View Article

Abstract

As a foundational strategy in modern synthetic chemistry, one-pot synthesis involves the execution of multiple, sequential chemical reactions within a single reaction vessel. This methodology fundamentally redefines synthetic routes by obviating the need to isolate and purify intermediate compounds, which in turn provides substantial benefits related to efficiency, sustainability, and the management of resources. This review offers a thorough examination of the principles and techniques that underpin one-pot synthesis. We investigate the primary classifications of these procedures, such as tandem, domino, and cascade reactions, and explore the tactical use of multicomponent reactions (MCRs) alongside catalytic sequential transformations. The significant advantages, including enhanced step and atom economy, diminished solvent use and waste production, and considerable reductions in time and labor, are analyzed in detail with reference to Green Chemistry metrics like the E-Factor and Process Mass Intensity (PMI). Furthermore, we underscore the critical importance of one-pot synthesis in diverse fields, encompassing the total synthesis of intricate natural products, the swift assembly of compound libraries for pharmaceutical research, and the fabrication of advanced materials. In closing, this review offers a critical look at the associated challenges, like reagent compatibility and the complexities of optimization, and considers the future trajectory, which points toward the integration of one-pot methods with pioneering technologies such as flow chemistry, automated synthesis, and artificial intelligence to propel chemical manufacturing forward.

Keywords

one pot synthesis, green chemistry, molecular docking, catalytic cascades , 1,3,4 Oxidazole , Hydrazine etc.

Introduction

The Imperative for Efficiency in Chemical Synthesis

The practice of chemical synthesis provides the essential foundation for nearly all facets of contemporary life, spanning from medicine and agriculture to technology and materials science. The conventional model for multi-step synthesis entails the stepwise conversion of a starting material through a linear sequence of distinct reactions. Each stage in this sequence demands its own set of specific conditions, followed by a time-consuming workup phase to isolate and purify the intermediate before it can proceed to the subsequent step [1]. Although this linear methodology affords a high level of command over each transformation, it is fundamentally inefficient. The compounding loss of material at each isolation and purification stage frequently results in disappointingly low overall yields. Additionally, this approach consumes enormous volumes of solvents, reagents, and energy, while creating substantial quantities of chemical waste, thereby presenting major environmental and economic hurdles [2].

The inefficiency of this linear model is captured by metrics such as the E-Factor (Environmental Factor), which represents the mass ratio of waste produced to the mass of the final product. Within the pharmaceutical sector, E-factors can reach exceptionally high levels, commonly falling between 25 and 100, which signify that for every kilogram of a drug manufactured, more than 100 kilograms of waste are created [2]. This sobering statistic has created a powerful incentive to devise more sustainable and efficient synthetic techniques.

Fig no. 1 : General scheme of one pot synthesis

Defining One-Pot Synthesis: A Paradigm Shift

In reaction to these limitations, a significant shift in thinking has occurred, moving towards process intensification and greater synthetic elegance. One-pot synthesis is a potent symbol of this evolution. It is characterized as a synthetic approach in which a reactant undergoes a series of consecutive chemical changes within a single reactor the "pot" thereby avoiding the need to isolate intermediates [3]. This methodology aims to replicate the extraordinary efficiency of biosynthetic pathways found in nature, where complex molecules are constructed within a cellular matrix via highly organized enzymatic cascades, all without the isolation of any intermediate compounds [4]. In biosynthesis, enzymes collaborate within the same cellular space to build intricate natural products with flawless efficiency and selectivity a process that synthetic chemists aspire to replicate.

Fig no. 2: General reaction of one pot synthesis

The central tenet of one-pot synthesis is the maximization of efficiency through the reduction of manual interventions. By consolidating multiple reaction stages into one seamless operation, chemists can realize substantial gains in overall yield, shorten reaction durations from days to mere hours, and significantly reduce the environmental impact of a synthetic pathway. This review is intended to furnish a detailed account of the guiding principles, varied strategies, and extensive applications of this vital synthetic approach.

