View Article

Abstract

A quick, sensitive, and accurate RP-HPLC approach has been employed to identify and measure Acetaminophen and Oxycodone using a Waters PDA-detected HPLC mode. An Inertsil -ODS C18 (250 x 4.6 mm, 5) column was completely utilized for separation of Acetaminophen and Oxycodone, volumetric rate was 1.0 ml/min. The process's mobile phase was filtered and combined with degassed Methanol and Acetonitrile (85:15) and detection wave length was 247 nm

Keywords

Oxycodone, Acetaminophen, RP-HPLC

Introduction

× Popup Image

1.0       Introduction to HPLC:

High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) was derived from the classical column chromatography and, is one of the most important tools of analytical chemistry today.1In the modern pharmaceutical industry, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is the major and integral analytical tool applied in all stages of drug discovery, development, and production.2 HPLC is the method of choice for checking peak purity of new chemical entities, monitoring reaction changes is in synthetic procedures or scale up, evaluating new formulations and carrying out

 

quality control / assurance of the final drug products.3

1.1       HPLC Method Development:

Methods are developed for new products when no official methods are available. Alternate methods for existing (Non-Pharmacopoeial) products are to reduce the cost and time for better precision and ruggedness. When alternate method proposed is intended to replace the existing procedure comparative laboratory data including merit/demerits are made available. The goal of the HPLC-method is to try & separate, quantify the main active drug, any reaction impurities, all available synthetic inter-mediates and any degradants.5

Steps involved in Method development are. 4,5

         Understanding the Physicochemical properties of drug molecule.

         Selection of chromatographic conditions.

         Developing the approach of analysis.

         Sample preparation

         Method optimization

         Method validation.

1.2       Method Validation:

Validation of an analytical method is the process by which it is established by laboratory studies, that the performance characteristics of the method meet the requirements for the intended analytical application. Validation is required for any new or amended method to ensure that it is capable of giving reproducible and reliable results, when used by different operators employing the same equipment in the same or different laboratories. The type of validation program required depends entirely on the particular method and its proposed Applications.6Results from method .Validation can be used to judge the quality, reliability and consistency of analytical results; it is an integral part of any good analytical practice. Use of equipment that is within specification, working correctly and adequately calibrated is fundamental to the method validation process. Analytical methods need to be validated or revalidated.7

         Before their introduction into routine use;

         Whenever the conditions change for which the method has been validated

         Whenever the method is changed

Typical parameters recommended by FDA, USP, and ICH are as follow.7,8

1.         System suitability

2.         Precision

3.         Accuracy (Recovery)

4.         Linearity

5.         Robustness

6.         Limit of Detection (LOD)

7.         Limit of Quantification (LOQ)

2.         MATERIALS

Tools-Instruments:

•           HPLC – Waters Model NO.2690/5 Compact System consisting of panel with Inertsil-C18 ODS.

•           Electronic equilibrium (SARTORIOUS)

•           Sonicator (CLEAN FAST)

Chemical Substances:

•           Methanol grade HPLC.

•           HPLC Class buffer (KH2PO4).

Raw Stock:

Standards in dealing with Oxycodone and Acetaminophen.

2.1 METHOD FOR HPLC DEVELOPEMENT

Cellular phase: Methanol and Acetonitral were degassed at a 85:15 V/V ratio.

Preparation of a stock solution:

Reference remedy:

 

In order to prepare the solution, two volumetric flasks with a volume of 100.0 mL each were filled with 125.0 mg of Acetaminophen and 120.0 mg of precisely weighed Oxycodonethen sonicated for 20 minutes. Take 10.0 mL of each of the solutions and place them in a 100.0 mL volumetric flask. Next, add mobile phase, and after 10 minutes, sonicate the mixture.

The creation of a Standard Working Solution:

Along with the previously mentioned Oxycodone and Acetaminophen, For each medically, stock solutions varying in ranging from 20 to 80 ppm were made, sonicated, and filtered through a 0.45 membrane.

 

 

Optimised Chromatography Condition

 

Parameters

Method

Stage of Stationary (column)

Inertsil -ODS C18(250 x 4.6 mm, 5 µ)

Mobile Phase

Methanol and Acetonitrile (85:15)

Flow rate (ml/min)

1.0 ml/min

Duration of operation (minutes)

8 min

Temperature in the column (°C)

Ambient

Volume of injection loop (l)

20

Wavelength of detection (nm)

247 nm

 

Drug RT (min)

5.066 min for Oxycodoneand 7.266 for Acetaminophen.

