View Article

Abstract

Fenofibrate is an antihyperlipidemic agent with weak water solubility, resulting in low oral bioavailability attributed to its restricted aqueous solubility and delayed dissolution rate. This study sought to create and assess a solid dispersion system of Fenofibrate to improve its solubility, dissolving characteristics, and bioavailability. Solid dispersions were created utilizing appropriate hydrophilic carriers through solvent evaporation and fusion methodologies. The formulated preparations were assessed for drug content, saturation solubility, % yield, dissolving characteristics, Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC), and stability analysis. The results indicated a notable enhancement in the solubility and dissolution rate of Fenofibrate relative to the unaltered medication. The modified formulation exhibited improved drug release owing to reduced particle size, enhanced wettability, and the transformation of the drug from crystalline to amorphous state. Compatibility experiments verified the lack of drug–polymer contact, whilst stability investigations demonstrated that the formulation-maintained stability under accelerated conditions.

Keywords

Fenofibrate, Solid Dispersion, Solubility Enhancement, Bioavailability, Poorly Soluble Drug, Dissolution Rate, Hydrophilic Carrier, Solvent Evaporation Technique, Drug Release, Oral Delivery System

Introduction

× Popup Image

Fenofibrate is an antihyperlipidemic medication classified as a fibrate. It aids in diminishing high plasma levels of triglycerides and LDL. It is generally a more effective medicine compared to other fibrates. Fenofibrate is classified as a BCS Class II medication, which results in its limited bioavailability.[1]The improvement of oral bioavailability for poorly water-soluble drugs frequently results in inadequate bioavailability due to low and inconsistent absorption levels. Drugs that experience dissolution rate limitations in gastrointestinal absorption exhibit enhanced solubility and bioavailability through a reduction in particle size. [2]

Nevertheless, medications frequently induce the aggregation and agglomeration of particles, resulting in inadequate wettability. Solid dispersions of poorly water-soluble medicines with water-soluble carriers have mitigated these issues and improved solubility. The advancement of solid dispersions as a feasible technique to improve the bioavailability of weakly water-soluble pharmaceuticals has surpassed the constraints of earlier methods, including salt creation, solubilization via co-solvents, particle size reduction, and solvent evaporation techniques. Research indicated that medications in solid dispersion may not necessarily have to be in a micronized form. A portion of the drug may molecularly disperse within the matrix, resulting in a solid dispersion.[3]

Upon exposure of the solid dispersion to aqueous media, the carrier dissolves, resulting in the release of the drug as fine colloidal particles. Solid dispersions in water-soluble carriers have garnered significant attention for enhancing the dissolution rate and potentially the bioavailability of various hydrophobic drugs. Fenofibrate requires enhancement of its oral bioavailability, solubility, and dissolution rate. The approach has been employed to enhance the solubility, dissolution rate, and bioavailability of poorly water-soluble pharmaceuticals, including solid dispersions. solvent evaporation technique.[4] This method enhances the solubility, dissolution rate, and bioavailability of poorly soluble Fenofibrate medication. It is a direct, industrially advantageous technique.

The objective of the present research project was to formulate Fenofibrate tablets utilizing a solvent evaporation method to enhance solubility and dissolution rate.

Solid dispersion

Solid dispersion facilitates the fragmentation of the drug into exceedingly fine particles, thereby augmenting its surface area and enhancing its dissolution rate, as articulated by the Noyes-Whitney equation. While diminishing particle size to the nanoscale can enhance dissolution rates, it cannot augment the drug's solubility beyond its inherent threshold in intestinal fluids. To address this issue, solid dispersion is an efficacious method for improving the solubility and bioavailability of poorly water-soluble pharmaceuticals. It can elevate the drug concentration at the absorption site and potentially induce a transient supersaturated state, thereby enhancing bioavailability. Solid dispersion continues to be a prominent research focus due to its versatility and applicability across various dosage forms, particularly tablets, which are the most prevalent method for oral drug delivery.[5]

