • Outcome: The result is flexible, transparent films with few drying flaws.
  • Performance: Rapid breakdown (15-30 sec) and medication release of over 95% within 10 minutes (1,3,17).
  • Goal: Provide immediate antihistaminic relief for acute allergies.

Evaluation Parameters

Each film should go through a systematic physicochemical examination to assure quality, repeatability, and effectiveness. These tests are comparable to those used for Flunarizine OTFs (27,29).

  • Thickness: 0.11–0.20 mm for uniform dosing
  • Weight variation: ±10 mg tolerance limit
  • Folding endurance: Should withstand 150–250 folds without breaking
  • Surface pH: 6.5–6.8, compatible with oral mucosa
  • Disintegration time: Within 15–45 seconds for fast action
  • Drug content uniformity: 95–105% to ensure accurate dosing
  • In vitro drug release: >90% within 10 minutes, reflecting immediate availability

Mechanism of Drug Release

The drug release behaviour from the film depends on polymer matrix swelling and diffusion dynamics.

  • Observed kinetic model: Korsmeyer–Peppas model (non-Fickian diffusion) (11).
  • Mechanism: Combined effect of polymer relaxation and drug diffusion
  • Implication: Predictable, controlled drug release ensuring therapeutic efficiency

Fig No:- 03

Stability Considerations

To maintain efficacy and physical integrity, stability testing is essential under controlled conditions.

  • Storage conditions: 40°C ±2°C and 75% ±5% RH for 3 months
  • Results from similar films: No major change in drug content, appearance, or disintegration time
  • Packaging recommendation: Aluminum foil pouches or laminated sachets for moisture protection
  • Shelf-life expectation: Stable for at least 3 months under accelerated conditions (24,26).

5. MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials

The study used flunarizine dihydrochloride as the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). Several hydrophilic polymers, such as HPMC E15, HPMC K15, PVA, and PVP, were used (3,14). to produce films. Plasticizers like PEG 400 and glycerol were employed to increase flexibility and mechanical strength. Other excipients included sweeteners (sucralose, aspartame) and flavorings agents (peppermint, orange) (21) to improve palatability and patient acceptance. All reagents were analytical grade.

Formulation Design

To optimise film thickness, mechanical strength, and disintegration time, many formulations were created by altering polymer concentration (2-10% w/v), plasticiser percentage (0.5-2% w/v), and solvent volume. Flunarizine loading was kept at 5-10 mg per film, based on the intended therapeutic dosage (26,27).

Preparation Method: Solvent Casting (1,3,14)

  1. Polymer dissolved in distilled water or hydroalcoholic mixture.
  2. Plasticizer added gradually.
  3. Flunarizine dispersed into the polymer-plasticizer solution.
  4. Degassing to remove air bubbles.
  5. Casting into leveled petri dishes or trays.
  6. Drying at room temperature (25–30°C) or in a hot air oven at 40°C.
  7. Cutting into uniform sizes (2×2 cm²) and storing in airtight containers.

6. Evaluation Parameters

Table no: - 02

Parameter (1,3,17)

Method

Range / Result

Physical Appearance

Visual inspection

Smooth, transparent, crack-free

Thickness

Digital micrometer

0.12–0.18 mm

Weight Uniformity

Analytical balance

60–75 mg per film, ±5% variation

Folding Endurance

Manual fold

>200 folds

Surface pH

pH meter after soaking

6.5–7.0

Drug Content

UV-spectrophotometry

95–99%

Disintegration Time

Phosphate buffer, 37°C

25–45 sec

Dissolution

USP Type II, 900 mL buffer, 50–100 rpm

>95% release in 5 min (1,25)

Mechanical Strength

Tensile test

15–20 MPa, elongation 12–18%

Stability

40°C/75% RH, 30 days

No significant change (24,25)

Oral thin films are evaluated using various critical characteristics to verify their quality, performance, and patient acceptance. Thickness and weight variations are assessed to ensure medication content homogeneity and mechanical consistency. Folding endurance, tensile strength, and elongation all influence the film's flexibility, durability, and handling properties (1,24). The surface pH is kept near neutral to avoid mucosal irritation, and the disintegration time measures how rapidly the film dissolves-ideally within 30 seconds for fast drug administration. To guarantee consistent dosage, drug content uniformity is tested using analytical techniques such as UV spectroscopy or HPLC. In vitro dissolution experiments measure the rate and amount of drug release in simulated saliva, providing information on bioavailability. In conclusion, taste evaluation—whether using human panels or electronic sensors-ensures good taste masking, which is critical for patient compliance (25)

7. Applcations and Benefits in Migraine Treatment

Flunarizine oral thin films (OTFs) provide a quick and easy solution for migraine treatment. These films dissolve quickly in the mouth and allow for buccal absorption, bypassing first-pass metabolism and resulting in quicker onset and higher bioavailability (1,2,9). The dose form is suitable for people who experience nausea or vomiting during migraine attacks since it reduces swallowing issues (11,13). According to studies, optimised Flunarizine OTFs dissolve in 15-30 seconds and reach over 95% drug release in 10 minutes, giving rapid therapeutic relief. Furthermore, their portable, unit-dose form improves convenience and compliance, making them appropriate for acute and prophylactic migraine treatment (1,3,15).

