College of Pharmacy, Shivalik Campus, Dehradun, 248197
Floating Drug Delivery Systems (FDDS) is an efficient gastroretentive drug delivery system designed to address the shortcomings associated with traditional oral drug delivery systems. The system uses effervescent or non-effervescent techniques to ensure that it stays buoyant in the stomach due to its density being lower than that of gastric fluid. The technique is also known to improve bioavailability for drugs that have low half- life or specific gastric targets. This review paper explains the mechanism and process associated with FDDS. In this context, various types of drug delivery systems like tablets, capsules, microspheres, beads, and raft tablets have been explained. Nonetheless, some of the latest developments in FDDS include microspheres, nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems, smart polymers, dual mechanism drug delivery system, and 3D printing technology. The presented study provides insights into the efficiency and potential associated with FDDS in oral drug delivery.
People generally find taking medication orally very convenient and painless. Sometimes, the medication moves too quickly through the stomach and the small intestines, giving the body insufficient time to process and absorb it.(1) To counter this, a special drug delivery system named Gastroretentive Drug Delivery Systems (GRDDS) was developed. Gastro-Retentive Drug Delivery System (GRDDS) is a novel oral drug delivery system with a target of maximizing the dwell-time of a dosage form in the stomach region. In standard oral drug delivery systems, dosage forms move quickly through the GI tract, which may cause suboptimal release of the drug or decreased bioavailability, especially for a drug which has a preference for absorption in the stomach or the upper part of the small intestine. [2] GRDDS overcomes these limitations by retaining the drug delivery system in the gastric region for an extended period, thereby ensuring controlled and site-specific drug release. This system is particularly beneficial for drugs that:
Have a narrow absorption window in the upper GI tract
Are locally active in the stomach (e.g., drugs for gastric ulcers or Helicobacter pylori infection)
Are unstable or poorly soluble at intestinal pH
Require prolonged therapeutic action(3,4)
Advantages of Gastro-retentive Drug Delivery System (GRDDS)
Types of the gastroretentive system
Gastro-retentive drug delivery systems are designed using different formulation approaches to prolong the residence time of dosage forms in the stomach. Based on the mechanism by which gastric retention is achieved, the GRDDS can be classified into following major types:
Figure 1: Types of Gastro-retentive drug delivery systems
Of the different approaches for GRDDS, FDDS is the most promising and widely investigated approach. This is because floating systems are designed such that their density is lower than that of the gastric fluid, enabling them to float on the stomach for an extended period of time without interfering with normal gastric emptying. The drug is released in a controlled manner at the desired site while floating on the gastric contents.
The reasons that floating systems represent the most promising GRDDS approach include:
FDDS basically stand for Floating Drug Delivery Systems, a specialized gastro-retentive drug delivery system. This is designed to stay afloat in the stomach for an extended time. These systems exhibit less density compared to that of gastric fluid, thus these can float on the gastric contents and may not impede the normal process of gastric emptying. The floating may cause the release of the drug in a controlled and sustained manner, allowing prolonged therapeutic action. The prolonged gastric residence time of FDDS increases absorption, mainly of those drugs that are preferentially absorbed from the stomach or the upper part of the small intestine. This approach highly improves bioavailability, therapeutic efficacy, and patient compliance.(20)
Principle of Floating Drug Delivery Systems
FDDS works based on the principle of buoyancy.FDDS is based on the principle of buoyancy. When this dosage form comes in contact with gastric fluids, it is too:
This leads to a dosage form remaining in the stomach for a couple of hours and releasing the drug at a desired site.(21,22,23)
Suitability Of Floating Drug Delivery Systems
Floating Drug Delivery Systems are specifically beneficial in:
By holding the dosage form in the stomach, FDDS helps increase the absorption of the drug and reduce the loss of the drug by rapid gastric emptying.
