View Article

  • Method Development and Validation of Netupitant and Palonosetron in Bulk and Capsule Dosage Forms Using Rp-Hplc

  • 1Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Nimra College of Pharmacy, Jupudi, Ibrahimpatnam,

    NTR-521456

    2Associate Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Nimra College of Pharmacy, Jupudi, Ibrahimpatnam, NTR-521456

    3Professors, Department of Pharmaceutics, Nimra College of Pharmacy, Jupudi, Ibrahimpatnam, NTR-521456

Abstract

For the simultaneous estimate of Netupitant and Palanosetron in tablet dose form, a straightforward, accurate, and exact approach was created. The Std Discovery C18 column (250 mm x 4.6 mm, 5 µm particle sizes) was used to run the chromatogram. Mobile phase comprising acetonitrile (65:35, v/v) and 0.01 M ammonium acetate buffer (pH adjusted to 3.5 with orthophosphoric acid) The temperature was kept at 30°C while the flow rate was 1 mL/min. 265 nm was the chosen optimal wavelength. Netupitant and Palanosetron were shown to have retention times of 2.439 and 3.718 minutes, respectively. The Netupitant and Palanosetron percent RSDs were determined to be 0.06 and 0.19, respectively. For Netupitant and Palanosetron, recovery rates were 100.16% and 99.86%, respectively. Netupitant and Palanosetron regression equations yielded LOD and LOQ values of 1.02, 3.06, and 0.002, 0.004, respectively. Netupitant's regression equation is y = 11003x + 686, while Palanosetron's is y = 968863x + 1760. Because retention times and run times were reduced, the devised approach was straightforward and cost-effective, making it suitable for use in routine quality control testing in industries.

Keywords

Netupitant, Palonosetron, Method development, RP-HPLC.

Introduction

× Popup Image

Netupitant is an antiemitic drug approved by the FDA in october 2014 for use in combination with palonosetron for the prevention of acute and delayed vomiting and nausea associated with cancer chemotherapy including highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Netupitant is a neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist. The combination drug is marketed by eisai inc. And helsinn therapeutics (u.s.) Inc. Under the brand akynzeo.

PALONOSETRON (inn, trade name aloxi) is an antagonist of 5-ht3 receptors that is indicated for the prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (cinv). it is the most effective of the 5-ht3 antagonists in controlling delayed cinv nausea and vomiting that appear more than 24 hours after the first dose of a course of chemotherapy and is the only drug of its class approved for this use by the u.s. food and drug administration. as of 2008, it is the most recent 5-ht3 antagonist to enter clinicaluse.

Structure of Netupitant

Structure of Palonsetron

Figure-1: Structures of Netupitant and Palonsetron.

Several analytical methods have been documented, according on a thorough review of the literature In the literature, there is no method reported for the stability indicating estimation. hence a simple, cost-effective stability-indicating simultaneous estimation of Netupitant and Palonosetron by RP-HPLC in pharmaceutical dosage form has to be develop and validated as per the guidelines of ICH (Q2 specification.

Experimental Investigations

An isocratic RP-HPLC method was performed on a Waters Alliance e2695 HPLC system with 515 HPLC pump, equipped with 2998 Photo Diode Array (PDA) detector and Empower 2 software for processing and data collecting. Kromasil C18 column (250 mm×4.6 mm ID, 5 ?m particle size) is used as a stationary phase. An ultrasonic bath sonicator (Frontline FS 4, Mumbai, India), semi-micro analytical balance (India) and Whatman filter paper No. 41 is used in the study.

Preparation of mobile phase

An accurately weighed quantity of 0.77 g of Ammonium acetate was taken into a 1000 mL beaker and diluted to 1000 mL with HPLC grade water and degassed in ultrasonic water bath and filtered through 0.45μm nylon membrane filter using vacuum filtration gives required buffer concentration of 0.01 M Ammonium acetate buffer and the pH was adjusted to 3.5 with orthophosphoric acid. 0.01 M Ammonium acetate buffer with pH adjusted to 3.5 with orthophosphoric acid were mixed with HPLC grade Acetonitrile in the proportion of 65:35, v/v and it was filtered through 0.45μm nylon membrane filter and degassed by ultrasonication.

