View Article

Abstract

This paper presents Drug Discovery and Design System (DD3S), a privacy-preserving, web-based artificial intelligence platform for end-to-end early-stage drug discovery. The aim of the study was to develop an integrated system enabling molecular design, analysis, and interpretation while ensuring complete data privacy through local computation. The platform combines interactive molecular design with dual three-dimensional visualization using 3Dmol.js for lightweight WebGL rendering and Mol* for high-fidelity structural representation. It incorporates Graph Neural Network-based property prediction and locally deployed Ollama-based large language models (Gemma-3:4b and Gemma-2:2b) for intelligent assistance. The Design module features an HTML5 canvas-based two-dimensional molecular sketcher with real-time three-dimensional generation and a toxicity-focused chatbot. The Analyzer module provides comprehensive molecular descriptors, ESOL solubility prediction, PAINS and Brenk toxicity screening, and Lipinski’s Rule of Five validation. The Search module retrieves ethically cited literature via the Semantic Scholar API with AI-generated summaries, while the Home dashboard enables dynamic exploration of 14,197 preloaded molecules with explanatory insights. All computations are performed locally, ensuring 100?ta privacy. System validation demonstrates 99.2% SMILES validation accuracy and prediction latency of less than 100 ms, with smooth interactive performance on standard consumer hardware.

Keywords

drug design, computer-aided; cheminformatics; neural networks, computer; molecular structure; SMILES; artificial intelligence; drug discovery

Introduction

× Popup Image

The drug discovery and development process remains one of the most resource-intensive endeavours in modern science, typically requiring 10–15 years and investments exceeding $2–3 billion per approved therapeutic agent[1]. High attrition rates — often exceeding 90% from lead identification to market approval — stem from challenges in target validation, compound optimization, toxicity prediction, and pharmacokinetic profiling. Traditional high-throughput screening and empirical methods are increasingly inadequate to explore the vast chemical space (estimated at 1060 possible small molecules), driving the adoption of computational approaches to accelerate early-stage discovery.

In recent years, artificial intelligence and machine learning have transformed cheminformatics and virtual screening paradigms. Graph Neural Networks, generative models (such as variational autoencoders, generative adversarial networks, and diffusion models), and large language models enable rapid property prediction, de novo molecular design, and Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion and Toxicity assessment[3,7,15]. Platforms integrating these techniques have demonstrated success in hit identification and lead optimization. However, several persistent limitations hinder widespread adoption in academic and industrial settings.

Fragmentation of tools remains a key challenge, as most existing solutions separate molecular sketching, three-dimensional visualization, property prediction, literature search, and explanatory analysis across multiple disconnected applications or cloud-based services. Data privacy and security concerns also persist, since reliance on external application programming interfaces or cloud-hosted models exposes proprietary molecular structures and research data to potential breaches — a critical issue in pharmaceutical research and development where intellectual property is paramount. Furthermore, limited interactivity and usability characterize current platforms, as few offer real-time HTML5 drawing synchronized with dual three-dimensional viewers, integrated local large language model chat for toxicity and risk explanation, or educational interfaces tailored for students and researchers. Finally, ethical and citation shortcomings are prevalent, as online literature retrieval often relies on increasingly restrictive commercial application programming interfaces or lacks proper attribution, risking academic integrity.

To address these gaps, we present DD3S (AI-Powered Drug Discovery System), a fully local, privacy-preserving, web-based platform that unifies interactive molecular design, high-fidelity visualization, accurate property prediction, and AI-assisted analysis within a single browser environment. DD3S leverages RDKit for robust cheminformatics and SMILES-to-graph conversion; an augmented Graph Neural Network (Add-GNN) fusing structural embeddings with physicochemical descriptors for toxicity, ESOL solubility, and bioactivity prediction; dual three-dimensional rendering synchronizing an HTML5 two-dimensional canvas with 3Dmol.js and Mol*; locally hosted large language models (Gemma-3:4b and Gemma-2:2b); a preloaded database of 14,197 molecules; and a Semantic Scholar-backed search engine for ethical citations and AI-generated summaries. By running all inference locally, DD3S guarantees 100% data privacy while delivering sub-2-second latencies for most operations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Molecular representation: Molecules are represented via Simplified Molecular Input Line Entry System (SMILES) notation. RDKit (version 2023.09.1; RDKit Open-Source Cheminformatics, rdkit.org) was employed to convert these strings into graph structures where atoms function as nodes and bonds as edges.