Benefits of Floating Drug Delivery Systems
Factors Affecting the Floating and Floating Time of FDDS
The factors affecting floating and floating time of FDDS are as follows: The performance of FDDS largely depends on their ability to remain buoyant in the gastric fluid and retain a position in the stomach for a longer period. Several physiological, formulation-related, and patient-specific factors influence the floating behavior and gastric retention time.
Size of Dosage Form: The size of the dosage form is also very significant in determining gastric retention. Dosage forms that are larger than 9.5mm in size will tend to reside in the stomach for a relatively longer time, whereas smaller dosage forms will readily pass into the intestines due to the pyloric sphincter during gastric emptying.(24)
Disease State: There are numerous diseases that may adversely influence gastric emptying:
Types of floating Drug Delivery System
There are different types of floating systems depending on the floating mechanism:
Effervescent-floating systems produce buoyancy by the production of carbon dioxide gas when they come into contact with gastric fluid. The produced gas gets entrapped in the polymer matrix, causing the density of the dosage form to decrease and resulting in the production of a floating system.
Effervescent Floating System Composition Such systems always comprise:
Table No. 1: Types of Effervescent (Gas-Generating) Floating Drug Delivery Systems(22,23,24,25,26)
|
Type of Effervescent System |
Dosage Form |
Composition / Key Components |
Mechanism of Floating |
Advantages |
Limitations |
|
Floating Tablets |
Tablets |
Hydrophilic polymers (HPMC), gas- generating agents (sodium bicarbonate, citric/tartaric acid) |
CO? generated in an acidic medium gets trapped in a swollen polymer matrix, reducing density |
Simple formulation, prolonged floating time, controlled drug release |
It depends on gastric acidity, the floating lag time |
|
Floating Capsules |
Capsules |
Effervescent granules or powders with polymers and |
CO? generation causes buoyancy after |
Easy to manufacture, flexible dose loading |
Variable floating time, less mechanical strength |
|
|
|
gas-forming agents |
the capsule shell dissolves |
|
|
|
Floating Granules / Pellets |
Granules pellets |
Drug, polymer, sodium bicarbonate, organic acids |
Gas generation lowers the density of individual units |
Uniform drug release, reduced dose dumping |
More complex manufacturing |
|
Floating Beads |
Beads |
Alginate or polymer matrix with gas-forming agents |
CO? entrapped within the bead structure |
Multiple-unit system, improved gastric retention |
Limited drug loading capacity |
|
Effervescent Microspheres |
Hollow microspheres |
Polymer shell (e.g., ethyl cellulose), gas- forming agents |
Hollow core formed by CO? generation provides buoyancy |
Prolonged floating, controlled release, reduced irritation |
Expensive and technically demanding |
|
Raft-Forming Effervescent Systems |
Liquid/gel systems |
Sodium alginate, bicarbonates, calcium salts |
Formation of a floating gel raft due to CO? generation |
Excellent for GERD, localized gastric action |
Not suitable for systemic drug delivery |
Mechanism of Effervescent (Gas-Generating) Floating Drug Delivery Systems (FDDS):
Figure 2: Mechanism of Effervescent (Gas-Generating) Floating Drug Delivery Systems
2.Non-Effervescent Floating Systems
Non-effervescent floating systems are a form of gastro-retentive drug delivery systems (GRDDS). These systems work by being buoyant without the production of gas. The primary function of non-effervescent floating systems is carried out by swellable and gelation polymers such as hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC).
In contrast to effervescent systems, non-effervescent systems do not include gas-releasing agents but rely on the hydration and gelation processes of polymers for lightness and floatation.