Preparation of NET and PAL mixed standard drug stock solutions

The mixed standard drug stock solutions of Netupitant and Palonosetron were prepared by dissolving 300 mg of Netupitant and 0.5 mg of Palonosetron in 100 mL of the mobile phase into a 100 mL of volumetric flask and then sonicated to dissolve it completely to get a concentration

of 3000 μg/mL of Netupitant and 5 μg/mL of Palonosetron

Preparation of linearity solutions

The mixed standard working solutions for linearity were prepared by pipette out an aliquots of 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25 and 1.5 mL from the mixed standard drug stock solutions of 3000 μg/mL of Netupitant and 5 μg/mL of Palonosetron and transferred into the series of 10 mL of volumetric flask and volume make upto 10 mL with the mobile phase to get a concentration of 75, 150, 225, 300, 375 and 450 μg/mL of Netupitant and 0.125, 0.25, 0.375, 0.5, 0.625 and 0.75 μg/mL ofPalonosetron respectively. All the above solutions were filtered through 0.45 μm nylon membrane filter before injection into the HPLC system.

Preparation of sample solution

Sample solution was prepared from Akynzeo® capsules. Twenty capsules of Akynzeo® were taken and weighed individually and the average weight of twenty capsules was calculated. From this calculation the weight of each capsule is determined. Each capsule of Akynzeo® contains 300 mg of Netupitant and 0.5 mg of Palonosetron. After weighing, twenty capsules of Akynzeo® were the body and cap of the capsule is separated out and the capsule powder is collected. An accurately weighed quantity of capsule powder equivalent to 300 mg of Netupitant and 0.5 mg of Palonosetron were transferred into a clean and dry 100 mL volumetric flask and then mobile phase was added and sonicated to dissolve it completely and filtered through 0.45 μm nylon membrane filter and volume was made up to the mark with the same mobile phase to get the concentration of 3000 μg/mL of Netupitant and 5 μg/mL of Palonosetron. An aliquot of 1 mL was pipette out from the above solution and transferred into a 10 mL volumetric flask and diluted up to the mark with mobile phase to get a concentration of 300 μg/mL of Netupitant and 0.5 μg/mL of Palonosetron solution.

Method validation

Method validation for bio-analytical studies consist of procedures that shows a suitable method for quantitative analysis of drug analytes present in the biological fluids such as blood, plasma, serum and urine was reproducible and reliable for the future purpose. The essential factors for bio-analytical method validation consist of: (1) Accuracy (2) Precision (3) Selectivity (4) Sensitivity (5) Reproducibility and (6) Stability.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Method optimisation

For the optimisation of RP-HPLC method several parameters and mobile phase compositions were tried. A satisfactory separation and good peak symmetry for NET and PAL were obtained with Kromasil C18 column (250 mm×4.6 mm, 5 ?m particle size) and mobile phase containing a mixture of 0.01 M Ammonium acetate buffer (pH adjusted to 3.5 with orthophosphoric acid) and Acetonitrile (65:35, v/v) was delivered at aflow rate of 1 mL/min to get better reproducibility and repeatability. Both NET and PAL were scanned in the wavelength region of 200-400 nm by using photo diode array (PDA) detector. Quantitation was attained with a PDA detector at 265 nm depends on peak area. Therefore 265 nm was selected as detection wavelength in the present study. The retention time of NET and PAL was found to be 2.438 min and 3.718 min respectively. A typical chromatogram of blank, standard and sample solution of NET and PAL is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1 Chromatogram of blank, standard and sample solution of NET and PAL

Method validation:

Specificity

The effect of excipients and other additives usually present in the combined dosage form of NET and PAL in the determination under optimum conditions was investigated and confirms that there is no interference. The specificity of the RP-HPLC method was established by injecting the placebo solution into the HPLC system. The representative chromatogram of placebo was shown in Figure 2.