Property prediction (Add-GNN): A Graph Neural Network was utilized to predict toxicity, solubility (ESOL), and bioactivity. The model achieves superior performance by fusing graph embeddings with physicochemical descriptors including LogP, topological polar surface area, and molecular weight. Model performance was assessed using mean absolute error (MAE) as the primary metric; results are reported across the full validation dataset (n = 14,197 molecules).

High-fidelity visualization with Mol*: Mol* (version 3.x; PDBe, EMBL-EBI) was integrated for web-based three-dimensional visualization, enabling rendering of complex protein–ligand interactions retrieved from the RCSB Protein Data Bank, with support for high-performance WebGL graphics even for large macromolecules. For responsive embedded views, 3Dmol.js (version 2.x; University of Pittsburgh) provides lightweight three-dimensional rendering.

Interactive web interface: The platform comprises four core pages built with Bootstrap 5, Django 4.2 (Django Software Foundation), and JavaScript libraries. The Home/Dashboard page showcases platform features and an AI Analysis Tool using Gemma-2:2b for dynamic insights across the 14,197 preloaded molecules. The Search page queries the open Semantic Scholar Graph API alongside PubMed and Europe PMC, ensuring open-access literature retrieval with full ethical citations and AI-generated summaries via Gemma-3:4b. The Design page features an interactive HTML5 canvas for two-dimensional molecular sketching, with real-time SMILES generation driving a lightweight three-dimensional WebGL render via 3Dmol.js and a secondary full-screen Mol* mode. The Analyzer page computes molecular descriptors, two-dimensional and three-dimensional views, solubility, toxicity filters, and Lipinski’s Rule of Five compliance upon entry of a SMILES string. All pages maintain sub-2-second response times with local inference only.

Statistical analysis: System performance metrics including SMILES validation accuracy and prediction latency were measured across the full dataset of 14,197 preloaded molecules and on standard reference compounds including Aspirin and Caffeine. Validation accuracy is reported as the percentage of correctly processed SMILES strings. Latency values represent mean response time across ten repeated measurements under standard consumer hardware conditions.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The system was validated on standard molecules, including Aspirin and Caffeine, as well as the full dataset of 14,197 molecules. The compound details view is shown in Figure 1, which demonstrates the integration of physicochemical properties, solubility prediction, Lipinski’s Rule of Five validation, and toxicity analysis within a unified interface. The interactive molecular design interface is illustrated in Figure 2, highlighting the real-time synchronization between the two-dimensional sketching canvas and the three-dimensional visualization.

The advanced visualization capabilities are further supported by the Mol* viewer (Figure 3), which provides high-fidelity structural rendering, and the 3Dmol.js viewer (Figure 4), which enables lightweight, real-time WebGL-based interaction. The dual-viewer approach ensures smooth performance and flexibility, even on standard consumer hardware.

Figure 1. Compound details view showing comprehensive profile displaying three-dimensional and two-dimensional molecular structures, basic physicochemical information, predicted solubility, Lipinski’s Rule of Five compliance, and integrated AI assistant.

Figure 2. Interactive molecular design interface featuring a real-time two-dimensional sketching canvas with synchronized three-dimensional viewer and integrated search bar.

Figure 3. Mol* viewer showing interactive molecular visualization displaying the current structure in high-quality three-dimensional rendering with support for orbiting, zooming, and residue selection.

Figure 4. 3Dmol.js showing real-time interactive three-dimensional display of molecules with smooth WebGL rendering, multiple visualization styles, and seamless synchronization with the design canvas.

Performance metrics obtained during validation are summarized in Table 1. The system achieved 99.2% SMILES validation accuracy for both Aspirin and Caffeine, along with prediction latency of less than 100 ms for property estimation, consistent with the reported benchmarks. The Analyzer module correctly classified all test compounds according to Lipinski’s criteria and toxicity filters (PAINS and Brenk), confirming the reliability of the implemented screening methods.

