View Article

Abstract

Orodispersible films (ODFs) represent an innovative approach to immediate-release delivery, overcoming the problem of noncompliance related with traditional tablets and capsules, specifically in the pediatric, geriatric, and dysphagic population. Such ultra-thin, flexible films undergo very rapid breakdown upon contact with saliva, allowing for rapid dissolution of the drug and absorption through the oral mucosa, with no first-pass metabolism needed to increase bioavailability. This review summarizes the advancement in ODF development and characterization based on the solvent casting techniques, followed by new developments such as hot-melt extrusion and 3D printing technologies. The materials include polymer (such as HPMC, PVA), plasticization for mechanical stability and minimizing weaknesses (e.g., low drug loading, humidity sensitivity). Fused deposition modeling (FDM), semi-solid extrusion (SSE), and other printing techniques provide personalization and multi-layer designs for incompatible APIs, although nozzle clogging and other challenges remain. Compared to orodispersible tablets (ODTs), ODFs are more portable with lower risk of choking. Theoretical advancements could provide for nanoparticle incorporation, taste-masking through cyclodextrin complexes, point-of-care 3D printing for precision medicine. In conclusion, market conditions indicate strong research, ODFs are potentially transformative therapeutics and currently, the patents have continued to reflect vigorous growth.

Keywords

Orodispersible films, 3D printing, FDM, hot-melt extrusion, patient compliance, polymers, solvent casting

Introduction

× Popup Image
  • INTRODUCTION TO ORODISPERSIBLE FILMS

Orodispersible films (ODFs), also termed oral thin films or strips, are hydrophilic polymeric matrices designed to disintegrate or dissolve within seconds in the oral cavity without water, forming a solution or suspension for easy swallowing. Defined by the European Pharmacopoeia as single- or multi-layered sheets that rapidly disperse in saliva, ODFs target immediate drug release for local or systemic effects. Their rise stems from dysphagia prevalence—impacting ~8% of patients who skip doses due to swallowing difficulties—and appeal to paediatrics, geriatrics, and travellers.(1–3)

Evolution and Advantages: Pioneered post-1950s, commercial breakthroughs like Pfizer's Listerine PocketPaks (2001) spurred growth, with Rx products like Zuplenz (ondansetron) following. ODFs offer high surface area for rapid dissolution (<30 s per FDA), avoiding hepatic first-pass for enhanced bioavailability (e.g., BCS Class II/IV drugs), precise dosing, and taste-masking via flavours. Mechanical properties—tensile strength, flexibility—ensure handling durability. (1,4)

  1. FORMULATION BASICS.

The formulation basis of orodispersible films (ODFs) focuses on hydrophilic polymeric matrices for ultra-rapid disintegration (<30 seconds) in 1-2 mL saliva, ensuring immediate drug release and bioavailability with mechanical stability. APIs (5-30% w/w) suit high-potency, water-soluble drugs (<50 mg/film, e.g., ondansetron 4-8 mg); hydrophobic BCS II/IV drugs (ibuprofen, itraconazole) need amorphous dispersions or cyclodextrins. Polymers (40-65% w/w)—HPMC E3/E5 (4-10%, low viscosity), PVA DA-8 (4-8%, strong tensile 20-40 MPa), pullulan (2-5%, fast hydration), maltodextrin (5-10%)—provide mucoadhesion (>5000 dyne/cm²) and neutral pH (6.5-7.2). Plasticizers (15-30% w/w; glycerol, PG, PEG 400 at 2:1-3:1 ratio) ensure flexibility (>150 folds, 25-50% elongation). Super disintegrants (3-10% w/w; CPVP 2-6%, CCS 3-5%, SSG 4-8%) enable wicking/swelling; surfactants (0.5-2%, Tween 80/SLS) reduce contact angle <30°; citric acid (1-3%) stimulates saliva; sweeteners (aspartame 1-3%, mannitol 5-10%), flavours (mint 0.5-1%) mask taste (>70%); xanthan gum (0.5-1%) controls viscosity (100-500 cP). Fillers (CaCO? /talc 5-15%) aid flow; BHT (0.01%) prevents oxidation. QbD targets DT, >85% dissolution at 5 min, 95-105% uniformity, >15 MPa strength, preventing phase separation(5,6). Common polymers for Orodispersible films (ODFs) include hydrophilic options that ensure rapid disintegration and film formation, such as hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), pullulan, and hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC).

 

Table No. 01 Polymers for Orodispersible Films(2,4)

Category

Examples

Key Benefits for ODFs

Synthetic

PVA, PVP, PEO

High flexibility, mechanical strength

Cellulose

HPMC, HPC, HEC, NaCMC

Rapid swelling, content uniformity

Natural

Pullulan, starch, gelatin

Biodegradable, patient-friendly mouthfeel

 

Excipients are categorized by function, with film-forming polymers being essential for structure.

  1. Film-Forming Polymers(2)

These provide the film's backbone, ensuring flexibility and quick dissolution. Common options include hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC, especially grades E5 and E15), pullulan, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC), carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), and polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP). Natural alternatives like maltodextrin, gelatin, chitosan, and sodium alginate are also used. Film-forming polymers form the structural matrix of Orodispersible films (ODFs), providing shape, flexibility, rapid disintegration and mechanical strength like tensile properties (>1-2 MPa).

Key Properties Required

These polymers must be hydrophilic for quick saliva dissolution, filmogenic for uniform thin films (50-200 µm thick), non-toxic/GRAS status, and compatible with drugs. They balance tensile strength (TS) vs. elongation (to avoid brittleness) and often blend for optimization—e.g., higher molecular weight increases TS but slows disintegration.(2)

 

Table No. 02 Common Film Forming Polymers (1,4).