 

Figure 2 Chromatogram of placebo for NET and PAL

Table 1 Performance calculations and system suitability parameters of NET and PAL

Parameters

NET

PAL

Acceptance limits

Retention time (min)

2.438

3.718

-----

Theoretical plates (N)

3871

10816

Not less than 2000

Asymmetry factor

1.1

1.1

Not more than 2

Resolution

8.08

More than 2

Linearity range (µg/mL)

75-450

0.125-0.75

-----

Limit of detection (LOD) (µg/mL)

0.06

0.01

-----

Limit of quantification (LOQ)

(µg/mL)

0.18

0.03

-----

Linearity

An aliquots of 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25 and 1.5 mL from the mixed standard drug stock solutions of 3000 μg/mL of Netupitant and 5 μg/mL of Palonosetron was pippetted out and transferred into the series of 10 mL of volumetric flask and volume make upto 10 mL with the mobile phase to get a concentration of 75, 150, 225, 300, 375 and 450 μg/mL of Netupitant and 0.125, 0.25, 0.375, 0.5, 0.625 and 0.75 μg/mL of Palonosetron respectively. All the above solutions were filtered through 0.45 μm nylon membrane filter and then 20 ?L of each solution was injected three times into the HPLC system. Least square regression analysis was carried out for the slope, intercept and correlation coefficient.

Table 2 Linearity of NET and PAL

Concentration of Netupitant (µg/mL)

Peak Area

Concentration of Palonosetron

(µg/mL)

Peak Area

75

864115

0.125

128061

150

1612752

0.25

245238

225

2466709

0.375

364102

300

3249231

0.5

474414

375

4226134

0.625

612356

450

4915001

0.75

730816

Table 3 Optical and regression parameters of NET and PAL

Optical and regression parameters

NET

PAL

Detection wavelength (nm)

265

Linearity range (µg/mL)

75-450

0.125-0.75

Regression Equation (y=mx+C)

11003x+686

968863x+1760

Slope (m)

11003

968863

Intercept (C)

686

1760

Correlation coefficient (r)

0.999

0.999

Limit of detection (µg/mL)

0.06

0.01

Limit of  quantification (µg/mL)

0.18

0.03

Accuracy

The accuracy of the proposed method was determined by calculating the recoveries of NET and PAL by standard addition method. Recovery studies were carried out by adding concentration level of 50 %, 100 % and 150 % of standard drug solution of NET and PAL to the pre-analysed

sample solution of Akynzeo® capsule powder and the mixtures were reanalyzed by the proposed method.

Table 4 Results of accuracy studies of NET

Concentration Level in %

Amount added (µg/mL)

Amount recovered (µg/mL)

% Recovery

% Mean Recovery

RSD %

S1:50%

75

75.03

100.04

 

99.85

 

0.36

S2:50%

75

75.06

100.08

S3:50%

75

74.58

99.44

S4:100%

150

149.97

99.98

 

100.04

 

0.21

S5:100%

150

149.79

99.86

S6:100%

150

150.41

100.27

S7:150%

225

224.94

99.97

 

99.92

 

0.12

S8:150%

225

225.03

100.01

S9 :150%

225

224.51

99.78

Table 5 Results of accuracy studies of PAL

Concentration Level in %

Amount added (µg/mL)

Amount recovered (µg/mL)

% Recovery

% Mean Recovery

RSD %

S1:50%

0.125

0.1252

100.16

 

100.03

 

0.17

S2:50%

0.125

0.1251

100.08

S3:50%

0.125

0.1248

99.84

S4:100%

0.25

0.251

100.40

 

99.73

 

0.61

S5:100%

0.25

0.249

99.60

S6:100%

0.25

0.248

99.20

S7:150%

0.375

0.3734

99.57

 