Adherence to Green Chemistry Principles

One-pot synthesis is more than a strategy of convenience; it is a direct application of several of the 12 Principles of Green Chemistry. Its benefits are in perfect alignment with the objective of developing more environmentally responsible chemical processes:

  • Prevention: By eliminating intermediate workups, the creation of waste (e.g., from solvents used in extractions and chromatography) is significantly curtailed.
  • Atom Economy: Multicomponent reactions (MCRs) serve as a prime illustration of maximizing atom economy, since the majority, if not all, of the atoms from the reactants are integrated into the final product.
  • Less Hazardous Chemical Syntheses: By doing away with the need to handle and store potentially hazardous or unstable intermediates, the entire process becomes inherently safer.
  • Safer Solvents and Auxiliaries: One-pot procedures intrinsically lower the total quantity of solvents needed for a multi-step sequence.
  • Design for Energy Efficiency: By sidestepping energy-demanding tasks such as solvent evaporation, purification, and temperature adjustments between steps, notable energy savings are achieved.
  • Reduce Derivatives: The high degree of selectivity that can often be attained in one-pot cascades can remove the necessity for protecting group chemistry, which adds steps and produces waste.
  • Catalysis: A great number of the most effective one-pot reactions depend on catalytic methods, which are preferable to stoichiometric reagents.

Fig no.3: 12 Principles of green chemistry

2. Foundational Principles and Classifications

The language used within the domain of one-pot synthesis can sometimes overlap, yet there are important distinctions that characterize the nature of the reaction sequence.

Tandem, Domino, and Cascade Reactions 

These descriptors apply to processes in which subsequent reactions unfold spontaneously under the same set of conditions after the initial transformation is set in motion.

  • Tandem (or Domino) Reaction: This denotes a process that includes two or more bond-forming events occurring in sequence under unchanging reaction conditions, without the addition of new reagents or catalysts after the first step. The product of the initial reaction is a short-lived or unstable intermediate that is immediately consumed in the next transformation [5]. The tandem Diels-Alder reaction, where an initial cycloaddition generates a structure perfectly arranged for a second, intramolecular cycloaddition, is a classic illustration.
  • Cascade Reaction: This term is frequently used as a synonym for tandem/domino, but it can also suggest a more elaborate sequence of events, typically resulting in a significant jump in molecular complexity. The defining characteristic is that the functionality created in one step serves as the direct trigger for the following step in an intramolecular manner [6]. The Robinson annulation, which comprises a Michael addition followed by an intramolecular aldol condensation, stands as a textbook example of a reaction cascade that constructs a six-membered ring onto a ketone substrate.

Sequential Addition Protocols

This represents a more encompassing and highly useful classification of one-pot synthesis, where the reagents or catalysts for subsequent stages are introduced in a stepwise fashion into the same reaction vessel. While this methodology does not demand that all reactions take place under the exact same conditions (for example, the temperature might be altered or a new catalyst introduced), it crucially avoids the necessity for any intermediate workup, extraction, or purification steps [3]. This technique provides superior flexibility compared to a genuine cascade reaction, as reagents that are incompatible can be added at different points in the process. For instance, a Grignard reaction (which requires an anhydrous ether solvent) could be carefully quenched, followed by a solvent swap to carry out an aqueous oxidation in the same flask a sequence that would be impossible under true cascade conditions.

Multicomponent Reactions (MCRs)

MCRs represent a distinct and highly convergent type of one-pot reaction in which three or more starting materials combine in a single procedure to yield a final product that incorporates substantial portions of all the initial reactants [7]. MCRs are lauded for their outstanding atom and step economy and for their capacity to rapidly build molecular complexity from simple, easily accessible starting materials. Their convergent nature is a major advantage; a linear synthesis of 3 steps, each with an 80% yield, results in a total yield of 51%, whereas a 3-component MCR that achieves a 51% yield does so in a single operation.