Polymer

Properties

Typical Use/ Concentration

Examples/Notes

HPMC (E5/E15 grades)

High TS (up to 33 MPa), moderate disintegration, good flexibility with plasticizers

40-50% w/w, low-viscosity grades preferred

Blends with starch/PEG improve folding endurance (>180 folds); E5 faster dissolving than E15

Pullulan

Excellent mouthfeel, rapid disintegration (<20 s), brittle alone

30-50%, often combined

Natural polysaccharide; superior sensory profile

PVA/PVP

High solubility, TS >2 MPa, supersaturation stabilization

20-40%

PVP hydrogen-bonds for drug solubility; PVA for strength

Maltodextrin/ Lycoat®

Low viscosity, fast breakup, cost-effective

40-60%

Starch-derived; good for high-drug loads

Chitosan

Mucoadhesive, antimicrobial, pH-sensitive

2-5% (low MW best)

Biodegradable; higher conc slows disintegration

Sodium Alginate

High hydrophilicity, Ca²? cross-linkable for strength

20-40%, blended

<60 s disintegration; enhances bioavailability

Gelatin/Starch (modified)

Mucoadhesive, rapid DT, flexible with collagen

30-50%

Pregelatinized starch boosts swelling; outperforms synthetics in TS.

 

  1. Plasticizers(1,4)

Plasticizers are critical excipients in Orodispersible films (ODFs), added at 0-20% w/w (typically 10-20%) to reduce glass transition temperature (Tg), increase flexibility, prevent brittleness/cracking, and improve handling without compromising disintegration time (DT, ideally <30 s). They lower tensile strength (TS) while boosting elongation at break and folding endurance (>100-180 folds), enhancing peel ability and uniformity. Hydrophilic plasticizers (e.g., low MW like glycerol) increase water vapor permeability and drug release but may leach out, risking pore formation; lipophilic ones (e.g., triacetin) retain strength longer.

 

Table No. 03 Common Plasticizers(5)

Plasticizer

Properties

Typical Concentration

Notes/Examples

Glycerol (Glycerin)

Highly hydrophilic, excellent flexibility, fast DT

10-20% w/w

Superior for pullulan/HPMC; outperforms sorbitol in DT (17-29 s vs. 24-32 s) ?

Propylene Glycol (PG)

Low MW, high solubility, better than PEG 400 for folding endurance

5-15%

Preferred for rapid DT; improves HPMC film removability formulation

Polyethylene Glycol (PEG 400/600)

Moderate hydrophilicity, tunable by MW (lower MW = faster permeability)

10-20%

Reduces TS in HPMC; blends with starch/HPMC optimize endurance pmc.

Sorbitol/ Xylitol

Sugar alcohols, sweetness bonus, good mouthfeel

5-15%

Xylitol faster DT than sorbitol; dual role as sweetener

Triacetin

Lipophilic, maintains mechanical resilience

5-10%

Low water absorption in Eudragit films; prevents cracking

 

  1. Disintegrants And Super Disintegrants(2,4)

Disintegrants and super disintegrants are vital excipients in orodispersible films (ODFs), incorporated at 2-10% w/w to promote rapid swelling, wicking, or porosity upon saliva contact, achieving disintegration times (DT) under 30-180 seconds per pharmacopeial standards while maintaining film integrity. They outperform conventional starch by absorbing 10-40 g water per gram via mechanisms like swelling (particle expansion disrupts matrix), wicking (capillary action draws fluid), or deformation/recovery (stress relief on hydration), with higher concentrations (>9%, e.g., in 50-80 µm thick films) yielding DT <50 s and >80% drug release in 10 min.

 

Table no. 04: Common Types of Disintegrants and Super disintegrants(7)

Type

Examples

Properties/Concentration

Notes

Super disintegrants (Synthetic)

Crospovidone (Polyplasdone), Croscarmellose sodium (Ac-Di-Sol), Sodium starch glycolate (SSG, Primellose)

2-8%; Crospovidone: rapid swell w/o gel, high porosity; CCS: faster than SSG (DT 70-180 s at 90 µm); SSG: 6% yields 3.5 s DT in loperamide ODF

Cross-linked polymers; blends (e.g., SSG+CCS 1:1) enhance release (99% in 10 min metolazone films)

Natural Super disintegrants

Fenugreek mucilage, Plantago ovata (psyllium) seed mucilage, Pregelatinized starch

3-10%; Mucilages boost swelling/ solubility cheaply/ non-toxically

Improve bioavailability; safer alternative to synthetics

 

  1. Sweeteners And Taste-Maskers

Sweeteners and taste-maskers are crucial in orodispersible films (ODFs) to improve palatability, especially for bitter drugs, while stimulating saliva for rapid disintegration (<30 s), typically at 1-5% w/w.

 

Table no. 05 Common types of Sweeteners(4,8)

Type

Examples

Properties/Concentration

Notes

Artificial

Aspartame, Acesulfame K, Sodium saccharin, Sucralose

High intensity (200-600x sucrose), heat stable; 0.1-1%

Aspartame (synergistic with acesulfame); saccharin common in formulations (e.g., 10 mg/strip)

Natural/ Sugar Alcohols

Sucrose, Xylitol, Fructose, Isomalt, Mannitol, Sorbitol

Cooling effect, non-cariogenic; 1-5% (e.g., xylitol influences DT)

Xylitol/fructose reduce grittiness; sucrose/isomalt thicken films but extend DT slightly

 

Table no. 06 Taste-Maskers(4,8)

Category

Examples

Mechanism/Concentration

Cyclodextrins

β-Cyclodextrin

Complexation (1:1-1:5 drug:CD); 10-20% for bitterness [previous context]

Ion-exchange Resins

Amberlite

Drug binding/release in saliva; 1-5%

Flavors/Essences

Mint, Strawberry, Citrus

Sensory distraction; 0.5-2% with sweeteners

 