     

 

3.RESULTS

OPTIMIZED METHOD

 

 

 

Fig 1: Conventional Chromatogram

 

Inference: With RTs of 5.066 minutes for Oxycodoneand 7.266 minutes for Acetaminophen, a chromatogram was obtained.

3.1DATA-VALIDATION(VALIDATION DATA)

3.1.1    SYSTEM ACCOMPANY(SYSTEM SUITABILITY):

Validation Stock Solution Preparation:

Solution A :Take 125mg Oxycodone working standard in 100ml V.F add methanol sonicate it 30minets,(That is 1000ppm solution).

Solution B :Take 120mg Acetaminophen working standard in 100ml V.F add methanol sonicate it 30minets,(That is 1000ppm solution).

Validation Parameters Solutions Preparation:

Prepare a series of standard solutions from 20 ppm to 80 ppm by diluting 2 ml to 8 ml of stock solutions A and B into 100 ml volumetric flasks with methanol, followed by 10 minutes of sonication

 

TABLE- 1(a): Device Eligibility Information for Oxycodone(Data of System Suitability for Oxycodone)

 

Injection

RT

Peak Area

USP Plate count

USP Tailing

1

7.266

779814

15231

1.15124

2

7.262

780101

15292

1.18749

3

7.264

778155

15225

1.17877

4

7.263

777520

15742

1.12460

5

7.267

778009

15236

1.18744

Mean

7.2644

778719.8

15345.2

1.16334

SD

0.002074

1158.527

-------

-------

% RSD

0.028545

0.148773

-------

-------

 

TABLE-1(b): Device Eligibility Information for Acetaminophen

(Data of System Suitability for Acetaminophen)

 

Injection

 

RT

Peak Area

USP Plate count

USP Tailing

1

7.266

779814

15231

1.15124

2

7.262

780101

15292

1.18749

3

7.264

778155

15225

1.17877

4

7.263

777520

15742

1.12460

5

7.267

778009

15236

1.18744

Mean

7.2644

778719.8

15345.2

1.16334

SD

0.002074

1158.527

-------

-------

% RSD

0.028545

0.148773

-------

-------

 

 

 

Fig: 2- Chromatogram compatible with devices (Standard 1)

 

3.1.2.PRECISION:

The method precision for Oxycodone was demonstrated by evaluating six replicate sample preparations

at a target concentration of 40 ppm, yielding a mean peak area of 471156.3 with a relative standard

deviation (% RSD) of 0.19%, which is well within the acceptable regulatory limit of  2.0%.

The method precision for Acetaminophen was demonstrated by evaluating six replicate sample preparations

 at a target concentration of 40 ppm, yielding a mean peak area of 779276.3 with a relative standard deviation

(%RSD) of 0.03%, which is well within the acceptable regulatory limit of  2.0%.

3.1.3.ACCURACY:

 

 

TABLE 2  ( a) oxycodone

*Concentration

 

% of spiked level

Amount added

(ppm)

Amount found

(ppm)

 

%

Recovery

Statistical Analysis of % Recovery

50%

Injection 1

20

19.92

99.78

MEAN

%RSD

99.87

0.68

100 %

Injection 1

40

39.94

98.92

MEAN

%RSD

99.84

0.657

150%

Injection 1

60

59.97

99.96

MEAN

%RSD

100.07

0.345

 

*Concentration % Of Spiked Level Has Been Performed 3 Times.

 

 

TABLE 2 (b) Acetaminophen

*Concentration

 

% of spiked level

Amount added

(ppm)

Amount found

(ppm)

 

%

Recovery

Statistical Analysis of % Recovery

50%

Injection 1

0

19.89

99.87

MEAN

%RSD

99.97

0.874

100 %

Injection 1

40

39.92

99.88

MEAN

%RSD

99.97

0.687

150%

Injection 1

60

59.95

98.87

MEAN

%RSD

99.94

0.97

 

*Concentration % Of Spiked Level Has Been Performed 3 Times.