Orthogonal Chemistry in One-Pot Systems

A refined strategy for creating complex one-pot sequences involves the application of orthogonal reaction conditions. This technique entails using multiple catalysts or reagents in the same vessel that are mutually non-interactive or "blind" to each other. Each catalyst or reagent exclusively targets its specific substrate or functional group and does not disrupt the other ongoing transformations. For instance, it is possible to combine a palladium catalyst for a cross-coupling reaction with an acid catalyst for a hydrolysis, as long as the two catalytic cycles remain independent, thus allowing two mechanistically different reactions to occur either simultaneously or sequentially in the same pot.

3. Core Strategies and Methodologies

The real-world execution of one-pot synthesis depends on a range of powerful and adaptable chemical strategies.

Celebrated Multicomponent Reactions

MCRs have a long and storied history and continue to be a dynamic area for the discovery of new chemical transformations. Among the most fundamental MCRs are:

Fig no.4: One pot Multicomponent reaction

  • The Ugi Reaction: A four-component condensation involving a ketone or aldehyde, an amine, an isocyanide, and a carboxylic acid to produce a di-peptide-like structure. It serves as a vital tool in combinatorial chemistry for assembling libraries of peptide analogues for drug discovery [8]. The reaction mechanism involves the formation of an imine, which is then attacked by the isocyanide and carboxylic acid to create a stable α-acylamino amide.
  • The Biginelli Reaction: A three-component condensation of an aldehyde, a β-ketoester, and urea or thiourea to create dihydropyrimidinones. This molecular framework is present in numerous biologically active compounds, including certain calcium channel blockers [9]. This reaction is typically acid-catalyzed and unfolds through an intricate cascade of imine formation, condensation, and cyclization.
  • The Passerini Reaction: A three-component reaction that combines an isocyanide, a carboxylic acid, and a carbonyl compound (an aldehyde or ketone) to generate an α-acyloxy carboxamide [10]. This transformation is a highly effective method for forming both ester and amide bonds in a single step.
  • The Hantzsch Pyridine Synthesis: A four-component reaction that produces a dihydropyridine derivative from an aldehyde, ammonia, and two equivalents of a β-ketoester. The resulting dihydropyridine can be readily oxidized to the corresponding pyridine, a heterocycle that is ubiquitous in medicinal chemistry.

Catalytic Cascades

The use of catalysts is essential for initiating and managing complex reaction cascades. A single catalyst can be engineered to promote multiple distinct transformations in sequence, or several catalysts can be employed simultaneously if they are compatible and do not interfere with each other.

  • Organocatalysis: The application of small, metal-free organic molecules to catalyze reactions has provided a robust platform for devising one-pot cascades. For instance, proline is capable of catalyzing a reaction sequence, such as a Michael addition followed by an intramolecular aldol reaction, to construct complex carbocyclic systems with a high degree of stereocontrol [11]. This has been famously applied in the Hajos-Parrish-Eder-Sauer-Wiechert reaction to synthesize a key intermediate for steroid production.
  • Transition Metal Catalysis: Transition metals such as palladium, rhodium, and copper are exceptionally effective at orchestrating catalytic cascades. A single palladium catalyst, for example, can manage a sequence that includes a Heck reaction followed by a Suzuki coupling or a cyclization, facilitating the swift assembly of complex heterocyclic structures from simple starting materials [12]. These sequences frequently capitalize on the metal's ability to execute multiple distinct elementary steps (e.g., oxidative addition, migratory insertion, reductive elimination) within a single catalytic cycle.

Biocatalytic Cascades

In an effort to closely replicate nature, chemists are now developing one-pot cascades that utilize multiple, compatible enzymes. In these "enzymatic cocktails," the product of the first enzyme-catalyzed reaction serves as the substrate for the second, and the process continues in this fashion. This method leverages the exquisite selectivity of enzymes to construct complex molecules under mild, aqueous conditions. A major challenge is to ensure that all enzymes in the cascade are active and stable in a shared buffer system and that no intermediates or byproducts from one step inhibit the function of another enzyme in the sequence.