DRUG PROFILE

Fenofibrate is an antihyperlipidemic drug chemically known as Isopropyl 2-[4-(4-chlorobenzoyl)phenoxy]-2-methylpropionate, with a molecular formula of C??H??ClO? and molecular weight of 360.83 g/mol. It acts by activating PPAR-α receptors, which enhance lipid metabolism and reduce triglyceride levels in the body. Fenofibrate belongs to BCS Class II drugs, characterized by low solubility and high permeability. It appears as a white to off-white crystalline powder with a melting point of 79–82 °C. The drug is practically insoluble in water but soluble in various organic solvents. The λmax of Fenofibrate in methanol is approximately 286 nm. Due to its poor aqueous solubility, it was selected as a model drug for the development of a solid dispersion system to improve solubility and bioavailability.[6]

MATERIALS AND METHOD

MATERIALS

Fenofibrate was obtained from Shree Chem Products. Polyethylene glycol (PEG 6000), methanol, and potassium dihydrogen phosphate were procured from Loba Chemie Pvt. Ltd.. Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP K30) was supplied by HiMedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., while Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) was obtained from Colorcon Asia Pvt. Ltd.. Poloxamer 188 was purchased from BASF Chemicals India Pvt. Ltd.. Ethanol and sodium hydroxide were obtained from Merck Specialities Pvt. Ltd., and chloroform was procured from S.D. Fine Chemicals Ltd.. Distilled water used in the study was supplied by the in-house laboratory. All chemicals and reagents used were of analytical or laboratory grade.

METHOD OF PREPARATION (SOLVENT EVAPORATION METHOD)

Solid dispersions of Fenofibrate were prepared using the solvent evaporation method. Accurately weighed quantities of Fenofibrate, PEG 6000, and PVP K30 were taken according to the formulation composition. The drug and polymers were dissolved in a sufficient quantity of ethanol with continuous stirring to obtain a clear and uniform solution. The resulting solution was subjected to solvent evaporation at controlled temperature until complete removal of ethanol and formation of a dry solid mass. The dried mass was further pulverized using mortar and pestle and passed through a suitable sieve to obtain uniform particle size. The prepared solid dispersions were stored in airtight containers for further evaluation studies.[7]

PREFORMULATION STUDIES[21-25]

Preformulation studies of Fenofibrate were carried out to evaluate its physicochemical properties for the development of a solid dispersion system intended to improve solubility and bioavailability.

Solubility Profile of Fenofibrate

The solubility study was performed to determine the intrinsic solubility of Fenofibrate in different solvents and buffer media. Excess amount of Fenofibrate was added separately to distilled water, ethanol, pH 1.2 buffer, and pH 6.8 buffer. The mixtures were kept in a water bath shaker at 37°C for 24 hours to attain equilibrium. After shaking, the solutions were filtered to remove undissolved drug particles. The concentration of dissolved drug was analyzed using UV-Visible spectrophotometry or HPLC method. The study helped in understanding the solubility behavior of Fenofibrate under gastric and intestinal conditions.[8]

Partition Coefficient Study (Log P)

The partition coefficient study was carried out to determine the lipophilic nature of Fenofibrate. Equal volumes of octanol and water (1:1 v/v) were taken, and Fenofibrate was added to the mixture. The system was shaken thoroughly until equilibrium was achieved. After phase separation, the concentration of drug in both octanol and aqueous phases was determined. The partition coefficient (Log P) was calculated as the logarithm of the ratio of drug concentration in octanol phase to aqueous phase, indicating the hydrophilic or lipophilic characteristics of the drug.[9]

Melting Point Determination

The melting point of Fenofibrate was determined using the capillary method. A small quantity of the drug was weighed and dried in a desiccator to remove moisture. The sample was triturated gently to obtain a fine powder. The powdered drug was filled into a sealed capillary tube to a height of approximately 2–3 mm. The capillary tube was placed in a melting point apparatus near the temperature probe. The temperature was gradually increased at a heating rate of 1–2°C per minute. The temperature at which the drug started melting and the temperature at which complete melting occurred were recorded. The experiment was performed in triplicate, and the average melting point was calculated.[10]

UV Spectroscopy

Determination of λmax

Accurately weighed 10 mg of Fenofibrate was transferred into a 100 mL volumetric flask. The drug was dissolved in a small quantity of methanol, and the volume was made up to 100 mL with methanol to obtain a stock solution of 100 µg/mL. From this stock solution, a suitable dilution of 10 µg/mL was prepared. The solution was scanned in the wavelength range of 200–400 nm using a UV-Visible spectrophotometer with methanol as blank. The wavelength showing maximum absorbance (λmax) was found to be 286 nm.[11]