 

 

 

Fig-3:Accuracy Chromatograms (50 percent)

 

 

Figure 4: Accuracy Chromatograms (100 per cent)

 

 

Figure -5: For Accuracy Chromatograms (150 per cent)

 

3.1.4.LINEARITY:

 

 

 

 

 

TABLE 3(a)Data of Linearity (Oxycodone)

 

S.NO

Concentration

Average

Area

1

0

0

2

20

230828

3

30

57053

4

40

469514

5

50

596111

6

60

719969

7

70

825875

 

 

 

Fig: 6(a) Linearity Plot of Oxycodone (Concentration Vs response)

 

TABLE 3(b)Data of Linearity (Acetaminophen)

S.no

Concentration

Average Area

0

0

0

2

20

386907

3

30

581164

4

40

779814

5

50

986354

6

60

1181597

7

70

1374407

 

Statistical Analysis:

•           Slope – 19719

•           y Intercept -- -4847

•           Corelation Coefficient – 0.999

 

 

 

Fig: 6(b) Acetaminophen linearity plot (Concentration Vs response)

 

3.1.5 Robust Durability(Robustness):

 

TABLE: 4(a) Information on Oxycodone's effects on flow rate variability:

Flow

 

0.8 ml

Std

 

Area

Tailing

 

factor

Flow

 

1.0 ml

Std

 

Area

Tailing

 

factor

Flow

 

1.2 ml

Std Area

Tailing

 

factor

469237

1.103

470324

1.122

471845

1.103

469284

1.110

470857

1.110

471324

1.116

469320

1.102

470321

1.110

471084

1.134

469271

1.131

470847

1.113

471382

1.101

469824

1.122

470342

1.101

471082

1.102

Avg

469387.

2

1.1136

Avg

470538.

2

1.1112

Avg

7640789.5

4

1.1112

SD

245.979

1

0.01258

2

SD

286.593

3

0.0075

3

SD

8786.021

0.01413

2

%RS D

0.05240

4

1.1298

%RS D

0.06090

8

0.6776

4

%RS D

0.87741

1.2717

 

TABLE: 4(b)Information on the effects of flux rate variation (Acetaminophen)

Flow

 

0.8 ml

Std

 

Area

Tailing

 

factor

Flow

 

1.0 ml

Std

 

Area

Tailing

 

factor

Flow

 

1.2 ml

Std

 

Area

Tailing

 

factor

778942

1.099

779351

1.128

780241

1.121

 

 

778643

1.103

 

779462

1.112

 

780642

1.122

778062

1.111

779637

1.121

780451

1.124

778613

1.117

779852

1.124

780354

1.123

778361

1.119

779082

1.123

780623

1.099

Avg

778523.

8

1.1098

Avg

779476.

8

1.1216

Avg

780462.

2

1.1178

SD

330.304

7

0.00867

2

SD

290.839

6

0.00594

1

SD

172.443

3

0.01056

9

%RS D

0.04242

7

0.78138

%RS D

0.03731

 

2

0.5297

%RS D

0.02209

 

5

0.9455

 

 

 

 

 

Fig-7: Robust Chromatograms

 

4.SUMMARY:

 

Validation Parameter

Oxycodone Results

Acetaminophen Results

System Suitability

Mean RT: 5.0628 min

 

Mean Peak Area: 471,351.6

 

% RSD (Peak Area): 0.270572%

 

 

Mean RT: 7.2644 min

 

Mean Peak Area: 778,719.8

 

% RSD (Peak Area): 0.148773%

 

 

Method Precision

 

(Repeatability at 40 ppm)

Mean Peak Area: 471,156.3

 

% RSD (Peak Area): 0.193263%

 

 

Mean Peak Area: 779,276.3

 

% RSD (Peak Area): 0.02561%

 

 

Accuracy (Recovery)

50% Level (20 ppm): 99.87%

 

100% Level (40 ppm): 99.84%

 

150% Level (60 ppm): 100.07%

50% Level (20 ppm): 99.97%

 

100% Level (40 ppm): 99.97%

 

150% Level (60 ppm): 99.94%

Linearity

 

Correlation Coefficient : 0.9997

 

Correlation Coefficient : 0.9999

Sensitivity

LOD: 0.34 ppm

 

LOQ: 1.03 ppm

LOD: 0.19 ppm

 

LOQ: 0.59 ppm

Robustness

 

(Flow Rate Variation)

0.8 ml/min Mean Area: 469,387.2 (%RSD: 0.05%)

 