4. Key Applications Across Chemical Science

The influence of one-pot synthesis is evident across the full range of chemical research and development, from academic labs to industrial-scale manufacturing.

Total Synthesis of Natural Products

The challenge of synthesizing complex natural products serves as the ultimate benchmark for any new synthetic method. One-pot cascade reactions have facilitated some of the most sophisticated and efficient total syntheses ever reported.

  • Strychnine: The total synthesis of this famously complex alkaloid has been accomplished using routes that incorporate powerful one-pot cascade reactions to build the elaborate polycyclic core in a single operation, drastically reducing the length of a synthesis that originally required dozens of steps [13].
  • Prostaglandins: The Corey synthesis of prostaglandins, a milestone in organic chemistry, includes a crucial cascade reaction in which a bicyclic core is assembled through a series of stereocontrolled reductions and cyclizations. This showcases the power of the one-pot approach to efficiently build molecular complexity.
  • Reserpine: Woodward's synthesis of reserpine is another classic case where meticulous strategic planning enabled the construction of complex stereochemical relationships in a highly controlled fashion, with principles that have since inspired the design of modern one-pot reactions.

Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry

The drug discovery pipeline depends on the capacity to synthesize and screen vast quantities of diverse molecules. One-pot reactions, especially MCRs, are perfectly suited for this role. They permit the rapid and automated production of large libraries of related compounds by simply altering the input components. This strategy, often referred to as Diversity-Oriented Synthesis (DOS), has been crucial in the identification of lead compounds for a wide array of diseases by granting access to novel heterocyclic scaffolds [14, 15]. The FDA-approved cancer therapeutic Sorafenib, for instance, is made using a diaryl urea formation reaction that can be modified for one-pot protocols to quickly generate analogues.

Materials Science and Polymer Chemistry

One-pot techniques are also finding increasing use in the synthesis of functional materials. For example, complex polymers with precisely defined architectures can be created in a single pot by sequentially adding different monomers or catalysts. This approach is used to fabricate block copolymers for self-assembling materials, functionalized nanoparticles for drug delivery, and conductive polymers with customized properties for applications in electronics and nanotechnology [16]. The popular "click chemistry" reaction, the copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne cyclo addition, is frequently employed in one-pot sequences to functionalize materials due to its high efficiency and orthogonality.

5. Current Challenges and Future Outlook

Although the benefits of one-pot synthesis are undeniable, its successful application requires overcoming several significant obstacles.

Challenges

  • Reagent and Catalyst Compatibility: The foremost difficulty lies in ensuring that all reagents, catalysts, intermediates, and solvents present in the reaction vessel are compatible and do not trigger undesirable side reactions. For instance, a potent reducing agent like LiAlH? cannot be present with an oxidizing agent like KMnO?. Likewise, a catalyst used in one step might be deactivated by a reagent introduced for a subsequent step.
  • Reaction Optimization: Optimizing a multi-step, one-pot sequence is substantially more complex than optimizing a single reaction. The conditions must reflect a "compromise" that permits all stages to proceed effectively. Discovering this optimal window of temperature, pressure, concentration, and stoichiometry can be an extremely demanding task.
  • Analytical Monitoring: Tracking the progress of a one-pot sequence can be challenging because the reaction mixture contains a complex and constantly changing array of chemical species. This makes it difficult to determine when one step is complete and the next should be initiated. This has spurred the development of in-situ monitoring methods like Process Analytical Technology (PAT), which uses tools such as FT-IR or Raman spectroscopy to observe reactant consumption and product formation in real time.

Future Directions

The field is in a state of continuous evolution, with new technologies emerging that promise to surmount these challenges and further amplify the power of one-pot synthesis.