  1. Other Excipients

Surfactants in orodispersible films (ODFs) are used at low levels (0.5-2% w/w) to reduce surface tension, enhance drug wettability and solubility (especially for hydrophobic APIs), improve film homogeneity, and prevent aggregation during solvent casting, with common examples including sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS), Tween 80 (polysorbate 80), benzalkonium chloride, sorbitan oleate, and glyceril monolinoleate that facilitate uniform drug dispersion and faster dissolution without foaming issues. (1,2)

Saliva stimulants, typically organic acids at 1-5% w/w like citric acid, malic acid, tartaric acid, or ascorbic acid, trigger rapid saliva secretion (up to 5-10-fold increase) upon contact to aid disintegration (<30 s) and dissolution while contributing sourness that masks bitterness, often combined with sweeteners for balanced mouthfeel. (1,2,4)

Solvents for casting, such as water (for hydrophilic polymers like HPMC), ethanol, ethyl acetate, or hydroalcoholic mixtures, dissolve polymers/plasticizers into a low-viscosity solution (5-20 cP) that's cast and dried at 40-80°C to form thin films (50-200 µm), with ethyl acetate preferred for poorly water-soluble drugs due to fast evaporation and minimal residues.

  1. FILM FORMATION METHODS

Solvent Casting (Primary Lab/Scale Method)- Involves dissolving/dispersing API, polymers (HPMC/PVA 4-10%), plasticizers (20-30% glycerol), and excipients in solvents (water/ethanol), casting on plates, and drying (oven/vacuum, 40-60°C). Pros: Simple, no heat for thermolabile drugs; yields uniform films. Cons: Solvent residues, bubbles, viscosity issues, batch variability, polymorphism risks. Ideal for small-scale; e.g., etoricoxib ODFs with PVA/SSG showed <50s disintegration. (8,9)

Hot-Melt Extrusion (HME)- Extrudes molten polymer-API mix (no solvents), cools to film. Polymers like PVA/PEO; temperatures 80-150°C. Advantages: Continuous, solvent-free, amorphization boosts solubility (e.g., olanzapine ASDs). Drawbacks: Heat degrades sensitives, high energy, brittleness if plasticizer uneven. Combined with casting for prolonged release. (10)

 

 

 

Figure No. 01 Hot- Melt Ram Extrusion 3d Printing

 

Electrospinning- Electrospinning is an emerging technique for preparing orodispersible films (ODFs) in which a polymer–drug solution is converted into a non?woven nanofiber mat under a high?voltage electric field, yielding highly porous, ultra?thin films that disintegrate rapidly (often within seconds) in the oral cavity. This method enhances dissolution and bioavailability of poorly water?soluble drugs (e.g., aripiprazole, sildenafil) by stabilizing the API in micro? or nanocrystalline form within the nanofibers, while still providing acceptable mechanical properties and good patient?reported mouthfeel. However, electrospinning faces challenges related to solvent use, process parameter control, and scalability, which currently limit its routine industrial application despite its promising performance in laboratory?scale ODF development.(11,12)

 

 

 

Figure No. 02 Electrospinning (13)

 

Rolling/ Semi-Solid Casting- Rolling or semi?solid casting is a solvent?based film?preparation method in which a viscous, semi?solid polymer–drug paste or gel is spread uniformly between rollers or over a substrate (e.g., PET liner) and then dried to form a thin orodispersible film. This approach avoids high?temperature processing and can be adapted to both simple lab?scale casting and larger?scale roll?to?roll systems, offering good thickness control and mechanical integrity when polymer blends and plasticizers are optimized. Compared with conventional solvent casting, semi?solid casting can reduce issues such as bubble formation and non?uniformity, while still enabling rapid disintegration and content uniformity suitable for low?dose, pediatric? and geriatric?friendly ODFs.(14,15)

3D Printing (Emerging Printing Technologies)-(16–18)

Overview- 2D/3D printing enables personalization, multilayers for incompatible APIs, precise dosing.

Inkjet Printing (2D)- Inkjet printing (2D) for orodispersible films (ODFs) is a non?contact, room?temperature technique in which a drug?loaded ink is precisely deposited onto a pre?formed ODF substrate (often cast or semi?solid extruded), enabling flexible, patient?specific dosing while preserving thermolabile APIs and flavours. The method supports high?resolution, customizable patterns and can encode data?matrix codes, but success depends on finely tuned inks with low viscosity, low surface tension, and sub?200 nm particles to avoid nozzle clogging and recrystallization?related dissolution changes. Inkjet?printed ODFs have been demonstrated for drugs such as enalapril and metoprolol, highlighting their potential for personalized, on?demand orodispersible films. Cons: Nozzle clogging (particles >200nm), ink limits, recrystallization. Used for metoprolol. (19–21)

Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM)- Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) is an additive manufacturing technique used to fabricate orodispersible films (ODFs) by extruding a thermoplastic polymer–API filament through a heated nozzle, depositing the molten material layer?by?layer onto a build platform according to a 3D CAD design. The process involves first producing drug?loaded filaments (commonly using polyvinyl alcohol, PVA, or PVA?mannitol?sugar?alcohol blends) via hot?melt extrusion, then printing them at elevated temperatures (typically 140–190?°C) to create porous, multilayer films with controlled geometry and high surface area, which can enhance dissolution and enable taste?masking by separating drug and flavour layers. FDM?printed ODFs achieve good mechanical strength and reproducible dosing, and have demonstrated rapid disintegration and >80–85% drug release within minutes for APIs such as aripiprazole and other model drugs, making FDM a promising platform for personalized, fast?dissolving films, though thermolabile APIs remain challenging due to the high?temperature processing. Extrudes API-polymer filaments (PVA/APR). Advantages: Amorphization (e.g., APR dissolution > casted), porous structures, multilayers. Drawbacks: High temp (150-200°C) degrades thermolabile drugs, filament prep. (22,23,24)

 

 

 

Figure No.- 03 Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM)

 

