View Article

Abstract

Floating Drug Delivery Systems (FDDS) is an efficient gastroretentive drug delivery system designed to address the shortcomings associated with traditional oral drug delivery systems. The system uses effervescent or non-effervescent techniques to ensure that it stays buoyant in the stomach due to its density being lower than that of gastric fluid. The technique is also known to improve bioavailability for drugs that have low half- life or specific gastric targets. This review paper explains the mechanism and process associated with FDDS. In this context, various types of drug delivery systems like tablets, capsules, microspheres, beads, and raft tablets have been explained. Nonetheless, some of the latest developments in FDDS include microspheres, nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems, smart polymers, dual mechanism drug delivery system, and 3D printing technology. The presented study provides insights into the efficiency and potential associated with FDDS in oral drug delivery.

Keywords

Floating Drug Delivery System; Gastroretentive Drug Delivery; Gastric Retention; Controlled Drug Release

Introduction

People generally find taking medication orally very convenient and painless. Sometimes, the medication moves too quickly through the stomach and the small intestines, giving the body insufficient time to process and absorb it.(1) To counter this, a special drug delivery system named Gastroretentive Drug Delivery Systems (GRDDS) was developed. Gastro-Retentive Drug Delivery System (GRDDS) is a novel oral drug delivery system with a target of maximizing the dwell-time of a dosage form in the stomach region. In standard oral drug delivery systems, dosage forms move quickly through the GI tract, which may cause suboptimal release of the drug or decreased bioavailability, especially for a drug which has a preference for absorption in the stomach or the upper part of the small intestine. [2] GRDDS overcomes these limitations by retaining the drug delivery system in the gastric region for an extended period, thereby ensuring controlled and site-specific drug release. This system is particularly beneficial for drugs that:

Have a narrow absorption window in the upper GI tract

Are locally active in the stomach (e.g., drugs for gastric ulcers or Helicobacter pylori infection)

Are unstable or poorly soluble at intestinal pH

Require prolonged therapeutic action(3,4)

Advantages of Gastro-retentive Drug Delivery System (GRDDS)

  1. Improved Bioavailability: Prolonged gastric residence time increases the bioavailability of drugs that depend on the stomach or the proximal part of the small intestine for absorption.
  2. Sustained Drug Delivery / Minimized Frequency of Dosing: GRDDS allows controlled and prolonged drug release, thereby reducing dosing frequency and improving patient compliance.
  3. Minimal Fluctuation of Drug Concentration: The continuous release of the drug maintains steady plasma levels of the drug and minimizes peak–trough fluctuations.
  4. Reduced Adverse Activity in the Colon: By limiting drug exposure to the colon, GRDDS reduces colonic irritation and side effects associated with unstable drugs or irritating drugs in the lower GI tract.(5,6)
  5. Enhanced therapeutic efficacy: Prolonged drug release at the absorption site improves therapeutic effectiveness, especially for drugs with a short half-life.
  6. Better Patient Compliance: Less frequent dosing and consistent therapeutic effect result in better adherence to treatment regimens.
  7. Site-Specific Drug Delivery in the Stomach: GRDDS are ideal for drugs intended for local action in the stomach, such as antacids, antibiotics for Helicobacter pylori, and anti-ulcer drugs.Reduced Drug Wastage: Controlled and targeted drug release minimizes drug loss due to premature passage through the gastrointestinal tract.viii.  Better Absorption of Drugs with Narrow Absorption Window: Drugs that exhibit absorption only in the upper GI tract are greatly benefited by extended gastric retention.
  8. Reduced Dose Requirement: Because of the improved bioavailability, the total drug dose can be reduced to avoid dose-related toxicity.(7)
  9. Improved Solubility of Weakly Basic Drugs: The acidic environment in the stomach enhances the dissolution of weakly basic drugs, thereby promoting their absorption.
  10. Suitable for Drugs Degraded in Intestinal pH: GRDDS protects drugs that are unstable in the alkaline environment of the intestine by retaining them in the stomach.(8)

Types of the gastroretentive system

Gastro-retentive drug delivery systems are designed using different formulation approaches to prolong the residence time of dosage forms in the stomach. Based on the mechanism by which gastric retention is achieved, the GRDDS can be classified into following major types:

  1. Floating Drug Delivery Systems: The density of these systems is less than that of gastric fluid; thus, these systems can float on the stomach contents for a considerable period of time. The drug is released while the system is buoyant, making it suitable for drugs whose absorption takes place in the upper GI tract.(9)
  2. High-Density Systems: These are formulated with materials having a density greater than that of gastric fluid. They sink to the bottom of the stomach and resist peristaltic movements, thus increasing gastric retention time.
  3. Swelling and Expanding Systems: These are systems that swell or expand rapidly following contact with gastric fluid to a size that is large enough to prevent passage through the pylorus. This allows for prolonged gastric residence, thereby providing a sustained drug release.iv. Bioadhesive systems: These systems adhere to the gastric mucosal surface because of bioadhesive polymers, resisting gastric emptying and improving drug absorption.(10,11,12)
  4. Raft-Forming Systems: Raft-forming systems form viscous, gel-like floating rafts in the presence of gastric fluid. They are particularly useful in the treatment of gastric reflux and ulcer conditions.
  5. Carbon dioxide gas-generating systems: Upon their contact and reaction with gastric acid, a sufficient amount of carbon dioxide gas is produced; this gas gets entrapped in the dosage form, thereby reducing its density and allowing it to float.
  6. Ion-exchange resin systems: Drugs complexed with ion-exchange resins are slowly released in the acidic gastric environment, resulting in prolonged gastric retention and sustained release of the drug. Hydrodynamically Balanced Systems (HBS): These are single-unit floating systems formulated with hydrophilic polymers that swell and maintain buoyancy in gastric fluid, ensuring sustained drug delivery.(13,14)

Figure 1: Types of Gastro-retentive drug delivery systems

Of the different approaches for GRDDS, FDDS is the most promising and widely investigated approach. This is because floating systems are designed such that their density is lower than that of the gastric fluid, enabling them to float on the stomach for an extended period of time without interfering with normal gastric emptying. The drug is released in a controlled manner at the desired site while floating on the gastric contents.

The reasons that floating systems represent the most promising GRDDS approach include:

  1. Simplicity of Design and Formulation Floating systems can be formulated using conventional polymers and excipients; hence they are more practical and cost-effective compared to complex expandable or bioadhesive systems.(15)
  2. Prolonged Gastric Residence Time: Since the floating systems maintain buoyancy, they can stay in the stomach for many hours, allowing extended drug release and enhancement of therapeutic efficacy.(16)
  3. Better Patient Compliance: Floating dosage forms are generally well tolerated and do not cause any gastric irritation or obstruction, unlike some swelling or expandable systems.
  4. Wide Applicability: Floating systems are suitable for many drugs, especially those that are absorbed in the stomach or upper small intestine, have a narrow absorption window, or are unstable at intestinal pH.(17, 18)
  5. Reduced Risk of Gastric Obstruction: Unlike expandable systems, floating systems do not depend on heavy swelling to achieve retention, hence diminishing risks for gastric blockage.
  6. Steady-state and controlled drug delivery: floating systems can keep steady plasma drug concentrations by providing sustained drug release while remaining in the gastric region.
  7. Clinical and commercial success: Various floating formulations have reached clinical development and commercialization, thus exhibiting practical feasibility and regulatory acceptance.(19)

FDDS basically stand for Floating Drug Delivery Systems, a specialized gastro-retentive drug delivery system. This is designed to stay afloat in the stomach for an extended time. These systems exhibit less density compared to that of gastric fluid, thus these can float on the gastric contents and may not impede the normal process of gastric emptying. The floating may cause the release of the drug in a controlled and sustained manner, allowing prolonged therapeutic action. The prolonged gastric residence time of FDDS increases absorption, mainly of those drugs that are preferentially absorbed from the stomach or the upper part of the small intestine. This approach highly improves bioavailability, therapeutic efficacy, and patient compliance.(20)

Principle of Floating Drug Delivery Systems

FDDS works based on the principle of buoyancy.FDDS is based on the principle of buoyancy. When this dosage form comes in contact with gastric fluids, it is too:

  • Producing gas which accumulates in the system and reduces its density, or
  • Swell to form a low-density, gel-like consistency that will float.