  • Integration with Flow Chemistry: Executing one-pot reactions in continuous flow reactors provides superior command over reaction parameters like temperature, pressure, and reaction duration. In a flow setup, the sequential addition of reagents can be precisely managed by introducing new streams at various points along the reactor. This offers a powerful framework for optimizing and scaling up complex one-pot sequences [17]. Incompatible reagents can be added downstream, or transient, unstable intermediates can be generated and immediately consumed in the next stage.
  • Automation and High-Throughput Experimentation: The use of robotic platforms for automated synthesis enables researchers to rapidly screen hundreds or even thousands of different one-pot reaction conditions, which drastically accelerates the optimization process. This is especially potent when paired with statistical Design of Experiments (DoE) methodologies.
  • Computational and AI-Driven Synthesis: Progress in machine learning and artificial intelligence is starting to allow for the in silico prediction of optimal one-pot reaction sequences. AI algorithms can sift through vast reaction databases to pinpoint compatible reagents and catalysts and to suggest novel, efficient one-pot pathways to target molecules [18]. This can assist chemists in designing better experiments and avoiding unpromising reaction routes from the start.
  • Dual Catalysis and Photoredox: A significant emerging area is the combination of different catalytic modes within a single pot. For example, merging photoredox catalysis (which uses light to create reactive radical intermediates) with transition metal catalysis enables novel bond formations that are not feasible with either method alone, thus opening new frontiers for one-pot reactions.

CONCLUSION

One-pot synthesis has evolved from a specialized academic interest into an essential strategy in modern chemical synthesis. By mirroring the efficiency of nature's own biosynthetic machinery, this approach offers a potent solution to the escalating demand for more sustainable, cost-effective, and resource-efficient chemical production. The principles of atom economy, step economy, and process intensification are fully captured in this elegant synthetic philosophy. Although challenges related to compatibility and optimization remains, the synergistic fusion of one-pot strategies with advanced technologies like flow chemistry, automation, and artificial intelligence is poised to usher in the next era of innovation. The continued refinement and application of one-pot synthesis will be vital for addressing complex synthetic challenges and for delivering the molecules that will define our future.

REFERENCES

  1. Trost, B. M. (1995). Atom economy a challenge for organic synthesis. Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English, 34(3), 259-281.
  2. Sheldon, R. A. (2007). The E factor: fifteen years on. Green Chemistry, 9(12), 1273-1283.
  3. Fogg, D. E., & dos Santos, E. N. (2004). Tandem catalysis: a fruitful approach to organic synthesis. Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 248(21-24), 2365-2379.
  4. Wender, P. A., Miller, B. L. (2009). The practicality of synthesis. Nature, 460(7252), 197-205.
  5. Tietze, L. F. (1996). Domino reactions in organic synthesis. Chemical Reviews, 96(1), 115-136.
  6. Pellissier, H. (2007). Asymmetric domino reactions. Part A: Reactions based on the use of chiral auxiliaries. Tetrahedron, 63(38), 9267-9331.
  7. Dömling, A., & Ugi, I. (2000). Multicomponent reactions with isocyanides. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 39(18), 3168-3210.
  8. Ugi, I., Werner, B., & Dömling, A. (2003). The chemistry of isocyanides, their multicomponent reactions and their libraries. Molecules, 8(1), 53-66.
  9. Kappe, C. O. (2000). Recent advances in the Biginelli dihydropyrimidine synthesis. New tricks from an old dog. Accounts of Chemical Research, 33(12), 879-888.
  10. Passerini, M. (1921). Sopra gli isonitrili (I). Composto del p-isontril-toluene con acetone ed acido acetico. Gazzetta Chimica Italiana, 51, 126-129.
  11. List, B., Lerner, R. A., & Barbas III, C. F. (2000). Proline-catalyzed direct asymmetric aldol reactions. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 122(10), 2395-2396.
  12. de Meijere, A., & Diederich, F. (Eds.). (2008). Metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions. John Wiley & Sons.
  13. Rawal, V. H., & Iwasa, S. (1994). A short, stereocontrolled synthesis of strychnine. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 116(7), 3199-3200.
  14. Orru, R. V., & de Greef, M. (2003). Recent advances in solution-phase combinatorial and parallel synthesis. Synthesis, 2003(10), 1471-1499.
  15. Ganem, B. (2009). Strategies for innovation in multicomponent reaction design. Accounts of Chemical Research, 42(3), 463-472.
  16. Hawker, C. J., & Wooley, K. L. (2005). The convergence of synthetic organic and polymer chemistries. Science, 309(5738), 1200-1205.
  17. Hartman, R. L., McMullen, J. P., & Jensen, K. F. (2011). Deciding whether to go with the flow: evaluating the merits of flow reactors for synthesis. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 50(33), 7502-7519.
  18. Segler, M. H., Preuss, M., & Waller, M. P. (2018). Planning chemical syntheses with deep neural networks and symbolic AI. Nature, 555(7698), 604-610.