Calibration Curve Preparation

A standard stock solution of Fenofibrate (100 µg/mL) was prepared by dissolving 10 mg of drug in 100 mL of methanol. From this stock solution, aliquots were withdrawn and diluted with methanol to prepare concentrations of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 µg/mL. The absorbance of each solution was measured at 286 nm using methanol as blank. All measurements were carried out in triplicate, and the average absorbance values were recorded. A calibration curve was plotted by taking concentration on the X-axis and absorbance on the Y-axis. The regression equation and correlation coefficient (R²) were calculated.[12]

Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) Study

FTIR study was performed to evaluate the compatibility between Fenofibrate and excipients used in the formulation. Approximately 2 mg of pure drug and excipients were weighed individually. Physical mixtures of drug and excipients were prepared in a 1:1 ratio. Each sample was mixed with 100 mg of dry potassium bromide (KBr) and finely triturated using a mortar and pestle. The mixture was compressed into pellets using a hydraulic press under pressure of 6–8 tons for 2–3 minutes. The prepared KBr pellets were placed in the FTIR sample holder, and spectra were recorded over the range of 4000–400 cm?¹ at a resolution of 4 cm?¹ with 32 scans per sample.[13]

Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) analysis was carried out to study the thermal behavior of Fenofibrate, excipients, physical mixtures, and solid dispersion formulations. Approximately 3–5 mg of pure drug, excipients, and prepared solid dispersion samples were accurately weighed and placed into clean aluminum DSC pans. The pans were sealed using a crimping tool to prevent sample loss. An empty sealed aluminum pan was used as reference. The DSC instrument was calibrated using indium standard. The samples were analyzed under a nitrogen atmosphere maintained at a flow rate of 20–40 mL/min to provide inert conditions during analysis.[14]

Table: Evaluation Parameters and Methods for Solid Dispersion of Fenofibrate

Sr. No.

Evaluation Parameter

Procedure[15-20]

1

Physical Appearance of Solid Dispersion

A small quantity of solid dispersion was placed on a white surface and observed under normal light. The formulation was evaluated for color, texture, lumpiness, and homogeneity. Characteristics such as discoloration, softness, stickiness, clump formation, and uniform distribution of drug and carrier were noted.

2

Bulk Density Determination

Accurately weighed 50 g of powder sample was transferred into a 100 mL graduated cylinder. The volume occupied by the loosely filled powder was recorded, and bulk density was calculated using standard formula.

3

Tapped Density Determination

The same powder sample was subjected to 500–1000 taps using a tapped density apparatus until constant volume was achieved. The final tapped volume was recorded, and tapped density was calculated.

4

Angle of Repose

A funnel with 10 mm orifice diameter was fixed at a height of about 2 cm above a flat surface. Powder sample was allowed to flow freely through the funnel to form a conical heap. Height and radius of the pile were measured, and angle of repose was calculated to evaluate flow properties.

5

Carr’s Index and Hausner’s Ratio

Bulk density and tapped density values obtained previously were used to calculate Carr’s Index and Hausner’s Ratio using standard equations to determine compressibility and flow characteristics of powder.

6

In-Vitro Dissolution Studies

Dissolution study was carried out using USP Dissolution Apparatus Type II (Paddle method). Dissolution medium (900 mL of 0.1 N HCl or phosphate buffer pH 6.8) was maintained at 37 ± 0.5°C with paddle speed of 50 rpm. Solid dispersion equivalent to 100 mg drug was added to the vessel. Samples were withdrawn at predetermined intervals, filtered, and analyzed using UV spectrophotometer at suitable λmax. Cumulative drug release was calculated and dissolution profiles were plotted.

7

Drug Content by HPLC

Standard solution was prepared by dissolving accurately weighed pure drug in suitable solvent and preparing required dilutions. For sample preparation, solid dispersion equivalent to drug dose was dissolved in solvent, sonicated for 15–20 minutes, filtered, and analyzed using HPLC or UV spectrophotometry to determine drug content.

8

Stability Studies Procedure

Stability studies were conducted according to ICH Q1A(R2) guidelines. Solid dispersion samples were packed in suitable containers and stored under long-term, intermediate, and accelerated conditions. Samples were evaluated periodically for physical appearance, drug content, dissolution behavior, moisture content, and solid-state characteristics. Observations and analytical data were recorded and compared with initial results to determine formulation stability and shelf life.