8. Challenges and Limitations

Although Flunarizine OTFs have great potential, significant formulation and processing problems remain. Flunarizine's limited water solubility complicates medication dispersion and influences dissolution rate (1,3). To make the bitter taste more acceptable to patients, effective masking agents are required (21,22). Another challenge is maintaining mechanical strength and flexibility, since an imbalance of polymer and plasticiser can result in brittle or sticky films. Additionally, moisture sensitivity and scale-up restrictions during solvent casting provide challenges for commercial manufacture (19,24,25).

9. Future Perspectives

Future study might concentrate on increasing solubility and stability by nanoparticle inclusion, solid dispersions, or lipid-based coatings. The introduction of innovative biopolymers and sophisticated production processes like 3D printing and electrospinning may enable accurate dosage control and combination treatment (15,18). Furthermore, in-vivo investigations and long-term stability testing are required to establish the therapeutic efficacy of Flunarizine OTFs for routine clinical usage. With further modification, these films might become a standard fast-acting dose form for migraine prevention and acute care (16,19,20).

CONCLUSION

The development of oral thin films (OTFs) or following research might concentrate on increasing solubility and stability by nanoparticle inclusion, solid dispersions, or lipid-based coatings (1,3). The introduction of innovative biopolymers and sophisticated production processes like 3D printing and electrospinning may enable accurate dosage control and combination treatment (9). Furthermore, in-vivo investigations and long-term stability testing are required to establish the therapeutic efficacy of Flunarizine OTFs for routine clinical usage. With further modification, these films might become a standard fast-acting dose form for migraine prevention and acute care by using HPMC-based polymers, PEG-400 or propylene glycol as plasticisers, and taste-masking chemicals such mannitol and citric acid, the optimised films disintegrate in seconds and release more than 90% of the medicine in a few minutes (1,15,25). These properties enable immediate relief from migraine symptoms, increased bioavailability via buccal absorption, and higher adherence among paediatric, geriatric, and dysphagic patients who struggle with traditional pills or capsules (2,9,11).

Although challenges such as low solubility, taste masking, and large-scale production persist, ongoing advances in polymer engineering, nanotechnology, and sophisticated manufacturing techniques such as 3D printing are likely to improve formulation quality and therapeutic effectiveness (18,19,26).

Overall, Flunarizine oral thin films are a patient-friendly, fast-acting, and unique drug delivery technology with enormous promise for effective, safe, and easy migraine control in contemporary pharmaceutical therapy.