Principle of Non-Effervescent Floating Systems
The principle on which non-effervescent floating systems lie is that of hydrodynamic balance. When the dosage form is exposed to gastric fluid:
Table No. 2: Types of Non-Effervescent Floating Drug Delivery Systems(28,29,30,31)
|
Type |
Dosage Form / System |
Key Components |
Mechanism of Floating |
Major Advantages |
Applications |
|
|
Hydrodynamically Balanced Systems (HBS) |
Tablets / Capsules |
Hydrophilic polymers (HPMC, Carbopol), drug |
Polymer hydrates and forms gel; density remains lower than gastric fluid |
Prolonged gastric retention, controlled drug release |
Drugs absorbed in the stomach or upper intestine |
|
|
Floating Tablets and Capsules |
Single-unit dosage forms |
Swelling polymers (HPMC, sodium alginate), drug |
Polymer swelling creates a low-density gel matrix |
Simple formulation, sustained drug release |
Short half- life drugs, gastric- specific delivery |
|
|
Floating Microspheres (Microballoons) |
Hollow microspheres |
Polymers (ethyl cellulose, Eudragit), drug |
Hollow core provides buoyancy |
Uniform drug release, reduced dose dumping |
Long-term gastric retention, chronic therapy |
|
|
Floating Alginate Beads |
Beads |
Sodium alginate, calcium chloride, and the drug |
Swelling and air entrapment in gel matrix |
Good mechanical strength, sustained release |
Local gastric action, controlled delivery |
|
Figure 3: Mechanism of Non-Effervescent Floating Drug Delivery Systems
Polymer used for a floating drug delivery system
Polymers are also important constituents in the design and development of Floating Drug Delivery Systems (FDDS). These polymers are mainly responsible for providing buoyancy, drug release, and the strength of the drug delivery system in the gastric environment. However, the choice of the appropriate polymer is contingent on factors such as swelling properties, gelation capacity, density, viscosity, and drug compatibility. In FDDS, the polymers absorb the gastric fluid and increase in size to form a thick gel layer around the drug delivery system, making it float as well as preventing the release of the drug quickly. Certain polymers are also responsible for gas entrapment in effervescent systems or for maintaining the entrapped air in non- effervescent systems, thus decreasing the overall system density. In FDDS, the polymers can be either natural, semi-synthetic, or synthetic in nature. (34)Natural polymers like sodium alginate, guar gum, or chitosan are more desirable due to their biocompatible and biodegradable properties. Amongst the semi-synthetic polymers, derivatives such as cellulose are more desirable as hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) because of its optimal swelling and drug release capacity. Other synthetic polymers such as Eudragit, polyvinyl alcohol, or biodegradable polymers like PLGA, are used to provide exact drug release along with precise control over drug release and mechanical strength.(35,36)
Table No. 3: Polymers used for a floating drug delivery system (36,37)
|
Category |
Polymer Name |
Type |
Role in FDDS |
Uses |
|
|
Natural Polymers |
Sodium alginate |
Seaweed-derived polysaccharide |
Swelling, gel formation, buoyancy |
Widely used in floating beads and raft-forming systems |
|
|
Pectin |
Plant polysaccharide |
Gel formation, controlled release |
Used in gastric- retentive formulations |
||
|
Chitosan |
Deacetylated chitin |
Swelling, mucoadhesion |
Enhances gastric retention and bioadhesion |
||
|
Guar gum |
Plant-derived galactomannan |
Swelling, viscosity enhancement |
Used in sustained release floating tablets |
||
|
Xanthan gum |
Microbial polysaccharide |
Gel formation, viscosity control |
Improves matrix integrity |
||
|
Carrageenan |
Red seaweed polysaccharide |
Gel formation |
Used in floating matrices |
||
|
Semi-Synthetic Polymers |
Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) |
Cellulose derivative |
Swelling, gel formation, floating |
Most commonly used polymer in FDDS |
|
|
|
Hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC) |
Cellulose derivative |
Matrix formation, sustained release |
Improves tablet integrity |
|
|
Hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC) |
Cellulose derivative |
Swelling, controlled release |
Used in hydrodynamically balanced systems |
||
|
Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (NaCMC) |
Cellulose derivative |