99.79

 

0.33

S8:150%

0.375

0.3756

100.16

S9 :150%

0.375

0.3736

99.63

Precision

The precision of the proposed method was performed to express the closeness of agreement between a series of measurements obtained from multiple sampling of the same homogeneous sample under the optimized conditions. Precision are of three levels they are repeatability intermediate precision and reproducibility. Repeatability was carried out by calculating method and system precision. Method precision was performed by injecting six times of a homogenous sample preparation of 300 μg/mL of Netupitant and 0.5 μg/mL of Palonosetron of a single batch sample solution of Akynzeo® capsule powder into the HPLC system to ensure that the analytical method is working properly.

Table 6 Method precision of Netupitant

Injection No.

Name of the

drug

Concentration (μg/mL)

Retention time (min)

Peak Area

Assay %

1

NET

300

2.438

3227906

99.66

2

NET

300

2.438

3258393

100.60

3

NET

300

2.439

3227518

99.65

4

NET

300

2.439

3265378

100.82

5

NET

300

2.440

3252181

100.41

6

NET

300

2.442

3239480

100.02

Average

2.439

3245143

100.19

SD

0.00151

15964.81

0.492913

RSD %

0.06

0.49

0.5

Table 7 Method precision of Palonosetron

Injection No.

Name of the

drug

Concentration (μg/mL)

Retention time (min)

Peak Area

Assay %

1

PAL

0.5

3.713

479376

100.18

2

PAL

0.5

3.713

476760

99.63

3

PAL

0.5

3.717

481643

100.65

4

PAL

0.5

3.717

478012

99.89

5

PAL

0.5

3.718

477938

99.88

6

PAL

0.5

3.732

479413

100.19

Average

3.718

478857

100.07

SD

0.00703

1690.934

0.3534

RSD %

0.19

0.35

0.35

Limit of detection and Limit of quantitation

Limit of detection is a smallest concentration of an analyte which gives a measurable response. Limit of quantitation is a smallest concentration of an analyte that gives a measurable response which can be quantified accurately. LOD and LOQ are calculated by using following formula andthe results of LOD and LOQ of Netupitant and Palonosetron were reported in Table 8.

Robustness

Robustness of the method was carried out by deliberately changing the mobile phase composition by altering the proportion of organic phase by ±10 % and flow rate by ±0.1 mL. There are no marked variations were observed in the system suitability parameters and the results of robustness were reported in Table 8 and Table 9 ensures that the developed analytical method remain unaffected by small, but deliberate variations in chromatographic method parameters and provides an indication of its reliability during normal usage.

Table 8 Robustness data of Netupitant

Variations in method parameters

Retention Time (mins)

Average peak area*

RSD %

System suitability

parameters

Theoretical

Plates

Asymmetry

Buffer : ACN

(69:31,v/v)

2.423

3264268

0.22

3986

1.46

Buffer : ACN

(61:39,v/v)

2.432

3224224

0.3

3879

1.49

0.9 mL/min

Flow rate

 

2.726

 

3641636

0.37

 

4043

 

1.48

1.1 mL/min

Flow rate

 

2.198

 

2920162

0.11

 

3562

 

1.48

Table 9 Robustness data of Palonosetron

Variations in method parameters

Retention Time (mins)

 

Average peak area*

RSD %

System suitability

parameters

Theoretical

Plates

Asymmetry

Buffer : ACN

(69:31,v/v)

3.623

 

478099

0.03

 

11948

 

1.2

Buffer : ACN

(61:39,v/v)

3.690

 

473333

0.4

 

11670

 

1.2

0.9 mL/min

Flow rate

 

4.141

 

513373

0.33

 

12020

1.2

1.1 mL/min

Flow rate

 

3.340

 

422857

0.15

 

10861

1.2

Solution stability study

Solution stability was carried out to ensure that the sample solutions of 300 μg/mL of Netupitant and 0.5 μg/mL of Palonosetron were found to be stable upto 48 hrs at room temperature. Solution stability was performed by injecting six times of a homogenous sample preparation of 300 μg/mL of Netupitant and 0.5 μg/mL of Palonosetron of a single batch sample solution of Akynzeo® capsule powder in different time intervals i.e. 0, 8, 16, 24, 32 and 48 hrs at room temperature into the HPLC system.