REFERENCES

  1. Utkarsh A, Kumar R, Mehra S. Development and evaluation of patient-friendly oral thin films of Flunarizine for migraine management. Int J Pharm Res Appl. 2021; 9(4):45–52.
  2. Sharma S, Patel M, Bansal V. Formulation and evaluation of Flunarizine oral thin films for rapid release and migraine treatment. Int J Res Med Sci. 2020; 8(3):2100–2108.
  3. Mehta K, Chauhan D, Joshi H. Design, development, and evaluation of instant release oral thin films of Flunarizine. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2019; 9(6):58–65.
  4. Gupta R, Singh A. Formulation approaches for oral thin films: A review. Int J Res Med Sci. 2020; 8(6):1345–1351.
  5. Patel D, Shah J. Oral thin film technology: A promising approach for CNS drug delivery. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2019; 58(2):101–107.
  6. Verma P, Tiwari R. Effect of polymer and plasticizer concentration on mechanical properties of oral thin films. Asian J Pharm. 2020; 14(1):45–51.
  7. Kaur M, Saini S. Development and characterization of drug-loaded oral thin films for improved bioavailability. J Pharm Innov. 2020; 12(3):56–63.
  8. Singh S, Rajput A. Optimization of polymeric oral thin films using solvent casting technique. Res J Pharm Technol. 2021; 14(4):2105–2110.
  9. Thakur R, Jain N. Fast-dissolving oral thin films: Formulation and evaluation parameters. Int J Drug Dev Res. 2020; 12(1):1–8.
  10. Joshi D, Patel R. Oral thin films for migraine management: Recent advances and formulation aspects. Indian J Pharm Educ Res. 2019; 53(2):112–120.
  11. Bhatt H, Desai T. Patient compliance improvement through oral thin film technology. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2020; 10(2):30–36.
  12. Chaudhari R, Dubey K. Evaluation of HPMC-based oral thin films for poorly soluble drugs. J Drug Formul Technol. 2019; 11(3):201–209.
  13. Patel P, Shukla N. Fast-dissolving films for migraine therapy: A novel approach. Int J Pharm Biol Sci. 2020; 10(2):145–150.
  14. Deshmukh M, Kumar V. Solvent casting method for preparation of oral thin films: Optimization and evaluation. Pharm Res Lett. 2019; 7(3):51–59.
  15. Chatterjee A, Jain S. Flunarizine-loaded polymeric oral thin films: Formulation development and evaluation. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2021; 12(7):3567–3574.
  16. Rathi V, Sharma R. Recent advances in oral thin film technology. J Pharm Res. 2020; 14(5):231–238.
  17. Desai P, Patel D. Development of fast dissolving films for CNS agents. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2019; 56(1):89–95.
  18. Jaiswal S, Kothari R. Enhancement of bioavailability through oral thin films: An overview. Int J Appl Pharm. 2020; 12(4):67–74.
  19. Bhuyan B, Reddy V. Evaluation of polymer compatibility and drug release in oral thin films. Res J Pharm Dosage Forms Technol. 2021; 13(2):112–118.
  20. Mishra S, Soni M. Effect of hydrophilic polymers on disintegration and dissolution of oral thin films. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2020; 82(6):965–972.
  21. Goyal A, Kaur R. Optimization of HPMC and PEG ratios for rapid-dissolving Flunarizine films. Int J Drug Deliv Technol. 2019; 9(3):220–226.
  22. Kumar P, Patel M. Design and evaluation of taste-masked oral thin films for improved patient compliance. J Pharm Sci Res. 2021; 13(1):75–81.
  23. Tiwari S, Mehra R. Formulation design and characterization of mouth-dissolving Flunarizine films. J Appl Pharm Res. 2020; 8(2):145–152.
  24. Roy S, Das A. Stability and mechanical behaviour of solvent-cast oral thin films under accelerated conditions. Asian J Pharm. 2021; 15(3):245–252.
  25. Bansal P, Chauhan A. Comparative evaluation of plasticizers in oral thin film formulations. J Pharm Innov. 2020; 13(4):301–308.
  26. Fatima A, Tirunagari M, Chilekampalli DT. Design, development and evaluation of instant release oral thin films of Flunarizine. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2021; 71(1):137–142.
  27. Lee KSKB. Polymer-based oral thin film technology for fast-dissolving drug delivery. J Pharm Innov. 2017;13(3):255–263.
  28. Pathan A, Gupta MK, Jain NK, Dubey A, Agrawal A. Formulation and evaluation of fast dissolving oral film of promethazine hydrochloride. J Innov Pharm Biol Sci. 2016;3(1):74–84.
  29. Nagar M, Nagar MK, Chopra V. Formulation and evaluation of mouth dissolving film of aripiprazole. Der Pharm Lett. 2014;4(4):1221–1227.
  30. Mahajan A, Chhabra N, Aggarwal G. Formulation and characterization of fast dissolving buccal films: A review. Der Pharm Lett. 2011;3(1):152–165.
  31. Silberstein SD. Preventive treatment of migraine. Neurologic Clinics. 2009;27(2):429–443.
  32. De Vries P, Villalón CM, Saxena PR. Pharmacological aspects of experimental headache models in migraine research. J Neurosci Methods. 1999;87(1):179–189.
  33. Gaudani H, Gajera B, Patel K. Formulation and evaluation of fast dissolving oral films of antihypertensive drug. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2014;5(3):1095–1101.
  34. Cilurzo F, Cupone IE, Minghetti P, Selmin F, Montanari L. Fast dissolving films made of maltodextrins. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2008;70(3):895–900.
  35. Preis M, Pein M, Breitkreutz J. Development of a taste-masked orodispersible film containing dimenhydrinate. Pharmaceutics. 2012;4(4):551–562.
  36. Karki S, Kim H, Na SJ, Shin D, Jo K, Lee JH. Thin films as an emerging platform for drug delivery. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2016;11(5):559–574.
  37. Dixit R, Puthli S. Oral strip technology: Overview and future potential. J Controlled Release. 2009;139(2):94–107.
  38. Irfan M, Rabel S, Bukhtar Q, Qadir MI, Jabeen F, Khan A. Orally disintegrating films: A modern expansion in drug delivery system. Saudi Pharm J. 2016;24
  39. Mahajan A, Chhabra N, Aggarwal G. Formulation and characterization of fast dissolving oral films of antihistaminic drug for enhanced bioavailability. Int J Drug Dev Res. 2013;5(1):55–60.