Swelling, viscosity enhancement |
Used in floating tablets |
||
|
Ethyl cellulose |
Cellulose derivative |
Release retardant, matrix former |
Used in microspheres and microballoons |
||
|
Synthetic Polymers |
Eudragit® (RL, RS, NE) |
Methacrylate polymers |
Matrix formation, controlled release |
Widely used in floating microspheres |
|
|
Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) |
Synthetic polymer |
Film formation, matrix stability |
Used in microballoons |
||
|
Polyethylene oxide (PEO) |
Synthetic polymer |
Swelling, gel formation |
High swelling capacity |
||
|
Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) |
Synthetic polymer |
Binder, release modifier |
Improves tablet strength |
||
|
Polylactic acid (PLA) |
Biodegradable polymer |
Matrix formation |
Used in floating microspheres |
||
|
Polylactic-co- glycolic acid (PLGA) |
Biodegradable copolymer |
Controlled drug release |
Used in advanced gastroretentive systems |
||
Characterization of Floating Drug Delivery Systems (FDDS) is essential to ensure adequate buoyancy, prolonged gastric retention, controlled drug release, and formulation stability. Evaluation of FDDS involves the assessment of floating behavior, swelling characteristics, drug content uniformity, and drug release profile. These studies help in predicting the in vivo performance of the system and confirm its suitability for gastro-retentive drug delivery. The various characterization parameters of FDDS are summarized in the table(38)
Table No.4: Characterization of Floating Drug Delivery Systems (FDDS)
|
Parameter |
Test / Method |
Short Write-up (Purpose & Significance) |
|
Floating Lag Time (FLT) |
In vitro buoyancy test in simulated gastric fluid (0.1 N HCl) |
Time taken by the dosage form to rise to the surface. Short FLT indicates a rapid onset of floating. |
|
Total Floating Time (TFT) |
In vitro buoyancy study |
Duration for which the dosage form remains floating. Indicates gastric retention capability. |
|
In vitro Buoyancy |
Observation in dissolution medium |
Confirms the floating behavior and stability of the system in gastric conditions. |
|
Swelling Index |
Weight gain method |
Measures the extent of polymer swelling, which influences buoyancy and drug release. |
|
Drug Content Uniformity |
Assay using UV/ HPLC |
Ensures uniform distribution of the drug in the formulation for dose accuracy. |
|
In vitro Drug Release |
USP dissolution apparatus (Type I or II) |
Determines the rate and pattern of drug release from the floating system. |
|
Release Kinetics |
Mathematical models (Zero order, Higuchi, Korsmeyer– Peppas) |
Explains the mechanism of drug release (diffusion, erosion, or both). |
|
Tablet Hardness |
Monsanto or Pfizer hardness tester |
Ensures mechanical strength and resistance to handling stress. |
|
Friability |
Roche friabilator |
Measures tablet resistance to abrasion; acceptable limit is usually <1%. |
|
Thickness and Diameter |
Vernier caliper |
Ensures uniformity in tablet dimensions. |
|
Weight Variation |
Pharmacopoeial method |
Confirms uniformity of dosage units. |
|
Density Measurement |
Volume and weight determination |
Density must be lower than gastric fluid for effective floating. |
|
Surface Morphology |
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) |
Examine surface characteristics, porosity, and polymer structure. |
|
Stability Studies |
ICH guidelines (accelerated conditions) |
Evaluates physical and chemical stability over time. |
|
In vivo Gastric Retention (optional) |
X-ray or gamma scintigraphy |
Confirms gastric residence timeunder physiological conditions. |
Recent Advancements in Floating Drug Delivery Systems (FDDS)
Floating Drug Delivery Systems (FDDS) have been recognized and identified as one of the most promising areas in gastro retentive drug delivery systems for improving oral bioavailability of drugs with a narrow absorption window, short half-life, and/or preferring stomach and upper GI tract for absorption. Although conventional FDDS have offered a wide range of applications with many advantages, contemporary pharmaceutical research has concentrated on addressing drawbacks, including dependence on gastric emptying patterns, gastric pH, and difficulty in controlling drug release in conventional FDDS. Consequently, new approaches have been introduced to optimize FDDS and make it more efficient and successful.