CONCLUSION:

In conclusion, the developed RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of Netupitant and Palonosetron was successfully validated according to ICH guidelines and demonstrated excellent specificity, accuracy, precision, linearity, robustness, and stability-indicating capability. The method provided efficient chromatographic separation with satisfactory recovery and low detection limits, making it suitable for the reliable quantification of both drugs in bulk materials and pharmaceutical dosage forms. Therefore, the proposed method can be effectively employed for routine quality control analysis and stability studies of Netupitant and Palonosetron in combined pharmaceutical formulations.

REFERENCES

  1. Niessen WMA. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, chromatographic science series, 2006, 97, 3rd edition, Taylor and Francis, London.
  2. Marvin CM. LC/MS: A Practical User's Guide, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2005.
  3. Niessen WMA, Voyksner RD. Current Practice in Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, 1st Edition, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1998.
  4. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Dolan JW. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography, 2010, 3rd Edition, 185.
  5. The European Medicines Agency, Pre-Authorisation Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use, ICH Q2 (R1), Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology, 2009, EMEA/410412/2007, London.
  6. Validation of Analytical Procedures: Methodology, ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guidelines, 1996, 1-8.
  7. United States Pharmacopoeia and National Formulary, Asian Edition 24, the United States Pharmacopoeia Convention Inc., U.S.A., 2149- 2152.
  8. 18. Quality Assurance of Pharmaceuticals, (A compendium of guidelines and related materials), 1997, 1, WHO, Geneva, 119-124.
  9. ICH Guidelines Q2 (R1) Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology, Current Step 4 version Parent Guideline, 1994, 1-13.
  10. Takahashi Y, Amano Y, Yuki T, Ose T, Miyake T, Kushiyama Y, Sato S, Ishihara S and Kinoshita Y. Influence of acid suppressants on gastric emptying: cross-over analysis in healthy volunteers. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006; 21(11):1664-8.
  11. Porro PB. Famotidine in the treatment of gastric and duodenal ulceration: overview of clinical experience. Digestion 1985; 32 (1): 62- 69.
  12. Langtry HD, Grant SM, Goa KL. Famotidine, an Updated Review of its Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Properties, and Therapeutic Use in Peptic Ulcer Disease and Other Allied Diseases. Drugs 1989; 38 (4): 551–590.
  13. Schunack W. Pharmacology of H2-receptor antagonists: an overview. The Journal of International Medical Research 1989; 17(1): 9A-16A.
  14. Savio CR, Irfan S and Richard WM. Domperidone: Review of Pharmacology and Clinical Applications in Gastroenterology. The American Journal of Gastroenterology 2007; 102: 2036–2045.
  15. Deshpande P, Gandhi S, Vandana B, Raviraj B, Abhijeet D, Vrushali Diwale. High Performance Thin Layer Chromatographic Determination of Famotidine and Domperidone in Combined Tablet Dosage Form. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences 2010; 1(4): 354-359.
  16. Helali N, Darghouth F, Monser L. RP-HPLC Determination of Famotidine and its Potential Impurities in Pharmaceuticals. Chromatographia 2004; 60(7): 455–460.
  17. Ahsanul Haque Md, Shahriar Md, Parvin MN and Ashraful Islam S M. Validated RP-HPLC Method for Estimation of Ranitidine Hydrochloride, Domperidone and Naproxen in Solid Dosage Form. Asian J. Pharm. Ana. 2011; 1(3): 59-63.
  18. Sahu R, Preeti Nagar, Bhattacharya S, Deepti Jain. Simultaneous spectrophotometric estimation of famotidine and domperidone in combined tablet dosage form. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2006; 68(4): 503-506.
  19. Dipali D. Tajane, Sacchidanand R. Gite, Aditi R. Shah, Arun B. Kale, Ranjit V. Gadhave and Vishnu P. Choudhari. Spectrophotometric Simultaneous Determination of Famotidine and Domperidone in Combined Tablet Dosage Form by Ratio Derivative and Area under Curve Method. Der Pharmacia Sinica 2011; 2(3): 60-66.
  20. Rajani Sekhar V, Reddy YP, Ramalingam P, Thej DH. RP-HPLC and UV-derivative spectrophotometry technique for the simultaneous estimation of ibuprofen and famotidine in pharmaceutical dosage form. Der Pharmacia Sinica 2013; 4(2):160-170.