This leads to a dosage form remaining in the stomach for a couple of hours and releasing the drug at a desired site.(21,22,23)

Suitability Of Floating Drug Delivery Systems

Floating Drug Delivery Systems are specifically beneficial in:

  • Drugs absorbed primarily from the upper GI tract, including the stomach and the upper parts of the small intestine
  • Drugs that lack good solubility or stability in intestinal fluids
  • Drugs with a short biological half-life, which need frequent administration
  • Drugs for topical administration within the stomach, for instance, antulcer medications and antacids

By holding the dosage form in the stomach, FDDS helps increase the absorption of the drug and reduce the loss of the drug by rapid gastric emptying.

Benefits of Floating Drug Delivery Systems

  • Prolonged Gastric Residence Time: The floating tablets or capsules are retained in the gastric phase for an extended period, thus ensuring a prolonged drug release.
  • Increased Drug Absorption and Bioavailability: FDDS increase the absorption of drugs, which are better absorbed under acidic pH or in the upper gastrointestinal region.
  • Decreased Dosage Intervals: The need for frequent dosing is reduced due to sustained drug releases.
  • Minimized Side Effects: The controlled release of the drug helps to minimize the peak level of the drug in the plasma and thereby the side effects of the drug.
  • Effective in Diarrhea and Gastric Motility: In cases of diarrhea and increased gastric motility, FDDS may preserve the retention of the drug in the gastrointestinal tract.
  • Increased Patient Compliance: Lower doses of the drug and higher effectiveness of therapy reduce the chances of patient noncompliance.
  • Suitable for Local Gastric Action: FDDS are best suited for catering to medications which are designed for local action in the stomach, for example, antibiotics and anti-ulcer medications.(23)

Factors Affecting the Floating and Floating Time of FDDS

The factors affecting floating and floating time of FDDS are as follows: The performance of FDDS largely depends on their ability to remain buoyant in the gastric fluid and retain a position in the stomach for a longer period. Several physiological, formulation-related, and patient-specific factors influence the floating behavior and gastric retention time.

  • Density of the Dosage Form: The most critical factor affecting floating behavior is the density of the dosage form. For effective floating, the density of the system should be lower compared to that of the gastric fluid (approximately 1.004 g/cm³). Dosage forms of lower density remain buoyant for a longer time, while systems of higher density tend to sink and are rapidly emptied from the stomach.
  • Dosage Form Shape: The shape of the dosage form significantly affects gastric retention and floating stability. It has been observed that tetrahedral and ring-shaped dosage forms possess more excellent floating behaviour and longer gastric residence time as compared to spherical or flat shapes since they can better resist peristaltic movements of the stomach.

Size of Dosage Form: The size of the dosage form is also very significant in determining gastric retention. Dosage forms that are larger than 9.5mm in size will tend to reside in the stomach for a relatively longer time, whereas smaller dosage forms will readily pass into the intestines due to the pyloric sphincter during gastric emptying.(24)

  • Gender, Posture, and Age: Various physical properties such as gender, posture, and age demonstrate the effects on gastric emptying time.
  • Gastric emptying is slower in females than in males.
  • The elderly, especially those above 70 years old, tend to have slow gastric emptying.
  • Body position, whether erect or supine, might influence gastric contractions and the flotation process.
  • Effect of Concomitant Drugs: Some drugs can cause a change in gastric motility, which can have a subsequent effect on the
  • Atropine, glycopyrrolate, metoclopramide, and domperidone can
  • But then again, medications such as neostigmine may cause the slowing down of gastric motility, resulting in the prolongation of gastric retention for the floating system.

Disease State: There are numerous diseases that may adversely influence gastric emptying:

  • Diabetes mellitus and Crohn’s disease could affect gastric motility and emptying.
  • There is a relation of depression to delayed gastric emptying.
  • Certain conditions such as stress or anxiety may contribute to faster gastric emptying by increasing gastric motility. Stress and anxiety can also cause faster gastric emptying(25)

Types of floating Drug Delivery System

There are different types of floating systems depending on the floating mechanism:

  1. Effervescent (Gas-Generating)

Effervescent-floating systems produce buoyancy by the production of carbon dioxide gas when they come into contact with gastric fluid. The produced gas gets entrapped in the polymer matrix, causing the density of the dosage form to decrease and resulting in the production of a floating system.

Effervescent Floating System Composition Such systems always comprise:

  • Gas-producing substances: Sodium bicarbonate, Calcium carbonate
  • Acidic parts: Citric acid or tartaric acid (optional, for the purpose of gas evolution
  • Hydrophilic polymers: HPMC, Carbopol,
  • Excipients: Binders, Lub

Table No. 1: Types of Effervescent (Gas-Generating) Floating Drug Delivery Systems(22,23,24,25,26)

Type         of

Effervescent System

Dosage Form

Composition    / Key

Components

Mechanism of Floating

Advantages

Limitations

 

 

 

 

Floating Tablets

Tablets

Hydrophilic polymers

(HPMC),   gas-

generating agents (sodium

bicarbonate, citric/tartaric

acid)

CO? generated in an acidic medium gets trapped in a swollen

polymer matrix, reducing

density

Simple formulation, prolonged

floating time, controlled drug release

It depends on gastric acidity, the floating lag time

 

Floating Capsules

Capsules

Effervescent

granules    or

powders    with

polymers   and

CO? generation causes

buoyancy after

Easy         to

manufacture,

flexible     dose loading

Variable

floating     time,

less mechanical strength

 

 

gas-forming agents

the            capsule shell dissolves

 

 

 

Floating Granules  / Pellets

Granules pellets

Drug,                 polymer, sodium

bicarbonate, organic acids

Gas generation lowers       the

density      of individual units

Uniform    drug release,

reduced     dose dumping

More complex manufacturing

 

 

Floating Beads

Beads

Alginate    or polymer matrix with gas-forming agents

CO? entrapped within the bead structure

Multiple-unit system,

improved gastric

retention

Limited     drug loading

capacity

 

 

Effervescent Microspheres

Hollow

microspheres

Polymer   shell

(e.g.,         ethyl cellulose), gas- forming agents

Hollow core formed by CO? generation

provides buoyancy

Prolonged floating, controlled release,

reduced

irritation

Expensive and technically

demanding

Raft-Forming Effervescent Systems

Liquid/gel systems

Sodium alginate, bicarbonates,

calcium salts

Formation of a floating gel raft due  to  CO?

generation

Excellent   for GERD,

localized

gastric action

Not suitable for systemic drug delivery

Mechanism of Effervescent (Gas-Generating) Floating Drug Delivery Systems (FDDS):

  1. Effervescent or gas-producing : floating systems are designed to generate gas in response to the gastric fluid to which the dosage form is exposed. The gas helps reduce the density of the drug, which then allows it to float along with the gastric fluids in the stomach for an extended period, thus releasing the drug in a regulated fashion.
  2. Hydration and Polymer Swelling: The hydrophilic polymers in the formulation start to swell by absorbing the gastric fluid, creating a kind of barrier around the dosage form due to the formation of a gel-like structure.
  3. Effervescent Reaction (Gas Generation): The gas-generating reagent (for example, sodium bicarbonate) reacts with gastric acid (or organic acids), resulting in the evolution of carbon dioxide gas according to the following reaction:
  4. Gas Entrapment in a Polymer Matrix: The produced CO? is trapped in the swelled polymeric matrix, leading to an expansion in the dosage form and a reduction in its density.
  5. Buoyancy and Floating Phenomena: With a density difference in favor of gastric fluids (approximating 1.004 g/cm³), the drug particles float on top of the gastric liquor.
  6. Prolonged Gastric Retention: The final property of floating is its role in prolonging gastric
  7. Controlled Drug Release: While floating, the drug is released gradually through diffusion and/or erosion of the polymer matrix, maintaining sustained plasma drug levels.(27,28)

Figure 2: Mechanism of Effervescent (Gas-Generating) Floating Drug Delivery Systems

2.Non-Effervescent Floating Systems

Non-effervescent floating systems are a form of gastro-retentive drug delivery systems (GRDDS). These systems work by being buoyant without the production of gas. The primary function of non-effervescent floating systems is carried out by swellable and gelation polymers such as hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC).