1.0 ml/min Mean Area: 470,538.2 (%RSD: 0.06%)

 

1.2 ml/min Mean Area: 7,640,789.54* (%RSD: 0.88%)

0.8 ml/min Mean Area: 778,523.8 (%RSD: 0.04%)

 

1.0 ml/min Mean Area: 779,476.8 (%RSD: 0.04%)

 

1.2 ml/min Mean Area: 780,462.2 (%RSD: 0.02%)

 

 

CONCLUSION

The analytical approach was developed through analysis of various parameters. First, maximum absorbance was observed at 254 nm for Oxycodone and 284 nm for Acetaminophen . Typical wavelength would be 247 nm, and the purity of peaks was excellent. The volume of injection was chosen as 20μl which gave a good peak area. The column used for analysis was Inertsil C18, a strong peak shape chosen by ODS. It has been found that ambient temperature suits the nature of the drug solution. Due to good peak area, adequate retention time and good resolution the flow rate was set at 1.0ml / min. Different mobile phase ratios were tested, mobile phase with Methanol and Acetonitrile (85:15) ratio was set due to good symmetrical peaks and good resolution. For the proposed analysis, instead, this mobile process was used.

The current recovery was found to be linear and precise over the same range as 98.0-101.50. Precision of both the device and the procedure has been found to be reliable and within limits. The detection limit for Acetaminophen was 0.25 Oxycodone, and 0.34. The study of linearity was, coefficient of correlation and curve fitting was found to be. For both the drugs, the analytical approach observed linearity over the 20-70ppm range of the target concentration. The analytical has passed tests of both robustness and robustness. Relative standard deviation was very satisfactory in both occasions.

REFERENCES

  1. V. Gupta, A.D. K. Jain, N.S. Gill, K. Gupta, Development and validation of HPLC method - a review , Int. Res J Pharm. App Sci., (2012);2(4) 17-25
  2. Y. Kazakevich, R. Lobrutto, HPLC for Pharmaceutical Scientists, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, 2007.
  3. S. Ahuja, H. Rasmussen, Development for Pharmaceuticals,Separation Science and Technology, Elsevier, New York [2007] Vol.8
  4. M.S. Charde, A.S. Welankiwar, J. Kumar, Method development by liquid chromatography with validation, International Journal of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, (2014);04(02): 57-61.
  5. S. Sood, R. Bala, N.S. Gill, Method development and validation using HPLC technique – A review, Journal of Drug Discovery and Therapeutics, 2014; 2(22): 18-24.
  6. N.Toomula, A. Kumar, S.D.Kumar, V.S. Bheemidi, Development and Validation of Analytical Methods for Pharmaceuticals, J Anal Bioanal Techniques. (2011); 2(5): 1-4.
  7. T. Bhagyasree, N. Injeti, A. Azhakesan, U.M.V. Rao, A review on analytical method development and validation,International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research & Analysis, Vol (2014); 4(8): 444-448.
  8. V. Kumar, R. Bharadwaj, G.G., S. Kumar, An Overview on HPLC Method Development, Optimization and Validation process for drug analysis, The Pharmaceutical and Chemical Journal,(2015); 2(2) ; 30-40  

Reference

  1. V. Gupta, A.D. K. Jain, N.S. Gill, K. Gupta, Development and validation of HPLC method - a review , Int. Res J Pharm. App Sci., (2012);2(4) 17-25
  2. Y. Kazakevich, R. Lobrutto, HPLC for Pharmaceutical Scientists, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, 2007.
  3. S. Ahuja, H. Rasmussen, Development for Pharmaceuticals,Separation Science and Technology, Elsevier, New York [2007] Vol.8
  4. M.S. Charde, A.S. Welankiwar, J. Kumar, Method development by liquid chromatography with validation, International Journal of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, (2014);04(02): 57-61.
  5. S. Sood, R. Bala, N.S. Gill, Method development and validation using HPLC technique – A review, Journal of Drug Discovery and Therapeutics, 2014; 2(22): 18-24.
  6. N.Toomula, A. Kumar, S.D.Kumar, V.S. Bheemidi, Development and Validation of Analytical Methods for Pharmaceuticals, J Anal Bioanal Techniques. (2011); 2(5): 1-4.
  7. T. Bhagyasree, N. Injeti, A. Azhakesan, U.M.V. Rao, A review on analytical method development and validation,International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research & Analysis, Vol (2014); 4(8): 444-448.
  8. V. Kumar, R. Bharadwaj, G.G., S. Kumar, An Overview on HPLC Method Development, Optimization and Validation process for drug analysis, The Pharmaceutical and Chemical Journal,(2015); 2(2) ; 30-40  