TABLE 1. KEY PERFORMANCE METRICS

Task

Latency

Accuracy/ Reliability

SMILES Validation

< 50 ms

99.2%

Property Prediction

< 100 ms

MAE < 0.5

LLM Insight Generation

2–5 s

100% Local Privacy

3D Rendering (3Dmol.js/Mol*)

< 800 ms

High-fidelity

Legend: MAE: mean absolute error; LLM: large language model; SMILES: Simplified Molecular Input Line Entry System; ms: milliseconds; s: seconds.

Furthermore, the Search module consistently retrieved relevant and properly cited literature using the Semantic Scholar API, with summaries generated by the local Gemma-3:4b model aligning closely with established scientific knowledge. The use of locally deployed large language models ensures privacy-preserving operation while maintaining high-quality insights. The platform addresses key limitations of fragmented tools and data privacy concerns by consolidating all computational steps within a single browser-based environment, with no data transmitted to external servers.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors gratefully acknowledge the invaluable guidance, continuous support, and encouragement provided by Mr. Sanjaykumar Ranveer throughout the development of this project. Special thanks are extended to Dr. Rachana Dhannawat, Head of the Department of Computer Engineering, for providing the necessary facilities and resources. The authors also express sincere appreciation to the faculty members of the Department of Computer Engineering, particularly Ms. Toshi Jain and Ms. Iffat Kazi, for their unwavering support, expert guidance, and meaningful insights. Furthermore, the authors thank the open-source community, especially the developers of RDKit, Django, PyTorch, and Ollama, whose tools and libraries formed the foundation of this work. Finally, heartfelt gratitude goes to the families and friends of all authors for their constant encouragement and support during this endeavour.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. Schneider G, Fechner U. Computer-based de novo design of drug-like molecules. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005;4:649-63.
  2. Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1997;23(1-3):3-25.
  3. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, et al. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):235-42.
  4. Olivecrona M, Blaschke T, Engkvist O, Chen H. Molecular de novo design through deep reinforcement learning. J Cheminform. 2017;9:48.
  5. Rogers D, Hahn M. Extended-connectivity fingerprints. J Chem Inf Model. 2010;50(5):742-54.
  6. Rego N, Koes D. 3Dmol.js: molecular visualization with WebGL. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(8):1322-4.
  7. Chen H, Engkvist O, Wang Y, Olivecrona M, Blaschke T. The rise of deep learning in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today. 2018;23(6):1241-50.
  8. Jin W, Barzilay R, Jaakkola T. Junction tree variational autoencoder for molecular graph generation. In: Proc Int Conf Mach Learn. 2018:2323-32.
  9. De Cao N, Kipf T. MolGAN: an implicit generative model for small molecular graphs. arXiv [Preprint]. 2018 [cited 2024 Jan 10]. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.11973
  10. Simonovsky M, Komodakis N. GraphVAE: towards generation of small graphs using variational autoencoders. In: Proc Int Conf Artif Neural Netw. 2018:412-22.
  11. Gupta A, Muller AT, Huisman BJH, Fuchs JA, Schneider P, Schneider G. Generative recurrent networks for de novo drug design. Mol Inform. 2018;37(1-2):1700111.
  12. Paszke A, Gross S, Massa F, Lerer A, Bradbury J, Chanan G, et al. PyTorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In: Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2019.
  13. Blaschke T, Olivecrona M, Engkvist O, Bajorath J, Chen H. REINVENT 2.0: an AI tool for de novo drug design. J Chem Inf Model. 2020;60(12):5918-22.