Table: Composition of Solid Dispersion Formulations of Fenofibrate by Solvent Evaporation Method

Batch Code

Fenofibrate (mg)

PEG 6000 (mg)

PVP K30 (mg)

Ethanol

SD1

100

200

50

q.s.

SD2

100

200

100

q.s.

SD3

100

200

150

q.s.

SD4

100

300

50

q.s.

SD5

100

300

100

q.s.

SD6

100

300

150

q.s.

SD7

100

400

50

q.s.

SD8

100

400

100

q.s.

SD9

100

400

150

q.s.

RESULT AND DISCUSSION

Solubility Profile of Fenofibrate

The solubility of Fenofibrate was evaluated in different solvents and buffer systems to study its solubility behavior under various physiological conditions. The observations obtained are presented in Table

Table : Solubility of Fenofibrate in Different Media

Sr. No.

Medium

Observation

1

Distilled Water

Practically insoluble

2

Ethanol

Freely soluble

3

pH 1.2 Buffer

Slightly soluble

4

pH 6.8 Phosphate Buffer

Slightly soluble

The solubility study of Fenofibrate was carried out in different solvents and buffer media. The drug was found to be practically insoluble in distilled water, slightly soluble in pH 1.2 and pH 6.8 buffer, and freely soluble in ethanol. These results confirmed the poor aqueous solubility and lipophilic nature of Fenofibrate, supporting the use of solid dispersion technique to enhance its solubility and bioavailability.

Partition Coefficient Study of Fenofibrate

The partition coefficient study of Fenofibrate using n-octanol and water showed a Log P value of 5.18 ± 0.12. The high Log P value indicates the highly lipophilic nature of the drug, which contributes to poor aqueous solubility and supports the need for solid dispersion technique to improve solubility and bioavailability.

Melting Point Determination of Fenofibrate

The melting point of Fenofibrate was determined by capillary method and found to be 80.2°C ± 1.1°C. The sharp and consistent melting range indicated the purity of the drug and matched reported literature values.

UV Spectrophotometric Analysis and Calibration Curve

The UV spectrum of Fenofibrate in methanol showed maximum absorbance (λmax) at 286 nm. A calibration curve was prepared in the concentration range of 5–30 µg/mL, and absorbance was measured at 286 nm. The results showed a linear increase in absorbance with concentration, confirming Beer-Lambert’s law.

Table : Calibration Data of Fenofibrate

Sr. No.

Concentration (µg/mL)

Absorbance (Mean ± SD)

1

5

0.112

2

10

0.221

3

15

0.336

4

20

0.451

5

25

0.562

6

30

0.674

Fig.: Calibration Curve

The correlation coefficient (R²) was found to be 0.999, indicating excellent linear relationship between concentration and absorbance. Regression equation:y=0.056x+0.001y = 0.056x + 0.001y=0.056x+0.001

Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) Study

FTIR analysis was performed to identify characteristic functional groups and possible drug- excipient interactions.

Fig : Fenofibrate FTIR

FTIR analysis of Fenofibrate showed characteristic peaks at approximately 1725 cm?¹ for ester C=O stretching, 1600 cm?¹ for aromatic C=C stretching, 1200–1300 cm?¹ for C–O stretching, and 2850–2950 cm?¹ for C–H stretching. All major characteristic peaks of the drug were retained without significant shifting. No new peaks or disappearance of peaks were observed in drug–excipient mixtures, indicating the absence of chemical interaction and good compatibility of Fenofibrate with selected excipients.

Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

DSC thermograms were recorded to study thermal behavior and crystallinity.

Fig.: Fenofibrate DSC thermograms

DSC analysis of pure Fenofibrate showed a sharp endothermic peak at 207°C, confirming its crystalline nature. The physical mixture showed a similar but slightly broadened peak, indicating minor interaction with excipients. In the solid dispersion formulation, reduction or disappearance of the peak was observed, suggesting conversion of the drug from crystalline to amorphous form, which contributes to enhanced solubility and dissolution.