Semi-Solid Extrusion (SSE)- Semi?Solid Extrusion (SSE) is an extrusion?based 3D printing technique for orodispersible films (ODFs) in which a drug?loaded polymer gel or paste (e.g., HPC, PVA?PEG, maltodextrin, sodium alginate, or their blends) is extruded at or near ambient temperature from a syringe?type nozzle and deposited layer?by?layer to form a thin, rapidly?disintegrating film, bypassing the high?temperature processing of FDM and thus preserving thermosensitive APIs. The method avoids solvent?casting drawbacks such as bubble formation and uneven thickness, while enabling precise control over dose, geometry, and multilayer designs (e.g., separating API?rich and flavour?rich layers), and has demonstrated rapid disintegration and complete drug release for model compounds like caffeine, making SSE?printed ODFs a promising platform for personalized, pediatric?friendly, on?demand formulations. Prints pastes at ambient temp. Pros: Thermostable APIs (levocetirizine personalization), porosity control. Cons: Viscosity sensitivity, slower. (25–27)

Flexographic- Flexographic printing is a high?speed, roll?to?roll manufacturing method adapted for orodispersible films (ODFs) in which a drug?loaded ink is transferred from an engraved roller onto a pre?formed, blank ODF substrate (typically produced by solvent casting or semi?solid casting). The process operates at or near room temperature, allowing accurate, low?dose patterning of APIs such as rasagiline mesylate or tadalafil onto the film surface without significantly altering the film’s mechanical properties, disintegration time, or API crystallinity, and is particularly suitable for low?dose, high?potency drugs and personalized?dose products. By enabling multiple printing cycles on the same carrier film, flexographic printing offers a cost?effective and scalable alternative to conventional solvent casting, while minimizing material waste and providing good control over content uniformity and dose flexibility in ODF production.(28,29)

Overall pros: Customization (QR-coded ODFs), on-demand pharmacy production. Drawbacks: Scale-up barriers, regulatory hurdles, nozzle issues. Patents surge for hybrids.

  • FILM PREPARATION -

Films prepared via solvent casting: Mix API/polymers/plasticizers in solvent, cast (50-200µm wet), dry (40-80°C), cut. HME: Extrude melt, calender. Printing: Design CAD, extrude/print, dry in-process. Uniformity key; e.g., HPMC/glycerol for HPMC-based ODFs yields <30s DT. (4,5)

 

Table No. 07 Comparison Between ODF vs ODT (2,3,30)

Aspect

ODFs

ODTs

Form/Size

Thin film (50-200 µm, 2-4 cm²)

Tablet (2-8 mm thick)

Disintegration

5-60s (saliva wick effect)

10s-180s (super-disintegrants)

Choking Risk

Minimal (no residue)

Higher (fragments)

Portability

High (pouch-packed)

Moderate (rigid)

Drug Loading

Low (<50 mg, potent APIs)

Higher (up to 500 mg)

Manufacturing

Casting/3D printing

Compression/lyophilization

Cost/Scalability

Lower production

Established, cheaper at scale

 
  • CHALLENGES(1,8)- Challenges of orodispersible films (ODFs) include:
  • Limited drug loading capacity: Restricted to low-dose, high-potency APIs (<50 mg/film) due to thin structure (50-200 µm); high-dose drugs cause brittleness or poor uniformity.
  • Moisture/humidity sensitivity: Hygroscopic polymers (HPMC, PVA) absorb water (>6% moisture triggers recrystallization, microbial growth, reduced mechanical strength) requiring specialized Alu-PA packaging.
  • Poor mechanical properties: Fragile films prone to tearing (low tensile strength <15 MPa without optimized plasticizers), reduced folding endurance (<100 cycles) during handling/packaging.
  • Taste-masking difficulties: Bitter APIs (ondansetron) release instantly; cyclodextrins/resins add bulk, compromising disintegration (<30s target).
  • Content uniformity issues: Suspended insoluble particles (micronized loratadine) alter casting viscosity, causing dose variability (RSD >5%) and phase separation.
  • Scale-up challenges: Lab solvent casting doesn't translate to roll-to-roll (R2R) due to thickness control (±10 µm), solvent residue (>2%), batch variability.
  • Manufacturing limitations: Solvent casting uses VOCs; HME degrades thermolabile drugs (150°C); 3D printing faces nozzle clogging, low throughput.
  • Stability concerns: API polymorphism/hydrolysis during drying; high water activity promotes microbial growth in humid storage.
  • High development costs: Complex QbD optimization, specialized equipment (NIR inline monitoring), compared to tablets.
  • Patient issues: Potential mouth irritation from excipients (SLS, citric acid); unsuitable for actively transported drugs or modified-release needs.
  • Regulatory hurdles: Stringent uniformity (Ph.Eur. 2.9.1), DT/dissolution specs; limited guidance for printing methods.

FUTURE ASPECTS

Future aspects of orodispersible films (ODFs) promise a paradigm shift toward personalized, patient-centric immediate-release drug delivery. 3D printing technologies like FDM and SSE will enable on-demand multilayer films at point-of-care, creating porous structures for 3-5x faster dissolution and incompatible API separation with >90% release in 30 seconds. Nanotechnology via HME amorphous dispersions and SEDDS/nanocrystals will overcome low drug loading, achieving >100 mg/film and 4x bioavailability for poorly soluble drugs. Smart pH-responsive Eudragit® films offer site-specific buccal retention up to 6 hours, while iontophoretic microneedles deliver peptides like semaglutide at 80% bioavailability; cyclodextrin taste-masking reduces bitterness 70%, and QR-NFC films ensure blockchain-tracked adherence. Biologics advance with stable probiotic/mRNA vaccine ODFs and mucoadhesive antibodies. Sustainable biodegradable polymers cut environmental impact 60%, with AI optimizing formulations for <20s disintegration at 95% accuracy, slashing development time. Regulatory support drives a $12.4B market by 2032; clinical frontiers include GLP-1/levodopa/fentanyl ODFs, with challenges like nozzle clogging and humidity resolved via self-healing filaments, SSE, MOFs, and silica coatings, positioning ODFs as precision therapy cornerstone. (2,31–33)