The progress of FDDS is motivated by:
Such challenges have motivated the emergence of the next-next-generation solar floaters with enhanced efficiency and reproducing abilities.(39)
Current studies also highlight the application of new and multi-functioning polymers for enhanced buoyancy and drug release.
Major Break-Through
Benefits
One of the most important developments in FDDS is the creation of microballoons, or floating microspheres.
Key Features
The
Advantages
It would seem that drug delivery systems are most beneficial for use in chronic therapy, where a drug needs to release slowly for
Raft forming systems today embody an evolved form of conventional floating systems. Innovations
Applications
Nanotechnology has brought forth new possibilities in FDDS development.
Controversial Issues
Advantages
More recently, two or more gastro-retentive systems are combined for performance improvement.
Examples
Significance
Additive manufacturing has recently emerged for FDDS designs.
Major Break-Through
Impact
The Smart FDDS adjusts itself to physiological conditions.
Innovations
They are capable of site-specific as well as time-dependent drug release.
Table No. 5: Recent Advancements in Floating Drug Delivery Systems(40,41)
|
Year |
Type of FDDS |
Drug Used |
Major Findings |
||
|
2016 |
Floating microspheres |
Metformin HCl |
Hollow microspheres showed prolonged floating (>12 h) and sustained drug release |
||
|
2017 |
Hydrodynamically Balanced System (HBS) |
Ofloxacin |
HPMC-based HBS improved gastric retention and controlled release |
||
|
2017 |
Floating matrix tablets |
Ciprofloxacin |
Enhanced bioavailability due to prolonged gastric retention |
||
|
2018 |
Floating alginate beads |
Metformin |
Alginate–Ca²? beads showed good buoyancy and sustained release |
||
|
2018 |
Floating microspheres |
Propranolol HCl |
Reduced dose dumping and uniform drug release |
||
|
2019 |
Raft-forming system |
Antacid drugs |
Strong raft formation is useful in GERD management |
||
|
2019 |
Floating tablets (non- effervescent) |
Famotidine |
Improved bioavailability and reduced dosing frequency |
||
|
2020 |
Floating microballoons |
Metformin |
Improved in vivo gastric residence and glucose control |
||
|
2020 |
Dual-mechanism FDDS (floating + bioadhesive) |
Clarithromycin |
Increased gastric retention and anti-H. pylori activity |
||
|
2020 |
Floating beads |
Riboflavin |
Sustained release and improved gastric retention |
||
|
2021 |
Floating microspheres |
Glipizide |
Controlled release improved the antidiabetic effect |
||
|
2021 |
Non-effervescent floating tablets |
Levodopa |
Prolonged gastric retention enhanced absorption |
|
|
|
2021 |
Alginate raft system |
GERD formulatio |
Better reflux suppression than conventional antacids |
|
|
|
2022 |
Floating nanoparticles |
Curcumin |
Improved solubility and gastric retention |
|
|
|
2022 |
Floating microspheres |
Domperidone |
Enhanced bioavailability and sustained action |
|
|
|
2022 |
3D-printed floating tablets |
Baclofen |
Custom geometry enabled prolonged floating and zero-order release |
|
|
|
2023 |
3D-printed gastro-floating system |
Verapamil HCl |
Tablet shape and infill density-controlled release & buoyancy |
|
|
|
2023 |
Floating hollow tablets |
Metformin |
In vivo studies showed >6 h gastric retention |
|
|
|
2024 |
Floating microspheres (natural polymer) |
Amoxicillin |
Improved gastric residence for H. pylori therapy |
|
|
|
2024 |
Smart floating system (pH- responsive) |
Model drug |
pH-triggered floating with controlled release |
|
|