Reference

  1. Niessen WMA. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, chromatographic science series, 2006, 97, 3rd edition, Taylor and Francis, London.
  2. Marvin CM. LC/MS: A Practical User's Guide, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2005.
  3. Niessen WMA, Voyksner RD. Current Practice in Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, 1st Edition, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1998.
  4. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Dolan JW. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography, 2010, 3rd Edition, 185.
  5. The European Medicines Agency, Pre-Authorisation Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use, ICH Q2 (R1), Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology, 2009, EMEA/410412/2007, London.
  6. Validation of Analytical Procedures: Methodology, ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guidelines, 1996, 1-8.
  7. United States Pharmacopoeia and National Formulary, Asian Edition 24, the United States Pharmacopoeia Convention Inc., U.S.A., 2149- 2152.
  8. 18. Quality Assurance of Pharmaceuticals, (A compendium of guidelines and related materials), 1997, 1, WHO, Geneva, 119-124.
  9. ICH Guidelines Q2 (R1) Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology, Current Step 4 version Parent Guideline, 1994, 1-13.
  10. Takahashi Y, Amano Y, Yuki T, Ose T, Miyake T, Kushiyama Y, Sato S, Ishihara S and Kinoshita Y. Influence of acid suppressants on gastric emptying: cross-over analysis in healthy volunteers. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006; 21(11):1664-8.
  11. Porro PB. Famotidine in the treatment of gastric and duodenal ulceration: overview of clinical experience. Digestion 1985; 32 (1): 62- 69.
  12. Langtry HD, Grant SM, Goa KL. Famotidine, an Updated Review of its Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Properties, and Therapeutic Use in Peptic Ulcer Disease and Other Allied Diseases. Drugs 1989; 38 (4): 551–590.
  13. Schunack W. Pharmacology of H2-receptor antagonists: an overview. The Journal of International Medical Research 1989; 17(1): 9A-16A.
  14. Savio CR, Irfan S and Richard WM. Domperidone: Review of Pharmacology and Clinical Applications in Gastroenterology. The American Journal of Gastroenterology 2007; 102: 2036–2045.
  15. Deshpande P, Gandhi S, Vandana B, Raviraj B, Abhijeet D, Vrushali Diwale. High Performance Thin Layer Chromatographic Determination of Famotidine and Domperidone in Combined Tablet Dosage Form. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences 2010; 1(4): 354-359.
  16. Helali N, Darghouth F, Monser L. RP-HPLC Determination of Famotidine and its Potential Impurities in Pharmaceuticals. Chromatographia 2004; 60(7): 455–460.
  17. Ahsanul Haque Md, Shahriar Md, Parvin MN and Ashraful Islam S M. Validated RP-HPLC Method for Estimation of Ranitidine Hydrochloride, Domperidone and Naproxen in Solid Dosage Form. Asian J. Pharm. Ana. 2011; 1(3): 59-63.
  18. Sahu R, Preeti Nagar, Bhattacharya S, Deepti Jain. Simultaneous spectrophotometric estimation of famotidine and domperidone in combined tablet dosage form. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2006; 68(4): 503-506.
  19. Dipali D. Tajane, Sacchidanand R. Gite, Aditi R. Shah, Arun B. Kale, Ranjit V. Gadhave and Vishnu P. Choudhari. Spectrophotometric Simultaneous Determination of Famotidine and Domperidone in Combined Tablet Dosage Form by Ratio Derivative and Area under Curve Method. Der Pharmacia Sinica 2011; 2(3): 60-66.
  20. Rajani Sekhar V, Reddy YP, Ramalingam P, Thej DH. RP-HPLC and UV-derivative spectrophotometry technique for the simultaneous estimation of ibuprofen and famotidine in pharmaceutical dosage form. Der Pharmacia Sinica 2013; 4(2):160-170.