CONCLUSION (2,4,20,34)

ODFs revolutionize immediate-release delivery due to patient-centered design, superior performance and immediate user appeal, rapid onset of action, and innovation potential. Hurdles such as drug loading notwithstanding, these recent progresses in printing and nanotech herald new use cases for precision medicine. Orodispersible films (ODFs) are now considered a transformative technology in the field of pharmaceuticals for immediate drug delivery systems based on early application, and are being used to improve patient compliance and medicine treatment efficacy. This study has thoroughly investigated their development and characterization, from basic solvent casting techniques to emerging 3D printing technologies, and it has reiterated the advantages of ODFs compared to the conventional dosage forms, including those including tablets and orodispersible tablets (ODTs) where rapid disintegration (less than 30 seconds), can be portable, and lower choking potentials have led to a favorable performance for dysphagic, pediatric, and geriatric patients. For instance, hydrophilic polymers like HPMC and PVA will also be combined with plasticizers called glycerol to yield mechanical strength and rapid mucoadhesive dispersion. Limitations in drug loading (<50 mg/film, humidity sensitivity, scale-up variability, etc.), which could pose major challenges due to physicochemical challenges, have been met through strategically deployed solutions: nanocrystal suspensions to amorphize the microtissue, hot-melt extrusion, and printing to accommodate personalization. ODFs possess greater surface area than ODTs for quicker onset and better taste-masking by cyclodextrin complexes, making them suitable for high-potency APIs for antiemetics, analgesics and psychotropics. The future of ODFs is very bright, powered by 3D printing (FDM/SSE) for on-demand multilayer preparation, nanotechnology for improved bioavailability and smart pH-responsive features for site-specific delivery. AI-optimized formulations and sustainable biopolymers will hasten GMP adoption, with forecasts showing potential market growth of $12.4 billion by 2032 due to rising chronic disease burdens. To this end, regulatory approvals such as the FDA’s NIR uniformity guidelines, open the door for biologics and personalized medicine applications ranging from mRNA vaccines to pharmacogenomics-specific doses. Finally, ODFs represent the newest frontiers of paradigm shift in patient-specific drug development, bringing formulation science and clinical science to a single level of innovation in drug formulation and treatment. Evolving from niche strips to precision platforms, their development should broaden the therapeutic access, increase the adherence and minimize first-pass effects that can be seen in oral drug delivery will ultimately lead to an evolution in oral delivery. Future studies should follow to maximize their clinical translation and long-term efficacy for achieving full promise to make ODFs a central pillar to existing pharmacotherapy.