Floating Drug Delivery Systems (FDDS) are a continually expanding domain of research in oral controlled drug delivery systems; they offer many advantages for drugs that have a small window of absorption, a short biological half-life, or for which site-specific entry in the upper GI tract is desired. In view of advances in material science, formulation, and processing methods, FDDS are expected to assume considerable importance in the development of pharmaceuticals in the years to come. One of the key areas that research in FDDS is expected to explore is the development of "smart" and "stimulus-responsive" FDDS. These systems would utilize novel polymers which could respond to changes in gastric pH values, temperature, ion concentrations, as well as gastric contractions. This would enable these systems to ensure desired floating as well as drug release profiles regardless of changes in physiological conditions. Another promising area that is expected to assume importance is that of "nanotechnology" and FDDS coupled together. The addition of nanospheres, Nano-emulsions to FDDS would enable a marked increase in the solubility and availability of sparingly soluble actives. Nano-based advances in FDDS would be particularly useful for a wide range of actives that need to be delivered via the oral geometry, porosity, density, and drug distribution, enabling the design of customized Floating Dosage Forms. This technology is enabling personalized medicine therapies where drug dosage and delivery profiles can be designed specifically for different patients. The future studies are also emphasizing multi-mechanism Gastro-Retentive Systems, combining Floating Mechanism with other retention techniques such as Bioadhesion, Swelling, Expandable Systems, and Muco-Adhesion. The hybrid systems provide improved and consistent gastric retention, overcoming obstacles linked with Single Mechanism FDDS. The expanding application base of Biodegradable, Biocompatible, and Natural Polymers is another significant area. The use of natural polymers is ensuring enhanced safety profiles, lowering toxicity issues, and enabling sustainable drug development. Natural Polymers are also improving patient acceptability and compliance, particularly for long-term drug therapies. In clinical and regulatory contexts, future innovations in In Vitro-In Vivo Correlation (IVIVC) Methods, Imaging Modalities, and Predictive Modeling will enable a seamless transition between lab research studies and real-world drug performance. Future studies will ease faster approvals and launches related to Floating Dosage Form Design.(42)
Key Future Prospects of FDDS
Development of smart, pH- and stimuli-responsive floating systems
Table No.6: Marketed Approved Floating Formulations
|
S. No. |
Category (dosage form) |
Brand / Product (active) |
Short detail |
Manufacturer |
||
|
1 |
Raft-forming oral suspension (liquid) |
Gaviscon Liquid (sodium alginate + antacids) |
Forms floating alginate raft in stomach |
Reckitt |
||
|
2 |
Raft-forming oral suspension (liquid) |
Gaviscon Advance (Liquid) |
Higher-strength alginate raft liquid |
Reckitt |
||
|
3 |
Raft-forming oral suspension (liquid) |
Gaviscon Double Action (Liquid) |
Alginate + antacid floating liquid |
Reckitt |
||
|
4 |
Raft-forming oral suspension (liquid) |
Peptac Liquid (sodium alginate + antacid) |
Floating alginate antacid suspension (UK/IE market) |
Various / regional distributors |
||
|
5 |
Raft-forming oral suspension (liquid) |
Rennie Liquid / Rennie Duo Liquid (alginate + antacid) |
Alginate raft antacid suspension (regional brands) |
Various / regional |
||
|
6 |
Raft-forming oral suspension (liquid) |
Mylanta (liquid variants with raft/alginate tech in some markets) |
Marketed liquid antacid/alginate suspensions (region-dependent) |
Various / regional |
||
|
7 |
Raft-forming oral suspension (liquid) |
Generic / private-label alginate raft suspensions |
Multiple store brands using alginate raft technology |
Various / regional manufacturers |
||
|
8 |
Liquid in-situ gelling (oral) |
Alginate in-situ gel antacid products (marketed regionally) |
Liquid that gels/rafts on contact with gastric fluid |