In contrast to effervescent systems, non-effervescent systems do not include gas-releasing agents but rely on the hydration and gelation processes of polymers for lightness and floatation.

Principle of Non-Effervescent Floating Systems

The principle on which non-effervescent floating systems lie is that of hydrodynamic balance. When the dosage form is exposed to gastric fluid:

  • hydrophilic polymers: Quickly hydrate and
  • A gel barrier is formed around the drug formulation
  • The swollen system has a bulk density below that of gastric fluid
  • The dosage form remains Buoyant for an Extended Period
  • Drug is delivered in a controlled and sustained fashion(29,30)

Table No. 2: Types of Non-Effervescent Floating Drug Delivery Systems(28,29,30,31)

Type

Dosage Form

/ System

Key Components

Mechanism of Floating

Major Advantages

Applications

Hydrodynamically Balanced Systems (HBS)

Tablets      / Capsules

Hydrophilic

polymers (HPMC, Carbopol), drug

Polymer

hydrates   and

forms                 gel; density remains lower    than

gastric fluid

Prolonged

gastric retention, controlled drug release

Drugs

absorbed in the stomach or upper intestine

Floating    Tablets and Capsules

Single-unit

dosage forms

Swelling polymers (HPMC, sodium alginate), drug

Polymer

swelling creates a low-density gel matrix

Simple formulation,

sustained                 drug release

Short                 half-

life                 drugs, gastric-

specific

delivery

Floating

Microspheres

(Microballoons)

Hollow

microspheres

Polymers                 (ethyl cellulose,

Eudragit), drug

Hollow                 core provides

buoyancy

Uniform drug release, reduced dose dumping

Long-term gastric

retention,

chronic therapy

Floating Alginate Beads

Beads

Sodium alginate, calcium chloride, and the drug

Swelling and air entrapment in gel matrix

Good

mechanical strength,

sustained release

Local gastric action,

controlled

delivery

             
Mechanism of Action
  • Oral Dosage: The non-effervescent floating tablet or capsule is taken orally.
  • Contact with Gastric Fluid: On arrival at the stomach, the drug form comes into contact with the gastric fluid.
  • Polymer Hydration: The hydrophilic polymer Hydroxyzine absorbs gastric fluids and hydrates.
  • Swelling and Gelation: The polymer absorbs water to form a viscous hydrogel enveloping the drug product.
  • Buoyancy Achievement: The buoyant system has a density that is less than that of gastric fluid; therefore, it floats.
  • Prolonged Gastric Retention: The floating drug reduces the risk of rapid gastric emptying
  • Controlled Drug Release: The release of the drug is achieved slowly through the process of diffusion and erosion of the gel layer.(32,33)

Figure 3: Mechanism of Non-Effervescent Floating Drug Delivery Systems

Polymer used for a floating drug delivery system

Polymers are also important constituents in the design and development of Floating Drug Delivery Systems (FDDS). These polymers are mainly responsible for providing buoyancy, drug release, and the strength of the drug delivery system in the gastric environment. However, the choice of the appropriate polymer is contingent on factors such as swelling properties, gelation capacity, density, viscosity, and drug compatibility. In FDDS, the polymers absorb the gastric fluid and increase in size to form a thick gel layer around the drug delivery system, making it float as well as preventing the release of the drug quickly. Certain polymers are also responsible for gas entrapment in effervescent systems or for maintaining the entrapped air in non- effervescent systems, thus decreasing the overall system density. In FDDS, the polymers can be either natural, semi-synthetic, or synthetic in nature. (34)Natural polymers like sodium alginate, guar gum, or chitosan are more desirable due to their biocompatible and biodegradable properties. Amongst the semi-synthetic polymers, derivatives such as cellulose are more desirable as hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) because of its optimal swelling and drug release capacity. Other synthetic polymers such as Eudragit, polyvinyl alcohol, or biodegradable polymers like PLGA, are used to provide exact drug release along with precise control over drug release and mechanical strength.(35,36)

Table No. 3: Polymers used for a floating drug delivery system (36,37)

Category

Polymer Name

Type

Role in FDDS

Uses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Natural Polymers

Sodium alginate

Seaweed-derived polysaccharide

Swelling,   gel formation,

buoyancy

Widely used in floating beads and raft-forming

systems

Pectin

Plant polysaccharide

Gel           formation, controlled

release

Used in gastric- retentive

formulations

Chitosan

Deacetylated chitin

Swelling,

mucoadhesion

Enhances  gastric

retention    and bioadhesion

Guar gum

Plant-derived galactomannan

Swelling, viscosity

enhancement

Used in sustained release      floating

tablets

Xanthan gum

Microbial

polysaccharide

Gel           formation,

viscosity control

Improves   matrix

integrity

Carrageenan

Red           seaweed

polysaccharide

Gel formation

Used in floating

matrices

Semi-Synthetic Polymers

Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose

(HPMC)

Cellulose derivative

Swelling,   gel formation,

floating

Most         commonly used polymer in

FDDS

 

Hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC)

Cellulose derivative

Matrix formation,

sustained release

Improves   tablet integrity

Hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC)

Cellulose derivative

Swelling, controlled

release

Used         in

hydrodynamically balanced systems

Sodium carboxymethyl

cellulose (NaCMC)

Cellulose derivative

Swelling, viscosity

enhancement

Used in floating tablets

Ethyl cellulose

Cellulose derivative

Release

retardant, matrix former

Used         in

microspheres and microballoons

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Synthetic Polymers

Eudragit® (RL, RS, NE)

Methacrylate polymers

Matrix formation, controlled

release

Widely      used in floating

microspheres

Polyvinyl  alcohol

(PVA)

Synthetic polymer

Film formation,

matrix stability

Used         in

microballoons

Polyethylene                 oxide

(PEO)

Synthetic polymer

Swelling,   gel

formation

High         swelling

capacity

Polyvinylpyrrolidone

(PVP)

Synthetic polymer

Binder,      release

modifier

Improves   tablet

strength

Polylactic acid (PLA)

Biodegradable

polymer

Matrix

formation

Used in floating

microspheres

Polylactic-co-

glycolic acid (PLGA)

Biodegradable copolymer

Controlled drug release

Used in advanced gastroretentive

systems

           
Characterization of Floating Drug Delivery Systems (FDDS)

Characterization of Floating Drug Delivery Systems (FDDS) is essential to ensure adequate buoyancy, prolonged gastric retention, controlled drug release, and formulation stability. Evaluation of FDDS involves the assessment of floating behavior, swelling characteristics, drug content uniformity, and drug release profile. These studies help in predicting the in vivo performance of the system and confirm its suitability for gastro-retentive drug delivery. The various characterization parameters of FDDS are summarized in the table(38)

Table No.4: Characterization of Floating Drug Delivery Systems (FDDS)

Parameter

Test / Method

Short Write-up (Purpose & Significance)

Floating Lag Time (FLT)

In  vitro  buoyancy  test  in

simulated gastric fluid (0.1 N HCl)

Time taken by the dosage form to rise to the

surface. Short FLT indicates a rapid onset of floating.