REFERENCES

  1. Jacob S, Boddu SHS, Bhandare R, Ahmad SS, Nair AB. Orodispersible Films: Current Innovations and Emerging Trends. Pharmaceutics. 2023 Dec 11;15(12):2753. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15122753
  2. Elbl J, Veselý M, Blahá?ková D, Ondruš J, Kulich P, Mašková E, et al. Development of 3D Printed Multi-Layered Orodispersible Films with Porous Structure Applicable as a Substrate for Inkjet Printing. Pharmaceutics. 2023 Feb 20;15(2):714. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15020714
  3. Visser JC, Wibier L, Mekhaeil M, Woerdenbag HJ, Taxis K. Orodispersible films as a personalized dosage form for nursing home residents, an exploratory study. Int J Clin Pharm. 2020 Apr;42(2):436–44. doi:10.1007/s11096-020-00990-w
  4. Salawi A. An Insight into Preparatory Methods and Characterization of Orodispersible Film—A Review. Pharmaceuticals. 2022 Jul 9;15(7):844. doi:10.3390/ph15070844
  5. Reuther M, Rollet N, Debeaufort F, Chambin O. Orodispersible films prepared by hot-melt extrusion versus solvent casting. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2025 Apr;675:125536. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.125536
  6. Ferlak J, Guzenda W, Osma?ek T. Orodispersible Films—Current State of the Art, Limitations, Advances and Future Perspectives. Pharmaceutics. 2023 Jan 20;15(2):361. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15020361
  7. Shahtalebi MA, Tabbakhian M, Koosha S. Formulation and evaluation of orally disintegrating tablet of ondansetron using natural superdisintegrant. Vol. 4. 2015;4(3).
  8. Ferlak J, Guzenda W, Osma?ek T. Orodispersible Films—Current State of the Art, Limitations, Advances and Future Perspectives. Pharmaceutics. 2023 Jan 20;15(2):361. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15020361
  9. GlobalGrowthInsights. Orodispersible film market size & share trends, 2033. 2024. [Internet]. [cited 2026 Mar 2]. Available from: https://www.globalgrowthinsights.com/market-reports/orodispersible-film-market-104351
  10. orodispersible-film-market-104351 [Internet]. [cited 2026 Mar 6]. Available from: https://www.globalgrowthinsights.com/market-reports/orodispersible-film-market-104351
  11. Song Q, Guo X, Sun Y, Yang M. Anti-solvent Precipitation Method Coupled Electrospinning Process to Produce Poorly Water-Soluble Drug-Loaded Orodispersible Films. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2019 Oct;20(7):273. doi:10.1208/s12249-019-1464-2
  12. ?yszczarz E, Brniak W, Szafraniec-Szcz?sny J, Majka TM, Majda D, Zych M, et al. The Impact of the Preparation Method on the Properties of Orodispersible Films with Aripiprazole: Electrospinning vs. Casting and 3D Printing Methods. Pharmaceutics. 2021 Jul 22;13(8):1122. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics13081122
  13. Ravasi E, Melocchi A, Arrigoni A, Chiappa A, Gennari CGM, Uboldi M, et al. Electrospinning of pullulan-based orodispersible films containing sildenafil. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2023 Aug;643:123258. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123258
  14. rolling method [Internet]. [cited 2026 Mar 6]. Available from: https://www.formulationbio.com/oral-thin-film/rolling-method-for-oral-thin-film-preparation.html
  15. Kamboj S, Dutt R, Kamboj R. Orodispersible thin films: A Hodiernal Perspective in Drug Delivery System. RJPT. 2022 Jan 25;447–57. doi:10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00074
  16. Kozakiewicz-Lata?a M, Dyba AJ, Marciniak D, Szymczyk-Zió?kowska P, Cieszko M, Nartowski KP, et al. PVA-based formulations as a design-technology platform for orally disintegrating film matrices. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2024 Nov;665:124666. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124666
  17. Kakad MAS, Bhajipale DNS, Kunjwani HK. Formulation and Evaluation of Orodispersible film. Vol. 10. 2025;10(5).
  18. Shaw A, Lawrence TE, Yan T, Liu M, Summers N, Daggumati V, et al. Bioequivalence Studies of Sildenafil Citrate Orodispersible Film Administered with and without Water vs Viagra? Film-Coated Tablets in Healthy Male Volunteers. Current Therapeutic Research. 2023;99:100708. doi:10.1016/j.curtheres.2023.100708
  19. Thabet Y, Lunter D, Breitkreutz J. Continuous inkjet printing of enalapril maleate onto orodispersible film formulations. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2018 Jul;546(1–2):180–7. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.04.064
  20. Tam CH, Alexander M, Belton P, Qi S. Drop-on-demand printing of personalised orodispersible films fabricated by precision micro-dispensing. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2021 Dec;610:121279. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.121279
  21. Rodríguez-Pombo L, Carou-Senra P, Rodríguez-Martínez E, Januskaite P, Rial C, Félix P, et al. Customizable orodispersible films: Inkjet printing and data matrix encoding for personalized hydrocortisone dosing. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2024 Apr;655:124005. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124005
  22. Tranová T, Pyteraf J, Kurek M, Jamróz W, Brniak W, Spálovská D, et al. Fused Deposition Modeling as a Possible Approach for the Preparation of Orodispersible Tablets. Pharmaceuticals. 2022 Jan 5;15(1):69. doi:10.3390/ph15010069
  23. Ikeda S, Kobayashi M, Aoki S, Terukina T, Kanazawa T, Kojima H, et al. 3D-Printed Fast-Dissolving Oral Dosage Forms via Fused Deposition Modeling Based on Sugar Alcohol and Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)—Preparation, Drug Release Studies and In Vivo Oral Absorption. Pharmaceutics. 2023 Jan 24;15(2):395. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15020395
  24. 3d-printed-orodispersible-films-with-aripiprazole [Internet]. [cited 2026 Mar 6]. Available from: https://www.pharmaexcipients.com/news/3d-printed-orodispersible-films-with-aripiprazole/
  25. Turkovi? E, Vasiljevi? I, Paroj?i? J. Preparation of orodispersible films using semisolid extrusion 3D printing: A versatile manufacturing approach. Arhiv za farmaciju. 2025;75(5):368–84. doi:10.5937/arhfarm75-61224
  26. Aina M, Baillon F, Sescousse R, Sanchez-Ballester NM, Begu S, Soulairol I, et al. From conception to consumption: Applications of semi-solid extrusion 3D printing in oral drug delivery. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2025 Apr;674:125436. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.125436
  27. Poudel I, Mita N, Scherer J, Annaji M, Kang X, Fasina O, et al. Comparative Formulation and Physicochemical Evaluation of Orodispersible Films Fabricated via Pneumatic and Syringe-Based 3D Printing. Pharm Res. 2025 Dec;42(12):2205–21. doi:10.1007/s11095-025-03967-4
  28. Gupta MS, Kumar TP, Davidson R, Kuppu GR, Pathak K, Gowda DV. Printing Methods in the Production of Orodispersible Films. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2021 Apr;22(3):129. doi:10.1208/s12249-021-01990-3
  29. Janßen EM, Schliephacke R, Breitenbach A, Breitkreutz J. Drug-printing by flexographic printing technology—A new manufacturing process for orodispersible films. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2013 Jan;441(1–2):818–25. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.12.023
  30. pullulan-hpmc-oral-film [Internet]. [cited 2026 Mar 6]. Available from: https://www.pharmaexcipients.com/news/pullulan-hpmc-oral-film/
  31. Cho HW, Baek SH, Lee BJ, Jin HE. Orodispersible Polymer Films with the Poorly Water-Soluble Drug, Olanzapine: Hot-Melt Pneumatic Extrusion for Single-Process 3D Printing. Pharmaceutics. 2020 Jul 22;12(8):692. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics12080692
  32. Steiner D, Tidau M, Finke JH. Embedding of Poorly Water-Soluble Drugs in Orodispersible Films—Comparison of Five Formulation Strategies. Pharmaceutics. 2022 Dec 21;15(1):17. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15010017
  33. Gupta MS, Kumar TP, Gowda DV, Rosenholm JM. Orodispersible films: Conception to quality by design. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2021 Nov;178:113983. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2021.113983
  34. Irfan M, Rabel S, Bukhtar Q, Qadir MI, Jabeen F, Khan A. Orally disintegrating films: A modern expansion in drug delivery system. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal. 2016 Sep;24(5):537–46. doi:10.1016/j.jsps.2015.02.024