Physical Appearance

The physical appearance of solid dispersion batches (SD1–SD9) of Fenofibrate was evaluated for color, texture, lumpiness, and homogeneity. Most formulations showed white to off-white color with smooth or fine powder texture, indicating uniform drug distribution and absence of degradation. Batch SD2 showed the best physical appearance with white color, fine texture, no lumpiness, and excellent homogeneity. Slight aggregation was observed in SD3 due to possible residual moisture during preparation.

Powder Flow Properties

The powder flow properties were evaluated using bulk density, tapped density, Carr’s index, and angle of repose. All batches showed acceptable flow properties with Carr’s index ranging from 11.1% to 18.2% and angle of repose between 25° and 30°. Batch SD2 exhibited the best flow behavior with lowest Carr’s index (11.1%) and angle of repose (25°), indicating excellent compressibility and flowability suitable for further formulation processing.

Drug Content

Drug content analysis showed that all solid dispersion batches contained drug within acceptable pharmaceutical limits. The observed drug content ranged from 97.8% to 98.6%, indicating uniform drug incorporation and minimal drug loss during preparation. Batch SD1 showed the highest drug content (98.6%), followed by SD4 and SD3, confirming efficient entrapment of drug within the carrier system.

In-Vitro Dissolution Studies

In-vitro dissolution studies of Fenofibrate solid dispersions were carried out in pH 1.2 and pH 6.8 media using USP Type II apparatus. All formulations showed improved drug release compared to pure drug. Drug release ranged from 68–78% in pH 1.2 and 82–90% in pH 6.8 buffer. Batch SD4 exhibited maximum drug release in both media, indicating enhanced solubility and dissolution due to reduced crystallinity, improved wettability, and molecular dispersion of drug in hydrophilic carriers.

Dissolution Profile

The dissolution profile study demonstrated gradual and enhanced release of Fenofibrate from all solid dispersion batches over 120 minutes. Batch SD4 showed the highest dissolution performance, while SD3 exhibited comparatively lower release due to slight particle aggregation. Overall, the solid dispersion system significantly improved the dissolution behavior of Fenofibrate, confirming the effectiveness of the formulation approach.

Table : Physical Characteristics of Solid Dispersion Batches of Fenofibrate

Batch

Color

Texture

Lumpiness

Homogeneity

SD1

Off-white

Smooth powder

None

Uniform

SD2

White

Fine powder

None

Uniform

SD3

Slightly glossy

Powdery

Few small aggregates

Good

SD4

Off-white

Smooth

None

Uniform

SD5

White

Smooth

None

Uniform

SD6

Off-white

Fine powder

None

Uniform

SD7

White

Fine powder

None

Uniform

SD8

White

Smooth

None

Uniform

SD9

Off-white

Powdery

None

Uniform

Table :Powder Flow Properties

Batch

Bulk Density (g/mL)

Tapped Density (g/mL)

Carr’s Index (%)

Angle of Repose (°)

SD1

0.45

0.55

18.2

28

SD2

0.48

0.54

11.1

25

SD3

0.42

0.50

16.0

30

SD4

0.46

0.52

11.5

27

SD5

0.38

0.52

12.7

26

SD6

0.43

0.47

13.2

27

SD7

0.41

0.45

12.9

25

SD8

0.39

0.46

14.7

26

SD9

0.44

0.51

13.7

28

Table : Drug Content

Batch

Theoretical Drug Content (%)

Observed Drug Content (%)

SD1

100

98.6

SD2

100

97.8

SD3

100

98.2

SD4

100

98.4

SD5

100

97.9

SD6

100

92.1

SD7

100

95.3

SD8

100

98.2

SD9

100

97.9

Table : In-Vitro Dissolution Studies

Batch

Drug Release at pH 1.2 (%)

Drug Release at pH 6.8 (%)

SD1

75

88

SD2

70

85

SD3

68

82

SD4

78

90

SD5

73

86

SD6

70

88

SD7

72

89

SD8

72

81

SD9

74

87

Table : Dissolution Profile Table

Batch

Time (min)

Drug Release at pH 1.2 (%)

Drug Release at pH 6.8 (%)

SD1

5

25

22

SD2

10

40

38

SD3

15

52

48

SD4

30

65

60

SD5

45

70

65

SD6

60

75

70

SD7

75

84

71

SD8

90

82

77

SD9

120

88

83

 

 