Reference

  1. Trost, B. M. (1995). Atom economy a challenge for organic synthesis. Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English, 34(3), 259-281.
  2. Sheldon, R. A. (2007). The E factor: fifteen years on. Green Chemistry, 9(12), 1273-1283.
  3. Fogg, D. E., & dos Santos, E. N. (2004). Tandem catalysis: a fruitful approach to organic synthesis. Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 248(21-24), 2365-2379.
  4. Wender, P. A., Miller, B. L. (2009). The practicality of synthesis. Nature, 460(7252), 197-205.
  5. Tietze, L. F. (1996). Domino reactions in organic synthesis. Chemical Reviews, 96(1), 115-136.
  6. Pellissier, H. (2007). Asymmetric domino reactions. Part A: Reactions based on the use of chiral auxiliaries. Tetrahedron, 63(38), 9267-9331.
  7. Dömling, A., & Ugi, I. (2000). Multicomponent reactions with isocyanides. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 39(18), 3168-3210.
  8. Ugi, I., Werner, B., & Dömling, A. (2003). The chemistry of isocyanides, their multicomponent reactions and their libraries. Molecules, 8(1), 53-66.
  9. Kappe, C. O. (2000). Recent advances in the Biginelli dihydropyrimidine synthesis. New tricks from an old dog. Accounts of Chemical Research, 33(12), 879-888.
  10. Passerini, M. (1921). Sopra gli isonitrili (I). Composto del p-isontril-toluene con acetone ed acido acetico. Gazzetta Chimica Italiana, 51, 126-129.
  11. List, B., Lerner, R. A., & Barbas III, C. F. (2000). Proline-catalyzed direct asymmetric aldol reactions. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 122(10), 2395-2396.
  12. de Meijere, A., & Diederich, F. (Eds.). (2008). Metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions. John Wiley & Sons.
  13. Rawal, V. H., & Iwasa, S. (1994). A short, stereocontrolled synthesis of strychnine. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 116(7), 3199-3200.
  14. Orru, R. V., & de Greef, M. (2003). Recent advances in solution-phase combinatorial and parallel synthesis. Synthesis, 2003(10), 1471-1499.
  15. Ganem, B. (2009). Strategies for innovation in multicomponent reaction design. Accounts of Chemical Research, 42(3), 463-472.
  16. Hawker, C. J., & Wooley, K. L. (2005). The convergence of synthetic organic and polymer chemistries. Science, 309(5738), 1200-1205.
  17. Hartman, R. L., McMullen, J. P., & Jensen, K. F. (2011). Deciding whether to go with the flow: evaluating the merits of flow reactors for synthesis. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 50(33), 7502-7519.
  18. Segler, M. H., Preuss, M., & Waller, M. P. (2018). Planning chemical syntheses with deep neural networks and symbolic AI. Nature, 555(7698), 604-610.