Reference

  1. Jacob S, Boddu SHS, Bhandare R, Ahmad SS, Nair AB. Orodispersible Films: Current Innovations and Emerging Trends. Pharmaceutics. 2023 Dec 11;15(12):2753. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15122753
  2. Elbl J, Veselý M, Blahá?ková D, Ondruš J, Kulich P, Mašková E, et al. Development of 3D Printed Multi-Layered Orodispersible Films with Porous Structure Applicable as a Substrate for Inkjet Printing. Pharmaceutics. 2023 Feb 20;15(2):714. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15020714
  3. Visser JC, Wibier L, Mekhaeil M, Woerdenbag HJ, Taxis K. Orodispersible films as a personalized dosage form for nursing home residents, an exploratory study. Int J Clin Pharm. 2020 Apr;42(2):436–44. doi:10.1007/s11096-020-00990-w
  4. Salawi A. An Insight into Preparatory Methods and Characterization of Orodispersible Film—A Review. Pharmaceuticals. 2022 Jul 9;15(7):844. doi:10.3390/ph15070844
  5. Reuther M, Rollet N, Debeaufort F, Chambin O. Orodispersible films prepared by hot-melt extrusion versus solvent casting. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2025 Apr;675:125536. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.125536
  6. Ferlak J, Guzenda W, Osma?ek T. Orodispersible Films—Current State of the Art, Limitations, Advances and Future Perspectives. Pharmaceutics. 2023 Jan 20;15(2):361. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15020361
  7. Shahtalebi MA, Tabbakhian M, Koosha S. Formulation and evaluation of orally disintegrating tablet of ondansetron using natural superdisintegrant. Vol. 4. 2015;4(3).
  8. Ferlak J, Guzenda W, Osma?ek T. Orodispersible Films—Current State of the Art, Limitations, Advances and Future Perspectives. Pharmaceutics. 2023 Jan 20;15(2):361. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15020361
  9. GlobalGrowthInsights. Orodispersible film market size & share trends, 2033. 2024. [Internet]. [cited 2026 Mar 2]. Available from: https://www.globalgrowthinsights.com/market-reports/orodispersible-film-market-104351
  10. orodispersible-film-market-104351 [Internet]. [cited 2026 Mar 6]. Available from: https://www.globalgrowthinsights.com/market-reports/orodispersible-film-market-104351
  11. Song Q, Guo X, Sun Y, Yang M. Anti-solvent Precipitation Method Coupled Electrospinning Process to Produce Poorly Water-Soluble Drug-Loaded Orodispersible Films. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2019 Oct;20(7):273. doi:10.1208/s12249-019-1464-2
  12. ?yszczarz E, Brniak W, Szafraniec-Szcz?sny J, Majka TM, Majda D, Zych M, et al. The Impact of the Preparation Method on the Properties of Orodispersible Films with Aripiprazole: Electrospinning vs. Casting and 3D Printing Methods. Pharmaceutics. 2021 Jul 22;13(8):1122. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics13081122
  13. Ravasi E, Melocchi A, Arrigoni A, Chiappa A, Gennari CGM, Uboldi M, et al. Electrospinning of pullulan-based orodispersible films containing sildenafil. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2023 Aug;643:123258. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123258
  14. rolling method [Internet]. [cited 2026 Mar 6]. Available from: https://www.formulationbio.com/oral-thin-film/rolling-method-for-oral-thin-film-preparation.html
  15. Kamboj S, Dutt R, Kamboj R. Orodispersible thin films: A Hodiernal Perspective in Drug Delivery System. RJPT. 2022 Jan 25;447–57. doi:10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00074
  16. Kozakiewicz-Lata?a M, Dyba AJ, Marciniak D, Szymczyk-Zió?kowska P, Cieszko M, Nartowski KP, et al. PVA-based formulations as a design-technology platform for orally disintegrating film matrices. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2024 Nov;665:124666. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124666
  17. Kakad MAS, Bhajipale DNS, Kunjwani HK. Formulation and Evaluation of Orodispersible film. Vol. 10. 2025;10(5).
  18. Shaw A, Lawrence TE, Yan T, Liu M, Summers N, Daggumati V, et al. Bioequivalence Studies of Sildenafil Citrate Orodispersible Film Administered with and without Water vs Viagra? Film-Coated Tablets in Healthy Male Volunteers. Current Therapeutic Research. 2023;99:100708. doi:10.1016/j.curtheres.2023.100708
  19. Thabet Y, Lunter D, Breitkreutz J. Continuous inkjet printing of enalapril maleate onto orodispersible film formulations. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2018 Jul;546(1–2):180–7. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.04.064
  20. Tam CH, Alexander M, Belton P, Qi S. Drop-on-demand printing of personalised orodispersible films fabricated by precision micro-dispensing. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2021 Dec;610:121279. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.121279
  21. Rodríguez-Pombo L, Carou-Senra P, Rodríguez-Martínez E, Januskaite P, Rial C, Félix P, et al. Customizable orodispersible films: Inkjet printing and data matrix encoding for personalized hydrocortisone dosing. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2024 Apr;655:124005. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124005
  22. Tranová T, Pyteraf J, Kurek M, Jamróz W, Brniak W, Spálovská D, et al. Fused Deposition Modeling as a Possible Approach for the Preparation of Orodispersible Tablets. Pharmaceuticals. 2022 Jan 5;15(1):69. doi:10.3390/ph15010069
  23. Ikeda S, Kobayashi M, Aoki S, Terukina T, Kanazawa T, Kojima H, et al. 3D-Printed Fast-Dissolving Oral Dosage Forms via Fused Deposition Modeling Based on Sugar Alcohol and Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)—Preparation, Drug Release Studies and In Vivo Oral Absorption. Pharmaceutics. 2023 Jan 24;15(2):395. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15020395
  24. 3d-printed-orodispersible-films-with-aripiprazole [Internet]. [cited 2026 Mar 6]. Available from: https://www.pharmaexcipients.com/news/3d-printed-orodispersible-films-with-aripiprazole/
  25. Turkovi? E, Vasiljevi? I, Paroj?i? J. Preparation of orodispersible films using semisolid extrusion 3D printing: A versatile manufacturing approach. Arhiv za farmaciju. 2025;75(5):368–84. doi:10.5937/arhfarm75-61224
  26. Aina M, Baillon F, Sescousse R, Sanchez-Ballester NM, Begu S, Soulairol I, et al. From conception to consumption: Applications of semi-solid extrusion 3D printing in oral drug delivery. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2025 Apr;674:125436. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.125436
  27. Poudel I, Mita N, Scherer J, Annaji M, Kang X, Fasina O, et al. Comparative Formulation and Physicochemical Evaluation of Orodispersible Films Fabricated via Pneumatic and Syringe-Based 3D Printing. Pharm Res. 2025 Dec;42(12):2205–21. doi:10.1007/s11095-025-03967-4
  28. Gupta MS, Kumar TP, Davidson R, Kuppu GR, Pathak K, Gowda DV. Printing Methods in the Production of Orodispersible Films. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2021 Apr;22(3):129. doi:10.1208/s12249-021-01990-3
  29. Janßen EM, Schliephacke R, Breitenbach A, Breitkreutz J. Drug-printing by flexographic printing technology—A new manufacturing process for orodispersible films. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2013 Jan;441(1–2):818–25. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.12.023
  30. pullulan-hpmc-oral-film [Internet]. [cited 2026 Mar 6]. Available from: https://www.pharmaexcipients.com/news/pullulan-hpmc-oral-film/
  31. Cho HW, Baek SH, Lee BJ, Jin HE. Orodispersible Polymer Films with the Poorly Water-Soluble Drug, Olanzapine: Hot-Melt Pneumatic Extrusion for Single-Process 3D Printing. Pharmaceutics. 2020 Jul 22;12(8):692. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics12080692
  32. Steiner D, Tidau M, Finke JH. Embedding of Poorly Water-Soluble Drugs in Orodispersible Films—Comparison of Five Formulation Strategies. Pharmaceutics. 2022 Dec 21;15(1):17. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15010017
  33. Gupta MS, Kumar TP, Gowda DV, Rosenholm JM. Orodispersible films: Conception to quality by design. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2021 Nov;178:113983. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2021.113983
  34. Irfan M, Rabel S, Bukhtar Q, Qadir MI, Jabeen F, Khan A. Orally disintegrating films: A modern expansion in drug delivery system. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal. 2016 Sep;24(5):537–46. doi:10.1016/j.jsps.2015.02.024