  14. Bannigan P, Aldeghi M, Bao Z, Hase F, Aspuru-Guzik A. Machine learning directed drug formulation development. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;175:113802.
  15. Grisoni F, Schneider G. Combining generative artificial intelligence and on-chip synthesis for de novo drug design. Sci Adv. 2021;7(24):eabg3338.
  16. Bilodeau C, Jin W, Jaakkola T, Barzilay R, Jensen KF. Generative models for molecular discovery: recent advances and challenges. WIREs Comput Mol Sci. 2022;12(5):e1608.
  17. Patel V, Shah S, Thakkar A. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in drug discovery and development. Intell Med. 2022;2(1):1-12.
  18. Wang A, Chen L, Liu Y, Zhang H, Wu J. Open-source browser-based tools for drug discovery. Molecules. 2022;27(14):4623.
  19. Landrum G. RDKit: open-source cheminformatics [Software]. Version 2023.09.1. 2023 [cited 2024 Jun 15]. Available from: https://www.rdkit.org
  20. Atz K, Grisoni F, Schneider G. Prospective de novo drug design with deep interactome learning. Nat Commun. 2024;15:3408.
  21. Alakhdar A, Poczos B, Washburn N. Diffusion models in de novo drug design. J Chem Inf Model. 2024;64(18):7013-32.
  22. Gangwal A, Ansari A, Ahmad I, Azad AK, Bhattacharya T, Chandrasekaran B, et al. Generative artificial intelligence in drug discovery: basic framework, recent advances, challenges, and opportunities. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:1331062.
  23. Tang X, Howard A, Chen H, Grisoni F, Schneider G, Waller MP, et al. A survey of generative AI for de novo drug design. Brief Bioinform. 2024;25(4):bbae338.
  24. Yang N, Ying P, Li J, Feng S, Li Y, Guo W, et al. Molecule generation for drug design: a graph learning perspective. Artif Intell Life Sci. 2024;5:100102.
  25. Bran AM, Cox S, Schilter O, Baldassari C, White AD, Schwaller P, et al. Augmenting large language models with chemistry tools. Nat Mach Intell. 2024;6:525-35.
  26. McNaughton AD, Goshu B, Mainer JM, Hocky GM. CACTUS: chemistry agent connecting tool usage to science. ACS Omega. 2024;9(43):43662-74.
  27. Khalid N, Qayyum A, Bilal M, Al-Fuqaha A, Qadir J. Privacy-preserving artificial intelligence in healthcare: techniques and applications. Comput Biol Med. 2023;158:106848.
  28. Das U, Mukherjee S, Roy A, Pal D. Generative AI for drug discovery and protein design. Artif Intell Chem. 2025;5:100097.
  29. Kang SI, Park J, Lee S, Kim H, Oh M, Kim D, et al. Deep generative AI for multi-target therapeutic design. ACS Omega. 2025;10(4):3812-25.
  30. Khater T, Ibrahim A, Hassan M, Ahmed R, El-Sayed M, Zaki N, et al. Generative artificial intelligence-based models optimization. J Cheminform. 2025;17:59.
  31. Ozcelik R, de Ruiter S, Grisoni F, Schneider G. Generative deep learning for de novo drug design. J Chem Inf Model. 2025;65(14):7352-72.
  32. Dharmasivam M, Villanueva R, Mehdizadeh P, Richardson DR. Leading AI-driven drug discovery platforms. Pharmacol Rev. 2025;77(1):100034.
  33. Dermawan D, Nurrochmad A, Ikawati Z, Wijaya L. From lab to clinic: AI in drug discovery timelines. Pharmaceuticals. 2025;18(7):981.
  34. Saini JPS, Beri A, Gupta R, Kumar S. AI-driven innovations in pharmaceuticals. RSC Pharm. 2025;2:437-54.
  35. US Food and Drug Administration. Considerations for the use of artificial intelligence to support regulatory decision-making for drugs and biological products [Internet]. Silver Spring: FDA; 2025 [cited 2025 Jul 1]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/167973/download
  36. Django Software Foundation. Django documentation [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 1]. Available from: https://docs.djangoproject.com
  37. Ollama. Ollama: run large language models locally [Software]. 2024 [cited 2024 Nov 1]. Available from: https://ollama.com