Reference

  1. Utkarsh A, Kumar R, Mehra S. Development and evaluation of patient-friendly oral thin films of Flunarizine for migraine management. Int J Pharm Res Appl. 2021; 9(4):45–52.
  2. Sharma S, Patel M, Bansal V. Formulation and evaluation of Flunarizine oral thin films for rapid release and migraine treatment. Int J Res Med Sci. 2020; 8(3):2100–2108.
  3. Mehta K, Chauhan D, Joshi H. Design, development, and evaluation of instant release oral thin films of Flunarizine. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2019; 9(6):58–65.
  4. Gupta R, Singh A. Formulation approaches for oral thin films: A review. Int J Res Med Sci. 2020; 8(6):1345–1351.
  5. Patel D, Shah J. Oral thin film technology: A promising approach for CNS drug delivery. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2019; 58(2):101–107.
  6. Verma P, Tiwari R. Effect of polymer and plasticizer concentration on mechanical properties of oral thin films. Asian J Pharm. 2020; 14(1):45–51.
  7. Kaur M, Saini S. Development and characterization of drug-loaded oral thin films for improved bioavailability. J Pharm Innov. 2020; 12(3):56–63.
  8. Singh S, Rajput A. Optimization of polymeric oral thin films using solvent casting technique. Res J Pharm Technol. 2021; 14(4):2105–2110.
  9. Thakur R, Jain N. Fast-dissolving oral thin films: Formulation and evaluation parameters. Int J Drug Dev Res. 2020; 12(1):1–8.
  10. Joshi D, Patel R. Oral thin films for migraine management: Recent advances and formulation aspects. Indian J Pharm Educ Res. 2019; 53(2):112–120.
  11. Bhatt H, Desai T. Patient compliance improvement through oral thin film technology. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2020; 10(2):30–36.
  12. Chaudhari R, Dubey K. Evaluation of HPMC-based oral thin films for poorly soluble drugs. J Drug Formul Technol. 2019; 11(3):201–209.
  13. Patel P, Shukla N. Fast-dissolving films for migraine therapy: A novel approach. Int J Pharm Biol Sci. 2020; 10(2):145–150.
  14. Deshmukh M, Kumar V. Solvent casting method for preparation of oral thin films: Optimization and evaluation. Pharm Res Lett. 2019; 7(3):51–59.
  15. Chatterjee A, Jain S. Flunarizine-loaded polymeric oral thin films: Formulation development and evaluation. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2021; 12(7):3567–3574.
  16. Rathi V, Sharma R. Recent advances in oral thin film technology. J Pharm Res. 2020; 14(5):231–238.
  17. Desai P, Patel D. Development of fast dissolving films for CNS agents. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2019; 56(1):89–95.
  18. Jaiswal S, Kothari R. Enhancement of bioavailability through oral thin films: An overview. Int J Appl Pharm. 2020; 12(4):67–74.
  19. Bhuyan B, Reddy V. Evaluation of polymer compatibility and drug release in oral thin films. Res J Pharm Dosage Forms Technol. 2021; 13(2):112–118.
  20. Mishra S, Soni M. Effect of hydrophilic polymers on disintegration and dissolution of oral thin films. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2020; 82(6):965–972.
  21. Goyal A, Kaur R. Optimization of HPMC and PEG ratios for rapid-dissolving Flunarizine films. Int J Drug Deliv Technol. 2019; 9(3):220–226.
  22. Kumar P, Patel M. Design and evaluation of taste-masked oral thin films for improved patient compliance. J Pharm Sci Res. 2021; 13(1):75–81.
  23. Tiwari S, Mehra R. Formulation design and characterization of mouth-dissolving Flunarizine films. J Appl Pharm Res. 2020; 8(2):145–152.
  24. Roy S, Das A. Stability and mechanical behaviour of solvent-cast oral thin films under accelerated conditions. Asian J Pharm. 2021; 15(3):245–252.
  25. Bansal P, Chauhan A. Comparative evaluation of plasticizers in oral thin film formulations. J Pharm Innov. 2020; 13(4):301–308.
  26. Fatima A, Tirunagari M, Chilekampalli DT. Design, development and evaluation of instant release oral thin films of Flunarizine. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2021; 71(1):137–142.
  27. Lee KSKB. Polymer-based oral thin film technology for fast-dissolving drug delivery. J Pharm Innov. 2017;13(3):255–263.
  28. Pathan A, Gupta MK, Jain NK, Dubey A, Agrawal A. Formulation and evaluation of fast dissolving oral film of promethazine hydrochloride. J Innov Pharm Biol Sci. 2016;3(1):74–84.
  29. Nagar M, Nagar MK, Chopra V. Formulation and evaluation of mouth dissolving film of aripiprazole. Der Pharm Lett. 2014;4(4):1221–1227.
  30. Mahajan A, Chhabra N, Aggarwal G. Formulation and characterization of fast dissolving buccal films: A review. Der Pharm Lett. 2011;3(1):152–165.
  31. Silberstein SD. Preventive treatment of migraine. Neurologic Clinics. 2009;27(2):429–443.
  32. De Vries P, Villalón CM, Saxena PR. Pharmacological aspects of experimental headache models in migraine research. J Neurosci Methods. 1999;87(1):179–189.
  33. Gaudani H, Gajera B, Patel K. Formulation and evaluation of fast dissolving oral films of antihypertensive drug. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2014;5(3):1095–1101.
  34. Cilurzo F, Cupone IE, Minghetti P, Selmin F, Montanari L. Fast dissolving films made of maltodextrins. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2008;70(3):895–900.
  35. Preis M, Pein M, Breitkreutz J. Development of a taste-masked orodispersible film containing dimenhydrinate. Pharmaceutics. 2012;4(4):551–562.
  36. Karki S, Kim H, Na SJ, Shin D, Jo K, Lee JH. Thin films as an emerging platform for drug delivery. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2016;11(5):559–574.
  37. Dixit R, Puthli S. Oral strip technology: Overview and future potential. J Controlled Release. 2009;139(2):94–107.
  38. Irfan M, Rabel S, Bukhtar Q, Qadir MI, Jabeen F, Khan A. Orally disintegrating films: A modern expansion in drug delivery system. Saudi Pharm J. 2016;24
  39. Mahajan A, Chhabra N, Aggarwal G. Formulation and characterization of fast dissolving oral films of antihistaminic drug for enhanced bioavailability. Int J Drug Dev Res. 2013;5(1):55–60.