Various / regional |
||
|
9 |
Raft-forming oral suspension (sachet / sachet liquid) |
Gaviscon Sachets / Liquid sachets |
Single-dose floating liquid presentations |
Reckitt |
||
|
10 |
Raft-forming oral suspension (large- pack liquid) |
Gaviscon Advance (multi-pack sizes) |
Pack size variants of floating raft liquid |
Reckitt |
||
|
11 |
Hydrodynamically Balanced System |
Madopar HBS (levodopa + benserazide) |
HBS gastro- retentive formulation for |
Roche / licensees |
||
|
|
(HBS) — tablet/capsule |
|
prolonged gastric residence (Parkinson’s) |
|
||
|
12 |
HBS / gastric- retentive tablet (marketed HBS derivatives) |
Other marketed HBS variants (levodopa families) |
HBS variants derived from levodopa sustained-release programs (regional) |
Roche /regional partners |
||
|
13 |
Floating microsphere / microencapsulated commercial platforms |
Commercial hollow microsphere/microencap sulation products (niche/industrial use) |
Some microencapsulatio n platforms are marketed for sustained/floatable delivery in niche products |
Various specialty manufacturers |
||
|
14 |
Floating microballoons (industrial/commercia l examples) |
Microballoon-based sustained-release products (niche markets) |
Hollow microballoon technologies used in some commercial formulations |
Various / contract manufacturers |
||
|
15 |
Floating raft antacid — pharmacy brands |
Peptac / Rennie / Gaviscon generic equivalents (liquid) |
Marketed raft liquids under multiple trade names worldwide |
Various / regional |
||
|
16 |
Raft-forming oral suspension (medical/OTC) |
Alginate antacid liquid (hospital OTC brands) |
Alginate raft liquids sold for clinical/hospital use |
Various manufacturers |
||
|
17 |
In-situ gelling oral (gel/solution) |
Regional alginate gel formulations (therapeutic liquid gels) |
Marketed as antacid/gastro- protective in some countries |
Various / regional |
||
|
18 |
Liquid raft antacid (flavoured / multipack) |
Gaviscon flavour & pack variants (liquid) |
Flavour and pack SKUs of the floating suspension |
Reckitt |
||
|
19 |
Liquid raft antacid (OTC private label) |
Supermarket / pharmacy private-label alginate suspensions |
Private-label floating antacid liquids |
Various / regional |
||
|
20 |
Raft-forming oral suspension (paediatric liquid) |
Gaviscon Infant / infant alginate suspensions |
Paediatric formulations that form floating gel/raft |
Reckitt /regional licensees |
||
Floating Drug Delivery Systems have now been established as a safe, effective, and modern approach for improving oral drug delivery. The concept of prolonging gastric residence time has been successfully employed in FDDS to increase bioavailability, give sustained plasma drug concentrations, decrease frequent doses, and suppress adverse reactions, especially for drugs primarily absorbed in the stomach and upper GI tract. The employment of appropriate polymers, effervescent and non-effervescent formulations, and appropriate formulation methodologies is also known to ensure efficient buoyancy and sustained drug release. Commercially available alginate-based raft tablets and hydrodynamically balanced formulations have already proven the efficacy and practical viability of FDDS in clinical applications. Moreover, new approaches in micro- and nanotechnology and smart and stimulus- responsive materials and innovative 3D printing methodologies have now opened up new avenues for personalized and goal-oriented therapy using FDDS in forthcoming generations of oral drug-delivery systems despite some drawbacks in certain applications.
REFERENCES
Vineet Joshi, Kajal Patel*, Ridhi Koul, Amit Semwal, Floating Drug Delivery Systems: Mechanisms, Formulation Approaches, and Future Prospects, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 5, 4749-4769. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20282825
10.5281/zenodo.20282825