Total        Floating                 Time

(TFT)

In vitro buoyancy study

Duration for which the dosage form remains

floating. Indicates gastric retention capability.

In vitro Buoyancy

Observation      in                 dissolution

medium

Confirms the floating behavior and stability of

the system in gastric conditions.

Swelling Index

Weight gain method

Measures the extent of polymer swelling,

which influences buoyancy and drug release.

Drug Content Uniformity

Assay using UV/ HPLC

Ensures uniform distribution of the drug in the

formulation for dose accuracy.

In vitro Drug Release

USP          dissolution   apparatus

(Type I or II)

Determines the rate and pattern of drug

release from the floating system.

Release Kinetics

Mathematical models (Zero order, Higuchi, Korsmeyer–

Peppas)

Explains the mechanism of drug release (diffusion, erosion, or both).

Tablet Hardness

Monsanto or Pfizer hardness

tester

Ensures mechanical strength and resistance to

handling stress.

Friability

Roche friabilator

Measures  tablet           resistance         to                 abrasion;

acceptable limit is usually <1%.

Thickness and Diameter

Vernier caliper

Ensures uniformity in tablet dimensions.

Weight Variation

Pharmacopoeial method

Confirms uniformity of dosage units.

Density Measurement

Volume     and  weight

determination

Density must be lower than gastric fluid for

effective floating.

Surface Morphology

Scanning   Electron

Microscopy (SEM)

Examine surface characteristics, porosity, and

polymer structure.

Stability Studies

ICH guidelines (accelerated

conditions)

Evaluates physical and chemical stability over

time.

In vivo Gastric Retention

(optional)

X-ray or gamma scintigraphy

Confirms   gastric          residence          timeunder

physiological conditions.

Recent Advancements in Floating Drug Delivery Systems (FDDS)

Floating Drug Delivery Systems (FDDS) have been recognized and identified as one of the most promising areas in gastro retentive drug delivery systems for improving oral bioavailability of drugs with a narrow absorption window, short half-life, and/or preferring stomach and upper GI tract for absorption. Although conventional FDDS have offered a wide range of applications with many advantages, contemporary pharmaceutical research has concentrated on addressing drawbacks, including dependence on gastric emptying patterns, gastric pH, and difficulty in controlling drug release in conventional FDDS. Consequently, new approaches have been introduced to optimize FDDS and make it more efficient and successful.

The progress of FDDS is motivated by:

  • unpredictable gastric retention because of physiological variations
  • Short duration of floating in conventional systems
  • Performance in fasted state scenarios
  • Need for better control over drug release kinetics
  • Patient-friendly drug delivery systems that target specific needs.

Such challenges have motivated the emergence of the next-next-generation solar floaters with enhanced efficiency and reproducing abilities.(39)

  • Advanced Polymer-Based Floating Systems

Current studies also highlight the application of new and multi-functioning polymers for enhanced buoyancy and drug release.

Major Break-Through

  • High-viscosity and blend polymers (such as combinations of HPMC and natural gums) to enhance the strength of gels
  • Stimuli-sensitive polymers that are sensitive to either pH, ion strength, or gastric motility.
  • Combination of bioadhesive polymers and floating polymers to enhance dual gastro-retention properties.

Benefits

  • Improved floating stability
  • Longer gastric residence time
  • Enhanced drug release predictability
  • Floating Microspheres & Micro

One of the most important developments in FDDS is the creation of microballoons, or floating microspheres.

Key Features

The

  • Hollow spherical structures with low density
  • By solvent diffusion or emulsion methods
  • Offer advantages over multiple-unit dosage forms

Advantages

  • Lower risk of dose dumping
  • Uniform distribution in stomach
  • Increased patient safety and adherence

It would seem that drug delivery systems are most beneficial for use in chronic therapy, where a drug needs to release slowly for

  1. Raft-Forming Advanced Systems

Raft forming systems today embody an evolved form of conventional floating systems. Innovations

  • Enhanced alginate raft systems with better mechanical strength
  • Calcium release agents for rapid gelation
  • Improved floating lag time and rafting stability

Applications

  • Managing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD
  • Localized gastric drug delivery
  • Nanotechnology-Based Floating

Nanotechnology has brought forth new possibilities in FDDS development.

Controversial Issues

  • Floating nanoparticles and nanospheres within polymeric matrices
  • Floating beads and capsules nano-enabled
  • Solubility of poorly soluble drugs using nanocarriers

Advantages

  • Enhanced solubility and dissolution rate
  • Improved Bio
  • Controlled and Targeted Drug Delivery
  • Dual Mechanism Floating

More recently, two or more gastro-retentive systems are combined for performance improvement.

Examples

  • Floating + bioadhesive systems
  • Floating + swelling designs
  • Floating + Controlled Release Matrix Systems

Significance

  • Dependence on singular retention systems decreased
  • Advances in gastric retention under different physiological conditions
  • 3D Printing and FDDS

Additive manufacturing has recently emerged for FDDS designs.

Major Break-Through

  • 3D Printed Floating Tablets w/ Programmable Density
  • Customizable drug release profiles
  • Individual dosage forms

Impact

  • A high degree of control over the geometry and porosity of tablets
  • Patient specific
  • Smart and Responsive Floating Systems

The Smart FDDS adjusts itself to physiological conditions.

Innovations

  • pH-responsive floating systems
  • Enzymatic activation
  • Time-controlled floating behavior

They are capable of site-specific as well as time-dependent drug release.

Table No. 5: Recent Advancements in Floating Drug Delivery Systems(40,41)

Year

Type of FDDS

Drug Used

Major Findings

2016

Floating microspheres

Metformin HCl

Hollow microspheres showed prolonged

floating (>12 h) and sustained drug release

2017

Hydrodynamically

Balanced System (HBS)

Ofloxacin

HPMC-based    HBS     improved          gastric

retention and controlled release

2017

Floating matrix tablets

Ciprofloxacin

Enhanced bioavailability due to prolonged

gastric retention

2018

Floating alginate beads

Metformin

Alginate–Ca²?   beads    showed good

buoyancy and sustained release

2018

Floating microspheres

Propranolol HCl

Reduced dose dumping and uniform drug

release

2019

Raft-forming system

Antacid drugs

Strong raft formation is useful in GERD

management

2019

Floating    tablets                 (non-

effervescent)

Famotidine

Improved  bioavailability          and       reduced

dosing frequency

2020

Floating microballoons

Metformin

Improved in vivo gastric residence and

glucose control

2020

Dual-mechanism                 FDDS

(floating + bioadhesive)

Clarithromycin

Increased gastric retention and anti-H.

pylori activity

2020

Floating beads

Riboflavin

Sustained release and improved gastric

retention

2021

Floating microspheres

Glipizide

Controlled release         improved          the

antidiabetic effect

2021

Non-effervescent  floating

tablets

Levodopa

Prolonged  gastric          retention                 enhanced

absorption

 

2021

Alginate raft system

GERD formulatio

Better        reflux           suppression       than

conventional antacids

 

2022

Floating nanoparticles

Curcumin

Improved solubility and gastric retention

 

2022

Floating microspheres

Domperidone

Enhanced bioavailability and sustained

action

 

2022

3D-printed floating tablets

Baclofen

Custom     geometry      enabled prolonged

floating and zero-order release

 

2023

3D-printed gastro-floating

system

Verapamil HCl

Tablet shape and infill density-controlled

release & buoyancy

 

2023

Floating hollow tablets

Metformin

In vivo studies showed >6 h gastric retention

 

2024

Floating    microspheres

(natural polymer)

Amoxicillin

Improved gastric residence for H. pylori

therapy

 