Photo
Alisha Rafik Sayyad
Corresponding author

Samarth Institute of pharmacy Belhe, Pune

Photo
Sachin Bhalekar
Co-author

Samarth Institute of pharmacy Belhe, Pune

Photo
Ganesh Lamkhede
Co-author

Samarth Institute of pharmacy Belhe, Pune

Photo
Snehal Moikar
Co-author

Samarth Institute of pharmacy Belhe, Pune

Photo
Sakshi Sadgir
Co-author

Samarth Institute of pharmacy Belhe, Pune

Alisha Rafik Sayyad, Sachin Bhalekar, Ganesh Lamkhede, Snehal Moikar, Sakshi Sadgir, Development of Patient-Friendly Oral Thin Film of Flunarizine for Migraine Management, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 11, 331-340. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17515394

More related articles
Application Of QBD Approach to Analytical Method D...
Akanksha Mohite , Sushant Kokane, ...
Development and Validation of a UV Spectrophotomet...
Sachhidananda Mahapatra, Soumyaranjan Biswal, Tushar Kanta Behera...
AI-Enabled Transformation in Clinical Drug Development: A Pathway from Innovatio...
Preethi J., Punniyamoorthy K., Rejina C., Dharanikumar S., Prathiksha M., Srinath M., Naresh R., ...
Development of Herbal Sanitory Pads...
Vaishnavi Rakshe , Manasi Deshmukh, Payal Shelke, Siddhi Bengude, Renuka Khandare, Samrudhi Andre, P...
Related Articles
Advancements In Digital Dentistry and Prosthodontics: Exploring the Impact of CA...
Dr. Kundanlal Sharma, Dr. Kalpana Chaudhary, Dr. Jitendra Khetan, Dr. Namrta Mahajan, ...
Development and Characterization of The Celecoxib Matrix Tablet...
Prashil Dhumale, Ab Ahesan Ab Faruk, Shyamkumar Dabhade, Vaishnavi Gole, Dipali Doifode, ...
More related articles
Development and Validation of a UV Spectrophotometric Method for Stability Evalu...
Sachhidananda Mahapatra, Soumyaranjan Biswal, Tushar Kanta Behera, Santosh Kumar Dash, Ashutosh Padh...