Photo
Pratik Dharashive
Corresponding author

Shivlingheshwar College of Pharmacy, Almala

Photo
Dr. V. M Dharashive
Co-author

Shivlingheshwar College of Pharmacy, Almala

Photo
Dr. S. G. Malpani
Co-author

Shivlingheshwar College of Pharmacy, Almala

Photo
R. G. Katke
Co-author

Shivlingheshwar College of Pharmacy, Almala

Photo
S. N. Mane
Co-author

Shivlingheshwar College of Pharmacy, Almala

Photo
V. R. Badgire
Co-author

Shivlingheshwar College of Pharmacy, Almala

Photo
D. M. Swami
Co-author

Shivlingheshwar College of Pharmacy, Almala

Pratik Dharashive, Dr. V. M Dharashive, Dr. S. G. Malpani, R. G. Katke, S. N. Mane, V. R. Badgire, D. M. Swami, One-Pot Synthesis: A Modern Review of Strategies, Principles, and Applications in Chemical Manufacturing, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 9, 3026-3034. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17201314

More related articles
Development of Herbal Anti-inflammatory Ointment...
Vaishnavi Mahajan, Ashwini Pundkar , Manjusha Markad, Prachi Murk...
Formulation And Evaluation of Herbal Syrup Using K...
Payal Badhe , Vaishnavi Gugale , ...
An Overview on Controlled Porosity Osmotic Tablet...
Saba Rajjak Shaikh, Pradnya K. Gnagurde, Shradha G. Kandalkar, Ka...
Formulation And Evaluation Of Resorcinol Gel With Rose Extract For eczema...
Prerana Sahu, Radha Rani Verma, Dr. Gyanesh Sahu , Dr. Harish Sharma , ...
A Review on: Advanced PROTAC Modalities for Precision Cancer Therapy...
Ch. Anusha, J. N. Suresh Kumar, Y. Mounika Devi, K. Bhavana, K. Sowmya , G. Kiran, Y. Sai Kumar, ...
Related Articles
Myonectin: The Muscle’s Signal to Metabolic Harmony...
Dr. Shanish Antony. A, Neethu Elsa shiju, Anjana P, Sandra Sajj, Aiswarya S S, Rijul M, ...
Comparative Study on Formulated Topical Cream Containing Butterfly Pea Flower an...
Ankita Kaimal , Ann Mary Thomas , Ansal C. A., Poojalal, Lincy John , ...
Formulation And Evaluation of Herbal Mouthwash for Maintaining Freshness and Pro...
Ashay Lakade, Ajay Jadhav, Kedar Shete, Shubham Tikait, Dr. Swati Deshmukh, ...
Solid Lipid Nanoparticle for Topical Drug Delivery...
Arya Ashok, Praveen Raj R., Riya Marium Philip, ...
Development of Herbal Anti-inflammatory Ointment...
Vaishnavi Mahajan, Ashwini Pundkar , Manjusha Markad, Prachi Murkute, Dr. Santosh Payghan , Swapnali...
More related articles
Development of Herbal Anti-inflammatory Ointment...
Vaishnavi Mahajan, Ashwini Pundkar , Manjusha Markad, Prachi Murkute, Dr. Santosh Payghan , Swapnali...
An Overview on Controlled Porosity Osmotic Tablet...
Saba Rajjak Shaikh, Pradnya K. Gnagurde, Shradha G. Kandalkar, Kajal A. Choursiya, Sheetal B. Gondka...
Development of Herbal Anti-inflammatory Ointment...
Vaishnavi Mahajan, Ashwini Pundkar , Manjusha Markad, Prachi Murkute, Dr. Santosh Payghan , Swapnali...
An Overview on Controlled Porosity Osmotic Tablet...
Saba Rajjak Shaikh, Pradnya K. Gnagurde, Shradha G. Kandalkar, Kajal A. Choursiya, Sheetal B. Gondka...