Reference

  1. Schneider G, Fechner U. Computer-based de novo design of drug-like molecules. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005;4:649-63.
  2. Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1997;23(1-3):3-25.
  3. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, et al. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):235-42.
  4. Olivecrona M, Blaschke T, Engkvist O, Chen H. Molecular de novo design through deep reinforcement learning. J Cheminform. 2017;9:48.
  5. Rogers D, Hahn M. Extended-connectivity fingerprints. J Chem Inf Model. 2010;50(5):742-54.
  6. Rego N, Koes D. 3Dmol.js: molecular visualization with WebGL. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(8):1322-4.
  7. Chen H, Engkvist O, Wang Y, Olivecrona M, Blaschke T. The rise of deep learning in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today. 2018;23(6):1241-50.
  8. Jin W, Barzilay R, Jaakkola T. Junction tree variational autoencoder for molecular graph generation. In: Proc Int Conf Mach Learn. 2018:2323-32.
  9. De Cao N, Kipf T. MolGAN: an implicit generative model for small molecular graphs. arXiv [Preprint]. 2018 [cited 2024 Jan 10]. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.11973
  10. Simonovsky M, Komodakis N. GraphVAE: towards generation of small graphs using variational autoencoders. In: Proc Int Conf Artif Neural Netw. 2018:412-22.
  11. Gupta A, Muller AT, Huisman BJH, Fuchs JA, Schneider P, Schneider G. Generative recurrent networks for de novo drug design. Mol Inform. 2018;37(1-2):1700111.
  12. Paszke A, Gross S, Massa F, Lerer A, Bradbury J, Chanan G, et al. PyTorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In: Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2019.
  13. Blaschke T, Olivecrona M, Engkvist O, Bajorath J, Chen H. REINVENT 2.0: an AI tool for de novo drug design. J Chem Inf Model. 2020;60(12):5918-22.
  14. Bannigan P, Aldeghi M, Bao Z, Hase F, Aspuru-Guzik A. Machine learning directed drug formulation development. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;175:113802.
  15. Grisoni F, Schneider G. Combining generative artificial intelligence and on-chip synthesis for de novo drug design. Sci Adv. 2021;7(24):eabg3338.
  16. Bilodeau C, Jin W, Jaakkola T, Barzilay R, Jensen KF. Generative models for molecular discovery: recent advances and challenges. WIREs Comput Mol Sci. 2022;12(5):e1608.
  17. Patel V, Shah S, Thakkar A. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in drug discovery and development. Intell Med. 2022;2(1):1-12.
  18. Wang A, Chen L, Liu Y, Zhang H, Wu J. Open-source browser-based tools for drug discovery. Molecules. 2022;27(14):4623.
  19. Landrum G. RDKit: open-source cheminformatics [Software]. Version 2023.09.1. 2023 [cited 2024 Jun 15]. Available from: https://www.rdkit.org
  20. Atz K, Grisoni F, Schneider G. Prospective de novo drug design with deep interactome learning. Nat Commun. 2024;15:3408.
  21. Alakhdar A, Poczos B, Washburn N. Diffusion models in de novo drug design. J Chem Inf Model. 2024;64(18):7013-32.
  22. Gangwal A, Ansari A, Ahmad I, Azad AK, Bhattacharya T, Chandrasekaran B, et al. Generative artificial intelligence in drug discovery: basic framework, recent advances, challenges, and opportunities. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:1331062.
  23. Tang X, Howard A, Chen H, Grisoni F, Schneider G, Waller MP, et al. A survey of generative AI for de novo drug design. Brief Bioinform. 2024;25(4):bbae338.
  24. Yang N, Ying P, Li J, Feng S, Li Y, Guo W, et al. Molecule generation for drug design: a graph learning perspective. Artif Intell Life Sci. 2024;5:100102.
  25. Bran AM, Cox S, Schilter O, Baldassari C, White AD, Schwaller P, et al. Augmenting large language models with chemistry tools. Nat Mach Intell. 2024;6:525-35.
  26. McNaughton AD, Goshu B, Mainer JM, Hocky GM. CACTUS: chemistry agent connecting tool usage to science. ACS Omega. 2024;9(43):43662-74.
  27. Khalid N, Qayyum A, Bilal M, Al-Fuqaha A, Qadir J. Privacy-preserving artificial intelligence in healthcare: techniques and applications. Comput Biol Med. 2023;158:106848.
  28. Das U, Mukherjee S, Roy A, Pal D. Generative AI for drug discovery and protein design. Artif Intell Chem. 2025;5:100097.
  29. Kang SI, Park J, Lee S, Kim H, Oh M, Kim D, et al. Deep generative AI for multi-target therapeutic design. ACS Omega. 2025;10(4):3812-25.
  30. Khater T, Ibrahim A, Hassan M, Ahmed R, El-Sayed M, Zaki N, et al. Generative artificial intelligence-based models optimization. J Cheminform. 2025;17:59.
  31. Ozcelik R, de Ruiter S, Grisoni F, Schneider G. Generative deep learning for de novo drug design. J Chem Inf Model. 2025;65(14):7352-72.
  32. Dharmasivam M, Villanueva R, Mehdizadeh P, Richardson DR. Leading AI-driven drug discovery platforms. Pharmacol Rev. 2025;77(1):100034.
  33. Dermawan D, Nurrochmad A, Ikawati Z, Wijaya L. From lab to clinic: AI in drug discovery timelines. Pharmaceuticals. 2025;18(7):981.
  34. Saini JPS, Beri A, Gupta R, Kumar S. AI-driven innovations in pharmaceuticals. RSC Pharm. 2025;2:437-54.
  35. US Food and Drug Administration. Considerations for the use of artificial intelligence to support regulatory decision-making for drugs and biological products [Internet]. Silver Spring: FDA; 2025 [cited 2025 Jul 1]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/167973/download
  36. Django Software Foundation. Django documentation [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 1]. Available from: https://docs.djangoproject.com
  37. Ollama. Ollama: run large language models locally [Software]. 2024 [cited 2024 Nov 1]. Available from: https://ollama.com