2024

Smart floating system (pH-

responsive)

Model drug

pH-triggered     floating with      controlled

release

 

           
Future Prospects of Floating Drug Delivery Systems (FDDS)

Floating Drug Delivery Systems (FDDS) are a continually expanding domain of research in oral controlled drug delivery systems; they offer many advantages for drugs that have a small window of absorption, a short biological half-life, or for which site-specific entry in the upper GI tract is desired. In view of advances in material science, formulation, and processing methods, FDDS are expected to assume considerable importance in the development of pharmaceuticals in the years to come. One of the key areas that research in FDDS is expected to explore is the development of "smart" and "stimulus-responsive" FDDS. These systems would utilize novel polymers which could respond to changes in gastric pH values, temperature, ion concentrations, as well as gastric contractions. This would enable these systems to ensure desired floating as well as drug release profiles regardless of changes in physiological conditions. Another promising area that is expected to assume importance is that of "nanotechnology" and FDDS coupled together. The addition of nanospheres, Nano-emulsions to FDDS would enable a marked increase in the solubility and availability of sparingly soluble actives. Nano-based advances in FDDS would be particularly useful for a wide range of actives that need to be delivered via the oral geometry, porosity, density, and drug distribution, enabling the design of customized Floating Dosage Forms. This technology is enabling personalized medicine therapies where drug dosage and delivery profiles can be designed specifically for different patients. The future studies are also emphasizing multi-mechanism Gastro-Retentive Systems, combining Floating Mechanism with other retention techniques such as Bioadhesion, Swelling, Expandable Systems, and Muco-Adhesion. The hybrid systems provide improved and consistent gastric retention, overcoming obstacles linked with Single Mechanism FDDS. The expanding application base of Biodegradable, Biocompatible, and Natural Polymers is another significant area. The use of natural polymers is ensuring enhanced safety profiles, lowering toxicity issues, and enabling sustainable drug development. Natural Polymers are also improving patient acceptability and compliance, particularly for long-term drug therapies. In clinical and regulatory contexts, future innovations in In Vitro-In Vivo Correlation (IVIVC) Methods, Imaging Modalities, and Predictive Modeling will enable a seamless transition between lab research studies and real-world drug performance. Future studies will ease faster approvals and launches related to Floating Dosage Form Design.(42)

Key Future Prospects of FDDS

Development of smart, pH- and stimuli-responsive floating systems

  • Integration of nanotechnology-based carriers for improved bioavailability
  • Application of 3D printing for personalized and customizable FDDS
  • Design of multi-mechanism gastro-retentive systems-floatation plus bioadhesion/ swelling
  • More usage of biodegradable and natural polymers
  • Improved IVIVC and Advanced In-Vivo Imaging Techniques
  • Improving the clinical translation and commercialization of FDDS(43)

Table No.6: Marketed Approved Floating Formulations

S. No.

Category  (dosage

form)

Brand / Product (active)

Short detail

Manufacturer

1

Raft-forming     oral suspension (liquid)

Gaviscon   Liquid

(sodium     alginate        + antacids)

Forms       floating

alginate     raft   in stomach

Reckitt

2

Raft-forming     oral

suspension (liquid)

Gaviscon   Advance

(Liquid)

Higher-strength

alginate raft liquid

Reckitt

3

Raft-forming     oral

suspension (liquid)

Gaviscon Double Action

(Liquid)

Alginate + antacid

floating liquid

Reckitt

4

Raft-forming     oral suspension (liquid)

Peptac Liquid (sodium alginate + antacid)

Floating    alginate

antacid suspension (UK/IE market)

Various / regional distributors

5

Raft-forming     oral suspension (liquid)

Rennie Liquid / Rennie

Duo Liquid (alginate + antacid)

Alginate    raft

antacid suspension (regional brands)

Various / regional

6

Raft-forming     oral suspension (liquid)

Mylanta (liquid variants with raft/alginate tech in some markets)

Marketed  liquid antacid/alginate suspensions

(region-dependent)

Various / regional

7

Raft-forming     oral suspension (liquid)

Generic / private-label alginate raft suspensions

Multiple    store

brands       using

alginate     raft technology

Various / regional manufacturers

8

Liquid in-situ gelling (oral)

Alginate in-situ gel antacid                 products (marketed regionally)

Liquid       that

gels/rafts   on

contact with gastric fluid

Various / regional

9

Raft-forming     oral suspension (sachet /

sachet liquid)

Gaviscon   Sachets        / Liquid sachets

Single-dose

floating     liquid presentations

Reckitt

10

Raft-forming                 oral suspension (large-

pack liquid)

Gaviscon   Advance (multi-pack sizes)

Pack size variants of                 floating                 raft

liquid

Reckitt

11

Hydrodynamically Balanced                 System

Madopar HBS (levodopa

+ benserazide)

HBS         gastro- retentive

formulation       for

Roche / licensees

 

(HBS)       —

tablet/capsule

 

prolonged  gastric residence

(Parkinson’s)

 

12

HBS          /      gastric-

retentive    tablet

(marketed  HBS derivatives)

Other marketed HBS variants     (levodopa families)

HBS variants derived      from levodopa

sustained-release

programs (regional)

Roche                 /regional partners

13

Floating microsphere

/                 microencapsulated commercial platforms

Commercial hollow microsphere/microencap sulation     products (niche/industrial use)

Some

microencapsulatio n                 platforms               are marketed   for sustained/floatable delivery in niche

products

Various specialty manufacturers

14

Floating

microballoons

(industrial/commercia l examples)

Microballoon-based sustained-release

products (niche markets)

Hollow

microballoon

technologies                      used in                 some

commercial

formulations

Various / contract manufacturers

15

Floating raft antacid

— pharmacy brands

Peptac / Rennie / Gaviscon   generic equivalents (liquid)

Marketed          raft liquids       under

multiple    trade

names worldwide

Various / regional

16

Raft-forming     oral suspension

(medical/OTC)

Alginate antacid liquid (hospital OTC brands)

Alginate    raft liquids sold for clinical/hospital

use

Various manufacturers

17

In-situ       gelling         oral (gel/solution)

Regional   alginate                 gel formulations

(therapeutic liquid gels)

Marketed  as antacid/gastro-

protective in some

countries

Various / regional

18

Liquid       raft   antacid

(flavoured / multipack)

Gaviscon flavour & pack variants (liquid)

Flavour and pack

SKUs        of     the floating suspension

Reckitt

19

Liquid       raft   antacid (OTC private label)

Supermarket / pharmacy private-label      alginate

suspensions

Private-label

floating     antacid liquids

Various / regional

20

Raft-forming     oral suspension

(paediatric liquid)

Gaviscon Infant / infant alginate suspensions

Paediatric

formulations     that form          floating

gel/raft

Reckitt                 /regional licensees

             
CONCLUSION

Floating Drug Delivery Systems have now been established as a safe, effective, and modern approach for improving oral drug delivery. The concept of prolonging gastric residence time has been successfully employed in FDDS to increase bioavailability, give sustained plasma drug concentrations, decrease frequent doses, and suppress adverse reactions, especially for drugs primarily absorbed in the stomach and upper GI tract. The employment of appropriate polymers, effervescent and non-effervescent formulations, and appropriate formulation methodologies is also known to ensure efficient buoyancy and sustained drug release. Commercially available alginate-based raft tablets and hydrodynamically balanced formulations have already proven the efficacy and practical viability of FDDS in clinical applications. Moreover, new approaches in micro- and nanotechnology and smart and stimulus- responsive materials and innovative 3D printing methodologies have now opened up new avenues for personalized and goal-oriented therapy using FDDS in forthcoming generations of oral drug-delivery systems despite some drawbacks in certain applications.