Photo
Mohammad Irfan Sami
Corresponding author

Deccan school of pharmacy, Osmania university, Hyderabad, Telangana, INDIA - 500001

Photo
Mirza Osman Baig
Co-author

Deccan school of pharmacy, Osmania university, Hyderabad, Telangana, INDIA - 500001

Photo
Wasifa Tabassum
Co-author

Deccan school of pharmacy, Osmania university, Hyderabad, Telangana, INDIA - 500001

Photo
Sana Sultana
Co-author

Deccan school of pharmacy, Osmania university, Hyderabad, Telangana, INDIA - 500001

Photo
Dr. Iffath Rizwana
Co-author

Deccan school of pharmacy, Osmania university, Hyderabad, Telangana, INDIA - 500001

Mirza Osman Baig, Mohammad Irfan Sami, Wasifa Tabassum, Sana Sultana ,Iffath Rizwana Method Development and Method Validation of Oxycodone and Acetaminophen BY RP-HPLC, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 7, 1145-1153, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21218014

More related articles
Regulatory Process of Adverse Drug Reporting Case ...
Harshada Gore, Shraddha Ratanwar, Dr. Vijay Navghare, Dr. Surykan...
Parkinson's Disease Beyond Dopamine: Integrating M...
Shubham Turewale, Mahesh Manke, Kiran surwase, Rushikesh choudhar...
Formulation And Development of Herbal Syrup for An...
Rameshwar Danave, Dr. Nilesh Chachda, Gaurav Meshram, Vaibhav Zot...
Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogel: An Overview...
Nityananda Mondal, Sanjiban Utpalkumar Sarkar, Kankana Koner, Arnab Bhunia, Niharika Sarkar, Suvodip...
Antibiotics Used in The Treatment of Diabetic Foot Infections...
Dt. Arifa Begum SK, V Priskilla, Y Srivani, V Tejaswi, S. Dhilip Kumar , Dr A Siva Prasad, Dr K V L ...
Antibiotics Used in The Treatment of Diabetic Foot Infections...
Dt. Arifa Begum SK, V Priskilla, Y Srivani, V Tejaswi, S. Dhilip Kumar , Dr A Siva Prasad, Dr K V L ...
Related Articles
A Comprehensive Review on Stability-Indicating RP-HPLC Methods for the Estimatio...
Komal Humbe, Dr. H. Kamble, Sugriv Ghodke, Sonawane A...
Evaluation of Antimicrobial Potential and Cytotoxicity of Selected Marine Seawee...
Jisha Kumaran, Ayana N, Namitha R, Adhithya P, Arya K V...
Regulatory Process of Adverse Drug Reporting Case Studies in India...
Harshada Gore, Shraddha Ratanwar, Dr. Vijay Navghare, Dr. Surykant Jadhav...
More related articles
Regulatory Process of Adverse Drug Reporting Case Studies in India...
Harshada Gore, Shraddha Ratanwar, Dr. Vijay Navghare, Dr. Surykant Jadhav...
Parkinson's Disease Beyond Dopamine: Integrating Molecular Pathogenesis, Biomark...
Shubham Turewale, Mahesh Manke, Kiran surwase, Rushikesh choudhari, Dr. Padmaja Giram...
Formulation And Development of Herbal Syrup for Anxiety and Stress in Children...
Rameshwar Danave, Dr. Nilesh Chachda, Gaurav Meshram, Vaibhav Zotting...
Regulatory Process of Adverse Drug Reporting Case Studies in India...
Harshada Gore, Shraddha Ratanwar, Dr. Vijay Navghare, Dr. Surykant Jadhav...
Parkinson's Disease Beyond Dopamine: Integrating Molecular Pathogenesis, Biomark...
Shubham Turewale, Mahesh Manke, Kiran surwase, Rushikesh choudhari, Dr. Padmaja Giram...
Formulation And Development of Herbal Syrup for Anxiety and Stress in Children...
Rameshwar Danave, Dr. Nilesh Chachda, Gaurav Meshram, Vaibhav Zotting...