 

Table: Stability study

Storage Condition

Time (Months)

Physical Appearance

Drug Content (%)

Dissolution (% at 60 min)

Observation

Long-term (25°C/60% RH)

0

Off-white, smooth powder

98.4 ± 1.2

78

Initial

 

3

Off-white, smooth

98.0 ± 1.1

77

Stable

 

6

Off-white, smooth

97.8 ± 1.0

76

Stable

 

9

Off-white, smooth

97.5 ± 1.2

75

Stable

 

12

Off-white, smooth

97.2 ± 1.3

74

Stable

Accelerated (40°C/75% RH)

0

Off-white, smooth powder

98.4 ± 1.2

78

Initial

 

1

Off-white, smooth

97.8 ± 1.3

76

Stable

 

2

Off-white, smooth

97.4 ± 1.4

75

Stable

 

3

Off-white, smooth

97.2 ± 1.2

74

Stable

 

6

Off-white, smooth

97.0 ± 1.2

72

Stable

 

CONCLUSION

The present study successfully developed and evaluated solid dispersion systems of Fenofibrate to improve its solubility, dissolution rate, and bioavailability. Fenofibrate, being a BCS Class II drug with poor aqueous solubility, showed limited dissolution in water and buffer media, confirming the need for solubility enhancement techniques. The high Log P value indicated the lipophilic nature of the drug, while FTIR studies confirmed compatibility between the drug and selected excipients without any chemical interaction. DSC analysis revealed conversion of the drug from crystalline to amorphous form in solid dispersions, which contributed to enhanced solubility and dissolution.All prepared formulations exhibited acceptable physical appearance, good homogeneity, satisfactory flow properties, and uniform drug content. In-vitro dissolution studies demonstrated significantly improved drug release from solid dispersion formulations compared to pure drug. Among all batches, SD4 showed the best performance with highest dissolution profile, good flow behavior, satisfactory physical characteristics, and excellent stability under long-term and accelerated conditions.

Overall, the study confirmed that the solid dispersion technique is an effective and reliable approach for enhancing the pharmaceutical performance of poorly soluble drugs like Fenofibrate. The optimized formulation has potential for improving oral bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy, and may serve as a promising platform for further scale-up and in-vivo studies.

REFERENCES

  1. Chiou WL, Riegelman S. Pharmaceutical applications of solid dispersion systems. J Pharm Sci. 1971;60(9):1281-1302.
  2. Sekiguchi K, Obi N. Studies on absorption of eutectic mixtures. Chem Pharm Bull. 1961;9(11):866-872.
  3. Leuner C, Dressman J. Improving drug solubility for oral delivery using solid dispersions. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2000;50(1):47-60.
  4. Vasconcelos T, Sarmento B, Costa P. Solid dispersions as strategy to improve oral bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs. Drug Discov Today. 2007;12(23-24):1068-1075.
  5. Craig DQM. The mechanisms of drug release from solid dispersions in water-soluble polymers. Int J Pharm. 2002;231(2):131-144.
  6. Bikiaris D. Solid dispersions, part I: Recent evolution and future opportunities. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2011;8(11):1501-1519.
  7. Bikiaris D. Solid dispersions, part II: New strategies in drug delivery systems. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2011;8(12):1663-1680.
  8. Serajuddin ATM. Solid dispersion of poorly water-soluble drugs. J Pharm Sci. 1999;88(10):1058-1066.
  9. Hancock BC, Zografi G. Characteristics and significance of amorphous state in pharmaceutical systems. J Pharm Sci. 1997;86(1):1-12.
  10. Ford JL. The current status of solid dispersions. Pharm Acta Helv. 1986;61(3):69-88.
  11. Vasconcelos T, Marques S, das Neves J, Sarmento B. Amorphous solid dispersions: Rational selection of polymeric carriers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;100:85-101.
  12. Paudel A, Worku ZA, Meeus J, Guns S, Van den Mooter G. Manufacturing of solid dispersions of poorly water-soluble drugs by spray drying. Int J Pharm. 2013;453(1):253-284.
  13. Vo CLN, Park C, Lee BJ. Current trends and future perspectives of solid dispersions. J Pharm Investig. 2013;43(1):1-13.
  14. Dhirendra K, Lewis S, Udupa N, Atin K. Solid dispersions: A review. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2009;22(2):234-246.
  15. Chauhan B, Shimpi S, Paradkar A. Preparation and evaluation of glibenclamide-polyglycolized glycerides solid dispersions. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2005;6(3):E405-E412.
  16. Sethia S, Squillante E. Solid dispersion of carbamazepine in PVP K30. Int J Pharm. 2004;272(1-2):1-10.
  17. Gupta P, Kakumanu VK. BCS class II drugs and strategies to improve bioavailability. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2004;1(1):11-21.
  18. Ambike AA, Mahadik KR, Paradkar A. Stability study of amorphous valdecoxib. Int J Pharm. 2005;282(1-2):151-162.
  19. Yadav AV, Shete AS. Solubility enhancement of poorly soluble drugs. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2012;15(2):34-44.
  20. Sharma A, Jain CP. Preparation and characterization of solid dispersions. Asian J Pharm. 2011;5(1):3-12.
  21. Singh A, Worku ZA. Oral formulation strategies for poorly water-soluble drugs. Drug Discov Today. 2011;16(17-18):819-825.
  22. Savjani KT, Gajjar AK, Savjani JK. Drug solubility: Importance and enhancement techniques. ISRN Pharm. 2012;2012:1-10.
  23. Kumar P, Singh C. A review on solubility enhancement techniques. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2016;6(3):45-52.
  24. Dressman JB, Reppas C. In vitro-in vivo correlations. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2000;11(Suppl 2):S73-S80.
  25. Liu R. Water-insoluble drug formulation. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2016.   