REFERENCES

  1. Thakur, S., Ramya, K., Shah, D. K., & Raj, K. (2021). Floating Drug Delivery System. Journal of Drug Delivery & Therapeutics, 11.
  2. Neetika, B., & Manish, G. (2012). Floating drug delivery system. IJPRAS, 1(4), 20-8.
  3. Raj, Hans, Shagun Sharma, Ankita Sharma, Kapil Kumar Verma, and Amit Chaudhary. "A novel drug delivery system: Review on microspheres." Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics 11, no. 2-S (2021): 156-61.
  4. Arora, Shweta, Javed Ali, Alka Ahuja, Roop K. Khar, and Sanjula Baboota. "Floating drug delivery systems: a review." Aaps PharmSciTech 6, no. 3 (2005): 47.
  5. Sharma, Natasha, Dilip Agarwal, M. K. Gupta, and M. Khinchi. "A comprehensive review on floating drug delivery system." International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences 2, no. 2 (2011): 428-441.
  6. Lahamge, Pradnya D., Yashpal M. More, Pallavi P. Ahire, and Vinay R. Kothawade. "A comprehensive review on floating drug delivery system." (2024): 42-46.
  7. Singh, S., & KisanJadhav, P. (2013). Various Approaches in Floating Drug Delivery. IntJou Pharm Phytopharmacol Res, 2(5).
  8. Divya, Arora, Kumar Lalit, Joshi Ashish, Chaudhary Abhishek, and Devi Pooja. "A Brief Review on Floating Drug Delivery System." Journal of Drug Delivery & Therapeutics 11, no. 4 (2021)
  9. Patil, Hemlata, Roshan V. Tiwari, and Michael A. Repka. "Recent advancements in mucoadhesive floating drug delivery systems: A mini-review." Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology 31 (2016): 65-71.
  10. Raj, Hans, Shagun Sharma, Ankita Sharma, Kapil Kumar Verma, and Amit Chaudhary. "A novel drug delivery system: Review on microspheres." Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics 11, no. 2-S (2021): 156-61..
  11. Shilpa, B.C., Vishnu, P., Babu, K.N., Rao, U.K., Sai, S. and Saravani, T., 2014. A brief review on floating drug delivery system. S Pac J Pharm Bio Sci, 2, pp.137-53.
  12. Dixit, N. (2011). Floating drug delivery system. Journal of current pharmaceutical research, 7(1), 6-20.
  13. Arunachalam, A., M. Karthikeyan, Kishore Konam, H. P. Prasad, S. Sethuraman, S. Ashutoshkumar, and S. Manidipa. "Floating drug delivery systems: A review." Int. J. Res. Pharm. Sci 2, no. 1 (2011): 76-83.
  14. Bhuyar, S. R., M. M. Auti, and S. A. Bhise. "Innovations and advancements in floating tablet drug delivery systems: a comprehensive review." Pharm Pharmacol Int J 12, no. 5 (2024): 195-200.
  15. Gupta, Pooja, Preeti Kothiyal Gnanarajan, and P. Kothiyal. "Floating drug delivery system: a review." International Journal of Pharma Research & Review 4, no. 8 (2015): 37-44.
  16. Ezike, Tobechukwu Christian, Ugochukwu Solomon Okpala, Ufedo Lovet Onoja, Chinenye Princess Nwike, Emmanuel Chimeh Ezeako, Osinachi Juliet Okpara, Charles Chinkwere Okoroafor et al. "Advances in drug delivery systems, challenges and future directions." Heliyon 9, no. 6 (2023).
  17. Turac, Imola-Rebeka, Alina Porfire, Sonia Iurian, Andrea Gabriela Cri?an, Tibor Casian, Rare? Iovanov, and Ioan Tomu??. "Expanding the manufacturing approaches for gastroretentive drug delivery systems with 3D printing technology." Pharmaceutics 16, no. 6 (2024): 790.
  18. Patial, K., Dua, J.S., Menra, M. and Prasad, D.N., 2016. A Review: Floating Drug Delivery System (FDDS). Pharmaceutical Research World Journal Of Pharmaceutical Research, 5(6), pp.614-33.
  19. Agale, Karan A., and Sanket Pandurang Shinde. "A Review on Floating Tablet." Journal of Drug Delivery & Therapeutics 15, no. 2 (2025).
  20. Thakur, Sanjay, Krishnappa Ramya, Deepak Kumar Shah, and Khadga Raj. "Floating Drug Delivery System." Journal of Drug Delivery & Therapeutics 11 (2021).
  21. Shah HP, Prajapati ST, Patel CN. Gastroretentive drug delivery systems: from conception to commercial success. Journal of Critical Reviews. 2017;4(2):10.
  22. Choudhury, Ananta, Lalmalsawmi Renthlei, Manjima Dewan, Raju Ahmed, Himal Barakoti, and Biplab Kumar Dey. "Floating drug delivery system: an outlook." Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Research 7, no. 3 (2019): 01-08.
  23. Shah, Harshil P., Shailesh T. Prajapati, and C. N. Patel. "Gastroretentive drug delivery systems: from conception to commercial success." Journal of Critical Reviews 4, no. 2 (2017): 10.
  24. Mandal, Uttam Kumar, Bappaditya Chatterjee, and Faria Gias Senjoti. "Gastro-retentive drug delivery systems and their in vivo success: A recent update." Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences 11, no. 5 (2016): 575-584.
  25. Bhardwaj, Vishal, and S. L. Harikumar. "Floating drug delivery system: A review." Pharmacophore 4, no. 1- 2013 (2013): 26-38.
  26. Sachin, Chaudhary, Dua JS, and Prasad DN. "Recent Development in Floating Drug Delivery System: An Overview." Journal of Drug Delivery & Therapeutics 12, no. 1 (2022).
  27. Bhuyar, S. R., M. M. Auti, and S. A. Bhise. "Innovations and advancements in floating tablet drug delivery systems: a comprehensive review." Pharm Pharmacol Int J 12, no. 5 (2024): 195-200.
  28. Vo, A.Q., Feng, X., Morott, J.T., Pimparade, M.B., Tiwari, R.V., Zhang, F. and Repka, M.A., 2016. A novel floating controlled release drug delivery system prepared by hot-melt extrusion. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 98, pp.108-121.
  29. Paunovska, Kalina, David Loughrey, and James E. Dahlman. "Drug delivery systems for RNA therapeutics." Nature Reviews Genetics 23, no. 5 (2022): 265-280.
  30. Chauhan, Reetu. "Floating Drug Delivery System: As A Novel Approach for Drug Delivery." Journal of Drug Delivery & Therapeutics 12, no. 6 (2022): 210-218.
  31. Pawar, Vivek K., Shaswat Kansal, Garima Garg, Rajendra Awasthi, Deepak Singodia, and Giriraj T. Kulkarni. "Gastroretentive dosage forms: A review with special emphasis on floating drug delivery systems." Drug delivery 18, no. 2 (2011): 97-110.
  32. Patel, Snehal, Chintan Aundhia, Avinash Seth, Nirmal Shah, Kartik Pandya, Chainesh Shah, Vinod Ramani, and Ankur Javia. "Microballoons: a novel approach in gastro-retention floating drug delivery system (FDDS)." An International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science 7, no. 2 (2016): 332-345.
  33. Tripathi, Julu, Prakash Thapa, Ravi Maharjan, and Seong Hoon Jeong. "Current state and future perspectives on gastroretentive drug delivery systems." Pharmaceutics 11, no. 4 (2019): 193.
  34. Desai, Harshdeep, Tushar Rukari, Rashmi Mahabal, and Vijay Jagtap. "Beyond Conventional: Recent Advancement on Floating Drug Delivery Systems: An Approach to Oral Controlled and Sustained Drug Delivery Via Gastric Retention."
  35. Rizvi, Syed AA, and Ayman M. Saleh. "Applications of nanoparticle systems in drug delivery technology." Saudi pharmaceutical journal 26, no. 1 (2018): 64-70.
  36. Mora-Castaño, Gloria, Juan Domínguez-Robles, Achmad Himawan, Mónica Millán-Jiménez, and Isidoro Caraballo. "Current trends in 3D printed gastroretentive floating drug delivery systems: A comprehensive review." International Journal of Pharmaceutics 663 (2024): 124543.
  37. Reddy Dumpa, Nagi, Suresh Bandari, and Michael A. Repka. "Novel gastroretentive floating pulsatile drug delivery  system  produced  via  hot-melt  extrusion  and  fused  deposition  modeling  3D printing." Pharmaceutics 12, no. 1 (2020): 52.
  38. Ghule, Pravin N., Amol S. Deshmukh, and Vijay R. Mahajan. "Floating drug delivery system (FDDS): An overview." Research Journal of Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Technology 6, no. 3 (2014): 174.
  39. Adepu, Shivakalyani, and Seeram Ramakrishna. "Controlled drug delivery systems: current status and future directions." Molecules 26, no. 19 (2021): 5905.
  40. Kumar, Aseem, Anil Kumar Sharma, and Rohit Dutt. "A Review of Gastro-retentive Drug Delivery Systems for Antidiabetics and their present status." Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology 14, no. 1 (2021): 538-546.
  41. Cetin, Meltem, and Selma Sahin. "Microparticulate and nanoparticulate drug delivery systems for metformin hydrochloride." Drug delivery 23, no. 8 (2016): 2796-2805.
  42. Mathew, Essyrose, Giulia Pitzanti, Eneko Larrañeta, and Dimitrios A. Lamprou. "3D printing of pharmaceuticals and drug delivery devices." Pharmaceutics 12, no. 3 (2020): 266
  43. Pandey, Manisha, Hira Choudhury, Joyce Lau Chui Fern, Alice Teo Kee Kee, Janice Kou, Jane Lee Jia Jing, How Chiu Her et al. "3D printing for oral drug delivery: a new tool to customize drug delivery." Drug delivery and translational research 10, no. 4 (2020): 986-1001.