Photo
Chandra sekhar Naik.D.
Corresponding author

Professors, Department of Pharmaceutics, Nimra College of Pharmacy, Jupudi, Ibrahimpatnam, NTR-521456

Photo
Kampalli Triveni
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Nimra College of Pharmacy, Jupudi, Ibrahimpatnam, NTR-521456

Photo
M. Ramakrishna Reddy
Co-author

Associate Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Nimra College of Pharmacy, Jupudi, Ibrahimpatnam, NTR-521456

Kampalli Triveni, M. Ramakrishna Reddy, Chandra sekhar Naik.D.*, Method Development and Validation of Netupitant and Palonosetron in Bulk and Capsule Dosage Forms Using Rp-Hplc, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 6, 3918-3927. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20719864

More related articles
Formulation, Evalution, And Study of Antiurolithia...
Ankita Limkar, Priyanka Gaikwad, Ajinkya More, Atharv Koshti, Apu...
Novel Diagnostic and Management Strategies in Coro...
Neha Singh, Vandan Patel, Srusti Mistry, Krinal Patel, Vishva Pat...
In-silico molecular docking study of rivastigmine...
Vrushali Damgude, Akanksha Chavan...
Analytical Method Development and Validation of Brivaracetam in Pharmaceutical D...
Neela Swathi, Challa Uma Reddy, Putlagari Akhila, Beethoju Sravanthi, Nalla Ramya, Chelimeti Bhandav...
Related Articles
Formulation And Evaluation of Herbal Face Serum...
Vishakha Borkar, Bhakti Putta, Vaishnavi Ture, Shubham Kakde, Vidya Waghamare...
Guillain–Barré Syndrome Presenting as Acute Flaccid Paralysis in a Child A Ca...
Adarsh G.S., Venkatrao Kulkani, Preeti Kulkarni , Shivananda Illalu, Janaki Torvi , Megha Hiremath...
The New Era of Synthesis: Greener Chemistry with Microwave Technology...
Shaijan Shaikh, Akshda Sawant , Rahul Metkari, Mayur Mangate , Suraj Shinde...
Formulation, Evalution, And Study of Antiurolithiatic Activity of Bryophyllum Pi...
Ankita Limkar, Priyanka Gaikwad, Ajinkya More, Atharv Koshti, Apurva Bhandare, Alisha Nandniwale, Aj...
More related articles
Formulation, Evalution, And Study of Antiurolithiatic Activity of Bryophyllum Pi...
Ankita Limkar, Priyanka Gaikwad, Ajinkya More, Atharv Koshti, Apurva Bhandare, Alisha Nandniwale, Aj...
Novel Diagnostic and Management Strategies in Coronary Microvascular Angina Pect...
Neha Singh, Vandan Patel, Srusti Mistry, Krinal Patel, Vishva Patel...
Formulation, Evalution, And Study of Antiurolithiatic Activity of Bryophyllum Pi...
Ankita Limkar, Priyanka Gaikwad, Ajinkya More, Atharv Koshti, Apurva Bhandare, Alisha Nandniwale, Aj...
Novel Diagnostic and Management Strategies in Coronary Microvascular Angina Pect...
Neha Singh, Vandan Patel, Srusti Mistry, Krinal Patel, Vishva Patel...