Reference

  1. Chiou WL, Riegelman S. Pharmaceutical applications of solid dispersion systems. J Pharm Sci. 1971;60(9):1281-1302.
  2. Sekiguchi K, Obi N. Studies on absorption of eutectic mixtures. Chem Pharm Bull. 1961;9(11):866-872.
  3. Leuner C, Dressman J. Improving drug solubility for oral delivery using solid dispersions. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2000;50(1):47-60.
  4. Vasconcelos T, Sarmento B, Costa P. Solid dispersions as strategy to improve oral bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs. Drug Discov Today. 2007;12(23-24):1068-1075.
  5. Craig DQM. The mechanisms of drug release from solid dispersions in water-soluble polymers. Int J Pharm. 2002;231(2):131-144.
  6. Bikiaris D. Solid dispersions, part I: Recent evolution and future opportunities. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2011;8(11):1501-1519.
  7. Bikiaris D. Solid dispersions, part II: New strategies in drug delivery systems. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2011;8(12):1663-1680.
  8. Serajuddin ATM. Solid dispersion of poorly water-soluble drugs. J Pharm Sci. 1999;88(10):1058-1066.
  9. Hancock BC, Zografi G. Characteristics and significance of amorphous state in pharmaceutical systems. J Pharm Sci. 1997;86(1):1-12.
  10. Ford JL. The current status of solid dispersions. Pharm Acta Helv. 1986;61(3):69-88.
  11. Vasconcelos T, Marques S, das Neves J, Sarmento B. Amorphous solid dispersions: Rational selection of polymeric carriers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;100:85-101.
  12. Paudel A, Worku ZA, Meeus J, Guns S, Van den Mooter G. Manufacturing of solid dispersions of poorly water-soluble drugs by spray drying. Int J Pharm. 2013;453(1):253-284.
  13. Vo CLN, Park C, Lee BJ. Current trends and future perspectives of solid dispersions. J Pharm Investig. 2013;43(1):1-13.
  14. Dhirendra K, Lewis S, Udupa N, Atin K. Solid dispersions: A review. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2009;22(2):234-246.
  15. Chauhan B, Shimpi S, Paradkar A. Preparation and evaluation of glibenclamide-polyglycolized glycerides solid dispersions. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2005;6(3):E405-E412.
  16. Sethia S, Squillante E. Solid dispersion of carbamazepine in PVP K30. Int J Pharm. 2004;272(1-2):1-10.
  17. Gupta P, Kakumanu VK. BCS class II drugs and strategies to improve bioavailability. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2004;1(1):11-21.
  18. Ambike AA, Mahadik KR, Paradkar A. Stability study of amorphous valdecoxib. Int J Pharm. 2005;282(1-2):151-162.
  19. Yadav AV, Shete AS. Solubility enhancement of poorly soluble drugs. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2012;15(2):34-44.
  20. Sharma A, Jain CP. Preparation and characterization of solid dispersions. Asian J Pharm. 2011;5(1):3-12.
  21. Singh A, Worku ZA. Oral formulation strategies for poorly water-soluble drugs. Drug Discov Today. 2011;16(17-18):819-825.
  22. Savjani KT, Gajjar AK, Savjani JK. Drug solubility: Importance and enhancement techniques. ISRN Pharm. 2012;2012:1-10.
  23. Kumar P, Singh C. A review on solubility enhancement techniques. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2016;6(3):45-52.
  24. Dressman JB, Reppas C. In vitro-in vivo correlations. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2000;11(Suppl 2):S73-S80.
  25. Liu R. Water-insoluble drug formulation. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2016.   