Photo
Shraddha Patil
Corresponding author

Department of Pharmaceutics, Konkan Gyanpeeth Rahul Dharkar College of Pharmacy and Research Institute, Karjat, Maharashtra.

Photo
Dr. Sanket Dharashivkar
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutics, Konkan Gyanpeeth Rahul Dharkar College of Pharmacy and Research Institute, Karjat, Maharashtra.

Photo
Dr. Swapnil Phalak
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutics, Konkan Gyanpeeth Rahul Dharkar College of Pharmacy and Research Institute, Karjat, Maharashtra.

Photo
Dr. Mohan Kale.
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutics, Konkan Gyanpeeth Rahul Dharkar College of Pharmacy and Research Institute, Karjat, Maharashtra.

Shraddha Patil, Dr. Sanket Dharashivkar, Dr. Swapnil Phalak, Dr. Mohan Kale, Innovative Advances in Orodispersible Films: Tailoring Immediate Drug Release for Enhanced Patient-Centric Therapy, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 4, 727-738 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19415607

More related articles
Formulation and Evaluation of Anti-Aging Serum usi...
Swapnil Pradhan, Snehalta Mali, Gauri Bhamare, Raj Patil, Neha Pa...
Niosomal Drug Delivery Systems: Emerging Trends in...
Imran Rashid, Quazia Ifaq Wani, Arashjit Singh, Neha Srivastava...
Groundnut Shell-Derived Activated Carbon for Lead (Ii) Removal from Aqueous Solu...
Stuti Ganbote, Yogesh Kolekar , Omkar Dhanawade, Pranavi Yadav, Siya Desai , Shravani Kumbhar, Prano...
The Comparision Between Rosuvastatin And Atorvastatin On Lipid Profile, Predispo...
Rudhra Sandhya, P. S. V. Sandeep, Deepika Pallati, Dr. Swathi Boddupally, Dr. Haritha. P, Mohd Shahn...
Related Articles
Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Modern Prodrug Design: Linker Chemistry and Payload ...
G. E. Ebimo-Moko, T. Ganatra, V. Ebimo-Moko, W. E. Madu, J. E. Sampson, J. D. Joel, F. O. Oladele...
Natural Hand Hygiene Solutions: A Review of Areca Catechu Leaf Sheath-Based Herb...
Aishwarya M, Dr. Shiju L, Bhoomika C K, Thejaswi Gowda K M, Sachin. M S, Harsha C J...
Formulation and Evaluation of Anti-Aging Serum using Ferulic Acid from Matsyaksh...
Swapnil Pradhan, Snehalta Mali, Gauri Bhamare, Raj Patil, Neha Patil, Kalyani Patil...
More related articles
Formulation and Evaluation of Anti-Aging Serum using Ferulic Acid from Matsyaksh...
Swapnil Pradhan, Snehalta Mali, Gauri Bhamare, Raj Patil, Neha Patil, Kalyani Patil...
Niosomal Drug Delivery Systems: Emerging Trends in Dermatological Applications...
Imran Rashid, Quazia Ifaq Wani, Arashjit Singh, Neha Srivastava...
Formulation and Evaluation of Anti-Aging Serum using Ferulic Acid from Matsyaksh...
Swapnil Pradhan, Snehalta Mali, Gauri Bhamare, Raj Patil, Neha Patil, Kalyani Patil...
Niosomal Drug Delivery Systems: Emerging Trends in Dermatological Applications...
Imran Rashid, Quazia Ifaq Wani, Arashjit Singh, Neha Srivastava...