Reference

  1. Thakur, S., Ramya, K., Shah, D. K., & Raj, K. (2021). Floating Drug Delivery System. Journal of Drug Delivery & Therapeutics, 11.
  2. Neetika, B., & Manish, G. (2012). Floating drug delivery system. IJPRAS, 1(4), 20-8.
  3. Raj, Hans, Shagun Sharma, Ankita Sharma, Kapil Kumar Verma, and Amit Chaudhary. "A novel drug delivery system: Review on microspheres." Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics 11, no. 2-S (2021): 156-61.
  4. Arora, Shweta, Javed Ali, Alka Ahuja, Roop K. Khar, and Sanjula Baboota. "Floating drug delivery systems: a review." Aaps PharmSciTech 6, no. 3 (2005): 47.
  5. Sharma, Natasha, Dilip Agarwal, M. K. Gupta, and M. Khinchi. "A comprehensive review on floating drug delivery system." International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences 2, no. 2 (2011): 428-441.
  6. Lahamge, Pradnya D., Yashpal M. More, Pallavi P. Ahire, and Vinay R. Kothawade. "A comprehensive review on floating drug delivery system." (2024): 42-46.
  7. Singh, S., & KisanJadhav, P. (2013). Various Approaches in Floating Drug Delivery. IntJou Pharm Phytopharmacol Res, 2(5).
  8. Divya, Arora, Kumar Lalit, Joshi Ashish, Chaudhary Abhishek, and Devi Pooja. "A Brief Review on Floating Drug Delivery System." Journal of Drug Delivery & Therapeutics 11, no. 4 (2021)
  9. Patil, Hemlata, Roshan V. Tiwari, and Michael A. Repka. "Recent advancements in mucoadhesive floating drug delivery systems: A mini-review." Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology 31 (2016): 65-71.
  10. Raj, Hans, Shagun Sharma, Ankita Sharma, Kapil Kumar Verma, and Amit Chaudhary. "A novel drug delivery system: Review on microspheres." Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics 11, no. 2-S (2021): 156-61..
  11. Shilpa, B.C., Vishnu, P., Babu, K.N., Rao, U.K., Sai, S. and Saravani, T., 2014. A brief review on floating drug delivery system. S Pac J Pharm Bio Sci, 2, pp.137-53.
  12. Dixit, N. (2011). Floating drug delivery system. Journal of current pharmaceutical research, 7(1), 6-20.
  13. Arunachalam, A., M. Karthikeyan, Kishore Konam, H. P. Prasad, S. Sethuraman, S. Ashutoshkumar, and S. Manidipa. "Floating drug delivery systems: A review." Int. J. Res. Pharm. Sci 2, no. 1 (2011): 76-83.
  14. Bhuyar, S. R., M. M. Auti, and S. A. Bhise. "Innovations and advancements in floating tablet drug delivery systems: a comprehensive review." Pharm Pharmacol Int J 12, no. 5 (2024): 195-200.
  15. Gupta, Pooja, Preeti Kothiyal Gnanarajan, and P. Kothiyal. "Floating drug delivery system: a review." International Journal of Pharma Research & Review 4, no. 8 (2015): 37-44.
  16. Ezike, Tobechukwu Christian, Ugochukwu Solomon Okpala, Ufedo Lovet Onoja, Chinenye Princess Nwike, Emmanuel Chimeh Ezeako, Osinachi Juliet Okpara, Charles Chinkwere Okoroafor et al. "Advances in drug delivery systems, challenges and future directions." Heliyon 9, no. 6 (2023).
  17. Turac, Imola-Rebeka, Alina Porfire, Sonia Iurian, Andrea Gabriela Cri?an, Tibor Casian, Rare? Iovanov, and Ioan Tomu??. "Expanding the manufacturing approaches for gastroretentive drug delivery systems with 3D printing technology." Pharmaceutics 16, no. 6 (2024): 790.
  18. Patial, K., Dua, J.S., Menra, M. and Prasad, D.N., 2016. A Review: Floating Drug Delivery System (FDDS). Pharmaceutical Research World Journal Of Pharmaceutical Research, 5(6), pp.614-33.
  19. Agale, Karan A., and Sanket Pandurang Shinde. "A Review on Floating Tablet." Journal of Drug Delivery & Therapeutics 15, no. 2 (2025).
  20. Thakur, Sanjay, Krishnappa Ramya, Deepak Kumar Shah, and Khadga Raj. "Floating Drug Delivery System." Journal of Drug Delivery & Therapeutics 11 (2021).
  21. Shah HP, Prajapati ST, Patel CN. Gastroretentive drug delivery systems: from conception to commercial success. Journal of Critical Reviews. 2017;4(2):10.
  22. Choudhury, Ananta, Lalmalsawmi Renthlei, Manjima Dewan, Raju Ahmed, Himal Barakoti, and Biplab Kumar Dey. "Floating drug delivery system: an outlook." Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Research 7, no. 3 (2019): 01-08.
  23. Shah, Harshil P., Shailesh T. Prajapati, and C. N. Patel. "Gastroretentive drug delivery systems: from conception to commercial success." Journal of Critical Reviews 4, no. 2 (2017): 10.
  24. Mandal, Uttam Kumar, Bappaditya Chatterjee, and Faria Gias Senjoti. "Gastro-retentive drug delivery systems and their in vivo success: A recent update." Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences 11, no. 5 (2016): 575-584.
  25. Bhardwaj, Vishal, and S. L. Harikumar. "Floating drug delivery system: A review." Pharmacophore 4, no. 1- 2013 (2013): 26-38.
  26. Sachin, Chaudhary, Dua JS, and Prasad DN. "Recent Development in Floating Drug Delivery System: An Overview." Journal of Drug Delivery & Therapeutics 12, no. 1 (2022).
  27. Bhuyar, S. R., M. M. Auti, and S. A. Bhise. "Innovations and advancements in floating tablet drug delivery systems: a comprehensive review." Pharm Pharmacol Int J 12, no. 5 (2024): 195-200.
  28. Vo, A.Q., Feng, X., Morott, J.T., Pimparade, M.B., Tiwari, R.V., Zhang, F. and Repka, M.A., 2016. A novel floating controlled release drug delivery system prepared by hot-melt extrusion. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 98, pp.108-121.
  29. Paunovska, Kalina, David Loughrey, and James E. Dahlman. "Drug delivery systems for RNA therapeutics." Nature Reviews Genetics 23, no. 5 (2022): 265-280.
  30. Chauhan, Reetu. "Floating Drug Delivery System: As A Novel Approach for Drug Delivery." Journal of Drug Delivery & Therapeutics 12, no. 6 (2022): 210-218.
  31. Pawar, Vivek K., Shaswat Kansal, Garima Garg, Rajendra Awasthi, Deepak Singodia, and Giriraj T. Kulkarni. "Gastroretentive dosage forms: A review with special emphasis on floating drug delivery systems." Drug delivery 18, no. 2 (2011): 97-110.
  32. Patel, Snehal, Chintan Aundhia, Avinash Seth, Nirmal Shah, Kartik Pandya, Chainesh Shah, Vinod Ramani, and Ankur Javia. "Microballoons: a novel approach in gastro-retention floating drug delivery system (FDDS)." An International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science 7, no. 2 (2016): 332-345.
  33. Tripathi, Julu, Prakash Thapa, Ravi Maharjan, and Seong Hoon Jeong. "Current state and future perspectives on gastroretentive drug delivery systems." Pharmaceutics 11, no. 4 (2019): 193.
  34. Desai, Harshdeep, Tushar Rukari, Rashmi Mahabal, and Vijay Jagtap. "Beyond Conventional: Recent Advancement on Floating Drug Delivery Systems: An Approach to Oral Controlled and Sustained Drug Delivery Via Gastric Retention."
  35. Rizvi, Syed AA, and Ayman M. Saleh. "Applications of nanoparticle systems in drug delivery technology." Saudi pharmaceutical journal 26, no. 1 (2018): 64-70.
  36. Mora-Castaño, Gloria, Juan Domínguez-Robles, Achmad Himawan, Mónica Millán-Jiménez, and Isidoro Caraballo. "Current trends in 3D printed gastroretentive floating drug delivery systems: A comprehensive review." International Journal of Pharmaceutics 663 (2024): 124543.
  37. Reddy Dumpa, Nagi, Suresh Bandari, and Michael A. Repka. "Novel gastroretentive floating pulsatile drug delivery  system  produced  via  hot-melt  extrusion  and  fused  deposition  modeling  3D printing." Pharmaceutics 12, no. 1 (2020): 52.
  38. Ghule, Pravin N., Amol S. Deshmukh, and Vijay R. Mahajan. "Floating drug delivery system (FDDS): An overview." Research Journal of Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Technology 6, no. 3 (2014): 174.
  39. Adepu, Shivakalyani, and Seeram Ramakrishna. "Controlled drug delivery systems: current status and future directions." Molecules 26, no. 19 (2021): 5905.
  40. Kumar, Aseem, Anil Kumar Sharma, and Rohit Dutt. "A Review of Gastro-retentive Drug Delivery Systems for Antidiabetics and their present status." Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology 14, no. 1 (2021): 538-546.
  41. Cetin, Meltem, and Selma Sahin. "Microparticulate and nanoparticulate drug delivery systems for metformin hydrochloride." Drug delivery 23, no. 8 (2016): 2796-2805.
  42. Mathew, Essyrose, Giulia Pitzanti, Eneko Larrañeta, and Dimitrios A. Lamprou. "3D printing of pharmaceuticals and drug delivery devices." Pharmaceutics 12, no. 3 (2020): 266
  43. Pandey, Manisha, Hira Choudhury, Joyce Lau Chui Fern, Alice Teo Kee Kee, Janice Kou, Jane Lee Jia Jing, How Chiu Her et al. "3D printing for oral drug delivery: a new tool to customize drug delivery." Drug delivery and translational research 10, no. 4 (2020): 986-1001.