Photo
Shahin Manar
Corresponding author

Usha Mittal Institute of Technology, SNDT Women’s University, Santacruz (W), Mumbai, Maharashtra 400049, India

Photo
Surabhi Yadav
Co-author

Usha Mittal Institute of Technology, SNDT Women’s University, Santacruz (W), Mumbai, Maharashtra 400049, India

Photo
S. Ranveer
Co-author

Usha Mittal Institute of Technology, SNDT Women’s University, Santacruz (W), Mumbai, Maharashtra 400049, India

Photo
Shraddha Dhotre
Co-author

Usha Mittal Institute of Technology, SNDT Women’s University, Santacruz (W), Mumbai, Maharashtra 400049, India

S. Ranveer, Surabhi Yadav, Shraddha Dhotre, Shahin Manar, DD3S: A Privacy-Preserving Artificial Intelligence Platform for End-to-End Early-Stage Drug Discovery, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 4, 3700-3707. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19699143

More related articles
Next Generation Incretin Therapies in Obesity: Evo...
Sonale S, Gowtham Arumugam , Revanth R...
A Review on Diuretic Activity, Pharmacological Use...
Mohd Sahil, Sudhir Kumar, Kamal Kishore...
Formulation and Evaluation of Polyherbal Shampoo...
Priyanka Bandichhode, Predeep Chabukswar, Shruti Narayankar, Kris...
Formulation and Evaluation of Natural Herbal Face Wash Tablets Containing Sandal...
Pradeep Chabukswar, Priyanka Bandichhode, Shivani Biskite, Deepak Bhosale...
A Research on Formulation and Evaluation of Herbal Soap...
Gurude Sneha, Shivraj Suryawanshi, Hambire Shradha, Gudde Saraswati, Ghevare Omkar, Gangapure Sakshi...
Virtual Screening of Bioactive Constituents of Lagenaria siceraria as Potential ...
Dinesh Kawade, Gun Chourasia, Shashwati Motghare, Dipak Rinait, Alpana Asnani...
More related articles
Formulation and Evaluation of Polyherbal Shampoo...
Priyanka Bandichhode, Predeep Chabukswar, Shruti Narayankar, Krishnamurthy Kamalapurkar...
Formulation and Evaluation of Polyherbal Shampoo...
Priyanka Bandichhode, Predeep Chabukswar, Shruti Narayankar, Krishnamurthy Kamalapurkar...