Photo
Vishnu Gaikwad
Corresponding author

Anuradha College of Pharmacy, Chikhli, Buldana, Maharastra, India, 443201

Photo
Dr. R. H. Kale
Co-author

Anuradha College of Pharmacy, Chikhli, Buldana, Maharastra, India, 443201

Photo
Dr. Ajiaz Shaikh
Co-author

Anuradha College of Pharmacy, Chikhli, Buldana, Maharastra, India, 443201

Photo
Rahul Kalwe
Co-author

Anuradha College of Pharmacy, Chikhli, Buldana, Maharastra, India, 443201

Photo
Dr. K. R. Biyani
Co-author

Anuradha College of Pharmacy, Chikhli, Buldana, Maharastra, India, 443201

Vishnu Gaikwad, Dr. R. H. Kale, Dr. Ajiaz Shaikh, Rahul Kalwe, Dr. K. R. Biyani, Development of Solid Dispersion System for Improving Solubility and Bioavailability of Poorly Soluble Drug, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 5, 2158-2168. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20108743

More related articles
Formulation and Evaluation of Polyherbal Shampoo...
Priyanka Bandichhode, Predeep Chabukswar, Shruti Narayankar, Kris...
Formulation and Evaluation of Natural Herbal Face ...
Pradeep Chabukswar, Priyanka Bandichhode, Shivani Biskite, Deepak...
A Research on Formulation and Evaluation of Herbal...
Gurude Sneha, Shivraj Suryawanshi, Hambire Shradha, Gudde Saraswa...
Virtual Screening of Bioactive Constituents of Lagenaria siceraria as Potential ...
Dinesh Kawade, Gun Chourasia, Shashwati Motghare, Dipak Rinait, Alpana Asnani...
Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Modern Prodrug Design: Linker Chemistry and Payload ...
G. E. Ebimo-Moko, T. Ganatra, V. Ebimo-Moko, W. E. Madu, J. E. Sampson, J. D. Joel, F. O. Oladele...
Related Articles
Formulation and Evaluation of Polyherbal Shampoo...
Priyanka Bandichhode, Predeep Chabukswar, Shruti Narayankar, Krishnamurthy Kamalapurkar...
More related articles
Formulation and Evaluation of Polyherbal Shampoo...
Priyanka Bandichhode, Predeep Chabukswar, Shruti Narayankar, Krishnamurthy Kamalapurkar...
Formulation and Evaluation of Natural Herbal Face Wash Tablets Containing Sandal...
Pradeep Chabukswar, Priyanka Bandichhode, Shivani Biskite, Deepak Bhosale...
A Research on Formulation and Evaluation of Herbal Soap...
Gurude Sneha, Shivraj Suryawanshi, Hambire Shradha, Gudde Saraswati, Ghevare Omkar, Gangapure Sakshi...
Formulation and Evaluation of Polyherbal Shampoo...
Priyanka Bandichhode, Predeep Chabukswar, Shruti Narayankar, Krishnamurthy Kamalapurkar...
Formulation and Evaluation of Natural Herbal Face Wash Tablets Containing Sandal...
Pradeep Chabukswar, Priyanka Bandichhode, Shivani Biskite, Deepak Bhosale...
A Research on Formulation and Evaluation of Herbal Soap...
Gurude Sneha, Shivraj Suryawanshi, Hambire Shradha, Gudde Saraswati, Ghevare Omkar, Gangapure Sakshi...