Photo
Kajal Patel
Corresponding author

College of Pharmacy, Shivalik Campus, Dehradun, 248197

Photo
Vineet Joshi
Co-author

College of Pharmacy, Shivalik Campus, Dehradun, 248197

Photo
Ridhi Koul
Co-author

College of Pharmacy, Shivalik Campus, Dehradun, 248197

Photo
Amit Semwal
Co-author

College of Pharmacy, Shivalik Campus, Dehradun, 248197

Vineet Joshi, Kajal Patel*, Ridhi Koul, Amit Semwal, Floating Drug Delivery Systems: Mechanisms, Formulation Approaches, and Future Prospects, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 5, 4749-4769. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20282825

More related articles
Formulation And Evaluation of Herbal Body Wash Sol...
Tanuja Kadam , Bahaisti Patel, Sakshi Labhade , Rutuja Shirode ,...
Antibiotic Utilization Patterns and Adverse Drug E...
Dr. Purushothama Reddy K., Abinandana Shaji., Dr. Vinod K. R, Alw...
Review On In-Situ Gel Drug Delivery System for Per...
Nithyasri J., Dr. Eswar Gupta Maddi, ...
Role Of Novel Polymer In Drug Delivery System...
Wasif Rao, Mohd Asad, Indu Saini, Bishal Singh, ...
Comprehensive Exploration of Stem Cells in Medicine and Research: An In-Depth Re...
Fadilullahi Opeyemi Ibiyemi, Ismail Kolawole Odetayo, Fareedah Adeshina, ...
Herbal Kajal Formulation from Cyanthillium Cinereum and Ocimum Tenuiflorum for t...
Raisey Jose, Sandeepa Sadhan, Femi C S, Jalwa Shameer, Jeseena K H, Rashidha M A, ...
Related Articles
Formulation And Evaluation Of Skin Infection Care Cream...
Shashank Tiwari, Sushil Kumar Pal, Vaibhav Raj Pandey, ...
Transdermal Patches for Controlled Release of Analgesics: A Novel Drug Delivery ...
Kautika Puyad, Prajakta Shingote, Ajay Bhagwat, Swapnil Auti, Aniket Kalpe, ...
Preparation And Characterization of Microencapsulating Drug Delivery Systems of ...
Pal Pawan Chandrashekhar, Mrityunjay Kumar, Yasir Akhbar Dar, Faizan Jeelani Shergojri, Nauneet Kuma...
Formulation And Evaluation of Herbal Body Wash Solution ...
Tanuja Kadam , Bahaisti Patel, Sakshi Labhade , Rutuja Shirode , Shubham Bodkhe , Roshni Sayyad, Ka...
More related articles
Formulation And Evaluation of Herbal Body Wash Solution ...
Tanuja Kadam , Bahaisti Patel, Sakshi Labhade , Rutuja Shirode , Shubham Bodkhe , Roshni Sayyad, Ka...
Antibiotic Utilization Patterns and Adverse Drug Events Risk in Special Populati...
Dr. Purushothama Reddy K., Abinandana Shaji., Dr. Vinod K. R, Alwin Regin, ...
Formulation And Evaluation of Herbal Body Wash Solution ...
Tanuja Kadam , Bahaisti Patel, Sakshi Labhade , Rutuja Shirode , Shubham Bodkhe , Roshni Sayyad, Ka...
Antibiotic Utilization Patterns and Adverse Drug Events Risk in Special Populati...
Dr. Purushothama Reddy K., Abinandana Shaji., Dr. Vinod K. R, Alwin Regin, ...